Emergencies cards for neuromuscular disorders 1st Consensus Meeting from UILDM - Italian Muscular Dystrophy Association Workshop report

Acute hospitalisation may be required to support patients with Neuromuscular disorders (NMDs) mainly experiencing respiratory complications, swallowing difficulties, heart failure, urgent surgical procedures. As NMDs may need specific treatments, they should be ideally managed in specialized hospitals. Nevertheless, if urgent treatment is required, patients with NMD should be managed at the closest hospital site, which may not be a specialized centre where local emergency physicians have the adequate experience to manage these patients. Although NMDs are a group of conditions that can differ in terms of disease onset, progression, severity and involvement of other systems, many recommendations are transversal and apply to the most frequent NMDs. Emergency Cards (EC), which report the most common recommendations on respiratory and cardiac issues and provide indications for drugs/treatments to be used with caution, are actively used in some countries by patients with NMDs. In Italy, there is no consensus on the use of any EC, and a minority of patients adopt it regularly in case of emergency. In April 2022, 50 participants from different centres in Italy met in Milan, Italy, to agree on a minimum set of recommendations for urgent care management which can be extended to the vast majority of NMDs. The aim of the workshop was to agree on the most relevant information and recommendations regarding the main topics related to emergency care of patients with NMD in order to produce specific ECs for the 13 most frequent NMDs.

829 IMPACT OF SODIUM-GLUCOSE COTRANSPORTER-2 INHIBITORS ON CARDIAC REMODELLING IN LOW RISK PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS

Background

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are associated to a reduced risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. Subclinical left ventricular (LV) systolic disfunction has been observed in DM patients, even if ejection fraction is preserved. The impact of SGLT2i on cardiac structure and function is still unclear. Our aim was to evaluate the effects of SGLT2i on LV remodelling and global longitudinal strain (GLS) in patients with well compensated TIIDM.

Methods

Between November 2021 to April 2022, we prospectively evaluated 35 consecutives subjects with TIIDM in need of SGLT2i according to their referring physician. Main inclusion criteria were preserved ejection fraction (EF>50%), no history of heart failure and coronary artery disease, and the lack of moderate to severe valvular heart disease and chronic kidney disease (EGFR <50%). Conventional and speckle tracking echocardiography were performed at baseline and after 6 months of treatment.

Results

17 patients have been evaluated for statistical analysis (6% F, mean age 65± 9 years). GLS (p=0,007) and EF (p=0.01) reached statistically significance after 6 months therapy. Moreover on ECG analysis, we found significant reduction in P-wave dispersion (p =0.019). However no statistically significant changes in diastolic function parameters and Myocardial Work indices have been found.

Conclusions

Our study showed that SGLT2i treatment in people with T2DM may display a positive effect on LV remodelling and improve GLS, even in patients with low-risk DM.

Keywords: Diabetes mellitus; SGLT2 inhibitors; Speckle tracking echocardiography; Left ventricular systolic function; Cardiac remodelling.

Subcutaneous Implantable Defibrillator programming: an analysis of Italian clinical practice and its evolution

Background

The UNTOUCHED study (designed in 2017 and published in 2021) demonstrated high success rate for termination of ventricular arrhythmias, and very low inappropriate shock rate in subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) recipients. The prescribed device programming included a conditional zone between 200 and 250 beats per minute (bpm) with discrimination algorithms employed to avoid delivering inappropriate shocks in this range, and a shock zone based on the rate alone for arrhythmias >250 bpm. Whether these results influenced clinical practice is unknown.

Methods

We assessed the programming at implantation and changes in programmed parameters at follow-up (≥1 year) in a cohort of S-ICD recipients enrolled in the Rhythm Detect registry at 56 centers.

Results

From 2013 to 2021, 1521 consecutive patients (aged 49±15 years; 79% male, 52% dilated cardiomyopathy, 31% arrhythmic syndromes, 16% hypertrophic cardiomyopathy) were analyzed. At implantation, the programmed sensing vector was the Primary in 59% of patients, the Secondary in 35%, the Alternate in 6%. At follow-up, the sensed vector was changed in 13% of patients. The programmed conditional zone cutoff was set to 200 [200–220] bpm (median [25–75 percentile]), and the shock zone cutoff to 230 [210–250] bpm. At follow-up, the conditional zone cutoff was reprogrammed in 13% of patients, but the median value in the overall population did not change (200 [200–220] bpm; p>0.05). The shock zone cutoff was reprogrammed in 43% of cases, and the overall median value was 250 [230–250] bpm (p<0.001 versus implantation). Sorting patients by implantation date, we observed that in the first 764 patients (implanted ≤2017) the shock zone cutoff was set to 210 [210–230] bpm at implantation and to 240 [230–250] bpm at follow-up (reprogrammed in 66% of cases). While in patients implanted >2017, it was already set to 250 [230–250] bpm at implantation and to 250 [240–250] bpm at follow-up (reprogrammed in 20% of cases, p<0.001 versus ≤2017).

