Frontline therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: an update

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fastest increasing cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States and is projected to be the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States by 2030. Main risk factors include alcoholic cirrhosis, chronic hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). More than half of the patients have advanced-stage disease at presentation. Currently approved frontline systemic therapy options include sorafenib, lenvatinib, and atezolizumab/bevacizumab. Over the past decade, there has been a significant improvement in survival with a median overall survival of 19.2 months reported with first-line treatment with atezolizumab/bevacizumab. Based on positive results of randomized phase III HIMALAYA trial, durvalumab and tremelimumab combination could become another frontline option. Multiple frontline clinical trials with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) or ICI combined with other novel agents are underway. In the frontline setting, identifying predictive biomarkers for ICI-based or tyrosine kinase (TKI)-based therapy is an unmet need. Subsequent treatment is poorly defined in patients with prior ICI-based therapy since all the available second-line and beyond therapy was studied after first-line sorafenib. Frontline systemic therapy is poorly defined in certain subgroups of HCC such as Child-Pugh B and post-transplant recurrent HCC. The landscape of frontline HCC treatment is rapidly changing, and this article reviews the most recent treatment approaches to frontline therapy for advanced HCC.

Rapidly Evolving Landscape and Future Horizons in Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Era of Immuno-Oncology

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a serious global health problem as one of the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Systemic therapy for advanced HCC has progressed with the development of molecular targeted agents, however survival benefits remain modest. More recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have emerged and exhibited promising therapeutic benefits in a subset of patients. Physiologically, the intrinsic microenvironment in the liver is immunosuppressive, which represents a major obstacle for effective immune therapies in primary and secondary liver malignancies. For this reason, combination therapies that can overcome immune inhibitory mechanisms and enhance the immune response are a rationale approach for drug development in HCC. A recent example is the combination of the anti-PD-L1 antibody (atezolizumab) and anti-VEGF-A antibody (bevacizumab), which has shown significant improvement in survival as compared to standard of care in the first-line treatment for HCC. Other immunotherapy approaches including cancer vaccines and adoptive cell therapy are also under investigation. This review summarizes the key trials leading to our current HCC treatment options and provides an overview of future immune-based strategies in development.

Evolving Role of Immunotherapy in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancers

Simple Summary

Biliary tract cancers (BTC) include gallbladder cancers, intrahepatic, perihilar and distal extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas. BTCs represent a major health problem due to their increasing global incidence and associated poor prognosis. The majority of patients present with advanced stages of cancer, where cytotoxic chemotherapy provides modest survival benefit. More recently, novel treatment options have emerged with the development of agents targeting specific genetic mutations of tumors as well as immunotherapy, which enhances the immune system’s ability to target cancer cells efficiently. In this review, we will discuss current and emerging systemic therapy options and the rationale for immunotherapy in BTC.

Abstract

Biliary tract cancers (BTC) comprise a rare and diverse group of malignancies that involve the gallbladder and biliary tree. These cancers typically present in later stages because they are aggressive in nature and affected patients are often asymptomatic in earlier stages of disease. Moreover, BTCs are generally refractory to cytotoxic chemotherapy, which further contributes to their associated poor survival outcomes. Novel therapy approaches are clearly needed. Molecular targeted agents have been developed based on our expanding knowledge of the genetic mutations underlying BTCs and represent a promising treatment strategy in molecularly selected subgroups of patients. In addition, the advent of immunotherapy over recent years has dramatically changed the bleak outcomes observed in malignancies such as melanoma. Our growing understanding of the complex tumor microenvironment in BTC has identified mechanisms of tumor immune evasion that could potentially be targeted with immunotherapy. As a result, different immunotherapeutic approaches including immune checkpoint inhibitors, cancer vaccines, and adoptive cell therapy, have been investigated. The use of immunotherapeutic agents is currently only approved for a small subset of treatment-refractory BTCs based on microsatellite instability (MSI) status and tumor mutational burden (TMB), but this will likely change with the potential approval of immunotherapy plus chemotherapy as a result of the TOPAZ-1 trial.

Characteristics and outcomes of patients with multiple synchronous colon cancer primaries

194

Background: Patients (pts) with multiple synchronous colon cancer primaries (MCPs) constitute a unique subset of pts with colon cancer. However, there are limited published studies about these pts. The objective of this study is to compare the characteristics and outcomes of pts with MCPs to those with single colon cancer primaries (SCPs) using the largest study population to date. Methods: Data was obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2015. Pts with synchronous MCPs were included and were matched 1:3 with pts with SCPs based on the Coarsened Exact Matching method for age, gender, and race. Only patients with multiple synchronous primaries were included (time since index = 0 months). We excluded pts with a lag time since diagnosis of index primary of 1 month or more. Univariate (UNA) and multivariable (MVA) analyses were performed to identify factors associated with patient outcomes. Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the association between tumor/patient characteristics and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 3322 pts with MCPs and 9966 pts with SCPs were identified. Median age was 71 years. Majority were male (51.5%) and White (80.1%). 73.4% and 69.6% of pts had 12 or more lymph nodes examined for the MCPs and SCPs cohorts, respectively. The SCPs cohort included more T4 stage and more well- and moderately-differentiated histology. OS was significantly shorter in MCPs compared to SCPs (HR 1.29; 1.22-1.36; p < 0.001), with a 5- and 10-year OS rate of 47.8% and 28.2% for the MCPs and 56.4% and 41.6% for the SCPs, respectively, for all stages combined. In the MCPs cohort, the use of adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with an improved survival in AJCC stages II, III, and IV but not stage I. Conclusions: This is the largest study evaluating the impact of MCPs on outcomes. Across stages II to IV, pts with MCPs have a shorter survival than those with SCPs. Pts with stage II MCPs who receive adjuvant chemotherapy derive a survival benefit. Current guidelines do not list multiple synchronous primaries as a high-risk feature for stage II.

