26
|
Fonseca J, Taveira-Gomes T, Pereira AM, Branco-Ferreira M, Carreiro-Martins P, Alves-Correia M, Correia de Sousa J, Costa E, Lourenço O, Morais-Almeida M, Morête A, Regateiro F, Todo Bom A, Bachert C, Pfaar O, Wallace D, Bedbrook A, Czarlewski W, Bousquet J. [ARIA 2019: An Integrated Care Pathway for Allergic Rhinitis in Portugal]. ACTA MEDICA PORT 2021; 34:144-157. [PMID: 33275547 DOI: 10.20344/amp.13777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Revised: 11/04/2020] [Accepted: 11/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
The Allergic Rhinitis and Its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) initiative started more than 20 years ago and has developed and disseminated evidence-based guidelines and projects in the field of allergic rhinitis. This initiative is currently focused on providing patient-centred guidelines that contribute to an integrated care pathway between the various levels of care and take advantage of digital solutions, and the introduction of integrated care pathways in clinical practice has been recommended. In this article we describe the adaptation for Portugal of the ARIA Integrated Care Pathways document. After a brief review of the epidemiology and impact of allergic rhinitis in Portugal and the activities carried out in Portugal within the ARIA initiative, we describe the broad knowledge base used for the development of recommendations for the pharmacological treatment of allergic rhinitis, and these recommendations are based on the GRADE methodology, real world evidence acquired by mobile technology (mHealth) and resulting from allergenic exposure chamber studies. What follows is a summary of integrated care pathways for allergen immunotherapy produced in 2019. Allergen immunotherapy is considered an example of precision medicine where the use of mHealth technologies will improve stratification for patient selection and response monitoring. These recommendations were considered as best practices of integrated patient-centred care supported by digital systems from Directorate General for Health and Food Safety of the European Union (DG Santé) and represent the ARIA Phase 4 Change Management strategy.
Collapse
|
27
|
Fritsch C, Gout JF, Haroon S, Towheed A, Chung C, LaGosh J, McGann E, Zhang X, Song Y, Simpson S, Danthi PS, Benayoun BA, Wallace D, Thomas K, Lynch M, Vermulst M. Genome-wide surveillance of transcription errors in response to genotoxic stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2021; 118:e2004077118. [PMID: 33443141 PMCID: PMC7817157 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2004077118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Mutagenic compounds are a potent source of human disease. By inducing genetic instability, they can accelerate the evolution of human cancers or lead to the development of genetically inherited diseases. Here, we show that in addition to genetic mutations, mutagens are also a powerful source of transcription errors. These errors arise in dividing and nondividing cells alike, affect every class of transcripts inside cells, and, in certain cases, greatly exceed the number of mutations that arise in the genome. In addition, we reveal the kinetics of transcription errors in response to mutagen exposure and find that DNA repair is required to mitigate transcriptional mutagenesis after exposure. Together, these observations have far-reaching consequences for our understanding of mutagenesis in human aging and disease, and suggest that the impact of DNA damage on human physiology has been greatly underestimated.
Collapse
|
28
|
Bédard A, Basagaña X, Anto JM, Garcia-Aymerich J, Devillier P, Arnavielhe S, Bedbrook A, Onorato GL, Czarlewski W, Murray R, Almeida R, Fonseca JA, Correia da Sousa J, Costa E, Morais-Almeida M, Todo-Bom A, Cecchi L, De Feo G, Illario M, Menditto E, Monti R, Stellato C, Ventura MT, Annesi-Maesano I, Bosse I, Fontaine JF, Pham-Thi N, Thibaudon M, Schmid-Grendelmeier P, Spertini F, Chavannes NH, Fokkens WJ, Reitsma S, Dubakiene R, Emuzyte R, Kvedariene V, Valiulis A, Kuna P, Samolinski B, Klimek L, Mösges R, Pfaar O, Shamai S, Roller-Wirnsberger RE, Tomazic PV, Ryan D, Sheikh A, Haahtela T, Toppila-Salmi S, Valovirta E, Cardona V, Mullol J, Valero A, Makris M, Papadopoulos NG, Prokopakis EP, Psarros F, Bachert C, Hellings PW, Pugin B, Bindslev-Jensen C, Eller E, Kull I, Melén E, Wickman M, De Vries G, van Eerd M, Agache I, Ansotegui IJ, Bosnic-Anticevich S, Cruz AA, Casale T, Ivancevich JC, Larenas-Linnemann DE, Sofiev M, Wallace D, Waserman S, Yorgancioglu A, Laune D, Bousquet J. Treatment of allergic rhinitis during and outside the pollen season using mobile technology. A MASK study. Clin Transl Allergy 2020; 10:62. [PMID: 33298191 PMCID: PMC7726888 DOI: 10.1186/s13601-020-00342-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2020] [Accepted: 08/25/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The analysis of mobile health (mHealth) data has generated innovative insights into improving allergic rhinitis control, but additive information is needed. A cross-sectional real-world observational study was undertaken in 17 European countries during and outside the estimated pollen season. The aim was to collect novel information including the phenotypic characteristics of the users. Methods The Allergy Diary–MASK-air–mobile phone app, freely available via Google Play and App, was used to collect the data of daily visual analogue scales (VASs) for overall allergic symptoms and medication use. Fluticasone Furoate (FF), Mometasone Furoate (MF), Azelastine Fluticasone Proprionate combination (MPAzeFlu) and eight oral H1-antihistamines were studied. Phenotypic characteristics were recorded at entry. The ARIA severity score was derived from entry data. This was an a priori planned analysis. Results 9037 users filled in 70,286 days of VAS in 2016, 2017 and 2018. The ARIA severity score was lower outside than during the pollen season. Severity was similar for all treatment groups during the pollen season, and lower in the MPAzeFlu group outside the pollen season. Days with MPAzeFlu had lower VAS levels and a higher frequency of monotherapy than the other treatments during the season. Outside the season, days with MPAzeFlu also had a higher frequency of monotherapy. The number of reported days was significantly higher with MPAzeFlu during and outside the season than with MF, FF or oral H1-antihistamines. Conclusions This study shows that the overall efficacy of treatments is similar during and outside the pollen season and indicates that medications are similarly effective during the year.
Collapse
|
29
|
Greenhawt M, Shaker M, Wang J, Oppenheimer JJ, Sicherer S, Keet C, Swaggart K, Rank M, Portnoy JM, Bernstein J, Chu DK, Dinakar C, Golden D, Horner C, Lang DM, Lang ES, Khan DA, Lieberman J, Stukus D, Wallace D. Peanut allergy diagnosis: A 2020 practice parameter update, systematic review, and GRADE analysis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2020; 146:1302-1334. [PMID: 32810515 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.07.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Revised: 07/14/2020] [Accepted: 07/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Given the burden of disease and the consequences of a diagnosis of peanut allergy, it is important that peanut allergy be accurately diagnosed so that an appropriate treatment plan can be developed. However, a test that indicates there is peanut sensitization present (eg, a "positive" test) is not always associated with clinical reactivity. This practice parameter addresses the diagnosis of IgE-mediated peanut allergy, both in children and adults, as pertaining to 3 fundamental questions, and based on the systematic reviews and meta-analyses, makes recommendations for the clinician who is evaluating a patient for peanut allergy. These questions relate to when diagnostic tests should be completed, which diagnostic tests to utilize, and the utility (or lack thereof) of diagnostic testing to predict the severity of a future allergic reaction to peanut.
