Early steroids after pediatric liver transplantation protect against T-cell-mediated rejection: Results from the ChilSFree study

Steroid-free immunosuppression protocols gained popularity in pediatric liver transplantation (pLT) after the introduction of IL-2-receptor blockade for induction therapy. We analyzed the clinical and immunologic outcome data of the multicenter prospective observational ChilSFree study to compare the impact of steroid-free versus steroid-containing immunosuppressive therapy following pLT in a real-life scenario. Two hundred forty-six children [55.3% male, age at pLT median: 2.4 (range: 0.2-17.9) y] transplanted for biliary atresia (43%), metabolic liver disease (9%), acute liver failure (4%), hepatoblastoma (9%), and other chronic end-stage liver diseases (39%) underwent immune monitoring and clinical data documentation over the first year after pLT. Patient and graft survival at 1 year was 98.0% and 92.7%, respectively. Primary immunosuppression was basiliximab induction followed by tacrolimus (Tac) monotherapy (55%), Tac plus steroid tapering over 3 months (29%), or cyclosporine and steroid tapering (7%). One center used intraoperative steroids instead of basiliximab followed by Tac plus mycophenolate mofetil (7% of patients). N = 124 biopsy-proven T-cell-mediated rejections were documented in n = 82 (33.3%) patients. T-cell-mediated rejection occurred early (median: 41 d, range: 3-366 d) after pLT. Patients initially treated with Tac plus steroids experienced significantly fewer episodes of rejection than patients treated with Tac alone (chi-square p <0.01). The use of steroids was associated with earlier downregulation of proinflammatory cytokines interferon (IFN)-γ, Interleukin (IL)-6, CX motif chemokin ligand (CXCL)8, IL-7, and IL-12p70. Both primary immunosuppression with Tac plus steroids and living donor liver transplantation were independent predictors of rejection-free survival 1 year after pLT on logistic regression analysis. Adjunctive steroid therapy after pLT leads to earlier suppression of the post-pLT proinflammatory response and significantly reduced rejection rates during the first year after pLT (15.9%). Fifty-one percent of patients initially treated without steroids remain steroid-free over the first 12 months without rejection.

Use of induction therapy post-heart transplantation: Clinical practice recommendations based on systematic review and network meta-analysis of evidence

BACKGROUND

The use of induction therapy (IT) agents in the early post-heart transplant period remains controversial. The following recommendations aim to provide guidance on the use of IT agents, including Basiliximab and Thymoglobulin, as part of routine care in heart transplantation (HTx).

METHODS

We recruited an international, multidisciplinary panel of 15 stakeholders, including patient partners, transplant cardiologists and surgeons, nurse practitioners, pharmacists, and methodologists. We commissioned a systematic review on benefits and harms of IT on patient-important outcomes, and another on patients' values and preferences to inform our recommendations. We used the GRADE framework to summarize our findings, rate certainty in the evidence, and develop recommendations. The panel considered the balance between benefits and harms, certainty in the evidence, and patient's values and preferences, to make recommendations for or against the routine post-operative use of Thymoglobulin or Basiliximab.

RESULTS

The panel made recommendations on three major clinical problems in HTx: (1) We suggest against the routine post-operative use of Basiliximab compared to no IT, (2) we suggest against the routine use of Thymoglobulin compared to no IT, and (3) for those patients for whom IT is deemed desirable, we suggest for the use of Thymoglobulin as compared to Basiliximab.

CONCLUSION

This report highlights gaps in current knowledge and provides directions for clinical research in the future to better understand the clinical utility of IT agents in the early post heart transplant period, leading to improved management and care.

Randomized controlled trial of sustained release tacrolimus vs twice daily tacrolimus in adult living donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

To compare the safety and efficacy of once-daily tacrolimus (ODT) versus twice-daily tacrolimus (BDT) in adult live donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

METHODS

In this open-labelled randomized trial, 174 adult patients undergoing LDLT were randomized into ODT or BDT, combined with basiliximab induction and mycophenolate mofetil (steroid-free regimen). Tacrolimus was started at a total dose of 1 mg and the trough level was aimed at 3-7 ng/ml. The primary endpoint was eGFR at 1,3- and 6 months post-transplant, using CKD- EPI equation. Secondary endpoints included biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), metabolic complications, post-operative bilio-vascular complications and patient survival.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in eGFR between the two groups at 6 months (ODT -96 ± 19, BDT -91 ± 21, p value-0.164). BPAR was comparable (18/84 in ODT, 19/88 in BDT, p value-0.981). For a similar dosage of tacrolimus, the median trough tacrolimus levels attained were significantly lower for ODT than BDT during the first-month post-transplant (p value-0.001). Metabolic complications due to immunosuppression, post-operative bilio-vascular complications and patient survival was similar between the two groups at 6 months.

CONCLUSION

Once-daily tacrolimus has similar renal safety and efficacy as twice-daily tacrolimus when used in combination with basiliximab induction and mycophenolate in adult LDLT.

Utilization of donor-derived Cell-Free DNA in pediatric kidney transplant recipients: A single center study

High donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) levels indicate transplant allograft injury and can identify graft rejection in kidney transplant recipients. Here, we evaluated the use of dd-cfDNA in pediatric kidney transplant rejection monitoring and treatment.

METHODS

Forty-two pediatric kidney transplant patients were enrolled between February 2020 and August 2021. Dd-cfDNA was tested before and after biopsy/rejection treatment. There was a total of 61 allograft biopsies (44 for-cause, 17 surveillance).

RESULTS

Graft rejection was found in 35/61 biopsies. Rejection was more common in basiliximab induction compared to rATG (77.1% vs. 22.9%, p = .0121). Median dd-cfDNA was higher in those with rejection (1.2% [0.34-3.12] vs. 0.24% [0.08-0.78], p < .0001). Dd-cfDNA was highest in biopsies with AMR and mixed AMR/TCMR. In addition, dd-cfDNA in basiliximab induction was higher compared to rATG (0.92% [0.27-1.8] vs. 0.26% [0.08-2], p = .0437). Median change in dd-cfDNA after rejection treatment was -0.57% (-1.67 to 0.05). Median time to dd-cfDNA <1% post-rejection treatment was 8.5 days (3.0-19.5). Dd-cfDNA in AMR was higher compared to TCMR or mixed rejection, and levels remained higher in AMR after treatment. In surveillance biopsies, 4/17 had rejection. Median dd-cfDNA was not different in those with versus without rejection (0.48% vs. 0.28%, p = .2342). Those without rejection all had dd-cfDNA <1%. In those with rejection, only one patient had dd-cfDNA >1%, and all had TCMR.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support dd-cfDNA as a useful indicator of graft rejection and response to treatment. Additional studies are needed to determine the role of dd-cfDNA in graft health surveillance.

Excellent efficacy and beneficial safety during observational 5-year follow-up of rapid steroid withdrawal after renal transplantation (Harmony FU study)

BACKGROUND

We previously reported excellent efficacy and improved safety aspects of rapid steroid withdrawal (RSWD) in the randomized controlled 1-year "Harmony" trial with 587 predominantly deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients randomized either to basiliximab or rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction therapy and compared with standard immunosuppressive therapy consisting of basiliximab, low tacrolimus once daily, mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids.

METHODS

The 5-year post-trial follow-up (FU) data were obtained in an observational manner at a 3- and a 5-year visit only for those Harmony patients who consented to participate and covered clinical events that occurred from the second year onwards.

RESULTS

Biopsy-proven acute rejection and death-censored graft loss rates remained low and independent of RSWD. Rapid steroid withdrawal was an independent positive factor for patient survival (adjusted hazard ratio 0.554, 95% confidence interval 0.314-0.976; P = .041).The reduced incidence of post-transplantation diabetes mellitus in RSWD patients during the original 1-year study period was not compensated by later incidences during FU. Incidences of other important outcome parameters such as opportunistic infections, malignancies, cardiovascular morbidity/risk factors, donor-specific antibody formation or kidney function did not differ during FU period.

CONCLUSIONS

With all the limitations of a post-trial FU study, the Harmony FU data confirm excellent efficacy and beneficial safety aspects of RSWD under modern immunosuppressive therapy over the course of 5 years after kidney transplantation in an immunologically low-risk, elderly population of Caucasian kidney transplant recipients. Trial registration: Clinical trial registration number: Investigator Initiated Trial (NCT00724022, FU study DRKS00005786).

Effects of Induction Therapy on Graft Functions in Terms of Immunologic Risk

BACKGROUND

Advances in immunosuppressive therapies and surgical techniques have led to a significant reduction in the incidence of rejection within 1 year after kidney transplantation. Immunologic risk is an important factor affecting graft functions and guiding the clinician in the selection of induction therapy. The aim of this study was to investigate graft functions based on serum creatinine levels, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD- EPI) and proteinuria levels, frequency of leukopenia, cytomegalovirus (CMV) and BK virus polymerase chain reaction (PCR) positivity in patients with low and high immunologic risk.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 80 renal recipients. Recipients were divided into 2 groups: patients at low immunologic risk who received basiliximab only and those with high immunologic risk who received low-dose (1.5 mg/kg for 3 days) antithymocyte globulin and basiliximab.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed between the 2 risk groups in terms of first, third, sixth, and 12th-month creatinine levels, CKD-EPI, proteinuria levels, leukopenia frequency, and CMV and BK virus PCR positivity.

CONCLUSION

One-year graft survivals did not differ significantly between these 2 treatment modalities. The combined use of low-dose antithymocyte globulin and basiliximab in the induction treatment of patients with high immunologic risk seems promising in terms of graft survival, leukopenia frequency, and CMV and BK virus PCR positivity.

