Phase Ib study of gemcitabine, nab-paclitaxel, and ficlatuzumab in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer

693

Background: Paired-related homeodomain transcription factor 1 (Prrx1) isoforms are involved in pancreatic development, pancreatitis, and carcinogenesis. Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) is a transcriptional target of Prrx1b. Ficlatuzumab is a recombinant humanized HGF antibody, that neutralizes HGF/c-Met binding and HGF-induced c-Met phosphorylation. In preclinical pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) models, inhibition of Prrx1b-HGF signaling using ficlatuzumab and gemcitabine reduced primary tumor volume and eliminated metastatic disease. Methods: Patients (pts) with previously-untreated metastatic PDAC enrolled in a phase Ib dose escalation study with 3+3 design and two dose cohorts of ficlatuzumab (10mg/kg and 20mg/kg) administered intravenously every other week with gemcitabine (G; 1000mg/m2) and nab-paclitaxel (A; 125mg/m2) given 3 weeks on and 1 week off. This was followed by an expansion phase at the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination. Results: 24 pts (sex, 12M:12F; median age, 69 years [range, 51-82 years]) were enrolled. No dose-limiting toxicities were identified in the phase 1b (N = 6 pts) and ficlatuzumab at 20mg/kg with GA was advanced to the expansion phase (N = 18 pts). By RECISTv1.1 in the full study population, 7 (29%) pts had partial response, 15 (63%) had stable disease, and 2 (8%) could not be evaluated. Median progression-free survival was 8 months (range, 3-16 months), 4 pts are still on study treatment. The primary toxicities attributed to ficlatuzumab included hypoalbuminemia (grade 3, 21%; any grade, 91%) and edema (grade 3, 8%; any grade, 91%). Nine (38%) of the 24 pts discontinued study treatment due to these toxicities prior to disease progression. Conclusions: The combination of ficlatuzumab with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel is associated with durable treatment responses but also significant hypoalbuminemia and edema that may impair treatment tolerability. Serial blood samples were collected for circulating HGF measurements, and mandatory pretreatment biopsies were collected for tumor c-MET pathway activation and 3D organoid culture drug sensitivity testing. Clinical trial information: NCT03316599.

A phase 2 clinical trial of the heat shock protein 90 (HSP 90) inhibitor ganetespib in patients with refractory advanced esophagogastric cancer

Subsets of esophagogastric (EG) cancers harbor genetic abnormalities, including amplification of HER2, MET, or FGFR2 or mutations in PIK3CA, EGFR, or BRAF. Ganetespib which is a novel triazolone heterocyclic inhibitor of HSP90, is a potentially biologically rational treatment strategy for advanced EG cancers with these gene amplification. This multicenter, single-arm phase 2 trial enrolled patients with histologically confirmed advanced EG cancer with progression on at least one line of systemic therapy. Patients received Ganetespib 200 mg/m2 IV on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included: Progression Free Survival (PFS); to correlate the presence of HSP clients with ORR and PFS; evaluating the safety, tolerability and adverse events profile. In this study 26 eligible patients mainly: male 77%, median age 64 years were enrolled. The most common drug-related adverse events were diarrhea (77%), fatigue (65%), elevated ALKP (42%), and elevated AST (38%). The most common grade 3/4 AEs included: leucopenia (12%), fatigue (12%), diarrhea (8%), and elevated ALKP (8%). The ORR of 4% reflects the single patient of 26 who had a complete response and stayed on treatment for more than seventy (70) months. Median PFS and OS was 61 days (2.0 months), 94 days (3.1 months) respectively. Ganetespib showed manageable toxicity. While the study was terminated early due to insufficient evidence of single-agent activity, the durable CR and 2 minor responses suggest that there may be a subset of EG patients who could benefit from this drug.

FOLFOX plus ziv-aflibercept or placebo in first-line metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma: A double-blind, randomized, multicenter phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Antiangiogenic therapy is a proven therapeutic modality for refractory gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. This trial assessed whether the addition of a high affinity angiogenesis inhibitor, ziv-aflibercept, could improve the efficacy of first-line mFOLFOX6 (oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and bolus plus infusional 5- fluorouracil) in metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Patients with treatment-naive metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned (in a 2:1 ratio) in a multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial to receive first-line mFOLFOX6 with or without ziv-aflibercept (4 mg/kg) every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients were randomized to receive mFOLFOX6 and ziv-aflibercept (43 patients) or mFOLFOX6 and a placebo (21 patients). There was no difference in the PFS, overall survival, or response rate. Patients treated with mFOLFOX6/ziv-aflibercept tended to be more likely to discontinue study treatment for reasons other than progressive disease (P = .06). The relative dose intensity of oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil was lower in the mFOLFOX6/ziv-aflibercept arm during the first 12 and 24 weeks of the trial. There were 2 treatment-related deaths due to cerebral hemorrhage and bowel perforation in the mFOLFOX6/ziv-aflibercept cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Ziv-aflibercept did not increase the anti-tumor activity of first-line mFOLFOX6 in metastatic esophagogastric cancer, potentially because of decreased dose intensity of FOLFOX. Further evaluation of ziv-aflibercept in unselected, chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma is not warranted.

Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers, Version 2.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

Esophageal cancer is the sixth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Squamous cell carcinoma is the most common histology in Eastern Europe and Asia, and adenocarcinoma is most common in North America and Western Europe. Surgery is a major component of treatment of locally advanced resectable esophageal and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) cancer, and randomized trials have shown that the addition of preoperative chemoradiation or perioperative chemotherapy to surgery significantly improves survival. Targeted therapies including trastuzumab, ramucirumab, and pembrolizumab have produced encouraging results in the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic disease. Multidisciplinary team management is essential for all patients with esophageal and EGJ cancers. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers focuses on recommendations for the management of locally advanced and metastatic adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and EGJ.

Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy as second-line therapy for advanced esophageal cancer: Phase 3 KEYNOTE-181 study

4010

Background: The phase 3 KEYNOTE-181 study compared pembrolizumab (pembro) vs chemo as second-line therapy for patients (pts) with advanced/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (ACC) of the esophagus (NCT02564263). Methods: Eligible pts were randomized 1:1 to pembro 200 mg Q3W for up to 2 years or choice of paclitaxel, docetaxel, or irinotecan. Randomization was stratified by histology (SCC vs adenocarcinoma) and region (Asia vs rest of world). Primary end points were OS in the SCC, PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥10, and the ITT. Secondary endpoints included PFS, ORR, safety; exploratory endpoints included health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in CPS ≥10. Results: 628 pts were randomized (401 with SCC; 222 with CPS ≥10). As of Oct. 15, 2018, median follow-up was 7.1 mo (pembro) vs 6.9 mo (chemo). In CPS ≥10, OS was superior with pembro vs chemo (median 9.3 vs 6.7 mo; HR 0.69; 95% CI 0.52-0.93; P= 0.0074). In CPS ≥10 SCC, median OS was 10.3 mo vs 6.7 mo and in CPS ≥10 ACC, median OS was 6.3 mo vs 6.9 mo; 12-mo OS rates were higher with pembro vs chemo (Table). In SCC, median OS was 8.2 mo vs 7.1 mo; HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.63-0.96; P= 0.0095. In the ITT, median OS was 7.1 mo vs 7.1 mo; HR 0.89; 95% CI 0.75-1.05; P= 0.0560. Updated OS will be presented. Grade 3-5 drug-related AEs (≥10% incidence in either arm) included decreased white blood cells (0% vs 10%), decreased neutrophils (0.3% vs 10%). In CPS ≥10, HRQoL improved with pembro vs chemo only for EQ-5D VAS (difference in LS mean change from baseline 5.57; 95% CI 0.58-10.56). Conclusions: Pembro significantly improved OS vs chemo as second-line therapy for advanced esophageal cancer with PD-L1 CPS ≥10, with a more favorable safety profile and stable and similar QOL. These data support pembro as a new second-line standard of care for esophageal cancer with PD-L1 CPS ≥10. Clinical trial information: NCT02564263. [Table: see text]

Ramucirumab with cisplatin and fluoropyrimidine as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic gastric or junctional adenocarcinoma (RAINFALL): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

VEGF and VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR-2)-mediated signalling and angiogenesis can contribute to the pathogenesis and progression of gastric cancer. We aimed to assess whether the addition of ramucirumab, a VEGFR-2 antagonist monoclonal antibody, to first-line chemotherapy improves outcomes in patients with metastatic gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

