Current Scenario of Clinical Cancer Research in Latin America and the Caribbean

In Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), progress has been made in some national and regional cancer control initiatives, which have proved useful in reducing diagnostic and treatment initiation delays. However, there are still significant gaps, including a lack of oncology clinical trials. In this article, we will introduce the current status of the region's clinical research in cancer, with a special focus on academic cancer research groups and investigator-initiated research (IIR) initiatives. Investigators in LAC have strived to improve cancer research despite drawbacks and difficulties in funding, regulatory timelines, and a skilled workforce. Progress has been observed in the representation of this region in clinical trial development and conduct, as well as in scientific productivity. However, most oncology trials in the region have been sponsored by pharmaceutical companies, highlighting the need for increased funding from governments and private foundations. Improvements in obtaining and/or strengthening the LAC cancer research group's financing will provide opportunities to address cancer therapies and management shortcomings specific to the region. Furthermore, by including this large, ethnic, and genetically diverse population in the world's research agenda, one may bridge the gap in knowledge regarding the applicability of results of clinical trials now mainly conducted in populations from the Northern Hemisphere.

Socioeconomic Impact of Cancer in Latin America and The Caribbean

The incidence of cancer in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) is increasing yearly and is expected to reach 2.4 million new cases by 2040, with a more pronounced effect in Central America and South America. In addition, cancer is already the most frequent cause of premature death for most countries in LAC, and the second cause of death independent of country socioeconomic status, clearly demonstrating that the cancer burden in LAC should be addressed now rather than considered as an issue to be dealt with in the future. LAC countries performed in a mid-range zone in terms of income and mortality-to-incidence ratio compared to other countries globally. The LAC continent has, in general, a median income per capita and a median availability of radiotherapy (RDT) machines per capita. Patients that have private health coverage are more likely to receive preventive care such as pap smears and mammography in many countries of the LAC. The human development index was negatively related to mortality from oral cancer in the LAC countries with medium and low Human Development Index (HDI). Cancer treatment adverse events can negatively affect survivors' workability compromising their return to work after diagnosis. In conclusion, the cancer burden can be a major public health issue with a considerable socioeconomic impact in LAC countries. It is demonstrated in several studies that unequal access to optimal care is frequent in LAC and that health insurance type may impact patients' diagnosis and outcome.

Assessing Oncologists’ Attitudes Concerning Comprehensive Genomic Profiling in Stage IV Lung Adenocarcinoma in Brazil

Introduction

Advances in comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) of lung adenocarcinomas (LUADs) led to personalized treatment for patients. This study evaluated medical oncologists’ attitudes toward CGP in a scenario where sponsored funding for CGP was available.

Methods

We designed an online survey assessing CGP use and treating physicians’ confidence, composed of three self-confidence domains, which are as follows: confidence in interpreting CGP results, confidence in treating oncogenic-driven LUAD, and confidence in managing tyrosine kinase inhibitor adverse events. The survey was distributed to medical oncologists who treat lung cancer in Brazil. Comparisons between groups were performed using the chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. Univariable and multivariable (adjusted OR) analyses were performed.

Results

Among 104 respondents who treat patients with lung cancer, 55% were from the Southeast region, 28% had high lung cancer clinical load, and 33% had in-house molecular testing. More than half (51%) of the participants request CGP systematically to stage IV LUAD. As for provider confidence, 67% stated being confident in all three domains: 76% confident in interpreting CGP, 84% confident in treating oncogenic-driven LUAD, and 81% in managing tyrosine kinase inhibitor adverse events. Providers’ confidence was associated with systematically requesting CGP to stage IV LUAD (p = 0.013). After controlling for the variables of interest, systematic requesting CGP for stage IV LUAD revealed a significant association with the provider’s confidence (adjusted OR = 0.35, p = 0.028, 95% CI: 0.14–0.84). The major challenge for properly requesting CGP was the long turnaround time and the fear of treatment delays.

Conclusions

Even though CGP for stage IV LUAD in Brazil is fully sponsored, only half of the oncologists in our survey systematically request it.. Requesting CGP was associated with providers’ confidence. Improving access and promoting providers’ awareness of CGP utility is necessary to increase CGP use and better inform treatment decisions.

Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With CNS Metastasis: Disparities From a Real-World Analysis (GBOT-LACOG 0417)

Despite the advances in the approach to non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with CNS metastasis, access to timely diagnosis and treatment may not be optimal in many instances. Our main objective was to describe a cohort of patients with NSCLC with brain metastases from public and private cancer centers, and the differences between patients' presentation, treatment, and outcomes.

Worse survival in lung cancer patients with brain metastasis from public institutions.

Abstract P4-10-01: Quality of life and symptom severity in the PALLAS randomized trial of palbociclib with adjuvant endocrine therapy in early breast cancer (AFT-05)

Background: Quality of life (QOL) in breast cancer patients (pts) can be greatly impacted by initial treatment and ongoing therapy, particularly if side effects and symptoms are not well tolerated. The PALLAS trial investigated whether the addition of 2 years of palbociclib (palbo) to adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) improved invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) over adjuvant ET alone. We report on the main patient-reported outcome (PRO) quality of life (QOL) and symptom severity results of this trial by treatment arm. Methods: PALLAS is an ongoing multicenter, open label phase 3 trial that enrolled hormone receptor positive, HER2-negative, stage II-III breast cancer patients at 406 cancer centers across 21 countries. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either 2 years of palbo (125mg/day, 3 weeks on 1 week off) plus ongoing provider or patient-choice adjuvant ET (palbo+ET) versus ongoing ET alone. The primary study endpoint was iDFS. Treatment with palbo in all pts stopped at the time of the second interim analysis (5/2020) due to futility; all pts then moved to follow up. The PRO analyses were triggered for completion after awareness of the pre-specified 469 iDFS cases in November 2020. Eight PRO endpoints were measured serially (i.e., day 1 of each monthly cycle for the first 3 months, then every 3 months for the first 2 years, and once at year 3). The endpoints were the EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status/QOL score, the Brief Fatigue Inventory score, the modified Brief Pain Inventory severity and pain interference scores, the EORTC QLQ-BR23 alopecia score, and the Breast Cancer Prevention Trial hot flash symptoms, vaginal problems, and musculoskeletal pain scores. Linear mixed models compared the average difference between arms across time points during the initial 2-year treatment period adjusting for cycle 1 day 1 (C1D1) PRO scores, demographic and clinical variables. The average differences between arms (palbo+ET vs ET alone) and the two-sided (1-[0.05/8]) x 100% confidence intervals, adjusted for multiple comparisons, were calculated. Analysis of covariance compared the average between-arm differences by endpoint at 3 years. Results: The PRO intention to collect population included 4688 (81%) of the overall trial pts, and was clinically and demographically representative of the remaining 1073 pts. Each analysis population, with measures at C1D1 and at least 1 post-C1D1 assessment for each PRO endpoint, comprised ≥ 89% of the 4688 pts and the proportions were similar between arms. After adjustment for baseline covariates, on average, no clinically important differences between arms were observed for any of the eight endpoints over the 2 year treatment period (Table 1). All effect sizes were below the pre-specified 0.2 threshold. These PRO results were similar at the 3 year time point. Conclusions: No clinically significant differences in either patient-reported QOL or symptom severity were found, on average, between participants in the two PALLAS treatment arms while either taking palbo+ET or ET alone, or after study-wide termination of palbo. In general, the addition of palbociclib in the adjuvant breast cancer setting did not contribute to increased symptom burden within this survivorship population. Further analyses will examine the relationship between PROs and treatment discontinuation by arm and study time point. Support: AFT, Pfizer, https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org

