A comparison of once-daily triamcinolone acetonide aqueous and twice-daily beclomethasone dipropionate aqueous nasal sprays in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis

Ragweed pollen is the most frequent cause of allergic rhinitis in the late summer-fall in North America. The objectives of this multicenter, randomized, single-blind study are to assess the efficacy and safety of triamcinolone acetonide aqueous (TAA AQ) and beclomethasone dipropionate aqueous (BDP) in the treatment of adult patients with seasonal ragweed-induced allergic rhinitis. Patient's self-assessment of comfort with medication and health-related quality of life were also assessed. A total of 152 patients were randomized to treatment with TAA AQ 200 micrograms once daily in the morning (n = 75) or BDP twice-daily 336 micrograms/day (n = 77). Both treatments were shown to be effective in alleviating the symptoms of allergic rhinitis, with no significant differences between the two treatments in mean reduction from baseline of nasal stuffiness, discharge, nasal index (sum of discharge, stuffiness, and sneezing), itching, and total eye symptoms. There were no significant differences between treatments in quality of life scores. However, TAA AQ was described by patients as having a better taste and smell than aqueous BDP (p < or = 0.05). Both treatments were well tolerated and associated with a similar incidence of adverse events. These results show that both once-daily TAA AQ 220 micrograms and twice-daily BDP 336 micrograms are well tolerated and effective in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. In addition, both treatments are equally as effective at improving patient health-related quality of life. However, patients preferred the odor and taste of TAA AQ over BDP. It is likely that once-daily dosing and patient preference for the sensory attributes of TAA AQ may enhance treatment compliance.

Effect of omalizumab on symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis: a randomized controlled trial

CONTEXT

Seasonal allergic rhinitis is a common IgE-mediated disorder that produces troublesome symptoms. A recombinant humanized monoclonal anti-IgE antibody (omalizumab) forms complexes with free IgE, blocking its interaction with mast cells and basophils and lowering free IgE levels in the circulation.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of omalizumab for prophylaxis of symptoms in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging, placebo-controlled trial conducted from July 25 through November 21, 1997.

SETTING

Twenty-five outpatient centers throughout the United States.

PATIENTS

Five hundred thirty-six patients aged 12 to 75 years with at least a 2-year history of moderate to severe ragweed-induced seasonal allergic rhinitis and a baseline IgE level between 30 and 700 IU/mL.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly assigned to receive omalizumab, 50 mg (n = 137), 150 mg (n = 134), or 300 mg (n = 129), or placebo (n = 136) subcutaneously just prior to ragweed season and repeated during the pollen season every 3 weeks in patients with baseline IgE levels of 151 to 700 IU/mL (4 total treatments) and every 4 weeks in patients with baseline IgE levels of 30 to 150 IU/mL (3 total treatments).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Self-assessed daily nasal symptom severity scores (range, 0-3), rescue antihistamine use, and rhinitis-specific quality of life during the 12 weeks from the start of treatment.

RESULTS

Nasal symptom severity scores were significantly lower in patients who received 300 mg of omalizumab than in those who received placebo (least squares means, 0.75 vs 0.98, respectively; P =.002). A significant association was observed between IgE reduction and nasal symptoms and rescue antihistamine use. Rhinitis-specific quality of life scores were consistently better in patients who received 300 mg of omalizumab than in those who received lower dosages or placebo and did not decline during peak season. The frequency of adverse events was not significantly different among the omalizumab and placebo groups.

CONCLUSION

Omalizumab decreased serum free IgE levels and provided clinical benefit in a dose-dependent fashion in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Use of nasal steroids in managing allergic rhinitis

Intranasal steroids are highly effective drugs for treating patients with allergic rhinitis. First-line use of intranasal steroids is becoming increasingly common, and intranasal steroids can be used alone or in combination with other therapies to achieve optimal improvement in rhinitis symptoms. The major adverse effect of intranasal steroids is local irritation. This article reviews the mechanism of action of corticosteroids, the effects of intranasal steroids on chemical mediators of inflammation, and the risks and benefits associated with their use.

