Clinical outcomes of non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery and immune checkpoint inhibitors, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors, or chemotherapy alone

OBJECTIVE

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are commonly used in the systemic management of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) brain metastases (BMs). However, optimizing control of NSCLC BM with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and various systemic therapies remains an area of investigation.

METHODS

Between 2016 and 2019, the authors identified 171 NSCLC BM patients with 646 BMs treated with single-fraction SRS within 3 months of receiving treatment with ICIs (n = 56; 33%), EGFR-TKI (n = 30; 18%), chemotherapy and ICIs (n = 23; 14%), or standard chemotherapy alone (n = 62; 36%). Time-to-event analysis was conducted, and outcomes included distant intracranial control (DIC), local control (LC), and overall survival from SRS.

RESULTS

The median follow-up from BM diagnosis was 8.9 months (range 0.3-127 months). The 12-month Kaplan-Meier DIC rates were 37%, 53%, 41%, and 21% (p = 0.047) for the ICI, EGFR-TKI, ICI and chemotherapy, and chemotherapy-alone groups, respectively. On multivariate analysis, DIC was improved with EGFR-TKI (HR 0.4, 95% CI 0.3-0.8, p = 0.005) compared with conventional chemotherapy and treatment with SRS before systemic therapy (HR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3-0.9, p = 0.03) compared with after; and LC was improved with SRS before (HR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.9, p = 0.03) or concurrently (HR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.6, p = 0.003) compared with after. No differences in radionecrosis were noted by timing or type of systemic therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors' analysis showed significant differences in DIC based on receipt of systemic therapy and treatment with SRS before systemic therapy improved DIC. Prospective evaluation of the potential synergism between systemic therapy and SRS in NSCLC BM management is warranted.

Oncolytic DNX-2401 virotherapy plus pembrolizumab in recurrent glioblastoma: a phase 1/2 trial

Immune-mediated anti-tumoral responses, elicited by oncolytic viruses and augmented with checkpoint inhibition, may be an effective treatment approach for glioblastoma. Here in this multicenter phase 1/2 study we evaluated the combination of intratumoral delivery of oncolytic virus DNX-2401 followed by intravenous anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab in recurrent glioblastoma, first in a dose-escalation and then in a dose-expansion phase, in 49 patients. The primary endpoints were overall safety and objective response rate. The primary safety endpoint was met, whereas the primary efficacy endpoint was not met. There were no dose-limiting toxicities, and full dose combined treatment was well tolerated. The objective response rate was 10.4% (90% confidence interval (CI) 4.2-20.7%), which was not statistically greater than the prespecified control rate of 5%. The secondary endpoint of overall survival at 12 months was 52.7% (95% CI 40.1-69.2%), which was statistically greater than the prespecified control rate of 20%. Median overall survival was 12.5 months (10.7-13.5 months). Objective responses led to longer survival (hazard ratio 0.20, 95% CI 0.05-0.87). A total of 56.2% (95% CI 41.1-70.5%) of patients had a clinical benefit defined as stable disease or better. Three patients completed treatment with durable responses and remain alive at 45, 48 and 60 months. Exploratory mutational, gene-expression and immunophenotypic analyses revealed that the balance between immune cell infiltration and expression of checkpoint inhibitors may potentially inform on response to treatment and mechanisms of resistance. Overall, the combination of intratumoral DNX-2401 followed by pembrolizumab was safe with notable survival benefit in select patients (ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT02798406).