Conclusions

S-ICD programming parameters are rarely changed during follow-up (approximately 13% of patients). The only exception in clinical practice was the shock zone cutoff. Centers have begun to program high cutoffs in recent years. This happened at the time of implantation for new S-ICD recipients and at follow-up for pre-existing implants. This behavior is consistent with a substantial adoption of published trial findings and could contribute to reduce the incidence of inappropriate shocks in clinical practice.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Intermuscular technique for implantation of the subcutaneous implantable defibrillator: a propensity-matched case-control study

Background

A previous randomized study (PRAETORIAN) demonstrated that the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter–defibrillator (S-ICD) was noninferior to transvenous ICD with respect to device-related complications and inappropriate shocks. However, that was performed prior to the widespread adoption of pulse generator implantation in the intermuscular (IM) space instead of the traditional subcutaneous (SC) pocket.

Purpose

To compare survival from device-related complications and inappropriate shocks between patients who underwent S-ICD implantation with the generator positioned in an IM position in comparison with a SC pocket.

Methods

We analyzed 1577 consecutive patients who had undergone S-ICD implantation from 2013 to 2021 and were followed up until December 2021. SC patients were propensity-matched with patients of the IM group, and their outcomes were compared.

Results

SC implantations were performed in 367 (23%) patients. These patients were propensity-matched with 367 IM patients. Intra-procedural complications were reported in 9 (2.5%) patients in the SC Group and 7 (1.9%) in the IM Group. During a median follow-up of 29 months, device-related complications were reported in 55 (7.5%) patients and inappropriate shocks were reported in 54 (7.4%) patients. The risk of the composite primary endpoint was lower in the matched IM Group than in the SC Group (unadjusted hazard ratio 0.67, 95% CI 0.45–0.99, p=0.042), while the risk of appropriate shocks was similar between groups (unadjusted hazard ratio 0.99, 95% CI 0.60–1.64, p=0.976). There was no significant interaction between generator positioning and variables such as gender, age, body mass index, ejection fraction and generation of the device.

Conclusions

In this experience, IM S-ICD generator positioning was superior to SC positioning in reducing device-related complications and inappropriate shocks.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Inappropriate shocks due to air entrapment in patients with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: a meta-summary of case reports

Air entrapment has been recently described as a cause of inappropriate shock (IAS) among patients who underwent subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation. Data about this complication are lacking in the literature. This meta-summary aimed to collect the case reports describing IAS due to air entrapment, evaluate the possible promoting factors and elaborate a practical approach for prevention, diagnosis, and management of this complication. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Impact of atrioventricular junction ablation and CRT-D on long-term mortality in patients with left ventricular dysfunction, permanent, refractory atrial fibrillation and narrow QRS: results of a propensity matched analysis

INTRODUCTION

In patients with symptomatic permanent atrial fibrillation (PEAF) and narrow QRS, atrio-ventricular junction ablation (AVJA) plus cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is superior to medical therapy in reducing heart failure (HF) hospitalization and all-cause mortality. To compare the mortality of a population of patients with HF, reduced EF (rEF) and PEAF treated with AVJA plus CRT with that of a contemporary cohort of patients in sinus rhythm (SR) with similar baseline characteristics.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this prospective, multicentre, observational study, all-cause mortality in a group of consecutive patients undergoing AVJA and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) combined with CRT implantation for HFrEF, narrow QRS, and PEAF with uncontrolled ventricular rate was compared with that of a contemporary cohort of patients in SR undergoing ICD implantation (not combined with CRT) for HFrEF and narrow QRS. Individual 1:1 propensity matching of baseline characteristics was performed. A total of 824 patients were enrolled. Propensity matching yielded 107 matched pairs. After a median follow-up of 52 months, all-cause mortality was similar in patients treated with AVJA plus CRT and in the control group (p=0.434). In AVJA plus CRT patients, mortality was significantly lower than in control group patients with a history of paroxysmal/persistent AF (n=45, p=0.020), and similar to that of patients without a history of AF (n=62, p=0.459).

