Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale

We have designed a scoring scale for knee ligament surgery follow-up emphasizing evaluation of symptoms of instability. Instability is defined as "giving way" during activity. Our scoring scale was compared to a slightly modified Larson scale in patients with anteromedial and/or anterolateral instability, posterolateral and straight posterior instability, chondromalacia patellae, and meniscus lesion. The two scales gave basically the same results in patients with meniscus rupture. In patients with unstable knees, the new scale gave a significantly lower total score. Thus, the new scale evaluates functional impairment due to clinical instability better than the modified Larson scale. The total score, with the new scoring scale, corresponded to the patients' own opinion of function and to the presence or absence of signs of instability.

The long-term consequence of anterior cruciate ligament and meniscus injuries: osteoarthritis

The objectives of this study are to review the long-term consequences of injuries to the anterior cruciate ligament and menisci, the pathogenic mechanisms, and the causes of the considerable variability in outcome. Injuries of the anterior cruciate ligament and menisci are common in both athletes and the general population. At 10 to 20 years after the diagnosis, on average, 50% of those with a diagnosed anterior cruciate ligament or meniscus tear have osteoarthritis with associated pain and functional impairment: the young patient with an old knee. These individuals make up a substantial proportion of the overall osteoarthritis population. There is a lack of evidence to support a protective role of repair or reconstructive surgery of the anterior cruciate ligament or meniscus against osteoarthritis development. A consistent finding in a review of the literature is the often poor reporting of critical study variables, precluding data pooling or a meta-analysis. Osteoarthritis development in the injured joints is caused by intra-articular pathogenic processes initiated at the time of injury, combined with long-term changes in dynamic joint loading. Variation in outcome is reinforced by additional variables associated with the individual such as age, sex, genetics, obesity, muscle strength, activity, and reinjury. A better understanding of these variables may improve future prevention and treatment strategies. In evaluating medical treatment, we now expect large randomized clinical trials complemented by postmarketing monitoring. We should strive toward a comparable level of quality of evidence in surgical treatment of knee injuries. In instances in which a randomized clinical trial is not feasible, natural history and other observational cohort studies need to be as carefully designed and reported as the classic randomized clinical trial, to yield useful information.

Cartilage injuries: a review of 31,516 knee arthroscopies

Although articular cartilage injuries of the knee are common, injured cartilage has a limited ability to heal. Recent data suggest that articular cartilage grafting may provide treatment for these injuries. To define the patient population that might benefit from cartilage grafting, 31,516 knee arthroscopies were reviewed. Between June 1991 and October 1995, 53,569 hyaline cartilage lesions were documented in 19,827 patients. The majority were articular cartilage lesions; grade III lesions of the patella were the most common. Grade IV lesions were predominantly located on the medial femoral condyle. Patients under 40 years of age with grade IV lesions accounted for 5% of all arthroscopies; 74% of these patients had a single chondral lesions (4% of the arthroscopies). No associated ligamentous or meniscal pathology was found in 36.6% of these patients.

Incidental meniscal findings on knee MRI in middle-aged and elderly persons

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the knee is often performed in patients who have knee symptoms of unclear cause. When meniscal tears are found, it is commonly assumed that the symptoms are attributable to them. However, there is a paucity of data regarding the prevalence of meniscal damage in the general population and the association of meniscal tears with knee symptoms and with radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis.

METHODS

We studied persons from Framingham, Massachusetts, who were drawn from census-tract data and random-digit telephone dialing. Subjects were 50 to 90 years of age and ambulatory; selection was not made on the basis of knee or other joint problems. We assessed the integrity of the menisci in the right knee on 1.5-tesla MRI scans obtained from 991 subjects (57% of whom were women). Symptoms involving the right knee were evaluated by questionnaire.

RESULTS

The prevalence of a meniscal tear or of meniscal destruction in the right knee as detected on MRI ranged from 19% (95% confidence interval [CI], 15 to 24) among women 50 to 59 years of age to 56% (95% CI, 46 to 66) among men 70 to 90 years of age; prevalences were not materially lower when subjects who had had previous knee surgery were excluded. Among persons with radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2 or higher, on a scale of 0 to 4, with higher numbers indicating more definite signs of osteoarthritis), the prevalence of a meniscal tear was 63% among those with knee pain, aching, or stiffness on most days and 60% among those without these symptoms. The corresponding prevalences among persons without radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis were 32% and 23%. Sixty-one percent of the subjects who had meniscal tears in their knees had not had any pain, aching, or stiffness during the previous month.

