1
|
Lee J, Ku G. Advances in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Targeted Therapy in Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2024:S0889-8588(24)00022-4. [PMID: 38521686 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2024.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/25/2024]
Abstract
The Trastuzumab for Gastric Cancer (ToGA) trial marked a pivotal moment in the adoption of trastuzumab for treating advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive esophagogastric (EG) cancer. The KEYNOTE-811 trial brought to light the synergistic effect of immune modulation and HER2 targeting. Additionally, the emergence of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) highlighted the potential of new pharmaceutical technologies to extend response, particularly for patients who have advanced beyond initial HER2-targeted therapies. This review aims to navigate through both the successes and challenges encountered historically, as well as promising current trials on innovative and transformative therapeutic strategies, including promising first-in-class and novel first-in-human agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaeyop Lee
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Geoffrey Ku
- Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhao B, Zhang T, Chen Y, Zhang C. Effects of unimodal or multimodal prehabilitation on patients undergoing surgery for esophagogastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer 2023; 32:15. [PMID: 38060053 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08229-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/02/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the effects of unimodal or multimodal prehabilitation on patients undergoing surgery for esophagogastric cancer. METHODS We conducted a systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) databases from database inception to May 5, 2023, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies that investigated prehabilitation in the context of esophagogastric cancer. A random-effects model was used for meta-analysis. RESULTS We identified 2,994 records and eventually included 12 studies (6 RCTs and 6 cohort studies) with a total of 910 patients. According to random-effects pooled estimates, prehabilitation reduced the incidence of all complications (RR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.66 to 0.93, P = 0.006), pulmonary complications (RR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.79, P = 0.0002), and severe complications (RR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.84, P = 0.002), and shortened the length of stay (MD = -1.92, 95% CI: -3.11 to -0.73, P = 0.002) compared to usual care. However, there were no statistically significant differences in 30-day readmission rates or in-hospital mortality. Subgroup analysis showed that multimodal prehabilitation was effective in reducing the risk of all complications and severe complications, while unimodal prehabilitation was not. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggested that prehabilitation may be beneficial in reducing postoperative complications and length of stay. We recommend preoperative prehabilitation to improve postoperative outcomes and hasten recovery following esophagogastric cancer surgery, and multimodal prehabilitation seems to be more advantageous in reducing complications. However, further studies are needed to confirm these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bingyan Zhao
- Graduate School of Tianjin University of Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, 301617, China
| | - Tongyu Zhang
- Graduate School of Tianjin University of Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, 301617, China
| | - Yu Chen
- Graduate School of Tianjin University of Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, 301617, China
| | - Chunmei Zhang
- School of Nursing, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, 301617, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
van Erning FN, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, van Laarhoven HWM, Rosman C, Gisbertz SS, Heisterkamp J, Lagarde SM, Slingerland M, van den Berg JW, Kouwenhoven EA, Verhoeven RHA, Vissers PAJ. Gastrointestinal Symptoms After Resection of Esophagogastric Cancer: A Longitudinal Study on Their Incidence and Impact on Patient-Reported Outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:8203-8215. [PMID: 37523120 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13952-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study assesses the incidence of gastrointestinal symptoms in the first year after resection of esophageal or gastric cancer and its association with health-related quality of life (HRQoL), functioning, work productivity, and daily activities. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients diagnosed with esophageal or gastric cancer between 2015 and 2021, who underwent a resection, and completed ≥ 2 questionnaires from the time intervals prior to resection and 0-3, 3-6, 6-9, and 9-12 months after resection were included. Multivariable generalized linear mixed models were used to assess changes in gastrointestinal symptoms over time and the impact of the number of gastrointestinal symptoms on HRQoL, functioning, work productivity, and daily activities for patients who underwent an esophagectomy or gastrectomy separately. RESULTS The study population consisted of 961 (78.8%) and 259 (21.2%) patients who underwent an esophagectomy and gastrectomy, respectively. For both groups, the majority of gastrointestinal symptoms changed significantly over time. Most clinically relevant differences were observed 0-3 after resection compared with prior to resection and included increased diarrhea, appetite loss, and eating restrictions, and specifically after esophagectomy dry mouth, trouble with coughing, and trouble talking. At 9-12 after resection one or more severe gastrointestinal symptoms were reported by 38.9% after esophagectomy and 33.7% after gastrectomy. A higher number of gastrointestinal symptoms was associated with poorer functioning, lower HRQoL, higher impairment in daily activities, and lower work productivity. CONCLUSIONS This study shows that gastrointestinal symptoms are frequently observed and burdensome after esophagectomy or gastrectomy, highlighting the importance to address these sequelae for high quality survivorship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felice N van Erning
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Camiel Rosman
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Suzanne S Gisbertz
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joos Heisterkamp
- Department of Surgery, Elisabeth Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd M Lagarde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marije Slingerland
