A multidisciplinary process to improve the efficiency of cardiac operating rooms

OBJECTIVE

To alter the approach to cardiac operating room services in an attempt to remain competitive in a cost-driven market.

DESIGN

Study of processes and strategies for tracking and decreasing the times required for the multiple components of the operating room period.

SETTING

Cardiac operating rooms in a tertiary care, university-affiliated hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

All patients undergoing primary coronary artery bypass grafting during December 1996 (baseline) and the following year (1997).

INTERVENTIONS

After participation in cost-containment meetings, site visits, and development of a working group, data collection was begun detailing the times of the various components of the operating room period. Changes of process were made to reduce operating room times. Most of these changes involved multitasking care: multiple people performing various tasks at the same time. All measured operating room intervals were decreased. There was no difference in morbidity and mortality over this time period.

CONCLUSION

Development of a working group, with support from the hospital administration, can significantly decrease the time of tasks in a cardiac surgery operating room without adversely affecting morbidity and mortality.

Cost estimates for treatment of cardiac ischemia (from the Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot [ACIP] study)

Costs for management of myocardial ischemia are enormous, yet comparison cost and outcome data for various ischemia treatment strategies from randomized trials are lacking and will require cost and resource utilization data from a large prospective trial. The Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot provided feasibility data for planning such a trial and an opportunity to estimate the long-term costs of different treatment strategies. Economic implications for ischemia management were compared in 558 patients with stable coronary artery disease and myocardial ischemia during both stress testing and daily life. Participants were randomized to 3 different initial treatment strategies and followed for 2 years. Based on cost trends over follow-up, costs for subsequent care were estimated. As expected, due to initial procedural costs, at 3 months, estimated costs for revascularization were approximately 10 times greater than costs for a medical care strategy. Extrapolated costs for anticipated resource consumption for care beyond 2 years, however, were approximately 2 times greater for an initial medical care strategy than for initial revascularization. This was due to increased need for drugs and hospitalizations for both late revascularizations and other ischemia-related events. Estimated costs for anticipated care in the medical strategies reached the anticipated cost of the revascularization strategy within 10 years. Because this cost-equal time period is well within the median life expectancy for such a patient population, these findings could have important public health implications and require testing in a full-scale prognosis trial. We anticipate that over the patients' life expectancy, early revascularization is likely to become either cost-neutral or cost-effective.

Economic evaluation of different minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVE

Several different techniques exist within the field of minimally invasive coronary artery surgery. In this study the impact of all these techniques on the total costs and economics has been evaluated.

METHODS

Since May 1997, 121 minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) procedures, 125 off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB), ten Port-Access coronary artery bypass (PA-CABG) and 10 endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting (ENDO-CABG) procedures were performed at our institution. A relative cost analysis of the different procedures was carried out in addition to a thorough evaluation done in five patients of each group dividing the costs into staff-related costs, material-related costs and general hospital costs. The costs were set in relation to regular CABG procedures.

RESULTS

Specific less invasive coronary artery surgical techniques, such as the MIDCAB or OPCAB technique already are able to reduce the total costs when compared to regular CABG procedures. Within the Port-Access group as well as the ENDO-CABG group, increased material- and general costs are present when compared to regular CABG leading to increased total hospital costs for PA-CABG and Endo-CABG in Germany.

CONCLUSION

At present, MIDCAB and OPCAB procedures are able to reduce total hospital charges, when compared to regular CABG procedures. Increased costs for Port-Access, as well as Endo-CABG surgeries may be compensated in the future by decreased costs due to a shorter phase of rehabilitation and faster return to regular professional activities.

Early discharge with home health care in the coronary artery bypass patient

Early hospital discharge after coronary artery bypass graft surgery has been the standard of practice throughout the United States. This study compared outcomes, readmissions, and costs for patients discharged early with home health care with those of patients discharged a day or more later without home health care. Discharging open-heart surgery patients on postoperative day 4 with home health care was found to be safe and cost-effective.

