First-in-man application of Liwen RF™ ablation system in the treatment of drug-resistant hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to evaluate the clinical applicability of the Liwen Liu RF™ ablation system for percutaneous intramyocardial septal radiofrequency ablation (PIMSRA).

BACKGROUND

Data on new cardiac radiofrequency ablation devices for the treatment of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) are limited.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From July 2019 to July 2020, a total of 68 patients with drug-resistant HOCM, who underwent PIMSRA with the Liwen RF™ ablation system, which has an ablation electrode of stepless adjustable length, were prospectively enrolled. Safety endpoints included, amongst others, the occurrence of pericardial effusion and/or hemorrhage, cardiac arrhythmias, device failure and procedural death. The reduction in left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradients at 12 months follow-up were used as a surrogate marker for device efficacy.

RESULTS

All procedures were technically successful. The total energy output time of the system was 75.8 (IQR: 30.0) min, and the average power was 43.61 ± 13.34 watts. No ablation system error occurred. The incidence of pericardial effusion or hemorrhage, transient arrhythmia and resuscitation was 8.8, 39.7, and 1.5% during procedure, respectively. None of the patients died. During 30-day follow-up, there were no complications with the exception of a pericardial effusion in one patient (1.5%). No further complications were reported after 30 days. The patients' resting [baseline: 75 (IQR: 48) vs. 12-months: 12 (IQR: 19) mmHg, p < 0.001] and provoked [baseline: 122 (IQR: 53) vs. 12-months: 41 (IQR: 59) mmHg, p < 0.001] LVOT gradients decreased significantly during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we demonstrate the safety and feasibility of the Liwen RF™ ablation system to treat HOCM. The system allows for significant and sustainable LVOT gradient reduction during 12-months of follow-up. Hence, the Liwen RF™ ablation system is a promising new device that has the potential to become an alternative to existing septal reduction concepts in HOCM patients.

How a thrombectomy service can reduce hospital deficit: a cost-effectiveness study

Background

There is level 1 evidence for cerebral thrombectomy with thrombolysis in acute large vessel occlusion. Many hospitals are now contemplating setting up this life-saving service. For the hospital, however, the first treatment is associated with an initial high cost to cover the procedure. Whilst the health economic benefit of treating stroke is documented, this is the only study to date performing matched-pair, patient-level costing to determine treatment cost within the first hospital episode and up to 90 days post-event.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective coarsened exact matched-pair analysis of 50 acute stroke patients eligible for thrombectomy.

Results

Thrombectomy resulted in significantly more good outcomes (mRS 0–2) compared to matched controls (56% vs 8%, p = 0.001). More patients in the thrombectomy group could be discharged home (60% vs 28%), fewer were discharged to nursing homes (4% vs 16%), residential homes (0% vs 12%) or rehabilitation centres (8% vs 20%). Thrombectomy patients had fewer serious adverse events (n = 30 vs 86) and were, on average, discharged 36 days earlier. They required significantly fewer physiotherapy sessions (18.72 vs 46.49, p = 0.0009) resulting in a median reduction in total rehabilitation cost of £4982 (p = 0.0002) per patient. The total cost of additional investigations was £227 lower (p = 0.0369). Overall, the median cost without thrombectomy was £39,664 per case vs £22,444, resulting in median savings of £17,221 (p = 0.0489).

Conclusions

Mechanical thrombectomy improved patient outcome, reduced length of hospitalisation and, even without procedural reimbursement, significantly reduced cost to the thrombectomy providing hospital.

PERFORMANCE 1 study: Novel carotid stent system with integrated post-dilation balloon and embolic protection device

OBJECTIVES

The PERFORMANCE I study was designed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the Neuroguard IEP® System, a novel carotid stent system with an integrated embolic filter and post-dilatation balloon, to treat clinically significant carotid artery stenosis.

BACKGROUND

The risk of major adverse events during carotid artery stenting is comparable to carotid endarterectomy, however, the risk of minor stroke remains higher with stenting.

