Risk Factors Associated With Ampicillin-Resistant Infection in Newborns in the Era of Group B Streptococcal Prophylaxis

OBJECTIVES

To document the trend of ampicillin-resistant infections in newborns weighing at least 1500 g and to determine factors associated with ampicillin-resistant neonatal early-onset infection in the era of routine group B streptococcal prophylaxis.

DESIGN

Case-control study.

SETTING

Referral hospital with level I through level III nurseries.Patients Newborns aged 0 to 7 days with cultures positive for bacterial infection, born from January 1994 to August 2002 (n = 53). Random controls were matched to admission year and nursery level (n = 159).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Trends of and factors associated with ampicillin-resistant infections.

RESULTS

Trends in our institution were the same as those found in some recent reports, a decrease in group B streptococcal early-onset infections without a concomitant increase in gram-negative early-onset infections. Specifically, when stratified by birth weight, newborns weighing at least 1500 g had no increase in gram-negative pathogens in the eras both before and after group B streptococcal prophylaxis (0.8 per 1000 live births to 0.3 per 1000 live births; incidence ratio, 2.3 [95% confidence interval, 0.5-10.9]). No increase in ampicillin resistance was seen during the same 3 periods (50%, 60%, and 50%, respectively; P =.97). Independent risk factors associated with ampicillin-resistant early-onset infection were intrapartum antibiotics for a 24-hour duration or longer (odds ratio, 4.8 [95% confidence interval, 1.0-23.3]) and clinical chorioamnionitis (odds ratio, 9.2 [95% confidence interval, 2.6-32.9]).

CONCLUSIONS

No increase in early-onset infections with gram-negative or ampicillin-resistant pathogens was detected. Ampicillin-resistant early-onset infection was associated with intrapartum antibiotics given for 24 hours or longer prior to delivery and with clinical chorioamnionitis. Ampicillin sodium and gentamicin sulfate remain appropriate initial antibiotic therapies for early-onset infection in newborns weighing at least 1500 g and without these risk factors.

Prophylaxis with cefazolin plus clindamycin in clean-contaminated maxillofacial surgery

PURPOSE

Infections after maxillofacial surgery are usually due to aerobic and anaerobic gram-positive cocci and gram-negative bacilli. Various antimicrobials, including cephalosporins, beta-lactams/beta-lactamase inhibitors, aminoglycosides, lincosamides, and fluoroquinolones, have been tested for use for perioperative prophylaxis in maxillofacial surgery. However, the best regimen has not been determined. We tested the safety and the efficacy of clindamycin plus cefazolin as perioperative prophylaxis for patients undergoing major maxillofacial procedures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Intravenous cefazolin and clindamycin in 3 doses were administered to 155 patients undergoing major maxillofacial procedures. After surgery, patients were monitored for the presence of infection and side effects.

RESULTS

No patient experienced a fever or infection after surgery. No side effects related to these antibiotics were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The antibiotics used as prophylaxis in maxillofacial surgery should possess an adequate coverage against gram-positive aerobic and anaerobic cocci as well as gram-negative bacilli. Prophylaxis with cefazolin plus clindamycin in major maxillofacial seems safe and effective.

Enterococcal infections: host response, therapeutic, and prophylactic possibilities

The emergence of resistance against multiple antibiotics and the increasing frequency with which Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium are isolated from hospitalized patients underscore the necessity for a better understanding of the virulence mechanisms of this pathogen and the development of alternatives to current antibiotic treatments. The genetic plasticity of enterococci and their ability to rapidly acquire and/or develop resistance against many clinically important antibiotics and to transfer these resistance determinants to other more pathogenic microorganisms makes the search for alternative treatment and preventive options even more important. A capsular polysaccharide antigen has recently been characterized that is the target of opsonic antibodies. A limited number of clinically relevant serotypes exist, and the development of an enterococcal vaccine based on capsular polysaccharides may improve our ability to prevent and treat these infections. Additional enterococcal surface antigens, including ABC transporter proteins and other virulence factors, such as aggregation substance (AS), may also be useful targets for therapeutic antibodies.

