The Benefits of High Relaxivity for Brain Tumor Imaging: Results of a Multicenter Intraindividual Crossover Comparison of Gadobenate Dimeglumine with Gadoterate Meglumine (The BENEFIT Study)

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Gadobenate dimeglumine (MultiHance) has higher r1 relaxivity than gadoterate meglumine (Dotarem) which may permit the use of lower doses for MR imaging applications. Our aim was to compare 0.1- and 0.05-mmol/kg body weight gadobenate with 0.1-mmol/kg body weight gadoterate for MR imaging assessment of brain tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed crossover, intraindividual comparison of 0.1-mmol/kg gadobenate with 0.1-mmol/kg gadoterate (Arm 1) and 0.05-mmol/kg gadobenate with 0.1-mmol/kg gadoterate (Arm 2). Adult patients with suspected or known brain tumors were randomized to Arm 1 (70 patients) or Arm 2 (107 patients) and underwent 2 identical examinations at 1.5 T. The agents were injected in randomized-sequence order, and the 2 examinations were separated by 2-14 days. MR imaging scanners, imaging sequences (T1-weighted spin-echo and T1-weighted high-resolution gradient-echo), and acquisition timing were identical for the 2 examinations. Three blinded readers evaluated images for diagnostic information (degree of definition of lesion extent, lesion border delineation, visualization of lesion internal morphology, contrast enhancement) and quantitatively for percentage lesion enhancement and lesion-to-background ratio. Safety assessments were performed.

RESULTS

In Arm 1, a highly significant superiority (P < .002) of 0.1-mmol/kg gadobenate was demonstrated by all readers for all end points. In Arm 2, no significant differences (P > .1) were observed for any reader and any end point, with the exception of percentage enhancement for reader 2 (P < .05) in favor of 0.05-mmol/kg gadobenate. Study agent-related adverse events were reported by 2/169 (1.2%) patients after gadobenate and by 5/175 (2.9%) patients after gadoterate.

CONCLUSIONS

Significantly superior morphologic information and contrast enhancement are demonstrated on brain MR imaging with 0.1-mmol/kg gadobenate compared with 0.1-mmol/kg gadoterate. No meaningful differences were recorded between 0.05-mmol/kg gadobenate and 0.1-mmol/kg gadoterate.

Compensatory biliary and urinary excretion of gadobenate ion after administration of gadobenate dimeglumine (MultiHance(®)) in cases of impaired hepatic or renal function: a mechanism that may aid in the prevention of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis?

Objective:

To determine whether increased elimination of gadobenate ion via the hepatobiliary pathway might compensate for reduced/absent elimination via the urinary pathway in the event of compromised renal function, as a possible protective mechanism against nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF).

Methods:

15 male Crl:CD^® R(SD)Br rats (Charles River Italia, Como, Italy) randomized to three treatment groups: (1) animals with occluded bile ducts, (2) animals with occluded renal vessels and (3) control animals, each received 0.25 mmol kg⁻¹ of bodyweight of gadobenate dimeglumine (MultiHance^®; Bracco Imaging SpA, Milan, Italy). Urine and bile were collected from 0−30, 30−60, 60−120, 120−240 and 240−480 min after gadobenate dimeglumine administration prior to exsanguination. Determinations of gadobenate ion in blood, bile and urine were performed by high-performance liquid chromatography. Gadolinium (Gd³⁺) levels in excised liver and kidneys were determined by X-ray fluorescence.

Results:

The recovery of gadobenate ion in the urine of rats with bile duct occlusion was significantly higher than that in the urine of normal rats (89.1 ± 4.2% vs 60.6 ± 2.8%; p < 0.0001). Conversely, mean recovery in the bile of rats with renal vessel occlusion was significantly higher than that in the bile of normal rats (96.16 ± 0.55% vs 33.5 ± 4.7%; p < 0.0001). Gadobenate ion was not quantifiable in any group 8 h post-injection.

Conclusion:

Compensatory elimination may be an effective means to overcome compromised renal or hepatobiliary elimination.