CONCLUSIONS

Incidental meniscal findings on MRI of the knee are common in the general population and increase with increasing age.

Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy versus sham surgery for a degenerative meniscal tear

BACKGROUND

Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy is one of the most common orthopedic procedures, yet rigorous evidence of its efficacy is lacking.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial in 146 patients 35 to 65 years of age who had knee symptoms consistent with a degenerative medial meniscus tear and no knee osteoarthritis. Patients were randomly assigned to arthroscopic partial meniscectomy or sham surgery. The primary outcomes were changes in the Lysholm and Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET) scores (each ranging from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating more severe symptoms) and in knee pain after exercise (rated on a scale from 0 to 10, with 0 denoting no pain) at 12 months after the procedure.

RESULTS

In the intention-to-treat analysis, there were no significant between-group differences in the change from baseline to 12 months in any primary outcome. The mean changes (improvements) in the primary outcome measures were as follows: Lysholm score, 21.7 points in the partial-meniscectomy group as compared with 23.3 points in the sham-surgery group (between-group difference, -1.6 points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -7.2 to 4.0); WOMET score, 24.6 and 27.1 points, respectively (between-group difference, -2.5 points; 95% CI, -9.2 to 4.1); and score for knee pain after exercise, 3.1 and 3.3 points, respectively (between-group difference, -0.1; 95% CI, -0.9 to 0.7). There were no significant differences between groups in the number of patients who required subsequent knee surgery (two in the partial-meniscectomy group and five in the sham-surgery group) or serious adverse events (one and zero, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In this trial involving patients without knee osteoarthritis but with symptoms of a degenerative medial meniscus tear, the outcomes after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy were no better than those after a sham surgical procedure. (Funded by the Sigrid Juselius Foundation and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00549172.).

Meniscal tears: the effect of meniscectomy and of repair on intraarticular contact areas and stress in the human knee. A preliminary report

The role of the meniscus in load transmission across the knee has long been a subject of debate. In this study, we examined the biomechanical consequences of the operative treatments for bucket-handle and peripheral meniscal tears. Contact areas and instantaneous intraarticular pressure distributions were measured in two groups of human cadaver knees. In Group I, consisting of four knees, we created a bucket-handle tear involving the inner one-third of the meniscus, followed by partial, and then total meniscectomy. Knees were tested in an Instron testing machine after each procedure, using a 400 pound load at 0 degrees or 30 degrees flexion. Contact areas and local stresses were measured using Prescale, a pressure-sensitive film. After partial meniscectomy, contact areas decreased approximately 10%, and peak local contact stresses (PLCS) increased approximately 65%. After total meniscectomy, contact areas decreased approximately 75%, and PLCS increased approximately 235%. In Group II, consisting of three additional knees, we created a 2 cm peripheral tear of the posterior meniscal horn, followed by open repair, arthroscopic repair, segmental, and then total meniscectomy. Repair of the tear was accomplished with either vertically placed sutures by an open technique or horizontally placed sutures by an arthroscopic technique. Knees were tested in the neutral position in the Instron machine and contact areas and local stresses measured using Prescale. PLCSs and contact areas were found to be the same using either repair technique. There was, however, a 110% increase in PLCS after segmental meniscectomy of that portion of the meniscus involved in the peripheral tear.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Knee osteoarthritis after meniscectomy: prevalence of radiographic changes after twenty-one years, compared with matched controls

OBJECTIVE

To study the long-term outcome of surgical removal of a meniscus in the knee with regard to radiographic signs of osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

Of the 123 patients who underwent an open meniscectomy due to an isolated meniscus tear in 1973 at Lund University Hospital, 107 were followed up 21 years later by clinical examination and by review of knee radiographs obtained with weight bearing. Seventy-nine of the 107 patients were men, and the mean age of the total study group at examination was 55 years (range 35-77). Sixty-eight sex- and age-matched individuals with healthy knees served as controls.

RESULTS

Mild radiographic changes were found in 76 (71%) of the knees, while more advanced changes, comparable with a Kellgren-Lawrence grade of 2 or higher, were seen in 51 (48%). The corresponding prevalence values in the control group were 12 (18%) and 5 (7%), respectively. The relative risk for the presence of the more advanced radiographic changes representing definite radiographic tibiofemoral OA was 14.0 (95% confidence interval 3.5-121.2), using age- and sex-matched pairs for comparison. No correlation with sex, localization to compartment, type of meniscus tear, or work load was found. Knee symptoms were reported twice as often in the study group as in the controls.