METHODS

In total, 67 patients undergoing carotid artery stenting were enrolled at nine centers in Europe. Follow-up assessments included neurological exams, duplex ultrasound, 12-lead electrocardiogram, and cardiac enzyme analysis. The primary endpoint was the 30-day composite rate of stroke, death, and myocardial infarctions versus a prespecified performance goal. Secondary endpoints included procedure success, device success, and target lesion revascularization.

RESULTS

The study population was predominantly male (74.6%) with a mean age of 69.3 ± 8.9 years and 67% of subjects met at least one criterion placing them at an elevated risk for adverse events following carotid endarterectomy. All patients were treated successfully with the study device. There were no deaths or strokes within 30 days of the index procedure. One subject (1.5%) experienced a non-ST elevation myocardial infarction at day 17. The primary endpoint was met with a 30-day major adverse events rate of 1.5% (1/67). Through 12-month follow-up, there were no strokes, neurological deaths, target lesion revascularizations, or instances of in-stent-restenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from this study demonstrate the Neuroguard IEP system is safe and feasible with a stroke/death rate of 0% at 30 days. A large pivotal study is currently underway.

Impact of atrial flow regulator implantation on survival in patients with heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction: a post-hoc analysis of the PRELIEVE study

Purpose

This analysis aims to assess the theoretical impact of atrial flow regulator implantation on mortality by comparing the observed survival rate with the median predicted probability for one-year survival.

Methods

The prospective, multicentre, open-label, non-randomised PRELIEVE study assessed the safety and efficacy of the atrial flow regulator in patients with symptomatic HFrEF (left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥15% and &lt;40%) or HFpEF (LVEF ≥40% and &lt;70%) and elevated PCWP (≥15mmHg at rest or ≥25mmHg during exercise). In this analysis, after the first 60 patients completed twelve months of follow-up, the theoretical impact of atrial flow regulator implantation on survival was assessed by comparing the observed mortality rate with the median predicted probability for one-year mortality. Each subject's risk of mortality was predicted from individual baseline data using the Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic HF (MAGGIC) prognostic model.

Results

A total of 87 patients had undergone successful device implantation for the treatment of HFrEF (53%) and HFpEF (47%). Sixty patients had a complete twelve-month follow-up. The median follow-up was 351 days (interquartile range [IQR] 202–370). A total of six (7%) patients died during follow-up (8.6 deaths per 100 patient-years; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.7 to 15.5), all of which had HFrEF. The median predicted mortality rate for the overall study population was 12.2 deaths per 100 patient-years (95% CI 10.2 to 14.7). While the observed mortality rate (0 deaths per 100 patient-years) was significantly lower than the median predicted mortality rate (9.3 deaths per 100 patient-years; 95% CI 8.4 to 11.1) in patients with HFpEF (−9.3 deaths per 100 patient-years; 95% CI −11.1 to −8.4), there was no difference in patients with HFrEF (−3.6 deaths per 100 patient-years; 95% CI −9.5 to 3.0) (Figure 1). Four deaths were HF-related deaths (5.7 HF-related deaths per 100 patient-years; 95% CI 1.4 to 11.9; 10.8 HF-related deaths per 100 patient-years; 95% CI 2.5 to 23.1 in the HFrEF subgroup).

Conclusion

In patients with HFpEF, the mortality rate following atrial flow regulator implantation was lower than the predicted mortality rate. These findings need to be confirmed by larger randomised, controlled trials.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Occlutech International AB

Endovascular Baroreflex Amplification With the MobiusHD Device in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction: Interim Analysis of the First-in-Human Results

Background

Endovascular baroreflex amplification with the MobiusHD, a self-expanding stent-like device that is implanted in the internal carotid artery, was designed to reduce the sympathetic overactivity that contributes to progressive heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

Methods

Symptomatic patients (New York Heart Association class III) with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] ≤40%) despite guideline directed medical therapy and n-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels ≥400 pg/mL in whom carotid ultrasound and computed tomographic angiography demonstrated absence of carotid plaque were enrolled. Baseline and follow-up measures included 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire overall summary score (KCCQ OSS), and repeat biomarkers and transthoracic echocardiography.