Effects of the inhaled corticosteroids fluticasone propionate, triamcinolone acetonide, and flunisolide and oral prednisone on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in adult patients with asthma

Two multicenter, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies were conducted in adult patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma to assess the effects of 4 weeks of treatment with inhaled corticosteroids on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis function. The first study compared fluticasone propionate 100 and 500 microg twice daily, triamcinolone acetonide 300 and 500 microg twice daily, oral prednisone 10 mg every morning, and placebo. The second study compared fluticasone propionate 100 and 250 microg twice daily, flunisolide 500 microg twice daily, and placebo. Therapeutic doses of fluticasone propionate, triamcinolone acetonide, and flunisolide were found to be comparable to each other and to placebo in their lack of adrenal suppressive effects, based on mean plasma cortisol responses to 6-hour cosyntropin infusion. Prednisone produced significantly greater suppression of HPA-axis function than did any of the inhaled corticosteroids or placebo (P<0.001). Mean reductions from baseline in 8-hour area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and 8-hour peak plasma cortisol concentrations and the mean percentage of change from baseline in 8-hour AUC were significantly greater after treatment with triamcinolone acetonide 500 microg twice daily compared with placebo (P< or =0.042). These findings indicate that fluticasone propionate has no greater systemic effect than either triamcinolone acetonide or flunisolide at doses appropriate for patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma.

Onset of action of mometasone furoate nasal spray (NASONEX) in seasonal allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS, NASONEX ), is a new synthetic corticosteroid with considerable efficacy in the treatment of seasonal and perennial rhinitis and less than 0.1% systemic absorption. This study was designed to evaluate the time of onset of action of MFNS. The subjects were evaluated over the course of 2 weeks during the spring allergy season.

METHODS

The effects of MFNS 200 microg given once daily for 2 weeks were evaluated in a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in 201 patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Clinically significant onset of action was assessed prospectively by special patient diary cards kept during the first 3 days of treatment.

RESULTS

By 12 h after initial dosage (the earliest evaluation), 28% of patients in the MFNS group experienced clinically significant relief, compared with 13% of those given placebo (P = 0.01). Median time to at least moderate symptom relief in patients who received MFNS was 35.9 h, compared with more than 72 h in patients given placebo (P<0.01). By 72 h, 64% of the patients receiving MFNS experienced at least moderate relief, compared with 40% of those treated with placebo (P<0.01). Both patient and physician ratings of symptom severity, response to treatment, and overall condition of rhinitis indicated significant (P<0.01) superiority of MFNS over placebo. MFNS was well tolerated, with adverse events comparable to placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

MFNS provided rapid onset of clinically significant symptom relief in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Salmeterol powder compared with albuterol aerosol as maintenance therapy for asthma in adolescent and adult patients

Two multicenter, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled studies involving 451 adolescent and adult patients with mild-to-moderate asthma compared the efficacy and safety of salmeterol powder 50 micrograms twice daily with albuterol 180 micrograms four times daily or placebo (with albuterol as needed) for 12 weeks. Patients had forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of 50% to 80%. Throughout the 12-week treatment period, the mean change from baseline in percentage of predicted FEV1 was significantly greater with salmeterol than with placebo; mean area under the curve for FEV1 was significantly greater with salmeterol than with albuterol or placebo. Significant improvements in morning and evening peak expiratory flow, percentage of nights without awakening, and asthma symptoms were observed with salmeterol. Salmeterol was well tolerated, and no clinically significant changes in electrocardiographic activity were observed.

Efficacy and safety of triamcinolone acetonide aqueous nasal spray in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

In order to accommodate increasing patient preferences a new aqueous formulation of triamcinolone acetonide nasal spray was developed for the relief of symptoms associated with seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis.

OBJECTIVE

This multicenter, randomized, double-blind study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily triamcinolone acetonide aqueous nasal spray (220 micrograms/day) with placebo in relieving the symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis due to ragweed.

METHODS

One hundred forty patients received either a once daily 220-microgram dose of triamcinolone acetonide aqueous nasal spray or placebo for 2 weeks. Patients evaluated the severity of seasonal allergic rhinitis symptoms daily for 2 weeks according to a 4-point scale (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe). Physician and patient global evaluations of overall treatment effectiveness were assessed at the end of the treatment period.