Successful treatment of severe immune checkpoint inhibitor associated autoimmune hepatitis with basiliximab: a case report

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and its corresponding ligand PD-L1 are being increasingly used for a wide variety of cancers, including refractory sarcomas. Autoimmune hepatitis is a known side effect of ICIs, and is typically managed with broad, non-specific immunosuppression. Here, we report a case of severe autoimmune hepatitis occurring after anti-PD-1 therapy with nivolumab in a patient with osteosarcoma. Following prolonged unsuccessful treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin, steroids, everolimus, tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and anti-thymoglobulin, the patient was eventually treated with the anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody basiliximab. This resulted in prompt, sustained resolution of her hepatitis without significant side effects. Our case demonstrates that basiliximab may be an effective therapy for steroid-refractory severe ICI-associated hepatitis.

Porcine anti-human lymphocyte immunoglobulin depletes the lymphocyte population to promote successful kidney transplantation

Introduction

Porcine anti-human lymphocyte immunoglobulin (pALG) has been used in kidney transplantation, but its impacts on the lymphocyte cell pool remain unclear.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 12 kidney transplant recipients receiving pALG, and additional recipients receiving rabbit anti-human thymocyte immunoglobulin (rATG), basiliximab, or no induction therapy as a comparison group.

Results

pALG showed high binding affinity to peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) after administration, immediately depleting blood lymphocytes; an effect that was weaker than rATG but stronger than basiliximab. Single-cell sequencing analysis showed that pALG mainly influenced T cells and innate immune cells (mononuclear phagocytes and neutrophils). By analyzing immune cell subsets, we found that pALG moderately depleted CD4+T cells, CD8+T cells, regulatory T cells, and NKT cells and mildly inhibited dendritic cells. Serum inflammatory cytokines (IL-2, IL-6) were only moderately increased compared with rATG, which might be beneficial in terms of reducing the risk of untoward immune activation. During 3 months of follow-up, we found that all recipients and transplanted kidneys survived and showed good organ function recovery; there were no cases of rejection and a low rate of complications.

Discussion

In conclusion, pALG acts mainly by moderately depleting T cells and is thus a good candidate for induction therapy for kidney transplant recipients. The immunological features of pALG should be exploited for the development of individually-optimized induction therapies based on the needs of the transplant and the immune status of the patient, which is appropriate for non-high-risk recipients.

Risk factors for recurrent IgA nephropathy after renal transplantation: A meta-analysis

Recurrent glomerulonephritis after renal transplantation is the third most common cause of allograft loss, the most frequent of which is associated with IgA nephropathy (IgAN). This study aims to provide a systematic review of the risk factors associated with recurrent IgAN after renal transplantation. We searched English and Chinese databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, and others, and included all case-control studies involving risk factors for recurrent IgAN after renal transplantation from the databases’ establishment to March 2022. Data were analyzed using the Stata 12.0. A total of 20 case–control studies were included in the meta-analysis, with 542 patients with recurrent IgAN and 1385 patients without recurrent IgAN. The results showed that donor age (standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.13 [95% CI -0.26, -0.001]; P = 0.048), patient age at transplantation (SMD -0.41 [95% CI -0.53, -0.29]; P < 0.001), time from diagnosis to end-stage renal disease (SMD -0.42 [95% CI -0.74, -0.10]; P = 0.010), previous transplantation (odds ratio [OR] 1.73 [95% CI 1.06, 2.81]; P = 0.027), living donor (OR 1.86 [95% CI 1.34, 2.58]; P < 0.001), related donor (OR 2.64, [95% CI 1.84, 3.79]; P < 0.001), tacrolimus use (OR 0.71 [95% CI 0.52, 0.98]; P = 0.035), basiliximab use (OR 0.39 [95% CI 0.27, 0.55]; P < 0.001), proteinuria (SMD 0.42 [95% CI 0.13, 0.71]; P = 0.005) and serum IgA level (SMD 0.48 [95% CI 0.27, 0.69]; P < 0.001) were associated with recurrent IgAN after renal transplantation. In general, tacrolimus and basiliximab use were protective factors against recurrent IgAN after renal transplantation, whereas donor age, patient age at transplantation, time from diagnosis to end-stage renal disease, previous transplantation, living donor, related donor, proteinuria, and serum IgA level were risk factors for recurrent IgAN after renal transplantation. Clinical decision making should warrant further consideration of these risk factors.

Lower dose of ATG combined with basiliximab for haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is associated with effective control of GVHD and less CMV viremia

Currently, the graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consists of an immunosuppressive therapy mainly based on antithymocyte globulin (ATG) or post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy). GVHD remains a major complication and limitation to successful allogeneic haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT). We modified the ATG-based GVHD prophylaxis with the addition of basiliximab in the setting of haplo-HSCT and attempted to explore the appropriate dosages. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 239 patients with intermediate- or high-risk hematologic malignancies who received haplo-HSCT with unmanipulated peripheral blood stem cells combined or not with bone marrow. All patients received the same GVHD prophylaxis consisting of the combination of methotrexate, cyclosporine or tacrolimus, mycofenolate-mofetil, and basiliximab with different doses of ATG (5-9mg/kg). With a median time of 11 days (range, 7-40 days), the rate of neutrophil engraftment was 96.65%. The 100-day cumulative incidences (CIs) of grade II-IV and III-IV aGVHD were 15.8 ± 2.5% and 5.0 ± 1.5%, while the 2-year CIs of total cGVHD and extensive cGVHD were 9.8 ± 2.2% and 4.1 ± 1.5%, respectively. The 3-year CIs of treatment-related mortality (TRM), relapse, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) were 14.6 ± 2.6%, 28.1 ± 3.4%, 60.9 ± 3.4%, 57.3 ± 3.4%, respectively. Furthermore, the impact of the reduction of the ATG dose to 6 mg/kg or less in combination with basiliximab on GVHD prevention and transplant outcomes among patients was analyzed. Compared to higher dose of ATG(>6mg/kg), lower dose of ATG (≤6mg/kg) was associated with a significant reduced risk of CMV viremia (52.38% vs 79.35%, P<0.001), while the incidences of aGVHD and cGVHD were similar between the two dose levels. No significant effect was found with regard to the risk of relapse, TRM, and OS. ATG combined with basiliximab could prevent GVHD efficiently and safely. The optimal scheme of using this combined regimen of ATG and basiliximab is that administration of lower dose ATG (≤6mg/kg), which seems to be more appropriate for balancing infection control and GVHD prophylaxis.

Multispecies Outbreak of Nocardia Infections in Heart Transplant Recipients and Association with Climate Conditions, Australia

Extreme weather conditions, coupled with greater susceptibility to opportunistic infection, could explain this outbreak.

A multispecies outbreak of Nocardia occurred among heart transplant recipients (HTR), but not lung transplant recipients (LTR), in Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, during 2018–2019. We performed a retrospective review of 23 HTR and LTR who had Nocardia spp. infections during June 2015–March 2021, compared risk factors for Nocardia infection, and evaluated climate conditions before, during, and after the period of the 2018–2019 outbreak. Compared with LTR, HTR had a shorter median time from transplant to Nocardia diagnosis, higher prevalence of diabetes, greater use of induction immunosuppression with basiliximab, and increased rates of cellular rejection before Nocardia diagnosis. During the outbreak, Sydney experienced the lowest monthly precipitation and driest surface levels compared with time periods directly before and after the outbreak. Increased immunosuppression of HTR compared with LTR, coupled with extreme weather conditions during 2018–2019, may explain this outbreak of Nocardia infections in HTR.

Basiliximab for the therapy of acute T cell–mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipient with BK virus infection: A case report

A 66-year-old Chinese man underwent a deceased donor kidney transplantation. Induction-immunosuppressive protocol consisted of basiliximab (BAS) and methyl prednisolone (MP), followed by maintenance immunosuppression with cyclosporin (CsA), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and prednisone (PED). The patient’s post-transplantation course was almost uneventful, and the graft was functioning well [serum creatinine (Scr) 2.15 mg/dL]. The MMF and CsA doses were decreased 1-month post-operative as the BK virus activation was serologically positive. His Scr was elevated to 2.45 mg/dL 45 days after the transplant. A graft biopsy showed BKV nephropathy (BKVN) and acute T cell–mediated rejection (TCMR) Banff grade IIA (I2, t2, ptc2, v1, c4d1, g0, and SV40 positive). The conventional anti-rejection therapy could deteriorate his BKVN, therefore, we administered BAS to eliminate activated graft-infiltrating T cells and combined with low-dose steroid. He responded well to the therapy after two doses of BAS were given, and the kidney graft status has been stable (recent Scr 2.1 mg/dL).

Pathogen distribution and risk factors of bacterial and fungal infections after liver transplantation

OBJECTIVES

Liver transplant recipients have a high rate of postoperative infection, and identification of patients at high risk for bacterial and fungal infections will help prevent disease and improve long-term outcomes for them. This study aims to understand the composition, distribution, prognosis of bacterial and fungal infections within 2 months after liver transplantation and to analyze their risk factors.