Identifying pre- and postoperative predictors of cost and length of stay for coronary artery bypass surgery

Prior studies of resource use for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery have either focused on a limited number of hospitals or have used charges instead of costs. We used a large statewide database (n = 6791) to study predictors of cost and length of stay (LOS) for CABG surgery. We used linear regression to sequentially model (a) specific procedures performed, (b) preoperative patient characteristics, and (c) postoperative events to determine the relative impact of these 3 factors on resource use. We then used the resulting models to calculate adjusted mean hospital costs and LOS. These 3 factors were all significantly associated with resource use. Postoperative events were the greatest determinant of costs, while preoperative characteristics were the greatest determinant of LOS. Despite risk adjustment for these factors, resource use differed significantly across 12 hospitals (mean cost range, $22,200 to $41,900; mean LOS range, 11 to 18 days), suggesting that some institutions may need to reduce their resource use.

Medicare physician payment reform and the utilization of cardiovascular procedures

Effective 1992, the US Congress implemented the Resource-Based Relative Value Scale (RBRVS) for pricing and reimbursing Medicare physician services. This study evaluates the post-1991 impacts of RBRVS on the utilization volumes of two leading cardiovascular procedures--Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Artery (PTCA) and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts (CABG). The regression model results based on HCFA-supplied data suggest that the new reimbursement policy reduced (increased) utilization volumes of the more (less) expensive CABG (PTCA) procedures. Physician adjustments to tightened HCFA reimbursements are partly aided by the increased percentage of Medicare patients enrolled in Medigap. The RBRVS fee schedule appears to be meeting its intended cost containment policy goals for the leading cardiovascular procedures.

Off-pump surgery decreases postoperative complications and resource utilization in the elderly

BACKGROUND

Bypass surgery in the elderly (age >70 years) has increased mortality and morbidity, which may be a consequence of cardiopulmonary bypass. We compare the outcomes of a cohort of elderly off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) patients with elderly conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients.

METHODS

Chart and provincial cardiac care registry data were reviewed for 30 consecutive elderly OPCAB patients (age 74.7 +/- 4.2 years) and 60 consecutive CABG patients (age 74.9 +/- 4.1 years, p = 0.82) with similar risk factor profiles: Parsonnet score 17.2 +/- 8.1 (OPCAB) versus 15.6 +/- 6.5 (CABG), p = 0.31; and Ontario provincial acuity index 4.5 +/- 1.9 (OPCAB) versus 4.3 +/- 2.0 (CABG), p = 0.65.

RESULTS

Mean hospital stay was 6.3 +/- 1.8 days for OPCAB patients and 7.7 +/- 3.9 days for CABG patients (p < 0.05). Average intensive care unit stay was 24.0 +/- 10.9 h for OPCAB patients versus 36.6 +/- 33.5 h for CABG patients (p < 0.05). Atrial fibrillation occurred in 10.0% of OPCAB patients and 28.3% of CABG patients (p < 0.05). Low output syndrome was observed in 10% of OPCAB patients and 31.7% of CABG patients (p < 0.05). Cost was reduced by $1,082 (Canadian) per patient in the OPCAB group. Postoperative OPCAB graft analysis showed 100% patency.

CONCLUSIONS

OPCAB is safe in the geriatric population and significantly reduces postoperative morbidity and cost.

Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass surgery

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass is gaining popularity as an alternative to conventional on-pump technique for myocardial revascularization. This includes minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) and full sternotomy off-pump (OPCAB) methods. These two approaches should be evaluated for financial and clinical appropriateness.

METHODS

Records of patients who had single or double bypass (internal mammary artery and/or saphenous vein) grafts between January 1997 and June 1998 were reviewed. These included 44 MIDCAB, 62 OPCAB, and 243 conventional coronary artery bypass (CCAB) patients. Univariate analysis was applied to pre, intra, and postoperative variables, comparing MIDCAB and OPCAB to the CCAB group. Procedural cost information was obtained from participating institutions.

RESULTS

MIDCAB patients compared to CCAB patients had a higher predicted risk (5.4+/-11 versus 2.3+/-2.8, p = 0.012) and OPCAB patients had a predicted risk of 5.3+/-7.8. MIDCAB and OPCAB procedures required less operating room time and blood utilization. Observed operative mortality rates were MIDCAB 4.5%, OPCAB 1.6%, and CCAB 2.8% (not significant). Mean hospital costs were CCAB at $19,000, OPCAB at $15,000, and $17,000 for MIDCAB.

CONCLUSIONS

Off pump procedures currently reflect acute episode-of-care cost savings over CCAB.

A randomized trial of endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest in coronary bypass surgery

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine whether or not endoscopic vein harvest is a reliable, beneficial, and cost-effective method for saphenous vein harvest in coronary bypass surgery (CABG).

