Acute impairing effects of morphine related to driving: A systematic review of experimental studies to define blood morphine concentrations related to impairment in opioid-naïve subjects

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to look for dose- and concentration-effect relationships in experimental studies on single-dose administration of morphine on traffic-relevant behavioral tests by a systematic literature review and possibly to see whether a dose/concentration could be defined below which few or no tests would be affected.

METHODS

Searches for corresponding literature were conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO, throughout March of 2016. The search strategy consisted of words colligated to cognitive and psychomotor functions of relevance to driving, in relation to morphine administration. The tests were arranged in main groups, and tests showing impairment were categorized by doses as well as calculated plasma concentrations.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies were included in the review. Impairment after the administration of a single intravenously dose of morphine was found in some of the tests on reaction time, attention, and visual functions. No impairment was observed in tests on psychomotor skills and en-/decoding. Tests on reaction time appeared to be less sensitive to the morphine administration, whereas tests on visual functions and attention appeared to be the most sensitive to the morphine administration. Single-dose administration of morphine with dosages up to 5 mg appeared to cause very few effects on traffic-relevant performance tasks. At higher dosages, impairment was found on various tasks but with no clear dose-effect relationship. Plasma morphine concentrations less than 50 nmol/L are most probably accompanied by few effects on traffic-relevant performance tasks.

CONCLUSIONS

A plasma morphine concentration of 50 nmol/L (approximately 14.3 ng/mL) could represent an upper level, under which there is little accompanying road traffic risk. A single dose of 5 mg morphine IV and analgetic equivalence doses of fentanyl, hydromorphone, oxycodone, and oxymorphone are presented with the suggestion that few traffic-relevant effects will appear after such doses.

Conversion factors for assessment of driving impairment after exposure to multiple benzodiazepines/z-hypnotics or opioids

AIMS

Norway has introduced legal concentration limits in blood for 28 non-alcohol drugs in driving under the influence cases. As of 2016 this legislation also regulates the assessment of combined effects of multiple benzodiazepines and opioids. We herein describe the employed methodology for the equivalence tables for concentrations of benzodiazepines/z-hypnotics and opioids implemented in the Norwegian Road Traffic Act.

METHODS

Legislative limits corresponding to impairment at blood alcohol concentrations (BAC) of 0.02%, 0.05% and 0.12% were established for 15 different benzodiazepines and opioids. This was based on a concept of a linear relationship between blood drug concentration and impairment in drug naïve users. Concentration ratios between these drugs were used to establish conversion factors and calculate net impairment using diazepam and morphine equivalents.

RESULTS

Conversion factors were established for 14 benzodiazepines/z-hypnotics (alprazolam, bromazepam, clobazam, clonazepam, etizolam, flunitrazepam, lorazepam, nitrazepam, nordiazepam, oxazepam, phenazepam, temazepam, zolpidem and zopiclone) and two opioids (methadone and oxycodone).

CONCLUSIONS

Conversion factors to calculate diazepam and morphine equivalents for benzodiazepines/z-hypnotics and selected opioids, respectively, have been operative in the Norwegian Road Traffic Act as of February 2016. Calculated equivalents can be applied by the courts to meter out sanctions.

Zopiclone concentrations in oral fluid and blood after, administration of therapeutic doses of zopiclone

PURPOSE

Little is known about the relationship between concentrations in oral fluid (OF) and blood for the widely prescribed hypnotic drug zopiclone. The purpose of this study was to investigate the usefulness of OF zopiclone concentrations to predict blood zopiclone concentrations in order to introduce OF testing as an alternative to more cumbersome blood testing.

METHODS

16 healthy young male volunteers received capsules of either 5 or 10mg zopiclone on two different study days separated by at least one week. Blood and OF were collected simultaneously at baseline and 9 times after intake of zopiclone on each study day. In addition an OF sample was collected 24-81h after intake. Lunch was served between samples taken 2.5 and 3.5h after intake. All samples were analysed for zopiclone, and the cut-off was 10ng/ml in blood and 0.2ng/ml in OF-buffer mixture.

RESULTS

Zopiclone was detected in all OF samples during the study day. After 24-81h, all subjects were also positive for zopiclone in OF, except from three subjects ingesting the 5mg dose. In a single case zopiclone was detected in a baseline OF sample 14days after intake on an earlier study day. Zopiclone was detected in both OF and blood in 231 OF/blood pairs, and a significant but weak correlation between OF and blood concentration was seen (R² of 0.30). The median (range) zopiclone OF/blood concentration ratio (ZOBCR) for all samples were 3.3 (0.8-18). The ZOBCR decreased when the OF volume increased. After 30 of 31 given doses of zopiclone, the ZOBCR was higher in samples collected before lunch than samples collected after lunch.