METHODS

The data of pathogen composition, distribution, and prognosis of bacterial and fungal infections among liver transplant recipients in the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from May 2020 to October 2021 were collected, and the risk factors for these infections were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 106 episodes of bacterial or fungal infections occurred in 71.4% of liver transplant recipients (75/105). Gram-negative bacteria were the dominant pathogenic bacteria (49/106, 46.2%), followed by Gram-positive bacteria (31/106, 29.2%). The most common Gram-negative bacterium was Acinetobacter baumannii (13/106, 12.3%). The most common Gram-positive bacterium was Enterococcus faecium (20/106, 18.9%). The most common infections were pulmonary (38/105, 36.2%) and multiple site infections (30/105, 28.6%). Six (6/105, 5.7%) patients with infections died within 2 months after liver transplantation. Univariate analysis showed that the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score ≥25, antibiotic use within half a month before transplantation, infections within 2 months prior to transplantation, intraoperative red blood cell infusion≥8 U, indwelling urinary tract catheter ≥4 days after transplantation, and the dosage of basiliximab use ≥40 mg were associated with infections. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that only infections within 2 months prior to transplantation (OR=5.172, 95% CI 1.905-14.039, P<0.01) was an independent risk factor for bacterial and fungal infections after liver transplantation. Postoperative bacterial and fungal infections were reduced in liver transplant recipients receiving basiliximab ≥40 mg (OR=0.197, 95% CI: 0.051-0.762, P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of bacterial and fungal infections is high in the early stage after liver transplantation, and the mortality after infection is significantly higher than that of non-infected patients. The most common infection is respiratory infection, and the dominant pathogens is Gram-negative bacteria. Patients infected within 2 months prior to liver transplantation are prone to bacterial and fungal infections. Standard use of basiliximab can reduce the incidence of infections after liver transplantation.

Coronavirus disease 2019 positivity immediately after lung transplantation: A case report

Management of COVID-19 in lung transplant recipients is challenging. We report a case of a 71-year-old male who underwent bilateral lung transplantation with an unexpected case of COVID-19. The patient had been fully vaccinated. The patient and donor tested negative for pretransplant COVID-19. On routine bronchoscopy on day 1 after transplant, the COVID-19 test was positive. Mycophenolic mofetil and the second dose of basiliximab were skipped, but tacrolimus and prednisone were continued. He was treated with casirivimab/imdevimab and remdesivir. He was discharged on day 14 and has had no episodes of acute rejection during the 3 months.

Early Blood Transfusion After Kidney Transplantation Does Not Lead to dnDSA Development: The BloodIm Study

Outcomes after kidney transplantation are largely driven by the development of de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA), which may be triggered by blood transfusion. In this single-center study, we investigated the link between early blood transfusion and dnDSA development in a mainly anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG)-induced kidney-transplant cohort. We retrospectively included all recipients of a kidney transplant performed between 2004 and 2015, provided they had &gt;3 months graft survival. DSA screening was evaluated with a Luminex assay (Immucor). Early blood transfusion (EBT) was defined as the transfusion of at least one red blood-cell unit over the first 3 months post-transplantation, with an exhaustive report of transfusion. Patients received either anti-thymocyte globulins (ATG) or basiliximab induction, plus tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid maintenance immunosuppression. A total of 1088 patients received a transplant between 2004 and 2015 in our center, of which 981 satisfied our inclusion criteria. EBT was required for 292 patients (29.7%). Most patients received ATG induction (86.1%); the others received basiliximab induction (13.4%). dnDSA-free graft survival (dnDSA-GS) at 1-year post-transplantation was similar between EBT+ (2.4%) and EBT- (3.0%) patients (chi-squared p=0.73). There was no significant association between EBT and dnDSA-GS (univariate Cox’s regression, HR=0.88, p=0.556). In multivariate Cox’s regression, adjusting for potential confounders (showing a univariate association with dnDSA development), early transfusion remained not associated with dnDSA-GS (HR 0.76, p=0.449). However, dnDSA-GS was associated with pretransplantation HLA sensitization (HR=2.25, p=0.004), hemoglobin &gt;10 g/dL (HR=0.39, p=0.029) and the number of HLA mismatches (HR=1.26, p=0.05). Recipient’s age, tacrolimus and mycophenolic-acid exposures, and graft rank were not associated with dnDSA-GS. Early blood transfusion did not induce dnDSAs in our cohort of ATG-induced patients, but low hemoglobin level was associated with dnDSAs-GS. This suggests a protective effect of ATG induction therapy on preventing dnDSA development at an initial stage post-transplantation.

Effects of Reduced-Dose Anti-Human T-Lymphocyte Globulin on Overall and Donor-Specific T-Cell Repertoire Reconstitution in Sensitized Kidney Transplant Recipients

Background

Pre-sensitized kidney transplant recipients have a higher risk for rejection following kidney transplantation and therefore receive lymphodepletional induction therapy with anti-human T-lymphocyte globulin (ATLG) whereas non-sensitized patients are induced in many centers with basiliximab. The time course of lymphocyte reconstitution with regard to the overall and donor-reactive T-cell receptor (TCR) specificity remains elusive.

Methods/Design

Five kidney transplant recipients receiving a 1.5-mg/kg ATLG induction therapy over 7 days and five patients with 2 × 20 mg basiliximab induction therapy were longitudinally monitored. Peripheral mononuclear cells were sampled pre-transplant and within 1, 3, and 12 months after transplantation, and their overall and donor-reactive TCRs were determined by next-generation sequencing of the TCR beta CDR3 region. Overall TCR repertoire diversity, turnover, and donor specificity were assessed at all timepoints.

Results

We observed an increase in the donor-reactive TCR repertoire after transplantation in patients, independent of lymphocyte counts or induction therapy. Donor-reactive CD4 T-cell frequency in the ATLG group increased from 1.14% + -0.63 to 2.03% + -1.09 and from 0.93% + -0.63 to 1.82% + -1.17 in the basiliximab group in the first month. Diversity measurements of the entire T-cell repertoire and repertoire turnover showed no statistical difference between the two induction therapies. The difference in mean clonality between groups was 0.03 and 0.07 pre-transplant in the CD4 and CD8 fractions, respectively, and was not different over time (CD4: F(1.45, 11.6) = 0.64 p = 0.496; CD8: F(3, 24) = 0.60 p = 0.620). The mean difference in R20, a metric for immune dominance, between groups was -0.006 in CD4 and 0.001 in CD8 T-cells and not statistically different between the groups and subsequent timepoints (CD4: F(3, 24) = 0.85 p = 0.479; CD8: F(1.19, 9.52) = 0.79 p = 0.418).

Conclusion

Reduced-dose ATLG induction therapy led to an initial lymphodepletion followed by an increase in the percentage of donor-reactive T-cells after transplantation similar to basiliximab induction therapy. Furthermore, reduced-dose ATLG did not change the overall TCR repertoire in terms of a narrowed or skewed TCR repertoire after immune reconstitution, comparable to non-depletional induction therapy.

Investigation of interleukin-2-mediated changes in blood pressure, fetal growth restriction, and innate immune activation in normal pregnant rats and in a preclinical rat model of preeclampsia

Two important clinical features of preeclampsia (PE) are hypertension and fetal growth restriction. The reduced uterine perfusion pressure (RUPP) preclinical rat model of PE exhibits both of these features. Moreover, RUPP and PE women have elevated vasoconstrictor peptide endothelin-1 (ET-1) and inflammation. Interleukin-2 (IL-2) is a cytokine that regulates NK cell activity and is elevated in miscarriage, PE, and RUPP rats. The objective of this study was to examine a role for IL-2 in NK cell activation, fetal growth restriction, and hypertension during pregnancy by either infusion of IL-2 or blockade of IL-2 (basiliximab) in normal pregnant (NP) and RUPP rats. On gestational day 14, NP and RUPP rats received low (LD), middle (MD), or high dose (HD) IL-2 (0.05, 0.10, or 0.20 ng/ml) IP or basiliximab (0.07 mg per rat) by IV infusion. On day 19, blood pressure (MAP), pup weights, and blood were collected. Basiliximab had no effect on blood pressure, however, significantly lowered NK cells and may have worsened overall fetal survival in RUPP rats. However, IL-2 LD (102 ± 4 mmHg) and IL-2 HD (105 ± 6 mmHg) significantly lowered blood pressure, ET-1, and activated NK cells compared to control RUPPs (124 ± 3 mmHg, p < 0.05). Importantly, IL-2 in RUPP rats significantly reduced fetal weight and survival. These data indicate that although maternal benefits may have occurred with low dose IL-2 infusion, negative effects were seen in the fetus. Moreover, inhibition of IL-2 signaling did not have favorable outcome for the mother or fetus.

Unusual expansion of CD3+CD56+ natural killer T-like cells in peripheral blood after anticytokine treatment for graft-versus-host disease: A case report

RATIONALE

Basiliximab and etanercept have achieved promising responses in steroid-refractory graft versus host disease (SR-GVHD). However, the in vivo immune changes following the treatment have not been elucidated.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 14-year-old boy presented with skin rash and diarrhea 20 days after haploidentical hemotopoietic stem cell transplantation.

DIAGNOSES

We made the diagnose of grade 3 acute GVHD with skin and gastrointestinal involvement.

INTERVENTIONS

After the failure of the first-line treatment with methylprednisolone, combined anti-cytokine therapies with basiliximab and etanercept were prescibed.

OUTCOMES

He achieved complete remission by basiliximab and etanercept. Furthermore, we detected that donor CD3CD56 Natural killer T(NKT)-like cells expanded gradually after the period of lymphocytopenia caused by GVHD and anti-cytokine therapy. The expansion of NKT-like cells was in association with high serum IFN-γ. NKT-like cells showed preferred proliferation in response to IFN-γ and potent cytotoxicity against leukemia cells. The expansion persisted > 2 years and the patient had a leukemia-free survival of 66 months.

LESSONS

Our case indicated that combined anti-cytokine treatment may reset the immune system and cause NKT-like cells to exhibit a predilection for expansion.

First case report of using Ofatumumab in kidney transplantation AB0 incompatible

Modern methods for desensitization protocol rely heavily on combined apheresis therapy and Rituximab, a chimeric (murine and human) anti-CD20 antibody used in AB0 incompatible kidney transplants. Severe infusion related reactions due to the administration of Rituximab are reported in 10% of patients. These adverse reactions may hinder the completion of the desensitization protocol. Therefore, it's useful to test alternative B cell depleting therapies. Our clinical case focuses on a 41-year-old male who developed an adverse infusion reaction following the administration of Rituximab and was given Ofatumumab as an alternative treatment. Ofatumumab is a fully humanized monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody. As a fully humanized antibody, Ofatumumab may avoid immunogenic reactions. The patient tolerated the administration of the drug showing no signs of adverse side effects and with good clinical efficacy. Our case report suggest that Ofatumumab is a valid alternative B cell depleting agent.

