Clinical efficacy of dacomitinib in rechallenge setting for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutant non-small cell lung cancer: A multicenter retrospective analysis (TOPGAN2020-02)

Background

Dacomitinib is the second‐generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)‐tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) for mutant non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). EGFR‐TKIs are often re‐administered in Japan after the disease progression prior EGFR‐TKI. There is little evidence of dacomitinib in rechallenge setting. This study evaluated clinical outcomes of dacomitinib in rechallenge setting.

Methods

Patients who received dacomitinib for advanced EGFR‐mutant NSCLC who had progressed after EGFR‐TKI in nine institutions in Japan were included in the analyses.

Results

In total, 43 patients were analyzed. The median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 4.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5–5.6). The overall survival (OS) was 10.5 months (95% CI, 7.4–not reached). The overall response rate was 25.5% (95% CI, 13.1–33.7). Subset analysis indicated that patients with EGFR exon 21 L858R showed longer PFS than those with EGFR exon 19 deletion (5.8 vs. 4.1 months) (p = 0.018). The most common adverse events leading to dose modification were diarrhea, paronychia, rash, and oral mucositis.

Conclusion

In the real practice in Japan, dacomitinib showed a worthwhile treatment option for NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation after failure of previous EGFR‐TKI. The benefit was especially pronounced in patients with the exon 21 mutation.

GSK3 inhibition circumvents and overcomes acquired lorlatinib resistance in ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion is found in ~3%–5% of patients with non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). Although the third-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) lorlatinib shows high clinical efficacy in ALK-positive NSCLC, most of the patients eventually relapse with acquired resistance. Recently, drug-tolerant persister (DTP) cells have been considered an important seed of acquired resistance cells. In this study, we established lorlatinib intermediate resistant cells from a patient-derived cell model. Glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) inhibitions significantly suppressed lorlatinib intermediate resistant cell growth. GSK3 inhibition also sensitized acquired resistance cells derived from alectinib-treated patients with or without secondary mutations to lorlatinib. Therefore, GSK3 plays a crucial role in developing acquired resistance against lorlatinib in ALK-positive NSCLC mediated by lorlatinib intermediate resistant cells and could be a potential molecular target to prevent acquired lorlatinib resistance and overcome ALK-TKI resistance.

Trastuzumab emtansine for patients with non-small cell lung cancer positive for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 exon-20 insertion mutations

BACKGROUND

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) mutations are present in ∼3% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with exon-20 insertions accounting for ∼90% of such HER2 mutations and having been identified as driver oncogenic alterations. Antibody-cytotoxic drug conjugates including trastuzumab deruxtecan have shown an excellent efficacy for NSCLC with HER2 mutations. We have now performed a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy of ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) for NSCLC positive for HER2 exon-20 insertion mutations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients with HER2 exon-20 insertion mutations confirmed by next-generation sequencing or multiplex polymerase chain reaction platforms and a history of one or two lines of chemotherapy received T-DM1 (3.6 mg/kg) intravenously every 21 days. The primary end-point of the study was the objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

Between February 2019 and July 2020, 22 patients were enrolled in the study. A775_G776insYVMA was the most frequent HER2 exon-20 insertion mutation, accounting for 19 (86.4%) of the 22 patients. The ORR was 38.1% (90% confidence interval, 23.0-55.9%), and the disease control rate was 52.4%. The median duration of response was 3.5 months, and the median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 2.8 and 8.1 months, respectively. Toxicity was mild, with the frequency of adverse events of grade ≥3 being low.

CONCLUSION

T-DM1 is a potential treatment option for patients with NSCLC with HER2 exon-20 insertion mutations. Further investigation of biomarkers for T-DM1 is warranted to improve its efficacy for NSCLC with such mutations.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

JapicCTI-194620.

