Treatment patterns in patients with acute myeloid leukemia in the United States: a cross-sectional, real-world survey

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this analysis was to examine treatment patterns in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in routine clinical practice in the United States, including factors influencing the choice of front-line treatment intensity and the effect of age and treatment line.

METHODS

We used data from the Adelphi AML Disease Specific Programme, a real-world, cross-sectional survey conducted in 2015. Physicians completed patient record forms providing patients' demographic and clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

In total, 61 academic, non-academic, and office-based hematologists and hematology/oncology specialists provided data on 457 patients with AML; 284 had ≥20% blasts (World Health Organization defined AML) and were included in the analysis. In the front-line setting, 60% of patients received high-intensity therapy, most commonly cytarabine plus anthracycline; the most common low-intensity treatments were hypomethylating agents. Primary drivers for selecting high-intensity versus low-intensity treatment were age, performance status and comorbidities; 67%, 64% and 61% of physicians stated they would prescribe high-intensity treatment to patients aged <65 years, with good performance status or no comorbidities, respectively. In practice, patients aged <60 years were more likely to receive high-intensity induction treatment (high vs. low intensity by age p < .0001). In a selected cohort of relapsed/refractory patients, 69% of patients received high-intensity therapy (78% of patients aged <60 years and 57% of patients aged ≥60 years).

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients in this analysis of real-world survey data received well established, front-line induction therapies. Treatment intensity was determined by age, comorbidities and performance status, as recommended by guidelines.

Real-World Impact of Physician and Patient Discordance on Health-Related Quality of Life in US Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Introduction

There is limited understanding concerning the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. Due to an overlap of symptoms, it can be difficult to separate disease versus treatment-related effects. Study objectives were to understand the impact of factors that might influence patients’ HRQoL, assess the degree of concordance in symptom reporting by patients and physicians, and assess the impact of any discordance on HRQoL in AML patients.

Methods

Physicians in the USA captured demographics, current AML treatment and symptoms for 82 AML patients who completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Leukemia (FACT-Leu), 5-Dimension EuroQol Questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L) and Cancer Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (CTSQ). Effect size (ES) and clinically meaningful differences between AML subgroups were assessed, as was the impact of disagreement between patients and physicians regarding symptom recognition.

Results

Clinically meaningful lower overall FACT-Leu scores were observed for: relapsed/refractory versus non-relapsed/refractory AML patients (92.5 vs. 103.7; P = 0.09; ES = 0.439), hypomethylating agent (HMA) monotherapy versus other therapies in patients with low treatment intensity (89.9 vs. 112.9; P = 0.0021; ES = 0.971) and presence/absence of FLT3-ITD mutation (85.5 vs. 100; P = 0.148; ES = 0.816). Differences in health state were also clinically meaningful between patients with/without FLT3-ITD; EQ-5D-Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (47.6 vs. 63.7; P = 0.0428; ES = 0.816). Patients were more likely than physicians to report bruising (κ = 0.1292), fatigue (κ = 0.0836), bleeding (κ = 0.0177), weight loss (κ = 0.0821) and appetite loss (κ = − 0.0246). FACT-Leu was associated with patient-physician discordance on bleeding (difference − 14.12; P = 0.046), weight loss (− 21.22; P = 0.001) and appetite loss (− 12.58; P = 0.027).

Conclusions

HRQoL is generally low for AML patients, especially for particular subgroups. Discordance in symptom reporting between patients and physicians was common and associated with further negative impacts on HRQoL. There may be many reasons for this but better communication between physicians and patients may lead to shared objectives and improvement in patients’ HRQoL.

Funding

Astellas Pharma, Inc.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s40487-019-0094-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Addressing the room for improvement in management of acute promyelocytic leukemia

Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is highly curable. To achieve high cure rates, targeted therapy with retinoic acid (ATRA) must be started promptly at time of suspected diagnosis. Early death rates (EDRs, ≤30 days from diagnosis) differ markedly in patients treated on clinical trials compared to the general population.

OBJECTIVES AND METHODS

We used the comprehensive Danish National Acute Leukemia Registry (DNLR) to investigate the incidence, treatment, EDR, and long-term clinical outcome in APL between 2000 and 2014.

RESULTS

Twenty-two of 41 deaths occurring in 122 APL patients were EDs which were primarily caused by intracranial hemorrhage, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), sepsis, and multiorgan failure. The overall EDR was 18.0%, whereas clinical trial participants had an EDR of 6.7%. Fifteen patients recruited to the NCRI AML17 APL trial from 2010 to 2013 were younger and had decreased mortality (HR 0.18, CI 0.04-0.86, P = 0.02) compared to contemporarily treated patients (n = 15) not recruited to a clinical trial. Performance status, leukemia origin, and Sanz-score were independent prognostic variables.

