ICAM-1 on epithelial cells in allergic subjects: a hallmark of allergic inflammation

Allergen-specific challenge was first shown to induce ICAM-1 expression on epithelial cells (ECs) of conjunctiva in allergic patients. The data have also been confirmed in the nose. We then checked for the presence of ICAM-1 consequent to natural exposure to allergens. For both conjunctivitis and rhinitis due to pollen we confirmed, during the pollen season, the presence of ICAM-1 on ECs. We demonstrated the endogenous source of ICAM-1 by in situ hybridization both in vitro and in vivo. ICAM-1 could be an activation marker on ECs, or could, enhanced EC susceptibility to bind offending cells such as eosinophils (LFA-1+). ICAM-1 is also a receptor for the vast majority of rhinoviruses, which are known to provoke, mainly in children, asthma attacks. Since we found that mite allergens can induce ICAM-1 on ECs, even during clinical latency, allergy may be considered as a primary event leading to asthma (through rhinovirus infection) and non-specific hyperreactivity.

Follicular thyroid cells of autoimmune thyroiditis may coexpress ICAM-1 (CD54) and its natural ligand LFA-1 (CD11a/CD18)

The leukocyte functional associated antigen-1 (LFA-1)-intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (CD11a-CD18/CD54) intercellular adhesion system plays a crucial role in several immunologic phenomena, including adhesion between lymphocytes and epithelial cells. In previous studies evidence for CD54 expression on thyroid follicular cells in Hashimoto's thyroiditis was provided. In this study we evaluated the possible expression of CD11a and CD18 antigens on thyrocytes of patients with Hashimoto's thyroiditis and on thyrocytes of patients with Graves' disease and simple goiter as controls; we used both alkaline phosphatase immunostaining and indirect immunofluorescence on cryostatic tissue sections. The results showed that LFA-1 (both CD11a and CD18) positivity on thyroid follicles may occur in glands of patients with Hashimoto's disease, with a pattern very similar to that of CD54: this was observed in five of seven specimens. Conversely, no positivity was observed in tissues from patients with Graves' disease or goiter: notably, isolated follicular cells from Graves' goiter tissues are induced in culture to express CD54, but not LFA-1. Using double-staining techniques, we were able to show that in specimens from patients with Hashimoto's disease, the same follicular structures coexpressed LFA-1 and CD54. Such a coexpression of the two ligands further emphasizes the possible role of this adhesion system in the pathogenesis of epithelial damage, through bidirectional interactions between thyroid epithelial cells and infiltrating LFA-1 or CD54-positive mononuclear cells.

Infiltrating gamma/delta T-cell receptor-positive lymphocytes in Hashimoto's thyroiditis, Graves' disease and papillary thyroid cancer

In the present study we have evaluated the expression of different molecular forms of the antigen receptor (TcR) on lymphocytes derived from thyroid tissue of patients with Graves' disease, Hashimoto thyroiditis and papillary cancer both in situ by APAAP technique and on isolated lymphocytes by indirect immunofluorescence. A panel of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) recognizing alpha/beta and gamma/delta TcR-positive subsets was used. The results showed that the large majority of T-cells in thyroid infiltrates were alpha/beta TcR+, gamma/delta TcR+ ones being very rare or nearly absent, whatever the disease (autoimmune or neoplastic). No difference between gamma/delta TcR+ T-cell subsets (V delta 1+ or V delta 2+) was observed. Thus, neither in autoimmune thyroid diseases nor in papillary cancer gamma/delta TcR+ cells are likely to be a major effector-T cell population.

Cetirizine reduces inflammatory cell recruitment and ICAM-1 (or CD54) expression on conjunctival epithelium in both early- and late-phase reactions after allergen-specific challenge

BACKGROUND

Allergen-specific conjunctival challenge (ASCC) is a safe and reproducible experimental model of allergic conjunctivitis and a useful tool in the evaluation of effectiveness and possible mechanisms of action of drugs commonly used in the treatment of allergic diseases.

OBJECTIVE

The protective effect of cetirizine on inflammatory changes after ASCC was assessed in 12 patients with rhinoconjunctivitis caused by Parietaria judaica in a double-blind study.