Collapse
|
30
|
Bousquet J, Anto JM, Bachert C, Haahtela T, Zuberbier T, Czarlewski W, Bedbrook A, Bosnic-Anticevich S, Walter Canonica G, Cardona V, Costa E, Cruz AA, Erhola M, Fokkens WJ, Fonseca JA, Illario M, Ivancevich JC, Jutel M, Klimek L, Kuna P, Kvedariene V, Le L, Larenas-Linnemann DE, Laune D, Lourenço OM, Melén E, Mullol J, Niedoszytko M, Odemyr M, Okamoto Y, Papadopoulos NG, Patella V, Pfaar O, Pham-Thi N, Rolland C, Samolinski B, Sheikh A, Sofiev M, Suppli Ulrik C, Todo-Bom A, Tomazic PV, Toppila-Salmi S, Tsiligianni I, Valiulis A, Valovirta E, Ventura MT, Walker S, Williams S, Yorgancioglu A, Agache I, Akdis CA, Almeida R, Ansotegui IJ, Annesi-Maesano I, Arnavielhe S, Basagaña X, D Bateman E, Bédard A, Bedolla-Barajas M, Becker S, Bennoor KS, Benveniste S, Bergmann KC, Bewick M, Bialek S, E Billo N, Bindslev-Jensen C, Bjermer L, Blain H, Bonini M, Bonniaud P, Bosse I, Bouchard J, Boulet LP, Bourret R, Boussery K, Braido F, Briedis V, Briggs A, Brightling CE, Brozek J, Brusselle G, Brussino L, Buhl R, Buonaiuto R, Calderon MA, Camargos P, Camuzat T, Caraballo L, Carriazo AM, Carr W, Cartier C, Casale T, Cecchi L, Cepeda Sarabia AM, H Chavannes N, Chkhartishvili E, Chu DK, Cingi C, Correia de Sousa J, Costa DJ, Courbis AL, Custovic A, Cvetkosvki B, D'Amato G, da Silva J, Dantas C, Dokic D, Dauvilliers Y, De Feo G, De Vries G, Devillier P, Di Capua S, Dray G, Dubakiene R, Durham SR, Dykewicz M, Ebisawa M, Gaga M, El-Gamal Y, Heffler E, Emuzyte R, Farrell J, Fauquert JL, Fiocchi A, Fink-Wagner A, Fontaine JF, Fuentes Perez JM, Gemicioğlu B, Gamkrelidze A, Garcia-Aymerich J, Gevaert P, Gomez RM, González Diaz S, Gotua M, Guldemond NA, Guzmán MA, Hajjam J, Huerta Villalobos YR, Humbert M, Iaccarino G, Ierodiakonou D, Iinuma T, Jassem E, Joos G, Jung KS, Kaidashev I, Kalayci O, Kardas P, Keil T, Khaitov M, Khaltaev N, Kleine-Tebbe J, Kouznetsov R, Kowalski ML, Kritikos V, Kull I, La Grutta S, Leonardini L, Ljungberg H, Lieberman P, Lipworth B, Lodrup Carlsen KC, Lopes-Pereira C, Loureiro CC, Louis R, Mair A, Mahboub B, Makris M, Malva J, Manning P, Marshall GD, Masjedi MR, Maspero JF, Carreiro-Martins P, Makela M, Mathieu-Dupas E, Maurer M, De Manuel Keenoy E, Melo-Gomes E, Meltzer EO, Menditto E, Mercier J, Micheli Y, Miculinic N, Mihaltan F, Milenkovic B, Mitsias DI, Moda G, Mogica-Martinez MD, Mohammad Y, Montefort S, Monti R, Morais-Almeida M, Mösges R, Münter L, Muraro A, Murray R, Naclerio R, Napoli L, Namazova-Baranova L, Neffen H, Nekam K, Neou A, Nordlund B, Novellino E, Nyembue D, O'Hehir R, Ohta K, Okubo K, Onorato GL, Orlando V, Ouedraogo S, Palamarchuk J, Pali-Schöll I, Panzner P, Park HS, Passalacqua G, Pépin JL, Paulino E, Pawankar R, Phillips J, Picard R, Pinnock H, Plavec D, Popov TA, Portejoie F, Price D, Prokopakis EP, Psarros F, Pugin B, Puggioni F, Quinones-Delgado P, Raciborski F, Rajabian-Söderlund R, Regateiro FS, Reitsma S, Rivero-Yeverino D, Roberts G, Roche N, Rodriguez-Zagal E, Rolland C, Roller-Wirnsberger RE, Rosario N, Romano A, Rottem M, Ryan D, Salimäki J, Sanchez-Borges MM, Sastre J, Scadding GK, Scheire S, Schmid-Grendelmeier P, Schünemann HJ, Sarquis Serpa F, Shamji M, Sisul JC, Sofiev M, Solé D, Somekh D, Sooronbaev T, Sova M, Spertini F, Spranger O, Stellato C, Stelmach R, Thibaudon M, To T, Toumi M, Usmani O, Valero AA, Valenta R, Valentin-Rostan M, Pereira MU, van der Kleij R, Van Eerd M, Vandenplas O, Vasankari T, Vaz Carneiro A, Vezzani G, Viart F, Viegi G, Wallace D, Wagenmann M, Wang DY, Waserman S, Wickman M, Williams DM, Wong G, Wroczynski P, Yiallouros PK, Yusuf OM, Zar HJ, Zeng S, Zernotti ME, Zhang L, Shan Zhong N, Zidarn M. ARIA digital anamorphosis: Digital transformation of health and care in airway diseases from research to practice. Allergy 2020; 76:168-190. [PMID: 32512619 DOI: 10.1111/all.14422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Revised: 05/04/2020] [Accepted: 05/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Digital anamorphosis is used to define a distorted image of health and care that may be viewed correctly using digital tools and strategies. MASK digital anamorphosis represents the process used by MASK to develop the digital transformation of health and care in rhinitis. It strengthens the ARIA change management strategy in the prevention and management of airway disease. The MASK strategy is based on validated digital tools. Using the MASK digital tool and the CARAT online enhanced clinical framework, solutions for practical steps of digital enhancement of care are proposed.
Collapse
|
31
|
Bédard A, Antó JM, Fonseca JA, Arnavielhe S, Bachert C, Bedbrook A, Bindslev‐Jensen C, Bosnic‐Anticevich S, Cardona V, Cruz AA, Fokkens WJ, Garcia‐Aymerich J, Hellings PW, Ivancevich JC, Klimek L, Kuna P, Kvedariene V, Larenas‐Linnemann D, Melén E, Monti R, Mösges R, Mullol J, Papadopoulos NG, Pham‐Thi N, Samolinski B, Tomazic PV, Toppila‐Salmi S, Ventura MT, Yorgancioglu A, Bousquet J, Pfaar O, Basagaña X, Aberer W, Agache I, Akdis CA, Akdis M, Aliberti MR, Almeida R, Amat F, Angles R, Annesi‐Maesano I, Ansotegui IJ, Anto JM, Arnavielle S, Asayag E, Asarnoj A, Arshad H, Avolio F, Bacci E, Baiardini I, Barbara C, Barbagallo M, Baroni I, Barreto BA, Bateman ED, Bedolla‐Barajas M, Bewick M, Beghé B, Bel EH, Bergmann KC, Bennoor KS, Benson M, Bertorello L, Białoszewski AZ, Bieber T, Bialek S, Bjermer L, Blain H, Blasi F, Blua A, Bochenska Marciniak M, Bogus‐Buczynska I, Boner AL, Bonini M, Bonini S, Bosse I, Bouchard J, Boulet LP, Bourret R, Bousquet PJ, Braido F, Briedis V, Brightling CE, Brozek J, Bucca C, Buhl R, Buonaiuto R, Panaitescu C, Burguete Cabañas MT, Burte E, Bush A, Caballero‐Fonseca F, Caillaud D, Caimmi D, Calderon MA, Camargos PAM, Camuzat T, Canfora G, Canonica GW, Carlsen KH, Carreiro‐Martins P, Carriazo AM, Carr W, Cartier C, Casale T, Castellano G, Cecchi L, Cepeda AM, Chavannes NH, Chen Y, Chiron R, Chivato