Combination therapy with telaprevir for chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection in patients with HIV: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Telaprevir (TVR) plus peginterferon-α2a (PEG-IFN-α2a) and ribavirin substantially increases treatment efficacy for genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection versus PEG-IFN-α2a-ribavirin alone. Its safety and efficacy in patients with HCV and HIV-1 are unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety and efficacy of TVR plus PEG-IFN-α2a-ribavirin in patients with genotype 1 HCV and HIV-1 and to evaluate pharmacokinetics of TVR and antiretrovirals during coadministration.

DESIGN

Phase 2a, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00983853).

SETTING

16 international multicenter sites.

PATIENTS

62 patients with HCV genotype 1 and HIV-1 who were HCV treatment-naive and receiving 0 or 1 of 2 antiretroviral regimens were randomly assigned to TVR plus PEG-IFN-α2a-ribavirin or placebo plus PEG-IFN-α2a-ribavirin for 12 weeks, plus 36 weeks of PEG-IFN-α2a-ribavirin.

MEASUREMENTS

HCV RNA concentrations.

RESULTS

Pruritus, headache, nausea, rash, and dizziness were higher with TVR plus PEG-IFN-α2a-ribavirin during the first 12 weeks. During this period, serious adverse events occurred in 5% (2 in 38) of those receiving TVR plus PEG-IFN-α2a-ribavirin and 0% (0 in 22) of those receiving placebo plus PEG-IFN-α2a-ribavirin; the same number in both groups discontinued treatment due to adverse events. Sustained virologic response occurred in 74% (28 in 38) of patients receiving TVR plus PEG-IFN-α2a-ribavirin and 45% (10 in 22) of patients receiving placebo plus PEG-IFN-α2a-ribavirin. Rapid HCV suppression was seen with TVR plus PEG-IFN-α2a-ribavirin (68% [26 in 38 patients] vs. 0% [0 in 22 patients] undetectable HCV RNA levels by week 4). Two patients had on-treatment HCV breakthrough with TVR-resistant variants. Patients treated with antiretroviral drugs had no HIV breakthroughs; antiretroviral exposure was not substantially modified by TVR.

LIMITATION

Small sample size and appreciable dropout rate.

CONCLUSION

In patients with HCV and HIV-1, more adverse events occurred with TVR versus placebo plus PEG-IFN-α2a-ribavirin; these were similar in nature and severity to those in patients with HCV treated with TVR. With or without concomitant antiretrovirals, sustained virologic response rates were higher in patients treated with TVR versus placebo plus PEG-IFN-α2a-ribavirin.

Genetic analysis of interferon induced thyroiditis (IIT): evidence for a key role for MHC and apoptosis related genes and pathways

Autoimmune thyroid diseases (AITD) have become increasingly recognized as a complication of interferon-alpha (IFNα) therapy in patients with chronic Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Interferon-induced thyroiditis (IIT) can manifest as clinical thyroiditis in approximately 15% of HCV patients receiving IFNα and subclinical thyroiditis in up to 40% of patients, possibly resulting in either dose reduction or discontinuation of IFNα treatment. However, the exact mechanisms that lead to the development of IIT are unknown and may include IFNα-mediated immune-recruitment as well as direct toxic effects on thyroid follicular cells. We hypothesized that IIT develops in genetically predisposed individuals whose threshold for developing thyroiditis is lowered by IFNα. Therefore, our aim was to identify the susceptibility genes for IIT. We used a genomic convergence approach combining genetic association data with transcriptome analysis of genes upregulated by IFNα. Integrating results of genetic association, transcriptome data, pathway, and haplotype analyses enabled the identification of 3 putative loci, SP100/110/140 (2q37.1), HLA (6p21.3), and TAP1 (6p21.3) that may be involved in the pathogenesis of IIT. Immune-regulation and apoptosis emerged as the predominant mechanisms underlying the etiology of IIT.

Hepatitis Outreach Network: a practical strategy for hepatitis screening with linkage to care in foreign-born communities

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Many foreign-born persons in the US are at high risk of chronic hepatitis B (HBV) and C (HCV) infections, yet are not aware of their infection, and lack healthcare coverage or linkage to care.

METHODS

A unique partnership, the Hepatitis Outreach Network, combines the expertise and resources of the Mount Sinai School of Medicine, the NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, and community-based organizations, to provide education, screening and link to care in communities with high prevalence of chronic viral hepatitis. Comprehensive HBV and HCV screening identifies infected patients, who then receive further evaluation from either local or Mount Sinai physicians, combined with patient-navigators who organize follow-up visits.

RESULTS

Of 1603 persons screened, 76 had HBV and 75 had HCV. Importantly, screening for HCV based on traditional risk factors would have missed 67% of those who tested positive. Of the 76 persons with HCV infection, 49 (64%) received a medical evaluation (26 with local providers and 23 at Mount Sinai). Of the 49 HCV-infected persons evaluated, treatment was recommended in 11 and begun in 8 (73%). Of the 76 persons with HBV infection, 43 (57%) received a medical evaluation (31 with local providers and 12 at Mount Sinai). Of the 43 HBV-infected persons evaluated, treatment was recommended and begun in 5 (100%).

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatitis Outreach Network has successfully established novel proof of concept for identifying HBV and HCV infections in foreign-born persons through use of several unique elements that effectively link them to care.

Sofosbuvir in combination with peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin for non-cirrhotic, treatment-naive patients with genotypes 1, 2, and 3 hepatitis C infection: a randomised, double-blind, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Protease inhibitors have improved treatment of infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV), but dosing, a low barrier to resistance, drug interactions, and side-effects restrict their use. We assessed the safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir, a uridine nucleotide analogue, in treatment-naive patients with genotype 1-3 HCV infection.

METHODS

In this two-cohort, phase 2 trial, we recruited treatment-naive patients with HCV genotypes 1-3 from 22 centres in the USA. All patients were recruited between Aug 16, 2010, and Dec 13, 2010, and were eligible for inclusion if they were aged 18-70 years, had an HCV RNA concentration of 50,000 IU/mL or greater, and had no cirrhosis. We randomly allocated all eligible patients with HCV genotype 1 (cohort A) to receive sofosbuvir 200 mg, sofosbuvir 400 mg, or placebo (2:2:1) for 12 weeks in combination with peginterferon (180 μg per week) and ribavirin (1000-1200 mg daily), after which they continued peginterferon and ribavirin for an additional 12 weeks or 36 weeks (depending on viral response). Randomisation was done by use of a computer-generated randomisation sequence and patients and investigators were masked to treatment allocation until week 12. Patients with genotypes 2 or 3 (cohort B) received open-label sofosbuvir 400 mg plus peginterferon and ribavirin for 12 weeks. Our primary outcomes were safety and tolerability. Secondary efficacy analyses were by intention to treat and endpoints included sustained virological response, defined as undetectable HCV RNA at post-treatment weeks 12 and 24. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01188772.

