Carbohydrate antigen 19.9 accurately selects patients for laparoscopic assessment to determine resectability of pancreatic malignancy

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopy with laparoscopic ultrasonography (L-LUS) may be useful in the selection of patients for surgery to resect peripancreatic malignancy in addition to contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT). The present prospective study assessed the strategy of using carbohydrate antigen 19.9 (CA19.9) levels to select patients for L-LUS.

METHODS

Patients with suspected peripancreatic malignancy that appeared resectable on CE-CT were selected for immediate surgery if CA19.9 was low (up to 150 kU/l, or up to 300 kU/l if serum bilirubin was above 35 micromol/l), or to L-LUS if CA19.9 was high (over 150 kU/l, or over 300 kU/l if serum bilirubin was above 35 micromol/l). Data were assessed to determine the clinical utility of this strategy.

RESULTS

A total of 94 patients went straight to surgery, of whom 65 proved resectable: 63 of 80 with a low CA19.9 level but only two of 14 with a high CA19.9 level and gastric outlet obstruction. From 55 patients with high CA19.9 levels, L-LUS correctly identified 26 of 31 resectable tumours and eight of 24 unresectable tumours.

CONCLUSION

Using CA19.9 levels to help select patients with pancreatic malignancy for immediate surgery or L-LUS for further assessment of resectability effectively increased resection rates and reduced unnecessary laparotomies.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours are rare tumours ( approximately 1/100,00 population/year) of which 60% are non-functioning. Except for insulinoma all types are malignant in >50% of cases. In multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN)1, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours occur in 40-80% of patients and are mostly non-functioning tumours or gastrinomas. Insulinomas are benign in approximately 90%, solitary in 95% of sporadic cases whilst multiple in 90% of MEN1 patients. In contrast approximately 50% gastrinomas and the majority of non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours are malignant. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours occur in 10-15% of patients with Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) and are frequently multiple (>30%). Surgical excision is a key aspect of treatment for all cases of sporadic gastrinoma and if >2.5 cm in MEN1. Insulinomas are enucleated if solitary and may require pancreatectomy if multiple. Non-functioning tumours should also be resected if sporadic and if >2 cm in MEN1 or if >2-3 cm in VHL. Tumours <1cm require yearly follow-up by CT or MRI from an early age in VHL. The local treatment for liver metastases is now well established and options include liver resection, chemoembolisation and radiofrequency ablation. Systemic therapies have also been better defined and include radionuclide therapy against somatostatin receptors or MIBG and chemotherapy especially for poorly differentiated tumours. A number of novel agents are currently in clinical development.

Adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer

Ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas is one of the leading causes of cancer death in the UK, Europe and US, with incidence closely paralleling mortality. Until recently, enthusiasm for treating these patients was limited for a number of reasons: the majority of patients undergoing surgery would relapse early, adjuvant treatment was of unproven value and systemic therapy in advanced disease had only a small chance of a short-term benefit. More recently, however, it has become recognised that specialist surgery can improve results and there is evidence that adjuvant chemotherapy has a significant advantage in terms of 5-year survival. In particular adjuvant systemic 5-fluorouracil with folinic acid can result in 5-year survival of < or = 29% (compared with 11% for controls) and adjuvant gemcitabine can improve disease-free survival to 13.4 months from a median of 6.9 months in controls, but not overall survival. In contrast the role of adjuvant chemoradiation in addition to chemotherapy remains unproven and the survival results appear to be inferior to systemic chemotherapy alone. New agents, such as capecitabine and erlotinib, are emerging with some activity in this dismal disease signalling hope for the future.

When is pancreatitis considered to be of biliary origin and what are the implications for management?