Abstract PD7-06: Characteristics of Long-Term Survival in Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis after Stereotactic Radiation

Background: Advances in imaging and systemic therapy have improved the survival for patients with breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM). However, an improved understanding of patients with long-term survival after stereotactic radiation (SRT) for BCBM is warranted and could allow for better prognostication and personalized treatment. Methods: This is a single institution retrospective review of 188 patients who underwent SRT sessions to 685 BCBM from August 2004 to June 2020. Patients who were lost to follow up within 2 years after SRT were excluded. Patients were stratified into 2 groups: those with overall survival (OS) from SRT less than 2 years (short-term survival, STS) and those with OS from SRT of at least 2 years (long-term survival, LTS). Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were compared between the 2 groups via the student t-test and Chi-square testing as appropriate. The Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to calculate OS, local control (LC), and distant intracranial control (DIC) from the date of SRT. The reverse KM method was used to estimate follow-up from SRT. Results: The median follow up from BCBM diagnosis was 52.8 months (95% CI: 40.5-75.2 months). Of the 685 treated BCBMs, 552 (81%) received stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to a median dose of 21 Gy (12-24 Gy) and 133 received fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (FSRT) to a median dose of 25 Gy (20-35 Gy) in 3-5 fractions. The 2-year LC, DIC, and OS was 78.4%, 26.5%, and 38.3%, respectively. The 5-year OS was 19%. There were 72 patients (38%) in the LTS group and 116 patients (62%) in the STS group. The LTS group had lower rates of invasive lobular carcinoma (0% vs 6%, p=0.001) and higher rate of HER2+ disease (61% vs 30%, p< 0.001). The LTS group had lower rates of concurrent extracranial metastasis (74% vs 89%, p=0.008) and lung metastasis (33% vs 53%, p=0.009), though there were no differences in the rates of bone or liver metastasis. The LTS group had less BCBM at the time of SRT (mean 1.9 vs 2.5, p=0.013) and more often received SRT to a single BCBM (65% vs 42%, p=0.002). There were no significant differences in age or performance status between the groups. Conclusion: Prognosis for patients with BCBM is heterogeneous, as a minority of patients have prolonged OS after SRT. These patients more often have limited BCBM, HER2+ disease, and a lower extracranial disease burden.

Citation Format: Joseph D. Tang, Matthew N. Mills, Chetna Thawani, Daniel E. Oliver, Aixa Soyano, Arnold Etame, Hsiang-Hsuan Michael Yu, Nam Tran, Michael A. Vogelbaum, Peter A. Forsyth, Brian J. Czerniecki, Hatem H. Soliman, Hyo S. Han, Kamran A. Ahmed. Characteristics of Long-Term Survival in Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis after Stereotactic Radiation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD7-06.

Federated learning enables big data for rare cancer boundary detection

Although machine learning (ML) has shown promise across disciplines, out-of-sample generalizability is concerning. This is currently addressed by sharing multi-site data, but such centralization is challenging/infeasible to scale due to various limitations. Federated ML (FL) provides an alternative paradigm for accurate and generalizable ML, by only sharing numerical model updates. Here we present the largest FL study to-date, involving data from 71 sites across 6 continents, to generate an automatic tumor boundary detector for the rare disease of glioblastoma, reporting the largest such dataset in the literature (n = 6, 314). We demonstrate a 33% delineation improvement for the surgically targetable tumor, and 23% for the complete tumor extent, over a publicly trained model. We anticipate our study to: 1) enable more healthcare studies informed by large diverse data, ensuring meaningful results for rare diseases and underrepresented populations, 2) facilitate further analyses for glioblastoma by releasing our consensus model, and 3) demonstrate the FL effectiveness at such scale and task-complexity as a paradigm shift for multi-site collaborations, alleviating the need for data-sharing.

Distinct Cell Adhesion Signature Defines Glioblastoma Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cell Subsets

In multiple types of cancer, an increased frequency in myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) is associated with worse outcomes and poor therapeutic response. In the glioblastoma (GBM) microenvironment, monocytic (m) MDSCs represent the predominant subset. However, the molecular basis of mMDSC enrichment in the tumor microenvironment compared with granulocytic (g) MDSCs has yet to be determined. Here we performed the first broad epigenetic profiling of MDSC subsets to define underlying cell-intrinsic differences in behavior and found that enhanced gene accessibility of cell adhesion programs in mMDSCs is linked to their tumor-accelerating ability in GBM models upon adoptive transfer. Mouse and human mMDSCs expressed higher levels of integrin β1 and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) compared with gMDSCs as part of an enhanced cell adhesion signature. Integrin β1 blockade abrogated the tumor-promoting phenotype of mMDSCs and altered the immune profile in the tumor microenvironment, whereas treatment with a DPP-4 inhibitor extended survival in preclinical GBM models. Targeting DPP-4 in mMDSCs reduced pERK signaling and their migration towards tumor cells. These findings uncover a fundamental difference in the molecular basis of MDSC subsets and suggest that integrin β1 and DPP-4 represent putative immunotherapy targets to attenuate myeloid cell-driven immune suppression in GBM.

