Comparison of resumption of ovulation after cessation of oral contraceptives and medroxyprogesterone acetate in women with polycystic ovary syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Both oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) and cyclic medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) are widely used to control menstrual abnormalities in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). We aimed to evaluate the chance of ovulation resumption after cessation of OCPs and MPA in women with PCOS.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted of women with PCOS who were treated with OCPs or cyclic MPA from September 2015 to March 2019. After cessation of medication, ovulation was assessed using basal body temperature and/or measurement of serum progesterone. The odds ratio for ovulation resumption was assessed with multivariable logistic regression. Additionally, doubly robust analysis was performed with inverse-probability-weighted analysis and regression adjustment based on the covariate balancing propensity score to adjust for the effect of covariates on the treatment assignment.

RESULTS

Among 272 women with PCOS, 136 were prescribed OCPs and 136 were prescribed cyclic MPA. Ovulation resumed in 18.4% of women (n = 25) after cessation of MPA and in 24.3% of women (n = 33) after cessation of OCPs. The odds of ovulation resumption in MPA users were comparable with those in OCP users (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89-1.12). After multiple imputation due to missing values, the results did not change substantially (aOR 0.99, 95% CI 0.89-1.10).

CONCLUSIONS

Among women with PCOS, MPA users have a similar chance of ovulation resumption as OCP users after cessation of medication. Cyclic MPA can be a good alternative to OCPs in women for whom OCPs are contraindicated or who decline to take OCPs.

Changes in the serum metabolomics of polycystic ovary syndrome before and after compound oral contraceptive treatment

Background

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is both a common endocrine syndrome and a metabolic disorder that results in harm to the reproductive system and whole-body metabolism. This study aimed to investigate differences in the serum metabolic profiles of patients with PCOS compared with healthy controls, in addition to investigating the effects of compound oral contraceptive (COC) treatment in patients with PCOS.

Materials and methods

50 patients with PCOS and 50 sex-matched healthy controls were recruited. Patients with PCOS received three cycles of self-administered COC treatment. Clinical characteristics were recorded, and the laboratory biochemical data were detected. We utilized ultra-performance liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry to study the serum metabolic changes between patients with PCOS, patients with PCOS following COC treatment, and healthy controls.

Result

Patients with PCOS who received COC treatment showed significant improvements in serum sex hormone levels, a reduction in luteinising hormone levels, and a significant reduction in the levels of biologically active free testosterone in the blood. Differential metabolite correlation analysis revealed differences between PCOS and healthy control groups in N-tetradecanamide, hexadecanamide, 10E,12Z-octadecadienoic acid, and 13-HOTrE(r); after 3 months of COC treatment, there were significant differences in benzoic acid, organic acid, and phenolamides. Using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry to analyse blood serum in each group, the characteristic changes in PCOS were metabolic disorders of amino acids, carbohydrates, and purines, with significant changes in the levels of total cholesterol, uric acid, phenylalanine, aspartic acid, and glutamate.

Conclusion

Following COC treatment, improvements in sex hormone levels, endocrine factor levels, and metabolic levels were better than in the group of PCOS patients receiving no COC treatment, indicating that COC treatment for PCOS could effectively regulate the levels of sex hormones, endocrine factors, and serum metabolic profiles.

Effect of Oral Contraceptive Use in Relation to Fertile Years on the Risk of Endometriosis in Women with Primary Infertility: A Ten-Year Single-Centre Retrospective Analysis

Background and Objectives: Oral contraceptives (OCs) are usually used to treat endometriosis; however, the evidence is inconsistent about whether OC use in the past, when given to asymptomatic women, is protective against the development of future disease. We aimed to assess the relationship between the use of OCs and the likelihood of discovering endometriosis, considering the length of time under OCs during their fertile age. Materials and Methods: This was a monocentric retrospective cohort study in a tertiary-care University Hospital (Department of Human Reproduction, Division of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia) carried out from January 2012 to December 2022. Reproductive-aged women scheduled for laparoscopic surgery for primary infertility and subsequent histopathological diagnosis of endometriosis were compared to women without an endometriosis diagnosis. They were classified based on the ratio of years of OC use to fertile years in four subgroups: never, <25%, between 25 and 50%, and >50. Results: In total, 1923 women (390 with and 1533 without endometriosis) were included. Previous OC use was higher in those with endometriosis than controls (72.31% vs. 58.64%; p = 0.001). Overall, previous OC usage was not related to histopathological diagnosis of endometriosis (aOR 1.06 [95% CI 0.87-1.29]). Women who used OCs for less than 25% of their fertile age had reduced risk of rASRM stage III endometriosis (aOR 0.50 [95% CI 0.26-0.95]; p = 0.036) or superficial implants (aOR 0.88 [95% CI 0.58-0.95]; p = 0.040). No significant results were retrieved for other rASRM stages. Using OCs for <25%, between 25 and 50%, or >50% of fertile age did not increase the risk of developing superficial endometriosis, endometriomas, or DIE. Conclusions: When OCs are used at least once, histological diagnoses of endometriosis are not increased. A protective effect of OCs when used for less than 25% of fertile age on superficial implants may be present. Prospective research is needed to corroborate the findings due to constraints related to the study's limitations.