T, Chkhartishvili E, Chuchalin AG, Chung KF, Ciaravolo MM, Ciceran A, Cingi C, Ciprandi G, Carvalho Coehlo AC, Colas L, Colgan E, Coll J, Conforti D, Constantinidis J, Correia de Sousa J, Cortés‐Grimaldo RM, Corti F, Costa E, Costa‐Dominguez MC, Courbis AL, Cox L, Crescenzo M, Custovic A, Czarlewski W, Dahlen SE, D'Amato G, Dario C, da Silva J, Dauvilliers Y, Darsow U, De Blay F, De Carlo G, Dedeu T, de Fátima Emerson M, De Feo G, De Vries G, De Martino B, Motta Rubini NP, Deleanu D, Denburg JA, Devillier P, Di Capua Ercolano S, Di Carluccio N, Didier A, Dokic D, Dominguez‐Silva MG, Douagui H, Dray G, Dubakiene R, Durham SR, Du Toit G, Dykewicz MS, El‐Gamal Y, Eklund P, Eller E, Emuzyte R, Farrell J, Farsi A, Ferreira de Mello J, Ferrero J, Fink‐Wagner A, Fiocchi A, Fontaine JF, Forti S, Fuentes‐Perez JM, Gálvez‐Romero JL, Gamkrelidze A, García‐Cobas CY, Garcia‐Cruz MH, Gemicioğlu B, Genova S, Christoff G, Gereda JE, Gerth van Wijk R, Gomez RM, Gómez‐Vera J, González Diaz S, Gotua M, Grisle I, Guidacci M, Guldemond NA, Gutter Z, Guzmán MA, Haahtela T, Hajjam J, Hernández L, Hourihane JO, Huerta‐Villalobos YR, Humbert M, Iaccarino G, Illario M, Ispayeva Z, Jares EJ, Jassem E, Johnston SL, Joos G, Jung KS, Just J, Jutel M, Kaidashev I, Kalayci O, Kalyoncu AF, Karjalainen J, Kardas P, Keil T, Keith PK, Khaitov M, Khaltaev N, Kleine‐Tebbe J, Kowalski ML, Kuitunen M, Kull I, Kupczyk M, Krzych‐Fałta E, Lacwik P, Laune D, Lauri D, Lavrut J, Le LTT, Lessa M, Levato G, Li J, Lieberman P, Lipiec A, Lipworth B, Lodrup Carlsen KC, Louis R, Lourenço O, Luna‐Pech JA, Magnan A, Mahboub B, Maier D, Mair A, Majer I, Malva J, Mandajieva E, Manning P, De Manuel Keenoy E, Marshall GD, Masjedi MR, Maspero JF, Mathieu‐Dupas E, Matta Campos JJ, Matos AL, Maurer M, Mavale‐Manuel S, Mayora O, Meco C, Medina‐Avalos MA, Melo‐Gomes E, Meltzer EO, Menditto E, Mercier J, Miculinic N, Mihaltan F, Milenkovic B, Moda G, Mogica‐Martinez MD, Mohammad Y, Momas I, Montefort S, Mora Bogado D, Morais‐Almeida M, Morato‐Castro FF, Mota‐Pinto A, Moura Santo P, Münter L, Muraro A, Murray R, Naclerio R, Nadif R, Nalin M, Napoli L, Namazova‐Baranova L, Neffen H, Niedeberger V, Nekam K, Neou A, Nieto A, Nogueira‐Silva L, Nogues M, Novellino E, Nyembue TD, O'Hehir RE, Odzhakova C, Ohta K, Okamoto Y, Okubo K, Onorato GL, Ortega Cisneros M, Ouedraogo S, Pali‐Schöll I, Palkonen S, Panzner P, Park HS, Papi A, Passalacqua G, Paulino E, Pawankar R, Pedersen S, Pépin JL, Pereira AM, Persico M, Phillips J, Picard R, Pigearias B, Pin I, Pitsios C, Plavec D, Pohl W, Popov TA, Portejoie F, Potter P, Pozzi AC, Price D, Prokopakis EP, Puy R, Pugin B, Pulido Ross RE, Przemecka M, Rabe KF, Raciborski F, Rajabian‐Soderlund R, Reitsma S, Ribeirinho I, Rimmer J, Rivero‐Yeverino D, Rizzo JA, Rizzo MC, Robalo‐Cordeiro C, Rodenas F, Rodo X, Rodriguez Gonzalez M, Rodriguez‐Mañas L, Rolland C, Rodrigues Valle S, Roman Rodriguez M, Romano A, Rodriguez‐Zagal E, Rolla G, Roller‐Wirnsberger RE, Romano M, Rosado‐Pinto J, Rosario N, Rottem M, Ryan D, Sagara H, Salimäki J, Sanchez‐Borges M, Sastre‐Dominguez J, Scadding GK, Schunemann HJ, Scichilone N, Schmid‐Grendelmeier P, Sarquis Serpa F, Shamai S, Sheikh A, Sierra M, Simons FER, Siroux V, Sisul JC, Skrindo I, Solé D, Somekh D, Sondermann M, Sooronbaev T, Sova M, Sorensen M, Sorlini M, Spranger O, Stellato C, Stelmach R, Stukas R, Sunyer J, Strozek J, Szylling A, Tebyriçá JN, Thibaudon M, To T, Todo‐Bom A, Trama U, Triggiani M, Suppli Ulrik C, Urrutia‐Pereira M, Valenta R, Valero A, Valiulis A, Valovirta E, van Eerd M, van Ganse E, van Hage M, Vandenplas O, Vezzani G, Vasankari T, Vatrella A, Verissimo MT, Viart F, Viegi G, Vicheva D, Vontetsianos T, Wagenmann M, Walker S, Wallace D, Wang DY, Waserman S, Werfel T, Westman M, Wickman M, Williams DM, Williams S, Wilson N, Wright J, Wroczynski P, Yakovliev P, Yawn BP, Yiallouros PK, Yusuf OM, Zar HJ, Zhang L, Zhong N, Zernotti ME, Zhanat I, Zidarn M, Zuberbier T, Zubrinich C, Zurkuhlen A. Correlation between work impairment, scores of rhinitis severity and asthma using the MASK-air ® App. Allergy 2020; 75:1672-1688. [PMID: 31995656 DOI: 10.1111/all.14204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2019] [Revised: 11/23/2019] [Accepted: 12/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In allergic rhinitis, a relevant outcome providing information on the effectiveness of interventions is needed. In MASK-air (Mobile Airways Sentinel Network), a visual analogue scale (VAS) for work is used as a relevant outcome. This study aimed to assess the performance of the work VAS work by comparing VAS work with other VAS measurements and symptom-medication scores obtained concurrently. METHODS All consecutive MASK-air users in 23 countries from 1 June 2016 to 31 October 2018 were included (14 189 users; 205 904 days). Geolocalized users self-assessed daily symptom control using the touchscreen functionality on their smart phone to click on VAS scores (ranging from 0 to 100) for overall symptoms (global), nose, eyes, asthma and work. Two symptom-medication scores were used: the modified EAACI CSMS score and the MASK control score for rhinitis. To assess data quality, the intra-individual response variability (IRV) index was calculated. RESULTS A strong correlation was observed between VAS work and other VAS. The highest levels for correlation with VAS work and variance explained in VAS work were found with VAS global, followed by VAS nose, eye and asthma. In comparison with VAS global, the mCSMS and MASK control score showed a lower correlation with VAS work. Results are unlikely to be explained by a low quality of data arising from repeated VAS measures. CONCLUSIONS VAS work correlates with other outcomes (VAS global, nose, eye and asthma) but less well with a symptom-medication score. VAS work should be considered as a potentially useful AR outcome in intervention studies.