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jan-Willem van den Berg
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Rob H A Verhoeven
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pauline A J Vissers
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vissers PAJ, Luijten JCHBM, Lemmens VEPP, van Laarhoven HWM, Slingerland M, Wijnhoven BPL, Rosman C, Mook S, Heisterkamp J, Hendriksen EM, Gisbertz SS, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Verhoeven RHA. The association between hospital variation in curative treatment for esophagogastric cancer and health-related quality of life and survival. Eur J Surg Oncol 2023; 49:107019. [PMID: 37659340 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As previous studies showed significant hospital variation in curative treatment of esophagogastric cancer, this study assesses the association between this variation and overall, cancer-specific and recurrence-free survival, and Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). METHODS Patients diagnosed with potentially curable esophageal or gastric cancer between 2015 and 2018 as registered in the Netherlands Cancer Registry were included. Data on overall survival was available for all patients, data on cancer-specific and recurrence-free survival and HRQoL was available for subgroups. Patients were classified according to diagnosis in hospitals with low, medium or high probability of treatment with curative intent (LP, MP or HP). Multivariable models were used to assess the association between LP, MP and HP hospitals and HRQoL and survival. RESULTS This study includes 7,199 patients with esophageal, and 2,407 with gastric cancer. Overall and cancer-specific survival was better for patients diagnosed in HP versus LP hospitals for both esophageal (HR = 0.82, 95%CI:0.77-0.88 and HR = 0.82, 95%CI:0.75-0.91, respectively), and gastric cancer (HR = 0.82, 95%CI:0.73-0.92 and HR = 0.74, 95%CI:0.64-0.87, respectively). These differences disappeared after adjustments for treatment. Recurrence-free survival was worse for gastric cancer patients diagnosed in HP hospitals (HR = 1.50, 95%CI:1.14-1.96), which disappeared after adjustment for radicality of surgery. Minor, but no clinically relevant, differences in HRQoL were observed. CONCLUSIONS Patients diagnosed in hospitals with a high probability of treatment with curative intent have a better overall and cancer-specific but not recurrence-free survival, while minor differences in HRQoL were observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pauline A J Vissers
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Department of Research & Development, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Josianne C H B M Luijten
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Department of Research & Development, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Rijnstate Hospital, Department of Surgery, Arnhem, the Netherlands
| | - Valery E P P Lemmens
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Department of Research & Development, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Erasmus University Medical Centre, Department of Public Health, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Medical Oncology, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marije Slingerland
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Erasmus University Medical Centre, Department of Surgery, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C Rosman
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Stella Mook
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiation Oncology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Joos Heisterkamp
- Elisabeth-Tweesteden Ziekenhuis, Department of Surgery, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Ellen M Hendriksen
- Medisch Spectrum Twente, Department of Radiation Oncology, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Suzanne S Gisbertz
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Rob H A Verhoeven
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Department of Research & Development, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Medical Oncology, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Okada N, Kinoshita Y, Nishihara S, Kurotaki T, Sato A, Kimura K, Kushiya H, Umemoto K, Furukawa S, Yamabuki T, Takada M, Kato K, Ambo Y, Nakamura F. PYloroplasty versus No Intervention in GAstric REmnant REconstruction after Oesophagectomy: study protocol for the PYNI-GAREREO phase III randomized controlled trial. Trials 2023; 24:412. [PMID: 37337238 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07435-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND After esophagectomy for esophageal and esophagogastric cancer, more than half of patients have lost > 10% of their body weight at 12 months. In most cases, the gastric remnant is used for reconstruction after esophagectomy. One of the most serious nutritional complications of this technique is delayed gastric emptying caused by gastric remnant mobilization and denervation of the vagus nerve. The aim of the PYloroplasty versus No Intervention in GAstric REmnant REconstruction after Oesophagectomy (PYNI-GAREREO) trial is to analyze the clinical outcome of modified Horsley pyloroplasty (mH-P) as a method of preventing delayed gastric emptying. METHODS The PYNI-GAREREO trial is designed as an open randomized, single-center superiority trial. Patients will be randomly allocated to undergo gastric remnant reconstruction with mH-P (intervention group) or no intervention (control group) in parallel groups. All patients with esophageal cancer or esophagogastric cancer planning to undergo curative minimally invasive esophagectomy will be considered for inclusion. A total of 140 patients will be included in the study and randomized between the groups in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome is the body weight change at 6 months postoperatively, and the secondary outcomes are the nutritional status, postoperative complications, functional outcome, and quality of life until 1 year postoperatively. DISCUSSION We hypothesize that mH-P after minimally invasive esophagectomy more effectively maintains patients' nutritional status than no pyloroplasty. TRIAL REGISTRATION UMIN Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000045104. Registered on 25 August 2021. https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000051346 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naoya Okada
- Department of Surgery and Center of Esophageal Diseases, Teine Keijinkai Hospital, 1-40 Maeda, Teine-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 006-8555, Japan.
| | - Yoshihiro Kinoshita
- Department of Surgery and Center of Esophageal Diseases, Teine Keijinkai Hospital, 1-40 Maeda, Teine-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 006-8555, Japan.