CONCLUSIONS

The very low EDR for on-trial patients is not observed in the general cohort of APL patients. Diagnostic awareness emerges as the greatest clinical challenge in management of APL.

The relationship between clinical trial accrual volume and outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia: A SWOG/ECOG-ACRIN study (S0106 and E1900)

PURPOSE

To study whether institutional clinical trial accrual volume affects clinical outcomes of younger (age less than 61 years) patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We investigated the impact of clinical trial accrual on response rates, early mortality and survival in patients with AML enrolled between 2002 and 2009 into two parallel cooperative group clinical trials SWOG S0106/ECOG-ACRIN E1900. Institutions were classified as low- (LAIs) (≤ 9 enrolled patients) or high-accruing institutions (HAIs) (≥10 enrolled patients). Fisher's exact text and logistic regression analysis were used to analyze the response and early mortality rates. The effect of accrual volume on survival was analyzed by log-rank tests and Cox regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 1252 patients from 152 institutions were included in the final analyses. The median clinical trial registrations in HAIs was 19 patients (range, 10 to 92) versus 3 (range, 1 to 9) patients in LAIs. In multivariate analyses, HAIs, as a quantitative covariate, was associated with improved complete remission rates (odds ratio (OR) 1.08, p = 0.0051), but no improvement median overall survival (HR 0.97, p = 0.065) or median event-free (hazard ratio (HR) 0.97, p = 0.05). Early mortality rates were similar between cohorts and academic affiliation had no impact on response rates or survival.

CONCLUSION

Clinical trial accrual volume, had an independent, albeit modest, impact on complete remission rates, but not on overall survival and event-free in younger patients with AML.

NSAID consumption and risk of acute myeloid leukemia: a national population-based case-control study

Background

Most cases of acute leukemia arise without identifiable risk factors. Studies investigating the impact of autoimmune diseases and infections on leukemogenesis have revealed conflicting results. If inflammation increases the risk of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use may decrease the risk of leukemia.

Methods

We conducted a case-control study of 3,053 patients with AML diagnosed between 2000 and 2013, who were registered in the Danish National Acute Leukemia Registry, and 30,530 population controls matched on sex and age. We identified prescriptions through the Danish National Health Service Prescription Database. We used conditional logistic regression analysis to compute ORs associating AML with NSAID use overall, in patients with inflammatory diseases, and for specific AML subtypes (de novo AML, AML related to previous hematological disease, ie, secondary AML [sAML], or therapy-related AML [tAML; exposed to previous cytotoxic therapy]).

Results

Overall, NSAID use was not associated with a lower risk of AML (OR 1.1, 95% CI=1.0-1.2), de novo AML (OR 1.0, 95% CI=0.9-1.1), and sAML/tAML (OR 1.3, 95% CI=1.1-1.5). In addition, in patients with known inflammatory diseases, NSAIDs did not affect AML risk (OR 0.9, 95% CI=0.5-1.6). Number of prescriptions, type of NSAID, age, or sex did not influence the results.

Conclusion

In line with our recent findings that showed no association between autoimmune diseases and infections and de novo AML, NSAID use was not found to reduce the risk of AML.

Functional genomic landscape of acute myeloid leukaemia

The implementation of targeted therapies for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) has been challenging because of the complex mutational patterns within and across patients as well as a dearth of pharmacologic agents for most mutational events. Here we report initial findings from the Beat AML programme on a cohort of 672 tumour specimens collected from 562 patients. We assessed these specimens using whole-exome sequencing, RNA sequencing and analyses of ex vivo drug sensitivity. Our data reveal mutational events that have not previously been detected in AML. We show that the response to drugs is associated with mutational status, including instances of drug sensitivity that are specific to combinatorial mutational events. Integration with RNA sequencing also revealed gene expression signatures, which predict a role for specific gene networks in the drug response. Collectively, we have generated a dataset-accessible through the Beat AML data viewer (Vizome)-that can be leveraged to address clinical, genomic, transcriptomic and functional analyses of the biology of AML.

CPX-351 (cytarabine and daunorubicin) Liposome for Injection Versus Conventional Cytarabine Plus Daunorubicin in Older Patients With Newly Diagnosed Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Purpose

CPX-351 is a dual-drug liposomal encapsulation of cytarabine and daunorubicin that delivers a synergistic 5:1 drug ratio into leukemia cells to a greater extent than normal bone marrow cells. Prior clinical studies demonstrated a sustained drug ratio and exposure in vivo and prolonged survival versus standard-of-care cytarabine plus daunorubicin chemotherapy (7+3 regimen) in older patients with newly diagnosed secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML).