Advances in knowledge:

The absence of NSF in at-risk patients administered with gadobenate dimeglumine may in part reflect greater Gd³⁺ elimination via the hepatobiliary route.

Are there differences between macrocyclic gadolinium contrast agents for brain tumor imaging? Results of a multicenter intraindividual crossover comparison of gadobutrol with gadoteridol (the TRUTH study)

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Gadobutrol (Gadavist) and gadoteridol (ProHance) have similar macrocyclic molecular structures, but gadobutrol is formulated at a 2-fold higher (1 mol/L versus 0.5 mol/L) concentration. We sought to determine whether this difference impacts morphologic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two hundred twenty-nine adult patients with suspected or known brain tumors underwent two 1.5T MR imaging examinations with gadoteridol or gadobutrol administered in randomized order at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg of body weight. Imaging sequences and T1 postinjection timing were identical for both examinations. Three blinded readers evaluated images qualitatively and quantitatively for lesion detection and for accuracy in characterization of histologically confirmed brain tumors. Data were analyzed by using the Wilcoxon signed rank test, the McNemar test, and a mixed model.

RESULTS

Two hundred nine patients successfully completed both examinations. No reader noted a significant qualitative or quantitative difference in lesion enhancement, extent, delineation, or internal morphology (P values = .69-1.00). One hundred thirty-nine patients had at least 1 histologically confirmed brain lesion. Two readers found no difference in the detection of patients with lesions (133/139 versus 135/139, P = .317; 137/139 versus 136/139, P = .564), while 1 reader found minimal differences in favor of gadoteridol (136/139 versus 132/139, P = .046). Similar findings were noted for the number of lesions detected and characterization of tumors (malignant/benign). Three-reader agreement for characterization was similar for gadobutrol (66.4% [κ = 0.43]) versus gadoteridol (70.3% [κ = 0.45]). There were no significant differences in the incidence of adverse events (P = .199).

CONCLUSIONS

Gadoteridol and gadobutrol at 0.1 mmol/kg of body weight provide similar information for visualization and diagnosis of brain lesions. The 2-fold higher gadolinium concentration of gadobutrol provides no benefit for routine morphologic imaging.

Use of the γ-H2AX assay to investigate DNA repair dynamics following multiple radiation exposures

Radiation therapy is one of the most common and effective strategies used to treat cancer. The irradiation is usually performed with a fractionated scheme, where the dose required to kill tumour cells is given in several sessions, spaced by specific time intervals, to allow healthy tissue recovery. In this work, we examined the DNA repair dynamics of cells exposed to radiation delivered in fractions, by assessing the response of histone-2AX (H2AX) phosphorylation (γ-H2AX), a marker of DNA double strand breaks. γ-H2AX foci induction and disappearance were monitored following split dose irradiation experiments in which time interval between exposure and dose were varied. Experimental data have been coupled to an analytical theoretical model, in order to quantify key parameters involved in the foci induction process. Induction of γ-H2AX foci was found to be affected by the initial radiation exposure with a smaller number of foci induced by subsequent exposures. This was compared to chromatin relaxation and cell survival. The time needed for full recovery of γ-H2AX foci induction was quantified (12 hours) and the 1:1 relationship between radiation induced DNA double strand breaks and foci numbers was critically assessed in the multiple irradiation scenarios.

Use of the γ-H2AX assay to investigate DNA repair dynamics following multiple radiation exposures

Radiation therapy is one of the most common and effective strategies used to treat cancer. The irradiation is usually performed with a fractionated scheme, where the dose required to kill tumour cells is given in several sessions, spaced by specific time intervals, to allow healthy tissue recovery. In this work, we examined the DNA repair dynamics of cells exposed to radiation delivered in fractions, by assessing the response of histone-2AX (H2AX) phosphorylation (γ-H2AX), a marker of DNA double strand breaks. γ-H2AX foci induction and disappearance were monitored following split dose irradiation experiments in which time interval between exposure and dose were varied. Experimental data have been coupled to an analytical theoretical model, in order to quantify key parameters involved in the foci induction process. Induction of γ-H2AX foci was found to be affected by the initial radiation exposure with a smaller number of foci induced by subsequent exposures. This was compared to chromatin relaxation and cell survival. The time needed for full recovery of γ-H2AX foci induction was quantified (12 hours) and the 1:1 relationship between radiation induced DNA double strand breaks and foci numbers was critically assessed in the multiple irradiation scenarios.

