Factors affecting short-term survival in patients older than 85 treated with resection for stage II and III colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients ≥85 years of age have high rates of colon cancer but disproportionately poor outcomes. Factors affecting short-term (90-day) survival in patients ≥85 undergoing surgery for stage II and III colon cancer were examined to identify potentially modifiable factors to improve outcomes.

METHODS

The New York State Cancer Registry and Statewide Planning Research and Cooperative System were queried for patients ≥85 years who underwent colectomy for stage II and III colon cancer between 2004 and 2012. Regression analyses were performed for factors associated with 90-day mortality and stratified by elective and nonelective surgery.

RESULTS

In total, 3,779 patients ≥85 years of age underwent colectomy between 2004 and 2012 for stage II or III colon cancer. Of these, 48.4% underwent nonelective colectomy, 79.9% had an open operation, and 90-day survival was 83.2%. Worse survival was associated with nonelective surgery (odds ratio = 3.81, 95% confidence interval = 3.03-4.89). Improved survival in the nonelective and overall groups was associated with a minimally invasive operation (nonelective group: odds ratio = 0.35, 95% confidence interval = 0.21-0.58; overall group: odds ratio = 0.50, 95% confidence interval = 0.36-0.73) and discharged to another health care facility (nonelective group: odds ratio = 0.30, 95% confidence interval = 0.22-0.39; overall group: odds ratio = 0.42, 95% confidence interval = 0.33-0.53). High surgeon annual operating volume was associated with improved survival in the elective and nonelective groups (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Factors associated with greater odds of 90-day mortality in this population include nonelective surgery, preoperative weight loss, and multiple comorbidities, whereas a minimally invasive approach was associated with lower mortality. Potential areas to improve outcomes in this population include using a multidisciplinary team approach, addressing frailty preoperatively when possible, and potentially reconsidering screening guidelines for colorectal cancer to reduce rates of emergency operations.

Surgeon volume and established hospital perioperative mortality rate together predict for superior outcomes after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

BACKGROUND

In 2018, the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) published hospital volume guidelines for elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair, recommending that elective open surgical repair of AAAs should be performed at centers with an annual volume of ≥10 open aortic operations of any type and a documented perioperative mortality of ≤5%. Recent work has suggested a yearly surgeon volume of at least seven open aortic cases for improved outcomes. The objective of the present study was to assess the importance of hospital volume and surgeon volume at these cut points for predicting 1-year mortality after open surgical repair of AAAs.

METHODS

We evaluated patients who had undergone elective open AAA repair using the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database from 2003 to 2014. The effect of the SVS guidelines on postoperative mortality and complications was evaluated. Confounding between the hospital and surgeon volumes was identified using mixed effects multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis. The effect of the interactions between hospital volume, established hospital perioperative survival, and surgeon volume on postoperative outcomes was also investigated.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 7594 elective open AAA repairs performed by 542 surgeons in 137 hospitals during the 12-year study period. Analysis of the 2018 guidelines using the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database revealed 1-year and 30-day mortality rates of 9.2% (range, 8.3%-10.1%) and 3.5% (range, 2.9%-4.1%) for centers that were within the SVS guidelines and 13.6% (range, 12.5%-14.7%) and 6.9% (range, 6.1%-7.8%) for those that were outside the guidelines, respectively (P < .001 for both). Multivariate survival analysis revealed a hazard ratio for a surgeon volume of ≥7, hospital volume of ≥10, and hospital 3-year perioperative mortality of ≤5% of 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-0.93; P = .003), 0.91 (95% CI, 0.77-1.08; P = .298), and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.62-0.82; P < .001), respectively. Additionally, procedures performed by surgeons with a yearly average volume of open aortic operations of at least seven and at hospitals with an established elective open AAA repair perioperative mortality rate of ≤5% showed improved 1-year (33.2% relative risk reduction; P < .001) and 30-day (P = .001) all-cause survival and improved postoperative complication rates.

CONCLUSIONS

These data have demonstrated that centers that meet the SVS AAA volume guidelines are associated with improved 1-year and 30-day all-cause survival. However, the results were confounded by surgeon volume. A surgeon open aortic volume of at least seven procedures and an established hospital perioperative mortality of ≤5% each independently predicted for 1-year survival after open AAA repair, with the hospital volume less important. These results indicate that surgeons with an annual volume of at least seven open aortic operations of any type should perform elective open AAA repair at centers with a documented perioperative mortality of ≤5%.

