Comprehensive Molecular and Clinicopathologic Analysis of 200 Pulmonary Invasive Mucinous Adenocarcinomas Identifies Distinct Characteristics of Molecular Subtypes

PURPOSE

Invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (IMA) is a unique subtype of lung adenocarcinoma, characterized genomically by frequent KRAS mutations or specific gene fusions, most commonly involving NRG1. Comprehensive analysis of a large series of IMAs using broad DNA- and RNA-sequencing methods is still lacking, and it remains unclear whether molecular subtypes of IMA differ clinicopathologically.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

A total of 200 IMAs were analyzed by 410-gene DNA next-generation sequencing (MSK-IMPACT; n = 136) or hotspot 8-oncogene genotyping (n = 64). Driver-negative cases were further analyzed by 62-gene RNA sequencing (MSK-Fusion) and those lacking fusions were further tested by whole-exome sequencing and whole-transcriptome sequencing (WTS).

RESULTS

Combined MSK-IMPACT and MSK-Fusion testing identified mutually exclusive driver alterations in 96% of IMAs, including KRAS mutations (76%), NRG1 fusions (7%), ERBB2 alterations (6%), and other less common events. In addition, WTS identified a novel NRG2 fusion (F11R-NRG2). Overall, targetable gene fusions were identified in 51% of KRAS wild-type IMAs, leading to durable responses to targeted therapy in some patients. Compared with KRAS-mutant IMAs, NRG1-rearranged tumors exhibited several more aggressive characteristics, including worse recurrence-free survival (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest molecular study of IMAs to date, where we demonstrate the presence of a major oncogenic driver in nearly all cases. This study is the first to document more aggressive characteristics of NRG1-rearranged IMAs, ERBB2 as the third most common alteration, and a novel NRG2 fusion in these tumors. Comprehensive molecular testing of KRAS wild-type IMAs that includes fusion testing is essential, given the high prevalence of alterations with established and investigational targeted therapies in this subset.

The Common Thread: A Case of Synchronous Lung Cancers and a Germline CHEK2 Mutation

Patients with one form of cancer are at increased risk for another, and this is true for lung cancer, where synchronous primary lung cancers are an increasing multifaceted challenge.^1,2 Here, we present the case of a middle age woman who was found to have bilateral lung masses. Biopsy and subsequent testing revealed unique synchronous lung adenocarcinomas, each with unique genetic signatures. Despite having two unique tumors, she was found to have CHEK2 mutations in both tumors and in germline testing. Because of this extensive testing that showed unique tumors, she was ultimately diagnosed with stage IIIb and IA2 lung cancers, and this changed her treatment options. Consideration of unique primary tumors leads to thorough diagnostics, which changed this patient's diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. We hope this case raises awareness for multiple primary tumors, as well as CHEK2 as an important oncogene.

Phase II two-arm study of tepotinib plus osimertinib in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC and acquired resistance to first-line osimertinib due to MET amplification: INSIGHT 2

TPS9136

Background: METamp is a mechanism of acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). METamp occurs in ̃30% of patients who progress on EGFR TKI therapy as measured using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). There is an unmet need for targeted treatment options in these patients. Combination treatment with a MET TKI may overcome MET-related osimertinib resistance. Tepotinib is an oral, once daily (QD), highly selective, potent MET TKI. In the INSIGHT study (NCT01982955), the combination of tepotinib and the EGFR TKI gefitinib improved outcomes in patients with EGFR-mutant METamp NSCLC and EGFR TKI resistance compared to chemotherapy (INSIGHT). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 16.6 vs 4.2 months (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.13; 90% confidence interval [CI]: 0.04, 0.43) and median overall survival (OS) was 37.3 vs 13.1 months (HR = 0.08; 90% CI: 0.01, 0.51). Methods: INSIGHT 2 is a global, open-label, Phase II trial of tepotinib + osimertinib in patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Following a protocol amendment in Apr 2020, the study is enrolling patients with acquired resistance to 1L osimertinib (radiological documentation of disease progression following previous objective clinical benefit) due to METamp by FISH (GCN ≥5 or MET/CEP7 ratio ≥2). Patients must be ≥18 years old, have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0/1, and normal organ function. Both tissue and liquid biopsy, obtained at the time of progression to osimertinib, will be sent for central confirmation of METamp. Liquid biopsy samples will also be used for exploratory biomarker evaluation. Enrollment is allowed based on local FISH testing while awaiting central confirmation of METamp. Patients will receive 500 mg QD (450 mg active moiety) tepotinib + 80 mg QD osimertinib until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. The study is anticipated to enroll 120 patients. The primary endpoint is objective response rate (ORR) by independent review (RECIST v1.1) in patients with METamp, centrally confirmed by FISH. Secondary endpoints include ORR by investigator assessment, duration of response, disease control, PFS, OS, pharmacokinetics, health-related quality of life, tolerability, and safety. An exploratory tepotinib monotherapy arm will enroll 12 patients to assess the contribution of tepotinib to the activity of the combination. At progression (determined by independent review committee), monotherapy patients can switch to combination treatment. These patients will be analyzed separately. Recruitment is ongoing, with > 300 patients prescreened. Approximately 100 sites in 17 countries in Europe, Asia, and North America are expected to participate. Approximately 15 sites will recruit patients in the US. Clinical trial information: NCT03940703.