Preemptive anti-cytomegalovirus therapy in high-risk (donor-positive, recipient-negative cytomegalovirus serostatus) kidney transplant recipients

OBJECTIVES

Universal prophylaxis and preemptive therapy are used to prevent cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease post-transplantation. Data regarding which strategy is superior are sparse, especially in high-risk recipients (donor CMV seropositive (D+) and recipient CMV seronegative (R-)).

METHODS

This retrospective, single-center cohort study included recipients who underwent kidney transplantation between 2009 and 2015. The incidence of CMV infection/disease and patient and graft outcomes were analyzed and compared between high-risk recipients (D+/R-) and intermediate-risk recipients (D+/R+ or D-/R+), all managed with preemptive therapy.

RESULTS

Of 118 kidney transplant recipients, 21 were high-risk and 97 were intermediate-risk. Over a median follow-up period of 3 years, asymptomatic CMV infection developed significantly more frequently in high-risk patients than in intermediate-risk patients (38.1% vs. 16.5%, p=0.04), and CMV disease developed in a similar manner (28.6% vs. 3.1%, p<0.01). Among high-risk patients, CMV infection developed within the first 3 months post-transplantation and CMV disease within the first 9 months post-transplantation. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no difference in the probability of mortality (log-rank p=0.63) or graft loss (log-rank p=0.50) between the patient groups. Graft rejection occurred more frequently in high-risk than in intermediate-risk patients, but the difference was not significant (log-rank p=0.24).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that further studies on universal prophylaxis in high-risk patients are needed to elucidate whether preventing CMV infection/disease during the early post-transplant period leads to better outcomes, especially in terms of reducing graft rejection.

Donor-Specific Anti-Human Leukocyte Antigens Antibodies, Acute Rejection, Renal Function, and Histology in Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving Tacrolimus and Everolimus

BACKGROUND

This analysis compared efficacy, renal function, and histology in kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus (TAC) combined with everolimus (EVR) or mycophenolate (MPS).

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis from a randomized trial in kidney transplant recipients who received a single 3 mg/kg dose of rabbit antithymocyte globulin (r-ATG), TAC, EVR, and prednisone (PRED; r-ATG/EVR, n = 85), basiliximab (BAS), TAC, EVR, and PRED (BAS/EVR, n = 102) or BAS, TAC, MPS, and PRED (BAS/MPS, n = 101). We evaluated the incidence of de novo donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigens antibodies (DSA) and histology on protocol biopsies at 12 months, and the incidence of acute rejection, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and proteinuria at 36 months.

RESULTS

At 12 months, there were no differences in de novo DSA (6.4 vs. 3.4 vs. 5.5%) or in subclinical inflammation (2.0 vs. 4.8 vs. 10.2%), interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (57.1 vs. 58.5 vs. 53.8%) and C4d deposition (2.0 vs. 7.3 vs. 2.6%). At 36 months, there were no differences in the incidence of treatment failure (19.0 vs. 27.7 vs. 27.7%, p = 0.186), first biopsy-proven acute rejection (9.5 vs. 21.8 vs. 16.8%, p = 0.073), and urine protein/creatinine ratios (0.53 ± 1.05 vs. 0.62 ± 0.75 vs. 0.71 ± 1.24). eGFR was lower in the BAS/EVR compared to that in the BAS/MPS group (53.4 ± 20.9 vs. 50.8 ± 19.5 vs. 60.7 ± 21.2 mL/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.017) but comparable using a sensitive analysis (49.5 ± 23 vs. 47.5 ± 22.6 vs. 53.6 ± 27.8 mL/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.207).

CONCLUSION

In this cohort, the use of EVR and reduced TAC concentrations were associated with comparable efficacy, renal function, and histological parameters compared to the standard-of-care immunosuppressive regimen.

Predictive Factors of Acute Rejection in Low Immunologic Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving Basiliximab

INTRODUCTION

The optimal immunosuppressive induction therapy in kidney transplant recipients with low immunologic risk of acute rejection (AR) is still controversial. The use of basiliximab (BSX) has led to a significant decrease of AR with a low side effect profile.

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to evaluate predictive risk factors for AR in low immunologic risk patients subjected to immunosuppressive induction therapy with BSX.

METHODS

We reviewed all low immunologic risk patients (panel reactive antibody [PRA] level <50%, who had undergone a first deceased-donor transplant) subjected to immunosuppressive induction therapy with BSX, calcineurin inhibitor, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone (n = 346). AR was defined as any rejection occurring until 12 months posttransplantation. Predictive risk factors for AR were evaluated by logistic regression and, to find the best cut-off of PRA related to a higher incidence of AR, receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The rate of AR was 7.8%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified age at the time of transplantation (P = .040) and PRA level (P = .001) as independent risk factors for AR. ROC curve analysis confirmed that PRA >10% was related to an increased incidence of AR (19.2% vs 6.0%, P = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

A higher incidence of AR was observed in low immunologic risk kidney transplant patients with a PRA level >10%. These data support the use of more intensive immunosuppressive induction therapy in patients with low immunologic risk and a PRA level >10%.

The Significance of Screening for HLA Antibodies in the Long-Term Follow-up of Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Post-transplant donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) reportedly have detrimental effects on the outcomes of organ transplantation. However, the prevalence of post-transplant DSA in the long term after pediatric liver transplantation remains unclear, and the significance of post-transplant DSA is unknown. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to determine the prevalence of and characteristics of patients with post-transplant DSA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Of the 84 pediatric liver transplant recipients who were followed up in the outpatient department of our institution, 34 patients with available HLA typing data were included after they or their parent(s) provided informed consent for DSA evaluations. Luminex single-antigen bead assays were performed, and a mean fluorescence intensity of ≥1000 was used as the cut-off for a positive reaction.

RESULTS

No class I DSA were detected, whereas class II DSA were detected in 11 patients (32%). There were no differences in age at transplantation, immunosuppressive drugs, or follow-up period between the DSA-positive and DSA-negative patients. The rate of positive pre-transplant complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch was higher with class II DSA than without, although the difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The utility of screening for class I DSA was insignificant in the long-term follow-up of pediatric liver transplant recipients. The prevalence of class II DSA was relatively high; therefore, screening for class II DSA might be justified, although a follow-up survey of the association between post-transplant class II DSA and the long-term clinical course needs to be conducted.

Rabbit-ATG or basiliximab induction for rapid steroid withdrawal after renal transplantation (Harmony): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Standard practice for immunosuppressive therapy after renal transplantation is quadruple therapy using antibody induction, low-dose tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids. Long-term steroid intake significantly increases cardiovascular risk factors with negative effects on the outcome, especially post-transplantation diabetes associated with morbidity and mortality. In this trial, we examined the efficacy and safety parameters of rapid steroid withdrawal after induction therapy with either rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rabbit ATG) or basiliximab in immunologically low-risk patients during the first year after kidney transplantation.

METHODS

In this open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial, we randomly assigned renal transplant recipients in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive either basiliximab induction with low-dose tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroid maintenance therapy (arm A), rapid corticosteroid withdrawal on day 8 (arm B), or rapid corticosteroid withdrawal on day 8 after rabbit ATG (arm C). The study was done in 21 centres across Germany. Only participants aged between 18 and 75 years with a low immunological risk who were scheduled to receive a single-organ renal transplant from either a living donor or a deceased donor were considered for enrolment. Patients receiving a second renal transplant were eligible, provided that the first allograft was not lost due to acute rejection within the first year after transplantation. Donor and recipient had to be ABO compatible. Grafts with pre-transplant existing donor-specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies were not eligible and the recipients had to have a panel-reactive antibody concentration of 30% or less. Pregnant women and nursing mothers were excluded from the study. The primary endpoint was the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) at 12 months. All analyses were done by intention-to-treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00724022.

FINDINGS

Between Aug 7, 2008, and Nov 30, 2013, 615 patients were randomly assigned to arm A (206), arm B (189), and arm C (192). BPAR rates were not reduced by rabbit ATG (9·9%) compared with either treatment arm A (11·2%) or B (10·6%; A versus C: p=0·75, B versus C p=0·87). As a secondary endpoint, rapid steroid withdrawal reduced post-transplantation diabetes in arm B to 24% and in arm C to 23% compared with 39% in control arm A (A versus B and C: p=0·0004). Patient survival (94·7% in arm A, 97·4% in arm B, and 96·9% in arm C) and censored graft survival (96·1% in arm A, 96·8% in arm B, and 95·8% in arm C) after 12 months were excellent and equivalent in all arms. Safety parameters such as infections or the incidence of post-transplantation malignancies did not differ between the study arms.

INTERPRETATION

Rabbit ATG did not show superiority over basiliximab induction for the prevention of BPAR after rapid steroid withdrawal within 1 year after renal transplantation. Nevertheless, rapid steroid withdrawal after induction therapy for patients with a low immunological risk profile can be achieved without loss of efficacy and is advantageous in regard to post-transplantation diabetes incidence.

FUNDING

Investigator Initiated Trial; financial support by Astellas Pharma GmbH, Sanofi, and Roche Pharma AG.