FINDINGS

In cohort A, 122 patients were assigned 200 mg sofosbuvir (48 patients), 400 mg sofosbuvir (48), or placebo (26). We enrolled 25 patients into cohort B. The most common adverse events--fatigue, headache, nausea, and chills--were consistent with those associated with peginterferon and ribavirin. Eight patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events, two (4%) receiving sofosbuvir 200 mg, three (6%) receiving sofosbuvir 400 mg, and three (12%) receiving placebo. In cohort A, HCV RNA was undetectable at post-treatment week 12 in 43 (90%; 95% CI 77-97) of 48 patients in the 200 mg sofosbuvir group; 43 (91%; 80-98) of 47 patients in the 400 mg sofosbuvir group, and 15 (58%; 37-77) of 26 patients in the placebo group. In cohort B, 23 (92%) of 25 patients had undetectable HCV RNA at post-treatment week 12.

INTERPRETATION

Our findings lend support to the further assessment, in phase 2 and 3 trials, of sofosbuvir 400 mg plus peginterferon and ribavirin for 12 weeks in treatment-naive patients with HCV genotype-1.

FUNDING

Gilead Sciences.

Update on combinations of DAAs with and without pegylated-interferon and ribavirin: triple and quadruple therapy more than doubles SVR

Monotherapy is an ineffective way to treat hepatitis C and it leads to rapid development of resistance. An increasing number of drugs are currently being developed for the treatment of hepatitis C. This allows combination strategies that can overcome the development of resistance and improve sustained virologic response rates. This article focuses on the 2 main strategies in development: quadruple combination therapies, including pegylated-interferon and triple/quadruple pegylated-interferon free combination therapies. If the first combinations are leading to extremely high sustained virologic responses, the second ones offer hope that the era of pegylated-interferon will end soon.

Rapid progression to decompensated cirrhosis, liver transplant, and death in HIV-infected men after primary hepatitis C virus infection

BACKGROUND

We and others have shown that primary hepatitis C (HCV) infection in men infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) causes early-onset liver fibrosis; however, little is known about the long-term natural history of the liver disease in these HIV-infected men.

METHODS

We followed a cohort of HIV-infected men with primary HCV infection in New York City.

RESULTS

Four men who were not cured after their primary HCV infection developed decompensated cirrhosis within 17 months to 6 years after primary HCV infection. Three died within 8 years of primary HCV infection, and 1 survived after liver transplant done 2 years after primary HCV infection. Three of the 4 men had AIDS at the time of primary HCV infection, and the most rapid progression occurred in the 2 men with the lowest CD4 counts at the time of HCV infection. Liver histopathology was most consistent with HCV-induced damage even though some had exposures to other potential hepatotoxins.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary HCV infection resulted in decompensated cirrhosis and death within 2-8 years in 4 HIV-infected men. The rapid onset of fibrosis due to primary HCV infection in HIV-infected men cannot therefore be considered benign. The rate of continued progression to liver failure may be proportional to the degree of underlying immunocompromise caused by HIV infection. More research is needed to better define the mechanisms behind accelerated liver damage.

Direct-acting antiviral agents in patients with hepatitis C cirrhosis

Patients with cirrhosis who are infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) are the most in need of antiviral treatment. Virologic cure improves fibrosis and quality of life while reducing liver-related morbidity and mortality. In mid-2011, the addition of direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs)-the protease inhibitors boceprevir (Victrelis, Merck) and telaprevir (Incivek, Vertex)-to pegylated interferon α-2a/b and ribavirin revolutionized the treatment of HCV infection by increasing cure rates across all fibrosis scores in patients with genotype 1 HCV infection. However, patients with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis are the most difficult to treat, and the addition of DAAs increases treatment side effects as well as potency. Five phase III DAA trials have been published to date, but they contain limited data on patients with cirrhosis. This review will examine the available data and will describe the evolution of HCV therapy in patients with cirrhosis from the standard-of-care therapy of the past decade into the new era of DAAs.

GS-7977: a promising nucleotide analog NS5B polymerase inhibitor of HCV

Despite the approval of the protease inhibitors telaprevir and boceprevir, the treatment of hepatitis C remains difficult to manage and sustained virologic response rates have room for further improvement. GS-7977 is a nucleotide analog NS5B inhibitor currently in Phase III trials. It offers great hope in addressing the problems currently associated with pegylated interferon and protease inhibitor-based therapies. The purpose of this article is to review the development of GS-7977, the information currently available in the public domain concerning its pharmacokinetic, clinical efficacy and side-effect profile, and to evaluate the future of this drug and its integration into the hepatitis C treatment paradigm.

Mortality in hepatitis C virus-infected patients with a diagnosis of AIDS in the era of combination antiretroviral therapy

BACKGROUND

Before the introduction of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART), patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) rarely died of liver disease. In resource-rich countries, cART dramatically increased longevity. As patients survived longer, hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection became a leading cause of death; however, because patients with AIDS continue to have 5-fold greater mortality than non-AIDS patients, it is unclear whether HCV infection increases mortality in them.

METHODS

In this investigation, which is part of the Longitudinal Studies of the Ocular Complications of AIDS, plasma banked at enrollment from 2025 patients with AIDS as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were tested for HCV RNA and antibodies.

RESULTS

Three hundred thirty-seven patients had HCV RNA (chronic infection), 91 had HCV antibodies and no HCV RNA (cleared infection), and 1597 had no HCV markers. Median CD4(+) T-cell counts/µL were 200 (chronic), 193 (cleared), and 175 (no markers). There were 558 deaths. At a median follow-up of 6.1 years, patients with chronic HCV had a 50% increased risk of mortality compared with patients with no HCV markers (relative risk [RR], 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-1.9; P = .001) in an adjusted model that included known risk factors. Mortality was not increased in patients with cleared infection (RR, 0.9; 95% CI, .6-1.5; P = .82). In patients with chronic HCV, 20.4% of deaths were liver related compared with 3.8% in patients without HCV.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic HCV infection is independently associated with a 50% increase in mortality among patients with a diagnosis of AIDS, despite competing risks. Effective HCV treatment may benefit HIV/HCV-coinfected patients with AIDS.

The era of direct-acting antivirals has begun: the beginning of the end for HCV?

