The risk and outcomes of epidural hematomas after perioperative and obstetric epidural catheterization: a report from the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group Research Consortium

BACKGROUND

In this study, we sought to determine the frequency and outcomes of epidural hematomas after epidural catheterization.

METHODS

Eleven centers participating in the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group used electronic anesthesia information systems and quality assurance databases to identify patients who had epidural catheters inserted for either obstetrical or surgical indications. From this cohort, patients undergoing laminectomy for the evacuation of hematoma within 6 weeks of epidural placement were identified.

RESULTS

Seven of 62,450 patients undergoing perioperative epidural catheterizations developed hematoma requiring surgical evacuation. The event rate was 11.2 × 10(-5) (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.5 × 10(-5) to 23.1 × 10(-5)). Four of the 7 had anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy that deviated from American Society of Regional Anesthesia guidelines. None of 79,837 obstetric patients with epidural catheterizations developed hematoma (upper limit of the 95% CI, 4.6 × 10(-5)). The hematoma rate in obstetric epidural catheterizations was significantly lower than in perioperative epidural catheterizations (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

In this series, the 95% CI for the frequency of epidural hematoma requiring laminectomy after epidural catheter placement for perioperative anesthesia/analgesia was 1 event per 22,189 placements to 1 event per 4330 placements. Risk was significantly lower in obstetric epidurals.

Prevention of pain on injection of propofol: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To systematically determine the most efficacious approach for preventing pain on injection of propofol.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, www.clinicaltrials.gov, and hand searching from the reference lists of identified papers.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomised controlled trials comparing drug and non-drug interventions with placebo or another intervention to alleviate pain on injection of propofol in adults.

RESULTS

Data were analysed from 177 randomised controlled trials totalling 25,260 adults. The overall risk of pain from propofol injection alone was about 60%. Using an antecubital vein instead of a hand vein was the most effective single intervention (relative risk 0.14, 95% confidence interval 0.07 to 0.30). Pretreatment using lidocaine (lignocaine) in conjunction with venous occlusion was similarly effective (0.29, 0.22 to 0.38). Other effective interventions were a lidocaine-propofol admixture (0.40, 0.33 to 0.48); pretreatment with lidocaine (0.47, 0.40 to 0.56), opioids (0.49, 0.41 to 0.59), ketamine (0.52, 0.46 to 0.57), or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (0.67, 0.49 to 0.91); and propofol emulsions containing medium and long chain triglycerides (0.75, 0.67 to 0.84). Statistical testing of indirect comparisons showed that use of the antecubital vein and pretreatment using lidocaine along with venous occlusion to be more efficacious than the other interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

The two most efficacious interventions to reduce pain on injection of propofol were use of the antecubital vein, or pretreatment using lidocaine in conjunction with venous occlusion when the hand vein was chosen. Under the assumption of independent efficacy a third practical alternative could be pretreatment of the hand vein with lidocaine or ketamine and use of a propofol emulsion containing medium and long chain triglycerides. Although not the most effective intervention on its own, a small dose of opioids before induction halved the risk of pain from the injection and thus can generally be recommended unless contraindicated.

An evaluation of remifentanil-sevoflurane response surface models in patients emerging from anesthesia: model improvement using effect-site sevoflurane concentrations

INTRODUCTION

We previously reported models that characterized the synergistic interaction between remifentanil and sevoflurane in blunting responses to verbal and painful stimuli. This preliminary study evaluated the ability of these models to predict a return of responsiveness during emergence from anesthesia and a response to tibial pressure when patients required analgesics in the recovery room. We hypothesized that model predictions would be consistent with observed responses. We also hypothesized that under non-steady-state conditions, accounting for the lag time between sevoflurane effect-site concentration (Ce) and end-tidal (ET) concentration would improve predictions.

METHODS

Twenty patients received a sevoflurane, remifentanil, and fentanyl anesthetic. Two model predictions of responsiveness were recorded at emergence: an ET-based and a Ce-based prediction. Similarly, 2 predictions of a response to noxious stimuli were recorded when patients first required analgesics in the recovery room. Model predictions were compared with observations with graphical and temporal analyses.