Acute pancreatitis is a disease caused by gallstones in 40-60% of patients. Identification of these patients is extremely important, since there are specific therapeutic interventions by endoscopic sphincterotomy and/or cholecystectomy. The combination of trans-abdominal ultrasound (stones in the gallbladder and/or main bile duct) and elevated serum alanine transaminase (circa >60 IU/l within 48 h of presentation) indicates gallstones as the cause in the majority of patients with acute pancreatitis. In the presence of a severe attack this is a strong indication for intervention by endoscopic sphincterotomy. The presence of a significant main bile duct dilatation is also strongly indicative of gallstones and should prompt the use of endoluminal ultrasonography: >8 mm diameter with gallbladder in situ, or >10 mm following cholecystectomy if aged <70 years and >12 mm, respectively, if > or = 70 years. In mild pancreatitis surgically fit patients should be treated by cholecystectomy, and intra-operative cholangiography, as pre-operative biliary imaging is not efficient in this setting. Patients who are not fit for cholecystectomy should undergo prophylactic endoscopic sphincterotomy to prevent further attacks. In the post-acute-phase, pancreatitis patients in whom the aetiology is uncertain should undergo endoluminal ultrasonography. Thisis the most sensitive method for the detection of cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis and may reveal alternative aetiological factors such as a small ampullary or pancreatic cancer. A number of recent studies have shown that bile crystal analysis, a marker for microlithiasis, increases the yield of positive results over and above endoluminal ultrasonography, and should be considered as part of the modern investigative algorithm.

Systematic review, including meta-analyses, on the management of locally advanced pancreatic cancer using radiation/combined modality therapy

There is no consensus on the management of locally advanced pancreatic cancer, with either chemotherapy or combined modality approaches being employed (Maheshwari and Moser, 2005). No published meta-analysis (Fung et al, 2003; Banu et al, 2005; Liang, 2005; Bria et al, 2006; Milella et al, 2006) has included randomised controlled trials employing radiation therapy. The aim of this systematic review was to compare the following: (i) chemoradiation followed by chemotherapy (combined modality therapy) vs best supportive care (ii) radiotherapy vs chemoradiation (iii) radiotherapy vs combined modality therapy (iv) chemotherapy vs combined modality therapy (v) 5FU-based combined modality treatment vs another-agent-based combined modality therapy. Relevant randomised controlled trials were identified by searching databases, trial registers and conference proceedings. The primary end point was overall survival and secondary end points were progression-free survival/time-to-progression, response rate and adverse events. Survival data were summarised using hazard ratio (HR) and response-rate/adverse-event data with relative risk. Eleven trials involving 794 patients met the inclusion criteria. Length of survival with chemoradiation was increased compared with radiotherapy alone (two trials, 168 patients, HR 0.69; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51-0.94), but chemoradiation followed by chemotherapy did not lead to a survival advantage over chemotherapy alone (two trials, 134 patients, HR 0.79; CI 0.32-1.95). Meta-analyses could not be performed for the other comparisons. A survival benefit was demonstrated for chemoradiation over radiotherapy alone. Chemoradiation followed by chemotherapy did not demonstrate any survival advantage over chemotherapy alone, but important clinical differences cannot be ruled out due to the wide CI.

Peutz-Jeghers syndrome and screening for pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Cancer risk, including pancreatic, is high in those with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS). It has been suggested that such patients should undergo screening for pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

The risk of pancreatic cancer in PJS, pancreatic screening and potential screening strategies were reviewed. Cost-effectiveness was assessed according to American Gastroenterology Association guidelines and a risk stratification model proposed by the European Registry of Hereditary Pancreatitis and Familial Pancreatic Cancer.

RESULTS

The risk of pancreatic cancer is increased in PJS but screening would cost over US 35,000 dollars per life saved. Risk stratification reduces cost by 100,000 dollars and costs fall to 50,000 dollars per life saved if deaths from other forms of cancer are avoided.

CONCLUSION

Screening should be performed only on a research basis to evaluate the benefit and cost-effectiveness in high-risk groups.

Familial pancreatic cancer: a review and latest advances

Familial Pancreatic Cancer (FPC) is the autosomal dominant inheritance of a genetic predisposition to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, penetrance is assumed to be high but not complete. It was first described in 1987 and since then many families have been identified, but the candidate disease gene remains elusive and the very existence of the syndrome is sometimes questioned. FPC identifies a target group for secondary screening. As well as being potentially life saving for the subjects, screening offers researchers the opportunity to elucidate the early pathogenesis of pancreatic cancer. The scientific incentive for screening should not blind us to the challenges facing clinicians in managing high risk patients. Early surgical treatment may dramatically improve the five year survival for pancreatic cancer, but this must be balanced against the risks of false positives, where healthy individuals are subjected to the mortality and morbidity of major pancreatic surgery.