Use of Oral and Emergency Contraceptives After the US Supreme Court's Dobbs Decision

Importance

The US Supreme Court Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision allowed states to strengthen restrictions on abortion access, triggering the closure of family planning clinics and leading to confusion about the legality of emergency contraceptives (ECs).

Objectives

To evaluate the association between the Dobbs decision and fills for oral and emergency contraceptives in states that enacted the most restrictive abortion policies after Dobbs.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study used data on contraceptive fills for women of reproductive age (15-49 years) in the US from IQVIA's National Prescription Audit PayerTrak and data from the Guttmacher Institute were used to categorize changes in abortion restrictions in each state. A difference-in-differences analysis compared changes in monthly fill rates for daily oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) and ECs in states that became most restrictive (implemented a full abortion ban after Dobbs) and comparison states (kept a medium level of abortion restrictions after Dobbs) before (March 2021 to November 2021) and after (July 2022 to October 2023) the Dobbs decision.

Exposure

State-level abortion restrictions.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Monthly fills of OCPs and ECs per 100 000 women of reproductive age.

Results

Between March 2021 and October 2023, 142.8 million prescriptions for OCPs and 904 269 prescriptions for ECs were dispensed at US retail pharmacies. Before Dobbs, trends in monthly fill rates were similar for OCPs and ECs between the most restrictive and comparison states. After the Dobbs decision, states that became the most restrictive experienced an additional 4.1% decline in OCP fills with 285.9 fewer fills per 100 000 (95% CI, -495.8 to -6.8; P = .04). In contrast to OCPs, fills for ECs increased during the first year after Dobbs (July 2022 to June 2023) in both groups of states. However, 1 year after Dobbs (July 2023 to October 2023), the most restrictive states experienced an additional 65% decrease in emergency contraceptive fills with 13.2 fewer fills per 100 000 (95% CI, -27.2 to -4.1; P = .01).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study of prescriptions filled at US pharmacies, the Dobbs decision was associated with declines in oral contraceptives, particularly ECs, in states enacting the most restrictive abortion policies. Given the important role of OCPs and ECs in preventing pregnancy and the need for abortion, efforts to improve access may be needed, especially in states where legal abortion is no longer an option.

Contraception as chemoprevention of ovarian cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 women

Ovarian cancer is the seventh most common cancer in women in the world, with an estimated worldwide mortality of over 207'000 women every year. This cancer, due to the current lack of adequate screening techniques, is commonly diagnosed late and has a poor prognosis. The oral contraceptive pill is considered the most effective prevention strategy for ovarian cancer in the general population, being associated with a decreased incidence while also having a substantial positive impact on the mortality rate, which is reduced by up to 50%. BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutated women have an augmented risk of ovary and breast cancer: despite international guidelines that consider prophylactic surgery as the gold standard for ovarian cancer prevention, there are currently no effective non-invasive preventive methods. In BRCA1\2 mutated patients, clinicians should weigh the benefits of contraceptive pills against the risk of long-term thromboembolic side effects and hormonal malignancies such as breast and cervical cancer. A multidisciplinary team should counsel patients on the most appropriate risk-reduction strategy tailored to their needs and expectations, proposing the oral contraceptive pill to selected patients after balancing the risks of adverse effects and the benefits on both contraception and chemoprevention.

A bitter pill to swallow: adjustments to oral contraceptive pill use in polycystic ovary syndrome

INTRODUCTION

This Special Report aims to highlight the importance of tailored therapies in women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS), avoiding prescribing generalized or unsuitable therapies based on oral contraceptive pills (OCPs).

AREAS COVERED

This article discusses the benefits and risks of OCP-based therapy, highlighting the possible undesirable effects, especially in those patients exhibiting risk factors as women with PCOS, and the importance of carefully evaluated tailored therapeutic approaches. Literature searches were performed with the use of PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science between January and February 2024.

EXPERT OPINION

Considering the recent re-analysis of PCOS Rotterdam Criteria by the Expert Group on Inositol in Basic and Clinical Research, and on PCOS (EGOI-PCOS), the traditional Rotterdam phenotypes can be reclassified to achieve more efficacious therapy choices. Using personalized therapies that consider the specific clinical characteristics of the patient allows to improve the management of the syndrome, thus avoiding the generalized use of OCPs, which risk treating only symptoms of PCOS rather than the underlying cause. In cases when contraceptive purpose is desired, patients may benefit from combined therapy with diet or insulin-sensitizer agents, as inositol, to rebalance the metabolic profile, thus reducing the risk of developing future complications.

Organokines and liver enzymes in adolescent girls with polycystic ovary syndrome during randomized treatments

Introduction

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is often associated with metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). MAFLD has been associated with altered hepatic function, systemic dysmetabolism, and abnormal circulating levels of signaling molecules called organokines. Here, we assessed the effects of two randomized treatments on a set of organokines in adolescent girls with PCOS and without obesity, and report the associations with circulating biomarkers of liver damage, which were assessed longitudinally in the aforementioned studies as safety markers.

