REV7 directs DNA repair pathway choice

REV7 is a small multifunctional protein that participates in multiple DNA repair pathways, most notably translesion DNA synthesis and double-strand break (DSB) repair. While the role of REV7 in translesion synthesis has been known for several decades, its function in DSB repair is a recent discovery. Investigations into the DSB repair function of REV7 have led to the discovery of a new DNA repair complex known as Shieldin. Recent studies have also highlighted the importance of REV7's HORMA domain, an ancient structural motif, in REV7 function and have identified the HORMA regulators, TRIP13 and p31, as novel DNA repair factors. In this review, we discuss these recent findings and their implications for repair pathway choice, at both DSBs and replication forks. We suggest that REV7, in particular the activation state of its HORMA domain, can act as a critical determinant of mutagenic versus error-free repair in multiple contexts.

Phase 1 Combination Study of the CHK1 Inhibitor Prexasertib and the PARP Inhibitor Olaparib in High-grade Serous Ovarian Cancer and Other Solid Tumors

PURPOSE

Checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1) plays a central role in the response to replication stress through modulation of cell-cycle checkpoints and homologous recombination (HR) repair. In BRCA-deficient cancers with de novo or acquired PARP inhibitor resistance, the addition of the CHK1 inhibitor prexasertib to the PARP inhibitor olaparib compromises replication fork stability, as well as HR proficiency, allowing for sensitization to PARP inhibition.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study followed a 3+3 design with a 7-day lead-in of olaparib alone, followed by 28-day cycles with prexasertib administered on days 1 and 15 in combination with an attenuated dose of olaparib on days 1-5 and 15-19. Pharmacokinetic blood samples were collected after olaparib alone and following combination therapy. Patients enrolled to the expansion phase of the study underwent paired tumor biopsies for pharmacodynamic (PD) assessments.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients were treated. DLTs included grade 3 neutropenia and grade 3 febrile neutropenia. The MTD/recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was prexasertib at 70 mg/m² i.v. with olaparib at 100 mg by mouth twice daily. Most common treatment-related adverse events included leukopenia (83%), neutropenia (86%), thrombocytopenia (66%), and anemia (72%). Four of 18 patients with BRCA1-mutant, PARP inhibitor-resistant, high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) achieved partial responses. Paired tumor biopsies demonstrated reduction in RAD51 foci and increased expression of γ-H2AX, pKAP1, and pRPA after combination exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

Prexasertib combined with olaparib has preliminary clinical activity in BRCA-mutant patients with HGSOC who have previously progressed on a PARP inhibitor. PD analyses show that prexasertib compromises HR with evidence of induction of DNA damage and replication stress.

A phase 2 study of berzosertib (M6620) in combination with carboplatin compared with docetaxel in combination with carboplatin in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

5034

Background: Alterations in DNA damage repair (DDR) genes are common in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), and are implicated in responses to carboplatin [carbo], PARP inhibitors and immunotherapeutics. Inhibitors of the ATR kinase, which is involved in the DDR response, have been demonstrated to have synergistic activity with platinum compounds in preclinical models. We therefore conducted a phase 2 study of the ATR inhibitor berzosertib [berzo]+carbo vs. docetaxel [doce]+carbo in mCRPC. Methods: Patients (pts) previously treated with at least one secondary hormonal therapy and taxane underwent mandatory pre-treatment biopsy and were randomized 1:1 to receive Arm A (doce 60 mg/m2 day 1 + carbo AUC 4 day 1) or Arm B (berzo 90 mg/m2 days 2,9 + carbo AUC 5 day 1) every 21 days. Pts randomized to Arm A who were not candidates for doce received carbo AUC 5 monotherapy. Stratification factors were 1) prior PARP inhibitor (yes vs. no) and 2) evaluable disease by RECIST 1.1 (yes vs. no). Pts on Arm A crossed over to Arm B (berzo+carbo) at the earlier of PSA or radiographic progression. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR; PSA reduction by ≥ 50% or radiographic response by RECIST 1.1). Secondary endpoints included time to PSA progression, radiographic PFS (rPFS), PFS by PCWG3 criteria, and adverse events (AEs) in each arm. Planned enrollment was 136 pts (for 130 to be treated), with interim analysis for futility after 65 pts were treated. Results: 73 pts were randomized between 6/2019 and 7/2020; 34 pts were treated on Arm A (26 carbo+doce; 8 carbo alone) and 31 on Arm B. Median number of prior systemic therapies (excluding ADT, 5α-reductase inhibitors, 1st generation antiandrogens) was 4 (range 2-8). Median treatment duration was 3 cycles, and 4 pts in each arm discontinued for AEs. Grade 3 or higher treatment-related AEs (TrAE) were seen in 13(38%) pts in Arm A and 21(68%) in Arm B. Pts in Arm B had greater frequency of grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia (8[26%] vs. 3[9%]). 1 pt in Arm B had grade 5 sepsis attributed to study treatment. ORR was 15% in Arm A (5/34; 5/26[19%] in pts who received carbo+doce) and 0% in Arm B (0/31). 14 pts in Arm A crossed over, with no subsequent responses seen. Median rPFS was 2.1(95% CI:2.0,3.2) mo in Arm A and 2.4(1.9,4.2) mo in Arm B. At planned interim analysis, trial enrollment and crossover to Arm B were halted due to futility. Conclusions: Carbo+berzo led to fewer overall responses and a higher rate of grade 3 or higher TrAEs compared to carbo+doce. All responses seen were in pts who received carbo+doce despite requirement for prior progression on taxane, suggesting that this combination is favored over carbo+berzo or carbo monotherapy in a heavily pre-treated biomarker-unselected population. Extensive genetic and molecular studies for DDR assessment from tissue and cfDNA are in progress. Clinical trial information: NCT03517969.

