[Organ donation: scarce and fragile resources]

Organ transplantation, the gold standard therapy for end-stage organ failures, has become a victim of its success. Indeed, the number of patients listed for transplantation has been increasing faster than that of available grafts. The number of brain-dead donors, the primary source of organ donation in France, is limited, but this figure is becoming more and more comprehensive, thanks to the work carried out by hospital transplant coordination units. The room for manoeuvre is limited: to increase the transplantation rate in this respect, the only possibility would be to reduce the rate of donation refusals, which still accounts for more than 30 percent of all identified brain deaths. It is thus more and more critical to resort to other donor sources: living donors and non-heart-beating donors. Each donor source is associated with different constraints and limitations in terms of available resources, removal organization and ethics. For cadaver donors, the key ethical issues are the acceptance of presumed consent, the difficulty in diagnosing the exact time of death and the notion of body integrity. For living donors, the ethical issues are related to the quality of the consent and the assessment of the risk undertaken by the donor, when no personal benefit is expected.

Living related liver transplantation: preoperative magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of hepatic vasculature of donor candidates

PURPOSE

To evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for preoperative assessment of hepatic vascular anatomy in liver donors before living related liver transplantation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 55 consecutive living liver donors (mean age 42 years, range 18-68 years) underwent multiphase contrast-enhanced MRA of the hepatic vessels. Two readers categorized vessel visualization on a five-point scale and recorded vascular anatomy or variations thereof for the arterial, portal venous and venous systems. All 55 living liver donors subsequently underwent right hemihepatectomy for hemiliver donation, and preoperative MRA results were correlated with surgical findings.

RESULTS

Overall vessel visualization assessment demonstrated good or very good ratings for the majority of patients. For hepatic arteries, the mean score was 4.4+/-0.8 (mean+/-standard deviation), and for the portal venous and venous systems it was 4.6+/-0.7 and 4.3+/-0.8, respectively. Among all 55 donors, 16 (29%) demonstrated accessory or replaced hepatic arteries, and seven (13%) and 20 (36%) donors had surgically relevant portal vein (trifurcation or early right posterolateral branching types) and hepatic vein variations, respectively. Correlation coefficients between MRA and surgery were 0.94, 1.00 and 0.91 for hepatic arteries, portal veins and hepatic veins, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In the preoperative evaluation before living related liver donation, contrast-enhanced MR angiography was a highly accurate, noninvasive tool for visualizing the hepatic vasculature and variations thereof in liver donor candidates.

Increasing live donor kidney transplantation: a randomized controlled trial of a home-based educational intervention

With the shortage of deceased donor kidneys and the superior clinical outcomes possible with live donor kidney transplantation (LDKT), more patients should seriously consider LDKT. However, little is known about how best to educate patients and their family members about LDKT. We evaluated the effectiveness of a home-based (HB) educational program in increasing LDKT. Patients were randomized to clinic-based (CB) education alone (CB, n = 69) or CB plus HB education (CB+HB, n = 63). Compared to CB, more patients in the CB+HB group had living donor inquiries (63.8% vs. 82.5%, p = 0.019) and evaluations (34.8% vs. 60.3%, p = 0.005) and LDKTs (30.4% vs. 52.4%, p = 0.013). Assignment to the CB+HB group, White race, more LDKT knowledge, higher willingness to discuss LDKT with others, and fewer LDKT concerns were predictors of having LDKT (p-values < 0.05). Both groups demonstrated an increase in LDKT knowledge after the CB education, but CB+HB led to an additional increase in LDKT knowledge (p < 0.0001) and in willingness to discuss LDKT with others (p < 0.0001), and a decrease in LDKT concerns (p < 0.0001). Results indicate that an HB outreach program is more effective in increasing LDKT rates than CB education alone.