RESULTS

While patients were anesthetized, model predictions indicated a high likelihood that patients would be unresponsive (> or = 99%). However, after termination of the anesthetic, models exhibited a wide range of predictions at emergence (1%-97%). Although wide, the Ce-based predictions of responsiveness were better distributed over a percentage ranking of observations than the ET-based predictions. For the ET-based model, 45% of the patients awoke within 2 min of the 50% model predicted probability of unresponsiveness and 65% awoke within 4 min. For the Ce-based model, 45% of the patients awoke within 1 min of the 50% model predicted probability of unresponsiveness and 85% awoke within 3.2 min. Predictions of a response to a painful stimulus in the recovery room were similar for the Ce- and ET-based models.

DISCUSSION

Results confirmed, in part, our study hypothesis; accounting for the lag time between Ce and ET sevoflurane concentrations improved model predictions of responsiveness but had no effect on predicting a response to a noxious stimulus in the recovery room. These models may be useful in predicting events of clinical interest but large-scale evaluations with numerous patients are needed to better characterize model performance.

Anatomic dead space cannot be predicted by body weight

BACKGROUND

Anatomic dead space (also called airway or tracheal dead space) is the part of the tidal volume that does not participate in gas exchange. Some contemporary ventilation protocols, such as the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network protocol, call for smaller tidal volumes than were traditionally delivered. With smaller tidal volumes, the percentage of each delivered breath that is wasted in the anatomic dead space is greater than it is with larger tidal volumes. Many respiratory and medical textbooks state that anatomic dead space can be estimated from the patient's weight by assuming there is approximately 1 mL of dead space for every pound of body weight. With a volumetric capnography monitor that measures on-airway flow and CO2, the anatomic dead space can be automatically and directly measured with the Fowler method, in which dead space equals the exhaled volume up to the point when CO2 rises above a threshold.

METHODS

We analyzed data from 58 patients (43 male, 15 female) to assess the accuracy of 5 anatomic dead space estimation methods. Anatomic dead space was measured during the first 10 min of monitoring and compared to the estimates.

RESULTS

The coefficient of determination (r2) between the anatomic dead space estimate based on body weight and the measured anatomic dead space was r2 = 0.0002. The mean +/- SD error between the body weight estimate and the measured dead space was 60 +/- 54 mL.

CONCLUSIONS

It appears that the anatomic dead space estimate methods were sufficient when used (as originally intended) together with other assumptions to identify a starting point in a ventilation algorithm, but the poor agreement between an individual patient's measured and estimated anatomic dead space contradicts the assumption that dead space can be predicted from actual or ideal weight alone.

Advances in and limitations of up-and-down methodology: a précis of clinical use, study design, and dose estimation in anesthesia research

Sequential design methods for binary response variables exist for determination of the concentration or dose associated with the 50% point along the dose-response curve; the up-and-down method of Dixon and Mood is now commonly used in anesthesia research. There have been important developments in statistical methods that (1) allow the design of experiments for the measurement of the response at any point (quantile) along the dose-response curve, (2) demonstrate the risk of certain statistical methods commonly used in literature reports, (3) allow the estimation of the concentration or dose-the target dose-associated with the chosen quantile without the assumption of the symmetry of the tolerance distribution, and (4) set bounds on the probability of response at this target dose. This article details these developments, briefly surveys current use of the up-and-down method in anesthesia research, reanalyzes published reports using the up-and-down method for the study of the epidural relief of pain during labor, and discusses appropriate inferences from up-and-down method studies.

When is a bispectral index of 60 too low?: Rational processed electroencephalographic targets are dependent on the sedative-opioid ratio

BACKGROUND

Opioids are commonly used in conjunction with sedative drugs to provide anesthesia. Previous studies have shown that opioids reduce the clinical requirements of sedatives needed to provide adequate anesthesia. Processed electroencephalographic parameters, such as the Bispectral Index (BIS; Aspect Medical Systems, Newton, MA) and Auditory Evoked Potential Index (AAI; Alaris Medical Systems, San Diego, CA), can be used intraoperatively to assess the depth of sedation. The aim of this study was to characterize how the addition of opioids sufficient to change the clinical level of sedation influenced the BIS and AAI.

METHODS

Twenty-four adult volunteers received a target-controlled infusion of remifentanil (0-15 ng/ml) and inhaled sevoflurane (0-6 vol%) at various target concentration pairs. After reaching pseudo-steady state drug levels, the modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation score, BIS, and AAI were measured at each target concentration pair. Response surface pharmacodynamic interaction models were built using the pooled data for each pharmacodynamic endpoint.