Effect of Immunosuppressive Drugs on the Changes of Serum Galactose-Deficient IgA1 in Patients with IgA Nephropathy

Galactose-deficient IgA1 (Gd-IgA1) and IgA-IgG complexes are known to play an important role in the pathogenesis of IgA nephropathy (IgAN). We aimed therefore to determine the impact of immunosuppression on the serum levels of Gd-IgA1, total IgA1 and IgA-IgG complexes in IgAN patients. In a retrospective study, serum samples from IgAN patients collected before transplantation (t0) and at 3- and 6-month posttransplant (t3 & t6) were used to measure the levels of Gd-IgA1, total IgA1 and IgA-IgG complexes. The area under the curves (AUC) of immunosuppressants was calculated by the plot of plasma trough level or dosage of each immunosuppressant versus time and was interpreted as the extent of drug exposure. Thirty-six out of 64 IgAN patients, who underwent kidney transplantation between 2005 and 2012, were enrolled. From t0 to t3, serum Gd-IgA1 and total IgA1 decreased significantly (24.7 AU (18.6-36.1) to 17.2 (13.1-29.5) (p<0.0001); 4.1 mg/ml (3.6-5.1) to 3.4 (3.0-4.1) (p = 0.0005)), whereas IgA-IgG complexes remained similar. From t3 to t6, Gd-IgA1 and IgA-IgG complexes significantly increased (17.2 AU (13.1-29.5) to 23.9 (16.8-32.0) (p = 0.0143); OD 0.16 (0.06-0.31) to 0.26 (0.14-0.35) (p = 0.0242)), while total IgA1 remained similar. According to median regression analysis, AUC of prednisone t0-6 was significantly associated with the decrease of Gd-IgA1 t0-6 (P = 0.01) and IgA1 t0-6 (p = 0.002), whereas AUC of tacrolimus t0-6 was associated with the decrease of IgA1 t0-6 (p = 0.02). AUC of prednisone t0-3 was associated with the decrease of IgA-IgG complexes t0-3 (p = 0.0036). The association of AUC prednisone t0-6 with Gd-IgA1 t0-6 remained highly significant after adjustment for other immunosuppressants (p = 0.0036). Serum levels of Gd-IgA1, total IgA1 and IgA-IgG in patients with IgAN vary according to the changing degrees of immunosuppression. The exposure to prednisone most clearly influenced the serum levels of Gd-IgA1.

T cell costimulation blockade for hyperacute steroid refractory graft versus-host disease in children undergoing haploidentical transplantation

The outcome of hyperacute grade 3-4 steroid-refractory graft-versus-host-disease (SR-GVHD) remains dismal despite a plethora of agents being tried alone or in combination. Following T replete haploidentical transplantation with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide on 75 patients, 10 patients (13%) aged 2-20years, developed hyperacute SR-GVHD. We report on the outcome of two different regimens for treatment of SR-GVHD on the outcome of these patients. Five patients were treated in Regimen A consisting of anti-thymocyte globulin, Etanercept and Basiliximab. The next 5 patients were treated combining T cell costimulation blockade with Abatacept along with Etanercept and Basiliximab. The overall response at days 29 and 56 were 40% and 0% with Regimen A and100% and 40% with Regimen B. The major cause of treatment failure was progression of GVHD and opportunistic infections. Two of the patients achieving a complete remission on Regimen B are long term disease free survivors off immunosuppression. Our study demonstrates the dismal outcome of early onset SR-GVHD in children following T replete haploidentical transplantation. However, the combination of Abatacept with anticytokine agents seems to produce encouraging early response and might warrant further investigation.

Use of Basiliximab and Daclizumab in Kidney Transplantation

Kidney transplantation represents a major medical victory in patients with whom dialysis and medical therapy have failed. To increase survival rates and optimize the use of limited organs, both patient care and immunosuppression therapy must be improved. Reduction in rejection episodes or severity of rejection may ultimately improve long-term allograft survival. Traditional engineered monoclonal antibodies have been associated with severe cytokine release reactions and an increased risk of opportunistic infections. Basiliximab and daclizumab are chimeric and humanized monoclonal antibodies that inhibit thymus-dependent lymphocyte proliferation. Interleukin 2 also affects the proliferation of natural killer cells, macrophages and monocytes, bursa-equivalent lymphocytes, epidermal dendritic cells, and lymphokine-activated killer cells. Interleukin-2 receptor antagonists have been shown to reduce the incidence of acute rejection without increasing the incidence of opportunistic infections or malignancy. Further studies are needed to evaluate the overall effect of these agents on long-term patient and allograft survival.

A Prospective Randomized, Comparative Trial of High-Dose Mizoribine Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil in Combination With Tacrolimus and Basiliximab for Living Donor Renal Transplant: A Multicenter Trial

OBJECTIVES

Our objectives were to compare the clinical outcomes of mizoribine (12 mg/kg/d) and mycophenolate mofetil (2000 mg/d) in combination with tacrolimus, basiliximab, and corticosteroids.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We enrolled 83 recipients of living-donor renal transplant (performed between 2008 and 2013) in this study. This prospective multi-institutional randomized comparative study compared mizoribine (n = 41) and mycophenolate mofetil (n = 42) in combination with tacrolimus, basiliximab, and corticosteroids for living-donor renal transplant recipients. We compared the acute rejection and graft survival rates and adverse event rates within 1 year of renal transplant between the 2 groups using intention-to-treat analyses.

RESULTS

During the 1-year observation period, patient and graft survival rates were 100%. The acute rejection rate was 17.1% in the mizoribine group and 19% in the mycophenolate mofetil group. The incidence rate of cytomegalovirus infection seropositivity (recipient and donor with positive cytomegalovirus antibody status) was higher in the mycophenolate mofetil group than in the mizoribine group, although the difference in these rates was not statistically significant. The incidence of leukopenia was higher in the mizoribine group than in the mycophenolate mofetil group.

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose mizoribine at 12 mg/kg/day was a safe and efficacious immunosuppressive alternative to mycophenolate mofetil in living-donor renal transplant recipients. Leukopenia should be closely monitored in the initial period of insufficient kidney function after renal transplant.

Effect of interleukin-2 receptor antagonists on new-onset diabetes after liver transplantation: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present retrospective observational study was to examine the effect of interleukin-2 receptor antagonists (IL-2Ra) on new-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) in liver transplant recipients.

METHODS

Pre- and postoperative clinical data of 781 patients undergoing liver transplantation between April 2001 and December 2014 at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, were analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups depending on the use of IL-2Ra (IL-2Ra and non-IL-2Ra). The cumulative incidence of NODAT was compared between the IL-2Ra and non-IL-2Ra groups and the effect of IL-2Ra on the incidence of NODAT in liver transplant recipients was evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 781 patients in the study, 451 received IL-2Ra. During follow-up, 138 (41.8%) and 137 (30.4%) patients in the non-IL-2Ra and IL-2Ra groups, respectively, developed NODAT (P = 0.001). The cumulative incidence of NODAT at 1, 3, 5, and 8 years after transplantation in the IL-2Ra group was 30%, 38%, 45%, and 54%, respectively; these values were substantially lower than corresponding values for the non-IL-2Ra group (P < 0.05). Cox regression analyses showed that IL-2Ra was a protective factor against NODAT development (odds ratio 0.685; 95% confidence interval 0.473-0.991; P = 0.044). This was independent of age, sex, donor type, hepatitis virus infection, body mass index, history of hypertension, preoperative liver function, preoperative fasting plasma glucose, total cholesterol, and total triglyceride levels, severity of liver cirrhosis, acute rejection, initial immunosuppressant regimen type, and postoperative immunosuppressant levels.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, IL-2Ra reduces the risk of NODAT in liver transplant recipients.

Outcomes of Early Steroid Withdrawal in Recipients of Deceased-Donor Expanded Criteria Kidney Transplants in the Era of Induction Therapy

OBJECTIVES

This study explored the safety of early steroid withdrawal in recipients of expanded criteria deceased-donor kidney transplants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network-United Network of Organ Sharing database, we identified patients who underwent expanded criteria deceased-donor kidney transplant between January 2000 and December 2008 after receiving induction with rabbit-antithymocyte globulin (n = 3717), alemtuzumab (n = 763), or interleukin 2 blocking agent (n = 2600) followed by calcineurin inhibitor and mycophenolate mofetil-based maintenance with and without steroid therapy.

RESULTS

Adjusted overall graft survival (hazard ratio 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-1.56; P = .002) and patient survival (hazard ratio 1.46, 95% confidence interval, 1.16-1.83, P = .001) were inferior, whereas death-censored graft survival (hazard ratio 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-1.47; P = .35) was similar for chronic steroid maintenance versus early steroid withdrawal groups in rabbit-antithymocyte globulin-induced patients. Graft and patient outcomes were similar for chronic steroid maintenance versus early steroid withdrawal groups among alemtuzumab and interleukin 2 blocking agent-induced patients. Among rabbit-antithymocyte globulin-induced patients, adjusted overall graft survival (hazard ratio 1.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-2.0; P < .001) and patient survival (hazard ratio 1.5; 95% CI, 1.15-2.1; P = .004) were inferior, whereas death-censored graft survival (hazard ratio 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 0.97-2.43; P = .07) trended inferior for chronic steroid maintenance versus early steroid withdrawal groups in recipients > 60 years old (n = 1729).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed safety of early steroid withdrawal in recipients of expanded criteria deceased-donor kidney transplants who underwent perioperative induction followed by calcineurin inhibitor and mycophenolate mofetil maintenance. Among rabbit-antithymocyte globulin-induced patients, chronic steroid maintenance was associated with inferior graft and patient outcomes, an effect limited to older recipients.

