Opportunities and challenges of tackling Scope 3 "Indirect" emissions from residential hot water

The water sector could play a major role towards a Net Zero greenhouse gas (GHG) future if Scope 3 emissions were embraced and operationalised. Significant opportunities and challenges exist in tackling Scope 3 emissions including those associated with customer hot water use. Present GHG emission reduction practices predominantly focus on Scope 1 "within utility" and Scope 2 "purchased energy" emissions. In the urban water cycle, Scope 3 "indirect" emissions dominate, and water use is only one example of Scope 3 emissions. Over 90% of all water cycle GHG emissions can be attributed to water use in residential, industrial and commercial premises, collectively some 7% of global GHG emissions. One possibility is for water utilities to actively support efficient hot water use such as new ultra-low flow shower heads. Scope 3 opportunities also offer a range of cost-effective emissions-reduction opportunities, particularly when the wider perspective of "community value" is considered and not just a "business financial perspective". Hot water efficiency is additionally essential to Net Zero carbon futures, even with decarbonised grids, because most major Net Zero roadmaps require energy efficiency gains. Scientific and management advance needed includes: accounting methodologies, clear roles, collaboration, new business models, and clear definitions. The water sector has the opportunity to play a significant role in achieving Net Zero cities. The decision how much is yet to be made.

REVISE: Re-Evaluating the Inhibition of Stress Erosions in the ICU: a randomised trial protocol

INTRODUCTION

The Re-Evaluating the Inhibition of Stress Erosions (REVISE) Trial aims to determine the impact of the proton pump inhibitor pantoprazole compared with placebo on clinically important upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding in the intensive care unit (ICU), 90-day mortality and other endpoints in critically ill adults. The objective of this report is to describe the rationale, methodology, ethics and management of REVISE.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

REVISE is an international, randomised, concealed, stratified, blinded parallel-group individual patient trial being conducted in ICUs in Canada, Australia, Saudi Arabia, UK, US, Kuwait, Pakistan and Brazil. Patients≥18 years old expected to remain invasively mechanically ventilated beyond the calendar day after enrolment are being randomised to either 40 mg pantoprazole intravenously or an identical placebo daily while mechanically ventilated in the ICU. The primary efficacy outcome is clinically important upper GI bleeding within 90 days of randomisation. The primary safety outcome is 90-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes include rates of ventilator-associated pneumonia, Clostridioides difficile infection, new renal replacement therapy, ICU and hospital mortality, and patient-important GI bleeding. Tertiary outcomes are total red blood cells transfused, peak serum creatinine level in the ICU, and duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU and hospital stay. The sample size is 4800 patients; one interim analysis was conducted after 2400 patients had complete 90-day follow-up; the Data Monitoring Committee recommended continuing the trial.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

All participating centres receive research ethics approval before initiation by hospital, region or country, including, but not limited to - Australia: Northern Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee and Mater Misericordiae Ltd Human Research Ethics Committee; Brazil: Comissão Nacional de Ética em Pesquisa; Canada: Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board; Kuwait: Ministry of Health Standing Committee for Coordination of Health and Medical Research; Pakistan: Maroof Institutional Review Board; Saudi Arabia: Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs Institutional Review Board: United Kingdom: Hampshire B Research Ethics Committee; United States: Institutional Review Board of the Nebraska Medical Centre. The results of this trial will inform clinical practice and guidelines worldwide.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03374800.

Final Study Report of Andexanet Alfa for Major Bleeding With Factor Xa Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Andexanet alfa is a modified recombinant inactive factor Xa (FXa) designed to reverse FXa inhibitors. ANNEXA-4 (Andexanet Alfa, a Novel Antidote to the Anticoagulation Effects of Factor Xa Inhibitors) was a multicenter, prospective, phase-3b/4, single-group cohort study that evaluated andexanet alfa in patients with acute major bleeding. The results of the final analyses are presented.