RESULTS

Response surface models adequately characterized all pharmacodynamic endpoints. Despite the fact that sevoflurane-remifentanil interactions were strongly synergistic for clinical sedation, BIS and AAI were minimally affected by the addition of remifentanil to sevoflurane anesthetics.

CONCLUSION

Although clinical sedation increases significantly even with the addition of a small to moderate dose of remifentanil to a sevoflurane anesthetic, the BIS and AAI are insensitive to this change in clinical state. Therefore, during "opioid-heavy" sevoflurane-remifentanil anesthetics, targeting a BIS less than 60 or an AAI less than 30 may result in an unnecessarily deep anesthetic state.

Opioid-volatile anesthetic synergy: a response surface model with remifentanil and sevoflurane as prototypes

BACKGROUND

Combining a hypnotic and an analgesic to produce sedation, analgesia, and surgical immobility required for clinical anesthesia is more common than administration of a volatile anesthetic alone. The aim of this study was to apply response surface methods to characterize the interactions between remifentanil and sevoflurane.

METHODS

Sixteen adult volunteers received a target-controlled infusion of remifentanil (0-15 ng/ml) and inhaled sevoflurane (0-6 vol%) at various target concentration pairs. After reaching pseudo-steady state drug levels, the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation score and response to a series of randomly applied experimental pain stimuli (pressure algometry, electrical tetany, and thermal stimulation) were observed for each target concentration pair. Response surface pharmacodynamic interaction models were built using the pooled data for sedation and analgesic endpoints. Using computer simulation, the pharmacodynamic interaction models were combined with previously reported pharmacokinetic models to identify the combination of remifentanil and sevoflurane that yielded the fastest recovery (Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation score > or = 4) for anesthetics lasting 30-900 min.

RESULTS

Remifentanil synergistically decreased the amount of sevoflurane necessary to produce sedation and analgesia. Simulations revealed that as the duration of the procedure increased, faster recovery was produced by concentration target pairs containing higher amounts of remifentanil. This trend plateaued at a combination of 0.75 vol% sevoflurane and 6.2 ng/ml remifentanil.

CONCLUSION

Response surface analyses demonstrate a synergistic interaction between remifentanil and sevoflurane for sedation and all analgesic endpoints.

Transient neurologic symptoms (TNS) following spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine versus other local anaesthetics

BACKGROUND

Spinal anaesthesia has been in use since the turn of the late nineteenth century. During the last decade there has been an increase in the number of reports implicating lidocaine as a possible cause of temporary and permanent neurologic complications after spinal anaesthesia. Follow-up of patients who received uncomplicated spinal anaesthesia revealed that some of them developed pain in the lower extremities after an initial full recovery. This painful condition that occurs in the immediate postoperative period was named "transient neurologic symptoms" (TNS).

OBJECTIVES

To study the frequency of TNS and neurologic complications after spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine, compared to other local anaesthetics.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CENTRAL), (The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2005); MEDLINE (1966 to January 2005); EMBASE (1980 to week 6, 2005); LILACS (March 2005); and handsearched the reference lists of trials and review articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomized and pseudo-randomized studies comparing the frequency of TNS and of neurologic complications after spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine as compared to other local anaesthetics.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently evaluated the quality of the relevant studies and extracted the data from the included studies.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifteen trials, reporting 1437 patients, 120 of whom developed transient neurologic symptoms, were included in the analysis. The use of lidocaine for spinal anaesthesia increased the risk of developing TNS. There was no evidence that this painful condition was associated with any neurologic pathology; the symptoms disappeared spontaneously by the fifth postoperative day. The relative risk (RR) for developing TNS after spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine as compared to other local anaesthetics (bupivacaine, prilocaine, procaine, levobupivacaine and ropivacaine) was 7.16 (95% confidence interval (CI) 4.02, 12.75).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The risk of developing TNS after spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine was significantly higher than when bupivacaine, prilocaine and procaine were used. The term "TNS", which implies a positive neurologic finding, should not be used for this painful condition. One study about the impact of TNS on patient satisfaction and functional impairment demonstrated that non-TNS patients were more satisfied and had less functional impairment after surgery than TNS patients, but this did not influence their willingness to recommend spinal anaesthesia.

