Comparable Immune Function Inhibition by the Infliximab Biosimilar CT-P13: Implications for Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

CT-P13 is the first biosimilar monoclonal antibody to infliximab, and was recently approved in the European Union, Japan, Korea, and USA for all six indications of infliximab. However, studies directly assessing the biologic activity of CT-P13 versus inflximab in the context of inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] are still scanty. In the present study, we aimed to compare the biological activities of CT-P13 and infliximab with specific focus on intestinal cells so as to gain insight into the potential biosimilarity of these two agents for treatment of IBD.

METHODS

CT-P13 and infliximab were investigated and compared by in vitro experiments for their neutralisation ability of soluble tumour necrosis factor alpha [sTNFα] and membrane-bound tumour necrosis factor alpha [mTNFα], suppression of cytokine release by reverse signalling, induction of regulatory macrophages and wound healing, and antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity [ADCC].

RESULTS

CT-P13 showed similar biological activities to infliximab as gauged by neutralisation of soluble TNFα, as well as blockade of apoptosis and suppression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in intestinal Caco-2 cells. Infliximab and CT-P13 equally induced apoptosis and outside-to-inside signals through transmembrane TNFα [tmTNFα]. Moreover, regulatory macrophage induction and ensuing wound healing were similarly exerted by CT-P13 and infliximab. However, neither CT-P13 nor infliximab exerted any significant ADCC of ex vivo-stimulated peripheral blood monocytes or lamina propria mononuclear cells from IBD patients.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that CT-P13 and infliximab exert highly similar biological activities in intestinal cells, and further support a mechanistic comparability of these two drugs in the treatment of IBD.

Addition of an immunomodulator can reverse antibody formation and loss of response in patients treated with adalimumab

BACKGROUND

Anti-adalimumab antibodies (AAA) are associated with loss of clinical response (LOR). Addition of an immunomodulator has been shown to reverse immunogenicity and regain response with infliximab monotherapy. Similar data on adalimumab are lacking.

AIM

To study the impact of immunomodulator addition on the emergence of AAA and LOR among adalimumab therapy patients.

METHODS

The databases of three tertiary medical centres were reviewed to identify patients who developed AAA during adalimumab monotherapy with resultant LOR, and received an immunomodulator as a salvage combination therapy. All sera were prospectively analysed using previously described ELISA assays. Clinical response was determined using appropriate clinical scores. Elimination of AAA, designated as 'sero-reversal', elevation of drug levels and regained clinical response were the sought outcomes.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients (21 Crohn's disease, and 2 ulcerative colitis) developed AAA with subsequent LOR and were thereafter prescribed an immunomodulator as salvage therapy (thiopurine n = 14, methotrexate n = 9). Eleven patients (48%) underwent sero-reversal with gradual elimination of AAA, increase in drug trough levels and restoration of clinical response (median time to sero-reversal 5 months). In 12 patients (52%), immunogenicity and loss of response could not be reversed. There was no difference between responders and nonresponders in the type of immunomodulators used or baseline clinical characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

In almost half of inflammatory bowel disease patients developing anti-adalimumab antibodies and loss of response, established immunogenicity of adalimumab can be gradually reversed by the addition of immunomodulator therapy with restoration of a clinico-biological response. However, these observations need to be confirmed with larger studies.

Addition of an immunomodulator can reverse antibody formation and loss of response in patients treated with adalimumab

BACKGROUND

Anti-adalimumab antibodies (AAA) are associated with loss of clinical response (LOR). Addition of an immunomodulator has been shown to reverse immunogenicity and regain response with infliximab monotherapy. Similar data on adalimumab are lacking.

AIM

To study the impact of immunomodulator addition on the emergence of AAA and LOR among adalimumab therapy patients.