METHODS

Patients with acute major bleeding within 18 hours of FXa inhibitor administration were enrolled. Co-primary end points were anti-FXa activity change from baseline during andexanet alfa treatment and excellent or good hemostatic efficacy, defined by a scale used in previous reversal studies, at 12 hours. The efficacy population included patients with baseline anti-FXa activity levels above predefined thresholds (≥75 ng/mL for apixaban and rivaroxaban, ≥40 ng/mL for edoxaban, and ≥0.25 IU/mL for enoxaparin; reported in the same units used for calibrators) who were adjudicated as meeting major bleeding criteria (modified International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis definition). The safety population included all patients. Major bleeding criteria, hemostatic efficacy, thrombotic events (stratified by occurring before or after restart of either prophylactic [ie, a lower dose, for prevention rather than treatment] or full-dose oral anticoagulation), and deaths were assessed by an independent adjudication committee. Median endogenous thrombin potential at baseline and across the follow-up period was a secondary outcome.

RESULTS

There were 479 patients enrolled (mean age, 78 years; 54% male, 86% White; 81% anticoagulated for atrial fibrillation at a median time of 11.4 hours since last dose, with 245 (51%) on apixaban, 176 (37%) on rivaroxaban, 36 (8%) on edoxaban, and 22 (5%) on enoxaparin. Bleeding was predominantly intracranial (n=331 [69%]) or gastrointestinal (n=109 [23%]). In evaluable apixaban patients (n=172), median anti-FXa activity decreased from 146.9 ng/mL to 10.0 ng/mL (reduction, 93% [95% CI, 94-93]); in rivaroxaban patients (n=132), it decreased from 214.6 ng/mL to 10.8 ng/mL (94% [95% CI, 95-93]); in edoxaban patients (n=28), it decreased from 121.1 ng/mL to 24.4 ng/mL (71% [95% CI, 82-65); and in enoxaparin patients (n=17), it decreased from 0.48 IU/mL to 0.11 IU/mL (75% [95% CI, 79-67]). Excellent or good hemostasis occurred in 274 of 342 evaluable patients (80% [95% CI, 75-84]). In the safety population, thrombotic events occurred in 50 patients (10%); in 16 patients, this occurred during treatment with prophylactic anticoagulation that began after the bleeding event. No thrombotic episodes occurred after oral anticoagulation restart. Specific to certain populations, reduction of anti-FXa activity from baseline to nadir significantly predicted hemostatic efficacy in patients with intracranial hemorrhage (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.54-0.70]) and correlated with lower mortality in patients <75 years of age (adjusted P=0.022; unadjusted P=0.003). Median endogenous thrombin potential was within the normal range by the end of andexanet alfa bolus through 24 hours for all FXa inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with major bleeding associated with the use of FXa inhibitors, treatment with andexanet alfa reduced anti-FXa activity and was associated with good or excellent hemostatic efficacy in 80% of patients.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov; Unique identifier: NCT02329327.

COVID-19 infection and maternal morbidity in critical care units in Scotland: a national cohort study

BACKGROUND

Previous research has shown that, in comparison with non-pregnant women of reproductive age, pregnant women with COVID-19 are more likely to be admitted to critical care, receive invasive ventilation, and die. At present there are limited data in relation to outcomes and healthcare utilisation following hospital discharge of pregnant and recently pregnant women admitted to critical care.

METHODS

A national cohort study of pregnant and recently pregnant women who were admitted to critical care in Scotland with confirmed or suspected COVID-19. We examined hospital outcomes as well as hospital re-admission rates.

RESULTS

Between March 2020 and March 2022, 75 pregnant or recently pregnant women with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 were admitted to 24 Intensive Care Units across Scotland. Almost two thirds (n=49, 65%) were from the most deprived socio-economic areas. Complete 90-day acute hospital re-admission data were available for 74 (99%) patients. Nine (12%) women required an emergency non-obstetric hospital re-admission within 90 days. Less than 5% of the cohort had received any form of vaccination.

CONCLUSIONS

This national cohort study has demonstrated that pregnant or recently pregnant women admitted to critical care with COVID-19 were more likely to reside in areas of socio-economic deprivation, and fewer than 5% of the cohort had received any form of vaccination. More targeted public health campaigning across the socio-economic gradient is urgently required.

