Prodrug delivery of novel PTP1B inhibitors to enhance insulin signalling

A growing percentage of the population is resistant to two key hormones - insulin and leptin - as a result of increased obesity, often leading to significant health consequences such as type 2 diabetes. Protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B) is a key negative regulator of signalling by both of these hormones, so that inhibitors of this enzyme may provide promise for correcting endocrine abnormalities in both diabetes and obesity. As with other tyrosine phosphatases, identification of viable drug candidates targeting PTP1B has been elusive because of the nature of its active site. Beginning with novel phosphotyrosine mimetics, we have designed some of the most potent PTP1B inhibitors. However, their highly acidic structures limit intrinsic permeability and pharmacokinetics. Ester prodrugs of these inhibitors improve their drug-like properties with the goal of delivering these nanomolar inhibitors to the cytoplasm of cells within target tissues. In addition to identifying prodrugs that is able to deliver active drugs into cells to inhibit PTP1B and increase insulin signalling, these compounds were further modified to gain a variety of cleavage properties for targeting activity in vivo. One such prodrug candidate improved insulin sensitivity in ob/ob mice, with lowered fasting blood glucose levels seen in the context of lowered fasting insulin levels following 4 days of intraperitoneal dosing. The results presented in this study highlight the potential for design of orally active drug candidates targeting PTP1B, while also delineating the considerable challenges remaining.

Adding nutritional value to meat and milk from pasture-fed livestock

Staple meat and milk provide excellent nutrition, but when traditional foods and ingredients are tailored to meet the particular nutritional or lifestyle demands of a population they become even more attractive and valuable. These foods can be considered as delivery systems for health-promoting nutrients. Nutritional improvement of meat and milk can be achieved several ways, preferably by making desirable changes on-farm to directly improve the food without subsequent manipulations. Scope for these changes is limited by animal homeostasis, but alternatives may be less desirable. Methods in vivo that suit typical pastoral farming practice and can complement the solving of animal health and production problems include: selection of traits or phenotypes; specialty diets; long-acting parenteral supplements; and modification of ruminal microflora. Successful techniques to increase the concentration of calcium, selenium, iodine and iron in milk or meat are described. Manipulations to change composition are only one part of bringing tailored foods to market. Commercial realisation of these new products needs the initiative and collaboration of scientists, veterinarians, growers and producers responding to market pull. The uptake of future biotechnologies to capture more value inside the farm gate will also be required if the pastoral industry in New Zealand is to sustain a global competitive advantage.

Phase II study of CKD602, a camptothecin analog, in combination with carboplatin for the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer

5554

Background: Belotecan (Camtobell, Chong Keun Dang Corp, Seoul, Korea; CKD602) is a camptothecin derivative with anti-tumor properties recently developed. This phase II study was designed to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of belotecan combined with carboplatin in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Methods: Belotecan 0.3 mg/m2/day (days 1–5) and carboplatin AUC 5 (day 5) were administered every 3 weeks for 6 cycles. Eligible patients had recurrent EOC, peritoneal serous cancer, or fallopian tube cancer. The primary objective was to determine response rate defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and CA-125 response; other end points included toxicities and progression free survival (PFS). Results: Until this preliminary analysis, sixteen patients had received the treatment and 13 patients were evaluable for response. Eight patients had platinum-sensitive disease (minimum treatment free interval≥6 months) and 6 had platinum-resistant disease (minimum treatment free interval <6 months). Overall response rate was 53.9%; there were 3 complete responses (23.1%), 4 partial responses (30.8%), 4 patients with stable disease (30.8%), and two patients with progressive disease (15.4%). Grade 3 and 4 hematologic toxicities included neutropenia (38%), thrombocytopenia (25%), and anemia (15%); there was one episode of febrile neutropenia. None of the patients experienced grades 3 and 4 gastrointestinal toxicities, including nausea, vomiting, and anorexia. Conclusions: The newly developed topoisomerase I inhibitor, belotecan (CKD-602), combined with carboplatin is a well-tolerated regimen with activity in recurrent EOC; further testing of this regimen is warranted.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Association of tobacco (T) use with risk of distant metastases (DM), tumor recurrence, and death in patients (pts) with HPV-positive (+) squamous cell cancer of the oropharynx (SCCOP)