METHODS

The databases of three tertiary medical centres were reviewed to identify patients who developed AAA during adalimumab monotherapy with resultant LOR, and received an immunomodulator as a salvage combination therapy. All sera were prospectively analysed using previously described ELISA assays. Clinical response was determined using appropriate clinical scores. Elimination of AAA, designated as 'sero-reversal', elevation of drug levels and regained clinical response were the sought outcomes.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients (21 Crohn's disease, and 2 ulcerative colitis) developed AAA with subsequent LOR and were thereafter prescribed an immunomodulator as salvage therapy (thiopurine n = 14, methotrexate n = 9). Eleven patients (48%) underwent sero-reversal with gradual elimination of AAA, increase in drug trough levels and restoration of clinical response (median time to sero-reversal 5 months). In 12 patients (52%), immunogenicity and loss of response could not be reversed. There was no difference between responders and nonresponders in the type of immunomodulators used or baseline clinical characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

In almost half of inflammatory bowel disease patients developing anti-adalimumab antibodies and loss of response, established immunogenicity of adalimumab can be gradually reversed by the addition of immunomodulator therapy with restoration of a clinico-biological response. However, these observations need to be confirmed with larger studies.

Cross-immunogenicity: antibodies to infliximab in Remicade-treated patients with IBD similarly recognise the biosimilar Remsima

OBJECTIVE

The cross-immunogenicity of the recently approved infliximab-biosimilar Remsima (CT-P13) with the originator drug Remicade is still unknown.

DESIGN

Sera of patients with IBD with or without measurable anti-Remicade antibodies to infliximab (ATI) were tested for their cross-reactivity to two batches of Remsima. Experiments were repeated after deglycosylation of Remicade/Remsima, IgG purification, excipients' dialysis and monomer purification by size exclusion chromatography. Anti-Remicade antibodies were tested for their functional inhibition of TNF-α binding by Remsima/Remicade by competition assay. Cross-reactivity of anti-adalimumab antibodies with Remicade/Remsima was also investigated.

RESULTS

125 patients' and controls' sera were tested (median age 31 years, IQR 24.5-39.5). All 56 anti-Remicade ATI-negative controls (14 healthy individuals, 42 patients with IBD) were also negative for anti-Remsima ATI. All 69 positive anti-Remicade IBD sera were cross-reactive with Remsima. ATI titres against Remicade or Remsima were strongly correlated (r values between 0.92 and 0.99, p<0.001 for all experiments, Spearman's correlation test). The background ELISA signal for Remsima was slightly higher compared with Remicade in negative controls (1.25±0.6 µg/mL vs 0.76±0.5 µg/mL, respectively, p<0.001), and persisted after deglycosylation, dialysis or protein size filtration, but abolished by IgG purification and significantly diminished by monomer purification. Anti-Remicade ATIs of patients with IBD (n=10) exerted similar functional inhibition on Remsima or Remicade TNF-α binding capacity (p=NS for all inhibition curve points). Antibodies-to-adalimumab in adalimumab-treated patients with IBD (n=7) did not cross-react with either Remicade or Remsima.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-Remicade antibodies in patients with IBD recognise and functionally inhibit Remsima to a similar degree, suggesting similar immunogenicity and shared immunodominant epitopes on these two infliximab agents. In contrast, anti-adalimumab antibodies do not cross-react with Remsima or Remicade.

Induction infliximab levels among patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis compared with patients with moderately severe ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Infliximab is effective as salvage therapy for patients with steroid refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis (UC). Although current data suggest that the pharmacokinetics of infliximab are influenced by inflammatory burden in patients with acute severe UC, data comparing infliximab trough levels in patients with acute severe UC vs. moderately severe UC are scarce.

AIM

To compare infliximab trough and anti-infliximab antibody levels at a standard fixed time-point during induction between patients with acute severe and moderately severe UC.

METHODS

A multi-centre retrospective study comparing infliximab drug and antibody levels 14 days after the first infusion in hospitalised acute severe UC versus out-patients with moderately severe UC was performed.

RESULTS

Sixteen acute severe UC patients, hospitalised between 2010-2015 and refractory to intravenous corticosteroids, were treated with infliximab 5 mg/kg salvage therapy. They were compared to 16 moderately severe UC out-patient controls. Mean infliximab trough levels at day 14 were significantly lower in patients with acute severe UC compared to moderately severe UC (7.15 ± 5.3 vs. 14.4 ± 11.2 μg/mL, P = 0.007). Seven patients (three acute severe and four moderate severe UC) were primary nonresponders to infliximab induction therapy. Infliximab level at day 14 did not differ between responders and nonresponders (9.8 ± 9 vs. 12.1 ± 10.6 μg/mL, respectively, P = N.S.). However, week 2 median antibody-to-infliximab levels were numerically higher among primary nonresponders (3.4 ± 5.7 vs. 1.2 ± 4 μg/mL-eq, respectively, P = 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Infliximab trough levels at day 14 were lower in patients with acute severe UC compared to moderately severe UC, possibly due to a higher inflammatory burden and/or increased drug clearance. However, drug levels at day 14 were not lower among nonresponders compared with responders. Controlled trials are warranted to examine whether an a-priori-intensified infliximab induction protocol will lead to an improved outcome in acute severe UC.