Table 1.Results of the Patient-Reported QOL and Symptom Severity Analyses Between the Two Treatment Arms During the First 2 Years of PALLASPRO Endpoint *Palbo + ET Adjusted average score (95% CI)ET alone Adjusted average score (95% CI)Average Difference + (Palbo + ET vs ET alone)[99.38% CI] Clinically ++ Important DifferenceEORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QOL71.7 (71.2, 72.2)74.0 (73.5, 74.5)-2.3 (-3.3, -1.4)**NoBrief Fatigue Inventory Score2.3 (2.2, 2.3)2.1 (2.0, 2.1)0.2 (0.1, 0.3)NoModified Brief Pain Inventory - Severity Score2.3 (2.2, 2.3)2.4 (2.4, 2.5)-0.2 (-0.3, -0.1)NoModified Brief Pain Inventory - Interference Score1.7 (1.6, 1.7)1.7 (1.6, 1.7)0.0 (-0.1, 0.1)NoEORTC QLQ-BR23 Alopecia1.4 (1.4, 1.4)1.3 (1.3, 1.3)0.1 (0.1, 0.1)NoBreast Cancer Prevention Trial - Hot Flash Symptoms1.2 (1.2, 1.3)1.2 (1.2, 1.3)0.0 (-0.1, 0.1)NoBreast Cancer Prevention Trial - Vaginal Problems0.8 (0.8, 0.8)0.8 (0.7, 0.8)0.0 (0.0, 0.1)NoBreast Cancer Prevention Trial - Musculoskeletal Pain1.2 (1.2, 1.2)1.3 (1.3, 1.3)-0.1 (-0.2, 0.0)No* For the EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QOL subscale, higher scores indicate better QOL. For all other PRO endpoints, higher scores indicate worse symptom levels. ** The lower bound of the one-sided CI (adjusted for multiple comparisons) was -3.3. Because the lower limit is greater than the pre-specified non-inferiority margin of -3.44, non-inferiority of palbo+ET relative to ET-alone was concluded. The non-inferiority margin corresponds to a 0.2 SD in the EORTC QLQ-C30 global health/QOL score. +The average difference was adjusted for the following baseline covariates: Cycle 1 day 1 score, region (if applicable), age category, first adjuvant ET, race, ethnicity, N-stage, T-stage, histological grade, PgR, prior chemotherapy, ECOG Performance Status. ++Based on each instrument’s published clinically relevant cut-offs, if available. After calculating Cohen’s d treatment effect sizes, (i.e. by dividing the average difference by the ET-alone arm standard deviation from cycle 1 day 1), all effect sizes were below the pre-specified 0.2 threshold, and would not be considered clinically important.

Citation Format: Michelle Joy Naughton, David Zahrieh, Michael Gnant, Nicholas Zdenkowski, Julie Lemieux, Jun J Mao, Vesna Bjelic-Radisic, Eileen Shinn, Marija Balic, Christoph Thomssen, Jane Neisel, Manuel Ruiz-Echarri, Sibylle Loibl, Claudine Isaacs, David Cameron, Fernando Manuel Henao Carrasco, Matthew Goetz, Viktor Wette, Gustavo Werutsky, Hope Rugo, Marcus Vetter, Ling-Ming Tseng, Kathy Miller, Florian Fitzal, Juan Miguel Gil Gil, Haeseong Park, Barbro Linderholm, Emilio Bajetta, Zoneddy Dayao, Aleix Prat, Karin Ehrhardt, Otto Metzger, Amal Arahmani, Ernest Law, Ann Partridge, Lisa Carey, Alex Zoroufy, Amylou Dueck, Dominik Hlauschek, Angela DeMichele, Erica Mayer. Quality of life and symptom severity in the PALLAS randomized trial of palbociclib with adjuvant endocrine therapy in early breast cancer (AFT-05) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-10-01.

Abstract P5-16-11: Ipatasertib (ipat) in combination with palbociclib (palbo) and fulvestrant (fulv) in patients (pts) with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (aBC)

