Removal of a Silicone Gel Breast Implant in a Multiple Myeloma Patient Improved Disease Status: A Case Report

A 52-year-old African-American woman with a prior history of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) developed infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the left breast. Following a mastectomy, she underwent reconstruction with a silicone gel breast implant. Three years later, her MGUS had progressed to active multiple myeloma (MM). She had a minimal response after two different regimens of bortezomib-based treatments and monthly zoledronic acid, and was placed on maintenance therapy with bortezomib, intravenous dexamethasone, and oral methylprednisolone, as well as ongoing monthly zoledronic acid. After 1 year of this maintenance therapy, during which her myeloma markers remained unchanged, she had her silicone implant replaced with saline. Despite no change in her myeloma treatment, her laboratory values began to steadily improve following removal of the silicone implant. Her M-protein decreased from 2.14 to 0.83 g/dL and her IgG levels from 3,330 to 1,210 mg/dL following replacement of her silicone implant with saline. To our knowledge, this is the first report in which removal of silicone implants improved the clinical status of a patient with MM following a year of maintenance therapy during which the patient's myeloma laboratory values remained unchanged. Further studies are warranted to determine if silicone breast implant removal can, in fact, improve MM patients' disease status.

Normalization of serum B-cell maturation antigen levels predicts overall survival among multiple myeloma patients starting treatment

Serum B-cell maturation antigen (sBCMA) is a novel biomarker for B-cell malignancies. A normal reference range (<82·59 ng/ml) has been recently established but the impact of achieving normal levels to outcomes for patients receiving treatment for B-cell malignancies has not been studied. We first found that among multiple myeloma (MM) patients starting a new treatment, those who begin treatment within normal sBCMA limits (<82·59 ng/ml) have improved progression-free survival (PFS; P = 0·0398) and overall survival (OS; P = 0·0217) than those who do not. Furthermore, among patients who begin treatment with elevated (≥82·59 ng/ml) sBCMA levels, we assessed the relationship of a decrease in sBCMA to the normal range to OS and found that those who normalize sBCMA demonstrated improved OS (P = 0·0078). Normalizing patients also experienced a markedly improved overall response rate (P < 0·0001). Moreover, all patients who achieved complete remission (CR) showed normalization of sBCMA, and time to normalization (median 0·9 months) was faster than time to CR (5·0 months; P = 0·0036) for these patients. These results suggest that normalization of sBCMA may be an accurate predictor of OS for MM patients during treatment and predict for a higher likelihood of response.

Estimating a normal reference range for serum B-cell maturation antigen levels for multiple myeloma patients

The serum B-cell maturation antigen (sBCMA) has been identified as a novel serum biomarker for patients with multiple myeloma. However, no study has yet established a reference range for sBCMA levels. Its levels were determined in 196 healthy subjects and showed a right-tailed distribution with a median value of 37·51 ng/ml with a standard deviation of 22·54 ng/ml (range 18·78-180·39 ng/ml). Partitioning of subgroup reference ranges was considered but determined to be irrelevant. A non-parametric method using the median ± 2 standard deviations suggests using a universal reference interval of <82·59 ng/ml.

A Phase I Study of Ruxolitinib, Lenalidomide, and Steroids for Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

PURPOSE

Ruxolitinib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone shows antimyeloma effects in vitro and in vivo. MUC1 leads to lenalidomide resistance in multiple myeloma cells, and ruxolitinib blocks its expression. Thus, ruxolitinib may restore sensitivity to lenalidomide. Therefore, a phase I trial was conducted to determine the safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib with lenalidomide and methylprednisolone for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who had been treated with lenalidomide/steroids and a proteasome inhibitor and showed progressive disease at study entry.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A traditional 3+3 dose escalation design was used to enroll subjects in four cohorts with planned total enrollment of 28 patients. Subjects received ruxolitinib twice daily, lenalidomide daily on days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle, and methylprednisolone orally every other day. Primary endpoints were safety, clinical benefit rate (CBR), and overall response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients were enrolled. The median age was 67 years and received a median of six prior treatments including lenalidomide and steroids to which 93% were refractory. No dose-limiting toxicities occurred. The CBR and ORR were 46% and 38%, respectively. All 12 responding patients were refractory to lenalidomide. Grade 3 or grade 4 adverse events (AE) included anemia (18%), thrombocytopenia (14%), and lymphopenia (14%). Most common serious AEs included sepsis (11%) and pneumonia (11%).