Glycopeptides are no more effective than beta-lactam agents for prevention of surgical site infection after cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis

A meta-analysis was performed to investigate whether a switch from beta-lactams to glycopeptides for cardiac surgery prophylaxis should be advised. Results of 7 randomized trials (5761 procedures) that compared surgical site infections (SSIs) in subjects receiving glycopeptide prophylaxis with SSIs in those who received beta -lactam prophylaxis were pooled. Neither agent proved to be superior for prevention of the primary outcome, occurrence of SSI at 30 days (risk ratio [RR], 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-1.42). In subanalyses, beta-lactams were superior to glycopeptides for prevention of chest SSIs (RR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.11-1.95) and approached superiority for prevention of deep-chest SSIs (RR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.91-1.94) and SSIs caused by gram-positive bacteria (RR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.98-1.91). Glycopeptides approached superiority to beta-lactams for prevention of leg SSIs (RR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.58-1.01) and were superior for prevention of SSIs caused by methicillin-resistant gram-positive bacteria (RR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.33-0.90). Standard prophylaxis for cardiac surgery should continue to be beta-lactams in most circumstances.

Prophylactic antibiotic treatment in patients with predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a placebo-controlled, double-blind trial

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Antibiotic prophylaxis in necrotizing pancreatitis remains controversial. Until now, there have been no double-blind studies dealing with this topic.

METHODS

A total sample size of 200 patients was calculated to demonstrate with a power of 90% that antibiotic prophylaxis reduces the proportion of patients with infected pancreatic necrosis from 40% placebo (PLA) to 20% ciprofloxacin/metronidazole (CIP/MET). One hundred fourteen patients with acute pancreatitis in combination with a serum C-reactive protein exceeding 150 mg/L and/or necrosis on contrast-enhanced CT scan were enrolled and received either intravenous CIP (2 x 400 mg/day) + MET (2 x 500 mg/day) or PLA. Study medication was discontinued and switched to open antibiotic treatment when infectious complications, multiple organ failure sepsis, or systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) occurred. After half of the planned sample size was recruited, an adaptive interim analysis was performed, and recruitment was stopped.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients received CIP/MET and 56 patients PLA. Twenty-eight percent in the CIP/MET group required open antibiotic treatment vs. 46% with PLA. Twelve percent of the CIP/MET group developed infected pancreatic necrosis compared with 9% of the PLA group (P = 0.585). Mortality was 5% in the CIP/MET and 7% in the PLA group. In 76 patients with pancreatic necrosis on contrast-enhanced CT scan, no differences in the rate of infected pancreatic necrosis, systemic complications, or mortality were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

This study detected no benefit of antibiotic prophylaxis with respect to the risk of developing infected pancreatic necrosis.

Managing recurrent bacterial vaginosis

Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is the most frequently found condition of the female genital tract. It increases a woman's risk of acquiring HIV, is associated with increased complications in pregnancy, and may be involved in the pathogenesis of pelvic inflammatory disease. Yet there are many unanswered questions about its aetiology, making management of recurrent infection difficult and often idiosyncratic. This paper discusses the current knowledge and possible management of recurrent BV.

In Vivo RNA Interference Analysis Reveals an Unexpected Role for GNBP1 in the Defense against Gram-positive Bacterial Infection in Drosophila Adults

The Drosophila immune system discriminates between different classes of infectious microbes and responds with pathogen-specific defense reactions via the selective activation of the Toll and the immune deficiency (Imd) signaling pathways. The Toll pathway mediates most defenses against Gram-positive bacteria and fungi, whereas the Imd pathway is required to resist Gram-negative bacterial infection. Microbial recognition is achieved through peptidoglycan recognition proteins (PGRPs); Gram-positive bacteria activate the Toll pathway through a circulating PGRP (PGRP-SA), and Gram-negative bacteria activate the Imd pathway via PGRP-LC, a putative transmembrane receptor, and PGRP-LE. Gram-negative binding proteins (GNBPs) were originally identified in Bombyx mori for their capacity to bind various microbial compounds. Three GNBPs and two related proteins are encoded in the Drosophila genome, but their function is not known. Using inducible expression of GNBP1 double-stranded RNA, we now demonstrate that GNBP1 is required for Toll activation in response to Gram-positive bacterial infection; GNBP1 double-stranded RNA expression renders flies susceptible to Gram-positive bacterial infection and reduces the induction of the antifungal peptide encoding gene Drosomycin after infection by Gram-positive bacteria but not after fungal infection. This phenotype induced by GNBP1 inactivation is identical to a loss-of-function mutation in PGRP-SA, and our genetic studies suggest that GNBP1 acts upstream of the Toll ligand Spätzle. Altogether, our results demonstrate that the detection of Gram-positive bacteria in Drosophila requires two putative pattern recognition receptors, PGRP-SA and GNBP1.