Background: Ipat is a potent oral AKT inhibitor that has been studied in multiple clinical trials, primarily in breast and prostate cancers. Combining fulv and AKT inhibition demonstrated efficacy in pts with HR+ aBC regardless of PI3K/AKT pathway alterations [Jones, Lancet Oncol 2020]. IPATunity150 (NCT04060862) was designed as a phase III trial with an open-label phase Ib portion adding ipat to palbo plus fulv in biomarker-unselected HR+ HER2-negative aBC. The biological rationale was to prevent or delay resistance to CDK4/6 inhibition plus endocrine therapy (ET). AKT1 alterations and PTEN loss have been implicated in resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors [Wander, Cancer Discov 2020; Costa, Cancer Discov 2020]. We report results from the open-label phase Ib portion. Patients and Methods: The primary objective was to assess safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of ipat in combination with palbo and fulv; several efficacy parameters were also analyzed. Pts with measurable disease who had not previously received a CDK4/6 inhibitor and had experienced relapse during adjuvant ET were treated with ipat at a dose of 300 mg/d, d1-21 q28d, plus standard-of-care doses of palbo (125 mg/d, d1-21 q28d) plus fulv (500 mg q28d with a loading dose in cycle 1). The selected ipat dose was lower than the 400 mg typically used in other studies because of the anticipated drug-drug interaction (DDI) when combining ipat (a sensitive CYP3A4 substrate and mild-to-moderate CYP3A inhibitor) with palbo (a weak time-dependent CYP3A4 inhibitor and CYP3A substrate). Results: Of the 20 pts treated, 20% were Asian, 65% had primary endocrine resistance (relapse ≤2 years after starting adjuvant ET), 80% had received prior (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy, and 60% had liver and/or lung metastases. At the data cutoff (19 Mar 2021; median follow-up 6.1 months), median treatment duration was 5.1, 5.9, and 5.3 months for ipat, palbo, and fulv, respectively. Treatment was ongoing in 13 pts. Grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 80% of pts (no grade 5). The most common AEs were diarrhea (80% any grade, 10% grade 3, no grade 4) and neutropenia (75% any grade, 45% grade 3, 20% grade 4). Other notable grade ≥3 AEs were grade 3 liver function test elevations in 10%. There were no cases of febrile neutropenia and only 1 case of pneumonitis (grade 1). AEs led to at least one dose reduction of ipat in 6 pts (30%; diarrhea n=3 [with vomiting in 1 pt], neutropenia n=3 [with fatigue in 1 pt]) and of palbo in 9 pts (45%; all for neutropenia). One pt (5%) discontinued ipat and palbo permanently due to ongoing neutropenia after protocol-defined dose reductions. As expected, a DDI led to increased ipat exposure (AUC0-24,ss ~60% and Cmax ~40%) when ipat and palbo were combined. Based on population PK analysis, palbo AUC0-24,ss was ~30% higher than reported from the PALOMA 1 and 2 trials, which was expected and consistent with previously reported physiologically based PK modeling of palbo exposure when administered with moderate CYP3A inhibitors [Yu, J Clin Pharmacol 2017]. All 20 pts had at least one post-baseline tumor assessment. Best overall response rate was 45% (95% CI: 23-68%), including confirmed responses in 7 pts (35%; 5% complete response, 30% partial response) at the clinical cutoff date. Median duration of response was 9.6 months (95% CI: 7.1-not estimable). An additional 10 pts (50%) had stable disease. Progression-free survival results were immature (events in 7 pts). There was no obvious association between efficacy and mutations in PIK3CA/AKT1 as tested in ctDNA. Conclusion: The triplet combination of ipat, fulv, and palbo had an acceptable safety profile generally consistent with that of the individual study drugs; ipat exposure was increased through a predicted DDI. Updated results will be presented.

Citation Format: Mafalda Oliveira, Aditya Bardia, Sung-Bae Kim, Naoki Niikura, Cristina Hernando, Gustavo Werutsky, Yoland Antill, Pedro Liedke, Catherine Oakman, Eriko Tokunaga, Seth Wander, Vanessa Krause, Toshinari Yamashita, Frauke Schimmoller, Jacob Rotmensch, Heidi Savage, Rucha Sane, Nicholas Turner. Ipatasertib (ipat) in combination with palbociclib (palbo) and fulvestrant (fulv) in patients (pts) with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (aBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-16-11.

Abstract OT2-11-09: Lidera breast cancer: A phase III adjuvant study of giredestrant (GDC-9545) vs physician’s choice of endocrine therapy (ET) in patients (pts) with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer (ER+/HER2- EBC)

BACKGROUND ETs that target ER activity and/or estrogen synthesis are the mainstay of ER+ BC treatment. Despite best management, up to 20% of pts with ER+/HER2- eBC develop resistance (in some cases due to the acquisition of tumor mutations in ESR1 that can drive estrogen-independent transcription and proliferation) and still have high recurrence rates on standard ETs. New treatment alternatives for ER+/HER2- eBC are needed to reduce risk of recurrence and improve survival, tolerability, quality of life, and adherence. Giredestrant is a highly potent, nonsteroidal oral selective ER antagonist and degrader (SERD). It achieves robust ER occupancy and is active against tumors that retain ER-sensitivity or have ESR1 mutation(s). Giredestrant has been demonstrated to be more potent in vitro and achieves higher ER occupancy in vivo than fulvestrant, the only currently approved SERD. Early phase clinical studies have demonstrated that single-agent giredestrant (30 mg daily) has promising clinical and pharmacodynamic activity, and is well-tolerated in the ER+/HER2- eBC and metastatic BC settings. TRIAL DESIGN This is a phase III, global, randomized, open-label, multicenter study evaluating the efficacy and safety of adjuvant giredestrant vs physician’s choice of adjuvant ET in pts with medium- and high-risk stage I-III histologically confirmed ER+/HER2- eBC. Pts are randomized 1:1 to oral 30 mg daily giredestrant or physician’s choice of standard ET (tamoxifen, anastrozole, letrozole, or exemestane, given according to prescribing information). Stratification factors are risk (medium vs high, based on anatomic [tumor size, nodal status] and biologic features [grade, Ki67, gene signatures if available]); geographic region (US/Canada/Western Europe vs Asia-Pacific vs rest of the world); prior chemotherapy (no vs yes); and menopausal status (pre-/perimenopausal vs postmenopausal). Beginning on Day 1 of Cycle 1, pts will be treated with giredestrant or physician’s choice of standard ET for at least 5 years. Continuing physician’s choice of standard ET after 5 years is at discretion of the investigator and per local standard of care. ELIGIBILITY Female/male pts with medium-/high-risk stage I-III ER+/HER2- eBC; prior curative surgery; completion of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy (if administered) and/or surgery <12 months prior to enrolment; no prior ET (up to 4 weeks of [neo]adjuvant ET is allowed). For men and pre-/perimenopausal women, a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist will be given per local prescribing information (mandatory for pts in the giredestrant arm). AIMS Primary endpoint: Invasive disease-free survival (IDFS). Secondary endpoints: Overall survival; IDFS (STEEP definition, including second non-primary BC); disease-free survival; distant recurrence-free survival; locoregional recurrence-free interval; safety; pharmacokinetics; pt-reported outcomes. In addition, this study aims to improve health equity in research and expand clinical trial access. The study will also use/develop digital healthcare solutions, which will enable better understanding of patients’ needs and their adherence to ET. STATISTICAL METHODS The primary endpoint analysis will use a stratified log-rank test at an overall 0.05 significance level (two-sided). An interim analysis and a futility analysis are planned, and an independent data monitoring committee will be in place. ACCRUAL Target enrollment is 4100 pts globally once the study is open for enrollment. CONTACT INFORMATION For more information or to refer a patient, email global.rochegenentechtrials@roche.com or call 1-888-662-6728 (USA only). Clinicaltrials.gov number NCT04961996.