The year 2011 marks the dawn of the new era of direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C. For the first time since 1998, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved two new antiviral drugs for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1. Dual therapy with pegylated interferon and ribavirin is no longer the standard of care for genotype 1. The new treatment paradigm includes one direct-acting antiviral, a protease inhibitor, in combination with pegylated interferon and ribavirin. This combination nearly doubles the chances of response to treatment, but at the cost of increased toxicity. Many agents with different mechanisms of action and improved safety profiles are in clinical development. The holy grail of HCV treatment is an all oral, interferon-free treatment. The ideal regimen will be potent, well tolerated, with minimal drug-drug interactions and once daily. This article covers new concepts of treatment of hepatitis C with DAAs and gives an overview of the recent highlights in direct-acting antiviral development.

The HIV/HCV-coinfected patient and new treatment options

Hepatitis C (HCV) treatment is on the cusp of change with the approval of the first direct-acting antivirals: telaprevir and boceprevir. Drug-drug interactions with HIV antiretrovirals, increased toxicity, and rapid selection of HCV-resistant mutants are among the treatment complexities expected in this difficult-to-treat population. Until the current standard of care changes, focus should be on strategies to optimize management of HIV/HCV-coinfected patients with currently available options. This article reviews the latest predictive factors of response to HCV treatment with the current standard of care in HIV-coinfected patients, and new treatment options.

Insulin resistance predicts re-treatment failure in an efficacy study of peginterferon-α-2a and ribavirin in HIV/HCV co-infected patients

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Few studies evaluated the efficacy of HCV re-treatment and the predictors of response in HIV/HCV co-infected patients. The role of insulin resistance as a predictor of response in this population is unknown. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of pegylated interferon-α-2a and ribavirin in re-treatment of HIV/HCV co-infected patients, predictors of sustained virological response, including insulin resistance, and the relationship between insulin resistance and liver histology.

METHODS

This prospective, multi-centered study included HIV/HCV co-infected patients with prior interferon-based treatment failure. Patients received pegylated interferon-α-2a and ribavirin for 48 weeks. Serum HCV RNA was measured 24 weeks post treatment to assess sustained virological response. Insulin resistance was defined as HOMA-IR >2. Correlations between baseline insulin resistance and steatosis, and/or cirrhosis were determined.

RESULTS

Sustained virological response was achieved in 14/96 (15%) patients. 35% of patients with HOMA-IR < 2 (6/17) achieved sustained virological response vs 14% (5/36) of those with HOMA-IR between 2-4, and 7% (3/41) of those with HOMA-IR > 4 (p = 0.01). In multivariable analysis, insulin resistance and log₁₀ HCV RNA were negatively associated with sustained virological response [AOR 0.17; 95% CI 0.05-0.64, p = 0.009, and AOR 0.36; 95% CI 0.14-0.93, p = 0.04, respectively]. Steatosis and cirrhosis correlated with insulin resistance (p = 0.02 and 0.03, respectively) but neither independently predicted sustained virological response. Discontinuations due to severe adverse events occurred in 8% of cases, and 2 patients died of unrelated causes.

CONCLUSIONS

In HIV/HCV co-infected patients undergoing re-treatment, sustained virological response rate is low; those patients without insulin resistance are significantly more likely to achieve sustained virological response.

The development of hepatoportal sclerosis and portal hypertension due to didanosine use in HIV

Hepatoportal sclerosis (HPS) is one of several entities known to cause noncirrhotic portal hypertension. To date, its etiology is unknown. There have been increasing reports of HPS occurring in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently issued an advisory regarding the development of noncirrhotic portal hypertension in association with didanosine (ddI) use. We report on a patient with HIV who had taken ddI for 4 years and who developed portal hypertension. Histopathological review of paired liver biopsies showed an initial drug hepatotoxicity, microvascular liver injury, and the presence of HPS. Despite cessation of ddI, the latter biopsy showed resolution of the drug-induced injury, but it also showed progression of the HPS. The patient's portal hypertension also progressed suggestive of an unremitting vascular injury. This case demonstrates the development of HPS resulting from a drug-induced microvascular injury. The paired biopsies demonstrate that the initial vascular injury may disappear but that the portal hypertension and HPS progress.

A sustained virologic response is durable in patients with chronic hepatitis C treated with peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin

BACKGROUND & AIMS

A sustained virologic response (SVR) to therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is defined as the inability to detect HCV RNA 24 weeks after completion of treatment. Although small studies have reported that the SVR is durable and lasts for long periods, it has not been conclusively shown.

METHODS

The durability of treatment responses was examined in patients originally enrolled in one of 9 randomized multicenter trials (n = 1343). The study included patients who received pegylated interferon (peginterferon) alfa-2a alone (n = 166) or in combination with ribavirin (n = 1077, including 79 patients with normal alanine aminotransferase levels and 100 patients who were coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus and HCV) and whose serum samples were negative for HCV RNA (<50 IU/mL) at their final assessment. Patients were assessed annually, from the date of last treatment, for a mean of 3.9 years (range, 0.8-7.1 years).

RESULTS

Most patients (99.1%) who achieved an SVR had undetectable levels of HCV RNA in serum samples throughout the follow-up period. Serum samples from 0.9% of the patients contained HCV RNA a mean of 1.8 years (range, 1.1-2.9 years) after treatment ended. It is not clear if these patients were reinfected or experienced a relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large cohort of patients monitored for the durability of an SVR, the SVR was maintained for almost 4 years after treatment with peginterferon alfa-2a alone or in combination with ribavirin. In patients with chronic hepatitis C infection, the SVR is durable and these patients should be considered as cured.

Short communication: Inadequate vitamin D exacerbates parathyroid hormone elevations in tenofovir users

Parathyroid hormone (PTH) elevations are associated with reduced bone mineral density and adverse health outcomes and have been reported in patients with HIV infection. We aimed to examine the impact of vitamin D status and tenofovir (TDF) use on PTH levels among HIV-infected patients receiving combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). Demographics, medication and supplement use, and clinical data, including 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] and PTH, were collected on 45 HIV-infected men on ART. Suboptimal vitamin D status was defined as 25(OH)D < 30 ng/ml. The relationship between antiretroviral agents, suboptimal 25(OH)D, and PTH levels was examined. Among subjects with suboptimal vitamin D status, PTH values greater than or equal to the ULN (87 pg/ml) were more common among TDF users than nonusers: 41% versus 0% (p = 0.018); and median PTH was higher in TDF users: 80 pg/ml versus 55 pg/ml (p = 0.02). Among TDF users, PTH was higher in the group with suboptimal 25(OH)D (p = 0.045). Multivariable linear regression showed that PTH was independently and directly related to TDF use (p = 0.017) and inversely related to 25(OH)D (p = 0.017). PTH was not related to the estimated glomerular filtration rate (p = 0.9). In this cross-sectional study of HIV-infected men on ART, the use of TDF and the level of 25(OH)D were independently associated with PTH levels. Because TDF is a potent and widely used antiretroviral drug, information about cofactors that may exacerbate its side effects is of significant clinical value.