Challenging immunosuppression treatment in lung transplant recipients with kidney failure

Kidney failure after lung transplantation is a risk factor for chronic kidney disease. Calcineurin inhibitors are immunosuppressants which play a major role in terms of postoperative kidney failure after lung transplantation. We report our preliminary experience with the anti-interleukin-2 monoclonal antibody Basiliximab utilized as a "calcineurin inhibitor-free window" in the setting of early postoperative kidney failure after lung transplantation. Between 2012 and 2015 nine lung transplant patients who developed kidney failure for more than 14 days were included. Basiliximab was administrated in three doses (Day 0, 4, and 20) whilst Tacrolimus was discontinued or reduced to maintain a serum level between 2 and 4 ng/mL. Baseline glomerular filtration rate pre transplant was normal for all patients. Seven patients completely recovered from kidney failure (67%, mean eGFR pre and post Basiliximab: 42.3 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and 69 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) and were switched back on Tacrolimus. Only one of these patients still needs ongoing renal replacement therapy. Two patients showed no recovery from kidney failure and did not survive. Basiliximab might be a safe and feasible therapeutical option in patients which are affected by calcineurin inhibitor-related kidney failure in the early post lung transplant period. Further studies are necessary to confirm our preliminary results.

Graft versus host disease as a complication after liver transplantation: A rare but serious association

The graft versus host disease after liver transplant is rare, with an incidence less than 1%, but with a high mortality (75-85%), especially due to infectious complications. It usually affects gastrointestinal tract, skin and blood system in the context of a normal liver graft function. There is no consensus on the most appropriate treatment: some articles support a reduction or even elimination of immunosuppressive drugs, while others published success with a dose increase.

CLINICAL CASE

We report a case of a 68 year-old liver transplant recipient with a graft retrieved from an ABO identical cadaveric donor. After an uneventful postoperative period, he was readmitted presenting these symptoms: skin lesions, diarrhea and kidney failure. After ruling out infectious causes or drug toxicity, skin, duodenum and colon biopsies demonstrated characteristic histological changes of graft versus host disease grade III. Initially, supportive treatment along with methylprednisolone bolus were administered with good response. However, as the doses of corticosteroids decreased, the patient worsened again, requiring basiliximab. In spite of that, the patient progressively worsened with hematological involvement and, finally, an alteration of liver function tests prior to decease. The autopsy showed CMV and Herpes virus superinfection.

DISCUSSION

We report a new case of graft-versus-host disease after liver transplantation with fatal evolution due to viral superinfection despite the employed measures.

Polyclonal versus monoclonal induction therapy in a calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplantation: a comparison of efficacy and costs

BACKGROUND

Induction therapy in renal transplantation reduces the incidence of acute rejection (AR) in expanded criteria donation (ECD) and donation after cardiac death (DCD). We compared the efficacy of Thymoglobulin (Sanofi-Aventis, Spain), ATG Fresenius (ATG-Fresenius, Spain), and Simulect (Novartis Farm, Spain) in a calcineurin-free protocol in ECD and DCD renal transplantation by evaluating patient survival, graft survival, and AR at 1 year and overall costs.

METHODS

An observational retrospective study was performed using our database of 289 consecutive cadaveric ECD renal transplant recipients (n = 178) and DCD recipients (n = 111) from April 1999 to December 2011. Induction therapy consisted of Simulect, Thymoglobulin, and ATG Fresenius. Calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI)-free maintenance therapy consisted of mycophenolate mofetil or sodium and steroids.

RESULTS

There were no differences in the patients' demographic characteristics or patient and graft survival. One-year AR rates were equivalent (ECD: 10%, 19.1%, 17.7% versus DCD: 14.3%, 7.1%, 16.7%). Leukopenia and thrombopenia were significantly more frequent in the ECD group treated with polyclonal induction. The average total cost of transplantation was higher in the ECD group but there were no significant differences in the average total cost between ECD and DCD: 39,970.31 ± 7,732€ versus 35,058.34 ± 6,801€ (P = NS).

CONCLUSION

Our study shows the same efficacy with polyclonal and monoclonal antibody induction and a CNI-free treatment regimen in ECD and DCD renal transplantation with no differences in overall costs at 1 year after transplantation.

Sirolimus vs cyclosporine after induction with basiliximab does not promote regulatory T cell expansion in de novo kidney transplantation: Results from a single-center randomized trial

Regulatory T cells (Tregs), defined as CD4+CD25+highFoxP3+CD127- cells, could promote tolerance in renal transplantation (Tx). In an open-label, randomized, controlled trial 62 de-novo Tx recipients received induction with basiliximab and cyclosporine A (CsA) for the first month after Tx and then were assigned to treatment with sirolimus (SRL) or CsA and followed up for 2 years. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the effects of induction and maintenance treatments on circulating Tregs, while the secondary endpoint was the assessment of Treg renal infiltration and the relationship between Treg count and clinical outcomes. There were no significant differences in either circulating or tissue Treg number between the two groups. At 1 month post-Tx, all patients presented a profound Treg depletion, followed by a significant increase in Tregs that resulted stable during the follow-up. The same trend was also observed for non-activated Tregs (CD69-) and for other immunocompetent cells (CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, B cells and NK cells). Moreover, the Treg count did not correlate either with renal function or with acute rejection and graft loss. Initial immunosuppression is crucial to regulate circulating Tregs, regardless of subsequent immunosuppressive maintenance regimens. Strategies aiming to promote tolerance should consider the effects of different induction regimens.

Low-dose RATG with or without basiliximab in renal transplantation: a matched-cohort observational study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

In renal transplantation, peri-operative low-dose rabbit-antithymocyte-globulin (RATG) plus basiliximab induction prevented acute allograft rejection more effectively than post-operative RATG plus basiliximab induction. We investigated the specific antirejection contribution of basiliximab in this context.

METHODS

This single-center, observational, matched-cohort study evaluated allograft rejections (primary outcome), steroid exposure and side effects, GFR (iohexol plasma clearance) and treatment costs in 16 deceased-donor renal transplant recipients induced with RATG (0.5 mg/kg/day) and 32 age-, gender- and treatment-matched reference-patients given RATG plus basiliximab (20 mg on days 0 and 4).

RESULTS

Induction was well tolerated. At 18 months, 8 patients (50%) vs. 3 reference-patients (9.4%) rejected the graft [HR (95% CI): 6.53 (1.73-24.70), p = 0.006]. Difference was significant (p < 0.01) even after adjusting for recipient/donor age and gender, cold ischemia time and HLA mismatches. There were 1 antibody-mediated rejection and 2 moderate cellular rejections in patients vs. none in reference-patients (p = 0.032). The median (interquartile range) prednisone cumulative dose was remarkably higher in patients than reference-patients [4.78 (1.12-6.10) vs. 0.19 (0.18-3.81) grams, p = 0.002]. Three patients vs. 24 reference-patients were off-steroid at study end (p < 0.001). Three patients vs. no reference-patient developed new-onset diabetes (p = 0.003). Both inductions similarly depleted B-cells. Outcomes of AZA- vs. MMF-treated participants were similar. GFR was similar in all groups. Compared to MMF, AZA therapy saved ≈ EUR 2,500/year and by month 14.3 post-transplant compensated basiliximab costs.

CONCLUSION

In renal transplantation, basiliximab plus peri-operative low-dose RATG more efficiently prevented allograft rejection than RATG monotherapy, and minimized steroid exposure and toxicity. AZA- vs MMF-based maintenance immunosuppression largely compensated the extra costs of basiliximab.

Belatacept for kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Most people who receive a kidney transplant die from either cardiovascular disease or cancer before their transplant fails. The most common reason for someone with a kidney transplant to lose the function of their transplanted kidney necessitating return to dialysis is chronic kidney transplant scarring. Immunosuppressant drugs have side effects that increase risks of cardiovascular disease, cancer and chronic kidney transplant scarring. Belatacept may provide sufficient immunosuppression while avoiding unwanted side effects of other immunosuppressant drugs. However, high rates of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) have been reported when belatacept is used in particular kidney transplant recipients at high dosage.

OBJECTIVES

1) Compare the relative efficacy of belatacept versus any other primary immunosuppression regimen for preventing acute rejection, maintaining kidney transplant function, and preventing death. 2) Compare the incidence of several adverse events: PTLD; other malignancies; chronic transplant kidney scarring (IF/TA); infections; change in blood pressure, lipid and blood sugar control. 3) Assess any variation in effects by study, intervention and recipient characteristics, including: differences in pre-transplant Epstein Barr virus serostatus; belatacept dosage; and donor-category (living, standard criteria deceased, or extended criteria deceased).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Renal Group's Specialised Register to 1 September 2014 through contact with the Trials' Search Co-ordinator using search terms relevant to this review.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCT) that compared belatacept versus any other immunosuppression regimen in kidney transplant recipients were eligible for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data for study quality and transplant outcomes and synthesized results using random effects meta-analysis, expressed as risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD), both with 95% confidence intervals (CI).  Subgroup analyses and univariate meta-regression were used to investigate potential heterogeneity.