Pregnancy outcomes in women with Ebstein's anomaly: data from the EORP Registry of Pregnancy and Cardiac Disease (ROPAC)

Background

Ebstein's anomaly is a rare congenital cardiac condition characterized by displacement of the posterior and septal leaflets of the tricuspid valve towards the apex of the right ventricle. The ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy categorize women with uncomplicated Ebstein's anomaly as modified World Health Organization (mWHO) risk class II. However, data regarding pregnancy outcomes in women with Ebstein's anomaly are scarce.

Purpose

To evaluate the maternal and perinatal risks of pregnancy in women with Ebstein's anomaly.

Methods

All patients with Ebstein's anomaly who had been included in the Registry of Pregnancy and Cardiac Disease (ROPAC), which is an international, prospective, observational registry of pregnant women with underlying cardiac disease (n=5739), were evaluated. The primary outcome was the occurrence of a major adverse cardiac event, defined as maternal mortality, heart failure, arrhythmia, thromboembolic events or endocarditis. The secondary outcomes were obstetric and perinatal outcomes and the influence of pregnancy on tricuspid valve regurgitation.

Results

Thirty-six hospitals in 22 countries enrolled 81 women with Ebstein's anomaly (mean age 29.7 years, 46.9% nulliparous). Seven (8.6%) women had a history of tricuspid valve repair and a further eight (9.9%) of tricuspid replacement. Most women (67.9%) were in NYHA class I. At least one major adverse cardiac event occurred in 8 (9.9%) pregnancies, including heart failure (n=6), supraventricular arrhythmia (n=3) and thromboembolic events (n=2). There was no maternal death. Almost half of the women underwent a Caesarean section (49%) and preterm delivery occurred in 24.7%. Neonatal mortality was 2.5% and four (4.9%) infants had neonatal congenital heart disease. Serial echocardiographic data pre- and postpregnancy were available in 14 women. There was no clear deterioration in tricuspid regurgitation (see Picture 1).

Conclusion

Although mortality was zero, in 10% of the pregnant women with Ebstein's anomaly a major adverse cardiac event occurred, most frequently heart failure or arrhythmia. Therefore, women with Ebstein's anomaly should be categorized as mWHO risk class II at least, but perhaps more correctly as II–III. Preconception counseling is crucial, so that women are aware of the potential risks of maternal morbidity, preterm delivery and congenital heart disease and the need for careful monitoring during pregnancy.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Substance use disorder in the anaesthetist: Guidelines from the Association of Anaesthetists: Guidelines from the Association of Anaesthetists

Anaesthetists have a higher incidence of substance use disorder when compared with other doctors. This might be due to the ease of access to intravenous opioids, propofol, midazolam, inhalational agents and other anaesthetic drugs. Alcohol use disorder continues to be the most common problem. Unfortunately, the first sign that something is amiss might be the anaesthetist's death from an accidental or deliberate overdose. While there are few accurate data, suicide is presumed to be the cause of death in approximately 6-10% of all anaesthetists. If we are to prevent this, substance use disorder must be recognised early, we should ensure the anaesthetist is supported by their department and hospital management and that the anaesthetist engages fully with treatment. Over 75% of anaesthetists return to full practice if they co-operate fully with the required treatment and supervision.

349 Improving Surgical Teaching for Junior Trainees Internationally in Light of Covid-19

Aim

During the Covid-19 pandemic there has been a gross effect on surgical training at all grades. A cohort that has been affected but reported less frequently are medical students and foundation doctors (junior trainees), whose interest in the field and clinical skills may have been affected by reduced service provision.

Method

A survey of junior trainees was conducted to analyse their perceived adequacy of surgical teaching in light of the effect of Covid-19. An online teaching course was then designed to target areas of weakness identified in the survey. The content was designed with the Imperial College London surgery curriculum and was vetted by a consultant surgeon.

Results

Of the 713 people surveyed, 393 (55%) had received little or no surgical teaching and 496 (70%) respondents said they were “not” or “slightly” confident in managing common and emergency surgical presentations. A free text box highlighted that deteriorating patients, clinical decision-making, and initiating management were the greatest concerns. This was used to design an international online teaching course for junior trainees, that focused explicitly on clinical care. The sessions were run live on MindTheBleep via Facebook live, to answer questions in real time and examine cases with live audience participation, receiving feedback after every session. This model has reached trainees in &gt;30 countries with &gt;200 feedback responses and an average rating of 4.5/5.

