[Daclizumab and basiliximab: monoclonal mouse-man antibodies with effective immunosuppression without side effects]

Four major double-blind randomized trials in kidney transplant patients have shown that the interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R alpha) antagonists declizumab or basiliximab, when added to an immunosuppressive regimen consisting of cyclosporin and prednisone, reduce the incidence of acute rejections after kidney transplantation by 30-40%, during the first 6 months. Daclizumab and basiliximab are monoclonal antibodies of which the variable parts are of mouse origin and the other components of human origin. The addition of the interleukin-2 receptor antagonists was not accompanied by extra side effects. Ongoing clinical trials aim at answering the question whether the addition of daclizumab and basiliximab will allow to avoid or decrease the use of more toxic immunosuppressive drugs.

Addition of isradipine (Lomir) results in a better renal function after kidney transplantation: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multi-center study

BACKGROUND

After successful kidney transplantation patients may suffer from the adverse effects due to the use of calcineurin inhibitors. Calcium channel blockers are effective in the treatment of hypertension and may ameliorate cyclosporine- (CsA) induced impairment of renal function after kidney transplantation. Calcium channel blockers may also modulate the immune-system which may result in reduction of acute rejection episodes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From June 1995 till 1997 the effect of isradipine (Lomir) on renal function, incidence and severity of delayed graft function (DGF), and acute rejection after kidney transplantation, was studied in 210 renal transplant recipients, who were randomized to receive isradipine (n=98) or placebo (n=112) after renal transplantation in a double-blind fashion.

RESULTS

In the isradipine group renal function was significantly better at 3 and 12 months (P=0.002 and P=0.021) compared with the placebo group. DGF was present in both groups: isradipine: (28+6)/98 (35%); placebo: (35+9)/112 (40%), P=0.57. Severity of DGF was comparable in both groups (isradipine: 9.1+/-8.7 vs. placebo: 9.3+/-8.1 days). No statistical difference was found in incidence or severity of biopsy-proven acute rejection [isradipine: (42+6)/98 (49%) versus placebo: (46+9)/112 (49%), P=1.00]. Renal vein thrombosis was observed in eight patients. This proved to be associated with the route of administration of the study medication [6/45 (13%) on i.v. medication versus 2/165 (1%) on oral medication, P<0.001].

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of isradipine results in a better renal function after kidney transplantation, without effect on incidence or severity of DGF or acute rejection.

Effect of cyclosporine on mycophenolic acid trough levels in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Triple drug treatment consisting of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), in a standard dose of 2 g daily, combined with cyclosporine (CsA) and prednisone, has become the standard immunosuppressive regimen after kidney transplantation in many centers. The need for therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolic acid (MPA) has not yet been established. Several drug interactions with MMF are known. We investigated the influence of CsA withdrawal on MPA trough levels in renal transplant patients.

METHODS

Fifty-two patients were treated with 1 g of MMF twice daily, and prednisone and CsA targeted between 125 and 175 ng/ml for 6 months after transplantation. At 6 months after transplantation, 19 patients were randomized for continuation of triple therapy (group A), 19 patients discontinued CsA (group B), and 14 patients discontinued prednisone (group C). We compared 12-hr fasted MPA trough levels at 6 and 9 months after transplantation within and between these groups.

RESULTS

MPA trough levels during treatment with CsA, MMF, and prednisone were significantly lower than those during treatment with MMF and prednisone only (group B); median levels were 1.87 mg/L (range: 0.56-5.27) vs. 3.16 mg/L (range: 0.32-7.78), respectively (P=0.002). MPA trough levels in groups A and C did not change between 6 and 9 months after transplantation; group A median levels were 1.87 (range: 0.31-4.32) vs. 1.53 mg/L (range: 0.36-3.70), and group C median levels were 1.62 (range: 0.69-10.34) vs. 1.79 mg/L (range: 0.54-6.00), respectively. At 9 months after transplantation, patients in whom CsA was discontinued had higher MPA trough levels as compared with patients who continued the use of triple therapy (P=0.001) or patients in whom steroids were withdrawn (P=0.014).