Materials and methods

Liver enzymes [aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT)] were assessed as safety markers in previous randomized pilot studies comparing the effects of an oral contraceptive (OC) with those of a low-dose combination of spironolactone-pioglitazone-metformin (spiomet) for 1 year. As a post hoc endpoint, the organokines fibroblast growth factor-21 (FGF21), diazepam-binding protein-1 (DBI), and meteorin-like protein (METRNL) were assessed by ELISA after 6 months of OC (N = 26) or spiomet (N = 28). Auxological, endocrine-metabolic, body composition (using DXA), and abdominal fat partitioning (using MRI) were also evaluated. Healthy, age-matched adolescent girls (N = 17) served as controls.

Results

Circulating ALT and GGT levels increased during OC treatment and returned to baseline concentrations in the post-treatment phase; in contrast, spiomet treatment elicited no detectable changes in ALT and GGT concentrations. In relation to organokines after 6 months of treatment, (1) FGF21 levels were significantly higher in PCOS adolescents than in control girls; (2) DBI levels were lower in OC-treated girls than in controls and spiomet-treated girls; and (3) no differences were observed in METRNL concentrations between PCOS girls and controls. Serum ALT and GGT levels were directly correlated with circulating METRNL levels only in OC-treated girls (R = 0.449, P = 0.036 and R = 0.552, P = 0.004, respectively).

Conclusion

The on-treatment increase in ALT and GGT levels occurring only in OC-treated girls is associated with circulating METRNL levels, suggesting enhanced METRNL synthesis as a reaction to the hepatic changes elicited by OC treatment.

Clinical Trial Registration

https://doi.org, identifiers 10.1186/ISRCTN29234515, 10.1186/ISRCTN11062950.

Oral contraceptive use in Premiership and Championship women's rugby union: perceived symptomology, management strategies, and performance and wellness effects

The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of oral contraceptive use in domestic rugby union, to compare symptomology by contraceptive use, and to determine symptom management strategies. Additionally, to characterise the perceived influence of oral contraceptive use and non-use on wellness and performance. A total of 238 Premiership and Championship women's rugby union players completed an online questionnaire. The survey was comprised of questions relating to player characteristics, hormonal or non-hormonal contraceptive characteristics, perceived symptomology, symptom management strategies, and performance and wellness characteristics. The prevalence of oral contraceptive users was 26%. Non-hormonal contraceptive users reported greater perceived negative symptomology (i.e., back pain, nausea, sore breasts) and performance and wellness effects (i.e., fatigue, stress, mood, concentration, power, match-play) than oral contraceptive users. The most common symptom management strategies were medication (33%), nutritional interventions (20%), and training modulation (20%). Twelve percent of players had previously spoken to staff about their menstrual cycle (i.e., regular and irregular) or contraceptive use. The most common barriers to speaking to staff were 'male staff' (29%) and 'club culture' (24%). The importance of assisting non-hormonal contraceptive users in managing symptoms is evident. Emphasis on overcoming barriers to staff-player dialogue regarding menstrual/contraceptive cycle is required.

Knowledge of non-contraceptive benefits of and willingness to consider taking oral contraceptive pills among a low-risk female population: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

In addition to its widely-appreciated contraceptive applications, the oral contraceptive pill (OCP) conveys both oncological and non-oncological benefits. Oncological benefits include a decreased risk of endometrial, ovarian, and colorectal cancer. Non-oncological benefits include reducing androgenic effects and alleviating menstruation-related problems. This study aimed to ascertain knowledge levels of non-contraceptive benefits and risks of OCP use among participants without contraindications to OCPs. This study also assessed factors associated with participants being more likely to consider taking OCPs.

METHODS

263 women aged 21 to 40 years old with no contraindications for OCP usage participated in this study. An anonymous questionnaire collected sociodemographic information and assessed participants' knowledge of the non-contraceptive benefits and risks associated with OCP use. Multivariate linear regression was used to assess factors associated with knowledge levels. Multivariate logistic regression was used to investigate factors associated with being more likely to consider taking OCPs among women who did not presently take them.

RESULTS

Multivariate logistic regression revealed that participants who were more knowledgeable overall about the non-contraceptive benefits of OCPs were more likely to consider taking OCPs (coefficient = 0.184, p-value = 0.00). Knowledge of both oncological and non-oncological benefits of OCP use was relatively poor, especially among older women. Current OCP users were found to be more knowledgeable about their benefits.

CONCLUSIONS

As women with greater knowledge of non-contraceptive benefits of OCPs are more likely to consider taking them, knowledge gaps regarding OCPs should be filled, so that more women may reap the non-contraceptive benefits of OCPs.