For this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial done at 126 centres in 20 countries, we recruited patients aged 18 years or older with metastatic, HER2-negative gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, and adequate organ function. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) with an interactive web response system to receive cisplatin (80 mg/m2, on the first day) plus capecitabine (1000 mg/m2, twice daily for 14 days), every 21 days, and either ramucirumab (8 mg/kg) or placebo on days 1 and 8, every 21 days. 5-Fluorouracil (800 mg/m2 intravenous infusion on days 1-5) was permitted in patients unable to take capecitabine. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival, analysed by intention to treat in the first 508 patients. We did a sensitivity analysis of the primary endpoint, including a central review of CT scans. Overall survival was a key secondary endpoint. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02314117.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 28, 2015, and Sept 16, 2016, 645 patients were randomly assigned to receive ramucirumab plus fluoropyrimidine and cisplatin (n=326) or placebo plus fluoropyrimidine and cisplatin (n=319). Investigator-assessed progression-free survival was significantly longer in the ramucirumab group than the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·753, 95% CI 0·607-0·935, p=0·0106; median progression-free survival 5·7 months [5·5-6·5] vs 5·4 months [4·5-5·7]). A sensitivity analysis based on central independent review of the radiological images did not corroborate the investigator-assessed difference in progression-free survival (HR 0·961, 95% CI 0·768-1·203, p=0·74). There was no difference in overall survival between groups (0·962, 0·801-1·156, p=0·6757; median overall survival 11·2 months [9·9-11·9] in the ramucirumab group vs 10·7 months [9·5-11·9] in the placebo group). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (85 [26%] of 323 patients in the ramucirumab group vs 85 [27%] of 315 in the placebo group), anaemia (39 [12%] vs 44 [14%]), and hypertension (32 [10%] vs 5 [2%]). The incidence of any-grade serious adverse events was 160 (50%) of 323 patients in the ramucirumab group and 149 (47%) of 315 patients in the placebo group. The most common serious adverse events were vomiting (14 [4%] in the ramucirumab group vs 21 [7%] in the placebo group) and diarrhoea (11 [3%] vs 19 [6%]). There were seven deaths in each group, either during study treatment or within 30 days of discontinuing study treatment, which were the result of treatment-related adverse events. In the ramucirumab group, these adverse events were acute kidney injury, cardiac arrest, gastric haemorrhage, peritonitis, pneumothorax, septic shock, and sudden death (n=1 of each). In the placebo group, these adverse events were cerebrovascular accident (n=1), multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (n=2), pulmonary embolism (n=2), sepsis (n=1), and small intestine perforation (n=1).

INTERPRETATION

Although the primary analysis for progression-free survival was statistically significant, this outcome was not confirmed in a sensitivity analysis of progression-free survival by central independent review, and did not improve overall survival. Therefore, the addition of ramucirumab to cisplatin plus fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy is not recommended as first-line treatment for this patient population.

FUNDING

Eli Lilly and Company.

Antitumor activity of margetuximab (M) plus pembrolizumab (P) in patients (pts) with advanced HER2+ (IHC3+) gastric carcinoma (GC)

65

Background: Trastuzumab (T) + chemo is standard first-line therapy (tx) for HER2+ gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) pts, though progression ensues in 6-8 months. The approved second-line tx is ramucirumab +/- paclitaxel (R+PAC). Pts with GC are less responsive to R+PAC than gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) pts, in particular HER2+ GC, and no anti-HER2 agents are approved in post-T setting. We report results of combination M+P in HER2+ GC pts and describe a biological rationale for this population. M is an anti-HER2 mAb Fc optimized for enhanced binding to activating FcgRIIIa (CD16A) and decreased binding to inhibitory FcgRIIb (CD32B). M demonstrated an enhanced Fc-dependent MoA, including enhanced ADCC. Methods: HER2+, PD-L1-unselected, second-line GEA pts post T progression received M (15 mg/kg) + P (200 mg) Q3wk. Safety, objective response rate (ORR), median overall & progression-free survival (mOS, mPFS), disease control rate (DCR), circulating tumor DNA, & tumor PD-L1 expression were assessed. Results: To date, 66 GEA pts were dosed; 35 (53%) GC and 31 (47%) GEJ. Overall, 12/66 (18.2%) had tx-related adverse events ≥ grade 3; 5 had drug-related SAEs: dehydration, diabetic ketoacidosis, hypotension and pneumonitis, each a single event, and 2 events of autoimmune hepatitis. Eligibility was based on archival HER2 expression; an exploratory endpoint measured retention of HER2 expression post-T by ERBB2 ctDNA. HER2 expression was lost in 23/56 (41.1%) of pts tested post T. HER2 retention was higher in pts with GC versus GEJ (65.8% vs. 44.8%) and in GEA pts with IHC 3+ vs 2+ archival tumors (61.7% vs 47.4%, respectively). Furthermore, GC had higher PD-L1 expression than GEJ, 53.3 vs. 33.3%, respectively. This coincided with more responses in IHC3+ GC pts, ORR 12/29 (41.4%; 95% CI 23.5-61.1), DCR 21/29 (72.4%; 95% CI 52.8-87.3), mPFS 5.5 months (95% CI 2.3-7.6), mOS not reached, with lower bound of 9.1 months for 95% CI. Enrollment of an additional 25 pts enriched for IHC3+ GC is ongoing. Conclusions: Results suggest that M+P, a chemo-free regimen, demonstrates acceptable tolerability and has encouraging preliminary activity in second-line HER2+ GEA, specifically in GC pts who retain ERBB2 amp prior to second-line tx. Clinical trial information: NCT02689284.

Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy as second-line therapy for advanced esophageal cancer: Phase III KEYNOTE-181 study

2

Background: Patients with advanced esophageal cancer after first-line chemotherapy (chemo) have a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. We present results of the phase 3 KEYNOTE-181 study of pembrolizumab vs investigator’s choice chemo as second-line therapy for patients (pts) with advanced/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or Siewert type I adenocarcinoma of the EGJ (NCT02564263). Methods: Eligible pts were randomized 1:1 to pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W for up to 2 years or investigator’s choice chemo of paclitaxel, docetaxel, or irinotecan. Randomization was stratified by histology (SCC vs adenocarcinoma) and region (Asia vs rest of world). Primary end points were OS in the SCC, PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥10, and ITT populations. Results: 628 pts were randomized including 401 with SCC, and 222 with CPS ≥10. As of October 15, 2018, the median follow-up was 7.1 mo (pembrolizumab) vs 6.9 mo (chemo). Pembrolizumab was superior to chemo for OS in CPS ≥10 (N=222; median 9.3 vs 6.7 mo; HR 0.69; 95% CI 0.52-0.93; P=0.0074). The 12-mo OS rate in pts with CPS ≥10 was 43% vs 20%. There was clinically meaningful improvement in OS with pembrolizumab vs chemo in pts with SCC, but this was not statistically significant per prespecified boundaries (N=401; 8.2 mo vs 7.1 mo; HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.63-0.96; P=0.0095). In the ITT population, while directionally favorable, the difference in OS was not statistically significant (N=628; 7.1 mo vs 7.1 mo; HR 0.89; 95% CI 0.75-1.05; P=0.0560). Fewer pts had any-grade (64% vs 86%) or grade 3-5 (18% vs 41%) drug-related AEs with pembrolizumab vs chemo. Conclusion: Pembrolizumab significantly improved OS compared with chemo as second-line therapy for advanced esophageal cancer with PD-L1 CPS ≥10, with a more favorable safety profile. These data support pembrolizumab as a new second-line standard of care for esophageal cancer with PD-L1 CPS ≥10. The phase 3 KEYNOTE-590 study of pembrolizumab plus chemo as first-line therapy for advanced esophageal cancer is ongoing (NCT03189719). Clinical trial information: NCT02564263.

Is There a Precise Adjuvant Therapy for Esophagogastric Carcinoma?

Esophagogastric cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. The prognosis for patients with locally advanced disease is poor and the majority of patients with operable tumors treated with surgery alone will have recurrent disease. A multimodal approach to treatment with adjunctive chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy is therefore the standard of care for these patients. However, there is no global consensus on the optimal treatment strategy and international guidelines vary. National clinical trials inform local practice: neoadjuvant, perioperative, and adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy combinations are all possible treatment options in the management of resectable esophagogastric cancer. A number of clinical trials are ongoing, which seek to directly compare multimodal treatment options and hope to provide clarity in this area. Furthermore, increased understanding of the molecular and genetic features of esophagogastric cancer may help to guide management of operable disease by determining optimal patient selection through identification of predictive biomarkers of response and the application of novel targeted agents.

Safety and Efficacy of Pembrolizumab Monotherapy in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: Phase 2 Clinical KEYNOTE-059 Trial

Importance

Therapeutic options are needed for patients with advanced gastric cancer whose disease has progressed after 2 or more lines of therapy.

Objective

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab in a cohort of patients with previously treated gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In the phase 2, global, open-label, single-arm, multicohort KEYNOTE-059 study, 259 patients in 16 countries were enrolled in a cohort between March 2, 2015, and May 26, 2016. Median (range) follow-up was 5.8 (0.5-21.6) months.

Intervention

Patients received pembrolizumab, 200 mg, intravenously every 3 weeks until disease progression, investigator or patient decision to withdraw, or unacceptable toxic effects.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Primary end points were objective response rate and safety. Objective response rate was assessed by central radiologic review per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, in all patients and those with programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive tumors. Expression of PD-L1 was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Secondary end points included response duration.

Results

Of 259 patients enrolled, most were male (198 [76.4%]) and white (200 [77.2%]); median (range) age was 62 (24-89) years. Objective response rate was 11.6% (95% CI, 8.0%-16.1%; 30 of 259 patients), with complete response in 2.3% (95% CI, 0.9%-5.0%; 6 of 259 patients). Median (range) response duration was 8.4 (1.6+ to 17.3+) months (+ indicates that patients had no progressive disease at their last assessment). Objective response rate and median (range) response duration were 15.5% (95% CI, 10.1%-22.4%; 23 of 148 patients) and 16.3 (1.6+ to 17.3+) months and 6.4% (95% CI, 2.6%-12.8%; 7 of 109 patients) and 6.9 (2.4 to 7.0+) months in patients with PD-L1-positive and PD-L1-negative tumors, respectively. Forty-six patients (17.8%) experienced 1 or more grade 3 to 5 treatment-related adverse events. Two patients (0.8%) discontinued because of treatment-related adverse events, and 2 deaths were considered related to treatment.