Collapse
|
32
|
Dörner T, Tanaka Y, Petri MA, Smolen JS, Wallace D, Crowe B, Dow E, Higgs RE, Rocha G, Benschop R, Silk M, De Bono S, Hoffman R, Fantini D. OP0045 DELINEATION OF A PROINFLAMMATORY CYTOKINE PROFILE TARGETED BY JAK1/2 INHIBITION USING BARICITINIB IN A PHASE 2 SLE TRIAL. Ann Rheum Dis 2020. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/15/2023]
Abstract
Background:Given the unmet clinical needs in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), including poor disease control and drug toxicities, new therapies are needed. In a phase 2, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study (JAHH), once-daily baricitinib (bari) resulted in significant clinical improvement in patients (pts) with active SLE versus PBO. Bari inhibits JAK1 and JAK2 signalling, and in turn may affect STAT1, STAT2, STAT4 pathways. Therefore, bari has the potential to simultaneously impact several pro-inflammatory immune cytokines implicated in the pathogenesis of SLE, including IFN-α, IFN-γ, IL-6, IL-12, and IL-23.Objectives:The objectives of the current study were: 1) to examine baseline serum cytokines in the JAHH phase 2 clinical trial for correlations with clinical or immunologic assessments; 2) to determine if changes in serum cytokine levels were associated with bari treatment.Methods:Pts enrolled in the JAHH phase 2 trial received daily treatment with PBO, bari 2 mg, or bari 4 mg through week 24. Serum samples were collected at baseline (week [wk] 0), wk 12, and wk 24) from SLE pts (n=270) and 50 sex- and age-matched controls. Samples were analyzed for: IL-2, IL-3, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, IL-17A, IL-21, IL-12/23p40, IL-12p70, GM-CSF, IFN-α and IFN-γ using ultrasensitive quantitative assays. IFN gene signature, autoantibodies, C3 and C4 were measured as previously described [1].Results:At wk 0, serum IL-17A, IL-12/23p40, IL-6, IFN-γ and IFN-α were readily detectable. IL-12/23p40 was detectable in 100% of pts vs. 100% of controls, IFN-γ in 89% of pts vs. 66% of controls, IL-6 in 53% of pts vs. 12% of controls and in IFN-α 41% of pts vs. 2% of controls; detection of serum IL-2, GM-CSF, IL-5, IL-10 and IL-17A was variable (Fig 1). At baseline (wk 0), IL-12/23p40 was positively correlated with SLEDAI and IFN gene signature and negatively correlated with serum C4. IL-6 was positively correlated with joint swelling, joint tenderness, IFN-γ and C3. Serum IFN-α was positively correlated with serum IFN-γ, anti-Sm and anti-RNP, and the IFN gene signature (Fig 2). Treatment with bari 4 mg (Fig 1B) significantly decreased serum IL12/23p40 and IL-6 cytokine levels at wk 12 (p<0.05) but not serum IFN-α or IFN-γ levels (Fig 1B).Figure 1.* p = 0.015; ** p = 0.001; Abbreviations: LLOQ, Lower limit of quantification.Figure 2.Abbreviations: Anti-dsDNA, Anti-double stranded DNA; Anti-RNP, Anti-ribonucleoprotein; CLASI, Cutaneous lupus erythematosus disease area and severity index; SLEDAI, SLE disease activity index.Conclusion:Bari 4 mg treatment was associated with statistically significant decreases of serum IL-12/23p40 and IL-6 at week 12 which continued through week 24. Serum IFN-α or IFN-γ were not reduced with bari treatment. Thus, bari 4 mg simultaneously impacted multiple pro-inflammatory cytokines implicated in the pathogenesis of SLE.References:[1]Hoffman RW, et al.Arthritis Rheumatol.2017;69(3):643-654.Disclosure of Interests:Thomas Dörner Grant/research support from: Janssen, Novartis, Roche, UCB, Consultant of: Abbvie, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Roche, Janssen, EMD, Speakers bureau: Eli Lilly, Roche, Samsung, Janssen, Yoshiya Tanaka Grant/research support from: Asahi-kasei, Astellas, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Chugai, Takeda, Sanofi, Bristol-Myers, UCB, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Pfizer, and Ono, Consultant of: Abbvie, Astellas, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Speakers bureau: Daiichi-Sankyo, Astellas, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, AbbVie, YL Biologics, Bristol-Myers, Takeda, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Novartis, Eisai, Janssen, Sanofi, UCB, and Teijin, Michelle A Petri Grant/research support from: GSK, Eli Lilly and Company, Consultant of: Eli Lilly and Company, Josef S. Smolen Grant/research support from: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Celltrion, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, ILTOO, Janssen, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer Inc, Samsung, Sanofi, Consultant of: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Celltrion, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, ILTOO, Janssen, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer Inc, Samsung, Sanofi, Daniel Wallace Consultant of: Amgen, Eli Lilly and Company, EMD Merck Serono, and Pfizer, Brenda Crowe Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Ernst Dow Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Richard E Higgs Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Guilherme Rocha Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Robert Benschop Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Maria Silk Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Stephanie de Bono Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Robert Hoffman Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Damiano Fantini Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company
Collapse
|
33
|
Alcantara C, Wallace M, Sotres-Alvarez D, Vetter C, Phillips AJ, Shafazand S, Johnson DA, Wallace D, Gallo LC, Ramos AR, Penedo F, Wohlgemuth WK, Zee PC, Redline S, Patel SR. 1097 Sleep Disturbances, Sleep Burden, And Depressive Symptoms In US Hispanics/Latinos: Results From The HCHS/SOL Sueño Study. Sleep 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsaa056.1092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
While sleep disturbances and depression often co-occur, these associations are understudied among Hispanics/Latinos. We examined the associations of sleep disturbances and sleep burden with depressive symptoms among Hispanic/Latino adults in the United States.
Methods
We used cross-sectional data from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos Sueño Ancillary study (2010-2013). The study enrolled 2072 adults (ages 18-64; 51.5% females) who completed one-week wrist-actigraphy and sleep questionnaires. Sleep burden was operationalized as the total count of sleep disturbances across six domains (duration, efficiency, midpoint, variability, insomnia, sleepiness). Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale (CESD-10). We used weighted survey linear regressions to evaluate the association of sleep disturbances and sleep burden with elevated depressive symptoms (CESD≥10) in individual models adjusted for age, gender, site, heritage, nativity, education, income, and employment. Sensitivity analyses further adjusted for behavioral health risk factors and apnea-hypopnea index.
Results
An estimated 28.3% had elevated depressive symptoms, 8.0% had short sleep duration (<6 hours of sleep), 10.9% had long sleep duration (>9 hours), 45.2% exhibited a later sleep midpoint (≥4:00AM), 38.4% had high sleep timing variability (upper third tertile for between day sleep midpoint), 15.3% had insomnia (ISI≥10), 17.3% had excessive daytime sleepiness (ESS ≥10), 21.5% had poor sleep efficiency (<85%), and 77.4% had a total sleep burden count of ≥0. Insomnia (ß=0.49,95%CI:.43,.56), later sleep timing (ß=0.10,95%CI:.04,.16), excessive daytime sleepiness (ß=0.19,95%CI:.11,.27), poor sleep efficiency (ß=0.09,95%CI:.02,.17), high variability (ß=0.07, 95%CI:.01,.12), and sleep burden (ß=0.11,95%CI:.09,.13), were each positively associated with elevated depressive symptoms in individual adjusted models and sensitivity analyses. Extreme sleep durations were not associated with elevated depressive symptoms.
Conclusion
Multiple inter-related sleep disturbances, particularly those pertaining to sleep quality and timing, are associated with depression and may be targets for future interventions aimed at improving mood among Hispanics/Latinos.
Support
HL127307, HL098927, HL125748
Collapse
|
34
|
Wohlgemuth W, Fins A, Tutek J, Gonzalez A, Martinez-Garcia A, Satyanarayana S, Marchetti D, Wallace D. 0551 Longitudinal Measurement Invariance of the Insomnia Severity Index in Veterans with Sleep Apnea. Sleep 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsaa056.548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
The Insomnia Severity Index is a commonly used instrument to assess the presence of insomnia symptoms as well as an outcome measure following an intervention. Longitudinal measurement invariance is a necessary property of an assessment instrument when it is repeated over time. The validity of conclusions regarding change in the construct ‘insomnia severity’ depend on scale equivalence at each measurement timepoint. Assessment of measurement invariance of the ISI in sleep apnea patients has never been performed.
Methods
Veterans with sleep apnea (n=654; AHI=36±28; 93% male; age=52±12; BMI=33±6) completed the ISI on the night of their overnight PSG and again when they picked up their PAP device. Invariance was determined by imposing a series of more restrictive equivalence constraints on a 2-factor model of the ISI. The series of constraints tested for configural, weak, strong and strict invariance. Invariance testing was modeled with exploratory structural equation modeling in Mplus (v. 7.0).
Results
The 2-factor model that emerged from the analysis showed items relating to nighttime symptoms loading on factor 1 and daytime symptoms loading on factor 2. The sleep ‘satisfaction’ item, however, had weak but similar loadings on both factors. The increasingly restrictive constraints imposed on the model revealed no decrement in model fit (RMSEA=.039 to.043; CFI=.987 to .980; TLI=.981-.977; SRMR=.027-.041).
Conclusion
The ISI met strict criteria for longitudinal measurement invariance demonstrating that it is a valid instrument to be used in repeated measures study designs of insomnia in sleep apnea patients. Change over time on the ISI is not due to the changing measurement characteristics of the ISI but to true changes in the ‘insomnia severity’ construct.
Support
None
Collapse
|
35
|
Searing DA, Dutmer CM, Fleischer DM, Shaker MS, Oppenheimer J, Grayson MH, Stukus D, Hartog N, Hsieh EWY, Rider NL, Vander Leek TK, Kim H, Chan ES, Mack D, Ellis AK, Abrams EM, Bansal P, Lang DM, Lieberman J, Golden DB, Wallace D, Portnoy J, Mosnaim G, Greenhawt M. A Phased Approach to Resuming Suspended Allergy/Immunology Clinical Services. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2020; 8:2125-2134. [PMID: 32450236 PMCID: PMC7242939 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2020] [Revised: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
In early 2020, the first US and Canadian cases of the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection were detected. In the ensuing months, there has been rapid spread of the infection. In March 2020, in response to the virus, state/provincial and local governments instituted shelter-in-place orders, and nonessential ambulatory care was significantly curtailed, including allergy/immunology services. With rates of new infections and fatalities potentially reaching a plateau and/or declining, restrictions on provision of routine ambulatory care are lifting, and there is a need to help guide the allergy/immunology clinician on how to reinitiate services. Given the fact that coronavirus disease 2019 will circulate within our communities for months or longer, we present a flexible, algorithmic best-practices planning approach on how to prioritize services, in 4 stratified phases of reopening according to community risk level, as well as highlight key considerations for how to safely do so. The decisions on what services to offer and how fast to proceed are left to the discretion of the individual clinician and practice, operating in accordance with state and local ordinances with respect to the level of nonessential ambulatory care that can be provided. Clear communication with staff and patients before and after all changes should be incorporated into this new paradigm on continual change, given the movement may be forward and even backward through the phases because this is an evolving situation.