CONCLUSIONS

After adjustment for patient characteristics, the long-term prognosis of patients with HFrEF, narrow QRS and PEAF who underwent AVJA plus CRT was similar to that of a population of patients in SR with similar characteristics. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Arrhythmic CArdiac DEath in MYotonic dystrophy type 1 patients (ACADEMY 1) study: the predictive role of programmed ventricular stimulation

AIMS

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) predisposes to the development of life-threatening arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Our study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) in DM1 patients with conduction system disease.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Arrhythmic CArdiac DEath in MYotonic dystrophy type 1 patients (ACADEMY 1) is a double-arm non-randomized interventional prospective study. Myotonic dystrophy type 1 patients with permanent cardiac pacing indication were eligible for the inclusion. The study population underwent to pacemaker (PM) or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation according to the inducibility of ventricular tachyarrhythmias at PVS. Primary endpoint of the study was a composite of appropriate ICD therapy and cardiac arrhythmic death. The secondary study endpoint was all-cause mortality. Seventy-two adult-onset DM1 patients (51 ± 12 years; 39 male) were enrolled in the study. A ventricular tachyarrhythmia was induced in 25 patients (34.7%) at PVS (PVS+) who underwent dual chambers ICD implantation. The remaining 47 patients (65.3%) without inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmia (PVS-) were treated with dual-chamber PM. During an average observation period of 44.7 ± 10.2 months, nine patients (12.5%) met the primary endpoint, four in the ICD group (16%) and five (10.6%) in the PM group. Thirteen patients died (18.5%), 2 in the ICD group (8%) and 11 in PM group (23.4%). The Kaplan-Meier analysis did not show a significantly different risk of both primary and secondary endpoint event rates between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The inducibility of ventricular tachyarrhythmias has shown a limited value in the arrhythmic risk stratification among DM1 patients.

Real-world survival of model-3501 subcutaneous implantable defibrillator lead

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

In December 2020, the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) lead model-3501 was subject to a safety notification because of increased risk of fracture at a location just distal to the proximal sense ring. The manufacturer’s product performance report currently reports a lead survival probability of 98.8% at 45 months. However, no multicenter long-term performance information exists for this lead.

Purpose

Our aim was to assess the longevity of model-3501 leads and to compare it with that of the previous model-3401.

Methods

This analysis included consecutive patients who received an S-ICD with a model-3501 or a model-3401 lead at 66 Italian participating centers of the Rhythm Detect registry. A lead failed if it required extraction/replacement because of abnormalities suggestive of a structural defect, e.g. out-of-range impedance, nonphysiological electrical noise or ineffective therapy.

Results

From January 2013 to July 2021, 2403 patients were implanted and followed up (78% male, age 49±15years, ejection fraction 45±16%, body mass index 26±4Kg/m2). A 3501-model lead was used in 1697 patients and a 3401-model in 706 patients. During a median follow-up of 38 months [25th–75th percentile: 24-55], we detected 4 malfunctioning model-3501 leads and 2 model-3401 leads. After analysis of the returned leads by the manufacturer’s technical services, a single model-3501 lead failure was a fracture distal to the proximal ring electrode, as described in the manufacturer’s advisory letter. No deaths or permanent injuries occurred as a result of lead failures. The survival of 3501-model leads at 4 years was 99.5% (95% confidence interval, 99.0 to 99.9) compared with 99.9% (95% confidence interval, 99.6 to 100.0) of 3401-model leads (p=0.110). The cumulative occurrence rate of the 3501-model safety notification fracture was 0.1% (95% confidence interval, 0.0 to 0.3).

Conclusions

In this large multicenter analysis, the survival probability of model-3501 S-ICD leads was in line with that reported by the manufacturer, was not significantly lower than that of 3401-model leads (not affected by a safety notification), and still higher than that reported with transvenous leads. Although an enhanced electrode is now available, which addresses the potential for electrode body fracture, the present findings are reassuring and may have significant implications for the management of patients who have affected leads.

Device-Related Complications and Inappropriate Therapies Among Subcutaneous vs. Transvenous Implantable Defibrillator Recipients: Insight Monaldi Rhythm Registry

Introduction

In the context of randomized clinical trials, subcutaneous implantable cardiac defibrillators (S-ICDs) are non-inferior to transvenous ICDs (T-ICDs) concerning device-related complications or inappropriate shocks in patients with an indication for defibrillator therapy and not in need of pacing. We aimed at describing the clinical features of patients who underwent S-ICD implantation in our clinical practice, as well as the ICD-related complications and the inappropriate therapies among S-ICD vs. T-ICD recipients during a long-term follow-up.