CONCLUSION

A significant increase of MPA trough levels was found after discontinuation of CsA (6 months after transplantation), resulting in almost a doubling of MPA trough levels at 9 months after transplantation. This resulted in increased MPA levels in patients without CsA as compared to MPA levels in patients continuing triple therapy or discontinuing prednisone.

The impact of recurrent glomerulonephritis on graft survival in recipients of human histocompatibility leucocyte antigen-identical living related donor grafts

BACKGROUND

Graft loss due to rejection is uncommon after human histocompatibility leukocyte antigen-identical living related donor (LRD) transplantation, resulting in an excellent long-term graft survival. Data on the impact of recurrence of the original disease on graft survival after LRD transplantation are scarce.

METHODS

We have studied the influence of recurrent glomerulonephritis in adult recipients of a human histocompatibility leukocyte antigen-identical LRD graft transplanted in our center in the period from 1968 to 1996. To that end, the data of 33 patients with proven or suspected primary glomerulonephritis and 27 patients with nonglomerular diseases were analyzed.

RESULTS

The patient survival was similar in both groups at 5, 10, and 20 years. The functional graft survival, i.e., graft survival after censoring for death, was, however, significantly worse for patients with glomerulonephritis as underlying disease (P<0.01). At 5 years graft survival was 100% vs. 88%, at 10 years 100% vs. 70%, and at 20 years 100% vs. 63%, respectively. Thus none of the patients with nonglomerular diseases lost a graft, whereas eight grafts were lost in the group of patients with glomerulonephritis. The main cause of graft loss in this patient group was recurrent glomerulonephritis (n=5), whereas chronic vascular rejection caused graft loss in two patients and occlusion of a transplant artery was the cause in one. A clinically significant proteinuria was detected in six more patients in the glomerulonephritis group: a recurrent glomerulonephritis was diagnosed in four patients and in two patients there was no biopsy. The cumulative incidence of recurrence was as high as 45% at 12 years after transplantation.

CONCLUSION

Recipients of a human histocompatibility leukocyte antigen-identical LRD kidney have a good prognosis with respect to graft survival. After censoring for death, recurrent glomerulonephritis is the main cause of graft failure in these patients and the impact of recurrent disease on graft survival will become even more prominent with longer follow-up.

Renal transplantation in patients with dense deposit disease: morphological characteristics of recurrent disease and clinical outcome

BACKGROUND

Dense deposit disease (DDD) is an uncommon cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). As a consequence, information on the outcome of renal transplantation in patients with DDD comes from series with a limited number of patients.

METHODS

We present the histological and clinical data of 13 adult patients with DDD, who received their first allograft in our centre in the period between 1983 and 1994.

RESULTS

Renal transplant biopsies were performed in 11 patients, at 2.9 months after transplantation (median; range 0.4-13.8 months). The indication for taking the biopsy was in all instances a raised serum creatinine level. Five patients also had a significant proteinuria. In only one patient, light microscopy showed alterations in the capillary walls suggestive of a recurrence of DDD. However, by immunofluorescence or electron microscopy, we found glomerular deposits compatible with a recurrence of DDD in all 11 patients. Three patterns of glomerular C3 deposition were found: globular depositions only in the mesangium; mesangial accumulation with linear deposits in the capillary wall; and prominent linear presence in the capillary wall with only a few mesangial granules. The findings by electron microscopy matched the immunofluorescence results. The linear C3 accumulation in the capillary wall was visible ultrastructurally as electron-dense ribbon-like transformation of the glomerular basement membrane. Mesangial C3 deposits were seen ultrastructurally as local electron-dense deposits in the mesangium. Four patients showed a pronounced glomerular influx of neutrophils, accompanied by crescents in three patients. In these three latter patients, the recurrence of DDD was the only histological lesion. In the other patients, the recurrence was merely a coincidence, the biopsy demonstrating an additional histological lesion (three chronic vascular rejection, two acute rejection, one ischaemic necrosis and two cyclosporin A toxicity). Eight patients with a recurrence of DDD have progressed to ESRD at an average of 14 months (range 0.2-38 months) after transplantation. The recurrence was the sole cause of graft loss in the three patients with crescents. The patients in whom the C3 deposits were confined to the mesangium appeared to have a better prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The histological recurrence rate of DDD is high. The histological picture is quite diverse, and in most patients abnormalities are only found by immunofluorescence and electron microscopy. Up to one-quarter of the patients with DDD lost their grafts because of a recurrence.

