Phase II study (daNIS-1) of the anti-TGF-β monoclonal antibody (mAb) NIS793 with and without the PD-1 inhibitor spartalizumab in combination with nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine (NG) versus NG alone in patients (pts) with first-line metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC)

TPS4183

Background: Overall survival remains low for pts with mPDAC despite approved therapies, highlighting the need for further innovative treatment options. Intra-tumoral fibrosis that characterizes PDAC has been associated with a state of immune exclusion and may constitute a mechanical obstacle to the intra-tumoral penetration of chemotherapy as well as contribute to the lack of efficacy of immunotherapy. TGF-β plays a key role in regulating the tumor microenvironment and emerging evidence points to its role as a pivotal activator of cancer-associated fibroblasts, leading to the development of fibrotic networks. Preclinical data in murine models have shown that TGF-β blockade augmented the antitumor activity of both NG and anti-PD-1 therapy, leading to tumor regression. These data provide the rationale for combining TGF-β-targeting agents with immunotherapy and chemotherapy. NIS793 is a human IgG2 mAb that binds to TGF-β. This study investigates NIS793 with and without spartalizumab (PD-1 antagonist) combined with NG in treatment naïve mPDAC. Methods: This is a phase II open-label, randomized, multicenter study (NCT04390763) beginning with a safety run-in period followed by randomization. Eligible pts are adults with previously untreated mPDAC and ECOG performance status score ≤1. Pts are excluded if they have a microsatellite-unstable tumor. The safety run-in data will be analyzed after ≥6 pts have received NIS793 (intravenously [IV] 2100 mg Q2W) + spartalizumab (IV 400 mg Q4W) + nab-paclitaxel (IV 125 mg/m2 on Days 1, 8 and 15) + gemcitabine (IV 1000 mg/m2 on Days 1, 8 and 15) for 1 cycle (28 days) to assess the safety and tolerability of the combination. In the randomized part, pts will be randomized 1:1:1 to NIS793 + spartalizumab + NG (n = 50) or NIS793 + NG (n = 50) or NG (n = 50). Treatment will continue until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, discontinuation by investigator’s/pt’s choice, or withdrawal of consent. The primary objective is to evaluate the progression-free survival per RECIST 1.1, of NIS793 + NG ± spartalizumab versus NG alone. Secondary objectives include safety and tolerability, antitumor activity, overall survival, change in tumoral CD8 and PD-L1 status, and characterization of immunogenicity and pharmacokinetics. Efficacy will be assessed locally per RECIST v1.1 and iRECIST at screening, every 8 weeks for 1 year and then every 12 weeks until disease progression. Blood and tumor samples will be taken at baseline and during study treatment for pharmacokinetic, immunogenicity and biomarker assessments. This study is ongoing and will enroll pts from 31 sites across 14 countries. The first pt was treated on October 22, 2020. Enrollment for the randomized part of the study started on August 09, 2021. Clinical trial information: NCT04390763.

A study of senaparib in combination with temozolomide for the treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors and extensive-stage small cell lung cancer

3102

Background: Senaparib (or IMP4297) is a PARP inhibitor with a novel chemical structure. Preliminary data demonstrate senaparib has significant anti-tumor activity with good tolerability in some patients with advanced solid tumors. DNA damage caused by temozolomide, a non-classic oral alkylating agent, can sensitize tumors to the effects of PARP inhibitors. In a xenograft model, synergistic antitumor effect was observed with the combination of senaparib and temozolomide, supporting this trial (NCT04434482). Methods: This is a phase Ⅰb/Ⅱ dose-escalation and dose-expansion study. Patients with advanced solid tumors were enrolled for dose escalation to evaluate the safety, tolerability using a modified “3+3” design. Low dose temozolomide (20 to 30 mg, once daily, days 1 to 21) in combination with continuous senaparib (40 to 80 mg, once daily, days 1 to 28) of each 28-day cycle was evaluated. Dose expansion will establish anti-tumor activity and safety of the combination in patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Results: A total of 14 patients were enrolled for dose escalation as follows: Cohort 1 (1 patient; senaparib 40 mg plus temozolomide 20 mg), Cohort 2 (3 patients; senaparib 60 mg plus temozolomide 20 mg), Cohort 3 (7 patients; senaparib 80 mg plus temozolomide 20 mg), Cohort 4 (3 patients; senaparib 80 mg plus temozolomide 30 mg). One DLT (Grade 4 thrombocytopenia) was observed in Cohorts 3 and 4. The MTD and RP2D were determined as: senaparib 80 mg plus temozolomide 20 mg. Anaemia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were the only Grade ≥3 TEAEs occurring in > 1 patient. All AEs were manageable, and no treatment related deaths were reported. The ORR was observed in 3 of 12 (25.0%) evaluable patients, including 2 confirmed PR and 1 unconfirmed PR. The DCR was 83.3% (10 of 12 evaluable patients). Two patients remain on treatment for more than 1 year. Conclusions: Preliminary results suggest that low dose temozolomide (D1-21 of a 28-day cycle) in combination with continuous senaparib is generally well tolerated with encouraging anti-tumor activity. Recruitment for dose expansion for ES-ECLC patients has commenced (Sep 2021). Clinical trial information: NCT04434482.

Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients (pts) with radioiodine-refractory (RAIR) differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes in prespecified subgroups based on histology subtypes