Results

Twenty-nine patients underwent device implantation. The mean age was 60.6 ± 11.4 years, and all had New York Heart Association class III symptoms. Mean KCCQ OSS was 41.4 ± 12.7, mean 6MWD was 216.0 ± 43.7 m, median NT-proBNP was 1005.9 pg/mL (894, 1294), and mean LVEF was 34.7 ± 2.9%. All device implantations were successful. Two patients died (161 days and 195 days) and one stroke occurred (170 days) during follow-up. For the 17 patients with 12-month follow-up, mean KCCQ OSS improved by 17.4 ± 9.1 points, mean 6MWD increased by 97.6 ± 51.1 meters, a mean 28.4% reduction from the baseline NT-proBNP concentration was found, and mean LVEF improved by 5.6% ± 2.9 (paired data).

Conclusion

Endovascular baroreflex amplification with the MobiusHD device was safe and effected positive changes in quality of life, exercise capacity, and LVEF, consistent with observed reductions in NT-proBNP levels.

Transvenous Right Greater Splanchnic Nerve Ablation in Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction: First-in-Human Study

BACKGROUND

Ablation of the right-sided greater splanchnic nerve (GSN) can reduce excessive splanchnic vasoconstriction, potentially improving the handling of volume shifts in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to assess a novel catheter procedure of right-sided GSN ablation to treat HFpEF: splanchnic ablation for volume management.

METHODS

This trial included 11 HFpEF patients (8 women, age 70 ± 8 years) with New York Heart Association functional class II or III symptoms, ejection fraction ≥50%, and elevated pulmonary capillary wedge pressure at rest or with exercise. After splanchnic ablation for volume management, follow-up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months included 6-minute walk test, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ), and echocardiography.

RESULTS

There were no device-related adverse cardiac events or clinical sequelae following right GSN ablation through 12 months. Patients experienced clinical improvements by 1 month that were sustained through 12 months. KCCQ score improved from baseline median 48 (IQR: 35-52) to 65 (IQR: 58-77) at 1 month and 80 (IQR: 77-88) at 12 months (P &lt; 0.05). The 6-minute walk test distance increased from baseline 292 ± 82 m to 341 ± 88 m at 1 month and 359 ± 75 m at 12 months (P &lt; 0.05). The NT-proBNP decreased from a baseline mean of 1,292 ± 1,186 pg/mL to 1,202 ± 797 pg/mL (P = 0.585) at 1 month, to 472 ± 226 pg/mL (P = 0.028) at 6 months, and to 379 ± 165 pg/mL (P = 0.039) at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

In this open-label, single-arm feasibility study, right-sided GSN ablation was safe and improved mostly subjective clinical metrics in patients with HFpEF over 12 months. (Endovascular GSN Ablation in Subjects With HFpEF; NCT04287946).

Description, Feasibility, and Histological Assessment of the Vsling, a Novel Transcatheter Ventricular Repair Device

Background

Reshaping the dilated left ventricle using a surgically implanted papillary muscle sling has been shown to provide long-term improvement in cardiac function compared to annuloplasty alone in patients with systolic heart failure. A papillary muscle sling which can be implanted via a transcatheter approach has the potential to make this treatment more widely available to patients.

Methods

The Vsling transcatheter papillary muscle sling device was evaluated in a chronic animal model (sacrificed at 30 and 90 days), in a simulator, and in a human cadaver.

Results

The Vsling device was successfully implanted in 10 pigs, 6 simulator procedures, and 1 human cadaver. Procedure complexity and device usability were rated as reasonable or better by 6 interventional cardiologists. Gross and histological analysis in chronic pigs through 90 days demonstrated near-complete endothelial coverage with mild inflammation and small hematoma formation but without adverse tissue reactions, thrombi, or embolization.