METHODS

A total of 100 patients having primary CABG were prospectively randomized to either endoscopic (EVH; n = 47) or open saphenous vein harvest (OVH; n = 50). Three patients in the EVH group required both techniques and were excluded from analysis.

RESULTS

The groups did not differ in preoperative characteristics, including: age, gender, left ventricular function, height, weight, percent over ideal body weight, incidence of diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, or preoperative laboratory values (creatinine, albumin, or hematocrit). The EVH group had longer vein harvest and preparation times than the OVH group, while the incision length was significantly shorter. There was no difference between groups in mortality, perioperative myocardial infarction, intensive care unit or postoperative length of stay, blood product utilization, or discharge laboratory measures. There was more drainage noted from leg incisions at hospital discharge in the OVH (34%) versus EVH group (8%; p = 0.001), but more ecchymosis in the EVH group. Although there was a trend towards reduced leg incision pain in the EVH group, there was no statistically significant difference in pain or in the quality of life measure at any point in time. There was no difference between groups in readmission to hospital, administration of antibiotics, or incidence of leg infection. While mean hospital charges for the EVH group were approximately $1,500 greater than for OVH, this difference did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

EVH is a safe, reliable, and cost-neutral method for saphenous vein harvest. The best indication for EVH may be in patients who are at increased risk for wound infection and in those for whom cosmesis is a major concern.

The clinical and financial impact of port-access coronary revascularization

OBJECTIVE

Port-access coronary bypass grafting (CABG)was performed in an attempt to impact the clinical course of patients with coronary artery disease.

METHODS

One hundred patients (56 men and 44 women) with a median age of 61 years underwent port-access coronary revascularization. The clinical and financial profiles of these patients were compared with fiscal year 1997 patients (n = 531) who underwent standard median sternotomy coronary bypass.

RESULTS

Preoperative clinical demographics were similar in both groups of patients. Among the port-access population there were no incidences of aortic dissection, deep vein thrombosis, conversion to median sternotomy, or death. Total time in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), incidence of atrial fibrillation, transfusion requirements, and (subjective) pain rating at 28 days postoperatively were less in the port-access group. The average hospital cost per case was $2703.00 (US dollars) more in the port-access patients, despite a similar length of stay versus conventional sternotomy patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Coronary bypass surgery can be performed safely with port-access technology with significant clinical benefits in selected patients. Currently these benefits are attained at a significant cost to the institution.

Uniform safety of beating heart surgery using the octopus tissue stabilization system

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been facilitated by the introduction of the Octopus Tissue Stabilization system (OTS). OTS improves exposure immobilizing the heart with minimal hemodynamic effects allowing multivessels off cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) CABG. The purpose of this study was to compare the utilization and clinical outcome of the OTS in three geographically distinct centers.

METHODS

239 patients who underwent OTS-CABG at Allegheny University Hospital/Medical College of Pennsylvania, Harrisburg Hospital, and Park Nicollet Clinic/HealthSystem Minnesota were reviewed. Age, acuity of patients, and number and type of vessels bypassed were recorded. Complications, mortality, length of hospital stay, incidence of conversion to CPB and blood transfusions, and operating room costs were compared to risk matched control patients who underwent CPB CABG during the same period.

RESULTS

Results were similar in all three centers. The average age was 62.3 years. Emergent operation was necessary in 7%-10% of patients, the operations averaged 1.8 grafts/patient. Arteries bypassed were LAD, DIAG, OM, RCA, PDA, and RPLB. There were 96% of operations completed without CPB. Morbidity was low (12%). Atrial fibrillation and blood transfusion rate were decreased. Mortality was 0 compared with a predicted mortality of 1.6%. Hospital length of stay was shorter and operating room costs were 61% lower.

CONCLUSIONS

OTS provides predictable reproducible immobilization allowing the performance of single and multiple off-pump CABG to almost all coronary branches with minimal morbidity and decreased costs in a variety of patients. Similar findings from three different centers suggests that these results are easily reproducible.

Surgery for aortic stenosis in severely symptomatic patients older than 80 years: experience in a single UK centre

OBJECTIVE

To ascertain the surgical risk and long term outcome of patients over 80 years old undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR).

DESIGN

Consecutive cases with respective case note audit and a telephone questionnaire.