[Kidney donation by a 'non-heart-beating' donor from an ethical perspective]

In asystolic patients, kidney donation is possible by using a non-heart-beating (NHB) donation procedure. This involves in situ perfusion of the kidneys by inserting a catheter into the femoral artery and flushing cold fluid through the kidneys. The introduction of an NHB donation programme leads to ethical questions concerning the guarantees for prudent procedure: How should death of a patient be defined in case of NHB donation? Is there a strict separation of responsibilities of the medical teams in the different phases of the procedure (patient treatment and actual donation procedure)? Are sufficient attention and care given to the relatives? Does the NHB donation procedure not interfere with the care of a patient who is expected to die soon? Extensive discussion with the Medical Ethics Committee of the University Hospital Nijmegen, the Netherlands, has led to a protocol for NHB kidney donation that meets the required guarantees.

Changes in venous hemodynamics after renal transplantation

To explain an occasionally observed transient swelling of the ipsilateral leg in renal transplant recipients in the absence of deep vein thrombosis, we took serial measurements of venous outflow resistance and duplex examinations of both legs. Fourteen recipients of a living related donor kidney graft were submitted to strain gauge plethysmography and duplex examination before transplantation and 1 and 6 weeks thereafter. Venous outflow resistance and venous flow were measured and the veins were assessed for thrombosis. Strain gauge plethysmography showed a significant increase in venous outflow resistance in the leg on the side of the renal transplant 1 week after transplantation [0.28 +/- 0.13 vs 0.40 +/- 0.15 mmHg.s (ml/100 ml)-1; P < 0.05]. Six weeks later, the venous outflow resistance had returned to preoperative values [0.30 +/- 0.11 mmHg.s (ml/100 ml)-1; P = NS]. On the contralateral side, no significant differences were found. Duplex examinations showed no signs of thrombosis. Venous flow measurements in the common femoral vein showed no significant differences. We conclude that the additional blood supply to the iliac veins results in an increase in venous outflow resistance in the ipsilateral leg, which can explain the observed swelling of this leg and may have implications for the preferred method of diagnosis of venous thrombosis after renal transplantation.

A randomised, prospective study on the conversion from cyclosporine-prednisone to cyclosporine-azathioprine at 6 months after renal transplantation

In a randomised prospective trial, we studied the effects of replacement of prednisone (Pred) by azathioprine (Aza), 6 months after transplantation, in stable renal allograft recipients on cyclosporine and prednisone (CsA + Pred). Out of 83 patients, 42 started treatment with CsA + Aza and 41 continued therapy with CsA + Pred. CsA was dosed to achieve a level of 150 ng/ml, the Aza dose was 3 mg/kg per day and the Pred dose was 0.15 mg/kg per day. Eighteen months after randomisation, in the CsA + Aza group 18 of the 42 patients were effectively treated with CsA + Aza. In the main, anaemia, leuco- and thrombocytopenia, and hypocorticism necessitated the reintroduction of Pred in the remaining 24 patients. Compared to the continuation of CsA + Pred, conversion of Pred to Aza resulted in a reduced number of antihypertensive drugs needed, and in lower serum total, LDL and HDL cholesterol levels; the incidence of acute rejections and graft losses was no different. In conclusion, conversion of CsA + Pred to CsA + Aza is a safe option in renal transplant patients with contraindications to long-term corticosteroid treatment.