CONCLUSIONS

This phase I trial demonstrates that a JAK inhibitor, ruxolitinib, can overcome refractoriness to lenalidomide and steroids for patients with RRMM. These results represent a promising novel therapeutic approach for treating multiple myeloma (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03110822).

The Role of B-Cell Maturation Antigen in the Biology and Management of, and as a Potential Therapeutic Target in, Multiple Myeloma

B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) was originally identified as a cell membrane receptor, expressed exclusively on late stage B-cells and plasma cells (PCs). Investigations of BCMA as a target for therapeutic intervention in multiple myeloma (MM) were initiated in 2007, using cSG1 as a naked antibody (Ab) as well as an Ab-drug conjugate (ADC) targeting BCMA, ultimately leading to ongoing clinical studies for previously treated MM patients. Since then, multiple companies have developed anti-BCMA-directed ADCs. Additionally, there are now three bispecific antibodies in development, which bind to both BCMA and CD3ε on T-cells. This latter binding results in T-cell recruitment and activation, causing target cell lysis. More recently, T-cells have been genetically engineered to recognize BCMA-expressing cells and, in 2013, the first report of anti-BCMA-chimeric antigen receptor T-cells showed that these killed MM cell lines and human MM xenografts in mice. BCMA is also solubilized in the blood (soluble BCMA [sBCMA]) and MM patients with progressive disease have significantly higher sBCMA levels than those responding to treatment. sBCMA circulating in the blood may limit the efficacy of these anti-BCMA-directed therapies. When sBCMA binds to B-cell activating factor (BAFF), BAFF is unable to perform its major biological function of inducing B-cell proliferation and differentiation into Ab-secreting PC. However, the use of γ-secretase inhibitors, which prevent shedding of BCMA from PCs, may improve the efficacy of these BCMA-directed therapies.

The role of JAK inhibitors in multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) is the most common primary malignancy of the bone marrow. No established curative treatment is currently available for patients diagnosed with MM. In recent years, new and more effective drugs have become available for the treatment of MM. Many newer drugs have been evaluated together and in combination with older agents. However, even in combination with other active MM agents, the responses are transient, and; thus, therapeutic approaches to help overcome resistance to these drugs are necessary. Recently, the Janus kinase (JAK) family of tyrosine kinases, including JAK1 and JAK2, has been shown to play a role in the pathogenesis of MM. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that the JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib, in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone, reduces proliferation of the MM cell lines and primary tumor cells derived from MM patients, and this inhibition is greater when these drugs are combined than with single agents. Clinically, early results from the oral treatment regimen of ruxolitinib, corticosteroids (methylprednisolone), and lenalidomide for patients with relapsed/refractory disease are encouraging in terms of safety and efficacy, and additional studies will provide further support for this promising new therapeutic approach for patients with MM.

JAK1/2 pathway inhibition suppresses M2 polarization and overcomes resistance of myeloma to lenalidomide by reducing TRIB1, MUC1, CD44, CXCL12, and CXCR4 expression

Monocytes polarize into pro-inflammatory macrophage-1 (M1) or alternative macrophage-2 (M2) states with distinct phenotypes and physiological functions. M2 cells promote tumour growth and metastasis whereas M1 macrophages show anti-tumour effects. We found that M2 cells were increased whereas M1 cells were decreased in bone marrow (BM) from multiple myeloma (MM) patients with progressive disease (PD) compared to those in complete remission (CR). Gene expression of Tribbles homolog 1 (TRIB1) protein kinase, an inducer of M2 polarization, was increased in BM from MM patients with PD compared to those in CR. Ruxolitinib (RUX) is an inhibitor of the Janus kinase family of protein tyrosine kinases (JAKs) and is effective for treating patients with myeloproliferative disorders. RUX markedly reduces both M2 polarization and TRIB1 gene expression in MM both in vitro and in vivo in human MM xenografts in severe combined immunodeficient mice. RUX also downregulates the expression of CXCL12, CXCR4, MUC1, and CD44 in MM cells and monocytes co-cultured with MM tumour cells; overexpression of these genes is associated with resistance of MM cells to the immunomodulatory agent lenalidomide. These results provide the rationale for evaluation of JAK inhibitors, including MM BM in combination with lenalidomide, for the treatment of MM patients.