SETTING

Single UK cardiothoracic surgical centre.

PATIENTS

103 (48 male) patients over 80 years old undergoing AVR. The median age was 82 years (80-95 years) and 95 of 103 patients were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV.

METHOD AND RESULTS

Preoperative characteristics, operative course, cost, and outcome measures were ascertained. Mean bypass time was 56 minutes and 25 patients had simultaneous coronary artery bypass grafting. Overall mortality was 19 of 103. Univariate analysis of pertinent variables found that impaired renal function and peripheral vascular disease were significantly associated with early postoperative death. 10 of 12 patients requiring ventilation for more than 24 hours died. The 50% actuarial survival was 62 months. Late complications were uncommon with 92% of patients in NYHA class I or II at follow up.

CONCLUSIONS

AVR in patients over 80 years old has a significant risk. However, those patients who survive experience significant benefit with good long term prospects for general health and social independence.

Clinical correlates of the initial and long-term cost of coronary bypass surgery and coronary angioplasty

BACKGROUND

Medical costs vary substantially among patients. Understanding the baseline factors that predict subsequent cost may allow better selection of therapy for individual patients. Understanding the postprocedure events that increase cost should help to improve efficiency and effectiveness of coronary revascularization.

METHODS

Data on 4-year costs were collected from patients randomly assigned to coronary angioplasty or bypass surgery as part of the BARI (Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation) trial. Regression models first examined factors known at the time of randomization that prospectively predicted initial procedure cost and long-term cost. Subsequent models tested the value of postrandomization events as explanatory variables for cost.

RESULTS

The independent baseline predictors of higher initial percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty cost included 3-vessel disease (+12%) and acute presentations (+22%), whereas the independent predictors of higher initial coronary artery bypass grafting cost included the number of comorbid conditions (+5% per condition) and female sex (+7%). The independent baseline predictors of 4-year cost included heart failure (+26%), diabetes (+22%), comorbidity (+10%), and angioplasty assignment in patients with 2-vessel disease (-15%). Postrandomization models showed higher initial and long-term costs were strongly correlated with the number of repeat revascularization procedures (+30% to +128%) and the occurrence of clinical complications (+8% to +131%).

CONCLUSIONS

Two-vessel disease identifies patients likely to have lower costs after angioplasty, whereas heart failure, comorbid conditions, and diabetes identify patients likely to accrue higher costs after either angioplasty or bypass surgery. Long-term costs can be potentially reduced by interventions that decrease procedural complications or reduce the need for repeat revascularization.

Cost-offset analysis of aprotinin in high-risk coronary artery bypass

Aprotinin, a naturally occurring protease inhibitor derived from bovine lung, is used prophylactically to minimize the amount of perioperative blood loss in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery who are at high risk for excessive bleeding. A retrospective multicenter evaluation of aprotinin use was performed in high-risk coronary artery bypass graft patients treated either with aprotinin or according to usual-care to assess (1) differences in demographic and medical history characteristics, and (2) clinical and economic outcomes associated with their care. This study suggests that in many cases, the cost of aprotinin is offset by reductions in overall cost. Additional study is required to better understand this potential. In other cases, however, a more conservative approach to aprotinin use appears to be warranted.

Angioplasty versus coronary artery by-pass surgery: a reappraisal

Revascularisation is the main principle of treatment of obstructive coronary artery disease. This technique is available either by catheter intervention like angioplasty or by-pass surgery. The superiority of one over the other is still undetermined. In symptomatic single vessel disease angioplasty may be a better option than by-pass surgery. In two-vessel coronary artery disease angioplasty may also be preferred especially with good left ventricular function. In patients with double-vessel disease particularly involving proximal left anterior descending artery in association with diabetes mellitus surgery has better long term results. In multivessel disease by-pass surgery is a preferred option although initial results of angioplasty in this group may be very satisfactory. The incidence of further intervention either by surgery or repeat angioplasty is high in patients undergoing angioplasty in multivessel disease. Left main stem disease should be dealt with by-pass surgery. With continued advancement in the revascularisation technology of coronary artery disease both in catheter intervention and surgical fronts there is no room for unequivocal or universal strategy plan in the management of coronary artery disease. Both the techniques are complimentary to each other. Cost consideration is a major consideration in India. Choice should be made after proper evaluation of coronary anatomy, underlying clinical condition, local experience, social and especially economic circumstances.