Management of chronic hepatitis C patients who have relapsed or not responded to pegylated interferon alfa plus ribavirin

Development of therapeutic strategies for patients with chronic hepatitis C who experience virological breakthrough, relapse or nonresponse lag behind those for treatment-naïve patients. The probability of a previously treated patient responding to re-treatment depends on the nature of the previous regimen, the magnitude of the response to previous treatment and the patient's characteristics. Relapsers have higher sustained virological response rates than nonresponders when re-treated with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin. Re-treatment of nonresponders to pegylated interferon plus ribavirin with the standard 48-week regimen resulted in an approximate 6% sustained response rate in the EPIC-3 program. In the REPEAT trial, the sustained response rate was significantly higher in nonresponders to pegylated interferon alfa-2b (12 kD) plus ribavirin randomized to 72 weeks of peginterferon alfa-2a (40 kD) plus ribavirin, compared with a 48-week regimen (16%vs 8%, P = 0.0006). Based on available data, extended treatment is the best option for these individuals. Undetectable viral RNA at week 12 is an important criterion for re-treatment in the REPEAT and EPIC studies. Maintenance therapy with pegylated interferon is generally ineffective in nonresponders and cannot be recommended. Directly acting antivirals may increase response rates and the burden of adverse events when combined with the standard of care, but will not be available for some years. In conclusion, after careful evaluation of an individual's benefit-risk ratio, a 72-week regimen is the preferred strategy for optimizing sustained response rates in patients who have not responded to the standard of care, provided that viral RNA is undetectable at week 12 of re-treatment.

Hepatitis B therapies and antiviral resistance detection and management

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is an important health problem and a major cause of chronic hepatitis that can lead to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Durable viral suppression has been documented to lower the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma and disease progression. Treatment of chronic HBV infection remains a major clinical challenge because long-term use with approved oral antiviral agents is associated with drug resistance. Antiviral resistance can result in poor clinical outcomes; therefore first-line therapy with the most potent agent(s) is recommended to lower the risk. Early detection of resistance is paramount to possibly reduce the risk of liver-related morbidity and mortality. It is important that clinicians monitor for therapeutic efficacy and resistance, so as to optimize the management of chronic HBV.

Liver fibrosis during an outbreak of acute hepatitis C virus infection in HIV-infected men: a prospective cohort study

Outbreaks of acute hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are occurring in HIV-infected men who have sex with men. We evaluated risk factors and liver histopathology in 11 consecutively enrolled men with newly acquired HCV infection that was diagnosed on the basis of antibody seroconversion, new elevations in alanine aminotransferase level, and wide fluctuations in HCV RNA level. Ten patients reported unprotected anal intercourse, and 7 reported "club-drug" use, including methamphetamine. Liver biopsy showed moderately advanced fibrosis (Scheuer stage 2) in 9 patients (82%). No cause of liver damage other than acute HCV infection was identified. The specific pathways leading to periportal fibrosis in HIV-infected men with newly acquired HCV infection require investigation.

Treatment of dialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C using pegylated interferon and low-dose ribavirin

BACKGROUND

No safe and effective therapy exists for chronic hepatitis C in dialysis patients. Available data on the antiviral treatment of hepatitis C in dialysis population is mostly based on standard interferon monotherapy.

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a prospective, cohort trial with combined therapy (pegylated-interferonalpha-2a (135 mcg/week) plus low dose ribavirin (200 mg/day)) for chronic hepatitis C in 15 patients undergoing long-term dialysis. Twelve patients had HCV genotype 1a/1b, three were co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and two had compensated cirrhosis. End-points were sustained viral response and adverse effects.

RESULTS

Sustained virological response was obtained in four patients (including two with HCV genotype 1); the SVR rate was 28.6% (4/14), on an intention-to-treat analysis. One subject with SVR had compensated cirrhosis. All HIV co-infected patients had well controlled HIV and one of them (33%) reached SVR. Seven (50%) of the 14 patients were non-responders, two of which relapsed after discontinuation of therapy. Drop-out rate was 71.4% (10/14). The most frequent side-effect was anemia, which required ribavirin discontinuation in three patients; seven (47%) patients received blood transfusions. Two patients died (week 4 and 14) of causes related to cardiovascular disease, which was frequent in our cohort. Two subjects were hospitalized and discontinued therapy (week 1, and 27).

CONCLUSIONS

Results from this study showed that about one-third of HD patients achieved sustained virological response with pegylated-interferon-alpha-2a plus low-dose ribavirin; however, tolerance to antiviral treatment was unsatisfactory. Well- controlled HIV infection should not be a contraindication to HCV therapy in dialysis patients. Prospective, controlled clinical trials of combined antiviral therapy targeted at HCV in chronic kidney disease population are indicated.

Hepatitis C patients' self-reported adherence to treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin

BACKGROUND

Prior research on adherence to hepatitis C treatment has documented rates of dose reductions and early treatment discontinuation, but little is known about patients' dose-taking adherence.

AIMS

To assess the prevalence of missed doses of pegylated interferon and ribavirin and examine the correlates of dose-taking adherence in clinic settings.

METHODS

One hundred and eighty patients on treatment for hepatitis C (23% coinfected with HIV) completed a cross-sectional survey at the site of their hepatitis C care.

RESULTS

Seven per cent of patients reported missing at least one injection of pegylated interferon in the last 4 weeks and 21% reported missing at least one dose of ribavirin in the last 7 days. Dose-taking adherence was not associated with HCV viral load.

CONCLUSIONS

Self-reported dose non-adherence to hepatitis C treatment occurs frequently. Further studies of dose non-adherence (assessed by method other than self-report) and its relationship to HCV virological outcome are warranted.

Hepatic steatosis in HIV/HCV co-infected patients: correlates, efficacy and outcomes of anti-HCV therapy: a paired liver biopsy study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Hepatic steatosis is caused by the complex interaction of host and viral factors, such as metabolic syndrome (MS), alcoholism and HCV genotype, and in HIV-HCV co-infected patients, antiretroviral therapy may also play a role. A large population of patients from the AIDS Pegasys Ribavirin International Co-infection Trial (APRICOT) had paired liver biopsies interpreted and graded for steatosis along with lipid measurements and anthropometric data.

METHODS

We analyzed these patients to determine the prevalence of steatosis, baseline factors associated with steatosis, effect of steatosis in HCV therapy efficacy and the impact of anti-HCV treatment on steatosis.