A phase I trial of ruxolitinib, lenalidomide, and methylprednisolone for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM)

8048

Background: Preclinical studies from our laboratory have demonstrated that ruxolitinib (RUX) in combination with lenalidomide (LEN) and dexamethasone shows marked anti-myeloma effects both in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, MUC1 is responsible for LEN resistance in MM cells, and RUX blocks its expression in MM cells. Thus, RUX may restore sensitivity to LEN. Therefore, a phase 1 trial was conducted to determine the safety and efficacy of RUX in combination with LEN and methylprednisolone (MP) for relapsed/refractory (RR) MM patients (pts) who had previously been treated with LEN/steroids and a proteasome inhibitor (PI) and showed progressive disease at study entry. Methods: A traditional 3+3 dose escalation design was used to enroll subjects in four cohorts with planned total enrollment to be 49 pts. Subjects received RUX twice daily continuously, LEN daily on d1-21 of a 28-d cycle and MP orally every other day. In DL0, pts received RUX 5 mg, LEN 5 mg, and MP 40 mg. In DL+1 and +2, both doses of LEN and MP remained unchanged and RUX was escalated to 10 and 15 mg, respectively. DL+3 escalated LEN to 10 mg with MP unchanged and RUX at 15 mg. Primary endpoints were safety, clinical benefit rate (CBR) and overall response rate (ORR). Results: As of September 1, 2018, 36 pts were enrolled, and 32 were evaluable for efficacy. The median age was 66 years (range, 46-81), and 21 (58%) were male. Pts received a median of 6 prior treatments including LEN and steroids to which they were all refractory and a proteasome inhibitor. No DLTs occurred, and DL+3 was expanded. Among evaluable pts, the CBR and ORR were 47% and 41%, respectively (1 CR, 2 VGPR, 10 PR and 2 MR), and 14 and 3 pts showed SD and PD. All 15 responding pts were refractory to LEN. G3 AEs included anemia (17%), neutropenia (14%), sepsis (14%), lymphocytopenia (11%), thrombocytopenia (11%), and pneumonia (11%). Most common SAEs included sepsis (14%) and pneumonia (11%). Conclusions: This Ph 1 trial demonstrates for the first time that a JAK inhibitor, RUX, can overcome refractoriness to LEN and steroids for RR MM pts. These promising results are leading to expansion of the current clinical trial to 78 pts, and represents a novel therapeutic approach for treating MM. Clinical trial information: NCT03110822.

Serum BCMA levels to predict outcomes for patients with MGUS and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM)

8020

Background: BCMA (B-cell maturation antigen) is a TNF receptor family member found on normal and malignant B-cells, including multiple myeloma (MM). It plays a role in proliferation and antiapoptotic pathways. Levels of serum (s)BMCA are elevated in patients (pts) with plasma cell disorders (PCD) and increase with each stage of disease: healthy donor< MGUS<SMM< active untreated MM. The purpose of this study was to test whether sBCMA levels predict progression of MGUS or SMM to MM. Methods: There were 3 cohorts in this retrospective study: MGUS progressing to MM (n=42); MGUS not progressing to MM (n=49); SMM progressing to MM (n=32). sBCMA levels were measured using an ELISA-based assay with a polyclonal anti-BCMA antibody from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). The Kruskal-Wallis analysis was used to assess differences. The relationships between sBCMA and both time to progression and overall survival were also assessed using Cox proportional hazard models. Results: The highest values of sBCMA were seen among pts with more advanced PCD (Table). The lowest baseline levels were seen in pts with MGUS who did not progress; the change of sBCMA over time was lowest in the MGUS non-progressors. ROC analysis identified a cutoff of 74.4 ng/mL to be predictive of progression at 5 years. This cut-point was associated with a risk ratio of progression of 5.8 (95%CI 3.2, 11.3) for all comers, a risk ratio of death for all comers of 2.5 (95%CI 1.5, 4.2), and a risk ratio of death for MGUS pts of 3.3 (95%CI 1.9, 5.7). Conclusions: Serum BCMA levels were predictive of diagnosis, progression and death among pts with MGUS or SMM. Limitations of the current study are that only a minority of pts had baseline bone marrow exams or serum FLCs to place sBCMA risk in the context of other previously described risk factors. Serum FLC is now being determined on all patients. [Table: see text]

Serum B-cell maturation antigen as a prognostic marker for untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia

7525

Background: New prognostic markers in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are in demand. Different groups have developed models which combine multiple prognostic markers into a single index to classify CLL patients (pts). The CLL-International Prognostic Index (CLL-IPI) combines five parameters: age, clinical stage, TP53 status, IGHV mutational status, and serum β2 microglobulin levels. B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) is a cell membrane receptor expressed exclusively on late stage B-cells and plasma cells with elevated serum (s) levels found in B-cell malignancies, such as multiple myeloma (MM). In MM, sBCMA levels can be used to monitor disease status and predict overall survival (OS). To further evaluate this biomarker in other hematologic malignancies, we studied it in CLL. Methods: Untreated (UNTX) CLL pts seen and consented at Mayo Clinic were identified. sBCMA levels were measured on stored sera of 331 UNTX CLL pts using an ELISA-based assay with a polyclonal anti-BCMA antibody from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). The Mann-Whitney analysis was used to assess differences between CLL pts and healthy controls. The relationships between sBCMA and both time to first treatment (TFT) and OS were also assessed using Cox Regression models with an optimal sBCMA cutoff of 40.9 ng/mL. Results: The median age of pts was 61 years, and 71% were male. The distribution of CLL-IPI risk groups was as follows: 135 (41%) Low; 114 (34%) Intermediate; 67 (20%) High; 15 (5%) Very High. The median level of sBCMA in CLL pts (48.6 ng/mL) was higher (P <0.0001) than those of healthy controls (n = 104; 36.03 ng/mL). In CLL pts, sBCMA is significant in univariable analyses of TFT (HR 2.9 (95%CI, 2.0-4.2); P < 0.0001) and OS (HR 2.5 (95%CI, 1.5-4.0); P < 0.0003), and remains significant when adjusting for sex and CLL-IPI factors (HR 2.3 (95%CI, 1.6-3.3), P < 0.0001; HR 1.9 (95%CI 1.1-3.1), P = 0.01, respectively). Conclusions: sBCMA is elevated in CLL pts compared to healthy controls. After adjusting for CLL-IPI and sex, sBCMA levels provided independent prognostic value in predicting TFT and OS in this cohort. Measuring sBCMA with a readily accessible ELISA-based test, provides incremental value over the current CLL-IPI model in predicting prognosis of CLL.

Once-weekly (70 mg/m2) versus twice-weekly (56 mg/m2) dosing of carfilzomib (CFZ) for patients (pts) with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM)

e19505

Background: CFZ combined with dexamethasone is approved to treat pts with RRMM, with CFZ given once-weekly at 70 mg/m2 (Kd70 QW) or twice-weekly at 56 mg/m2 (Kd56 BIW). No randomized trials have directly compared Kd70 QW with Kd56 BIW. We performed a post hoc comparison between pts who received Kd56 BIW in the ENDEAVOR trial and pts who received Kd70 QW in the A.R.R.O.W. or CHAMPION-1 trials. Methods: Data were analyzed from 3 trials of CFZ in RRMM: A.R.R.O.W. (240 pts in Kd70 QW arm; 2–3 prior therapies and refractory to most recent therapy), CHAMPION-1 (104 pts received Kd70 QW; 1–3 prior therapies), and ENDEAVOR (464 pts in Kd56 BIW arm; 1–3 prior therapies). Pts who received Kd70 QW in A.R.R.O.W. and CHAMPION-1 were pooled and compared with pts who received Kd56 BIW in ENDEAVOR. As study populations slightly varied among the 3 trials, an analysis of safety and efficacy was performed in a subgroup of pts who received 2–3 prior therapy lines and were not refractory to bortezomib (BTZ). Also, we performed regression analyses (controlling for age, ISS stage, BTZ and lenalidomide refractory status, and number of prior regimens) among all pts in the trials who received Kd70 QW or Kd56 BIW. Results: Among BTZ non-refractory pts with 2–3 lines of prior therapy, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.1 months (95% CI 8.4–14.3) for Kd70 QW (n = 146) and 14.5 months (95% CI 10.2–NE) for Kd56 BIW (n = 217), and the overall response rate (ORR) was 69.9% (95% CI 61.7–77.2) for Kd70 QW and 72.4% (95% CI 65.9–78.2) for Kd56 BIW. The rate of grade ≥3 adverse events (Kd70 QW vs Kd56 BIW) was 67.6% and 85.3%; among adverse events of interest, the grade ≥3 rate was 1.4% and 5.1% for cardiac failure, 3.4% and 6.0% for renal failure, and 5.5% and 15.7% for hypertension. Kd70 QW represents a convenient and well-tolerated treatment modality for pts with RRMM. In a Cox proportional hazards model, the hazard ratio for PFS (Kd70 QW vs Kd56 BIW) was 0.91 (95% CI 0.69–1.19), and in a logistic regression model the odds ratio for ORR (Kd70 QW vs Kd56 BIW) was 1.12 (95% CI 0.74–1.69). Conclusions: This post hoc analysis suggests that once-weekly Kd70 has a comparable benefit-risk profile to twice-weekly Kd56. Clinical trial information: NCT02412878, NCT01677858, NCT01568866.