Diagnosis of suspected coronary artery disease in women: a cost-effectiveness analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal strategy for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) in women is not well defined. We compared the cost-effectiveness of several strategies for diagnosing CAD in women with chest pain.

METHODS

We performed decision and cost-effectiveness analyses with simulations of 55-year-old ambulatory women with chest pain. With a Markov model, simulations of patients underwent exercise electrocardiography, exercise testing with thallium scintigraphy, exercise echocardiography, angiography, or no workup.

RESULTS

Diagnosis with angiography cost less than $17, 000 per quality-adjusted life-year compared with exercise echocardiography if the patient had definite angina and less than $76,000 per life-year if she had probable angina. If she had nonspecific chest pain, diagnosis with exercise echocardiography increased life-years compared with no testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Cost-effectiveness of first-line diagnostic strategy for diagnosis of CAD in women varies mostly according to pretest probability of CAD. Diagnosis of coronary artery disease with angiography is cost-effective in 55-year-old women with definite angina. In 55-year-old women with probable angina, diagnosis with angiography would increase quality-adjusted life-years but significantly increase costs. Use of exercise echocardiography as a first-line diagnosis for CAD is cost effective in 55-year-old women with probable angina and nonspecific chest pain.

CNS facilitation of a cardiac surgery clinical pathway program

In this collaborative project, the Clinical Nurse Specialist (CNS) worked with various members of the healthcare team using a clinical pathway group work process to implement changes in the nursing, medical, and respiratory care of cardiac surgery patients. The patient population (N = 598) comprised cardiac surgery patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft, mitral valve replacement, or aortic valve replacement. The practice changes implemented were earlier extubation, earlier ambulation, the administration of fentanyl and propofol, and the administration of gastrointestinal (GI) prophylactic medications. The overall outcomes were decreased incidence of pneumonia, earlier increase in level of consciousness, improved ambulation abilities, and improved nausea levels. Pneumonia decreased significantly, from 2.49% to 1.67% (p = 0.05). For patients who met early extubation criteria, mean time on the ventilator decreased from 17 hours to 8 hours, and length of stay decreased from 8 days to 7 days in a subgroup of patients (diagnosis-related group (DRG) 105). The overall annual charge savings was approximately $201,000. These results add to the belief that CNS-guided patient care in collaboration with the healthcare team has positive benefits.

The health care burden of unstable angina

Worldwide, UA represents a significant allocation of resources. UA represents a syndrome where not only do many therapies exist, but considerable clinical trial evidence has accumulated. Universal application of effective practice patterns is warranted if we are to successfully reduce the burden of UA. Economic analyses cannot resolve many of the underlying societal issues that affect decision making. Often, the acceptability of an economic burden is dependent on the willingness of both individuals and society to pay. In an interesting study, Chestnut et al evaluated the willingness of 50 patients to pay for avoiding a worsening of their angina symptoms. On average, the patients were willing to pay between $210 and $499 to avoid four to eight additional angina episodes each month. The "rule of rescue" suggests that society is often willing to pay large sums of money to save those in extreme need, such as the 55-year-old man rushed to the emergency department clutching his chest. Only recently has attention been paid to how much this disease entity costs us. Whereas the 1980s and 1990s saw a focus on costs, the next century will increasingly focus on value--obtaining the best health outcome for the dollars spent. Debate has shifted, at least in part, from purely financial costs to medical effectiveness and outcomes management. Continuing assessments of value of interventions and application of evidence based-management strategies permit rational selection of therapy and allow us best to bear the burden of UA.

Trends in mortality, incidence, hospitalisation, cardiac procedures and outcomes of care for coronary heart disease in Singapore, 1991-1996