METHODS

After a screening ASCC was performed, patients were randomized into two treatment groups; each patient was given cetirizine (oral tablets) 10 mg twice daily, or matching placebo for 3 1/2 days in off-pollen season. Clinical evaluation (itching, hyperemia, lacrimation, and swelling of eyelids) and cytologic assessment (number of inflammatory cells in conjunctival scraping and evaluation of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1)/CD54 expression on epithelial cells) were performed at baseline, 30 minutes (i.e., early-phase reaction [EPR]), 6 hours, and 24 hours (i.e., late-phase reaction [LPR]) after ASCC, before and after treatment.

RESULTS

The EPR clinical events and the EPR total number of inflammatory cells were significantly reduced by cetirizine compared with placebo. The LPR clinical events and inflammatory cell recruitment were reduced by cetirizine in a similar manner. Both eosinophil and neutrophil numbers were decreased by active drug in EPR and LPR. Furthermore, ICAM-1/CD54 expression was significantly reduced by cetirizine in both the EPR and LPR compared with placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that cetirizine has a protective effect on clinical and cellular EPR and LPR events (including ICAM-1/CD54 expression on epithelium) induced by ASCC.

Allergen-specific challenge induces intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1 or CD54) on nasal epithelial cells in allergic subjects. Relationships with early and late inflammatory phenomena

Intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1 or CD54) expression on epithelial cells (EC) has been demonstrated to play a role in the local molecular events of inflammation following allergen-specific conjunctival challenge. In the light of these observations, we evaluated the possible expression of ICAM-1 on nasal EC after allergen-specific challenge. Three groups of subjects were studied: (1) 14 symptomless patients sensitized to mites, (2) 15 symptomless patients sensitized to pollen, and (3) 10 healthy volunteers as controls. The study was performed during winter. At baseline we found that both pollinosic and healthy subjects did not express CD54 on epithelial cells, whereas mite-sensitive patients showed a mild expression (possibly caused by a persistent natural allergen exposure). In addition, clinical and cellular responses were induced by lower allergen dosages in mite-sensitive patients compared with pollen-sensitive patients. CD54 was detectable in all the allergic patients but not in the control subjects 30 min after challenge. At 6 h all patients showed a marked inflammatory infiltration and CD54 persistence on EC: such an infiltration was more relevant in patients developing clinical late-phase reaction (LPR). Finally, 24 h after challenge EC CD54 expression persisted, as well as a cellular infiltrate mainly caused by eosinophils (the latter being more pronounced in mite-sensitive individuals). CD54 should be regarded as an early and sensitive marker of inflammation in both LPR-positive and LPR-negative patients. A cellular inflammatory infiltrate was detectable in both LPR-positive and LPR-negative subjects, although relevant differences in eosinophil counts were observed between the two groups. The study emphasizes the importance of the different events of inflammation in allergy.

Evidence of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 expression on nasal epithelial cells in acute rhinoconjunctivitis caused by pollen exposure

Rhinoconjunctivitis caused by pollen allergy is characterized by typical signs and symptoms and mucosal infiltration by inflammatory cells during pollen season. It has been recently demonstrated that the adhesion molecule system is deeply involved in cell-to-cell interaction during inflammatory response consequent to allergic reactions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1 or CD54) on nasal epithelial cells, before and during natural seasonal exposure, in 10 allergic patients (Parietaria judaica-sensitized) and in 10 healthy volunteers, correlating this parameter with clinical and cytologic involvement. Nasal epithelial cells of allergic subjects showed a significant expression of CD54 during pollen season (p < 0.001). On the contrary, no CD54 expression was observed out of pollen season. In healthy volunteers no CD54 expression was observed both before and during pollen season. Cytologic evaluation demonstrated an infiltration by eosinophils (mainly activated [EG2+]), (p < 0.001), neutrophils (p < 0.001), and metachromatic cells (p < 0.001) during pollen season only in allergic subjects. Therefore results indicate that seasonal allergic rhinitis is characterized by an infiltration of inflammatory cells correlated with CD54 expression on nasal epithelial cells. This phenomenon is specific, being restricted only to allergic patients during pollen season.