Citation Format: Aditya Bardia, Peter Schmid, Nadia Harbeck, Mothaffar F Rimawi, Sara A Hurvitz, Sherene Loi, Shigehira Saji, Kyung Hae Jung, Gustavo Werutsky, Daniil Stroyakovskii, Vanesa López-Valverde, David Tesarowski, Chenglin Ye, Michael Davis, Tanja Badovinac Crnjevic, Pablo Diego Perez-Moreno, Charles E Geyer, Jr. Lidera breast cancer: A phase III adjuvant study of giredestrant (GDC-9545) vs physician’s choice of endocrine therapy (ET) in patients (pts) with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer (ER+/HER2- EBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-11-09.

Characteristics of patients diagnosed with cervical cancer in Brazil: preliminary results of the prospective cohort EVITA study (EVA001/LACOG 0215)

OBJECTIVES

Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer in women worldwide. Epidemiological and quality of life (QoL) data in patients with cervical cancer from low- and middle-income countries are scarce. We aimed to describe sociodemographic and clinicopathological characteristics and quality of life of patients with cervical cancer at diagnosis in Brazil.

METHODS

EVITA is a prospective cohort study of newly diagnosed patients with cervical cancer from May 2016 to December 2017, stages I-IVB, from 16 Brazilian sites representing the five Brazilian regions. At baseline, medical evaluation was performed and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-CX24/C30 questionnaires were administered.

RESULTS

A total of 631 patients were included. Mean±SD age was 49.3±13.9 years; skin color was non-white in 65.3%, and 68.0% had ≤8 years of formal education. In total, 85.1% of patients had a Pap smear. The main reasons reported by patients for not having a Pap smear were: lack of interest (46.9%), shame or embarrassment (19.7%), lack of knowledge (19.7%), and difficulty with access (9.1%). Most patients were diagnosed with locally advanced or metastatic disease (FIGO clinical stage II-IV in 81.8%- stage II in 35.2%, stage III in 36.1%, and stage IV in 10.5%). Patients with clinical stage III-IV had worse physical functioning and role functioning.

CONCLUSIONS

Cervical cancer in Brazil is usually diagnosed at an advanced stage. Most patients have low formal education and are unemployed. Lack of interest was identified as a main reason for not having a screening test, and limited access was reported as a reason by <10% of the patients. Awareness campaigns must be a governmental priority, specially focused on the needy population, along with wide access to treatment.

Perspectives on emerging technologies, personalised medicine, and clinical research for cancer control in Latin America and the Caribbean

Challenges of health systems in Latin America and the Caribbean include accessibility, inequity, segmentation, and poverty. These challenges are similar in different countries of the region and transcend national borders. The increasing digital transformation of health care holds promise of more precise interventions, improved health outcomes, increased efficiency, and ultimately reduced health-care costs. In Latin America and the Caribbean, the adoption of digital health tools is in early stages and the quality of cancer registries, electronic health records, and structured databases are problematic. Cancer research and innovation in the region are limited due to inadequate academic resources and translational research is almost fully dependent on public funding. Regulatory complexity and extended timelines jeopardise the potential improvement in participation in international studies. Emerging technologies, artificial intelligence, big data, and cancer research represent an opportunity to address the health-care challenges in Latin America and the Caribbean collectively, by optimising national capacities, sharing and comparing best practices, and transferring scientific and technical capabilities.

Cancer control in Latin America and the Caribbean: recent advances and opportunities to move forward

The increasing burden of cancer represents a substantial problem for Latin America and the Caribbean. Two Lancet Oncology Commissions in 2013 and 2015 highlighted potential interventions that could advance cancer care in the region by overcoming existing challenges. Areas requiring improvement included insufficient investment in cancer control, non-universal health coverage, fragmented health systems, inequitable concentration of cancer services, inadequate registries, delays in diagnosis or treatment initiation, and insufficient palliative services. Progress has been made in key areas but remains uneven across the region. An unforeseen challenge, the COVID-19 pandemic, strained all resources, and its negative effect on cancer control is expected to continue for years. In this Series paper, we summarise progress in several aspects of cancer control since 2015, and identify persistent barriers requiring commitment of additional resources to reduce the cancer burden in Latin America and the Caribbean.

A phase 2 randomized clinical trial of abiraterone plus ADT, apalutamide, or abiraterone and apalutamide in patients with advanced prostate cancer with non-castrate testosterone levels (LACOG 0415)

BACKGROUND

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) combined with apalutamide, abiraterone acetate plus prednisone, enzalutamide, or docetaxel are the standard treatments for advanced castration-sensitive prostate cancer (CSPC). We investigated ADT-free alternatives for advanced CSPC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

LACOG 0415 is a phase 2, open-label, non-comparative, randomized trial. Patients with advanced CSPC were randomized (1:1:1) to receive goserelin plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone (ADT plus AAP arm), apalutamide (APA arm), or apalutamide plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone (APA plus AAP arm). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with PSA of ≤0.2 ng/mL at week 25 in the modified intention-to-treat population. Safety analyses were performed in all patients with at least one dose of the study drug.

RESULTS

Of 128 randomized patients, 120 patients were evaluable for PSA response at week 25; 17.2% had a high-risk biochemical recurrence, 8.6% had locally advanced disease, and 74.2% had distant metastases. At week 25, PSA of ≤0.2 ng/mL was observed in 75.6% (95%CI 59.7%-87.6%), 60.0% (95%CI 43.3%-75.1%), and 79.5% (95%CI 63.5%-90.7%) of patients in ADT plus AAP, APA, and APA plus AAP arms, respectively. PSA decline of ≥80% was observed in 100%, 90.0%, and 97.4%, respectively. Grade 3-4 AEs were observed in 31.0%, 21.4% and 36.4%, respectively. Testosterone levels increased significantly in the APA arm and decreased significantly in ADT plus AAP and APA plus AAP arms.

CONCLUSIONS

ADT-free alternatives provide a high PSA response in advanced CSPC, although the APA arm did not reach the expected rate of PSA of ≤0.2 ng/mL at week 25. These results warrant further investigation of ADT-free treatments as alternatives in advanced CSPC.