| | - Shoji Nishihara
- Department of Surgery, Teine Keijinkai Hospital, 1-40 Maeda1-12, Teine-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 006-8555, Japan
| | - Takuma Kurotaki
- Department of Surgery, Teine Keijinkai Hospital, 1-40 Maeda1-12, Teine-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 006-8555, Japan
| | - Aya Sato
- Department of Surgery, Teine Keijinkai Hospital, 1-40 Maeda1-12, Teine-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 006-8555, Japan
| | - Kotaro Kimura
- Department of Surgery, Teine Keijinkai Hospital, 1-40 Maeda1-12, Teine-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 006-8555, Japan
| | - Hiroki Kushiya
- Department of Surgery, Teine Keijinkai Hospital, 1-40 Maeda1-12, Teine-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 006-8555, Japan
| | - Kazufumi Umemoto
- Department of Surgery, Teine Keijinkai Hospital, 1-40 Maeda1-12, Teine-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 006-8555, Japan
| | - Shotaro Furukawa
- Department of Surgery, Teine Keijinkai Hospital, 1-40 Maeda1-12, Teine-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 006-8555, Japan
| | - Takumi Yamabuki
- Department of Surgery, Teine Keijinkai Hospital, 1-40 Maeda1-12, Teine-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 006-8555, Japan
| | - Minoru Takada
- Department of Surgery, Teine Keijinkai Hospital, 1-40 Maeda1-12, Teine-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 006-8555, Japan
| | - Kentaro Kato
- Department of Surgery, Teine Keijinkai Hospital, 1-40 Maeda1-12, Teine-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 006-8555, Japan
| | - Yoshiyasu Ambo
- Department of Surgery, Teine Keijinkai Hospital, 1-40 Maeda1-12, Teine-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 006-8555, Japan
| | - Fumitaka Nakamura
- Department of Surgery, Teine Keijinkai Hospital, 1-40 Maeda1-12, Teine-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 006-8555, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Apostolidis L, Lang K, Sisic L, Busch E, Ahadova A, Wullenkord R, Nienhüser H, Billeter A, Müller-Stich B, Kloor M, Jaeger D, Haag GM. Outcome and prognostic factors in patients undergoing salvage therapy for recurrent esophagogastric cancer after multimodal treatment. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:1373-1382. [PMID: 35441345 PMCID: PMC10020279 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-04016-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Perioperative systemic treatment has significantly improved the outcome in locally advanced esophagogastric cancer. However, still the majority of patients relapse and die. Data on the optimal treatment after relapse are limited, and clinical and biological prognostic factors are lacking. METHODS Patients with a relapse after neoadjuvant/perioperative treatment and surgery for esophagogastric cancer were analyzed using a prospective database. Applied treatment regimens, clinical prognostic factors and biomarkers were analyzed. RESULTS Of 246 patients 119 relapsed. Among patients with a relapse event, those with an early relapse (< 6 months) had an inferior overall survival (OS 6.3 vs. 13.8 months, p < 0.001) after relapse than those with a late relapse (> 6 months). OS after relapse was longer in patients with a microsatellite-unstable (MSI) tumor. Systemic treatment was initiated in 87 patients (73% of relapsed pat.); among those OS from the start of first-line treatment was inferior in patients with an early relapse with 6.9 vs. 10.0 months (p = 0.037). In 27 patients (23% of relapsed pat.), local therapy (irradiation or surgical intervention) was performed due to oligometastatic relapse, resulting in a prolonged OS in comparison to patients without local therapy (median OS 35.2 months vs. 7.8 months, p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis confirmed the prognostic benefit of the MSI status and a local intervention. CONCLUSION Patients relapsing after multimodal treatment have a heterogeneous prognosis depending on the relapse-free interval (if systemic treatment applied), extent of metastatic disease as well as MSI status. The benefit of additional local intervention after relapse should be addressed in a randomized trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonidas Apostolidis
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Department of Medical Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld, 460, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kristin Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Leila Sisic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elena Busch
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Department of Medical Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld, 460, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Aysel Ahadova
- Department of Applied Tumor Biology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Clinical Cooperation Unit Applied Tumor Biology, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ramona Wullenkord
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Department of Medical Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld, 460, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Henrik Nienhüser
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Adrian Billeter
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Beat Müller-Stich
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Kloor
- Department of Applied Tumor Biology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Clinical Cooperation Unit Applied Tumor Biology, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dirk Jaeger
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Department of Medical Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld, 460, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Applied Tumor-Immunity, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Georg Martin Haag
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Department of Medical Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld, 460, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Applied Tumor-Immunity, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Optimal management of esophageal and gastric cancer during the perioperative period requires a coordinated multidisciplinary treatment effort. Accurate staging guides treatment strategy. Advances in minimally invasive surgery and endoscopy have reduced risks associated with resection while maintaining oncological standards. Although the standard perioperative chemo-and radiotherapy regimens have not yet been established, randomized control trials exploring this subject show promising results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amn Siddiqi
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Fabian M Johnston
