26
|
|
27
|
Fiegler H, Gribble SM, Burford DC, Carr P, Prigmore E, Porter KM, Clegg S, Crolla JA, Dennis NR, Jacobs P, Carter NP. Array painting: a method for the rapid analysis of aberrant chromosomes using DNA microarrays. J Med Genet 2003; 40:664-70. [PMID: 12960211 PMCID: PMC1735585 DOI: 10.1136/jmg.40.9.664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The authors describe a method, termed array painting, which allows the rapid, high resolution analysis of the content and breakpoints of aberrant chromosomes. METHODS Array painting is similar in concept to reverse chromosome painting and involves the hybridisation of probes generated by PCR of small numbers of flow sorted chromosomes on large insert genomic clone DNA microarrays. RESULTS and CONCLUSIONS By analysing patients with cytogenetically balanced chromosome rearrangements, the authors show the effectiveness of array painting as a method to map breakpoints prior to cloning and sequencing chromosome rearrangements.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Cell Line
- Child
- Child, Preschool
- Chromosome Aberrations
- Chromosome Disorders/genetics
- Chromosome Disorders/pathology
- Chromosomes, Human, Pair 11/genetics
- Chromosomes, Human, Pair 12/genetics
- Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17/genetics
- Chromosomes, Human, Pair 22/genetics
- Female
- Flow Cytometry
- Humans
- In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence/methods
- Karyotyping/methods
- Male
- Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis/methods
- Translocation, Genetic
Collapse
|
28
|
Carter NP, Fiegler H, Piper J. Comparative analysis of comparative genomic hybridization microarray technologies: report of a workshop sponsored by the Wellcome Trust. CYTOMETRY 2002; 49:43-8. [PMID: 12357458 DOI: 10.1002/cyto.10153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Array-comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), although providing much higher resolution compared with conventional CGH, has not yet become a widely applied method for the analysis of genomic gains and losses. METHODS In January 2002, the Wellcome Trust sponsored a workshop where many of the laboratories developing this technology met to compare different methodologies for array-CGH. Fourteen groups participated, comprising 11 from Europe and 3 from the United States. To facilitate objective analysis, each laboratory constructed arrays using the same anonymous clones and performed a series of test hybridizations using identical genomic DNAs. RESULTS A figure of merit (FM) was developed to summarize entire collections of data from each laboratory in a single measurement. The FMs consistently showed that a few groups produced quantitative array hybridization data of high quality, whereas a majority achieved a lower standard. CONCLUSIONS The conclusions of the workshop were that polymerase chain reaction-based methods for the amplification of large insert clones for arraying were effective for array-CGH. It was also concluded that hybridizations performed under coverslips or in automated hybridization apparatus were less effective than hybridizations performed in simple wells with gentle rocking. A common experience by the participants was the batch-to-batch variability of commercial Cot1 preparations in their ability to suppress hybridization to repeat sequences. (Supplementary material for this article can be found in the online issue, which is available at http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/0196-4763/suppmat/49_2/v49.43.html or at http://www.sanger.ac.uk/HGP/Cytogenetics/Publications/Cytometry Sept 2002/Supplemental.pdf.)