Anticipation in familial pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Previous studies of anticipation in familial pancreatic cancer have been small and subject to ascertainment bias. Our aim was to determine evidence for anticipation in a large number of European families.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 1223 individuals at risk from 106 families (264 affected individuals) were investigated. Generation G3 was defined as the latest generation that included any individual aged over 39 years; preceding generations were then defined as G2 and G1.

RESULTS

With 80 affected child-parent pairs, the children died a median (interquartile range) of 10 (7, 14) years earlier. The median (interquartile range) age of death from pancreatic cancer was 70 (59, 77), 64 (57, 69), and 49 (44, 56) years for G1, G2, and G3, respectively. These indications of anticipation could be the result of bias. Truncation of Kaplan-Meier analysis to a 60 year period to correct for follow up time bias and a matched test statistic indicated significant anticipation (p=0.002 and p<0.001). To minimise bias further, an iterative analysis to predict cancer numbers was developed. No single risk category could be applied that accurately predicted cancer cases in every generation. Using three risk categories (low with no pancreatic cancer in earlier generations, high with a single earlier generation, and very high where two preceding generations were affected), incidence was estimated without significant error. Anticipation was independent of smoking.

CONCLUSION

This study provides the first strong evidence for anticipation in familial pancreatic cancer and must be considered in genetic counselling and the commencement of secondary screening for pancreatic cancer.

Influence of surgical resection and post-operative complications on survival following adjuvant treatment for pancreatic cancer in the ESPAC-1 randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The influence of type of surgery and occurrence of post-operative complications on survival following adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer are uncertain.

METHODS

Cox proportional hazard modelling was used to investigate the influence of type of surgery and the presence of complications on survival in conjunction with clinico-pathological variables in the 550 patients of the ESPAC-1 adjuvant randomized controlled trial.

RESULTS

Standard Kausch-Whipple (KW) was performed in 282 (54%) patients, 186 (35%) had a pylorus-preserving (PP) KW, 39 (7%) had a distal pancreatectomy and 21 (4%) had a total pancreatectomy. Post-operative complications were reported in 140 (27%) patients. PP-KW patients survived longer with a median (95% CI) survival of 19.9 (17.3, 23.1) months compared to 14.8 (13.0, 16.7) for KW patients (chi(2)(LR) = 15.1, p < 0.001). KW patients were more likely however to have R1 margins (67 (24%) vs. 29 (16%), chi(2) = 4.59, p = 0.032), poorly differentiated tumours (70 (26%) vs. 19 (10%), chi(2) = 18.65, p < 0.001) and positive lymph nodes (165 (60%) vs. 81 (44%), chi(2) = 11.32, p < 0.001). Post-operative complications did not significantly affect survival. Independent prognostic factors were tumour grade, nodal status and tumour size but not type of surgery or post-operative complications. There was a survival benefit for chemotherapy irrespective of the type of surgery or post-operative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The KW and PP-KW procedures did not significantly influence the hazard of death in the presence of tumour staging, demonstrating that ESPAC-1 surgeons showed good judgement in their choice of operation. Post-operative complications did not adversely affect the survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.