Preoperative “Fentanyl Challenge” as a Tool to Estimate Postoperative Opioid Dosing in Chronic Opioid-Consuming Patients

When opioids are used for postoperative pain control, it is useful to define the dose-response relationship for analgesia and respiratory depression. We studied 20 chronically opioid-consuming patients having elective multilevel spine fusion. Preoperatively, each patient received a fentanyl infusion of 2 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) until the respiratory rate was <5 breaths/min. Pharmacokinetic simulations were used to estimate the effect site concentration at the time of respiratory depression and to predict the patient-controlled analgesia settings that would provide an effect-site fentanyl concentration that was 30% of the concentration associated with respiratory depression. Postoperatively, patient-controlled analgesia settings were adjusted to achieve 2-3 demand doses per hour. At steady-state patient-controlled analgesia settings, arterial blood gases and plasma fentanyl levels were measured. Sixteen patients required no adjustment or one patient-controlled analgesia adjustment. The median arterial Pco(2) level was 41 mm Hg and the interquartile range was 39-46 mm Hg. Plasma fentanyl levels demonstrated a significant correlation to the estimated effect-site concentration associated with respiratory depression determined during the preoperative fentanyl challenge. A preoperative fentanyl challenge used with pharmacokinetic simulations may be a useful tool to individualize the administration of analgesics to chronically opioid-consuming patients.

IMPLICATIONS

In chronically opioid-consuming patients, doses causing respiratory depression and analgesia may differ from those in opioid-naive individuals. A preoperative infusion of fentanyl, used in conjunction with pharmacokinetic simulation, may be a valuable tool for identifying clinical end-points, such as respiratory depression and analgesia, and individualizing postoperative treatment of pain in patients who chronically consume opioids.

Transient Neurologic Symptoms After Spinal Anesthesia with Lidocaine Versus Other Local Anesthetics: A Systematic Review of Randomized, Controlled Trials

Lidocaine has been used for spinal anesthesia since 1948, seemingly without causing concern. However, during the last 10 years, a number of reports have appeared implicating lidocaine as a possible cause of neurologic complications after spinal anesthesia. Follow-up of patients who received uncomplicated spinal anesthesia revealed that some of them developed pain in the lower extremities--transient neurologic symptoms (TNS). In this study, we sought to compare the frequency of 1) TNS and 2) neurologic complications after spinal anesthesia with lidocaine with that after other local anesthetics. Published trials were identified by computerized searches of The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, LILAC, and EMBASE and by checking the reference lists of trials and review articles. The search identified 14 trials reporting 1347 patients, 117 of whom developed TNS. None of these patients showed signs of neurologic complications. The relative risk for developing TNS after spinal anesthesia with lidocaine was higher than with other local anesthetics (bupivacaine, prilocaine, procaine, and mepivacaine), i.e., 4.35 (95% confidence interval, 1.98-9.54). There was no evidence that this painful condition was associated with any neurologic pathology; in all patients, the symptoms disappeared spontaneously by the 10th postoperative day.

Influence of Hemorrhagic Shock Followed by Crystalloid Resuscitation on Propofol

Background

Previous work has demonstrated that ongoing hemorrhagic shock dramatically alters the distribution, clearance, and potency of propofol. Whether volume resuscitation after hemorrhagic shock restores drug behavior to baseline pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics remains unclear. This is particularly relevant because patients suffering from hemorrhagic shock are typically resuscitated before surgery. To investigate this, the authors studied the influence of an isobaric bleed followed by crystalloid resuscitation on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol in a swine model. The hypothesis was that hemorrhagic shock followed by resuscitation would not significantly alter the pharmacokinetics but would influence the pharmacodynamics of propofol.

Methods

After approval from the Animal Care Committee, 16 swine were randomly assigned to control and shock-resuscitation groups. Swine randomized to the shock-resuscitation group were bled to a mean arterial blood pressure of 40 mm Hg over a 20-min period and held there by further blood removal until 42 ml/kg of blood had been removed. Subsequently, animals were resuscitated with lactated Ringer's solution to maintain a mean arterial blood pressure of 70 mm Hg for 60 min. After resuscitation, propofol (750 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) was infused for 10 min. The control group underwent a sham hemorrhage and resuscitation and received propofol at the same dose and approximate time as the shock-resuscitation group. Arterial samples (20 from each animal) were collected at frequent intervals until 180 min after the infusion began and were analyzed to determine drug concentrations. Pharmacokinetic parameters for each group were estimated using a three-compartment model. The electroencephalogram Bispectral Index Scale was used as a measure of drug effect. Pharmacodynamics were characterized using a sigmoid inhibitory maximal effect model.