MAIN RESULTS

We included five studies that compared belatacept and calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) that reported data from a total of 1535 kidney transplant recipients. Of the five studies, three (478 participants) compared belatacept and cyclosporin and two (43 recipients) compared belatacept and tacrolimus. Co-interventions included basiliximab (4 studies, 1434 recipients); anti-thymocyte globulin (1 study, 89 recipients); alemtuzumab (1 study, 12 recipients); mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, 5 studies, 1509 recipients); sirolimus (1 study, 26 recipients) and prednisone (5 studies, 1535 recipients).Up to three years following transplant, belatacept and CNI-treated recipients were at similar risk of dying (4 studies, 1516 recipients: RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.44), losing their kidney transplant and returning to dialysis (4 studies, 1516 recipients: RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.38), and having an episode of acute rejection (4 studies, 1516 recipients: RR 1.56, 95% CI 0.85 to 2.86). Belatacept-treated kidney transplant recipients were 28% less likely to have chronic kidney scarring (3 studies, 1360 recipients: RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.94) and also had better graft function (measured glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (3 studies 1083 recipients): 10.89 mL/min/1.73 m², 95% CI 4.01 to 17.77; estimated GFR (4 studies, 1083 recipients): MD 9.96 mL/min/1.73 m², 95% CI 3.28 to 16.64) than CNI-treated recipients. Blood pressure was lower (systolic (2 studies, 658 recipients): MD -7.51 mm Hg, 95% CI -10.57 to -4.46; diastolic (2 studies, 658 recipients): MD -3.07 mm Hg, 95% CI -4.83 to -1.31, lipid profile was better (non-HDL (3 studies 1101 recipients): MD -12.25 mg/dL, 95% CI -17.93 to -6.57; triglycerides (3 studies 1101 recipients): MD -24.09 mg/dL, 95% CI -44.55 to -3.64), and incidence of new-onset diabetes after transplant was reduced by 39% (4 studies (1049 recipients): RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.93) among belatacept-treated versus CNI-treated recipients.Risk of PTLD was similar in belatacept and CNI-treated recipients (4 studies, 1516 recipients: RR 2.79, 95% CI 0.61 to 12.66) and was no different among recipients who received different belatacept dosages (high versus low dosage: ratio of risk ratios (RRR) 1.06, 95% CI 0.11 to 9.80, test of difference = 0.96) or among those who were Epstein Barr virus seronegative compared with those who were seropositive before their kidney transplant (seronegative versus seropositive; RRR 1.49, 95% CI 0.15 to 14.76, test for difference = 0.73).The belatacept dose used (high versus low), type of donor kidney the recipient received (extended versus standard criteria) and whether the kidney transplant recipient received tacrolimus or cyclosporin made no difference to kidney transplant survival, incidence of acute rejection or estimated GFR. Selective outcome reporting meant that data for some key subgroup comparisons were sparse and that estimates of the effect of treatment in these groups of recipients remain imprecise.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence of any difference in the effectiveness of belatacept and CNI in preventing acute rejection, graft loss and death, but treatment with belatacept is associated with less chronic kidney scarring and better kidney transplant function. Treatment with belatacept is also associated with better blood pressure and lipid profile and a lower incidence of diabetes versus treatment with a CNI. Important side effects (particularly PTLD) remain poorly reported and so the relative benefits and harms of using belatacept remain unclear. Whether short-term advantages of treatment with belatacept are maintained over the medium- to long-term or translate into better cardiovascular outcomes or longer kidney transplant survival with function remains unclear. Longer-term, fully reported and published studies comparing belatacept versus tacrolimus are needed to help clinicians decide which patients might benefit most from using belatacept.

Alemtuzumab-based induction treatment versus basiliximab-based induction treatment in kidney transplantation (the 3C Study): a randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) reduce short-term kidney transplant failure, but might contribute to transplant failure in the long-term. The role of alemtuzumab (a potent lymphocyte-depleting antibody) as an induction treatment followed by an early reduction in CNI and mycophenolate exposure and steroid avoidance, after kidney transplantation is uncertain. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of alemtuzumab-based induction treatment compared with basiliximab-based induction treatment in patients receiving kidney transplants.

METHODS

For this randomised trial, we enrolled patients aged 18 years and older who were scheduled to receive a kidney transplant in the next 24 h from 18 transplant centres in the UK. Using minimised randomisation, we randomly assigned patients (1:1; minimised for age, sex, and immunological risk) to either alemtuzumab-based induction treatment (ie, alemtuzumab followed by low-dose tacrolimus and mycophenolate without steroids) or basiliximab-based induction treatment (basiliximab followed by standard-dose tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and prednisolone). Participants were reviewed at discharge from hospital and at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after transplantation. The primary outcome was biopsy-proven acute rejection at 6 months, analysed by intention to treat. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01120028, and isrctn.org, number ISRCTN88894088.

FINDINGS

Between Oct 4, 2010, and Jan 21, 2013, we randomly assigned 852 participants to treatment: 426 to alemtuzumab-based treatment and 426 to basiliximab-based treatment. Overall, individuals allocated to alemtuzumab-based treatment had a 58% proportional reduction in biopsy-proven acute rejection compared with those allocated to basiliximab-based treatment (31 [7%] patients in the alemtuzumab group vs 68 [16%] patients in the basiliximab group; hazard ratio (HR) 0·42, 95% CI 0·28-0·64; log-rank p<0·0001). We detected no between-group difference in treatment effect on transplant failure during the first 6 months (16 [4%] patients vs 13 [3%] patients; HR 1·23, 0·59-2·55; p=0·58) or serious infection (135 [32%] patients vs 136 [32%] patients; HR 1·02, 0·80-1·29; p=0·88). During the first 6 months after transplantation, 11 (3%) patients given alemtuzumab-based treatment and six (1%) patients given basiliximab-based treatment died (HR 1·79, 95% CI 0·66-4·83; p=0·25).

INTERPRETATION

Compared with standard basiliximab-based treatment, alemtuzumab-based induction therapy followed by reduced CNI and mycophenolate exposure and steroid avoidance reduced the risk of biopsy-proven acute rejection in a broad range of patients receiving a kidney transplant. Long-term follow-up of this trial will assess whether these effects translate into differences in long-term transplant function and survival.

FUNDING

UK National Health Service Blood and Transplant Research and Development Programme, Pfizer, and Novartis UK.

Myeloablative haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using basiliximab for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis

OBJECTIVES

We retrospectively compared the prophylactic effect of basiliximab and antithymocyte globulin (ATG) after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with leukemia.

METHODS

Haploidentical HSCT using basiliximab for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in 10 patients with leukemia was retrospectively compared to ATG for GVHD prophylaxis in 24 patients.

RESULTS

All the patients achieved neutrophil engraftment. One patient in the ATG group did not achieve platelet engraftment. The incidence of grade II-IV and grade III-IV acute GVHD was 30 and 20%, respectively, in the basiliximab group and 16.7 and 4.2%, respectively, in the ATG group (P > 0.05). Extensive cGVHD developed in 40 and 22.2% of patients in the basiliximab group and ATG group, respectively (P > 0.05). Basiliximab resulted in mild infection and a low incidence (10%) of infection-related mortality; ATG resulted in relative severe infection with 29.2% infection-related mortality (P > 0.05). During the follow-up period, 20% of the basiliximab group and 22.7% of the ATG group relapsed (P > 0.05). In the basiliximab group and the ATG group, the 3-year accumulative overall survival rate was, respectively, 80 and 52.5% and the 3-year leukemia-free survival, respectively, was 60 and 49.6% (P > 0.05).

DISCUSSION

The incidences of grade II-IV and grade III-IV aGVHD in the basiliximab group were similar to those in halpoidentical HSCT containing ATG. Compared to the ATG group, the basiliximab group had a lower rate of transplantation-related mortality and better long-term survival, but without statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

The prophylactic regimen of basiliximab with haploidentical HSCT against GVHD seems safe and promising. More studies needed to verify this.

Biological therapy in acute severe ulcerative colitis: Indian experience

Biologicals have a well established role as rescue therapy in management of steroid refractory cases of Ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. However, high cost and potential risk of infections like tuberculosis limits their use in developing countries. As there is paucity of data on the use of various biological agents from developing countries like India, we are reporting the limited Indian experience with the available agents. Infliximab has been used as a rescue therapy for severe refractory Ulcerative colitis while other agents have been used as a part of multicentre clinical trials.

Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation following myeloablative conditioning regimens in hematologic diseases with G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood stem cells grafts without T cell depletion: a single center report of 38 cases

Many Chinese patients with hematologic diseases, who need allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), lack a human leukocyte antigen-matched donor. To save these patients and to avoid collecting donor bone marrow graft, we adopted haploidentical peripheral blood HSCT with granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilized peripheral blood stem cells as the grafts without ex vivo T cell depletion. Thirty-eight patients were enrolled, and they received myeloablative preconditioning. Thirty-five patients attained a successful neutrophil and platelet recovery. The median time for the neutrophil recovery was 16 days (range of 10-23 days), and the median time for the platelet recovery was 19 days (range of 10-66 days). During the follow-up at a median time of 33.1 weeks (range of 1.1-412.6 weeks), eleven (28.9 %) patients developed aGVHD grade I-II and seven (18.4 %) patients developed aGVHD grade III-IV. The incidence of cGVHD was 27.6 %, and nine (23.7 %) patients died within the first 100 days after transplantation. The cumulative survival proportions at 1 and 2 years were 52.51 ± 8.57 % and 43.76 ± 9.11 %, respectively. These results suggested that the G-CSF-primed peripheral blood stem cell grafts, without in vitro T cell depletion, could be an appropriate stem cell source for Haplo-HSCT.

Immunosuppressive T-cell antibody induction for heart transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Heart transplantation has become a valuable and well-accepted treatment option for end-stage heart failure. Rejection of the transplanted heart by the recipient's body is a risk to the success of the procedure, and life-long immunosuppression is necessary to avoid this. Clear evidence is required to identify the best, safest and most effective immunosuppressive treatment strategy for heart transplant recipients. To date, there is no consensus on the use of immunosuppressive antibodies against T-cells for induction after heart transplantation.

OBJECTIVES

To review the benefits, harms, feasibility and tolerability of immunosuppressive T-cell antibody induction versus placebo, or no antibody induction, or another kind of antibody induction for heart transplant recipients.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Issue 11, 2012), MEDLINE (Ovid) (1946 to November Week 1 2012), EMBASE (Ovid) (1946 to 2012 Week 45), ISI Web of Science (14 November 2012); we also searched two clinical trial registers and checked reference lists in November 2012.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised clinical trials (RCTs) assessing immunosuppressive T-cell antibody induction for heart transplant recipients. Within individual trials, we required all participants to receive the same maintenance immunosuppressive therapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors extracted data independently. RevMan analysis was used for statistical analysis of dichotomous data with risk ratio (RR), and of continuous data with mean difference (MD), both with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Methodological components were used to assess risks of systematic errors (bias). Trial sequential analysis was used to assess the risks of random errors (play of chance). We assessed mortality, acute rejection, infection, Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder, cancer, adverse events, chronic allograft vasculopathy, renal function, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidaemia.

