1
|
Kaveeshwar S, Hasan S, Polsky D, O'Hara NN, Honig EL, Li S, Shul C, Jauregui J, Henn RF, Langhammer CG. Area Deprivation Index as a proxy for socioeconomic status in outpatient orthopaedic surgery patients - A prospective registry cross sectional study. J Orthop 2025; 60:19-24. [PMID: 39345677 PMCID: PMC11437601 DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.08.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2024] [Revised: 08/22/2024] [Accepted: 08/23/2024] [Indexed: 10/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Background We aimed to determine if Area Deprivation Index (ADI) is associated with self-reported metrics socioeconomic status (SES), and to assess the relationship between ADI and preoperative score on common patient reported outcome scores (PROS). Methods Patients presenting for outpatient orthopaedic surgery completed Patient-Reported Outcome Metric Information System (PROMIS) and joint-specific PROS. ADI was determined from geocoded home address. Sociodemographic data was collected from self-reported survey. Tests of association were used to describe the relationship between ADI and sociodemographic factors as well as the correlation between ADI and PROS. Extreme group analysis was used to examine which PROS may be subject to clinically meaningful variation. Results ADI was associated with self-reported SES. ADI was correlated with score on all baseline PROS. Extreme group analysis showed that low SES was associated with clinically meaningful differences in some, but not all, PROS. Conclusion ADI is associated with self-reported measures of SES in an orthopaedic outpatient surgical population. Lower SES correlates with worse function to a clinically significant degree for some PROS. SES should be considered in the context of preoperative symptom severity in outpatient orthopaedic surgery patients. ADI may be a useful adjunct to self-reported measures of SES for this purpose.
Collapse
|
2
|
Rocca MS, Honig EL, Tran A, Kolevar MP, Kaveeshwar S, Aneizi A, Leong NL, Packer JD, Henn RF, Meredith SJ. Preoperative opioid use is associated with worse preoperative patient-reported outcomes in hip arthroscopy patients. J ISAKOS 2024; 9:581-586. [PMID: 38692433 DOI: 10.1016/j.jisako.2024.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Revised: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to define the rate of preoperative opioid use among patients undergoing hip arthroscopy, ascertain which clinical factors are associated with opioid use, and assess the effect of preoperative opioid usage on preoperative patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. METHODS A single institution orthopedic registry was retrospectively analyzed for patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome with or without labral tear between 2015 and 2022. Patients completed Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) in six domains, Numeric Pain Scores (NPS), and Musculoskeletal Outcomes Data Evaluation and Management System expectations domain preoperatively. Patients' charts were reviewed to determine demographic factors and identify any active opioid prescription within 6 weeks before surgery. Bivariate analysis was used to determine associations between preoperative opioid use and baseline PROs. Statistically significant bivariate associations were further tested by multivariate analysis to determine independent predictors. RESULTS A total of 123 patients were included (age 39.7 ± 12.0 years; 87 females; body mass index 27.4 ± 5.7 kg/m2). There were 21 patients (17%) using opioids preoperatively. Prior orthopedic or other surgery and lower education level were associated with preoperative opioid use. Patients with preoperative opioid use scored statistically significantly worse compared with those without preoperative opioid use on baseline PROMIS Physical Function (38.6 vs 40.5, p = 0.01), Pain Interference (65.9 vs 60.2, p = 0.001), Fatigue (60.7 vs 51.6, p = 0.005), Social Satisfaction (38.2 vs 43.2, p = 0.007), and Depression (54.2 vs 48.8, p = 0.01). Preoperative opioid use was also associated with statistically significantly worse preoperative NPS for both the operative hip (6.3 vs 4.6, p = 0.003) and whole body (3.0 vs 1.4, p = 0.008). Preoperative opioid use was an independent predictor of worse baseline PROMIS Pain Interference, Fatigue, Social Satisfaction, and NPS for the operative hip. CONCLUSION Patients using opioids preoperatively had worse baseline PROs for physical function, pain, social satisfaction, and depression than those not using opioids preoperatively. When controlling for confounding variables, preoperative opioid use was independently predictive of worse baseline pain, fatigue, and social satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, prognostic study.
Collapse
|
3
|
Lynch J, Kaveeshwar S, Moshyedi M, Buitrago I, Schneider MB, Tran A, Honig EL, Pensy RA, Langhammer CG, Henn RF. Preoperative predictors of two-year satisfaction in hand and wrist surgery patients. J Hand Microsurg 2024; 16:100051. [PMID: 39035862 PMCID: PMC11257134 DOI: 10.1016/j.jham.2024.100051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose As stakeholders seek to improve patient outcomes while maintaining cost-effectiveness in an increasingly expensive healthcare system, metrics such as patient satisfaction are becoming more important. This present study sought to identify factors associated with and independently predictive of better surgical satisfaction two years following hand and wrist surgery. Methods Patients undergoing hand and wrist surgery at an urban outpatient institution were enrolled preoperatively into a surgical registry and assessed two years postoperatively. Patient satisfaction with surgery was measured at two years postoperatively with the Surgical Satisfaction Questionnaire (SSQ-8). Bivariate analysis determined associations between postoperative satisfaction and patient demographics, injury specifiers, medical history, and multiple patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Multivariable analysis determined independent predictors of two-year postoperative satisfaction following hand and wrist surgery. Results Better surgical satisfaction was associated with having never smoked, no preoperative opioid use, lack of an accompanying legal claim, lack of a workers compensation claim, no clinical history of depression/anxiety, less comorbidities, and higher preoperative expectations.Various PROs relating to function, pain, activity, and general health at both baseline and two years demonstrated associations with postoperative satisfaction. Multivariable analysis confirmed that never smoking, lack of a legal claim, and better preoperative Brief Michigan Hand Questionnaire scores were independently predictive of better surgical satisfaction two years following hand and wrist surgery. Conclusion At two years following hand and wrist surgery, better patient satisfaction was best predicted by never smoking, no related legal claim, and better baseline Brief Michigan Hand Questionnaire scores. Level of evidence III.