Results

The raw data demonstrated minimal differences in the mean plasma propofol concentrations between groups. The compartment analysis revealed some subtle differences between groups in the central and slow equilibrating volumes, but the differences were not significant. Hemorrhagic shock followed by resuscitation shifted the concentration effect relationship to the left, demonstrating a 1.5-fold decrease in the effect-site concentration required to achieve 50% of the maximal effect in the Bispectral Index Scale.

Conclusions

Hemorrhagic shock followed by resuscitation with lactated Ringer's solution did not alter the pharmacokinetics but did increase the potency of propofol. These results demonstrate that alterations in propofol pharmacokinetics observed in moderate to severe blood loss can be reversed with resuscitation. These results suggest that a modest reduction in propofol is prudent to achieve a desired drug effect after resuscitation from severe hemorrhagic shock.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol in a modified cyclodextrin formulation (Captisol) versus propofol in a lipid formulation (Diprivan): an electroencephalographic and hemodynamic study in a porcine model

The currently marketed propofol formulation has a number of undesirable properties that are in part a function of the lipid emulsion formulation, including pain on injection, serious allergic reactions, and the support of microbial growth. A modified cyclodextrin-based formulation of propofol (sulfobutyl ether-beta-cyclodextrin) has been developed that may mitigate some of these formulation-dependent problems. However, reformulation may alter propofol's pharmacologic behavior. Our aim in this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol in the currently marketed lipid-based formulation with those of the novel cyclodextrin formulation. We hypothesized that the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the propofol in cyclodextrin would be substantially similar to those of the propofol in lipid. Thirty-two isoflurane-anesthetized animals were instrumented with pulmonary artery, arterial, and IV catheters and were randomly assigned to receive either propofol in lipid or propofol in cyclodextrin by continuous infusion. Arterial blood samples for propofol assay were collected. The processed electroencephalogram, heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, and cardiac output were measured continuously. The propofol formulations were compared by using model-independent analysis techniques. Combined kinetic/dynamic models were also constructed for simulation purposes. There were no significant differences in the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of the two propofol formulations. The simulations based on the combined pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models confirmed the substantial similarity of the two formulations. The hypothesis that the propofol-in-cyclodextrin formulation would exhibit pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic behavior that was substantially similar to the propofol-in-lipid formulation was confirmed.

IMPLICATIONS

A modified cyclodextrin-based formulation of propofol has been developed that may mitigate some of the problems associated with propofol in lipid emulsion. However, reformulation of propofol may change its clinical characteristics. This study in a pig model showed that the novel propofol formulation was substantially similar to the lipid emulsion propofol formulation.

Transient neurologic symptoms (TNS) following spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine versus other local anaesthetics

BACKGROUND

Spinal anaesthesia has been in use since the turn of the late 19th century. The most serious complication of this technique is damage to the spinal cord or nerve roots resulting in lasting neurologic sequelae. Such serious adverse effects seldom happen. There has been an increase in the number of reports during the last nine years implicating lidocaine as a possible cause of temporary and permanent neurologic complications after spinal anaesthesia. Follow-up of patients who received uncomplicated spinal anaesthesia revealed that some of them developed pain in the lower extremities after an initial full recovery. This painful condition that occurs in the immediate post-operative period was named "transient neurologic symptoms" (TNS).

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this review were to study the frequency of TNS and neurologic complications after spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine, compared to other local anaesthetics.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Trials were identified by computerized searches of the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (4th Quarter 2002), MEDLINE (1966 - January 2003), LILAC database, EMBASE (1980 - week 51, 2002), and by checking the reference lists of trials and review articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomized and pseudo-randomized studies comparing the frequency of TNS and of neurologic complications after spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine as compared to other local anaesthetics.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently evaluated the quality of the relevant studies and extracted the data from the included studies.