Genomic Landscape of Primary and Recurrent Anal Squamous Cell Carcinomas in Relation to HPV Integration, Copy-Number Variation, and DNA Damage Response Genes

The incidence of anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) has been increasing, particularly in populations with HIV. Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the causal factor in 85% to 90% of ASCCs, but few studies evaluated HPV genotypes and integrations in relation to genomic alterations in ASCC. Using whole-exome sequence data for primary (n = 56) and recurrent (n = 31) ASCC from 72 patients, we detected HPV DNA in 87.5% of ASCC, of which HPV-16, HPV-18, and HPV-6 were detected in 56%, 22%, and 33% of HIV-positive (n = 9) compared with 83%, 3.2%, and 1.6% of HIV-negative cases (n = 63), respectively. Recurrent copy-number variations (CNV) involving genes with documented roles in cancer included amplification of PI3KCA and deletion of APC in primary and recurrent tumors; amplifications of CCND1, MYC, and NOTCH1 and deletions of BRCA2 and RB1 in primary tumors; and deletions of ATR, FANCD2, and FHIT in recurrent tumors. DNA damage response genes were enriched among recurrently deleted genes in recurrent ASCCs (P = 0.001). HPV integrations were detected in 29 of 76 (38%) ASCCs and were more frequent in stage III-IV versus stage I-II tumors. HPV integrations were detected near MYC and CCND1 amplifications and recurrent targets included NFI and MUC genes. These results suggest HPV genotypes in ASCC differ by HIV status, HPV integration is associated with ASCC progression, and DNA damage response genes are commonly disrupted in recurrent ASCCs. IMPLICATIONS: These data provide the largest whole-exome sequencing study of the ASCC genomic landscape to date and identify HPV genotypes, integrations, and recurrent CNVs in primary or recurrent ASCCs.

MMB-FOXM1-driven premature mitosis is required for CHK1 inhibitor sensitivity

To identify genes whose loss confers resistance to CHK1 inhibitors, we perform genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 screens in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines treated with the CHK1 inhibitor prexasertib (CHK1i). Five of the top six hits of the screens, MYBL2 (B-MYB), LIN54, FOXM1, cyclin A2 (CCNA2), and CDC25B, are cell-cycle-regulated genes that contribute to entry into mitosis. Knockout of MMB-FOXM1 complex components LIN54 and FOXM1 reduce CHK1i-induced DNA replication stress markers and premature mitosis during Late S phase. Activation of a feedback loop between the MMB-FOXM1 complex and CDK1 is required for CHK1i-induced premature mitosis in Late S phase and subsequent replication catastrophe, indicating that dysregulation of the S to M transition is necessary for CHK1 inhibitor sensitivity. These findings provide mechanistic insights into small molecule inhibitors currently studied in clinical trials and provide rationale for combination therapies.

Branigan et al., by using genome-wide CRISPR screens, identify the MMB-FOXM1 complex as being required for CHK1 inhibitor (CHK1i) sensitivity. Their study shows that CHK1i-induced premature activation of the G2/M transcriptional program by this complex triggers a breakdown in the separation of DNA synthesis and mitosis, leading to replication catastrophe.

Heterogeneity and Clonal Evolution of Acquired PARP Inhibitor Resistance in TP53- and BRCA1-Deficient Cells

Homologous recombination (HR)-deficient cancers are sensitive to poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi), which have shown clinical efficacy in the treatment of high-grade serous cancers (HGSC). However, the majority of patients will relapse, and acquired PARPi resistance is emerging as a pressing clinical problem. Here we generated seven single-cell clones with acquired PARPi resistance derived from a PARPi-sensitive TP53 ^-/- and BRCA1 ^-/- epithelial cell line generated using CRISPR/Cas9. These clones showed diverse resistance mechanisms, and some clones presented with multiple mechanisms of resistance at the same time. Genomic analysis of the clones revealed unique transcriptional and mutational profiles and increased genomic instability in comparison with a PARPi-sensitive cell line. Clonal evolutionary analyses suggested that acquired PARPi resistance arose via clonal selection from an intrinsically unstable and heterogenous cell population in the sensitive cell line, which contained preexisting drug-tolerant cells. Similarly, clonal and spatial heterogeneity in tumor biopsies from a clinical patient with BRCA1-mutant HGSC with acquired PARPi resistance was observed. In an imaging-based drug screening, the clones showed heterogenous responses to targeted therapeutic agents, indicating that not all PARPi-resistant clones can be targeted with just one therapy. Furthermore, PARPi-resistant clones showed mechanism-dependent vulnerabilities to the selected agents, demonstrating that a deeper understanding on the mechanisms of resistance could lead to improved targeting and biomarkers for HGSC with acquired PARPi resistance. SIGNIFICANCE: This study shows that BRCA1-deficient cells can give rise to multiple genomically and functionally heterogenous PARPi-resistant clones, which are associated with various vulnerabilities that can be targeted in a mechanism-specific manner.

MYC Promotes Bone Marrow Stem Cell Dysfunction in Fanconi Anemia

Bone marrow failure (BMF) in Fanconi anemia (FA) patients results from dysfunctional hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs). To identify determinants of BMF, we performed single-cell transcriptome profiling of primary HSPCs from FA patients. In addition to overexpression of p53 and TGF-β pathway genes, we identified high levels of MYC expression. We correspondingly observed coexistence of distinct HSPC subpopulations expressing high levels of TP53 or MYC in FA bone marrow (BM). Inhibiting MYC expression with the BET bromodomain inhibitor (+)-JQ1 reduced the clonogenic potential of FA patient HSPCs but rescued physiological and genotoxic stress in HSPCs from FA mice, showing that MYC promotes proliferation while increasing DNA damage. MYC-high HSPCs showed significant downregulation of cell adhesion genes, consistent with enhanced egress of FA HSPCs from bone marrow to peripheral blood. We speculate that MYC overexpression impairs HSPC function in FA patients and contributes to exhaustion in FA bone marrow.