Optimizing Anti-TNF-α Therapy: Serum Levels of Infliximab and Adalimumab Are Associated With Mucosal Healing in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

BACKGROUND & AIMS

It is not clear what serum levels of anti-tumor necrosis factor are associated with reduced intestinal inflammation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We aimed to identify serum levels of infliximab and adalimumab associated with mucosal healing in patients with IBD and to evaluate the putative gain in control of inflammation by incremental increases in drug levels.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study of 145 patients with IBD treated with infliximab (n = 78) or adalimumab (n = 67) at a medical center in Israel from 2009 through 2014. We collected data from colonoscopy examinations; mucosal healing was defined as simple endoscopic score of <3 or a Mayo score ≤1. These data were compared with serum levels of anti-tumor necrosis factor agents, clinical scores, and levels of C-reactive protein.

RESULTS

Median serum levels of infliximab and adalimumab were significantly higher in patients with mucosal healing than patients with active disease (based on endoscopy) (for infliximab, 4.3 vs 1.7 μg/mL, P = .0002; for adalimumab, 6.2 vs 3.1 μg/mL, P = .01). Levels of infliximab above 5 μg/mL (area under the curve = 0.75; P < .0001) and levels of adalimumab above 7.1 μg/mL (area under the curve = 0.7; P = .004) identified patients with mucosal healing with 85% specificity. Increasing levels of infliximab beyond 8 μg/mL produced only minimal increases in the rate of mucosal healing, whereas the association between higher level of adalimumab and increased rate of mucosal healing reached a plateau at 12 μg/mL. In patients with measurable levels of infliximab >3 μg/mL, the presence of antibodies to infliximab was associated with a lower rate of mucosal healing compared with patients with similar drug level without antibodies (16% vs 50%, respectively; P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

In a retrospective study, we found significant association between serum levels of anti-tumor necrosis factor agents and level of mucosal healing. We propose that serum levels of 6-10 μg/mL for infliximab and 8-12 μg/mL for adalimumab are required to achieve mucosal healing in 80%-90% of patients with IBD, and that this could be considered as a "therapeutic window." Exceeding these levels produces only a negligible gain in proportion of patients with mucosal healing.

Ashkenazi Jewish origin protects against formation of antibodies to infliximab and therapy failure

Infliximab is an anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) used for treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) as well as rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, and other inflammatory conditions. Antibodies to infliximab (ATI) develop in approximately 45% of infliximab-treated IBD patients and are correlated with loss of clinical response. Scarce data exist as to factors which predict infliximab immunogenicity.To investigate factors that may predict formation of antibodies to infliximab (ATI) and infliximab therapy failure an observational study of consecutive IBD patients treated with infliximab between 2009 and 2013 was performed. Trough levels of ATI were measured. Patients were monitored for disease activity using clinical activity indexes and were classified according to ATI formation and clinical response. All clinical and demographic parameters were analyzed for association with the designated outcomes.One hundred fifty-nine patients were included and 1505 sera were tested. On multivariate analysis, Jewish Ashkenazi ethnicity was protective against both development of ATI (odds ratio [OR] 0.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.17-0.7, P = 0.005) and treatment failure (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.13-0.66, P = 0.003). Concomitant immunomodulator therapy was also negatively associated with immunogenicity and infliximab therapy failure (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.15-0.65, P = 0.002; OR 0.42 95% CI 0.18-0.99, p = 0.04, respectively), whereas episodic therapy was positively associated with both outcomes (OR 4.2 95% CI 1.07-16.1, p = 0.04, OR 4.45 95% CI 1.2-16.6, p = 0.026 respectively). All other variables, including IBD type, gender, weight, age, smoking status and disease duration, were not predictive of ATI formation or clinical failure. However, among Crohn's disease patients, a non-stricturing non-penetrating phenotype was protective against ATI formation (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.14-0.96, p = 0.04). P = 0.04, respectively), whereas episodic/interrupted therapy was positively associated with both outcomes (OR 4.2, 95% CI 1.07-16.1, P = 0.04; OR 4.45, 95% CI 1.2-16.6, P = 0.026, respectively). All other variables, including IBD type, sex, weight, age, smoking status, and disease duration, were not predictive of ATI formation or clinical failure. However, among Crohn disease patients, a nonstricturing nonpenetrating phenotype was protective against ATI formation (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.14-0.96, P = 0.04).Jewish Ashkenazi ethnicity is protective of ATI formation and infliximab therapy failure. These findings suggest a role for ethnicity, and implicitly for genetic predisposition, in modulating the risk of anti-TNF immunogenicity and treatment unresponsiveness.