Conclusions

Junior trainees are a key cohort whose interest and education in surgery has suffered due to the pandemic. An innovative, online, clinically orientated course is assisting to re-engage trainees internationally.

The RAIS Device for Global Surgery: Using a Participatory Design Approach to Navigate the Translational Pathway to Clinical Use

Background: Over 5 billion people worldwide have no access to surgery worldwide, typically in low-resource settings, despite it being a primary life-saving treatment. Gas Insufflation-Less Laparoscopic Surgery (GILLS) can address this inequity, by improving current GILLS instrumentation to modern surgical standards. Objective: to develop and translate a new Retractor for Abdominal Insufflation-less Surgery (RAIS) into clinical use and thus provide a context-appropriate system to advance GILLS surgery. Methods: A collaborative multidisciplinary team from the UK and India was formed, embedding local clinical stakeholders and an industry partner in defining user and contextual needs. System development was based on a phased roadmap for ‘surgical device design in low resource settings’ and embedded participatory and frugal design principles in an iterative process supported by traditional medical device design methodologies. Each phase of development was evaluated by the stakeholder team through interactive workshops using cadaveric surgical simulations. A Commercialisation phase undertook Design to Manufacture and regulatory approval activities. Clinical validation was then conducted with rural surgeons performing GILLS procedures using the RAIS system. Semi-structured questionnaires and interviews were used to evaluate device performance. Results: A set of user needs and contextual requirements were defined and formalised. System development occurred across five iterations. Stakeholder participation was instrumental in converging on a design which met user requirements. A commercial RAIS system was then produced by an industry partner under Indian regulatory approval. This was successfully used in clinical validation to conduct 12 surgical procedures at two locations in rural India. Surgical feedback showed that the RAIS system provided a valuable and usable surgical instrument which was appropriate for use in low-resource contexts. Conclusions: Using a context-specific development approach with close engagement of stakeholders was crucial to develop the RAIS system for low-resource regions. The outcome is translation from global health need into a fully realized commercial instrument which can be used by surgeons in low-resource regions across India.

Digital screening tool (Health Catch-UP!) to promote multi-disease screening in migrants

Background

The ECDC has called for innovative strategies to deliver multi-disease screening (TB, LTBI, HIV, hepatitis B/C, Chagas, Strongyloidiasis and schistosomiasis) and catch-up vaccination (MMR, DTP) to adult migrants within the primary care context. We did a UK i qualitative study to explore current practice and seek views on a novel integrated digital tool to support delivery of screening recommendations for migrants https://emishealth.vids.io/videos/a49ad1bb1a18e4c72c/health-catch-up-with-requested-edits-mp4).

Methods

Phase 1 was conducted via telephone with clinical primary care practitioners (PCPs) (phase 1) and informed data collection and analysis for phase 2 with administrative staff. Data were analysed iteratively, informed by thematic analysis (Ethics no.20/HRA/1674).

Results

64 participants were recruited in Phase 1 (25 general practitioners [GPs], 15 nurses, 7 healthcare assistants, 1 pharmacist); Phase 2 comprised administrative staff (11 Practice-Managers, 5 receptionists). There was lack of consistency in delivery of screening and vaccination. Most GP practices adopted a practice-specific approach, or had no system in place; screening only for HIV and hepatitis B/C. Barriers to screening were perceived lack of knowledge/training and limited financial resources. Facilitators included having an infectious disease/migrant-health champion, incentivisation, and clear protocols. Participants responded positively to the integrated Health Catch-UP! tool, confirming that it would increase screening and vaccination, reduce missed opportunities for preventative healthcare, and raise awareness of migrant health.

Conclusions

Infectious disease screening and catch-up vaccination is not currently delivered well in primary care in high-migrant receiving European countries. Innovative digital tools like Health Catch-UP! could aid clinical decision-making and facilitating improved health outcomes for migrants. Further work is needed to evaluate this intervention.