Inhibition of TGFβ1 and TGFβ3 promotes hematopoiesis in Fanconi anemia

Fanconi anemia (FA) is a chromosome instability syndrome with congenital abnormalities, cancer predisposition and bone marrow failure (BMF). Although hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) transplantation is the recommended therapy, new therapies are needed for FA patients without suitable donors. BMF in FA is caused, at least in part, by a hyperactive growth-suppressive transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) pathway, regulated by the TGFβ1, TGFβ2, and TGFβ3 ligands. Accordingly, the TGFβ pathway is an attractive therapeutic target for FA. While inhibition of TGFβ1 and TGFβ3 promotes blood cell expansion, inhibition of TGFβ2 is known to suppress hematopoiesis. Here, we report the effects of AVID200, a potent TGFβ1- and TGFβ3-specific inhibitor, on FA hematopoiesis. AVID200 promoted the survival of murine FA HSPCs in vitro. AVID200 also promoted in vitro the survival of human HSPCs from patients with FA, with the strongest effect in patients progressing to severe aplastic anemia or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Previous studies have indicated that the toxic upregulation of the nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway accounts, at least in part, for the poor growth of FA HSPCs. AVID200 downregulated the expression of NHEJ-related genes and reduced DNA damage in primary FA HSPC in vitro and in in vivo models. Collectively, AVID200 exhibits activity in FA mouse and human preclinical models. AVID200 may therefore provide a therapeutic approach to improving BMF in FA.

Exploiting the Microhomology-Mediated End-Joining Pathway in Cancer Therapy

Repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) is performed by two major pathways, homology-dependent repair and classical nonhomologous end-joining. Recent studies have identified a third pathway, microhomology-mediated end-joining (MMEJ). MMEJ has similarities to homology-dependent repair, in that repair is initiated with end resection, leading to single-stranded 3' ends, which require microhomology upstream and downstream of the DSB. Importantly, the MMEJ pathway is commonly upregulated in cancers, especially in homologous recombination-deficient cancers, which display a distinctive mutational signature. Here, we review the molecular process of MMEJ as well as new targets and approaches exploiting the MMEJ pathway in cancer therapy.

CHK1 Inhibitor Blocks Phosphorylation of FAM122A and Promotes Replication Stress

While effective anti-cancer drugs targeting the CHK1 kinase are advancing in the clinic, drug resistance is rapidly emerging. Here, we demonstrate that CRISPR-mediated knockout of the little-known gene FAM122A/PABIR1 confers cellular resistance to CHK1 inhibitors (CHK1is) and cross-resistance to ATR inhibitors. Knockout of FAM122A results in activation of PP2A-B55α, a phosphatase that dephosphorylates the WEE1 protein and rescues WEE1 from ubiquitin-mediated degradation. The resulting increase in WEE1 protein expression reduces replication stress, activates the G2/M checkpoint, and confers cellular resistance to CHK1is. Interestingly, in tumor cells with oncogene-driven replication stress, CHK1 can directly phosphorylate FAM122A, leading to activation of the PP2A-B55α phosphatase and increased WEE1 expression. A combination of a CHK1i plus a WEE1 inhibitor can overcome CHK1i resistance of these tumor cells, thereby enhancing anti-cancer activity. The FAM122A expression level in a tumor cell can serve as a useful biomarker for predicting CHK1i sensitivity or resistance.

Abstract PR06: Dissecting mechanisms of replication fork stabilization in patient-derived high-grade serous organoid cultures and their impact on therapeutic sensitivity and the immune-tumor interaction

Genomic analyses indicate that 50% of high-grade serous ovarian cancers (HGSC) harbor a genomic alteration in a DNA damage repair gene that may lead to functional defects. Using functional assays on patient-derived HGSC organoid cultures to test the capacity of the tumor cells to repair double-strand DNA breaks and to protect stalled replication forks, we have found that many HGSCs have stalled fork protection defects regardless of the genomic background of the tumor and that these defects correlate with sensitivity to replication stress inducing therapeutic agents. We hypothesized that gaining a better understanding of the mechanisms of replication fork instability and stability in HGSC organoid cultures would help to better understand the mechanisms of therapeutic sensitivity of the tumor cells. The purpose of this work is to understand how replication fork stabilization either in the primary tumor or through selection post-treatment leads to alterations in tumor cell biology, including therapeutic sensitivity and interaction of the tumor cells with the surrounding microenvironment. We utilized bulk RNA sequencing analysis of HGSC organoid cultures with varied replication fork protection capacity, some matched pairs of untreated and post-neoadjuvant tumors, to stratify differences in functional profiles in fork stable versus unstable tumors; we then used basic molecular biology techniques to understand the mechanisms of fork stabilization and how this stabilization affects the therapeutic sensitivity of the cells. We also developed and utilized multiple functional assays to assess the interaction of HGSC organoids of varying fork protection capacity with their immune microenvironment in different drug exposure settings. We identified multiple proteins that through either up- or downregulation lead to stabilization of replication forks in the tumor cells and found that the mechanisms of stabilization can occur at both the level of the replication fork and the overall transcriptional level of the cell and can alter the therapeutic sensitivity of the cells. We have determined that replication fork stability leads to increased mesenchymal characteristics in tumors and to decreased activation of the antitumor immune response within the cultures after treatment with DNA damage repair and immuno-oncologic (IO) agents. Overall, these results indicate that replication fork stabilization in HGSC through multiple different mechanisms can lead to altered interactions of the tumor cells with their microenvironment and altered therapeutic sensitivity.

This abstract is also being presented as Poster B10.