6081

Background: DTC comprises multiple histology subtypes, the most common being papillary and follicular. Based on results of the phase 3 COSMIC-311 trial, the multikinase inhibitor cabozantinib was recently approved by FDA for the treatment of pts with RAIR DTC who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy (Brose et al. 2021). In an extended follow-up, median (m) progression-free survival (PFS) was 11 months (mo) for cabozantinib vs 1.9 mo for placebo (HR 0.22, 96% CI 0.15–0.32, P<.0001) in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (Capdevila et al. ESMO 2021. Abstr LBA67). Here we present outcomes for prespecified subgroups based on the baseline histology subtypes of papillary and follicular thyroid cancers. Methods: Pts were randomized 2:1 to cabozantinib (60 mg QD) or placebo. Placebo pts could cross over to open-label cabozantinib upon disease progression per blinded independent radiology committee (BIRC). Primary endpoints were PFS (ITT) and objective response rate (ORR, first 100 randomized pts), per RECIST v1.1 assessed by BIRC. Results: After a median follow-up of 10.1 mo, 258 pts (170 cabozantinib, 88 placebo) had been randomized (data cutoff 8 Feb 2021); 150 pts (96 cabozantinib, 54 placebo) had papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) and 113 pts (78 cabozantinib, 35 placebo) had follicular thyroid cancer (FTC), with the PTC and FTC subgroups each including 5 pts with both PTC and FTC. Sixty-three pts (̃56%) within the FTC subgroup had Hurthle cell and poorly differentiated variants. mPFS was 9.2 mo for cabozantinib vs 1.9 mo for placebo in the PTC subgroup (HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.17–0.43) and 11.2 mo vs 2.6 mo in the FTC subgroup (HR 0.18, 95% CI 0.10–0.31). The mPFS was 11.1 mo for cabozantinib and 1.9 mo for placebo for pts with Hurthle cell and poorly differentiated variants (HR 0.12, 95% CI 0.05–0.27). The ORR was 15% for cabozantinib vs 0% for placebo in the PTC subgroup and 8% vs 0% in the FTC subgroup. Median duration of cabozantinib exposure was 5.5 mo for the PTC subgroup and 7.3 mo for FTC. Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) in the cabozantinib arm occurred in 59% of pts in the PTC subgroup and 68% of pts in the FTC subgroup; discontinuations due to TEAE occurred in 17% and 15% of pts, respectively. Conclusions: In the extended follow-up, cabozantinib maintained superior efficacy vs placebo irrespective of histology subtype, including the aggressive Hurthle cell and poorly differentiated variants. The moderately higher rates of grade 3/4 TEAE in the FTC vs the PTC subgroup could be attributed to the longer median duration of exposure of cabozantinib in the FTC subgroup. Clinical trial information: NCT03690388.

Pralsetinib in patients (pts) with advanced or metastatic RET-altered thyroid cancer (TC): Updated data from the ARROW trial

6080

Background: Alterations in RET are targetable oncogenic drivers in TC. Pralsetinib is a highly potent, selective RET inhibitor, with demonstrated efficacy in pts with RET-altered TC. In a previous analysis of the Phase I/II ARROW trial (NCT03037385; data cutoff: 22 May 2020), overall response rates [ORR; measurable-disease population] with pralsetinib at 400 mg once daily (QD) were 60% (33/55) and 71% (15/21) in pts with RET-mutant medullary TC ( RET-mutant MTC) who had received prior multikinase inhibitors cabozantinib and/or vandetanib (C/V), and those who were treatment naïve, respectively, and 89% (8/9) in pts with previously treated RET fusion-positive TC ( RET-fp TC). Here we report an updated analysis of these cohorts in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Methods: Adult pts with RET-altered locally advanced/metastatic TC who had enrolled in ARROW and initiated pralsetinib at 400 mg QD, were included. Phase II primary endpoints: ORR (by blinded independent central review, per RECIST v1.1) and safety. Efficacy endpoints for this analysis were assessed in the ITT population. Safety was assessed in all pts with RET-altered TC who initiated pralsetinib at 400 mg QD. Enrolment cutoff: 23 August 2020 for the ITT population; data cutoff: 12 April 2021. Results: The ITT population comprised 145 pts with RET-mutant MTC (with or without prior systemic therapy, including C/V) and 22 pts with RET-fp TC, 21 of whom had received prior systemic therapy (including multikinase inhibitor[s] and/or radioactive iodine). In pts with RET-mutant MTC who had received prior C/V (n = 67), ORR was 51% (34/67; 95% CI 38–63; 2 complete responses [CR]; 32 partial responses [PR]), median duration of response (DoR) was 25.8 months (95% CI 18.0–not reached [NR]) and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 24.9 months (95% CI 19.7–31.2). In treatment-naïve pts with RET-mutant MTC, ORR was 72% (48/67; 95% CI 59–82; 4 CR; 44 PR), and median DoR and median PFS were not reached. In pts with previously treated RET-fp TC, ORR was 86% (18/21; 95% CI 64–97; 3 CR; 15 PR), median DoR was 17.5 months (95% CI 16.0–NR) and median PFS was 19.4 months (95% CI 13.0–NR). Median overall survival (OS) was not reached in any of the cohorts. The safety population comprised 172 pts with RET-altered TC treated at 400 mg QD. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were increased aspartate aminotransferase (n = 67; 39%), anemia (n = 60; 35%), hypertension (n = 57; 33%) and decreased white blood cell count (n = 52; 30%). Serious TRAEs were reported in 27 pts (16%); the most frequent was pneumonitis (n = 5; 3%). Nine pts (5%) discontinued pralsetinib due to a TRAE and one patient ( < 1%) died due to a TRAE ( pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia) following 44 days ( < 3 cycles) on pralsetinib. Conclusions: In this updated analysis including more pts, pralsetinib continues to be efficacious with a manageable safety profile in pts with RET-altered TC. Clinical trial information: NCT03037385.

A phase 1/2 study of BLU-945 in patients with common activating EGFR-mutant non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): SYMPHONY trial in progress

TPS9156

Background: Although EGFR-targeted therapies have improved outcomes in patients with EGFR-mutant ( EGFRm) NSCLC, such as EGFR ex19del and L858R, resistance to these drugs is inevitable. BLU-945 is an investigational next-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) designed to suppress common activating and on-target resistance EGFR mutations, such as C797S and T790M. Preclinically it has shown activity as monotherapy in osimertinib-resistant patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. In addition, BLU-945 has > 450-fold selectivity for C797S and T790M mutants over wildtype, advantageous for combinations with complementary EGFR-targeting agents, such as osimertinib. These combinations have shown enhanced activity in PDX models. The SYMPHONY trial (BLU-945-1101; NCT04862780) is an international, open-label, first-in-human, phase 1/2 study designed to evaluate safety, tolerability, and antitumor activity of BLU-945 as monotherapy and in combination with osimertinib in patients with EGFRm NSCLC. Methods: Key eligibility criteria include adults with pathologically confirmed metastatic NSCLC with an activating EGFR mutation, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0–1, and previous treatment with ≥1 EGFR-targeted TKI. Patients with asymptomatic brain metastases who are on stable doses of corticosteroids are eligible. Tumors with additional known driver alterations, including EGFR exon 20 insertions and other kinase drivers, are excluded. Primary endpoints are maximum tolerated dose, recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) and safety (phase 1); and overall response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1 (phase 2). Key secondary endpoints include ORR, duration of response (DOR), pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD; phase 1); and DOR, progression-free survival, overall survival, CNS efficacy, PK, and safety (phase 2). Phase 1 dose escalation will be done using Bayesian optimal interval design; ̃85 patients will receive BLU-945 monotherapy and ̃18 will receive combination BLU-945 and osimertinib. In the phase 2 dose expansion, patients will receive BLU-945 at the RP2D of the monotherapy in 3 groups based on EGFR mutational profile: T790M and C797S (n≈37), T790M, but not C797S (n≈12), and C797S, but not T790M (n≈12). In a combination group, BLU-945 plus osimertinib will be administered at RP2D of the combination to n≈24 patients, ≥12 with both T790M and C797S mutations. Patients may receive treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Recruitment has started and approximately 30 sites will be open for enrollment across North America, Europe, and Asia. Clinical trial information: NCT04862780.