Norgestrel (Opill) Is the First Over-the-Counter Oral Contraceptive Pill Approved in the United States

Just less than half of the pregnancies in the United States are unintended. Unintended pregnancy rates are greatest among women younger than 24 years, women of color, and those who have incomes less than 200% of the federal poverty level. Additionally, options to terminate a pregnancy are restricted or limited in some states. In July 2023, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved norgestrel (Opill) as the first over-the-counter oral contraceptive pill available in the United States. Norgestrel is indicated specifically for the prevention of pregnancy, contains only progesterone, and is indicated for daily oral use. This article provides an overview of over-the-counter norgestrel, including administration, adverse effects, contraindications, and practice implications for women's health nurses.

Proposal for targeted, neo-evolutionary-oriented secondary prevention of early-onset endometriosis and adenomyosis. Part II: medical interventions

According to consistent epidemiological data, the slope of the incidence curve of endometriosis rises rapidly and sharply around the age of 25 years. The delay in diagnosis is generally reported to be between 5 and 8 years in adult women, but it appears to be over 10 years in adolescents. If this is true, the actual onset of endometriosis in many young women would be chronologically placed in the early postmenarchal years. Ovulation and menstruation are inflammatory events that, when occurring repeatedly for years, may theoretically favour the early development of endometriosis and adenomyosis. Moreover, repeated acute dysmenorrhoea episodes after menarche may not only be an indicator of ensuing endometriosis or adenomyosis, but may also promote the transition from acute to chronic pelvic pain through central sensitization mechanisms, as well as the onset of chronic overlapping pain conditions. Therefore, secondary prevention aimed at reducing suffering, limiting lesion progression, and preserving future reproductive potential should be focused on the age group that could benefit most from the intervention, i.e. severely symptomatic adolescents. Early-onset endometriosis and adenomyosis should be promptly suspected even when physical and ultrasound findings are negative, and long-term ovulatory suppression may be established until conception seeking. As nowadays this could mean using hormonal therapies for several years, drug safety evaluation is crucial. In adolescents without recognized major contraindications to oestrogens, the use of very low-dose combined oral contraceptives is associated with a marginal increase in the individual absolute risk of thromboembolic events. Oral contraceptives containing oestradiol instead of ethinyl oestradiol may further limit such risk. Oral, subcutaneous, and intramuscular progestogens do not increase the thromboembolic risk, but may interfere with attainment of peak bone mass in young women. Levonorgestrel-releasing intra-uterine devices may be a safe alternative for adolescents, as amenorrhoea is frequently induced without suppression of the ovarian activity. With regard to oncological risk, the net effect of long-term oestrogen-progestogen combinations use is a small reduction in overall cancer risk. Whether surgery should be considered the first-line approach in young women with chronic pelvic pain symptoms seems questionable. Especially when large endometriomas or infiltrating lesions are not detected at pelvic imaging, laparoscopy should be reserved to adolescents who refuse hormonal treatments or in whom first-line medications are not effective, not tolerated, or contraindicated. Diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms, including self-reported outcome measures, for young individuals with a clinical suspicion of early-onset endometriosis or adenomyosis are proposed.

Contraception Use by Title X Clients and Clients of Other Providers, 2015-2019

INTRODUCTION

Title X clinics provide access to a wide range of contraceptive options for individuals of all income levels and documentation statuses. As Title X continues to face political uncertainties, it is important to provide up-to-date information about its clients' use of contraception. This study used recent nationally representative data to compare contraception received by Title X clients with that received by clients of other providers.

METHODS

This article draws on 2015-2017 and 2017-2019 waves of the National Survey of Family Growth. The sample was restricted to 15- to 44-year-old women needing contraception. Logistic regressions estimated associations between receiving services at Title X clinics versus at other providers (including private) and use of a range of contraceptive options, as well as number of months' supply for those using oral contraceptives.

RESULTS

In 2015-2017, Title X was associated with using any contraception (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 4.11; p = .004). In both waves, Title X clients were more likely to use long-acting reversible contraceptives (AOR, 1.78 in 2015-2017 [p = .023] and AOR, 2.59 in 2017-2019 [p = .003]) and hormonal methods other than oral contraceptives (AOR, 2.31 in 2015-2017 [p = .007] and AOR, 3.04 in 2017-2019 [p = .001]). In both waves, Title X clients using oral contraceptives were also more likely than non-Title X clients to receive more than a 3-month supply (AOR, 3.54 in 2015-2017 [p = .008] and AOR, 2.61 in 2017-2019 [p = .043]). Title X was not associated in either wave with use of barrier or time-based methods, such as periodic abstinence or withdrawal.

CONCLUSIONS

Patterns of contraceptive use by Title X clients compared with those of clients of other providers indicate that the Title X program has allowed access to a wide range of contraceptive methods. Ongoing research is necessary to see whether these patterns change over time.

Impact of the Affordable Care Act on Prescription Contraceptive Use and Costs Among Privately Insured Women, 2006-2020

BACKGROUND

In the years immediately following the Affordable Care Act (ACA)'s contraceptive coverage requirement, out-of-pocket costs fell for all Food and Drug Administration-approved contraceptive methods and use of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) increased. This analysis examines whether these trends have continued through 2020 for privately insured women.