Citation Format: Sarah J. Hill, Patrick Lizotte, Nikolas Kesten, Neil S. Horowitz, Michael G. Muto, Michael J. Worley, Colleen M. Feltmate, Ross S. Berkowitz, Henry Long, Ursula A. Matulonis, Christopher P. Crum, Myles Brown, Alan D. D'Andrea. Dissecting mechanisms of replication fork stabilization in patient-derived high-grade serous organoid cultures and their impact on therapeutic sensitivity and the immune-tumor interaction [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Ovarian Cancer Research; 2019 Sep 13-16, 2019; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2020;26(13_Suppl):Abstract nr PR06.

Biomarker-Guided Development of DNA Repair Inhibitors

Anti-cancer drugs targeting the DNA damage response (DDR) exploit genetic or functional defects in this pathway through synthetic lethal mechanisms. For example, defects in homologous recombination (HR) repair arise in cancer cells through inherited or acquired mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, or other genes in the Fanconi anemia/BRCA pathway, and these tumors have been shown to be particularly sensitive to inhibitors of the base excision repair (BER) protein poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP). Recent work has identified additional genomic and functional assays of DNA repair that provide new predictive and pharmacodynamic biomarkers for these targeted therapies. Here, we examine the development of selective agents targeting DNA repair, including PARP inhibitors; inhibitors of the DNA damage kinases ataxia-telangiectasia and Rad3 related (ATR), CHK1, WEE1, and ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM); and inhibitors of classical non-homologous end joining (cNHEJ) and alternative end joining (Alt EJ). We also review the biomarkers that guide the use of these agents and current clinical trials with these therapies.

Berzosertib plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone in platinum-resistant high-grade serous ovarian cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

High-grade serous ovarian cancers show increased replication stress, rendering cells vulnerable to ATR inhibition because of near universal loss of the G1/S checkpoint (through deleterious TP53 mutations), premature S phase entry (due to CCNE1 amplification, RB1 loss, or CDKN2A mRNA downregulation), alterations of homologous recombination repair genes, and expression of oncogenic drivers (through MYC amplification and other mechanisms). We hypothesised that the combination of the selective ATR inhibitor, berzosertib, and gemcitabine could show acceptable toxicity and superior efficacy to gemcitabine alone in high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

METHODS

In this multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 study, 11 different centres in the US Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trials Network enrolled women (aged ≥18 years) with recurrent, platinum-resistant high-grade serous ovarian cancer (determined histologically) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, who had unlimited previous lines of cytotoxic therapy in the platinum-sensitive setting but no more than one line of cytotoxic therapy in the platinum-resistant setting. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intravenous gemcitabine (1000 mg/m²) on day 1 and day 8, or gemcitabine plus intravenous berzosertib (210 mg/m²) on day 2 and day 9 of a 21-day cycle until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Randomisation was done centrally using the Theradex Interactive Web Response System, stratified by platinum-free interval, and with a permuted block size of six. Following central randomisation, patients and investigators were not masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival, and analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of the study drugs. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02595892, and is active but closed to enrolment.

FINDINGS

Between Feb 14, 2017, and Sept 7, 2018, 88 patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom 70 were randomly assigned to treatment with gemcitabine alone (36 patients) or gemcitabine plus berzosertib (34 patients). At the data cutoff date (Feb 21, 2020), the median follow-up was 53·2 weeks (25·6-81·8) in the gemcitabine plus berzosertib group and 43·0 weeks (IQR 23·2-69·1) in the gemcitabine alone group. Median progression-free survival was 22·9 weeks (17·9-72·0) for gemcitabine plus berzosertib and 14·7 weeks (90% CI 9·7-36·7) for gemcitabine alone (hazard ratio 0·57, 90% CI 0·33-0·98; one-sided log-rank test p=0·044). The most common treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events were decreased neutrophil count (14 [39%] of 36 patients in the gemcitabine alone group vs 16 [47%] of 34 patients in the gemcitabine plus berzosertib group) and decreased platelet count (two [6%] vs eight [24%]). Serious adverse events were observed in ten (28%) patients in the gemcitabine alone group and nine (26%) patients in the gemcitabine plus berzosertib group. There was one treatment-related death in the gemcitabine alone group due to sepsis and one treatment-related death in the gemcitabine plus berzosertib group due to pneumonitis.

INTERPRETATION

To our knowledge, this is the first randomised study of an ATR inhibitor in any tumour type. This study shows a benefit of adding berzosertib to gemcitabine in platinum-resistant high-grade serous ovarian cancer. This combination warrants further investigation in this setting.

FUNDING

US National Cancer Institute.

A phase II study of M6620 in combination with carboplatin compared with docetaxel in combination with carboplatin in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

TPS5597

Background: Alterations in DNA damage repair genes are common in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), and are implicated in responses to carboplatin, PARP inhibitors and immunotherapeutics. The ATR kinase is involved in the DNA damage response, and ATR inhibitors have been demonstrated in preclinical models to have synergistic activity with platinum compounds due to induction of replication stress. Methods: This is a randomized open-label Phase 2 study of the ATR inhibitor M6620 + carboplatin vs. docetaxel + carboplatin in mCRPC. Patients (pts) previously treated with at least one secondary hormonal therapy and taxane-based chemotherapy undergo mandatory pre-treatment biopsy and are randomized 1:1 to receive Arm A (docetaxel 60 mg/m2 day 1 + carboplatin AUC 4 day 1) or Arm B (M6620 90 mg/m2 days 2,9 + carboplatin AUC 5 day 1) every 21 days. Pts randomized to Arm A who are not candidates for docetaxel receive carboplatin AUC 5 monotherapy. Stratification factors are 1) prior PARP inhibitor (yes vs. no) and 2) evaluable disease by RECIST 1.1 (yes vs. no). Pts on Arm A crossover to Arm B (M6620+carboplatin) at the earlier of PSA or radiographic progression. For the primary endpoint of overall response rate (ORR; PSA reduction by ≥ 50% or radiographic response by RECIST 1.1), with 65 pts on each arm (total N = 130), there will be 80% power to distinguish ORR of 40% vs. 20% using a chi-square test (one sided α = 0.05). 136 pts will be enrolled to account for 5% dropout. Secondary endpoints include time to PSA progression, radiographic PFS, PFS by PCWG3 criteria, safety and adverse events in each arm. Biomarker studies include whole exome sequencing, RAD51 focus formation, and ATM IHC from tumor specimens. Circulating cell-free DNA from pre-treatment and progression plasma specimens will undergo ultra-low pass whole genome sequencing and deep targeted sequencing. The goal of this study is to expand therapeutic options in mCRPC through a novel approach to targeting the DNA damage response, and to identify biomarkers associating with response and resistance to both standard and trial therapy. Enrollment began June 2019 (NCI/ETCTN #10191, NCT03517969). Clinical trial information: NCT03517969 .