Variation in outcomes across surgeons meeting the Leapfrog volume standard for complex oncologic surgery

BACKGROUND

A large body of evidence supports regionalization of complex oncologic surgery to high-volume surgeons at high-volume hospitals. However, whether there is heterogeneity of outcomes among high-volume surgeons at high-volume hospitals remains unknown.

METHODS

Patients who underwent esophagectomy, lung resection, pancreatectomy, or proctectomy for primary cancer were identified within the Medicare 100% Standard Analytic File (2013-2017). Mixed-effects analyses assessed the association between Leapfrog annual volume standards for surgeons (esophagectomy ≥7, lung resection ≥15, pancreatectomy ≥10, proctectomy ≥6) and hospitals (esophagectomy ≥20, lung resection ≥40, pancreatectomy ≥20, proctectomy ≥16) relative to postoperative complications and 90-day mortality. Additional analyses using New York's all-payer Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (2004-2015) were performed.

RESULTS

Among 112,154 Medicare beneficiaries, high-volume surgeons at high-volume hospitals were associated with lower adjusted odds of complications (esophagectomy: odds ratio [OR], 0.73 [95% CI, 0.61-0.86]; lung resection: OR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.82-0.94]; pancreatectomy: OR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.66-0.80]; proctectomy: OR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.85-0.99]) and 90-day mortality (esophagectomy: OR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.44-0.76]; lung resection: OR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.73-0.93]; pancreatectomy: OR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.56-0.76]; proctectomy: OR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.65-0.85]). For the average patient at the average high-volume hospital, there was a 2-fold difference in the adjusted complication rate between the best-performing and worst-performing high-volume surgeon for all operations (esophagectomy, 28%-55%; lung resection, 7%-21%; pancreatectomy, 16%-35%; proctectomy, 16%-28%). Wide variation was also present in adjusted 90-day mortality for esophagectomy (3.5%-9.3%). Results from New York's all-payer database were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Even among high-volume surgeons meeting the Leapfrog volume standards, wide variation in postoperative outcomes exists. These findings suggest that volume alone should not be used as a quality indicator, and quality metrics should be continuously evaluated across all surgeons and hospital systems.

LAY SUMMARY

Previous studies have demonstrated a surgical volume-outcome relationship for high-risk operations-that is high-volume surgeons and hospitals that perform a specific surgical procedure more frequently have better outcomes for that operation. Although most high-volume surgeons had better outcomes, this study demonstrated that some high-volume surgeons did not have better outcomes. Therefore, volume is an important factor but should not be the only factor considered when assessing the quality of a surgeon and a hospital for cancer surgery.

The accumulation of ERAS (enhanced recovery after surgery) components reduces post-colectomy length of stay at small and low volume hospitals

In small hospitals, where the majority of colectomy surgery is performed in the United States, adopting more individual ERAS components improves outcomes. The accumulation of individual ERAS components influences outcome more than an "ERAS designation" and this can be used by small hospitals to improve outcomes.

The Association between Pathologic Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Postoperative Complications

INTRODUCTION

With growing interest in the watch-and-wait strategy, the benefits of avoiding surgery and its complications must be weighed against possible recurrence and need for salvage surgery. However, the relationship between pathologic complete response (pCR) and postoperative complications has not been well established.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Proctectomy and Colectomy Procedure-Targeted databases from 2016 to 2018. The association between pCR and major complications, sepsis, anastomotic leak or organ space infection, return to the operating room, or septic shock was analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 3,878 rectal cancer patients who received chemotherapy or radiation therapy within 90 days of surgery were included in this study. The pCR rate was 12.8%. There was no statistically significant association between pCR and major complications (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 0.48, p = 0.12) after risk adjustment. Those with pCR had no statistically significant association with anastomotic leak or organ space infection, return to the operating room, or septic shock but had significantly lower odds of sepsis (adjusted OR = 0.42, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

It is reassuring that pCR is not associated with postoperative complications and that those with pCR are less likely to have postoperative sepsis after risk adjustment since postoperative sepsis after rectal surgery has been associated with poorer oncologic outcomes.