METHODS

Using 2006-2020 MarketScan data, we examined trends in prescription contraceptive use and out-of-pocket costs among women 13 to 49 years old. Multivariable analyses model the likelihood of contraceptive use and paying $0 post-ACA requirement (vs. pre-ACA requirement) for contraception, controlling for age group, U.S. region, urban versus rural, and cohort year.

RESULTS

The likelihood of LARC insertion increased post-ACA requirement (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.127, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.121-1.133), with insertion rates peaking at 3.73% for intrauterine devices (IUDs) and 1.08% for implants in 2019, before declining with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Although the likelihood of paying $0 for LARC increased after the ACA requirement (IUD: aOR 5.495, 95% CI 5.278-5.716; implant: aOR 7.199, 95% CI 6.992-7.412), the proportion of individuals paying $0 declined to 69% for IUDs and 73% for implants in 2020, after having peaked at 88% in 2014 and 90% in 2016, respectively. For oral contraceptives, both use (aOR 1.028, 95% CI 1.026-1.030) and paying $0 (aOR 20.399, 95% CI 20.301-20.499) increased significantly after the ACA requirement.

CONCLUSION

With the exception of oral contraceptives, the proportion of individuals paying $0 for all contraceptive methods declined after peaking in 2014 for IUDs, 2016 for the implant, and 2019 for non-LARC methods. Future monitoring is needed to understand the continuing impact of the ACA requirement on prescription contraceptive use and costs.

Over-the-Counter Progestin-Only Oral Contraceptives

This JAMA Patient Page describes progestin-only oral contraceptive pills, which recently have been approved to be sold over the counter.

Quantitative risk-benefit profiles of oral contraceptives, insulin sensitizers and antiandrogens for women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A model-based meta-analysis

Oral contraceptives (OCs), insulin sensitizers, and antiandrogens (AAs), alone or in combination, are commonly used for treating non-fertility indications in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). However, unclear risk-benefit profiles jeopardize their appropriate clinical applications. This study aimed to quantitatively evaluate the effects of the aforementioned medications and to compare their risk-benefit profiles. Randomized controlled trials published until 14th March 2022 were searched in PubMed and Embase. A model-based meta-analysis was developed to examine the time-effect profiles of each medication. The maximal percentage change of the effect (Emax) and time to achieve half of Emax (T50) were estimated. Primary outcomes included menstruation, hirsutism score, free androgen index (FAI), body mass index (BMI), insulin sensitivity, and lipid profiles. Overall, 200 studies (9,685 patients and 385 arms) were identified for modeling. OCs performed exceptionally well in improving menstruation (Emax: 149%; T50: 7.44 weeks), hirsutism score (Emax: 66.2%; T50: 26.2 weeks), and FAI (Emax: 75.7%; T50: 0.51 weeks). However, OCs elevated the triglyceride (TG) level (Emax: 12.6%; T50:1.19 weeks). After 12-week OC treatment, the TG level of approximately 30% of patients, whose baselines were normal, exceeded the reference limit. This suggested that OC-induced dyslipidemia should be routinely monitored. The maximal BMI-lowering effect of metformin was similar to that of placebo (Emax: 3.80%); however, metformin had a shorter T50 (6.67 weeks versus 12.9 weeks). Further, active lifestyle intervention plus placebo significantly decreased BMI (Emax: 8.78%). Adding metformin to active lifestyle intervention accelerated the BMI-lowering effect within 24 weeks, whereas with the extension of this addition beyond 24 weeks, BMI did not reduce further, which indicated that benefits were limited from this prolonged addition. AAs were less potent in reducing hirsutism score (Emax: 40.2% versus 66.2%) and FAI (Emax: 34.5% versus 75.7%) compared to OCs. OC plus metformin combined OC-derived androgen-suppressing effects and metformin-derived insulin-sensitizing effects, and partially relieved the OC-induced TG increase (Emax: 9.76%). Baseline dependency was found in most clinical responses, implying that pharmacotherapies tailored based on baselines achieved more clinical improvements. This study presents new quantitative evidence on pharmacotherapies for PCOS. Currently, long-term risk-benefit profiles and emerging therapies are inadequately reported and require more further research.

Importance of a multi-tiered treatment approach for intellectually and developmentally disabled patients with hidradenitis suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, debilitating skin condition that is characterized by painful pustules, nodules, abscesses, and sinus tracts. The complicated and fast-evolving treatment of HS consists of a multi-tiered approach that includes, antibacterial, antihormonal, anti-inflammatory, and surgical options. Studies have demonstrated an earlier age of onset and increased prevalence of HS in patients with intellectual and developmental disability (IDD) compared to patients without IDD. To explore the use of an intensive multi-tiered HS management algorithm that requires monthly office visits, monthly intravenous therapy, and several daily treatment modalities in an HS population with IDD, we conducted an IRB-approved retrospective chart review of HS patients treated at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine-Montefiore HS Center (HSC) with diagnoses of concurrent IDD to investigate their demographic and diagnostic characteristics, as well as the spectrum of therapies employed in this cohort. A total of 22 HS patients with concomitant IDD, including trisomy 21, unspecified intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorder, and trisomy 13 were identified. Therapies utilized in this cohort for HS included topical and oral antibiotics, spironolactone, finasteride, oral contraceptive pills, infliximab, adalimumab, isotretinoin, intralesional and intramuscular triamcinolone injections, and excisional surgery. In conclusion, our findings indicate that despite the practical challenges, daily oral antibiotic regimens, anti-androgen combinations, oral retinoids, infliximab, adalimumab, and surgery collectively play important roles in treating HS patients with IDD. Our cases underscore the importance of utilizing the full range of modalities as the HS treatment algorithm continues to evolve.