Soluble PD-L1 through alternative polyadenylation works as a decoy in lung cancer immunotherapy

Immune checkpoint therapy targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis is a novel development in anticancer therapy and has been applied to clinical medicine. However, there are still some problems, including a relatively low response rate, innate mechanisms of resistance against immune checkpoint blockades, and the absence of reliable biomarkers to predict responsiveness. In this study of in vitro and in vivo models, we demonstrate that PD-L1-vInt4, a splicing variant of PD-L1, plays a role as a decoy in anti-PD-L1 antibody treatment. First, we showed that PD-L1-vInt4 was detectable in clinical samples and that it was possible to visualize the secreting variants with IHC. By overexpressing the PD-L1-secreted splicing variant on MC38 cells, we observed that an immune-suppressing effect was not induced by their secretion alone. We then demonstrated that PD-L1-vInt4 secretion resisted anti-PD-L1 antibody treatment, compared with wild type PD-L1, which was explicable by the PD-L1-vInt4's decoying of the anti-PD-L1 antibody. The decoying function of PD-L1 splicing variants may be one of the reasons for cancers being resistant to anti-PD-L1 therapy. Measuring serum PD-L1 levels might be helpful in deciding the therapeutic strategy.

Osimertinib plus platinum-pemetrexed in newly diagnosed epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: safety run-in results from the FLAURA2 study

Background

The phase III FLAURA2 (NCT04035486) study will evaluate efficacy and safety of first-line osimertinib with platinum–pemetrexed chemotherapy versus osimertinib monotherapy in epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive (EGFRm) advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The safety run-in, reported here, assessed the safety and tolerability of osimertinib with chemotherapy prior to the randomized phase III evaluation.

Patients and methods

Patients (≥18 years; Japan: ≥20 years) with EGFRm locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC received oral osimertinib 80 mg once daily (QD), with either intravenous (IV) cisplatin 75 mg/m² or IV carboplatin target area under the curve 5, plus pemetrexed 500 mg/m² every 3 weeks (Q3W) for four cycles. Maintenance was osimertinib 80 mg QD with pemetrexed 500 mg/m² Q3W until progression/discontinuation. The primary objective was to evaluate safety and tolerability of the osimertinib–chemotherapy combination.

Results

Thirty patients (15 per group) received treatment [Asian, 73%; female, 63%; median age (range) 61 (45-84) years]. Adverse events (AEs) were reported by 27 patients (90%): osimertinib–carboplatin–pemetrexed, 100%; osimertinib–cisplatin–pemetrexed, 80%. Most common AEs were constipation (60%) with osimertinib–carboplatin–pemetrexed and nausea (60%) with osimertinib–cisplatin–pemetrexed. In both groups, 20% of patients reported serious AEs. No specific pattern of AEs leading to dose modifications/discontinuations was observed; one patient discontinued all study treatments including osimertinib due to pneumonitis (study-specific discontinuation criterion). Hematologic toxicities were as expected and manageable.

Conclusions

Osimertinib–chemotherapy combination had a manageable safety and tolerability profile in EGFRm advanced/metastatic NSCLC, supporting further assessment in the FLAURA2 randomized phase.

•

FLAURA2 aims to assess efficacy and safety of first-line osimertinib with platinum–pemetrexed in EGFRm advanced NSCLC.

•

In the FLAURA2 safety run-in period, 30 patients received osimertinib and pemetrexed with carboplatin or cisplatin.

•

Most common AEs were constipation and nausea; no AE patterns leading to dose modifications/discontinuations were observed.

•

The FLAURA2 safety run-in study showed that the safety profile of this combination was as expected and manageable.

Association Between the Efficacy of Pembrolizumab and Low STK11/LKB1 Expression in High-PD-L1-expressing Non-small-cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND/AIM

STK11/LKB1 mutation has been suggested as a poorly responding candidate biomarker of the anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) antibody; however, the association between STK11/LKB1 expression and the effects of anti-PD-1 antibodies is uncertain. The aim of the study was to correlate the efficacy of pembrolizumab monotherapy and STK11/LKB1 expression in untreated patients with non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and high PD-ligand 1 expression.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From February 2017 to January 2020, we retrospectively analyzed 30 previously untreated patients with NSCLC and a tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥50% treated with pembrolizumab monotherapy. STK11/LKB1 expression in tumor tissue was evaluated by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Twenty-three (76.7%) of the 30 patients were classified with low-STK11/LKB1 expression. The median progression-free survival and overall survival of patients with low-STK11/LKB1 expression was shorter than those with high-STK11/LKB1 expression, although the results were not statistically significant. The disease progression rate for the low-STK11/LKB1 group was higher than that of the high-STK11/LKB1 group.