Association between antecedent intravenous antimicrobial exposure and isolation of vancomycin-resistant enterococci

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) have become important causes of nosocomial infections. This study evaluated the association between a variety of intravenous antimicrobial exposures and the isolation of VRE using two control groups: (1) a vancomycin-susceptible enterococci (VSE) group, to assess factors associated with development of VRE, and (2) a nonenterococci control group, to assess factors associated with positive cultures for enterococci without regard to vancomycin resistance. After adjusting for the effect of other antimicrobials, time at risk, and patient morbidity, compared to vancomycin-susceptible enterococci controls, exposures to imipenem (OR = 4.9, 95% CI = 1.6-14.1) and ceftazidime (OR = 2.6, 95% CI = 1.1-6.1) were significant predictors of VRE. When compared to nonenterococci controls, exposures to ampicillin (OR = 20.1, 95% CI = 1.5-263.1) and imipenem (OR = 5.1, 95% CI = 1.5-17.1) were significantly associated with VRE. Neither piperacillin nor vancomycin was associated with VRE compared to either control group. This study offers further evidence that the replacement of broad-spectrum cephalosporins by extended-spectrum penicillins, specifically piperacillin, may be effective in reducing VRE.

Basic aspects of and general problems in surgical infections

Antibiotics are important in the prophylaxis and treatment of surgical infections as well as in the management of nosocomial infections acquired postoperatively in surgical patients. Surgeons encounter a range of infectious conditions, including established single-pathogen infections of soft tissues, polymicrobial intra-abdominal infections, and resistant gram-negative nosocomial infections such as ventilator-associated and aspiration pneumonia. Preoperative antibiotic administration has been shown to reduce the risk of surgical site infections and is now an accepted part of the standard care for most surgical patients. In patients with established single-pathogen or polymicrobial infections requiring surgery, studies have shown appropriate empiric antibiotic therapy to be an important adjunct to surgical intervention and general supportive measures in improving patient outcome. Antibiotics are also essential for those who develop postoperative nosocomial infections. Empiric coverage of the most likely causative organisms, especially in synergistic polymicrobial mixed infections, is one of the keys to successful prophylaxis and treatment of surgical infections.

Human corneal stromal tissue concentration after consecutive doses of topically applied 3.3% vancomycin

AIMS

To evaluate vancomycin penetration into human corneal stromal tissue in patients treated with topical vancomycin eyedrops before penetrating keratoplasty (PKP).

METHODS

Twenty four patients who underwent PKP, seven patients with keratoconus (group 1) and 17 patients with corneal scar or corneal decompensation (group 2). All patients received topical application of vancomycin eyedrops (concentration: 33 mg/ml) 10, 3, 2, 1 hour, and 15 minutes before the operation. Corneal cumulative vancomycin levels were assessed by bioassay.

RESULTS

Mean vancomycin corneal stromal tissue concentration was 46.7 (SE 4.11) microg/g tissue. This value was four to 20-fold in excess of the MIC90 of vancomycin in Staphylococcus aureus (2-10 microg/ml).

CONCLUSIONS

Vancomycin reached high corneal tissue concentrations that significantly exceeded the MIC90 (2-10 microg/ml) for most key Gram positive corneal pathogens. The ratio of vancomycin stromal concentration to protein concentration was statistically higher in group 2 (non-keratoconus).

Pharmacokinetics and effects on bowel and throat microflora of oral levofloxacin as antibacterial prophylaxis in neutropenic patients with haematological malignancies

Gram-positive breakthrough infections pose a major drawback to the use of quinolones for antibacterial prophylaxis in neutropenic patients. Levofloxacin offers the advantage of an augmented Gram-positive spectrum and may potentially overcome this problem. In an open-label, clinical pilot study, we investigated the effects on throat and bowel microflora and pharmacokinetics of a once-daily oral dose of 500 mg levofloxacin, during neutropenia in 20 patients with haematological malignancies. Gram-negative bowel flora and Staphylococcus aureus were successfully eradicated. No Gram-negative infections occurred. Minimal inhibitory concentration values for viridans group (VG) streptococci tended to increase, in four patients over 8 mg/l, indicating resistance to levofloxacin. Four patients developed blood-stream infections with levofloxacin-resistant Gram-positive cocci. No significant changes in numbers of anaerobic microorganisms were observed. Pharmacokinetic parameters of levofloxacin, including the maximum serum concentration (C(max)), time to C(max) (T(max)), area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), volume of distribution at steady state (V(ss)/F) and clearance (CL/F) were not statistically different at first dose and during neutropenia. In conclusion, levofloxacin eradicates Gram-negative microorganisms and S. aureus and spares the anaerobic flora. Its pharmacokinetic profile is unaltered during neutropenia. However, prolonged administration of levofloxacin as antibacterial prophylaxis may be hampered by the emergence of levofloxacin-resistant VG streptococci.