Collapse
|
36
|
Shaker MS, Oppenheimer J, Grayson M, Stukus D, Hartog N, Hsieh EWY, Rider N, Dutmer CM, Vander Leek TK, Kim H, Chan ES, Mack D, Ellis AK, Lang D, Lieberman J, Fleischer D, Golden DBK, Wallace D, Portnoy J, Mosnaim G, Greenhawt M. Reply to "Subcutaneous terbutaline as an alternative to aerosolized albuterol". THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2020; 8:2450-2452. [PMID: 32340824 PMCID: PMC7174169 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2020] [Accepted: 04/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
37
|
Wallace D, Cowling TE, Walker K, Suddle A, Gimson A, Rowe I, Callaghan C, Sapisochin G, Mehta N, Heaton N, van der Meulen J. Liver transplantation outcomes after transarterial chemotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg 2020; 107:1183-1191. [DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2019] [Revised: 01/05/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) awaiting liver transplantation is widespread, although evidence that it improves outcomes is lacking and there exist concerns about morbidity. The impact of TACE on outcomes after transplantation was evaluated in this study.
Methods
Patients with HCC who had liver transplantation in the UK were identified, and stratified according to whether they received TACE between 2006 and 2016. Cox regression methods were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for death and graft failure after transplantation adjusted for donor and recipient characteristics.
Results
In total, 385 of 968 patients (39·8 per cent) received TACE. Five-year patient survival after transplantation was similar in those who had or had not received TACE: 75·2 (95 per cent c.i. 68·8 to 80·5) and 75·0 (70·5 to 78·8) per cent respectively. After adjustment for donor and recipient characteristics, there were no differences in mortality (HR 0·96, 95 per cent c.i. 0·67 to 1·38; P = 0·821) or graft failure (HR 1·01, 0·73 to 1·40; P = 0·964). The number of TACE treatments (2 or more versus 1: HR 0·97, 0·61 to 1·55; P = 0·903) or the time of death after transplantation (within or after 90 days; P = 0·291) did not alter the outcome. The incidence of hepatic artery thrombosis was low in those who had or had not received TACE (1·3 and 2·4 per cent respectively; P = 0·235).
Conclusion
TACE delivered to patients with HCC before liver transplant did not affect complications, patient death or graft failure after transplantation.
Collapse
|
38
|
Shaker MS, Oppenheimer J, Grayson M, Stukus D, Hartog N, Hsieh EWY, Rider N, Dutmer CM, Vander Leek TK, Kim H, Chan ES, Mack D, Ellis AK, Lang D, Lieberman J, Fleischer D, Golden DBK, Wallace D, Portnoy J, Mosnaim G, Greenhawt M. COVID-19: Pandemic Contingency Planning for the Allergy and Immunology Clinic. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2020; 8:1477-1488.e5. [PMID: 32224232 PMCID: PMC7195089 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 210] [Impact Index Per Article: 52.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2020] [Accepted: 03/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
In the event of a global infectious pandemic, drastic measures may be needed that limit or require adjustment of ambulatory allergy services. However, no rationale for how to prioritize service shut down and patient care exists. A consensus-based ad-hoc expert panel of allergy/immunology specialists from the United States and Canada developed a service and patient prioritization schematic to temporarily triage allergy/immunology services. Recommendations and feedback were developed iteratively, using an adapted modified Delphi methodology to achieve consensus. During the ongoing pandemic while social distancing is being encouraged, most allergy/immunology care could be postponed/delayed or handled through virtual care. With the exception of many patients with primary immunodeficiency, patients on venom immunotherapy, and patients with asthma of a certain severity, there is limited need for face-to-face visits under such conditions. These suggestions are intended to help provide a logical approach to quickly adjust service to mitigate risk to both medical staff and patients. Importantly, individual community circumstances may be unique and require contextual consideration. The decision to enact any of these measures rests with the judgment of each clinician and individual health care system. Pandemics are unanticipated, and enforced social distancing/quarantining is highly unusual. This expert panel consensus document offers a prioritization rational to help guide decision making when such situations arise and an allergist/immunologist is forced to reduce services or makes the decision on his or her own to do so.
Collapse
|
39
|
Wallace D, Cowling TE, Walker K, Suddle A, Rowe I, Callaghan C, Gimson A, Bernal W, Heaton N, van der Meulen J. Short- and long-term mortality after liver transplantation in patients with and without hepatocellular carcinoma in the UK. Br J Surg 2020; 107:896-905. [DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2019] [Revised: 11/01/2019] [Accepted: 11/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The increasing demand for liver transplantation has led to considerable changes in characteristics of donors and recipients. This study evaluated the short- and long-term mortality of recipients with and without hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the UK between 1997 and 2016.
Methods
First-time elective adult liver transplant recipients in the UK were identified and four successive eras of transplantation were compared. Hazard ratios (HRs) comparing the impact of era on short-term (first 90 days) and longer-term (from 90 days to 5 years) mortality were estimated, with adjustment for recipient and donor characteristics.
Results
Some 1879 recipients with and 7661 without HCC were included. There was an increase in use of organs donated after circulatory death (DCD), from 0 per cent in era 1 to 35·2 per cent in era 4 for recipients with HCC, and from 0·2 to 24·1 per cent for non-HCC recipients. The 3-year mortality rate decreased from 28·3 per cent in era 1 to 16·9 per cent in era 4 (adjusted HR 0·47, 95 per cent c.i. 0·35 to 0·63) for recipients with HCC, and from 20·4 to 9·3 per cent (adjusted HR 0·44, 0·36 to 0·53) for those without HCC. Comparing era 4 with era 1, improvements were more marked in short-term than in long-term mortality, both for recipients with HCC (0–90 days: adjusted HR 0·20, 0·10 to 0·39; 90 days to 5 years: adjusted HR 0·52, 0·35 to 0·75; P = 0·043) and for non-HCC recipients (0–90 days: adjusted HR 0·32, 0·24 to 0·42; 90 days to 5 years: adjusted HR 0·52, 0·40 to 0·67; P = 0·024).
Conclusion
In the past 20 years, the mortality rate after liver transplantation has more than halved, despite increasing use of DCD donors. Improvements in overall survival can be explained by decreases in short-term and longer-term mortality.
Collapse
|
40
|
Yorgancıoğlu AA, Gemicioğlu B, Cingi C, Kalaycı Ö, Kalyoncu AF, Bachert C, Hellings P, Pfaar O, Schünemann HJ, Wallace D, Bedbrook A, Czarlewski W, Bousquet J. ARIA 2019, Allerjik Rinite Tedavi Yaklaşımı-Türkiye. Turk Thorac J 2020; 21:122-133. [PMID: 32203003 DOI: 10.5152/turkthoracj.2019.19084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2019] [Accepted: 08/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Gerçek yaşamda, çevresel maruziyetlerin de etkilediği rinit ve astım mültimorbidite durumlarında, dijitalleşmiş ve kişiye odaklanan tedaviler için bütünleştirilmiş tedavi yollarının değerlendirilmesi önerilmektedir. Gerçek yaşamdaki bu durum mültisipliner bir yaklaşımla basamaklandırılıp, rehberilerinde ülkelerdeki gereksinimlere göre değiştilmesini gerektirebilir. Allerjik rinitte hem farmakoterapi hem immünoterapi açısından acil yeni yaklaşımlara ihtiyaç olduğu görülmüştür. 3. Aralık 2018'de Paris'te bir toplantı yapılmış ve iki ayrı belge hazırlanmıştır. Bu yayında bunlara ait bir özet sunulup, ülkeye ve sağlık sistemine uygun kullanımın çerçevesi oluşturulmak istenmiştir.