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Moehler M, Högner A, Wagner AD, Obermannova R, Alsina M, Thuss-Patience P, van Laarhoven H, Smyth E. Recent progress and current challenges of immunotherapy in advanced/metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma. Eur J Cancer 2022; 176:13-29. [PMID: 36183651 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.08.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2022] [Revised: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The new era of immunotherapy is successfully implemented in the treatment of metastatic/locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (EGAC), as it has been investigated in combinations with/without chemotherapy in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her2)-positive and Her2-negative tumors. Recent approvals of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) enrich the therapeutic landscape in nearly every therapeutic line. Based on CHECKMATE-649, the combination of nivolumab and chemotherapy in first-line therapy of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-L1)-positive patients with advanced gastroesophageal junction cancer (GEJC), esophageal cancer (EC), and gastric cancer (GC) was approved in Europe for PD-L1 combined positivity score (CPS) ≥ 5 patients and independently from PD-L1 score in the USA and Asia. Based on KEYNOTE-590, patients with advanced GEJC and EC qualify for the combination of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in Europe (CPS ≥ 10) and the USA. For Her2-positive patients, trastuzumab with first-line chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab has beneficial response rates and resulted in approval in the USA (KEYNOTE-811). In third-line therapy, superior overall survival (OS) was achieved by the administration of nivolumab (approval in Japan, ATTRACTION-02), and pembrolizumab shows a positive effect on the duration of response (KEYNOTE-059). Questions of resistance to immunotherapy or the role of gender in response to ICI need to be clarified. This review provides an overview of the current approvals of ICI in advanced EGAC and reflects results of relevant phase II/III trials with focus on possible biomarkers, including PD-L1 CPS and microsatellite-instability (MSI) status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Moehler
- Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
| | - Anica Högner
- Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Department of Haematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anna D Wagner
- Department of Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Radka Obermannova
- Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Maria Alsina
- Vall D'Hebron University Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, and Vall D'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Passeig de La Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Peter Thuss-Patience
- Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Department of Haematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Hanneke van Laarhoven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Elizabeth Smyth
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Parmar C, Zakeri R, Abouelazayem M, Shin TH, Aminian A, Mahmoud T, Abu Dayyeh BK, Wee MY, Fischer L, Daams F, Mahawar K. Esophageal and gastric malignancies after bariatric surgery: a retrospective global study. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2022; 18:464-472. [PMID: 35065887 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2021.11.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2021] [Revised: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bariatric surgery can influence the presentation, diagnosis, and management of gastrointestinal cancers. Esophagogastric (EG) malignancies in patients who have had a prior bariatric procedure have not been fully characterized. OBJECTIVE To characterize EG malignancies after bariatric procedures. SETTING University Hospital, United Kingdom. METHODS We performed a retrospective, multicenter observational study of patients with EG malignancies after bariatric surgery to characterize this condition. RESULTS This study includes 170 patients from 75 centers in 25 countries who underwent bariatric procedures between 1985 and 2020. At the time of the bariatric procedure, the mean age was 50.2 ± 10 years, and the mean weight 128.8 ± 28.9 kg. Women composed 57.3% (n = 98) of the population. Most (n = 64) patients underwent a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) followed by adjustable gastric band (AGB; n = 46) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG; n = 43). Time to cancer diagnosis after bariatric surgery was 9.5 ± 7.4 years, and mean weight at diagnosis was 87.4 ± 21.9 kg. The time lag was 5.9 ± 4.1 years after SG compared to 9.4 ± 7.1 years after RYGB and 10.5 ± 5.7 years after AGB. One third of patients presented with metastatic disease. The majority of tumors were adenocarcinoma (82.9%). Approximately 1 in 5 patients underwent palliative treatment from the outset. Time from diagnosis to mortality was under 1 year for most patients who died over the intervening period. CONCLUSION The Oesophago-Gastric Malignancies After Obesity/Bariatric Surgery study presents the largest series to date of patients developing EG malignancies after bariatric surgery and attempts to characterize this condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chetan Parmar
- Department of Surgery, Whittington Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
| | - Roxanna Zakeri
- Department of Surgery, Whittington Health NHS Trust, London, UK; Centre for Obesity Research, University College, London, UK
| | - Mohamed Abouelazayem
- Department of Surgery, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Thomas H Shin
- Bariatric and Metabolic Institute, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Ali Aminian
- Bariatric and Metabolic Institute, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Tala Mahmoud
- Department of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Melissa Y Wee
- Department of Oesophagogastric Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Laura Fischer
- Department of Surgery, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Freek Daams
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kamal Mahawar
- Department of Surgery, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Niihara M, Hiki N, Hosoda K, Sakuraya M, Washio M, Chuman M, Yamashita K. Improved anastomotic technique for esophagojejunal anastomosis using circular stapler. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2022; 407:353-356. [PMID: 35072779 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-021-02417-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In total gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y reconstruction with esophagojejunal anastomosis has been widely used in gastrointestinal reconstruction. In the case of anastomotic leakage of RY reconstruction, esophagojejunal anastomosis should be paid attention, and esophageal fragility is considered the reason for the leakage. Here, we introduce an atraumatic and innovative technique for esophagojejunostomy. METHODS We prospectively performed routine novel esophagojejunal anastomosis using circular stapler device and reviewed the records of 14 consecutive patients with gastric cancer who underwent open total gastrectomy at Kitasato University Hospital from April 2019 to March 2020. By placing about 10 stay sutures around the entire esophageal stump, the esophageal stump can be opened to the maximum diameter. The forceps grasping the tissue was not necessary for these procedures, consequently preventing either tears the esophageal stump tissue or narrowing the esophageal lumen. RESULTS These 14 cases were far advanced cases of gastric cancer, 6 cases of splenectomy and 3 cases of distal pancreatectomy. No technical problems such as esophageal tear were observed in all cases. Postoperative complications were observed in 6 patients (42.9%), and their contents varied. However, they all improved conservatively. Regarding anastomotic complications, anastomotic leakage of Clavien-Dindo-II was observed in one case, but it improved conservatively. CONCLUSION Our new atraumatic anastomosis technique could abolish problems such as tear of esophagus wall due to introduce a larger-sized anvil, trauma of esophageal wall by grasping with forceps such as Alice or Babcock. Consequently, the atraumatic and innovative technique might make the esophagojejunostomy safe. This method might prevent anastomotic leakage and other complications effectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masahiro Niihara
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kitasato 1-15-1, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan.