SOURCE STUDY REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.govNCT02867020.

Mentoring as an opportunity to improve research and cancer care in Latin America (AAZPIRE project)

Effective networking and mentoring are critical determinants of professional satisfaction and success in oncology. There are multiple benefits associated with established mentoring programs. However, these are scarce in Latin America (LATAM). The AAZPIRE project meeting was held to encourage the discussion of mentorship strategies in our region, to create new learning frameworks, and improve cancer care. A group of 30 young oncologists and investigators, together with seven members of LACOG and CLICaP experts of 8 LATAM countries, were reunited to share views and define opportunities, barriers, and possible solutions to implement mentorship programs in LATAM. For each of the mentioned topics, key points were obtained by consensus, and a literature review was conducted to support group conclusions. This article analyses mentoring in LATAM countries and its role on promoting leadership. It will address conceptual frameworks, limitations, and opportunities from the perspectives of both mentor and mentee. The creation of regional and international group stimulation programs and joint projects that impact health policies are attractive, starting points to implement mentorship scenarios.

Estimation of the Number of Brazilian Women Living With Metastatic Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Breast cancer is the most common cancer and the leading cause of cancer-related death in women worldwide. The number of women living with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in Brazil is unknown. The objective of this article was to use population-based data to estimate the prevalence of MBC in Brazil.

METHODS

Using 4 different sources and cancer registries (DataSUS, Registro Hospitalar de Câncer, the Brazilian National Health Agency, and the National Geography and Statistics Institute) with data from 2008 to 2018, we built a database that represents Brazilian MBC cases. The current number of women in the model living with MBC was considered the prevalence (recurrent or de novo), and new cases in the year 2018 represented the incidence. In each of these outcomes, we were able to separate our population on the basis of cancer subtype, age, and time from diagnosis.

RESULTS

We estimate that 44,642 women currently live with MBC in Brazil. This accounts for one in every 2,409 Brazilian women and approximately 41 women per 100,000. A total of 58% have hormone receptor–positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative tumors, 25% are human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive, and 16% have triple-negative breast cancer. According to our methodology, the estimated median overall survival of Brazilian women after diagnosis of MBC is 26.2 months.

CONCLUSION

The significant number of patients living with MBC should inform and raise the interest of the many stakeholders involved. This collaborative effort is a clear requirement to improve the lives of these patients as well as to prepare for future challenges related to the trend of a progressive increase in MBC prevalence.

Sociodemographic and clinicopathologic features of elderly breast cancer patients in Brazil: A sub-analysis of AMAZONA III study (GBCAM 0115)

e12603

Background: Breast cancer (BC) is the most common invasive cancer diagnosed in women worldwide. The risk of developing BC increases with age. Studies have shown that approximately up to half of BC cases occur in patients aged 65 years and older. To better understand and characterize elderly patients with BC in Brazil, we performed a sub analysis of AMAZONA III study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02663973). Methods: The AMAZONA III study (GBCAM 0115) is a prospective cohort study that included 2,950 women with newly diagnosed invasive BC from January 2016 to March 2018 in 23 Brazilian sites. For this sub analysis, only BC patients aged 65 years and older were included. To compare sociodemographic and clinicopathologic features we classify patients into two groups: cohort 65 to 75 years of age and cohort 75 years and older. Qualitative variables were described by absolute and relative frequencies and compared with Chi-square test. Results: Of 2,950 BC patients from AMAZONA IIII study, 602 (20.8%) were ≥ 65 years-old and were included in this sub analysis. Most patients (93.1%) had ECOG performance status 0-1, 63.4% were white. In terms of educational level, 68.6% had reported completing primary school or less. At diagnosis, 23.7% of patients had clinical stage (CS) I, 41.9% had CS II, 28.2% had CS III, and 6.2% had CS IV disease. The majority of BC were detected by symptoms and only 34.2% were detected by screening. Regarding pathological characteristics, half of cases were grade 2, 58.7% were hormone receptor positive, 25% were HER-2 positive, and 16.0% were triple negative. When evaluated by subgroup, patients from cohort 75 years and older were more frequently diagnosed at advanced clinical stages and had worse ECOG performance status at diagnosis. There was no statistically significant difference in molecular subtype, tumor grade, and mode of BC detection (Table). Conclusions: Elderly patients commonly had BC detected by symptoms. Patients from cohort 75 years and older are diagnosed more frequently with advanced disease and worse performance status than patients from cohort 65 to 75 years. Strategies to improve BC screening and educational programs among elderly patients are warranted to guarantee accessibility to early BC diagnosis.[Table: see text]

Palbociclib for Residual High-Risk Invasive HR-Positive and HER2-Negative Early Breast Cancer-The Penelope-B Trial

PURPOSE

About one third of patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer who have residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) will relapse. Thus, additional therapy is needed. Palbociclib is a cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor demonstrating efficacy in the metastatic setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

PENELOPE-B (NCT01864746) is a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study in women with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative primary breast cancer without a pathological complete response after taxane-containing NACT and at high risk of relapse (clinical pathological staging-estrogen receptor grading score ≥ 3 or 2 and ypN+). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 13 cycles of palbociclib 125 mg once daily or placebo on days 1-21 in a 28-day cycle in addition to endocrine therapy (ET). Primary end point is invasive disease-free survival (iDFS). Final analysis was planned after 290 iDFS events with a two-sided efficacy boundary P < .0463 because of two interim analyses.

RESULTS

One thousand two hundred fifty patients were randomly assigned. The median age was 49.0 years (range, 19-79), and the majority were ypN+ with Ki-67 ≤ 15%; 59.4% of patients had a clinical pathological staging-estrogen receptor grading score ≥ 3. 50.1% received aromatase inhibitor, and 33% of premenopausal women received a luteinizing hormone releasing hormone analog in addition to either tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor. After a median follow-up of 42.8 months (92% complete), 308 events were confirmed. Palbociclib did not improve iDFS versus placebo added to ET-stratified hazard ratio, 0.93 (95% repeated CI, 0.74 to 1.17) and two-sided weighted log-rank test (Cui, Hung, and Wang) P = .525. There was no difference among the subgroups. Most common related serious adverse events were infections and vascular disorders in 113 (9.1%) patients with no difference between the treatment arms. Eight fatal serious adverse events (two palbociclib and six placebo) were reported.

CONCLUSION

Palbociclib for 1 year in addition to ET did not improve iDFS in women with residual invasive disease after NACT.