Patients and Methods

In this open-label, randomized, phase III trial, 309 patients age 60 to 75 years with newly diagnosed high-risk/sAML received one to two induction cycles of CPX-351 or 7+3 followed by consolidation therapy with a similar regimen. The primary end point was overall survival.

Results

CPX-351 significantly improved median overall survival versus 7+3 (9.56 v 5.95 months; hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.90; one-sided P = .003). Overall remission rate was also significantly higher with CPX-351 versus 7+3 (47.7% v 33.3%; two-sided P = .016). Improved outcomes were observed across age-groups and AML subtypes. The incidences of nonhematologic adverse events were comparable between arms, despite a longer treatment phase and prolonged time to neutrophil and platelet count recovery with CPX-351. Early mortality rates with CPX-351 and 7+3 were 5.9% and 10.6% (two-sided P = .149) through day 30 and 13.7% and 21.2% (two-sided P = .097) through day 60.

Conclusion

CPX-351 treatment is associated with significantly longer survival compared with conventional 7+3 in older adults with newly diagnosed sAML. The safety profile of CPX-351 was similar to that of conventional 7+3 therapy.

Abstract 568: Recurrent drug sensitivity patterns in myelodysplastic syndrome patients are recapitulated by ex vivo drug response profiling

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a collection of clonal diseases of dysfunctional hematopoietic stem cells, characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis, cytopenias, and dysplasia. Limited conventional treatment options exist for these patients, with hypomethylating agents remaining the standard of care for higher-risk MDS patients. Drug sensitivity and resistance testing on myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) samples should provide important functional information to guide actionable target and biomarker discovery. We provide proof-of-concept data by profiling the effects of 50 common oncology drugs on 14 myelodysplastic (MDS) samples from both treatment-naïve and refractory cases. Ex vivo high-throughput functional screening was performed on lysed peripheral blood and/or bone marrow aspirate patient samples. This set of samples was analyzed 72 hours post incubation and blasts were quantified by flow cytometry. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering was performed to determine similar responses between patient samples, and produced two distinct groups with differing sensitivity to tested drugs. We defined these groups as “sensitive” and “resistant” clusters based on the prevailing drug sensitivity patterns these groups displayed, the latter being strongly enriched for HMA refractory samples. Ex vivo testing recapitulated known patient drug sensitivity patterns, with 12/14 samples from known HMA refractory vs. sensitive patients showing similar ex vivo phenotypes. Interestingly, sensitive and resistant clusters strongly correlated with known features associated with therapy resistance and poor prognosis in MDS patients, including number of somatic driver mutations (average 2.38 vs. 4.5, P &lt;0.05), absence vs. presence of RUNX1 or ASXL1 mutations (P 0.015 and 0.0256, respectively), and HMA sensitive vs. refractory status (P &lt;0.05). Interestingly, percent bone marrow blasts, cytogenetic risk groups and other somatic mutations had no effect on sensitivity patterns. Furthermore, while the resistant cluster showed increased resistance to most drugs, some drugs seemed to have increased activity in this cluster, including calcitriol and poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor rucaparib. This unique platform, applied to predict ex vivo therapeutic response of MDS patient samples to various classes of drugs, recapitulates known clinical and molecular predictors of therapeutic response, and possible new therapeutic targets. These data suggest the possible utility of using this methodology to aid decision making for therapeutic selection in the management of MDS patients.

Citation Format: Alexey Aleshin, Bruno C. Medeiros, Savita Kamble, Diane Heiser, Marianne Santaguida, Sacha Prashad, Peter L. Greenberg. Recurrent drug sensitivity patterns in myelodysplastic syndrome patients are recapitulated by ex vivo drug response profiling [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 568.

Abstract 3004: Single-cell mutational profiling of clonal evolution in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) during therapy and disease progression