Collapse
|
29
|
Deloukas P, Matthews LH, Ashurst J, Burton J, Gilbert JG, Jones M, Stavrides G, Almeida JP, Babbage AK, Bagguley CL, Bailey J, Barlow KF, Bates KN, Beard LM, Beare DM, Beasley OP, Bird CP, Blakey SE, Bridgeman AM, Brown AJ, Buck D, Burrill W, Butler AP, Carder C, Carter NP, Chapman JC, Clamp M, Clark G, Clark LN, Clark SY, Clee CM, Clegg S, Cobley VE, Collier RE, Connor R, Corby NR, Coulson A, Coville GJ, Deadman R, Dhami P, Dunn M, Ellington AG, Frankland JA, Fraser A, French L, Garner P, Grafham DV, Griffiths C, Griffiths MN, Gwilliam R, Hall RE, Hammond S, Harley JL, Heath PD, Ho S, Holden JL, Howden PJ, Huckle E, Hunt AR, Hunt SE, Jekosch K, Johnson CM, Johnson D, Kay MP, Kimberley AM, King A, Knights A, Laird GK, Lawlor S, Lehvaslaiho MH, Leversha M, Lloyd C, Lloyd DM, Lovell JD, Marsh VL, Martin SL, McConnachie LJ, McLay K, McMurray AA, Milne S, Mistry D, Moore MJ, Mullikin JC, Nickerson T, Oliver K, Parker A, Patel R, Pearce TA, Peck AI, Phillimore BJ, Prathalingam SR, Plumb RW, Ramsay H, Rice CM, Ross MT, Scott CE, Sehra HK, Shownkeen R, Sims S, Skuce CD, Smith ML, Soderlund C, Steward CA, Sulston JE, Swann M, Sycamore N, Taylor R, Tee L, Thomas DW, Thorpe A, Tracey A, Tromans AC, Vaudin M, Wall M, Wallis JM, Whitehead SL, Whittaker P, Willey DL, Williams L, Williams SA, Wilming L, Wray PW, Hubbard T, Durbin RM, Bentley DR, Beck S, Rogers J. The DNA sequence and comparative analysis of human chromosome 20. Nature 2001; 414:865-71. [PMID: 11780052 DOI: 10.1038/414865a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 148] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
The finished sequence of human chromosome 20 comprises 59,187,298 base pairs (bp) and represents 99.4% of the euchromatic DNA. A single contig of 26 megabases (Mb) spans the entire short arm, and five contigs separated by gaps totalling 320 kb span the long arm of this metacentric chromosome. An additional 234,339 bp of sequence has been determined within the pericentromeric region of the long arm. We annotated 727 genes and 168 pseudogenes in the sequence. About 64% of these genes have a 5' and a 3' untranslated region and a complete open reading frame. Comparative analysis of the sequence of chromosome 20 to whole-genome shotgun-sequence data of two other vertebrates, the mouse Mus musculus and the puffer fish Tetraodon nigroviridis, provides an independent measure of the efficiency of gene annotation, and indicates that this analysis may account for more than 95% of all coding exons and almost all genes.
Collapse
|
30
|
Jentsch I, Adler ID, Carter NP, Speicher MR. Karyotyping mouse chromosomes by multiplex-FISH (M-FISH). Chromosome Res 2001; 9:211-4. [PMID: 11330395 DOI: 10.1023/a:1016696303479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Karyotyping of mouse chromosomes is a skillful art, which is laborious work even for experienced cytogeneticists. With the growing number of mouse models for human diseases, there is an increasing demand for automated mouse karyotyping systems. Here, such a karyotyping system for mouse chromosomes based on the multiplex-fluorescence in-situ hybridization (M-FISH) technology is shown. The system was tested on a number of individual mice with numerical and structural aberrations and its reproducibility and robustness verified. Mouse M-FISH should be a valuable tool for the analysis of chromosomal rearrangements in mice.
Collapse
|
31
|
Bentley DR, Deloukas P, Dunham A, French L, Gregory SG, Humphray SJ, Mungall AJ, Ross MT, Carter NP, Dunham I, Scott CE, Ashcroft KJ, Atkinson AL, Aubin K, Beare DM, Bethel G, Brady N, Brook JC, Burford DC, Burrill WD, Burrows C, Butler AP, Carder C, Catanese JJ, Clee CM, Clegg SM, Cobley V, Coffey AJ, Cole CG, Collins JE, Conquer JS, Cooper RA, Culley KM, Dawson E, Dearden FL, Durbin RM, de Jong PJ, Dhami PD, Earthrowl ME, Edwards CA, Evans RS, Gillson CJ, Ghori J, Green L, Gwilliam R, Halls KS, Hammond S, Harper GL, Heathcott RW, Holden JL, Holloway E, Hopkins BL, Howard PJ, Howell GR, Huckle EJ, Hughes J, Hunt PJ, Hunt SE, Izmajlowicz M, Jones CA, Joseph SS, Laird G, Langford CF, Lehvaslaiho MH, Leversha MA, McCann OT, McDonald LM, McDowall J, Maslen GL, Mistry D, Moschonas NK, Neocleous V, Pearson DM, Phillips KJ, Porter KM, Prathalingam SR, Ramsey YH, Ranby SA, Rice CM, Rogers J, Rogers LJ, Sarafidou T, Scott DJ, Sharp GJ, Shaw-Smith CJ, Smink LJ, Soderlund C, Sotheran EC, Steingruber HE, Sulston JE, Taylor A, Taylor RG, Thorpe AA, Tinsley E, Warry GL, Whittaker A, Whittaker P, Williams SH, Wilmer TE, Wooster R, Wright CL. The physical maps for sequencing human chromosomes 1, 6, 9, 10, 13, 20 and X. Nature 2001; 409:942-3. [PMID: 11237015 DOI: 10.1038/35057165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
