1
|
Foroutan F, Guyatt G, Stehlik J, Gustafsson F, Greig D, McDonald M, Bertolotti AM, Kugathasan L, Rayner DG, Cuello CA, Cook A, Zlatanoski D, Ram S, Demas-Clarke P, Kozuszko S, Alba AC. Use of induction therapy post-heart transplantation: Clinical practice recommendations based on systematic review and network meta-analysis of evidence. Clin Transplant 2024; 38:e15270. [PMID: 38445536 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.15270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Revised: 02/03/2024] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of induction therapy (IT) agents in the early post-heart transplant period remains controversial. The following recommendations aim to provide guidance on the use of IT agents, including Basiliximab and Thymoglobulin, as part of routine care in heart transplantation (HTx). METHODS We recruited an international, multidisciplinary panel of 15 stakeholders, including patient partners, transplant cardiologists and surgeons, nurse practitioners, pharmacists, and methodologists. We commissioned a systematic review on benefits and harms of IT on patient-important outcomes, and another on patients' values and preferences to inform our recommendations. We used the GRADE framework to summarize our findings, rate certainty in the evidence, and develop recommendations. The panel considered the balance between benefits and harms, certainty in the evidence, and patient's values and preferences, to make recommendations for or against the routine post-operative use of Thymoglobulin or Basiliximab. RESULTS The panel made recommendations on three major clinical problems in HTx: (1) We suggest against the routine post-operative use of Basiliximab compared to no IT, (2) we suggest against the routine use of Thymoglobulin compared to no IT, and (3) for those patients for whom IT is deemed desirable, we suggest for the use of Thymoglobulin as compared to Basiliximab. CONCLUSION This report highlights gaps in current knowledge and provides directions for clinical research in the future to better understand the clinical utility of IT agents in the early post heart transplant period, leading to improved management and care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farid Foroutan
- Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gordon Guyatt
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Josef Stehlik
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Finn Gustafsson
- Rigshospitalet - Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Douglas Greig
- Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Michael McDonald
- Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Lakshmi Kugathasan
- Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daniel G Rayner
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Carlos A Cuello
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amanda Cook
- Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Darko Zlatanoski
- Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sujivan Ram
- Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Stella Kozuszko
- Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ana Carolina Alba
- Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cuello CA, Morgan RL, Brozek J, Verbeek J, Thayer K, Ansari MT, Guyatt G, Schünemann HJ. Case studies to explore the optimal use of randomized and nonrandomized studies in evidence syntheses that use GRADE. J Clin Epidemiol 2022; 152:56-69. [PMID: 36198367 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.09.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Revised: 08/13/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the preferred source of evidence for the relative effect of healthcare interventions summarized in knowledge syntheses. Nonrandomized studies of interventions (NRSI) may provide replacement, sequential, or complementary evidence to RCTs. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach can provide different options for properly using RCTs and NRSI integrated in health syntheses. In this article, we discuss different implications on the certainty of evidence when authors consider the use of NRSI and RCTs in systematic reviews using GRADE. Although this is a GRADE-related article, it is not an official GRADE guidance or concept article. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING We present case studies used during GRADE working group meetings for discussion of the effects of using NRSI and RCTs on GRADE domains and on the certainty of evidence. Several concepts were discussed through iterative feedback with experts in GRADE methods and Cochrane authors. We compared suggested solutions for possible scenarios that can be met in evidence syntheses informing decisions and future guidance. RESULTS Different scenarios for the use of RCTs and NRSI in evidence syntheses are presented, focusing on how different GRADE ratings between RCTs and NRSI affect the overall assessment of the evidence and possible health recommendations. CONCLUSIONS Considering differences and similarities grounded in the GRADE approach between NRSI and RCTs may help complement one another and maximize the value of knowledge syntheses and health recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos A Cuello
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton Ontario, Canada; Canadian Agency of Drugs and Technology in Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rebecca L Morgan
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton Ontario, Canada
| | - Jan Brozek
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jos Verbeek
- Cochrane Work Review Group, University Medical Centers Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Kris Thayer
- Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) Division, National Center for Environmental Assessment, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, USA
| | - Mohammed T Ansari
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Epidemiology and Public health. University of Ottawa, Ottawa Ontario, Canada
| | - Gordon Guyatt
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton Ontario, Canada
| | - Holger J Schünemann