SIGNIFICANCE

Epigenetic profiling uncovers cell adhesion programming as a regulator of the tumor-promoting functions of monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells in glioblastoma, identifying therapeutic targets that modulate the immune response and suppress tumor growth.

Patient satisfaction and cost savings analysis of the telemedicine program within a neuro-oncology department

Purpose

Unique challenges exist in the utilization of telemedicine for neurological and surgical specialties. We examined the differences in patient satisfaction for telemedicine versus in-person visits within a Neuro-Oncology Program to assess whether there was a difference between surgical and medical specialties. We also examined the potential cost savings benefits of utilizing telemedicine.

Methods

1189 Press Ganey surveys in the Department of Neuro-Oncology (982 in-person and 207 telemedicine) by surgical and medical neuro-oncology patients between 04/01/2020 and 06/30/2021 were reviewed. Survey results were divided into 4 categories (Access, Provider, Technology (telemedicine only), and Overall Satisfaction). Results were analyzed for the impact of telemedicine versus in-person visits, and gender, age, insurance, and specialty. Cost savings were calculated based on potential travel distance and lost productivity.

Results

Survey results from telemedicine visits demonstrated that patients with private insurance returned higher scores in the Provider (p = 0.0089), Technology (p = 0.00187), and Overall (p = 0.00382) categories. Surgical patients returned higher scores for Access (p = 0.0015), Technology (p = 0.0002), and Overall (p = 0.0019). When comparing telemedicine to in-person scores, in-person scored higher in Provider (p = 0.0092) for all patients, while in-person scored higher in Access (p = 0.0252) amongst surgical patients. Cost analysis revealed that telemedicine allowed patients to save an average of 4.1 to 5.6 h per visit time and a potential cost savings of up to $223.3 ± 171.4.

Conclusion

Telemedicine yields equivalent patient satisfaction when employed in surgical as compared to medical Neuro-Oncology patients with the potential to lessen the financial and time burden on neuro-oncology patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11060-022-04173-7

Replicative Instability Drives Cancer Progression

In the past decade, defective DNA repair has been increasingly linked with cancer progression. Human tumors with markers of defective DNA repair and increased replication stress exhibit genomic instability and poor survival rates across tumor types. Seminal studies have demonstrated that genomic instability develops following inactivation of BRCA1, BRCA2, or BRCA-related genes. However, it is recognized that many tumors exhibit genomic instability but lack BRCA inactivation. We sought to identify a pan-cancer mechanism that underpins genomic instability and cancer progression in BRCA-wildtype tumors. Methods: Using multi-omics data from two independent consortia, we analyzed data from dozens of tumor types to identify patient cohorts characterized by poor outcomes, genomic instability, and wildtype BRCA genes. We developed several novel metrics to identify the genetic underpinnings of genomic instability in tumors with wildtype BRCA. Associated clinical data was mined to analyze patient responses to standard of care therapies and potential differences in metastatic dissemination. Results: Systematic analysis of the DNA repair landscape revealed that defective single-strand break repair, translesion synthesis, and non-homologous end-joining effectors drive genomic instability in tumors with wildtype BRCA and BRCA-related genes. Importantly, we find that loss of these effectors promotes replication stress, therapy resistance, and increased primary carcinoma to brain metastasis. Conclusions: Our results have defined a new pan-cancer class of tumors characterized by replicative instability (RIN). RIN is defined by the accumulation of intra-chromosomal, gene-level gain and loss events at replication stress sensitive (RSS) genome sites. We find that RIN accelerates cancer progression by driving copy number alterations and transcriptional program rewiring that promote tumor evolution. Clinically, we find that RIN drives therapy resistance and distant metastases across multiple tumor types.