A 10-hour time-restricted eating intervention to address cancer-related fatigue among cancer survivors

12109

Background: Cancer-related fatigue is a common, debilitating condition that can persist for months or years after cancer treatment. Time-restricted eating has been shown to improve circadian rhythm and strengthen rest and activity patterns, and therefore could help reduce persistent fatigue. Herein, we evaluated the feasibility of recruiting cancer survivors to a two-week, single-arm, time-restricted eating intervention with a 10-h eating window, assessed safety of the intervention, monitored adherence, and obtained initial estimates of within-group change in patient-reported fatigue. Methods: We recruited adults 4-60 months post-cancer treatment who had a fatigue level ≥3 on a scale from 0-10 and who did not already consume food within a 10-h window. Participants were asked to consume all food and beverages within a self-selected 10-h eating window for 14 days; water was allowed at all times. Participants completed a daily diary indicating when they began and stopped eating each day. To assess fatigue, participants completed the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) and the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) at pre- and post-intervention. We report mean±standard deviation and used a t-test to assess differences in pre- vs. post-intervention scores. Results: A total of 21 participants consented (20 breast cancer, 1 prostate cancer; 20 female; age 57.7±11.4 years; 1.6±1.1 years post-primary treatment). The study was feasible: 19/21 (90.5%) completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and daily diaries. It was also safe: there were two mild adverse events—one unlikely (insomnia) and one possibly related to the intervention (acute headache) and no severe adverse events. Most of the participants adhered to the intervention; 14/19 (73.7%) ate all of their food within a 10-h window at least 80% of the days, and 16/19 (84.2%) reported an average eating window ≤10 h. Fatigue scores improved a clinically meaningful degree for FACIT-F total score, FACIT-F fatigue subscale, and the BFI total score from pre- to post-intervention per established cutoffs (Table). Conclusions: Cancer survivors were willing and able to adhere to a two-week time-restricted eating intervention, and the intervention was safe. Also, fatigue was reduced with moderate to large effect sizes after two weeks of time-restricted eating. Based on our results, a follow-up randomized controlled trial to investigate time-restricted eating to alleviate cancer-related fatigue among cancer survivors is indicated. Funding: NIH/NCI UG1CA189961, T32CA102618. Clinical trial information: NCT04243512. [Table: see text]

Problem-solving skills training in adult cancer survivors: Bright IDEAS-AC

e24109

Background: Cancer patients experience significant distress throughout treatment and especially during transition back to normal life with greater burden on socially disadvantaged patients and those with medical comorbidities. Patient stressors can interfere with their ability to make reasoned and timely decisions about survivorship care and lead to poor quality of life and low physical and social functioning. This pilot effectiveness-implementation study examined the impact and feasibility of offering the Bright IDEAS system of Problem-Solving Skills Training (PSST) to adult cancer survivors to help them and their caregivers cope more successfully with decision making and distress. Methods: Patients with breast (21), prostate (9) or colorectal (20) cancer who completed their definitive cancer treatment within the last 6 months and had their cancer survivorship visit were recruited from two regional cancer centers and affiliated community oncology clinics. Patients with an NCCN distress level > 2 were randomly assigned to either care as usual (CAU) or 8 weekly PSST sessions provided by a trained therapist in person or remotely. Patients were invited but not required to include a supportive other (n = 17). Patient and caregiver assessments at baseline (T1), end of intervention/3 months (T2), and 3 months post intervention/6 months (T3) focused on problem-solving skills (SPSI-25), distress (HADS) and quality of life (FACT). We also collected healthcare utilization data. We compared outcome changes T1-T2 and T1-T3, by study arm, using t-tests. Multivariate regression analysis identified subgroups of patients with positive and negative responses to skills training. Results: Average age of the participants was 63 years (45 to 87) with racial and ethnic distributions representative of the local population (88% white). Two thirds were women (n = 32), one third of the patients were recruited and received therapy fully remotely due to COVID-19-related protocol changes. Patients who received PSST reported a reduction in dysfunctional problem-solving style and improvement in constructive style while problem-solving skills of CAU patients trended in the opposite direction. Patients in the PSST arm also reported significant reduction in anxiety and depression and improvement in cancer-specific quality of life (p < 0.05) that was sustained at 6 months. Patients in the PSST arm reported lower use of hospital and ED services compared to CAU patients (p = 0.07). Better improvement in outcomes was driven by lower problem-solving skills at baseline. Conclusions: Despite the logistical complexity of running a clinical trial during quarantine, patients and caregivers in the PSST arm demonstrated meaningful improvement in distress and quality of life. The evidence from this pilot study will help guide development of a future multi-site randomized clinical trial of the effect of PSST on cancer survivorship care and outcomes. Clinical trial information: NCT03567850.