Algorithm for the diagnosis and treatment of acute biliary pancreatitis

Gallstones are the commonest cause of acute pancreatitis in developed countries. There is now a considerable evidence base consolidated by a series of systematic reviews, meta-analyses and guidelines that has established a clear algorithm for diagnosis and management. In the majority of patients the combination of ultrasonography and serum alanine transaminase > or = 60 iu/l < or = 48 hours of symptoms will identify gallstones as the cause. The simplest method of severity assessment is a high level of serum C-reactive protein (> 150 mg/l up to 72 hours after symptoms). In mild disease, all fit patients must undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative cholangiography or if not fit for surgery then endoscopic sphincterotomy during the same admission to prevent further attacks. All patients with severe disease should undergo endoscopic sphincterotomy in less than 72 hours. Patients with > 30% necrosis should undergo fine needle aspiration for bacteriology. Necrosectomy is indicated for infected necrosis or sterile necrosis if there are persisting clinically significant symptoms. There is increasing evidence for the use of minimally invasive pancreatic necrosectomy. Enteral nutrition should be instituted whenever possible but antibiotics should be reserved for patients with proven sepsis. The presence of fungal infection requires active anti-fungal therapy. Patients with severe disease should undergo cholecystectomy at a later stage. Patients who have undergone necrosectomy require long-term follow-up because of delayed complications.

Surgery in the treatment of acute pancreatitis--minimal access pancreatic necrosectomy

Between 5% and 10% of patients with acute pancreatitis will develop infected pancreatic necrosis. Traditional open surgery for this condition carries a mortality rate of up to 50%, and therefore a number of less invasive techniques have been developed, including radiological drainage and a minimal access retroperitoneal approach. No randomised controlled trials have been published which compare these techniques. Indications for minimal access surgery are the same as for open surgery, i.e. infected pancreatic necrosis or failure to improve with extensive sterile necrosis. Access is obtained to the pancreatic necrosis via the left loin and necrosectomy performed using an operating nephroscope, and this often requires several procedures to remove all necrotic tissue. The cavity is continuously irrigated on the ward in between procedures. The results of this approach are encouraging, with less systemic upset to the patient, a lower incidence of post-operative organ failure when compared with open surgery, and a reduced requirement for ITU support. There is also a trend towards a lower mortality rate, although this does not reach statistical significance on the data published so far. Current evidence suggests that a minimal access approach to pancreatic necrosis is feasible, well tolerated and beneficial for the patient when compared with open surgery.

Meta-analysis of randomised adjuvant therapy trials for pancreatic cancer

The aim of this study was to investigate the worldwide evidence of the roles of adjuvant chemoradiation and adjuvant chemotherapy on survival in potentially curative resected pancreatic cancer. Five randomised controlled trials of adjuvant treatment in patients with histologically proven pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were identified, of which the four most recent trials provided individual patient data (875 patients). This meta-analysis includes previously unpublished follow-up data on 261 patients. The pooled estimate of the hazard ratio (HR) indicated a 25% significant reduction in the risk of death with chemotherapy (HR=0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.64, 0.90, P-values_stratified (P_strat)=0.001) with median survival estimated at 19.0 (95% CI: 16.4, 21.1) months with chemotherapy and 13.5 (95% CI: 12.2, 15.8) without. The 2- and 5-year survival rates were estimated at 38 and 19%, respectively, with chemotherapy and 28 and 12% without. The pooled estimate of the HR indicated no significant difference in the risk of death with chemoradiation (HR=1.09, 95% CI: 0.89, 1.32, P_strat=0.43) with median survivals estimated at 15.8 (95% CI: 13.9, 18.1) months with chemoradiation and 15.2 (95% CI: 13.1, 18.2) without. The 2- and 5-year survival rates were estimated at 30 and 12%, respectively, with chemoradiation and 34 and 17% without. Subgroup analyses estimated that chemoradiation was more effective and chemotherapy less effective in patients with positive resection margins. These results show that chemotherapy is effective adjuvant treatment in pancreatic cancer but not chemoradiation. Further studies with chemoradiation are warranted in patients with positive resection margins, as chemotherapy appeared relatively ineffective in this patient subgroup.

Early and late complications after pancreatic necrosectomy

BACKGROUND

Surgery for pancreatic necrosis is associated with a high morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to review the incidence of early and late complications after pancreatic necrosectomy in a large contemporary series of patients.

METHODS

The clinical outcomes of 88 patients who underwent pancreatic necrosectomy between 1997 and 2003 were reviewed.