We constructed maps for eight chromosomes (1, 6, 9, 10, 13, 20, X and (previously) 22), representing one-third of the genome, by building landmark maps, isolating bacterial clones and assembling contigs. By this approach, we could establish the long-range organization of the maps early in the project, and all contig extension, gap closure and problem-solving was simplified by containment within local regions. The maps currently represent more than 94% of the euchromatic (gene-containing) regions of these chromosomes in 176 contigs, and contain 96% of the chromosome-specific markers in the human gene map. By measuring the remaining gaps, we can assess chromosome length and coverage in sequenced clones.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Chromosomes, Human, Pair 1
- Chromosomes, Human, Pair 10
- Chromosomes, Human, Pair 13
- Chromosomes, Human, Pair 20
- Chromosomes, Human, Pair 6
- Contig Mapping
- Genome, Human
- Humans
- X Chromosome
Collapse
|
32
|
BAC Resource Consortium T, Cheung VG, Nowak N, Jang W, Kirsch IR, Zhao S, Chen XN, Furey TS, Kim UJ, Kuo WL, Olivier M, Conroy J, Kasprzyk A, Massa H, Yonescu R, Sait S, Thoreen C, Snijders A, Lemyre E, Bailey JA, Bruzel A, Burrill WD, Clegg SM, Collins S, Dhami P, Friedman C, Han CS, Herrick S, Lee J, Ligon AH, Lowry S, Morley M, Narasimhan S, Osoegawa K, Peng Z, Plajzer-Frick I, Quade BJ, Scott D, Sirotkin K, Thorpe AA, Gray JW, Hudson J, Pinkel D, Ried T, Rowen L, Shen-Ong GL, Strausberg RL, Birney E, Callen DF, Cheng JF, Cox DR, Doggett NA, Carter NP, Eichler EE, Haussler D, Korenberg JR, Morton CC, Albertson D, Schuler G, de Jong PJ, Trask BJ. Integration of cytogenetic landmarks into the draft sequence of the human genome. Nature 2001; 409:953-8. [PMID: 11237021 PMCID: PMC7845515 DOI: 10.1038/35057192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 203] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
We have placed 7,600 cytogenetically defined landmarks on the draft sequence of the human genome to help with the characterization of genes altered by gross chromosomal aberrations that cause human disease. The landmarks are large-insert clones mapped to chromosome bands by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Each clone contains a sequence tag that is positioned on the genomic sequence. This genome-wide set of sequence-anchored clones allows structural and functional analyses of the genome. This resource represents the first comprehensive integration of cytogenetic, radiation hybrid, linkage and sequence maps of the human genome; provides an independent validation of the sequence map and framework for contig order and orientation; surveys the genome for large-scale duplications, which are likely to require special attention during sequence assembly; and allows a stringent assessment of sequence differences between the dark and light bands of chromosomes. It also provides insight into large-scale chromatin structure and the evolution of chromosomes and gene families and will accelerate our understanding of the molecular bases of human disease and cancer.
Collapse
|
33
|
Mullikin JC, Hunt SE, Cole CG, Mortimore BJ, Rice CM, Burton J, Matthews LH, Pavitt R, Plumb RW, Sims SK, Ainscough RM, Attwood J, Bailey JM, Barlow K, Bruskiewich RM, Butcher PN, Carter NP, Chen Y, Clee CM, Coggill PC, Davies J, Davies RM, Dawson E, Francis MD, Joy AA, Lamble RG, Langford CF, Macarthy J, Mall V, Moreland A, Overton-Larty EK, Ross MT, Smith LC, Steward CA, Sulston JE, Tinsley EJ, Turney KJ, Willey DL, Wilson GD, McMurray AA, Dunham I, Rogers J, Bentley DR. An SNP map of human chromosome 22. Nature 2000; 407:516-20. [PMID: 11029003 DOI: 10.1038/35035089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 112] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The human genome sequence will provide a reference for measuring DNA sequence variation in human populations. Sequence variants are responsible for the genetic component of individuality, including complex characteristics such as disease susceptibility and drug response. Most sequence variants are single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), where two alternate bases occur at one position. Comparison of any two genomes reveals around 1 SNP per kilobase. A sufficiently dense map of SNPs would allow the detection of sequence variants responsible for particular characteristics on the basis that they are associated with a specific SNP allele. Here we have evaluated large-scale sequencing approaches to obtaining SNPs, and have constructed a map of 2,730 SNPs on human chromosome 22. Most of the SNPs are within 25 kilobases of a transcribed exon, and are valuable for association studies. We have scaled up the process, detecting over 65,000 SNPs in the genome as part of The SNP Consortium programme, which is on target to build a map of 1 SNP every 5 kilobases that is integrated with the human genome sequence and that is freely available in the public domain.