6001

Background: Chemoradiation (CRT) for HPV (+) SCCOP is associated with a more favorable prognosis than HPV-negative (-) SCCOP. However, the interaction of HPV and T in terms of etiology and disease progression remains unclear. HPV (+) SCCOP pts were prospectively studied to determine if T use was a key variable in discriminating which pts would develop DM, locoregional recurrences (LR), or second primaries (SP). Methods: From 1999–2007, 124 pts with stage III/IV SCCOP were enrolled in one of two CRT trials. Tumor specimens were analyzed for HPV presence and type. Use of T, determined via self-reporting and chart review, was recorded as both continuous (number of pack-yrs) and categorical (never, former, and current) variables. Former T users were subdivided into an early cessation group (quit ≥ 20 yrs prior to diagnosis) and a late cessation group (quit < 20 yrs prior to diagnosis). T use and HPV status were analyzed with respect to survival & the development of DM, LR, or SP. Results: Of the 124 pts, 100 (81%) were HPV (+), 22 of which developed disease progression (22%). Twenty-four were HPV (-), 12 of which had disease progression (50%). Seventeen of 124 pts (14%) developed DM [12 HPV (+), 5 HPV (-)]. Nine of 124 (7%) developed LR [5 HPV (+), 4 HPV (-)], and 8 of 124 (7%) developed SP [5 HPV (+), 3 HPV (-)]. Thirty-two HPV (+) pts were never-T users, 88% (28/32) of which remain alive with no evidence of disease; 3 died from other causes and 1 died of lung metastases from SCCOP. Sixty-eight were HPV (+) and had T exposure. Of 46 former T users, 37/46 (80%) are living. Twenty were HPV (+) and in the early cessation group, 35% (7/20) of which had disease progression [3 LR, 3 DM, 1 SP]. Twenty-six HPV (+) pts were former T users in the late cessation group, 11% (3/26) of which had disease progression [2 DM, 1 SP]. Of 22 HPV (+) current T users, 68% (15/22) are alive and 36% (8/22) have developed disease progression. Seventeen of the 24 HPV (-) pts were current T users, 47% (8/17) of which developed disease progression. Conclusions: Never-T users with HPV-positive SCCOP have improved survival & reduced risk of disease progression compared to HPV (+) & HPV (-) former & current T users.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

BEAM or BuCyE high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients

7097

Background: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and toxicity of two high-dose regimens for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL): BEAM (BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan) and BuCyE (busulfan, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide). Methods: We analysed 65 NHL patients, who underwent high-dose chemotherapy with BEAM (N=43) or BuCyE (N=22), followed by ASCT, at the Asan Medical Center. BEAM was used from February 2002 to October 2005, and BuCyE was used from November 2005 to April 2008. Results: Median age was 46 years (range: 15–68), and baseline characteristics, such as gender, International Prognostic Index (IPI), age adjusted IPI, stage and status of disease at ASCT, and median number of infused CD 34+cells/kg were well balanced between groups. The incidence of mucositis, nausea/vomiting, diarrhea and bleeding, and the number of events clinically important infections during ASCT did not differ between groups. Median follow-up for survivors was 49.3 months in the BEAM group and 21.5 months in the BuCyE group. Median overall survival (OS) was 30.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.19–53.0 months) and 22.6 months (95% CI, 12.1–33.1 months) and median event-free survival (EFS) was 16.1 months (95% CI, 0.0–53.6 months) and 11.2 months (95% CI, 0.0–22.5 months) in the BEAM and BuCyE group, respectively. There were no significant differences in OS (p=0.636) and EFS (p=0.575) between the two groups. Conclusions: In our analysis, BuCyE appeared to be not inferior to BEAM for survival. And we found that regimen-related toxicities did not differ significantly between the two groups.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Primary chemotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, or whole brain radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with asymptomatic brain metastases