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milano, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Onel KB, Horton DB, Lovell DJ, Shenoi S, Cuello CA, Angeles-Han ST, Becker ML, Cron RQ, Feldman BM, Ferguson PJ, Gewanter H, Guzman J, Kimura Y, Lee T, Murphy K, Nigrovic PA, Ombrello MJ, Rabinovich CE, Tesher M, Twilt M, Klein-Gitelman M, Barbar-Smiley F, Cooper AM, Edelheit B, Gillispie-Taylor M, Hays K, Mannion ML, Peterson R, Flanagan E, Saad N, Sullivan N, Szymanski AM, Trachtman R, Turgunbaev M, Veiga K, Turner AS, Reston JT. 2021 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Recommendations for Nonpharmacologic Therapies, Medication Monitoring, Immunizations, and Imaging. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2022; 74:505-520. [PMID: 35233989 DOI: 10.1002/acr.24839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Revised: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide recommendations for the management of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) with a focus on nonpharmacologic therapies, medication monitoring, immunizations, and imaging, irrespective of JIA phenotype. METHODS We developed clinically relevant Patient/Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes questions. After conducting a systematic literature review, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach was used to rate the quality of evidence (high, moderate, low, or very low). A Voting Panel including clinicians and patients/caregivers achieved consensus on the direction (for or against) and strength (strong or conditional) of recommendations. RESULTS Recommendations in this guideline include the use of physical therapy and occupational therapy interventions; a healthy, well-balanced, age-appropriate diet; specific laboratory monitoring for medications; widespread use of immunizations; and shared decision-making with patients/caregivers. Disease management for all patients with JIA is addressed with respect to nonpharmacologic therapies, medication monitoring, immunizations, and imaging. Evidence for all recommendations was graded as low or very low in quality. For that reason, more than half of the recommendations are conditional. CONCLUSION This clinical practice guideline complements the 2019 American College of Rheumatology JIA and uveitis guidelines, which addressed polyarthritis, sacroiliitis, enthesitis, and uveitis, and a concurrent 2021 guideline on oligoarthritis, temporomandibular arthritis, and systemic JIA. It serves as a tool to support clinicians, patients, and caregivers in decision-making. The recommendations take into consideration the severity of both articular and nonarticular manifestations as well as patient quality of life. Although evidence is generally low quality and many recommendations are conditional, the inclusion of caregivers and patients in the decision-making process strengthens the relevance and applicability of the guideline. It is important to remember that these are recommendations. Clinical decisions, as always, should be made by the treating clinician and patient/caregiver.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen B Onel
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Daniel B Horton
- Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Daniel J Lovell
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Susan Shenoi
- Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Center and University of Washington, Seattle
| | | | - Sheila T Angeles-Han
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | | | | | | | | | - Harry Gewanter
- Children's Hospital of Richmond at VCU, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Jaime Guzman
- BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Yukiko Kimura
- Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Hackensack, New Jersey
| | | | | | - Peter A Nigrovic
- Boston Children's Hospital and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | | - Marinka Twilt
- University of Calgary and Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Marisa Klein-Gitelman
- Ann & Robert Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago and Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | | | | | | | - Kimberly Hays
- Penn State Health Children's Hospital, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Keila Veiga
- Maria Fareri Children's Hospital, Valhalla, New York
| | - Amy S Turner
- American College of Rheumatology, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Onel KB, Horton DB, Lovell DJ, Shenoi S, Cuello CA, Angeles-Han ST, Becker ML, Cron RQ, Feldman BM, Ferguson PJ, Gewanter H, Guzman J, Kimura Y, Lee T, Murphy K, Nigrovic PA, Ombrello MJ, Rabinovich CE, Tesher M, Twilt M, Klein-Gitelman M, Barbar-Smiley F, Cooper AM, Edelheit B, Gillispie-Taylor M, Hays K, Mannion ML, Peterson R, Flanagan E, Saad N, Sullivan N, Szymanski AM, Trachtman R, Turgunbaev M, Veiga K, Turner AS, Reston JT. 2021 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Recommendations for Nonpharmacologic Therapies, Medication Monitoring, Immunizations, and Imaging. Arthritis Rheumatol 2022; 74:570-585. [PMID: 35233961 PMCID: PMC10127939 DOI: 10.1002/art.42036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Revised: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide recommendations for the management of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) with a focus on nonpharmacologic therapies, medication monitoring, immunizations, and imaging, irrespective of JIA phenotype. METHODS We developed clinically relevant Patient/Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes questions. After conducting a systematic literature review, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach was used to rate the quality of evidence (high, moderate, low, or very low). A Voting Panel including clinicians and patients/caregivers achieved consensus on the direction (for or against) and strength (strong or conditional) of recommendations. RESULTS Recommendations in this guideline include the use of physical therapy and occupational therapy interventions; a healthy, well-balanced, age-appropriate diet; specific laboratory monitoring for medications; widespread use of immunizations; and shared decision-making with patients/caregivers. Disease