RESULTS

Patients receiving triamcinolone acetonide aqueous nasal spray, 220 micrograms/day, had significantly (P < .05) greater improvements in all rhinitis symptoms at weeks 1 and 2 and overall for the 2-week treatment period compared with the placebo group. A significant (P = .006) improvement in the nasal index occurred as early as 12 hours after the first dose of triamcinolone acetonide aqueous nasal spray. Both patients and physicians reported a greater overall improvement in symptoms for the triamcinolone acetonide aqueous nasal spray group. There were no differences between the two treatment groups in the incidence of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirmed that a 220-microgram dose of triamcinolone acetonide aqueous nasal spray, administered once daily for 2 weeks, is well tolerated and reduces effectively the severity of symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis due to ragweed.

Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray compared with terfenadine tablets in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Comparative studies with topical corticosteroids and antihistamines for treatment of allergic rhinitis have not always demonstrated clear distinctions between the two on the basis of therapeutic efficacy.

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray with those of terfenadine in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

METHODS

Three hundred forty-eight patients with allergic rhinitis were given fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray (200 micrograms once daily), terfenadine tablets (60 mg twice daily), or placebo for 4 weeks in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study.

RESULTS

Clinician-rated total nasal symptom scores after 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks of therapy and patient-rated total nasal symptom scores throughout treatment were significantly (p <0.05) lower in the fluticasone propionate group compared with the terfenadine group or the placebo group. Terfenadine was not statistically different from placebo on the basis of clinician-related nasal symptom scores, except for sneezing. Total nasal airflow, measured by rhinomanometry, significantly (p <0.05) improved in the fluticasone propionate group compared with the terfenadine group or the placebo group. More fluticasone propionate-treated patients compared with placebo-treated patients had reduced nasal mucosal eosinophil counts after 4 weeks of therapy (p <0.05). No serious or unusual drug-related adverse events were reported. Morning plasma cortisol concentrations after 4 weeks of therapy did not differ among groups.

CONCLUSION

Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray is more effective than terfenadine tablets for treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Fluticasone propionate aerosol: efficacy in patients with mild to moderate asthma. Fluticasone Propionate Asthma Study Group

BACKGROUND

This double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study investigated the efficacy and tolerability of fluticasone propionate aerosol (25, 50, or 100 mg bid for 12 weeks) administered as primary maintenance therapy to patients whose mild to moderate asthma was inadequately controlled by as-needed use of an inhaled beta-agonist.

RESULTS

At all clinic visits, fluticasone propionate compared with placebo was associated with significant (P<.05) improvement in pulmonary function indexed by forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) as well as fewer night awakenings and less use of rescue albuterol. Values for patient-measured morning peak expiratory flow rates (PEFR) were significantly (P<.05) higher and the use of rescue albuterol was significantly (P<.05) lower beginning 3 to 5 days after initiation of therapy in the groups treated with fluticasone propionate, compared with the placebo group. Maximal improvement in FEV1 was achieved during the second week of treatment and maintained throughout the course of therapy. Differences among the three fluticasone propionate dosing groups for these efficacy measures were not statistically significant. The incidence of adverse events was similar across groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that fluticasone propionate aerosol is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for asthma and significantly improves pulmonary function within days of initiation of treatment in patients whose asthma is inadequately controlled with as-needed beta-agonists.

Safety and efficacy of azelastine nasal spray (Astelin NS) for seasonal allergic rhinitis: a 4-week comparative multicenter trial

BACKGROUND

Azelastine is a chemically novel investigational antiallergy drug with the ability to antagonize the effects of chemical mediators of the early- phase and late phase allergic responses suggesting its usefulness in the treatment of upper and lower airway diseases.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this 4-week, double- bind, multicenter trial was to evaluate the efficacy of azelastine nasal spray in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

METHODS

Two hundred sixty-four subjects 12 years of age and older were randomized to receive either azelastine, 2 sprays/nostril qd; azelastine, 2 sprays/nostril bid; oral chlorpheniramine maleate, 12 mg bid; or placebo. The primary efficacy parameters were the changes in major and total symptom severity scores.