Safety and tolerability of BION-1301 in adults with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

8012

Background: BION-1301 (BION) is first in class humanized monoclonal antibody directed against a proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) for treatment of relapsed/refractory (R/R) multiple myeloma (MM). APRIL secreted by cells in the bone marrow (BM) niche binds to BCMA (B-Cell maturation antigen) and TACI (transmembrane activator and CAML interactor) expressed on human MM cells to drive their proliferation and survival. In patients (pts) with MM, serum APRIL levels are elevated and are correlated with promotion of malignancy, chemo- and immune-resistance. This study evaluated tolerability and clinical activity of BION monotherapy in R/R MM pts. Methods: Adults with MM, progression after ≥3 systemic therapies, and ECOG 0-1 were enrolled in this phase 1/2, open-label study. The phase 1 study is evaluating 6 cohorts with increasing BION doses of 50, 150, 450, 1350, and 2700 mg administered Q2W intravenously (cohort 6 - 1350 mg dose given QW and Q2W). Response was assessed by investigators Q4W. Serum was analyzed for BION, anti-drug antibodies (ADA), and soluble unbound “free APRIL” (fAPRIL) and evaluated by PK-PD modeling. Results: As of 7Dec2018, 15 pts were enrolled in 4 cohorts at doses between 50-1350 mg given Q2W. 5/15 (33%) had ECOG 0 and pts received median of 6 prior systemic therapies (range: 4-17). Related treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE) were reported in 8/15 (36%); most common related TEAE included anemia (n=3), arthralgia (n=2), and dysgeusia (n=2). 1 subject receiving 4th dose of BION experienced grade 3 wheezing considered infusion-related and serious. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Of 14/15 evaluable for response, no objective response was observed and 5/14 (36%) had stable disease. Median time on treatment was 2 months (range: 0.9-4.9+) and median of 3 doses of BION (range: 2-11) were administered. BION exposure increased dose proportionally from 50-1350 mg, and half-life (T1/2) and clearance (CL) did not differ significantly (median T1/2 = 9.0 days [range: 3.9-20], median CL = 0.52 L/day [range: 0.32-0.72]). Levels of fAPRIL in serum and BM decreased with increasing BION doses. By 450 mg, 95% target engagement (TG) was achieved around peak exposure levels. Non-neutralizing ADA was detected in 1/15 pts. Conclusions: BION, at doses 50-1350 mg given Q2W, was well-tolerated and dose-dependently reduces serum levels of fAPRIL. To date, objective responses have not been observed. The study is ongoing with pts exposed to higher and/or more frequent doses with the objective of achieving accelerated and sustained APRIL TG. Clinical trial information: NCT03340883.

Elotuzumab and dexamethasone for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma patients: A retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of elotuzumab and dexamethasone (Ed) for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients.

METHOD

This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of Ed treatment for 21 RRMM patients, 11 of whom were considered lenalidomide-refractory, and all of whom had progressed on at least 1 prior steroid-containing regimen. We also evaluated the efficacy of adding lenalidomide to a subset of patients following progression from Ed.

RESULTS

The overall response rate (ORR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) of Ed were 10% and 19%, respectively. An additional 52% of patients demonstrated stable disease as their best response. The median PFS was 1.8 months on Ed for all patients. Fifteen patients received ERd following progression on Ed, and 60% of these patients were lenalidomide-refractory. The ORR and CBR were 20% and 33%, respectively, and the median PFS was 3.4 months.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that some patients can benefit from Ed without an accompanying immunomodulatory agent and that efficacy can be achieved with the addition of lenalidomide at the time of progression. No new safety signals were detected, except for thrombocytopenia in 1 patient on Ed.