Key messages

Infectious disease screening and catch-up vaccination is not currently delivered well in primary care in high-migrant receiving European countries. Innovative digital tools could aid clinical decision-making and facilitating improved health outcomes for migrants.

Impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the device therapy for patients with the heart failure

Introduction

Hospital admissions of patients with cardiovascular disease were markedly reduced in the UK in 2020 during the Covid-19 pandemic. In many institutions, including ours, patient care was redistributed from a specialty-based approach to a ward-based system, meaning some patients being admitted and managed under the care of non-specialist teams.

Purpose

We wished to examine the impact of these changes on heart failure (HF) patients presenting during the pandemic and on appropriate delivery of complex device therapies.

Methods

The study was undertaken in a large UK teaching hospital. The institution audit programme includes cardiac device therapy provision, aiming to ensure that implantable cardioverter defibrillators and cardiac resynchronisation therapy are offered to the target population in accordance with NICE guidance [Technology Appraisal 314]. In accordance with the guidance, patients admitted to hospital with serious ventricular arrhythmia, familial cardiac condition with high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD), surgical repair of congenital heart disease (CHD) and patients with HF and LVEF&lt;36% were identified from hospital coding. Findings during the pandemic (March to August 2020) were compared with the same period in 2019. Fisher's exact test was used to compare proportions.

Results

Among non-HF patients, device therapy prescription was consistent in the two periods observed. Table 1 shows how many patients were eligible for device therapy and how many were offered it. Table 2 contains details of HF admissions, showing an 8% reduction in admissions during the pandemic. The proportion of patients eligible for device therapy did not change significantly. However, there was a significant reduction in the proportion of eligible patients who were offered device therapy (79% vs 94% p=0.03). In addition, during the pandemic there was a trend towards a greater chance of patients being considered too frail for device therapy (p=0.08). Among 12 patients overlooked for device therapy, 10 were not under the care of Cardiology. Among 31 patients considered too frail for device therapy, 26 were not under the care of Cardiology.

Conclusion

During the Covid-19 pandemic, a modest reduction in HF hospital admission was observed with a marked fall in identification of patients eligible for device therapy. Possible explanations include intense pressure to discharge patients quickly, an increased perception of patient frailty during a crisis and the lack of recognition of indications for device therapy when patients are under the care of non-specialists. These findings suggest that cardiac services should actively look for HF patients who may have missed out on life-saving device therapies during the pandemic.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in women with structural heart disease: data from the ESC EORP Registry of Pregnancy and Cardiac disease (ROPAC)

Background

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are estimated to occur in 10% of pregnancies in the general population and preeclampsia specifically in 3–5%. HDP are suggested to be more common in and less well tolerated by women with heart disease. However, the current data are conflicting and this knowledge gap impacts clinical practice guidelines.

Purpose

To harness the well characterized data of the Registry of Pregnancy and Cardiac disease (ROPAC) to examine the frequency of HDP in women with structural heart disease and its impact on maternal and perinatal outcomes.

Methods

The ROPAC registry (n=5739) is a worldwide prospective registry on pregnancies in women with heart disease, including congenital heart disease (CHD, n=3295), valvular heart disease (VHD, n=1648), cardiomyopathy (CMP, n=438), aortopathy (AOP, n=217), ischemic heart disease (IHD, n=95), and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH, n=45). We defined HDP as either chronic hypertension, gestational hypertension, and/or preeclampsia (including HELLP syndrome and eclampsia) and assessed the frequency of HDP in each heart disease category. Predictors of preeclampsia were identified using multivariable logistic regression. The proportion of women with adverse maternal, pregnancy, and fetal/neonatal outcomes were described among women with preeclampsia or HDP, and compared between women with and women without HDP using chi-square tests.