[Kidney transplantation without previous dialysis: limitations, but also possibilities]

Kidney transplantation guarantees a better quality of life than dialysis and is less costly. Transplantation without preceding dialysis is an attractive option. However, transplantation long before end-stage renal failure prolongs the period of exposure to immunosuppressive therapy, thereby increasing the risk of malignancy. Transplantation at one year before dialysis-dependency is expected would seem an acceptable compromise. Unfortunately, this option is purely theoretical because there is a long waiting-list due to the existing donor shortage. Patients are usually put on the waiting-list after dialysis has already been started. Extension of the list with pre-dialysis patients is currently only justifiable in exceptional cases. These limitations do not apply to patients who have received an offer of kidney donation from a living (related or unrelated) donor. In these patients transplantation can be done as soon as the creatinine clearance has reached a level of 10-12 ml per minute. More attention should be paid to this form of transplantation, because it can help to decrease the donor shortage.

Recurrence of type I membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis after renal transplantation: analysis of the incidence, risk factors, and impact on graft survival

BACKGROUND

The information in the medical literature on the incidence of recurrence of type I membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN) after renal transplantation and its impact on graft survival is limited because most data are derived from case reports or from studies involving a small number of patients.

METHODS

We analyzed the data from our transplant center. Among 1097 adult patients receiving their first allograft between 1977 and 1994, we identified 32 patients with type I MPGN.

RESULTS

A recurrence was detected in 9 of the 27 recipients of a first cadaveric graft (33%). The cumulative incidence reached 48% at 4 years after transplantation when patients with graft failure from other causes were censored. All patients with recurrent MPGN had clinically significant proteinuria (>1 g/24 hr) that was first observed at a median time of 20 months (range, 1.5-42 months) after transplantation. Graft survival was significantly worse in patients with recurrence as compared with patients without recurrence. Mean duration of graft survival after the diagnosis of recurrence was 40 months. We could not detect any clinical characteristics of patients or donors that were associated with recurrent disease. However, an increased risk of recurrence was observed in patients with the HLA haplotype B8DR3. Four patients received an HLA-identical graft from a living related donor. Recurrence occurred in three patients (75%), with ensuing graft loss in two. The only patient with a haploidentical living related graft did not have a recurrence. Five patients with a recurrence in the first graft received a second transplant. Recurrence was observed in four of these patients (80%).

CONCLUSIONS

Type I MPGN recurred after renal transplantation in half of the patients. The incidence may be even higher in recipients of an identical living related donor graft and in patients receiving a second transplant after having experienced a recurrence in their first graft. Recurrence of type I MPGN has a detrimental effect on graft survival.

Urological complications in renal transplantation. A comparison between living-related and cadaveric grafts

OBJECTIVE

Since 1989 the percentage of living-related donor renal transplantations has increased considerably at our institution. We compared the incidence of urological complications in the living-related donor transplantation (LRDT) group and the cadaveric donor transplantation (CDT) group.

METHODS

Between September 1989 and September 1994, 534 consecutive patients underwent a renal transplantation. During that period, the percentage of LRDT increased from 10 to 25 (mean: 14.8) per year. In all patients a transvesical ureteroneocystostomy without antireflux mechanism was performed.

RESULT

A urological complication developed in 64 (11.9%) of the recipients (obstruction in 6.3%; leakage in 5.6%). In 41 (7.7%) patients the complication was transitory and could be managed with minimal invasive measures such as a percutaneous nephrostomy (n = 34), drainage of a paraurethral fluid collection (n = 13), transurethral bladder drainage (n = 3) or a combination of these. In 23 (4.3%) of the recipients a secondary urological intervention such as a pyeloureterostomy (n = 21) or percutaneous dilatation of a ureteral stricture was necessary. The incidence of obstruction was equal in the LRDT and CDT groups, whereas leakage was more frequently encountered in the LRDT group (11.4 vs. 4.6%, p < 0.05). Transplant survival after 1 year was significantly better in the LRDT group than in the CDT group (97 vs. 77%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The risk of leakage is higher in living-related donor kidney transplantations. Urological complications, however, do not impair graft survival.