Kidney transplantation in Georgia: a single centre experience with living-related donors

37 patients underwent living donor kidney Tx at the National Centre of Urology from January 2000 to December 2007. All transplants were performed from genetically related donors. The mean follow-up was 29,5 months. The following parameters were analysed: early and late posttransplant complications, rejection rate, the most recent Cr, patient and graft survival rates. Haemorrhage (5.4%), gastro-intestinal bleeding (10.8%) and graft thrombosis (5.4%) were the most important early complications. 6 (16.2%) episodes of acute cellular rejection were detected of whom 5 were treated successfully with bolus steroids. Two (5.4%) patients developed delayed graft function and needed postoperative dialyses. The mean value of the most recent serum Cr level is 1.6+/-1.1 g/dl (range: 0.7-6.2 g/dl). 1, 2 and 3 year patient survival for the whole group was 89.2%. 1, 2 and 3 year graft survival for the whole group was 89.2%, 83% and 83%, respectively. The mortality rate associated with kidney Tx has decreased from 38% in 1995-2000, to 5.4% in 2000-2007. The results of kidney Tx can achieve the acceptable level with improving surgical technique and experience. The pool of living-unrelated (spouses etc.) donors should be wider used to increase the number of transplants.

Markets in health care: the case of renal transplantation

This article explores the ethics and economics of a market in donated kidneys in the United States. With the impending changes in the health care system, the author argues that a full turn to the market for distribution of kidneys is not appropriate. However, he would sanction a regulated market, as outlined in the article.

Present status at the Vienna Transplantation Center after four thousand renal transplantations

The Division of Transplantation at the Medical University of Vienna, Austria was established by Dr Franz Piza, who performed the first deceased donor kidney transplantation in Vienna in 1965. During the next 43 years, 4,849 transplants were performed at this unit. Data were analysed in the time period 1993-2006 for 2,165 deceased donor transplants (1,734 first and 431 regrafts) and 263 living donor transplants. Long-term follow-up was available for more than 95% of all grafts and all recipients had at least 9 months of follow-up. Two- and 6-year graft survival rates were 81.4% and 66.3%, respectively, for first deceased donor grafts, 76.1% and 61.8% for regrafts and 91.5% and 79.1% for living transplants. Appropriate immunosuppression, HLA matching and crossmatching supported by solid basic scientific research have proved successful in achieving good graft survival at our unit.

Effect of amino acid mismatch in the UNOS 2007 dataset

1. The study began with the 2007 UNOS dataset of 270,690 kidney transplant, from which were selected post-1995 first transplants with Caucasian donor/patients and available ABDR typing data, yielding 87,616 cases. These were split into cadaver donor (n=46,927) and living donor (n=40,689) populations. 2. Cases with broad antigens such as A9, A10, B12 and B17 were eliminated, as were cases that had failed within 30 days. That left 28,264 cadaver donor and 26,211 living donor cases. 3. We looked at every theoretical mismatch between donors and patients in the living donor population. Overall, 405 single, 21,269 double, and 391,325 triple position/amino acid mismatches were included in the analysis. Two tallies for each mismatch were generated: "function" and "fail" based on patient's associated graft survival. 4. We generated a list of "fail" single, double, and triple position/amino acid mismatches and computed 10-year survival curves for each of the mismatches, comparing them with the average 10-year survival curve using the log-rank test. Based on the log-rank statistics, a ranking of the bad mismatches was established. 5. We looked at the long-term graft survival of additive single, double, and triple "fail" mismatches in cadaver donor transplants. 6. Survival curves of transplants with position/ amino acid mismatches were generated and compared with the survival curves of the traditional standards: 0 ABDR mismatch; 1 A, 1 B and 1 DR mismatch; and full 6 ABDR mismatches. 7. The greatest effect was seen in first transplants with a male recipient, but that were not Caucasian-to-Caucasian. Up to 125 double mismatches resulted in a 10-year survival 29% lower than 0 ABDR mismatches. 8. In first transplants that were not Caucasian-to-Caucasian 1154 out of 1177 (98%) pos/aa mismatches (single, double, or triple) had lower 10-year survival than cases with one mismatch, each, in A, B and DR. Looking at re-grafts, we see that 498 out of 499 with single, double and triple mismatches had lower 10-year survival than that of cases with one mismatch, each, in A, B and DR. 9. Overall, position/amino acid mismatches had consistently lower 10-year survival than 1 A, 1 B, 1 DR mismatches. We believe our selection of "fail" pos/aa mismatches provide a good starting point for establishing a list of mismatches to be looked for and avoided in future transplants in order to give them a better chance of survival.