Collapse
|
4
|
Burt CI, McCurdy M, Schneider MB, Zhang T, Weir TB, Langhammer CG, Pensy RA, Akabudike NM, Henn RF. Preoperative opioid use is associated with worse two-year patient-reported outcomes after hand surgery: A retrospective cohort study. J Hand Microsurg 2024; 16:100060. [PMID: 39035863 PMCID: PMC11257131 DOI: 10.1016/j.jham.2024.100060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Opioid overprescribing has caused a substantial increase in opioid related deaths and billions of dollars in additional healthcare costs. Orthopaedic surgeons commonly prescribe opioids in the perioperative period; however, research has shown preoperative opioid use may be associated with worse postoperative outcomes. Despite this body of evidence, there are few studies investigating the association between preoperative opioid use and two-year outcomes after hand surgery. Materials and methods This study evaluated two-year postoperative patient-reported outcomes in patients who used opioids prior to hand surgery, and those who did not. Patients completed pre and postoperative questionnaires including Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) domains, the Brief Michigan Hand Questionnaire (BMHQ), and other questionnaires related to pain, function, and satisfaction. 342 patients undergoing upper-extremity surgery were enrolled into a prospective orthopaedic surgery outcome registry, and 69.9% completed the follow-up surveys. Preoperative opioid use and its association to patient outcome scores was analyzed through bivariate analysis. Significant associations were further tested by multivariable analysis to determine independent predictors. Results Preoperative opioid use was associated with worse two-year PROMIS Fatigue (p < .01), PROMIS Anxiety (p < .01), PROMIS Depression (p < .01), SSQ-8 (p = .01), BMHQ (p = .01), NPS Hand (p < .01) and MODEMS met expectations (p = .03). No significant differences were observed in patient-reported outcome change scores. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that preoperative opioid use was predictive of worse two-year PROMIS Fatigue (p < .01), PROMIS Anxiety (p < .01), PROMIS Depression (p = .02), BMHQ (p = .01), SSQ-8 (p < .01), NPS Hand (p = .02) and MODEMS met expectations (p < .01). Conclusion Preoperative opioid use was associated with worse patient-reported outcomes two years after elective hand surgery. There was no significant difference in the improvement from baseline between the two groups. Clinically significant differences were observed in follow-up PROMIS Anxiety, BMHQ and NPS - Hand scores. Clinically significant change scores were noted in both groups for PROMIS PF, PROMIS PI, PROMIS SS, BMHQ, and NPS - Hand.
Collapse
|
5
|
Weber A, O'Hara NN, Slobogean GP, Henn RF, O'Toole RV, Sciadini MF. Can an Orthopedic Hip Fracture Simulator Advance Orthopedic Residents' Hip Fracture Fixation Skills to an Expert Level? JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION 2024; 81:288-294. [PMID: 38160109 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2023.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Revised: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 11/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study was undertaken to evaluate hip fracture simulator training and orthopedic resident skill attainment. We hypothesized that after 6 training sessions, improvement in post-training scores in junior residents would exceed that of senior residents and that senior residents would attain expert level proficiency sooner. DESIGN Thirty orthopedic residents from a single institution completed 6 training sessions. Sessions included a pretest, 9 training modules, and post-test. An expert score was obtained from the average scores of 8 trauma fellows and attending orthopedic traumatologists. The primary outcome measure was overall score. SETTING A single academic institution. PARTICIPANTS Orthopedic residents (postgraduate years [PGYs] 1-5). RESULTS Twenty-six residents completed the study. The mean overall post-training score was 87% of the expert level. Factors associated with post-training score changes were additional training sessions (4.2% improvement [p < 0.01]), time between training sessions (0.3% decrease [p = 0.05]) and PGY5 class (12.1% improvement [p = 0.03]). Fifty-four percent of residents attained the expert overall score. Expert score attainment was not associated with an additional year of training or case log volume. Post-training scores plateaued for the PGY1s and showed linear improvement for the PGY5s. CONCLUSIONS Differences in trends between training levels suggest this simulator is a useful adjunct to a 5-year orthopedic residency training program.
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhang T, Wahl A, Schneider M, Xu D, Hahn A, Meredith SJ, Packer JD, Leong NL, Zhang LQ, Henn RF, Jauregui JJ. Biomechanical Comparison of Four- versus Six-Strand Transosseous Suture Repair for Patellar Tendon Rupture. J Knee Surg 2024; 37:193-197. [PMID: 37023764 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1766094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical repair is indicated for patellar tendon ruptures that result in loss of knee extensor mechanism function. However, biomechanical studies report conflicting results when comparing transosseous suture versus suture anchor repair techniques. This discrepancy may be due to inconsistencies in experimental design as these studies use various numbers of suture strands. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to compare the ultimate load of four- versus six-strand transosseous suture repair. Secondary objectives are to compare gap formation after cyclical loading and mode of failure. METHODS Six pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric specimen were randomly allocated to either four- or six-strand transosseous suture repair. Specimen underwent preconditioning cyclical loading and then load to failure. RESULTS The six-strand repair had a significantly higher maximum load to failure compared with the four-strand repair (mean difference = 319.3 N [57.9%], p = 0.03). There was no significant difference in gap length after cyclical loading or at max load. There were no significant differences in mode of failure. CONCLUSION Utilizing a six-stand transosseous patella tendon repair construct with one additional suture increases overall construct strength by over 50% compared with a four-strand construct.