In this study, we used Singapore population-based data from 1991 to 1996 to examine recent trends in mortality, incidence and hospitalisation for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and explored the roles of primary prevention and medical care interventions in explaining these trends. We examined trends in medical interventions, namely coronary angiography (catheterisation), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), length of stay, and payment methods, and explored the roles of technological, healthcare financing and delivery, and regulatory factors in influencing the diffusion and outcomes of these medical interventions. During the period 1991 to 1996, there were parallel declines in resident population rates of mortality, incidence and hospitalisation for AMI. The rates of angiograms, CABG and PTCA among residents also increased greatly, with the greatest increase among elderly aged 60 years and above. The rates of invasive cardiac procedures for AMI were all lower in females than in males. The population case-fatality rate of AMI declined slightly only for persons below 40 years of age. The case-fatality rate was higher in females than in males. The number of hospitalisations and cardiac procedures all rose sharply, and was phenomenal for PTCA (247%). The increase in volume of resource use was starkly greater in private hospitals than in restructured hospitals. The ratios of PTCA to CABG from 1991 to 1996 for private and restructured hospitals showed a greater rate of technology substitution in restructured hospitals than in private hospitals. The average length of stay (LOS, 6.7 days) was fairly constant in restructured hospitals. For private hospitals, LOS declined from 7.6 days in 1991 to 5.6 in 1996. LOS varied little among individual restructured hospitals, but widely among private hospitals. The most common method of payment for AMI hospitalisation was Medisave alone (50%), but for CABG surgery, the proportion of payment made through this method was only 12%. Out-of-pocket payments, Medisave, Medishield and private insurance have increased steadily. These data indirectly suggest that primary prevention and medical care interventions might have begun to succeed in reducing the rates of coronary heart disease in Singapore. The sharp increases in cardiac procedures may be explained by changing supply and demand factors for care of AMI and chronic ischaemic heart disease, including consumer preference for cardiac procedures, overuse of medical intervention, and technological change. More studies are needed to test these hypotheses.

[Experiences with ambulatory cardiologic phase II rehabilitation]

The phase II cardiac rehabilitation in Germany differs markedly from other European countries and the USA. Most of the patients enter a 3-week full residential program. In contrast we developed an outpatient phase II cardiac rehabilitation program. Since 1979 we treated more than 8,500 patients with different indications (i.e. after myocardial infarction, coronary bypass surgery, valve replacement and reconstruction). Patients with a daily commuting time over 60 minutes are not suitable for outpatient rehabilitation. Our model corresponds to the German intrahospital rehabilitation. The rehabilitation is carried out in 3 weeks offering approximately 66 hours of therapy. Groups of 8 patients with a similar level of physical capacity stay together during the rehabilitation. A comprehensive program with exercise training, physical therapy, psychological support, education in life style changes and risk factor modification has been developed. The compliance of the patients as well as the acceptance by the family are excellent. Long-lasting reduction in LDL cholesterol levels and increments in work-load capacities have been demonstrated. A high percentage of patients returned to work. Cost analysis demonstrates a reduction up to 40% in comparison to the full residential program. Therefore the outpatient phase II cardiac rehabilitation is a good alternative especially in urban areas.

Comparing physician-specific two-year patient outcomes after coronary angiography: methodologic issues and results

OBJECTIVES

We sought to evaluate methodologies to compare physician-related long-term patient outcomes appropriately.

BACKGROUND

Evaluation of physicians on the basis of short-term patient outcome is becoming widely practiced. These analyses fail to consider the importance of long-term outcome, and methods appropriate to such an analysis are poorly defined.

METHODS

All patients undergoing coronary angiography between 1992 and 1994 who received all of their cardiac care at our institution were followed for 27+/-13 months (mean+/-SD). Patients (n = 754) were cared for by one or more of 17 staff physicians. Risk-adjusted models were developed for four candidate clinical end points and cost. Physicians were then evaluated for each outcome measure.

RESULTS

Of the clinical end points, death could be modeled most accurately (c-statistic = 0.83). The c-statistics for other end points ranged from 0.63 to 0.70. Physicians with outcomes statistically different (p < 0.05) from other physicians were identified more commonly than would be expected from the play of chance (p = 0.005). However, improvement in the c-statistics by the addition of physician identifiers was very modest. Physician's evaluations by the four measures of clinical outcome were variably correlated (r = .00 to .85). Graphic display of clinical and cost results for each physician did identify certain physicians who might be judged to provide more cost-effective care than others.

CONCLUSIONS

Although comparisons of groups of physicians on the basis of long-term patient outcomes may have merit, individual physician-to-physician comparisons will be more difficult, owing to 1) multiple physicians contributing care to individual patients; 2) the poor predictive capacity of models other than that for survival; and 3) the modest apparent impact of differences in physician providers on long-term patient outcome. With these caveats in mind, modeling to compare patient outcomes of individual physicians with homogeneous patient populations or to identify gross outliers (good or bad) may be practicable in some patient-care systems, but may be inappropriate in others.