CONCLUSION

Surgical removal of a meniscus following knee injury represents a significant risk factor for radiographic tibiofemoral OA, with a relative risk of 14.0 after 21 years.

Articular cartilage defects: study of 25,124 knee arthroscopies

This retrospective study aimed to provide data on the prevalence, epidemiology and etiology of the knee articular cartilage lesions and describe and estimate, on the ground of a large database, the number of patients who might benefit from cartilage repair surgery. The analysis of 25,124 knee arthroscopies performed from 1989 to 2004 was conducted. Information concerning cartilage lesion, associated articular lesions and performed procedure were collected. Cartilage lesions were classified in accordance with the Outerbridge classification. Chondral lesions were found in 60% of the patients. Documented cartilage lesions were classified as localized focal osteochondral or chondral lesion in 67%, osteoarthritis in 29%, osteochondritis dissecans in 2% and other types in 1%. Non-isolated cartilage lesions accounted for 70% and isolated lesions accounted for 30%. The patellar articular surface (36%) and the medial femoral condyle (34%) were the most frequent localization of the cartilage lesions. Grade II according to Outerbridge classification was the most frequent grade of the cartilage lesion (42%). The most common associated articular lesions were the medial meniscus tear (37%) and the injury of the anterior crucial ligament (36%). Articular cartilage lesions are a common pathology of the knee joint. The potential candidates for cartilage repair surgery, patients with one to three localized grade III and IV cartilage lesions, under the age of 40 were found in 7% and under the age of 50 years in 9% of all analysed patients. However, because these patients are a heterogeneous group and the natural history of cartilage lesions remains so far unknown, also the total number of patients in our study, who might benefit from cartilage repair, remains unknown precisely.

Surgery versus physical therapy for a meniscal tear and osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Whether arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for symptomatic patients with a meniscal tear and knee osteoarthritis results in better functional outcomes than nonoperative therapy is uncertain.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial involving symptomatic patients 45 years of age or older with a meniscal tear and evidence of mild-to-moderate osteoarthritis on imaging. We randomly assigned 351 patients to surgery and postoperative physical therapy or to a standardized physical-therapy regimen (with the option to cross over to surgery at the discretion of the patient and surgeon). The patients were evaluated at 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome was the difference between the groups with respect to the change in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) physical-function score (ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms) 6 months after randomization.

RESULTS

In the intention-to-treat analysis, the mean improvement in the WOMAC score after 6 months was 20.9 points (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.9 to 23.9) in the surgical group and 18.5 (95% CI, 15.6 to 21.5) in the physical-therapy group (mean difference, 2.4 points; 95% CI, -1.8 to 6.5). At 6 months, 51 active participants in the study who were assigned to physical therapy alone (30%) had undergone surgery, and 9 patients assigned to surgery (6%) had not undergone surgery. The results at 12 months were similar to those at 6 months. The frequency of adverse events did not differ significantly between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In the intention-to-treat analysis, we did not find significant differences between the study groups in functional improvement 6 months after randomization; however, 30% of the patients who were assigned to physical therapy alone underwent surgery within 6 months. (Funded by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases; METEOR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00597012.).

Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)--validation of a Swedish version

The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a self-administered instrument measuring outcome after knee injury at impairment, disability, and handicap level in five subscales. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of a Swedish version was assessed in 142 patients who underwent arthroscopy because of injury to the menisci, anterior cruciate ligament, or cartilage of the knee. The clinimetric properties were found to be good and comparable to the American version of the KOOS. Comparison to the Short Form-36 and the Lysholm knee scoring scale revealed expected correlations and construct validity. Item by item, symptoms and functional limitations were compared between diagnostic groups. High responsiveness was found three months after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for all subscales but Activities of Daily Living.

Impact of type of meniscal tear on radiographic and symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a sixteen-year followup of meniscectomy with matched controls

OBJECTIVE

To investigate long-term radiographic and patient-relevant outcome of isolated limited meniscectomy with regard to type of meniscal tear and extent of surgical resection.

METHODS

We studied 155 patients with intact cruciate ligaments (mean +/- SD age 54 +/- 12 years) who had undergone meniscectomy an average of 16 +/- 1 years earlier. The patients were examined using standardized radiography and validated self-administered questionnaires. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) was used to quantify knee-related symptoms, and the definition of a symptomatic knee was determined. We used 68 control subjects matched for age, sex, and body mass index to calculate the relative risks (RRs).