Quantifying human health risks from virginiamycin used in chickens

The streptogramin antimicrobial combination Quinupristin-Dalfopristin (QD) has been used in the United States since late 1999 to treat patients with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF) infections. Another streptogramin, virginiamycin (VM), is used as a growth promoter and therapeutic agent in farm animals in the United States and other countries. Many chickens test positive for QD-resistant E. faecium, raising concern that VM use in chickens might compromise QD effectiveness against VREF infections by promoting development of QD-resistant strains that can be transferred to human patients. Despite the potential importance of this threat to human health, quantifying the risk via traditional farm-to-fork modeling has proved extremely difficult. Enough key data (mainly on microbial loads at each stage) are lacking so that such modeling amounts to little more than choosing a set of assumptions to determine the answer. Yet, regulators cannot keep waiting for more data. Patients prescribed QD are typically severely ill, immunocompromised people for whom other treatment options have not readily been available. Thus, there is a pressing need for sound risk assessment methods to inform risk management decisions for VM/QD using currently available data. This article takes a new approach to the QD-VM risk modeling challenge. Recognizing that the usual farm-to-fork ("forward chaining") approach commonly used in antimicrobial risk assessment for food animals is unlikely to produce reliable results soon enough to be useful, we instead draw on ideas from traditional fault tree analysis ("backward chaining") to reverse the farm-to-fork process and start with readily available human data on VREF case loads and QD resistance rates. Combining these data with recent genogroup frequency data for humans, chickens, and other sources (Willems et al., 2000, 2001) allows us to quantify potential human health risks from VM in chickens in both the United States and Australia, two countries where regulatory action for VM is being considered. We present a risk simulation model, thoroughly grounded in data, that incorporates recent nosocomial transmission and genetic typing data. The model is used to estimate human QD treatment failures over the next five years with and without continued VM use in chickens. The quantitative estimates and probability distributions were implemented in a Monte Carlo simulation model for a five-year horizon beginning in the first quarter of 2002. In Australia, a Q1-2002 ban of virginiamycin would likely reduce average attributable treatment failures by 0.35 x 10(-3) cases, expected mortalities by 5.8 x 10(-5) deaths, and life years lost by 1.3 x 10(-3) for the entire population over five years. In the United States, where the number of cases of VRE is much higher, a 1Q-2002 ban on VM is predicted to reduce average attributable treatment failures by 1.8 cases in the entire population over five years; expected mortalities by 0.29 cases; and life years lost by 6.3 over a five-year period. The model shows that the theoretical statistical human health benefits of a VM ban range from zero to less than one statistical life saved in both Australia and the United States over the next five years and are rapidly decreasing. Sensitivity analyses indicate that this conclusion is robust to key data gaps and uncertainties, e.g., about the extent of resistance transfer from chickens to people.

[Transplantation-associated infections]

Transplantation-associated infections are caused by an infected transplanted organ or the endogenic or exogenic environment of the recipient in a state of induced immunodeficiency. The best therapy would be to reconstitute the immunodeficiency, but this is usually impossible as it endangers the transplanted organ. Thus, a specific, standardised anti-infectious therapy is needed even in the absence of clearly identified micro-organisms [bacteria (in two thirds gram-positive rods), parasites (in central Europe predominantly Toxoplasma), fungi (especially Candida spp. or Aspergillus spp.) or viruses (such as Parvovirus B19 and Cytomegalovirus)]. Origins of infection (e.g., hygiene), types of infection (e.g., reactivation), typical localisations, diagnostic tools (e.g., blood cultures, antigenic tests, PCR, CT, advantages and disadvantages of antibody assays) and possible therapies are briefly discussed. The take home messages are to avoid economy measures in microbial diagnostics and to use CMV-seronegative donors whenever possible.

Preventive antibacterial treatment improves the general medical and neurological outcome in a mouse model of stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Epidemiological studies have demonstrated a high incidence of infections after severe stroke and their prominent role in morbidity and mortality in stroke patients. In a mouse model, it has been shown recently that stroke is coupled with severe and long-lasting immunosuppression, which is responsible for the development of spontaneous systemic infections. Here, we investigated in the same model the effects of preventive antibiotic treatment on survival and functional outcome of experimental stroke.