Collapse
|
34
|
Cross SH, Clark VH, Simmen MW, Bickmore WA, Maroon H, Langford CF, Carter NP, Bird AP. CpG island libraries from human chromosomes 18 and 22: landmarks for novel genes. Mamm Genome 2000; 11:373-83. [PMID: 10790537 DOI: 10.1007/s003350010071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
CpG islands are found at the 5' end of approximately 60% of human genes and so are important genomic landmarks. They are concentrated in early-replicating, highly acetylated gene-rich regions. With respect to CpG island content, human Chrs 18 and 22 are very different from each other: Chr 18 appears to be CpG island poor, whereas Chr 22 appears to be CpG island rich. We have constructed and validated CpG island libraries from flow-sorted Chrs 18 and 22 and used these to estimate the difference in number of CpG islands found on these two chromosomes. These libraries contain normalized collections of sequences from the 5' end of genes. Clones from the libraries were sequenced and compared with the sequence databases; one third matched ESTs, thus anchoring these ESTs at the 5' end of their gene. However, it was striking that many clones either had no match or matched only existing CpG island clones. This suggests that a significant proportion of 5' gene sequences are absent from databases, presumably either because they are difficult to clone or the gene is poorly expressed and/or has a restricted expression pattern. This point should be taken into consideration if the currently available libraries are those used for the elucidation of complete, as opposed to partial, gene sequences. The Chr 18 and 22 CpG island libraries are a sequence resource for the isolation of such 5' gene sequences from specific human chromosomes.
Collapse
|
35
|
|
36
|
Tse E, Grutz G, Garner AA, Ramsey Y, Carter NP, Copeland N, Gilbert DJ, Jenkins NA, Agulnick A, Forster A, Rabbitts TH. Characterization of the Lmo4 gene encoding a LIM-only protein: genomic organization and comparative chromosomal mapping. Mamm Genome 1999; 10:1089-94. [PMID: 10556429 DOI: 10.1007/s003359901167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
LIM-only (LMO) proteins are transcription regulators that function by mediating protein-protein interaction and include the T cell oncogenes encoding LMO1 and LMO2. The oncogenic functions of LMO1 and LMO2 are thought to be mediated by interaction with LDB1 since they form a multimeric protein complex(es). A new member of the Lmo family, Lmo4, has also recently been identified via its interaction with Ldb1. Sequence analysis of the mouse Lmo4 gene shows that it spans about 18 kb and consists of at least six exons, including two alternatively spliced 5' exons. Unlike Lmo1, the two 5' exons of Lmo4 do not encode protein. Comparison of the Lmo4 gene structure with the other LMO family members shows the exon structure of Lmo4 differs in the position of exon junctions encoding the second LIM domain and in a novel exon-intron junction at the penultimate codon of the gene. Lmo4 is thus the least conserved known member of the LIM-only family in both nucleotide sequence and exon structure. Physical mapping of the Lmo4/LMO4 genes has shown mouse Lmo4 is located on Chromosome (Chr) 3 and human LMO4 on Chr 1p22.3. This chromosome location is of interest as it occurs in a region that is deleted in a number of human cancers, indicating a possible role of LMO4 in tumorigenesis, like its relatives LMO1 and LMO2.