CONCLUSION

STK11/LKB1 expression, as measured by immunohistochemistry, could be a useful biomarker associated with the efficacy of pembrolizumab monotherapy for patients with NSCLC and a TPS ≥50%.

Characteristics of central nervous system progression in non-small cell lung cancer treated with crizotinib or alectinib

Background

Most patients treated with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)‐tyrosine kinase inhibitors for ALK‐positive non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) develop resistance, leading to metastasis, with progression to the central nervous system (CNS) being a primary concern. Although alectinib has better CNS penetration than crizotinib, patients treated with alectinib also develop CNS progression. CNS metastases more likely occurs during crizotinib treatment due to less blood‐brain barrier (BBB) penetration capability than alectinib. CNS progression pattern may be different during crizotinib and alecitinib treatment. Understanding the characteristics of CNS progression is important for developing treatment strategies.

Aims

We compared the clinical‐radiographic characteristics of CNS metastases among patients undergoing crizotinib and alectinib treatment for ALK‐positive NSCLCs.

Methods and results

We retrospectively analyzed the radiographic and clinical characteristics of CNS progression in ALK‐positive NSCLC patients treated with crizotinib or alectinib at our hospital between July 2011 and May 2020. CNS and systemic tumor progression were evaluated using computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Fifty‐three and 65 patients were treated with crizotinib and alectinib, respectively. Baseline CNS metastasis was observed in 18 and 27 patients in the crizotinib and alectinib groups, respectively. Among the patients in the crizotinib and alectinib groups who developed disease progression, 15/49 (30.6%) and 9/44 (20.5%) had CNS progression, respectively (P = .344). Intra‐CNS progression‐free survival was significantly longer in the alectinib group than in the crizotinib group (median: 14.0 vs 5.6 months, P = .042). The number of CNS metastases sized ≥3 cm, rate of peritumoral brain edema, and the second progression pattern after treatment continuation was not significantly different between the groups.

Conclusion

We observed no significant difference in the clinical‐radiographic characteristics of CNS progression between patients undergoing crizotinib and alectinib treatments. Local therapy, including stereotactic radiosurgery, for CNS progression may be suitable and important following alectinib and crizotinib treatment.

Monitoring epidermal growth factor receptor C797S mutation in Japanese non-small cell lung cancer patients with serial cell-free DNA evaluation using digital droplet PCR

Osimertinib is a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) that is effective in treating both naïve and T790M-mutated EGFR-TKI-resistant non-small cell lung cancer patients. The EGFR C797S mutation is the major osimertinib resistance mechanism. The present study monitored the EGFR C797S mutation during osimertinib treatment in Japanese patients using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). In our first cohort, C797S detection was validated with tumor specimens and/or plasma samples from 26 patients using ddPCR with custom-designed probes detecting and discriminating T790M and C797S in cis and trans positions. In our second cohort, 18 patients with EGFR-T790M who were going to start osimertinib were analyzed using ddPCR by collecting the plasma samples every month from the beginning of the course of osimertinib. In the first cohort, C797S was detected in 15.4% of patients. C797S and T790M in cis and trans positions were distinguished using ddPCR. In the second cohort, serial cfDNA evaluation revealed that the rate of EGFR mutation changes with disease state. Increases of EGFR mutation were detected, including C797S several months before the diagnosis of disease progression. As with the first cohort, C797S and T790M in cis and trans position were distinguished by ddPCR at disease progression. Coincidentally, in the first cohort, next generation sequencing detected NRAS Q61K mutation and the resistance with NRAS Q61K mutation was overcome by trametinib. In the second cohort, serial cfDNA analysis was useful for evaluating bone oligo-progression and local radiation therapy.

Microsecond-timescale MD simulation of EGFR minor mutation predicts the structural flexibility of EGFR kinase core that reflects EGFR inhibitor sensitivity

Approximately 15–30% of patients with lung cancer harbor mutations in the EGFR gene. Major EGFR mutations (>90% of EGFR-mutated lung cancer) are highly sensitive to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Many uncommon EGFR mutations have been identified, but little is known regarding their characteristics, activation, and sensitivity to various EGFR-TKIs, including allosteric inhibitors. We encountered a case harboring an EGFR-L747P mutation, originally misdiagnosed with EGFR-del19 mutation using a routine diagnostic EGFR mutation test, which was resistant to EGFR-TKI gefitinib. Using this minor mutation and common EGFR-activating mutations, we performed the binding free energy calculations and microsecond-timescale molecular dynamic (MD) simulations, revealing that the L747P mutation considerably stabilizes the active conformation through a salt-bridge formation between K745 and E762. We further revealed why several EGFR inhibitors, including the allosteric inhibitor, were ineffective. Our computational structural analysis strategy would be beneficial for future drug development targeting the EGFR minor mutations.