Real-world Data on First-line Systemic Therapy for Hormone Receptor-positive HER2-negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Trend Shift in the Era of CDK 4/6 Inhibitors

Hormone receptor-positive (HR⁺) human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (HER2^-) tumors represent the most common subtype of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). International guidelines clearly state that endocrine therapy (ET) should be considered the preferred first-line therapy for these patients in the absence of very symptomatic visceral disease or evidence of endocrine resistance. Nonetheless compliance with guidelines significantly vary worldwide for many different reasons. Historically, a substantial proportion of patients with HR⁺ HER2^- MBC have been treated with chemotherapy (CT) in first-line setting, jeopardizing patients' quality of life without a significant benefit in outcome. In 17 observational studies, including more than 63,000 patients, ET was most frequently used in first-line treatment of HR⁺/HER2^- MBC (range, 42%-87%), nonetheless a high proportion of patients received CT (13%-66%) as initial therapy. More recently, results of clinical trials with CDK 4/6 inhibitors improved response, progression-free and overall survival in this population and are currently the standard of care. There was a trend toward increased use of ET in recent years. This review article aims to evaluate real-world data on patterns of first-line treatment of HR⁺ HER2^- MBC with a special focus on the use of CT in this setting and the potential implications and perceived preliminary changes after the introduction of CDK 4/6 inhibitors.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Oncology Clinical Research in Latin America (LACOG 0420)

PURPOSE

COVID-19 has affected cancer care worldwide. Clinical trials are an important alternative for the treatment of oncologic patients, especially in Latin America, where trials can be the only opportunity for some of them to access novel and, sometimes, standard treatments.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study, in which a 22-question survey regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on oncology clinical trials was sent to 350 representatives of research programs in selected Latin American institutions, members of the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group.

RESULTS

There were 90 research centers participating in the survey, with 70 of them from Brazil. The majority were partly private or fully private (n = 77; 85.6%) and had confirmed COVID-19 cases at the institution (n = 57; 63.3%). Accruals were suspended at least for some studies in 80% (n = 72) of the responses, mostly because of sponsors' decision. Clinical trials' routine was affected by medical visits cancelation, reduction of patients' attendance, reduction of other specialties' availability, and/or alterations on follow-up processes. Formal COVID-19 mitigation policies were adopted in 96.7% of the centers, including remote monitoring and remote site initiation visits, telemedicine visits, reduction of research team workdays or home office, special consent procedures, shipment of oral drugs directly to patients' home, and increase in outpatient diagnostic studies. Importantly, some of these changes were suggested to be part of future oncology clinical trials' routine, particularly the ones regarding remote methods, such as telemedicine.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this was the first survey to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on Latin American oncology clinical trials. The results are consistent with surveys from other world regions. These findings may endorse improvements in clinical trials' processes and management in the postpandemic period.

Clinical-pathological characterization and outcomes of metastatic urothelial cancer in Latin America: Retrospective and translational multicenter database (LACOG 1518)

TPS497

Background: There is lack of high-quality and comprehensive data on advanced urothelial cancer in Latin America. Pathological and clinical outcomes information of this cancer can help the scientific community to understand the current standard of treatment and identify possible gaps for optimal care. Very few translational studies were performed in advanced urothelial cancer in developing countries describing the prevalence of key biomarkers for targeted agents and immunotherapy. Methods: LACOG 1518 is a large multi-institutional retrospective study that will collect information about sociodemographic data, treatment and outcome of patients diagnosed with recurrent/ metastatic urothelial cancer in Latin America between January 2016 and December 2019. Socio-demographic characteristics, clinical-pathological features, treatment patterns and outcomes will be extracted from medical charts. Tumor tissue will be collected for fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) gene mutation or fusion test in a central laboratory. A biorepository will be built for future translational research including PD-L1 test and next generation sequencing. Primary endpoint consists on characterize demographic, socioeconomic factors, medical and oncological history of patients diagnosed with recurrent/metastatic urothelial cancer. This study aim to describe treatment sequence, duration, best response and progression time in each line of therapy as well as survival at 1 and 2 years. Translational research endpoints are biomarkers prevalence and association with treatment responses and outcomes.

Abiraterone acetate in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, chemo-naive, who received a prior diethylstilbestrol therapy

130

Background: The use of diethylstilbestrol (DES) for the treatment of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is very common in developing countries. Retrospective data suggests that abiraterone acetate (AA) is active in patients that progressed to DES. This phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of abiraterone acetate in chemotherapy-naïve patients with metastatic CRPC who have progressed to DES. Methods: Patients with DES−refractory metastatic CRPC with ongoing ADT, serum testosterone level < 50 ng/dL and ECOG of 0-2 were included. All patients received AA 1,000 mg with prednisone 5 mg once daily in a 28 days cycles. The primary endpoint was the time to PSA progression (PSAP) by PCWG2 and was previously reported. We present here secondary endpoints: overall survival, PSA response, maximum PSA change from baseline and safety. Results: A total of 46 patients were enrolled, median age was 69.8 years, 76% had gleason > = 7 at diagnosis, median time from metastatic disease to DES discontinuation was 25.9 months, and a median duration of prior DES of 7.2 months. AA treatment resulted in median time to PSA progression of 7.3 months. PSA response rate (³ 50%) was 47.5% (95% CI: 36,1% to 68,5%) at 12 weeks and 57.5% (95% CI: 27.0% to 59.1%) at any time. 93.4% received chemotherapy after progression to AA. The median overall survival was 29.6 months. Substantial declines in serum androgens from baseline to week 12 occurred and in this group a higher proportion of PSA responses occurred. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) related to AA was 74% and prednisone 59%. Hypertension (21.7%), fatigue (19.6%) and oedema peripheral (13.0%) were the most frequent AA related AEs. The most frequent prednisone related AEs were hyperglycaemia (15.2%) hypertension (10.9%). Serious AEs occurred in 23.9% of subjects and 3 subjects (6.5%) died of AEs not related to study drugs. Conclusions: AA is well tolerated and demonstrated activity in mCRPC patients previously treated with DES, therefore it should be considered an option in chemo-naïve patients. Serum androgens levels tend to decrease with AA treatment and are associated with PSA responses. Clinical trial information: NCT02217566.