Results from MAGENTA: A national randomized four-arm noninferiority trial evaluating pre- and post-test genetic counseling during online testing for breast and ovarian cancer genetic risk

1506

Background: Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) is preventable when genetic risk is identified. We aimed to test whether pre and/or post-test genetic counseling is needed to optimally deliver online accessible genetic testing. Methods: MAGENTA (Making GENetic Testing Accessible) is a four-arm non-inferiority trial evaluating electronic genetic education and results delivery alone or combined with pre-test only, or post-test only telephone genetic counseling compared to mandatory pre- and post-test counseling (control arm) in women at risk of HBOC (NCT02993068). Regardless of assigned arm, all subjects with a pathogenic mutation received post-test telephone counseling. All subjects were enrolled electronically as part of either a family history cohort (FHC) or a cascade cohort (CC, known familial mutation). The primary outcome was cancer risk distress at 3 months and the trial was powered for the FHC. Secondary outcomes included completion of testing (i.e., received results), anxiety, depression, quality of life, and decisional regret, all measured by standardized scales. Results: Enrollment is complete and a total of 3,822 participants were randomized, 3,111 in FHC and 711 in CC. Participants were enrolled from all 50 states, but most were white/non-Hispanic (88%). Among participants that completed genetic testing, 173 (7.2%) had a mutation in a breast or ovarian cancer gene, with 114 (5.7%) of FHC and 59 (14.2%) of CC. In the primary intention-to-treat analysis of FHC, each of the three experimental arms was non-inferior to the control arm for distress at 3 months (p < 0.025/3 = 0.0083). In the CC, no and pre-test only counseling were also non-inferior (p < 0.025/3 = 0.0083). Distress was lowest in the arm with neither pre nor post-test counseling. Overall, 318 (18%) participants had very high distress at three month follow-up, and this rate was not significantly different across arms. Anxiety, depression and decisional regret did not have statistically significant differences across arms at follow-up. Test completion was highest in the no counseling arm (86.4%) and lowest in the control arm (60.6%). Conclusions: Electronic genetic education and results release without genetic counseling was non-inferior with regard to patient distress and was associated with higher test completion and lower distress. These results support use of a genetic testing paradigm providing individualized genetic counseling only for patients with positive test results. Clinical trial information: NCT02993068.

Author Correction: Immunogenomic profiling determines responses to combined PARP and PD-1 inhibition in ovarian cancer

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.

Disassembly of the Shieldin Complex by TRIP13

In the past decade, the study of the major DNA double strand break (DSB) repair pathways, homologous recombination (HR) and classical non-homologous end joining (C-NHEJ), has revealed a vast and intricate network of regulation.  The choice between HR and C-NHEJ is largely controlled at the step of DNA end-resection. A pro-C-NHEJ cascade commencing with 53BP1 and culminating in the newly discovered REV7-Shieldin complex impedes end resection and therefore HR. Importantly, loss of any component of this pathway confers PARP inhibitor resistance in BRCA1-deficient cells; hence, their study is of great clinical importance. The newest entrant on the scene of end resection regulation is the ATPase TRIP13 that disables the pro-C-NHEJ cascade by promoting a novel conformational change of the HORMA protein REV7. Here, we tie these new findings and factors with previous research on the regulation of DSB repair and HORMA proteins, and suggest testable hypotheses for how TRIP13 could specifically inactivate REV7-Shieldin to promote HR. We also discuss these biological questions in the context of clinical therapeutics.

Immunogenomic profiling determines responses to combined PARP and PD-1 inhibition in ovarian cancer

Combined PARP and immune checkpoint inhibition has yielded encouraging results in ovarian cancer, but predictive biomarkers are lacking. We performed immunogenomic profiling and highly multiplexed single-cell imaging on tumor samples from patients enrolled in a Phase I/II trial of niraparib and pembrolizumab in ovarian cancer (NCT02657889). We identify two determinants of response; mutational signature 3 reflecting defective homologous recombination DNA repair, and positive immune score as a surrogate of interferon-primed exhausted CD8 + T-cells in the tumor microenvironment. Presence of one or both features associates with an improved outcome while concurrent absence yields no responses. Single-cell spatial analysis reveals prominent interactions of exhausted CD8 + T-cells and PD-L1 + macrophages and PD-L1 + tumor cells as mechanistic determinants of response. Furthermore, spatial analysis of two extreme responders shows differential clustering of exhausted CD8 + T-cells with PD-L1 + macrophages in the first, and exhausted CD8 + T-cells with cancer cells harboring genomic PD-L1 and PD-L2 amplification in the second.