Collapse
|
37
|
Breen M, Thomas R, Binns MM, Carter NP, Langford CF. Reciprocal chromosome painting reveals detailed regions of conserved synteny between the karyotypes of the domestic dog (Canis familiaris) and human. Genomics 1999; 61:145-55. [PMID: 10534400 DOI: 10.1006/geno.1999.5947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 105] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
The domestic dog is increasingly being recognized as a useful model for human disease. The aim of this study was to conduct the first detailed whole-genome comparison of human and dog using bidirectional heterologous chromosome painting (reciprocal Zoo-FISH) analysis. We used whole-chromosome paint probes produced from degenerate oligonucleotide-primed PCR amplification of high-resolution bivariate flow-sorted human and dog chromosomes. No fewer than 68 evolutionarily conserved segments were identified between the dog and the human karyotypes. The use of elongated metaphase chromosomes for both species allowed the boundaries of each evolutionarily conserved segment to be determined to subband resolution. The distribution of conserved segments is discussed, as are the applications of these data in refining the current status of the dog genome map.
Collapse
|
38
|
Nusbaum C, Slonim DK, Harris KL, Birren BW, Steen RG, Stein LD, Miller J, Dietrich WF, Nahf R, Wang V, Merport O, Castle AB, Husain Z, Farino G, Gray D, Anderson MO, Devine R, Horton LT, Ye W, Wu X, Kouyoumjian V, Zemsteva IS, Wu Y, Collymore AJ, Courtney DF, Tam J, Cadman M, Haynes AR, Heuston C, Marsland T, Southwell A, Trickett P, Strivens MA, Ross MT, Makalowski W, Xu Y, Boguski MS, Carter NP, Denny P, Brown SD, Hudson TJ, Lander ES. A YAC-based physical map of the mouse genome. Nat Genet 1999; 22:388-93. [PMID: 10431246 DOI: 10.1038/11967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
A physical map of the mouse genome is an essential tool for both positional cloning and genomic sequencing in this key model system for biomedical research. Indeed, the construction of a mouse physical map with markers spaced at an average interval of 300 kb is one of the stated goals of the Human Genome Project. Here we report the results of a project at the Whitehead Institute/MIT Center for Genome Research to construct such a physical map of the mouse. We built the map by screening sequenced-tagged sites (STSs) against a large-insert yeast artificial chromosome (YAC) library and then integrating the STS-content information with a dense genetic map. The integrated map shows the location of 9,787 loci, providing landmarks with an average spacing of approximately 300 kb and affording YAC coverage of approximately 92% of the mouse genome. We also report the results of a project at the MRC UK Mouse Genome Centre targeted at chromosome X. The project produced a YAC-based map containing 619 loci (with 121 loci in common with the Whitehead map and 498 additional loci), providing especially dense coverage of this sex chromosome. The YAC-based physical map directly facilitates positional cloning of mouse mutations by providing ready access to most of the genome. More generally, use of this map in addition to a newly constructed radiation hybrid (RH) map provides a comprehensive framework for mouse genomic studies.
Collapse
|
39
|
Heppell-Parton AC, Nacheva E, Carter NP, Bergh J, Ogilvie D, Rabbitts PH. Elucidation of the mechanism of homozygous deletion of 3p12-13 in the U2020 cell line reveals the unexpected involvement of other chromosomes. CANCER GENETICS AND CYTOGENETICS 1999; 111:105-10. [PMID: 10347545 DOI: 10.1016/s0165-4608(98)00208-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Homozygous deletions in tumor cells have been useful in the localization and validation of tumor suppressor genes. We have described a homozygous deletion in a lung cancer cell line (U2020) which is located within the most proximal of the three regions on the short arm of chromosome 3 believed to be lost in lung cancer development. Construction of a YAC contig map indicates that the deletion spans around 8 Mb, but no large deletion was apparent on conventional cytogenetic analysis of the cell line. To investigate this paradox, whole chromosome, arm-specific, and regional paints have been used. This analysis has revealed that genetic loss has occurred by complex rearrangements of chromosomes 3, rather than simple interstitial deletion. These studies emphasize the power of molecular cytogenetics to disclose unsuspected tumor-specific translocations within the extremely complex karyotypes characteristic of solid tumors.
Collapse
|
40
|
Heppell-Parton AC, Nacheva E, Carter NP, Rabbitts PH. A combined approach of conventional and molecular cytogenetics for detailed karyotypic analysis of the small cell lung carcinoma cell line U2020. CANCER GENETICS AND CYTOGENETICS 1999; 108:110-9. [PMID: 9973937 DOI: 10.1016/s0165-4608(98)00130-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Until recently the ability to analyze complex karyotypic rearrangements was totally dependent upon light microscopy of G-banded chromosomes. Developments in the area of molecular cytogenetics have revolutionized such analysis, making it possible to determine the nature of complex rearrangements. An extensive analysis has been made of the small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) cell line U2020, using a combined approach of conventional and molecular cytogenetics, enabling a highly detailed karyotype to be constructed revealing rearrangements previously undetected by G-banding alone. This approach offers the opportunity to reassess other tumor karyotypes, particularly those of high complexity found in solid tumors, for tumor-specific consistent rearrangements indecipherable by conventional karyotyping.
Collapse
|
41
|
Breen M, Langford CF, Carter NP, Holmes NG, Dickens HF, Thomas R, Suter N, Ryder EJ, Pope M, Binns MM. FISH mapping and identification of canine chromosomes. J Hered 1999; 90:27-30. [PMID: 9987898 DOI: 10.1093/jhered/90.1.27] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The karyotype of the domestic dog (Canis familiaris) is widely accepted as one of the most difficult mammalian karyotypes to work with. The dog has a total of 78 chromosomes; all 76 autosomes are acrocentric in morphology and show only a gradual decrease in length. Standardization of the canine karyotype has been performed in two stages. The first stage dealt only with chromosomes 1-21 which can be readily identified by conventional G-banding techniques. The remaining 17 autosomal pairs have proven to be very difficult to reliably identify by banding alone. To facilitate the identification of all canine chromosomes, chromosome-specific paint probes have been produced by DOP-PCR from flow-sorted dog chromosomes. Each paint probe has been used for FISH to identify the corresponding chromosome(s), allowing precise identification of all 78 canine chromosomes. The identification of the undesignated 17 autosomal pairs has been agreed upon by the standardization committee during the second stage of their role. Cosmid clones containing microsatellite markers may now be conclusively assigned to their chromosomal origin by simultaneous dual-color FISH with the corresponding paint probe. In this way a collection of chromosome-specific cosmid clones is being constructed, comprising at least one marker per chromosome, which will allow anchoring of existing and future linkage groups to the physical map.
Collapse
|
42
|
Dickens HF, Holmes NG, Ryder E, Breen M, Thomas R, Suter N, Sampson J, Langford CF, Ross M, Carter NP, Binns MM. Use of cosmid-derived and chromosome-specific canine microsatellites. J Hered 1999; 90:52-4. [PMID: 9987903 DOI: 10.1093/jhered/90.1.52] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The majority of microsatellite markers being used to generate the emerging genetic linkage maps of the dog are derived from small-insert, random clones. While such markers are easy to generate, they have the disadvantage that they cannot easily be physically mapped by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), making it difficult to assess the extent of genome coverage represented by such maps. In contrast, microsatellite markers from large-insert libraries enable the linkage groups within which they fall to be physically anchored to specific chromosomes. One aim of our work is to identify at least one microsatellite-containing cosmid clone for each canine chromosome, to ensure that linkage groups exist for all chromosomes. This is particularly important for a species with as complex a karyotype as the dog. Locating two cosmids on each chromosome would allow the orientation of the linkage groups to be established. Chromosomal locations of cosmid clones containing microsatellites have been determined by FISH and confirmed using canine chromosome-specific paints. Microsatellite sequences have been genotyped on the DogMap reference family. Microsatellites derived from flow-sorted, chromosome-specific libraries represent another source of useful markers. Initial studies have been carried out on the canine X chromosome, on which markers were underrepresented in our initial studies.
Collapse
|
43
|
Dixon AK, Richardson PJ, Lee K, Carter NP, Freeman TC. Expression profiling of single cells using 3 prime end amplification (TPEA) PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 1998; 26:4426-31. [PMID: 9742245 PMCID: PMC147873 DOI: 10.1093/nar/26.19.4426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The ability to relate the physiological status of individual cells to the complement of genes they express is limited by current methodological approaches for performing these analyses. We report here the development of a robust and reproducible method for amplifying 3' sequences of mRNA derived from single cells and demonstrate that the amplified cDNA, derived from individual human lymphoblastoma cells, can be used for the expression profiling of up to 40 different genes per cell. In addition, we show that 3 prime end amplification (TPEA) PCR can be used to enable the detection of both high and low abundance mRNA species in samples harvested from live neurons in rat brain slices. This procedure will facilitate the study of complex tissue function at the cellular level.