A randomized phase II trial of MEK and CDK4/6 inhibitors vesus tipiracil/trifluridine (TAS-102) in metastatic KRAS/NRAS mutant (mut) colorectal cancer (CRC)

116

Background: Constitutively activating KRAS or NRAS muts occur in ̃50% of CRC, increasing RAF-MEK-ERK signaling and causing overexpression of cyclin D1, which binds to cyclin dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) to drive cell cycle progression. Combination MEK and CDK4/6 inhibitors caused tumor regression in patient-derived xenografts of KRAS mut CRC. We hypothesized that binimetinib and palbociclib (B+P) would improve progression-free survival (PFS) compared to TAS-102 in refractory KRAS/NRAS mut mCRC. Methods: ACCRU-GI-1618 was a multicenter, randomized phase II clinical trial (NCT03981614). Key inclusion criteria were KRAS/NRAS mut mCRC, with prior fluoropyrimidine/ oxaliplatin/ irinotecan/ anti-VEGF therapy. There was a 6-patient safety run-in with binimetinib 30 mg po BID D1-28 and palbociclib 100 mg po daily D1-21. After, patients were randomized 1:1 to B+P vs TAS-102 (stratified by KRAS mut type and prior regorafenib use), with optional crossover at progression. The primary endpoint was PFS; 73 PFS events (from a sample size of 112) provided 90% power to detect improvement of PFS (hazard ratio = 0.5, i.e. median PFS of 2 vs. 4 months) with 1-sided α = 0.05. A prespecified interim analysis for futility was planned after 37 PFS events were observed, with completion of accrual if 1-sided stratified log-rank p-value < 0.551. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) are estimated by stratified Cox proportional hazards models. Results: After the safety run-in, 93 patients at 6 sites were randomized; 82 (41 B+P, 41 TAS-102) comprise the primary analysis population (eligible, consented, and started treatment). In this population, median age was 52 years, 50% female, 68% left-sided, 79% with KRAS codon 12/13 mut, 12% with prior regorafenib. Enrollment was halted at interim analysis as the futility boundary was crossed (1-sided p = 0.67). At final analysis, 68 subjects had a PFS event (34 in each arm). Median PFS was 2.1 mo (95% CI 2.0-3.0) with B+P vs 2.1 mo (2.0-2.4) with TAS-102; HR 0.86 (0.52-1.44). 4-mo PFS rate was 22.2% (11.9-41.6) with B+P vs 10.6% (3.8-30.0) with TAS-102. With 37 OS events (14 in B+P arm), median OS was 7.7 mo (5.1-NE) with B+P vs 6.6 mo (4.8-8.9) with TAS-102; HR 0.77 (95% CI 0.39-1.51). TAS-102 had greater grade 3-4 hematologic AEs (46% vs 22%), and B+P had more grade 3-4 non-hematologic AEs (47% vs 32%). Grade 3-4 AEs more common with B+P were fatigue (8% vs 0%), oral mucositis (6% vs 0%), and nausea (4% vs 2%). Though 63% of patients on B+P had acneiform rash, only 2% was grade 3-4. Grade 1-2 diarrhea occurred in 35% of B+P and 24% of TAS-102 patients. No new safety signal was observed. Conclusions: B+P did not significantly improve median PFS or OS compared to TAS-102 in KRAS/NRAS mut mCRC. Subgroup analyses and translational studies are ongoing to determine which subgroups may be more likely to attain 4-mo PFS or identify mechanisms of resistance. Clinical trial information: NCT03981614.

Impact of local therapy on survival among patients with metastatic anal squamous cell carcinoma

4

Background: About 10-20% of patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCCa) present with metastatic disease, and are usually treated with systemic chemotherapy. The role of local therapy to control the primary tumor is controversial in this setting. We evaluated survival impact of local therapy in metastatic anal SCCa. Methods: Data were obtained from all US hospitals that contributed to the National Cancer Database (NCDB) between 2004 and 2015. We excluded patients who did not receive palliative systemic chemotherapy. Univariate (UVA) and multivariable analyses (MVA) were performed to identify factors associated with patient outcome. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the association between tumor/patient characteristics and overall survival (OS). Results: 1,160 patients were identified over 12 years. Median age was 57 years. Majority were female (64.9%), non-Hispanic Whites (79.1%) and had Charlson-Deyo Score of 0 (83.6%). Most common metastatic sites were liver (25.9%), lung (11.6%) and bone (8.5%). More than 79% of the patients received radiation to the primary site, and 10.4% underwent surgical resection for local control. Use of local therapy correlated closely with a significant improvement in OS on MVA (HR 0.66; 0.55-0.79; p < 0.001), with a 12-month and 5-year OS rates of 72.8% and 25.7% respectively, compared with 61.1% and 14.6% for patients treated with chemotherapy only. Poor prognostic factors included male gender (HR 1.44; 1.24-1.67; p < 0.001), age > 70 years (HR 1.28; 1.02-1.62; p = 0.034), lack of health insurance (HR 1.32; 1.02-1.71; p = 0.034), and cloacogenic zone location (HR 4.02; 1.43-11.30; p = 0.008). There was no benefit from abdominoperineal resection (mOS = 19.7mos; HR 1.05; 0.48-2.29; p = 0.909), but both local resection of the primary (mOS = 24.8mos, HR 0.48; 0.29-0.80; p = 0.005) and palliative radiation (mOS = 22.6 mos; HR 0.66; 0.55-0.79; p < 0.001) were associated with improved OS. Conclusions: This is the largest reported study on management of de novo stage IV SCCa. The data suggest that local control of the primary tumor through resection or radiation improved OS in patients with anal SCCa. Patients unlikely to benefit from local therapy include age over 70 years, male, lack of health insurance and cloacogenic carcinoma.

Phase Ib/II trial of siltuximab and spartalizumab in patients in metastatic pancreatic cancer

TPS626

Background: Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is associated with carcinogenesis, immune suppression, and poor prognosis in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Preclinical data demonstrated dual inhibition of IL-6 and (programmed death ligand-1) PD-L1 facilitates CD8+ T cell migration into pancreatic tumors and was effective in controlling tumor growth in syngeneic and genetically engineered PDAC mouse models. Siltuximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody which targets the IL-6 molecule specifically and spartalizumab is a high-affinity ligand-blocking humanized IgG4 antibody against the PD-1 receptor. Based on this preclinical rationale, we developed a phase Ib/II trial to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D), evaluate the safety, toxicity profile, preliminary antitumor activity, and immunogenicity of the siltuximab and spartalizumab in patients with previously treated metastatic PDAC. Methods: The phase Ib trial design is standard 3+3. Primary endpoint is to determine RP2D. Siltuximab is administered intravenously (IV) in three dose levels of 6 mg/kg (DL1), 11 mg/kg (DL2), 9 mg/kg (only if 2 DLTs observed on DL2) every 3 weeks with spartalizumab at 300 mg IV every 3 weeks. Eligible patients must have stage IV PDAC who have failed at least one prior therapy age ≥18 years, ECOG PS 0-1, no prior anti PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 agent. After RP2D is established, an expansion phase will enroll 24 patients with PDAC. Pre and on-treatment biopsy will be performed in 24 patients in the expansion cohort for correlative analysis. Pre-treatment and on-treatment peripheral blood samples will be collected from all patients. In the expansion phase patients will receive initial cycle (every 3 weeks) treatment with either spartalizumab or spartalizumab plus siltuximab and then starting cycle 2 all patients receive the combination following the on-treatment research biopsy. This design will enable us to evaluate the immunological effects of spartalizumab alone versus the combination in the tumor microenvironment and peripheral blood. This study was activated in January 2020 and to date 12 patients were enrolled in dose escalation phase. The dose expansion phase has recently started accrual. Clinical trial information: NCT04191421.

Comparing Somatostatin Analogs in the Treatment of Advanced Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

BACKGROUND

The 2 approved somatostatin analogs (SSAs) in the first-line treatment of advanced, well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are octreotide long-acting release (Sandostatin LAR) and somatuline depot (Lanreotide). The study's objective was to compare progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients (pts) with GEP-NETs treated with somatuline or octreotide LAR. Pts and Methods: Pts with advanced well-differentiated GEP-NET who received either SSA at Emory University between 1995 and 2019 were included after institutional review board approval. The primary end point was PFS, defined as time to disease progression (according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, or clinical progression) or death. The secondary end point was OS. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated, and log-rank tests were conducted to compare the survival outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 105 pts were identified. The mean age was 62.1 years (SD ± 11.8). The male-to-female ratio was 51:54. The majority (N = 69, 65.7%) were white. Most pts had grade 2 (G2) disease (N = 44, 41.9%). Primary location was small bowel in 58 (55.2%), pancreas in 27 (25.7%), and other in 20 (19.0%). Functional tumors were defined in 32 pts distributed equally between the 2 groups. Distribution of treatment was similar in the 2 groups, with 54 receiving octreotide LAR and 51 receiving somatuline depot. The median PFS for the octreotide LAR and somatuline depot groups was 12 months (95% CI, 6-18 months) and 10.8 months (95% CI, 6-15.6 months), respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.2665). For pts with G1 disease, the median PFS for the octreotide LAR and somatuline depot was 8.4 versus 32.4 months, respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.159). For G2 disease, the difference in median PFS between octreotide LAR and somutaline depot groups was statistically significant (12 vs. 7.2 months, respectively; p = 0.0372). The mean follow-up time for octreotide LAR was 21.6 months versus 11.3 months for somatuline depot.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, there was no difference in PFS between octreotide LAR and somatuline depot for pts with well-differentiated, metastatic GEP-NETs. A prospective study is worth designing selecting for G.

OUP accepted manuscript

Background

The survival impact of multi-agent (MAC) compared with single-agent (SAC) adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in elderly patients with stage III colon cancer (CC) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare survival outcomes of MAC and SAC in this population utilizing the National Cancer Database (NCDB).

Patients and Methods

Patients aged ≥70 years with pathological stage III CC diagnosed in 2004-2015 were identified in the NCDB. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted, and Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify associations between MAC vs. SAC and overall survival (OS).

Results

Among 41 707 elderly patients (≥70 years old) with stage III CC, about half (n = 20 257; 48.5%) received AC; the majority (n = 12 923, 63.8%) received MAC. The median age was 79 (range 70-90). The majority were female (n = 11 201, 55.3%), Caucasians (88%) and had moderately differentiated tumor grade (n = 12 619, 62.3%), tumor size >4 cm (11 785, 58.2%), and negative surgical margins (18 496, 91.3%). Low-risk stage III CC constituted 50.6% (n = 10 264) of the study population. High-risk stage III CC was associated with worse OS compared with low-risk disease (HR 0.35, 0.34-0.36, P < .001). Multi-agent chemotherapy was associated with a better 5-year OS compared with SAC (P < .001). High-risk stage III patients who received MAC vs. SAC had an OS of 4.2 vs. 3.4 years, respectively (P < .001). Low-risk stage III patients who received MAC vs. SAC had a median OS of 8.5 vs. 7 years (P < .001). In univariate and multivariable analyses, male sex, positive surgical margin, insurance and facility types, age, year of diagnosis, tumor size, and Charlson-Deyo score of >2 were associated with worse OS (P < .05).

Conclusions

Any adjuvant chemotherapy has a trend of survival benefits. Multi-agent chemotherapy seems to have an enhanced benefit in the 70-75 age group. Multi-agent chemotherapy seemed to have similar efficacy as SAC in those aged >76 years.

Predictive and Prognostic Effects of Primary Tumor Size on Colorectal Cancer Survival

Background

Pathologic staging is crucial in colorectal cancer (CRC). Unlike the majority of solid tumors, the current staging model does not use tumor size as a criterion. We evaluated the predictive and prognostic impact of primary tumor size on all stages of CRC.

Methods

Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we conducted an analysis of CRC patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 who underwent resection of their primary cancer. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify predictive and prognostic factors, Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models for association between tumor size and survival.

Results

About 61,000 patients met the inclusion criteria. Median age was 63 years and majority of the tumors were colon primary (82.7%). AJCC stage distribution was: I - 20.1%; II - 32.1%; III - 34.7% and IV - 13.1%. The prognostic impact of tumor size was strongly associated with survival in stage III disease. Compared to patients with tumors <2cm; those with 2-5cm (HR 1.33; 1.19-1.49; p<0.001), 5-10cm (HR 1.51 (1.34-1.70; p<0.001) and >10cm (HR 1.95 (1.65-2.31; p<0.001) had worse survival independent of other variables. Stage II treated without adjuvant chemotherapy had comparable survival outcomes (HR 1.09; 0.97-1.523; p=0.148) with stage III patients who did, while Stage II patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy did much better than both groups (HR 0.76; 0.67-0.86; p<0.001). Stage III patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy had the worst outcomes among the non-metastatic disease subgroups (HR 2.66; 2.48-2.86; p<0.001). Larger tumors were associated with advanced stage, MSI high, non-rectal primary and positive resection margins.

Conclusions

Further studies are needed to clarify the role of tumor size in prognostic staging models, and how to incorporate it into therapy decisions.

Role of Resection of the Primary in Metastatic Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors

OBJECTIVE

Resection of the primary (RP) in metastatic neuroendocrine tumor (NET) is controversial. The aim was to evaluate survival outcomes for RP in metastatic NET patients.

METHODS

Data were obtained from US hospitals at the National Cancer Database between 2004 and 2014. χ2, analysis of variance tests, univariate, and multivariate cox proportional hazards models were evaluated. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests conducted to compare the survival difference of patient characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 2361 patients were identified. The mean age was 62.1 years (standard deviation, 13 years), male-to-female ratio 1:1; 33% were small intestine, 26.3% pancreas, and 24.4% lung; 69.6% were well-differentiated; and 42.5% underwent RP. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was significantly improved for patients who underwent RP in small intestine (5-year OS, 63.9% vs 44.2%), lung (5-year OS, 65.4% vs 20.2%), and pancreas tumors (5-year OS, 75.6% vs 30.6%). On multivariate analysis, RP (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.73; P < 0.001), female, year of diagnosis 2010-2014, margin, Charlson-Deyo score less than 2, and age less than 51 years, were associated with better OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Resection of the primary in metastatic well-differentiated NET is associated with improved OS compared with no RP.

403 Correlative analysis of blood and biopsy samples from a clinical trial of Hsp90 inhibition in combination with pembrolizumab reveals increased intratumoral myeloid cell accumulation after treatment

Background

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has yet to widely benefit from T cell-targeted immunotherapy and displays universally poor prognosis. Thus, enhancing the activity of immunotherapy is a high priority. Our laboratory recently reported that heat shock protein-90 (Hsp90) inhibition enhances the efficacy of PD-1 blockade in murine models of PDAC (Zhang Y. et al., Mol Cancer Ther, 2020). Hsp90 inhibitors can limit activation of cancer associated fibroblasts (CAF) and promote infiltration of T cells when combined with PD-1 blockade in preclinical systems.

Methods

Based on these data, we are conducting a Phase Ib/II clinical trial to evaluate the combination of XL888 (Hsp90 inhibitor) and pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. We hypothesize that this combination will be safe and elicit pronounced microenvironmental changes, leading to enhanced efficacy of checkpoint blockade in a tumor type that is otherwise refractory to this approach. During the phase II portion patients were randomized to receive a three week lead in with either pembrolizumab or pembrolizumab and XL888. Paired biopsies and blood samples were obtained at baseline and at week two on treatment and CyTOF was used to assess changes in circulating and tumor infiltrating immune populations. Further, CyTOF profiling of circulating immune cells was performed to assess impacts of XL888 on over thirty phenotypically defined immune populations (figure 1).

Results

As of June 2021, paired liver biopsy specimens from sites of metastasis have been successfully obtained from a total of 8 patients and paired peripheral blood mononuclear cell samples have been analyzed in 24 patients. Our CyTOF analysis illustrated a surprising increase in myeloid cell populations within the tumor following treatment. Analysis of circulating immune cells illustrated a decrease in natural killer cells and Th17 populations following treatment while naïve B cells were increased. These data will be validated by immunohistochemical analysis of FFPE biopsy specimens obtained in parallel at the time of CyTOF analysis. The impact of XL888 on systemic cytokines and chemokines (n=48 total) in the peripheral blood from patients enrolled in the clinical trial is therefore being assessed as a potential mechanism to explain this observation.

Abstract 403 Figure 1

Clinical trial and correlative analysis schema. Patients were randomized to receive either pembrolizumab alone or in combination with the HSP90 inhibitor XL888 for a two week cycle prior to crossover to the combination arm. Plasma, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), and biopsies were assayed to evaluate immunomodulatory effects of the therapies.

Conclusions

Clinical data from this trial indicates that this combination is safe in patients. As clinical data matures, changes in soluble and cellular biomarkers will be correlated with response to elucidate mechanisms of response or resistance to this combination therapy.

Trial Registration

This clinical trial is underway and registered with the ID NCT03095781

Ethics Approval

The study was approved by Emory University’s Ethics Board, approval IRB00087397.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this abstract and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor of this journal.

High-Risk Features Are Prognostic in dMMR/MSI-H Stage II Colon Cancer

BACKGROUND

High-risk features, such as T4 disease, bowel obstruction, poorly/undifferentiated histology, lymphovascular, perineural invasion, and <12 lymph nodes sampled, indicate poor prognosis and define high-risk stage II disease in proficient mismatch repair stage II colon cancer (CC). The prognostic role of high-risk features in dMMR/MSI-H stage II CC is unknown. Similarly, the role of adjuvant therapy in high-risk stage II CC with dMMR/MSI-H (≥1 high-risk feature) has not been studied in prospective trials. The aim of this analysis of the National Cancer Database is to evaluate the prognostic value of high-risk features in stage II dMMR/MSI-H CC.

METHODS

Univariate (UVA) and multivariate (MVA) Cox proportional hazards (Cox-PH) models were built to assess the association between clinical and demographic characteristics and overall survival. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated with log-rank tests to evaluate the association between adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk and low-risk cohorts separately.

RESULTS

A total of 2,293 stage II CC patients have dMMR/MSI-H; of those, 29.5% (n = 676) had high-risk features. The high-risk dMMR/MSI-H patients had worse overall survival [5-year survival and 95%CI, 73.2% (67.3-78.1%) vs. 80.3% (76.7-83.5%), p = 0.0001]. In patients with stage II dMMR/MSI-H CC, the high-risk features were associated with shorter overall survival (OS) along with male sex, positive carcinoembryonic antigen, Charlson-Deyo score >1, and older age. Adjuvant chemotherapy administration was associated with better OS, regardless of the high-risk features in dMMR/MSI-H (log-rank test, p = 0.001) or not (p = 0.0006). When stratified by age, the benefit of chemotherapy was evident only in patients age ≥65 with high-risk features.

CONCLUSION

High-risk features are prognostic in the setting of dMMR/MSI-H stage II CC. Adjuvant chemotherapy may improve survival specifically in patients ≥65 years and with high-risk features.

Assessment of pegylated arginine deiminase and modified FOLFOX6 in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Results of an international, single-arm, phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

Arginine starvation depletes the micronutrients required for DNA synthesis and interferes with both thymidylate synthetase activity and DNA repair pathways in preclinical models of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Pegylated arginine deiminase (ADI-PEG 20), an arginine degrader, potentiates the cytotoxic activity of platinum and pyrimidine antimetabolites in HCC cellular and murine models.

METHODS

This was a global, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial of ADI-PEG 20 and modified 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) in patients who had HCC with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis and disease progression on ≥2 prior lines of treatment. The primary objective was the objective response rate assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Secondary objectives were to estimate progression-free survival, overall survival, safety, and tolerability. Eligible patients were treated with mFOLFOX6 intravenously biweekly at standard doses and ADI-PEG-20 intramuscularly weekly at 36 mg/m² .

RESULTS

In total, 140 patients with advanced HCC were enrolled. The median patient age was 62 years (range, 30-85 years), 83% of patients were male, 76% were of Asian race, 56% had hepatitis B viremia, 10% had hepatitis C viremia, 100% had received ≥2 prior lines of systemic therapy, and 39% had received ≥3 prior lines of systemic therapy. The objective response rate was 9.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.0%-15.4%), with a median response duration of 10.2 months (95% CI, 5.8 months to not reached). The median progression-free survival was 3.8 months (95% CI, 1.8-6.3 months), and the median overall survival was 14.5 months (95% CI, 13.6-20.9 months). The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related events were neutropenia (32.9%), white blood cell count decrease (20%), platelet count decrease (19.3%), and anemia (9.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent mFOLFOX6 plus ADI-PEG 20 exhibited limited antitumor activity in patients with treatment-refractory HCC. The study was terminated early, and no further evaluation of the combination will be pursued.

LAY SUMMARY

Arginine is an important nutrient for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The depletion of arginine with pegylated arginine deiminase (ADI-PEG 20), an arginine degrader, appeared to make chemotherapy (FOLFOX) work better in animal models of HCC and in patients with HCC on an early phase clinical trial. To formally test this hypothesis in the clinical setting, a large, global, phase 2 clinical trial was conducted of ADI-PEG 20 and FOLFOX in the treatment of patients with refractory HCC. The study showed limited activity of ADI-PEG 20 and FOLFOX in advanced HCC and was stopped early.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of niraparib in patients with moderate hepatic impairment

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to characterize niraparib pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety in patients with normal hepatic function (NHF) versus moderate hepatic impairment (MHI).

METHODS

Patients with advanced solid tumors were stratified by NHF or MHI (National Cancer Institute-Organ Dysfunction Working Group criteria [bilirubin > 1.5-3 × upper limit of normal and any aspartate aminotransferase elevation]). In the PK phase, all patients received one 300 mg dose of niraparib. In the extension phase, patients with MHI received niraparib 200 mg daily; patients with NHF received 200 or 300 mg based on weight (< 77 kg, ≥ 77 kg)/platelets (< 150,000/µL, ≥ 150,000/µL). PK parameters included maximum concentration (C_max), area under the curve to last measured concentration (AUC_last) and extrapolated to infinity (AUC_inf). Safety was assessed in both phases. Exposure-response (E-R) modeling was used to predict MHI effects on exposure and safety of niraparib doses ≤ 200 mg or 300/200 mg or 200/100 mg weight/platelet regimens.

RESULTS

In the PK phase (NHF, n = 9; MHI, n = 8), mean niraparib C_max was 7% lower in patients with MHI versus NHF. Mean exposure (AUC_last, AUC_inf) was increased by 45% and 56%, respectively, in patients with MHI without impacting tolerability. In the extension phase (NHF, n = 8; MHI, n = 7), the overall safety profile was consistent with previous trials. In patients with MHI, E-R modeling predicted niraparib 200 mg reduced Grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia incidence, whereas a 200/100 mg regimen yielded exposures below efficacy-associated levels in 15% of patients.

CONCLUSION

These findings support adjusting the 300 mg niraparib starting dose to 200 mg QD in patients with MHI.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03359850; registered December 2, 2017.

Improved Tumor Response in Patients on Metformin Undergoing Yttrium-90 Radioembolization Segmentectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

PURPOSE

Metformin is associated with improved outcomes after external radiation and chemotherapy but has not been studied for Y-90 radiation segmentectomy (RS). This study evaluates the effect of metformin on tumor response after Y-90 RS in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A retrospective analysis of patients with HCC who underwent Y-90 RS between 2014-2018 was performed. Comparisons were made between all patients taking and not taking metformin, and diabetic patients taking and not taking metformin. Tumor response was analyzed with logistic regression to compare absolute and percent change in total tumor diameter (TTD) and modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). Overall survival (OS) was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier estimation and log-rank analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 106 patients underwent 112 Y-90 RS, of which 40 were diabetic (38.8%) and 19 (18.4%) were on metformin. At baseline, the two groups of patients on metformin and not on metformin had no significant difference in age, Child-Pugh score, MELD score, ALBI grade, total tumor diameter, and size of dominant tumor. The only significant baseline difference was ECOG status. Uni- and multivariate analysis demonstrated a larger reduction in TTD and objective response by mRECIST criteria for patients undergoing Y-90 RS on metformin compared to those not on metformin. OS was similar between patients taking and not taking metformin (p = 0.912).

CONCLUSION

Metformin may be associated with increased tumor response after Y-90 RS in patients with HCC.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, Retrospective Study.

Clinical features and outcomes of colloid carcinoma of pancreas compared to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

e16259

Background: Colloid carcinoma (CC) of the pancreas is a rare histopathological subtype of ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), with poorly defined prognostic factors and therapeutic outcomes. The aim of this study is to characterize the clinicopathological features and evaluate the overall survival (OS) and prognostic factors of patients with pancreatic CC using National Cancer Database (NCDB). Methods: Patients diagnosed with CC of the pancreas and PDAC between 2004 and 2016 were identified from the NCDB using ICD-O-3 morphology (8480/3 for CC and 8140/3 for PDAC) and topography codes (C25). Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted and Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were used to perform OS analysis. Results: A total of 56,846 patients met the inclusion criteria for the final analysis. Of the total population included, 2,430 patients (4.3%) had CC and 54,416 patients (95.7%) had PDAC. For both, CC and PDAC, there was a male preponderance (52.0%, 52.5%), Caucasians (85.1%, 84%), occurrence above the age of 70 (39.2%, 38.2%), and the most common primary site was the head of the pancreas (50.5%, 53%). For CC, the percentage of pathologic stage III colloid pancreas cancer appeared the lowest (3.5%, 85 patients), compared to stage I (16.7%), stage II (37.8%), and stage IV (42.1%). While in PDAC, the percentage of pathologic stage I (5.94%) and stage III (4.44%) patients was lower than stage II (37.21%) and IV (52.41%). CC and PDAC more frequently presented with < 5cm tumor, at academic or research cancer centers, and diagnosed between 2009 and 2013 compared to 2004–2008 ( p< 0.001). For both CC and PDAC, the majority underwent surgical resection (58%, 53%), systemic chemotherapy (57.8%, 63%) and did not receive radiotherapy (78.8%, 77.6%). A positive surgical margin on pathologic evaluation was associated with worse outcomes for CC and PDAC in both univariate and multivariate analysis (HR 1.61; 1.56–1.66; p< 0.001 and HR 1.43; 1.38–1.48, p< 0.001). CC had a better 1-year overall survival (OS) in all stages compared to PDAC (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, mucinous carcinoma histology, female sex, diagnosis between 2004 and 2009, well/moderately differentiated histology, chemotherapy, age at diagnosis less than 60, radiation therapy after surgery, and local surgical procedure of primary site and pancreatectomy (p < 0.001) were associated with better OS compared to PDAC. Colloid histology was associated with better 1-year overall survival (OS) in all stages compared to PDAC (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Colloid carcinoma of pancreas is associated with a better overall survival as compared to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. This is the largest study to address the clinical features and outcomes of colloid carcinoma of pancreas.

Treatment outcomes for stage T1b-2 esophagogastric adenocarcinomas

e16085

Background: Treatment of localized esophageal, gastroesophageal junction (GEJ), and stomach cancer is neoadjuvant therapy with either chemoradiation or chemotherapy followed by surgery. Treatment for T1b-2 stage disease is not well evaluated and this stage is underrepresented in prospective studies. The aim of this study is to evaluate survival outcomes among the three treatment modalities (neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NACRT), and upfront surgery (US)) in this population using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Methods: Patients (pts) with clinical stage T1b-2N0 and any pathological stage (excluding metastatic) adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, GEJ, and stomach treated with neoadjuvant therapy or upfront surgery, with or without adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), were identified between 2004 and 2015 in the NCDB. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted, and Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify the association between the three treatment modalities and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 2260 pts were analyzed. The median follow-up was 66.6 months. The median age was 67 years. Most pts were White (86%) and male (77%). 1018 (45%) had moderately-differentiated grade, while 946 (42%) had poorly-differentiated/undifferentiated grade. The most common site of disease was the lower third of esophagus (34.1%). 161 pts (7%) received NACT, of whom 45 pts received AC; 537 pts (24%) received NACRT, of whom 40 pts received AC. 1562 pts (69%) underwent US, of whom 146 pts received AC. US with AC was associated with the best survival, followed by NACT with AC; median OS was 90.1 and 86.8 months for surgery with AC and NACT with AC, respectively. NACRT was associated with the worst survival (39.5 and 40.2 months with and without AC, respectively). The 5-year OS rates were 59.8%, 58.5%, 52.1%, 44.9%, 37.3%, and 37.8%, for US, NACT, and NACRT, with and without AC, respectively. The rate of tumor upstaging was highest in the NACT group, followed by the NACRT group, and lowest in the US group. Postsurgically, 62 (39%) and 48 (30%) pts in the NACT group and 198 (37%) and 161 (30%) pts in the NACRT group had upstaging in their T and N stages, respectively, compared to 214 (13%) and 326 (21%) pts in the US group. For the 1107 pts who also had pathological T1b-2N0 stage disease following US, no difference in survival was observed with or without AC. Conclusions: Upfront surgery with adjuvant chemotherapy and perioperative chemotherapy are associated with the best survival compared to preoperative radiotherapy. This is the largest study to address the best approach for the treatment of T1b-2 stage disease.

Survival Outcomes of Acinar Cell Pancreatic Cancer: A National Cancer Database Analysis

OBJECTIVES

Acinar cell pancreatic carcinomas (ACPCs) are rare neoplasms accounting for 1% to 2% of pancreatic tumors in adults. The objective of this study is to evaluate the benefit of chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting in resected ACPC and in the palliative setting for metastatic ACPC.