Clinical outcomes for patients with thymoma and thymic carcinoma after undergoing different front-line chemotherapy regimens

Background

Front‐line platinum‐base chemotherapy for advanced thymoma and thymic carcinoma (TC) improves resectability and prolongs patients' overall survival (OS). In this study, we evaluated patients' outcomes given different front‐line regimens: cisplatin, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (CAP); cisplatin and etoposide (EP); or cisplatin and paclitaxel (TP).

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively evaluated the medical records of patients with advanced thymoma and TC who were treated at our medical center between 2005 and 2015. We investigated objective response rates (ORRs), progression‐free survival (PFS), and OS after undergoing different front‐line regimens.

Results

Among the 108 enrolled patients, 37 (34%) had thymoma and 71 (66%) had TC; 45 received CAP, 36 received EP, and 27 received TP regimens. The ORRs of patients receiving CAP, EP, and TP were 51%, 50%, and 41%, respectively. For patients with stage III and IVA disease, the median PFS after CAP, EP, and TP were 34.5, 26.4, and 18.0 months (p = 0.424), respectively, and the 5‐year OS rates were 84.9%, 70.6%, and 60.0% (p = 0.509). In patients with stage IVB disease, the median PFS were 9.4, 8.2, and 11.6 months after undergoing CAP, EP, and TP (p = 0.173), respectively, and the 5‐year OS rates were 41.1%, 39.1%, and 14.3% (p = 0.788). TC pathology subtype and liver metastasis were associated with poor OS. Three patients with stage IVB TC had an OS of more than 5 years.

Conclusion

Different front‐line chemotherapy regimens may provide similar long‐term PFS and OS in patients with advanced thymoma and TC. In addition to TC and liver metastasis were associated with poor OS, other potential prognostic factors are warranted for studying.

Surface Wrinkling on Polymer Films

A series of gold precursor solutions are prepared by dissolving HAuCl₄ and its mixtures with K₂CO₃ of different contents in deionized (DI) water. Neat HAuCl₄ predominately forms AuCl₄^- ions in an aqueous solution. In the presence of K₂CO₃, AuCl₄^- ions hydrolyze to form [AuCl_4-x(OH)_x]^- complex ions. Increasing the content of K₂CO₃ in a gold precursor solution increases the content of [AuCl_4-x(OH)_x]^- complex ions and decreases the content of AuCl₄^- ions. Poly(4-vinyl pyridine) (P4VP) films of two different molecular weights are deposited on SiO_x/Si by spin coating, by which the thicknesses are controlled by polymer weight fractions in butanol. Those P4VP films form periodic wrinkles when immersed in aqueous solutions, followed by drying. The surface wrinkling is induced by swelling pressure that overwhelms the mechanical property of the P4VP film. The periodicity and amplitude of wrinkles grown on the P4VP films strongly correlate with initial thickness, AuCl₄^- ion content, and residual stress.

Results from a First-in-Human Phase I Study of Siremadlin (HDM201) in Patients with Advanced Wild-Type TP53 Solid Tumors and Acute Leukemia

PURPOSE

This phase I, dose-escalation study investigated the recommended dose for expansion (RDE) of siremadlin, a p53-MDM2 inhibitor, in patients with wild-type TP53 advanced solid or hematologic cancers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Initial dosing regimens were: 1A (day 1; 21-day cycle; dose 12.5-350 mg) and 2A (days 1-14; 28-day cycle; dose 1-20 mg). Alternative regimens included 1B (days 1 and 8; 28-day cycle) and 2C (days 1-7; 28-day cycle). The primary endpoint was incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) during cycle 1.

RESULTS

Overall, 115 patients with solid tumors and 93 with hematologic malignancies received treatment. DLTs occurred in 8/92 patients with solid tumors and 10/53 patients with hematologic malignancies. In solid tumors, an RDE of 120 mg was defined in 1B. In hematologic tumors, RDEs were defined in 1A: 250 mg, 1B: 120 mg, and 2C: 45 mg. More patients with hematologic malignancies compared with solid tumors experienced grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (71% vs. 45%), most commonly resulting from myelosuppression. These were more frequent and severe in patients with hematologic malignancies; 22 patients exhibited tumor lysis syndrome. Overall response rates at the RDEs were 10.3% [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.2-27.4] in solid tumors and 4.2% (95% CI, 0.1-21.1), 20% (95% CI, 4.3-48.1), and 22.2% (95% CI, 8.6-42.3) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in 1B, 1A, and 2C, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A common safety profile was identified and preliminary activity was noted, particularly in AML. Comprehensive investigation of dosing regimens yielded recommended doses/regimens for future combination studies.

A single-arm phase II study of cabozantinib and atezolizumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (R/M ESCC) who failed platinum-based chemotherapy