Serological survey of leptospiral infection in kennelled dogs in Italy

Two hundred and forty-five dogs were examined serologically for the presence of antibodies against different serovars of Leptospira interrogans. The dogs belonged to five different groups: group 1 was composed of clinically healthy pet dogs referred for a regular veterinary check-up visit or for vaccination; group 2 was composed of stray dogs; and groups 3, 4 and 5 were composed of dogs maintained in three different kennels which had varying standards of hygiene. Seventy-two out of the 245 dogs examined were seropositive for leptospirosis. In group 1, there were 3-4 per cent seropositive dogs; in group 2, 30.3 per cent; in group 3, 13.8 per cent; in group 4, 38.6 per cent; and in group 5, 49.2 per cent. This study demonstrates that leptospiral infection is common in dogs housed in kennels, despite most of them being vaccinated, and that crowding of animals into unsanitary quarters is associated with a high prevalence of infection. The most common infecting serovars found were bratislava and grippotyphosa, confirming recent observations that demonstrate a significant change in the epidemiology of canine leptospirosis.

Magnetic resonance imaging of metastatic disease to the brain with gadobenate dimeglumine

Seventy-four patients with one to eight proven intraaxial brain metastases received a total cumulative dose of 0.2 mmol/kg bodyweight gadobenate dimeglumine, administered as sequential injections of 0.05, 0.05 and 0.1 m mol/kg over a 20-min period. MR imaging was performed before the first administration (T2- and T1-weighted sequences) and after each injection of contrast agent (T1-weighted sequences only). Quantitative assessment of images revealed significant (P <0.01) dose-related increases in lesion-to-brain (L/B) ratio and percent enhancement of lesion signal intensity. Qualitative assessment by two independent, blinded assessors revealed additional lesions in 22%, 25% and 38% (assessor 1) and 29%, 32% and 34% (assessor 2) of patients after each cumulative dose when compared with combined T1- and T2-weighted pre-contrast images. Significantly more lesions (P < 0.01) were noted by both assessors after the first injection and by one assessor after each subsequent injection. For patients with just one lesion observed on unenhanced T1- and T2-weighted images, additional lesions were noted in 12%, 16% and 28% of patients by assessor 1 following each dose and in 24%, 27% and 30% of patients by assessor 2. Contemporaneously, diagnostic confidence was increased and lesion conspicuity improved over unenhanced MRI. For patients with one lesion observed after an initial dose of 0.05 mmol/kg, additional lesions were noted by assessors 1 and 2 in 9.1% and 11.8% of patients, respectively, after a cumulative dose of 0.1 mmol/kg and in a further 9.1% and 5.9% of patients, respectively, after a cumulative dose of 0.2 mmol/kg. No safety concerns were apparent.

Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of intracranial metastases: effect of dose on lesion detection and delineation

Seventy-four patients with one to eight proven intraaxial metastatic lesions to the brain received a total gadobenate dimeglumine dose of 0.3 mmol/kg of body weight, administered as three sequential bolus injections of 0.1 mmol/kg, at 10-minute intervals over a 20-minute period. Quantitative and qualitative assessments of efficacy were performed after each injection and a full evaluation of safety was conducted. Cumulative dosing produced significant (P < 0.01) dose-related increases in lesion-to-brain (L/B) ratio and lesion signal intensity (SI) enhancement. Two independent, blinded assessors noted additional lesions, compared to unenhanced images in 31% and 33%, 49% and 42%, and 50% and 48% of patients after each cumulative dose, respectively. Significantly more lesions were noted after the first injection, compared to unenhanced images (P = 0.002 and P < 0.001; assessors 1 and 2, respectively), and after a second injection, compared to the first (P < 0.001 and P = 0.039; assessors 1 and 2, respectively). Neither assessor noted significantly more lesions after the third injection. For patients with just one lesion observed on unenhanced T1- and T2-weighted images, additional lesions were noted by assessors 1 and 2 for 27% and 26%, 48% and 35%, and 42% and 41% of patients, respectively, following each injection. Contemporaneously, diagnostic confidence was increased and lesion conspicuity improved over unenhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). For patients with one lesion observed after 0.1 mmol/kg of gadobenate dimeglumine, additional lesions were noted for 24% and 17% of patients (assessors 1 and 2, respectively) following a second 0.1 mmol/kg injection. Only assessor 2 noted additional lesions following the third 0.1 mmol/kg injection. The findings of on-site investigators concurred with those of the two off-site assessors. No safety concerns were apparent.