e19063

Background: Approximately 25 to 30% of patients with lung cancer develop brain metastases at some stage and 12∼18% at the time of initial presentation. Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) has long been a mainstay of treatment of brain metastases. Another treatment approach, Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a method of delivering high doses of focal irradiation to a tumor while minimizing the irradiation to the adjacent normal tissue. However, the prognosis of NSCLC patients with asymptomatic brain metastases, who are not treated with SRS or WBRT, has not been fully investigated yet. This study aimed to analyze the outcome for various treatment modalities in NSCLC patients with asymptomatic brain metastases. Methods: We reviewed the medical records of 129 patients with a histopathologically proven NSCLC and a synchronous brain metastases between January 2003 and December 2007. The patients were categorized as primary chemotherapy, primary SRS, and primary WBRT group: primary chemotherapy (78 patients), primary SRS (24 patients), and primary WBRT (27 patients). Results: With median follow-up of 30.0 months (7.2 -70.7), the median overall survival (OS) for the entire patients was 15.6 months (0.5–50.7) and the progression free survival (PFS) was 6.1 months (0.3- 53.0). The OS was 22.4m for primary SRS group, 13.9m for primary chemotherapy group, and 17.7m for primary WBRT group; p=0.86). However, patients treated with primary SRS showed trend toward prolonged survival compared to those of primary WBRT p=0.06). Subset analysis of 110 adenocarcinoma patients showed that the median OS for patients treated with primary SRS was longer than those of primary WRBT (29.3m vs 17.7m p=0.01) or primary chemotherapy (29.3m vs 14.6m p=0.04). Conclusions: These results suggest that for NSCLC patients with asymptomatic brain metastases at first diagnosis, SRS rather than primary chemotherapy or WBRT might be considered as initial treatment, especially for patients with adenocarcinoma.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Use of tumor volume as measured on F18FDG-PET/CT scan as a predictive biomarker for head and neck cancer

e17019

Background: Functional imaging, PET and its fusion with anatomical modalities, PET/CT promise to improve detection and characteristic disease. The objective of this study was to evaluate metabolic tumor volume as measured on F-18 FDG-PET/CT and its association with treatment response and prognosis in patients with head and neck cancer. Methods: The study population consisted of patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy for a maximum of three cycles followed by radiation therapy. Before treatment patients were taken FDG-PET/CT scan, SUVmax, tumor volume, metastasis were recorded. Results: We enrolled 59 patients with stage III ann IV head and neck cancer. The median age was 66 years (range 47–81). There were 32 patients with stage III and 27 with stage IV. The mean SUVmax was 8.8 (range, 1.478). The mean tumor volume was 21.3 cm3 (range, 0.2–170). There was no correlation between tumor volume and SUVmax (correlation coefficient 0.295). Higher SUVmax was not associated with an increased risk of lymph node and distant metastasis at diagnosis (p = 0.968). But higher tumor volume was associated with an increased risk of lymph node and distant metastasis at diagnosis (p = 0.063). The metabolic tumor volume as measured on PET/CT scans was predictor of treatment response and disease -free survival. The response rate were 84% (21/25) for an SUVmax <5.5, 55% (19/34) for an SUVmax > 5.5 (p = 0.038). The disease free survival were 31.1month for an SUVmax <5.5, 4.6months for an SUVmax > 5.5 (p = 0.025). Conclusions: The metabolic tumor volume as measured on F-18FDG-PET/CT is a predictive biomarker of treatment response and disease free survival for patients with head and neck cancer.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Pemetrexed versus gefitinib versus erlotinib in previously treated non-small cell lung cancer by retrospective analysis