RESULTS

Overall, across all 4 weeks of treatment, the mean percent improvements in the total and major symptom complex severity scores in both azelastine treatment groups were greater than those for the placebo group. For the azelastine 2 sprays bid group, the overall results were significant at P = .05 for the major symptom complex score and at .05 < P = .10 for the total symptom complex score versus placebo. For both azelastine treatment groups, improvements in all of the individual rhinitis symptoms were superior to those for the placebo group and, in general were clinically and statistically significant. Azelastine nasal spray was well tolerated; adverse experiences were generally application site reactions, mild to moderate, and not limiting to continued treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Azelastine nasal spray demonstrated broad clinical antirhinitis activity that for the 2 sprays/nostril bid dosage regimen was consistently clinically and statistically significant.

Fluticasone propionate aerosol for the treatment of adults with mild to moderate asthma. The Fluticasone Propionate Asthma Study Group

BACKGROUND

Recent emphasis on the control of airway inflammation in asthma highlights the need for safe and effective antiinflammatory agents. Fluticasone propionate is one of the most potent antiinflammatory corticosteroids developed to date.

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the safety and efficacy of fluticasone propionate aerosol in the treatment of mild to moderate asthma.

METHODS

Fluticasone propionate aerosol (25, 100, or 500 micrograms twice daily) or placebo was given for as long as 8 weeks to adults with mild to moderate asthma in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. Patients were removed from the study if they showed predefined signs of worsening asthma.

RESULTS

Sixty-three percent of placebo-treated patients and 23%, 13%, and 4% of patients treated with fluticasone propionate 25, 100, and 500 micrograms twice daily, respectively, were removed from the study. Mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second, forced vital capacity, and forced expiratory flow at midexpiratory phase at weekly visits throughout the study demonstrated that fluticasone propionate was more efficacious than placebo in maintaining asthma control. Measurements of peak expiratory flow and symptom scores significantly improved and nighttime awakenings and albuterol use to treat symptoms significantly declined in fluticasone propionate-treated groups relative to the placebo-treated group. Differences among fluticasone propionate groups for these variables were not statistically significant. Incidence and severity of adverse events were similar across groups. Fluticasone propionate did not affect morning or stimulated plasma cortisol concentrations, although slight, transient reductions in urinary free cortisol and urinary 17-hydroxy steroids occurred in the group receiving 500 micrograms fluticasone propionate twice daily.

CONCLUSION

These data indicate that fluticasone propionate provides safe and effective treatment for mild to moderate asthma.

A comparison of salmeterol with albuterol in the treatment of mild-to-moderate asthma

BACKGROUND

An effective, long-acting bronchodilator could benefit patients with asthma who have symptoms not controlled by antiinflammatory drugs. We compared a new long-acting, inhaled beta 2-adrenoceptor agonist, salmeterol, with a short-acting beta 2-agonist, albuterol, in the treatment of mild-to-moderate asthma.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 234 patients (150 male and 84 female patients 12 to 73 years old) to one of three treatment groups: one group received 42 micrograms of salmeterol twice daily, one received 180 micrograms of albuterol four times daily, and one received placebo. Treatment was assigned in a double-blind fashion, and all patients could use supplemental inhaled albuterol as needed during the 12-week treatment period.

RESULTS

Measurements of the forced expiratory volume in one second, performed hourly for 12 consecutive hours, showed that a single dose of salmeterol produced a greater mean area under the curve than two doses of albuterol taken 6 hours apart (6.3 vs. 4.9 liter.hr, P < 0.05). The difference was significant on day 1 and at week 4 of the study, but not at week 8 or 12. Salmeterol was also more effective than albuterol or placebo (with albuterol taken as needed) in increasing the morning peak expiratory flow rate: salmeterol induced a mean increase of 24 liters per minute over the pretreatment values, as compared with a decrease of 6 liters per minute with albuterol (P < 0.001) and an increase of 1 liter per minute with placebo (P = 0.002). The mean overall symptom score was improved most by salmeterol treatment (P < 0.05), with the number of days with symptoms and of nights with awakenings decreasing by 22 percent and 52 percent, respectively; there were no differences in results between albuterol treatment and placebo administration. We found no evidence of tolerance to the bronchodilating effects of salmeterol, and adverse reactions to all the treatments were infrequent and mild.

CONCLUSIONS

For the management of mild-to-moderate asthma, salmeterol given twice daily is superior to albuterol given either four times daily or as needed.