Collapse
|
7
|
Kevas Y, Kaveeshwar S, Pitsenbarger L, Hughes M, Schneider MB, Hahn A, Honig EL, Pensy RA, Langhammer CG, Henn RF. Preoperative Factors Associated With Worse PROMIS Pain Interference 2 Years After Hand and Wrist Surgery. Hand (N Y) 2023:15589447231218301. [PMID: 38156464 DOI: 10.1177/15589447231218301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to identify preoperative factors associated with worse postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain interference (PI) scores 2 years after hand and wrist surgery. We hypothesized that older age, more comorbidities, increased substance use, and lower socioeconomic status would correlate with worse 2-year PROMIS PI scores. METHODS This study was a retrospective review of prospectively acquired data on 253 patients. Surveys were administered within 1 week of surgery and 2 years postoperatively. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were conducted to identify significant predictors of worse 2-year PROMIS PI scores and change in PROMIS PI scores. RESULTS Older age, higher body mass index, more comorbidities, lower preoperative expectations, more prior surgeries, unemployment, smoking, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, and multiple other socio-demographic factors were correlated with worse 2-year PROMIS PI scores (P ≤ .018). Similar factors were also correlated with less improvement in 2-year PROMIS PI scores (P ≤ .048). Worse scores on all preoperative patient-reported outcome measures correlated with worse 2-year PROMIS PI scores (P ≤ .007). Multivariable analysis identified smoking history, less frequent alcohol consumption, worse preoperative PROMIS social satisfaction and Numeric Pain Scale whole body scores, and higher ASA scores as independent predictors of worse 2-year PROMIS PI. The same factors in addition to better baseline PROMIS PI were predictive of less improvement in 2-year PROMIS PI. CONCLUSION Numerous preoperative factors were predictive of worse postoperative 2-year PROMIS PI and less improvement in 2-year PROMIS PI for patients undergoing hand and wrist surgery.
Collapse
|
8
|
Kung JE, Kaveeshwar S, Rocca M, Rivkin D, Hartline J, Packer JD, Meredith SJ, Leong NL, Henn RF. PROMIS cluster analysis predicts two-year outcomes in knee surgery patients. J Orthop 2023; 39:59-65. [PMID: 37125017 PMCID: PMC10139851 DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Revised: 03/26/2023] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Aims & objectives Meaningful clinical interpretation of orthopaedic patient-reported outcome scores remains challenging. Grouping scores may be more meaningful than individual score analysis. The purpose of this study was to determine if grouping knee surgery patients into four preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) clusters would have prognostic value for two-year postoperative outcomes. Materials & methods 488 of 697 (70%) patients undergoing elective knee surgery at a single urban institution were enrolled in an orthopaedic registry and completed two-year follow up. Patients were administered questionnaires for PROMIS, International Knee Documentation Committee Score (IKDC), Marx Activity Rating Scale (MARS), and Surgical Satisfaction (SSQ-8). A k-means cluster analysis was performed to identify preoperative PROMIS clusters. Chi-square or Kruskal-Wallis tests were conducted for bivariate analyses. Least-squares multiple linear regression models were performed to identify if cluster group was an independent predictor. Results Cluster analysis revealed four clusters of patients. Psychological distress was most significant in determining classification. More impaired clusters were associated with higher rates of arthroplasty, African American race, preoperative opioid use, lower income, higher comorbidity index, and other sociodemographic and operative factors. Worse preoperative cluster status was associated with higher chance of achieving minimally clinically important change (MCID) on all metrics except PROMIS Pain Interference (PI), IKDC, and MARS. Multivariable analysis confirmed better preoperative cluster as predictive of better PROMIS Physical Function (PF), PI, IKDC scores, and satisfaction. Worse preoperative cluster was predictive of greater improvement on PF and PI but not IKDC. Conclusion Preoperative PROMIS clusters have prognostic value in predicting outcomes for knee surgery patients. Better preoperative cluster function predicts superior outcomes. While worse preoperative cluster predicts worse outcome, all clusters still significantly improve, so worse preoperative cluster is not a contraindication to surgery.