RESULTS

Radiographic tibiofemoral osteoarthritis (OA) (Kellgren/Lawrence grade > or =2) was present in 66 index knees (43%), of which 39 (59%) were considered to be symptomatic according to the KOOS. In total, 77 patients (50%) had a symptomatic index knee. In a multivariate model, degenerative meniscal tears were associated with both radiographic OA (P = 0.030) and combined radiographic and symptomatic OA (P < or = 0.015). The RRs for combined radiographic and symptomatic OA after degenerative and traumatic types of meniscal tear were 7.0 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 2.1-23.5) and 2.7 (95% CI 0.9-7.7), respectively, compared with matched controls.

CONCLUSION

An isolated meniscal tear treated by limited meniscectomy is associated with a high risk of radiographic and symptomatic tibiofemoral OA at 16-year followup. Factors associated with worse outcome were degenerative meniscal lesions and extensive resections. We suggest that degenerative meniscal tears may be associated with incipient OA, and that the meniscal tear signals the first symptom of the disease.

Meniscal tear and extrusion are strongly associated with progression of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis as assessed by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND

The relation between knee meniscal structural damage and cartilage degradation is plausible but not yet clearly proven.

OBJECTIVES

To quantitate the cartilage volume changes in knee osteoarthritis using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and determine whether meniscal alteration predicts cartilage volume loss over time.

METHODS

32 patients meeting ACR criteria for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis were studied. MRI knee acquisitions were done every six months for two years. The cartilage volumes of different knee regions were measured. Three indices of structural change in the medial and lateral menisci were evaluated--degeneration, tear, and extrusion--using a semiquantitative scale.

RESULTS

24 patients (75%) had mild to moderate or severe meniscal damage (tear or extrusion) at baseline. A highly significant difference in global cartilage volume loss was observed between severe medial meniscal tear and absence of tear (mean (SD), -10.1 (2.1)% v -5.1 (2.4)%, p = 0.002). An even greater difference was found between the medial meniscal changes and medial compartment cartilage volume loss (-14.3 (3.0)% in the presence of severe tear v -6.3 (2.7)% in the absence of tear; p<0.0001). Similarly, a major difference was found between the presence of a medial meniscal extrusion and loss of medial compartment cartilage volume (-15.4 (4.1)% in the presence of extrusion v -4.5 (1.7)% with no extrusion; p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Meniscal tear and extrusion appear to be associated with progression of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis.

Osteoarthritis of the knee after injury to the anterior cruciate ligament or meniscus: the influence of time and age

The degree of cartilage changes by arthroscopic and radiologic examination was evaluated in a retrospective, cross-sectional study of 1012 patients with knee complaints at different times after knee injury. Patients were classified by age, sex, trauma date and type of injury. The condition of the cartilage was graded on a 1-10 scale based on findings at arthroscopy and on weight-bearing radiographs. Patients with injury to the anterior cruciate ligament (isolated or combined with injury to meniscus or collateral ligaments) showed the first radiologic signs (joint space narrowing) of osteoarthritis (OA) at an average age of about 40 years, while patients with isolated meniscus injury had the same stage of disease at an average age of about 50 years. Both study groups displayed the first radiologic signs of OA on average about 10 years after the injury and showed increasingly serious arthroscopic and radiologic signs of joint damage with increased time between injury and examination. For patients who sustained an isolated meniscus injury between the ages of 17 and 30, the average time until development of radiologic signs of OA was about 15 years, while for those who had the same injury over the age of 30, the corresponding time interval was only about 5 years. We conclude from this that knee OA becomes increasingly severe with increased time between joint injury and examination. OA changes appear sooner in older patients with knee injury than in the young.

The consequences of meniscectomy

The menisci of the knee have an important role in load-bearing and shock absorption within the joint. They may also function as secondary stabilisers, have a proprioceptive role, and aid the lubrication and nutrition of the articular cartilage. Complete or partial loss of a meniscus can have damaging effects on a knee, leading to serious long-term sequelae. This paper reviews the consequences of meniscectomy and summarises the body of evidence in the literature regarding those factors most relevant to long-term outcome.

Incidence and risk factors for graft rupture and contralateral rupture after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine the rates of contralateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture and of ACL graft rupture after ACL reconstruction using either patellar tendon or hamstring tendon autograft, and to identify any patient characteristics that may increase this risk.

TYPE OF STUDY

Case series.