Amivantamab in combination with lazertinib for the treatment of osimertinib-relapsed, chemotherapy-naïve EGFR mutant (EGFRm) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and potential biomarkers for response

9006

Background: Preliminary efficacy was observed with the combination of amivantamab, an EGFR-MET bispecific antibody, and lazertinib, a 3rd-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in both treatment-naïve and osimertinib (osi)-relapsed patients (pts) with EGFRm NSCLC (Cho Ann Oncol 2020;31:S813). We present updated results of the combination in osi-relapsed pts, including an analysis of potential biomarkers of response. Methods: Pts with EGFR exon 19 deletion or L858R mutation NSCLC, who had progressed on osi without intervening chemotherapy, were enrolled in the combination cohort of the ongoing CHRYSALIS study (NCT02609776). With pre-treatment tumor biopsies and ctDNA collected prospectively, pts received the combination dose of 1050/1400 mg amivantamab + 240 mg lazertinib to assess safety and efficacy in the osi-relapsed population. Response was assessed by investigator per RECIST v1.1. Osi-resistance mutations or amplifications in EGFR/MET identified by next-generation sequencing (NGS) in either ctDNA or tumor biopsy (biomarker-positive [pos]), were evaluated for enriching response. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining for EGFR and MET expression was also explored as a potential biomarker for response. Results: Of the 45 osi-relapsed pts, 36% (95% CI, 22–51) had a confirmed response (1 complete response and 15 partial responses [PR]). At a median follow-up of 8.2 mo (1.0–11.8), 20/45 pts (44%) remain on treatment. With 11/16 pts (69%) continuing in response (2.6–9.6+ mo), median duration of response has not been reached (NR). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 4.9 mo (95% CI, 3.7–8.3). In total, 44/45 pts were evaluable by ctDNA and 29/45 by tumor NGS. Genetic testing identified 17 biomarker-pos pts, of whom 8 (47%) responded. Of the remaining 28 pts, 8 (29%) responded. Among these 28 pts, 18 had unknown mechanisms of osi-resistance (8 PR) and 10 had non-EGFR/MET mechanisms of resistance identified (none responded). The mPFS (95% CI) for biomarker-pos and remaining pts was 6.7 mo (3.4–NR) and 4.1 mo (1.4–9.5), respectively. Adequate tissue was available for 20 pts to perform IHC testing for EGFR and MET–9/10 (90%) IHC high (combined EGFR+MET H score>400) pts responded to treatment, while 1/10 IHC low pts responded to treatment. Conclusions: Treatment with the combination of amivantamab and lazertinib yielded responses in 36% of chemotherapy-naïve pts who progressed on osi. Among these pts, genetic EGFR and MET-based biomarkers of resistance identified a subgroup of pts more likely to respond to amivantamab and lazertinib, although additional pts lacking identified resistance markers also responded. An IHC-based approach may identify pts most likely to benefit from the combination regimen, but further investigation is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT02609776.

Dynamic Management of Lung Cancer Care During Surging COVID-19

Management of patients with lung cancer continues to be challenging during the COVID-19 pandemic, due to the increased risk of complications in this subset of patients. During the COVID-19 surge in New York City, New York University Langone Health adopted triage strategies to help with care for lung cancer patients, with good surgical outcomes and no transmission of COVID-19 to patients or healthcare workers. Here, we will review current recommendations regarding screening and management of lung cancer patients during both a non-surge phase and surge phase of COVID-19.

KRYSTAL-2: A phase I/II trial of adagrasib (MRTX849) in combination with TNO155 in patients with advanced solid tumors with KRAS G12C mutation

TPS146

Background: KRAS is the most frequently mutated oncogene in cancer and a key mediator of the RAS/MAPK signaling cascade that promotes cellular growth and proliferation. KRAS G12C tumor mutations occur in approximately 14% of patients with lung adenocarcinoma and 3-4% of colorectal adenocarinoma. SHP2 is a phosphatase that acts as a key mediator of signaling from receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) to downstream RAS/MAPK pathways. Adagrasib (MRTX849) is a specific small-molecule investigational inhibitor of KRAS G12C that covalently binds to and locks mutant KRAS in its GDP-bound inactive form. Adagrasib has been optimized for a long half-life and extensive tissue distribution to enable inhibition throughout the entire dosing interval. Preliminary results from a Phase 1/2 study of adagrasib demonstrated promising antitumor activity and tolerability across multiple KRAS G12C tumor types. TNO155 is a selective inhibitor of SHP2 with demonstrated inhibition of RTK signaling and significant antitumor activity in preclinical models. Preclinical studies have shown that resistance to KRAS G12C inhibition may be mediated by SHP2-dependent feedback loops. Because KRAS G12C retains some level of cycling between GTP- and GDP-bound states, KRAS G12C that is not bound by inhibitor can activate downstream signaling. Active SHP2 functions to increase the active state of RAS proteins (including mutant KRAS) and also increases ERK pathway activation. Therefore, the addition of TNO155 to adagrasib may augment antitumor activity and overcome resistance by inhibiting cycling to GTP-bound KRAS and/or through inhibition of feedback activation and more comprehensively inhibiting downstream ERK signaling. In KRAS G12C human tumor models, adagrasib combined with a SHP2 inhibitor demonstrated greater activity compared to each agent alone. These data provide support for clinical evaluation of this combination in KRAS G12C tumors. Methods: KRYSTAL-2 is a multicenter Phase 1/2 study evaluating adagrasib and TNO155 in patients with advanced solid tumors harboring a KRAS G12C mutation. Overall objectives of the trial include evaluating safety, tolerability, and PK. The Phase 1 portion will evaluate adagrasib and TNO155 utilizing a modified Toxicity Probability Interval dose escalation design to identify maximum tolerated dose and recommended Phase 2 dose. The Phase 2 portion utilizes a Simon's optimal two-stage design to evaluate the clinical activity of adagrasib with TNO155 in 2 cohorts of up to 108 patients—CRC (54 patients) and NSCLC (54 patients). Efficacy endpoints include Objective Response Rate (RECIST 1.1), Duration of Response (DOR), Progression-free Survival (PFS), and Overall Survival (OS). The study is currently enrolling and patients will receive study treatment until disease progression, unacceptable adverse events, patient withdrawal, or death. Clinical trial information: NCT04330664.

Progression free survival (PFS) in Asian vs non-Asian patients (pts) with EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving osimertinib

e21679

Background: Third generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) osimertinib demonstrated superior PFS and OS compared to earlier generation TKIs in pts with EGFR+ NSCLC. These pts are disproportionately Asian, female, and never-smokers. Contradictory data has been reported regarding the PFS and OS to osimertinib in Asian pts as compared to 1st and 2nd generation EGFR TKI. These inconsistencies warrant further investigation. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the PFS in Asian vs non-Asian pts with EGFR+ NSCLC receiving osimertinib. Methods: We conducted a single institution IRB approved retrospective study of pts with EGFR+ NSCLC. PFS was evaluated in pts treated from 1/2013 – 12/2019. Disease and treatment characteristics were summarized using frequency distributions and Kaplan-Meier curves for comparison of subgroups. Results: Of 190 EGFR+ pts: 52 (27%) Asian, 108 (57%) Caucasian, 125 (66%) female, 172 (91%) advanced disease, 107 (56%) never-smokers. Baseline characteristics in Asian and non-Asian pts were similar in regards to de-novo stage IV disease (71% vs 65%, p = 0.80), brain metastases (42% vs 54%, p = 0.48), and differed with regards to ever-smoking (29% vs 56%, p = 0.04). Treatment: 126/172 (73%) pts with advanced disease received TKI across all lines of therapy; 92/126 received osimertinib (22 (24%) 1st line; 45 (49%) 2nd line; 18 (19%) 3rd line; 7 (8%) ≥4th line). There were insufficient number of pts who received osimertinib in the 1st line to comment on differences in PFS between Asian and non-Asian pts. In the 2nd line, 19 Asian pts and 26 non-Asian pts received osimertinib, with no observed difference in PFS (median 15.4 v 13.8 months, p = 0.20). Moreover, Asian pts who received osimertinib as second line therapy had superior PFS (median 15.4 vs 9.6 months, p < 0.01) compared to Asian pts who received earlier generation TKIs, likely due to T790M resistance. Conclusions: Among second line advanced EGFR+ NSCLC, we did not observe a difference in PFS between Asian and non-Asian pts treated with osimertinib. Median PFS in Asian pts treated with osimertinib was longer compared to those treated with 1st or 2nd generation TKIs in the 2nd line setting. Our study highlights the the role of ethnic background in response to EGFR therapies and may warrant further study.

Amivantamab (JNJ-61186372), an anti-EGFR-MET bispecific antibody, in patients with EGFR exon 20 insertion (exon20ins)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

9512

Background: EGFR exon20ins-mutated NSCLC is generally refractory to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and is associated with poor prognosis. Amivantamab (JNJ-61186372) is a novel, fully human anti-EGFR-MET bispecific antibody whose mechanism of action can target both EGFR- and MET-driven disease and has shown monotherapy activity in patients (pts) with diverse EGFR mutant disease characterized by EGFR C797S, T790M, exon20ins, and MET amplification. We present preliminary results of pts with advanced NSCLC harboring exon20ins mutations from CHRYSALIS, an ongoing phase 1 study of amivantamab (NCT02609776). Methods: This study comprises a dose escalation phase in pts with advanced NSCLC and a dose expansion phase in pts with EGFR- and MET-mutated disease. This analysis includes all enrolled pts with exon20ins disease who received the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of 1050 mg (1400 mg, pts ≥80 kg) amivantamab. Response was assessed by investigator per RECIST v1.1. Results: As of 30 Oct 2019, 50 pts with exon20ins mutations had received amivantamab at the RP2D. 39/50 pts were response-evaluable and had ≥2 disease assessments or had discontinued therapy prior to the assessment period; among these pts, 29 had prior platinum-based chemotherapy (PBCT). Median age for response-evaluable pts was 61 y (40–78), 51% were female, and median prior lines was 1 (0–7). In the 50 pts harboring exon20ins mutations treated at the RP2D, the most common adverse events (AEs) reported were rash (72%), infusion related reaction (60%), and paronychia (34%). Additional EGFR-related AEs included stomatitis (16%), pruritus (14%), and diarrhea (6%). Grade ≥3 AEs were reported in 36% of pts; 6% were treatment-related. One grade 3 diarrhea and no grade ≥3 rash was reported. Among the 39 response-evaluable pts, with a median follow-up of 4 months (1–26), the overall response rate (≥partial response [PR]) was 36% (95% CI, 21–53), and 41% (95% CI, 24–61) for the 29 pts who had prior PBCT. The clinical benefit rate (≥PR or stable disease ≥11 weeks) was 67% for response-evaluable pts and 72% for pts who had prior PBCT. Among all 14 responders, median duration of response was 10 months (1–16), with ongoing responses in 9 pts at data cutoff. Median progression-free survival was 8.3 months (95% CI, 3.0–14.8) for response-evaluable pts and 8.6 months (95% CI, 3.7–14.8) for pts who had prior PBCT. Conclusions: Amivantamab demonstrates robust and durable antitumor activity in pts with exon20ins disease, with a manageable safety profile. Clinical trial information: NCT02609776 .

A Prospective Study of Circulating Tumor DNA to Guide Matched Targeted Therapy in Lung Cancers

BACKGROUND

Liquid biopsy for plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) next-generation sequencing (NGS) is commercially available and increasingly adopted in clinical practice despite a paucity of prospective data to support its use.

METHODS

Patients with advanced lung cancers who had no known oncogenic driver or developed resistance to current targeted therapy (n = 210) underwent plasma NGS, targeting 21 genes. A subset of patients had concurrent tissue NGS testing using a 468-gene panel (n = 106). Oncogenic driver detection, test turnaround time (TAT), concordance, and treatment response guided by plasma NGS were measured. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

Somatic mutations were detected in 64.3% (135/210) of patients. ctDNA detection was lower in patients who were on systemic therapy at the time of plasma collection compared with those who were not (30/70, 42.9% vs 105/140, 75.0%; OR = 0.26, 95% CI = 0.1 to 0.5, P < .001). The median TAT of plasma NGS was shorter than tissue NGS (9 vs 20 days; P < .001). Overall concordance, defined as the proportion of patients for whom at least one identical genomic alteration was identified in both tissue and plasma, was 56.6% (60/106, 95% CI = 46.6% to 66.2%). Among patients who tested plasma NGS positive, 89.6% (60/67; 95% CI = 79.7% to 95.7%) were also concordant on tissue NGS and 60.6% (60/99; 95% CI = 50.3% to 70.3%) vice versa. Patients who tested plasma NGS positive for oncogenic drivers had tissue NGS concordance of 96.1% (49/51, 95% CI = 86.5% to 99.5%), and directly led to matched targeted therapy in 21.9% (46/210) with clinical response.

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma ctDNA NGS detected a variety of oncogenic drivers with a shorter TAT compared with tissue NGS and matched patients to targeted therapy with clinical response. Positive findings on plasma NGS were highly concordant with tissue NGS and can guide immediate therapy; however, a negative finding in plasma requires further testing. Our findings support the potential incorporation of plasma NGS into practice guidelines.

PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden, and response to immunotherapy in patients with MET exon 14 altered lung cancers

Background

MET exon 14 alterations are actionable oncogenic drivers. Durable responses to MET inhibitors are observed in patients with advanced MET exon 14-altered lung cancers in prospective trials. In contrast, the activity of immunotherapy, PD-L1 expression and tumor mutational burden (TMB) of these tumors and are not well characterized.

Patients and methods

Patients with MET exon 14-altered lung cancers of any stage treated at two academic institutions were identified. A review of clinicopathologic and molecular features, and an analysis of response to single-agent or combination immune checkpoint inhibition were conducted. PD-L1 immunohistochemistry was carried out and TMB was calculated by estimation from targeted next-generation sequencing panels.

Results

We identified 147 patients with MET exon 14-altered lung cancers. PD-L1 expression of 0%, 1%-49%, and ≥50% were 37%, 22%, and 41%, respectively, in 111 evaluable tumor samples. The median TMB of MET exon 14-altered lung cancers was lower than that of unselected non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) in both independently evaluated cohorts: 3.8 versus 5.7 mutations/megabase (P < 0.001, n = 78 versus 1769, cohort A), and 7.3 versus 11.8 mutations/megabase (P < 0.001, n = 62 versus 1100, cohort B). There was no association between PD-L1 expression and TMB (Spearman's rho=0.18, P = 0.069). In response-evaluable patients (n = 24), the objective response rate was 17% (95% CI 6% to 36%) and the median progression-free survival was 1.9 months (95% CI 1.7-2.7). Responses were not enriched in tumors with PD-L1 expression ≥50% nor high TMB.

Conclusion

A substantial proportion of MET exon 14-altered lung cancers express PD-L1, but the median TMB is lower compared with unselected NSCLCs. Occasional responses to PD-1 blockade can be achieved, but overall clinical efficacy is modest.

JNJ-61186372 (JNJ-372), an EGFR-cMet bispecific antibody, in EGFR-driven advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

9009

Background: JNJ-372 binds EGFR and cMet to block ligand binding, promote receptor degradation, and trigger antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity in models of EGFR-mutated (EGFRm) NSCLC. Here we describe the ongoing phase 1 safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and activity of JNJ-372 in patients (pts) with NSCLC, including 3rd generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (3GTKI)-relapsed EGFRm NSCLC and EGFR Exon20ins disease. Methods: Pts received JNJ-372 (140–1400 mg) IV weekly for the first 28-day cycle and biweekly thereafter. 1050–1400 mg doses are being explored in dose expansion. Blood samples were collected for PK analyses. Efficacy by investigator per RECIST v1.1 in pts with EGFRm NSCLC treated at ≥700 mg is presented. Tumors were characterized by next-generation sequencing of circulating tumor (ct)DNA and/or tumor tissue. Results: As of 17 Jan 2019, 116 enrolled pts with NSCLC were treated. Median age was 63 years, 38% were male, 77% were Asian, and 97% had EGFR mutations. Mean duration of treatment was 3.8 months, longest exposure was 20 cycles. The PK data set included pts from Korea (77%) and the US (23%). At the 1050 mg dose, 72% of pts achieved average concentrations above the EC90 based on preclinical models. Adverse events (AEs; ≥20%) were rash (59%), infusion related reaction (58%), paronychia (28%), and constipation (22%). Additional EGFR/cMet-related AEs include stomatitis (17%), pruritis (15%), peripheral edema (11%), and diarrhea (7%). Grade ≥3 AEs were reported in 34% (8% treatment-related) with dyspnea (6%) and pneumonia (3%) most frequently observed. Among response-evaluable pts, 25/88 (28%) achieved best timepoint response of partial response (PR). 10/47 pts with prior 3GTKI therapy had best timepoint response of PR (6 confirmed), including 4 with C797S, 1 with cMet amplification, and 5 without identifiable EGFR/cMet-dependent resistance. 6/20 pts with Exon20ins had best timepoint response of PR (3 confirmed). Conclusions: JNJ-372 has a manageable safety profile consistent with EGFR and cMet inhibition. Preliminary responses were achieved in 3GTKI-relapsed disease, including C797S and cMet amplification, and Exon20ins disease; enrollment in dose expansion is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02609776.

Afatinib in patients with metastatic or recurrent HER2-mutant lung cancers: a retrospective international multicentre study

INTRODUCTION

HER2 mutations occur in 1-3% of lung adenocarcinomas. With increasing use of next-generation sequencing at diagnosis, more patients with HER2-mutant tumours present for treatment. Few data are available to describe the clinical course and outcomes of these patients when treated with afatinib, a pan-HER inhibitor.

METHODS

We identified patients with metastatic or recurrent HER2-mutant lung adenocarcinomas treated with afatinib among seven institutions across Europe, Australia, and North America between 2009 and 2017. We determined the partial response rate to afatinib, types of HER2 mutations, duration of response, time on treatment, and survival.

RESULTS

We collected information on 27 patients with stage IV or recurrent HER2-mutant lung adenocarcinomas treated with afatinib. Of 23 patients evaluable for response, three partial responses were noted (13%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4-33%). In addition, 57% of patients (13/23) had stable disease, and 30% (7/23) had progressive disease. We documented partial responses in patients with HER2 exon 20 insertions, including two with YVMA insertion and one with VAG insertion. Two patients with partial responses were previously treated with trastuzumab and pertuzumab. Median duration of response to afatinib was 6 months (range 5-10); median time on treatment was 3 months (range 1-30) and median overall survival from the date of diagnosis of metastatic or recurrent disease was 23 months (95% CI 18-53 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Afatinib is modestly active in patients with HER2-mutant lung adenocarcinomas, including responses after progression on prior HER2-targeted therapies. However, investigations into the biology of HER2-mutant lung adenocarcinomas and development of better HER2-directed therapies are warranted.

Activation of KRAS Mediates Resistance to Targeted Therapy in MET Exon 14-mutant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

MET exon 14 splice site alterations that cause exon skipping at the mRNA level (METex14) are actionable oncogenic drivers amenable to therapy with MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI); however, secondary resistance eventually arises in most cases while other tumors display primary resistance. Beyond relatively uncommon on-target MET kinase domain mutations, mechanisms underlying primary and acquired resistance remain unclear.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We examined clinical and genomic data from 113 patients with lung cancer with METex14. MET TKI resistance due to KRAS mutation was functionally evaluated using in vivo and in vitro models.

RESULTS

Five of 113 patients (4.4%) with METex14 had concurrent KRAS G12 mutations, a rate of KRAS cooccurrence significantly higher than in other major driver-defined lung cancer subsets. In one patient, the KRAS mutation was acquired post-crizotinib, while the remaining 4 METex14 patients harbored the KRAS mutation prior to MET TKI therapy. Gene set enrichment analysis of transcriptomic data from lung cancers with METex14 revealed preferential activation of the KRAS pathway. Moreover, expression of oncogenic KRAS enhanced MET expression. Using isogenic and patient-derived models, we show that KRAS mutation results in constitutive activation of RAS/ERK signaling and resistance to MET inhibition. Dual inhibition of MET or EGFR/ERBB2 and MEK reduced growth of cell line and xenograft models.

CONCLUSIONS

KRAS mutation is a recurrent mechanism of primary and secondary resistance to MET TKIs in METex14 lung cancers. Dual inhibition of MET or EGFR/ERBB2 and MEK may represent a potential therapeutic approach in this molecular cohort.

Impact of Baseline Steroids on Efficacy of Programmed Cell Death-1 and Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Blockade in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Treatment with programmed cell death-1 or programmed death ligand 1 (PD-(L)1) inhibitors is now standard therapy for patients with lung cancer. The immunosuppressive effect of corticosteroids may reduce efficacy of PD-(L)1 blockade. On-treatment corticosteroids for treatment of immune-related adverse events do not seem to affect efficacy, but the potential impact of baseline corticosteroids at the time of treatment initiation is unknown. Clinical trials typically excluded patients who received baseline corticosteroids, which led us to use real-world data to examine the effect of corticosteroids at treatment initiation.

METHODS

We identified patients who were PD-(L)1-naïve with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer from two institutions-Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Gustave Roussy Cancer Center-who were treated with single-agent PD-(L)1 blockade. Clinical and pharmacy records were reviewed to identify corticosteroid use at the time of beginning anti-PD-(L)1 therapy. We performed multivariable analyses using Cox proportional hazards regression model and logistic regression.

RESULTS

Ninety (14%) of 640 patients treated with single-agent PD-(L)1 blockade received corticosteroids of ≥ 10 mg of prednisone equivalent daily at the start of the PD-(L)1 blockade. Common indications for corticosteroids were dyspnea (33%), fatigue (21%), and brain metastases (19%). In both independent cohorts, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (n = 455) and Gustave Roussy Cancer Center (n = 185), baseline corticosteroids were associated with decreased overall response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival with PD-(L)1 blockade. In a multivariable analysis of the pooled population, adjusting for smoking history, performance status, and history of brain metastases, baseline corticosteroids remained significantly associated with decreased progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 1.3; P = .03), and overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.7; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Baseline corticosteroid use of ≥ 10 mg of prednisone equivalent was associated with poorer outcome in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer who were treated with PD-(L)1 blockade. Prudent use of corticosteroids at the time of initiating PD-(L)1 blockade is recommended.

Abstract 1826: Oncogenic KRAS mediates resistance to MET targeted therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with MET mutations that induce exon14 skipping

Mutations in MET that induce skipping of exon 14 and lead to reduced ubiquitin ligase-mediated turnover of this receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) are detected in 3-4% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), approaching the prevalence of ALK-rearranged lung cancers. Preclinical and clinical studies have revealed that MET exon14 alterations are actionable oncogenic drivers that are amenable to therapy with MET kinase inhibitors such as crizotinib. However, similar to most kinase-driven cancers, despite initial benefit, acquired resistance to therapy is inevitable. Next-generation sequencing (MSK-IMPACT 468 gene panel) was performed on samples from 81 NSCLC patients with MET exon14 alterations, including 7 with paired pre- and post-treatment tumor samples. A concurrent KRAS G12 mutation was identified in 5 patients. In 4 of these patients, the KRAS mutation was present prior to receiving crizotinib. The KRAS mutation was acquired post-crizotinib in the remaining patient. These findings implicate KRAS activation as a potential mechanism of acquired resistance. Using isogenic and patient-derived in vitro and in vivo models harboring MET exon14 skipping alteration, we confirmed that the KRAS mutation results in constitutive activation of RAS/ERK signaling and cells expressing both MET exon14 skipping and KRAS mutations are refractory to MET inhibition. Dual inhibition of MET and MEK with crizotinib and trametinib, respectively, has an additive effect in cell line and xenograft models. Whereas concurrent KRAS mutation is an extremely rare event in EGFR- and ALK-driven NSCLC, our findings confirm KRAS mutation as a recurrent mechanism of primary or secondary resistance to MET-directed therapies in lung cancers harboring MET exon14 alterations. We provide a new potential therapeutic strategy for NSCLC patients with both MET exon14 alterations and KRAS mutations.

Citation Format: Ken Suzawa, Michael D. Offin, Christopher Kurzatkowski, Daniel Liu, Morana Vojnic, Roger S. Smith, Marissa Mattar, Inna Khodos, Elisa de Stanchina, Joshua K. Sabari, William W. Lockwood, Alexander E. Drilon, Marc Ladanyi, Romel Somwar. Oncogenic KRAS mediates resistance to MET targeted therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with MET mutations that induce exon14 skipping [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1826.

Next-generation sequencing based detection of germline and somatic alterations in a patient with four metachronous primary tumors

INTRODUCTION

Multiple primary tumors (MPTs) are defined as two or more separate synchronous or metachronous neoplasms occurring in different sites in the same individual. These tumors differ in histology, as well as primary sites from which they arise. Risk factors associated with the occurrence of MPTs include germline alterations, exposure to prior cancer therapies, occupational hazards, and lifestyle and behavioral influences.

CASE REPORT

We present a case of a patient who was diagnosed with four metachronous primary tumors. In 2013, she was diagnosed with serous proliferations associated with psammomatous bodies of primary peritoneal origin (pT3NxM0). This was followed by invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast (stage pT2N0Mx, histological grade III/III) in 2014, melanoma (stage pT2bNxMx) in 2016 that further advanced to the lung and brain in 2017, and a low-grade lung carcinoid in 2017. To better understand the biology of this patient's MPTs, we performed next-generation sequencing (NGS) to assess for both somatic and germline alterations. The treatment course for this patient aims to target the tumor with the strongest prognostic value, namely her malignant melanoma, and has contributed favorably to the overall survival of this patient.

CONCLUSION

We report the clinical and genomic landscape of a patient with MPTs who had no identifiable unique somatic or germline mutations to explain her predilection to cancer. The treatment course and overall prognosis for this patient is important for understanding future cases with unrelated, metachronous MPTs, the occurrence of which cannot always be explained by underlying genetic mechanisms.

Relevance of genetic alterations in squamous and small cell lung cancer

The precision medicine revolution has led to the development and US FDA approval of multiple targeted therapies in non-squamous non-small cell lung cancers, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting EGFR, ALK, and ROS1. However, the development of targeted therapies for squamous cell lung cancers (SQCLCs) and small cell lung cancers (SCLCs) has lagged behind and the mainstay of systemic therapy for most patients with metastatic disease remains chemotherapy; which has seen little meaningful progress over the past three decades. The ideal of precision medicine in these diseases may appear elusive; however, recent comprehensive genomic analysis of SQCLC and SCLC has led to multiple breakthroughs in our understanding of the biology of these diseases and has led to new therapeutic approaches currently under active clinical investigation. This review will focus on the therapeutic relevance of these alterations in their respective diseases and new insights into promising therapeutics currently under investigation.

Unravelling the biology of SCLC: implications for therapy

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive malignancy associated with a poor prognosis. First-line treatment has remained unchanged for decades, and a paucity of effective treatment options exists for recurrent disease. Nonetheless, advances in our understanding of SCLC biology have led to the development of novel experimental therapies. Poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have shown promise in preclinical models, and are under clinical investigation in combination with cytotoxic therapies and inhibitors of cell-cycle checkpoints.Preclinical data indicate that targeting of histone-lysine N-methyltransferase EZH2, a regulator of chromatin remodelling implicated in acquired therapeutic resistance, might augment and prolong chemotherapy responses. High expression of the inhibitory Notch ligand Delta-like protein 3 (DLL3) in most SCLCs has been linked to expression of Achaete-scute homologue 1 (ASCL1; also known as ASH-1), a key transcription factor driving SCLC oncogenesis; encouraging preclinical and clinical activity has been demonstrated for an anti-DLL3-antibody-drug conjugate. The immune microenvironment of SCLC seems to be distinct from that of other solid tumours, with few tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes and low levels of the immune-checkpoint protein programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1). Nonetheless, immunotherapy with immune-checkpoint inhibitors holds promise for patients with this disease, independent of PD-L1 status. Herein, we review the progress made in uncovering aspects of the biology of SCLC and its microenvironment that are defining new therapeutic strategies and offering renewed hope for patients.

Liquid biopsy in the clinic: A prospective study of plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) next generation sequencing (NGS) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancers to match targeted therapy

11536

Background: Liquid biopsy for plasma ctDNA NGS is a rapidly evolving science. Plasma ctDNA assays are commercially available and are increasingly adopted in the community with a paucity of evidence-based guidance. We set out to study the optimal timing and utility of plasma ctDNA NGS in clinic. Methods: Pts with advanced NSCLC who were driver unknown, defined as not having prior tissue NGS or clinical concern for tumor heterogeneity that may affect treatment decisions, were eligible. Peripheral blood was collected in a Streck tube (10mL), DNA extracted, and subjected to a bias-corrected hybrid-capture 21 gene targeted NGS assay in a CLIA lab with unique reads at 3000x and sensitive detection at variant allele frequency above 0.1% (ResolutionBio Bellevue, WA). Pts also had concurrent tissue NGS via MSK IMPACT. Clinical endpoints included detection of oncogenic drivers in plasma, ability to match pts to targeted therapy, concordance and turnaround time of plasma and tissue NGS. Results: Forty-one pts were prospectively accrued. Plasma ctDNA detected an oncogenic driver in 39% (16/41) of pts, of whom 17% (7/41) were matched to targeted therapy; including pts matched to clinical trials for HER2 exon 20 insertionYVMA, BRAF L597Q and MET exon14. Mean turnaround time for plasma was 7 days (4-12) and 28 days (20-43) for tissue. Plasma ctDNA was detected in 56% (23/41) of pts; detection was 40% (8/20) if blood was drawn on active therapy and 71% (15/21) if drawn off therapy, either at diagnosis or progression (Odds ratio 0.28, 95% CI 0.06 - 1.16; p = 0.06). All pts had concurrent tissue NGS; of the 10 samples resulted, there was 100% driver concordance between tissue and plasma in pts drawn off therapy. Conclusions: In pts who were driver unknown or who had clinical concern for tumor heterogeneity, plasma ctDNA NGS identified a variety of oncogenic drivers with a short turnaround time and matched them to targeted therapy. Plasma ctDNA detection was more frequent at diagnosis of metastatic disease or at progression. A positive finding of an oncogenic driver in plasma is highly specific, but a negative finding may still require tissue biopsy.

Lung cancers with mutations in EGFR exon 18: Molecular characterization and clinical outcomes in response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors

9029

Background: Little data is available to guide clinical management of individuals with less common oncogenic drivers such as exon 18 mutations (ex18m) in EGFR. To better understand the impact of these rare mutations on treatment outcomes, we reviewed clinicopathologic data in patients (pts) with ex18m treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in EGFR-mutant lung cancers. Methods: Pts with EGFR ex18m were detected via molecular diagnostics using Sequenom™, FoundationOne™ or MSK IMPACT™ NGS testing from 2003-2016. We reviewed their clinical data for molecular alterations in EGFR, treatment outcomes in response to TKI (time on treatment) and median overall survival (OS). Results: We identified mutations in EGFR ex18m in 63 pts. Median age at diagnosis was 68; 63% were women; 29% never smokers. Overall, 74 ex18m were found in 63 pts, including: G719A = 38, G719S = 11, G719C = 8, E709K = 6, E709_T710delinsD = 6, E709A = 3, G719D = 2. E709 and G719 co-mutations in ex18 were found in 9 pts, and 1 pt was found to have 3 separate tumors, each with a distinct ex18m. 29/63 (46%) patients with ex18m had a co-occurring EGFR mutation: 9 with another ex18m; 20 with ex19-21m. Using our IMPACT NGS, the median number of co-mutations was 8 (range 1-17). Two out of 63 pts had a pre-treatment T790M mutation. The 25 pts with non-metastatic disease presented in the following stages: IA = 19; IB = 3; IIB = 1; IIIA = 2; IIIB = 2. 34/38 pts with metastatic disease were treated with the following first-line EGFR-TKIs: erlotinib = 28, afatinib = 5, osimertinib = 1. Median duration on TKI treatment in months was: erlotinib = 10 mo, (range 1-25), afatinib = 3 mo (range 2-9), osimertinib = 4 mo. Median OS from the date of diagnosis of metastatic disease was 22 months (95% CI 18-29). In comparison, a similar cohort of pts with sensitizing EGFR exon19del/L858R mutations had a median OS of 31 months (95% CI 28-33) (Naidoo Cancer2015). Conclusions: Almost half of ex18m occur concurrently with another EGFR mutation. Overall, ex18m pts have a shorter median OS when compared to similar patient cohorts. EGFR-TKIs appear to be an effective treatment for pts with ex18m in EGFR-mutant lung cancers.