Doppler spectrum analysis in the differential diagnosis of renal transplant dysfunction

Cyclosporin A (CyA) nephrotoxicity and rejection of a renal allograft each demands a specific therapy. This study was designed to establish the capability of Doppler spectrum analysis to diagnose either one of these causes during renal dysfunction. Between October 1989 and October 1991 we performed echo-Doppler examinations in 209 renal transplant recipients on a routine basis during the first three months after transplantation. Echo-Doppler examinations during periods of renal dysfunction were analyzed. A total of 93 periods of renal dysfunction, retrospectively due to rejection (n = 40) or CyA toxicity (n = 53), occurred in 70 patients during the study period. A control group consisted of 82 patients with normal functioning grafts. When compared to the control group, the Doppler features (in segmental arteries) of the rejection group showed significant lower frequency shifts [Fmax (Hz) 1637 +/- 423 vs. 1436 +/- 465; p < 0.05; Fdia (Hz) 582 +/- 180 vs. 458 +/- 225; p < 0.05], a shorter deceleration time of the Doppler spectrum [Tdown (ms) 340 +/- 100 vs. 276 +/- 102; p < 0.05], and a higher Resistance Index (RI 0.64 +/- 0.08 vs. 0.68 +/- 0.13; p < 0.05). Doppler spectra during CyA toxicity showed only a significantly longer acceleration time [Tmax (ms) 123 +/- 36 vs. 139 +/- 40; p < 0.05]. The capability of differentiation between the two causes was assessed with ROC analysis of single Doppler features, stepwise regression and canonic discriminant analysis on a set of Doppler features and with manual selection of several features with extreme values. ROC analysis yielded maximum sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of rejection using Tdown (sensitivity 65%; specificity 68%). Stepwise regression and canonic discriminant analysis of a set of features rendered a sensitivity and specificity of 73% and 64%, respectively. Explorative selection of extreme Doppler feature values showed that 18 of the 40 grafts with rejection had values that were only seen in 2 cases with CyA toxicity (positive predictive value 90%; sensitivity 45%; specificity 96%). In half of these cases Doppler features preceded the clinical diagnosis of rejection by a median of 4 d. In conclusion, Doppler spectra are influenced by rejection and CyA toxicity in specific ways. The Doppler features, however do not enable definite differentiation between rejection and CyA toxicity in all cases. Some changes in Doppler spectra are only seen in cases of rejection and thus enable positive identification of grafts with rejection, often earlier than clinical signs indicate rejection. A normal Doppler spectrum does not exclude rejection as the cause of renal dysfunction.

Cyclosporin does not inhibit the tubular secretion of creatinine

BACKGROUND

The immunosuppressive drug cyclosporin is known to impair renal function. The degree of renal dysfunction is usually estimated from the clearance of creatinine (CCr). Theoretically however, a fall in CCr can be caused by a decrease of GFR, an inhibition of the tubular secretion of creatinine, or the combination of both. CsA has convincingly been shown to decrease GFR, but detailed information on the effects of CsA on tubular secretion of creatinine is lacking.

METHODS

We performed two studies to investigate the influence of CsA on tubular creatinine secretion. In study A we simultaneously measured CCr and GFR (using inulin) immediately before and 4 weeks after cessation of CsA therapy in 17 renal transplant patients. In study B, the rise in serum creatinine after administration of cimetidine, which blocks the tubular secretion of creatinine, was compared in renal transplant patients treated with either CsA (in whom secretion might already be inhibited) or azathioprine.