METHODS

Over a 2-year period, 760 endoscopic ACL reconstructions were performed in 743 patients. Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft was used in 316 patients and 4-strand hamstring tendon in 427 patients. Those patients with a previous contralateral ACL rupture or those who underwent a simultaneous bilateral ACL reconstruction were excluded, leaving 675 knees (675 patients) for review. Persons not involved in the index operation or the care of the patient conducted follow-up assessment by telephone interview conducted 5 years after surgery. Patients were questioned about the incidence of ACL graft rupture, contralateral ACL rupture, symptoms of instability or significant injury, family history of ACL injury, and activity level according to the International Knee Documentation Committee scale. From our prospective database we obtained further information on graft source, meniscal or articular surface injury, and gender. Binary logistic regression was used to measure the relative association between the measured variables and the risk of graft rupture and contralateral ACL rupture.

RESULTS

Five years after primary ACL reconstruction, 612 of the 675 patients (90.7%) were assessed. ACL graft rupture occurred in 39 patients (6%) and contralateral ACL rupture occurred in 35 patients (6%). Three patients suffered both a graft rupture and a contralateral ACL injury. The odds of ACL graft rupture were increased 3-fold by a contact mechanism of initial injury. Return to level 1 or 2 sports increased the risk of contralateral ACL injury by a factor of 10. The risk of sustaining an ACL graft rupture was greatest in the first 12 months after reconstruction. No other studied variable increased the risk of repeat ACL injury.

CONCLUSIONS

After reconstruction, repeat ACL injury occurred in 12% of patients over 5 years. Twelve months after reconstruction, the ACL graft is at no greater risk than the contralateral ACL, suggesting that adequate graft and muscular function for most activities is achieved by this time. Risk factors for repeat ACL injury identified included a return to competitive side-stepping, pivoting, or jumping sports, and the contact mechanism of the index injury. Female patients were at no greater risk of repeat ACL injury than male patients and graft choice did not affect the rate of repeat ACL injury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Medial Meniscus Extrusion on Knee MRI:Is Extent Associated with Severity of Degeneration or Type of Tear?

OBJECTIVE

The meniscus is considered "extruded" when it extends beyond the tibial margin. We hypothesize that severe degeneration, large radial tears, complex tears, and tears involving the meniscal root would alter meniscal stability and cause more substantial extrusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The knee MRI database at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital was searched for reports describing meniscal extrusion; MR images were reviewed retrospectively. On mid coronal images, extrusion of the medial meniscus was quantified in millimeters. A separate, independent review of the meniscus evaluated degeneration severity and tear (type and extent). Radial tears were divided into those involving more (large) or less (small) than 50% of the meniscal width. Tears that involved the "root" at the tibial spine were recorded. Chi-square analysis compared these findings with extrusion extent, divided into minor (</= 3 mm) and major (> 3 mm) extrusion.

RESULTS

One hundred five knees were reviewed (12 men and 93 women; age range, 34-83 years; mean age, 56 years). Distribution of medial meniscus extrusion was 2 mm (n = 17), 3 mm (n = 17), 4 mm (n = 27), 5 mm (n = 14), 6 mm (n = 16), and 7-10 mm (n = 14). Mild, moderate, or marked degeneration was seen in 47%, 26%, and 27% with minor extrusion, respectively, and in 17%, 41%, and 42% with major extrusion, respectively (p = 0.003). Tears were seen in 59% (20/34) with minor extrusion versus 89% (63/71) with major extrusion (p = 0.001). Tears involved one third, two thirds, or all of the meniscus in 75%, 25%, or 0%, respectively, with minor extrusion and 46%, 40%, or 14% with major extrusion, respectively (p = 0.014). Longitudinal (nonradial) and horizontal tears were not associated with extent of extrusion (p = 1.0). Oblique tears were significantly associated with minor extrusion (minor, 26% [9/34]; major, 4% [3/71]; p = 0.003). Radial tears were seen in 9% (3/34) with minor extrusion versus 21% (15/71) with major extrusion (p = 0.20). All three radial tears with minor extrusion were small; conversely, 87% (13/15) of radial tears with major extrusion were large (p = 0.019). Complex tears were seen in 18% (6/34) with minor extrusion versus 59% (42/71) with major extrusion (p < 0.001). Tears involving the meniscal root were seen in 3% (1/34) with minor extrusion and 42% (30/71) with major extrusion (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Substantial medial meniscus extrusion (> 3 mm) is associated with severe meniscal degeneration, extensive tear, complex tear, large radial tear, and tear involving the meniscal root.

Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries, part I

Anterior cruciate ligament injuries are common among athletes. Although the true natural history remains unclear, anterior cruciate ligament injuries are functionally disabling; they predispose the knee to subsequent injuries and the early onset of osteoarthritis. This article, the first in a 2-part series, was initiated with the use of the PubMed database and a comprehensive search of articles that appeared between January 1994 to the present, using the keywords anterior cruciate ligament. A total of 3810 citations were identified and reviewed to determine the current state of knowledge about the treatment of these injuries. Articles pertaining to the biomechanical behavior of the anterior cruciate ligament, the prevalence of anterior cruciate ligament injury, the natural history of the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee, injuries associated with anterior cruciate ligament disruption, risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament injury, indications for treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries, and nonoperative and operative treatments were obtained, reviewed, and served as the basis for part I. Part II, to be presented in another issue of this journal, includes technical aspects of anterior cruciate ligament surgery, bone tunnel widening, graft healing, rehabilitation after reconstruction, and the effect of sex, age, and activity level on the outcome of surgery. Our approach was to build on prior reviews and to provide an overview of the literature for each of the before-mentioned areas of study by summarizing the highest level of scientific evidence available. For the areas that required a descriptive approach to research, we focused on the prospective studies that were available; for the areas that required an experimental approach, we focused on the prospective, randomized controlled trials and, when necessary, the highest level of evidence available. We were surprised to learn that considerable advances have been made during the past decade regarding the treatment of this devastating injury.

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autogenous patellar tendon graft followed by accelerated rehabilitation. A two- to nine-year followup

We sought to determine the long-term results of 1057 consecutive patients who underwent an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with an autogenous patellar tendon graft from 1987 through 1993 and who followed an accelerated rehabilitation program. The patients were followed prospectively and objective physical examination data were obtained on 806 patients at a mean of 4.0 years postoperatively. Subjective follow-up data were obtained on 948 patients at a mean of 4.4 years postoperatively. The mean final range of motion was 5 degree/0 degrees/140 degrees. The mean manual maximum KT-1000 arthrometer score was 2.0 +/- 1.5 mm. Isokinetic quadriceps muscle strength testing revealed a mean of 94% strength after acute reconstructions and 91% strength after chronic reconstructions. International Knee Documentation Committee evaluation after acute reconstruction rated 42% of knees as normal, 47% as near normal, 10% as abnormal, and 1% as severely abnormal. The same evaluation after chronic reconstruction rated 41% of knees as normal, 44% as near normal, 14% as abnormal, and 1% as severely abnormal. Radiographically, 94% of acute knees and 89% of chronic knees had no joint space narrowing. Subjective modified Noyes questionnaire results showed a mean score of 93.2 +/- 7.9 points. The mean time for patients to return to sport-specific activities was 6.2 weeks and to athletic competition at full capacity was 6.2 months postoperatively. In the long-term, patients exhibited full range of motion, excellent stability, good strength, and a return of full function in most cases.

Societal and economic impact of anterior cruciate ligament tears

BACKGROUND

An anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear is a common knee injury, particularly among young and active individuals. Little is known, however, about the societal impacts of ACL tears, which could be large given the typical patient age and increased lifetime risk of knee osteoarthritis. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of ACL reconstruction compared with structured rehabilitation only.

METHODS

A cost-utility analysis of ACL reconstruction compared with structured rehabilitation only was conducted with use of a Markov decision model over two time horizons: the short to intermediate term (six years), on the basis of Level-I evidence derived from the KANON Study and the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) database; and the lifetime, on the basis of a comprehensive literature review. Utilities were assessed with use of the SF-6D. Costs (in 2012 U.S. dollars) were estimated from the societal perspective and included the effects of the ACL tear on work status, earnings, and disability. Effectiveness was expressed as quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained.

RESULTS

In the short to intermediate term, ACL reconstruction was both less costly (a cost reduction of $4503) and more effective (a QALY gain of 0.18) compared with rehabilitation. In the long term, the mean lifetime cost to society for a typical patient undergoing ACL reconstruction was $38,121 compared with $88,538 for rehabilitation. ACL reconstruction resulted in a mean incremental cost savings of $50,417 while providing an incremental QALY gain of 0.72 compared with rehabilitation. Effectiveness gains were driven by the higher probability of an unstable knee and associated lower utility in the rehabilitation group. Results were most sensitive to the rate of knee instability after initial rehabilitation.