Kidney and pancreas transplantation in the United States, 1996-2005

Kidney and pancreas transplantation in 2005 improved in quantity and outcome quality, despite the increasing average age of kidney graft recipients, with 56% aged 50 or older. Geography and ABO blood type contribute to the discrepancy in waiting time among the deceased donor (DD) candidates. Allocation policy changes are decreasing the median times to transplant for pediatric recipients. Overall, 6% more DD kidney transplants were performed in 2005 with slight increases in standard criteria donors (SCD) and expanded criteria donors (ECD). The largest increase (39%) was in donation after cardiac death (DCD) from non-ECD donors. These DCD, non-ECD kidneys had equivalent outcomes to SCD kidneys. 1-, 3- and 5-year unadjusted graft survival was 91%, 80% and 70% for non-ECD-DD transplants, 82%, 68% and 53% for ECD-DD grafts, and 95%, 88% and 80% for living donor kidney transplants. In 2005, 27% of patients were discharged without steroids compared to 3% in 1999. Acute rejection decreased to 11% in 2004. There was a slight increase in the number of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants (895), with fewer pancreas after kidney transplants (343 from 419 in 2004), and a stable number of pancreas alone transplants (129). Pancreas underutilization appears to be an ongoing issue.

Liver transplantation: experience at our center

Liver transplantation was pioneered by Starzl and his team in 1967. Since then, many difficulties have been overcome and this treatment modality has gained worldwide acceptance as the definitive treatment for end-stage liver disease. However, the current numbers of liver transplantations are still far below what is needed, the rising numbers on waiting lists have pushed transplant surgeons to search for new alternatives, and living related donors are considered one solution. At our center, the only living liver donors we accept are relatives and spouses of recipients. We have held the same policy for our kidney program from the beginning. In the past 3 years, we have increased the annual numbers of liver transplantations; our graft and patient survival rates for this period exceed 90%. Liver grafts donated by living related donors offer an extremely important, lifesaving alternative in urgent situations, such as acute liver failure, where there is limited time to wait for a deceased donor. Hepatocellular carcinoma is another important indication for living related liver transplantation. Availability of living donors allows us to perform transplantations even in recipients with advanced tumors who would not be accepted as appropriate transplant candidates according to widely used selection criteria. Liver transplantation is a lifesaving procedure that presents many challenges, and our experience has led us to develop an innovative technique for biliary reconstruction. We have used a method of "back-table guide-wire placement and intraoperative transhepatic biliary catheter insertion" in 44 patients since December 2004 to significantly decrease biliary complications and perform duct-to-duct anastomosis even in small pediatric recipients.

Outcome of Laparoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy in 2005: National Survey of Japanese Transplantation Centers

The increased acceptance of laparoscopic nephrectomy (LN) has been a driving force for live donor kidney transplantation. However, the outcomes of LN in live donors has not yet been clarified in Japan. In this study, we surveyed 125 Japanese kidney transplantation centers to investigate the current status of live donor LN. Of 125 centers, the 98 that responded had performed 695 live donor nephrectomies. Among these centers, 43 had performed LN. Among the 695 nephrectomies, 441 donors had undergone LN and 254, open nephrectomies. In 43 centers, 16 were performed as hand-assisted (HA) LN; 20, non-HA; 3, both HA and non-HA; and 5 laparoscope-assisted. Ten centers used a peritoneal approach; 30, a retroperitoneal; and 3, both. In 441 LN donors, 1 had a life-threatening complication of deep venous thrombosis and survived. Blood transfusions were performed in 7 donors. Open conversions from LN were necessary in 24. Minor complications not requiring prolonged hospital stay were reported in 52. The mortality of LN was zero. In contrast, among the 441 recipients, 1 case was reported as primary nonfunction after venous misadventure in the operation and 30 recipients needed hemodialysis after transplantation because of delayed graft function. Urinary tract complications were noted in 11 recipients. This survey presented the current status of the procedure, providing a base for informed consent from potential donors.