Collapse
|
9
|
Livesey MG, Weir TB, Addona JL, Curto RA, Apte A, Hughes M, Enobun B, Henn RF, Hasan SA, Gilotra MN. The Effect of Patients' Understanding of Sling Necessity and Home Assistance on Sling Wear After Shoulder Surgery. Am J Sports Med 2023; 51:179-186. [PMID: 36349935 DOI: 10.1177/03635465221131984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perioperative education and socioeconomic factors influence patient behavior. Recent evidence has suggested that sling compliance is associated with improved outcomes after shoulder surgery; it is important to investigate factors that influence sling compliance. PURPOSE To determine the associations between postoperative sling wear and patients' understanding of sling necessity, postoperative home assistance, and social deprivation. STUDY DESIGN Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS A total of 66 patients were prospectively enrolled from 2018 to 2020 if they were ≥18 years of age and undergoing shoulder surgery requiring a sling for at least 1 month postoperatively. Sling wear was measured using a temperature-sensing device. At 6 weeks postoperatively, patients' understanding for sling necessity was determined by their response to a question on the Medical Adherence Measure questionnaire, "Why did you have to wear a shoulder sling?" The Patient Understanding Grading Scale (PUGS) was developed to quantify patient responses. PUGS was graded 1 to 3, with grade 1 corresponding to the least technical knowledge. Patient characteristics, social deprivation (Area Deprivation Index [ADI]), and home assistance were additionally analyzed. RESULTS There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between patients when stratified by PUGS grade. Multivariable linear regression analysis for total hours of sling wear per week showed that patients with PUGS grade 2 (β, 48.2 hours; P = .007) and grade 3 (β, 59.5 hours; P = .003) wore their slings significantly more than grade 1 patients. Patients with home assistance had significantly greater day hours (73.5 ± 33.0 vs 44.0 ± 24.5 hours; P = .037) of sling wear per week, but there was no difference in night sling hours. Patients older than 60 years wore their slings significantly more, while men and those with a higher body mass index (BMI) wore their slings significantly less. ADI was not significantly associated with sling wear. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates that patients with greater understanding for sling necessity, those with home assistance, and patients >60 years have greater sling wear, while male patients and those with a higher BMI have lower sling compliance. ADI was not a significant contributor.
Collapse
|
10
|
Kaveeshwar S, Rocca MP, Oster BA, Schneider MB, Tran A, Kolevar MP, Adib F, Henn RF, Meredith SJ. Depression and anxiety are associated with worse baseline function in hip arthroscopy patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2022; 30:3563-3569. [PMID: 35416491 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-06963-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to analyze the correlation between baseline depression and anxiety and preoperative functional status in hip arthroscopy patients. METHODS A prospective, institutional review board-approved orthopaedic registry was used to retrospectively study 104 patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. Enrolled patients were administered baseline questionnaires for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) domains, Musculoskeletal Outcomes Data Evaluation and Management System (MODEMS) preoperative expectations, and Numeric Pain Scale (NPS). RESULTS The average baseline PROMIS Depression and Anxiety scores were 49.9 ± 9.8 and 55.5 ± 9.3, respectively. Bivariate analysis demonstrated that greater baseline PROMIS Anxiety correlated with worse preoperative PROMIS PI (p < 0.001), Fatigue (p < 0.001), Social Satisfaction (p < 0.001), and NPS score (p = 0.013). Bivariate analysis showed that greater PROMIS Depression correlated with worse preoperative PROMIS PF (p = 0.001), PI (p < 0.001), Fatigue (p < 0.001), SS (p < 0.001), and NPS score (p = 0.004). After controlling for confounders, multivariable analysis confirmed increased PROMIS Depression as an independent predictor of worse preoperative PROMIS PF (p = 0.009), MODEMS Expectations (p = 0.025), and NPS score (p = 0.002). Increased PROMIS Anxiety was predictive of worse baseline PROMIS PI (p < 0.001), Fatigue (p < 0.001), and Social Satisfaction (p < 0.001). A previous clinical diagnosis of depression or anxiety was only an independent predictor of worse baseline PROMIS Fatigue (p = 0.002) and was insignificant in all other models. CONCLUSION Increasing severity of depression and anxiety correlated with and predicted worse functional status at baseline in hip arthroscopy patients. As compared to clinical diagnosis of anxiety and depression, PROMIS metrics have superior utility in recognizing potentially modifiable mental health concerns that predict worse preoperative status. Ultimately, the study identifies an at-risk population undergoing hip arthroscopy that requires particular attention and potential mental health intervention in the preoperative setting. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Collapse
|
11
|
Henn RF, Hasan SA, Gilotra MN, Weir TB. To Drive or Not to Drive?: Commentary on an article by Ariel E. Badger, MS, et al.: "Patients Who Undergo Rotator Cuff Repair Can Safely Return to Driving at 2 Weeks Postoperatively". J Bone Joint Surg Am 2022; 104:e81. [PMID: 36129677 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.22.00736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
|
12
|
Fisher KJ, Livesey MG, Sax OC, Gilotra MN, O'Hara NN, Henn RF, Hasan SA. Are Outcomes After Fixation of Distal Humerus Coronal Shear Fractures Affected by Surgical Approach? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JSES Int 2022; 6:1054-1061. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022] Open
|
13
|
Aneizi A, Gelmann D, Ventimiglia DJ, Sajak PMJ, Nadarajah V, Foster MJ, Weir TB, Akabudike NM, Pensy RA, Henn RF. Preoperative Opioid Use in Patients Undergoing Common Hand Surgeries. Hand (N Y) 2022; 17:905-912. [PMID: 33467941 PMCID: PMC9465804 DOI: 10.1177/1558944720974122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objectives of this study were to determine the baseline patient characteristics associated with preoperative opioid use and to establish whether preoperative opioid use is associated with baseline patient-reported outcome measures in patients undergoing common hand surgeries. METHODS Patients undergoing common hand surgeries from 2015 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed from a prospective orthopedic registry at a single academic institution. Medical records were reviewed to determine whether patients were opioid users versus nonusers. On enrollment in the registry, patients completed 6 Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) domains (Physical Function, Pain Interference, Fatigue, Social Satisfaction, Anxiety, and Depression), the Brief Michigan Hand Questionnaire (BMHQ), a surgical expectations questionnaire, and Numeric Pain Scale (NPS). Statistical analysis included multivariable regression to determine whether preoperative opioid use was associated with patient characteristics and preoperative scores on patient-reported outcome measures. RESULTS After controlling for covariates, an analysis of 353 patients (opioid users, n = 122; nonusers, n = 231) showed that preoperative opioid use was associated with higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class (odds ratio [OR], 2.88), current smoking (OR, 1.91), and lower body mass index (OR, 0.95). Preoperative opioid use was also associated with significantly worse baseline PROMIS scores across 6 domains, lower BMHQ scores, and NPS hand scores. CONCLUSIONS Preoperative opioid use is common in hand surgery patients with a rate of 35%. Preoperative opioid use is associated with multiple baseline patient characteristics and is predictive of worse baseline scores on patient-reported outcome measures. Future studies should determine whether such associations persist in the postoperative setting between opioid users and nonusers.