Safety assessment of gadobenate dimeglumine (MultiHance): extended clinical experience from phase I studies to post-marketing surveillance

Clinical trials completed by September 2000 on gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA; MultiHance) included 2540 adult and pediatric subjects that were administered this agent. For adult patient volunteers, the overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was 19.8%, although marked study- and indication-related differences were apparent. Events potentially related to Gd-BOPTA administration were reported for 15.1% of adult patients. The vast majority of AEs were non-serious, mild, transient, and self-resolving. Headache, injection site reaction, nausea, taste perversion, and vasodilation were the most common AEs, reported with a frequency of between 1.0% and 2.6%. Serious AEs potentially related to Gd-BOPTA were reported for five (0.2%) patients overall. Controlled studies revealed no differences between Gd-BOPTA and other gadolinium chelates or placebo in the incidence and type of AEs. Similarly, no differences with respect to adult patients and/or comparator were noted in studies on pediatric subjects and subjects with renal or liver insufficiency. Post-marketing surveillance of approximately 100000 doses revealed an overall AE incidence of < 0.03% with serious AEs reported for < 0.005% of patients.

Evaluation of the accuracy of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging in the detection and characterization of focal liver lesions

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the extent to which hepatic lesion characterization and detection is improved by using gadobenate dimeglumine for enhancement of MR images.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty-six patients were imaged before gadobenate dimeglumine administration, immediately after the 2 mL/sec bolus administration of a 0.05 mmol/kg dose (dynamic imaging), and at 60-120 min after the IV infusion at 10 mL/min of a further 0.05 nmol/kg dose (delayed imaging). The accuracy for lesion characterization was assessed for a total of 107 lesions. Sensitivity for lesion detection was assessed for a total of 149 lesions detected on either intra-operative sonography, iodized oil CT, CT during arterial portography, or follow-up contrast-enhanced CT as the gold standard.

RESULTS

The accuracy in differentiating benign from malignant liver lesions increased from 75% and 82% (the findings of two observers) on unenhanced images alone, to 89% and 80% on dynamic images alone (p<0.001, p = 0.8), and to 90.7% when combining the unenhanced and dynamic image sets (p<0.001, p = 0.023). Delayed images did not further improve accuracy (90% and 91%; p = 0.002, p< 0.05). A similar trend was apparent in terms of accuracy for specific diagnosis: values ranged from 49% and 62% on unenhanced images alone, to 76% and 70% on combined unenhanced and dynamic images (p<0.001, p = 0.06), and to 75% and 70% on inclusion of delayed images (p<0.001, p = 0.12). The sensitivity for lesion detection increased from 77% and 81% on unenhanced images alone, to 87% and 85% on combined unenhanced and dynamic images (p = 0.001, p = 0.267), and to 92% and 89% when all images were considered (p<0.001, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Contrast-enhanced dynamic MR imaging with gadobenate dimeglumine significantly increases sensitivity and accuracy over unenhanced imaging for the characterization of focal hepatic lesions, and delayed MR imaging contributes to the improved detection of lesions.