e19103

Background: The standards in 2nd-line therapy with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were erlotinib or pemetrexed as well as docetaxel. To evaluate the efficacies and safeties of pemetrexed, gefitinib, and erlotinib in previously treated NSCLC we analyzed the datas retrospectively. Methods: Eligible patents were 1) histologically confirmed pretreated advanced (stage IIIB or IV) NSCLC, 2) with at least one measurable lesion, 3) age over 18 years, 4) performance status (PS) 0–2, and 5) should never experience other two drugs as previous therapy. Patients of pemetrexed group received IV infusion of 500mg/m2 pemetrexed mixed with normal saline every 3 weeks with vitamin B12 and folate supplementation. Patients of gefitinib group received gefitinib 250mg PO daily and of erlotinib took erlotinib 150mg PO daily. Cycles of IV pemetrexed or taking PO drugs were continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Results: we analyzed 57 patients (pemetrexed; 20, gefitnib; 20, and erlotinib; 17). The response rates were 5.3%, 25.0%, and 12.5% (P=0.22), and the disease control rate were 5.3%, 40.0%, and 50.0% respectively (P<0.01). Median progression-free survival (PFS) of pemetrexed, gefitinib, and erlotinib were 1.7, 3.5 and 4.4 months (P<0.01) and median overall survival (OS) were 5.6, 21.8 and 21.5 months respectively (P=0.04). In subgroup analysis, patients with non-squamous carcinoma, smokers and good PS (0 or 1) showed longer PFS and OS in gefitinib and erlotinib compared with in pemetrexed. All of these agents showed mild and tolerable toxicity. Conclusions: In retrospective analysis, the patients with gefitinib or erlotinib had longer PFS and OS than pemetrexed, eventhough there was no significant difference for response rate in three group. These results have to confirm by large randomized prospective study because the sample size was small and it was not randomized.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

National survey of physicians practice patterns: Fertility preservation and cancer patients

CRA9508

The full, final text of this abstract will be available in Part II of the 2009 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings, distributed onsite at the Meeting on May 30, 2009, and as a supplement to the June 20, 2009, issue of the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Employment status and work-related difficulties in family caregivers of terminal cancer patients compared with the general population

9580

Background: This study was aimed to investigate the employment status and work-related difficulties among family caregiver of terminal cancer patients compared with the general population. Methods: A survey was administered to 381 family caregivers of terminal cancer patients at 11hospitals and 994 general populations aged more than 18 years. Results: Family caregivers of terminal cancer patients were female (66.7%) and the patient's spouse (50.9%), with mean age of 46.8years (SD, 13.5). 212(56.1%) were working before cancer diagnosis, however, only 133(36.3%) continued working currently. Compared with the general population, 233(63.7%)family caregivers of terminal cancer patients were more likely to be not working (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] =2.39; 95% confidence interval [95%CI] = 1.73 to 3.29).Those who continued working reported more easy fatigability (40.6% vs 22.4%) and reduced working hours (20.3% vs 2.1%) than general population. For those doing housework, caregiving itself (56.4%) were identified to be the most common difficulties, followed by easy fatigability (32.3%). Major reasons for not working were providing care to the terminal cancer patients (24.0%). Older age (aOR=10.37; 95%CI=2.80 to 38.41), female sex (aOR=4.28; 95%CI=2.25 to 8.13), lower household income (aOR=2.19; 95%CI=1.19 to 4.06), bearing medical cost by other than spouse (aOR=2.10; 95%CI=1.05 to 4.19), and low performance status of the patients (aOR=2.00; 95%CI=1.01 to 3.95) were significantly associated with not working. Conclusions: When compared to the general population, family caregivers of terminal cancer patients were at risk job loss from their caregiving burden, and caregiving and easy fatigability were the major work-related difficulties. Our study might help make a strategy to reduce job loss for family caregivers' caregiving burden.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Survival time and its prognostic factors in advanced unresected cholangiocarcinoma without chemoradiation