Results

In total, the frequency of HDP and preeclampsia was 9.3% and 2.6% in CHD, 7.5% and 2.2% in VHD, 18.7% and 7.1% in CMP, 15.7% and 2.8% AOP, 35.8% and 6.3% in IHD, and 22.2% and 11.1% in PAH. Independent predictors of preeclampsia were chronic hypertension (OR 3.06, 95% CI 2–4.69), nulliparity (2.39, 1.68–3.38), HDP in a previous pregnancy (2.29, 1.11–4.7), gestational diabetes in the current pregnancy (2.13, 1.13–4.03), pulmonary hypertension (1.71, 1.08–2.7) and age (1.04, 1.01–1.07). In women with preeclampsia and heart disease, maternal mortality was 3.5% and heart failure was 29.1%. Maternal mortality (1.4% vs 0.6%, p=0.042), heart failure (18.5% vs 10.6%), Caesarean section (61.2% vs 48.4%), preterm births (27.4% vs 16.9%), low Apgar score (9.8% vs 6.6%), small for gestational age (14.6% vs 9.7%) and neonatal mortality (1.7% vs 0.4%) were higher in women with than women without HDP (all p&lt;0.001 except maternal mortality).

Conclusions

The frequency of HDP is increased (&gt;10%) in CMP, AOP, IHD and PAH, but not in CHD and VHD. The high frequency of HDP is partly due to chronic hypertension, but the incidence of preeclampsia is also increased (&gt;5%) in CMP, IHD and PAH. Among women with cardiac disease, HDP were associated with adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. The high maternal mortality rate of 3.5% in women with heart disease and preeclampsia warrants close clinical monitoring and a better understanding of the optimal management strategies in the complex population group.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Other. Main funding source(s): Funding from “Zabawas Foundation” and “De Hoop Foundation” in addition to the support from EORP is greatly acknowledged. Since the start of EORP, the following companies have supported the programme: Abbott Vascular Int. (2011–2021), Amgen Cardiovascular (2009–2018), AstraZeneca (2014–2021), Bayer AG (2009–2018), Boehringer Ingelheim (2009–2019), Boston Scientific (2009–2012), The Bristol Myers Squibb and Pfizer Alliance (2011–2019), Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH (2011–2020), The Alliance Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH and Eli Lilly and Company (2014–2017), Edwards (2016–2019), Gedeon Richter Plc. (2014–2016), Menarini Int. Op. (2009–2012), MSD-Merck & Co. (2011–2014), Novartis Pharma AG (2014–2020), ResMed (2014–2016), Sanofi (2009–2011), Servier (2009–2021), Vifor (2019–2022). HDP in women with heart diseaseIncidence of HDP per diagnosis group

Access to care and frequency of detransition among a cohort discharged by a UK national adult gender identity clinic: retrospective case-note review

BACKGROUND

UK adult gender identity clinics (GICs) are implementing a new streamlined service model. However, there is minimal evidence from these services underpinning this. It is also unknown how many service users subsequently 'detransition'.

AIMS

To describe service users' access to care and patterns of service use, specifically, interventions accessed, reasons for discharge and re-referrals; to identify factors associated with access; and to quantify 'detransitioning'.

METHOD

A retrospective case-note review was performed as a service evaluation for 175 service users consecutively discharged by a tertiary National Health Service adult GIC between 1 September 2017 and 31 August 2018. Descriptive statistics were used for rates of accessing interventions sought, reasons for discharge, re-referral and frequency of detransitioning. Using multivariate analysis, we sought associations between several variables and 'accessing care' or 'other outcome'.

RESULTS

The treatment pathway was completed by 56.1%. All interventions initially sought were accessed by 58%; 94% accessed hormones but only 47.7% accessed gender reassignment surgery; 21.7% disengaged; and 19.4% were re-referred. Multivariate analysis identified coexisting neurodevelopmental disorders (odds ratio [OR] = 5.7, 95% CI = 1.7-19), previous adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) per reported ACE (OR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.1-1.9), substance misuse during treatment (OR = 4.3, 95% CI = 1.1-17.6) and mental health concerns during treatment (OR = 2.2, 95% CI 1.1-4.4) as independently associated with accessing care. Twelve people (6.9%) met our case definition of detransitioning.

CONCLUSIONS

Service users may have unmet needs. Neurodevelopmental disorders or ACEs suggest complexity requiring consideration during the assessment process. Managing mental ill health and substance misuse during treatment needs optimising. Detransitioning might be more frequent than previously reported.