Impact of Renin-angiotensin System Inhibitors on the Efficacy of Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Antibodies in NSCLC Patients

BACKGROUND/AIM

The Renin-Angiotensin system (RAS) induces immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment, and RAS inhibitors (RASi) improve the tumor immune microenvironment. We evaluated the impact of RASi on the efficacy anti-programmed cell death-1/Ligand-1 (anti-PD-1/PD-L1) antibodies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies monotherapy as second- or later-line treatment. We classified patients into those with or without use of RASi.

RESULTS

A total of 256 NSCLC patients were included and 37 patients used RASi. The median PFS of patients treated with RASi was significantly longer than that of patients treated without (HR=0.59, 95%CI=0.40-0.88). The median OS of patients treated with RASi tended to be longer than that of patients treated without (HR=0.71, 95%CI=0.45-1.11).

CONCLUSION

The use of RASi was associated with a significantly longer PFS in NSCLC patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies. RASi use may enhance the efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies.

Clinical influence of switching companion diagnostic tests for EGFR-TKs from Therascreen to Cobas v2

Background

Several companion diagnostic (CDx) tests for epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR‐TKIs) have been approved. In our institute, the CDx test for EGFR‐TKIs was changed from the Therascreen test (Therascreen) to the Cobas EGFR v2 test (Cobas) because only Cobas was approved for the use of osimertinib in patients with EGFR‐mutated non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with T790M mutations. The clinical influence of switching the CDx test has not yet been examined comprehensively.

Methods

All serial patients with lung cancer tested for EGFR mutations with CDx tests between February 2014 and February 2016 at the Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research (JFCR) were enrolled in this analysis.

Results

Therascreen was used as a CDx test for EGFR‐TKI therapy in 607 patients between February 2014 and January 2015, and Cobas was used in 621 patients between February 2015 and February 2016. EGFR mutations were detected in 218 patients (35.9%) and 244 patients (39.3%) tested with Therascreen and Cobas, respectively. At the initial diagnosis, 400 and 459 patients were tested with Therascreen and Cobas, respectively. EGFR mutation subtypes, including del19, L858R, and others, were detected in 13.0%, 17.0%, and 2.5% of patients using Therascreen and 17.4%, 14.4%, and 1.5% of patients using Cobas, respectively.

Conclusions

No significant impact of switching from Therascreen to Cobas as the CDx test for EGFR mutations in clinical practice was observed. However, the detection pattern of the EGFR mutation subtypes between the two CDx tests was slightly different.

Key points

Significant findings of the study

We examined the influence of changing the EGFR test in 1228 patients in total. The detection rate of EGFR mutations was similar. However, the detection pattern for EGFR subtype mutations was slightly different between the two tests.

What this study adds

Switching CDx tests from target polymerase chain reaction (PCR)‐ to next‐generation sequencing (NGS)‐based methods may lead to obvious changes in clinical practice. When the CDx test is required to change, the investigation of this influence is warranted in future studies.

Rapid genomic profiling of circulating tumor DNA in non-small cell lung cancer using Oncomine Precision Assay with GenexusTM integrated sequencer

Background

Genomic profiling of tumors from cancer patients facilitates molecular-guided therapy. The turnaround time is one of important issues to deliver results timely for clinical decisions. The Ion Torrent™ Genexus™ Integrated Sequencer automates all next generation sequencing (NGS) workflows and delivers results within a day.

Methods

In this study, we conducted a feasibility study to evaluate the detection rate of genomic alterations from cell-free total nucleic acid (cfTNA, containing cfDNA and cfRNA) of 119 non-small cell lung cancer using Oncomine Precision Assay on Genexus™ Integrated Sequencer. Oncomine Precision Assay (OPA) covers actionable mutations, copy number variations and fusion genes and that are applicable for the selection of targeted therapy. cfTNA isolated from plasma (derived from 14 ml of blood) were subjected to the Genexus system for library construction, templating, sequencing, and data analyses.