Materials and Methods

All patients undergoing ICD, both S-ICD and TV-ICD, at Monaldi Hospital from January 1, 2015 to January 1, 2019 and followed up at our institution were included in the present analysis. The clinical variables associated with S-ICD implantation were evaluated by logistic regression analyses. We collected the ICD inappropriate therapies, ICD-related complications (including both pulse generator and lead-related complications), ICD-related infections, appropriate ICD therapies, and overall mortality. Kaplan-Meier (KM) analyses were performed to assess the risk of clinical outcome events between the two subgroups. A time-dependent Cox regression analysis was performed to adjust the results.

Results

Total 607 consecutive patients (mean age 53.8 ± 16.8, male 77.8%) with both TV-ICD (n: 290, 47.8%) and S-ICD (n: 317, 52.2%), implanted and followed at our center for a mean follow-up of 1614 ± 1018 days, were included in the study. At multivariate logistic regression analysis, an independent association between S-ICD implantation and ionic channel disease [OR: 6.01 (2.26–15.87); p < 0.0001] and ischemic cardiomyopathy [OR: 0.20 (0.12–0.35); p < 0.0001] was shown. The KM analysis did not show a significantly different risk of the inappropriate ICD therapies (log rank p = 0.64) between the two subgroups; conversely, a significant increase in the risk of ICD-related complications (log rank p = 0.02) and infections (log rank p = 0.02) in TV-ICD group was shown. The adjusted risk for ICD-related infections [OR: 0.07 (0.009–0.55), p = 0.01] and complications [0.31 (0.12–0.81), p = 0.01] was significantly lower among patients with S-ICD.

Conclusions

The choice to implant S-ICD was mainly driven by younger age and the presence of ionic channel disease; conversely ischemic cardiomyopathy reduces the probability to use this technology. No significant differences in inappropriate ICD therapies were shown among S-ICD vs. TV-ICD group; moreover, S-ICD is characterized by a lower rate of infectious and non-infectious complications leading to surgical revision or extraction.

Performance of transcatheter pacing system use in relation to patients' age

PURPOSE

Real-world safety data on the use of transcatheter pacing systems particularly in very elderly patients is still limited. The aim of this analysis was to investigate the effect of age on the safety and efficacy of leadless pacemaker implant.

METHODS

From May 2016 through July 2019, 577 patients were implanted with a leadless single-chamber pacemaker according to current pacing indication in 15 Italian cardiologic centers. The population was divided into age quartiles for evaluation, including (1) < 70 years, (2) 70-77 years, (3) 78-83 years, and (4) ≥ 83 years. Procedural data, complications, and electrical parameters were collected at baseline and during the follow-up.

RESULTS

Procedural-related complication occurrence was very low (< 1.0%) and similar in the four subgroups according to age even if the older patients were more frail. No cardiac tamponade was reported. Among the groups, no difference was observed in procedural time, fluoroscopy time duration, and electrical parameters (mean pacing impedance: 750 ± 192 and 599 ± 156, mean pacing threshold: 0.7 ± 0.5 and 0.7 ± 0.6, and mean right ventricular sensing 10.7 ± 6.1 and 11.5 ± 4.8 at implant and last follow-up, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The reported data demonstrated a high degree of safety during leadless implant across all patient ages. Procedural complications and device electrical measurements were similar among the different ages.

Optimized radiofrequency lesions through local impedance guidance for effective CTI ablation in right atrial flutter

BACKGROUND

Although radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation of cavo-tricuspid isthmus (CTI) is an established treatment for typical right atrial flutter (RAFL), it remains to be established whether local tissue impedance (LI) is able to predict effective CTI ablation and what LI drop values during ablation should be used to judge a lesion as effective. We aimed to investigate the ability of LI to predict ablation efficacy in patients with RAFL.

METHODS

RF delivery was guided by the DirectSense™ algorithm. Successful single RF application was defined according to a defragmentation of atrial potentials (DAP), reduction of voltage (RedV) by at least 80% or changes on unipolar electrogram (UPC). The ablation endpoint was the creation of bidirectional conduction block (BDB) across the isthmus.