Significance of low level infliximab in the absence of anti-infliximab antibodies

AIM: To evaluate the prevalence of double negative (DN) sera and the mechanisms responsible for DN status.

METHODS: Sera of inflammatory bowel disease patients treated with infliximab (IFX) were tested for drug/antibodies to infliximab (ATI) trough levels and the proportion of DN results was compared between a commercially available double antigen ELISA (with labeled IFX as the detection antibody) and an anti-lambda ELISA (with anti-human lambda chain detection antibody). Repeat testing with lower than customary serum dilution (1:10) was performed. Patients with DN status were matched with IFX+/ATI- controls and were followed-up for subsequent development of non-transient ATI to investigate if DN status precedes ATI.

RESULTS: Of 67 sera obtained at time of loss of response, only 6/67 (9%) were DN by anti-lambda ELISA compared to 27/67 (40%) with double antigen ELISA (P < 0.001, Fisher’s Exact test). Of the latter 27 sera, 22% were also DN by anti-lambda ELISA, whereas 44% were actually IFX positive (IFX+ATI-), 30% were ATI positive (IFX-ATI+) and 4% were double positive (IFX+ATI+). Re-testing using a 1:10 dilution converted most DN results into IFX+ and /or ATI+ status. Patients with DN status had shorter survival free of non-transient ATI compared with matched controls (log rank test, P < 0.001). In 9/30 (30%) of these patients, non transient ATI occurred before and after the event at which the DN serum was obtained, supporting the view that a DN result may represent a particular time-point along the two curves of ATI titer rise and infliximab drug level decline.

CONCLUSION: DN status may result from false negative detection of IFX or ATI by double antigen ELISA, suggesting a transitional state of low-level immunogenicity, rather than non-immunological clearance.

Expression of IL-2, IL-17 and TNF-alpha in patients with Crohn's disease treated with anti-TNF antibodies

BACKGROUND

The T cell cytokine IL-17 and the Th-17 pathway appear to have a role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel diseases. IL-2 is a potent stimulator of lymphocyte proliferation and IL2/IL21 receptor polymorphisms have recently been associated with susceptibility to IBD.

AIMS

To evaluate the expression of IL-17, IL-2 and TNFα in Crohn's disease (CD) patients with and without anti-TNFs.

METHODS

Cytokine expression was evaluated by ELISA and intracellular staining of CD4(+) T-cells from the peripheral blood and lamina propria of CD patients and of non-IBD controls. The results were stratified by disease activity and anti-TNF treatment.

RESULTS

IL2 expression was significantly elevated in CD patients not treated with anti-TNFs in comparison to healthy controls (19.6% vs. 33.3%, P=0.03) and CD patients treated with anti-TNFs (20.4% vs. 33.3%, P=0.02), and similar in infliximab-treated patients and controls. IL17 expression was similar in CD patients and controls, and was not affected by anti-TNF therapy. TNFα expression in patients with active CD was increased compared to controls (35.5% vs 25.7%, P<0.005), and was significantly decreased in anti-TNF treated patients in comparison to CD patients without anti-TNFs (39.6% vs 26.2%, P=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Expression of IL2 was significantly decreased in anti-TNF-treated CD patients in comparison to non-treated CD patients and controls. This novel finding may indicate a further mechanism of anti-TNF therapy in CD. Expression of IL17 was not influenced by presence of CD or anti-TNF therapy, which may partly explain the failure of recent clinical trials investigating anti-IL17 therapy in CD.

The temporal evolution of antidrug antibodies in patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with infliximab

OBJECTIVE

To characterise the temporal evolution of antibodies to infliximab (ATI).