management for all patients with JIA is addressed with respect to nonpharmacologic therapies, medication monitoring, immunizations, and imaging. Evidence for all recommendations was graded as low or very low in quality. For that reason, more than half of the recommendations are conditional. CONCLUSION This clinical practice guideline complements the 2019 American College of Rheumatology JIA and uveitis guidelines, which addressed polyarthritis, sacroiliitis, enthesitis, and uveitis, and a concurrent 2021 guideline on oligoarthritis, temporomandibular arthritis, and systemic JIA. It serves as a tool to support clinicians, patients, and caregivers in decision-making. The recommendations take into consideration the severity of both articular and nonarticular manifestations as well as patient quality of life. Although evidence is generally low quality and many recommendations are conditional, the inclusion of caregivers and patients in the decision-making process strengthens the relevance and applicability of the guideline. It is important to remember that these are recommendations. Clinical decisions, as always, should be made by the treating clinician and patient/caregiver.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen B Onel
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Daniel B Horton
- Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Daniel J Lovell
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Susan Shenoi
- Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Center and University of Washington, Seattle
| | | | - Sheila T Angeles-Han
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | | | | | | | | | - Harry Gewanter
- Children's Hospital of Richmond at VCU, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Jaime Guzman
- BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Yukiko Kimura
- Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Hackensack, New Jersey
| | | | | | - Peter A Nigrovic
- Boston Children's Hospital and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | | - Marinka Twilt
- University of Calgary and Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Marisa Klein-Gitelman
- Ann & Robert Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago and Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | | | | | | | - Kimberly Hays
- Penn State Health Children's Hospital, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Keila Veiga
- Maria Fareri Children's Hospital, Valhalla, New York
| | - Amy S Turner
- American College of Rheumatology, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Onel KB, Horton DB, Lovell DJ, Shenoi S, Cuello CA, Angeles-Han ST, Becker ML, Cron RQ, Feldman BM, Ferguson PJ, Gewanter H, Guzman J, Kimura Y, Lee T, Murphy K, Nigrovic PA, Ombrello MJ, Rabinovich CE, Tesher M, Twilt M, Klein-Gitelman M, Barbar-Smiley F, Cooper AM, Edelheit B, Gillispie-Taylor M, Hays K, Mannion ML, Peterson R, Flanagan E, Saad N, Sullivan N, Szymanski AM, Trachtman R, Turgunbaev M, Veiga K, Turner AS, Reston JT. 2021 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Therapeutic Approaches for Oligoarthritis, Temporomandibular Joint Arthritis, and Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2022; 74:521-537. [PMID: 35233986 PMCID: PMC10124899 DOI: 10.1002/acr.24853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2021] [Revised: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide updated guidelines for pharmacologic management of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), focusing on treatment of oligoarthritis, temporomandibular joint (TMJ) arthritis, and systemic JIA with and without macrophage activation syndrome. Recommendations regarding tapering and discontinuing treatment in inactive systemic JIA are also provided. METHODS We developed clinically relevant Patient/Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes questions. After conducting a systematic literature review, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach was used to rate the quality of evidence (high, moderate, low, or very low). A Voting Panel including clinicians and patients/caregivers achieved consensus on the direction (for or against) and strength (strong or conditional) of recommendations. RESULTS Similar to those published in 2019, these JIA recommendations are based on clinical phenotypes of JIA, rather than a specific classification schema. This guideline provides recommendations for initial and subsequent treatment of JIA with oligoarthritis, TMJ arthritis, and systemic JIA as well as for tapering and discontinuing treatment in subjects with inactive systemic JIA. Other aspects of disease management, including factors that influence treatment choice and medication tapering, are discussed. Evidence for all recommendations was graded as low or very low in quality. For that reason, more than half of the recommendations are conditional. CONCLUSION This clinical practice guideline complements the 2019 American College of Rheumatology JIA and uveitis guidelines, which addressed polyarthritis, sacroiliitis, enthesitis, and uveitis. It serves as a tool to support clinicians, patients, and caregivers in decision-making. The recommendations take into consideration the severity of both articular and nonarticular manifestations as well as patient quality of life. Although evidence is generally low quality and many recommendations are conditional, the inclusion of caregivers and patients in the decision-making process strengthens the relevance and applicability of the guideline. It is important to remember that these are recommendations. Clinical decisions, as always, should be made by the treating clinician and patient/caregiver.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen B Onel
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Daniel B Horton
- Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Daniel J Lovell
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Susan Shenoi
- Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Center and University of Washington, Seattle
| | | | - Sheila T Angeles-Han
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | | | | | | | | | - Harry Gewanter
- Children's Hospital of Richmond at VCU, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Jaime Guzman
- BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Yukiko Kimura
- Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Hackensack, New Jersey
| | | | | | - Peter A Nigrovic
- Boston Children's Hospital and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | | - Marinka Twilt
- University of Calgary and Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Marisa Klein-Gitelman
- Ann & Robert Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago and Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | | | | | | | - Kimberly Hays
- Penn State Health Children's Hospital, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Keila Veiga
- Maria Fareri Children's Hospital, Valhalla, New York
| | - Amy S Turner
- American College of Rheumatology, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Onel KB, Horton DB, Lovell DJ, Shenoi S, Cuello CA, Angeles-Han ST, Becker ML, Cron RQ, Feldman BM, Ferguson PJ, Gewanter H, Guzman J, Kimura Y, Lee T, Murphy K, Nigrovic PA, Ombrello MJ, Rabinovich CE, Tesher M, Twilt M, Klein-Gitelman M, Barbar-Smiley F, Cooper AM, Edelheit B, Gillispie-Taylor M, Hays K, Mannion ML, Peterson R, Flanagan E, Saad N, Sullivan N, Szymanski AM, Trachtman R, Turgunbaev M, Veiga K, Turner AS, Reston JT. 2021 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Therapeutic Approaches for Oligoarthritis, Temporomandibular Joint Arthritis, and Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2022; 74:553-569. [PMID: 35233993 PMCID: PMC10161784 DOI: 10.1002/art.42037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2021] [Revised: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide updated guidelines for pharmacologic management of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), focusing on treatment of oligoarthritis, temporomandibular joint (TMJ) arthritis, and systemic JIA with and without macrophage activation syndrome. Recommendations regarding tapering and discontinuing treatment in inactive systemic JIA are also provided. METHODS We developed clinically relevant Patient/Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes questions. After conducting a systematic literature review, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach was used to rate the quality of evidence (high, moderate, low, or very low). A Voting Panel including clinicians and patients/caregivers achieved consensus on the direction (for or against) and strength (strong or conditional) of recommendations. RESULTS Similar to those published in 2019, these JIA recommendations are based on clinical phenotypes of JIA, rather than a specific classification schema. This guideline provides recommendations for initial and subsequent treatment of JIA with oligoarthritis, TMJ arthritis, and systemic JIA as well as for tapering and discontinuing treatment in subjects with inactive systemic JIA. Other aspects of disease management, including factors that influence treatment choice and medication tapering, are discussed. Evidence for all recommendations was graded as low or very low in quality. For that reason, more than half of the recommendations are conditional. CONCLUSION This clinical practice guideline complements the 2019 American College of Rheumatology JIA and uveitis guidelines, which addressed polyarthritis, sacroiliitis, enthesitis, and uveitis. It serves as a tool to support clinicians, patients, and caregivers in decision-making. The recommendations take into consideration the severity of both articular and nonarticular manifestations as well as patient quality of life. Although evidence is generally low quality and many recommendations are conditional, the inclusion of caregivers and patients in the decision-making process strengthens the relevance and applicability of the guideline. It is important to remember that these are recommendations. Clinical decisions, as always, should be made by the treating clinician and patient/caregiver.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen B Onel
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Daniel B Horton
- Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Daniel J Lovell
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Susan Shenoi
- Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Center and University of Washington, Seattle
| | | | - Sheila T Angeles-Han
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | | | | | | | | | - Harry Gewanter
- Children's Hospital of Richmond at VCU, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Jaime Guzman
- BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Yukiko Kimura
- Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Hackensack, New Jersey
| | | | | | - Peter A Nigrovic
- Boston Children's Hospital and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | | - Marinka Twilt
- University of Calgary and Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Marisa Klein-Gitelman
- Ann & Robert Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago and Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | | | | | | | - Kimberly Hays
- Penn State Health Children's Hospital, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Keila Veiga
- Maria Fareri Children's Hospital, Valhalla, New York
| | - Amy S Turner
- American College of Rheumatology, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I, Zhang Y, Brundisini F, Florez ID, Wiercioch W, Nieuwlaat R, Begum H, Cuello CA, Roldan Y, Chen R, Ding C, Morgan RL, Riva JJ, Zhang Y, Charide R, Agarwal A, Balduzzi S, Morgano GP, Yepes-Nuñez JJ, Rehman Y, Neumann I, Schwab N, Baldeh T, Braun C, Rodríguez MF, Schünemann HJ. Patient values and preferences regarding VTE disease: a systematic review to inform American Society of Hematology guidelines. Blood Adv 2020; 4:953-968. [PMID: 32150612 PMCID: PMC7065473 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2019] [Accepted: 01/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Values and preferences relate to the importance that patients place on health outcomes (eg, bleeding, having a deep venous thrombosis) and are essential when weighing benefits and harms in guideline recommendations. To inform the American Society of Hematology guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism (VTE) disease, we conducted a systematic review of patients' values and preferences related to VTE. We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature from inception to April of 2018 (PROSPERO-CRD42018094003). We included quantitative and qualitative studies. We followed Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) guidance for rating the certainty and presenting findings for quantitative research about the relative importance of health outcomes and a grounded theory approach for qualitative thematic synthesis. We identified 14 quantitative studies (2465 participants) describing the relative importance of VTE-related health states in a widely diverse population of patients, showing overall small to important impact on patients' lives (certainty of the evidence from low to moderate). Additionally, evidence from 34 quantitative studies (6424 participants) and 15 qualitative studies (570 participants) revealed that patients put higher value on VTE risk reduction than on the potential harms of the treatment (certainty of evidence from low to moderate). Studies also suggested a clear preference for oral medication over subcutaneous medication (moderate certainty). The observed variability in health state values may be a result of differences in the approaches used to elicit them and the diversity of included populations rather than true variability in values. This finding highlights the necessity to explore the variability induced by different approaches to ascertain values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yuan Zhang
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Francesca Brundisini
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Ivan D Florez
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia
| | - Wojtek Wiercioch
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Robby Nieuwlaat
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Housne Begum
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Carlos A Cuello
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Health Quality Improvement, School of Medicine, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Yetiani Roldan
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Ru Chen
- National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Chengyi Ding
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rebecca L Morgan
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - John J Riva
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Yuqing Zhang
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Rana Charide
- GRADE Center, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Arnav Agarwal
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sara Balduzzi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children and Adults, University of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Gian Paolo Morgano
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | - Yasir Rehman
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Ignacio Neumann
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Nicole Schwab
- SickKids Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tejan Baldeh
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Cody Braun
- Department of Internal Medicine, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL
| | | | - Holger J Schünemann
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University Health Sciences Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Angeles-Han ST, Ringold S, Beukelman T, Lovell D, Cuello CA, Becker ML, Colbert RA, Feldman BM, Holland GN, Ferguson PJ, Gewanter H, Guzman J, Horonjeff J, Nigrovic PA, Ombrello MJ, Passo MH, Stoll ML, Rabinovich CE, Sen HN, Schneider R, Halyabar O, Hays K, Shah AA, Sullivan N, Szymanski AM, Turgunbaev M, Turner A, Reston J. 2019 American College of Rheumatology/Arthritis Foundation Guideline for the Screening, Monitoring, and Treatment of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis-Associated Uveitis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2019; 71:703-716. [PMID: 31021540 DOI: 10.1002/acr.23871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 122] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2018] [Accepted: 02/27/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop recommendations for the screening, monitoring, and treatment of uveitis in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). METHODS Pediatric rheumatologists, ophthalmologists with expertise in uveitis, patient representatives, and methodologists generated key clinical questions to be addressed by this guideline. This was followed by a systematic literature review and rating of the available evidence according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology. A group consensus process was used to compose the final recommendations and grade their strength as conditional or strong. RESULTS Due to a lack of literature with good quality of evidence, recommendations were formulated on the basis of available evidence and a consensus expert opinion. Regular ophthalmic screening of children with JIA is recommended because of the risk of uveitis, and the frequency of screening should be based on individual risk factors. Regular ophthalmic monitoring of children with uveitis is recommended, and intervals should be based on ocular examination findings and treatment regimen. Ophthalmic monitoring recommendations were strong primarily because of concerns of vision-threatening complications of uveitis with infrequent monitoring. Topical glucocorticoids should be used as initial treatment to achieve control of inflammation. Methotrexate and the monoclonal antibody tumor necrosis factor inhibitors adalimumab and infliximab are recommended when systemic treatment is needed for the management of uveitis. The timely addition of nonbiologic and biologic drugs is recommended to maintain uveitis control in children who are at continued risk of vision loss. CONCLUSION This guideline provides direction for clinicians and patients/parents making decisions on the screening, monitoring, and management of children with JIA and uveitis, using GRADE methodology and informed by a consensus process with input from rheumatology and ophthalmology experts, current literature, and patient/parent preferences and values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheila T Angeles-Han