Collapse
|
41
|
Bousquet J, Anto JM, Bachert C, Bosnic-Anticevich S, Erhola M, Haahtela T, Hellings PW, Kuna P, Pfaar O, Samolinski B, Schünemann HJ, Sheikh A, Wallace D. From ARIA guidelines to the digital transformation of health in rhinitis and asthma multimorbidity. Eur Respir J 2019; 54:54/6/1901023. [PMID: 31801821 DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01023-2019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2019] [Accepted: 09/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
42
|
Shaker M, Oppenheimer J, Wallace D, Lang DM, Rambasek T, Dykewicz M, Greenhawt M. Optimizing Value in the Evaluation of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2019; 8:2360-2369.e1. [PMID: 31751758 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2019] [Revised: 10/31/2019] [Accepted: 11/03/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) affects approximately 1% of the general population. The cost-effectiveness of routine laboratory testing for secondary causes of CSU has not been formally evaluated. OBJECTIVE To characterize the cost-effectiveness of routine laboratory screening in adults with CSU. METHODS A Markov model using cohort analysis and microsimulations was created for adult patients aged 20 years, over a 10-year time horizon, randomized to receive screening laboratory testing or a no-testing approach. Laboratory results were derived from a previously published retrospective analysis of adult patients with CSU. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated at a willingness to pay threshold of $100,000/quality-adjusted life-year using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in patients with untreated CSU, and patients treated with antihistamines, cyclosporine, or omalizumab. RESULTS Average laboratory costs per simulated patient with CSU were $573 (standard deviation [SD], $41), with only 0.16% (SD, 3.99%) of tests resulting in improved clinical outcomes. Testing costs per laboratory-associated positive outcome were $358,052 (no therapy), $357,576 (antihistamine therapy), $354,115 (cyclosporine), and $262,121 (omalizumab). Screening tests were not cost-effective, with ICERs of $856,905 (no therapy), $855,764 (antihistamine therapy), $847,483 (cyclosporine), and $627,318 (omalizumab). In the omalizumab-treated subgroup, testing could be cost-effective below $220 or if it resulted in a 0.73% rate of CSU resolution. From a simulated US population perspective, nation-wide screening costs could reach $941,750,741 to $1,833,501,483. CONCLUSIONS In CSU, the likelihood of clinical improvement from laboratory testing is very low, and testing is not cost-effective. These data support recommendations to not routinely perform laboratory testing in patients with CSU with otherwise normal histories and physical evaluations.
Collapse
|
43
|
Bousquet J, Ansotegui IJ, Anto JM, Arnavielhe S, Bachert C, Basagaña X, Bédard A, Bedbrook A, Bonini M, Bosnic-Anticevich S, Braido F, Cardona V, Czarlewski W, Cruz AA, Demoly P, De Vries G, Dramburg S, Mathieu-Dupas E, Erhola M, Fokkens WJ, Fonseca JA, Haahtela T, Hellings PW, Illario M, Ivancevich JC, Jormanainen V, Klimek L, Kuna P, Kvedariene V, Laune D, Larenas-Linnemann D, Lourenço O, Onorato GL, Matricardi PM, Melén E, Mullol J, Papadopoulos NG, Pfaar O, Pham-Thi N, Sheikh A, Tan R, To T, Tomazic PV, Toppila-Salmi S, Tripodi S, Wallace D, Valiulis A, van Eerd M, Ventura MT, Yorgancioglu A, Zuberbier T. Mobile Technology in Allergic Rhinitis: Evolution in Management or Revolution in Health and Care? THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2019; 7:2511-2523. [PMID: 31445223 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.07.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2019] [Revised: 07/02/2019] [Accepted: 07/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Smart devices and Internet-based applications (apps) are largely used in allergic rhinitis and may help to address some unmet needs. However, these new tools need to first of all be tested for privacy rules, acceptability, usability, and cost-effectiveness. Second, they should be evaluated in the frame of the digital transformation of health, their impact on health care delivery, and health outcomes. This review (1) summarizes some existing mobile health apps for allergic rhinitis and reviews those in which testing has been published, (2) discusses apps that include risk factors of allergic rhinitis, (3) examines the impact of mobile health apps in phenotype discovery, (4) provides real-world evidence for care pathways, and finally (5) discusses mobile health tools enabling the digital transformation of health and care, empowering citizens, and building a healthier society.
Collapse
|
44
|
Bousquet J, Pfaar O, Togias A, Schünemann HJ, Ansotegui I, Papadopoulos NG, Tsiligianni I, Agache I, Anto JM, Bachert C, Bedbrook A, Bergmann K, Bosnic‐Anticevich S, Bosse I, Brozek J, Calderon MA, Canonica GW, Caraballo L, Cardona V, Casale T, Cecchi L, Chu D, Costa E, Cruz AA, Czarlewski W, Durham SR, Du Toit G, Dykewicz M, Ebisawa M, Fauquert JL, Fernandez‐Rivas M, Fokkens WJ, Fonseca J, Fontaine J, Gerth van Wijk R, Haahtela T, Halken S, Hellings PW, Ierodiakonou D, Iinuma T, Ivancevich JC, Jacobsen L, Jutel M, Kaidashev I, Khaitov M, Kalayci O, Kleine Tebbe J, Klimek L, Kowalski ML, Kuna P, Kvedariene V, La Grutta S, Larenas‐Linemann D, Lau S, Laune D, Le L, Lodrup Carlsen K, Lourenço O, Malling H, Marien G, Menditto E, Mercier G, Mullol J, Muraro A, O’Hehir R, Okamoto Y, Pajno GB, Park H, Panzner P, Passalacqua G, Pham‐Thi N, Roberts G, Pawankar R, Rolland C, Rosario N, Ryan D, Samolinski B, Sanchez‐Borges M, Scadding G, Shamji MH, Sheikh A, Sturm GJ, Todo Bom A, Toppila‐Salmi S, Valentin‐Rostan M, Valiulis A, Valovirta E, Ventura M, Wahn U, Walker S, Wallace D, Waserman S, Yorgancioglu A, Zuberbier T. 2019 ARIA Care pathways for allergen immunotherapy. Allergy 2019; 74:2087-2102. [PMID: 30955224 DOI: 10.1111/all.13805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 105] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2019] [Revised: 02/19/2019] [Accepted: 02/22/2019] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is a proven therapeutic option for the treatment of allergic rhinitis and/or asthma. Many guidelines or national practice guidelines have been produced but the evidence-based method varies, many are complex and none propose care pathways. This paper reviews care pathways for AIT using strict criteria and provides simple recommendations that can be used by all stakeholders including healthcare professionals. The decision to prescribe AIT for the patient should be individualized and based on the relevance of the allergens, the persistence of symptoms despite appropriate medications according to guidelines as well as the availability of good-quality and efficacious extracts. Allergen extracts cannot be regarded as generics. Immunotherapy is selected by specialists for stratified patients. There are no currently available validated biomarkers that can predict AIT success. In adolescents and adults, AIT should be reserved for patients with moderate/severe rhinitis or for those with moderate asthma who, despite appropriate pharmacotherapy and adherence, continue to exhibit exacerbations that appear to be related to allergen exposure, except in some specific cases. Immunotherapy may be even more advantageous in patients with multimorbidity. In children, AIT may prevent asthma onset in patients with rhinitis. mHealth tools are promising for the stratification and follow-up of patients.
Collapse
|
45
|
Bousquet J, Schünemann HJ, Togias A, Bachert C, Erhola M, Hellings PW, Klimek L, Pfaar O, Wallace D, Ansotegui I, Agache I, Bedbrook A, Bergmann KC, Bewick M, Bonniaud P, Bosnic-Anticevich S, Bossé I, Bouchard J, Boulet LP, Brozek J, Brusselle G, Calderon MA, Canonica WG, Caraballo L, Cardona V, Casale T, Cecchi L, Chu DK, Costa EM, Cruz AA, Czarlewski W, D'Amato G, Devillier P, Dykewicz M, Ebisawa M, Fauquert JL, Fokkens WJ, Fonseca JA, Fontaine JF, Gemicioglu B, van Wijk RG, Haahtela T, Halken S, Ierodiakonou D, Iinuma T, Ivancevich JC, Jutel M, Kaidashev I, Khaitov M, Kalayci O, Kleine Tebbe J, Kowalski ML, Kuna P, Kvedariene V, La Grutta S, Larenas-Linnemann D, Lau S, Laune D, Le L, Lieberman P, Lodrup Carlsen KC, Lourenço O, Marien G, Carreiro-Martins P, Melén E, Menditto E, Neffen H, Mercier G, Mosgues R, Mullol J, Muraro A, Namazova L, Novellino E, O'Hehir R, Okamoto Y, Ohta K, Park HS, Panzner P, Passalacqua G, Pham-Thi N, Price D, Roberts G, Roche N, Rolland C, Rosario N, Ryan D, Samolinski B, Sanchez-Borges M, Scadding GK, Shamji MH, Sheikh A, Bom AMT, Toppila-Salmi S, Tsiligianni I, Valentin-Rostan M, Valiulis A, Valovirta E, Ventura MT, Walker S, Waserman S, Yorgancioglu A, Zuberbier T. Next-generation Allergic Rhinitis and Its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines for allergic rhinitis based on Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) and real-world evidence. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2019; 145:70-80.e3. [PMID: 31627910 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.06.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 211] [Impact Index Per Article: 42.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2019] [Revised: 05/07/2019] [Accepted: 06/12/2019] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
The selection of pharmacotherapy for patients with allergic rhinitis aims to control the disease and depends on many factors. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines have considerably improved the treatment of allergic rhinitis. However, there is an increasing trend toward use of real-world evidence to inform clinical practice, especially because randomized controlled trials are often limited with regard to the applicability of results. The Contre les Maladies Chroniques pour un Vieillissement Actif (MACVIA) algorithm has proposed an allergic rhinitis treatment by a consensus group. This simple algorithm can be used to step up or step down allergic rhinitis treatment. Next-generation guidelines for the pharmacologic treatment of allergic rhinitis were developed by using existing GRADE-based guidelines for the disease, real-world evidence provided by mobile technology, and additive studies (allergen chamber studies) to refine the MACVIA algorithm.
