Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immune checkpoint inhibitor-related adverse events

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are the standard of care for the treatment of several cancers. While these immunotherapies have improved patient outcomes in many clinical settings, they bring accompanying risks of toxicity, specifically immune-related adverse events (irAEs). There is a need for clear, effective guidelines for the management of irAEs during ICI treatment, motivating the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) to convene an expert panel to develop a clinical practice guideline. The panel discussed the recognition and management of single and combination ICI irAEs and ultimately developed evidence- and consensus-based recommendations to assist medical professionals in clinical decision-making and to improve outcomes for patients.

Using the tumor microenvironment to identify predictors of immunotoxicity to checkpoint inhibitors

2545

Background: While Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized the field of oncology, the benefits have come at the cost of serious side effects known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Approaches that can predict patients’ susceptibility to irAEs are key to their early detection and management. In the present study, we investigate the association between irAEs reported during ICI therapy across multiple cancer types and markers of tumor immune response. Our primary objective is to explore potential biomarkers for assessing patients’ risk of irAEs. Methods: 472 patients were evaluated who had tumor immune profiling performed paraffin embedded formalin fixed archival tumor biopsy samples using Omniseq Immune Report Card (IRC) and subsequently underwent ICI therapy. The IRC consisted of enumeration of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and TIL-associated genes by RNA-Seq, PD-L1 expression by IHC, and tumor mutational burden (TMB) by DNA-Seq. irAE type and grade were determined based on retrospective chart review. Fisher’s exact test was used to determined statistically significant associations between immune markers and irAE development. Results: Patients with lung (55%), ovarian (9%), and melanoma (5%) cancers constituted the majority of the cases. The median age of patients was 61, with 56% being female and 44% male. Most patients underwent treatment with (94%). irAEs developed in 36% of patients, with 2% of patients developing high-grade irAEs (Grade 3 or 4). Skin (11%), thyroid (10%), and GI (9%), were the most commonly affected organ systems. Increased TILs were associated with increased risk for any irAE (p = 0.04). A stronger association was noted in patients who underwent anti-PD-1/L1 monotherapy (p = 0.01) and/or in cases of lung cancer (p = 0.01). Interestingly, subanalyses by gender showed a statistically significant correlation between increased TILs and risk for any irAE in males (p = 0.006) but not in females (p = 0.63). High PD-L1 (defined as > 70% by IHC) was also significantly associated with increased risk for any irAE (p = 0.03). Subanalyses by gender and age again showed a similar association in females (p = 0.0002) and/or patients < 65 years (p = 0.04). high TMB and any irAE in female patients (p = 0.01) and in breast cancer cases (p = 0.03). On multivariate analysis, TILs by IHC appeared to be the strongest predictor of irAEs (p = 0.03). Conclusions: The tumor immune microenvironment (TME) has been shown to influence response to ICI, yet its association with irAEs has not been well studied. Our analysis sheds light on potential TME predictors for irAE in patients receiving ICI therapy. Further studies are needed to deepen our understanding of immune toxicity and to develop tools for identifying patients who are at risk.

ARTISTRY-1: Nemvaleukin alfa monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors

2513

Background: Nemvaleukin alfa (nemvaleukin, ALKS 4230) is a novel, engineered cytokine that selectively binds the intermediate-affinity interleukin-2 (IL-2) receptor complex to preferentially activate CD8+ T cells and natural killer cells with minimal expansion of regulatory T cells, designed to leverage antitumor effects of the IL-2 pathwaywhile mitigating potential toxicity that would limit use. Methods: ARTISTRY-1 (NCT02799095) is a phase 1/2 study. Parts A (dose escalation 0.1-10 µg/kg) and B (6 µg/kg [recommended phase 2 dose]) are monotherapy; pts receive intravenous nemvaleukin for 5 days every 14 or 21 days. In Part C, pts receive nemvaleukin (3 or 6 µg/kg) every 21 days in combination with pembrolizumab (200 mg on day 1). We present safety and antitumor activity (RECIST v1.1, iRECIST) data as of 12/02/2020. Results: In Part A, 39 pts received nemvaleukin. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed; maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Part B enrolled immune checkpoint inhibitor–pretreated pts into melanoma or renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cohorts. 18 pts with melanoma enrolled; 10 were evaluable, 2 (both with metastatic mucosal melanoma) achieved a partial response (PR; 1 unconfirmed). 24 pts with RCC enrolled; 1 of 16 evaluable pts achieved a PR (awaiting confirmation). 12 pts in each cohort continue on study. In Parts A and B, treatment-related adverse events in ≥40% included chills (74.4% and 52.4%, respectively) and pyrexia (74.4% and 47.6%, respectively). In Part C (83 evaluable pts), 12 objective responses (OR) were observed; an additional 5 pts had stable disease (SD) >6 months (1 pt with breast cancer, 2 with ovarian cancer, and 2 with non-small-cell lung cancer). Nemvaleukin did not demonstrate any additive toxicity to that already established with pembrolizumab alone. OR data are summarized in the table. Conclusions: Nemvaleukin was generally well tolerated and demonstrated antitumor activity as monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab. Pharmacodynamic studies to identify biomarkers are ongoing. Future research of monotherapy and combination therapy with nemvaleukin is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT02799095. [Table: see text]