| | - Naoki Hiki
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kitasato 1-15-1, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan
| | - Kei Hosoda
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kitasato 1-15-1, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan
| | - Mikiko Sakuraya
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kitasato 1-15-1, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan
| | - Marie Washio
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kitasato 1-15-1, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan
| | - Motohiro Chuman
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kitasato 1-15-1, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan
| | - Keishi Yamashita
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kitasato 1-15-1, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dal Cero M, Rodríguez-Santiago J, Miró M, Castro S, Miranda C, Santamaría M, Gobbini Y, Garsot E, Pujadas M, Luna A, Momblán D, Balagué C, Aldeano A, Olona C, Molinas J, Pulido L, Sánchez-Cano JJ, Güell M, Salazar D, Gimeno M, Grande L, Pera M. Evaluation of data quality in the Spanish EURECCA Esophagogastric Cancer Registry. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47:3081-3087. [PMID: 33933340 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.04.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2021] [Revised: 03/27/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although the number of nationwide clinical registries in upper gastrointestinal cancer is increasing, few of them perform regular clinical audits. The Spanish EURECCA Esophagogastric Cancer Registry (SEEGCR) was launched in 2013. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of the data in terms of completeness and accuracy. METHODS Patients who were registered (2014-2017) in the online SEEGCR and underwent esophagectomy or gastrectomy with curative intent were selected for auditing. Independent teams of surgeons visited each center between July 2018 and December 2019 and checked the reliability of data entered into the registry. Completeness was established by comparing the cases reported in the registry with those provided by the Medical Documentation Service of each center. Twenty percent of randomly selected cases per hospital were checked during on-site visits for testing the accuracy of data (27 items per patient file). Correlation between the quality of the data and the hospital volume was also assessed. RESULTS Some 1839 patients from 19 centers were included in the registry. The mean completeness rate in the whole series was 97.8% (range 82.8-100%). For the accuracy, 462 (25.1%) cases were checked. Out of 12,312 items, 10,905 were available for verification, resulting in a perfect agreement of 95% (87.1-98.7%). There were 509 (4.7%) incorrect and 35 (0.3%) missing entries. No correlation between hospital volume and the rate of completeness and accuracy was observed. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that the SEEGCR contains reliable data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Dal Cero
- Section of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hospital del Mar, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Rodríguez-Santiago
- Service of Surgery, Hospital Universitari Mútua Terrassa, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Miró
- Service of Surgery, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - S Castro
- Service of Surgery, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - C Miranda
- Service of Surgery, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - M Santamaría
- Service of Surgery, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain
| | - Y Gobbini
- Service of Surgery, Hospital de Sant Joan Despí Moisès Broggi, Sant Joan Despí, Barcelona, Spain
| | - E Garsot
- Service of Surgery, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Pujadas
- Service of Surgery, Hospital Universitari de Girona Dr. Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
| | - A Luna
- Service of Surgery, Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí de Sabadell, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain
| | - D Momblán
- Service of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - C Balagué
- Service of Surgery, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Aldeano
- Service of Surgery, Hospital General de Granollers, Granollers, Barcelona, Spain
| | - C Olona
- Service of Surgery, Hospital Universitari de Tarragona Joan XXIII, Tarragona, Spain
| | - J Molinas
- Service of Surgery, Hospital Universitari de Vic, Vic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - L Pulido
- Service of Surgery, Hospital de Mataró, Consorci Sanitari del Maresme, Mataró, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J J Sánchez-Cano
- Service of Surgery, Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus, Reus, Spain
| | - M Güell
- Service of Surgery, Hospital de Sant Joan de Deu de Manresa, Manresa, Spain
| | - D Salazar
- Service of Surgery, Hospital Universitari de Igualada, Igualada, Spain
| | - M Gimeno
- Section of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hospital del Mar, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
| | - L Grande
- Section of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hospital del Mar, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Pera
- Section of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hospital del Mar, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
van Zweeden AA, Opperman RCM, Honeywell RJ, Peters GJ, Verheul HMW, van der Vliet HJ, Poel D. The prognostic impact of circulating miRNAs in patients with advanced esophagogastric cancer during palliative chemotherapy. Cancer Treat Res Commun 2021; 27:100371. [PMID: 33866108 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2021.100371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The prognosis of patients with advanced oesophageal cancer (EC) and gastric cancer (GC) is poor. Circulating microRNAs (ci-miRNAs) may have prognostic and predictive value to improve patient selection for palliative treatment. The purpose of this study is to assess the prognostic and predictive value of specific ci-miRNAs in plasma of patients with EC and GC treated with first-line palliative gemcitabine and cisplatin. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) was used to quantify miR-200c-3p, miR-375, miR-21-5p, miR-148a-3p, miR-146a-5p, miR-141-3p and miR-218-5p in plasma from 68 patients. ci-miRNA expression was analyzed in relation to overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and response to chemotherapy. ci-miRNA levels were detectable in 36 baseline (71%) samples and in 14 (47%) follow-up samples. Increased circulating miR-200c-3p in GC showed a trend (p = 0.06) towards a shorter OS. High circulating miR-375 was associated with a longer OS (p = 0.02) in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). No significant difference was observed in ci-miRNA expression between paired pre- and on-treatment samples. ci-miRNA expression was not associated with response to chemotherapy. ci-miRNAs can be measured in plasma samples of patients treated with first-line palliative chemotherapy using ddPCR despite prolonged storage in heparin. Elevated circulating miR-375 might be a prognostic marker for patients with EAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annette A van Zweeden
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, Netherlands,; Amstelland Hospital, Internal Medicine, Amstelveen, Netherlands,.
| | - Roza C M Opperman
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, Netherlands,.
| | - Richard J Honeywell
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, Netherlands,.
| | - Godefridus J Peters
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, Netherlands,; Department of Biochemistry, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland,.
| | - Henk M W Verheul
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, Netherlands,; Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands,.
| | - Hans J van der Vliet
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, Netherlands,; Lava Therapeutics, Yalelaan 60, Utrecht, Netherlands,.
| | - Dennis Poel
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, Netherlands,; Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands,.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Piraux E, Reychler G, de Noordhout LM, Forget P, Deswysen Y, Caty G. What are the impact and the optimal design of a physical prehabilitation program in patients with esophagogastric cancer awaiting surgery? A systematic review. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil 2021; 13:33. [PMID: 33766107 PMCID: PMC7993458 DOI: 10.1186/s13102-021-00260-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2020] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Background Substantial postoperative complications occur after tumor resection for esophagogastric cancers. Physical prehabilitation programs aim to prepare patients for surgery by improving their functional status with the aim of reducing postoperative complications. This systematic review aims to summarize the effects of physical prehabilitation programs on exercise capacity, muscle strength, respiratory muscle function, postoperative outcomes, and health-related quality of life and to determine the optimal design of such a program to improve these outcomes in esophagogastric cancer patients undergoing tumor resection. Methods A systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Scopus, and PEDro databases to identify studies evaluating the effects of physical prehabilitation program on exercise capacity, muscle strength, respiratory muscle function, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, mortality, and health-related quality of life in patients with esophagogastric cancer awaiting surgery. Data from all studies meeting the inclusion criteria were extracted. The quality of each selected study was determined using the Downs and Black checklist. Results Seven studies with 645 participants were included. The preoperative exercise program consisted of respiratory training alone in three studies, a combination of aerobic and resistance training in two studies, and a combination of respiratory, aerobic, and resistance training in two studies. Training frequency ranged from three times a day to twice a week and each session lasted between 20 and 75 min. Four studies were of fair quality and three of good quality. Some studies reported improvements in maximal inspiratory pressure, inspiratory muscle endurance, postoperative (pulmonary) complications, and length of hospital stay in the preoperative exercise group compared to the control group. Conclusion This systematic review reports the current evidence for physical prehabilitation programs in patients with esophagogastric cancer awaiting surgery. However, due to the limited number of randomized controlled trials, the significant heterogeneity of exercise programs, and the questionable quality of the studies, higher quality randomized controlled trials are needed. Trial registration PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42020176353. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13102-021-00260-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise Piraux
- Pôle de Neuro Musculo Skeletal Lab, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Neuro Musculo Skeletal Lab, Université catholique de Louvain, Avenue Mounier 53, bte B1.53.07, 1200, Brussels, Belgium. .,Pôle de Pneumologie, ORL & Dermatologie, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium. .,Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neurosciences, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Gregory Reychler
- Pôle de Pneumologie, ORL & Dermatologie, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.,Haute Ecole Léonard de Vinci, Parnasse-ISEI, Brussels, Belgium.,Secteur de kinésithérapie, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.,Service de Pneumologie, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Louise Maertens de Noordhout
- Pôle de Neuro Musculo Skeletal Lab, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Neuro Musculo Skeletal Lab, Université catholique de Louvain, Avenue Mounier 53, bte B1.53.07, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.,Pôle de Pneumologie, ORL & Dermatologie, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.,Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neurosciences, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Patrice Forget