DISCUSSION

Vast intra- and interindividual differences in ZOBCR were found, and the correlation between OF and blood concentration was less pronounced than reported in former studies. In accordance with earlier studies we found a negative correlation between ZOBCR and OF volume. The ZOBCR decreases in relation to recent intake of a meal, probably because stimulated saliva production causes "dilution" of saliva. OF zopiclone concentration appeared unsuitable for estimation of blood zopiclone concentration. Due to long detection time, analysis of zopiclone in OF might be useful to detect non-recent, previous intake.

Impairment due to alcohol, tetrahydrocannabinol, and benzodiazepines in impaired drivers compared to experimental studies

OBJECTIVE

In some countries, per se laws for other drugs than alcohol are used to judge drunk and drugged drivers. These blood concentration limits are often derived from experimental studies on traffic relevant behavior of healthy volunteers. Knowledge about how results from experimental studies could be transferred to a real-life setting is missing. The aim of this study was to compare impairment seen in experimental studies to the impairment seen at equivalent concentrations in apprehended drunk and drugged drivers.

METHODS

Results from previously performed meta-analyses of experimental studies regarding impairment from alcohol, tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), and benzodiazepines were compared to impairment in apprehended drunk and drugged drivers as judged by a clinical test of impairment. Both experimental studies and real-life cases were divided into 4 groups according to increasing blood drug concentration intervals. The percentage of impaired test results in experimental studies was compared to the percentage of impaired subjects among drivers within the same blood drug concentration window.

RESULTS

For ethanol, the percentage of impaired drivers (n = 1,223) increased from 59% in the lowest drug concentration group to 95% in the highest drug concentration group, compared to 7 and 72% in the respective groups in experimental studies. For THC, the percentage of impaired drivers (n = 950) increased from 42 to 58%, the corresponding numbers being 11 and 42% for experimental studies. For benzodiazepines, the percentage of impaired drivers (n = 245) increased from 46 to 76%, the corresponding numbers being 16 and 60% for experimental studies. The increased odds ratio for impairment between 2 concentration groups was comparable for experimental studies and impaired drivers.

CONCLUSIONS

Fewer test results indicated impairment in experimental studies compared to impaired drivers in real life when influenced by similar blood concentrations of either ethanol, THC, or benzodiazepines. In addition, a comparable relationship between drug concentration and impairment was seen for both experimental studies and real-life cases. We believe that the present study strengthens the background for using experimental studies to establish fixed concentration limits for drunk and drugged drivers, but experimental studies in an impaired driver population could further expand our knowledge.

Prevalence and concentrations of drugs in older suspected drugged drivers

OBJECTIVE

Older drivers are somewhat more likely to be involved in car crashes than middle-aged drivers but less likely to be involved than younger drivers. This study aimed to assess the extent of drug use in older suspected drunk and drugged drivers, with respect to which drugs were detected and at which concentrations.

METHODS

Blood samples from older suspected drunk and drugged drivers taken between February 1, 2012, and May 22, 2013, were identified from the database at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health and were retrospectively analyzed for a broad repertoire of drugs relevant for impairment. The prevalence of different drugs among the suspected drunk and drugged drivers was studied. Regarding drug concentrations, the findings in older drivers (>65 years) were compared to a reference group of apprehended drivers aged 20-40 years.

RESULTS

Four hundred and ten older suspected drunk and drugged drivers were included. Any drug (including ethanol) was detected in 92% of blood samples, and ethanol was detected in 81%. Benzodiazepines were found in 15% of the older drivers and z-hypnotics (zopiclone or zolpidem) were detected in 13%. The most frequent single legal drugs found in blood samples taken from older impaired drivers were zopiclone (9.8%) and diazepam (9.3%). Regarding drug combinations, older drivers used a mean number of 1.4 drugs, and 20% of ethanol-positive cases showed at least one other drug. High drug concentrations of clonazepam and diazepam were more frequently seen in the younger group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that drugs were detected in the vast majority of older drivers suspected for drunk or drugged driving. Ethanol was the most frequent drug detected, followed by zopiclone and diazepam. Older drivers combine drugs to a lesser degree than younger drivers, but their combination of ethanol and other drugs represents a considerable traffic risk. Lower concentrations of benzodiazepines are seen in older compared to younger drivers.