DESIGN

Prospective observational study of infliximab-treated patients with inflammatory bowel disease between 2009 and 2012.

INTERVENTIONS

Trough levels of infliximab and ATI were measured before each infusion by anti-λ ELISA. Patients were monitored for disease activity by clinical activity indexes and for dose-intensification or infliximab cessation. The occurrence of transient ATI disappearing spontaneously without intervention was recorded separately.

RESULTS

125 patients were included (98 Crohn's disease, 27 ulcerative colitis, median follow-up 11.5±22 months) and 1119 sera were analysed for infliximab and ATI levels. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that 42% of patients remained ATI-free by 4 years of treatment. Most (90%) of the patients who developed ATI did so within the first 12 months of therapy, whereas transient ATI were detected throughout the duration of infliximab therapy (p<0.001). ATI incidence was similar between patients who received infliximab previously (episodic/interrupted therapy patients, n=14) and scheduled-therapy patients (n=111). In the scheduled group, combination immunomodulator+infliximab resulted in longer ATI-free survival compared with monotherapy (p=0.003, logrank test). Survival free of clinical loss of response was enjoyed by 51% of patients, and serial measurements showed that ATI development often preceded the onset of clinical flare.

CONCLUSIONS

When followed prospectively, most patients who develop ATI do so within the first 12 months of therapy. This incidence is reduced by concomitant immunomodulator even in scheduled-therapy patients. In contrast, transient ATI, which are of little clinical significance, can appear haphazardly at any time during treatment. The onset of clinical loss of response may lag behind the appearance of anti-infliximab antibodies.

Addition of an immunomodulator to infliximab therapy eliminates antidrug antibodies in serum and restores clinical response of patients with inflammatory bowel disease

There are few therapeutic options for patients with inflammatory bowel disease who lose response to infliximab because they produced antibodies against the drug. We performed a retrospective analysis to investigate whether administration of immune modulators to 5 patients who developed antibodies to infliximab (ATI) restored response to this drug; 3 patients were given azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine and 2 patients were given methotrexate. Concentrations of infliximab and ATIs, and antitumor necrosis factor (TNF) activity, were analyzed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-based competition assays of serum samples collected before and after patients were given the immunomodulator. In all patients, levels of ATIs gradually decreased and trough levels of infliximab increased; clinical responses were restored to all patients. In competition assays, immunomodulator-induced elimination of ATIs was associated with increased anti-TNF activity in serum. The addition of immunomodulators to therapy might be helpful to patients who have lost response to anti-TNF agents owing to formation of antidrug antibodies.

Clinical utility of antihuman lambda chain-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) versus double antigen ELISA for the detection of anti-infliximab antibodies

BACKGROUND

Anti-infliximab antibodies (ATIs) are associated with lower serum infliximab (IFX) trough levels and diminished clinical response. The current most prevalent method for detection of ATI is a double-antigen (DA) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) utilizing IFX for ligand and detection antibody. Serum IFX interferes with ATI measurement in this method. An alternative ELISA using antihuman lambda chain (AHLC) antibody for ATI detection may be less amenable to this interference. The aim of our study was to compare the performance of AHLC-ATI versus DA-ATI for prediction of clinical response and evaluate the clinical significance of positive ATI in the presence of detectable IFX levels in IFX-treated inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients.

METHODS

In all, 63 patients' sera were analyzed for IFX levels and antibody levels by AHLC and DA. The results were compared with the clinical response to IFX. Percentage of patients with IFX+ATI+ status among IFX-treated patients and the clinical outcome of IFX+ATI+ patients were assessed.

RESULTS

ATIs were demonstrated in 22/63 (34.9%) and 18/63 (28.5%) sera of patients by AHLC and DA assay, respectively (P = 0.6). Detectable ATI and in IFX was detected in four patients (6.3%) by AHLC but not by DA assay. IFX+ATI+ status was documented in 8.7% of available sera and was associated with a trend for loss of response.

CONCLUSIONS

AHLC and DA ELISA are equally effective for ATI detection in patients with undetectable serum IFX. AHLC ELISA detects ATI in some patients with detectable serum IFX. This IFX+ATI+ status may be a harbinger of evolving loss of response to the drug.