- Department of Anaesthetics, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Epidemiology Group, University of Aberdeen, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Yannick Deswysen
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Unit, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Gilles Caty
- Pôle de Neuro Musculo Skeletal Lab, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Neuro Musculo Skeletal Lab, Université catholique de Louvain, Avenue Mounier 53, bte B1.53.07, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.,Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neurosciences, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.,Service de médecine physique et réadaptation, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Grenda A, Wojas-Krawczyk K, Skoczylas T, Krawczyk P, Sierocińska-Sawa J, Wallner G, Milanowski J. HER2 gene assessment in liquid biopsy of gastric and esophagogastric junction cancer patients qualified for surgery. BMC Gastroenterol 2020; 20:382. [PMID: 33198632 PMCID: PMC7670771 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-020-01531-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2020] [Accepted: 11/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Amplification of HER2 gene (ERBB2) and overexpression of HER2 protein on cancer cells are found in 10-26% of gastric cancer (GC) and esophagogastric junction cancer (EGJC). Gene copy number variation (CNV) could be detected in these patients in liquid biopsy and in cancer cells. METHODS We analysed HER2 gene CNV used qPCR method in 87 sera collected from GC and EGJC patients before surgical treatment and in 40 sera obtained from healthy donors. HER2 gene CNV was also assessed in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue. Furthermore, we assessed the number of HER2 gene copies and HER2 expression in cancer cells using the fluorescent in situ hybridization method (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC). RESULTS We found that the HER2 gene copy number in liquid biopsy was higher in GC and EGJC patients compared to healthy people (p = 0.01). Moreover, EGJC patients had higher number of HER2 gene copies than healthy donors (p = 0.0016). HER2 CNV examination could distinguish healthy individuals and patients with gastric or esophagogastric junction cancers with sensitivity and specificity of 58% and 98% (AUC = 0.707, 95% CI 0.593-0.821, p = 0.004). We found that patients with a high copy number of the HER2 gene in the tumor tissue assessed by qPCR (but not by FISH) have significantly more often a high number of HER2 gene copies in liquid biopsy (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS We suggested that HER2 testing in liquid biopsy could be used as an auxiliary method to analysis of HER2 status in tumor tissue in gastric or esophagogastric junction cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Grenda
- Chair and Department of Pneumology, Oncology and Allergology, Medical University of Lublin, Jaczewskiego 8, 20-090, Lublin, Poland.
| | - Kamila Wojas-Krawczyk
- Chair and Department of Pneumology, Oncology and Allergology, Medical University of Lublin, Jaczewskiego 8, 20-090, Lublin, Poland
| | - Tomasz Skoczylas
- II Chair and Department of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery and Surgical Oncology of the Alimentary Tract, Medical University of Lublin, Staszica 16, 20-080, Lublin, Poland
| | - Paweł Krawczyk
- Chair and Department of Pneumology, Oncology and Allergology, Medical University of Lublin, Jaczewskiego 8, 20-090, Lublin, Poland
| | - Jadwiga Sierocińska-Sawa
- Laboratory of Pathomorphology, Independent Public Clinical Hospital No. 1 in Lublin, ul. Staszica 11, 20-081, Lublin, Poland
| | - Grzegorz Wallner
- II Chair and Department of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery and Surgical Oncology of the Alimentary Tract, Medical University of Lublin, Staszica 16, 20-080, Lublin, Poland
| | - Janusz Milanowski
- Chair and Department of Pneumology, Oncology and Allergology, Medical University of Lublin, Jaczewskiego 8, 20-090, Lublin, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tsang ES, Lim HJ, Renouf DJ, Davies JM, Loree JM, Gill S. Real-world treatment attrition rates in advanced esophagogastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26:6027-6036. [PMID: 33132652 PMCID: PMC7584053 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i39.6027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2020] [Revised: 06/24/2020] [Accepted: 09/25/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over the last decade, multiple agents have demonstrated efficacy for advanced esophagogastric cancer (EGC). Despite the availability of later lines of therapy, there remains limited real-world data about the treatment attrition rates between lines of therapy.
AIM To characterize the use and attrition rates between lines of therapy for patients with advanced EGC.
METHODS We identified patients who received at least one cycle of chemotherapy for advanced EGC between July 1, 2017 and July 31, 2018 across six regional centers in British Columbia (BC), Canada. Clinicopathologic, treatment, and outcomes data were extracted.