Focal liver lesions: evaluation of the efficacy of gadobenate dimeglumine in MR imaging--a multicenter phase III clinical study

PURPOSE

To evaluate gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) for dynamic and delayed magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of focal liver lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 126 of 214 patients, MR imaging was performed before Gd-BOPTA administration, immediately after bolus administration of a 0.05- mmol/kg dose of Gd-BOPTA, and 60-120 minutes after an additional intravenously infused 0.05-mmol/kg dose. In 88 patients, imaging was performed before and 60-120 minutes after a single, intravenously infused 0.1-mmol/kg dose. T1- and T2-weighted spin-echo and T1-weighted gradient-echo images were acquired. On-site and blinded off-site reviewers prospectively evaluated all images. Intraoperative ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT) during arterial portography, and/or CT with iodized oil served as the reference methods in 110 patients.

RESULTS

Significantly more lesions were detected on combined pre- and postcontrast images compared with on precontrast images alone (P <. 01). All reviewers reported a decreased mean size of the smallest detected lesion and improved lesion conspicuity on postcontrast images. All on-site reviewers and two off-site reviewers reported increased overall diagnostic confidence (P <.01). Additional lesion characterization information was provided on up to 109 (59%) of 184 delayed images and for up to 50 (42%) of 118 patients in whom dynamic images were assessed. Gd-BOPTA would have helped change the diagnosis in 99 (47%) of 209 cases and affected patient treatment in 408 (23%) of 209 cases.

CONCLUSION

Gd-BOPTA increases liver lesion conspicuity and detectability and aids in the characterization of lesions.

Hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation between gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI and pathologic findings

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To correlate the appearance of hepatocellular carcinoma on delayed (60 minutes) postcontrast T1-weighted gradient echo images with the mode of action of gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) and the anatomic and pathologic characteristics of the lesions.

METHODS

A total of 34 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and varying degrees of diffuse liver disease were studied. T2-weighted spin echo and T1-weighted spin echo and gradient echo images were acquired before and 60 minutes after the intravenous administration of 0.1 mmol/kg Gd-BOPTA. Qualitative and quantitative evaluations of the images were performed and correlated with histologic findings. The quantitative evaluation, performed on T1-weighted gradient echo images, looked at the percentage increase of liver enhancement after Gd-BOPTA administration, the lesion-to-liver contrast/noise (C/N) ratio before and after Gd-BOPTA administration, and the C/N variation after Gd-BOPTA administration. Qualitative assessment considered the morphologic features of the lesions as well as the visual variation of contrast before and after Gd-BOPTA administration. Finally, a histologic evaluation was made of the degree of differentiation of the lesions and of the presence of fatty metaplasia, necrosis, bile, or intratumoral peliosis.

RESULTS

Among the parameters affecting lesion identification were the extent of liver function, degree of vascularization, residual functionality of the tumor cells, and characteristics of the neoplastic tissue. Positive correlations (Spearman coefficients = 0.359 and 0.393, respectively) were observed precontrast between the degree of liver failure and the amount of contrast noise, and postcontrast between the amount of intralesional fatty metaplasia and the extent to which lesion conspicuity worsened after Gd-BOPTA administration. An inverse correlation (Spearman coefficient = -0.330) was observed between the degree of lesion differentiation and the visible appearance after Gd-BOPTA administration, with well-differentiated lesions tending toward worsened conspicuity postcontrast. A statistically significant difference (P = 0.001) was observed in the mean precontrast C/N ratio for lesions later showing unchanged conspicuity and worse conspicuity on postcontrast images, respectively. Marked variation (P = 0.019) was also observed between Child A and B cirrhotic patients for the degree of hepatic enhancement on postcontrast images.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that liver parenchyma signal intensity is influenced by the extent to which liver function is compromised, that residual hepatocytic functionality permits Gd-BOPTA uptake by certain lesions and that this uptake might subsequently impair the observed C/N ratio on delayed images, and that the worsening of lesion conspicuity on postcontrast images is influenced also by high quantities of intralesional fatty metaplasia.