Selection of the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) for subcutaneous nemvaleukin alfa: ARTISTRY-2

2552

Background: Nemvaleukin alfa (nemvaleukin, ALKS 4230) is a novel engineered cytokine that selectively binds the intermediate-affinity interleukin-2 receptor to preferentially activate CD8+ T and natural killer (NK) cells with minimal expansion of regulatory T cells (Tregs),designed for use as a cancer immunotherapy. ARTISTRY-2 (NCT03861793) is an ongoing phase 1/2 study evaluating the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PD) responses of subcutaneous (SC) nemvaleukin in combination with pembrolizumab in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. Methods: In phase 1, cohort-specific doses of SC nemvaleukin are administered on an every-7-day (q7d) or every-21-day (q21d) schedule during a 6-week monotherapy lead-in period, followed by combination with pembrolizumab 200 mg q21d. We present safety, PD effects, and preliminary clinical activity outcomes as of 12/02/2020. Results: 57 pts received nemvaleukin doses ranging from 0.3 mg to 6 mg q7d or 1 mg to 10 mg q21d. The most frequent tumor types (> 5 pts) were colorectal, pancreatic, ovarian, and lung; median number of prior therapies was 4. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) in > 30% pts overall were pyrexia (43.9%), chills (38.6%), injection site erythema (33.3%), injection site reaction (33.3%), and fatigue (31.6%). 3 mg q7d (n = 7) had no drug-related dose reductions, discontinuations, or deaths during the monotherapy or combination periods. 6 mg was declared the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for q7d dosing as 2 of 8 pts experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). For 6 mg q21d (n = 7), no drug-related dose reductions, discontinuations, or deaths have occurred during the monotherapy period; combination period data are not mature. 10 mg was declared the MTD for q21d dosing as 1 of 9 pts experienced DLTs and 3 had TRAEs leading to dose reductions. Systemic exposure to nemvaleukin increased with increasing dose. Increases in NK cells and CD8+ T cells of approximately 16-fold and 3-fold, respectively, at 3 mg q7d, and approximately 8-fold and 3-fold, respectively, at 6 mg q21d were observed, with minimal change in Tregs. 46 pts had at least 1 on-treatment scan as of the data cutoff date, and 30 (65%) had stable disease (SD) on the first scan. Of the 30 pts with ≥2 scans, 13 (43%) had 2+ consecutive scans of SD. 16 of 57 pts remain on therapy. Antitumor activity data for more recent cohorts are still maturing. Based on the totality of the safety, PD effects, and antitumor activity data, 3 mg q7d was selected as the RP2D for SC nemvaleukin. Conclusions: SC nemvaleukin 3 mg q7d was generally well tolerated as monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab, and demonstrated robust PD effects on NK cells and CD8+ T cells with minimal expansion of Tregs. These PD effects are similar to or greater than those observed with intravenous nemvaleukin. Thus, 3 mg q7d was selected as RP2D; phase 2 expansion cohorts for combination with pembrolizumab are enrolling. Clinical trial information: NCT03861793.

Case Report: Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Exuberant Tumor Inflammation With Accelerated Clinical Deterioration in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer therapy. Nivolumab, an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, markedly improved overall survival in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, ICIs can rarely trigger massive inflammation, a phenomenon characterized by rapid acceleration in radiographic tumor growth, the mechanisms underlying which are largely unknown. We report three patients with metastatic RCC who experienced rapid radiographic progression and clinical deterioration following treatment with nivolumab. However, histological analysis revealed no viable cancer despite the evidence of radiological progression. Instead, extensive necrosis and lymphohistiocytic infiltration were noted, as described previously in patients with ICI-induced pseudoprogression. Based on these observations, we postulate that exuberant antitumor inflammatory responses may contribute to adverse clinical outcomes in some patients with ICI-induced radiographic progression. Prospective studies incorporating tumor biopsies may shed more light on this rare phenomenon.

Safety and Efficacy of the Combination of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Patients With Melanoma and Asymptomatic or Symptomatic Brain Metastases (CheckMate 204)

Background

In patients with melanoma and asymptomatic brain metastases (MBM), nivolumab plus ipilimumab provided an intracranial response rate of 55%. Here, we present the first report for patients who were symptomatic and/or required corticosteroids and updated data for asymptomatic patients.

Methods

Patients with measurable MBM, 0.5-3.0 cm, were enrolled into Cohort A (asymptomatic) or Cohort B (stable neurologic symptoms and/or receiving corticosteroids). Nivolumab, 1 mg/kg, and ipilimumab, 3 mg/kg, were given intravenously every 3 weeks ×4, followed by nivolumab, 3 mg/kg, every 2 weeks until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or 24 months. The primary endpoint was intracranial clinical benefit rate (CBR; complete response [CR], partial response [PR], or stable disease ≥6 months).

Results

Symptomatic patients (N = 18) received a median of one nivolumab and ipilimumab combination dose and had an intracranial CBR of 22.2%. Two of 12 patients on corticosteroids had CR; 2 responded among the 6 not on corticosteroids. Median intracranial progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 1.2 and 8.7 months, respectively. In contrast, with 20.6 months of follow-up, we confirmed an intracranial CBR of 58.4% in asymptomatic patients (N = 101); median duration of response, PFS, and OS were not reached. No new safety signals were observed.

Conclusions

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab provides durable clinical benefit for asymptomatic patients with MBM and should be considered for first-line therapy. This regimen has limited activity in MBM patients with neurologic symptoms and/or requiring corticosteroids, supporting the need for alternative approaches and methods to reduce the dependency on corticosteroids.

Clinical trial registration. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02320058.

Co-Isolation of Cytokines and Exosomes: Implications for Immunomodulation Studies

Exosomes play a vital role in intercellular communication and their immunomodulatory potential have become an important focus in cancer research. Various methods have been developed for the isolation although each method differs in the number and purity of exosomes they yield. In melanoma, tumor-derived exosomes drive immunosuppression within the tumor microenvironment. The co-elution of exosomes and soluble factors such as cytokines during isolation, however, make it difficult to ascertain the contribution of exosome cargo, as soluble cytokines are equally capable of immune suppression. In this review we will expound upon the biological relevance that exosome-associated cytokines possess. Furthermore, we discuss the technical challenges that arise during exosome isolation and what this means for further studies into the TME and in vivo work.

Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab and High-Dose IFNα-2b in Resectable Regionally Advanced Melanoma

PURPOSE

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy may improve the clinical outcome of regionally advanced operable melanoma and allows for rapid clinical and pathologic assessment of response. We examined neoadjuvant pembrolizumab and high-dose IFNα-2b (HDI) therapy in patients with resectable advanced melanoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with resectable stage III/IV melanoma were treated with concurrent pembrolizumab 200 mg i.v. every 3 weeks and HDI 20 MU/m²/day i.v., 5 days per week for 4 weeks, then 10 MU/m²/day subcutaneously 3 days per week for 2 weeks. Definitive surgery followed, as did adjuvant combination immunotherapy, completing a year of treatment. Primary endpoint was safety of the combination. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), pathologic complete response (pCR), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS). Blood samples for correlative studies were collected throughout. Tumor tissue was assessed by IHC and flow cytometry at baseline and at surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 31 patients were enrolled, and 30 were evaluable. At data cutoff (October 2, 2019), median follow-up for OS was 37.87 months (range, 33.2-43.47). Median OS and RFS were not reached. Radiographic ORR was 73.3% [95% confidence interval (CI): 55.5-85.8], with a 43% (95% CI: 27.3-60.1) pCR rate. None of the patients with a pCR have had a recurrence. HDI and pembrolizumab were discontinued in 73% and 43% of patients, respectively. Correlative analyses suggested that intratumoral PD-1/PD-L1 interaction and HLA-DR expression are associated with pCR (P = 0.002 and P = 0.008, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant concurrent HDI and pembrolizumab demonstrated promising clinical activity despite high rates of treatment discontinuation. pCR is a prognostic indicator.See related commentary by Menzies et al., p. 4133.

ALKS 4230: a novel engineered IL-2 fusion protein with an improved cellular selectivity profile for cancer immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Interleukin-2 (IL-2) plays a pivotal role in immune homeostasis due to its ability to stimulate numerous lymphocyte subsets including natural killer (NK) cells, effector CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells, and regulatory T cells (T_regs). Low concentrations of IL-2 induce signaling through the high-affinity IL-2 receptor (IL-2R) comprised of IL-2Rα, IL-2Rβ, and common γ chain (γ_c), preferentially expressed on T_regs. Higher concentrations of IL-2 are necessary to induce signaling through the intermediate-affinity IL-2R, composed of IL-2Rβ and γ_c, expressed on memory CD8⁺ T cells and NK cells. Recombinant human IL-2 (rhIL-2) is approved for treatment of metastatic melanoma and renal cell carcinoma (RCC), but adverse events including capillary leak syndrome, potentially mediated through interaction with the high-affinity IL-2R, limit its therapeutic use. Furthermore, antitumor efficacy of IL-2 may also be limited by preferential expansion of immunosuppressive T_regs. ALKS 4230 is an engineered fusion protein comprised of a circularly-permuted IL-2 with the extracellular domain of IL-2Rα, designed to selectively activate effector lymphocytes bearing the intermediate-affinity IL-2R.

RESULTS

ALKS 4230 was equipotent to rhIL-2 in activating human cells bearing the intermediate-affinity IL-2R, and less potent than rhIL-2 on cells bearing the high-affinity IL-2R. As observed in vitro with primary human cells from healthy donors and advanced cancer patients, ALKS 4230 induced greater activation and expansion of NK cells with reduced expansion of T_regs relative to rhIL-2. Similarly, in mice, ALKS 4230 treatment stimulated greater expansion of NK cells and memory-phenotype CD8⁺ T cells at doses that did not expand or activate T_regs. ALKS 4230 treatment induced significantly lower levels of proinflammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor alpha, interleukin-6, and interferon gamma relative to rhIL-2. Furthermore, ALKS 4230 exhibited superior antitumor efficacy in the mouse B16F10 lung tumor model, where ALKS 4230 could be administered via multiple routes of administration and dosing schedules while achieving equivalent antitumor efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

ALKS 4230 exhibited enhanced pharmacokinetic and selective pharmacodynamic properties resulting in both improved antitumor efficacy and lower indices of toxicity relative to rhIL-2 in mice. These data highlight the potential of ALKS 4230 as a novel cancer immunotherapy, and as such, the molecule is being evaluated clinically.

T-cell CX3CR1 expression as a dynamic blood-based biomarker of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized treatment for various cancers; however, durable response is limited to only a subset of patients. Discovery of blood-based biomarkers that reflect dynamic change of the tumor microenvironment, and predict response to ICI, will markedly improve current treatment regimens. Here, we investigate CX3C chemokine receptor 1 (CX3CR1), a marker of T-cell differentiation, as a predictive correlate of response to ICI therapy. Successful treatment of tumor-bearing mice with ICI increases the frequency and T-cell receptor clonality of the peripheral CX3CR1+CD8+ T-cell subset that includes an enriched repertoire of tumor-specific and tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells. Furthermore, an increase in the frequency of the CX3CR1+ subset in circulating CD8+ T cells early after initiation of anti-PD-1 therapy correlates with response and survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Collectively, these data support T-cell CX3CR1 expression as a blood-based dynamic early on-treatment predictor of response to ICI therapy.

Resident and circulating memory T cells persist for years in melanoma patients with durable responses to immunotherapy

While T-cell responses to cancer immunotherapy have been avidly studied, long-lived memory has been poorly characterized. In a cohort of metastatic melanoma survivors with exceptional responses to immunotherapy, we probed memory CD8+ T-cell responses across tissues, and across several years. Single-cell RNA sequencing revealed three subsets of resident memory T (TRM) cells shared between tumors and distant vitiligo-affected skin. Paired T-cell receptor sequencing further identified clonotypes in tumors that co-existed as TRM in skin and as effector memory T (TEM) cells in blood. Clonotypes that dispersed throughout tumor, skin, and blood preferentially expressed a IFNG / TNF-high signature, which had a strong prognostic value for melanoma patients. Remarkably, clonotypes from tumors were found in patient skin and blood up to nine years later, with skin maintaining the most focused tumor-associated clonal repertoire. These studies reveal that cancer survivors can maintain durable memory as functional, broadly-distributed TRM and TEM compartments.

A Rapid Exosome Isolation Using Ultrafiltration and Size Exclusion Chromatography (REIUS) Method for Exosome Isolation from Melanoma Cell Lines

Cells release extracellular vesicles (EVs) that can be detected both in vivo and in cell culture medium. Among EVs, exosomes are 50-150 nm vesicles that are systematically packaged into multivesicular bodies for release into the external environment. In cancer, these intentionally packaged exosomes carry a payload of proteins such as RNAs and surface receptors that facilitate the reprogramming of proximal cells to assemble a protumor microenvironment. Exosomes have been implicated as an important intermediary extracellular communication pathway between cells, including in melanoma. Human melanoma-derived exosomes (HMEX) have been demonstrated to modulate the extracellular environment and inhibit immune cell activation. There are many methods to isolate and enrich for exosomes and the method applied can impact yield and purity of the isolates. In this chapter we describe the REIUS (rapid exosome isolation using ultrafiltration and size exclusion chromatography) method to isolate HMEX from melanoma cell cultures and then demonstrate their enrichment using molecular and microscopic approaches.

Systemic Therapy for Melanoma: ASCO Guideline

PURPOSE

To provide guidance to clinicians regarding the use of systemic therapy for melanoma.

METHODS

ASCO convened an Expert Panel and conducted a systematic review of the literature.

RESULTS

A systematic review, one meta-analysis, and 34 additional randomized trials were identified. The published studies included a wide range of systemic therapies in cutaneous and noncutaneous melanoma.

RECOMMENDATIONS

In the adjuvant setting, nivolumab or pembrolizumab should be offered to patients with resected stage IIIA/B/C/D BRAF wild-type cutaneous melanoma, while either of those two agents or the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib should be offered in BRAF-mutant disease. No recommendation could be made for or against the use of neoadjuvant therapy in cutaneous melanoma. In the unresectable/metastatic setting, ipilimumab plus nivolumab, nivolumab alone, or pembrolizumab alone should be offered to patients with BRAF wild-type cutaneous melanoma, while those three regimens or combination BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy with dabrafenib/trametinib, encorafenib/binimetinib, or vemurafenib/cobimetinib should be offered in BRAF-mutant disease. Patients with mucosal melanoma may be offered the same therapies recommended for cutaneous melanoma. No recommendation could be made for or against specific therapy for uveal melanoma. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/melanoma-guidelines.

Phase I Clinical Trial of Combination Propranolol and Pembrolizumab in Locally Advanced and Metastatic Melanoma: Safety, Tolerability, and Preliminary Evidence of Antitumor Activity

PURPOSE

Increased β-adrenergic receptor (β-AR) signaling has been shown to promote the creation of an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). Preclinical studies have shown that abrogation of this signaling pathway, particularly β2-AR, provides a more favorable TME that enhances the activity of anti-PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors. We hypothesize that blocking stress-related immunosuppressive pathways would improve tumor response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients. Here, we report the results of dose escalation of a nonselective β-blocker (propranolol) with pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic melanoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A 3 + 3 dose escalation study for propranolol twice a day with pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks) was completed. The primary objective was to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Additional objectives included safety, antitumor activity, and biomarker analyses. Responders were defined as patients with complete or partial response per immune-modified RECIST at 6 months.

RESULTS

Nine patients with metastatic melanoma received increasing doses of propranolol in cohorts of 10, 20, and 30 mg twice a day. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were rash, fatigue, and vitiligo, observed in 44% patients. One patient developed two grade ≥3 TRAEs. Objective response rate was 78%. While no significant changes in treatment-associated biomarkers were observed, an increase in IFNγ and a decrease in IL6 was noted in responders.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination of propranolol with pembrolizumab in treatment-naïve metastatic melanoma is safe and shows very promising activity. Propranolol 30 mg twice a day was selected as RP2D in addition to pembrolizumab based on safety, tolerability, and preliminary antitumor activity.

Mechanism-based treatment of cancer with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies

Immune checkpoints are cell surface molecules that initiate regulatory pathways which have powerful control of CD8+ cytolytic T cell activity. Antagonistic and agonistic antibodies engaging these molecules have demonstrated profound impact on immune activation and have entered clinical use for the treatment of a variety of diseases. Over the past decade, antagonistic antibodies known as immune checkpoint inhibitors have become a new pillar of cancer treatment and have reshaped the therapeutic landscape in oncology. These agents differ in their mechanism of action and toxicity profiles compared to more traditional systemic cancer treatments such as chemo- and targeted therapies. This article reviews the pharmacology of this new class of agents.

An Immunosuppressive Effect of Melanoma-derived Exosomes on NY-ESO-1 Antigen-specific Human CD8+ T Cells is Dependent on IL-10 and Independent of BRAFV600E Mutation in Melanoma Cell Lines

Exosomes, including human melanoma-derived exosomes (HMEX), are known to suppress the function of immune effector cells, which for HMEX has been associated with the surface presence of the immune checkpoint ligand PD-L1. This study investigated the relationship between the BRAF mutational status of melanoma cells and the inhibition of secreted HMEX exosomes on antigen-specific human T cells. Exosomes were isolated from two melanoma cell lines, 2183-Her4 and 888-mel, which are genetically wild-type BRAF^WT and BRAF^V600E, respectively. HMEX were isolated using a modified, size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) method shown to reduce co-isolation of non-exosome-associated cytokines compared to ultracentrifugation isolation. The immunoinhibitory effect of the exosomes was tested in vitro on patient-derived NY-ESO-1-specific CD8⁺ T cells challenged with NY-ESO-1 antigen. HMEX from both cell lines inhibited the immune response of antigen-specific T cells comparably, as evidenced by the reduction of IFN-γ and TNF-α in NY-ESO-1 tetramer-positive cells. This inhibition could be partially reversed by the presence of anti-PD-L1 and anti-IL-10 antibodies. IL-10 has been demonstrated to be a critical pathway for sustaining enhanced tumorigenesis in BRAF^V600E mutant cells compared to BRAF^WT melanoma cells. Thus, we demonstrate that HMEX inhibit antigen-specific T cell responses independent of the BRAF mutational status of the parent cells. In addition, PD-L1 and IL-10 contribute to the HMEX-mediated immunosuppression of antigen-specific human T cells. The inhibitory capacity of exosomes should be taken into consideration when developing therapies that are reliant upon the potency of customized, antigen-specific effector T cells.

Human genes differ by their UV sensitivity estimated through analysis of UV-induced silent mutations in melanoma

We hypothesized that human genes differ by their sensitivity to ultraviolet (UV) exposure. We used somatic mutations detected by genome-wide screens in melanoma and reported in the Catalog Of Somatic Mutations In Cancer. As a measure of UV sensitivity, we used the number of silent mutations generated by C>T transitions in pyrimidine dimers of a given transcript divided by the number of potential sites for this type of mutations in the transcript. We found that human genes varied by UV sensitivity by two orders of magnitude. We noted that the melanoma-associated tumor suppressor gene CDKN2A was among the top five most UV-sensitive genes in the human genome. Melanoma driver genes have a higher UV-sensitivity compared with other genes in the human genome. The difference was more prominent for tumor suppressors compared with oncogene. The results of this study suggest that differential sensitivity of human transcripts to UV light may explain melanoma specificity of some driver genes. Practical significance of the study relates to the fact that differences in UV sensitivity among human genes need to be taken into consideration whereas predicting melanoma-associated genes by the number of somatic mutations detected in a given gene.

Abstract A82: Immune checkpoint protein VISTA controls antitumor immunity via regulating Toll-like receptor signaling and myeloid cells-mediated inflammation

Introduction: V-domain Ig suppressor of T-cell activation (VISTA, gene Vsir) is an inhibitory immune-checkpoint molecule that suppresses CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell activation. Vsir-/- mice developed chronic inflammatory phenotypes, and Vsir-/- CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were hyper-responsive towards self- and foreign antigens. Our recent study (Li et al., Sci Rep 2017) has identified a novel role of VISTA as a critical regulator of IL-23/IL-17 inflammatory axis induced by Toll-like receptor (TLR) stimulation. The molecular mechanisms by which VISTA inhibits TLR signaling remain to be elucidated.

Methods: Peritoneal macrophages from WT or Vsir-/- mice were isolated and stimulated with TLR agonists. Alternatively, human monocyte THP-1 cells overexpressing VISTA were stimulated by TLR2 agonist Pam3CSK4. The activation of TLR signaling pathways and the production of inflammatory cytokines were examined by Western blotting, gel shift assay, or ELISA. Tumor-bearing mice were treated with VISTA-specific monoclonal antibody (mAb) and a peptide vaccine containing TLR agonists. The production of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines was examined via RT-PCR and ELISA.

Results: VISTA downregulates Toll-like receptor (TLR)/TRAF6/TAK1-mediated signaling pathway via promoting K48-linked polyubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of TRAF6 and inhibiting K63-linked polyubiquitination and activation of TRAF6. VISTA blockade by an antibody or genetic deletion augments the activation of MAPKs/AP-1 and IKK/NF-kB signaling cascades in myeloid cells and induces the accumulation of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines within tumor tissues. Inflamed tumor tissues promote the infiltration and effector function of tumor-reactive CD8+ T cells. TLR/TRAF6-mediated inflammatory responses promote the antitumor efficacy of VISTA-blocking antibodies and contribute to a synergistic outcome when VISTA blockade is combined with a TLR agonistic vaccine.

Conclusions: Our study establishes that VISTA critically regulates the inflammatory responses of myeloid cells mediated by TLR signaling. Unlike targeting other immune checkpoint proteins, the therapeutic efficacy of VISTA inhibition benefits from the activation of myeloid cells and early induction of inflammatory cytokines may predict positive clinical responses.

Citation Format: Wenwen Xu, Yongwei Zheng, Juan Zhou, Ying Yuan, Hieu Minh Ta, Jun Dong, Halli E. Miller, Michael Olson, Kamalakannan Rajasekaran, Marc S. Ernstoff, Demin Wang, Subramaniam Malarkannan, Li Wang. Immune checkpoint protein VISTA controls antitumor immunity via regulating Toll-like receptor signaling and myeloid cells-mediated inflammation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy; 2018 Nov 27-30; Miami Beach, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2020;8(4 Suppl):Abstract nr A82.