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a collection of clonal diseases with dysfunctional hematopoietic stem cells, characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis, cytopenias, and dysplasia. MDS is increasingly being recognized as a molecularly heterogeneous disease with variability in clinical phenotype, prognosis, and response to treatment. The clonal evolution in response to therapy remains a challenge in the management of MDS. However, resolution of complex clonal architectures is difficult with current bulk sequencing approaches. High-throughput single-cell genomic profiling enables the resolution of tumor heterogeneity, and may improve clinical diagnosis and treatment monitoring by allowing for characterization and early identification of resistant subclonal populations. To enable the characterization of genetic heterogeneity in tumor cell populations, we developed a novel microfluidic approach that barcodes amplified genomic DNA from thousands of individual cells confined to droplets. The barcodes were then used to reassemble the genetic profiles of cells from next-generation sequencing data. We applied this approach to sequential clinical MDS samples, genotyping the most clinically relevant loci across more than 15,000 individual cells. Additionally, to study effects of subclonal mutations on drug sensitivity, ex vivo functional testing was performed on red blood cell-lysed peripheral blood and/or bone marrow aspirate patient samples. Targeted single-cell sequencing was able to recapitulate bulk sequencing data from both peripheral blood and bone marrow aspirate samples. Furthermore, the single-cell nature of our approach enabled definitive determination of mutational co-occurrence within the same cell. For examples in one sample, bulk sequencing identified mutations in JAK2 and NRAS both at 3% variant allele frequency (VAF), where single-cell analysis suggested that these mutations were mutually exclusive, each defining a distinct subclone. Single-cell sequencing allowed for serial monitoring of clonal evolution, with analysis of sequential samples from this same patient showing increase of NRAS clone from 2.5% to 24.7% at time of disease progression after hypomethylating agent therapy. Furthermore, single-cell analysis was able to identify a distinct subclone characterized by a KRAS mutation (0.4% at initiation of therapy and 6.7% at relapse), missed by serial bulk sequencing. Taken together, our results suggest a greater degree of heterogeneity in MDS samples than suggested with bulk sequencing methods alone, and demonstrate utility of single-cell sequencing for sequential monitoring and identification of resistant clones prior to therapy initiation. We show here that this approach is a feasible, scalable, and effective way to identify and track heterogeneous populations of cells in MDS.

Citation Format: Alexey Aleshin, Peter L. Greenberg, Bruno C. Medeiros, Diane Heiser, Marianne Santaguida, Sacha Prashad, Robert Durruthy- Durruthy, Dennis J. Eastburn. Single-cell mutational profiling of clonal evolution in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) during therapy and disease progression [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3004.

A phase I, open-label, dose-escalation study of amrubicin in combination with lenalidomide and weekly dexamethasone in previously treated adults with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

This phase 1 study investigated the safety of the anthracycline amrubicin combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in adults with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. A standard 3 + 3 design was used. Patients received intravenous amrubicin 40-80 mg/m² on day one, lenalidomide 15 mg orally on days 1-14, and dexamethasone 40 mg orally weekly on 21 day cycles. 14 patients were enrolled, and completed a median of three cycles. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached. One patient experienced dose limiting toxicity of dizziness and diarrhea. The most frequent non-hematologic toxicity was infection (79%). Serious adverse events included cord compression and sepsis. Three patients (21%) had a partial response or better, and seven (50%) had stable disease. The median duration of response was 4.4 months, and the median progression-free survival was 3 months. Amrubicin combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone, was safe and demonstrated clinical activity in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01355705.

Autoimmune diseases, infections, use of antibiotics and the risk of acute myeloid leukaemia: a national population-based case-control study

Previous studies reported increased risk of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) in individuals with inflammatory conditions. However, it is unclear whether this association is explained by preceding cytotoxic therapy or haematological diseases. We conducted a nationwide case-control study that included 3053 AML patients, diagnosed in Denmark between 2000 and 2013, and 30 530 sex- and age-matched population controls. We retrieved information on autoimmune disease, infections, and use of antibiotics and computed odds ratios for AML (conditional logistic regression). Results were stratified by AML type, sex, and age. Autoimmune diseases were associated with an overall increased risk of AML {odds ratio [OR] 1·3 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1·1-1·5]}. However, the risk was confined to patients with previous haematological disease or cytotoxic therapy exposure [secondary/therapy-related AML (sAML/tAML0) OR 2·0 (95% CI = 1·6-2·6)] and not de novo AML [OR 1·1 (95% CI = 0·9-1·3)]. Similarly, any prior infection requiring hospitalization was associated with a higher risk of AML [OR 1·3 (95% CI = 1·1-1·4)]. Again, this association was evident for sAML/tAML [OR 1·8 (95% CI = 1·5-2·2)], and not de novo AML [OR 1·1 (95% CI = 1·0-1·2)]. In conclusion, autoimmune diseases and infections were associated with an increased AML risk only in subjects with prior haematological disease and/or cytotoxic treatment. These observations suggest, that inflammation plays - if any - a minor role for the development of de novo AML.