Comprehensive or specialty-specific cancer care in the United States: A story of continuing underperformance

6577

Background: “Textbook oncologic outcome” (TOO) is a composite measure representing the “ideal” outcome for patients undergoing cancer surgery and is associated with improved survival. Using TOO as the primary outcome, we asked whether hospitals are high-performing across multiple cancer types. Methods: Patients undergoing potentially curative breast, colon, rectal, lung, or pancreatic cancer resection were identified within the National Cancer Database (2010-2016). Organ-specific TOO was defined as: adequate lymph node yield, R0 resection, non-length of stay outlier, no hospital readmission, no 90-day postoperative mortality, and receipt of guideline-concordant chemotherapy and/or radiation. Mixed-effects analyses estimated the risk-adjusted TOO rate for each hospital stratified by cancer type. Results: Among 1,094,550 cancer resections (breast = 690,442; colon = 213,918; lung = 121,771; rectum = 40,315; pancreas = 28,104), 434 hospitals performed ≥10 resections for each cancer type. Only 11 hospitals (2.5%) ranked in the top quartile for adjusted TOO rate for all five cancer types. Of the 323 hospitals (74.4%) that ranked in the top quartile for one cancer type, 149 hospitals (46.1%) also ranked in the bottom quartile for another cancer type. There was a weak correlation between hospital rankings across cancer types with the strongest correlations between colon and rectal cancer (R2= 0.148) and lung and pancreatic cancer (R2= 0.098). Conclusions: Most U.S. hospitals do not provide high-quality care across cancer types with respect to TOO. Perhaps this knowledge should be used to guide referral for oncology care.

Feasibility of fully remote administration of problem-solving skills training (PSST) to adult cancer survivors in community settings

1536

Background: Cancer survivors experience significant stress throughout cancer treatment and especially during transition back to normal life. These stressors are particularly severe for rural or socially disadvantaged patients with limited access to care. Improving their problem-solving skills is known to help patients make reasoned and timely decisions about survivorship care that reduce stress and enhance quality of life, physical and social functioning, and overall cancer prognosis. This pilot implementation study examined barriers to and facilitators of providing Problem-Solving Skills Training (PSST) to adult cancer survivors and their caregivers in community settings. Methods: Patients (n = 50) who completed their definitive cancer treatment and cancer survivorship visit within the previous 6 months were recruited from two regional cancer centers and affiliated community cancer clinics. Patients with NCCN distress level >2 were randomly assigned to either care as usual (CAU) or 8 weekly PSST sessions using the Bright IDEAS system of teaching problem solving. Training was offered by a trained therapist in person at the patient’s preferred location or remotely. Patients were invited but not required to include a supportive other (SO). Patient outcomes were assessed at baseline (T1), the end of the intervention/3 months (T2), and 3 months post intervention/6 months (T3). We examined patient and caregiver preferences for mode of communication and therapy, barriers to PSST participation, and adherence rates. An independent consultant interviewed patients and caregivers about factors that promote or inhibit intervention sustainability and its wider adaptation and usefulness. Results: Average age of the participants was 63 years (45-87) with gender, racial and ethnic distributions representative of the local population (64% women, 88% white). Women were 80% less likely to include a SO than men. Among the third of the patients recruited fully remotely, 50% preferred receiving consent materials via regular mail and 18% preferred electronic communication. Among the two patients lost to follow-up before PSST completion and one patient who withdrew despite reporting significant distress, none had a SO in the study. Seventy-six percent of the PSST patients completed the training (defined as > 6 sessions). After study completion, all patients and caregivers reported high satisfaction with Bright IDEAS and high probability of continuing to use the skills learned. Conclusions: Despite significant distress and numerous reported social challenges, patients and caregivers in the PSST arm demonstrated high adherence, skill retention and overall satisfaction. Future research should be tailored to accommodate the preferred type of communication and recruitment approaches of the targeted population and emphasize the positive role of informal caregivers. Clinical trial information: NCT03567850.