METHODS

Mice were subjected to experimental stroke by occlusion of the middle cerebral artery (MCAO) for 60 minutes. A group of mice received moxifloxacin (6x100 mg/kg body weight every 2 hours over 12 hours) either immediately or 12 hours after MCAO. Control animals received the vector only. Behavior, neurological deficit, fever, survival, and body weight were monitored over 14 days. In a subgroup, infarct volume was measured 4 days after MCAO. Microbiological assessment was based on cultures of lung tissue, blood, and feces of animals 3 days after stroke. For a dose-response study, moxifloxacin was given immediately after MCAO in different doses and at different time points.

RESULTS

Microbiological analyses of blood and lung tissue demonstrated high bacterial burden, mainly Escherichia coli, 3 days after stroke. Accordingly, we observed clinical and histological signs of septicemia and pneumonia. Moxifloxacin prevented the development of infections and fever, significantly reduced mortality, and improved neurological outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Preventive antibiotic treatment may be an important new therapeutical approach to improve outcome in patients with severe stroke.

Safety aspects of enterococci from the medical point of view

Enterococci occur in a remarkable array of environments. They can be found in soil, food, and water, and make up a significant portion of the normal gut flora of humans (10(5)-10(7)/g of stool) and animals. As other bacteria of the gut flora, enterococci can also cause infectious diseases. Most clinical isolates are Enterocococus faecalis, which account for 80-90% of clinical strains. Enterocococus faecium accounts for 5-10% of such isolates. Typical enterococcal infections occur in hospitalised patients with underlying conditions representing a wide spectrum of severity of illness and immune modulation. Enterococci today rank second to third in frequency among bacteria isolated from hospitalised patients. They are isolated from urinary tract infections, intra-abdominal and pelvic infections, bacteremias, wound and tissue infections, and endocarditis--often as part of a polymicrobial flora. Surprisingly, little is known about the factors that contribute to the ability of enterococci to cause infections. Many strains of E. faecalis produce a cytolysin (haemolysin) exhibiting tissue-damaging capacity. Further extracellular products often observed in clinical isolates are a proteinase (gelatinase), hyaluronidase, and extracellular superoxide. Furthermore, many of the clinical isolates possess the aggregation substance on the surface and an extracellular surface protein, both contributing to the adherence to eucaryotic cells. Some strains of E. faecalis, and many E. faecium strains are resistant to multiple antimicrobials. The ultimate role of all these factors in enterococcal pathogenicity remains to be determined. It was previously thought that enterococcal infections were endogenously acquired from the patient's own gut flora. A rather new concept that has emerged is that enterococcal disease is a two-stage process. There is an initial colonisation of the gastrointestinal tract by enterococcal strains possessing virulence traits and/or antibiotic resistance. Subsequently, this population spreads, often facilitated by antibiotic elimination of competitors. For a selected number of patients, there is subsequent tissue invasion from the gastrointestinal tract reservoir. From this concept, it can be deduced that enterococcal strains without virulence traits and antibiotic resistances exogenously transferred into the human gut via food products or probiotics will not represent any risk for immunocompetent individuals. In very severely immunocompromised patients, however, a risk for enterococcal disease by such strains cannot completely be excluded.

Prophylaxis against gram-positive organisms causing exit-site infection and peritonitis in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients by applying mupirocin ointment at the catheter exit site

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the effectiveness of local application of mupirocin ointment at the catheter exit site in preventing exit-site infection and peritonitis attributable to gram-positive organisms in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients.

METHODS

This prospective randomized controlled trial included 154 patients. They were randomly allocated to a mupirocin-treated group (group M) and a control group (group C). Group M included 73 patients (47.4%) who were instructed to apply mupirocin ointment to the catheter exit site once daily after the routine daily exit-site dressing. Group C included 81 patients (52.6%) who continued their usual daily exit-site care without applying mupirocin. The two groups were followed to see whether there would be any difference in the frequency of exit-site infection and peritonitis or in the infecting organisms.