Results

The sequencing resulted in median overall depth of 35,773× and median molecular coverage of 2,192× with cfTNA input ranged from 11 to 36 ng. Among the 119 samples evaluated, we detected at least one genomic alteration in plasma cfTNA of 79 cases (66%). When comparing to standard-of-care testing, the sensitivity and specificity of mutation detection in non-small cell lung cancer related genes using liquid biopsy with Genexus-OPA ranged between 49–67% and 93–100%, respectively. 59% of actionable mutations, which were present in tumor tissues, were detected by the Genexus- Oncomine Precision Assay using plasma cfTNA. Among the 5 mutations detected from liquid biopsy only, three mutations are of level 1 evidence according to OncoKB database, highlighting the clinical utilities of liquid biopsy in addressing tumor heterogeneity. Extrathoracic metastasis and levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), C-reactive protein (CRP) and Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) are found to be associated with increased circulating tumor DNA detection.

Conclusions

The Genexus™ Integrated Sequencer system is an automated, accurate NGS system with short turnaround time (TAT) that could assist clinicians to make more timely decision.

Phase 1/2 study of alectinib in RET-rearranged previously-treated non-small cell lung cancer (ALL-RET)

Background

Rearranged during transfection (RET) rearrangements occur in 1–2% of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). Alectinib administered at doses of 300 mg and 600 mg twice daily (BID) is approved for

ALK

rearranged NSCLC in Japan and other countries, respectively. Since alectinib has activity against RET, we conducted a phase (P) 1/2 study of alectinib to determine its activity in Japanese patients with

RET

rearranged NSCLC.

Methods

This study was a single-arm, open-label, multi-institutional P1/2 trial. Previously treated patients with RET-rearranged NSCLC, screened by nation-wide network (LC-SCRUM-Japan), were recruited. In P1, alectinib (600 or 450 mg BID) was administered following a 3+3 design and its safety was assessed. During P2, alectinib was administered at the recommended dose (RD) determined in P1. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) in RET inhibitor-naïve patients treated with the RD of alectinib.

Results

Thirty-four patients were administered alectinib. In cohort 1 (600 mg BID) of P1, we observed 5 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), including grade 3 rash and thromboembolic event, in 3 of 6 patients. In cohort 2 (450 mg BID), we observed no DLTs in 3 patients. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed that AUC_0–10 to 600 mg BID was higher than that previously reported in global trials. We determined 450 mg BID as the RD for P2. In 25 RET inhibitor-naïve patients, one achieved an objective response (4%) and 13 achieved disease control at 8 weeks (52%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.4 months (95% CI, 2.0–5.4), while the median overall survival was 19.0 months (5.4–NE). We observed grade 3 adverse events (AEs) (4%) including pneumonitis in P2.

Conclusions

Alectinib exerts limited activity against RET-rearranged NSCLC. Further investigation to elucidate the mechanisms underlying sensitivity and resistance of RET inhibitors is required to improve outcomes for these patients.

Feasibility of next-generation sequencing test for patients with advanced NSCLC in clinical practice

Background

The usefulness of the Oncomine Dx Target test (Oncomine Dx), a next‐generation sequencing (NGS) test, has already been proven in clinical trials. However, NGS requires high‐quality tumor samples and takes a long time to generate results. The feasibility of NGS for use in advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in clinical practice has not yet been determined.

Methods

Patients serially diagnosed with advanced NSCLC were evaluated in our hospital. The Oncomine Dx, Cobas EGFR mutation test (Cobas EGFR), and ALK‐IHC were performed. The patients were divided into four sets: the full analysis set (FAS) that referred to patients diagnosed with NSCLC, the intent to perform companion diagnostics (CDx) set (IPS) that referred to patients in which CDx had been ordered regardless of sample quality, the per‐performed CDx set (PPS) that referred to patients who could undergo CDx regardless of the results, and the per‐completed CDx set (CCS) that referred to patients in which informative results were received from the CDx.