RESULTS

392 point-by-point RF applications were analyzed in 48 consecutive RAFL patients. The mean baseline LI was 105.4±12Ω prior to ablation and 92.0±11Ω after ablation (p<0.0001). According to validation criteria, absolute drops in impedance were larger at successful ablation sites than at ineffective ablation sites (DAP: 17.8±6Ω vs 8.7±4Ω; RedV: 17.2±6Ω vs 7.8±5Ω; UPC: 19.6±6Ω vs 10.1±5Ω, all p<0.0001). LI drop values significantly increased according to the number of criteria satisfied (ranging from 7.5Ω to 19.9). BDB was obtained in all cases. No procedure-related adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

A LI-guided approach to CTI ablation was safe and effective in treating RAFL. The magnitude of LI drop was associated with effective lesion formation and BDB and could be used as a marker of ablation efficacy.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Catheter Ablation of Arrhythmias with a High-Density Mapping System in Real-World Practice (CHARISMA). URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ Identifier: NCT03793998. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Add-on Therapy With Sacubitril/Valsartan and Clinical Outcomes in CRT-D Nonresponder Patients

ABSTRACT

No data on the add-on sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) therapy among cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-D) nonresponder patients are currently available in literature. We conducted a prospective observational study including 190 CRT-D nonresponder patients with symptomatic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction despite the optimal medical therapy from at least 1 year. The primary endpoint was the rate of additional responders (left ventricular end-systolic volume reduction >15%) at 12 months from the introduction of S/V therapy. At the end of the 12 months follow-up, 37 patients (19.5%) were deemed as "additional responders" to the combination use of CRT + S/V therapy. The only clinical predictor of additional response was a lower left ventricular ejection fraction [OR 0.881 (0.815-0.953), P = 0.002] at baseline. At 12 months follow-up, there were significant improvements in heart failure (HF) symptoms and functional status [New York Heart Association 2 (2-3) vs. 1 (1-2), P < 0.001; physical activity duration/day: 10 (8-12) vs. 13 (10-18) hours, P < 0.001]. Compared with the 12 months preceding S/V introduction, there were significant reductions in the rate of HF rehospitalization (35.5% vs. 19.5%, P < 0.001), in atrial tachycardia/atrial fibrillation burden [6.0 (5.0-8.0) % vs. 0 (0-2.0) %, P < 0.001] and in the proportions of patients experiencing ventricular arrhythmias (21.6% vs. 6.3%; P < 0.001). Our results indicate that S/V add-on therapy in CRT-D nonresponder patients is associated with 19.5% of additional responders, a reduction in HF symptoms and rehospitalizations, AF burden, and ventricular arrhythmias.

Use of Cardiac Contractility Modulation as Bridge to Transplant in an Obese Patient With Advanced Heart Failure: A Case Report

Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) is a novel device-based therapy in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). In randomized clinical trials and real-life studies, CCM has been shown to improve exercise tolerance and quality of life, reverse left ventricular remodeling and reduce hospitalization in patients with HFrEF. In this case report, we describe for the first time the use of CCM as a “bridge to transplant” in a young obese patient with advanced heart failure due to non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. The patient had a poor quality of life and frequent heart failure-related hospitalizations despite the optimal medical therapy and, due to obesity, a suitable heart donor was unlikely to be identified in the short term and due to severe obesity risk of complications after implantation of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) was very high.

Early evaluation of atrial high rate episodes using remote monitoring in pacemaker patients: Results from the RAPID study

Aim

Remote monitoring (RM) of implantable cardiac devices has enabled continuous surveillance of atrial high rate episodes (AHREs) with well‐recognized clinical benefits. We aimed to add evidence on the role of the RM as compared to conventional follow‐up by investigating the interval from AHRE onset to physician’s evaluation and reaction time in actionable episodes.

Methods and Results

A total of 97 dual‐chamber pacemaker recipients were followed with RM (RM‐ON group; N = 64) or conventional in‐office visits (RM‐OFF group; N = 33) for 18 months. In‐office visits were scheduled at 1, 6, 12, and 18 months in the RM‐OFF group and at 1 and 18 months in the RM‐ON group. The overall AHRE rate was 1.98 per patient‐year (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.76–2.20) with no difference between the two groups (RM‐ON vs. RM‐OFF weighted‐HR, 0.88; CI, 0.36–2.13; p = .78). In the RM‐ON group, 100% AHREs evaluated within 11 days from onset, and within 202 days in the RM‐OFF group, with a median evaluation delay 79 days shorter in the RM‐ON group versus the RM‐OFF group (p < .0001). Therapy adjustment in actionable AHREs occurred 77 days earlier in the RM‐ON group versus the control group (p < .001). In the RM‐ON group, there were 50% less in‐office visits as compared to the RM‐OFF group (p < .001).