Aortic coarctation in pregnancy: outcomes and predictors for cardiovascular and hypertensive complications. Data from the ESC Registry of Pregnancy and Cardiac disease (ROPAC)

Background

Pregnancy in women with repaired aortic coarctation (CoA) has a moderately increased risk (mWHO II-III) of an adverse cardiovascular, obstetric or fetal event, but prospective data to validate this estimated risk is scarce.

Purpose

We examined maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant women with unrepaired and repaired CoA to identify predictors of adverse outcomes.

Methods

Pregnancies in women with CoA were selected from the worldwide prospective Registry of Pregnancy and Cardiac Disease (ROPAC, n=5739). The frequency and predictors of major adverse cardiac events (MACE, defined as maternal cardiac death, heart failure, atrial fibrillation/flutter, ventricular tachyarrhythmia, endocarditis, thromboembolic events, aortic dissection and acute coronary syndrome), and hypertensive complications (defined as pregnancy-induced hypertension, (pre)eclampsia or HELLP syndrome) were analyzed.

Results

Of 303 pregnancies in women with CoA (median age 30 years, median pregnancy duration 39 weeks), 10% were in women with unrepaired CoA and 27% in women with pre-existing hypertension. There were no maternal deaths. There were 4 neonatal deaths of which 3 occurred after a spontaneous extreme preterm birth. MACE occurred in 4.3% of pregnancies, predominantly involving heart failure (3.3%). MACE rate was similar in unrepaired vs repaired CoA (3.4% vs 4.4%, p=0.814). Predictors of MACE included pre-pregnancy clinical signs of heart failure (OR 31.8, 95% CI 6.8–147.7), LVEF &lt;40% (OR 10.4, 95% CI 1.8–59.5), NYHA class &gt;1 (OR 11.4, 95% CI 3.6–36.3), cardiac medication use (OR 4.9, 95% CI 1.3–18.3) and living in an emerging country (OR 4.88, 95% CI 1.58–15.07). Hypertensive complications occurred in 6.3%, more often in the subgroup with pre-existing hypertension (11% vs 5%, p=0.040). Pre-existing hypertension was the only predictor (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.01–6.6). Caesarean section was performed in 50% of the total cohort.

Conclusions

Pregnancies in women with CoA are safe, well tolerated and MACE and hypertensive complication rates are low. These findings support mWHO risk score reevaluation to mWHO II for women with CoA without cardiac impairment.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: Foundation. Main funding source(s): ESC EURObservational Research Programme (EORP)

Pregnancy outcomes in women with a systemic right ventricle and transposition of the great arteries. Results from the ESC-EORP Registry of Pregnancy and Cardiac disease (ROPAC)

Background

Cardiac disease is one of the major causes of maternal mortality. We studied pregnancy outcomes in women with a systemic right ventricle (sRV) after the atrial switch procedure for transposition of the great arteries (TGA) or congenitally corrected TGA (CCTGA).

Methods

The ESC-EORP Registry of Pregnancy and Cardiac Disease is an international prospective registry of pregnant women with cardiac disease. Pregnancy outcomes (maternal and fetal) in women with a sRV are described. The primary endpoint was a major cardiovascular event (MACE) defined as maternal death, supraventricular or ventricular arrhythmias requiring treatment, heart failure, aortic dissection, endocarditis, ischemic coronary event and other thromboembolic events.

Results

Altogether, 163 women with a sRV (TGA n=121, CCTGA n=42, mean age 28.8±4.6 years) were included. Maternal mortality did not occur. At least one MACE occurred in 26 women (heart failure in 16 (9.8%), arrhythmias (atrial 5, ventricular 6) in 11 (6.7%), and others in 4 (2.5%)). Predictors of MACE were pre-pregnancy signs of heart failure [Odds ratio (OR) 6.05, 95% CI: 1.41–25.97, p=0.02] as well as a sRV ejection fraction below 40% [OR 2.81, 95% CI: 1.18–6.69, p=0.02]. One woman experienced fetal loss, while no neonatal mortality was observed. No significant differences were found between women with CCTGA and TGA. In the subset of women who had an echocardiogram before and after pregnancy, no clear deterioration in sRV was observed.