RESULTS

A total of 65/283 (23%) patients with paired biopsies were positive for steatosis. Patients with steatosis were significantly more likely to have HCV genotype 3, bridging fibrosis/cirrhosis, higher HCV RNA levels, increased triglycerides and lower cholesterol levels. The only different body measurement was neck circumference which was greater in patients with steatosis and significantly decreased from baseline during the study. Hip circumference was predictive of steatosis at baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

Factors associated to the metabolic syndrome are important in co-infected patients. Treatment outcome affected steatosis in that viral eradication reduced steatosis in genotype 3 patients, but altogether steatosis did not affect efficacy of treatment in any genotype.

Chronic hepatitis B: preventing, detecting, and managing viral resistance

Licensed oral agents for antiviral therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection include lamivudine, adefovir, entecavir, and telbivudine. Emtricitabine, tenofovir, and the combination of tenofovir plus emtricitabine in 1 tablet, which are licensed for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus infection, are additional off-label options for treating HBV infection. Preventing HBV antiviral drug resistance to nucleoside/nucleotide analogues and appropriate management when resistance occurs has become a major focus in the management of chronic hepatitis B. HBV antiviral drug resistance may be best prevented by using an agent or combination of agents with a high genetic barrier to resistance, and 2 potent nucleoside and nucleotide drugs with different resistance profiles may prove to be the optimal first-line treatment for chronic hepatitis B. Frequent assessment of quantitative serum HBV DNA remains the best approach to early detection of resistance, and antiviral therapy should be modified as soon as resistance is detected. Results from several clinical trials have shown that the addition or substitution of newer antiviral agents can restore suppression of viral replication, normalize alanine aminotransferase levels, and reverse histologic progression in patients with resistance to lamivudine, but little information exists regarding the long-term benefits of second-line treatment regimens. Despite the substantial advances in treatment made to date, new agents with novel viral targets will be needed for patients who ultimately may fail second- or third-line therapy.

Treatment of acute hepatitis C in an HIV-positive man with pegylated interferon and ribavirin for 24 weeks

An epidemic of acute hepatitis C is emerging among HIV-infected men who have sex with men (MSM), with a growing number of cases reported in the MSM population in the United States and Europe. We report a case of a 47-year-old HIV-infected MSM who sexually contracted acute hepatitis C and was treated with pegylated interferon and ribavirin for 24 weeks. After 4 weeks of therapy, the patient's HCV RNA level became undetectable and remained undetectable 1 year after the 24-week treatment course.

Presentation and outcome of hepatocellular carcinoma in HIV-infected patients: a U.S.-Canadian multicenter study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

HIV-infected patients now live longer and often have complications of liver disease, especially with hepatitis B or C virus coinfection. Limited data are available on those with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis from 1992 to 2005 in 6 centers identified 63 HIV-infected HCC patients. Controls were 226 consecutive HIV-negative HCC patients from four sites.

RESULTS

HIV-positive patients were younger than controls (52 vs. 64 years, p<0.001), more commonly had chronic hepatitis B or C (97% vs. 73%, p<0.001), were more frequently symptomatic (51% vs. 38%, p=0.048), had a higher median alfa-fetoprotein level (227 vs. 51 ng/ml, p=0.005), but a similar mean Child-Turcotte-Pugh score (7.0 vs. 7.5, p=0.05) and HCC staging score (Barcelona-Clínic-Liver-Cancer stages C+D in 50% vs. 58%, p=0.24). HCC developed faster in HIV/HCV-coinfected than in HCV-monoinfected patients (mean, 26 vs. 34 years after HCV infection, p=0.002). HIV-positive patients received proven therapy more often (48% vs. 31%, p=0.017), but median survival was similar (6.9 vs. 7.5 months, p=0.44). Independent factors predicting survival were symptomatic presentation (hazard ratio [HR], 0.437; p<0.001), any proven therapy (HR, 2.19; p<0.001), diagnosis after 01-Jan-2002 (HR, 1.52; p=0.010), Barcelona-Clínic-Liver-Cancer stages C+D (HR, 0.491; p<0.001), AST/ALT >or= 2.00 (HR, 0.597; p=0.001), AFP >or= 400 ng/mL (HR, 0.55, p=0.003), and platelets >or= 100,000/mm3 (HR, 0.651; p=0.012), but not HIV-serostatus (p=0.19). In HIV-infected patients without HCC therapy (n=33), median survival was longer with undetectable HIV RNA (<400 copies/mL) than with HIV viremia (6.5 vs. 2.6 months, p=0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

HIV-positive HCC patients are younger and more frequently symptomatic and infected with HCV or HBV than HIV-negative patients. Tumor staging and survival are similar. In untreated patients, undetectable HIV RNA independently predicts better survival.

Report of an international workshop: Roadmap for management of patients receiving oral therapy for chronic hepatitis B

An international group of experienced hepatologists and virologists conducted a single-day workshop to review the management of patients with chronic hepatitis B receiving treatment with oral nucleosides or nucleotides. Guidelines regarding on-treatment management and available published data on the importance of serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA as a marker of outcomes were reviewed. On-treatment monitoring strategies to define early virologic responses that might be predictive of better outcomes and a reduced risk of viral resistance were proposed for further study. This treatment plan, labeled the roadmap concept, recommends monitoring of serum HBV DNA levels to identify outcomes of therapy. Primary treatment failure was defined as a reduction of serum HBV DNA levels by less than 1 log10 IU/mL from baseline at week 12. Measurement of the HBV DNA level at week 24 was considered essential to characterize virologic responses as complete, partial, or inadequate. Complete virologic response was defined as negative HBV DNA by a sensitive assay (<60 IU/mL or <300 copies/mL); partial virologic response was defined as HBV DNA levels less than 2000 IU/mL (4 log10 copies/mL), and inadequate virologic response was defined as HBV DNA levels of 2000 IU/mL or greater (4 log10 copies/mL). Strategies are proposed for managing patients in each of these categories, depending in part on the rapidity with which HBV DNA suppression is achieved and the emergence of genotypic mutations that reduce the effectiveness of a specific drug. Future studies of the use of the roadmap concept in improving outcomes of chronic hepatitis B are warranted.

Baseline factors prognostic of sustained virological response in patients with HIV-hepatitis C virus co-infection

OBJECTIVE

To identify baseline characteristics predictive of a sustained virological response (SVR) in patients with HIV-hepatitis C virus (HCV) co-infection treated with interferon-based therapy.

DESIGN/METHODS

A stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis was used to explore the prognostic factors associated with SVR [undetectable HCV-RNA (< 50 IU/ml) at the end of untreated follow-up in week 72].