Statins for women with polycystic ovary syndrome not actively trying to conceive

BACKGROUND

Statins are lipid-lowering agents with pleiotropic actions. Experts have proposed that in addition to improving the dyslipidaemia associated with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), statins may also exert other beneficial metabolic and endocrine effects, such as reducing testosterone levels. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2011.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of statin therapy in women with PCOS who are not actively trying to conceive.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group specialised register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHLs, and four ongoing trials registers on 7 November 2022. We also handsearched relevant conference proceedings and the reference lists of relevant trials for any additional studies, and we contacted experts in the field for any further ongoing studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the effects of statin therapy in women with PCOS not actively trying to conceive. Eligible comparisons were statin versus placebo or no treatment, statin plus another agent versus the other agent alone, and statin versus another agent. We performed statistical analysis using Review Manager 5, and we assessed the certainty of the evidence using GRADE methods.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methodology. Our primary outcomes were resumption of menstrual regularity and resumption of spontaneous ovulation. Our secondary outcomes were clinical and physiological measures including hirsutism, acne severity, testosterone levels, and adverse events.

MAIN RESULTS

Six RCTs fulfilled the criteria for inclusion. They included 396 women with PCOS who received six weeks, three months, or six months of treatment; 374 women completed the studies. Three studies evaluated the effects of simvastatin and three studies evaluated the effects of atorvastatin. We summarised the results of the studies under the following comparisons. Statins versus placebo (3 RCTs) One trial measured resumption of menstrual regularity as menstrual cycle length in days. We are uncertain if statins compared with placebo shorten the mean length of the menstrual cycle (mean difference (MD) -2.00 days, 95% confidence interval (CI) -24.86 to 20.86; 37 participants; very low-certainty evidence). No studies reported resumption of spontaneous ovulation, improvement in hirsutism, or improvement in acne. We are uncertain if statins compared with placebo reduce testosterone levels after six weeks (MD 0.06, 95% CI -0.72 to 0.84; 1 RCT, 20 participants; very low-certainty evidence), after 3 months (MD -0.53, 95% CI -1.61 to 0.54; 2 RCTs, 64 participants; very low-certainty evidence), or after 6 months (MD 0.10, 95% CI -0.43 to 0.63; 1 RCT, 28 participants; very low-certainty evidence) Two studies recorded adverse events, and neither reported significant differences between the groups. Statins plus metformin versus metformin alone (1 RCT) The single RCT included in this comparison measured resumption of menstrual regularity as the number of spontaneous menses per six months. We are uncertain if statins plus metformin compared with metformin improves resumption of menstrual regularity (MD 0.60 menses, 95% CI 0.08 to 1.12; 69 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The study did not report resumption of spontaneous ovulation. We are uncertain if statins plus metformin compared with metformin alone improves hirsutism measured using the Ferriman-Gallwey score (MD -0.16, 95% CI -0.91 to 0.59; 69 participants; very low-certainty evidence), acne severity measured on a scale of 0 to 3 (MD -0.31, 95% CI -0.67 to 0.05; 69 participants; very low-certainty evidence), or testosterone levels (MD -0.03, 95% CI -0.37 to 0.31; 69 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The study reported that no significant adverse events occurred. Statins plus oral contraceptive pill versus oral contraceptive pill alone (1 RCT) The single RCT included in this comparison did not report resumption of menstrual regularity or spontaneous ovulation. We are uncertain if statins plus the oral contraceptive pill (OCP) improves hirsutism compared with OCP alone (MD -0.12, 95% CI -0.41 to 0.17; 48 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The study did not report improvement in acne severity. We are also uncertain if statins plus OCP compared with OCP alone reduces testosterone levels, because the certainty of the evidence was very low (MD -0.82, 95% CI -1.38 to -0.26; 48 participants). The study reported that no participants experienced significant side effects. Statins versus metformin (2 RCTs) We are uncertain if statins improve menstrual regularity compared with metformin (number of spontaneous menses per six months) compared to metformin (MD 0.50 menses, 95% CI -0.05 to 1.05; 1 RCT, 61 participants, very low-certainty evidence). No studies reported resumption of spontaneous ovulation. We are uncertain if statins compared with metformin reduce hirsutism measured using the Ferriman-Gallwey score (MD -0.26, 95% CI -0.97 to 0.45; 1 RCT, 61 participants; very low-certainty evidence), acne severity measured on a scale of 0 to 3 (MD -0.18, 95% CI -0.53 to 0.17; 1 RCT, 61 participants; very low-certainty evidence), or testosterone levels (MD -0.24, 95% CI -0.58 to 0.10; 1 RCT, 61 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Both trials reported that no significant adverse events had occurred. Statins versus oral contraceptive pill plus flutamide (1 RCT) According to the study report, no participants experienced any significant side effects. There were no available data for any other main outcomes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The evidence for all main outcomes of this review was of very low certainty. Due to the limited evidence, we are uncertain if statins compared with placebo, or statins plus metformin compared with metformin alone, improve resumption of menstrual regularity. The trial evaluating statin plus OCP versus OCP alone reported neither of our primary outcomes. No other studies reported resumption of spontaneous ovulation. We are uncertain if statins improve hirsutism, acne severity, or testosterone. All trials that measured adverse events reported no significant differences between the groups.