RESULTS

Study A: After cessation of CsA there was an increase of GFR (54+/-15 vs 63+/-16 ml/min/1.73 m2, PCr (71+/-21 vs 82+/-23 ml/min/1.73 m2; PCr and GFR (a measure of the relative contribution of tubular secretion to the clearance of creatinine) did not change significantly (1.33+/-0.21 vs 1. 32+/-0.30). Study B: In nine couples of patients matched for GFR the relative rises in serum creatinine after administration of cimetidine were 26+/-21% and 22+/-7% for CsA and azathioprine treated patients respectively (NS).

CONCLUSION

CsA does not substantially inhibit the tubular secretion of creatinine. A rise in serum creatinine after administration of CsA can thus be attributed completely to a fall in GFR.

Randomized, prospective trial of cyclosporine monotherapy versus azathioprine-prednisone from three months after renal transplantation

Cyclosporine (CsA) and prednisone (Pred) are the mostly used drugs for immunosuppression after renal transplantation, but both drugs have marked side effects. Either replacement of CsA by azathioprine (Aza) or withdrawal of prednisone (Pred) resulting in CsA monotherapy can be employed to circumvent the adverse effects in the long run. Both treatment regimens were compared to this prospective randomized trial in patients who were treated with CsA and Pred during the first 3 months after renal transplantation (CsA: n=64, Aza-Pred: n=63, median duration of follow-up: 3.9 years). Estimated graft survival rates at 5 years after transplantation (in patients with a functioning graft at 3 months) were 78% in the CsA group and 87% in the Aza-Pred group. The incidence of a rejection within 3 months after start of steroid withdraw or conversion from CsA to Aza was 30% and 25% respectively (NS). At 2 years after transplantation, serum creatinine levels were lower in the Aza-Pred group (126+/-35 micromol/L) than in the CsA group (180+/-78 micromol/L; P>0.001). There were no differences in blood pressure or incidence of infections between the treatment groups. Treatment-related costs were measured during the first year after transplantation and were lower in the Aza-Pred group (DFL 40,882+/-18,895 vs. DFL 53,484+/-44,828; 1 DFL [Dutch guilder] is about US $0.60; P<0.005). In conclusion, CsA monotherapy and Aza-Pred treatment from 3 months after renal transplantation are comparably effective immunosuppressive treatment regimens, although Aza-Pred therapy results in better graft function. Withdrawal of steroids and replacement of CsA by Aza both carry a substantial risk of rejection. The previously demonstrated cost effectiveness of CsA-containing therapies seems to be limited to the first phase after transplantation. Conversion to Aza-Pred at 3 months after transplantation reduces costs.

Long-term clinical experience with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: access-related problems

Patients with end-stage renal failure can be treated with peritoneal dialysis, which is based on the capacity of the peritoneum to exchange fluid and metabolic products. To achieve this, dialysis fluid has to be instilled in the abdominal cavity through a permanent percutaneous access device. Apart from the advantages of peritoneal dialysis, severe problems are related to the access device. In this study, catheter-related morbidity and mortality are described, as found in the patient population from the University Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. The overall rates of exit-site infections and peritonitis are respectively 0.80 and 1.36 infection episodes per patient-year. Furthermore, it appeared that exit-site infections and peritonitis are the main reasons for discontinuation of dialysis and removal of the catheter. A correlation between the occurrence of peritonitis and exit-site infections was found. Also, the efficacy of the antibiotic treatment necessary to control these infectious complications is described. It is concluded that the design and the materials used to manufacture the currently used access device are the main reason for the existing morbidity in peritoneal dialysis. Therefore, more efforts should be undertaken to improve the access device, in which the design and the material used are critically considered.