TPS364

Background: Patients with R/M ESCC failing platinum-based chemotherapy have grave prognosis. Anti PD-1 immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), by demonstrating survival benefits over 2nd-line chemotherapy in multiple phase III trials, have emerged as a new standard-of-care for patients with platinum-refractory R/M ESCC. However, the efficacy of anti-PD-1 ICIs remains modest with an objective response rate (ORR) of 17-20%; and the median overall survivals (OS) for these patients range from 8.2 to 10 months. Cabozantinib, a multikinase inhibitor, in combination with atezolizumab has been investigated in the phase Ib COSMIC-021 trial, which includes multiple cohorts of various cancer types including gastroesophageal cancer and head-and-neck cancer. Promising preliminary results were reported in lung cancer and genitourinary cancer cohorts. To investigate the combination of cabozantinib plus atezolizumab in patients with ESCC, a subtype of esophageal cancer that may be under-represented in the gastroesophageal cancer cohort of COSMIC-021 trial, we thus proposed this phase II trial to verify the hypothesis whether adding cabozantinib to atezolizumab would improve the outcomes of R/M ESCC patients who have failed platinum-based chemotherapy. Methods: This single institution single-arm phase II study includes patients with histologically confirmed R/M ESCC who failed at least one platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients with prior exposure of any ICI or kinase inhibitor are excluded. Patients enrolled will receive cabozantinib 40mg once per day and atezolizumab 1200mg once every three weeks until disease progression or intolerable toxicities. The primary endpoint of this study is the ORR evaluated by RECIST 1.1; and the key secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, OS, and toxicity profile. We hypothesize that combination of cabozantinib plus atezolizumab will improve the ORR from 15% to 30%. With one-sided, 0.1 type I error (α), 0.2 type II error (β, corresponding power: 0.8), the sample size will be 37. The study, registered with clinical trial ID of NCT05007613, started patient enrollment in Jun 2021. As of Sep of 2021, 5 patients have been enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT05007613.

Phase 1 study of nanoliposomal irinotecan in combination with trifluridine/tipiracil in refractory solid tumors

660

Background: Nal-IRI is irinotecan (as known as CPT-11) encapsulated in a nanoliposome drug delivery system (nanoliposomal irinotecan; nal-IRI). Nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV has been approved in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer after gemcitabine-based therapy through the NAPOLI-1 study. TAS-102 is a combination drug of trifluridine (FTD), an antineoplastic thymidine analog, and tipiracil hydrochloride (TPI), a thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor. TAS-102 has been approved in metastatic colorectal cancer and gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Given both drugs show antitumor activity in various cancers, this study is to identify the MTD (maximum tolerated dose) and recommended phase II dose (RP2D), and to explore the preliminary efficacy of nal-IRI and TAS-102 combination in solid tumors. Methods: This multi-center phase I study consists of a classical 3 + 3 dose finding portion and an expansion portion. Eligible patients have pathologically confirmed solid malignancies with no standard treatment available. Patients will be treated with nal-IRI at dose of 60, 70, 80 mg/m2 over 90 minutes on day 1, and oral TAS-102 25, 30, 35 mg/m2 twice daily on day 1-5, every 14 days. Patients who have homozygous for the UGT1A1*28 allele ( TA7/TA7) or UGT1A1*6 allele ( A/A), or double heterozygous for both UGT1A1*28 allele ( TA6/TA7) and UGT1A1*6 allele ( G/A) will be excluded from the dose finding portion. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT 03810742. Results: From February 2019 to May 2021, a total of 43 (male/female: 27/16; median age 56, range 25-69) patients (pts) were treated, including 28 in the dose finding portion in which 3, 3, 3, 3, 7, 3 and 6 pts were at levels 1, 2A, 2B, 3, 4A, 4B and 5, respectively, and 15 pts in the expansion portion. The results here are reported from the dose finding portion. The most common cancer types were cholangiocarcinoma (N = 6), neuroendocrine tumor (N = 3), and ampulla of Vater (N = 3). DLTs were noted at one patient who had G4 sepsis and G3 diarrhea at level 4A (80/30), and two subjects who had G3 diarrhea and G3 dehydration at level 5 (80/35). The dosage of the level 4A is determined to be the MTD and it is also the RP2D for the expansion phase. Most common treatment related toxicities during the DLT observation period (the first 2 cycles) are neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, fatigue, and vomiting. In this dose finding portion, 4 pts had partial response and 17 pts had stable disease as the best response. Conclusions: The MTD of Nal-IRI in combination with TAS-102 every 2 weeks is 80/30 mg/m2, which is also the RP2D for expansion study. The clinical benefit was observed in pts at different dose levels. The expansion portion of the study is still ongoing and pts will be followed until disease progression or consent withdrawal. Clinical trial information: NCT03810742.

Targeting CD38 and PD-1 with isatuximab plus cemiplimab in patients with advanced solid malignancies: results from a phase I/II open-label, multicenter study

Background

Preclinical data suggest that concurrent treatment of anti-CD38 and antiprogrammed death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibodies substantially reduce primary tumor growth by reversing T-cell exhaustion and thus enhancing anti-PD-1/PD-L1 efficacy.

Methods

This phase I/II study enrolled patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) or advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The primary objectives of phase I were to investigate the safety and tolerability of isatuximab (anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody)+cemiplimab (anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, Isa+Cemi) in patients with mCRPC (naïve to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy) or NSCLC (progressed on anti-PD-1/PD-L1-containing therapy). Phase II used Simon’s two-stage design with response rate as the primary endpoint. An interim analysis was planned after the first 24 (mCRPC) and 20 (NSCLC) patients receiving Isa+Cemi were enrolled in phase II. Safety, immunogenicity, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity were assessed, including CD38, PD-L1, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in the tumor microenvironment (TME), and peripheral immune cell phenotyping.

Results

Isa+Cemi demonstrated a manageable safety profile with no new safety signals. All patients experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event. Grade≥3 events occurred in 13 (54.2%) patients with mCRPC and 12 (60.0%) patients with NSCLC. Based on PCWG3 criteria, assessment of best overall response with Isa+Cemi in mCRPC revealed no complete responses (CRs), one (4.2%) unconfirmed partial response (PR), and five (20.8%) patients with stable disease (SD). Per RECIST V.1.1, patients with NSCLC receiving Isa+Cemi achieved no CR or PR, and 13 (65%) achieved SD. In post-therapy biopsies obtained from patients with mCRPC or NSCLC, Isa+Cemi treatment resulted in a reduction in median CD38+ tumor-infiltrating immune cells from 40% to 3%, with no consistent modulation of PD-L1 on tumor cells or T regulatory cells in the TME. The combination triggered a significant increase in peripheral activated and cytolytic T cells but, interestingly, decreased natural killer cells.

Conclusions

The present study suggests that CD38 and PD-1 modulation by Isa+Cemi has a manageable safety profile, reduces CD38+ immune cells in the TME, and activates peripheral T cells; however, such CD38 inhibition was not associated with significant antitumor activity. A lack of efficacy was observed in these small cohorts of patients with mCRPC or NSCLC.

Trial registration numbers

NCT03367819.