Results

The total number of patients analyzed in the study was 167. The IPS/FAS of Oncomine Dx (80.2%) was lower than that of the ALK‐IHC (85.0%) and Cobas EGFR (92.8%). The CCS/FAS of Oncomine Dx (65.9%) was lower than that of the ALK‐IHC (82.0%) and Cobas EGFR (92.2%). PPS/IPS and CCS/PPS of the Oncomine Dx with nonsurgical biopsy ranged between 78.6% and 90.9%, which was lower than those patients who underwent surgical resection (95.0% and 100%).

Conclusions

The feasibility of Oncomine Dx in clinical practice was lower than the other CDx. The feasibility of Oncomine Dx will increase by improving the biopsy procedure.

Key points

Significant study findings

The usefulness of a next‐generation sequencing (NGS) test has been proven in clinical trials.

The feasibility of NGS is lower than other diagnostics in clinical practice especially with regard to nonsurgical biopsy.

What this study adds

It is necessary to improve the feasibility of NGS in clinical practice.

To improve NGS feasibility, turnaround time must be shortened, and larger samples must be obtained during surgical procedures.

Association between continuous decrease of plasma VEGF-A levels and the efficacy of chemotherapy in combination with anti-programmed cell death 1 antibody in non-small cell lung cancer patients

OBJECTIVES

Vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) plays important roles in tumor immune suppression and thus correlates with the efficacy of anti-programmed cell death-1/ligand 1 (anti-PD-1/PD-L1) antibodies. We aimed to determine the association between change in plasma VEGF-A levels and the efficacy of chemotherapy combined with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies (chemo-PD1) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

METHODS

We included NSCLC patients treated with chemo-PD1. Plasma VEGF-A levels were measured at baseline (Pre) and days 7 (D7) and 14 (D14) after the initiation of chemo-PD1. Continuous VEGF-A decrease was determined by comparing Pre with the median value of maximum change rate of posttreatment VEGF-A as cutoff. Patients whose change rates of VEGF-A at both D7 and D14 were consistently lower than the cutoff value were classified into the VEGF-A decrease group, whereas those whose VEGF-A at D7 or D14 were higher than the cutoff level were classified into the VEGF-A no-decrease group. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

A total of 32 patients were evaluated. The median Pre VEGF-A levels was 49 (range, 13-257). The median change rate of VEGF-A at D7 and D14 was -25.6% (range, -77.5-376.9) and -42.3% (range, -100-138.5) respectively. The cutoff value of posttreatment VEGF-A change rate was -9.3%. The PFS was significantly longer in the VEGF-A decrease group than that in the VEGF-A no-decrease group (median, not reached vs 2.4 months; p = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous decrease of plasma VEGF-A levels during treatment may be associated with the efficacy of chemo-PD1.

Phase II study of the combination of S-1 with bevacizumab for patients with previously treated advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

We assessed the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab and S-1 chemotherapy for patients with previously treated advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

This was a prospective single-arm study, including patients with non-squamous NSCLC who had received at least one chemotherapy regimen along with a platinum-based regimen. Bevacizumab 15 mg/kg was intravenously administered every 3 weeks, and S-1 40 mg/m² was orally administered twice daily from day 1 (evening) through day 15 (morning). The treatment continued for 3 weeks/cycle until disease progression or until unacceptable toxicities occurred. During the lead-in part, six patients were evaluated for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) rate. In phase II, the primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.

RESULTS

In the lead-in part, we evaluated the safety in the first six patients and observed no DLT. In phase II, a total of 46 patients were enrolled from September 2012 to December 2018. The median follow-up duration was 13.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-72.0]. The ORR was 28.3%. The median PFS and OS were 4.3 (95% CI 2.9-5.9) and 15.0 months (95% CI 9.8-30.3), respectively. The most common adverse events were hypertension (65.2%), diarrhea (47.8%), mucositis oral (45.7%), and proteinuria (43.5%), and the most common grade 3 adverse events were hypertension (23.9%) and proteinuria (6.5%). Grade 4/5 adverse events were not observed.

CONCLUSION

Bevacizumab and S-1 combination chemotherapy showed high activity and were well tolerated in patients with previously treated advanced non-squamous NSCLC.