Effects of conjunctival hyperosmolar challenge in allergic subjects and normal controls

Nonspecific hyperreactivity to a number of physical, chemical and pharmacological agents in a common characteristics of allergic subjects, which is strictly related to the inflammatory events consequent to an allergic reaction. Hyperosmolar stimulus has previously been shown to cause an inflammatory response inducing mast cell activation and subsequent mediator release. We investigated the clinical and cytological events following conjunctival challenge using a hyperosmolar agent (i.e. glucose solution) in patients with allergy due to pollen, in patients with allergy due to mites and in healthy individuals in order to investigate the possible existence of 'conjunctival hyperreactivity', similar to the well-known nasal and bronchial nonspecific hyperreactivity in allergic patients. Hyperosmolar stimulus was able to produce an immediate inflammatory response evidenced by clinical symptomatology, inflammatory cell infiltrate and CD54 expression on conjunctival epithelium in all allergic subjects and healthy volunteers. House dust mite-sensitive subjects, but not pollen-sensitive subjects studied out of pollen season, showed conjunctival hyperreactivity as shown by histamine challenge, in that they required lower glucose concentrations to elicit the conjunctival reaction. This is probably related to an underlying although mild, inflammation.

A three-year double-blind placebo-controlled study with specific oral immunotherapy to Dermatophagoides: evidence of safety and efficacy in paediatric patients

Very few double-blind trials of oral immunotherapy have been reported. The majority of these have been performed with pollen extracts and the results have often been equivocal. The major weaknesses of these studies have been the short periods of the trials, the low doses of allergen employed and inadequate evaluation of efficacy. The present study has involved a placebo-controlled double-blind trial of oral immunotherapy for three years with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus at relatively high doses in 18 paediatric patients. Throughout the trial clinical parameters (symptom and medication scores) and immunological parameters (specific IgE, IgG1 and IgG4 levels) were monitored in order to assess the safety and efficacy of the treatment. The treatment was well tolerated by all patients and no side-effects were experienced. Clinical improvement was evident after the second year of therapy and this was confirmed by a significant reduction in conjunctival reactivity assessed by a specific conjunctival provocation test. In addition, there were significant changes in the immunological parameters with a reduction in specific IgE and increased levels of IgG4 and IgG1, results in keeping with previous studies of oral and subcutaneous immunotherapy. Although the results do not provide an explanation of the basis of successful oral immunotherapy, they clearly demonstrate the efficacy and safety of the treatment and suggest that it may be a useful and more acceptable alternative for patients than the traditional subcutaneous immunotherapy.

Nedocromil sodium and the immune response

Chromones are frequently employed in the treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma. Following our recent investigations concerning the influence of some antiallergic drugs, such as cromoglycate sodium, steroids, oxatomide and ketotifen (H1 antihistamines), and theophylline, on the immune response, in the present study we analyzed the in vitro effects of a new chromone derivative, nedocromil, on the immune response. To this end, the proliferation of peripheral mononuclear cells (PMNCs) induced by mitogen (PHA) and by CD3, CD2 or CD28 monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) has been studied. Since the effects of nedocromil on immunological parameters are achieved at 10(-7) mol/l, in the experiments herein reported the drug was tested in the cultures at concentrations of 10(-8), 10(-7) and 10(-6) mol/l. Furthermore, the effect of nedocromil was evaluated on the surface expression of the following markers expressed by PMNCs upon activation: ICAM-1 (CD54), LFA-1 and alpha 1-acid glycoprotein (alpha 1-AGP). The results of the present investigation showed no effect of nedocromil on these immunological parameters. These data acquire clinical relevance when related to previous reports showing a depression of the immunological response exerted by other compounds, such as ketotifen, theophylline and steroids.