Collapse
|
46
|
Shaker M, Wallace D, Golden DBK, Oppenheimer J, Greenhawt M. Simulation of Health and Economic Benefits of Extended Observation of Resolved Anaphylaxis. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2:e1913951. [PMID: 31642933 PMCID: PMC6820064 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.13951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Biphasic anaphylaxis may occur in up to 20% of patients with anaphylaxis; however, the optimal observation time of patients with resolved anaphylaxis is unknown. OBJECTIVE To characterize the cost-effectiveness of short vs prolonged medical observation times after resolved anaphylaxis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS An economic evaluation was performed of computer-simulated adult patients observed in outpatient allergy clinics and emergency departments, with rates of biphasic anaphylaxis derived from a 2019 meta-analysis. EXPOSURES Computer-simulated patients (10 000 per strategy) were randomized to undergo 1 hour of medical observation (associated with 95% negative predictive value of biphasic anaphylaxis) or 6 or more hours of observation (associated with a 97.3% negative predictive value of biphasic anaphylaxis). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Cost-effectiveness of 6- to 24-hour medical observation of resolved anaphylaxis evaluated at willingness-to-pay thresholds of $10 000 per case of biphasic anaphylaxis observed and $10 million per death prevented, assuming that observation is associated with a 10- to 1000-fold reduction in the risk of death due to biphasic anaphylaxis. RESULTS Biphasic anaphylaxis occurred after hospital discharge in 365 patients observed for 1 hour and in 213 patients undergoing prolonged observation. From a health care sector perspective, with medical observation costs of $286.92 per hour, the incremental cost of extended medical observation of resolved anaphylaxis (1 hour vs 6 hours) was $62 374 per case of biphasic anaphylaxis identified ($68 411 from the societal perspective). In Monte Carlo simulations, with hourly costs ranging from $100 to $500 and extended observation ranging from 6 to 24 hours (health care sector perspective), the mean (SD) costs were $295.36 ($81.22) for 1 hour of observation vs $3540.42 ($1626.67) for extended observation. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $213 439 per biphasic anaphylaxis observed ($230 202 from the societal perspective). A 6-hour observation could be cost-effective if the risk of biphasic anaphylaxis after 1-hour observation of resolved anaphylaxis was 17% or if hourly observation costs were less than $46 in the base case. Cost-effectiveness could also be achieved (willingness-to-pay of $10 million per death prevented, health care sector perspective) when a baseline fatality rate of 0.33% per biphasic anaphylactic event was assumed, with a no greater than 24% relative risk of fatality associated with 6-hour observation. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This study indicates that prolonged medical observation (6-24 hours) for resolved anaphylaxis may not be cost-effective for patients at low risk for biphasic anaphylaxis; however, in particular clinical circumstances of low observation costs, high postdischarge risk of biphasic anaphylaxis, or large incremental fatality risk reduction associated with extended observation, longer medical observation can be justified.
Collapse
|
47
|
Bousquet JJ, Schünemann HJ, Togias A, Erhola M, Hellings PW, Zuberbier T, Agache I, Ansotegui IJ, Anto JM, Bachert C, Becker S, Bedolla-Barajas M, Bewick M, Bosnic-Anticevich S, Bosse I, Boulet LP, Bourrez JM, Brusselle G, Chavannes N, Costa E, Cruz AA, Czarlewski W, Fokkens WJ, Fonseca JA, Gaga M, Haahtela T, Illario M, Klimek L, Kuna P, Kvedariene V, Le LTT, Larenas-Linnemann D, Laune D, Lourenço OM, Menditto E, Mullol J, Okamoto Y, Papadopoulos N, Pham-Thi N, Picard R, Pinnock H, Roche N, Roller-Wirnsberger RE, Rolland C, Samolinski B, Sheikh A, Toppila-Salmi S, Tsiligianni I, Valiulis A, Valovirta E, Vasankari T, Ventura MT, Walker S, Williams S, Akdis CA, Annesi-Maesano I, Arnavielhe S, Basagana X, Bateman E, Bedbrook A, Bennoor KS, Benveniste S, Bergmann KC, Bialek S, Billo N, Bindslev-Jensen C, Bjermer L, Blain H, Bonini M, Bonniaud P, Bouchard J, Briedis V, Brightling CE, Brozek J, Buhl R, Buonaiuto R, Canonica GW, Cardona V, Carriazo AM, Carr W, Cartier C, Casale T, Cecchi L, Cepeda Sarabia AM, Chkhartishvili E, Chu DK, Cingi C, Colgan E, de Sousa JC, Courbis AL, Custovic A, Cvetkosvki B, D’Amato G, da Silva J, Dantas C, Dokic D, Dauvilliers Y, Dedeu A, De Feo G, Devillier P, Di Capua S, Dykewickz M, Dubakiene R, Ebisawa M, El-Gamal Y, Eller E, Emuzyte R, Farrell J, Fink-Wagner A, Fiocchi A, Fontaine JF, Gemicioğlu B, Schmid-Grendelmeir P, Gamkrelidze A, Garcia-Aymerich J, Gomez M, González Diaz S, Gotua M, Guldemond NA, Guzmán MA, Hajjam J, O’B Hourihane J, Humbert M, Iaccarino G, Ierodiakonou D, Illario M, Ivancevich JC, Joos G, Jung KS, Jutel M, Kaidashev I, Kalayci O, Kardas P, Keil T, Khaitov M, Khaltaev N, Kleine-Tebbe J, Kowalski ML, Kritikos V, Kull I, Leonardini L, Lieberman P, Lipworth B, Lodrup Carlsen KC, Loureiro CC, Louis R, Mair A, Marien G, Mahboub B, Malva J, Manning P, De Manuel Keenoy E, Marshall GD, Masjedi MR, Maspero JF, Mathieu-Dupas E, Matricardi PM, Melén E, Melo-Gomes E, Meltzer EO, Menditto E, Mercier J, Miculinic N, Mihaltan F, Milenkovic B, Moda G, Mogica-Martinez MD, Mohammad Y, Montefort S, Monti R, Morais-Almeida M, Mösges R, Münter L, Muraro A, Murray R, Naclerio R, Napoli L, Namazova-Baranova L, Neffen H, Nekam K, Neou A, Novellino E, Nyembue D, O’Hehir R, Ohta K, Okubo K, Onorato G, Ouedraogo S, Pali-Schöll I, Palkonen S, Panzner P, Park HS, Pépin JL, Pereira AM, Pfaar O, Paulino E, Phillips J, Picard R, Plavec D, Popov TA, Portejoie F, Price D, Prokopakis EP, Pugin B, Raciborski F, Rajabian-Söderlund R, Reitsma S, Rodo X, Romano A, Rosario N, Rottem M, Ryan D, Salimäki J, Sanchez-Borges MM, Sisul JC, Solé D, Somekh D, Sooronbaev T, Sova M, Spranger O, Stellato C, Stelmach R, Suppli Ulrik C, Thibaudon M, To T, Todo-Bom A, Tomazic PV, Valero AA, Valenta R, Valentin-Rostan M, van der Kleij R, Vandenplas O, Vezzani G, Viart F, Viegi G, Wallace D, Wagenmann M, Wang DY, Waserman S, Wickman M, Williams DM, Wong G, Wroczynski P, Yiallouros PK, Yorgancioglu A, Yusuf OM, Zar HJ, Zeng S, Zernotti M, Zhang L, Zhong NS, Zidarn M. Next-generation ARIA care pathways for rhinitis and asthma: a model for multimorbid chronic diseases. Clin Transl Allergy 2019; 9:44. [PMID: 31516692 PMCID: PMC6734297 DOI: 10.1186/s13601-019-0279-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2019] [Accepted: 07/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In all societies, the burden and cost of allergic and chronic respiratory diseases are increasing rapidly. Most economies are struggling to deliver modern health care effectively. There is a need to support the transformation of the health care system into integrated care with organizational health literacy. MAIN BODY As an example for chronic disease care, MASK (Mobile Airways Sentinel NetworK), a new project of the ARIA (Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma) initiative, and POLLAR (Impact of Air POLLution on Asthma and Rhinitis, EIT Health), in collaboration with professional and patient organizations in the field of allergy and airway diseases, are proposing real-life ICPs centred around the patient with rhinitis, and using mHealth to monitor environmental exposure. Three aspects of care pathways are being developed: (i) Patient participation, health literacy and self-care through technology-assisted "patient activation", (ii) Implementation of care pathways by pharmacists and (iii) Next-generation guidelines assessing the recommendations of GRADE guidelines in rhinitis and asthma using real-world evidence (RWE) obtained through mobile technology. The EU and global political agendas are of great importance in supporting the digital transformation of health and care, and MASK has been recognized by DG Santé as a Good Practice in the field of digitally-enabled, integrated, person-centred care. CONCLUSION In 20 years, ARIA has considerably evolved from the first multimorbidity guideline in respiratory diseases to the digital transformation of health and care with a strong political involvement.