A Novel System to Detect Circulating Tumor Cells Using Two Different Size-selective Microfilters

BACKGROUND/AIM

Clusters of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) increase metastatic potential compared to single CTC. However, conventional technologies have been unable to generate an accurate analysis of single and cluster CTCs in the peripheral blood. We propose an effective strategy to detect and isolate both single and cluster CTCs using two size-selective microfilters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five ml of whole blood were collected from 10 patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer. Single and cluster CTCs were identified using precision microfiltration membranes with two distinct pore sizes together with anti-EpCAM antibody labeling.

RESULTS

Single and cluster CTCs were detected by simultaneously using two size-selective microfilters. The EGFR-L858R mutation was detected in the DNA from cells captured using both microfilters.

CONCLUSION

Our method can be used to detect and isolate single and cluster CTCs in the whole blood and may facilitate the development of a liquid biopsy strategy.

Efficacy of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients having EGFR-activating mutations with or without BIM polymorphisms

PURPOSE

Patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer with BIM deletion polymorphism may have a limited response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). However, some results of previous reports are discordant. It is necessary to evaluate the relationship between BIM polymorphism and the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients treated with EGFR-TKIs. We collected serum samples from patients before EGFR-TKI administration. We analyzed BIM deletion polymorphism and BIM single nucleotide polymorphism in exon 5 c465C > T by the Invader^® assay.

RESULTS

BIM deletion polymorphism was identified in 27 of 194 patients (13.9%). BIM single nucleotide polymorphism was identified in 29 of 194 patients (14.9%). The overall response ratio was 81.5% in patients with BIM deletion polymorphism, 89.7% with BIM single nucleotide polymorphism, and 83.6% with BIM wild type. Median progression-free survival was 10.3 months with BIM deletion polymorphism, 8.5 months with BIM single nucleotide polymorphism, and 10.4 months with BIM wild type. Overall survival was 38.4 months with BIM deletion polymorphism, 29.1 months with BIM single nucleotide polymorphism, and 31.6 months with BIM wild type. There were no significant differences between the groups in overall response ratio, progression-free survival, and overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

BIM polymorphism does not affect EGFR-TKI efficacy.

Poor efficacy of anti-programmed cell death-1/ligand 1 monotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer patients with active brain metastases

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of anti-programmed cell death-1/ligand 1 antibody monotherapy (anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy) in patients with active brain metastases (BMs) is not established. Here, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with active BMs.

METHODS

This retrospective study included NSCLC patients treated with second-line or later-line anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy between December 2015 and August 2019. Patients were classified into those with or without active BMs, including symptomatic BMs requiring systemic steroids and untreated BMs. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the patients with and without active BMs were compared. Intracranial and extracranial tumor responses were evaluated in patients with active BMs.

RESULTS

We analyzed 197 patients who had received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy. Among them, 24 had active BMs. Among those without active BMs, 145 had no BMs and 28 had treated asymptomatic BMs. The PFS and OS of patients with active BMs were significantly shorter than those of patients without active BMs (1.3 vs. 2.7 months; P < 0.001, and 4.5 vs. 16.3 months; P = 0.001 respectively). For patients with active BMs, the intracranial and extracranial response rates were 13.3% and 26.7%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, active BMs, poor performance status (PS), and EGFR/ALK positivity were significant factors associated with shorter PFS. Active BMs and poor PS were significant factors associated with shorter OS.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggested that anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy was not effective for NSCLC patients with active BMs. Further studies on immunotherapy are needed for patients with active BMs.

KEY POINTS

Significant findings of the study: The present study showed that anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody monotherapy was not effective for non-small cell lung cancer patients with active brain metastases. Intracranial and extracranial response rates were 13.3% and 26.7%, respectively.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

Further studies on immunotherapy are needed for patients with active BMs.

Phase II trial of S-1 treatment as palliative-intent chemotherapy for previously treated advanced thymic carcinoma

Thymic carcinoma (TC) is a rare cancer with minimal evidence of survival following palliative-intent chemotherapy. Sunitinib, everolimus, and pembrolizumab have been proposed as active agents based on previous phase II trials. In this phase II study, TC patients previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy were enrolled. The patients received S-1 orally twice daily at a dose of 40-60 mg/m² for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks off until the progression of the disease or the presence of unacceptable toxicities. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR), and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. The sample size of 26 patients was planned to reject the ORR of 10% under the expectation of 30% with a power of 0.80 and a type I error of 0.05 (one-sided). Twenty-six patients were recruited between 2013 and 2016; 23 patients had squamous cell carcinoma and 10 had an ECOG performance status of 0. One patient showed complete response and seven patients showed partial responses, resulting in a 30.8% response rate (90% confidence interval [CI], 18.3-46.9) and an 80.8% disease control rate (90% CI, 65.4-90.3). The median PFS was 4.3 months (95% CI, 2.3-10.3 months) and median OS was 27.4 months (95% CI, 16.6-34.3). Adverse events of grade ≥ 3 included neutropenia (12%), skin rash (8%), elevated alanine aminotransferase, and fatigue (4%). No treatment-related death was observed. S-1 confirmed clinical activity with tolerability in patients with previously treated TC. (UMIN000010736).

Addition of ramucirumab enhances docetaxel efficacy in patients who had received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment

OBJECTIVES

Docetaxel (DTX) efficacy increases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had received anti-programmed cell death-1/ligand 1 (anti-PD-1/L1) therapy. However, the effect of ramucirumab (Ram) on DTX efficacy following anti-PD-1/L1 therapy is unknown. Here, we aimed to evaluate the effect of Ram on DTX efficacy following anti-PD-1/L1 therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 99 patients with NSCLC, who were divided into those who had (pre-ICI group) or had not (no-ICI group) received anti-PD-1/L1 antibody before DTX. Both groups were then treated with DTX or DTX plus Ram (DTX/Ram). Patient characteristics were compared between the DTX and DTX/Ram groups and adjusted with inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity scores and the following confounding variables: age, sex, performance status, smoking status, histology, driver mutation, and line of treatment. We compared DTX/Ram and DTX in terms of efficacy in both the pre-ICI and no-ICI groups.

RESULTS

In the pre-ICI group, 18 and 21 patients received DTX and DTX/Ram, respectively. In the no-ICI group, 35 and 25 patients received DTX and DTX/Ram. In the no-ICI group, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not significantly different between DTX/Ram- and DTX-treated patients (median PFS, 2.6 versus 1.6 months; p = 0.30, median OS; 8.2 versus 8.0 months; p = 0.30). In the pre-ICI group, PFS was significantly longer in DTX/Ram-treated than in DTX-treated patients (median, 5.9 versus 2.8 months; p = 0.03). Hazard ratio for disease progression or death was 0.75 (95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.96). The OS of DTX/Ram-treated patients tended to be longer than that of DTX-treated patients (median, 19.8 versus 8.6 months; p = 0.10).

CONCLUSIONS

DTX efficacy following anti-PD-1/L1 therapy may be enhanced by Ram. Further studies are needed to validate the efficacy of inhibiting the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway following anti-PD-1/L1 therapy.

Efficacy of anti-programmed cell death-1/ligand 1 monotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer patients with active brain metastases

e14511

Background: The efficacy of anti-programmed cell death-1/ligand 1 (anti-PD-(L)1) for active brain metastases (BMs) is not established, because most clinical trials excluded patients (pts) with active BMs such as untreated, symptomatic, or unstable BMs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) pts with active BMs. Methods: This retrospective study included NSCLC pts who had received anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy in 2nd or later line between December 2015 and August 2019. Pts who had not evaluated BMs by CT/MRI before anti-PD-(L)1 were excluded. Pts were classified into those with or without active BMs which were defined as untreated or symptomatic BMs or BMs requiring systemic steroids. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of pts with or without active BMs were compared. Intra-cranial and extra-cranial tumor responses were evaluated in pts with active BMs. Results: In this study, 242 pts who had received anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy were identified and 197 pts were analyzed. Twenty-four pts were classified to pts with active BMs. Among pts without active BMs, 145 pts had no BMs and 28 pts had treated asymptomatic BMs. PFS of pts with active BMs was significantly shorter than that of pts without active BMs (1.3 versus 2.7 months; p < 0.001). OS of pts with active BMs was significantly shorter than that of pts without active BMs (4.5 vs 16.3 months; p = 0.001). Intracranial response rate (RR) was 13.3% (2/15) and extracranial RR was 26.7% (4/15) in pts with active BMs. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, active BM, poor PS and EGFR/ALK(+) were selected as significant factors associated with poor PFS. Active BM and poor PS were selected as significant factors associated with poor OS. Conclusions: Anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy is not recommend for pts with active BMs.