e15681

Background: To evaluate survival time and its prognostic factors contributing to survival of advanced unresected cholangiocarcinoma. Methods: We reviewed the experience of 330 patients with histologically proven unresected advanced intrahepatic and hilar cholangiocarcinoma and evaluated their survival time and significant prognostic factors. They did not receive any surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy and they underwent only palliative nonsurgical biliary drainage if it was needed to relieve biliary obstructive symptom. Results: Survival time of overall cholangiocarcinoma (median±SD) was 3.9±7.8 months; 3±5.3 months for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, 5.9±10.1 months for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. By Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients survived significantly shorter than hilar cholangiocarcinoma patients. By multivariate analysis for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, distant metastasis was independently associated with shorter survival time. Multivariate analysis for hilar cholangiocarcinoma showed initial CEA > 30 ng/dl were independent predictors of shorter survival. Conclusions: Patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma who do not undergo surgery, chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy have a dismal prognosis. We hope that the outcome of our study would help clinicians better predict the prognosis of cholangiocarcinoma patients not receiving such aggressive treatments. These data would be used as the comparable data for control groups of future studies to assess the outcome of newly designed or developed treatment method.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Pretransplant comorbidity as an outcome predictor in adult patients younger than 60 years of age receiving standard induction chemotherapy for de novo acute myeloid leukemia

7055

Background: Comorbidity has been evaluated as an outcome predictor in elderly patients receiving induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) as well as in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for various hematologic disorders. In this single-institute retrospective study, we investigated the prognostic significance of comorbidity in younger AML patients. Methods: A total of 276 patients, aged 14 to 59 years, who received standard induction chemotherapy consisting of cytarabine plus daunorubicin or idarubicin for de novo AML excluding M3 subtype between 2000 and 2007 were included. Pre-treatment comorbidity score, assessed by the HCT specific comorbidity index (HCT-CI), was calculated using clinico- pathologic data, which were retrieved from Asan Medical Center Leukemia Registry Database. The HCT-CI score was 0 in 113 patients (40.9%), 1 in 94 (34.1%), and ≥ 2 in 69 (25.0%). Results: In the univariate analyses, the HCT-CI score was not a significant prognostic factor for induction of complete remission (CR), whereas survival outcomes such as overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS) and event-free survival (EFS) were significantly different according to the HCT-CI scores (Table). The multivariate models showed that the HCT-CI score was an independent prognostic factor for EFS (P=0.044), but not for OS (P=0.301) and RFS (P=0.119). Other independent prognostic factors were age (P=0.001 for OS, P=0.002 for RFS, P=0.006 for EFS), initial leukocyte counts (P=0.006 for CR, P<0.001 for OS, P=0.039 for RFS), initial uric acid levels (P=0.004 for RFS, P=0.001 for EFS), and cytogenetic risk groups (P=0.012 for CR, P<0.001 for OS, P<0.001 for RFS, P=0.005 for EFS). Conclusions: Pre-treatment comorbidity may provide additional prognostic information over established prognostic factors in patients younger than 60 years of age receiving standard induction chemotherapy for de novo AML.

[Table: see text]

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Study of anxiety and depression in cervical cancer survivors

e20644

Background: Cervical cancer is the second leading cause of cancer related deaths among women in Korea. However, few studies have been conducted to elucidate the psychological distress of this population. This study aimed to examine the prevalence of anxiety and depression among cervical cancer survivors, and to identify factors associated with such caseness. Methods: A total of 832 cervical cancer survivors recruited from six large hospitals in Korea completed a mailed survey, which included the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30, and QLQ-CX24. Anxiety and depression were defined by a score of ≥ 8 on the HADS subscales. With a framework that included socio-demographic, clinical, and symptom characteristics, multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with anxiety and depression. Results: Among cervical cancer survivors, 34.3% reported HADS-defined anxiety and 39.7% reported HADS-defined depression. Anxiety was associated with having a lower income (OR=1.95, p=.021), smoking (OR=2.42, p=.002), poor body image (OR=3.26, p<.001), peripheral neuropathy (OR=2.21, p=.002), menopausal symptoms (OR=2.02, p=.004), and sexual inactivity (OR=2.35, p=.001). Depression was associated with younger age (OR=1.75, p=.006), having a lower income (OR=2.14 p<.001), drinking (OR=1.56, p=.050), poor body image (OR=4.59, p<.001), peripheral neuropathy (OR=2.34, p<.001), and sexual inactivity (OR=2.68, p=.002). Both anxiety and depression were influenced by socio-demographic factors, health behaviors, and cervical cancer-specific symptom characteristics rather than cancer- or treatment-related factors. Conclusions: Anxiety and depression were highly prevalent among cervical cancer survivors in Korea. This examination of risk factors for anxiety and depression will be helpful for the development of clinical management strategies in cervical cancer survivors.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Adherence to National Quality Forum (NQF) colorectal cancer indicators among members of the Florida Initiative for Quality Cancer Care (FIQCC) consortium