Comparison of the efficacy of oral contraceptives and levonorgestrel intrauterine system in intermenstrual bleeding caused by uterine niche

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of oral contraceptives and a levonorgestrel intrauterine system in treating intermenstrual bleeding due to uterine niche.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 72 patients with intermenstrual bleeding due to uterine niche from January 2017 to December 2021, of whom 41 were treated with oral contraceptives and 31 with a levonorgestrel intrauterine system. Post-treatment follow-ups at 1, 3, and 6 months were conducted to compare the efficiency and adverse effects between the two groups.

RESULTS

In the oral contraceptive group, the effectiveness rate was higher than 80% at 1- and 3-months post-treatment and higher than 90% at 6 months. In the levonorgestrel intrauterine system group, the effectiveness rates were 58.06%, 54.84%, and 61.29% at 1, 3, and 6 months of treatment, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral contraceptives were more effective than the levonorgestrel intrauterine system in treating intermenstrual bleeding caused by uterine niche.

Trends in Treatments With Disease-Specific and Interfering Drugs in Patients With Hereditary Angioedema in Sweden

BACKGROUND

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is caused by low levels of or defects in C1 inhibitor. Although disease activity may be modified by prophylaxis, emergency treatment, treatment for comorbidities, and oral contraceptives, the extent of their use is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate trends in the use of disease-specific and interfering drugs in patients with HAE compared with the general population in Sweden.

METHODS

In a nationwide, longitudinal study, 239 patients with HAE and 2 383 controls were compared with the Prescribed Drug Register (2005-2019). These data reflect rates of dispensed prescriptions from pharmacies in Sweden.

RESULTS

Attenuated androgens were used by approximately 10% of patients with HAE. The number of individuals treated with prophylactic plasma-derived C1 inhibitor increased during this period to reach almost 25% in men and 35% in women in 2019. Tranexamic acid was prescribed to 5% to 15% of patients, primarily children and young adults. Rates of prescriptions for icatibant, an emergency medication, showed a steady increase since its introduction in 2010, in particular among middle-aged women, suggesting poorly controlled disease. The use of diuretics, calcium channel blockers, and gestagens was more common in patients with HAE than in controls, whereas angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were rarely collected.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite concerns regarding side effects, approximately 10% of patients with HAE received attenuated androgens for long-term prophylaxis. The common use of emergency medication also suggests poorly controlled disease in many patients, highlighting the need for increased focus on prophylactic treatment.

Recent Intimate Partner Violence and Oral Contraceptive Pill Adherence in a Cohort of Reproductive-Aged Women

Objective: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is an important public health problem that impacts reproductive decision-making. Although previous literature has reported a negative impact on contraceptive adherence overall, this study specifically aims to investigate the association between IPV and oral contraceptive pill (OCP) adherence. Methods: We analyzed baseline survey data from 373 OCP users participating in the MyNewOptions study. Recent IPV was defined as any positive response to HARK, a 4-question tool assessing emotional, sexual, and physical abuse in the past year, or self-report of sexual coercion in the past 6 months. High OCP adherence was defined by self-report of missing ≤1 pill per month, which was then corroborated by pharmacy claims data. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to assess the influence of recent IPV history and patient-level variables on OCP adherence. Results: Just over half of our participants were highly adherent to OCPs (53.6%), and approximately one-quarter reported recent IPV exposure (25.2%). Women with recent IPV were significantly less likely to be OCP adherent than those without IPV (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.32-0.92). Protestant religion was also associated with high OCP adherence (AOR 2.41, 95% CI: 1.24-4.65, compared with no religious affiliation), while younger age groups (18-25 and 26-33 years) were less likely to have high OCP adherence compared with the 34-40 age group (AOR 0.45, 95% CI: 0.20-1.00 and AOR 0.40, 95% CI: 0.18-0.91, respectively). Conclusion: Recent IPV exposure is associated with low OCP adherence among women of reproductive age. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02100124.