Collapse
|
48
|
Bousquet J, Pham-Thi N, Bedbrook A, Agache I, Annesi-Maesano I, Ansotegui I, Anto JM, Bachert C, Benveniste S, Bewick M, Billo N, Bosnic-Anticevich S, Bosse I, Brusselle G, Calderon MA, Canonica GW, Caraballo L, Cardona V, Carriazo AM, Cash E, Cecchi L, Chu DK, Colgan E, Costa E, Cruz AA, Czarlewski W, Durham S, Ebisawa M, Erhola M, Fauquert JL, Fokkens WJ, Fonseca JA, Guldemond N, Iinuma T, Illario M, Klimek L, Kuna P, Kvedariene V, Larenas-Linneman D, Laune D, Le LTT, Lourenço O, Malva JO, Marien G, Menditto E, Mullol J, Münter L, Okamoto Y, Onorato GL, Papadopoulos NG, Perala M, Pfaar O, Phillips A, Phillips J, Pinnock H, Portejoie F, Quinones-Delgado P, Rolland C, Rodts U, Samolinski B, Sanchez-Borges M, Schünemann HJ, Shamji M, Somekh D, Togias A, Toppila-Salmi S, Tsiligianni I, Usmani O, Walker S, Wallace D, Valiulis A, Van der Kleij R, Ventura MT, Williams S, Yorgancioglu A, Zuberbier T. Next-generation care pathways for allergic rhinitis and asthma multimorbidity: a model for multimorbid non-communicable diseases-Meeting Report (Part 2). J Thorac Dis 2019; 11:4072-4084. [PMID: 31656683 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2019.09.38] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
|
49
|
Bousquet J, Pham-Thi N, Bedbrook A, Agache I, Annesi-Maesano I, Ansotegui I, Anto JM, Bachert C, Benveniste S, Bewick M, Billo N, Bosnic-Anticevich S, Bosse I, Brusselle G, Calderon MA, Canonica GW, Caraballo L, Cardona V, Carriazo AM, Cash E, Cecchi L, Chu DK, Colgan E, Costa E, Cruz AA, Czarlewski W, Durham S, Ebisawa M, Erhola M, Fauquert JL, Fokkens WJ, Fonseca JA, Guldemond N, Iinuma T, Illario M, Klimek L, Kuna P, Kvedariene V, Larenas-Linneman D, Laune D, Le LTT, Lourenço O, Malva JO, Marien G, Menditto E, Mullol J, Münter L, Okamoto Y, Onorato GL, Papadopoulos NG, Perala M, Pfaar O, Phillips A, Phillips J, Pinnock H, Portejoie F, Quinones-Delgado P, Rolland C, Rodts U, Samolinski B, Sanchez-Borges M, Schünemann HJ, Shamji M, Somekh D, Togias A, Toppila-Salmi S, Tsiligianni I, Usmani O, Walker S, Wallace D, Valiulis A, Van der Kleij R, Ventura MT, Williams S, Yorgancioglu A, Zuberbier T. Next-generation care pathways for allergic rhinitis and asthma multimorbidity: a model for multimorbid non-communicable diseases-Meeting Report (Part 1). J Thorac Dis 2019; 11:3633-3642. [PMID: 31559071 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2019.08.64] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
|
50
|
Bosnic‐Anticevich S, Costa E, Menditto E, Lourenço O, Novellino E, Bialek S, Briedis V, Buonaiuto R, Chrystyn H, Cvetkovski B, Di Capua S, Kritikos V, Mair A, Orlando V, Paulino E, Salimäki J, Söderlund R, Tan R, Williams DM, Wroczynski P, Agache I, Ansotegui IJ, Anto JM, Bedbrook A, Bachert C, Bewick M, Bindslev‐Jensen C, Brozek JL, Canonica GW, Cardona V, Carr W, Casale TB, Chavannes NH, Correia de Sousa J, Cruz AA, Czarlewski W, De Carlo G, Demoly P, Devillier P, Dykewicz MS, Gaga M, El‐Gamal Y, Fonseca J, Fokkens WJ, Guzmán MA, Haahtela T, Hellings PW, Illario M, Ivancevich JC, Just J, Kaidashev I, Khaitov M, Khaltaev N, Keil T, Klimek L, Kowalski ML, Kuna P, Kvedariene V, Larenas‐Linnemann DE, Laune D, Le LTT, Lodrup Carlsen KC, Mahboub B, Maier D, Malva J, Manning PJ, Morais‐Almeida M, Mösges R, Mullol J, Münter L, Murray R, Naclerio R, Namazova‐Baranova L, Nekam K, Nyembue TD, Okubo K, O'Hehir RE, Ohta K, Okamoto Y, Onorato GL, Palkonen S, Panzner P, Papadopoulos NG, Park H, Pawankar R, Pfaar O, Phillips J, Plavec D, Popov TA, Potter PC, Prokopakis EP, Roller‐Wirnsberger RE, Rottem M, Ryan D, Samolinski B, Sanchez‐Borges M, Schunemann HJ, Sheikh A, Sisul JC, Somekh D, Stellato C, To T, Todo‐Bom AM, Tomazic PV, Toppila‐Salmi S, Valero A, Valiulis A, Valovirta E, Ventura MT, Wagenmann M, Wallace D, Waserman S, Wickman M, Yiallouros PK, Yorgancioglu A, Yusuf OM, Zar HJ, Zernotti ME, Zhang L, Zidarn M, Zuberbier T, Bousquet J. ARIA pharmacy 2018 "Allergic rhinitis care pathways for community pharmacy": AIRWAYS ICPs initiative (European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing, DG CONNECT and DG Santé) POLLAR (Impact of Air POLLution on Asthma and Rhinitis) GARD Demonstration project. Allergy 2019; 74:1219-1236. [PMID: 30565275 DOI: 10.1111/all.13701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2018] [Revised: 09/22/2018] [Accepted: 10/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Pharmacists are trusted health care professionals. Many patients use over-the-counter (OTC) medications and are seen by pharmacists who are the initial point of contact for allergic rhinitis management in most countries. The role of pharmacists in integrated care pathways (ICPs) for allergic diseases is important. This paper builds on existing studies and provides tools intended to help pharmacists provide optimal advice/interventions/strategies to patients with rhinitis. The Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA)-pharmacy ICP includes a diagnostic questionnaire specifically focusing attention on key symptoms and markers of the disease, a systematic Diagnosis Guide (including differential diagnoses), and a simple flowchart with proposed treatment for rhinitis and asthma multimorbidity. Key prompts for referral within the ICP are included. The use of technology is critical to enhance the management of allergic rhinitis. However, the ARIA-pharmacy ICP should be adapted to local healthcare environments/situations as regional (national) differences exist in pharmacy care.
Collapse
|