Collapse
|
14
|
Hamaker M, Enobun B, Kaveeshwar S, Hasan SA, Shiu B, Henn RF, Kilcoyne K, Srikumaran U, Gasbarro G, R. Zimmer Z, Gilotra MN. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of a novel subscapularis outcome score: The Baltimore Orthopedic Subscapularis Score. JSES Int 2022; 6:957-962. [PMID: 36353434 PMCID: PMC9637793 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Available surveys that evaluate shoulder strength and pain often combine rotator cuff muscles making the test unable to differentiate subscapularis tears from other pathology including concomitant supraspinatus, infraspinatus tears. The purpose of this study was to validate a subscapularis-specific shoulder survey (Baltimore Orthopedic Subscapularis Score) as a viable clinical outcome assessment through analysis of psychometric properties. Methods A 5-question survey was given to a study population of 390 patients, 136 of whom had full thickness rotator cuff tears with a minimum score of 5 (better) and a maximum score of 25 (worse). Surveys were given during the initial consultation, preoperative visit, and postoperative visit. Content validity, construct validity, test-retest reliability, responsiveness to change, internal consistency, and minimal clinically important difference using distribution and anchor-based methods were determined for our subscapularis function survey. Results A high correlation was reported on test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.89). An acceptable internal consistency was reported for all patients surveyed (Cronbach alpha = 0.91). Floor and ceiling effects for patients with rotator cuff pathology were minimized (1% for both). Patients with an isolated subscapularis tear scored worse than supraspinatus/infraspinatus tears and exhibited similar dysfunction as patients with a supraspinatus/infraspinatus/subscapularis tear. An acceptable construct validity was reported with subscapularis-involved tears demonstrating higher scores with significance (P < .05). There was excellent responsiveness to change with a standardized response mean of 1.51 and effect size of 1.27 (large > 0.8). The minimal clinically important difference using a distribution and anchor-based method was 4.1 and 4.6, respectively. Among patients with rotator cuff tears in this population, a score of 22 or higher predicts a subscapularis tear 75% of the time, in spite of its low overall prevalence. Conclusion The subscapularis shoulder score demonstrated acceptable psychometric performance for outcomes assessment in patients with rotator cuff disease. This survey can be used as an effective clinical tool to assess subscapularis function.
Collapse
|
15
|
Song X, Sajak PMJ, Aneizi A, Alqazzaz A, Burt CI, Ventimiglia DJ, Meredith SJ, Leong NL, Packer JD, Henn RF. Impact of Postoperative Opioid Use on 2-Year Patient-Reported Outcomes in Knee Surgery Patients. J Knee Surg 2022; 35:1106-1118. [PMID: 33618400 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1722326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The purposes of this study were to identify the patient characteristics associated with refilling a postoperative opioid prescription after knee surgery and to determine whether refilling opioids is associated with 2-year patient-reported outcomes. We hypothesized that postoperative refill of opioids would be associated with worse 2-year patient-reported outcomes. We studied 192 patients undergoing knee surgery at a single urban academic institution. Patients completed multiple patient-reported outcome measures preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively, including six Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) domains, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) questionnaire, numeric pain scale scores for the operative knee and the rest of the body, Marx Activity Rating Scale, as well as measures of met expectations, improvement, and satisfaction. Total morphine equivalents (TMEs) were calculated from a regional prescription monitoring program. Patients who refilled a postoperative opioid prescription were compared with those who did not, and TMEs were calculated for those who refilled (Refill TMEs). One hundred twenty-nine patients (67%) refilled at least one postoperative opioid prescription. Black race, older age, higher average body mass index (BMI), smoking, greater medical comorbidities, preoperative opioid use, lower income, government insurance, and knee arthroplasty were associated with refilling opioids. Greater Refill TMEs was associated with black or white race, older age, higher average BMI, smoking, greater medical comorbidities, preoperative opioid use, government insurance, and unemployment. Refilling opioids and greater Refill TMEs were associated with worse postoperative scores on most patient-reported outcome measures 2 years after knee surgery. However, refilling opioids and greater Refill TMEs did not have a significant association with improvement after surgery. Multivariable analysis controlling for potential confounding variables confirmed that greater postoperative Refill TMEs independently predicted worse 2-year PROMIS Physical Function, 2-year PROMIS Pain Interference, and 2-year IKDC knee function scores. Postoperative refill of opioids was associated with worse 2-year patient-reported outcomes in a dose-dependent fashion. These findings reinforce the importance of counseling patients regarding opioid use and optimizing opioid-sparing pain management postoperatively.