Reversion and non-reversion mechanisms of resistance to PARP inhibitor or platinum chemotherapy in BRCA1/2-mutant metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Little is known about mechanisms of resistance to poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) and platinum chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer and BRCA1/2 mutations. Further investigation of resistance in clinical cohorts may point to strategies to prevent or overcome treatment failure.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We obtained tumor biopsies from metastatic breast cancer patients with BRCA1/2 deficiency before and after acquired resistance to PARPi or platinum chemotherapy. Whole exome sequencing was carried out on each tumor, germline DNA, and circulating tumor DNA. Tumors underwent RNA sequencing, and immunohistochemical staining for RAD51 foci on tumor sections was carried out for functional assessment of intact homologous recombination (HR).

RESULTS

Pre- and post-resistance tumor samples were sequenced from eight patients (four with BRCA1 and four with BRCA2 mutation; four treated with PARPi and four with platinum). Following disease progression on DNA-damaging therapy, four patients (50%) acquired at least one somatic reversion alteration likely to result in functional BRCA1/2 protein detected by tumor or circulating tumor DNA sequencing. Two patients with germline BRCA1 deficiency acquired genomic alterations anticipated to restore HR through increased DNA end resection: loss of TP53BP1 in one patient and amplification of MRE11A in another. RAD51 foci were acquired post-resistance in all patients with genomic reversion, consistent with reconstitution of HR. All patients whose tumors demonstrated RAD51 foci post-resistance were intrinsically resistant to subsequent lines of DNA-damaging therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Genomic reversion in BRCA1/2 was the most commonly observed mechanism of resistance, occurring in four of eight patients. Novel sequence alterations leading to increased DNA end resection were seen in two patients, and may be targetable for therapeutic benefit. The presence of RAD51 foci by immunohistochemistry was consistent with BRCA1/2 protein functional status from genomic data and predicted response to later DNA-damaging therapy, supporting RAD51 focus formation as a clinically useful biomarker.

A phase II study of M6620 in combination with carboplatin compared with docetaxel in combination with carboplatin in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

TPS252

Background: Alterations in DNA damage repair genes are common in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), and are implicated in responses to carboplatin, PARP inhibitors and immunotherapeutics. The ATR kinase is involved in the DNA damage response, and ATR inhibitors have been demonstrated in preclinical models to have synergistic activity with platinum compounds due to induction of replication stress. Methods: This is a randomized open-label Phase 2 study of the ATR inhibitor M6620 + carboplatin vs. docetaxel + carboplatin in mCRPC. Patients (pts) previously treated with at least one secondary hormonal therapy and taxane-based chemotherapy undergo mandatory pre-treatment biopsy and are randomized 1:1 to receive Arm A (docetaxel 60 mg/m2 day 1 + carboplatin AUC 4 day 1) or Arm B (M6620 90 mg/m2 days 2,9 + carboplatin AUC 5 day 1) every 21 days. Pts randomized to Arm A who are not candidates for docetaxel receive carboplatin AUC 5 monotherapy. Stratification factors are 1) prior PARP inhibitor (yes vs. no) and 2) evaluable disease by RECIST 1.1 (yes vs. no). Pts on Arm A crossover to Arm B (M6620+carboplatin) at the earlier of PSA or radiographic progression. For the primary endpoint of overall response rate (ORR; PSA reduction by ≥ 50% or radiographic response by RECIST 1.1), with 65 pts on each arm (total N = 130), there will be 80% power to distinguish ORR of 40% vs. 20% using a chi-square test (one sided α = 0.05). 136 pts will be enrolled to account for 5% dropout. Secondary endpoints include time to PSA progression, radiographic PFS, PFS by PCWG3 criteria, safety and adverse events in each arm. Biomarker studies include whole exome sequencing, RAD51 focus formation, and ATM IHC from tumor specimens. Circulating cell-free DNA from pre-treatment and progression plasma specimens will undergo ultra-low pass whole genome sequencing and deep targeted sequencing. The goal of this study is to expand therapeutic options in mCRPC through a novel approach to targeting the DNA damage response, and to identify biomarkers associating with response and resistance to both standard and trial therapy. Enrollment began June 2019 (NCI/ETCTN #10191). Clinical trial information: NCT03517969.

TRIP13 regulates DNA repair pathway choice through REV7 conformational change

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are repaired through homology-directed repair (HDR) or non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). BRCA1/2-deficient cancer cells cannot perform HDR, conferring sensitivity to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). However, concomitant loss of the pro-NHEJ factors 53BP1, RIF1, REV7-Shieldin (SHLD1-3) or CST-DNA polymerase alpha (Pol-α) in BRCA1-deficient cells restores HDR and PARPi resistance. Here, we identify the TRIP13 ATPase as a negative regulator of REV7. We show that REV7 exists in active 'closed' and inactive 'open' conformations, and TRIP13 catalyses the inactivating conformational change, thereby dissociating REV7-Shieldin to promote HDR. TRIP13 similarly disassembles the REV7-REV3 translesion synthesis (TLS) complex, a component of the Fanconi anaemia pathway, inhibiting error-prone replicative lesion bypass and interstrand crosslink repair. Importantly, TRIP13 overexpression is common in BRCA1-deficient cancers, confers PARPi resistance and correlates with poor prognosis. Thus, TRIP13 emerges as an important regulator of DNA repair pathway choice-promoting HDR, while suppressing NHEJ and TLS.

Abstract AP22: DNA DAMAGE RESPONSES AND IMMUNE PROFILING THROUGH HIGHLY MULTIPLEXED TISSUE IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE (T-CYCIF) IN HIGH-GRADE SEROUS OVARIAN CANCER

INTRODUCTION: Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has emerged as a new therapeutic approach for multiple cancers, however, the responses to single-agent ICBs have been modest in high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). Preclinical and early clinical data indicate promising efficacy of combination with DNA damaging agents and immunotherapy, however lack of functional- and tissue geographical knowledge on the interplay between DNA repair and immune activation has hampered the future development of these strategies. The majority of HGSOC are deficient in homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair, and this deficiency is associated with increased immune recognition and potentially increased response to ICBs. Compelling evidence has shown that DNA damaging agents increase the expression of immune-regulatory genes, such as interferons, which can potentially overcome resistance to ICB. There is a critical need for a deeper understanding of the dynamics between DNA damage in cancer cells and anti-tumor immune responses in HGSOC in order to find rational combinations and predictive biomarkers for DNA damaging agents and immunotherapy.