The decline of anti-drug antibody titres after discontinuation of anti-TNFs: implications for predicting re-induction outcome in IBD

BACKGROUND

Anti-drug antibodies can be elicited by infliximab and adalimumab, but the rate of their decay after therapy is stopped is unknown.

AIM

To investigate the decline of anti-drug antibody titre after anti-TNF cessation, and to evaluate the clinical utility of anti-drug antibody measurement before anti-TNF re-induction.

METHODS

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients who stopped anti-TNF therapy and had measurable anti-drug antibodies were prospectively followed up by serial blood measurements of antibodies levels. The clinical outcome of a second cohort of patients who received re-induction by infliximab or adalimumab after a drug holiday >4 months was determined vis-à-vis their anti-drug antibodies status before re-induction.

RESULTS

The first cohort included 22 patients with anti-drug antibodies who were prospectively followed up after cessation of anti-TNF. Sixteen had antibodies-to-infliximab (ATI) and six had antibodies-to-adalimumab (ATA). ATI titres declined within 12 months to below detection levels in 13/16 infliximab-treated patients, whereas ATA titres became undetectable in only 2/6 adalimumab-treated patients (P = 0.04). The second cohort comprised 27 patients who resumed anti-TNFs (24 infliximab, 3 adalimumab). Of these, 3/5 patients with measurable anti-drug antibodies before re-induction experienced severe hypersensitivity reaction and/or nonresponse mandating drug-discontinuation, compared to 11/22 patients who were re-induced without measurable anti-drug antibodies (OR = 1.5, 95% CI 0.2-11, P = 0.7).

CONCLUSIONS

Antibodies to infliximab titres decline to undetectable levels within one year of cessation of infliximab in the majority of patients, whereas antibodies to adalimumab seem to persist longer after adalimumab discontinuation. Measuring antibodies to infliximab prior to infliximab re-induction is probably of little clinical utility, especially if more than a 12-month drug-holiday has elapsed.

Detection of infliximab in breast milk of nursing mothers with inflammatory bowel disease

INTRODUCTION

Limited data suggest the absence of infliximab in breast milk, thereby implying the safety of this drug during breast-feeding. We aimed to re-evaluate the presence of infliximab in breast milk of nursing IBD patients.

METHODS

Serum and breast milk were obtained post-partum from 3 breast-feeding patients with Crohn's disease before and after re-initiation of infliximab. ELISA assay was employed to measure infliximab level in maternal serum and in breast milk. The level of infliximab was also measured in breast milk of a control group of 8 nursing healthy mothers.

RESULTS

Infliximab was undetectable in breast milk prior to the first infusion and was also not measurable in 8 lactating women not exposed to infliximab. Infliximab levels in breast milk rose up to 101ng/ml within 2-3days of the infusion. These levels of infliximab in breast milk were roughly 1/200th of the level in blood.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast with prior reports, infliximab can be detected in the breast milk of nursing mothers. The miniscule amounts of infliximab transferred in breast milk are unlikely to result in systemic immune-suppression of the infant. Nonetheless, local effects of this exposure on the neonates' intestine and potential immune sensitization or tolerization towards the drug can not be excluded and merit further investigations.

The immunogenic part of infliximab is the F(ab')2, but measuring antibodies to the intact infliximab molecule is more clinically useful

OBJECTIVES

To localise the immunogenic part of infliximab and evaluate the clinical usefulness of measuring antibodies against infliximab fragments.

DESIGN

Observational study.

SETTINGS

A specialised inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) centre in a tertiary hospital.

INTERVENTIONS

Serum was collected from patients with IBD and controls. Antibodies against whole infliximab (ATI) and against the digested Fc, F(ab')(2) and F(ab') fragments were measured by a specifically developed ELISA and by western blotting. A separate ELISA was used to determine infliximab levels in serum.

RESULTS

109 serum samples from 62 infliximab-treated patients were tested along with 64 control samples. Anti-F(ab')(2) antibodies were found in 28/42 (67%) samples with positive ATI, all from infliximab-exposed patients. Anti-F(ab')(2) antibodies were also present in 26 of the remaining 67 (39%) samples from exposed patients despite absent ATI. No specific anti-Fc antibodies were detected. Low trough infliximab level and high ATI level was found in 10/12 patients (83%) with complete loss of response to infliximab, but in only 5/14 patients (36%, p=0.02) who regained response to intensified infliximab regimen and in 2/24 patients (8%, p<0.001) in maintained remission while on 5 mg/kg/8 week infliximab treatment. Although Anti-F(ab')(2) antibodies showed similar test characteristics to ATI in patients losing response to infliximab, they were also detected in 61% of patients in maintained remission, thereby limiting their clinical usefulness. No cross reactivity to adalimumab was noted.