Collapse
|
16
|
Ventimiglia DJ, Chrencik M, Schneider MB, Zhang T, Munn M, Kolakowski L, Gilotra MN, Hasan SA, Henn RF. Preoperative Factors Associated with Patient Satisfaction Two Years After Elective Shoulder Surgery. JSES Int 2022; 6:649-654. [PMID: 35813145 PMCID: PMC9264137 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Purpose Patient satisfaction has become an increasingly important component of quality measures for both hospital reimbursement and quality assessment. Additionally, patient satisfaction influences patient behavior and patient follow-up. The purpose of this study was to identify preoperative factors associated with patient satisfaction 2 years after shoulder surgery. Methods Electronic surveys were used to collect patient information including demographic, surgical, and social history, as well as outcome data. Satisfaction was measured 2 years after surgery using the Surgical Satisfaction Questionnaire. Results Multivariable linear regression identified preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Interference, annual income, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score as independent predictors of lower patient satisfaction, while total shoulder arthroplasty was an independent predictor of greater patient satisfaction. The model accounted for 15% of the variance in satisfaction scores (R2 = 0.15). Conclusion Patient satisfaction 2 years after shoulder surgery is associated with preoperative patient-reported outcome scores. Lower patient satisfaction is independently predicted by greater preoperative PROMIS PI, income less than $70,000, and ASA score >1, while higher patient satisfaction is predicted by total shoulder arthroplasty.
Collapse
|
17
|
Aneizi A, Sajak PMJ, Alqazzaz A, Weir T, Burt CI, Ventimiglia DJ, Leong NL, Packer JD, Henn RF. Impact of Preoperative Opioid Use on 2-Year Patient-Reported Outcomes in Knee Surgery Patients. J Knee Surg 2022; 35:511-520. [PMID: 32898898 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1716358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The objectives of this study are to assess perioperative opioid use in patients undergoing knee surgery and to examine the relationship between preoperative opioid use and 2-year postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs). We hypothesized that preoperative opioid use and, more specifically, higher quantities of preoperative opioid use would be associated with worse PROs in knee surgery patients. We studied 192 patients undergoing knee surgery at a single urban institution. Patients completed multiple PRO measures preoperatively and 2-year postoperatively, including six patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) domains; the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) questionnaire, numeric pain scale (NPS) scores for the operative knee and the rest of the body, Marx's knee activity rating scale, Tegner's activity scale, International Physical Activity Questionnaire, as well as measures of met expectations, overall improvement, and overall satisfaction. Total morphine equivalents (TMEs) were calculated from a regional prescription monitoring program. Eighty patients (41.7%) filled an opioid prescription preoperatively, and refill TMEs were significantly higher in this subpopulation. Opioid use was associated with unemployment, government insurance, smoking, depression, history of prior surgery, higher body mass index, greater comorbidities, and lower treatment expectations. Preoperative opioid use was associated with significantly worse 2-year scores on most PROs, including PROMIS physical function, pain interference, fatigue, social satisfaction, IKDC, NPS for the knee and rest of the body, and Marx's and Tegner's scales. There was a significant dose-dependent association between greater preoperative TMEs and worse scores for PROMIS physical function, pain interference, fatigue, social satisfaction, NPS body, and Marx's and Tegner's scales. Multivariable analysis confirmed that any preoperative opioid use, but not quantity of TMEs, was an independent predictor of worse 2-year scores for function, activity, and knee pain. Preoperative opioid use and TMEs were neither independent predictors of met expectations, satisfaction, patient-perceived improvement, nor improvement on any PROs. Our findings demonstrate that preoperative opioid use is associated with clinically relevant worse patient-reported knee function and pain after knee surgery.
Collapse
|
18
|
Schneider MB, Kung JE, Zhang T, Rocca MS, Foster MJ, Meredith SJ, Leong NL, Packer JD, Henn RF. Patient Perception of Being "Completely Better" After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2022; 50:1215-1221. [PMID: 35225001 DOI: 10.1177/03635465221074331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Contextualizing patient-reported outcomes (PROs) by defining clinically relevant differences is important. Considering that anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) ideally results in the restoration of normal knee function, an assessment of patients' perception of being "completely better" (CB) may be of particular value. PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence and characteristics of patients who self-report a CB status after ACLR. Additionally, we aimed to determine whether PROs were associated with a CB status after ACLR as well as to determine CB status thresholds for 2-year and change in values. STUDY DESIGN Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed data from an orthopaedic registry at a single institution. Patients were administered the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF), PROMIS Pain Interference (PI), and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form preoperatively and at 2 years after ACLR. Additionally, patients completed a CB anchor question at 2 years after ACLR. Thresholds for 2-year and change in PRO scores associated with achieving a CB status were identified with 90% specificity. RESULTS Overall, 95 of the 136 patients (69.9%) considered their condition to be CB at 2 years after surgery. The 2-year and change in PROMIS PF, PROMIS PI, and IKDC scores were significantly better in the CB group than in the non-CB group. Thresholds associated with a CB status for 2-year PROMIS PF, PROMIS PI, and IKDC scores were more reliable than those for changes in scores and were ≥63, ≤44, and ≥80, respectively. Thresholds for the change in PROMIS PF, PROMIS PI, and IKDC scores were ≥19, ≤-16, and ≥44, respectively. CONCLUSION The majority of patients reported that they were CB at 2 years after ACLR. This study may serve as a reference for orthopaedic surgeons and researchers when considering outcomes after ACLR.