Collapse
|
44
|
Khan J, Parsa NZ, Harada T, Meltzer PS, Carter NP. Detection of gains and losses in 18 meningiomas by comparative genomic hybridization. CANCER GENETICS AND CYTOGENETICS 1998; 103:95-100. [PMID: 9614906 DOI: 10.1016/s0165-4608(97)00394-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) was used to examine gains and losses in 18 meningioma tumors that had been previously analyzed for loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at 22q12. Partial or complete losses were seen by CGH in only 9 of 18 cases on chromosome 22. This compares with 11 of 18 losses of single or more loci by LOH. The discrepancy in these results in probably explained by the increased sensitivity of LOH by using microsatellite markers that are able to detect small deletions, whereas losses on the order of 10-15 megabases are required for confident identification by CGH. There was no consistent pattern of gains or losses by CGH, including those tumors that lacked LOH at 22q12. In one tumor of interest in which CGH and LOH studies failed to demonstrate loss on chromosome 22, CGH identified an area of amplification at 17q22-23.
Collapse
|
45
|
Morris JS, Carter NP, Ferguson-Smith MA, Edwards PA. Cytogenetic analysis of three breast carcinoma cell lines using reverse chromosome painting. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1997; 20:120-39. [PMID: 9331563 DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2264(199710)20:2<120::aid-gcc3>3.0.co;2-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Chromosome painting was used to determine the copy number and identity of virtually all the chromosomes in three breast cancer cell lines, T-47D, MDA-MB-361, and ZR-75-1. The karyotypes of all three cell lines were very complex, and were consistent with the monosomic pattern of evolution suggested by Dutrillaux, in which nonreciprocal translocations cause an initial reduction in chromosome number, followed by duplication of the entire genome and further chromosome loss. Twenty distinct abnormal chromosomes were identified in T-47D, seven of which were present as two copies. MDA-MB-361 had 27 abnormal chromosomes each as a single copy. Thirteen abnormal chromosomes in ZR-75-1 occurred singly, two were paired, and one was present as three copies. Most of the aberrant chromosomes were nonreciprocal translocations, although deletions, duplications, isochromosomes, and amplifications (HSR of 1q) were also found. Chromosome arms present in abnormal chromosomes in all three lines were 1q, 6p, 7p, 8p, 8q, 10q, 11p, 11q, 12p, 13q, 14q, 15q, 16p, 16q, 17q, and 20q. The only chromosome arms present in four or more copies in all three lines were 8q and proximal 12p, while 1p, 17p, and bands 11q12--13 were the only chromosome regions consistently reduced to two copies. The most striking feature common to all three lines was a translocation breakpoint on the short arm of chromosome 8 at 8p12.
Collapse
|
46
|
Guilbaud C, Peyrard M, Fransson I, Clifton SW, Roe BA, Carter NP, Dumanski JP. Characterization of the mouse beta-prime adaptin gene; cDNA sequence, genomic structure, and chromosomal localization. Mamm Genome 1997; 8:651-6. [PMID: 9271666 DOI: 10.1007/s003359900531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Adaptins are important subunits of heterotetrameric complexes called adaptors, which participate in the clathrin-coated, vesicle-mediated endocytosis and intracellular receptor transport. The gene family of adaptins is divided into three classes, alpha, beta, and gamma, with further subdivision into beta- and beta-prime components. Two beta-prime adaptins, the rat AP105a and the human BAM22, have previously been characterized. The BAM22 gene is located on human Chromosome (Chr) 22q12 and can be considered a candidate meningioma tumor suppressor gene. We report here the characterization of the mouse ortholog of the BAM22 gene, and we suggest the name adtb1 for the mouse gene. Like the BAM22 gene, the adtb1 transcript is highly and ubiquitously expressed. We provide 3885-bp cDNA sequence, which entirely covers the open reading frame of the adtb1, capable of encoding a protein of 943 amino acids. The adtb1 protein is highly conserved (>96% identity) when compared with AP105a and BAM22 proteins. We also report the genomic organization of adtb1, which is similar to the BAM22 gene. The adtb1 gene has been assigned to mouse Chr 11, band 11A2, which confirms the synteny between human Chr 22q12 and mouse Chr 11.