Conclusions

Preliminary feasibility and safety of the Vsling implant and implantation procedure have been demonstrated. Human trials are planned to begin in the summer of 2022.

Transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation to treat aortic Para-valvular regurgitation after TAVI

BACKGROUND

Para-valvular regurgitation (PVR) after transcatheter aortic valve (TAV) implantation is associated with increased mortality. Redo-TAVI may be applied to treat PVR, yet with unknown efficacy. We thought to assess redo-TAVI efficacy in reducing PVR using the Redo-TAVI registry (45 centers; 600 TAV-in-TAV cases).

METHODS

Patients were excluded if redo-TAVI was done urgently (N = 253), for isolated TAV stenosis (N = 107) or if regurgitation location at presentation remained undetermined (N = 123). The study group of patients with PVR (N = 70) were compared against patients with intra-valvular regurgitation (IVR) (N = 41). Echocardiographic examinations of 67 (60%) patients were reassessed in a core-lab for data accuracy validation.

RESULTS

Core-lab examination validated the jet location in 66 (98.5%) patients. At 30 days, the rate of residual AR ≥ moderate was 7 (10%) in the PVR cohort vs. 1 (2.4%) in the IVR cohort, p = 0.137. The rate of procedural success was 53 (75.7%) vs. 33 (80.5%), p = 0.561; procedural safety 51 (72.8%) vs. 31 (75.6%), p = 0.727; and mortality 2 (2.9%) vs. 1 (2.4%), p = 0.896 at 30 days and 7 (18.6%) vs. 2 (11.5%), p = 0.671 at 1 year, respectively. Of patients with residual PVR ≥ moderate at 30 days, 5/7 occurred after implanting balloon-expandable in self-expanding TAV and 2/7 after balloon-expandable in balloon-expandable TAV.

CONCLUSIONS

This study puts in perspective redo-TAVI efficacy and limitations to treat PVR after TAVI. Patient selection for this and other therapies for PVR needs further investigation.

Adverse events and stroke prevention by interventional left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with low CHA2 DS2 -VASc score-results from the multicenter German LAARGE registry

BACKGROUND

Interventional left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is routinely performed in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and contraindications to standard anticoagulation.

AIMS

We investigated its role in patients at low stroke risk, and compared the effectiveness and safety in patients with low versus high risk.

METHODS

LAARGE is a prospective registry depicting the clinical reality of LAAO. LAAO was conducted with different standard commercial devices, and follow-up period was 1 year. Patients with started procedure and documented CHA₂ DS₂ -VASc score were selected from the whole database.

RESULTS

A total of 638 patients from 38 centers were divided into CHA₂ DS₂ -VASc score ≤2, i.e., low-risk group (10.2%), and >2, i.e., high-risk group (89.8%). The latter had a pronounced cardiovascular risk profile and preceding strokes (0% vs. 23.9%; p < 0.001). Implantation success was consistently high (97.6%), frequencies of intrahospital major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (0% vs. 0.5%) and other major complications (4.6% vs. 4.0%) were low (each p = not significant [NS]). Numerous moderate complications were also observed in the low-risk patients (12.3% vs. 9.4%; p = NS). Frequencies of nonfatal strokes (0% vs. 0.7%) and severe bleedings (0% vs. 0.7%) were low (each p = NS). In a specig analysis, patients at very high risk of stroke (i.e., CHA₂ DS₂ -VASc score >4) did not have increased rates of complications or nonfatal strokes in the first year after the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-risk patients had no nonfatal strokes and major bleedings within 1 year after hospital discha but had unexpectedly high rates of moderate procedural complications. The indication in these patients should be strictly defined based on an individual benefit-risk assessment.

Management and Outcome of Failed Percutaneous Edge-to-Edge Mitral Valve Plasty: Insight From an International Registry

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the incidence, management, and outcome of patients who experienced MitraClip (Abbott Vascular) failure secondary to loss of leaflet insertion (LLI), single leaflet detachment (SLD), or embolization.