RESULTS: We are employing a novel, high-multiplex tissue cyclic immunofluorescence (t-CycIF) platform allowing for the simultaneous detection of up to 60 different antigens at single cell resolution. To reveal the effects of between intrinsic and treatment-induced DNA damage in HGSOC, we are profiling the microenvironments in HGSOCs with inherent DNA repair deficiencies, and after DNA damaging therapy. We collected clinically annotated cohorts of 37 BRCA1/2 mutated and 17 HR wild-type patients (Strickland et al, 2016), as well as six paired pre- and post-treatment and 18 post-treatment tumor samples from patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Using image analysis we generated highly multiplexed single cell data for over 106 cells. Through supervised clustering, we evidenced distinct cell compositions in the tumor microenvironment of BRCA1/2 mutated and HR-wild type HGSOCs. Consistent with the role of immune-suppression in HGSOC progression, we found that high infiltration of CD4/FOXP3+ regulatory T-cells associated with more actively proliferating cancer cells. Interestingly, tumors with high expression of PD1/PD-L1 were found to have high infiltration of CD1c+ dendritic cells potentially indicating active suppression of antigen presenting pathways in these tumors. Further, tumors with high levels of DNA damage show active interferon signaling, which associated with significantly higher CD8+ cytotoxic T-cell infiltration. In addition, our preliminary evidence suggests heterogenous DNA damage response- and immune profiles in samples collected after NACT.

CONCLUSIONS: BRCA1/2 mutated tumors have a distinct microenvironment compared to HR-wt HGSOC. In support of earlier findings, FOXP3+ T-cells contribute to immune suppression in HGSOC. The high infiltration of dendritic cells and PD1/PD-L1 expression indicates a subgroup of HGSOC that are likely sensitive to ICBs. Further, increased DNA damage and interferon pathway activation delineated a more immunogenic subset of HGSOC. We conclude that t-CycIF could accelerate the development of rational strategies for combining DNA damaging agents with immunotherapy to ultimately improve the treatment and outcomes of patients with ovarian cancer.

Citation Format: Anniina Färkkilä, Jia-Ren Lin, Zoltan Maliga, Sameer S. Chopra, Bose Koruchupakkal, Brooke E. Howitt, Kyle C. Strickland, Sandro Santagata, Elizabeth M. Swisher, Ursula A. Matulonis, Jennifer. L. Guerriero, Kevin Elias, Panagiotis Konstantinopoulos, Peter K. Sorger, and Alan D. D'Andrea. DNA DAMAGE RESPONSES AND IMMUNE PROFILING THROUGH HIGHLY MULTIPLEXED TISSUE IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE (T-CYCIF) IN HIGH-GRADE SEROUS OVARIAN CANCER [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 12th Biennial Ovarian Cancer Research Symposium; Sep 13-15, 2018; Seattle, WA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2019;25(22 Suppl):Abstract nr AP22.

Abstract AP10: REAL-TIME ASSESSMENT OF HGSC DNA DAMAGE REPAIR DEFECTS AND DEFECT-INDUCED RESPONSE TO THERAPY IN OVARIAN CANCER ORGANOIDS

Patients with High Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer (HGSC) have limited therapeutic options. Immuno-oncologic (IO) agents have had limited effect. DNA damage repair gene mutations that may confer repair defects have been identified in up to 50% of HGSCs, making therapies that target repair defects, like PARP, CHK1, and ATR inhibitors, additional options. We have no means of predicting which patients will respond to any of these therapies.

A model system that allows for functional assays to assess for DNA damage repair defects, prediction of response to therapies targeting such defects, and assessment of the functionality of the tumor immune infiltrate and its response to IO agents is needed. Organoids are three-dimensional structures derived from human normal or tumor tissue cells that anatomically and functionally mimic the developed human organ. Organoids mimicking the parent tumor from which they were derived have aided in the study of multiple tumor types. They are inexpensive and easily manipulated and may be an ideal model system for studying ovarian cancer.

We have devised a functional assay platform to profile the DNA damage repair capacity and immune targetability of short-term patient-derived HGSC organoids. The organoids mimic the tumors from which they were derived morphologically, molecularly, and genetically.

We have tested 33 organoid cultures derived from 21 HGSC patients for homologous recombination (HR) and replication fork protection capacity and compared the functional results to the tumor genomic profile. Regardless of repair gene mutational status, an HR functional defect in the organoids correlated with PARP inhibitor sensitivity. A fork protection functional defect correlated with carboplatin, and ATR and CHK1 inhibitor sensitivity. Importantly, this work has led to the discovery of potential therapeutic combinations, such as a CHK1 inhibitor plus carboplatin or gemcitabine that may be useful in treating tumors otherwise resistant to most therapies. Drugs such as carboplatin or gemcitabine can synergize with a CHK1 inhibitor by enhancing replication stress and fork deprotection.

In parallel, we have immune phenotyped the parent tumors and organoid cultures from 15 patients, and shown that the organoid cultures retain lymphocytes expressing relevant IO receptors in the short term. Upon treatment with carboplatin, olaparib, and pembrolizumab as single agents or in combination, we detect changes in IO receptor expression and production of different cytokines in the cultures, suggesting an immune response induced by these agents. We have detected receptor and cytokine alterations that would create an immune suppressive environment with specific drug combinations in tumors with specific repair defects, suggesting that these may be inappropriate combinations for harnessing the immune system in tumors with specific repair capacities.