Conclusion

The majority of women with a sRV tolerated pregnancy well with a favorable maternal and fetal outcome. Heart failure and arrhythmias were the most common MACE.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

AB1332-HPR ASSESSING THE PATIENT EXPERIENCE OF LUPUS NEPHRITIS: DEVELOPMENT OF A CONCEPTUAL MODEL AND REVIEW OF EXISTING PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME (PRO) MEASURES

Background:

Lupus nephritis (LN) is an autoimmune disease characterized by inflammation of the kidneys as a result of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Approximately 50% of SLE patients will develop LN, which is considered to be one of the most severe manifestations of SLE and the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in SLE. While there is ample existing evidence on disease experience and PROs used in extra-renal SLE, little research has been done in LN. Qualitative interviews with patients can help identify concepts that are both important and relevant to the patient. In order to effectively evaluate treatment benefit, it is critical that PRO measures used to assess such concepts and define clinical trial endpoints are fit for purpose and have strong evidence of content validity in the specific context of use.

Objectives:

The objective of this study was to understand the patient experience of LN and to identify and characterize the signs and symptoms of LN and their impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) through the development of a disease-specific conceptual model. This model was then used to evaluate the content validity of existing PRO measures available for use in LN.

Methods:

A structured literature search was conducted in Medline, Embase and PsycINFO to identify qualitative research articles documenting the patient experience of LN. PRO measures developed or commonly used to assess patient experiences of LN were also identified. Semi-structured concept elicitation interviews were conducted with 15 adult patients in the US with a clinician-confirmed diagnosis of LN (defined in accordance with established clinical guidelines). Supplementary qualitative data were also collected from a review of publicly available online blogs/forums. Findings were used to inform the development of a conceptual model detailing the impact of LN signs, symptoms and HRQoL and evaluate the validity of existing measures used within LN.

Results:

Searches revealed a paucity of qualitative research conducted with LN patients, supporting the need for prospective research in LN. Consistent with existing literature in SLE, the core signs and symptoms identified from the qualitative literature review, interviews and blog/forum review included joint pain, fatigue, joint stiffness, swelling (particularly in the extremities) and skin rashes. LN patients also reported urinary frequency, urgency, foamy urine and blood in their urine. Disease impact on physical functioning, activities of daily living, emotions, social life, work/finances and sleep were reported. PRO measures commonly used to evaluate patient experiences in LN included the SF-36, LupusQOL, LupusPRO, SLE Symptom Checklist, KDQoL and KSQ. Conceptual mapping of instruments against the newly developed conceptual model (Figure 1) highlighted that no single measure provides a comprehensive assessment of all symptoms/impact important to LN patients. Furthermore, items are largely focused on impact of symptoms with few items on symptom severity.

Figure 1.

Conceptual model of lupus nephritis symptoms and associated impacts

Conclusion:

The presentation of signs and symptoms in LN patients appears similar to those reported in extra-renal SLE populations, with the addition of swelling and urinary symptoms. Qualitative research with LN patients guided the development of a comprehensive LN conceptual model outlining the disease experience from the patients’ perspective. These insights can be useful to inform PRO measurement strategies for clinical trials in LN.

Acknowledgments:

With thanks to Dr. Betty Diamond and Dr. David Wofsy for their collaboration and helpful insights

Disclosure of Interests:

Pamela Berry Employee of: Janssen, Kate Burrows Consultant of: Adelphi Values a health outcomes research company commissioned by Janssen to conduct the research reported in this abstract, Rebecca Hall Consultant of: Adelphi Values a health outcomes research company commissioned by Janssen to conduct the research reported in this abstract., Adam Gater Consultant of: Adelphi Values a health outcomes research company commissioned by Janssen to conduct the research reported in this abstract, Helena Bradley Consultant of: Adelphi Values a health outcomes research company commissioned by Janssen to conduct the research reported in this abstract, Amy Ward Consultant of: Adelphi Values a health outcomes research company commissioned by Janssen to conduct the research reported in this abstract, Chloe Tolley Consultant of: Adelphi Values a health outcomes research company commissioned by Janssen to conduct the research reported in this abstract, Patricia Delong Employee of: Janssen, Elizabeth C Hsia Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC