Neratinib plus fulvestrant plus trastzuzumab (N+F+T) for hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative, HER2-mutant metastatic breast cancer (MBC): Outcomes and biomarker analysis from the SUMMIT trial

1028

Background: N is an oral, irreversible pan-HER TKI with activity against HER2 mutations. Genomic analyses from the SUMMIT MBC cohort following N±F suggest that resistance to N may occur via mutant allele amplification or secondary HER2 mutations. Adding T to N+F in SUMMIT showed encouraging durable responses in patients (pts) with HR+, HER2-mutant MBC and prior CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i). Methods: SUMMIT (NCT01953926) enrolled pts with HR+, HER2-negative MBC with activating HER2 mutation(s) and prior CDK4/6i. Pts received N+F+T (oral N 240 mg/d with loperamide prophylaxis, im F 500 mg d1&15 of cycle 1 then q4w, iv T 8 mg/kg initially then 6 mg/kg q3w). During the small, randomized portion of the trial, pts received N+F+T, F+T or F (1:1:1 ratio). Pts randomized to F+T or F could crossover to N+F+T at progression. Efficacy endpoints: investigator-assessed ORR and CBR (RECIST v1.1); DOR; best overall response. Pre-treatment tumor tissue was centrally assessed retrospectively by next-generation sequencing. ctDNA from patient samples was assessed by NGS. Results: SUMMIT has completed enrolment; we report efficacy from 45 pts in the N+F+T cohort, plus 10 pts who progressed on F (n=6) or F+T (n=4) and crossed over to N+F+T (Table). HER2 allelic variants in the 45 N+F+T pts and ORR (%) (pts may have >1 mutation) were: V777L (n=6, 50%), L755S/P (n=15, 40%), S310F (n=4, 50%), exon 20 insertion (n=11, 36%), other KD missense (n=6, 33%), TMD missense (n=2, 0%), exon 19 deletion (n=1, 0%). Conclusions: N+F+T is a promising combination for HR+, HER2-mutated MBC with prior exposure to CDK4/6i, across a range of activating HER2 mutations. Results from the upcoming Apr 2022 data cut, including biomarkers, safety, mechanisms of acquired resistance, and preclinical mechanism of N+T, will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT01953926. [Table: see text]

Primary analysis from the phase 2 study of continuous talazoparib (TALA) plus intermittent low-dose temozolomide (TMZ) in patients with relapsed or refractory extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC)

8517

Background: TALA exhibits cytotoxic effects by inhibiting poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) proteins 1 and 2 in addition to “trapping” PARP on DNA. TMZ has been shown to increase antitumor response when combined with TALA in SCLC models (Wainberg AACR 2016). TALA plus TMZ as second-line therapy for ES-SCLC may improve disease-related outcomes. Methods: This is a phase 2, open-label, single-arm study of the safety and efficacy of TALA plus TMZ in patients with ES-SCLC, relapsed or refractory to a first-line platinum-based regimen. Participants receive TALA 0.75 mg (or 0.5 mg if creatinine clearance < 60 mL/min) po daily on 28-day cycles with TMZ 37.5 mg/m2 po on days 1-5. The primary endpoint is objective response rate (ORR) based on RECIST 1.1 criteria, versus a historical control of 15% ORR in second-line topotecan, with the null hypothesis rejected for 8 or more confirmed responses among 28 evaluable subjects (29% ORR). Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, overall survival, duration of response, and time to response. Exploratory endpoints include biomarker studies such as status of DNA damage response genes (DDR) and patient reported outcomes. A Simon two-stage design was utilized to reach a total accrual of 28 evaluable patients. Results: Thirty-one subjects were enrolled, of which 3 were non-evaluable due to ineligibility (1) or early withdrawal of consent prior to first disease assessment (2). Eleven of 28 evaluable subjects (39.3%) achieved a confirmed partial response. The ORR was similar among platinum-refractory (3/6), -resistant (4/9), and -sensitive subgroups (4/13). The median time to response was 1.8 months (m), duration of response 5.8 m, progression free survival 4.5 m, and overall survival 11.9 m. Adverse events (AEs) were manageable, with grade ≥ 3 AEs being thrombocytopenia (61.3%), anemia (54.8%), neutropenia (41.9%), and atypical pneumonia (3.2%), which responded well to dose-hold or dose-reduction and transfusion or growth factor support as needed. Cell free DNA and tissue analysis demonstrated no germline DDR mutations among the trial subjects, but somatic DDR mutations at baseline and acquired during treatment were common. Three subjects remain on study treatment. Conclusions: The study exceeded its target response rate. This is the second trial to demonstrate a benefit of PARP inhibition with low-dose TMZ in SCLC (see Farago Cancer Discovery 2019). A phase 3 study is appropriate to confirm the benefit of this approach compared to currently approved options. Clinical trial information: NCT03672773.

Immunogenicity and disease control induced by a multineoantigen vaccine (ADXS-503) in patients with metastatic non–small cell lung cancer who have progressed on pembrolizumab

9042

Background: The administration of a lung cancer-specific immunotherapy with 22 tumor-associated antigens (ADXS-503, A503), has been evaluated as an add-on therapy for patients (pts) with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have progressed on pembrolizumab (pembro) as last therapy [Haigentz M et al. ASCO 2021]. The present study explores the immunogenicity and potential reversal of immune resistance with A503 when added-on to pembro at the time of progressive disease (PD). Methods: A phase 2 study of A503 + pembro is being conducted in pts with metastatic squamous or non-squamous NSCLC. In Part B of the study, A503 was added-on to pembro within 12 weeks after the first scan showing disease progression following pembro therapy (per RECIST criteria v1.1). Both A503 (1x108 CFU) and pembro (200 mg) were infused by IV every 3 weeks until disease progression or dose-limiting toxicity. Immunogenicity assays included serum cytokine and chemokine levels; flow cytometry; and in-vitro stimulation FluoroSpot assay with 4 different antigen-pools represented in A503 [i.e., hot spot mutations, heteroclitic/wild-type tumor-associated antigens and other antigens not included in the A503 construct (antigen spreading)]. Results: A total of 14 pts have been treated in Part B, of which 13 are clinically evaluable and up to 11 have immune assessments. Combination therapy was well tolerated with transient increased secretion of cytokines for several hours after infusion of A503 consistent with the expected immune activation and transient ‘flu-like’ syndrome. The objective response rate (16%) and disease control rate (46%) were encouraging with 2 partial responses (PR), 4 stable diseases (SD) and 7 pts with PD. Pts with disease control, in particular, generated CD8+ T cells reactive to neoantigens in 1 or more of the 4 antigen pools tested in FluoroSpot. Also, activation of NK cells and of cytotoxic- and memory-CD8+ T cells was mainly observed in pts with PR or SD, but not in those with PD, as shown in the table. Conclusions: Adding A503 to pembro after PD appears to induce innate and adaptive immune responses that may restore or enhance sensitivity to checkpoint inhibitors in pts with clinical benefit. Clinical trial information: NCT03847519. [Table: see text]

Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes in Patients with Resected Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Received Adjuvant Osimertinib in the Phase III ADAURA Trial

PURPOSE

In the phase III ADAURA trial, adjuvant treatment with osimertinib versus placebo, with/without prior adjuvant chemotherapy, resulted in a statistically significant and clinically meaningful disease-free survival benefit in completely resected stage IB-IIIA EGFR-mutated (EGFRm) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We report health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes from ADAURA.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients randomized 1:1 received oral osimertinib 80 mg or placebo for 3 years or until recurrence/discontinuation. HRQoL (secondary endpoint) was measured using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) health survey at baseline, 12, and 24 weeks, then every 24 weeks until recurrence or treatment completion/discontinuation. Exploratory analyses of SF-36 score changes from baseline until week 96 and time to deterioration (TTD) were performed in the overall population (stage IB-IIIA; N = 682). Clinically meaningful changes were defined using the SF-36 manual.

RESULTS

Baseline physical/mental component summary (PCS/MCS) scores were comparable between osimertinib and placebo (range, 46-47) and maintained to Week 96, with no clinically meaningful differences between arms; difference in adjusted least squares (LS) mean [95% confidence intervals (CI), -1.18 (-2.02 to -0.34) and -1.34 (-2.40 to -0.28), for PCS and MCS, respectively. There were no differences between arms for TTD of PCS and MCS; HR, 1.17 (95% CI, 0.82-1.67) and HR, 0.98 (95% CI, 0.70-1.39), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

HRQoL was maintained with adjuvant osimertinib in patients with stage IB-IIIA EGFRm NSCLC, who were disease-free after complete resection, with no clinically meaningful differences versus placebo, further supporting adjuvant osimertinib as a new treatment in this setting. See related commentary by Patil and Bunn, p. 2204.

Phase I trial of in situ vaccination with autologous CCL21-modified dendritic cells (CCL21-DC) combined with pembrolizumab for advanced NSCLC

TPS9154

Background: Effective immunotherapy options are lacking for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who progress on a programmed cell death-(ligand)1 [PD-(L)1] inhibitor and for those that are epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement positive after progression on tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. One potential approach to improve immune checkpoint efficacy in these patient populations is to promote cytolytic T cell infiltration into tumors. This can be accomplished via in situ vaccination with functional antigen presenting cells (APCs) which can take advantage of the full repertoire of tumor antigens and convert the tumor into a lymph node-like environment promoting both local and systemic T cell activation. The chemokine CCL21 promotes co-localization of naive T cells and antigen-experienced dendritic cells (DCs) to facilitate T cell activation. Our preclinical studies and phase I trial of intratumoral (IT) administration of DC genetically modified to overexpress CCL21 (CCL21-DC) revealed augmentation of tumor antigen presentation in situ, resulting in systemic antitumor immunity. However, increased PD-L1 expression was observed in some patient tumors, suggesting that tumor-mediated impairment of T cell function may be forestalling a more robust CCL21-DC mediated antitumor response. Similarly, improved PD-(L)1 inhibitor efficacy may be possible with enhanced T cell infiltration and augmented APC function following IT CCL21-DC. Therefore, we are conducting a phase I trial, combining IT CCL21-DC with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced NSCLC that are either (1) EGFR/ALK wild-type after progression on a PD-(L)1 inhibitor or (2) EGFR/ALK mutant after progression on TKI therapy. Methods: Phase I, dose-escalating, multi-cohort trial followed by dose expansion. Maximum of 24 patients (9-12 escalation + 12 expansion) with stage IV NSCLC will be evaluated who have tumors accessible for IT injection and are either (1) EGFR/ALK wild-type after progression on a PD-(L)1 inhibitor or (2) EGFR/ALK mutant after progression on TKI therapy. Three IT injections of autologous CCL21-DC (days 0, 21, 42) will be concurrently administered with pembrolizumab, followed by q3wk pembrolizumab up to 1 year. Primary objective of dose escalation is safety and determination of maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of IT CCL21-DC (5x106, 1x107, or 3x107) when combined with pembrolizumab. Primary objective of dose expansion is objective response rate at MTD. Secondary objectives include adverse event profiling and determination of drug target activity by immune monitoring studies. This trial is currently open for enrollment. Clinical trial information: NCT03546361.

A phase 2 study of an off-the-shelf, multi-neoantigen vector (ADXS-503) in patients with metastatic non–small cell lung cancer either progressing on prior pembrolizumab or in the first-line setting

9038

Background: ADXS-503 (A503) is an off-the-shelf, attenuated Listeria monocytogenes (Lm)-based immunotherapy bioengineered to elicit potent T-cell responses against 22 tumor antigens commonly found in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC, i.e. 11 hotspot mutations and 11 tumor-associated antigens, TAAs). Pembrolizumab (pembro) is a programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1)-blocking antibody approved for the treatment of advanced lung cancer. A503 and pembro have complementary mechanisms of immune activation and reversal of immune tolerance. Methods: A phase 2 study of A503 ± pembro is being conducted in patients with metastatic squamous or non-squamous NSCLC. In Part B of the study, A503 was added-on to pembro within 12 weeks of the first scan showing disease progression following pembro (per RECIST criteria v1.1). In Part C of the study, A503 and pembro were administered to previously untreated patients. Both A503 (1x108 CFU) and pembro (200 mg) were infused by IV every 3 weeks until disease progression or limiting toxicity. Results: A total of 17 patients have been treated/evaluated from Part B (n = 14/13) and Part C (n = 3/3). Pembro + A503 was well tolerated in both parts of the study, with mostly grade 1–2, transient and reversible treatment-related adverse events, the most common being fever (47%), chills (35%), fatigue (29%) and nausea (21%). There have been no added immune-related toxicities associated with the combination. Of the 13 evaluable patients in Part B, 2 achieved partial response (PR) and 4 achieved stable disease (SD), yielding an objective response rate (ORR) of 15.4% and a disease control rate (DCR) of 46.2%. Two patients from Part C also achieved SD (DCR 67%). The 2 PRs in Part B have been durable (i.e. 710 and 189 days) as were 5 of the SDs: 3 in Part B (i.e. 448, 175, 117 days) and 2 in Part C (i.e. 322 and 175 days). Both patients with PR in Part B are still undergoing therapy in addition to the other patients who achieved SD. Patients who seem to achieve clinical benefit in both parts of the study include those with PD-L1 expression ≥ 50% and those who show proliferation and/or activation of NK and CD8+ T cells within the first weeks of therapy. In addition, patients with prior pembro exposure ≥ 6 months and DCR > 6 months seem to have clinical benefit when A503 is added to pembro (Part B). Conclusions: The addition of A503 to pembro after disease progression on pembro appears to be well tolerated and induced antigen-specific T-cell responses and durable disease control in 46% of patients in Part B and 67% of patients in Part C. Additional patients are currently being enrolled into both parts of the study to further explore the potential of A503 to restore or enhance sensitivity to checkpoint inhibitors. Clinical trial information: NCT03847519.

Telisotuzumab vedotin (Teliso-V) monotherapy in patients (pts) with previously treated c-Met–overexpressing (OE) advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

9016

Background: Teliso-V is an antibody-drug conjugate composed of a c-Met antibody (ABT-700) and a microtubule inhibitor (monomethyl auristatin E). The phase 2 M14-239 trial (LUMINOSITY, NCT03539536) aims to identify the c-Met OE NSCLC populations best suited to Teliso-V (Stage 1) and expand selected groups for further evaluation of efficacy (Stage 2). In Stage 1, pts were enrolled into cohorts defined by histopathology (non-squamous [NSQ] or squamous [SQ]) and EGFR mutation status (mutant or wild type [WT]); NSQ cohorts were further divided in groups on the basis of c-Met expression (high or intermediate). Updated data from the fourth interim analysis (IA4) are presented. Methods: Pts had locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC, ≤2 prior lines of systemic therapy, ≤1 line of chemotherapy, and tumors that were c-Met OE by central immunohistochemistry (IHC; Ventana; Tucson, AZ). c-Met OE was defined for the NSQ cohort as ≥25% 3+ by IHC (high, ≥50% 3+; intermediate, 25 to <50% 3+) and for the SQ cohort as ≥75% 1+ by IHC. The planned enrollment was up to approximately 150 pts in Stage 1 and 160 pts in Stage 2. Teliso-V was dosed at 1.9 mg/kg IV Q2W. The primary endpoint is objective response rate (ORR) by independent central review. Secondary endpoints include duration of response (DOR). Results: As of data cutoff (27 May 2021), 136 pts were treated with Teliso-V; 122 were evaluable for ORR. ORR was 36.5% in the NSQ EGFR WT cohort (52.2% in c-Met high group and 24.1% in c-Met intermediate group), but was modest in the NSQ EGFR mutant and SQ cohorts. Efficacy data in groups/cohorts are in the Table. The most common any-grade adverse events (AEs) were peripheral sensory neuropathy (25.0%), nausea (22.1%), and hypoalbuminemia (20.6%). Grade 5 AEs considered possibly related to Teliso-V occurred in 2 pts (sudden death and pneumonitis in 1 pt each in the SQ cohort). Conclusions: Teliso-V demonstrated a promising ORR in pts with previously treated c-Met OE NSQ EGFR WT NSCLC; this cohort is currently expanding in Stage 2. ORR was modest in the cohorts of pts with c-Met OE NSQ EGFR mutant NSCLC and with c-Met OE SQ NSCLC; both cohorts have now met the protocol-specified stopping criteria and are no longer enrolling. The safety profile observed was consistent with IA3. Clinical trial information: NCT03539536. [Table: see text]

Phase 1/1b study of telisotuzumab vedotin (Teliso-V) + osimertinib (Osi), after failure on prior Osi, in patients with advanced, c-Met overexpressing, EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

9013

Background: Osi (third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor) is a standard frontline treatment (Tx) for advanced/metastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC. However, tumors invariably progress after an initial response, with c-Met protein overexpression (OE) often associated with acquired resistance. Second- and third-line Tx options are limited to chemotherapy-based regimens with limited efficacy and significant toxicities. Teliso-V (ABBV-399), an anti–c-Met antibody-drug conjugate, delivers a cytotoxic payload (monomethyl auristatin E) into c-Met OE tumor cells. In a phase 1/1b study (NCT02099058) in patients (pts) with c-Met OE NSCLC, Teliso-V alone or in combination with erlotinib demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and antitumor activity. Interim safety and efficacy data from the Teliso-V + Osi cohort (arm E) of this trial are presented. Methods: Pts (≥18 yr) with metastatic EGFR-mutated, c-Met OE (by central immunohistochemistry) NSCLC who had progressed on a prior Osi regimen were eligible. Pts received Teliso-V (IV Q2W) + Osi (oral; 80 mg QD). Teliso-V was evaluated at 1.6 mg/kg and, after review of safety data, escalated to 1.9 mg/kg (safety evaluation). An expansion cohort was opened at 1.9 mg/kg for pts who had received ≤2 prior lines of systemic therapy. Pharmacokinetics (PK) were assessed throughout the study. Pts received study Tx until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or for up to 24 months. Results: As of 20 Dec 2021, 25 pts received Teliso-V (1.6 mg/kg, n = 7; 1.9 mg/kg, n = 18) + Osi. Median age was 60.0 yr; 14 (58%) pts were on prior Tx with Osi for > 12 mo. No dose-limiting toxicities (grade [Gr] ≥3 non-hematologic or Gr 4 hematologic Tx-related adverse events [AEs]) were reported during the safety lead-in or evaluation phases. All-Gr AEs considered possibly related to Teliso-V occurred in 22/25 (88%) pts: the most common (≥20%) were peripheral sensory neuropathy (36%), nausea, and peripheral edema (20% each); Gr ≥3 AEs (> 5%) were anemia (12%) and peripheral motor neuropathy (8%). No Gr 5 events related to Tx were reported. PK of Teliso-V + Osi was similar to single-agent Teliso-V. Efficacy data (19/25 pts) are in the table. The overall objective response rate (ORR) was 58% (67% at 1.9 mg/kg). Conclusions: Teliso-V + Osi is well tolerated with an ORR of 58% (67% at 1.9 mg/kg) in pts with c-Met OE NSCLC who progressed on prior Osi. Clinical trial information: NCT02099058. [Table: see text]

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) mutations associate with response in patients (pts) with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) treated with talazoparib (TALA) and temozolomide (TMZ)

8582

Background: Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition in combination with TMZ is a promising treatment strategy for ES-SCLC. In SCLC models, TALA, a potent PARP inhibitor, exhibits cytotoxic effects by impairing PARP proteins 1/2 and trapping PARP on DNA while TMZ potentiates antitumor response by contributing to genomic instability (Wainberg 2016). A prior analysis of ctDNA in 15 pts treated on trial with TALA and TMZ suggested that mutations in DNA damage repair (DDR) genes occurred with this combination and may associate with response (Mulroy ASCO 2021). Methods: Pts with relapsed or refractory ES-SCLC were treated with TALA 0.75 mg po daily with TMZ 37.5 mg/m2 po on days 1-5 of 28-day cycles in a phase 2 clinical trial (UCLA/TRIO-US L-07, NCT03672773). ctDNA was collected and assessed based on allele frequency and plasma copy number at baseline and every 8 weeks during treatment with the Guardant360 assay (Redwood City, CA). DDR status was defined as a mutation known or likely to result in aberrant expression of ATM or BRCA1/2 (other DDR genes not detected by assay) (Pearl 2015). Germline DDR mutations were evaluated with matched-normal (PBMC) whole exome sequencing (WES) with archival specimens by Tempus (Chicago, IL). Response to treatment was defined by RECIST 1.1 criteria. Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare proportions of patients, with P-values <0.05 considered statistically significant ( www.r-project.org , Vienna, AU). Results: For 27 pts with evaluable response, 78 ctDNA samples were collected. The most common baseline somatic alterations were mutations in TP53 (23 pts), RB1 (8 pts), ATM (5 pts), and BRCA2 (5 pts). There were no patients with germline DDR mutations. Overall, 22/27 (81.5%) had disease control (DC), including 11 with confirmed partial responses (PR) and 11 with stable disease while 5 had progressive disease. All those with PRs and ctDNA burden >0.2% at baseline experienced a ctDNA decrease at 8 weeks of treatment. DDR mutations were found in 18/27 (66.7%) pts. Of those with ≥ 1 follow-up ctDNA time point collected, 13/17 (76.4%) pts had at least one new mutation detected while on treatment, most commonly in ATM (6 pts). The appearance of new mutations associated with DC (P=0.042) and with a trend towards improved progression free survival (PFS, 5.9 m vs 3.6 m, P=0.099). All 5 pts with DDR mutations present at baseline had DC with TALA and TMZ, and 9/11 (81.8%) of those with PR had DDR mutations detected at some point during the trial, although the trend toward DC enrichment with DDR mutations did not maintain statistical significance (P=0.24). Conclusions: Mutations in DDR genes occur on treatment with TALA and TMZ and may associate with disease control. Validation in a larger cohort will be pursued.

Adverse events self-reported by patients (pts) with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) treated with durvalumab (D) plus platinum-etoposide (EP) or EP in the CASPIAN study

8571

Background: The CASPIAN phase 3 study established D+EP as a global standard of care in ES-SCLC. Patient-Reported Outcomes - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) was developed to complement standard adverse event (AE) reporting in oncology trials. Here we describe patient-reported symptomatic AEs using PRO-CTCAE in CASPIAN, the first time the PRO-CTCAE tool has been piloted in SCLC research. Methods: In CASPIAN, treatment-naïve pts (WHO PS 0/1) with ES-SCLC received 4 cycles of D+EP q3w followed by maintenance D q4w until progressive disease (PD), or up to 6 cycles of EP q3w. As part of exploratory analyses, where validated local language versions were available (in English, German, Japanese or Spanish), pts were asked to complete the PRO-CTCAE by e-device at baseline, q3w during EP (in both arms), then q4w until PD, followed by day 28 post-PD, 2 months post-PD, and q8w until second progression/death. Presence/absence, frequency or severity were examined during the first 24 weeks after starting treatment across 11 AEs selected as being relevant to pts with ES-SCLC (Table). Results: In total, 164 of the 537 pts randomized to D+EP and EP in CASPIAN (31%; D+EP: 83; EP: 81) were asked to complete the PRO-CTCAE. At baseline, the PRO-CTCAE was completed by 84% of these pts in the D+EP arm and 81% in the EP arm; compliance rates > 60% were achieved up to cycle 32 for D+EP and cycle 6 for EP. Examined AEs were reported by a minority of pts before starting treatment in both arms (range D+EP vs EP: 4% vs 3% for hand-foot syndrome to 34% vs 41% for dry mouth). Baseline AE rates were generally maintained in both arms up to 24 weeks after starting treatment, except for itchy skin, which showed a numerical increase from 13% at baseline to a peak of 34% at cycle 6 in the D+EP arm and 12% at baseline to a peak of 42% at cycle 8 in the EP arm; and dizziness, which showed a numerical increase from 16% at baseline to a peak of 40% at cycle 5 in the D+EP arm, while rates were maintained vs baseline in the EP arm. Most pts reporting these AEs indicated that they occurred rarely or occasionally, or were mild or moderate in severity. Conclusions: Self-reported data from pts in CASPIAN showed that the 11 AEs examined during the 24 weeks after starting treatment were reported by a minority of pts, mostly with rare or occasional occurrence, and mild to moderate severity. Rates and patterns of AEs over time were broadly similar in the D+EP and EP arms. These results complement the CASPIAN safety profile and give insight into pts’ experience of treatment. Clinical trial information: NCT03043872. [Table: see text]

Inter-reader reliability of immune-specific response criteria (irRECIST & iRECIST)

e21108

Background: RECIST 1.1 can underestimate treatment benefits of immunotherapy, with irRECIST and iRECIST accounting for atypical responses. Inter-reader discordances are known to occur in a dual reader paradigm. Our objective is to compare inter-reader reliability between RECIST 1.1, irRECIST, and iRECIST. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of advanced NSCLC patients treated with pembrolizumab at our institution as part of the KEYNOTE-001 study. All trial imaging was interpreted by two radiologists. RECIST 1.1, irRECIST, and iRECIST categorical responses and agreement for progressive disease (PD) was compared by kappa statistic. Time to progression (TTP) or time to censor was compared between readers by paired t test. Relationship to disease progression and overall survival (OS) was assessed by log rank. Results: Of 98 patients, 77 had baseline and subsequent imaging available for 5.8 mean timepoints with 42.9 weeks of follow up. From this group, 45 patients had imaging beyond iUPD for confirmation and were analyzed. PD occurred by reader 1, reader 2 in 34, 33 patients by RECIST 1.1 (k = 0.591, CI = 0.320-0.863), 31, 29 patients by irRECIST (k = 0.501, CI = 0.234-0.768), and 27, 22 patients by iRECIST iCPD (confirmed-PD) (k = 0.690, CI = 0.485-0.896). There was no significant difference in reader agreement by RECIST 1.1, irRECIST, iRECIST (p = 0.38, 0.60, 0.26). There was a significant difference in time to progression between RECIST 1.1, irRECIST and iRECIST, with median PFS 3.4 months (2.6-4.6), 4.7 (3.5-6.8) and 8.7 (6.9-14.5) (p < 0.0001). PD by any criteria was not significantly correlated with OS. Conclusions: PD confirmation by iRECIST resulted in substantial reader agreement compared to moderate reader agreement by RECIST 1.1 and irRECIST. There were significant differences in TTP between the criteria, with iRECIST having the longest TTP. PD by each criteria did not correlate with a significant difference in OS.[Table: see text]

Amivantamab in patients with NSCLC with MET exon 14 skipping mutation: Updated results from the CHRYSALIS study

9008

Background: Amivantamab, a fully human bispecific antibody targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and MET, is approved for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR exon 20 insertion after prior platinum-based chemotherapy. Given its bispecific nature, amivantamab is being explored in patients (pts) with primary MET exon 14 skipping mutation (METex14) in the MET-2 cohort of the CHRYSALIS study. Methods: CHRYSALIS (NCT02609776) is an ongoing phase 1 dose escalation/dose expansion study of amivantamab in pts with advanced NSCLC. Pts with primary METex14 whose disease progressed on or who declined current standard of care therapy were treated with amivantamab 1050 mg (pts <80 kg) or 1400 mg (pts ≥80 kg) weekly in cycle 1 and biweekly thereafter. Response was assessed by investigators using RECIST v1.1. Results: As of 2 Dec 2021, 43 pts with METex14 had received amivantamab. Median age was 70 y (range, 43-88), 58% were women, median prior lines of therapy was 2 (range, 0-10) [eg, crizotinib (n=13), capmatinib (n=11), tepotinib (n=5), anti-MET antibody (n=1)], and 23% had history of brain metastases at baseline. In 36 pts with ≥1 postbaseline disease assessment, median duration of follow-up was 5.8 months (range, 0.3-15.8); 6 pts had no prior treatment, 11 had no prior MET inhibitor, and 19 had a prior MET inhibitor. Overall response rate was 33% (50% [3/6] in treatment-naïve pts, 46% [5/11] in pts with no prior MET inhibitor, and 21% [4/19] in pts with prior MET inhibitor therapy). Clinical benefit rate was >54% regardless of prior treatment (Table). Median duration of response (DOR) was not reached (range, 2.1-12.2 months); 67% (8/13) had DOR ≥6 months. Ten of the 12 responders remain on treatment (6.0-14.4 months) with ongoing responses; 2 discontinued after 2 and 12 months, respectively. Safety profile was consistent with previously reported experience of amivantamab (Sabari 2021 JTO 16(3):S108-109). Treatment-related adverse events leading to dose reduction or discontinuation occurred in 3 pts, each. Conclusions: Amivantamab demonstrates anti-tumor activity in primary METex14 NSCLC including after prior MET inhibitor treatment. Enrollment is ongoing and updated data will be shown. Clinical trial information: NCT02609776. [Table: see text]

Facets of stigma, self-compassion, and health-related adjustment to lung cancer: A longitudinal study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate whether three facets of lung cancer stigma (internalized stigma, constrained disclosure, and perceived subtle discrimination) uniquely predicted psychological and physical health-related adjustment to lung cancer across 12 weeks. Additionally, self-compassion was tested as a moderator of the stigma-health relationship.

METHOD

Adults receiving oncologic treatment for lung cancer (N = 108) completed measures of lung cancer stigma, self-compassion, depressive symptoms, cancer-related stress, and physical symptom bother. Multivariable linear regression models were used to investigate cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships (at 6- and 12-week follow-up) between indicators of stigma and health-related outcomes, controlling for covariates. Self-compassion was tested as a moderator of these relationships.

RESULTS

At study entry, higher internalized stigma, constrained disclosure, and perceived subtle discrimination were associated significantly and uniquely with higher depressive symptoms (all p < .05). Constrained disclosure and perceived subtle discrimination were also associated significantly with higher cancer-related stress and higher physical symptom bother at study entry (all p < .05). Furthermore, higher internalized stigma predicted significant increases in depressive symptoms across 12 weeks and in cancer-related stress across 6 and 12 weeks (all p < .05). Higher self-compassion significantly moderated relationships between perceived discrimination and psychological health outcomes at study entry as well as between internalized stigma and increasing depressive symptoms across 12 weeks (all p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Results indicated robust relationships between distinct facets of stigma and health-related adjustment to lung cancer. Supportive care programs that bolster self-compassion may be useful for reducing lung cancer stigma. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Brief report: Impact of brain metastases on treatment patterns and outcomes with first-line durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide in extensive-stage SCLC (CASPIAN)

Introduction

In the phase 3 study involving the use of durvalumab with or without tremelimumab in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy in untreated extensive-stage SCLC (CASPIAN study), first-line durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide (EP) significantly improved overall survival (OS) versus EP alone (p = 0.0047). We report exploratory subgroup analyses of treatment patterns and outcomes according to the presence of baseline brain or central nervous system metastases.

Methods

Patients (WHO performance status 0 or 1), including those with asymptomatic or treated-and-stable brain metastases, were randomized to four cycles of durvalumab plus EP followed by maintenance durvalumab until progression or up to six cycles of EP and optional prophylactic cranial irradiation. Prespecified analyses of OS and progression-free survival (PFS) in subgroups with or without brain metastases used unstratified-Cox proportional hazards models. The data cutoff was on January 27, 2020.

Results

At baseline, 28 out of 268 patients (10.4%) in the durvalumab plus EP arm and 27 out of 269 patients (10.0%) in the EP arm had known brain metastases, of whom 3 of 28 (10.7%) and 4 of 27 (14.8%) had previous brain radiotherapy, respectively. Durvalumab plus EP (versus EP alone) prolonged OS (hazard ratio, 95% confidence interval) in patients with (0.79, 0.44–1.41) or without (0.76, 0.62–0.92) brain metastases, with similar PFS results (0.73, 0.42–1.29 and 0.80, 0.66–0.97, respectively). Among patients without brain metastases, similar proportions in each arm developed new brain lesions as part of their first progression (8.8% and 9.5%), although 8.3% in the EP arm received prophylactic cranial irradiation. Similar proportions in each arm received subsequent brain radiotherapy (20.5% and 21.2%), although more common in patients with than without baseline brain metastases (45.5% and 18.0%).

Conclusions

The OS and PFS benefit with first-line durvalumab plus EP were maintained irrespective of the presence of brain metastases, further supporting its standard-of-care use.

Poziotinib in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Harboring HER2 Exon 20 Insertion Mutations After Prior Therapies: ZENITH20-2 Trial

PURPOSE

Insertion mutations in Erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 gene (ERBB2 or HER2) exon 20 occur in 2%-5% of non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) and function as an oncogenic driver. Poziotinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, was evaluated in previously treated patients with NSCLC with HER2 exon 20 insertions.

METHODS

ZENITH20, a multicenter, multicohort, open-label phase II study, evaluated poziotinib in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC. In cohort 2, patients received poziotinib (16 mg) once daily. The primary end point was objective response rate evaluated by independent review committee (RECIST v1.1); secondary outcome measures were disease control rate, duration of response, progression-free survival, and safety and tolerability. Quality of life was assessed.

RESULTS

Between October 2017 and March 2021, 90 patients with a median of two prior lines of therapy (range, 1-6) were treated. With a median follow-up of 9.0 months, objective response rate was 27.8% (95% CI, 18.9 to 38.2); 25 of 90 patients achieved a partial response. Disease control rate was 70.0% (95% CI, 59.4 to 79.2). Most patients (74%) had tumor reduction (median reduction 22%). Median progression-free survival was 5.5 months (95% CI, 3.9 to 5.8); median duration of response was 5.1 months (95% CI, 4.2 to 5.5). Clinical benefit was seen regardless of lines and types of prior therapy, presence of central nervous system metastasis, and types of HER2 mutations. Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events included rash (48.9%), diarrhea (25.6%), and stomatitis (24.4%). Most patients had poziotinib dose reductions (76.7%), with median relative dose intensity of 71.5%. Permanent treatment discontinuation because of treatment-related adverse events occurred in 13.3% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Poziotinib demonstrates antitumor activity in previously treated patients with HER2 exon 20 insertion NSCLC.

Abstract GS4-10: Neratinib + fulvestrant + trastuzumab for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-mutant metastatic breast cancer and neratinib + trastuzumab for triple-negative disease: Latest updates from the SUMMIT trial

Background: HER2 mutations are oncogenic drivers in a subset of metastatic breast cancers (MBC). Neratinib (N) is an oral, irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor with preclinical and clinical activity against HER2 mutations. Genomic analyses from paired biopsies following N ± fulvestrant (F) suggest that resistance to N may occur via amplification of the mutant allele or by acquisition of secondary HER2 mutations. Addition of trastuzumab (T) to N+F showed encouraging clinical activity with durable responses in the SUMMIT trial in hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-mutant MBC, including patients (pts) who had previously received cyclin-dependent kinase 4 & 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) [Jhaveri et al. SABCS 2020]. On the basis of these findings, and in order to better understand the contribution of N to the activity of the N+F+T combination, SUMMIT has recently been expanded to include a randomized Simon 2-stage comparison of N+F+T vs. F+T vs. F in pts with HR+, HER2-mutated, HER2-negative MBC who were exposed to CDK4/6i. Enrollment for stage 1 is now complete (N+F+T, n=7; F+T, n=7; F, n=7), and results will be forthcoming once the data are mature. Here we report updated findings from the breast cancer cohorts of the SUMMIT trial for which data are currently available. Methods: The phase 2 SUMMIT trial (NCT01953926) enrolled pts with HR+, HER2-negative MBC whose tumors harbored activating HER2 mutation(s) identified by genomic sequencing. Prior to starting the randomized portion of the trial, these patients were enrolled in a non-randomized cohort and received N+F+T (oral N 240 mg/d, i.m. F 500 mg d1&15 of cycle 1 then q4w, i.v. T 8 mg/kg initially then 6 mg/kg q3w). Following initiation of the randomized portion of the trial, these pts received N+F+T, F+T or F (1:1:1 ratio; dose schedules as above). Pts with HER2-mutant triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) were enrolled in a non-randomized cohort and received N+T (dose schedules as above). Loperamide prophylaxis was mandatory during the first 2 treatment cycles. There was no restriction on the number of prior lines of systemic therapy for MBC. Efficacy endpoints: investigator-assessed objective response rate and clinical benefit rate (RECIST v1.1 or other defined criteria); duration of response; best overall response. Results: Prior to enrolling the randomized cohort, 24 pts with HR+, HER2-mutated MBC who had previously received CDK4/6i were enrolled in the non-randomized cohort and received N+F+T, and 17 pts with HER2-mutant TNBC were enrolled and received N+T, as of 18-Jun-2021. Data for randomized pts are not yet mature. HER2 allelic variants across both cohorts (pts may have &gt;1 mutation): kinase domain hotspots (n=26); exon-20 insertion (n=9); extracellular domain hotspot (n=4); exon-19 deletion (n=1); transmembrane domain missense (n=1); kinase domain non-hotspot (n=2). Efficacy findings are reported in the Table. Diarrhea was the most commonly reported adverse event: N+F+T (non-randomized cohort), 96%; N+T (TNBC cohort), 94%. No grade 4 diarrhea was reported.

Conclusions: N+F+T is a promising combination for pts with HR+, HER2-mutated MBC with prior exposure to CDK4/6 inhibitors. N+T also showed encouraging activity in HER2-mutated TNBC. The first results from the randomized comparison of N+F+T vs. F+T vs. F in pts with HR+, HER2-mutated MBC (Simon stage 1 analysis) will be presented at the meeting.

Table: Efficacy findingsHR+, HER2-mutated, HER2-non-amplified MBCHER2-mutant TNBCN+F+T (n=24)N+T (n=17)Confirmed objective response,a n (%)11 (46)5 (29)CR0 (0)1 (6)PR11 (46)4 (24)ORR, % (95% CI)46 (26–67)29 (10–56)Best overall response, n (%)13 (54)7 (41)CR0 (0)1 (6)PR13 (54)6 (35)Best overall response rate, % (95% CI)54 (33–74)41 (18–67)Medianb DOR, months (95% CI)14.4 (6.4–NR)NRClinical benefit, n (%)14 (58)6 (35)CR or PR11 (46)5 (29)SD ≥24 weeks3 (13)1 (6)CBR,b % (95% CI)58 (37–78)35 (14–62)aORR defined as either a CR or PR confirmed no less than 4 weeks after the response criteria are met; bCBR defined as confirmed CR or PR or SD for ≥24 weeks. Note: Tumor response is based on investigator tumor assessments per RECIST v1.1 for HR+, HER2-mutated cohort, and RECIST v1.1 or modified PERCIST for HER2-mutated TNBC cohort. CBR, clinical benefit rate; CI, confidence interval; CR, complete response; DOR, duration of response; F, fulvestrant; HR+, hormone receptor-positive; MBC, metastatic breast cancer; N, neratinib; NR, not reached; ORR, objective response rate; PERCIST, Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors; PR, partial response; RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; SD, stable disease; T, trastuzumab, TNBC, triple-negative breast cancer.

Citation Format: Komal Jhaveri, Haeseong Park, James Waisman, Jonathan W Goldman, Angel Guerrero-Zotano, Valentina Boni, Barbara Haley, Ingrid A Mayer, Adam Brufsky, Eddy S Yang, José A García-Sáenz, François-Clement Bidard, John Crown, Bo Zhang, Aimee Frazier, Irmina Diala, Lisa D Eli, Brian Barnett, Hans Wildiers. Neratinib + fulvestrant + trastuzumab for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-mutant metastatic breast cancer and neratinib + trastuzumab for triple-negative disease: Latest updates from the SUMMIT trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS4-10.

A Phase 1b Study of Telisotuzumab Vedotin in Combination With Nivolumab in Patients With NSCLC

Introduction

Telisotuzumab vedotin (Teliso-V) is an anti-c-Met-directed antibody-drug conjugate that has exhibited antitumor activity as monotherapy in NSCLC. Its potential activity combined with programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitors has not been previously evaluated.

Methods

In a phase 1b study (NCT02099058), adult patients (≥18 y) with advanced NSCLC received combination therapy with Teliso-V (1.6, 1.9, or 2.2 mg/kg, every 2 wk) plus nivolumab (3 mg/kg, 240 mg, or per locally approved label). The primary objective was to assess safety and tolerability; secondary objectives included the evaluation of antitumor activity.

Results

As of January 2020, a total of 37 patients received treatment with Teliso-V (safety population) in combination with nivolumab; 27 patients (efficacy population) were c-Met immunohistochemistry-positive. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) status was evaluated in the efficacy population (PD-L1-positive [PD-L1+]: n = 15; PD-L1-negative [PD-L1-]: n = 9; PD-L1-unknown: n = 3). The median age was 67 years and 74% (20 of 27) of patients were naive to immune checkpoint inhibitors. The most common any-grade treatment-related adverse events were fatigue (27%) and peripheral sensory neuropathy (19%). The pharmacokinetic profile of Teliso-V plus nivolumab was similar to Teliso-V monotherapy. The objective response rate was 7.4%, with two patients (PD-L1+, c-Met immunohistochemistry H-score 190, n = 1; PD-L1-, c-Met H-score 290, n = 1) having a confirmed partial response. Overall median progression-free survival was 7.2 months (PD-L1+: 7.2 mo; PD-L1-: 4.5 mo; PD-L1-unknown: not reached).

Conclusions

Combination therapy with Teliso-V plus nivolumab was well tolerated in patients with c-Met+ NSCLC with limited antitumor activity.

Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 2.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) provide recommended management for patients with SCLC, including diagnosis, primary treatment, surveillance for relapse, and subsequent treatment. This selection for the journal focuses on metastatic (known as extensive-stage) SCLC, which is more common than limited-stage SCLC. Systemic therapy alone can palliate symptoms and prolong survival in most patients with extensive-stage disease. Smoking cessation counseling and intervention should be strongly promoted in patients with SCLC and other high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas. The "Summary of the Guidelines Updates" section in the SCLC algorithm outlines the most recent revisions for the 2022 update, which are described in greater detail in this revised Discussion text.

A plain language summary of results from the ADAURA study: osimertinib after surgery for patients who have early-stage EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer

Here, we summarize the initial results from the ADAURA clinical study looking at treatment with osimertinib in patients with a specific type of non-small cell lung cancer (also called NSCLC). Osimertinib (TAGRISSO®) is a medication used to treat a type of NSCLC with a change (mutation) in the EGFR gene, known as EGFR-mutated NSCLC. EGFR stands for 'epidermal growth factor receptor'. It is a protein present on the surface of both healthy and cancer cells that can regulate how cells grow and divide. Sometimes, certain mutations in EGFR can result in the EGFR protein malfunctioning, which can lead to the formation of cancer, like EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Based on previous clinical studies, osimertinib is already approved for use in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC that has spread beyond the lung (metastatic disease). This medication works to stop, prevent, or slow the growth of EGFR-mutated NSCLC tumors, by specifically blocking the activity of EGFR. In the ADAURA clinical study, participants had resectable EGFR-mutated NSCLC, which means they had tumors that can be removed by surgery. Participants took either osimertinib or a placebo (a dummy drug with no active ingredient) after having their tumors removed by surgery. Post-surgery chemotherapy was allowed, but not compulsory (this was decided by the participant and their doctor). To date, the study has shown that osimertinib could be beneficial for patients with resectable EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Participants who took osimertinib have stayed cancer-free for longer than those who took the placebo, regardless of whether or not they received chemotherapy after surgery. Osimertinib treatment also reduced the risk of tumors spreading to the brain and spinal cord, otherwise known as the central nervous system (also called CNS). The side effects experienced by the participants taking osimertinib have been consistent with what we already know. Based on the results from ADAURA, osimertinib has been approved for the treatment of resectable EGFR-mutated NSCLC after tumor removal. The ADAURA study is still ongoing and more results are expected to be released in the future. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT number: NCT02511106.

Postoperative Chemotherapy Use and Outcomes From ADAURA: Osimertinib as Adjuvant Therapy for Resected EGFR-Mutated NSCLC

INTRODUCTION

Adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended in patients with resected stage IIꟷIIIA (and select IB) NSCLC; however, recurrence rates are high. In the phase III, ADAURA study (NCT02511106), osimertinib demonstrated a highly statistically significant improvement in disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with resected stage IBꟷIIIA EGFRm NSCLC. Here, we report prespecified and exploratory analyses of adjuvant chemotherapy use and outcomes from ADAURA.

METHODS

Patients with resected stage IBꟷIIIA EGFRm NSCLC were randomized 1:1 to receive osimertinib or placebo for 3 years. Adjuvant chemotherapy before randomization was not mandatory, per physician and patient choice. DFS in the overall population (IBꟷIIIA), with/without adjuvant chemotherapy, was a prespecified analysis. Exploratory analyses included: adjuvant chemotherapy use by patient age, disease stage and geographical location; DFS by adjuvant chemotherapy use and disease stage.

RESULTS

Overall, 410/682 patients (60%) received adjuvant chemotherapy (osimertinib, n = 203; placebo, n = 207) for a median duration of 4.0 cycles. Adjuvant chemotherapy use was more frequent in patients: aged <70 years (338/509; 66%) versus ≥70 years (72/173; 42%); with stage II-IIIA disease (352/466; 76%) versus stage IB (57/216; 26%); enrolled in Asia (268/414; 65%) versus outside of Asia (142/268; 53%). A DFS benefit favoring osimertinib versus placebo was observed in patients with (DFS HR = 0.16, 95% CI: 0.10ꟷ0.26) and without adjuvant chemotherapy (HR = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.13ꟷ0.40), regardless of disease stage.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support adjuvant osimertinib as an effective treatment for patients with stage IB-IIIA EGFRm NSCLC after resection, with or without prior adjuvant chemotherapy.

Phase I Study of 2- or 3-Week Dosing of Telisotuzumab Vedotin, an Antibody-Drug Conjugate Targeting c-Met, Monotherapy in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma

PURPOSE

Telisotuzumab vedotin (Teliso-V) is an anti-c-Met-directed antibody-drug conjugate. Here, we present safety and efficacy data from a phase I/Ib study of Teliso-V monotherapy evaluated in once every 2 weeks/once every 3 weeks schedules in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

During dose escalation, patients received Teliso-V monotherapy intravenously once every 3 weeks (0.15-3.3 mg/kg) or once every 2 weeks (1.6-2.2 mg/kg). The dose-expansion phase enrolled patients with NSCLC and c-Met H-score ≥150 (c-Met+) or MET amplification/exon 14 skipping mutations. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy were assessed. Herein, the analysis of patients receiving ≥1.6 mg/kg once every 2 weeks or ≥2.4 mg/kg once every 3 weeks Teliso-V is reported.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients with NSCLC were enrolled and received ≥1.6 mg/kg Teliso-V once every 2 weeks (n = 28) or ≥2.4 mg/kg Teliso-V once every 3 weeks (n = 24). The most common adverse events were fatigue (54%), peripheral neuropathy (42%), and nausea (38%). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed for Teliso-V once every 2 weeks and once every 3 weeks up to 2.2 and 2.7 mg/kg, respectively. The recommended phase II dose was established at 1.9 mg/kg once every 2 weeks and 2.7 mg/kg once every 3 weeks on the basis of overall safety and pharmacokinetics. Forty of 52 patients were c-Met+ (33 nonsquamous, 6 squamous, 1 mixed histology) and were included in the efficacy-evaluable population. Of those, 9 (23%) had objective responses with median duration of response of 8.7 months; median progression-free survival was 5.2 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Teliso-V monotherapy was tolerated and showed antitumor activity in c-Met+ NSCLC. On the basis of overall safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy outcomes, 1.9 mg/kg Teliso-V once every 2 weeks and 2.7 mg/kg once every 3 weeks schedules were selected for further clinical development.

Biomarker-Directed Phase II Platform Study in Patients With EGFR Sensitizing Mutation-Positive Advanced/Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Whose Disease Has Progressed on First-Line Osimertinib Therapy (ORCHARD)

INTRODUCTION

Osimertinib, a third-generation, irreversible, epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), selectively inhibits both EGFR-TKI sensitizing (EGFRm) and EGFR T790M resistance mutations and has demonstrated efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) CNS metastases. Most patients with EGFRm NSCLC treated with osimertinib will eventually develop resistance. ORCHARD (NCT03944772) is a phase II study aiming to characterize first-line osimertinib resistance and identify post-progression treatments.

METHODS

Adults aged ≥ 18 years (Japan ≥ 20 years), with EGFRm locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC will be allocated to one of three groups after first-line osimertinib progression, based on molecular profiling from a post-progression tumor biopsy. Group A will evaluate patients with protocol-determined biomarkers of resistance treated with novel osimertinib combination therapies, Group B will evaluate patients without a detectable protocol-determined biomarker treated with non-biomarker selected therapies that are chemotherapy- or EGFR-TKI-based, and Group C (observational) includes patients with histologically transformed disease, and/or a biomarker with an available therapy not investigated in ORCHARD. Group C patients will be treated as per local practice and followed to assess overall survival. The study's platform design allows for adaptability to include emerging treatments related to novel resistance mechanisms. The primary endpoint is confirmed objective response rate (investigator assessed). Other endpoints are progression-free survival, duration of response, overall survival, pharmacokinetics and safety.

CONCLUSIONS

ORCHARD aims to characterize mechanisms of resistance to first-line osimertinib and explore treatments to overcome acquired resistance. The modular design allows for additional biomarker-directed cohorts and treatment options as understanding of osimertinib resistance mechanisms evolves.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor induced thyroid dysfunction is a frequent event post-treatment in NSCLC

INTRODUCTION

Thyroid dysfunction is the most frequent endocrine immune related adverse event (irAE) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), typically arising 3-6 months into immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy, but arising after ICI cessation, in some cases. Due to limited post-treatment adverse event reporting requirements on ICI trials, the incidence of ICI-induced thyroid dysfunction arising after therapy is unclear. We investigated ICI-induced thyroid dysfunction in a cohort of 294 NSCLC patients, with a specific focus on the post-treatment setting.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of ICI-induced thyroid dysfunction (clinically acted upon or laboratory only) was performed in 294 UCLA NSCLC patients treated 2012-2018. Clinically acted upon thyroid dysfunction was defined as thyroid diagnosis documentation and/or thyroid medication administration. Laboratory only dysfunction was defined as abnormal thyroid labs in the absence of clinical action. Timing of thyroid dysfunction relative to ICI treatment and thyroid monitoring patterns were also assessed.

RESULTS

82% (241/294) of ICI treated NSCLC patients had thyroid labs during treatment. Of these 241 patients, 13% (31/241) had clinically acted upon thyroid dysfunction prior to, 8% (18/241) during, and 4% (9/241) after ICI. Most patients, 66% (159/241), did not have thyroid labs after ICI, but in the 53 patients with labs and no prior clinical dysfunction, 17% (9/53) developed clinical dysfunction after ICI. In these 9 patients, median time from ICI initiation to dysfunction was 253 days. Two patients with post-treatment laboratory only dysfunction were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

ICI-induced thyroid dysfunction arising post-treatment appears more common than previously appreciated, warranting additional evaluation.