Autoimmune diseases and immune-checkpoint inhibitors for cancer therapy: review of the literature and personalized risk-based prevention strategy

Patients with cancer and with preexisting active autoimmune diseases (ADs) have been excluded from immunotherapy clinical trials because of concerns for high susceptibility to the development of severe adverse events resulting from exacerbation of their preexisting ADs. However, a growing body of evidence indicates that immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may be safe and effective in this patient population. However, baseline corticosteroids and other nonselective immunosuppressants appear to negatively impact drug efficacy, whereas retrospective and case report data suggest that use of specific immunosuppressants may not have the same consequences. Therefore, we propose here a two-step strategy. First, to lower the risk of compromising ICI efficacy before their initiation, nonselective immunosuppressants could be replaced by specific selective immunosuppressant drugs following a short rotation phase. Subsequently, combining ICI with the selective immunosuppressant could prevent exacerbation of the AD. For the most common active ADs encountered in the context of cancer, we propose specific algorithms to optimize ICI therapy. These preventive strategies go beyond current practices and recommendations, and should be practiced in ICI-specialized clinics, as these require multidisciplinary teams with extensive knowledge in the field of clinical immunology and oncology. In addition, we challenge the exclusion from ICI therapy for patients with cancer and active ADs and propose the implementation of an international registry to study such novel strategies in a prospective fashion.

Impact of concomitant medication use and immune-related adverse events on response to immune checkpoint inhibitors

Aim: Patients receiving checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) are frequently on other medications for co-morbidities. We explored the impact of concomitant medication use on outcomes. Materials & methods: 210 metastatic cancer patients on CPI were identified and association between concomitant medication use and immune-related adverse events with clinical outcomes was determined. Results: Aspirin, metformin, β-blockers and statins were not shown to have any statistically significant difference on clinical benefit. 26.3% patients with clinical benefit developed rash versus 11.8% without clinical benefit (p < 0.05) on multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Use of common prescription and nonprescription medications in patients with multiple co-morbidities appears safe and does not have an adverse effect on CPI efficacy. The presence of rash predicted for a better response.

Purity and yield of melanoma exosomes are dependent on isolation method

Both exosomes and soluble factors have been implicated in the generation of an immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment. Determining the contribution of each requires stringent control of purity of the isolated analytes. The present study compares several conventional exosome isolation methods for the presence of co-enriched soluble factors while isolating exosomes from human melanoma-derived cell lines. The resultant preparations were analysed by multiplex bead array analysis for cytokine profiles, and by electron microscopy and nanotracking analysis for exosome size distribution and concentration. It is demonstrated that the amount and repertoire of soluble factors in exosome preparations is dependent upon the isolation method used. A combination of ultrafiltration and size exclusion chromatography yielded up to 58-fold more exosomes than ultracentrifugation, up to 836-fold lower concentrations of co-purified soluble factors when adjusted for exosome yield, and a greater than two-fold increase in PD-L1 expressing exosomes. Mechanistically, in context of the immunomodulatory effects of exosomes, the exosome isolation method should be carefully considered in order to limit any effects due instead to co-eluted soluble factors.

Combination of pembrolizumab and imatinib in a patient with double KIT mutant melanoma: A case report

RATIONALE

The treatment of metastatic melanoma has been revolutionized in the past decade because of the development of immunotherapies and targeted therapies. Despite these developments, there is still an unmet clinical need for more advanced combination therapies for the subset of patients who remain resistant to immunotherapy or targeted therapy alone. To our knowledge, no reports have been published on combinations of PD-1 blockades and c-KIT inhibitors in melanoma patients. Furthermore, data are limited regarding the safety and efficacy of this combination in patients harboring KIT mutations.

PATIENT CONCERNS AND DIAGNOSIS

We report a case of an 82-year-old female with metastatic melanoma who was found to have double KIT mutations at V559 and N822I.

INTERVENTIONS

She was treated with a combination of c-KIT inhibitor and PD-1 blockade after being resistant to anti-PD-1 monotherapy.

OUTCOMES

Patient developed two episodes of grade 2 liver toxicity requiring treatment breaks followed by a dose reduction. Her transaminitis eventually resolved and patient remained on combination treatment for almost two years with good control of her disease prior to progression.

LESSONS

Treatment options for patients who progress after PD-1 inhibitors are very limited; therefore, there is a high unmet clinical need for this patient population. Combining Imatinib with checkpoint inhibitors may be efficacious in patients with metastatic melanoma and KIT mutations. This novel combination can cause additional toxicities which seem to be overall manageable.

Immunological Correlates of Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The identification of prognostic and/or predictive biomarkers for response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) could help guide treatment decisions.