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair with MitraClip is an established therapy for the treatment of mitral regurgitation (MR), but no data exist regarding the prevalence and outcome according to the mode of clip failure.

METHODS

Between January 2009 and December 2020, we retrospectively screened 4,294 procedures of MitraClip performed in 19 centers. LLI was defined as damage to the leaflet where the MitraClip was attached, SLD as demonstration of complete separation between the device and a single leaflet tissue, and clip embolization as loss of contact between MitraClip and both leaflets.

RESULTS

A total of 147 cases of MitraClip failure were detected (overall incidence = 3.5%), and these were secondary to LLI or SLD in 47 (31.9%) and 99 (67.3%) cases, respectively, whereas in 1 (0.8%) case clip embolization was observed. MitraClip failure occurred in 67 (45.5%) patients with functional MR, in 64 (43.5%) patients with degenerative MR, and 16 (10.8%) with mixed etiology. Although the majority of MitraClip failures were detected before discharge (47 intraprocedural and 42 in the hospital), up to 39.5% of cases were diagnosed at follow-up. In total, 80 (54.4%) subjects underwent a redo procedure, either percutaneously with MitraClip (n = 51, 34.7%) or surgically (n = 36, 24.5%) including 4 cases of surgical conversion of the index procedure and 7 cases of bailout surgery after unsuccessful redo MitraClip. After a median follow-up of 163 days (IQR: 22-720 days), 50 (43.9%) subjects presented moderate to severe MR, and 43 (29.3%) patients died. An up-front redo MitraClip strategy was associated with a trend toward a reduced rate of death at follow-up vs surgical or conservative management (P = 0.067), whereas postprocedural acute kidney injury, age, and moderate to severe tricuspid regurgitation were independent predictors of death.

CONCLUSIONS

MitraClip failure secondary to LLI and SLD is not a rare phenomenon and may occur during and also beyond hospitalization. Redo MitraClip strategy demonstrates a trend toward a reduced risk of death compared with bailout surgery and conservative management. A third of those patients remained with more than moderate MR and had substantial mortality at the intermediate-term follow-up.

Initial experiences of transapical beating‐heart mitral valve repair with a novel artificial chordal implantation device

Background

Severe mitral regurgitation (MR) is associated with progressive heart failure and impairment of survival. Degenerative MR accounts for most MV repair surgeries. Conventional mitral valve repair surgery requires cardiopulmonary bypass and is associated with significant morbidity and risks. Transapical beating‐heart mitral valve repair by artificial chordae implantation with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) guidance has the potential to significantly reduce surgical morbidity. We report the first‐in‐human experience of degenerative MR repair using a novel artificial chordae implantation device (Mitralstitch^TM system).

Methods

Ten patients with severe MR underwent transapical artificial chordae implantation using MitralstitchTM system. The procedure was performed through a small left thoracotomy under general anesthesia and TEE guidance. Patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography and other assessments during the follow‐up.

Results

All 10 patients with an average age of 63.7 ± 9.6 years successfully received transapical artificial chordae implantation. Their MR reduced from severe to none or trace in five patients, mild in five patients before discharge. Five patients received one artificial chordal implantation, four patients received two, and one patient received three and edge‐to‐edge repair by locking two of them. The safety and efficacy endpoint were achieved in all patients at 1‐month follow‐up. At 1‐year follow‐up, six patients had mild MR, three patients had moderate MR, one patient had recurrence of severe MR and underwent surgical repair.

Conclusions

The results of this first‐in‐human study show safety and feasibility of transapical mitral valve repair using MitralStitch system. Patient selection and technical refinement are crucial to improve the outcomes.

Influence of severe anemia on procedural safety and one-year outcome after left atrial appendage closure: Insights from a very high-risk cohort

Introduction

Patients undergoing left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) are often severly anemic and close to the transfusion threshold. The aim was to investigate the prevalence of severe anemia in this cohort and if procedural safety is compromised compared with non-anemic patients.