METHODS

Data were obtained from all US hospitals that contributed to the National Cancer Database between 2004 and 2014. Cases were identified using the histology code 8550.

RESULTS

A total of 593 patients with ACPC were identified. The mean age was 64.4 years (range, 18-90 years), with a male preponderance (72.8%, n = 432). Localized stage disease comprised 52.3% (n = 310) of patients. Among localized ACPC patients, 88.0% (n = 191) underwent surgery and 50.6% (n = 91) received adjuvant chemotherapy. The 5-year overall survival in those who received adjuvant treatment was slightly higher than those who did not receive adjuvant treatment (46.7% vs 44.8%, P = 0.3271). Among advanced-stage ACPC patients, 67.6% received chemotherapy, which translated into improved 5-year overall survival compared with no chemotherapy (8.1% vs 0%, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Chemotherapy in the palliative setting for advanced-stage ACPC patients was associated with improved survival. Adjuvant therapy did not translate into significant survival benefit.

Impact of Tumor Side on Clinical Outcomes in Stage II and III Colon Cancer With Known Microsatellite Instability Status

Background

Tumor sidedness as a prognostic factor in advanced stage colon cancer (CC) is well established. The impact of tumor sidedness on the clinical outcomes of stage II and III CC has not been well studied.

Methods

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was utilized to identify patients with pathological stage II and III primary adenocarcinoma of the colon from 2010 to 2015 using ICD-O-3 morphology and topography codes: 8140-47, 8210-11, 8220-21, 8260-63, 8480-81, 8490 and C18.0, 18.2,18.3, 18.5,18.6, 18.7. Univariate (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) survival analyses and Kaplan–Meier Curves with Log-rank test were utilized to compare overall survival (OS) based on tumor location and treatment received.

Results

A total of 35,071 patients with stage II (n = 17,629) and III (n = 17,442) CC were identified. 51.3% female; 81.5% Caucasian; median age 66 (range, 18–90). Majority of stage II and III tumors were right sided, 61.2% (n = 10,794) and 56.0% (n = 9,763). Microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) was more common in stage II compared to III, 23.3% (n = 4,115) vs 18.2% (n = 3,171) (p < 0.0001). In stage II MSI-H CC right was more common than left, 78.3% (n = 3223) vs 21.7% (n = 892). There was no significant difference in survival between stage II MSI-H left vs right (5-year OS 76.2 vs 74.7%, p = 0.1578). Stage II MSS CC right was more common than left, 56.0% (n = 7571) vs 44.0% (n = 5943), and survival was better in the left vs right (5-year OS 73.2 vs 70.8%, p = 0.0029). Stage III MSI-H CC was more common in the right than in the left, 75.6% (n = 2,397) vs 24.4% (n = 774) and survival was better in the left (5-year OS 62.5 vs 56.5%, p = 0.0026). Stage III MSS CC was more common in the right than in the left, 51.6% (n = 7,366) vs 48.4% (n = 6,905), and survival was better in the left vs right (5-year OS 67.0 vs 54.4%, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Survival was better in left sided tumors compared to right in stage II MSS, stage III MSS, and stage III MSI-H CC.

Impact of Sarcopenia, BMI, and Inflammatory Biomarkers on Survival in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated With Anti-PD-1 Antibody

BACKGROUND

Sarcopenia and inflammation are independently associated with worse survival in cancer patients. This study aims to determine the impact of sarcopenia, body mass index (BMI), and inflammatory biomarkers on survival in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with anti-PD-1 antibody-based immunotherapy.

METHODS

A retrospective review of advanced HCC patients treated with immunotherapy at Winship Cancer Institute between 2015 and 2019 was performed. Baseline computed tomography and magnetic resonance images were collected at mid-L3 level, assessed for skeletal muscle density using SliceOmatic (TomoVision, version 5.0) and converted to skeletal muscle index (SMI) by dividing it by height (m2). Sex-specific sarcopenia was defined by the median value of SMI. The optimal cut for continuous inflammation biomarker was determined by bias-adjusted log-rank test. Overall survival (OS) was set as primary outcome and Cox proportional hazard model was used for association with survival.

RESULTS

A total of 57 patients were included; 77.2% male, 52.6% Caucasian, 58.5% Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, 80.7% Child Pugh A. Treatment was second line and beyond in 71.9% of patients. The median follow-up time was 6 months. Sarcopenia cut-off for males and females was SMI of 43 and 39, respectively. 49.1% of patients had sarcopenia. Median OS was 5 versus 14.3 months in sarcopenic versus nonsarcopenic patients (Log-rank P=0.054). Median OS was 5 and 17.5 months in patients with BMI <25 and BMI ≥25, respectively (Log-rank P=0.034). Median OS was 3.6 and 14.3 months for patients with neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥5.15 versus NLR <5.15 (Log-rank P<0.001). In multivariable Cox regression model, higher baseline NLR was associated with worse OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.17, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.52-11.39, P=0.005). Sex-specific sarcopenia showed a trend of worse OS (HR: 1.71, 95% CI: 0.73-4.00, P=0.215) but was not statistically significant. BMI<25 was associated with worse OS (HR: 2.28, 95% CI: 0.92-5.65, P=0.076). In the association with progression free survival, neither baseline BMI nor sex-specific sarcopenia showed statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

After controlling for baseline Child Pugh score and NLR, sex-specific sarcopenia does not predict OS. Baseline BMI and NLR together may predict OS in advanced HCC patients treated with anti-PD-1 antibody.