RESULTS

In all patients (n = 853), in addition to the HCV therapy received, the factors most predictive of SVR were baseline HCV-RNA [< or = versus > 400 000 IU/ml; odds ratio (OR) 4.77; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.15-7.22; P < 0.0001] and HCV genotype (OR 2.87; 95% CI 2.00-4.12; P < 0.0001). HIV treatment (with a protease inhibitor or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor; P = 0.034), race (P = 0.027), and body mass index (P = 0.039) were also weak predictors of HCV treatment response.

CONCLUSIONS

In the AIDS PEGASYS Ribavirin International Co-infection Trial (APRICOT), the predictors of SVR among HIV-HCV co-infected patients treated with peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin were similar to those in patients with HCV mono-infection. The HCV genotype and pretreatment HCV-RNA level had the greatest influence on SVR.

Special Considerations and Treatment of Patients with HBV-HIV Coinfection

Coinfection with HIV and hepatitis B virus (HBV) substantially alters the natural course of HBV infection as well as its management. Therapy for HBV infection in HIV-coinfected patients requires several factors to be taken into consideration, such as whether the antiviral activity of a particular agent is specific for HBV (that is, adefovir, entecavir, telbivudine and pegylated interferon) or for both viruses (that is, lamivudine, emtricitabine and tenofovir), whether the chosen drug has the potential for inducing drug resistance and cross-resistance, and whether use of the agent is associated with hepatotoxicity. For coinfected patients who do not require therapy for their HIV infection, clinicians should avoid prescribing monotherapy with agents that have activity against HIV (that is, tenofovir, entecavir, emtricitabine or lamivudine) so as not to compromise future HIV care. This review discusses the current status of treatment of hepatitis B in the setting of HIV infection. It describes emerging therapeutic strategies and addresses challenges in the treatment of coinfection.

Special considerations and treatment of patients with HBV-HIV coinfection

Coinfection with HIV and hepatitis B virus (HBV) substantially alters the natural course of HBV infection as well as its management. Therapy for HBV infection in HIV-coinfected patients requires several factors to be taken into consideration, such as whether the antiviral activity of a particular agent is specific for HBV (that is, adefovir, entecavir, telbivudine and pegylated interferon) or for both viruses (that is, lamivudine, emtricitabine and tenofovir), whether the chosen drug has the potential for inducing drug resistance and cross-resistance, and whether use of the agent is associated with hepatotoxicity. For coinfected patients who do not require therapy for their HIV infection, clinicians should avoid prescribing monotherapy with agents that have activity against HIV (that is, tenofovir, entecavir, emtricitabine or lamivudine) so as not to compromise future HIV care. This review discusses the current status of treatment of hepatitis B in the setting of HIV infection. It describes emerging therapeutic strategies and addresses challenges in the treatment of coinfection.

Effect of switching to tenofovir with emtricitabine in patients with chronic hepatitis B failing to respond to an adefovir-containing regimen

BACKGROUND

In patients with chronic hepatitis B, long-term use of lamivudine is limited by resistance mutations. Adefovir dipivoxil has a very low rate of resistance, but there have been recent reports describing resistance mutations. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine show potent activity against wild-type and lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus.

METHODS

We describe a series of seven HIV-seronegative patients who failed to achieve undetectable hepatitis B viral DNA on adefovir. No lamivudine resistance testing was performed. The antiviral regimen was changed to tenofovir (300 mg daily) and emtricitabine (200 mg daily). Variables collected included levels of hepatitis B viral DNA by polymerase chain reaction, alanine and aspartate aminotransferase, hepatitis B e antigen and hepatitis B e antibody.

RESULTS

The median hepatitis B viral DNA level while on adefovir was 430,000 copies/ml with a median fall in hepatitis B viral DNA levels of 2.0 log10 copies/ml. Patients were on adefovir for a median period of 10 months before a change in regimen to tenofovir and emtricitabine. This regimen change resulted in a median fall in hepatitis B viral DNA levels of 3.0 log10 copies/ml (range, 2-4) after a median treatment duration of 23 months (range, 14-28). All patients (100%) had achieved undetectable hepatitis B viral DNA levels following combination therapy. Anti-hepatitis B e seroconversion occurred in one patient. No change in serum creatinine was observed during therapy, and no significant adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients failing to respond to adefovir monotherapy or an adefovir-containing regimen for chronic hepatitis B virus, a combination of tenofovir and emtricitabine resulted in undetectable hepatitis B viral DNA levels without any renal toxicity. Tenofovir, in combination with emtricitabine, may be an alternative treatment for those with detectable hepatitis B viral DNA on adefovir.

Zidovudine use but not weight-based ribavirin dosing impacts anaemia during HCV treatment in HIV-infected persons

Anaemia during peginterferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) therapy is common in human immunodeficiency virus/hepatitis C virus (HIV/HCV)-coinfected patients despite the use of lower doses of RBV than are recommended for HIV-seronegative persons. In addition, concurrent zidovudine (ZDV) may exacerbate the anaemia caused by PEG-IFN and RBV. We retrospectively analysed the incidence of anaemia, RBV dose reduction and epoetin-alpha (EPO) use among coinfected patients treated with PEG-IFN and weight-based RBV (800-1400 mg/day) who enrolled in two clinical trials and had haemoglobin (Hb) levels assessed at baseline and after 4 and/or 12 weeks of HCV treatment. Overall, 217 patients were included; pre-treatment Hb levels (mean 14.7 g/dL) were similar in all patients, including ZDV users (29% of patients). After 4 weeks of therapy, the mean Hb decline was greater among ZDV recipients (3.13 g/dL) compared with those on other anti-retroviral treatment (ART) (2.13 g/dL) or on no ART (1.47 g/dL) (P < 0.0001). RBV dose reduction and EPO use were more common in patients taking ZDV compared with those not taking ZDV (P < 0.0001). RBV dose was not associated with Hb reduction, RBV dose reduction or EPO use. Virologic response after 12 weeks of therapy and the treatment discontinuation rate did not differ by ZDV use. The use of ZDV but not weight-based RBV dosing was associated with an increased risk of anaemia, RBV dose reduction or EPO use in coinfected patients treated with PEG-IFN/RBV. However, ZDV use was not associated with higher rates of treatment discontinuation or lower early virologic response rates. HIV and hepatitis C care providers should be cognizant of these data.