RESULTS

Interim data were collected at 5 months after the start of the study. Those data showed a significantly lower incidence of exit-site infection and peritonitis attributable to gram-positive organisms in group M as compared with group C. The incidence of gram-positive exit-site infection in group C was 1 episode per 36.8 patient-months; in group M, the incidence was 1 episode per infinity patient-months (0 incidence in 5 months, p < 0.05). The incidence of gram-positive peritonitis in group C was 1 episode per 40.5 patient-months; in group M, the incidence was 1 episode per 365 patient-months (p < 0.05). Mupirocin treatment had no significant effect on the incidence of exit-site infection and peritonitis attributable to other organisms. Before mupirocin treatment, we saw a trend toward higher infection rates in diabetic patients and nasal carriers of Staphylococcus aureus as compared with non diabetic patients and nasal non carriers, although the differences were not statistically significant. Mupirocin brought the infection rate attributable to gram-positive organisms to an equally low level in diabetic and non-diabetic patients, and in nasal carriers and nasal non carriers of S. aureus. No adverse effect of local application of mupirocin was reported.

CONCLUSION

Local application of mupirocin ointment at the catheter exit site is a safe and effective method of preventing exit-site infection and peritonitis involving gram-positive organisms.

Prevalence of vancomycin and high level aminoglycoside resistant enterococci among high-risk patients

Enterococci have been recognized as clinically important pathogens in high-risk populations of hospitalized patients. The role of enterococci in nosocomial infections is being recognized with increasing frequency. The main source of these infections is usually fecal carriage of the microorganisms. In this study, gastrointestinal colonization with vancomycin resistant enterococci (VRE) and high-level aminoglycoside resistant enterococci among 316 high-risk hospitalized patients were investigated. One hundred and ninety-eight enterococci strains were isolated from stool specimens. All strains were identified to species level and 90 of the isolates were identified as Enterococcus faecalis (45%), 85 as E. faecium (21.5%), 14 as E. avium (7%), 7 as E. raffinosus (3.5%), 1 as E. durans (0.5%) and 1 as E. hirae (0.5%). Eleven of 198 strains were found to be moderately sensitive to vancomycin (MIC: 8-16 microg/ml) by the agar dilution method according to the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) recommendations, and the rest of these strains were found to be sensitive (MIC < or = 4 microg/ml). Twenty-eight strains showed high-level resistance to streptomycin (2,000 microg/ml) and 26 strains were found to have high-level resistance to gentamicin (500 microg/ml). Twelve of these strains had high-level resistance to both aminoglycosides. By the disk diffusion tests, 53 of 198 strains were found to be resistant to erythromycin, 51 to penicillin, 37 to ampicillin, 18 to ciprofloxacin, 14 to norfloxacin and 3 to nitrofurantoin. No beta-lactamase production was detected in 198 studied strains.

Reappraisal With Meta-Analysis of the Addition of Gram-Positive Prophylaxis to Fluoroquinolone in Neutropenic Patients

Purpose: Past reports and meta-analyses indicate that fluoroquinolones are highly effective in preventing Gram-negative infections in neutropenic cancer patients, but offer inadequate coverage for Gram-positive infections. We evaluated by meta-analysis the efficacy of the addition of antimicrobial agents with enhanced Gram-positive activity to prophylaxis with quinolones.

Materials and Methods: Randomized trials comparing fluoroquinolones alone (ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, pefloxacin, or norfloxacin) with fluoroquinolone in combination with Gram-positive prophylaxis (rifampin, vancomycin, amoxicillin, roxithromycin, or penicillin) were retrieved. We pooled relative risks (RRs) using a fixed-effects model.

Results: Nine trials (1,202 patients) published between 1993 and 2000 meet inclusion criteria. Compared with fluoroquinolone alone, Gram-positive prophylaxis reduced total bacteremic episodes (RR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.26 to 1.88), streptococcal infections (RR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.44 to 3.37), coagulase-negative staphylococcal infections (RR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.04), and rate of febrile patients (RR 1.08; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.16). Occurrence of clinically documented infections, unexplained fever, and infectious mortality was similar in the two groups. The addition of Gram-positive prophylaxis, however, significantly increased side effects (RR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.76). Rifampin use resulted in a higher incidence of undesirable effects.

Conclusion: Considering the lack of cut-clear benefit on some parameters of morbidity and mortality, routine use of Gram-positive prophylaxis is not advisable. This strategy, however, should be particularly valuable in subgroups of patients at high risk of streptococcal infection (eg, those with severe and prolonged neutropenia or mucositis, and those receiving cytarabine). Problems of tolerability and the potential for the emergence of resistant microorganisms should be considered when prescribing prophylaxis with enhanced Gram-positive activity to neutropenic patients.