Conclusions and Relevance

Pembrolizumab monotherapy demonstrated promising activity and manageable safety in patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer who had previously received at least 2 lines of treatment. Durable responses were observed in patients with PD-L1-positive and PD-L1-negative tumors. Further study of pembrolizumab for this group of patients is warranted.

Trial Registration

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02335411.

Phase 1b/2 study of margetuximab (M) plus pembrolizumab (P) in advanced HER2+ gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) or gastric (G) adenocarcinoma (GEA)

140

Background: Trastuzumab (T) + chemotherapy (ctx) is standard for 1st line advanced HER2+ GEA, yet subsequent targeted options are lacking. M is an anti-Her 2 monoclonal antibody with an optimized Fc domain to increase affinity for activating CD16A Fc-receptors (FcR) on NK cells. Outcomes for T-treated patients (pts) carrying the low-affinity CD16A-F allele are generally worse than pts homozygous for the high-affinity V allele. M is designed to be FcR genotype independent. Evidence of clinical activity of M alone has been seen in HER2+ GEA pts post T, while P has demonstrated durable activity. Loss of HER2 amplification may occur after T failure in a subset of initially HER2+ GEA pts. Preclinical studies suggest that engagement of innate and adaptive immunity with the combination of anti-HER-2 antibodies and T-cell checkpoint inhibition could achieve greater antitumor activity than either agent alone. Methods: Advanced HER2+, PD-L1-unselected GEA pts post T failure were eligible. Dose escalation evaluated 10 and 15 mg/kg M and 200 mg P for 2nd line or higher pts. Cohort expansion evaluates safety and objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST v1.1 in 2nd line pts. M + P is given every 21 days; response assessed every 6 weeks. HER2 amplification status was assessed in a subset of pts by plasma circulating tumor (ct) DNA analysis prior to Cycle 1 of M+P. Results: Dose escalation enrolled 9 pts; cohort expansion 48 pts at 15 mg/kg M: 30 in North America (NA) and 18 in Asia (A). Treatment was well tolerated, with 1 drug-related serious adverse event. Of 38 evaluable pts to date in expansion (24 NA and 14 A), the best overall responses include 7 pts (18.4%) with PR (4 confirmed and 3 unconfirmed) and 11 (28.9%) with SD. Higher ORR trends were observed in A vs NA (35.7% vs 8.3%) and G vs GEJ (31.6% vs 5.3%). Of 25 pts with ctDNA results, HER2 amplification detection was higher in GC than GEJ (80% vs 53%). Responses were independent of FcR genotype; CD16A genotype for evaluable pts with PR: 1 V/V, 2 V/F, 2 F/F with similar allelic distribution among non-responders. Conclusions: M+P is a well-tolerated ctx-free regimen that has shown preliminary antitumor activity in 2nd line pts with advanced/metastatic GEA. Clinical trial information: NCT02689284.

Patterns of chemotherapy (CT) use in a U.S.-wide cohort of patients (pts) with metastatic gastric cancer (MGC)

112

Background: MGC is associated with poor survival outcomes. Despite multiple therapeutic options, there is no clearly defined standard-of-care (SOC) CT algorithm. Assessing MGC treatment trends of CT utilization is of critical import. Few population studies have examined the frequencies and temporal trends of MGC CT regimens. This study was designed to address this knowledge deficit. Methods: Eligible pts had biopsy-proven MGC diagnoses and received CT between Jan 2005 and Dec 2016 at academic, private or community hospital practices using IntrinsiQ, a US-wide CT order entry system that captures pt, provider and CT data. Temporal trends were analyzed in the context of SOC changes during the study’s observational period. Results: Among 4,333 MGC pts, median age was 64; 74% were male. In 1st-line CT, 26% received fluoropyrimidine [FU] + oxaliplatin (FOLFOX), 15% received epirubicin + platinum + FU [ECF/EOX], 15% received docetaxel (D) + cis/carboplatin (C) + FU [DCF], 13% received C + paclitaxel, 10% received C + FU [CF], 5% received taxane [TAX] monotherapy. FOLFOX use has increased steadily to 41% in 2015 while DCF use dropped from 29% in 2007 to below 10% by 2015. Biologics were used in 11% of all 1st-line starts and 24% of all 2nd-line starts. Trastuzumab represented 72% of 1st line biologic use (with or without CT backbones), overall use increased from 0% in 2008 to 16% of 1st line in 2015 In 2nd line, no single treatment regimen was used in more than 7% of patients in 2005, but the use of newer treatments has increased over time: trastuzumab use increased from 0% in 2008 to a peak of 22% in 2016 and ramucirumab use increased from 0% in 2012 to its peak in 2015 of 26%. Conclusions: This population-based study provides insight into US MGC treatment patterns and recent trends with the availability of novel agents. [Table: see text]

Pilot study of serial FLT and FDG-PET/CT imaging to monitor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy of esophageal adenocarcinoma: correlation with histopathologic response

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this prospective pilot study was to investigate the potential of serial FLT-PET/CT compared to FDG-PET/CT to provide an early indication of esophageal cancer response to concurrent neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy.