6563

Background: FIQCC is a consortium of 10 institutions participating in a comprehensive practice-based system of quality self-assessment across a number of cancer types. The NQF has endorsed several performance measures to assess the quality of care for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. We have sought to identify adherence to NQF CRC indicators among members of FIQCC. Methods: Comprehensive chart reviews were conducted for all patients with CRC first seen in 2006 by a medical oncologist at one of the 10 FIQCC sites (2 academic/8 community). NQF quality measures included: 1) consideration or administration of chemotherapy to patients with stage III colon cancer (CC); 2) completeness of pathology reporting for CRC; 3) >12 regional lymph nodes (LN) examined for resected CC. Statistical comparisons were performed using chi-squared analysis. Results: The population consisted of 475 patients (250 men and 225 women) with a median age of 65 years (range 27–92). Chemotherapy was considered/administered in 96.5% (136/141) of stage III CC patients. With respect to CRC pathologic reporting, there was strong compliance (>90%) for reporting the number of LN examined and involved by tumor, proximal/distal margin status, depth of invasion, and histologic grade. However, only 225 of 295 (76.2%) reports documented lymphovascular invasion status. Radial margin status was included for 45% (27/60) of surgical rectal cancer specimens. Only 73.9% (173/234) of CC cases had >12 LN examined. Of the NQF measures, significant differences across practice sites were noted for the reporting of histologic grade (p = 0.0002), proximal/distal margin status (p = 0.049), and lymphovascular invasion (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Although there was uniformly strong adherence to the application of adjuvant therapy for stage III CC across FIQCC sites, the adequacy of lymphadenectomy and LN examination for resected CC was lower and varied considerably across sites. There remains room for improvement of pathologic CRC reporting across the whole consortium as well as at individual sites. The FIQCC initiative allows for the identification of targets for global quality improvement as well as of specific measures for individual institutions.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Value of preoperative staging of breast cancer patients using computed tomography to detect asymptomatic lung and liver metastasis

1105

Background: Preoperative clinical staging in breast cancer patients is important to determine the most appropriate treatment plans and to predict prognosis for individual patients. Identifying unexpected distant metastases in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients frequently alters initial treatment plans. Routine imaging studies to detect lung or liver metastasis is not indicated in patients with early and operable breast cancer. A recent study showed that routine use of chest radiograph and liver ultrasound does not provide much diagnostic benefit in early breast cancer patients. Methods: We aimed to investigate the value of preoperative computed tomography to detect asymptomatic liver and lung metastasis in breast cancer patients. We performed preoperative CT for 667 breast cancer patients to detect lung and liver metastasis among 1,636 primary breast cancer patients who had been diagnosed and treated between January 2006 and December 2007 at Seoul National University Hospital. Results: CT showed abnormal findings (suspicious of metastasis or indeterminate nodules) in 78 patients (10.5%). Among these, abnormal finding in 13 patients (1.7%) turned out to be true metastatic lesions. There was no CT-detected lung or liver metastasis in patients with T1 tumor and 4 metastases in patients with T2 tumor. There was no CT-detected lung or liver metastasis in patients with negative axillary lymph node metastasis. When patients were classified according to the AJCC staging, CT-detected true metastatic lesions were only present in stage III patients (13 out of 173 patients, 7.5%). The true metastatic lesions in lung or liver were all small sized nodules, ranging from 0.3cm to 1.2cm in largest diameters. In seven patients, the CT-detected metastatic lesions were less than 1cm which is in contrast with the previous studies. Conclusions: Our results demonstrated the lack of usefulness in performing routine CT exams to detect asymptomatic liver and lung metastasis in early breast cancer patients. Staging CT might be useful in stage III patients, since 13 (7.5%) patients were upstaged to stage IV by the use of CT.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Detection of human papillomavirus DNA from the breast carcinomas and the cervix: Are they correlated?