MultiHance in the dynamic phase of contrast enhancement: a pictorial assessment

The present article demonstrates pictorially the use of MultiHance (gadobenate dimeglumine, Gd-BOPTA) in dynamic magnetic resonance imaging and is aimed at ensuring that the product is not misconceived as solely a hepatobiliary agent for use in delayed, static magnetic resonance imaging for the improved detection of focal liver lesions. The enhancement patterns of three malignant (hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma and metastasis) and three benign (hemangioma, focal nodular hyperplasia and adenoma) lesion types are demonstrated. Each was imaged during the dynamic phase of contrast enhancement immediately following the intravenous bolus administration of 0.05 mmol/kg MultiHance. The article demonstrates that the enhancement patterns observed for these relatively common lesions are similar to those reported in the literature after the intravenous bolus administration of conventional, non-specific 'extracellular fluid' contrast agents, and concludes by inferring that MultiHance behaves in the liver as a conventional gadolinium-based agent in the first minutes after administration.

MultiHance in the assessment of intracranial tumors: results of phase II clinical studies

PURPOSE

To assess preliminarily the efficacy of 0.1 and 0.2 mmol/kg doses of MultiHance for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of brain tumors.

METHODS

Patients were imaged pre-dose using proton density (PD), T2-weighted and T1-weighted spin-echo sequences, and post-dose by repetition of the T1-weighted sequences at 0-15, 15-30, 30-45 and 45-60 min after the completion of MultiHance administration. Qualitative efficacy assessments of the image sets were performed by two blinded neuroradiologists in terms of the level of diagnostic information, the type of additional information provided by post-contrast images, the best post-contrast image set in terms of diagnostic information, the radiological utility of MultiHance, and the detectability of brain metastases. Extensive safety and tolerability controls were performed at 3 and 24 h post-contrast.

RESULTS

Additional diagnostic information was available on MultiHance-enhanced images as compared to pre-contrast images for 58.678.9% of patients administered 0.1 mmol/kg MultiHance and 66.1-74.6% of patients administered 0.2 mmol/kg MultiHance. Generally, the early (0 to 30 min) post-contrast image sets were preferred, with a clear superiority at the 15-30 min post-dose time point. In a subgroup of 21 patients with brain metastases, a higher number of lesions was detected in 55.6-66.7% of the cases with 0.1 mmol/kg MultiHance and in 58.3% of the cases with 0.2 mmol/kg MultiHance. Overall, the usefulness of MultiHance was judged as good to excellent in 91.4% of the patients at both dose levels. A total of 12 of 120 patients (10%) reported 15 transient, self-resolving adverse events of mild-to-moderate intensity. No difference between doses was observed in the incidence of adverse events and no laboratory, ECG or vital signs abnormalities were reported.

CONCLUSION

MultiHance is a safe and effective contrast agent for magnetic resonance assessment of brain tumors when administered intravenously at doses up to 0.2 mmol/kg.

Clinical utility and safety of MultiHance in magnetic resonance imaging of liver cancer: results of multicenter studies in Europe and the USA

MultiHance (gadobenate dimeglumine; Gd-BOPTA, Bracco SpA, Milano, Italy) is a novel gadolinium-based contrast agent which has recently been made commercially available in Europe for magnetic resonance imaging of the liver. It combines the properties of a conventional extracellular fluid contrast agent with those of a liver-specific agent and has been shown in numerous clinical trials to improve the impact of magnetic resonance imaging for both the detection and characterization of focal liver masses. The present article briefly summarizes the safety and efficacy results of Phase I, II and III clinical studies carried out in almost 800 patient and non-patient volunteers in both Europe and the USA.

Safety, tolerance, biodistribution, and MR imaging enhancement of the liver with gadobenate dimeglumine: results of clinical pharmacologic and pilot imaging studies in nonpatient and patient volunteers

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess safety, tolerance, biodistribution, and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging enhancement of the liver with gadobenate dimeglumine.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Phase I single-blind studies were performed in 53 healthy volunteers, of whom 39 received gadobenate dimeglumine and 14 placebo. Another 106 patients with focal liver disease received gadobenate dimeglumine in parallel-group, open-label, phase II studies. The imaging potential of gadobenate dimeglumine was assessed in all 106 patients plus 11 healthy volunteers, whereas pharmacokinetics were determined for 42 healthy volunteers. Safety was assessed for all subjects enrolled in the study. Imaging protocols for healthy volunteers were similar to those for patients and comprised predose T2-weighted sequences and pre- and postinjection T1-weighted spin-echo and gradient-echo sequences.