Driving simulator sickness: Impact on driving performance, influence of blood alcohol concentration, and effect of repeated simulator exposures

Simulator sickness is a major obstacle to the use of driving simulators for research, training and driver assessment purposes. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the possible influence of simulator sickness on driving performance measures such as standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP), and the effect of alcohol or repeated simulator exposure on the degree of simulator sickness. Twenty healthy male volunteers underwent three simulated driving trials of 1h's duration with a curvy rural road scenario, and rated their degree of simulator sickness after each trial. Subjects drove sober and with blood alcohol concentrations (BAC) of approx. 0.5g/L and 0.9g/L in a randomized order. Simulator sickness score (SSS) did not influence the primary outcome measure SDLP. Higher SSS significantly predicted lower average speed and frequency of steering wheel reversals. These effects seemed to be mitigated by alcohol. Higher BAC significantly predicted lower SSS, suggesting that alcohol inebriation alleviates simulator sickness. The negative relation between the number of previous exposures to the simulator and SSS was not statistically significant, but is consistent with habituation to the sickness-inducing effects, as shown in other studies. Overall, the results suggest no influence of simulator sickness on SDLP or several other driving performance measures. However, simulator sickness seems to cause test subjects to drive more carefully, with lower average speed and fewer steering wheel reversals, hampering the interpretation of these outcomes as measures of driving impairment and safety. BAC and repeated simulator exposures may act as confounding variables by influencing the degree of simulator sickness in experimental studies.

Driving under the influence of non-alcohol drugs--An update. Part II: Experimental studies

Experimental studies on the impairing effects of drugs of relevance to driving-related performance published between 1998 and 2015 were reviewed. Studies with on-the-road driving, driving simulators, and performance tests were included for benzodiazepines and related drugs, cannabis, opioids, stimulants, GHB, ketamine, antihistamines, and antidepressants. The findings in these experimental studies were briefly discussed in relation to a review of epidemiological studies published recently. The studies mainly concluded that there may be a significant psychomotor impairment after using benzodiazepines or related drugs, cannabis, opioids, GHB, or ketamine. Low doses of central stimulants did not seem to cause impairment of driving behavior.

Comparison of (+)- and (-)-Naloxone on the Acute Psychomotor-Stimulating Effects of Heroin, 6-Acetylmorphine, and Morphine in Mice

Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) signaling is implied in opioid reinforcement, reward, and withdrawal. Here, we explored whether TLR4 signaling is involved in the acute psychomotor-stimulating effects of heroin, 6-acetylmorphine (6-AM), and morphine as well as whether there are differences between the three opioids regarding TLR4 signaling. To address this, we examined how pretreatment with (+)-naloxone, a TLR4 active but opioid receptor (OR) inactive antagonist, affected the acute increase in locomotor activity induced by heroin, 6-AM, or morphine in mice. We also assessed the effect of pretreatment with (-)-naloxone, a TLR4 and OR active antagonist, as well as the pharmacokinetic profiles of (+) and (-)-naloxone in the blood and brain. We found that (-)-naloxone reduced acute opioid-induced locomotor activity in a dose-dependent manner. By contrast, (+)-naloxone, administered in doses assumed to antagonize TLR4 but not ORs, did not affect acute locomotor activity induced by heroin, 6-AM, or morphine. Both naloxone isomers exhibited similar concentration versus time profiles in the blood and brain, but the brain concentrations of (-)-naloxone reached higher levels than those of (+)-naloxone. However, the discrepancies in their pharmacokinetic properties did not explain the marked difference between the two isomers' ability to affect opioid-induced locomotor activity. Our results underpin the importance of OR activation and do not indicate an apparent role of TLR4 signaling in acute opioid-induced psychomotor stimulation in mice. Furthermore, there were no marked differences between heroin, 6-AM, and morphine regarding involvement of OR or TLR4 signaling.