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | | | | | - Daniel Lovell
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | | | | | | | - Brian M Feldman
- The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gary N Holland
- UCLA Stein Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - Harry Gewanter
- Children's Hospital of Richmond, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond
| | - Jaime Guzman
- BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Peter A Nigrovic
- Brigham & Women's Hospital and Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | | | | - H Nida Sen
- National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Rayfel Schneider
- The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Amy Turner
- American College of Rheumatology, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ringold S, Angeles-Han ST, Beukelman T, Lovell D, Cuello CA, Becker ML, Colbert RA, Feldman BM, Ferguson PJ, Gewanter H, Guzman J, Horonjeff J, Nigrovic PA, Ombrello MJ, Passo MH, Stoll ML, Rabinovich CE, Schneider R, Halyabar O, Hays K, Shah AA, Sullivan N, Szymanski AM, Turgunbaev M, Turner A, Reston J. 2019 American College of Rheumatology/Arthritis Foundation Guideline for the Treatment of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Therapeutic Approaches for Non-Systemic Polyarthritis, Sacroiliitis, and Enthesitis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2019; 71:846-863. [PMID: 31021537 DOI: 10.1002/art.40884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2018] [Accepted: 02/27/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop treatment recommendations for children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis manifesting as non-systemic polyarthritis, sacroiliitis, or enthesitis. METHODS The Patient/Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes (PICO) questions were developed and refined by members of the guideline development teams. A systematic review was conducted to compile evidence for the benefits and harms associated with treatments for these conditions. GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology was used to rate the quality of evidence. A group consensus process was conducted among the Voting Panel to generate the final recommendations and grade their strength. A Parent and Patient Panel used a similar consensus approach to provide patient/caregiver preferences for key questions. RESULTS Thirty-nine recommendations were developed (8 strong and 31 conditional). The quality of supporting evidence was very low or low for 90% of the recommendations. Recommendations are provided for the use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, biologics, and intraarticular and oral glucocorticoids. Recommendations for the use of physical and occupational therapy are also provided. Specific recommendations for polyarthritis address general medication use, initial and subsequent treatment, and adjunctive therapies. Good disease control, with therapeutic escalation to achieve low disease activity, was recommended. The sacroiliitis and enthesitis recommendations primarily address initial therapy and adjunctive therapies. CONCLUSION This guideline provides direction for clinicians, caregivers, and patients making treatment decisions. Clinicians, caregivers, and patients should use a shared decision-making process that accounts for patients' values, preferences, and comorbidities. These recommendations should not be used to limit or deny access to therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sheila T Angeles-Han
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | | | - Daniel Lovell
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | | | | | | | - Brian M Feldman
- The Hospital for Sick Children and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Harry Gewanter
- Children's Hospital of Richmond, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond
| | - Jaime Guzman
- BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Peter A Nigrovic
- Brigham & Women's Hospital and Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | | | | - Rayfel Schneider
- The Hospital for Sick Children and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Amy Turner
- American College of Rheumatology, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Angeles-Han ST, Ringold S, Beukelman T, Lovell D, Cuello CA, Becker ML, Colbert RA, Feldman BM, Holland GN, Ferguson PJ, Gewanter H, Guzman J, Horonjeff J, Nigrovic PA, Ombrello MJ, Passo MH, Stoll ML, Rabinovich CE, Sen HN, Schneider R, Halyabar O, Hays K, Shah AA, Sullivan N, Szymanski AM, Turgunbaev M, Turner A, Reston J. 2019 American College of Rheumatology/Arthritis Foundation Guideline for the Screening, Monitoring, and Treatment of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis-Associated Uveitis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2019; 71:864-877. [PMID: 31021511 DOI: 10.1002/art.40885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2018] [Accepted: 02/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop recommendations for the screening, monitoring, and treatment of uveitis in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). METHODS Pediatric rheumatologists, ophthalmologists with expertise in uveitis, patient representatives, and methodologists generated key clinical questions to be addressed by this guideline. This was followed by a systematic literature review and rating of the available evidence according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology. A group consensus process was used to compose the final recommendations and grade their strength as conditional or strong. RESULTS Due to a lack of literature with good quality of evidence, recommendations were formulated on the basis of available evidence and a consensus expert opinion. Regular ophthalmic screening of children with JIA is recommended because of the risk of uveitis, and the frequency of screening should be based on individual risk factors. Regular ophthalmic monitoring of children with uveitis is