Abstract PS7-91: Influence of physician’s lifestyle on the prescription of healthy habits to breast cancer patients (LACOG 1218)

BACKGROUND Healthy lifestyle has been shown to have a positive impact on quality of life, risk of recurrence, and overall survival in breast cancer (BC). Physicians play an important role in encouraging their patients to lifestyle modification. Nonetheless, little is known whether physician lifestyle can impact on healthy habits recommendations to BC patients. We aimed to evaluate how physician’s lifestyle influences the prescription of healthy habits to BC patients. METHODSLACOG 1218 was an observational, cross-sectional study. An online questionnaire composed of 14 objective questions to evaluate physician lifestyle and prescription of healthy habits to BC patients was developed and circulated by e-mail to breast surgeons, clinical and radiation oncologists who were members of the Brazilian Society of Clinical Oncology (SBOC) and Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG) and dedicated to the treatment of BC patients. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the correlation between the physician lifestyle and the prescription of healthy habits to BC patients. A multivariate Poisson regression analysis was used to assess which factors of physician lifestyle could influence prescription of healthy habits.RESULTSA total of 267 physicians answered the questionnaire from October to November 2018. Of these, 142 (53.2%) were clinical oncologists, 116 (43.5%) were breast surgeons, and 9 (3.4%) were radiation oncologists. Female were 58.4%, 51.8% were older than 50 years and the majority 71.5% worked in private health insurance practice. In terms of physician lifestyle, 228 (85.4%) had healthy eating habits, 236 (88.4%) practiced physical activity and 93 (34.9%) were self-reported with overweight or obese. A total of 143 (46.1%) did not drink alcohol or drunk less than once a month and did not consume more than 5 doses and only 8 (3%) of them were current smoker. Overall, 84.3% of the physicians advised their BC patients on the importance of lifestyle modification. Physicians who did not exercise regularly have a higher chance of not advising for health lifestyle (HR 2.48; 95% CI 1.28 to 4.82, p=0.0265) as opposite to physicians older than 50 years (RR 0.37; CI 95% 0.15 - 0.92; p=0.0118).Obesity treatment and management was performed by 121 (45.3%) of physicians. Being a breast surgeon (RR 1.29; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.63, p=0.0025) or radiation oncologists (RR 1.82; 95% CI 1.43 to 2.31, p=0.0025) were the only factors associated with not performing obesity treatment and management. About 53.4% of physicians referred overweight or obese patients to a dietician and/or endocrinologist. Male gender (RR 1.35; CI 95% 1.03-1.76; p=0.0296), breast surgeons (RR 1.99; CI 95% 1.50-2.64; p=0.0001) and clinical practice in public health system (RR 1.53; CI 95% 1.20-1.96; p=0.0012) were factors associated with not referring patients to dietician and/or endocrinologist as opposed to physicians older than 50 years (RR 0.46; CI 95% 0.28-0.75; p=0.0005).CONCLUSIONIn general physicians treating BC patients have a healthy lifestyle. Physicians who practice physical activity regularly or older than 50 years had more chance to advise lifestyle modification. Only half of BC patients’ physicians treat obesity or refer these patients to specialist which in this case may impact BC patient’s outcome.

Citation Format: Renata Cangussú, Eldsamira Mascarenhas, Taiane F Rebelatto, Paulo R Nunes, Rafaela G de Jesus, Facundo Zaffaroni, Gustavo Werutsky. Influence of physician’s lifestyle on the prescription of healthy habits to breast cancer patients (LACOG 1218) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS7-91.

Abstract OT-10-01: A study to observe patients characteristics, treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer in Latin America - LATINA breast (LACOG 0615/ MO39485)

Background: Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy and one of the leading causes of cancer death in Latin American women, with an estimated age-standardized annual incidence of 38.3 and 56.8 and mortality rates of 10.1 and 13.4 cases per 100,000 females, in Central and South America respectively. However, BC incidence in Latin America (LATAM)is largely underestimated and lacks updated information. Furthermore, the shortage and quality of cancer registry data hinders a more reliable assessment of treatment and outcomes for these patients. The goals of LATINA Breast study is to build an electronic platform/database to allow a standardized collection of epidemiological data of BC in LATAMin addition to describe real world data on patients characteristics, treatment patterns and outcomes of this population. Methods: LATINA Breast (LACOG 0615) is a prospective, international, multicentre and non-interventional study of primary data collection designed to describe the diagnosis, oncologic treatment and outcomes of patients with BC in LATAM. Patients aged ≥ 18 years with stage I to IV newly diagnosed BC (i.e. &lt;12 months since site activation) will be considered eligible for inclusion.Patient data will be collected from medical records at diagnosis and every 6 months for up to 5 years of follow-up. At baseline, data on socioeconomic, demographic, medical history and BC clinicopathological characteristics will be collected. Thereafter, information regarding treatment patterns, sequencing, response to treatment, adverse events, disease relapse/ progression and overall survival will be collected at each time-point. This study has a planned sample size of a minimum of 2.200 to a maximum of 4.500 patients accrued from approximately 30 sites in 10 LATAM countries: Argentina, Brazil, Cuba, Colombia, Chile, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Mexico, Peru and Uruguay. The expected number of patients per country is based on age-standardize BC incidence rate by GLOBOCAN 2012 and not in a formal statistical estimation.Co-primary endpoints are (1) to describe patients’ characteristics, prevalence of BC subtypes at diagnosis, local and systemic treatment patterns and outcomes; (2) to build an electronic platform/database of epidemiological data of BC in LATAM. Secondary endpoints are to evaluate regional differences in treatment strategies, to describe treatment efficacy parameters such as locoregional relapse, invasive disease-free survival, progression-free survival, overall survival and to evaluate treatment safety. The trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov NCT04158258.Results The first site was activated for patient accrual on February 13, 2020, in Argentina. As of July 6, 2020, a total of 243 patients have been included in Argentina (n=81), Brazil (n=123), Colombia (n=37), and Guatemala (n=2) within 19 active sites. Regulatory approval and activation are ongoing in the other countries. Recruitment is estimated to last until December 2021 to achieve the planned sample size. Patients will be followed-up for 5 years, therefore we estimate the last follow-up data collection in December 2026. ConclusionLATINA Breast is the first multinational, prospective cohort study of BC in Latin America that will generate detailed information on diagnosis, treatment and outcome in real-world clinical practice. It will address important gaps in BC management and will likely single out some of the main inequities in this large and diverse population of BC patients and consequently support strategies for the improvement of BC cancer care in LATAM.