CONCLUSIONS

ACL reconstruction is the preferred cost-effective treatment strategy for ACL tears and yields reduced societal costs relative to rehabilitation once indirect cost factors, such as work status and earnings, are considered. The cost of an ACL tear over the lifetime of a patient is substantial, and resources should be directed to developing innovations for injury prevention and for altering the natural history of an ACL injury.

Meniscal tears of the knee: accuracy of MR imaging

Before surgery, 277 menisci in 144 knees were examined with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. They were then examined directly with arthroscopy or arthrotomy. Menisci were graded on a scale of 1-3 according to the character of the intrameniscal MR imaging signal. At surgery, 137 of 154 (89%) menisci exhibiting only grade 1 or grade 2 signal were found to be normal. One hundred sixteen of 123 (94%) menisci exhibiting intrameniscal signal communicating with a meniscal articular surface (grade 3 signal) had tears. If only a grade 3 signal is considered consistent with meniscal tears, then MR findings and surgical findings agreed in 91.3% of menisci. MR imaging can separate surgically significant from nonsignificant meniscal lesions and is useful in the noninvasive preoperative screening of suspected meniscal tears.

Articular cartilage engineering with Hyalograft C: 3-year clinical results

The use of tissue engineering for cartilage repair has emerged as a potential therapeutic option and has led to the development of Hyalograft C, a tissue-engineered graft composed of autologous chondrocytes grown on a scaffold entirely made of HYAFF 11, an esterified derivative of hyaluronic acid. Here we present the results of an ongoing multicenter clinical study conducted with the primary objective to investigate the subjective symptomatic, functional and health-related quality of life outcomes of patients treated with Hyalograft C. Clinical results on the cohort of 141 patients with followup assessments ranging from 2 to 5 years (average followup time: 38 months), are reported. At followup 91.5% of patients improved according to the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective evaluation; 76% and 88% of patients had no pain and mobility problems respectively assessed by the EuroQol-EQ5D measure. Furthermore, 95.7% of the patients had their treated knee normal or nearly normal as assessed by the surgeon; cartilage repair was graded arthroscopically as normal or nearly normal in 96.4% of the scored knees; the majority of the second-look biopsies of the grafted site histologically were assessed as hyaline-like. Importantly, a very limited complication rate was recorded in this study. The positive clinical results obtained indicate that Hyalograft C is a safe and effective therapeutic option for the treatment of articular cartilage lesions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, Level III-2 (retrospective cohort study). See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The incidence of healing in arthroscopic meniscal repairs in anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees versus stable knees

In this study, follow-up data was obtained in 90 of 117 consecutive meniscal repairs. In Group I, there were 68 meniscal repairs in conjunction with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, and in Group II, 22 isolated repairs in anterior cruciate ligament stable knees. Meniscal healing was assessed using the criteria established by Henning, by either arthroscopy or arthrography, at a mean of 7 months for isolated repairs and a mean of 10 months for repairs done in conjunction with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Average time from injury to surgery was 19 months in Group I patients, and 14 months in Group II patients. The overall rate of successful healing was 82%. Group I repairs were successful 93% of the time compared to a 50% success rate in Group II (P less than 0.00005). Lateral meniscal repairs fared better than medial repairs in both groups. Although a smaller rim width yielded better overall healing, there was no difference in the mean rim width of the two groups. Patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction did better than those with isolated meniscal repair, regardless of tear length. Older patients had better healing than younger ones. Overall, acute repairs were more successful than repairs of chronic tears. Even so, the chronic Group I patients had a 91% successful healing rate.

The role of meniscal root pathology and radial meniscal tear in medial meniscal extrusion

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was twofold: to better understand the relationship between medial meniscal extrusion (MME) and degenerative joint disease (DJD), and to determine whether a relationship exists between MME and medial meniscal root (MMR) pathology, radial tear and joint effusion.

DESIGN AND PATIENTS

Two hundred and five consecutive MR imaging examinations of the knee were prospectively evaluated, regardless of indication, for the presence and degree of MME, medial compartment marginal osteophytes, medial compartment articular cartilage loss, joint effusion, medial meniscal tear and MMR pathology. MME >or=3 mm was considered abnormal. All studies were performed using a 1.5 T GE Signa MR unit with a quadrature knee coil. The standard protocol included oblique sagittal, coronal and axial imaging.