Collapse
|
19
|
Kung JE, Zhang T, Weir TB, Schneider MB, Aneizi A, Leong NL, Packer JD, Meredith SJ, Henn RF. Correlation of Press Ganey Scores With Early Patient Satisfaction After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med 2022; 10:23259671221083704. [PMID: 35386839 PMCID: PMC8977719 DOI: 10.1177/23259671221083704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 12/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Patient satisfaction metrics are commonly used to assess the quality of
health care and affect reimbursement. The Press Ganey Ambulatory Surgery
(PGAS) is a satisfaction survey that has emerged as a prominent quality
assessment tool; however, no data exist on whether PGAS scores correlate
with early postsurgical satisfaction during the PGAS survey administration
period in patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
(ACLR). Purpose: To determine if PGAS scores correlate with measures of satisfaction and
patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at 2 weeks postoperatively in ACLR
patients. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent ACLR at a single institution
was performed. Patients who completed the PGAS survey and PROs at 2 weeks
postoperatively were included in the study. Surgical satisfaction was
measured with the Surgical Satisfaction Questionnaire (SSQ-8), and PROs
included 6 Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System domains.
Bivariate analysis between PGAS and PRO scores was conducted using the
Spearman rank correlation coefficient (rS). Results: Of the 716 patients who received the PGAS survey after ACLR, 81 patients
completed the survey, and 39 patients also completed PROs and were included
in the study. Total converted (mean scaled score) and “top box” (percentages
of questions with highest rating selected) PGAS scores showed no significant
correlations with the SSQ-8 (rS =–0.24; P = .14). There were no significant
correlations between SSQ-8 and PGAS domain scores except for a negative
correlation with Facility domain top box scores (rS =–0.33; P = .04), meaning that patients with
higher surgical satisfaction had lower PGAS Facility scores. Total PGAS
(converted and top box scores) and PGAS domain scores showed no significant
correlation with any of the other PROs. Conclusion: PGAS scores showed no significant positive correlation with surgical
satisfaction, function, pain, mental health, activity, or expectations of
surgery in patients 2 weeks after ACLR. This suggests little to no
relationship between PGAS score and surgical satisfaction in the early
recovery period after ACLR.
Collapse
|
20
|
Hunt D, Zhang T, Koenig S, Aneizi A, Perraut G, Shasti K, Wahl AJ, Meredith SJ, Henn RF. Predictors of PROMIS Physical Function at 2 Years following Knee Surgery. J Knee Surg 2022; 35:521-528. [PMID: 32898902 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1716360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical function (PROMIS PF) 2 years following knee surgery, and identify preoperative factors associated with postoperative PROMIS PF. Three hundred and sixty-five patients, age 17 years and older, undergoing knee surgery at one institution were studied. Patients completed multiple questionnaires prior to surgery and again 2 years postoperatively including PROMIS PF, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), joint and body numeric pain scales (NPS), Tegner's activity scale (TAS), and Marx's activity rating scale (MARS). Mean PROMIS PF improved from 41.4 to 50.9 at 2 years postoperatively (p < 0.001) and was strongly correlated with 2-year IKDC scores. Older age, female gender, non-Hispanic ethnicity, unemployment, lower income, government insurance, smoking, preoperative opioid use, having a legal claim, comorbidities, previous surgeries, higher body mass index (BMI), and knee arthroplasty were associated with worse 2-year PROMIS PF. Multivariable analysis confirmed that lower BMI, less NPS body pain, and higher MARS were independent predictors of greater 2-year PROMIS PF and better improvement in PROMIS PF. In this large, broad cohort of knee surgery patients, multiple preoperative factors were associated with PROMIS PF 2 years postoperatively. PROMIS PF scores improved significantly, but worse 2 year PROMIS PF scores and less improvement from baseline were independently predicted by higher BMI, greater NPS body pain, and lower MARS activity level. PROMIS PF can be implemented as an efficient means to assess outcomes after knee surgery.
Collapse
|
21
|
Baker M, Albelo F, Zhang T, Schneider MB, Foster MJ, Aneizi A, Hasan SA, Gilotra MN, Henn RF. PROMIS Depression and Anxiety in shoulder surgery patients. Bone Joint J 2022; 104-B:479-485. [PMID: 35360950 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.104b4.bjj-2021-1089.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
AIMS The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of depression and anxiety symptoms in patients undergoing shoulder surgery using the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Depression and Anxiety computer adaptive tests, and to determine the factors associated with more severe symptoms. Additionally, we sought to determine whether PROMIS Depression and Anxiety were associated with functional outcomes after shoulder surgery. METHODS This was a retrospective analysis of 293 patients from an urban population who underwent elective shoulder surgery from 2015 to 2018. Survey questionnaires included preoperative and two-year postoperative data. Bivariate analysis was used to identify associations and multivariable analysis was used to control for confounding variables. RESULTS Mean two-year PROMIS Depression and Anxiety scores significantly improved from preoperative scores, with a greater improvement observed in PROMIS Anxiety. Worse PROMIS Depression and Anxiety scores were also significantly correlated with worse PROMIS Physical Function (PF) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (ASES). After controlling for confounding variables, worse PROMIS Depression was an independent predictor of worse PROMIS PF, while worse PROMIS Anxiety was an independent predictor of worse PROMIS PF and ASES scores. CONCLUSION Mean two-year PROMIS Depression and Anxiety scores improved after elective shoulder surgery and several patient characteristics were associated with these scores. Worse functional outcomes were associated with worse PROMIS Depression and Anxiety; however, more severe two-year PROMIS Anxiety was the strongest predictor of worse functional outcomes. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(4):479-485.