CONCLUSIONS

F(ab')(2) is the immunogenic fragment of infliximab. However, ATI level in serum--combined with measurement of trough infliximab level--is better correlated with the clinical response to infliximab or with its loss.

Early preservation of effector functions followed by eventual T cell memory depletion: a model for the delayed onset of the effect of thiopurines

OBJECTIVE

The onset of the effect of thiopurines is delayed for several months. The aim of this study was to investigate immune mechanisms for this delay.

METHODS

The effects of thiopurines on human peripheral blood T cells and on lamina propria lymphocytes were investigated for apoptosis induction by Annexin V/propidium iodide (PI) and for cytokine secretion by intracellular staining and ELISA assays. To investigate the mechanism of the effect of thiopurines in vivo, Balb/C mice were co-immunised with HEL/OVA (hen egg lysozyme/ovalbumin) antigens, and then repeatedly challenged by HEL only, while being treated by mercaptopurine or vehicle alone for either 4 or 20 weeks. The memory response of CD4+ splenocytes towards HEL/OVA was then determined by CFSE (carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester) dilution.

RESULTS

Thiopurines arrested the proliferation of stimulated T cells but did not enhance the apoptosis of either resting T cells or activated T cells until day 5 poststimulation. Despite the proliferation arrest, stimulated T cells successfully differentiated into effector cells, as evidenced by their capacity for proinflammatory cytokine secretion, potent adhesion and cytotoxicity. Prolonged mercaptopurine treatment of mice for 20 weeks selectively reduced the CD4+ memory response to a repeatedly encountered HEL antigen, but did not affect the T cell memory pool to the previously presented OVA antigen. A shorter, 4 weeks, treatment with mercaptopurine did not inhibit the memory response to either antigen.

CONCLUSIONS

T cells arrested from cycling by thiopurines can still differentiate into potent effector cells capable of propagating the inflammatory process. Thiopurine treatment results in depletion of antigen-specific memory T cells, but this effect is dependent upon repeated encounters with the antigen over a prolonged time course.

Functional voltage-gated sodium channels are expressed in human intestinal epithelial cells

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Local anesthetics which preferentially interact with voltage-gated sodium channels (VGSCs) were shown to have a clinical beneficial effect in ulcerative colitis and to regulate the secretion of inflammatory mediators from intestinal epithelial cells. However, expression of VGSCs in epithelial cells was not demonstrated. Herein we assessed whether intestinal epithelial cells express VGSCs.

METHODS

The expression of VGSCs in normal human colonic tissue and in the TNFalpha-treated or untreated intestinal epithelial cell line HT-29 was studied by immunofluorescence staining and FACS analysis, Western blot, immunohistochemistry, and RT-PCR using primers specific for several VGSC alpha subunits. The function of VGSCs was assessed by measuring changes in the membrane potential of the intestinal epithelial cells following incubation with lidocaine, veratridine, or both.

RESULTS

HT-29 cells were shown to express the VGSC alpha protein. mRNA analysis revealed the expression of nine of ten VGSC alpha isoforms. Immunohistochemical staining of normal colonic tissue confirmed the expression of VGSCs in colonic epithelial cells, smooth muscle cells, and nerves. Lidocaine induced membrane depolarization of HT-29 cells and its effect was blocked by veratridine.

CONCLUSION

Malignant and normal intestinal epithelial cells express functional VGSCs. These molecules may play a role in the regulation of inflammation in gut physiology and pathology.

