Hit by a Train: Injury Burden and Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Few data exist regarding the train vs. pedestrian (TVP) injury burden and outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine the epidemiology and outcomes associated with TVP injuries.

METHODS

This is a retrospective National Trauma Databank study (January 2007 to July 2012) including trauma patients sustaining TVP injury. Demographics, injury data, interventions, and outcomes were abstracted. Patients injured by a train were compared to patients who sustained an automobile vs. pedestrian (AVP) injury.

RESULTS

Of the 152,631 patients struck by ground transportation during the study time frame, 1863 (1.2%) were TVP. Median TVP age was 38 years (interquartile range [IQR] 24-50 years), 81.6% were male, median Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 13 (IQR 6-24). TVP patients were more severely injured (ISS 13 vs. 9; p < 0.001) and required more proximal amputations (13.4% vs. 0.2%; p < 0.001) and cavitary operations (18.2% vs. 2.8%; p < 0.001). TVP patients had higher rates of intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation and transfusion, longer length of stay, and higher in-hospital mortality. On multivariable logistical regression, TVP was an independent predictor for higher injury burden, ISS ≥25 (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.650), immediate operative need (AOR 7.535), and complications (AOR 1.317).

CONCLUSIONS

TVP is associated with a significant injury burden. These patients have a significantly higher need for immediate operation and more complicated hospital course.

Cannabis Use Is Associated with Increased Mechanical Ventilation and Polysubstance Use in Trauma Patients

Recent policy changes in California regarding cannabis use underscore the need to study outcomes and prevalence of this drug in trauma. Our study aims to study the prevalence of cannabis use and associations with injury types and outcomes in Los Angeles County trauma patients. Data were reviewed from 21,276 adult patients from a Los Angeles countywide database spanning five years (2012-2016), who underwent urine toxicology testing in the ED after sustaining a traumatic injury. The percentage of trauma patients using marijuana increased from 36 to 43 per cent over the five-year period. On univariate analysis, cannabis-positive patients were significantly younger and more likely male, with lower median systolic blood pressure and heart rate on arrival in the ED. A higher proportion of cannabis users had penetrating trauma, and 48 per cent of cannabis users also tested positive for amphetamines, cocaine, opioids, or Phencyclidine. On multivariate analysis, cannabis was associated with an increase in need for mechanical ventilation after adjusting for age, admission Glasgow Coma Score, gender, polysubstance use, blunt or penetrating mechanism, and Injury Severity Score, and was not associated with increases in mortality or ICU length of stay.

Cannabis Use is Associated with Increased Mechanical Ventilation and Polysubstance Use in Trauma Patients

Recent policy changes in California regarding cannabis use underscore the need to study outcomes and prevalence of this drug in trauma. Our study aims to study the prevalence of cannabis use and associations with injury types and outcomes in Los Angeles County trauma patients. Data were reviewed from 21,276 adult patients from a Los Angeles countywide database spanning five years (2012–2016), who underwent urine toxicology testing in the ED after sustaining a traumatic injury. The percentage of trauma patients using marijuana increased from 36 to 43 per cent over the five-year period. On univariate analysis, cannabis-positive patients were significantly younger and more likely male, with lower median systolic blood pressure and heart rate on arrival in the ED. A higher proportion of cannabis users had penetrating trauma, and 48 per cent of cannabis users also tested positive for amphetamines, cocaine, opioids, or Phencyclidine. On multivariate analysis, cannabis was associated with an increase in need for mechanical ventilation after adjusting for age, admission Glasgow Coma Score, gender, polysubstance use, blunt or penetrating mechanism, and Injury Severity Score, and was not associated with increases in mortality or ICU length of stay.

Safety of early ambulation following blunt abdominal solid organ injury: A prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

There is continued debate regarding the optimal period of bed-rest and in-hospital monitoring for non-operative management of solid organ injury following blunt trauma.

METHODS

Single center, prospective, observational study of blunt solid organ injuries from 07/2014-02/2016, managed initially without surgical or angiographic intervention. Early ambulation was defined as ≤24 h.

RESULTS

79 patients met inclusion criteria, with 36 (45.6%) in the early ambulation group and 43 (54.4%) in the late ambulation group. There were zero complications in the early ambulation group, and three complications in the late ambulation group (complications, p = 0.246; further interventions, p = 0.498). Median ICU LOS was zero days and three days for early vs. late ambulation, p = 0.001. Median total LOS was two days and five days for early vs. late ambulation, p < 0.001.

CONCLUSION

Early ambulation is safe in patients undergoing non-operative management of their solid organ injury, and may result in a reduced length of stay.