Deflazacort protects against late-phase but not early-phase reactions induced by the allergen-specific conjunctival provocation test

The protective effects of deflazacort against the inflammation that follows the conjunctival provocation test (CPT) by specific allergen were assessed in 24 patients with rhinoconjunctivitis caused by Parietaria judaica in a double-blind study. After a screening CPT, patients were randomized into four treatment groups, each being given deflazacort (oral tablets) at 6, 30, and 60 mg once daily, or matching placebo, for 3 d, outside the pollen season. Clinical evaluation (itching, hyperemia, lacrimation, and swelling of eyelids) and cytologic assessment (number of inflammatory cells in conjunctival scraping and evaluation of ICAM (intercellular adhesion molecule)-1/CD54 expression on epithelial cells) were performed at base line, 30 min (early-phase reaction (EPR), 6 h and 24 h (late-phase reaction (LPR)) after specific CPT, and before and after treatment. Neither the EPR clinical reactions nor the EPR total number of inflammatory cells was modified by deflazacort. However, the LPR clinical effects were significantly reduced by deflazacort at 30 or 60 mg/d (P < 0.01), as compared with placebo. The total number of inflammatory cells during LPR was significantly reduced by deflazacort at 30 or 60 mg/d (P < 0.01), as compared with placebo. Furthermore, CD54 expression was significantly reduced by deflazacort at 30 or 60 mg/d both in the EPR (P < 0.01) and LPR (P < 0.01), as compared with placebo. None of the studied indicators were modified at the 6 mg/d dose. This study shows that deflazacort has a highly protective action against clinical and cellular LPR effects induced by the specific CPT. In addition, deflazacort markedly reduces CD54 expression on the conjunctival epithelium during both EPR and LPR.

Sedation from H1 antagonists: evaluation methods and experimental results

Sedation is the most frequent and troublesome side effect of H1-antagonists, since it can impair many psycho-motor performances of working and social life. As these drugs are largely employed for the treatment of allergic diseases, both in adults and children, an evaluation of sedation must be accurately performed by standardized tests. In the present work, authors briefly describe the most important clinical tests and summarize the results from the recent literature about the new H1-antagonists.

Allergic subjects express intercellular adhesion molecule--1 (ICAM-1 or CD54) on epithelial cells of conjunctiva after allergen challenge

BACKGROUND

Allergic inflammation can be experimentally reproduced in vivo in humans, by means of the conjunctival provocation test with allergen. The allergen stimulation triggers an early clinical response and an almost simultaneous cellular infiltrate. Among the factors that can contribute to the local cellular recruitment, we postulate a possible early involvement of CD54 in the development of inflammation caused by the allergic reaction.

METHODS

We used a sensitive immunocytochemical immunoenzymatic alkaline phosphatase-monoclonal antialkaline phosphatase technique to detect the possible expression of CD54 molecule on epithelial cells of conjunctiva in 15 allergic subjects and in 15 healthy individuals in basal conditions and after allergen challenge (Parietaria judaica) during the off-pollen season.

RESULTS

At baseline all studied individuals did not evidence CD54 expression on epithelial cells; 30 minutes after allergen challenge, all the allergic individuals showed a marked expression of CD54 on conjunctival epithelium, whereas none of healthy subjects showed any CD54 expression. First, CD54 expression on conjunctival epithelium after specific provocation test appeared as a specific phenomenon occurring only in sensitized subjects; moreover, it is an immediate event concomitant with the local inflammatory infiltrate. Therefore conjunctival epithelium unexpectedly appeared to be more than a bystander in the allergic reaction; it may be perceived as an active participant interacting with the inflammatory infiltrate.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that CD54 may play a central role in the allergic inflammation and strongly support the concept that maneuvers designed to interact with the adhesion machinery expressed on inflammatory cells and epithelium may be a helpful therapeutic approach.