Survival analysis of colorectal cancer patients treated with first-line modified FOLFOX6 with or without bolus fluorouracil

35

Background: The combination of oxaliplatin, bolus 5-FU (b5FU), infusional 5-FU (5-FUCI), and leucovorin (LV) is the preferred first line treatment option for mCRC. This study evaluates the impact of b5FU on survival in first line therapy for mCRC patients treated with mFOLFOX6. Methods: This was a retrospective chart review of patients ≥ 18 years old with mCRC receiving palliative first line mFOLFOX6 chemotherapy with or without b5FU/ LV from January 1, 2010 through June 1, 2019 at Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University. Data collection included the following: demographics (age, race, gender), disease characteristics (tumor sidedness), microsatellite status, KRAS status, BRAF status, addition of monoclonal antibodies (bevacizumab, panitumumab), ECOG PS, grade 3/4 neutropenic events, addition of growth factors, and treatment delays. The primary endpoint was PFS. The multivariable Cox proportional hazards model for PFS and OS was performed with selected covariates of interest. Results: A total of 252 patients with mCRC met the inclusion criteria. Median follow-up time was 2.4 years. 161 patients (64%) received mFOLFOX6 with b5FU/LV and 91 patients (36%) received mFOLFOX6 with no b5FU/LV. More cycles were delivered in the b5FU group as compared to the non-b5FU group (mean, 4.8 v. 3.8 cycles, respectively; p < 0.001). There were no differences in grade 3 and 4 neutropenic events between groups. Growth factor usage was numerically higher in the bolus group though not significantly different (p = 0.06). No difference was observed in treatment delays between groups (p = 0.83). There was no statistical difference in PFS between treatment groups (1.1 years in the b5FU/LV group v. 0.8 years (95% CI, 0.6-1.0) in the no 5-FU/LV bolus group; p = 0.076). The median OS was 2.5 years in the b5FU/LV group compared to 1.8 years in the no b5FU/LV group (p = 0.012). On univariate analysis, tumor sidedness and performance status were significantly different between groups. On multivariate analysis, none of the variables were significantly different between groups. Conclusions: The omission of the b5FU/LV from mFOLFOX6 does not significantly impact PFS, toxicity or treatment delays. However, OS is significantly shorter when the b5FU/LV is omitted suggesting the clinical importance of maintaining bolus administration with 5-FUCI in the first line palliative treatment of mCRC.

Survival outcomes of adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients with stage III colon cancer

89

Background: The survival impact of multi-agent (MAC) as compared to single-agent (SAC) adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in elderly patients with stage III colon cancer (CC) remains controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate the survival outcome comparing MAC to SAC in this population utilizing the National Cancer DataBase (NCDB). Methods: Patients 70 years and older with pathological stage III CC were identified between 2004 and 2015 from the NCDB using ICD-O-3 morphology and topography codes: 8140-47, 8210-11, 8220-21, 8260-63, 8480-81, 8490, and C18.0-18.8 (without C18.1). Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted and Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify the association between MAC vs. SAC and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 41,707 elderly patients (≥70 years old) with stage III CC were identified. Around half of the patients (n = 20,257; 48.5%) received AC; the majority of whom (n = 12,923, 63.8%) received MAC. The median age was 79 (range 70-90). Of the patients who received AC, the majority were female (n = 11,201, 55.3 %), Caucasians (87.4%) and had a moderately differentiated tumor grade (n = 12,619, 62.3%). Tumor size more than 4 cm was identified in 11,785 (58.2%) patients and 18,496 (91.3%) had negative surgical margins. Low-risk stage III CC constituted 50.6% (n = 10,264) of the study population. High-risk stage III CC was associated with worse OS compared to low-risk disease (p < 0.001). MAC was associated with better 5-year OS compared to SAC (p < 0.001). High-risk stage III patients who received MAC had an OS of 4.2 v. 3.4 years in SAC (p < 0.001). In low risk stage III, patients who received MAC had median OS of 8.5 v. 7 years in SAC (p < 0.001). In Univariate, male sex, positive surgical margin, insurance and facility types, age, year of diagnosistumor size, and Charlson-Deyo Score of > 2 were associated with worse OS (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Multi-agent AC is associated with better survival in stage III CC patients 70 years and older compared to SAC. Enhanced benefit of MAC was shown for both low risk and high risk stage III CC.

Phase II trial of nivolumab and metformin in patients with treatment refractory microsatellite stable metastatic colorectal cancer

95

Background: Preclinical data suggests metformin can improve immune exhaustion of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and potentiate the effects of PD-1 blockade. By normalizing the hypoxic TME, metformin was shown to improve cytotoxic T cell function and efficacy of anti-PD-1 antibody in highly aggressive B16 melanoma and MC38 colon adenocarcinoma tumor models. Based on this preclinical rationale we conducted a phase II study with nivolumab and metformin combination in treatment refractory MSS metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Methods: Nivolumab 480 mg IV every 4 weeks and Metformin 1000 mg po twice daily was administered in 28-day cycles following a 14-day metformin only lead-in phase.Eligible patients included stage IV metastatic treatment refractory MSS mCRC (patients must have received oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and fluoropyrimidine), age ≥18 years, ECOG PS 0-1, adequate organ function, no prior anti PD-1 agent. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). Simon’s two-stage Minimax design was employed (H0: ORR =4%; H1: ORR=15%; alpha = 0.1; power =80%). If ≥1 objective response was observed in the first evaluable 18 patients, 10 additional patients would be included in the cohort. ≥3 objective responders in 28 patients would be required to be considered positive study. Pre-treatment and on-treatment research biopsies and correlative peripheral blood specimens were collected. Results: A total of 24 patients were enrolled, 6 patients were replaced per protocol, and 18 patients had evaluable disease. Of the 18 evaluable patients 11/18 (61%) were female, median age 58 [IQR 50-67]. 2 patients had prolonged stable disease (4 and 10 cycles). No patients had objective response based on RECIST 1.1. Median OS and PFS was 5.1 months [95% CI (2-11.7)] and 2.3 months [95% CI (1.7-2.4)], respectively. Most common grade 3 and 4 toxicities were anemia (n=2) and diarrhea (n=2). Conclusions: In treatment refractory MSS mCRCnivolumab and metformin combination was well tolerated. Two patients achieved stable disease, but no objective response was seen; therefore, the study did not proceed with the second stage of enrollment. Immunologic correlative analysis of this study is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03800602.