MAIN RESULTS

Fourteen trials, reporting 1,349 patients, 117 of whom developed transient neurologic symptoms, were included in the analysis. The use of lidocaine for spinal anaesthesia increased the risk of developing TNS. There was no evidence that this painful condition was associated with any neurologic pathology as it was clearly documented that no positive neurologic findings were present in any patient with TNS; the symptoms disappeared spontaneously by the fifth postoperative day. The relative risk for developing TNS after spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine as compared to other local anaesthetics (bupivacaine, prilocaine, procaine and mepivacaine) was 4.35 (95% Confidence Interval: 1.98, 9.54).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

The risk of developing TNS after spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine was significantly higher than when bupivacaine, prilocaine and procaine were used. The term "TNS", which implies a positive neurologic finding, should not be used for this painful condition, which is in fact comparable to another common adverse effect after spinal anaesthesia - lower back pain. How much the pain in the lower extremities influences patient satisfaction is not elucidated clearly in the literature.

The anatomic relationship of the sciatic nerve to the lesser trochanter: implications for anterior sciatic nerve block

Classic descriptions of the anterior sciatic nerve block suggest needle placement at the level of the lesser trochanter of the femur. Recently, investigators have reported that the sciatic nerve is not accessible at this level. To define more accurately the anatomic relationship of the sciatic nerve to the lesser trochanter, we analyzed magnetic resonance scans performed on 20 patients in the supine position. After IRB approval, magnetic resonance scans of the hip and proximal femur were reviewed in 20 supine patients in the neutral position. Images from five axial levels were studied, specifically, at the level of the lesser trochanter and at 1-cm intervals inferior to the lesser trochanter for 4 cm. In each axial image, the medial or lateral distance was measured from the sciatic nerve to a sagittal plane at the medial border of the femur. If the sciatic nerve was lateral to this sagittal plane (inaccessible), the distance was assigned a negative value, and if the sciatic nerve was medial to the sagittal plane (accessible), the distance was assigned a positive value. The distance between the coronal plane at the anterior border of the femur and the coronal plane through the sciatic nerve was also recorded for each level. At the level of the lesser trochanter, the sciatic nerve was lateral to the femoral border (inaccessible) in 13 of 20 patients with a mean distance of -4.0 +/- 7.7 mm. At 4 cm below the lesser trochanter, the sciatic nerve was medial to the femoral border (accessible) in 19 of 20 patients with a mean distance 7.8 +/- 5.8 mm. The distance from the anterior border of the femur to the sciatic nerve was 42.9 +/- 5.8 mm at the level of the lesser trochanter and 45.7 +/- 9.5 mm at 4 cm below the lesser trochanter. The classic description of the anterior approach to the sciatic nerve suggests that the needle be walked off medially at the level of the lesser trochanter. Our data are consistent with recent reports suggesting that in the majority of subjects, the position of the sciatic nerve relative to lesser trochanter made it inaccessible from an anterior approach at this level. In contrast, at 4 cm below the lesser trochanter, the sciatic nerve was medial to the femur in 19 of 20 subjects. We conclude that needle insertion medial to the proximal femur, 4 cm below the lesser trochanter, is a more direct anatomical approach to the anterior sciatic nerve block.

IMPLICATIONS

Magnetic resonance images suggest that in the majority of supine subjects, the sciatic nerve is lateral to the lesser trochanter of the femur and therefore not accessible using the classic anterior approach. By contrast, 4 cm below the lesser trochanter, the sciatic nerve is consistently medial to the femoral shaft and therefore may be more accessible using an anterior approach.

Effects of intrathecal morphine on the ventilatory response to hypoxia

BACKGROUND

Intrathecal administration of morphine produces intense analgesia, but it depresses respiration, an effect that can be life-threatening. Whether intrathecal morphine affects the ventilatory response to hypoxia, however, is not known.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 30 men to receive one of three study treatments in a double-blind fashion: intravenous morphine (0.14 mg per kilogram of body weight) with intrathecal placebo; intrathecal morphine (0.3 mg) with intravenous placebo; or intravenous and intrathecal placebo. The selected doses of intravenous and intrathecal morphine produce similar degrees of analgesia. The ventilatory response to hypercapnia, the subsequent response to acute hypoxia during hypercapnic breathing (targeted end-tidal partial pressures of expired oxygen and carbon dioxide, 45 mm Hg), and the plasma levels of morphine and morphine metabolites were measured at base line (before drug administration) and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours after drug administration.