Conclusions

In our pacemaker population with no history of atrial fibrillation, RM allowed significant reduction of AHRE evaluation delay and prompted treatment of actionable episodes as compared to biannual in‐office visit schedule.

Prevalence and clinical predictors of inappropriate direct oral anticoagulant dosage in octagenarians with atrial fibrillation

PURPOSE

Older age is associated with inappropriate dose prescription of direct oral anticoagulants. The aim of our study was to describe the prevalence and the clinical predictors of inappropriate DOACs dosage among octogenarians in real-world setting.

METHODS

Data for this study were sourced from the multicenter prospectively maintained Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Research Database (NCT03760874). Of the AF patients aged ≥ 80 who received DOACs treatment, 253 patients were selected. Participants were categorized as appropriate dosage, overdosage, or underdosage. Underdosage and overdosage were, respectively, defined as administration of a lower or higher DOAC dose than recommended in the EHRA consensus.

RESULTS

A total of 178 patients (71%) received appropriate DOACs dose and 75 patients (29%) inappropriate DOACs dose; among them, 19 patients (25.6%) were overdosed and 56 (74.4%) were underdosed. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that underdosage was independently associated with male gender [OR = 3.15 (95% IC; 1.45-6.83); p < 0.001], coronary artery disease [OR = 3.60 (95% IC 1.45-9.10); p < 0.001] and body mass index [OR = 1.27 (1.14-1.41); p < 0.001]. Overdosage was independently associated with diabetes mellitus [OR = 18 (3.36-96); p < 0.001], with age [OR = 0.76 (95% IC; 0.61-0.96; p = 0.045], BMI [OR = 0.77 (95% IC; 0.62-0.97; p = 0.043] and with previous bleedings [OR = 6.40 (0.7; 1.43-28); p = 0.039]. There wasn't significant difference in thromboembolic, major bleeding events and mortality among different subgroups. Underdosage group showed a significatively lower survival compared with appropriate dose group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In our analysis, nearly one-third of octogenarians with AF received an inappropriate dose of DOAC. Several clinical factors were associated with DOACs' overdosage (diabetes mellitus type II, previous bleeding) or underdosage (male gender, coronary artery disease, and higher body mass index). Octogenarians with inappropriate DOACs underdosage showed less survival.

Single-Chamber Leadless Cardiac Pacemaker in Patients Without Atrial Fibrillation: Findings From Campania Leadless Registry

Introduction:

Little is known about the clinical performance of single-chamber leadless pacemaker (LLPM) in patients without atrial fibrillation (AF) as pacing indication. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics of patients who underwent single chamber LLPM implantation at three tertiary referral centers and to compare the safety and effectiveness of the single-chamber LLPM among patients with or without AF.

Materials and Methods:

All the consecutive patients who underwent LLPM implantation at three referral centers were analyzed. The indications to LLPM in a real-world setting were described. The study population was divided into two groups according to AF as pacing indication. We assessed the procedure-related complications; moreover, we compared syncope, cardiac hospitalization, pacemaker syndrome, and all-cause death recurrence during the follow-up between patients with and without AF as pacing indication.

Results:

A total of 140 consecutive patients (mean age, 76.7 ± 11.24 years, men 64.3%) were included in the study. The indication to implantation of LLPM was permanent AF with slow ventricular response (n: 67; 47.8%), sinus node dysfunction (n: 25; 17.8%), third atrioventricular block (AVB) (n: 20; 14.2%), second-degree AVB (n: 18; 12.8%), and first degree AVB (n: 10; 7.1%). A total of 7 patients (5%) experienced perioperative complications with no differences between the AF vs. non-AF groups. During a mean follow-up of 606.5 ± 265.9 days, 10 patients (7.7%) died and 7 patients (5.4%) were reported for cardiac hospitalization; 5 patients (3.8%) experienced syncope; no patients showed pacemaker syndrome. No significant differences in the clinical events between the groups were shown. The Kaplan–Meier analysis for the combined endpoints did not show significant differences between the AF and non-AF groups [hazard ratio (HR): 0.94, 95% CI: 0.41–2.16; p = 0.88].

Conclusion:

Our real-world data suggest that LLPM may be considered a safe and reasonable treatment in patients without AF in need of pacing. Further studies are needed to confirm these preliminary results.