Collapse
|
47
|
Breen M, Langford CF, Carter NP, Fischer PE, Marti E, Gerstenberg C, Allen WR, Lear TL, Binns MM. Detection of equine X chromosome abnormalities in equids using a horse X whole chromosome paint probe (WCPP). Vet J 1997; 153:235-8. [PMID: 9232112 DOI: 10.1016/s1090-0233(97)80057-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
|
48
|
Langford CF, Fischer PE, Binns MM, Holmes NG, Carter NP. Chromosome-specific paints from a high-resolution flow karyotype of the dog. Chromosome Res 1996; 4:115-23. [PMID: 8785605 DOI: 10.1007/bf02259704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Using peripheral blood lymphocyte cultures and dual-laser flow cytometry, we have routinely obtained high-resolution bivariate flow karyotypes of the dog in which 32 peaks are resolved. To allow the identification of the chromosome types in each peak, chromosomes were flow sorted, amplified and labelled by polymerase chain reaction with partially degenerate primers and hybridized onto metaphase spreads of a male dog. The chromosome paints from 22 of the 32 peaks each hybridized to single homologue pairs and eight peaks each hybridized to two pairs. Paints from the remaining two peaks hybridized to only one homologue each in the male metaphase spread, thus corresponding to the sex chromosomes X and Y. All of the 38 pairs of autosomes and the two sex chromosomes of the dog could be accounted for in these painting experiments. The positions of chromosomes 1-21 were assigned to the flow karyotype (only chromosomes 1-21 have as yet been officially designated). The high-resolution flow karyotype and the chromosome paints will facilitate further standardization of the dog karyotype. The ability to sort sufficient quantities of dog chromosomes for the production of chromosome-specific DNA libraries has the potential to accelerate the physical and genetic mapping of the dog genome.
Collapse
|
49
|
Mungall AJ, Edwards CA, Ranby SA, Humphray SJ, Heathcott RW, Clee CM, East CL, Holloway E, Butler AP, Langford CF, Gwilliam R, Rice KM, Maslen GL, Carter NP, Ross MT, Deloukas P, Bentley DR, Dunham I. Physical mapping of chromosome 6: a strategy for the rapid generation of sequence-ready contigs. DNA SEQUENCE : THE JOURNAL OF DNA SEQUENCING AND MAPPING 1996; 7:47-9. [PMID: 9063638 DOI: 10.3109/10425179609015647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
The development of radiation hybrid (RH) mapping (Cox et al., 1990) and the availability of large numbers of STS markers, together with extensive bacterial clone resources provided a means to accelerate the process of mapping a human chromosome and preparing bacterial clone contigs ready to sequence. Our aim is to construct physical clone maps covering those regions of chromosome 6 that are not currently extensively mapped, and use these to determine the DNA sequence of the whole chromosome. We report here a strategy which initially involves establishing a high density framework map using RH mapping. The framework markers are then used for the identification of bacterial genomic clones covering the chromosome. The bacterial clones are analysed by restriction enzyme fingerprinting and STS-content analysis to identify sequence-ready contigs. Contig gap closure will also be performed by clone walking.
Collapse
|
50
|
Schinzel A, Lorda-Sanchez I, Binkert F, Carter NP, Bebb CE, Ferguson-Smith MA, Eiholzer U, Zachmann M, Robinson WP. Kallmann syndrome in a boy with a t(1;10) translocation detected by reverse chromosome painting. J Med Genet 1995; 32:957-61. [PMID: 8825924 PMCID: PMC1051777 DOI: 10.1136/jmg.32.12.957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Prometaphase chromosomes from a 16 year old boy with hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism and anosmia (Kallmann syndrome) showed a tiny chromosome fragment attached to the long arm of one chromosome 1 without a visible reciprocal translocation chromosome. Chromosome painting with libraries from chromosomes 1 and X excluded a t(X;1) translocation, but failed to detect a second translocation chromosome. Through reverse chromosome painting, an unbalanced der(1), t(1;10) (q44;q26) translocation could be detected. This is the third case of Kallmann syndrome with a de novo rearrangement between two autosomes. The distal long arm of chromosome 1 may contain a candidate locus for a gene, mutations of which may cause the Kallmann phenotype; a 10q location seems less likely.
Collapse
|