recommended, and intervals should be based on ocular examination findings and treatment regimen. Ophthalmic monitoring recommendations were strong primarily because of concerns of vision-threatening complications of uveitis with infrequent monitoring. Topical glucocorticoids should be used as initial treatment to achieve control of inflammation. Methotrexate and the monoclonal antibody tumor necrosis factor inhibitors adalimumab and infliximab are recommended when systemic treatment is needed for the management of uveitis. The timely addition of nonbiologic and biologic drugs is recommended to maintain uveitis control in children who are at continued risk of vision loss. CONCLUSION This guideline provides direction for clinicians and patients/parents making decisions on the screening, monitoring, and management of children with JIA and uveitis, using GRADE methodology and informed by a consensus process with input from rheumatology and ophthalmology experts, current literature, and patient/parent preferences and values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheila T Angeles-Han
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | | | | | - Daniel Lovell
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | | | | | | | - Brian M Feldman
- The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gary N Holland
- UCLA Stein Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - Harry Gewanter
- Children's Hospital of Richmond, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond
| | - Jaime Guzman
- BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Peter A Nigrovic
- Brigham & Women's Hospital and Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | | | | - H Nida Sen
- National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Rayfel Schneider
- The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Amy Turner
- American College of Rheumatology, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ringold S, Angeles-Han ST, Beukelman T, Lovell D, Cuello CA, Becker ML, Colbert RA, Feldman BM, Ferguson PJ, Gewanter H, Guzman J, Horonjeff J, Nigrovic PA, Ombrello MJ, Passo MH, Stoll ML, Rabinovich CE, Schneider R, Halyabar O, Hays K, Shah AA, Sullivan N, Szymanski AM, Turgunbaev M, Turner A, Reston J. 2019 American College of Rheumatology/Arthritis Foundation Guideline for the Treatment of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Therapeutic Approaches for Non-Systemic Polyarthritis, Sacroiliitis, and Enthesitis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2019; 71:717-734. [PMID: 31021516 DOI: 10.1002/acr.23870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 149] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2018] [Accepted: 02/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop treatment recommendations for children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis manifesting as non-systemic polyarthritis, sacroiliitis, or enthesitis. METHODS The Patient/Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes (PICO) questions were developed and refined by members of the guideline development teams. A systematic review was conducted to compile evidence for the benefits and harms associated with treatments for these conditions. GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology was used to rate the quality of evidence. A group consensus process was conducted among the Voting Panel to generate the final recommendations and grade their strength. A Parent and Patient Panel used a similar consensus approach to provide patient/caregiver preferences for key questions. RESULTS Thirty-nine recommendations were developed (8 strong and 31 conditional). The quality of supporting evidence was very low or low for 90% of the recommendations. Recommendations are provided for the use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, biologics, and intraarticular and oral glucocorticoids. Recommendations for the use of physical and occupational therapy are also provided. Specific recommendations for polyarthritis address general medication use, initial and subsequent treatment, and adjunctive therapies. Good disease control, with therapeutic escalation to achieve low disease activity, was recommended. The sacroiliitis and enthesitis recommendations primarily address initial therapy and adjunctive therapies. CONCLUSION This guideline provides direction for clinicians, caregivers, and patients making treatment decisions. Clinicians, caregivers, and patients should use a shared decision-making process that accounts for patients' values, preferences, and comorbidities. These recommendations should not be used to limit or deny access to therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sheila T Angeles-Han
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | | | - Daniel Lovell
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | | | | | | | - Brian M Feldman
- The Hospital for Sick Children and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Harry Gewanter
- Children's Hospital of Richmond, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond
| | - Jaime Guzman
- BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Peter A Nigrovic
- Brigham & Women's Hospital and Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | | | | - Rayfel Schneider
- The Hospital for Sick Children and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Amy Turner