RESULTS

We found a strong association ( P<0.0001) between >or=3 mm MME and medial joint line osteophytosis (77%), medial compartment articular cartilage loss (69%), MMR pathology (64%) and radial tear (58%) when compared with knees without these findings. Fifty-one percent of cases with a moderate/large joint effusion had <3 mm MME. We found that 20% (31/155) of patients with minimal or no evidence of DJD had >or=3 mm MME. Of this group, 62% (19/31) had either MMR pathology and/or radial tear, 13% (4/31) had joint effusion as their only abnormality and 6% (2/31) had a normal examination (other than the presence of MME). The remaining 19% consisted of three cases of different types of meniscal tear and three cases of small joint effusions but no other detectable pathology.

CONCLUSION

MME >or=3 mm is strongly associated with DJD, MMR pathology and radial tear. A significant number of cases with no or minimal evidence of DJD (20%) had >or=3 mm MME, suggesting that MME precedes, rather than follows, the development of DJD. We also found that joint effusion was not strongly associated with >or=3 mm MME.

The clinical importance of meniscal tears demonstrated by magnetic resonance imaging in osteoarthritis of the knee

BACKGROUND

Meniscal tears are frequently found during magnetic resonance imaging of osteoarthritic knees. However, the prevalence and clinical relevance of these tears have not been determined. This study was designed to investigate the relationship between meniscal tears and osteoarthritis and between such tears and pain in patients with osteoarthritis.

METHODS

Magnetic resonance imaging and plain radiography of the knee were performed in a group of 154 patients with clinical symptoms of knee osteoarthritis and a group of forty-nine age-matched asymptomatic controls. Pain scores (according to a 100-mm visual analog scale) and functional scores (according to the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC]) were determined for ninety-one of the patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis. Meniscal tears were defined as tears extending to an articular surface as seen on magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

A medial or lateral meniscal tear was a very common finding in the asymptomatic subjects (prevalence, 76%) but was more common in the patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis (91%) (p < 0.005). In the group with symptomatic osteoarthritis, a higher Kellgren-Lawrence radiographic grade was correlated with a higher frequency of meniscal tears (r = 0.26, p < 0.001), and men had a higher prevalence of meniscal tears than did women (p < 0.01). However, there was no significant difference with regard to the pain or WOMAC score between the patients with and those without a medial or lateral meniscal tear in the osteoarthritic group (p = 0.8 to 0.9 for all comparisons). The power of the study was 80% to detect a difference in the WOMAC scores of 15 points and a difference in the scores on the visual analog scale of 16 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Meniscal tears are highly prevalent in both asymptomatic and clinically osteoarthritic knees of older individuals. However, osteoarthritic knees with a meniscal tear are not more painful than those without a tear, and the meniscal tears do not affect functional status. These data do not support the routine use of magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation and management of meniscal tears in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic study, Level I-1 (testing of previously developed diagnostic criteria in series of consecutive patients [with universally applied reference "gold" standard]). See p. 2 for complete description of levels of evidence.

A review of the effects of insulin-like growth factor and platelet derived growth factor on in vivo cartilage healing and repair

Growth factors may enhance current cartilage repair techniques via multiple mechanisms including recruitment of chondrogenic cells (chemotaxis), stimulation of chondrogenic cell proliferation (mitogenesis) and enhancement of cartilage matrix synthesis. Two growth factors that have been studied in cartilage repair are insulin-like growth factor (IGF) and platelet derived growth factor (PDGF). IGF plays a key role in cartilage homeostasis, balancing proteoglycan synthesis and breakdown. Incorporating IGF into a fibrin clot placed in an equine cartilage defect improved the quality and quantity of repair tissue and reduced synovial inflammation. PDGF is a potent mitogenic and chemotactic factor for all cells of mesenchymal origin, including chondrocytes and mesenchymal stem cells. Resting zone chondrocytes cultured with PDGF demonstrated increased cell proliferation and proteoglycan production, while maturation of these cells along the endochondral pathway was inhibited. Pretreating chondrocytes with PDGF promotes heterotopic cartilage formation in the absence of any mechanical stimulus. PDGF has also been shown to be a potent stimulator of meniscal cell proliferation and migration. These studies and others suggest a potential role for these potent biological regulators of chondrocytes in cartilage repair. More work needs to be performed to define their appropriate dosing and the optimum delivery method. Combining tissue growth factors with a biological matrix can provide a physical scaffold for cell adhesion and growth as well as a means to control the release of these potent molecules. This could result in biological devices that enhance the predictability and quality of current cartilage repair techniques.