Methods and results

Comparison of severly anemic patients (Hb < 80 g/l) vs. non-severly anemic patients in the prospective, multicentre observational LAARGE registry of patients undergoing LAAC. A total of 638 patients (anemia 22.3% vs non-anemic 77.7%) were included. Anemic patients were older (77.1 years ± 7.9 vs 75.6 years ± 7.9, p = 0.014), had more comorbidities, higher CHA2DS2-VASc (4.8 vs 4.4, p = 0.017) and higher HAS-BLED (4.3 vs 3.8, p < 0.001) scores. Implant success was not influenced by anemia (99.3% vs 97.2%). Severe in-hospital (0.7% vs 5.6%, p = 0.01) and overall complications (8.5% vs 13.7%, p = 0.11) were less common in patients with anemia, driven by fewer pericardial effusions. Mortality was higher in anemic patients and associated with an increased hazard ratio, albeit not significantly (16.0% vs 10.3%, HR 1.61 (95%-CI: 0.97–2.67), p = 0.06). In the one-year follow-up, composite outcome of death, stroke or systemic embolism occurred in 22/142 anemic and in 54/496 non-anemic patients with an adjusted HR of 1.04 (95%-CI 0.62–1.73, p = 0.89).

Conclusion

Severe anemia close to the transfusion threshold is common in patients undergoing LAAC. However, this does not influence in-hospital complications or implant success. One-year mortality is higher in anemic patients, mainly driven by co-morbidities.

The V-LAP System for Remote Left Atrial Pressure Monitoring of Patients with Heart Failure: Remote Left Atrial Pressure Monitoring

OBJECTIVE

Patients with heart failure (HF) are at an increased risk of hospital admissions. The aim of this report is to describe the feasibility, safety and accuracy of a novel wireless left atrial pressure (LAP) monitoring system in HF patients.

METHODS

The V-LAP Left Atrium Monitoring systEm for Patients With Chronic sysTOlic & Diastolic Congestive heart Failure (VECTOR-HF) study is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, open-label, first-in human clinical trial to assess the safety, performance and usability of the V-LAP system (Vectorious Medical Technologies, Ltd) in NYHA Class III HF patients. The device was implanted in the inter-atrial septum via a percutaneous, trans-septal approach, guided by fluoroscopy and echocardiography. Primary endpoints included the successful deployment of the implant, ability to perform initial pressure measurements and safety outcomes.

RESULTS

To date, 24 patients were implanted with the LAP monitoring device. No device-related complications have occurred. LAP was reported accurately, agreeing well with wedge pressure at 3 months (Lin's CCC=0.850). After 6 months, NYHA class improved in 40% of the patients (95% CI =16.4%-63.5%), while 6-minute walk test distance had not changed significantly (313.9 ± 144.9 vs. 232.5 ± 129.9 meters, p=0.076).

CONCLUSION

The V-LAP left atrium monitoring system appears to be safe and accurate.

Safety and feasibility of peri-device leakage closure after LAAO: an international, multicentre collaborative study

BACKGROUND

Residual peri-device leakage (PDL) is frequent after left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). Little is known about management strategies, procedural aspects and outcomes of interventional PDL closure.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to assess the safety and feasibility of PDL closure after LAAO.

METHODS

Fifteen centres contributed data on baseline characteristics, in-hospital and follow-up outcomes of patients who underwent PDL closure after LAAO. Outcomes of interest included acute success and complication rates and long-term efficacy of the procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 95 patients were included and a cumulative number of 104 leaks were closed. The majority of PDLs were detected within 90 days (range 41-231). Detachable coils were the most frequent approach (42.3%), followed by the use of the AMPLATZER Vascular Plug II (29.8%) and the AMPLATZER Duct Occluder II (17.3%). Technical success was 100% with 94.2% of devices placed successfully within the first attempt. There were no major complications requiring surgical or transcatheter interventions. During follow-up (96 days [range 49-526]), persistent leaks were found in 18 patients (18.9%), yielding a functional success rate of 82.7%, although PDLs were significantly reduced in size (pre-leak sizemax: 6.1±3.6 mm vs post-leak sizemax: 2.5±1.3 mm, p<0.001). None of the patients had a leak >5 mm. Major adverse events during follow-up occurred in 5 patients (2 ischaemic strokes, 2 intracranial haemorrhages, and 1 major gastrointestinal bleeding).