MAIN RESULTS

In this review, we included 22 RCTs that investigated the use of T-cell antibody induction, with a total of 1427 heart-transplant recipients. All trials were judged to be at a high risk of bias. Five trials, with a total of 606 participants, compared any kind of T-cell antibody induction versus no antibody induction; four trials, with a total of 576 participants, compared interleukin-2 receptor antagonist (IL-2 RA) versus no induction; one trial, with 30 participants, compared monoclonal antibody (other than IL-2 RA) versus no antibody induction; two trials, with a total of 159 participants, compared IL-2 RA versus monoclonal antibody (other than IL-2 RA) induction; four trials, with a total of 185 participants, compared IL-2 RA versus polyclonal antibody induction; seven trials, with a total of 315 participants, compared monoclonal antibody (other than IL-2 RA) versus polyclonal antibody induction; and four trials, with a total of 162 participants, compared polyclonal antibody induction versus another kind, or dose of polyclonal antibodies.No significant differences were found for any of the comparisons for the outcomes of mortality, infection, CMV infection, post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder, cancer, adverse events, chronic allograft vasculopathy, renal function, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or hyperlipidaemia. Acute rejection occurred significantly less frequently when IL-2 RA induction was compared with no induction (93/284 (33%) versus 132/292 (45%); RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.90; I(2) 57%) applying the fixed-effect model. No significant difference was found when the random-effects model was applied (RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.46 to 1.17; I(2) 57%). In addition, acute rejection occurred more often statistically when IL-2 RA induction was compared with polyclonal antibody induction (24/90 (27%) versus 10/95 (11%); RR 2.43; 95% CI 1.01 to 5.86; I(2) 28%). For all of these differences in acute rejection, trial sequential alpha-spending boundaries were not crossed and the required information sizes were not reached when trial sequential analysis was performed, indicating that we cannot exclude random errors.We observed some occasional significant differences in adverse events in some of the comparisons, however definitions of adverse events varied between trials, and numbers of participants and events in these outcomes were too small to allow definitive conclusions to be drawn.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review shows that acute rejection might be reduced by IL-2 RA compared with no induction, and by polyclonal antibody induction compared with IL-2 RA, though trial sequential analyses cannot exclude random errors, and the significance of our observations depended on the statistical model used. Furthermore, this review does not show other clear benefits or harms associated with the use of any kind of T-cell antibody induction compared with no induction, or when one type of T-cell antibody is compared with another type of antibody. The number of trials investigating the use of antibodies against T-cells for induction after heart transplantation is small, and the number of participants and outcomes in these RCTs is limited. Furthermore, the included trials are at a high risk of bias. Hence, more RCTs are needed to assess the benefits and harms of T-cell antibody induction for heart-transplant recipients. Such trials ought to be conducted with low risks of systematic and random error.

Antibody induction therapy for lung transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Lung transplantation has become a valuable and well-accepted treatment option for most end-stage lung diseases. Lung transplant recipients are at risk of transplanted organ rejection, and life-long immunosuppression is necessary. Clear evidence is essential to identify an optimal, safe and effective immunosuppressive treatment strategy for lung transplant recipients. Consensus has not yet been achieved concerning use of immunosuppressive antibodies against T-cells for induction following lung transplantation.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to assess the benefits and harms of immunosuppressive T-cell antibody induction with ATG, ALG, IL-2RA, alemtuzumab, or muromonab-CD3 for lung transplant recipients.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Renal Group's Specialised Register to 4 March 2013 through contact with the Trials Search Co-ordinator using search terms relevant to this review. Studies contained in the Specialised Register are identified through search strategies specifically designed for CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared immunosuppressive monoclonal and polyclonal T-cell antibody induction for lung transplant recipients. An inclusion criterion was that all participants must have received the same maintenance immunosuppressive therapy within each study.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three authors extracted data. We derived risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous data and mean differences (MD) for continuous data with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Methodological risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and trial sequential analyses were undertaken to assess the risk of random errors (play of chance).

MAIN RESULTS

Our review included six RCTs (representing a total of 278 adult lung transplant recipients) that assessed the use of T-cell antibody induction. Evaluation of the included studies found all to be at high risk of bias.We conducted comparisons of polyclonal or monoclonal T-cell antibody induction versus no induction (3 studies, 140 participants); polyclonal T-cell antibody versus no induction (3 studies, 125 participants); interleukin-2 receptor antagonists (IL-2RA) versus no induction (1 study, 25 participants); polyclonal T-cell antibody versus muromonab-CD3 (1 study, 64 participants); and polyclonal T-cell antibody versus IL-2RA (3 studies, 100 participants). Overall we found no significant differences among interventions in terms of mortality, acute rejection, adverse effects, infection, pneumonia, cytomegalovirus infection, bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disease, or cancer.We found a significant outcome difference in one study that compared antithymocyte globulin versus muromonab-CD3 relating to adverse events (25/34 (74%) versus 12/30 (40%); RR 1.84, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.98). This suggested that antithymocyte globulin increased occurrence of adverse events. However, trial sequential analysis found that the required information size had not been reached, and the cumulative Z-curve did not cross the trial sequential alpha-spending monitoring boundaries.None of the studies reported quality of life or kidney injury. Trial sequential analyses indicated that none of the meta-analyses achieved required information sizes and the cumulative Z-curves did not cross the trial sequential alpha-spending monitoring boundaries, nor reached the area of futility.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

No clear benefits or harms associated with the use of T-cell antibody induction compared with no induction, or when different types of T-cell antibodies were compared were identified in this review. Few studies were identified that investigated use of antibodies against T-cells for induction after lung transplantation, and numbers of participants and outcomes were also limited. Assessment of the included studies found that all were at high risk of methodological bias.Further RCTs are needed to perform robust assessment of the benefits and harms of T-cell antibody induction for lung transplant recipients. Future studies should be designed and conducted according to methodologies to reduce risks of systematic error (bias) and random error (play of chance).

HCMV infection in renal transplant recipients: a retrospective cohort study

Human Cytomegalovirus (HCMV) represents the most common viral complication affecting solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) and its management is still debated. This study analyzes the association between HCMV infection and renal transplant recipients' outcomes. From January 2008 through December 2009, 97 consecutive renal transplant recipients were retrospectively studied. HCMV disease prevention was pursued by pre-emptive therapy, reserving long-term prophylaxis for high-risk patients. A total of 32/97 patients (32.9%) developed HCMV positivity in blood for a cumulative estimated proportion at 3 months post-transplantation of 0.21. HCMV disease developed in 7 patients (7.2%), while 25 patients had asymptomatic infection (25.7%). No patient died from HCMV. HCMV disease, older graft age and post-transplant renal dysfunction were independent predictors of rejection while HCMV infection without disease was associated with a higher number of other complications. The use of basiliximab was independently associated with a reduced hazard of HCMV infection/ disease. In renal transplant recipients HCMV infection still represents a major issue influencing the outcome, not only because of the potential to develop the disease and its link to graft rejection, but also in terms of higher number of complications. The choice of different immunosuppressive strategies might be associated with HCMV replication.

Living kidney transplantation in adult patients with atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Dysregulation of complement activation is the most common cause of the atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (aHUS). Many patients with aHUS develop end-stage renal disease and consider kidney transplantation. However, the recurrence rate after transplantation ranges from 45-90% in patients with known abnormalities in circulating complement proteins. It was recently proposed that patients with aHUS should be treated prophylactically with plasma exchange or eculizumab to prevent recurrence after transplantation.

METHODS

A case series describing the successful outcome of kidney transplantation without prophylactic therapy in four adult patients with aHUS and a high risk of disease recurrence. Patients received a living donor kidney and immunosuppression consisting of basiliximab induction, low-dose tacrolimus, prednisone and mycophenolate mofetil. Patients received a statin, and were targeted to a low blood pressure preferably using blockers of the renin-angiotensin system.

RESULTS

After a follow-up of 16-21 months, none of the patients developed recurrent aHUS. Also, no rejection was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Kidney transplantation in adult patients with aHUS can be successful without prophylactic eculizumab, using a protocol that minimises cold ischaemia time, reduces the risk of rejection and provides endothelial protection. Our data suggest that in patients with aHUS, controlled trials are needed to demonstrate the optimal strategy.

[Experience in kidney transplantation without blood transfusion: kidney transplantation transfusion-free in Jehovah's Witnesses. First communication in Mexico]

BACKGROUND

Jehovah's Witness refuse blood transfusion, but they accept organ transplantation, albumin, immunoglobulin, vaccines and clotting factors.

CLINICAL CASES

We present 3 kidney transplants in Jehovah's Witness patients (two male and one female) without blood transfusion, with a mean age of 31.33 years and a mean body mass index of 20.99 kg/m(2). All patients underwent pretransplant peritoneal dialysis for an average of 52.3 months. Two transplants came from living donors and one from a deceased donor with a cold ischemia of 23 hours. The donors were two females and one male, with a mean age of 34.33 years. All patients received pretransplant erythropoietin and iron dextran and an intraoperative cell saver was used. Hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cells and serum creatinine levels, as well as the glomerular filtration at 24 months postransplant were stable. All patients received induction with basiliximab and initial immunosuppression with calcineurin inhibitors. One of the patients had a perirenal hematoma as a complication, which required a surgery 20 days post-transplant. At 5, 26 and 36 months postransplant the three patients are alive and with functional grafts.

CONCLUSION

It is possible to perform kidney transplantation without transfusion in Jehovah's Witness, obtaining an acceptable global survival without acute rejection.