Protective effects of deflazacort on allergen-specific conjunctival challenge

The protective effects of deflazacort, (a new heterocyclic glucocorticoid and derivative of prednisolone, with calcium and glucose-sparing effects) on the inflammatory reaction following an allergen-specific conjunctival provocation test (CPT) were assessed in a double-blind study, in 24 patients suffering from rhinoconjunctivitis due to Parietaria judaica. After an initial screening CPT, patients were randomized to four treatment groups, to receive deflazacort, 6, 30 or 60 mg, once daily or placebo, for 3 days, during the low-pollen season. Clinical evaluations (itching, hyperaemia, lacrimation and eyelid swelling), cytological assessment (number of inflammatory cells, i.e. neutrophils, eosinophils and lymphocytes, sampled by conjunctival scraping) and immunocytochemical evaluation of CD54 (intercellular adhesion molecular-1 [ICAM-1]) expression on epithelial cells were performed after CPT, at baseline, after 30 minutes (early-phase reaction [EPR]) and after 6 and 24 hours (late-phase reaction [LPR]), before and after treatment. Neither the nature or severity of clinical events nor the total number of inflammatory cells during the EPR changed during treatment with deflazacort. The severity of the clinical events during the LPR were significantly reduced by deflazacort, 30 and 60 mg/day P < 0.01) compared to the placebo-treated group. The total number of inflammatory cells during the LPR was also significantly reduced by deflazacort, 30 and 60 mg/day (P < 0.01) compared to the placebo-treated group. CD54 expression was significantly reduced by deflazacort, 30 and 60 mg/day both during the EPR (P < 0.01) and LPR (P < 0.01) compared to the placebo-treated group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Protective effect of loratadine on late phase reaction induced by conjunctival provocation test

The protective effect of Loratadine, a new generation, non-sedating antihistamine, on clinical and cellular events during the early phase reaction (EPR) and late phase reaction (LPR) of the allergen-specific conjunctival provocation test (CPT) was assessed out of the pollen season in 20 seasonally allergic rhino-conjunctivitis patients. After a screening CPT, selected patients were randomized to Loratadine (10 mg OD) or matching placebo for 7 days. CPT was repeated following treatment. Clinical and cellular responses were evaluated by a symptom score and cell counting in conjunctival scrapings before, and 30 min and 6 h after challenge with allergen (one eye) or placebo (control eye). Conjunctival symptom severity following CPT was reduced at 30 min (EPR) and 6 h (LPR) after CPT in the Loratadine group compared to placebo group (p < 0.01), as was the total number of inflammatory cells (p < 0.001). In conclusion, Loratadine protects against the clinical and cellular EPR and LPR events consequent to CPT, showing antiallergic properties.

Topical anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of allergic pollinosic conjunctivitis: a comparative double-blind study

Anti-inflammatory drugs, i.e. glucocorticosteroids and NSAIDs (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs), are often included in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis. The present study compares the clinical efficacy and safety of topical hydrocortisone, acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and piroxicam compared to placebo. The trial, designed as a double-blind, randomized and parallel-group treatment, was carried out in a group of 40 patients suffering from seasonal allergic conjunctivitis due to Parietaria pollen, during the pollen season (June-July, 1990). Patients received hydrocortisone 0.1% solution, ASA 1% solution, piroxicam 0.5% solution or placebo as eye drops, all one drop in each eye q.i.d. for 14 days. The symptoms were evaluated at baseline and at the end of treatment by the clinician and by patients on a diary card. The hydrocortisone group showed a rapid and significant improvement during the first week of treatment, while ASA and piroxicam reduced symptomatology during the second week of treatment; this difference was statistically significant. At the end of the trial, the active drugs were comparable with regard to clinical efficacy. A statistically significant difference was observed between the active drugs and placebo, while no statistically significant difference was observed among the three drugs. No serious side-effects were observed. The results demonstrate the clinical efficacy of anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of pollen-induced allergic conjunctivitis; they also suggest the use of NSAIDs in long-term treatment, as their efficacy has been shown to be closely comparable to that of steroids, while avoiding the well-known side-effects of the latter in prolonged treatment.

A multi-allergen ELISA screening method. Comparison with Pharmacia CAP system and Phazet skin prick test

Eighty consecutive subjects, coming to our service as suffering from conjunctivitis and/or rhinitis and/or asthma, were investigated by a new multi-allergen enzymatic screening immunoassay (Profilo, Bio-Allergy, Rome, Italy) regarding to serum specific IgE for groups of inhalant allergens (Dermatophagoides, Parietaria, grasses, trees, animal danders). These groups include allergens which are most frequently responsible of allergy in our country. Indices of diagnostic accuracy of this assay were analyzed in relation to skin prick test (SPT, Phazet, Pharmacia), as in vivo reference test, and Pharmacia CAP System, as in vitro reference test, comparing the results achieved by these tests in the same group of subjects. Profilo showed high significant (p < 0.0005) correlations and satisfactory indices of diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, predictive values of positive and negative, and efficiency) for the tested allergens with reference to both Phazet SPT and CAP System. In addition, the method appeared very rapid and simple, so that it could be performed in the physician's office.