How to choose your surgeon for colorectal cancer: The influence of fellowship training on outcomes

e18603

Background: Rectal cancer has a well-established volume-outcome relationship. However, the impact of fellowship training on outcomes following colorectal cancer resection is unknown. Methods: Patients who underwent stage I-III colorectal adenocarcinoma resection (2004-2014) were identified in the New York State Cancer Registry and Statewide Planning & Research Cooperative System. Hierarchical analyses assessed the association between surgeon American Board of Colorectal Surgery (ABCRS) certification and postoperative outcomes and survival. Derived from volume tertiles, surgeons who performed ≥15 annual colon cancer resections or ≥10 annual rectal cancer resections were characterized as high-volume colon (HVCSs) or rectal (HVRSs) surgeons, respectively. Results: 47,491 colorectal cancer resections (right colon = 23,824, 50.2%; left colon = 18,154, 38.2%; rectal cancer = 5,513, 11.6%) met inclusion criteria. ABCRS-certified HVCSs (N = 92) comprised only 5.5% of the surgeon cohort but performed 20.6% of the colon cancer resections. Similarly, ABCRS-certified HVRSs (N = 31) comprised only 3.8% of the surgeon cohort but performed 16.5% of the rectal cancer resections. Despite no significant difference in complications, ABCRS-certified HVCS/HVRSs overall had better postoperative outcomes and were associated with improved survival following colorectal cancer resection. Conclusions: These results suggest that for the best outcomes and long-term survival following colon and rectal cancer resection, referral to high-volume, ABCRS-certified surgeons may be the best choice.[Table: see text]

Quality Assurance, Metrics, and Improving Standards in Rectal Cancer Surgery in the United States

Rectal cancer surgery has seen significant improvement in recent years. This has been possible in part due to focus on surgeon education and training, specific surgical quality metrics, and longitudinal tracking of data through the use of registries. In countries that have implemented such efforts, data has shown significant improvement in outcomes. However, there continues to be significant variation in rectal cancer outcomes and practices worldwide. Just within the United States, county level mortality rates from rectal cancer range from 8-15 per 100,000 to 38-59 per 100,000. In order to continue to improve rectal cancer patient outcomes, there needs to be evidence based guidelines and standards centered around the framework of structure, process, and outcomes. In addition, there must be a feedback system by which programs can continually assess their performance. Obtaining evidence for specific standards and measures can be challenging and requires analyzing available data and literature, some of which may be conflicting. This article evaluates the evolution of metrics and standards used for quality improvement in rectal cancer and ongoing efforts to further improve patient outcomes.

Complications and Survivorship Trends After Primary Debulking Surgery for Ovarian Cancer

BACKGROUND

We examined factors associated with postoperative complications, 1-year overall and cancer-specific survival after epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) diagnosis.

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgery for EOC between 2004 and 2013 were included. Multivariable models analyzed postoperative complications, overall survival, and cancer-specific survival.

RESULTS

Among 5223 patients, surgical complications were common. Postoperative complications correlated with increased odds of overall and disease-specific survival at 1 y. Receipt of chemotherapy was similar among women with and without postoperative complications and was independently associated with a reduction in the hazard of overall and disease-specific death at 1-year. Extensive pelvic and upper abdomen surgery resulted in 2.26 times the odds of postoperative complication, but was associated with longer 1-year overall 0.53 (0.35, 0.82) and disease-specific survival 0.54 (0.34, 0.85).

CONCLUSIONS

Although extent of surgery was associated with complications, the survival benefit from comprehensive surgery offset the risk. Tailored surgical treatment for women with EOC may improve outcomes.

Can high-volume surgeons achieve optimal outcomes at low-volume hospitals? Implications for the Leapfrog Initiative and regionalization of high-risk surgical oncology procedures