Immunotherapy in anaplastic thyroid cancer: Case series

Unresectable anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) has a poor prognosis. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy have limited effects on it. Here, we present four cases who underwent immunotherapy for ATC. The patients were aged between 58 and 70 years. Two male patients with pulmonary metastases received pembrolizumab and lenvatinib. However, they died of septic shock and respiratory failure in 2.7 and 1 months, respectively, after the initiation of combination therapy. Another male patient with stage IVB disease was treated with spartalizumab. The tumor remained stable after surgical debulking but slightly progressed after 23 months. He survived for 45.5 months after spartalizumab initiation. A female patient with BRAF-mutant ATC and lung metastases was treated with a combination of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib, which was complicated with grade 4 transaminitis. The patient subsequently received dabrafenib (a BRAF inhibitor) and trametinib (a MEK inhibitor) treatment, which was continued for 10.2 months with a best response of partial remission. She died 18 months after the initial diagnosis (11.4 months after treatment with dabrafenib and trametinib). In conclusion, the treatment responses of immunotherapy, either alone or in combination with other therapies, were highly variable in patients with ATC and should be carefully monitored along with the side effects.

Co-Targeting of MDM2 and CDK4/6 with Siremadlin and Ribociclib for the Treatment of Patients with Well-Differentiated or Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma: Results From a Proof-of-Concept, Phase Ib Study

PURPOSE

Well-differentiated (WDLPS) and dedifferentiated (DDLPS) liposarcoma are characterized by co-amplification of the murine double minute-2 (MDM2) and cyclin-dependent kinase-4 (CDK4) oncogenes. Siremadlin, a p53-MDM2 inhibitor, was combined with ribociclib, a CDK4/6 inhibitor, in patients with locally advanced/metastatic WDLPS or DDLPS who had radiologically progressed on, or despite, prior systemic therapy.

METHODS

In this proof-of-concept, phase Ib, dose-escalation study, patients received siremadlin and ribociclib across different regimens until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, and/or treatment discontinuation: Regimen A (4-week cycle: siremadlin once daily [QD] and ribociclib QD, [2 weeks on, 2 weeks off]); Regimen B (3-week cycle: siremadlin once every 3 weeks; ribociclib QD [2 weeks on, 1 week off]); Regimen C (4-week cycle: siremadlin once every 4 weeks; ribociclib QD [2 weeks on, 2 weeks off]). The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and/or recommended dose for expansion (RDE) of siremadlin plus ribociclib in one or more regimens.

RESULTS

As of 16 October 2019 (last patient last visit), 74 patients had enrolled. Median duration of exposure was 13 (range, 1-174) weeks. Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in 10 patients, most of which were Grade 3/4 hematologic events. The RDE was siremadlin 120 mg every 3 weeks plus ribociclib 200 mg QD (Regimen B). Three patients achieved a partial response, and 38 achieved stable disease. One patient (Regimen C) died as a result of treatment-related hematotoxicity.

CONCLUSION

Siremadlin plus ribociclib demonstrated manageable toxicity and early signs of antitumor activity in patients with advanced WDLPS or DDLPS.

Safety and Antitumor Activity of α-PD-L1 Antibody as Monotherapy or in Combination with α-TIM-3 Antibody in Patients with Microsatellite Instability-High/Mismatch Repair-Deficient Tumors

PURPOSE

Immune checkpoint inhibitors show high response rates and durable clinical benefit in microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) tumors. However, 50%-60% do not respond to single-agent anti-programmed death-1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) antibodies, and approximately 50% of responders relapse within 6-12 months. This phase Ib trial evaluated safety and antitumor activity of anti-PD-L1 antibody LY3300054 monotherapy or in combination with anti-TIM-3 antibody LY3321367 in patients with MSI-H/dMMR advanced solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients ≥18 years without prior anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy received LY3300054 monotherapy (N = 40) or combination (N = 20); patients with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-resistant/refractory tumors received the combination (N = 22). LY3300054 (700 mg) and anti-TIM-3 antibody (cycles 1-2: 1,200 mg, cycle 3 onward: 600 mg) were administered intravenously every 2 weeks. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability.

RESULTS

Eighty-two patients were enrolled. Most had colorectal (n = 39, 47.6%) or endometrial (n = 14, 17.1%) tumors. More than 70% of patients in the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-resistant/refractory combination cohort had received ≥3 treatment lines. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) occurred in 22 patients (55.0%) receiving monotherapy, 13 (65.0%) in the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-naïve combination cohort, and 6 (27.3%) in the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-resistant/refractory combination cohort. A total of 2 patients (5.0%) receiving monotherapy and 3 (7.1%) receiving the combination experienced grade ≥3 TRAEs. Objective responses occurred in 13 patients (32.5%) with monotherapy, 9 (45.0%) in the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-naïve combination cohort, and 1 patient (4.5%) in the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-resistant/refractory combination cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

LY3300054 monotherapy and combined LY3300054/anti-TIM-3 had manageable safety profiles. Both regimens showed promising clinical activity against PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-naïve MSI-H/dMMR tumors. The combination had limited clinical benefit in patients with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-resistant/refractory MSI-H/dMMR tumors.

A Phase 1 Study of Sapanisertib (TAK-228) in East Asian Patients with Advanced Nonhematological Malignancies

BACKGROUND

Sapanisertib is an oral, highly selective inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin complexes 1 and 2.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, preliminary efficacy, and to establish the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of sapanisertib.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this dose-escalation and expansion study, East Asian patients with nonhematologic malignancies received increasing sapanisertib doses once-daily (QD; starting at 2 mg) or once-weekly (QW; starting at 20 mg) in 28-day cycles.

RESULTS

Among 28 patients (QD dosing, n = 22; QW dosing, n = 6), three dose-limiting toxicities were reported (stomatitis [n = 2], gastrointestinal inflammation, gingivitis, and acute myocardial infarction [all n = 1]), all in the 4 mg QD cohort. The RP2D of sapanisertib was 3 mg QD. The most common adverse events were stomatitis (64%), nausea (50%), and decreased appetite (50%) in the QD arm, and nausea (100%), blood alkaline phosphatase increased (67%), and hyperglycemia (67%) in the QW arm. The T_max of sapanisertib was ~ 0.5-2.6 h and the T_1/2 was ~ 5.9-7.6 h. Three patients achieved stable disease for ≥ 6 months (1 each in 3 mg QD, 4 mg QD and 20 mg QW cohorts, respectively); the clinical benefit rate was 45% and 67% in the QD and QW arms, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The RP2D of sapanisertib in East Asian patients (3 mg QD) was lower than in Western patients (4 mg QD), but the pharmacokinetics and safety profiles were similar. Sapanisertib was well tolerated and showed moderate anti-tumor effects in heavily pretreated patients with nonhematologic malignancies.