Collapse
|
22
|
DePalma BJ, Costales TG, Schneider MB, Henn RF. Bilateral Extensor Mechanism Allograft Reconstruction in Native Knees: A Case Report. JBJS Case Connect 2022; 12:01709767-202203000-00031. [PMID: 35081064 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.cc.21.00322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
CASE A 66-year-old man presented with chronic bilateral extensor mechanism dysfunction and profound patella baja after failed revision surgery for bilateral quadriceps tendon ruptures. Staged bilateral reconstruction with complete extensor mechanism allograft resulted in excellent two-year satisfaction and clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION Complete extensor mechanism reconstruction can be a successful treatment for chronic quadriceps tendon rupture with profound patella baja.
Collapse
|
23
|
Zhang T, Jauregui JJ, Foster M, Packer JD, Meredith SJ, Leong NL, Henn RF. Outcomes of Partial Meniscectomy in Obese Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cartilage 2021; 13:216S-227S. [PMID: 32432486 PMCID: PMC8808876 DOI: 10.1177/1947603520923025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures. However, the indications for APM are controversial and obese patients may have worse outcomes. This study's primary purpose was to investigate differences in outcome after APM associated with elevated body mass index (BMI). Secondary objectives included differences in pathophysiology, surgical complications/failures, or osteoarthritis development. DESIGN MEDLINE, EMBASE, and OVID databases were systematically searched for eligible studies reporting on APM outcomes at a minimum of 1 year postoperatively. Studies that did not include BMI categorization were excluded. Meta-analysis was conducted with random-effects modeling where data from at least 2 studies was available. RESULTS A total of 16 articles were included. Overweight/obese BMI was associated with worse preoperative Lysholm (mean difference, -6.06 [95% CI, -11.70 to -0.42]) and visual analogue scale pain scores (0.43 [0.07 to 0.79]). Worse postoperative normalized knee-specific patient-reported outcome scores were also associated with obese BMI (-4.57 [-5.33 to -3.81]). There were no significant differences in clinical improvement or osteoarthritis progression among BMI groups. Two studies found higher complication/failure rates, 3 articles associated medial meniscus posterior root tears, and 1 article found differences in gene transcript expression with increased BMI. CONCLUSIONS Obesity is associated with worse knee function after APM, and patients with elevated BMI have worse preoperative knee pain and function. However, there is no difference in amount of improvement between elevated and normal BMI patients. Further prospective research is necessary to determine the comparative effectiveness of APM in patients with elevated BMI.
Collapse
|
24
|
Henry LE, Zhang T, Aneizi A, Weir TB, Schneider MB, Meredith SJ, Leong NL, Packer JD, Henn RF. Perioperative opioid use and Press Ganey patient satisfaction scores after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop 2021; 27:84-91. [PMID: 34588743 DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Satisfaction measures such as Press Ganey (PG) scores are increasingly used to determine reimbursement. Purpose To investigate the relationship between PG satisfaction scores and perioperative opioid use in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Methods Patients undergoing ACLR were retrospectively identified. Perioperative opioid prescription data were collected using the electronic medical record. Results Positive correlations existed between immediate preoperative total morphine equivalents (TMEs) and PG scores. There was a negative correlation between "Pain Control" and preoperative TMEs. Conclusion PG scores were correlated with preoperative and intraoperative opioid administration but not postoperative opioid administration.
Collapse
|
25
|
Chrencik MT, Ventimiglia DJ, Schneider MB, Zhang T, Fisher KJ, Hahn A, Gilotra MN, Hasan SA, Henn RF. Preoperative characteristics predictive of PROMIS Pain Interference two years after shoulder surgery. J Orthop 2021; 27:49-55. [PMID: 34483550 DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2021] [Revised: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 08/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The objective of this study was to identify preoperative characteristics associated with worse Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference (PI) two years after shoulder surgery. Methods This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on 293 patients who underwent elective shoulder surgery. Survey questionnaires were collected within one week of surgery and then two years postoperatively. Bivariate analysis was used to identify associations and multivariable analysis was used to control for confounding variables. Results Worse two-year PROMIS PI was significantly correlated with older age, higher BMI, greater comorbidities, more prior surgeries, and multiple socio-demographic factors. Less improvement in PROMIS PI was significantly correlated with greater comorbidities, more previous surgeries, unemployment, prior orthopaedic surgery on the operative joint, and a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score. Better scores on all preoperative patient-reported outcome measures correlated with better two-year PROMIS PI. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that worse two-year PROMIS PI was independently predicted by the following preoperative factors: Workers' Compensation claim, opioid use, worse whole body Numeric Pain Score, and worse PROMIS PI. Less improvement in two-year PROMIS PI was predicted by the same preoperative factors. Conclusion Worse PROMIS PI after shoulder surgery was associated with older age, greater comorbidities, mental health impairment, and lower socioeconomic status. Preoperative predictors of worse pain interference two years after shoulder surgery included Workers' Compensation, opioid use, worse whole body pain, and worse PROMIS PI. Level of evidence III.
Collapse
|