Lidocaine down-regulates nuclear factor-kappaB signalling and inhibits cytokine production and T cell proliferation

Lidocaine is a commonly used local anaesthetic agent which has also been found to possess anti-inflammatory activity in several disorders. However, the mechanism of this effect has been little explored. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of lidocaine on stimulated human T cells. The effect of lidocaine on Jurkat T cells was examined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to determine secretion of interleukin (IL)-2, and by the [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide] viability assay. Tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha and IL-2 mRNA expression was determined by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. In addition, the effect of lidocaine on the proliferation of freshly isolated peripheral blood (PB) CD3(+) T cells was examined by carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester dilution. Apoptosis induction and cytokine production and secretion were determined by annexin V/PI assay, intracellular immunostaining and ELISA respectively. The results showed that lidocaine exerts a dose-dependent inhibition of IL-2 and TNF-alpha secretion by Jurkat T cells at the protein and mRNA levels. Moreover, lidocaine reduced nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB) signalling in clinically relevant concentrations. Similarly, proliferation of anti-CD3 stimulated PB T cells was abrogated significantly by lidocaine, and the percentage of interferon-gamma- and TNF-alpha-producing T cells was diminished after culture with this agent. In both experimental systems, lidocaine's effect was not mediated by cytotoxic mechanism, as no significant apoptosis or necrosis was demonstrated following co-culture of T cells with this drug. In conclusion, lidocaine's anti-inflammatory effect may be mediated by a drug-induced abrogation of T cell proliferation and cytokine secretion independent of cell death. These effects are mediated at least partly by inhibition of NF-kappaB signalling.

Qualité de vie et syndrome lipodystrophique chez les patients infectés par le VIH

AIM OF THE STUDY

The aim of this work is to show to what extent a psychosocial evaluation can lead bring to comprehension of the subjectivity of Quality of Life (QoL) among HIV-infected patients. Evaluation of QoL makes it possible to understand the link between the therapeutic effectiveness and the subjective evaluation of the treatment, but also to estimate more precisely how people live and take their treatment in the context of HIV infection.

METHOD

This work confronts the variation of QoL with the variation of several social and psychosocial parameters identified as of the components of the system, which is the subjective evaluation, and more precisely to a specific side effect of Highly Active AntiRetroviral Therapies (HAART): lipodystrophy syndrome that consists in body fat redistribution. This side effect could consist in an accumulation of body fat, or a loss of body fat or a combination of both symptoms. The analysis was made on the data from APROCO-COPILOTE cohort composed of HIV-infected patients initiating HAART.

RESULTS

Among a sample of 706 patients follow-up for three years and with available QoL data, we identified the variations of QoL according to the variation of this specific side effect and according to gender. Results show that lipodystrophy syndrome has a determinant impact on QoL different among male and female patients. Adjusted on clinical and socio-demographic characteristics, impaired women's QoL is associated with accumulation of body fat and impaired men's QoL is associated with loss of body fat.

CONCLUSION

These results underline the role of body image on subjective evaluation of QoL. The analysis of empirical data made it possible to highlight the social implication of the evaluation of QoL from the role of the social support, patient-provider relationship and the social context.

Impact of Newly Available Drugs on Clinical Progression in Patients with Virological Failure after Exposure to Three Classes of Antiretrovirals

Objective

To study the prognosis of HIV-infected patients with virological failure after exposure to three classes of antiretroviral drugs (ARVs).

Design

Cohort study. Setting: French Hospital Database on HIV.

Patients

Patients previously exposed to at least two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), two protease inhibitors and one non-NRTI, with viral load (VL) values of >5000 copies/ml after the exposure criteria were met and a new treatment initiated between 1998 and 2001 with VL >5000 copies/ml.

Main outcome measures

Risk of new AIDS-defining-events (ADEs) or death from first introduction of a drug never used before occurring between 1998 and 2001 defined as baseline.

Results

The main baseline characteristics of the 1092 patients were: previous ADE in 49% of cases, median CD4 cell count 181 μl, median VL 4.9 log10 copies/ml, median duration of ARV therapy 5.0 years and previous exposure to a median of nine ARVs. The crude progression rates were 20.1/100 patient-years among patients included in 1998, 15.1 in 1999, 11.1 in 2000 and 8.6 in 2001. After adjustment for baseline characteristics, the calendar year of inclusion was associated with the risk of clinical progression ( P<0.001). When the types of newly available drugs used at baseline or during follow-up were introduced into the model, year of inclusion was no longer associated with the risk of clinical progression ( P=0.42), while exposure to amprenavir/r, lopinavir/r, abacavir or tenofovir was associated with a lower risk.

Conclusions

The clinical prognosis of heavily pretreated patients experiencing virological failure improved between 1998 and 2001, mainly thanks to the use of newly available drugs with more favourable resistance profiles.