Molecular determinants of outcomes in meningiomas

Meningiomas are the most common intracranial primary tumor in adults. Surgery is the predominant therapeutic modality for symptomatic meningiomas. Although the majority of meningiomas are benign, there exists a subset of meningiomas that are clinically aggressive. Recent advances in genetics and epigenetics have uncovered molecular alterations that drive tumor meningioma biology with prognostic and therapeutic implications. In this review, we will discuss the advances on molecular determinants of therapeutic response in meningiomas to date and discuss findings of targeted therapies in meningiomas.

Prognostic validation of a new classification system for extent of resection in glioblastoma: a report of the RANO resect group

BACKGROUND

Terminology to describe extent of resection in glioblastoma is inconsistent across clinical trials. A surgical classification system was previously proposed based upon residual contrast-enhancing (CE) tumor. We aimed to (I) explore the prognostic utility of the classification system and (II) define how much removed non-CE tumor translates into a survival benefit.

METHODS

The international RANO resect group retrospectively searched previously compiled databases from seven neuro-oncological centers in the USA and Europe for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma per WHO 2021 classification. Clinical and volumetric information from pre- and post-operative MRI were collected.

RESULTS

We collected 1008 patients with newly diagnosed IDHwt glioblastoma. 744 IDHwt glioblastomas were treated with radiochemotherapy per EORTC 26981/22981 (TMZ/RT→TMZ) following surgery. Among these homogenously treated patients, lower absolute residual tumor volumes (in cm 3) were favorably associated with outcome: patients with 'maximal CE resection' (class 2) had superior outcome compared to patients with 'submaximal CE resection' (class 3) or 'biopsy' (class 4). Extensive resection of non-CE tumor (≤5 cm 3 residual non-CE tumor) was associated with better survival among patients with complete CE resection, thus defining class 1 ('supramaximal CE resection'). The prognostic value of the resection classes was retained on multivariate analysis when adjusting for molecular and clinical markers.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed "RANO categories for extent of resection in glioblastoma" are highly prognostic and may serve for stratification within clinical trials. Removal of non-CE tumor beyond the CE tumor borders may translate into additional survival benefit, providing a rationale to explicitly denominate such 'supramaximal CE resection'.

Depatuxizumab mafodotin in EGFR-amplified newly diagnosed glioblastoma: A phase III randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Approximately 50% of newly diagnosed glioblastomas (GBMs) harbor epidermal growth factor receptor gene amplification (EGFR-amp). Preclinical and early-phase clinical data suggested efficacy of depatuxizumab mafodotin (depatux-m), an antibody-drug conjugate comprised of a monoclonal antibody that binds activated EGFR (overexpressed wild-type and EGFRvIII-mutant) linked to a microtubule-inhibitor toxin in EGFR-amp GBMs.

METHODS

In this phase III trial, adults with centrally confirmed, EGFR-amp newly diagnosed GBM were randomized 1:1 to radiotherapy, temozolomide, and depatux-m/placebo. Corneal epitheliopathy was treated with a combination of protocol-specified prophylactic and supportive measures. There was 85% power to detect a hazard ratio (HR) ≤0.75 for overall survival (OS) at a 2.5% 1-sided significance level (ie traditional two-sided p ≤ 0.05) by log-rank testing.

RESULTS

There were 639 randomized patients (median age 60, range 22-84; 62% men). Prespecified interim analysis found no improvement in OS for depatux-m over placebo (median 18.9 vs. 18.7 months, HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.82-1.26, 1-sided p = 0.63). Progression-free survival was longer for depatux-m than placebo (median 8.0 vs. 6.3 months; HR 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-1.01, p = 0.029), particularly among those with EGFRvIII-mutant (median 8.3 vs. 5.9 months, HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.56-0.93, 1-sided p = 0.002) or MGMT unmethylated (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.61-0.97; 1-sided p = 0.012) tumors but without an OS improvement. Corneal epitheliopathy occurred in 94% of depatux-m-treated patients (61% grade 3-4), causing 12% to discontinue.