Racial disparities in living kidney donation: is there a lack of willing donors or an excess of medically unsuitable candidates?

BACKGROUND

Live kidney donation is safe for healthy donors and an effective treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease. Many potential donors are referred for live kidney donation, but only a small percentage donate. This study aims to determine reasons for nondonation and establish if racial differences exist.

METHODS

A retrospective database and chart review of all patients that were referred for potential live kidney donation from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2004 was conducted.

RESULTS

In all, 30.3% of referred potential live kidney donors were lost to follow-up. Primary reasons for nondonation (n=1,050) included unsuitable donor health (43.1%) and recipient-based causes (41.3%). Immunologic incompatibility accounted for 9.7% of all nondonations. Racial differences indicated more African Americans had incompatible blood types (P=0.01) or ineligible recipients (26.7% vs. 14.4%, P<0.01). More non-African Americans donated (13.2% vs. 4.6%, P<0.01) or were halted because the potential recipient received another organ (living/cadaveric) (20.0% versus 7.9%, P<0.01). Nondonation due to overall donor health (including diabetes and hypertension) did not differ between races, but subanalysis indicated more African American nondonation was due to high body mass index (P=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Determining the reason behind nondonation is a first step towards understanding low rates of live kidney donation. More African American donor referrals are lost to follow-up while rates of other reasons were similar among races. This may indicate that African Americans are not more frequently medically unsuitable, but that the divergence in rates of live kidney donation is caused by a disparity in willingness to donate among African Americans.

Live donor liver transplantation in adults

Live donor liver transplantation (LDLT) was initiated in 1988 for children recipients. Its application to adult recipients was limited by graft size until the first right liver LDLT was performed in Hong Kong in 1996. Since then, right liver graft has become the major graft type. Despite rapid adoption of LDLT by many centers, many controversies on donor selection, indications, techniques, and ethics exist. With the recent known 11 donor deaths around the world, transplant surgeons are even more cautious than the past in the evaluation and selection of donors. The need for routine liver biopsy in donor evaluation is arguable but more and more centers opt for a policy of liberal liver biopsy. Donation of the middle hepatic vein (MHV) in the right liver graft was considered unsafe but now data indicate that the outcome of donors with or without MHV donation is about equal. Right liver LDLT has been shown to improve the overall survival rate of patients with chronic liver disease, acute or acute-on-chronic liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma waiting for liver transplantation. The outcome of LDLT is equivalent to deceased donor liver transplantation despite a smaller graft size and higher technical complexity.

The Current Practice of Live Donor Nephrectomy in Europe

BACKGROUND

The increasing number of live kidney donors in the last decade has stimulated interest in the surgical technique of donor nephrectomy. In this study, we evaluated the current status of the surgical approach in European transplant centers.

METHODS

A questionnaire was sent to 131 centers in 12 European countries. Questions included the number of donors, the technique used, and the inclusion and exclusion criteria for a technique.

RESULTS

Ninety-two replies (70%) were included. In the responding centers, approximately 1450 live donor nephrectomies were performed in 2004 (more than 80% of all live kidney donations in these countries). The number of living donors ranged from 0 to 95 per center. Nineteen institutions (21%) removed kidneys using endoscopic techniques only. Twenty-two centers (24%) performed both open and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Vessel length, difficult anatomy and right-sided donor nephrectomy were common reasons to choose an open technique. Twelve centers had performed laparoscopic donor nephrectomy but quit their program for various reasons. In 51 centers (55%), only open donor nephrectomy was carried out. Lack of evidence that endoscopic techniques provide better results was the main reason for these centers to stick to an open approach. Incisional hernias occurred after all types of open surgery in up to 30% of the donors per center. Twenty-nine clinics still carry out the classic flank incision.

CONCLUSION

The surgical technique of live donor nephrectomy varies greatly between transplant centers in European countries. To define the optimal surgical approach a European registration of donor nephrectomies would be helpful.