Citation Format: Gustavo Werutsky, Cynthia Villareal-Garza, Henry Gomez, Juan Manuel Donaire, José Bines, Luis Fein, Mariano Nicolas Carrizo, Facundo Zaffaroni, Paulo Ricardo Nunes Filho, Carlos H Barrios. A study to observe patients characteristics, treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer in Latin America - LATINA breast (LACOG 0615/ MO39485) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT-10-01.

Abstract PS7-89: The socioeconomic impact of breast cancer in Brazil: An analysis of AMAZONA III cohort study

INTRODUCTIONPatients diagnosed with breast cancer (BC) in Brazil are on average 54 years old and the majority (70%) have stage II-III. Age and clinical stage have a negative impact on patient personal life and labor productivity. The socioeconomic status is a fundamental part of the population’s health, which includes marital and employment status. Our aim was to analyze the socioeconomic impact of BC diagnosis which is poorly studied in low or middle-income countries.

METHODSThis is a cross-sectional study including patients from AMAZONA III cohort study. Eligible patients were female aged &gt; 18 years with diagnosis of any stage invasive BC from 2016 to 2018 in 24 participating hospitals in Brazil. The present analysis evaluated the marital and employment status at baseline and at 1-year follow-up after BC diagnosis. Patients with missing data were excluded and women older than 60 years, retirement age in Brazil, were not included in this analysis. A multivariate Poisson regression analysis with robust variance was adjusted to assess which patients’ characteristics associated with job loss and relationship status. The characteristics evaluated were age (⇐ 50 vs. &gt; 50 years), educational level (Illiterate to completed first degree or completed second degree vs. higher), personal income (no income – 2 minimum wages vs. 2 to 5 minimum wages vs. more than 5 minimum wages), clinical-stage (I-III vs. IV), molecular subtype (luminal, HER2 positive vs. triple negative), surgery type (breast conserving surgery vs. any type of mastectomy), and systemic treatment (chemotherapy vs. hormonal therapy vs. none). The significance level was set at 5%. All analyses were conducted using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

RESULTSFrom a total of 1257 patients with evaluable employment status, 655 patients (52.1%) had working activity at the time of BC diagnosis. After 1 year of follow-up, there was an absolute decrease of 5.3% in patients’ employment (52.1% to 46.8%; p= 0.0075). Loss of employment was higher in older patient &gt; 50 years (8.7%), lower educational level (9.9%), those earning 2-5 minimum wages (11.2%), stage I-III (7%), triple negative (6.9%), mastectomy (9.9%) and treatment with hormone therapy (11%). Patients with higher educational level (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.36-0.94, p=0.0265) were at lower risk of employment loss whereas patients with personal income of more than 2 minimum wages (RR 1.83, 95% CI 1.08-3.10, p=0.0236) and mastectomy (RR 2.16, 95% CI 1.47-3.17, p=0.0015) were at higher risk of being unemployed loss after 1 year of diagnosis. Other factors such as age, clinical stage, BC subtype and treatment were not independently associated with unemployment. A total of 1947 patients had marital status information at baseline. Of those, 1182 (60.7%) were married or in common-law marriage at BC diagnosis. After 1 year of follow-up, 52 (2.7%) of these women loss their relationship (60.7% vs. 58%; p=0.08). Loss of relationships was higher (5.2%) in younger patients (≤ 50 years), lower educational level (4.9%), no income or up to 2 minimum wages (5.4%), stage IV (7.7%), HER2 positive (5.5%), mastectomy (5.4%) and treatment with hormone therapy (5.5%). None of the variables evaluated such as age, educational level, personal income, clinical-stage, molecular subtype, surgery type and systemic treatment, were significantly associated with change of marital status for patients previously married or in common-law marriage.

CONCLUSION

The socioeconomic impact of BC diagnosis was minimal at 1-year follow-up in Brazil. Nonetheless personal income and surgery type were associated with higher chance of unemployment whereas no specific variables were related to marital status change. Government social policies specifically for work return remains critical for BC patients in short-term after BC diagnosis.

Citation Format: Gustavo Werutsky, Daniela Dornelles Rosa, Carlos Barrios, Eduardo Cronemberger, Geraldo Queiroz, Jose Bines, Mahira Lopes Rosa, Rafaela Gomes, Ana P Heck, Laura Freitas, Arthur F da Silva, Matheus Rodrigues, Andre P Fay, Sergio Simon. The socioeconomic impact of breast cancer in Brazil: An analysis of AMAZONA III cohort study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS7-89.

Comprehensive genomic profiling of Brazilian non-small cell lung cancer patients (GBOT 0118/LACOG0418)

Background

The aim of this study was to carry out a descriptive analysis of the somatic genetic profile and co‐occurring mutations of non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) samples from patients tested with comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP).

Methods

This was a retrospective cross‐sectional study of patients diagnosed with NSCLC from 2013 to 2018 in Brazil and whose samples were submitted to CGP (FoundationOne or FoundationACT) using either tumor or circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from plasma.

Results

We recovered 513 CGP results from patients, 457 (89.1%) of which were from tumors and 56 (10.9%) from plasma. The median age of patients was 64 years old, of which 51.6% were males. TP53 mutations were identified in 53.6% of tumor samples, KRAS mutations in 24.2%, EGFR activating mutations were detected in 22.5%, STK11 mutations in 11.6%, PIK3CA mutations in 8.8%, ALK rearrangements in 5.4%, BRAF mutations in 5.2%, and ERBB2 alterations in 4.9%. The most commonly comutated gene was TP53. TP53 p.R337H was observed in 4.3% of samples and was associated with somatic mutations in EGFR and ERBB2 (P < 0.00001). Tumor mutational burden (TMB) analysis was available for 80.5% of samples tested, and 5.5% of samples had high TMB (≥ 20 mutations/Mb).

In conclusion, this retrospective analysis of genomic data from NSCLC patients obtained by CGP showed that common abnormalities such as EGFR mutations and ALK rearrangements had similar frequency to those previously described by other groups using others strategies. Additionally, our data confirm an association between TP53 p.R337H, supposedly germline in nature, and somatic mutations in genes of the HER family.

Key points

Significant findings of the study

This is the first report of the prevalence of driver mutations in Brazilian NSCLC patients using comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP).

The frequency of the most common driver mutations in this population was similar to that previously described in Brazil.

What this study adds

TP53 was the most commonly comutated gene across samples. TP53 p.R337H was associated with somatic mutations in EGFR and ERBB2.

Most samples had low TMB; only 5.5% of samples had high TMB.