RESULTS

The median age was 55.5 (range, 18-85) years, 54 (61%) were males, 68 (77%) had primary pancreatic infection, 71 (81%) had >50% necrosis, and the median admission Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation score was 9 (range, 1-21). Median time to surgery was 31 (range, 1-161) days; 47 patients underwent minimally invasive necrosectomy and 41 open necrosectomy; 81 (92%) of patients had complications postoperatively, and 25 (28%) died. Multiorgan failure (odds ratio = 3.4, P = .05) and hemorrhage (odds ratio = 6.1, P = .03) were the only independent predictors of mortality. During a median follow-up of 28.9 months, 39 (62%) of 63 surviving patients had one or more late complications: biliary stricture in 4 (6%), pseudocyst in 5 (8%), pancreatic fistula in 8 (13%), gastrointestinal fistula in 1 (2%), delayed collections in 3 (5%), and incisional hernia in 1 (2%); intervention was required in 10 (16%) patients. Sixteen (25%) of 63 surviving patients developed exocrine insufficiency, and 19 (33%) of 58 without prior diabetes mellitus developed endocrine insufficiency.

CONCLUSIONS

Almost all patients undergoing necrosectomy developed significant early or late complications or both. Multiorgan failure and postoperative hemorrhage were independent predictors of mortality. Long-term follow-up was important because 62% developed complications, and 16% of those with complications required surgical or endoscopic intervention.

Serum CA19-9 measurement increases the effectiveness of staging laparoscopy in patients with suspected pancreatic malignancy

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Staging laparoscopy for suspected pancreatic neoplasia is not widely accepted due to its low yield. The aim of this study was to determine if serum carbohydrate antigen (CA19-9) levels could be used to improve the selection of patients for staging laparoscopy.

METHODS

The data from a prospectively collected database (1997-2004) with 159 patients who had computed tomography-predicted resectable disease and who had undergone laparoscopic staging were analysed to determine if a low preoperative CA19-9 level (< or =150 kU/l, or < or =300 kU/l with a bilirubin >35 micromol/l) identified patients in whom laparoscopy was not useful.

RESULTS

The CA19-9 level was >150 kU/l in 96 patients of whom 75 (78%) were considered resectable following laparoscopic assessment. There were 63 patients with a CA19-9 < or =150 kU/l of whom 60 (95%) were considered resectable following laparoscopic assessment. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for CA19-9 < or =150 kU/l in predicting that laparoscopic assessment would judge patients as resectable were 44, 88, 95 and 22%, respectively. A cut-off level of < or =300 kU/l in patients with a bilirubin >35 micromol/l produced values of 30, 94, 94 and 28%, respectively. By using CA19-9 < or =150 kU/l, laparoscopy could have been avoided in 40% of patients, increased to 55% of patients with adjustment for the presence of jaundice; concomitantly, the yield from laparoscopy would have been increased from 15 to 22 and 25%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Use of serum CA19-9 levels would increase the efficiency of laparoscopic staging in patients with suspected pancreatic malignancy.

Positron emission tomography does not add to computed tomography for the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Positron emission tomography (PET) has been proposed for pancreatic cancer diagnosis and staging.

METHODS

112 patients with suspected pancreatic cancer underwent 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose gamma camera PET and computed tomography (CT), of whom 62 also had laparoscopic ultrasonography and 70 underwent abdominal exploration for potential resection. The final diagnosis was malignancy in 78 and benign disease in 34 patients (25 with chronic pancreatitis).

RESULTS

The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for PET were 73 and 60% compared to 89 and 65% for CT respectively (Cohen's kappa = 0.59). In 30 patients CT was equivocal with cancer in 14 and benign disease in 16. PET correctly diagnosed 13 of these patients (cancer in 6 and benign disease in 7), interpreted 4 as equivocal (cancer in 3 and benign disease in 1) but was incorrect in the remaining 13 patients (cancer in 5 and benign disease in 8). The sensitivity and specificity for detecting small volume metastatic disease were 20 and 94% for CT and 22 and 91% for PET, respectively.

CONCLUSION

PET had a similar accuracy to that of CT for imaging pancreatic cancer but it did not provide any additional information in patients with equivocal CT findings and currently would seem of little benefit for the staging of pancreatic cancer.