RESULTS

At base line, the mean (+/-SD) values for the ventilatory response to hypoxia (calculated as the difference between the minute ventilation during the second full minute of hypoxia and the fifth minute of hypercapnic ventilation) were similar in the three groups: 38.3+/-23.2 liters per minute in the placebo group, 33.5+/-16.4 liters per minute in the intravenous-morphine group, and 30.2+/-11.6 liters per minute in the intrathecal-morphine group (P=0.61). The overall ventilatory response to hypoxia (the area under the curve) was significantly lower after either intravenous morphine (20.2+/-10.8 liters per minute) or intrathecal morphine (14.5+/-6.4 liters per minute) than after placebo (36.8+/-19.2 liters per minute) (P=O.003). Twelve hours after treatment, the ventilatory response to hypoxia in the intrathecal-morphine group (19.9+/-8.9 liters per minute), but not in the intravenous-morphine group (30+/-15.8 liters per minute), remained significantly depressed as compared with the response in the placebo group (40.9+/-19.0 liters per minute) (P= 0.02 for intrathecal morphine vs. placebo). Plasma concentrations of morphine and morphine metabolites either were not detectable after intrathecal morphine or were much lower after intrathecal morphine than after intravenous morphine.

CONCLUSIONS

Depression of the ventilatory response to hypoxia after the administration of intrathecal morphine is similar in magnitude to, but longer-lasting than, that after the administration of an equianalgesic dose of intravenous morphine.

Dysphotopsia in phakic and pseudophakic patients: incidence and relation to intraocular lens type(2)

PURPOSE

To determine the relationship between various intraocular lens (IOL) types and the incidence of unwanted light images.

SETTING

The Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

METHODS

A telephone questionnaire was administered to 302 postoperative patients who had received 1 of 6 commonly used IOLs between January and September 1998. Patients were included only if they had uneventful cataract surgery, no additional ocular pathology, and a postoperative best corrected visual acuity of 20/25 or better. A control group of 50 patients with the diagnosis of presbyopia only also participated in the questionnaire. Patients reported on incidence of glare, light sensitivity, and unwanted images. The data were analyzed for statistically significant relationships between incidence of photopsias and IOL type.

RESULTS

The AcrySof 5.5 mm, AcrySof 6.0 mm, and SI-40 groups reported significantly more unwanted images than the control group (P =.0014). The 2 AcrySof groups also reported a greater incidence of light to the side causing a central flash, and the SI-40 group, a higher incidence of glare. The control group was more likely to experience symptoms of glare than any pseudophakic group. Overall, a mean of 49% of patients reported some light-related phenomenon postoperatively. The majority in all groups reported being satisfied with their eyesight despite the light-related problems.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant number of pseudophakic patients reported symptoms of dysphotopsia. Patients who received an acrylic IOL with flattened edges were at increased risk of experiencing images associated with edge reflections. The SI-40 lens group, although less than the AcrySof groups, reported a higher incidence of glare than the non-AcrySof groups; however, it also had the highest number of patients still driving at night. The phakic population commonly experienced glare reported as more severe than several of the IOL groups.

Intrathecal fentanyl is superior to intravenous ondansetron for the prevention of perioperative nausea during cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia

This study compares intrathecal (IT) fentanyl with IV ondansetron for preventing intraoperative nausea and vomiting during cesarean deliveries performed with spinal anesthesia. Thirty healthy parturients presenting for elective cesarean delivery with standardized bupivacaine spinal anesthesia were randomized to receive 20 microg IT fentanyl (Group F) or 4 mg IV ondansetron (Group O) by using double-blinded methodology. At eight specific intervals during the surgery, a blinded observer questioned the patient about nausea (1 = nausea, 0 = no nausea), observed for the presence of retching or vomiting (1 = vomiting or retching, 0 = no vomiting or retching), and recorded a verbal pain score (0-10, 0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable). Cumulative nausea, vomiting, and pain scores were calculated as the sum of the eight measurements. Intraoperative nausea was decreased in the IT fentanyl group compared with the IV ondansetron group: the median (interquartile range) difference in nausea scores was 1 (1, 2), P = 0.03. The incidence of vomiting and treatment for vomiting was not different (P = 0.7). The IT fentanyl group had a lower cumulative perioperative pain score than the IV ondansetron group; the median difference in the cumulative pain score was 12 (8, 16) (P = 0.0007). The IT fentanyl group required less supplementary intraoperative analgesia. The median difference in the cumulative fentanyl dose was 100 (75, 100) microg fentanyl, (P = 0.0002).