Autophagy mediates proteolysis of NPM1 and HEXIM1 and sensitivity to BET inhibition in AML cells

The mechanisms underlying activation of the BET pathway in AML cells remain poorly understood. We have discovered that autophagy is activated in acute leukemia cells expressing mutant nucleophosmin 1 (NPMc+) or MLL-fusion proteins. Autophagy activation results in the degradation of NPM1 and HEXIM1, two negative regulators of BET pathway activation. Inhibition of autophagy with pharmacologic inhibitors or through knocking down autophagy-related gene 5 (Atg5) expression increases the expression of both NPM1 and HEXIM1. The Brd4 inhibitors JQ1 and I-BET-151 also inhibit autophagy and increase NPM1 and HEXIM1 expression. We conclude that the degradation of NPM1 and HEXIM1 through autophagy in certain AML subsets contributes to the activation of the BET pathway in these cells.

Interpretation of clinical endpoints in trials of acute myeloid leukemia

Treatment regimens for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have remained largely unchanged until recently. Molecular advances have opened the door to targeted therapies, many of which are in late-phase clinical trials. As new therapeutic opportunities arise, it is appropriate to review key aspects of clinical trial design, statistical interpretation of outcomes, and methods of data reporting. Complete remission and overall survival (OS) are common primary endpoints in early-phase AML clinical trials. OS and event-free survival are frequent primary endpoints in phase 3 trials. Clinical trials are designed to address the primary endpoint using prespecified α and power levels. Interpretation of additional endpoints (eg, secondary endpoints and subgroup analyses) must be viewed in light of a trial's statistical design. Furthermore, variations in reporting of endpoints must be considered in order to understand trial outcomes. Time-to-event endpoints are typically reported using Kaplan-Meier curves, which are visually informative. Statistical data derived from these curves can be complex, and a variety of factors may impact interpretation. The purpose of this review is to discuss the nuances of common AML trial endpoints and their data presentation to better inform evaluation and understanding of clinical trial data.

Report of the relapsed/refractory cohort of SWOG S0919: A phase 2 study of idarubicin and cytarabine in combination with pravastatin for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML)

Inhibition of cholesterol synthesis and uptake sensitizes acute myeloid leukemia (AML) blasts to chemotherapy. A Phase 2 study of high dose pravastatin given in combination with idarubicin and cytarabine demonstrated an impressive response rate [75% complete remission (CR), CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi)]. However, this population was a favorable risk group as eligible patients had to have a CR/CRi lasting ≥3 months following their most recent chemotherapy. Therefore, the study was amended to treat patients with poor risk disease including those with CR/CRi <6 months following their last induction regimen or with refractory disease. Here, we present results in this poor risk group. This trial included a significant number of patients with poor risk cytogenetics (43%) and poor risk molecular mutations. The response rate was 30% and approximately one-fourth of patients were able to proceed to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). The median overall survival for patients proceeding to allogeneic HSCT is 27.1 months. Although this trial did not meet criteria for a positive study based on the response rate (p = .062), these results are encouraging given the poor risk population and suggest that targeting the cholesterol pathway may have therapeutic benefit in AML.

Novel Therapeutics in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

In this review, we focus on three key areas in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) developmental therapeutics: FLT3 inhibitors, IDH inhibitors, and drugs that may be particularly beneficial in secondary AML.

Randomized study of continuous high-dose lenalidomide, sequential azacitidine and lenalidomide, or azacitidine in persons 65 years and over with newly-diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia

Therapy of acute myeloid leukemia in older persons is associated with poor outcomes because of intolerance to intensive therapy, resistant disease and co-morbidities. This multi-center, randomized, open-label, phase II trial compared safety and efficacy of three therapeutic strategies in patients 65 years or over with newly-diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: 1) continuous high-dose lenalidomide (n=15); 2) sequential azacitidine and lenalidomide (n=39); and 3) azacitidine only (n=34). The efficacy end point was 1-year survival. Median age was 76 years (range 66–87 years). Thirteen subjects (15%) had prior myelodysplastic syndrome and 41 (47%) had adverse cytogenetics. One-year survival was 21% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0, 43%] with high-dose lenalidomide, 44% (95%CI: 28, 60%) with sequential azacitidine and lenalidomide, and 52% (95%CI: 35, 70%) with azacitidine only. Lenalidomide at a continuous high-dose schedule was poorly-tolerated resulting in a high rate of early therapy discontinuations. Hazard of death in the first four months was greatest in subjects receiving continuous high-dose lenalidomide; hazards of death thereafter were similar. These data do not favor use of continuous high-dose lenalidomide or sequential azacitidine and lenalidomide over the conventional dose and schedule of azacitidine only in patients aged 65 years or over with newly-diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: 01358734).