Protective effect of different doses of terfenadine on the conjunctival provocation test

The protective effect of terfenadine on inflammatory processes following the early phase of conjunctival provocation tests by specific allergen was assessed in 24 patients suffering from seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, in a single-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Patients were randomly assigned to four treatment groups, each being given terfenadine 60, 120, 180 mg daily, or placebo, respectively, for 7 days, out of the pollen season. Clinical severity (burning, itching, lacrimation and hyperemia), and number of inflammatory cells obtained by conjunctival scraping (neutrophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, and monocytes) were evaluated before and after treatment. Pre-treatment with terfenadine resulted in a significantly higher allergen threshold dose than placebo (p less than 0.01), regardless of drug dose. Patients given terfenadine experienced a significant reduction (p less than 0.03) in conjunctival symptom severity, as compared with placebo, following conjunctival challenge. Accordingly, the number of inflammatory cells in terfenadine-treated patients was significantly lower (p less than 0.01) than in the placebo-treated after the conjunctival provocation test. The results of this study suggest that terfenadine has a significant protective effect on the early-phase cellular and clinical events of conjunctival reaction induced by allergen challenge in atopic patients.

Cetirizine does not influence the immune response

Antihistamines are frequently employed in the treatment of allergic rhinitis and urticaria-angioedema syndrome. We analyzed the in vitro effects of cetirizine on the immune response. To this end the proliferation of peripheral mononuclear cells induced by mitogen and by -CD3, -CD2, or -CD28 monoclonal antibodies has been studied. Since the plasma peak of cetirizine following ingestion of 10 mg is about 1 microgram/mL, the drug was tested in the cultures at the concentration of 0.1, 1, or 10 micrograms/mL. No influence of cetirizine on T cell proliferation was detected. We also evaluated the effect of cetirizine on the expression of the following markers expressed by T cells upon activation: lymphocyte markers ICAM-1, HLA-DR, and CD25 surface expression, alpha-1-acid glycoprotein has been also studied. There was no effect of cetirizine on the investigated immunologic parameters; these data acquire clinical relevance when related to previous reports showing a depression of the immunologic response exerted by other compounds such as ketotifen and theophylline and when related to the recent data about the modulation of ICAM-1 expression on eosinophils by cetirizine. Cetirizine does not affect ICAM-1 expression of lymphocyte membrane.

Drug Treatment of Allergic Conjunctivitis

Allergic conjunctivitis, unlike several other ocular diseases, is seldom followed by permanent visual impairment; nevertheless, it is important because of both its frequency and its severity. Two major forms, seasonal and perennial, are considered in this review. To recognise the hallmarks of allergic conjunctivitis, clinicians have need of a thorough knowledge of its pathophysiological aspects and clinical features, enabling them to choose the best and most suitable therapy among the alternatives. The aims of treatment vary according to the symptoms, severity and characteristics of the allergic reactions; in general, treatment is based mainly on environmental control, pharmacotherapy and (sometimes) specific immunotherapy. Topical vasoconstrictors, decongestant compounds, standard antihistamines or combinations of these drugs have been used for a number of years to treat the acute and/or persistent symptomatology, and in order to prevent the side effects of a prolonged treatment with topical glucocorticosteroids. Nevertheless, the latter represent the most powerful anti-inflammatory drugs, and are particularly recommended in short term treatment (5 to 7 days) in severe acute symptomatology. Orally administered 'classic' antihistamines, i.e. histamine H1-receptor antagonists, are effective and very convenient in either short or long term treatment, largely because the new compounds also act on the inflammatory process secondary to the allergic events. Recently, other topical compounds such as sodium cromoglycate (cromolyn sodium), nedocromil and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) [i.e. piroxicam, aspirin] have become available. Sodium cromoglycate and nedocromil act as prophylactic compounds, able to prevent the allergic reaction; NSAIDs represent a valid and effective alternative to glucocorticosteroids in several situations.