Iranian model of paid and regulated living-unrelated kidney donation

Since the 1980s, many countries have passed legislation prohibiting monetary compensation for organ donation. Organ donation for transplantation has become altruistic worldwide. During the past two decades, advances in immunosuppressive therapy has led to greater success in transplantation and to increased numbers of patients on transplant waiting lists. Unfortunately, the altruistic supply of organs has been less than adequate, and severe organ shortage has resulted in many patient deaths. A number of transplant experts have been convinced that providing financial incentives to organ sources as an alternative to altruistic organ donation needs careful reconsideration. In 1988, a compensated and regulated living-unrelated donor renal transplant program was adopted in Iran. As a result, the number of renal transplants performed substantially increased such that in 1999, the renal transplant waiting list was completely eliminated. By the end of 2005, a total of 19,609 renal transplants were performed (3421 from living related, 15,356 from living-unrelated and 823 from deceased donors). In this program, many ethical problems that are associated with paid kidney donation also were prevented. Currently, Iran has no renal transplant waiting lists, and >50% of patients with ESRD in the country are living with a functioning graft. In developed countries, the severe shortage of transplantable kidneys has forced the transplant community to adopt new strategies to expand the kidney donor pool. However, compared with the Iranian model, none of these approaches has the potential to eliminate or even alleviate steadily worsening renal transplant waiting lists.

Documented deaths of hepatic lobe donors for living donor liver transplantation

The actual risk of death in hepatic lobe donors for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is unknown because of the lack of a comprehensive database. In the absence of a definitive estimate of the risk of donor death, the medical literature has become replete with anecdotal reports of donor deaths, many of which cannot be substantiated. Because donor death is one of the most important outcomes of LDLT, we performed a comprehensive survey of the medical and lay literature to provide a referenced source of worldwide donor deaths. We reviewed all published articles from the medical literature on LDLT and searched the lay literature for donor deaths from 1989 to February 2006. We classified each death as "definitely," "possibly," or "unlikely" related to donor surgery. We identified 19 donor deaths (and one additional donor in a chronic vegetative state). Thirteen deaths and the vegetative donor were "definitely," 2 were "possibly," and 4 were "unlikely" related to donor surgery. The estimated rate of donor death "definitely" related to donor surgery is 0.15%. The rate of donor death which is "definitely" or "possibly" related to the donor surgery is 0.20%. This analysis provides a source document of all identifiable living liver donor deaths, provides a better estimate of donor death rate, and may provide an impetus for centers with unreported deaths to submit these outcomes to the liver transplantation community.

Outcome of pediatric renal transplantation in Labfi Nejad Hospital, Tehran, Iran

Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for children with end-stage renal disease. In Iran, a kidney transplantation program was started in the Labfi Nejad Hospital, Tehran in 1985. From 1985 to 2003, 278 children (mean age 11.6 years, 59.7% males) received their first renal transplant. All transplants were donations from live donors (12.5% live-related donors); 30.8% of patients were preemptively transplanted. The overall 1-year patient survival rate was 92% and the 5-year survival rate 74%. The median graft survival time was 7.2 years. The rate of graft survival was 88.8% at 1 year, 77% at 3 years, 67% at 5 years, 50% at 7 years, and 43% at 10 years after transplantation. The survival rate of patients and transplants improved significantly with time (p<0.05). In patients transplanted before 1997, the 5-year graft survival was 50% and 82% in patients transplanted after 1997. At the same time intervals, the frequency of acute rejection episodes was 66.6 versus 40.8% and of chronic rejection 50.5 versus 28.7%. The outcome in children below the age of 6 years was poor. Graft survival was negatively correlated with the frequency and an early time point of acute rejection episodes. The modus of transplantation (preemptive or postdialysis) did not influence the results. In conclusion, patient and graft survival in transplanted children significantly improved with time, thus reflecting greater medical and surgical experience, new immunosuppressive drugs, and better compliance.