Usefulness of the MAGGIC Score in Predicting the Competing Risk of Non-Sudden Death in Heart Failure Patients Receiving an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator: A Sub-Analysis of the OBSERVO-ICD Registry

The role of prognostic risk scores in predicting the competing risk of non-sudden death in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) receiving an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is unclear. To this goal, we evaluated the accuracy and usefulness of the Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC) score. The present analysis included 1089 HFrEF ICD recipients enrolled in the OBSERVO-ICD registry (NCT02735811). During a median follow-up of 36 months (1st-3rd IQR 25-48 months), 193 patients (17.7%) experienced at least one appropriate ICD therapy, and 133 patients died (12.2%) without experiencing any ICD therapy. The frequency of patients receiving ICD therapies was stable around 17-19% across increasing tertiles of 3-year MAGGIC probability of death, whereas non-sudden mortality increased (6.4% to 9.8% to 20.8%, p < 0.0001). Accuracy of MAGGIC score was 0.60 (95% CI, 0.56-0.64) for the overall outcome, 0.53 (95% CI, 0.49-0.57) for ICD therapies and 0.65 (95% CI, 0.60-0.70) for non-sudden death. In patients with higher 3-year MAGGIC probability of death, the increase in the competing risk of non-sudden death during follow-up was greater than that of receiving an appropriate ICD therapy. Results were unaffected when analysis was limited to ICD shocks only. The MAGGIC risk score proved accurate and useful in predicting the competing risk of non-sudden death in HFrEF ICD recipients. Estimation of mortality risk should be taken into greater consideration at the time of ICD implantation.

244 Prevalence and clinical predictors of inappropriate direct oral anticoagulant dosage in octagenarians with atrial fibrillation

Aims

Older age is associated with inappropriate dose prescription of direct oral anticoagulants. The aim of our study was to describe the prevalence and the clinical predictors of inappropriate DOACs dosage among octogenarians in real-world setting.

Methods

Data for this study were sourced from the multicentre prospectively maintained Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Research Database (NCT03760874). AF patients aged ≥80 who received DOACs treatment 253 patients were selected. Participants were categorized as appropriate dosage, overdosage, or underdosage. Underdosage and overdosage were respectively defined as administration of a lower or higher DOAC dose than recommended in the EHRA consensus.

Results

A total of 178 patients (71%) received appropriate DOACs dose and 75 patients (29%) inappropriate DOACs dose; among them 19 patients (25.6%) were overdosed and 56 (74.4%) were underdosed. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that underdosage was independently associated with male gender [OR = 3.15 (95% IC 1.45–6.83); P &lt; 0.01], coronary artery disease [OR = 3.6 (95% IC 1.41–9.1); P&lt; 0.01] and body mass index [OR = 1.27 (1.14–1.41); P &lt; 0.01]. Overdosage was independently associated with diabetes mellitus [OR = 18 (3.36–96); P &lt; 0.01], with age [OR = 0.76 (95% IC; 0.61–0.96); P &lt; 0.05], BMI [OR = 0.77 (0.11; 0.62–0.97); P &lt; 0.05] and with previous bleedings [OR = 6.4 (0.7; 1.43–28) P &lt; 0.05]. There wasn’t significant difference in thromboembolic, major bleeding events and mortality among different subgroups. Underdosage group showed a significatively lower survival compared with appropriate dose group (P &lt; 0.001).

Conclusion

In our analysis, nearly one-third of octogenarians with AF received an inappropriate dose of DOAC. Several clinical factors increased the risk of DOACs’ overdosage (diabetes mellitus Type II) or underdosage (male gender, coronary artery disease and higher body mass index). Octogenarians with inappropriate DOACs underdosage showed less survival.

164 Effect of cardiac contractility modulation therapy on myocardial work in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Aims

Cardiac contractility modulation therapy (CCMT) has been shown to reduce hospitalizations and to improve quality of life in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) who remain symptomatic despite disease-modifying therapies. Strain imaging derived myocardial work (MW) is an emerging tool for evaluating left ventricular mechanics by incorporating systolic deformation and afterload burden in the analysis. To evaluate prospectively the impact of CCMT in HFrEF patients on MW derived parameters in relation to standard echocardiographic indices.