METHODS

Five patients with biopsy-proven esophageal adenocarcinomas underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation (Tx) prior to minimally invasive esophagectomy. The presence of residual tumor was classified histologically using the Mandard et al. criteria, categorizing patients as pathologic responders and non-responders. Participants underwent PET/CT imaging 1 h after intravenous administration of FDG and of FLT on two separate days within 48 h of each other. Each patient underwent a total of 3 scan "pairs": (1) pre-treatment, (2) during treatment, and (3) post-treatment. Image-based response to therapy was measured in terms of changes in SUVmax (ΔSUV) between pre- and post-therapeutic FLT- and FDG-PET scans. The PET imaging findings were correlated with the pathology results after surgery.

RESULTS

All tumors were FDG and FLT avid at baseline. Lesion FLT uptake was lower than with FDG. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation resulted in a reduction of tumor uptake of both radiotracers in pathological responders (n = 3) and non-responders (n = 2). While the difference in the reduction in mean tumor FLT uptake during Tx between responders (ΔSUV = - 55%) and non-responders (ΔSUV = - 29%) was significant (P = 0.007), for FDG it was not, [responders had a mean ΔSUV = - 39 vs. - 31% for non-responders (P = 0.74)]. The difference in the reduction in tumor FLT uptake at the end of treatment between responders (ΔSUV = - 62%) and non-responders (ΔSUV = - 57%) was not significant (P = 0.54), while for FDG there was a trend toward significance [ΔSUV of responders = - 74 vs. - 52% in non-responders (P = 0.06)].

CONCLUSION

The results of this prospective pilot study suggest that early changes in tumor FLT uptake may be better than FDG in predicting response of esophageal adenocarcinomas to neoadjuvant chemoradiation. These preliminary results support the need to corroborate the value of FLT-PET/CT in a larger cohort.

Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy With Epirubicin, Cisplatin, and Fluorouracil Compared With Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy With Fluorouracil and Leucovorin After Curative Resection of Gastric Cancer: Results From CALGB 80101 (Alliance)

Purpose After curative resection of gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, Intergroup Trial 0116 (Phase III trial of postoperative adjuvant radiochemotherapy for high risk gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: Demonstrated superior survival for patients who received postoperative chemoradiotherapy with bolus fluorouracil (FU) and leucovorin (LV) compared with surgery alone. CALGB 80101 (Alliance; Phase III Intergroup Trial of Adjuvant Chemoradiation After Resection of Gastric or Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma) assessed whether a postoperative chemoradiotherapy regimen that replaced FU plus LV with a potentially more active systemic therapy could further improve overall survival. Patients and Methods Between April 2002 and May 2009, 546 patients who had undergone a curative resection of stage IB through IV (M0) gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned to receive either postoperative FU plus LV before and after combined FU and radiotherapy (FU plus LV arm) or postoperative epirubicin, cisplatin, and infusional FU (ECF) before and after combined FU and radiotherapy (ECF arm). Results With a median follow-up duration of 6.5 years, 5-year overall survival rates were 44% in the FU plus LV arm and 44% in the ECF arm ( P_logrank = .69; multivariable hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.24 comparing ECF with FU plus LV). Five-year disease-free survival rates were 39% in the FU plus LV arm and 37% in the ECF arm ( P_logrank = .94; multivariable hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.20). In post hoc analyses, the effect of treatment seemed to be similar across all examined patient subgroups. Conclusion After a curative resection of gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, postoperative chemoradiotherapy using a multiagent regimen of ECF before and after radiotherapy does not improve survival compared with standard FU and LV before and after radiotherapy.

Colon Cancer, Version 1.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

This portion of the NCCN Guidelines for Colon Cancer focuses on the use of systemic therapy in metastatic disease. Considerations for treatment selection among 32 different monotherapies and combination regimens in up to 7 lines of therapy have included treatment history, extent of disease, goals of treatment, the efficacy and toxicity profiles of the regimens, KRAS/NRAS mutational status, and patient comorbidities and preferences. Location of the primary tumor, the BRAF mutation status, and tumor microsatellite stability should also be considered in treatment decisions.

A stakeholder-driven approach to improve the informed consent process for palliative chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE

Patients often anticipate cure from palliative chemotherapy. Better resources are needed to convey its risks and benefits. We describe the stakeholder-driven development and acceptability testing of a prototype video and companion booklet supporting informed consent (IC) for a common palliative chemotherapy regimen.