A treatment algorithm for the management of chronic hepatitis B virus infection in the United States: an update

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is an important public health problem worldwide and in the United States, with approximately 25% of patients infected as neonates dying prematurely from cirrhosis or liver cancer. A treatment algorithm for CHB previously developed and published by a panel of United States hepatologists was revised based on new developments in the understanding of CHB, the availability of more sensitive molecular diagnostic testing, the addition of new treatments, and better understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of approved therapies. This updated algorithm is based on available evidence using a systematic review of the scientific literature. Where data are lacking, the panel relied on clinical experience and consensus expert opinion. Serum HBV DNA can be detected at levels as low as 10 IU/mL using molecular assays and should be determined to establish a baseline level before treatment, monitor response to antiviral therapy, and survey for the development of drug resistance. The primary aim of antiviral therapy is durable suppression of serum HBV DNA to the lowest levels possible. The threshold level of HBV DNA for determination of candidacy for therapy is 20,000 IU/mL or more for patients with hepatitis B e antigen-positive CHB. A lower serum HBV DNA threshold of 2000 IU/mL or more is recommended for patients with hepatitis B e antigen-negative CHB, and 200 IU/mL or more for those with decompensated cirrhosis. Interferon alfa-2b, lamivudine, adefovir, entecavir, and peginterferon alfa-2a all are approved as initial therapy for CHB and have certain advantages and disadvantages. Issues for consideration include efficacy, safety, incidence of resistance, method of administration, and cost.

Cost-effectiveness of peginterferon alfa-2a (40kDa) plus ribavirin in patients with HIV and hepatitis C virus co-infection

BACKGROUND

A multinational trial (APRICOT) showed that peginterferon alfa-2a (40kDa) plus ribavirin is efficacious for treatment of HIV-HCV co-infection. The cost-effectiveness of treating these patients with peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin has yet to be explored from a US societal perspective.

OBJECTIVE

To predict the cost-effectiveness of peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin with interferon/ribavirin (IFN/RBV) or no treatment in HIV-HCV co-infected patients.

STUDY DESIGN

A Markov model was constructed with liver progression estimates based on published literature. Sustained virological response and baseline characteristics of the reference case were based on APRICOT. Quality of life and costs in 2004 US dollars (US$) were based on literature estimates and discounted at 3%.

RESULTS

Peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin compared with IFN/RBV or no treatment is predicted to increase quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) by 0.73 and 0.94 years, respectively, in HCV-genotype-1 patients. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin compared with IFN/RBV and no treatment for all patients is respectively US$ 2,082 and 5,187/QALY gained.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-HCV treatment is predicted to decrease the risk of cirrhosis and increase quality-adjusted survival of HIV-HCV co-infected patients compared with IFN/RBV and no treatment. Peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin's cost per QALY gained relative to these options falls within the cost-effectiveness level of many health technologies commonly adopted in the US.

Risk of Immune Recovery Uveitis in Patients with AIDS and Cytomegalovirus Retinitis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prevalence of and risk factors for immune recovery uveitis (IRU) in eyes of patients with AIDS and cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis.

DESIGN

Enrollment data from a 19-clinical center cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

Three hundred seventy-four patients with AIDS and CMV retinitis affecting 539 eyes.

METHODS

Patients with AIDS were enrolled at 19 United States AIDS ophthalmology clinics. Data were collected by interview, review of medical records, ophthalmic examination, and phlebotomy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Immune recovery uveitis.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients (9.6%) were diagnosed with IRU involving 50 eyes. The CD4+ T-cell count of 31 of these had risen by > or =50 cells per microliter above nadir to a level > or = 100 cells per microliter (immune recovery), making up 17.6% of the patients known to have immune recovery after diagnosis of CMV retinitis (95% confidence interval, 12.3%-24.1%). No patients with IRU were observed to have active retinitis or detectable CMV DNA in peripheral blood (P<0.001 and P<0.001 with respect to patients without IRU). Other factors associated with IRU were > or =25% retinal area (odds ratio [OR], 2.72; P = 0.014) or posterior pole involvement with CMV retinitis (odds ratio, 0.43; P = 0.039), treatment with intravitreous injection of cidofovir (OR, 10.6 with respect to eyes never exposed to intravitreous or IV cidofovir; P<0.001), and male gender (OR, 0.26; P = 0.012). More eyes with IRU had visual acuity (VA) of 20/50 or worse (38.0% vs. 26.3%, P = 0.077) relative to eyes without IRU, but the proportions with VA of 20/200 or worse were similar (14.0% vs. 13.8%, P = 0.96). Eyes with IRU more commonly had cystoid macular edema (CME) (45.5% vs. 3.7%, P<0.001) and epiretinal membrane (48.9% vs. 13.3%, P<0.001) than eyes without IRU.

CONCLUSIONS

Among eyes of patients with immune recovery, the prevalence of IRU is substantial. Eyes with IRU have a high risk of additional morbidity over and above that seen with CMV retinitis, with several-fold higher risk of CME and epiretinal membrane. Large CMV lesions and use of intravitreous cidofovir are risk factors for IRU.

Sustained virologic response with short-course ribavirin and peginterferon treatment in 2 patients coinfected with HIV and HCV genotype 1

The current recommendation for the duration of treatment of patients infected with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 is 48 weeks; however, the standard regimen of peginterferon plus ribavirin bears significant adverse effects, which make completion of treatment exceedingly difficult. Reported here are 2 cases of HIV-HCV-coinfected genotype-1 patients who discontinued treatment early (after 3 and 8 weeks) because of adverse effects yet had a sustained virologic response with undetectable HCV viral loads at follow-up.

HBV plus HCV, HCV plus HIV, HBV plus HIV

Coinfection of hepatitis C virus (HCV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and HIV is common due to shared modes of transmission. These coinfections accelerate the course of chronic liver disease and facilitate progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The viral interactions between these viruses are complex, and their treatment may be challenging for clinicians.

Management of chronic Hepatitis C virus in patients with HIV

The life expectancy of HIV seropositive persons is approaching the life expectancy of those who are uninfected with HIV. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has emerged as a worldwide epidemic. Given the similar transmission route between HCV and HIV, there has been an explosion in the number of individuals infected with both viruses. Because of the successful introduction of antiretroviral therapy, patients are more susceptible to new opportunistic infections such as HCV. HCV leads to a more rapid progression to end-stage liver disease in patients with HIV, and the morbidity and mortality related to HCV in co-infected patients is on the rise. Therefore, it has become imperative to treat both HIV and HCV in co-infected patients. The primary goal of HCV therapy is permanent eradication of the virus. Secondary goals include reduction in hepatic fibrosis progression, development of decompensated cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Early studies using standard interferon-alfa for the treatment of HCV in co-infected individuals were discouraging, as poor outcomes, high discontinuation rates, and severe adverse events were observed. The current standard of care for treatment of HCV is pegylated-interferon and ribavirin. New studies have recently demonstrated a higher sustained virologic response rate and a better adverse event profile than previously reported in co-infected patients. As a result, we recommend considering all co-infected patients for HCV therapy while watching closely for unique treatment-related toxicities. The treatment of HCV in co-infected patients should be a high priority for all providers.