Hereditary pancreatitis and secondary screening for early pancreatic cancer

Hereditary pancreatitis is an autosomal dominant disease with incomplete penetrance (80%), accounting for approximately 1% of all cases of pancreatitis. It is characterized by the onset of recurrent attacks of acute pancreatitis in childhood and frequent progression to chronic pancreatitis. Whitcomb et al. identified the cationic trypsinogen gene (PRSS1) on chromosome 7q35 as the site of the mutation that causes hereditary pancreatitis. The European registry of hereditary pancreatitis and familial pancreatic cancer (EUROPAC) aims to identify and make provisions for those affected by hereditary pancreatitis and familial pancreatic cancer. The most common mutations in hereditary pancreatitis are R122H, N29I and A16V but many families have been described with clinically defined hereditary pancreatitis where there is no PRSS1 mutation. It is known that the cumulative lifetime risk (to age 70 years) of pancreatic cancer is 40% in individuals with hereditary pancreatitis. This subset of individuals form an ideal group for the development of a screening programme aimed at detecting pancreatic cancer at an early stage in an attempt to improve the presently poor long-term survival. Current screening strategies involve multimodality imaging (computed tomography, endoluminal ultrasound) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for pancreatic juice collection followed by molecular analysis of the DNA extracted from the juice. The potential benefit of screening (curative resection) must be balanced against the associated morbidity and mortality of surgery. Philosophically, the individual's best interest must be sought in light of the latest advances in medicine and science following discussions with a multidisciplinary team in specialist pancreatic centres.

Survival of patients with periampullary carcinoma is predicted by lymph node 8a but not by lymph node 16b1 status

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of metastatic disease in lymph nodes 8a and 16b1 (as defined by the Japanese Pancreas Society) on survival in patients with periampullary malignancy.

METHODS

Patients undergoing resection for primary pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma or intrapancreatic bile duct adenocarcinoma were identified from a prospective database (September 1997-May 2003).

RESULTS

Thirteen of 54 and ten of 44 evaluable patients had metastatic involvement of lymph nodes 8a and 16b1 respectively. Metastatic involvement of lymph node 8a was associated with a significantly shorter median survival (197 versus 470 days; P = 0.003) but metastatic involvement of lymph node 16b1 did not affect survival (457 versus 503 days; P = 0.185). Multivariate analysis showed lymph node 8a status to be the strongest predictor of outcome (P = 0.006). Median survival of those with metastatic lymph node 8a was not significantly different from that of 81 patients with overt metastatic periampullary cancer at the time of diagnosis (98 days; P = 0.072)

CONCLUSION

Lymph node 8a was an independent prognostic factor in patients with periampullary malignancy, but lymph node 16b1 was not. Survival in those with metastatic lymph node 8a was not significantly different from that in patients with metastatic disease at presentation. Preoperative determination of lymph node 8a status may have important implications in selecting patients for treatment.

Current standards of surgery for pancreatic cancer

Background

Pancreatic cancer carries a dismal prognosis but there has been a vast increase in evidence on its management in the past decade.

Methods

An electronic and manual search was performed for articles on the surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer published in the past 10 years.

Results

Six major areas of advancement were identified. Groups at high risk of developing pancreatic cancer, notably those with chronic pancreatitis and hereditary pancreatitis, have been defined, raising the need for secondary screening. Methods of staging pancreatic cancer for resection have greatly improved but accuracy is still only 85–90 per cent. Pylorus-preserving partial pancreatoduodenectomy without extended lymphadenectomy is the simplest procedure; it does not compromise long-term survival. Adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improves long-term survival. Patients who are free from major co-morbidity have better palliation by surgery (with a double bypass) than by endoscopy. High-volume centres improve the results of surgery for all outcome measures including long-term survival.

Conclusion

The surgical management of pancreatic cancer has undergone a significant change in the past decade. It has moved away from no active treatment. The standard of care can now be defined as potentially curative resection in a specialist centre followed by adjuvant systemic chemotherapy.