NCT NUMBER

NCT03370302; Registered December 7, 2017.

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Efficacy of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan with Concomitant Ritonavir or Itraconazole in Patients with HER2-Expressing Advanced Solid Tumors

PURPOSE

To evaluate drug-drug interactions between the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd; DS-8201a) and the OATP1B/CYP3A inhibitor ritonavir or the strong CYP3A inhibitor itraconazole.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with HER2-expressing advanced solid tumors were enrolled in this phase I, open-label, single-sequence crossover study (NCT03383692) and received i.v. T-DXd 5.4 mg/kg every 3 weeks. Patients received ritonavir (cohort 1) or itraconazole (cohort 2) from day 17 of cycle 2 through the end of cycle 3. Primary endpoints were maximum serum concentration (C max) and partial area under the concentration-time curve from beginning of cycle through day 17 (AUC17d) for T-DXd and deruxtecan (DXd) with (cycle 3) and without (cycle 2) ritonavir or itraconazole treatment.

RESULTS

Forty patients were enrolled (cohort 1, n = 17; cohort 2, n = 23). T-DXd C max was similar whether combined with ritonavir [cohort 1, cycle 3/cycle 2; 90% confidence interval (CI): 1.05 (0.98-1.13)] or itraconazole [cohort 2, 1.03 (0.96-1.09)]. T-DXd AUC17d increased from cycle 2 to 3; however, the cycle 3/cycle 2 ratio upper CI bound remained at ≤1.25 for both cohorts. For DXd (cycle 3/cycle 2), C max ratio was 0.99 (90% CI, 0.85-1.14) for cohort 1 and 1.04 (0.92-1.18) for cohort 2; AUC17d ratio was 1.22 (1.08-1.37) and 1.18 (1.11-1.25), respectively. The safety profile of T-DXd plus ritonavir or itraconazole was consistent with previous studies of T-DXd monotherapy. T-DXd demonstrated promising antitumor activity across HER2-expressing solid-tumor types.

CONCLUSIONS

T-DXd was safely combined with ritonavir or itraconazole without clinically meaningful impact on T-DXd or DXd pharmacokinetics.

Serial Plasma Cell-Free Circulating Tumor DNA Tests Identify Genomic Alterations for Early Prediction of Osimertinib Treatment Outcome in EGFR T790M-Positive NSCLC

Introduction

Recent advances in the detection of genomic DNA from plasma samples allow us to follow tumor DNA shedding in plasma during systemic treatment. Osimertinib is the standard of care for patients with NSCLC with acquired EGFR T790M mutations. We assessed changes in serial plasma cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) genomic alterations to predict osimertinib efficacy.

Methods

We prospectively collected plasma from patients having EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC previously treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy and with acquired EGFR T790M mutation detected by standard methods. Plasma samples were collected before starting osimertinib treatment, 4 weeks after osimertinib treatment, and on progression. ctDNA was analyzed using the Guardant360 assay.

Results

A total of 15 eligible patients received osimertinib. Before starting treatment, EGFR-activating mutations were detected in the ctDNA of all patients, and EGFR T790M was detected in 93% of the cases. Osimertinib treatment was associated with an objective response rate of 53% and a median progression-free survival of 7.3 months. A total of 12 of the 15 patients had undetectable plasma T790M and decreased activating mutation allelic frequency (AF) at week 4. None of the 12 patients had disease progression within 16 weeks. For the remaining three patients, with detectable plasma T790M (n = 2) or increased activating mutation AF (n = 1) at week 4, two had progressive disease within 16 weeks (p = 0.03).

Conclusions

In patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC, persistent EGFR T790M or increasing activating mutation AF as detected in ctDNA 4 weeks after the start of osimertinib treatment may predict disease progression within 16 weeks.

Phase 1b Open-Label Trial of Afatinib Plus Xentuzumab (BI 836845) in Patients With EGFR Mutation-Positive NSCLC After Progression on EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Introduction

Insulin-like growth factor signaling has been implicated in acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in NSCLC. This phase 1 trial (NCT02191891) investigated the combination of xentuzumab (an insulin-like growth factor-ligand neutralizing monoclonal antibody) and afatinib (an EGFR TKI) in patients with previously treated EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC.

Methods

The trial comprised dose escalation (part A) and expansion (part B). Patients had advanced or metastatic NSCLC that had progressed on EGFR TKI monotherapy or platinum-based chemotherapy (nonadenocarcinoma only, part A) or irreversible EGFR TKI monotherapy (part B). Absence of EGFR T790M mutation was required in part B. Part A used a 3 + 3 design, with a starting dose of xentuzumab 1000 mg/wk (intravenous) and afatinib 30 mg/d (oral). Primary endpoints were the maximum tolerated dose of the combination (part A) and objective response (part B).

Results

A total of 16 patients each were treated in parts A and B. Maximum tolerated dose was xentuzumab 1000 mg/wk plus afatinib 40 mg/d. No patients in part B had an objective response, but 10 had stable disease (median [range] duration of disease control: 2.3 [0.8–10.9] mo). The most common drug-related adverse events were diarrhea (75 %), paronychia (69 %), and rash (69 %) in part A and diarrhea (31 %), rash (19 %), paronychia (19 %), and fatigue (19 %) in part B.

Conclusions

There were no new safety issues; xentuzumab and afatinib could be safely coadministered. Nevertheless, the combination revealed only modest activity in patients with EGFR mutation-positive, T790M-negative NSCLC after progression on afatinib.

Evaluating online learning engagement of nursing students

BACKGROUND

Previous studies suggest that increased learning satisfaction may encourage learning engagement in an online learning environment.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the level of learning engagement and its relationship with students' perceived learning satisfaction in an online clinical nursing elective course.

DESIGN

A prospective interventional study.

SETTINGS

A nursing course was converted to an online format because of the coronavirus disease COVID pandemic.

PARTICIPANTS

Part-time post-registration nursing undergraduates enrolled in an elective online clinical course.

METHODS

Related teaching and learning strategies were deployed in the course using the Community of Inquiry framework. All students who completed the course were invited to complete an online survey that included a validated Online Student Engagement questionnaire (OSE). Pearson's correlations were used to determine the association between perceived learning satisfaction and learning engagement. A logistic regression model was used to explore the associations of gender, age, working experience and perceived learning satisfaction with higher learning engagement.