6585

Background: The Leapfrog group recently released surgeon and hospital procedure volume standards for several surgical oncology procedures. This study investigated trends in volume and whether high-volume surgeons at low-volume hospitals achieve equivalent outcomes to high-volume surgeons at high-volume hospitals. Methods: New York’s Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System was queried for esophagectomy, lung resection, pancreatectomy, and proctectomy for cancer from 2004-2015. Mixed-effects analyses assessed the association among Leapfrog surgeon/hospital volume standards and 90-day mortality. Results: Among 55,528 cases, high-volume surgeons performed 64.7% of cases (esophagectomy = 52%; lung resection = 75.6%; pancreatectomy = 56.7%; proctectomy = 53%), and high-volume hospitals performed 59.5% of cases (esophagectomy = 55.5%; lung resection = 58.3%; pancreatectomy = 63.4%; proctectomy = 61%). After risk-adjustment, high-volume surgeons at high-volume hospitals had lower odds of 90-day mortality compared to high-volume surgeons at low-volume hospitals for each organ system except for pancreas. Despite trends toward regionalization, between 2012-2015, there were large differences in the number of hospitals and median annual case number between high-volume and low-volume centers for esophagectomy (8 vs. 56 hospitals; 31.5 vs. 3 cases), lung resection (22 vs. 89 hospitals; 69.5 vs. 7 cases), pancreatectomy (15 vs. 56 hospitals; 36 vs. 3 cases), and proctectomy (38 vs. 117 hospitals; 28 vs. 3 cases). Conclusions: This study supports the Leapfrog initiative for performance of high-risk surgical oncology procedures by high-volume surgeons at high-volume hospitals. However, it remains unclear whether full regionalization to high-volume centers is feasible. [Table: see text]

Treatments for Stage IV Colon Cancer and Overall Survival

BACKGROUND

The role of primary tumor resection (PTR) for asymptomatic stage IV colon cancer with unresectable metastases remains unclear. Increasingly there has been a trend away from resection. The aim of this study was to examine trends in the treatment of stage IV colon cancers, impact of different treatments on long-term mortality, and factors associated with receipt of postoperative chemotherapy.

METHODS

The 2006-2012 National Cancer Data Base was queried for stage IV colon cancer patients. Treatments were grouped into PTR and chemotherapy, PTR only, chemotherapy only, and no treatment. A descriptive analysis was performed examining patient and hospital characteristics associated with different treatments. A Cox regression analysis was used to assess the adjusted effect of different treatments on long-term survival. A multivariable logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with postoperative chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Of 31,310 patients, who met inclusion criteria, 22% of the patients underwent PTR and chemotherapy, 37.5% received chemotherapy only, 11.9% underwent PTR, and 28.6% received no treatment. Patients who received no treatment had the highest hazard of death at 1, 3, and 5 y, followed by PTR only, and chemotherapy only compared with PTR combined with chemotherapy. Patients who were older and had more comorbidities were less likely to receive postoperative chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary tumor resection in conjunction with postoperative chemotherapy among stage IV colon cancer patients with unresectable metastases was associated with a long-term survival benefit compared with other treatment options. Efforts should be made to increase the use of postoperative chemotherapy where feasible.

Postoperative Mortality After Nonelective Surgery for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients in the Era of Biologics

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to analyze recent trends in the rate of nonelective surgery and corresponding mortality for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients since the rise of biologic use.

BACKGROUND

Modern biologic therapy has improved outcomes for IBD, but little is known about the impact on mortality rates after nonelective surgery.

METHODS

New York's Statewide Planning & Research Cooperative System was queried for hospital admissions for ulcerative colitis (UC) with concurrent colectomy and Crohn disease (CD) with concurrent small bowel resection or colectomy from 2000 to 2013. Mixed-effects analyses assessed patient, surgeon, and hospital-level factors and hospital-level variation associated with 30-day mortality after nonelective surgery.

RESULTS

Between 2000 to 2006 and 2007 to 2013, the number of unscheduled IBD-related admissions increased by 50% for UC and 41% for CD, but no change in the proportion of nonelective surgery cases was observed (UC=38% vs 38%; CD=45% vs 42%) among 15,837 intestinal resections (UC=5,297; CD=10,540). Nonelective surgery mortality rates between 2000 to 2006 and 2007 to 2013 were high and increased for UC (10.2% vs 15%) but decreased for CD (3.3% vs 2.2%). Nonelective surgery in 2007 to 2013 was associated with an 82% increased risk of 30-day mortality in UC cases (odds ratio: 1.82; confidence interval: 1.19-2.62). After controlling for patient-level factors, large hospital-level variation was observed with 23-fold difference in mortality for both UC and CD.

CONCLUSIONS

Although nonelective IBD surgery rates have remained stable, associated 30-day mortality for UC has doubled in recent years despite advances in medical management. Current clinical decision-making and care pathways must be further evaluated to improve outcomes in this high-risk population.

Short course radiation therapy for rectal cancer in the elderly: can radical surgery be avoided?