HIV and liver diseases: recent clinical advances

Because the life expectancy of patients infected with HIV has been prolonged, liver diseases have assumed far greater importance as a cause of morbidity and mortality in these patients. Given the shared risks of transmission, patients who have HIV often are coinfected with hepatotrophic viruses such as hepatitis C and hepatitis B. Further, antiretroviral therapy (ART) used by patients who have HIV is often hepatotoxic, contributing to liver damage. With increasing immunosuppression caused by AIDS, patients who have HIV have to deal with these issues and the increased risk of infection with opportunistic viral, fungal, bacterial, and protozoal pathogens. In addition, steatosis and lipodystrophy now are recognized more commonly in patients who have HIV, particularly in the setting of ART. Thus, understanding of liver diseases in the setting of HIV infection becomes an important focus in caring these individuals. There have been numerous advances in the treatment of liver disease in patients who have HIV, particularly in treating viral hepatitis C and B. This article reviews various liver manifestations in patients who have HIV and the recent advances in diagnostic and therapeutic options.

Treatment of hepatitis C virus in HIV patients: a review

BACKGROUND

Survival in HIV infection has improved dramatically in the last decade due to antiretroviral therapy (ART). Due to shared routes of transmission, HCV is found in approximately 30% of HIV infected patients. HCV infection has emerged as a major issue in this population as manifest by a major increase in liver-related mortality. ART-associated hepatotoxicity has been demonstrated to occur more frequently in co-infected individuals and may be severe or fatal in some instances. Thus treatment of HCV has become a priority in HIV infected individuals.

OBJECTIVES

The main aims of this review are to summarise and illustrate the current evidence based management of anti-HCV therapy in HIV-infected patients.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed using Pubmed and Medline searches.

CONCLUSION

All HIV-infected patients should be screened for HCV infection via anti-HCV antibody and HCV RNA polymerase chain reaction. If HCV infection is present, treatment should be considered in those patients with evidence of liver inflammation and fibrosis. Recent studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of anti-HCV therapy in HIV-infected individuals with pegylated interferon and ribavirin combination therapy. HCV genotype is predictive of response to therapy and increasing the duration of therapy to 48 weeks has proven to be more effective in patients with genotypes 2 and 3. HCV treatment with interferon based therapy is associated with many unique side effects and toxicities in this population of which the clinician must be aware.

Interferon-induced depression and cognitive impairment in hepatitis C virus patients: a 72 week prospective study

OBJECTIVES

This study assessed the rates and course of depressive symptomatology and neurocognitive deficits in hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients undergoing interferon treatment, and explored possible predictors of depression and neurocognitive deficits.

DESIGN

In order to obtain objective assessments of depression, and to evaluate cognitive impairment, a 72-week prospective study, comprising 48 weeks of treatment and 24 weeks of post-treatment follow-up was utilized.

METHODS

A total of 50 HCV patients were assessed at baseline, and 14 times during pegylated interferon plus ribavirin treatment. Patients were also assessed on four timepoints after the termination of treatment. All patients have previously been treated for hepatitis C infection with interferon and were judged to be treatment resistant in these treatments. Depression was assessed using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) questionnaire, and patients were interviewed regarding problems with memory, attention and concentration.

RESULTS

Eighty-two per cent of interferon-treated patients developed severe enough depressive symptoms to meet the CES-D criteria for possible major depressive disorder (MDD). Possible MDD onset was most frequent by the first week of treatment, and almost all possible MDD cases were observed by week 8. More severe depressive symptoms at baseline were associated with higher depressive symptoms during interferon treatment. Thirty per cent of patients complained about cognitive problems. In half of these patients cognitive impairments were still reported after the termination of treatment. There was no association between depression during interferon treatment and subjective cognitive complaints.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that depression and cognitive impairments are frequent and persistent side-effects of interferon treatment in treatment-resistant patients.

Daily versus thrice-weekly interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in HIV-infected persons: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

Among HIV-infected persons, chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection causes substantial morbidity and mortality. However, few studies have evaluated the safety and efficacy of interferon alfa (IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) therapy in co-infected persons. Accordingly, a randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter trial was conducted to establish the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of IFN alfa-2b 3 mIU daily plus RBV 800 mg/d compared with IFN alfa-2b 3 mIU thrice weekly (TIW) plus RBV 800 mg/d in HCV treatment-naive, HIV-infected subjects with compensated liver disease and stable HIV disease. The primary endpoint was sustained virologic response (SVR), defined as an undetectable HCV RNA level 24 weeks after discontinuation of HCV therapy. At study entry, subjects in both groups were similar with respect to age, gender, HCV genotype, and HIV disease status. Of 180 randomized subjects, 162 received at least 1 dose of study medication, constituting the modified intention-to-treat population. After 12 weeks of therapy, 122 (75%) had serum HCV RNA levels assessed; of these subjects, early virologic response (undetectable HCV RNA or >2 log10 decrease from baseline) was observed in 33 (42%) and 13 (16%) of subjects taking daily and TIW IFN, respectively (P < 0.001). SVR was observed in 15 (19.0%) and 7 (8.4%) of subjects taking daily and TIW IFN, respectively (P = 0.05). Adverse events were similar in both groups. However, while no deaths or opportunistic infections were observed, nearly 30% of subjects stopped treatment due to adverse events and 7 subjects experienced a serious adverse event. In conclusion, SVR was achieved in 19% of HIV/HCV coinfected subjects treated with daily IFN plus RBV, but the effectiveness of therapy was substantially diminished by relatively high rates of treatment-related toxicity.

Management of hepatitis C virus in special populations: patient and treatment considerations

The most common chronic blood-borne infection in the United States is caused by hepatitis C virus. An estimated 3.9 million people (1.8%) in the United States have been infected with the hepatitis C virus, excluding certain subpopulations who are at high risk for hepatitis C virus infection. Among these subpopulations are an estimated 255,000 (15%) of prison inmates and 175,000 (22%) of homeless people. Prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection is also high among veterans (6.6% overall and even higher among homeless veterans). The single most important risk factor for hepatitis C virus infection is injection drug use; up to 90% of illicit injection drug users are infected with hepatitis C virus. This review describes the prevalence of hepatitis C virus in special populations and discusses the treatment options for patients with severe disease, transplant recipients, and patients at high risk for infection. Close monitoring and management of therapeutic side effects are required to assist these patients in adhering to therapy.