- American College of Rheumatology, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Monagle P, Cuello CA, Augustine C, Bonduel M, Brandão LR, Capman T, Chan AKC, Hanson S, Male C, Meerpohl J, Newall F, O'Brien SH, Raffini L, van Ommen H, Wiernikowski J, Williams S, Bhatt M, Riva JJ, Roldan Y, Schwab N, Mustafa RA, Vesely SK. American Society of Hematology 2018 Guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: treatment of pediatric venous thromboembolism. Blood Adv 2018; 2:3292-3316. [PMID: 30482766 PMCID: PMC6258911 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018024786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 216] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2018] [Accepted: 09/24/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite an increasing incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in pediatric patients in tertiary care settings, relatively few pediatric physicians have experience with antithrombotic interventions. OBJECTIVE These guidelines of the American Society of Hematology (ASH), based on the best available evidence, are intended to support patients, clinicians, and other health care professionals in their decisions about management of pediatric VTE. METHODS ASH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel that included 2 patient representatives and was balanced to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The McMaster University GRADE Centre supported the guideline-development process, including updating or performing systematic evidence reviews (up to April of 2017). The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The panel used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, including GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks, to assess evidence and make recommendations, which were subject to public comment. RESULTS The panel agreed on 30 recommendations, covering symptomatic and asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis, with specific focus on management of central venous access device-associated VTE. The panel also addressed renal and portal vein thrombosis, cerebral sino venous thrombosis, and homozygous protein C deficiency. CONCLUSIONS Although the panel offered many recommendations, additional research is required. Priorities include understanding the natural history of asymptomatic thrombosis, determining subgroup boundaries that enable risk stratification of children for escalation of treatment, and appropriate study of newer anticoagulant agents in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Monagle
- Department of Clinical Haematology, Royal Children's Hospital, University of Melbourne and Murdoch Children's Research Institute, VIC, Australia
| | - Carlos A Cuello
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Tecnologico de Monterrey School of Medicine, Monterrey, Mexico
| | | | - Mariana Bonduel
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Hospital de Pediatria "Prof. Dr. Juan P. Garrahan," Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Leonardo R Brandão
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Anthony K C Chan
- Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Sheila Hanson
- Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin and Critical Care Section, Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Christoph Male
- Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Joerg Meerpohl
- Department of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Institute of Medical Biometry and Medical Informatics, University of Freiburg and University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Fiona Newall
- Department of Clinical Haematology and
- Department of Nursing Research, Royal Children's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Sarah H O'Brien
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Leslie Raffini
- Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Heleen van Ommen
- Department of Pediatric Hematology, Sophia Children's Hospital Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - John Wiernikowski
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, McMaster Children's Hospital, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Suzan Williams
- Department of Pediatrics, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Meha Bhatt
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - John J Riva
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Yetiani Roldan
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Nicole Schwab
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Reem A Mustafa
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS; and
| | - Sara K Vesely
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rodríguez EM, Cuello CA. Ultrastructure of the toad pars intermedia after the extirpation of the pars distalis. J Ultrastruct Res 1982; 79:207-22. [PMID: 6804641 DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5320(82)90032-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
14
|
Ciocca DR, Rodríguez EM, Cuello CA. Comparative light- and electron-microscopical study of the normal adenohypophysis in the human. Cells Tissues Organs 1979; 103:83-99. [PMID: 85403 DOI: 10.1159/000144998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The pars distalis of 1 girl and of 3 sexually mature women was studied. The glands were dissected out and fixed within a period of 30 min following death; in the aldehyde fixative, each gland was systematically divided into ten pieces. Before fixation in osmium tetroxide, each piece was again divided into several blocks. At least 60 blocks were obtained from each gland. Semi-thin sections obtained from all the blocks were stained and studied under the light microscope. Ultrathin sections were obtained from selected blocks. Under the light microscope, 6 types of secretory cells and 2 types of non-secretory cells were characterized. At the ultrastructural level, 7 types of granulated cells and 2 types of non-granulated cells were distinguished. The range of the granule size for each type of sectetory cell was determined by applying a mathematical model and a computer program that corrected the size distribution curve in such a way that only the diameter of the equatorial sections of the granules, that is the real granule sizes, was recorded. By comparing the observations made in the ultrastructural study with those performed in adjacent semi-thin sections it was possible to correlate the cell types characterized ultrastructurally with those distinguished under the light microscope. In addition, the study of the semi-thin sections made it possible to quantitatively analyze the different cell types, while the ultrastructural characteristics suggested the probable functional role of each of these cell types.
Collapse
|
15
|
Cuello CA, Rodríguez EM. Morphological changes of the toad adrenal tissue grafted in the median eminence-- pars distalis region. Gen Comp Endocrinol 1977; 31:385-97. [PMID: 407122 DOI: 10.1016/0016-6480(77)90026-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|