METHODS

Our multidisciplinary team (researchers, advocates, clinicians) employed a multistep process of content development, production, critical evaluation, and iterative revisions. Patient/clinician stakeholders were engaged throughout using stakeholder advisory panels, featuring their voices within the intervention, conducting surveys and qualitative interviews. A national panel of 57 patient advocates, and 25 oncologists from nine US practices critiqued the intervention and rated its clarity, accuracy, balance, tone, and utility. Participants also reported satisfaction with existing chemotherapy IC materials.

RESULTS

Few oncologists (5/25, 20%) or advocates (10/22, 45%) were satisfied with existing IC materials. In contrast, most rated our intervention highly, with 89-96% agreeing it would be useful and promote informed decisions. Patient voices were considered a key strength. Every oncologist indicated they would use the intervention regularly.

CONCLUSION

Our intervention was acceptable to advocates and oncologists. A randomized trial is evaluating its impact on the chemotherapy IC process.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Stakeholder-driven methods can be valuable for developing patient educational interventions.

A retrospective comparison of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced esophageal cancer

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with carboplatin/paclitaxel has been shown to increase survival in patients with esophageal cancer, including gastroesophageal junction (GE) junction cancer, over surgery alone; however, there have been no studies comparing the different neoadjuvant CRT regimens. We retrospectively evaluated the long-term results of trimodality therapy for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer treated on several chemotherapy regimens. Between 1999 and 2014, 215 patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer underwent neoadjuvant CRT followed by surgical resection. The median age was 62 years (range 21-84), 80.5% were men and 86% had adenocarcinoma. The following chemotherapy regimens were administered: cisplatin/5FU (14.9%), cisplatin/irinotecan (35.8%), carboplatin/paclitaxel (35.8%), and other (9.7%). The majority of patients (92.1%) received a radiation dose of 50.4 Gy. Predictors of toxicities and surgical complications were assessed using logistic regression. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and proportional hazards regression was used to model time-to-event outcomes. The median follow-up among surviving patients was 4.1 years (range 0.4,13). The median OS was 3.0 years from time of diagnosis and OS was 36.8% at 5 years. RFS was 34.9% at 5 years. After neoadjuvant CRT, 34.7% of patients achieved a pathologic complete response including 60.7% of squamous cell carcinoma patients and 18.4% of adenocarcinoma patients (P < 0.001) and 66% were downstaged. Of the variables examined, pathologic stage, preoperative baseline cardiac comorbidity, postoperative cardiac or pulmonary complications, and chemotherapy regimen were associated with OS. Using cisplatin and 5FU as the reference regimen, patients treated with carboplatin/paclitaxel had significantly improved OS (HR = 0.47, P = 0.017 after adjusting for surgery type, radiation modality, baseline cardiac comorbidity, and preoperative stage) with 5-year OS rate of 66%. The most common surgical complications were cardiac in 61 patients (28.5%) and pulmonary in 52 patients (24.3%). Cardiac complications were associated with age (OR 1.05, P = 0.007) and cardiac comorbidity (OR 2.6, P = 0.02) and pulmonary complications with female gender (OR 3.98, P < 0.001). Forty-four patients (20.5%) required readmission within 30 days of discharge, and readmission was associated with cardiac comorbidity (OR 2.7, P = 0.017). Three patients died within 30 days of surgery. We observed an association between neoadjuvant carboplatin/paclitaxel and improved overall survival that requires confirmation in a prospective randomized trial.

A phase 1b/2, open label, dose-escalation study of margetuximab (M) in combination with pembrolizumab (P) in patients with relapsed/refractory advanced HER2+ gastroesophageal (GEJ) junction or gastric (G) cancer

TPS219

Background: Prognosis for advanced HER2+ GEJ and G cancers remains poor, with median survival just beyond one year. Trastuzumab (T) in combination with chemotherapy is the initial treatment of choice, but therapeutic options targeting HER2 beyond T are poorly defined. M is an Fc-enhanced monoclonal antibody (Mab) to HER2 that recognizes with similar affinity the same epitope as T and whose Fc domain, compared to T, binds with increased affinity to the activating CD16A Fc-receptor (FcR) and decreased affinity to the inhibitory CD32B FcR. Preliminary data shows that M monotherapy has clinical activity against HER2+ tumors in GEJ and G cancer patients previously treated with T or other anti-HER2 agents. P is a Mab that blocks the interaction of the immune checkpoint molecule, PD-1, with its ligands, facilitating tumor cell elimination by releasing tumor-associated T cells from exhaustion. Monotherapy P has demonstrated remarkable and durable clinical activity in a Phase I study. Safety profiles of M and P are acceptable and non-overlapping. Methods: This study advances a chemotherapy free combination of M + P treatment for advanced HER2+ GEJ and G cancer patients. Enrolled patients will have relapsed/refractory HER2+ GEJ or G adenocarcinoma with measurable disease that has progressed on T plus first line chemotherapy. HER2+ (IHC 3+ or ISH+) will be confirmed by central review. Two dose levels of M (10mg/kg and 15mg/kg) and a fixed dose of P (200mg) will be evaluated for safety and tolerability. Patients will receive combination treatment once every 21 days for up to 24 months, until confirmed disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Dose expansion will enroll up to 60 patients, with 20 undergoing pre- and on-treatment biopsy. Response will be assessed every 6 weeks for the first 6 months and every 12 weeks thereafter per RECIST v1.1 and immune RECIST to account for response patterns observed with immunotherapies. Primary endpoint is ORR and duration of response, and secondary endpoints include PFS and OS. The study was initiated on January 2016 and is ongoing in North America and Asia. Clinical trial information: NCT02689284.