Association of Short-Term Changes in Menstrual Frequency, Medication Use, Weight and Exercise on Bone Mineral Density in College-Aged Women

To evaluate if experiencing a short-term exposure (18-months) to factors such as menstrual irregularities, dieting, changes in exercise or body weight, and medication usage is associated with bone mineral density (BMD) in college-aged females. A retrospective survey assessing health behaviors during a recent 18-month time period and a DXA scan were completed in 641 females. A total of 45.5% of participants reported amenorrhea during the 18-month time period. Those who experienced amenorrhea had lower femoral neck BMD (p = 0.018), trochanter (p = 0.018) and spine BMD (p = 0.022) compared to eumenorrheic women. Lifetime oral contraceptive usage longer than six months was negatively associated with BMD at femoral neck (p = 0.018) and total hip (p = 0.021). Women who lost weight trended towards having the lowest BMD at all sites compared to women who gained weight. Following a very-low calorie diet during the time period was negatively correlated with spine BMD (p = 0.001). Time spent in vigorous and very vigorous activity was weakly correlated with some hip BMD sites but time spent in extremely vigorous activity was not. In conclusion, females who experienced weight loss, amenorrhea, or a very low-calorie diet within an 18-month period of time in young adulthood had lower BMD. Additionally, oral contraceptive usage for longer than six months during their lifetime was associated with lower BMD.

Efficacy of Post-Operative Medication to Prevent Recurrence of Endometrioma: Cyclic Oral Contraceptive (OC) After Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Agonist Versus Dienogest

BACKGROUND

There are several medical treatment options for endometrioma. Progestin, especially dienogest, is an effective drug for preventing recurrence of endometrioma after surgery. Additionally, oral contraceptive (OC) use after conservative surgery has been reported to reduce significantly the risk of endometrioma recurrence. The aim of this study was to compare the long-term effects of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist followed by OC to those of dienogest alone to prevent recurrence of endometrioma after laparoscopic surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed on patients who underwent conservative laparoscopic surgery for endometrioma between January 2000 and December 2020, in the Endometriosis Clinic, Department of Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center. A total of 624 patients who received medical treatment at least six months after laparoscopic conservative surgery for endometrioma was included. Among them, 372 patients used OC after GnRH agonist therapy, and 252 patients used dienogest. Within the OC group, 148 used a 21/7 regiment and 224 used a 24/4 regimen. A cumulative endometrioma recurrence curve was presented using the Kaplan-Meier method to compare the recurrence of those groups.

RESULTS

The cumulative recurrence rate of endometrioma for 60 months was 2.08% (n = 4) in the OC after GnRH agonist group and 0.40% (n = 1) in the dienogest group. There was no statistical difference in cumulative recurrence of endometrioma between the two groups. In subgroup analysis, the cumulative recurrence rate of endometrioma over 60 months was 4.21% (n = 2) in the 21/7 OC group and 1.09% (n = 2) in the 24/4 OC group and showed no significant difference.

CONCLUSION

Long-term use of OC after GnRH agonist as well as that of dienogest treatment are effective postoperative medical therapies for preventing endometrioma recurrence. Thus, the choice of regimen can be individualized or used interchangeably depending on patient condition, need for contraception, and compliance with drug therapy.

Effects of oral contraceptive use on muscle strength, muscle thickness, and fiber size and composition in young women undergoing 12 weeks of strength training: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

It is suspected that hormonal fluctuations during menstruation may cause different responses to strength training in women who use oral contraceptives (OC) versus those who do not. However, previous studies that investigated the existence of such differences produced conflicting results. In this study, we hypothesized that OC use has no effect on muscle strength and hypertrophy among women undergoing strength training. Thus, we compared the differences in muscle strength and thickness among women who used OCs and those who did not.

METHODS

We investigated the influence of OC use on muscle strength (Fmax), muscle thickness (Mtk), type 1-to-type 2 muscle fiber (NO) ratio, muscle fiber thickness (MFT), and nuclear-to-fiber (N/F) ratio. Seventy-four healthy young women (including 34 who used OCs and 40 who did not) underwent 12 weeks of submaximal strength training, after which Fmax was evaluated using a leg-press machine with a combined force and load cell, while Mtk was measured using real-time ultrasonography. Moreover, the NO ratio, MFT, and N/F ratio were evaluated using muscle needle biopsies.

RESULTS

Participants in the non-OC and OC groups experienced increases in Fmax (+ 23.30 ± 10.82 kg and + 28.02 ± 11.50 kg respectively, p = 0.073), Mtk (+ 0.48 ± 0.47 cm2 and + 0.50 ± 0.44 cm2 respectively, p = 0.888), Fmax/Mtk (+ 2.78 ± 1.93 kg/cm2 and + 3.32 ± 2.37 kg/cm2 respectively, p = 0.285), NO ratio (type 2 fibers: + 1.86 ± 6.49% and - 4.17 ± 9.48% respectively, p = 0.169), MFT (type 2 fibers: + 7.15 ± 7.50 µm and + 4.07 ± 9.30 µm respectively, p = 0.435), and N/F ratio (+ 0.61 ± 1.02 and + 0.15 ± 0.97 respectively, p = 0.866) after training. There were no significant differences between the non-OC and OC groups in any of these parameters (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The effects of 12 weeks of strength training on Fmax, muscle thickness, muscle fiber size, and composition were similar in young women irrespective of their OC use.