RESULTS

The questionnaires were completed by 56 of 68 students (82%). The Pearson's correlation coefficient between the mean perceived learning satisfaction and OSE scores was 0.75 (p < .001). Twenty-five students (45%) were identified as highly engaged, using a cut-off of ≥3.5 for the mean OSE score. The mean perceived learning satisfaction (SD) score differed significantly between highly engaged and not highly engaged students [4.02 (0.49) vs. 3.27 (0.62), p < .001]. The logistic regression model showed that a greater perceived learning satisfaction [adjusted odds ratio (OR): 17.2, 95% C.I.: 3.46-86.0, p = .001] was associated with an increased likelihood of higher learning engagement, and >1 year of working experience (adjusted OR: 0.11, 95% C.I.: 0.01-0.89, p = .0039) was associated with a decreased likelihood of higher learning engagement.

CONCLUSIONS

The study findings suggest that perceived learning satisfaction predicts learning engagement among nursing students in this online learning course.

Prognostic value of PD-L1 expression on immune cells or tumor cells for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

PURPOSE

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression may influence the prognosis of patients with localized esophageal cancer. The current study compared the prognostic value of PD-L1 expression between tumor cells and immune cells.

METHODS

Archival esophageal tumor tissue samples were collected from patients who received paclitaxel and cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in three prospective phase II trials. PD-L1 expression on tumor and immune cells was examined immunohistochemically by using the SP142 antibody and scored by two independent pathologists. The association of PD-L1 expression with patient's outcomes was analyzed using a log-rank test and Cox regression multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients were included. PD-L1 expression on tumor cells was positive (≥ 1%, TC-positive) in 55 patients; PD-L1 expression on immune cells was high (≥ 5%, IC-high) in 30 patients. TC-positive status was associated with poor overall survival (OS) (HR: 1.63, P = 0.035), whereas IC-high status was associated with improved OS (HR: 0.44, P = 0.0024). Multivariate analysis revealed that TC-positive, IC-high, and performance status were independent prognostic factors for progression-free survival and that IC-high and performance status were independent factors for OS. Furthermore, the combination of IC-high and TC-negative status was associated with the optimal OS, whereas that of TC-positive and IC-low status was associated with the worst OS.

CONCLUSION

PD-L1 expression on tumor and immune cells may have different prognostic value for patients with locally advanced ESCC receiving neoadjuvant CRT. A combination of these two indexes may further improve the prognostic prediction.

Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Recurrent or Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma May Be Affected by Tumor Sites

INTRODUCTION

Heterogeneous tumor response has been reported in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). This study investigated whether the tumor site is associated with the response to ICIs in patients with recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

Patients with ESCC who had measurable tumors in the liver, lung, or lymph node (LN) according to the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and received ICIs at 2 medical centers in Taiwan were enrolled. In addition to RECIST 1.1, tumor responses were determined per individual organ basis according to organ-specific criteria modified from RECIST 1.1. Fisher test or χ2 test was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 37 patients were enrolled. The overall response rate per RECIST 1.1 was 13.5%. Measurable tumors in the LN, lung, and liver were observed in 26, 17, and 13 patients, respectively. The organ-specific response rates were 26.9%, 29.4%, and 15.4% for the LN, lung, and liver tumors, respectively (p = 0.05). The organ-specific disease control rates were 69.2%, 52.9%, and 21.1% for the LN, lung, and liver tumors, respectively (p = 0.024). Five (27.8%) among 18 patients harboring at least 2 involved organs had heterogeneous tumor response.

CONCLUSION

The response and disease control to ICIs may differ in ESCC tumors located at different metastatic sites, with a lesser likelihood of response and disease control in metastatic liver tumors than in tumors located at the LNs and lung.

Pralsetinib for patients with advanced or metastatic RET-altered thyroid cancer (ARROW): a multi-cohort, open-label, registrational, phase 1/2 study

BACKGROUND

Oncogenic alterations in RET represent important therapeutic targets in thyroid cancer. We aimed to assess the safety and antitumour activity of pralsetinib, a highly potent, selective RET inhibitor, in patients with RET-altered thyroid cancers.

METHODS

ARROW, a phase 1/2, open-label study done in 13 countries across 71 sites in community and hospital settings, enrolled patients 18 years or older with RET-altered locally advanced or metastatic solid tumours, including RET-mutant medullary thyroid and RET fusion-positive thyroid cancers, and an Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 (later limited to 0-1 in a protocol amendment). Phase 2 primary endpoints assessed for patients who received 400 mg once-daily oral pralsetinib until disease progression, intolerance, withdrawal of consent, or investigator decision, were overall response rate (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1; masked independent central review) and safety. Tumour response was assessed for patients with RET-mutant medullary thyroid cancer who had received previous cabozantinib or vandetanib, or both, or were ineligible for standard therapy and patients with previously treated RET fusion-positive thyroid cancer; safety was assessed for all patients with RET-altered thyroid cancer. This ongoing study is registered with clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03037385, and enrolment of patients with RET fusion-positive thyroid cancer was ongoing at the time of this interim analysis.

FINDINGS

Between Mar 17, 2017, and May 22, 2020, 122 patients with RET-mutant medullary and 20 with RET fusion-positive thyroid cancers were enrolled. Among patients with baseline measurable disease who received pralsetinib by July 11, 2019 (enrolment cutoff for efficacy analysis), overall response rates were 15 (71%) of 21 (95% CI 48-89) in patients with treatment-naive RET-mutant medullary thyroid cancer and 33 (60%) of 55 (95% CI 46-73) in patients who had previously received cabozantinib or vandetanib, or both, and eight (89%) of nine (95% CI 52-100) in patients with RET fusion-positive thyroid cancer (all responses confirmed for each group). Common (≥10%) grade 3 and above treatment-related adverse events among patients with RET-altered thyroid cancer enrolled by May 22, 2020, were hypertension (24 patients [17%] of 142), neutropenia (19 [13%]), lymphopenia (17 [12%]), and anaemia (14 [10%]). Serious treatment-related adverse events were reported in 21 patients (15%), the most frequent (≥2%) of which was pneumonitis (five patients [4%]). Five patients [4%] discontinued owing to treatment-related events. One (1%) patient died owing to a treatment-related adverse event.