Pediatric live-donor kidney transplantation in Mansoura Urology & Nephrology Center: a 28-year perspective

Our objective was to evaluate our overall experience in pediatric renal transplantation. Between March 1976 and March 2004, 1,600 live-donor kidney transplantations were carried out in our center; 216 of the patients were 18 years old or younger (mean age 12.9 years). There were 136 male patients and 80 female patients. The commonest causes of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) were renal dysplasia (22%), nephrotic syndrome (20%), hereditary nephritis (16%), and obstructive uropathy (16%). Of the donors, 94% were one-haplotype matched and the rest were identical. Pre-emptive transplantation was performed in 51 (23%) patients. Triple-therapy immunosuppression (prednisone + cyclosporine + azathioprine) was used in 78.2% of transplants. Rejection-free recipients constituted 47.7%. Hypertension (62%) was the commonest complication. A substantial proportion of patients (48%) were short, with height standard deviation score (SDS) less than -1.88. The overall infection rate was high, and the majority (53%) of infections were bacterial. The graft survival at 1 year, 5 years and 10 years were 93.4%, 73.3% and 48.2%, respectively, while the patients' survival at 1, 5 and 10 years were 97.6%, 87.8% and 75.3%, respectively. Despite long-term success results of pediatric renal transplantation in a developing country, there is a risk of significant morbidity.

Impact of incidentally found hepatocellular carcinoma on the outcome of living donor liver transplantation

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) nodules newly found in the explant liver have been observed, but the impact on patient prognosis is not known. Sixty HCC patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation were the subjects of the study. Radiologic findings prior to transplantation and pathologic findings of the explant liver were compared. Histologic characteristics of preoperatively overlooked tumors were examined. The influence of the discrepancy between these findings on tumor recurrence was evaluated. A total of 227 HCC nodules were found in the explant livers. Of these, 91 nodules (40%) were newly found by pathologic examination. They were smaller and more likely to be well differentiated than the others. The number and size of the tumors were underestimated in 50% (30/60) and 32% (19/60), respectively. There was no significant difference in the recurrence-free survival rate between patients who met the Milan criteria both in the pre- and post-transplant evaluation (n = 29) and those who met the Milan criteria preoperatively, but exceeded the criteria in the explant (n = 19). Nodules newly found in the explant liver had little impact on recurrence-free survival. A decision for liver transplantation according to the Milan criteria based on preoperative evaluation is valuable for securing an excellent outcome.

Ureteral Complications in the Renal Transplant Recipient after Laparoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy

OBJECTIVES

We report on ureteral and surgical complications in our first 110 consecutive recipients of kidneys procured with laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy (LLDN).

METHODS

The records of all living donor transplants with LLDN performed between February 1999 and December 2004, including 10 pediatric transplants, were reviewed retrospectively. Three urologists performed LLDN using a pure laparoscopic non-hand-assisted transperitoneal technique. Kidney transplantation was performed in a standard fashion. For ureteroneocystostomy, the intravesical Politano-Leadbetter (P-L) technique was used.

RESULTS

Two-year patient and graft survival was 99% and 98%, respectively. Serum creatinine at 12 months was 1.36+/-0.1mg/dl in adult and 0.99+/-0.23 mg/dl in pediatric recipients. Nineteen right donor kidneys were transplanted into adult recipients. Surgical complications included three symptomatic lymphoceles, one peritransplant haematoma and one kinking of a lower pole artery. All five (4.5%) ureteral complications occurred in adult recipients with a mean age of 33.2+/-2.8 years. The incidence of ureteral complications was not clustered around the early phase of our LLDN experience. Of the three (2.7%) patients diagnosed with ureteral obstruction, two required ureteral reimplantation, and one was managed conservatively. Another two patients (1.8%) with a urinary leak received a double J stent and a cystostomy catheter for 3 and 5 months, respectively. Of the five patients with a ureteral complication, three had received a donor kidney with more than one renal artery.

CONCLUSIONS

LLDN combined with the intravesical (P-L) ureteral implantation technique provides excellent graft outcomes with low recipient morbidity. Renal artery multiplicity may increase the risk of ureteral complications.