Continued combined immune and DNA damage repair phenotyping analyses of the organoids will lead to a better understanding of which mechanistic defects are needed to confer sensitivity to DNA damage repair agents, what functional properties and immune milieu lead to sensitivity to IO agents, and how best to combine such therapies. In addition, through further correlation with patient responses over time, HGSC organoids may become a useful tool for rapidly predicting patient response to therapeutic agents.

Citation Format: Sarah J. Hill, Brennan Decker, Emma A. Roberts, Chunyu Yang, Neil S. Horowitz, Michael G. Muto, Michael J. Worley Jr., Colleen M. Feltmate, Marisa R. Nucci, Elizabeth M. Swisher, Ryuji Morizane, Bose Kochupurakkal, Khanh T. Do, Panagiotis Konstantinopoulos, Joyce F. Liu, Joseph V. Bonventre, Ursula A. Matulonis, Geoffrey I. Shapiro, Ross S. Berkowitz, Christopher P. Crum, and Alan D. D'Andrea. REAL-TIME ASSESSMENT OF HGSC DNA DAMAGE REPAIR DEFECTS AND DEFECT-INDUCED RESPONSE TO THERAPY IN OVARIAN CANCER ORGANOIDS [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 12th Biennial Ovarian Cancer Research Symposium; Sep 13-15, 2018; Seattle, WA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2019;25(22 Suppl):Abstract nr AP10.

Abstract GMM-027: DYNLL1 INHIBITS DNA END RESECTION IN BRCA1-DEFICIENT CELLS AND REGULATES PARP INHIBITOR SENSITIVITY

High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) patients with germline mutations in BRCA1/2 exhibit high sensitivity and improved outcome to double strand DNA break (DSB)-inducing agents [i.e. platinum and Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi)] due to underlying defects in DNA repair via homologous recombination (HR). Due to their effectiveness, three PARP inhibitors (olaparib, rucaparib, niraparib) have recently gained FDA approval for the treatment of HGSOCs. However, de novo and acquired resistance to these agents is common even in the BRCA mutation carriers, and pose a significant, and unsolved, clinical challenge. Therefore, we adopted a systematic approach to comprehensibly identify unexplored factors/pathways that could be responsible for PARPi/platinum resistance in BRCA-defective HGSOC patients.

Here we identify DYNLL1 as a negative regulator of DNA end resection through a loss-of-function CRISPR screen in BRCA1-mutant ovarian carcinoma cells. DNA end resection is a vital process that initiates homologous recombination (HR)-mediated repair of double-stranded DNA breaks (DSBs), and consequently influences genome stability. In BRCA-defective HGSOC patients, DNA end resection is greatly compromised and contribute to the loss of HR and PARP inhibitor sensitivity. Loss of DYNLL1 allows DNA end resection and restores HR in BRCA1-mutant cells, thereby inducing resistance to platinum drugs and PARP inhibitors. In primary ovarian carcinomas low BRCA1 expression correlates with increased chromosomal aberrations, and the junction sequences of somatic structural variants indicate the loss of HR. Concurrent decrease in DYNLL1 expression in BRCA1 low ovarian cancers ‘rescued' this phenotype with reduced genomic alterations and increased homology at putative lesions. DYNLL1 limits nucleolytic degradation of DNA ends by interacting with the DNA end resection machinery (MRN complex, BLM helicase and DNA2) in cells. The impact of DYNLL1 on end resection can be re-capitulated in vitro and this is dependent on direct interaction with MRE11. In the absence of exogenous stress, depletion of DYNLL1 slows DNA replication fork progression due to ectopic activity of MRE11. Therefore, we infer that DYNLL1 is an important anti-resection factor that significantly influences genomic stability and response to DNA damaging chemotherapy.

Citation Format: Yizhou Joseph He, Khyati Meghani, Marie-Christine Caron, Chunyu Yang, Daryl A. Ronato, Jie Bian, Anchal Sharma, Jessica Miller, Niraj Joshi, Alexandre Detappe, John G. Doench, Gaelle Legube, David E. Root, Alan D. D'Andrea, Pascal Drané, Subhojyoti De, Panagiotis Konstantinopoulos, Jean-Yves Masson, and Dipanjan Chowdhury. DYNLL1 INHIBITS DNA END RESECTION IN BRCA1-DEFICIENT CELLS AND REGULATES PARP INHIBITOR SENSITIVITY [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 12th Biennial Ovarian Cancer Research Symposium; Sep 13-15, 2018; Seattle, WA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2019;25(22 Suppl):Abstract nr GMM-027.

Functional profiling of nucleotide Excision repair in breast cancer

Homologous recombination deficiency conferred by alterations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 are common in breast tumors and can drive sensitivity to platinum chemotherapy and PARP inhibitors. Alterations in nucleotide excision repair (NER) activity can also impact sensitivity to DNA damaging agents, but NER activity in breast cancer has been poorly characterized. Here, we apply a novel immunofluorescence-based cellular NER assay to screen a large panel of breast epithelial and cancer cell lines. Although the majority of breast cancer models are NER proficient, we identify an example of a breast cancer cell line with profound NER deficiency. We show that NER deficiency in this model is driven by epigenetic silencing of the ERCC4 gene, leading to lack of expression of the NER nuclease XPF, and that ERCC4 methylation is also strongly correlated with ERCC4 mRNA and XPF protein expression in primary breast tumors. Re-expression of XPF in the ERCC4-deficient breast cancer rescues NER deficiency and cisplatin sensitivity, but does not impact PARP inhibitor sensitivity. These findings demonstrate the potential to use functional assays to identify novel mechanisms of DNA repair deficiency and nominate NER deficiency as a platinum sensitivity biomarker in breast cancer.