INTERPRETATION

Pralsetinib is a new, well-tolerated, potent once-daily oral treatment option for patients with RET-altered thyroid cancer.

FUNDING

Blueprint Medicines.

Cabozantinib for radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (COSMIC-311): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) previously treated with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-targeted therapy have aggressive disease and no available standard of care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the tyrosine kinase inhibitor cabozantinib in this patient population.

METHODS

In this global, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, patients aged 16 years and older with radioiodine-refractory DTC (papillary or follicular and their variants) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 were randomly assigned (2:1) to oral cabozantinib (60 mg once daily) or matching placebo, stratified by previous lenvatinib treatment and age. The randomisation scheme used stratified permuted blocks of block size six and an interactive voice-web response system; both patients and investigators were masked to study treatment. Patients must have received previous lenvatinib or sorafenib and progressed during or after treatment with up to two VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Patients receiving placebo could cross over to open-label cabozantinib on disease progression confirmed by blinded independent radiology committee (BIRC). The primary endpoints were objective response rate (confirmed response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours [RECIST] version 1.1) in the first 100 randomly assigned patients (objective response rate intention-to-treat [OITT] population) and progression-free survival (time to earlier of disease progression per RECIST version 1.1 or death) in all patients (intention-to-treat [ITT] population), both assessed by BIRC. This report presents the primary objective response rate analysis and a concurrent preplanned interim progression-free survival analysis. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03690388, and is no longer enrolling patients.

FINDINGS

Between Feb 27, 2019, and Aug 18, 2020, 227 patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom 187 were enrolled from 164 clinics in 25 countries and randomly assigned to cabozantinib (n=125) or placebo (n=62). At data cutoff (Aug 19, 2020) for the primary objective response rate and interim progression-free survival analyses, median follow-up was 6·2 months (IQR 3·4-9·2) for the ITT population and 8·9 months (7·1-10·5) for the OITT population. An objective response in the OITT population was achieved in ten (15%; 99% CI 5·8-29·3) of 67 patients in the cabozantinib group versus 0 (0%; 0-14·8) of 33 in the placebo (p=0·028) but did not meet the prespecified significance level (α=0·01). At interim analysis, the primary endpoint of progression-free survival was met in the ITT population; cabozantinib showed significant improvement in progression-free survival over placebo: median not reached (96% CI 5·7-not estimable [NE]) versus 1·9 months (1·8-3·6); hazard ratio 0·22 (96% CI 0·13-0·36; p<0·0001). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 71 (57%) of 125 patients receiving cabozantinib and 16 (26%) of 62 receiving placebo, the most frequent of which were palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia (13 [10%] vs 0), hypertension (11 [9%] vs 2 [3%]), and fatigue (ten [8%] vs 0). Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in 20 (16%) of 125 patients in the cabozantinib group and one (2%) of 62 in the placebo group. There were no treatment-related deaths.

INTERPRETATION

Our results show that cabozantinib significantly prolongs progression-free survival and might provide a new treatment option for patients with radioiodine-refractory DTC who have no available standard of care.

FUNDING

Exelixis.

Abstract LB040: Targeting CD38 and PD-1 with isatuximab (Isa) plus cemiplimab (Cemi) in patients (pts) with advanced malignancies: Results from a Phase 1/2 open-label, multicenter study

Background: CD38 is implicated in noncanonical adenosine synthesis and its overexpression on tumor cells has been implicated in T-cell exhaustion and resistance to immune checkpoint blockade. Preclinical data suggest that concurrent treatment of anti-CD38 and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies substantially reduce primary tumor growth via suppressing acquired resistance to immune checkpoint blockade, and thus enhancing anti-PD-1/PD-L1 efficacy. Methods: This Phase 1/2 study (NCT03367819) enrolled pts with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) or advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The primary objectives of Phase 1 were safety and tolerability of Isa (anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody) + Cemi (anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody) in pts with mCRPC (naïve to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy) or NSCLC (progressed on anti-PD-1/PD-L1-containing therapy). Phase 2 used a Simon's 2-stage design with response rate (RR) as the primary endpoint. An interim analysis was planned after the first 24 (mCRPC) and 20 (NSCLC) pts receiving Isa+Cemi were enrolled in Phase 2. Tolerability, immunogenicity, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity were assessed, including CD38, PD-L1, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in the tumor microenvironment (TME), and peripheral immune cell phenotyping. Results: Isa+Cemi demonstrated a manageable safety profile with no new safety signals. All pts experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event. Grade ≥3 events occurred in 13 (54.2%) mCRPC pts and 12 (60.0%) NSCLC pts. Based on PCWG3 criteria, assessment of best overall response (BOR) with Isa+Cemi in mCRPC revealed no complete responses (CR), 1 unconfirmed partial response (PR) (4.2%), and 5 (20.8%) pts with stable disease (SD). Per RECIST 1.1, NSCLC pts receiving Isa+Cemi achieved no CR or PR, and 13 (65%) achieved SD. Isa+Cemi resulted in ~40% reduction in CD38+ tumor-infiltrating immune cells in post-therapy biopsies. The combination triggered a significant increase in peripheral activated and cytolytic T cells, but decreased NK cells. In addition, low baseline CD38 levels on tumor cells were observed in NSCLC pts who progressed on prior checkpoint inhibitor treatment. No significant modulation of Tregs or PD-L1 in the TME or CD38 expression on tumor cells was observed. Conclusions: The present study suggests that CD38 and PD-1 modulation by Isa+Cemi has a manageable safety profile, reduces CD38+ immune cells in the TME, and activates peripheral T cells; however, this was not associated with significant antitumor activity in these small cohorts of mCRPC and NSCLC pts.

Citation Format: Chia-Chi Lin, Paolo Zucali, Bradley Carthon, Todd M. Bauer, Marcello Tucci, Antoine Italiano, Roberto Iacovelli, Wu-Chou Su, Christophe Massard, Monsoor Saleh, Gennaro Daniele, Alastair Greystoke, Martin Gutierrez, Shubham Pant, Ying-Chun Shen, Matteo Perrino, Robin Meng, Giovanni Abbadessa, Helen Lee, Yingwen Dong, Marielle Chiron, Rui Wang, Laure Loumagne, Johann de Bono, Johann de Bono. Targeting CD38 and PD-1 with isatuximab (Isa) plus cemiplimab (Cemi) in patients (pts) with advanced malignancies: Results from a Phase 1/2 open-label, multicenter study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr LB040.