CONCLUSIONS

Interim analysis demonstrated no OS benefit for depatux-m in treating EGFR-amp newly diagnosed GBM. No new important safety risks were identified.

Leveraging the neurosurgical operating room for therapeutic development in NeuroOncology

Glioblastoma (GBM) remains a disease with a dismal prognosis. For all the hope and promise immunotherapies and molecular targeted therapies have shown for systemic malignancies, these treatments have failed to show any promise in GBM. In this context, the paradigm of investigation of therapeutics for this disease itself must be examined and modifications considered. The unique challenge of the presence of blood-brain and blood-tumor barriers (BBB/BTB) raises questions about both the true levels of systemic drug delivery to the affected tissues. Window-of-opportunity (WoO) trials in neuro-oncology allow for proof-of-concept at the start of a classic phase I-II-III clinical trial progression. For therapeutics that do not have the ability to cross the BBB/BTB, direct delivery into tumor and/or tumor-infiltrated brain in the setting of a surgical procedure can provide a novel route of therapeutic access. These approaches permit neurosurgeons to play a greater role in therapeutic development for brain tumors.

Use of virtual magnetic resonance imaging to compensate for brain shift during image-guided surgery: illustrative case

BACKGROUND

Maximal safe resection is the paramount objective in the surgical management of malignant brain tumors. It is facilitated through use of image-guided neuronavigation. Intraoperative image guidance systems use preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the navigational map. The accuracy of neuronavigation is limited by intraoperative brain shift and can become less accurate over the course of the procedure. Intraoperative MRI can compensate for dynamic brain shift but requires significant space and capital investment, often unavailable at many centers.

OBSERVATIONS

The authors described a case in which an image fusion algorithm was used in conjunction with an intraoperative computed tomography (CT) system to compensate for brain shift during resection of a brainstem hemorrhagic melanoma metastasis. Following initial debulking of the hemorrhagic metastasis, intraoperative CT was performed to ascertain extent of resection. An elastic image fusion (EIF) algorithm was used to create virtual MRI relative to both the intraoperative CT scan and preoperative MRI, which facilitated complete resection of the tumor while preserving critical brainstem anatomy.

LESSONS

EIF algorithms can be used with multimodal images (preoperative MRI and intraoperative CT) and create an updated virtual MRI data set to compensate for brain shift in neurosurgery and aid in maximum safe resection of malignant brain tumors.

Low-risk meningioma: Initial outcomes from NRG Oncology/RTOG 0539

BACKGROUND

Three- and five-year progression-free survival (PFS) for low-risk meningioma managed with surgery and observation reportedly exceeds 90%. Herewith we summarize outcomes for low-risk meningioma patients enrolled on NRG/RTOG 0539.

METHODS

This phase II trial allocated patients to one of three groups per World Health Organization grade, recurrence status, and resection extent. Low-risk patients had either gross total (GTR) or subtotal resection (STR) for a newly diagnosed grade 1 meningioma and were observed after surgery. The primary endpoint was 3-year PFS. Adverse events (AEs) were scored using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.

RESULTS

Among 60 evaluable patients, the median follow-up was 9.1 years. The 3-, 5-, and 10-year rates were 91.4% (95% CI, 84.2 to 98.6), 89.4% (95% CI, 81.3 to 97.5), 85.0% (95% CI, 75.3 to 94.7) for PFS and 98.3% (95% CI, 94.9 to 100), 98.3%, (95% CI, 94.9 to 100), 93.8% (95% CI, 87.0 to 100) for overall survival (OS), respectively. With centrally confirmed GTR, 3/5/10y PFS and OS rates were 94.3/94.3/87.6% and 97.1/97.1/90.4%. With STR, 3/5/10y PFS rates were 83.1/72.7/72.7% and 10y OS 100%. Five patients reported one grade 3, four grade 2, and five grade 1 AEs. There were no grade 4 or 5 AEs.