Rectal cancer in elderly patients can be difficult to manage. Short course radiation therapy (SCRT) has shown to be effective when given immediately prior to surgery. Here we report outcomes of elderly patients who underwent SCRT either alone or prior to resection. Between 2010 and 2015, elderly patients with rectal cancer and no distant metastatic disease were identified. Symptoms at diagnosis, therapies, toxicities, and pathologic and clinical response were recorded from patient charts. The SCRT prescription dose was 5 Gy ×5 to the rectal tumor and 4 Gy ×5 to the mesorectum, omitting the iliac nodes. Twenty patients were identified with median age of 85 years (range, 71-93 years). No patient received systemic therapy. Sixty percent of patients were cT3 at diagnosis. Half underwent resection post SCRT and half received SCRT as definitive therapy. The 1- and 2-year overall survival was 75% and 54%. Overall survival did not differ between patients treated with SCRT and surgery compared to SCRT alone (P=0.8). Of the 10 surgical patients, 3 had a complete pathologic response at time of resection and 3 patients died within 2 weeks due to perioperative complications. Of patients treated with SCRT alone, 8 were symptomatic at presentation and 5 had a clinician defined symptomatic response. No patient treated with SCRT monotherapy required additional palliative measures for outflow obstruction, but 2 progressed locally and died. SCRT is well tolerated, results in pathologic complete responses in a small percentage of patients, and achieves 63% symptom improvement rate as monotherapy. A high peri-operative complication rate was observed in this small series. In elderly patients, SCRT as initial treatment with a watch and wait approach for surgery is feasible and should be evaluated prospectively.

Allogeneic Leukocyte-Reduced Red Blood Cell Transfusion Is Associated with Postoperative Infectious Complications and Cancer Recurrence after Colon Cancer Resection

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Transfusion rates in colon cancer surgery are traditionally very high. Allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) transfusions are reported to induce immunomodulation that contributes to infectious morbidity and adverse oncologic outcomes. In an effort to attenuate these effects, the study institution implemented a universal leukocyte reduction protocol. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of leukocyte-reduced (LR) transfusions on postoperative infectious complications, recurrence-free survival, and overall survival (OS).

METHODS

In a retrospective study, patients with stage I-III adenocarcinoma of the colon from 2003 to 2010 who underwent elective resection were studied. The primary outcome measures were postoperative infectious complications and recurrence-free and OS in patients that received a transfusion. Bivariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed for each endpoint.

RESULTS

Of 294 patients, 66 (22%) received a LR RBC transfusion. After adjustment, transfusion of LR RBCs was found to be independently associated with increased infectious complications (OR 3.10, 95% CI 1.24-7.73), increased odds of cancer recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 3.74, 95% CI 1.94-7.21), and reduced OS when ≥3 units were administered (HR 2.24, 95% CI 1.12-4.48).

CONCLUSION

Transfusion of LR RBCs is associated with an increased risk of infectious complications and worsened survival after elective surgery for colon cancer, irrespective of leukocyte reduction.

Hospital and surgeon variation in positive circumferential resection margin among rectal cancer patients

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to evaluate variation in positive CRM at the surgeon and hospital levels and assess impact on disease-specific survival.

METHODS

Patients with stage I-III rectal cancer were identified in New York State. Bayesian hierarchical regressions estimated observed-to-expected (O/E) ratios for each surgeon/hospital. Competing-risks analyses estimated disease-specific survival among patients who were treated by surgeons/hospitals with O/E > 1 compared to those with O/E ratio ≤ 1.

RESULTS

Among 1,251 patients, 208 (17%) had a positive CRM. Of the 345 surgeons and 118 hospitals in the study, 99 (29%) and 48 (40%) treated a higher number of patients with CRM than expected, respectively. Patients treated by surgeons with O/E > 1 (HR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.16, 1.67) and those treated at hospitals with O/E > 1 (HR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.11, 1.85) had worse disease-specific survival.

DISCUSSION

Surgeon and hospital performance in positive CRM is associated with worse prognosis suggesting opportunities to enhance referral patterns and standardize care.

Effect of care continuity on mortality of patients readmitted after colorectal surgery

BACKGROUND

Postoperative readmission after colorectal resection is common. It is unknown whether patients who receive readmission care from the surgeon who performed the index surgery have improved mortality. This study evaluated whether postdischarge continuity of care, defined at the hospital and surgeon level, was associated with decreased mortality after colorectal surgery.