Increased incidence of renal allograft thrombosis after continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis

Allograft thrombosis occurred in 44 cases (4.8%) among 915 consecutive cadaveric renal transplantations performed in a single center over a 13-year period. Multiple logistic regression analysis of risk factors revealed that continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) was the only independent variable associated with renal allograft thrombosis. When CAPD was used for prior renal replacement therapy graft thrombosis occurred in 7.3% (22/303), whereas hemodialysis was associated with 3.6% (22/612) of graft thromboses (p < 0.02). No differences in transplant characteristics, including hemodynamics, hematological parameters, immunosuppressive therapy, graft anatomy and preservation, were observed between the cases with graft thrombosis and a matched control group (n = 88). CAPD treatment appears to be a risk factor in the development of renal allograft thrombosis that requires further perioperative coagulation studies in order to design an effective prophylaxis.

Costs of drugs used after renal transplantation

There are no detailed data on the relative contributions to overall health care costs of the various drugs that are commonly used in renal transplant patients. We performed a cost analysis in 122 patients, using the medical records and our hospital administration service as data sources, for all health care-related costs during the first year after renal transplantation. During the first 3 months all patients were on cyclosporine (CsA) and prednisone. Subsequently, they were randomly allocated to CsA monotherapy or to conversion from CsA to azathioprine. Cost of drugs comprised about 25% of total health care expenses. In CsA-treated patients, the following costs per patient per year were calculated: CsA, DFL 9929 (1 DFL is about US$0.60; 67.5% of total drug costs); antilymphocyte agents, DFL 2613 (17.8%); other immunosuppressive drugs, DFL 455 (3.1%); antimicrobial agents, DFL 687 (4.7%); antihypertensive drugs, DFL 467 (3.2%); remaining drugs, DFL 554 (3.8%). Conversion from CsA to azathioprine resulted in a decrease in mean drug costs for the remainder of the first posttransplant year of DFL 4597 (P < 0.01). Although the incidence of acute rejections tended to be higher after steroid withdrawal than after conversion (39% versus 26%, not significant), the costs of anti-rejection therapy, hospitalization, and laboratory services did not differ. We conclude that CsA is the main determinant of overall drug costs. When compared to CsA monotherapy, conversion from CsA to azathioprine at 3 months after transplantation may result in subsequent cost savings of about DFL 5000 per patient per year without a higher incidence of rejection or graft loss.

Randomized trial of misoprostol in patients with chronic renal transplant rejection

Chronic vascular rejection is a major cause of long-term graft failure after renal transplantation. We investigated the effect of the addition of misoprostol (200 micrograms four times daily) to standard immunosuppressive therapy on the outcome of chronic rejection in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Patients had to fulfill predefined histological and clinical criteria. After an entry of 40 patients into the study (22 misoprostol, 18 placebo), the inclusion of additional patients was terminated because of a high incidence of withdrawal due to adverse effects. Of the patients who used their study medication for at least 3 months (16 misoprostol, 15 placebo), graft function deteriorated in all but 5 misoprostol-treated and all but 2 placebo-treated patients. There was no difference in dialysis-free survival. Withdrawal because of adverse effects (mainly gastrointestinal complaints) occurred in 3 cases in the placebo group and in 11 cases in the misoprostol group (P < 0.05). In conclusion, we found no evidence for a beneficial effect of misoprostol on the course of chronic renal allograft rejection, while use of the drug was accompanied by a high incidence of side effects.

Comparison of Sandimmun with a new cyclosporin derivative (IMM 125) in renal transplant patients with stable renal function. IMM 125 Multicentre Study Group

A double-blind switch-over study was carried out on 70 renal transplant patients to assess the value of a new cyclosporin derivative, IMM 125. Preclinical in vitro and in vivo studies indicated that IMM 125 was as equally immunosuppressive as Sandimmun, but that its therapeutic index should be superior. The duration of the treatment was 24 weeks. The assumption that the dosage of IMM 125 could be 2.5 times lower than Sandimmun proved to be false; three patients suffered acute rejection episodes, probably as a consequence of the low dosage, and dosage adjustments had to be made for all patients receiving IMM 125 after only a few weeks. Although IMM 125 is an effective immunosuppressive agent, it does not appear to offer advantages over Sandimmun with regard to renal function. In addition, IMM 125 causes some disturbances in liver function.