CONCLUSIONS

These results prospectively validate high PFS and OS for low-risk meningioma managed surgically but raise questions regarding optimal management following STR, a subcohort that could potentially benefit from adjuvant therapy.

A Window of Opportunity to Overcome Therapeutic Failure in Neuro-Oncology

Glioblastoma is the most common primary malignant brain neoplasm and it remains one of the most difficult-to-treat human cancers despite decades of discovery and translational and clinical research. Many advances have been made in our understanding of the genetics and epigenetics of gliomas in general; yet, there remains an urgent need to develop novel agents that will improve the survival of patients with this deadly disease. What sets glioblastoma apart from all other cancers is that it develops and spreads within an organ that renders tumor cells inaccessible to most systemically administered agents because of the presence of the blood-brain barrier. Inadequate drug penetration into the central nervous system is often cited as the most common cause of trial failure in neuro-oncology, and even so-called brain-penetrant therapeutics may not reach biologically relevant concentrations in tumor cells. Evaluation of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a novel therapy is a cornerstone of drug development, but few trials for glioma therapeutics have incorporated these basic elements in an organ-specific manner. Window-of-opportunity clinical trial designs can provide early insight into the biological plausibility of a novel therapeutic strategy in the clinical setting. A variety of window-of-opportunity trial designs, which take into account the limited access to treated tissue and the challenges with obtaining pretreatment control tissues, have been used for the initial development of traditional and targeted small-molecule drugs and biologic therapies, including immunotherapies and oncolytic viral therapies. Early-stage development of glioma therapeutics should include a window-of-opportunity component whenever feasible.

Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases: ASCO Guideline Endorsement of ASTRO Guideline

PURPOSE

American Society of Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) has developed a guideline on appropriate radiation therapy for brain metastases. ASCO has a policy and set of procedures for endorsing clinical practice guidelines that have been developed by other professional organizations.

METHODS

"Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases: An ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline"² was reviewed for developmental rigor by methodologists. An ASCO Endorsement Panel subsequently reviewed the content and the recommendations.

RESULTS

The ASCO Endorsement Panel determined that the recommendations from the ASTRO guideline, published May 6, 2022, are clear, thorough, and based upon the most relevant scientific evidence. ASCO endorses "Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases: An ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline."².

RECOMMENDATIONS

Within the guideline, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is recommended for patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 and up to four intact brain metastases, and conditionally recommended for patients with up to 10 intact brain metastases. The guideline provides detailed dosing and fractionation recommendations on the basis of the size of the metastases. For patients with resected brain metastases, radiation therapy (SRS or whole-brain radiation therapy [WBRT]) is recommended to improve intracranial disease control; if there are limited additional brain metastases, SRS is recommended over WBRT. For patients with favorable prognosis and brain metastases ineligible for surgery and/or SRS, WBRT is recommended with hippocampal avoidance where possible and the addition of memantine is recommended. For patients with brain metastases, limiting the single-fraction V_12Gy to brain tissue to ≤ 10 cm³ is conditionally recommended.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/neurooncology-guidelines.

Improving Brain Metastases Outcomes Through Therapeutic Synergy Between Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Targeted Cancer Therapies

Brain metastases are the most common form of brain cancer. Increasing knowledge of primary tumor biology, actionable molecular targets and continued improvements in systemic and radiotherapy regimens have helped improve survival but necessitate multidisciplinary collaboration between neurosurgical, medical and radiation oncologists. In this review, we will discuss the advances of targeted therapies to date and discuss findings of studies investigating the synergy between these therapies and stereotactic radiosurgery for non-small cell lung cancer, breast cancer, melanoma, and renal cell carcinoma brain metastases.