Pharmacological Effects of a Monoclonal Antibody against 6-Monoacetylmorphine upon Heroin-Induced Locomotor Activity and Pharmacokinetics in Mice

Immunotherapy can provide a supplemental treatment strategy against heroin use on the principle of sequestering the active drug in the bloodstream, thereby reducing its distribution to the brain. Previous studies have shown that heroin's first metabolite, 6-monoacetylmorphine (6-MAM), is the main mediator of acute heroin effects. The objective of the present study was to characterize the pharmacological potential of a monoclonal antibody against 6-MAM (anti-6-MAM mAb) to counteract the heroin response. The individual contributions from heroin and 6-MAM to heroin effects were also examined by pretreating mice with anti-6-MAM mAb (10-100 mg/kg) prior to either heroin or 6-MAM injection (1.25-2.5 μmol/kg). The opioid-induced behavioral response was assessed in a locomotor activity test, followed by opioid and antibody quantification in blood and brain tissue. Pretreatment with mAb caused a profound reduction of heroin- and 6-MAM-induced behavior, accompanied by correspondingly decreased levels of 6-MAM in brain tissue. mAb pretreatment was more efficient against 6-MAM injection than against heroin, leading to an almost complete blockade of 6-MAM-induced effects. mAb pretreatment was unable to block the immediate (5-minute) transport of active metabolites across the blood-brain barrier after heroin injection, indicating that heroin itself appears to enhance the immediate delivery of 6-MAM to the brain. The current study provides additional evidence that 6-MAM sequestration is crucial for counteracting the acute heroin response, and demonstrates the pharmacological potential of immunotherapy against heroin use.

International trends in alcohol and drug use among vehicle drivers

Trends in the use of alcohol and drugs among motor vehicle drivers in Australia, Brazil, Norway, Spain, and the United States have been reviewed. Laws, regulations, enforcement, and studies on alcohol and drugs in biological samples from motor vehicle drivers in general road traffic and fatal road traffic crashes (RTCs) are discussed. Roadside surveys showed a reduction of drunk driving over time in the studied countries; however, the pattern varied within and between different countries. The reduction of alcohol use may be related to changes in road traffic laws, public information campaigns, and enforcement, including implementation of random breath testing or sobriety checkpoints. For non-alcohol drugs, the trend in general road traffic is an increase in use. However, drugs were not included in older studies; it is therefore impossible to assess the trends over longer time periods. Data from the studied countries, except Brazil, have shown a significant decrease in fatal RTCs per 100,000 inhabitants over the last decades; from 18.6 to 4.9 in Australia, 14.5 to 2.9 in Norway, 11.1 to 3.6 in Spain, and 19.3 to 10.3 in the United States. The number of alcohol-related fatal RTCs also decreased during the same time period. The proportion of fatal RTCs related to non-alcohol drugs increased, particularly for cannabis and stimulants. A general challenge when comparing alcohol and drug findings in biological samples from several countries is connected to differences in study design, particularly the time period for performing roadside surveys, biological matrix types, drugs included in the analytical program, and the cutoff limits used for evaluation of results. For RTC fatalities, the cases included are based on the police requests for legal autopsy or drug testing, which may introduce a significant selection bias. General comparisons between high-income countries and low- and middle-income countries as well as a discussion of possible future trends are included.

Evaluation of the hip-flask defence by determination of ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulphate concentrations in blood

INTRODUCTION

The hip-flask defence (i.e. claiming ethanol intake after an incident) is difficult to refute by the use of ethanol analyses alone, as these may show decreasing concentrations shortly after intake of alcohol. The non-oxidative metabolites of ethanol, ethyl glucuronide (EtG) and ethyl sulphate (EtS) have a different pharmacokinetic profile, with peak concentrations in blood around 4h after intake. The aim of this study was to describe a method for using EtG-analysis for the purpose of estimating the time point of ethanol intake and to report cases in which this method is used.

METHODS

Previously published studies are summarised. Also, in expert witness cases where the hip-flask defence is claimed, EtG and EtS were analysed in selected cases. Twelve such cases are reported.

RESULTS

In previous studies, about 70 healthy volunteers have been included in different kinetic studies, demonstrating maximal individual concentrations of EtG always below 0.5 mg/L after 1 h, below 1 mg/L after 2 h and somewhat above 1 mg/L 4 h after a moderate alcohol intake (up to 80 grams of ethanol). Twelve cases are reported in the present study, where the suspect claimed no alcohol intake before driving, only intake after driving. In all 12 cases, ethanol concentration was lower in the second sample (taken approximately 30 min after the first). The median EtG concentration in the first sample was 4.13 mg/L (range 2.0-7.4) and 4.34 mg/L (range 2.1-7.2) in the second sample. One case showed an increase in EtG concentrations of 15% from first to second sample (the time difference between the samples was 32 min, with the first sample taken 41 min after driving). For the remainder of the cases, EtG concentrations were relatively stable.