CONCLUSIONS

Several interventional techniques have become available to achieve PDL closure. They are associated with high technical and functional success and low complication rates.

90 Annular size and interaction with trans-catheter aortic valves for the treatment of severe bicuspid aortic valve stenosis: insights from the beat registry

Aims

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is safe and feasible in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV), but whether annular size may influence TAVR results in BAV patients remains unclear. We aimed at evaluating the impact of aortic annular size on procedural and clinical outcomes of BAV patients undergoing TAVR, as well as potential interactions between annular dimension and trans-catheter heart valve (THV) type [balloon-expandable (BEV) vs. self-expanding (SEV)].

Methods and results

BEAT is a multicentre registry of consecutive BAV stenosis undergoing TAVR. For this sub-study patients were classified according to annular dimension in small-annulus (area &lt; 400 mm2 or perimeter &lt;72 mm), medium-annulus (area ≥ 400 and &lt; 575 mm2, perimeter ≥72 mm and&lt; 85 mm), large-annulus (area ≥575 mm2 or perimeter ≥85 mm). Primary endpoint was Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) device success. 45(15.5%) patients had small, 132(45.3%) medium, and 114(39.2%) large annuli. Compared with other groups, patients with large annuli were more frequently male, at younger age, had higher body mass index, larger aortic valve area, higher rate of moderate-severe calcification, lower mean trans-aortic valve gradient and lower left ventricular ejection fraction. In large-annuli SEVs were associated with a lower VARC-2 device success (75.9% vs. 90.6%, P = 0.049) driven by a higher rate of paravalvular valvular leak (PVL) compared to BEVs (20.7% vs. 1.2%, P &lt; 0.001). However, no differences in clinical outcomes were observed according to annular size nor THV type.

Conclusions

TAVR in BAV patients is feasible irrespective of annular size. However in patients with large aortic annulus SEVs were associated with a significantly higher rate of PVLs compared to BEVs.

Annular size and interaction with trans-catheter aortic valves for treatment of severe bicuspid aortic valve stenosis: Insights from the BEAT registry

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is safe and feasible in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV), but whether annular size may influence TAVR results in BAV patients remains unclear. We aimed at evaluating the impact of aortic annular size on procedural and clinical outcomes of BAV patients undergoing TAVR, as well as potential interactions between annular dimension and trans-catheter heart valve (THV) type (balloon-expandable (BEV) vs. self-expanding (SEV).

METHODS

BEAT is a multicenter registry of consecutive BAV stenosis undergoing TAVR. For this sub-study patients were classified according to annular dimension in small-annulus (area < 400 mm² or perimeter <72 mm), medium-annulus (area ≥ 400 and < 575 mm², perimeter ≥72 mm and< 85 mm), large-annulus (area ≥ 575 mm² or perimeter ≥85 mm). Primary endpoint was Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) device success.

RESULTS

45(15.5%) patients had small, 132(45.3%) medium, and 114(39.2%) large annuli. Compared with other groups, patients with large annuli were more frequently male, younger, with higher body mass index, larger aortic valve area, higher rate of moderate-severe calcification, lower mean trans-aortic valve gradient and lower left ventricular ejection fraction. In large-annuli SEVs were associated with a lower VARC-2 device success (75.9% vs. 90.6%, p = 0.049) driven by a higher rate of paravalvular valvular leak (PVL) compared to BEVs (20.7% vs. 1.2%, p < 0.001). However, no differences in clinical outcomes were observed according to annular size nor THV type.

CONCLUSIONS

TAVR in BAV patients is feasible irrespective of annular size. However in patients with large aortic annulus SEVs were associated with a significantly higher rate of PVLs compared to BEVs.