1544

Background: The association between human papillomavirus (HPV) and cervical cancer is well known. However, it remains unclear whether there is also a correlation between HPV infection and human breast cancer. The aim of this study is to investigate the hypothetic association between HPV infection and breast carcinoma through the comparison of the type of HPV infection in the breast and cervix. Methods: From April to December 2008, 106 patients who were diagnosed as breast cancer and underwent mastectomy were analyzed. Their breast tissue (tumor, normal parenchyme, and nipple-areolar complex) and cervix smear were analyzed for HPV infection with DNA chip microarray method. Results: 24 patients (23.1%) showed HPV infection in their cervix smear; high-risk type of HPV was found in 12 patients. But only six patients (5.8%) revealed the HPV infection in breast cancer; half of them were high-risk group (HPV-16, 31); the same types of HPV was found at the normal breast tissue in two patients of them. However, there were no patients with HPV infection in both breast and cervix concurrently. Conclusions: There were no positive results for HPV infection of cervix in HPV-infected breast cancer patients. Also, we cannot find that the presence of high-risk HPV in the breast might be related to the breast carcinogenesis. We concluded that HPV infection is not correlated to the carcinogenesis of breast.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

The relationship between the responses to prior systemic therapies and the efficacy of subsequent pemetrexed (Pem) therapy in patients (pts) with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

8061

Background: Pem has been used for pts with previously treated advanced NSCLC. We tried to examine whether the response to prior systemic therapy regimen could predict the efficacy of subsequent Pem therapy. Methods: The medical record of clinical stage IIIB or IV NSCLC pts who received Pem as the second-line or further-line treatment were analyzed retrospectively. Prior systemic therapies were divided into 4 types [gemcitabine based (G), paclitaxel based (P), docetaxel based (D), and EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (I)]. Along with that, patients were classified into two response groups, either responders (partial responses or stable disease for 4 months or more) or non-responders to each type of the prior therapy. Response rate (RR) and progression free survival (PFS) for Pem therapy were analyzed according to the response groups for each type of prior therapies. Results: A total of 247 pts received Pem therapy, and their median PFS was 2.3 months. The number of pts who previously received G, P, D and I, was 159, 120, 110, and 139, respectively. The RR for Pem was higher in responders to G therapy than in non-responders to G (15.0% vs 4.3%, p = 0.02). In addition, median PFS after Pem therapy was longer in responders to G therapy than in non-responders (3.0 vs 1.7 months, p = 0.007). However, the responses to prior P, D, I therapies had no impact on the efficacy of subsequent Pem therapy. By univariate analyses, the variables of the responders to G therapy, female, never-smoker, ECOG performance status 0–1 were good predictive factors for Pem therapy in terms of PFS. By multivariate analysis, only the responders to G therapy had a statistical significance (Hazard ratio = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.37–0.82). Conclusions: The response to the prior gemcitabine based therapy was a predictive factor for subsequent pemetrexed therapy for advanced NSCLC.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A randomized phase II study of FOLFOX or FOLFIRI.3 as second-line therapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer previously treated with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy

4618

Background: Only few clinical trials have been conducted in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer after failure of first-line gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. We conducted a randomized phase II trial of modified FOLFOX vs. modified FOLFIRI.3 as second-line regimen for the patients with gemcitabine refractory pancreatic cancer ( NCT00786006 ). Methods: Patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma previously treated with gemcitabine were randomly assigned to FOLFOX or FOLFIRI.3 stratifying by age (≤ 65 vs. >65), performance status (0–1 vs. 2) and prior response to gemcitabine (PR/SD vs. PD). FOlFIRI.3 regimen consisted of Irinotecan 70 mg/m2 (over 60 min) D1, leucovorin 400 mg/m2 (over 2h) D1, 5-FU 2000 mg/m2 (over 46 hours) from D1, then irinotecan 70 mg/m2 (over 60 min) at the end of the 5-FU infusion every two week. FOLFOX regimen is composed of oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 (over 120 min) D1, LV 400 mg/m2 D1, 5-FU 2,000 mg/m2 (over 46 hours) every two week. The primary end-point was 6-month overall survival (P0=20%) and Simon-Wittes-Ellenberg design was used to calculate the sample size (29 evaluable patients for each treatment arm). Results: From January 2007 to December 2008, sixty patients were enrolled and randomized to FOLFOX (N=30) or FOLFIRI.3 (N=30). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between each arm; median age 56 (35–60) vs. 56 yo (37–73); ECOG PS 0/1/2, 5/24/1 vs. 5/25/0; prior response to gemcitabine-based chemotherapy PR/SD/PD 10/13/7 vs. 10/11/9. With a median follow-up period of 6.0 months (95% CI, 4.7–7.3) the median overall survival was 4.0 months in both group (HR=0.95, 95% CI 0.52–1.75) with 6-month survival rates of 25% and 20%, respectively. The median PFS was 1.4 months for FOLFOX and 1.9 months for FOLFIRI.3 (HR=1.11, 95% CI, 0.64–1.92). Disease control (PR+SD) was achieved in 20% (5/25 in FOLFOX) and 28% (7/25 in FOLFIRI.3) of patients with measurable disease. The incidences of grade 3/4 toxicities were similar in both groups. Conclusions: Both FOLFOX and FOLFIRI.3 were tolerated with manageable toxicity, offering modest activity as second-line treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer, previously treated with gemcitabine.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Impact of patient age on quality of care in the treatment of colorectal cancer: Results from the Florida Initiative for Quality Cancer Care (FIQCC)

6548

Background: The quality of colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment has been suggested to vary by age, with older patients receiving poorer quality care. As part of a state-wide quality improvement effort, the FIQCC developed and implemented methods to assess the quality of care of several cancers among practices across the state of Florida. The current report focuses on the variability of adherence to CRC quality indicators for treatment and surveillance by patient age. Methods: Medical chart reviews were conducted of all patients first seen by a medical oncologist for CRC in 2006 at one of the 10 FIQCC sites (2 academic/8 community). Abstractors were trained and periodically monitored. Abstraction focused on assessing adherence to quality indicators consistent with evidence-, consensus-, and regulatory-based guidelines. Variability in adherence across age quartiles was evaluated using a Fisher's exact test. Of the 475 patients whose charts were reviewed, 53% were male, 80% were diagnosed with colon cancer and the median age was 65 years (range 27 to 92 years). Results: Adherence was consistently (p values>.05) high across all age quartiles for presence of chemotherapy flow sheets (85%-93%), assessment of body-surface area (98%-100%) and performance of complete colon evaluation within 12 months of surgery (87%-89%). Moderate-to-low adherence was consistent by age for performance of CEA test before (74%-84%) or in the 6 months after (75%-82%) surgery/chemotherapy, and documentation of planned chemotherapy dose (51%-59%). Adherence decreased with increasing age for documentation of discussion/referral for chemotherapy in non-metastatic CRC cases (100%, 99%, 93%, and 89%; p = 0.001), but was consistently adhered to for all ages among metastatic cases (100%). The documentation of consent for patients treated with chemotherapy also varied by age-quartile (63%. 57%, 79%, and 73%; p = 0.02). Conclusions: Overall quality of CRC treatment was not consistent across the broad spectrum of patient age. Our data suggest age related disparity in the recommendation for adjuvant chemotherapy. Efforts should be made to understand the reasons for these differences and to improve and standardize the quality of CRC care for patients across all age groups.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.