Intraosseous Infusion as a Bridge to Definitive Access

Intraosseous (IO) needle placement is an alternative for patients with difficult venous access. The purpose of this retrospective study was to examine indications and outcomes associated with IO use at a Level 1 trauma center (January 2008–May 2015). Data points included demographics, time to insertion, intravenous (IV) access points, indications, infusions, hospital and intensive care unit length of stay, and mortality. Of 68 patients with IO insertion analyzed (63.2% blunt trauma, 29.4% penetrating trauma, and 7.4% medical), 56 per cent were hypotensive on arrival and 38.2 per cent asystolic. The most common indications for IO infusion were difficult IV access (69%) and rapid sequence intubation (20.6%). The median time to IO access was three minutes. IV access was gained after IO in 72.1 per cent of patients. Through IO access, 30.9 per cent patients received crystalloid, 29.4 per cent received Advanced Care Life Support (ACLS) medications, 25 per cent rapid sequence intubation medications, 20.6 per cent blood products, and 2.9 per cent seizure medications. Overall, 80.9 per cent were intubated in the Emergency Department (ED), 26.5 per cent had ED thoracotomy, and 20.6 per cent had a laparotomy. Median crystalloid infused through IO was 180 cc in pediatric patients and 1 L in adults, respectively. Extravasation, the most common complication, was experienced by 7.4 per cent of patients. Inhospital mortality was 72.9 per cent. IO access should be considered when there is a need for rapid intervention requiring vascular access.

Do Antiplatelet and Anticoagulation Agents Matter after Repair of Traumatic Arterial Injuries?

Thrombosis is a devastating complication after repair of traumatic vascular injury. Although thrombosis rates have been described, the value of anticoagulation in preventing postrepair thrombosis is unknown. We hypothesize that postoperative anticoagulation reduces thrombosis rates. A total of 1524 consecutive patients with traumatic arterial injuries from January 2005 to June 2015 were identified, and 381 patients underwent the following repair types: direct suture of vessel wall, primary anastomosis, extra-anatomic reconstruction, tissue and synthetic interposition reconstruction. Twenty six patients received postoperative heparin at therapeutic levels, and 29 patients received postoperative aspirin for five consecutive days. The heparin and aspirin groups were matched with patients without postoperative anticoagulation by the following variables: anatomic arterial injury, type of vascular repair, and age. These groups were then compared using the following outcome measures: mortality, thrombosis of repaired vessel, amputation, hemorrhage, cerebral vascular accident, and extremity compartment syndrome. The demographics between the heparin, aspirin, and respectively matched groups were not statistically different. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of thrombosis, bleeding, compartment syndrome, cerebral vascular accident, limb amputation, or mortality. Although there was no increase in bleeding complications with the use of heparin or aspirin, there was also no impact on the rate of thrombosis.

Intraosseous Infusion as a Bridge to Definitive Access

Intraosseous (IO) needle placement is an alternative for patients with difficult venous access. The purpose of this retrospective study was to examine indications and outcomes associated with IO use at a Level 1 trauma center (January 2008-May 2015). Data points included demographics, time to insertion, intravenous (IV) access points, indications, infusions, hospital and intensive care unit length of stay, and mortality. Of 68 patients with IO insertion analyzed (63.2% blunt trauma, 29.4% penetrating trauma, and 7.4% medical), 56 per cent were hypotensive on arrival and 38.2 per cent asystolic. The most common indications for IO infusion were difficult IV access (69%) and rapid sequence intubation (20.6%). The median time to IO access was three minutes. IV access was gained after IO in 72.1 per cent of patients. Through IO access, 30.9 per cent patients received crystalloid, 29.4 per cent received Advanced Care Life Support (ACLS) medications, 25 per cent rapid sequence intubation medications, 20.6 per cent blood products, and 2.9 per cent seizure medications. Overall, 80.9 per cent were intubated in the Emergency Department (ED), 26.5 per cent had ED thoracotomy, and 20.6 per cent had a laparotomy. Median crystalloid infused through IO was 180 cc in pediatric patients and 1 L in adults, respectively. Extravasation, the most common complication, was experienced by 7.4 per cent of patients. Inhospital mortality was 72.9 per cent. IO access should be considered when there is a need for rapid intervention requiring vascular access.

Do Antiplatelet and Anticoagulation Agents Matter after Repair of Traumatic Arterial Injuries?

Thrombosis is a devastating complication after repair of traumatic vascular injury. Although thrombosis rates have been described, the value of anticoagulation in preventing postrepair thrombosis is unknown. We hypothesize that postoperative anticoagulation reduces thrombosis rates. A total of 1524 consecutive patients with traumatic arterial injuries from January 2005 to June 2015 were identified, and 381 patients underwent the following repair types: direct suture of vessel wall, primary anastomosis, extra-anatomic reconstruction, tissue and synthetic interposition reconstruction. Twenty six patients received postoperative heparin at therapeutic levels, and 29 patients received postoperative aspirin for five consecutive days. The heparin and aspirin groups were matched with patients without postoperative anticoagulation by the following variables: anatomic arterial injury, type of vascular repair, and age. These groups were then compared using the following outcome measures: mortality, thrombosis of repaired vessel, amputation, hemorrhage, cerebral vascular accident, and extremity compartment syndrome. The demographics between the heparin, aspirin, and respectively matched groups were not statistically different. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of thrombosis, bleeding, compartment syndrome, cerebral vascular accident, limb amputation, or mortality. Although there was no increase in bleeding complications with the use of heparin or aspirin, there was also no impact on the rate of thrombosis.

The role of margins in extremity soft tissue sarcoma

For extremity soft tissue sarcomas, limb salvage is now standard of care. The extent of surgical margins is balanced with functionality of the resected limb. Although negative margins are the goal, the necessary width is unclear. Additional considerations for margin adequacy include presence of anatomic barriers such as fascia and periosteum, proximity of critical structures, receipt of adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies, and histologic subtype. Multidisciplinary team discussion is critical for treatment planning.