Temozolomide and radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in patients with glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype: post-hoc analysis of the EORTC randomized phase 3 CATNON trial

PURPOSE

In a post-hoc analysis of the CATNON trial (NCT00626990), we explored whether adding temozolomide to radiotherapy improves outcome in patients with IDH1/2wt anaplastic astrocytomas with molecular features of glioblastoma (redesignated as glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype in the 2021 WHO classification of CNS tumors).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

From the randomized phase 3 CATNON study examining the addition of adjuvant and concurrent temozolomide to radiotherapy in anaplastic astrocytomas, we selected a subgroup of IDH1/2wt and H3F3Awt tumors with presence of TERT promoter mutations and/or EGFR amplifications and/or combined gain of chromosome 7 and loss of chromosome 10. Molecular abnormalities including MGMT promoter methylation status were determined by next-generation sequencing, DNA methylation profiling, and SNaPshot analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 751 patients entered in the CATNON study, 670 had fully molecularly characterized tumors. 159 of these tumors met the WHO 2021 molecular criteria for glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype. Of these patients, 47 received radiotherapy only and 112 received a combination of radiotherapy and temozolomide. There was no added effect of temozolomide on either overall survival (HR 1.19, 95%CI 0.82-1.71) or progression-free survival (HR 0.87, 95%CI 0.61-1.24). MGMT promoter methylation was prognostic for overall survival, but was not predictive for outcome to temozolomide treatment either with respect to overall survival or progression-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of patients with glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype temozolomide treatment did not add benefit beyond that observed from radiotherapy, regardless of MGMT promoter status. These findings require a new well-powered prospective clinical study to explore the efficacy of temozolomide treatment in this patient population.

Abstract OT2-09-01: Phase I/II study of stereotactic radiation and abemaciclib in the management of hormone receptor positive HER2 negative breast cancer brain metastases

Background: Breast cancer patients with brain metastases have a high unmet clinical need and improved management strategies are needed. There has been interest in studying CDK 4/6 inhibitors in the management of breast cancer brain metastases. A phase II study has shown abemaciclib to have activity in the management of hormone receptor (HR)+/HER2- brain metastases. Pre-clinical data suggests a potential synergy with CDK inhibitors and radiation therapy. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a cornerstone in the management of limited brain metastases. We hypothesize treatment with abemaciclib and SRS will be safe and improve intracranial progression free survival (PFS) compared to abemaciclib alone. Trial Design: The study is designed as a prospective, single-arm, nonrandomized, open-label, phase I/II trial of abemaciclib and endocrine therapy with SRS among patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer brain metastases. Treatment will be initiated with one week of abemaciclib followed by stereotactic radiation to sites of brain metastases or post-operative cavities with continued abemaciclib. Safety will be monitored initially by a 3+3 design. If unexpected neurologic toxicities are noted, the dose of radiation therapy will be reduced. This will be followed by a phase II study to evaluate intracranial PFS. Eligibility: Eligible patients include those that are HR+/HER2-, ≥18, ECOG ≤2 with ≤15 breast cancer brain metastases with measurable disease per Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) criteria. Specific Aims: The primary objective of the phase I study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of abemaciclib and SRS to sites of brain metastases in the management of HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer with brain metastases. The primary objective of the phase II portion is to determine PFS intracranially. Secondary objectives include evaluation of extracranial PFS, local and distant intracranial control, and overall survival. Statistical Methods: Safety and feasibility will be monitored in the phase I study using a 3 + 3 design followed by a phase II study to assess intracranial PFS. The phase II study is designed as a single-arm, two-stage trial using the Restricted-Kwak-and-Jung’s method. In the first stage, a total of 21 patients will be enrolled. If pre-specified endpoints are met, an additional 10 patients will be enrolled in the second stage. Patient Accrual: A total of up to 31 patients will be enrolled inclusive of patients in the phase I portion treated at the recommended phase II dose. Clinical trial information: NCT04923542.

Citation Format: Kamran A. Ahmed, Youngchul Kim, Michelle DeJesus, Sasha J. Beyer, Nicole O. Williams, Joshua Palmer, Kristina D. Woodhouse, Rashmi K. Murthy, Jing Li, Avan J. Armaghani, John A. Arrington, Ricardo L. Costa, Brian J. Czerniecki, Arnold B. Etame, Peter A. Forsyth, Hung T. Khong, Daniel E. Oliver, Marilin Rosa, Solmaz Sahebjam, Hatem H. Soliman, Aixa E. Soyano, Michael A. Vogelbaum, Michael Yu, Hyo S. Han. Phase I/II study of stereotactic radiation and abemaciclib in the management of hormone receptor positive HER2 negative breast cancer brain metastases [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-09-01.