Methods and results

We recruited 12 HFrEF patients with indications to CCMT according to current clinical practice. A comprehensive echo-Doppler evaluation, including speckle tracking derived assessment of global longitudinal strain (GLS), was performed before and after three months from the CCM device implantation. Parameters of MW such as global work index (GWI), global constructive work (GCW) global wasted work (GWW), and global work efficiency (GWE) were calculated according to standardized procedures. Median values (interquartile range) were compared for all those parameters from baseline and 3-month follow-up with Wilcoxon Rank Sum test for continuous variables. At three months from CCM implant an improvement of LVEF [from 32% (27–34) to 36% (29–39), P &lt; 0.05], GLS [from 7.4% (6.2–11.2) to 9.9% (7.5–9.4), P &lt; 0.05], GWI [from 461 mmHg (372–613) to 589 mmHg (413–696), P &lt; 0.05], GCW [from 800 mmHg (620–930) to 970 mmHg (644–1009), P = 0.236], and GWE [from 73% (65–78) to 85% (78–87), P &lt; 0.05] was observed, with a consistent reduction of GWW [from 161 mmHg (148–227) to 125 mmHg (101–188), P &lt; 0.05]. We also found a positive correlation between the magnitude of LVEF improvement and the baseline values of GCW (r = 0.727, P = 0.011).

Conclusions

At 3 months, CCMT significantly improves standard and advanced left ventricular systolic function indices. This improvement is due to the increase of constructive work and a reduction of wasted work. In addition, the increase of left ventricular ejection fraction can be predicted by the global constructive work levels at baseline.

Molecular diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 in seminal fluid

PURPOSE

Due to relevant repercussions on reproductive medicine, we aimed to evaluate feasibility of RT-PCR as a detection method of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in seminal fluid.

METHODS

A qualitative determination of the RT-PCR assays in semen was performed through different approaches: (1) efficiency of RNA extraction from sperm and seminal plasma was determined using PRM1 and PRM2 mRNA and a heterologous system as control; (2) samples obtained by diluting viral preparation from a SARS-CoV-2 panel (virus cultured in Vero E6 cell lines) were tested; (3) viral presence in different fractions of seminal fluid (whole sample, seminal plasma and post-centrifugation pellet) was evaluated. Semen samples from mild and recovered COVID-19 subjects were collected by patients referring to the Infectious Disease Department of the Policlinico Umberto I Hospital - "Sapienza" University of Rome. Control subjects were recruited at the Laboratory of Seminology-Sperm Bank "Loredana Gandini'' of the same hospital.

RESULTS

The control panel using viral preparations diluted in saline and seminal fluid showed the capability to detect viral RNA presence with C_t values depending on the initial viral concentration. All tested semen samples were negative for SARS-CoV-2, regardless of the nasopharyngeal swab result or seminal fluid fraction.

CONCLUSION

These preliminary data show that RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 RNA testing appears to be a feasible method for the molecular diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 in seminal fluid, supported by results of the control panel. The ability to detect SARS-CoV-2 in semen is extremely important for reproductive medicine, especially in assisted reproductive technology and sperm cryopreservation.

Prevalence and clinical predictors of inappropriate direct oral anticoagulant dosage in octagenarians with atrial fibrillation

Aims

Older age was associated to inappropriate dose prescription of direct oral anticoagulants. The aim of our study was to describe the prevalence and the clinical predictors of inappropriate DOACs dosage among octogenarians in real-world setting.

Methods and results

Data for this study were sourced from the multicenter prospectively maintained Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Research Database (NCT03760874). AF patients aged ≥ 80 who received DOACs treatment 253 patients were selected. Participants were categorized as appropriate dosage, overdosage, or underdosage. Underdosage and overdosage were respectively defined as administration of a lower or higher DOAC dose than recommended in the EHRA consensus. A total of 178 patients (71%) received appropriate DOACs dose and 75 patients (29%) inappropriate DOACs dose; among them 19 patients (25.6%) were overdosed and 56 (74.4%) were underdosed. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that underdosage was independently associated with male gender [OR=3,15 (95% IC 1.45–6.83); p&lt;0,01], coronary artery disease [OR= 3,6 (95% IC 1.41–9.1); p&lt;0,01] and body mass index [OR=1,27 (1.14–1.41); p&lt;0,01]. Overdosage was independently associated with diabetes mellitus [OR= 18 (3.36–96); p&lt;0,01]. There wasn't significant difference in thromboembolic, major bleeding events and mortality among different subgroups. Underdosage group showed a significatively lower survival compared with appropriate dose group (p&lt;0,001).

Conclusion

In our analysis, nearly one-third of octogenarians with AF received an inappropriate dose of DOAC. Several clinical factors increased the risk of DOACs' overdosage (diabetes mellitus type II) or underdosage (male gender, coronary artery disease and higher body mass index). Octogenarians with inappropriate DOACs underdosage resulted in less survival.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.