METHODS

The Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System was queried for patients who had colorectal resections from 2004 to 2014, and were readmitted within 30 days of discharge. Propensity-adjusted logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between 30-day mortality and readmission care continuity.

RESULTS

A total of 20 016 patients readmitted within 30 days of discharge were eligible for analysis. Some 39·5 per cent of readmitted patients experienced hospital and surgeon care continuity, 47·1 per cent hospital but not surgeon continuity, 1·0 per cent surgeon but not hospital continuity, and 12·4 per cent neither hospital nor surgeon care continuity. A total of 1349 patients (6·7 per cent) died within 30 days of readmission. Patients readmitted with absence of surgeon but not of hospital care continuity had 2·04 (95 per cent c.i. 1·72 to 2·42) times the risk of 30-day mortality compared with those who experienced surgeon and hospital continuity. Absence of both surgeon and hospital care continuity was associated with 2·65 (2·18 to 3·30) times the risk of death compared with presence of both.

CONCLUSION

Readmission after colorectal resection not under the care of the index operating surgeon is associated with an increased risk of 30-day mortality. Addressing processes of care that are affected by surgeon care continuity may decrease surgical deaths.

Population-based study of outcomes following an initial acute diverticular abscess

Background

Studies examining long-term outcomes following resolution of an acute diverticular abscess have been limited to single-institution chart reviews. This observational cohort study compared outcomes between elective colectomy and non-operative management following admission for an initial acute diverticular abscess.

Methods

The Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System was queried for unscheduled admissions for an initial acute diverticular abscess in 2002–2010. Bivariable and propensity-matched multivariable analyses compared stoma rates and use of healthcare in patients who had an elective resection and those receiving non-operative management. Diverticulitis recurrence rates were analysed for non-operative management.

Results

Among 10 342 patients with an initial acute diverticular abscess, one-third (3270) underwent surgical intervention within 30 days despite initial non-operative management. Of the remaining 7072 patients, 1660 had an elective colectomy within 6 months. Of 5412 patients receiving non-operative management, 1340 (24·8 per cent) had recurrence of diverticulitis within 5 years (median 278 (i.q.r. 93·5–707) days to recurrence). Elective colectomy was associated with higher stoma rates (10·0 per cent, compared with 5·7 per cent for non-operative observation, P &lt; 0·001; odds ratio 1·88, 95 per cent c.i. 1·50 to 2·36), as well as more inpatient hospital days for diverticulitis-related admissions (mean 8·0 versus 4·6 days respectively, P &lt; 0·001; incidence rate ratio (IRR) 2·16, 95 per cent c.i. 1·89 to 2·47) and higher mean diverticulitis-related cost (€70 107 versus €24 490, P &lt; 0·001; IRR 3·11, 2·42 to 4·01).

Conclusion

Observation without elective colectomy following resolution of an initial diverticular abscess is a reasonable option with lower healthcare costs than operation.

Characterizing cancer cachexia in the geriatric oncology population

OBJECTIVES

Cancer cachexia, characterized by weight loss and sarcopenia, leads to a decline in physical function and is associated with poorer survival. Cancer cachexia remains poorly described in older adults with cancer. This study aims to characterize cancer cachexia in older adults by assessing its prevalence utilizing standard definitions and evaluating associations with components of the geriatric assessment (GA) and survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with cancer older than 65 years of age who underwent a GA and had baseline CT imaging were eligible in this cross-sectional study. Cancer cachexia was defined by the international consensus definition reported in 2011. Sarcopenia was measured using cross-sectional imaging and utilizing sex-specific cut-offs. Associations between cachexia, sarcopenia, and weight loss with survival and GA domains were explored.

RESULTS

Mean age of 100 subjects was 79.9 years (66-95) and 65% met criteria for cancer cachexia. Cachexia was associated with impairment in instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) (p = .017); no significant association was found between sarcopenia or weight loss and IADL impairment. Cachexia was significantly associated with poorer survival (median 1.0 vs 2.1 years, p = .011).

CONCLUSIONS

Cancer cachexia as defined by the international consensus definition is prevalent in older adults with cancer and is associated with functional impairment and decreased survival. Larger prospective studies are needed to further describe cancer cachexia in this population.