NTRK3 gene fusion in an adult ganglioglioma: illustrative case

BACKGROUND

Gangliogliomas are well-differentiated, slow-growing glioneuronal neoplasms frequently reported to harbor upregulating alterations in the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway, particularly serine–threonine protein kinase B-RAF alterations. Fusions involving neurotrophin tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) genes have rarely been reported in ganglioglioma. Similarly, echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like (EML) 4 gene fusion has been described in lung cancer, but none has been reported in ganglioglioma.

OBSERVATIONS

This report discusses the care of a 72-year-old man presenting with medication-refractory, left-sided focal seizures who was found to have a nongadolinium-enhancing, T2-hyperintense, right frontoparietal lesion. The patient received resection, and histological analysis found a World Health Organization grade I ganglioglioma, with genetic analysis demonstrating an EML4-NTRK3 gene fusion protein.

LESSONS

To our knowledge, this is the first report of an NTRK3 fusion, EML4-NTRK3, in an adult ganglioglioma, which is otherwise mostly associated with BRAF alterations and activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway. Further studies are needed to elucidate the function of the resultant fusion protein and determine whether it may serve as a future therapeutic target.

Surgical and anatomic factors predict development of leptomeningeal disease in patients with melanoma brain metastases

BACKGROUND

Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a devastating complication of systemic malignancy, of which there is an unclear etiology. The aim of this study is to determine if surgical or anatomic factors can predict LMD in patients with metastatic melanoma.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed of 1162 patients treated at single institution for melanoma brain metastases (MBM). Patients with fewer than 3 months follow-up or lacking appropriate imaging were excluded. Demographic information, surgical, and anatomic data were collected.

RESULTS

Eight hundred and twenty-seven patients were included in the final review. On multivariate analysis for the entire cohort, female gender, dural-based and intraventricular metastasis, and tumor bordering CSF spaces were associated with increased risk of LMD. Surgical resection was not significant for risk of LMD. On multivariate analysis of patients who have undergone surgical resection of a metastatic tumor, dural-based and intraventricular metastasis, ventricular entry during surgery, and metastasis in the infratentorial space were associated with increased risk of LMD. On multivariate analysis of patients who did not undergo surgery, chemotherapy after initial diagnosis and metastasis bordering CSF spaces were associated with increased risk of LMD.

CONCLUSION

In a single-institution cohort of MBM, we found that surgical resection alone did not result in an increased risk of LMD. Anatomical factors such as dural-based and intraventricular metastasis were significant for developing LMD, as well as entry into a CSF space during surgical resection. These data suggest a strong correlation between anatomic location and tumor cell seeding in relation to the development of LMD.

Liquid biopsy in gliomas: A RANO review and proposals for clinical applications

BACKGROUND

There is an extensive literature highlighting the utility of blood-based liquid biopsies in several extracranial tumors for diagnosis and monitoring.

METHODS

The RANO (Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology) group developed a multidisciplinary international Task Force to review the English literature on liquid biopsy in gliomas focusing on the most frequently used techniques, that is circulating tumor DNA, circulating tumor cells, and extracellular vesicles in blood and CSF.

RESULTS

ctDNA has a higher sensitivity and capacity to represent the spatial and temporal heterogeneity in comparison to circulating tumor cells. Exosomes have the advantages to cross an intact blood-brain barrier and carry also RNA, miRNA, and proteins. Several clinical applications of liquid biopsies are suggested: to establish a diagnosis when tissue is not available, monitor the residual disease after surgery, distinguish progression from pseudoprogression, and predict the outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a need for standardization of biofluid collection, choice of an analyte, and detection strategies along with rigorous testing in future clinical trials to validate findings and enable entry into clinical practice.