OBJECTIVE

We assessed changes in programmed cell death-1 (PD1)/PD1 ligand (PDL1) expression in key immunomodulatory cell subsets (myeloid-derived suppressor cells [MDSC]; cytotoxic T lymphocytes [CTL]) following ICI therapy and investigated whether these changes correlated with outcomes in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Serial peripheral blood samples were collected from ICI-treated mUC patients. Flow cytometry was used to quantify PD1/PDL1 expression on MDSC (CD33⁺HLADR^-) and CTL (CD8⁺CD4^-) from peripheral blood mononuclear cells. MDSC were grouped into monocytic (M)-MDSC (CD14⁺CD15^-), polymorphonuclear (PMN)-MDSC (CD14^-CD15⁺), and immature (I)-MDSC (CD14^-CD15^-). Mixed-model regression and Wilcoxon signed-rank or rank-sum tests were performed to assess post-ICI changes in immune biomarker expression and identify correlations between PD1/PDL1 expression and objective response to ICI.

RESULTS

Of 41 ICI-treated patients, 26 received anti-PDL1 (23 atezolizumab/3 avelumab) and 15 received anti-PD1 (pembrolizumab) therapy. Based on available data, 27.5% had prior intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin therapy, 42% had prior neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 70% had prior cystectomy or nephroureterectomy. Successive doses of anti-PDL1 correlated with decreased percentage of PDL1⁺ (%PDL1⁺) M-MDSC, while doses of anti-PD1 correlated with decreased %PD1⁺ M- and I-MDSC. Although pre-treatment %PD1⁺ CTL did not predict response, a greater %PD1⁺ CTL within 9 weeks after ICI initiation correlated with objective response.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with ICI correlated with distinct changes in PD1/PDL1-expressing peripheral immune cell subsets, which may predict objective response to ICI. Further studies are required to validate immune molecular expression as a prognostic and/or predictive biomarker for long-term outcomes in mUC.

Assessment of the Safety of Pembrolizumab in Patients With HIV and Advanced Cancer-A Phase 1 Study

Importance

Anti-PD-1 (anti-programmed cell death 1) and anti-PD-L1 (anti-programmed cell death ligand 1) regimens are preferred therapies for many cancers, including cancers associated with HIV. However, patients with HIV were excluded from most registered trials.

Objective

The primary objective was to evaluate the safety of pembrolizumab in people with HIV and advanced cancer; the secondary objective was to evaluate tumor responses.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Open-label, nonrandomized, phase 1 multicenter study conducted at 7 Cancer Immunotherapy Trials Network sites. Patients with HIV and advanced cancer as well as a CD4 count greater than or equal to 100 cells/μL, antiretroviral therapy (ART) for 4 or more weeks, and an HIV viral load of less than 200 copies/mL were eligible. Exclusion criteria included uncontrolled hepatitis B or C infection, active immunosuppressive therapy, or a history of autoimmune disease requiring systemic therapy.

Interventions

Pembrolizumab, 200 mg, administered intravenously every 3 weeks for up to 35 doses in 3 CD4 count-defined cohorts. Participants continued ART.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Safety and tolerability were assessed using current NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Immune-related adverse events grade 2 or higher were considered immune-related events of clinical interest (irECI). Tumor responses were evaluated using standard tumor-specific criteria.

Results

Thirty participants (28 men and 2 women; median [range] age, 57 [39-77] years) were enrolled from April 2016 through March 2018; 6 had Kaposi sarcoma (KS), 5 had non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), and 19 had non-AIDS-defining cancers. Safety was observed over 183 cycles of treatment with pembrolizumab. Most treatment-emergent adverse events at least possibly attributed to pembrolizumab were grade 1 or 2 (n = 22), and 20% (n = 6) were grade 3. The irECI included hypothyroidism (6 participants), pneumonitis (3 participants), rash (2 participants), an elevated aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase level (1 participant), and a musculoskeletal event (1 participant). One participant with pretreatment KS herpesvirus (KSHV) viremia developed a polyclonal KSHV-associated B-cell lymphoproliferation and died. HIV was controlled in all participants. Increases in CD4 count were not statistically significant (median increase, 19 cells/μL; P = .18). Best tumor responses included complete response (lung, 1 patient), partial response (NHL, 2 patients), stable disease for 24 weeks or more (KS, 2 patients), stable disease for less than 24 weeks (15 patients), and progressive disease (8 patients); 2 patients were not evaluable.

Conclusions and Relevance

Pembrolizumab has acceptable safety in patients with cancer, HIV treated with ART, and a CD4+ T-cell count of greater than 100 cells/μL but may be associated with KSHV-associated B-cell lymphoproliferation. Clinical benefit was noted in lung cancer, NHL, and KS. Anti-PD-1 therapy is appropriate for US Food and Drug Administration-approved indications and clinical trials in this population.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02595866.