CONCLUSIONS

In all the presented cases, the levels of EtG were substantially higher than what would be expected only about 1-2h after a very recent alcohol intake. The relatively stable concentrations between the first and second sample also indicated that the high EtG concentrations were not caused by a rapid formation after a recent intake, as this would have demonstrated increasing concentrations over a time period of 30 min. In conclusion, EtG and EtS in blood could be a helpful tool in assessment of the hip-flask defence, in cases where the detected ethanol is claimed to be caused solely by a single intake after driving.

Characteristics of methadone-related fatalities in Norway

There are currently over 7000 patients enrolled in opioid maintenance treatment (OMT) programs in Norway. A rise in methadone-related deaths proportional to increasing methadone sales over the period 2000-2006 has been observed, but the causative factors for these fatalities have been elusive. In the present study, individual characteristics, methadone concentrations and additional toxicological findings were analyzed. Methadone intoxication deaths (n = 264) were divided into 3 groups according to toxicological findings in whole blood: group 1 - methadone detected alone, or together with one additional drug at low or therapeutic levels, or a low concentration of ethanol (<1 g/L) (n = 21); group 2 - multiple additional drugs/substances detected below lethal levels (n = 175); group 3 - one or more additional drugs/substances detected at lethal levels, or ethanol >3 g/L (n = 55). Methadone blood concentrations in decedents who had been enrolled in OMT were higher than for decedents not in treatment, in all groups. Blood methadone concentrations around 1 mg/L were present in fatal multi-drug intoxications in OMT patients. Results suggest that some patients may be at risk of dying when combining therapeutic concentrations of methadone with other psychoactive substances. Somatic disease was a common finding among deceased OMT patients. Concentrations in methadone users not enrolled in OMT were predominantly between 0.3 and 0.4 mg/L and were not related to the presence of other drugs. However, methadone concentrations below 0.1 mg/L may be associated with intoxication following methadone use, both alone and in combination with other drugs. Younger male users (mean age 34 years) seemed to have a higher susceptibility to methadone intoxication.

Amphetamine-induced psychosis: Transition to schizophrenia and mortality in a small prospective sample

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

We investigated transition from amphetamine-induced psychosis (AIP) to schizophrenia.

METHODS

A sample of 28 individuals was identified while hospitalized for AIP. We reviewed their hospital records after six years.

RESULTS

During follow-up, seven individuals (25%) died and nine (32%) had moved from the area. Of the remaining 12, four individuals (25%) were diagnosed with schizophrenia. These individuals were, at baseline, characterized by fewer hallucinatory symptoms and more homelessness.

CONCLUSION AND SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE

Hospitalization for AIP was a relatively specific risk factor for schizophrenia and the mortality rate in AIP was high.

Evaluation of measures of impairment in real and simulated driving: Results from a randomized, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE

Standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP) is often the primary outcome in experimental studies on impaired driving. However, other measures may be easier and more practical to obtain and reflect a broader range of driving-related behaviors. We wanted to assess the validity and sensitivity of a range of measures in a driving simulator as well as during real driving and compare these to SDLP.

METHODS

Twenty healthy male volunteers undertook 6 driving trials each, 3 in a regular car on a closed track resembling rural road conditions and 3 in a simulator with an identical driving scenario. Ethanol was used as impairing substance due to its well-characterized effects on driving. The subjects were tested sober and at blood alcohol concentrations (BAC) of approximately 0.5 and 0.9 g/L. We explored dose-response relationships between BAC and a range of driving-related measures, as well as their BAC-dependent effect sizes.

RESULTS

In simulator driving, ethanol intake increased steering wheel reversal frequency, steering wheel movement measures, average speed, standard deviation of speed, and pedal use frequency. At the test track, only steering wheel movement and standard deviation of speed were significantly correlated to BAC. Likewise, reaction to unexpected incidents and observance of red traffic lights were adversely affected by ethanol in the simulator but not at the test track. Whereas SDLP showed a relatively large effect size that was similar in simulated and real driving, all other measures demonstrated smaller effect sizes, with less pronounced BAC effects on the test track than in the simulator.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that the driving-related measures explored in this study are less sensitive to alcohol-mediated driving impairment than SDLP, especially during real (test track) driving. The discrepancy in effect sizes between simulated and real driving may imply low external validity of these measures in simulator studies.