Neoadjuvant irinotecan, cisplatin, and concurrent radiation therapy with celecoxib for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer

Background

Patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer who are treated with trimodality therapy have a high recurrence rate. Preclinical evidence suggests that inhibition of cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2) increases the effectiveness of chemoradiation, and observational studies in humans suggest that COX-2 inhibition may reduce esophageal cancer risk. This trial tested the safety and efficacy of combining a COX2 inhibitor, celecoxib, with neoadjuvant irinotecan/cisplatin chemoradiation.

Methods

This single arm phase 2 trial combined irinotecan, cisplatin, and celecoxib with concurrent radiation therapy. Patients with stage IIA-IVA esophageal cancer received weekly cisplatin 30 mg/m² plus irinotecan 65 mg/m² on weeks 1, 2, 4, and 5 concurrently with 5040 cGy of radiation therapy. Celecoxib 400 mg was taken orally twice daily during chemoradiation, up to 1 week before surgery, and for 6 months following surgery.

Results

Forty patients were enrolled with stage IIa (30 %), stage IIb (20 %), stage III (22.5 %), and stage IVA (27.5 %) esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer (AJCC, 5th Edition). During chemoradiation, grade 3–4 treatment-related toxicity included dysphagia (20 %), anorexia (17.5 %), dehydration (17.5 %), nausea (15 %), neutropenia (12.5 %), diarrhea (10 %), fatigue (7.5 %), and febrile neutropenia (7.5 %). The pathological complete response rate was 32.5 %. The median progression free survival was 15.7 months and the median overall survival was 34.7 months. 15 % (n = 6) of patients treated on this study developed brain metastases.

Conclusions

The addition of celecoxib to neoadjuvant cisplatin-irinotecan chemoradiation was tolerable; however, overall survival appeared comparable to prior studies using neoadjuvant cisplatin-irinotecan chemoradiation alone. Further studies adding celecoxib to neoadjuvant chemoradiation in esophageal cancer are not warranted.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00137852, registered August 29, 2005.

CALGB 80403 (Alliance)/E1206: A Randomized Phase II Study of Three Chemotherapy Regimens Plus Cetuximab in Metastatic Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancers

PURPOSE

To determine the optimal chemotherapy backbone for testing in future US cooperative group studies for metastatic esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers. Cetuximab was added to each treatment arm based on promising preclinical data.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with previously untreated metastatic esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer were randomly assigned at a one-to-one-to-one ratio to epirubicin, cisplatin, and continuous-infusion fluorouracil (ECF), irinotecan plus cisplatin (IC), or FOLFOX (oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and bolus and infusional fluorouracil). All treatment programs included cetuximab once per week. The primary end point was response rate. Secondary outcomes included overall survival, progression-free survival, time to treatment failure, and safety. As prespecified, primary and secondary analyses were conducted only among patients with adenocarcinoma.

RESULTS

This study randomly assigned 245 patients, including 222 with adenocarcinoma. Among patients with adenocarcinoma, response rate was 60.9% (95% CI, 47.9 to 72.8) for ECF plus cetuximab, 45.0% (95% CI, 33.0 to 57.0) for IC plus cetuximab, and 54.3% (95% CI, 42.0 to 66.2) for FOLFOX plus cetuximab. Median overall survival was 11.6, 8.6, and 11.8 months; median progression-free survival was 7.1, 4.9, and 6.8 months; and median time to treatment failure was 5.6, 4.3, and 6.7 months for each of these arms, respectively. FOLFOX plus cetuximab required fewer treatment modifications compared with ECF plus cetuximab and IC plus cetuximab (P = .013), and fewer patients were removed from treatment because of an adverse event or experienced treatment-related death.

CONCLUSION

In combination with cetuximab, ECF and FOLFOX had similar efficacy, but FOLFOX was better tolerated. Although differences were nonsignificant, IC plus cetuximab seemed to be the least effective and most toxic of the three regimens tested.