RESULTS

Gadobenate dimeglumine was safe and well tolerated in healthy volunteers and patients, with pharmacokinetics described adequately as a distribution phase and an elimination phase. Most of the injected dose of gadobenate was excreted unchanged in urine within 24 hours, although a fraction corresponding to 0.6%-4.0% of the injected dose was eliminated with the bile and recovered in the feces. The gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced signal intensity of liver parenchyma was dose-related and constant for 120 minutes. Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging was superior to nonenhanced MR imaging in more than 50% of patient studies, with more lesions seen in 26%-38% of patients and smaller lesions in 21%-33% of patients. In general, image sets acquired 40-180 minutes after administration of a dose were preferred, whereas images acquired during the dynamic phase after administration were typical of those obtained with extracellular fluid contrast agents.

CONCLUSION

Gadobenate dimeglumine is a safe and efficacious MR imaging contrast agent suitable for both delayed and dynamic imaging of the liver.

Delayed MR imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma enhanced by gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA)

The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA)-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma HCC. MR images were obtained in 14 patients with 31 HCC nodules as a part of a phase III clinical trial. T1- and T2-weighted images were obtained before and after iv administration of 0.1 mmol/kg of Gd-BOPTA. Two blinded readers evaluated pre- and delayed postcontrast images separately for detection of tumor nodules. Quantitative measurements of signal-to-noise (SNR) and tumor/liver contrast-to-noise (CNR) ratios were also performed. A signal/intensity ratio was calculated. Tumor enhancement was correlated with histologic findings. Consensus agreement of precontrast T1- and T2-weighted images revealed 23/31 HCC nodules in 14 patients; postcontrast T1-weighted images demonstrated 24/31 HCC nodules in the same number of patients. Combining both pre- and postcontrast images, 27/31 lesions were detected. Four patients had four well-differentiated HCC nodules detected only on postcontrast images, while three well-differentiated lesions in two patients were only seen on precontrast images. Quantitative evaluation showed an SNR ratio increase in both liver parenchyma and HCC nodules, as well as a significant increase in the absolute CNR ratio on postcontrast T1-weighted gradient-recalled images (P < 0.05). Well-differentiated HCC lesions showed a greater enhancement than poorly differentiated HCC lesions.

Gadobenate dimeglumine (BOPTA) enhanced MR imaging: patterns of enhancement in normal liver and cirrhosis

To determine whether gadobenate dimeglumine (BOPTA) will adequately enhance cirrhotic liver parenchyma, and to document the enhancement patterns in cirrhosis, 14 cirrhotic and 20 non-cirrhotic patients were evaluated before and 60-120 minutes after gadolinium-BOPTA. Proof of liver cirrhosis was biopsy (6), surgical resection (3), and clinical follow-up (5). Enhancement effects were compared quantitatively by determining the liver signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and signal enhancement in both populations. Qualitatively assessment of the liver enhancement was performed and classified as homogeneous or heterogeneous. Quantitative analysis: cirrhotic liver parenchyma presented a higher increase in SNR values, relative to non-cirrhotic liver parenchyma, on postcontrast images. Likewise the signal enhancement of cirrhotic liver parenchyma was superior to non-cirrhotic liver on T1-weighted SE images (P = .02) and in-phase GRE images (P < .001). There was no statistical difference on out-of-phase GRE images. Qualitative analysis: on T1-weighted SE postcontrast images, cirrhotic liver parenchyma showed a homogeneous enhancement in 7 patients and heterogeneous in 7. Whereas on GRE images, cirrhotic parenchyma showed heterogeneous enhancement in 9 patients and homogeneous in 5 patients. The heterogeneous enhancement was due to the presence of hypointense nodules in 7 patients and hyperintense nodules in 2 patients. In conclusion, our study has shown that the hepatobiliary contrast agent Gd-BOPTA is effective in the cirrhotic liver, demonstrating an increased liver enhancement compared with non-cirrhotic patients.