RESULTS Of 245 patients who received at least one line of therapy, median age was 66 years (IQR 58.2-72.3) and 186 (76%) were male, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0/1 (80%), gastric vs GEJ (36% vs 64%). Histologies included adenocarcinoma (78%), squamous cell carcinoma (8%), and signet ring (14%), with 31% HER2 positive. 72% presented with de novo disease, and 25% had received previous chemoradiation. There was a high level of treatment attrition, with patients receiving only one line of therapy n = 122, 50%), two lines n = 83, 34%), three lines n = 34, 14%), and four lines n = 6, 2%). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated improved survival with increasing lines of therapy (median overall survival 7.7 vs 16.6 vs 22.8 vs 40.4 mo, P < 0.05). On multivariable Cox regression, improved survival was associated with better baseline ECOG and increased lines of therapy (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION The steep attrition rates between therapies highlight the unmet need for more efficacious early-line treatment options for patients with advanced EGC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica S Tsang
- Department of Medicine, BC Cancer, Vancouver V5Z 4E6, Canada
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V5Z 4E6, Canada
| | - Howard J Lim
- Department of Medicine, BC Cancer, Vancouver V5Z 4E6, Canada
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V5Z 4E6, Canada
| | - Daniel J Renouf
- Department of Medicine, BC Cancer, Vancouver V5Z 4E6, Canada
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V5Z 4E6, Canada
| | - Janine M Davies
- Department of Medicine, BC Cancer, Vancouver V5Z 4E6, Canada
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V5Z 4E6, Canada
| | - Jonathan M Loree
- Department of Medicine, BC Cancer, Vancouver V5Z 4E6, Canada
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V5Z 4E6, Canada
| | - Sharlene Gill
- Department of Medicine, BC Cancer, Vancouver V5Z 4E6, Canada
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V5Z 4E6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Chaudhary SP, Kwak EL, Hwang KL, Lennerz JK, Corcoran RB, Heist RS, Russo AL, Parikh A, Borger DR, Blaszkowsky LS, Faris JE, Murphy JE, Azzoli CG, Roeland EJ, Goyal L, Allen J, Mullen JT, Ryan DP, Iafrate AJ, Klempner SJ, Clark JW, Hong TS. Revisiting MET: Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes of Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic, MET-Amplified Esophagogastric Cancers. Oncologist 2020; 25:e1691-e1700. [PMID: 32820577 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Accepted: 07/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metastatic esophagogastric cancers (EGCs) have a poor prognosis with an approximately 5% 5-year survival. Additional treatment approaches are needed. c-MET gene-amplified tumors are an uncommon but potentially targetable subset of EGC. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were evaluated in patients with MET-amplified EGC and compared with those without MET amplification to facilitate identification of these patients and possible treatment approaches. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with locally advanced or metastatic MET-amplified EGC at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) were identified using fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis, with a gene-to-control ratio of ≥2.2 defined as positive. Non-MET-amplified patients identified during the same time period who had undergone tumor genotyping and treatment at MGH were evaluated as a comparison group. RESULTS We identified 233 patients evaluated for MET amplification from 2002 to 2019. MET amplification was seen in 28 (12%) patients versus 205 (88%) patients without amplification. Most MET-amplified tumors occurred in either the distal esophagus (n = 9; 32%) or gastroesophageal junction (n = 10; 36%). Of MET-amplified patients, 16 (57%) had a TP53 mutation, 5(18%) had HER2 co-amplification, 2 (7.0%) had EGFR co-amplification, and 1 (3.5%) had FGFR2 co-amplification. MET-amplified tumors more frequently had poorly differentiated histology (19/28, 68.0% vs. 66/205, 32%; p = .02). Progression-free survival to initial treatment was substantially shorter for all MET-amplified patients (5.6 vs. 8.8 months, p = .026) and for those with metastatic disease at presentation (4.0 vs. 7.6 months, p = .01). Overall, patients with MET amplification had shorter overall survival (19.3 vs. 24.6 months, p = .049). No difference in survival was seen between low MET-amplified tumors (≥2.2 and <25 MET copy number) compared with highly amplified tumors (≥25 MET copy number). CONCLUSION MET-amplified EGC represents a distinct clinical entity characterized by rapid progression and short survival. Ideally, the identification of these patients will provide opportunities to participate in clinical trials in an attempt to improve outcomes. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE This article describes 233 patients who received MET amplification testing and reports (a) a positivity rate of 12%, similar to the rate of HER2 positivity in this data set; (b) the clinical characteristics of poorly differentiated tumors and nodal metastases; and (c) markedly shorter progression-free survival and overall survival in MET-amplified tumors. Favorable outcomes are reported for patients treated with MET inhibitors. Given the lack of published data in MET-amplified esophagogastric cancers and the urgent clinical importance of identifying patients with MET amplification for MET-directed therapy, this large series is a valuable addition to the literature and will have an impact on future practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Surendra Pal Chaudhary
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Eunice L Kwak
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Katie L Hwang
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jochen K Lennerz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ryan B Corcoran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Rebecca S Heist
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Andrea L Russo
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Aparna Parikh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Darrell R Borger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lawrence S Blaszkowsky
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jason E Faris
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center and Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Janet E Murphy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Christopher G Azzoli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Eric J Roeland
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lipika Goyal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jill Allen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - John T Mullen
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - David P Ryan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - A John Iafrate
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Samuel J Klempner
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jeffrey W Clark
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Theodore S Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Goyal L, Chaudhary SP, Kwak EL, Abrams TA, Carpenter AN, Wolpin BM, Wadlow RC, Allen JN, Heist R, McCleary NJ, Chan JA, Goessling W, Schrag D, Ng K, Enzinger PC, Ryan DP, Clark JW. A phase 2 clinical trial of the heat shock protein 90 (HSP 90) inhibitor ganetespib in patients with refractory advanced esophagogastric cancer. Invest New Drugs 2020; 38:1533-1539. [PMID: 31898183 DOI: 10.1007/s10637-019-00889-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2019] [Accepted: 12/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Subsets of esophagogastric (EG) cancers harbor genetic abnormalities, including amplification of HER2, MET, or FGFR2 or mutations in PIK3CA, EGFR, or BRAF. Ganetespib which is a novel triazolone heterocyclic inhibitor of HSP90, is a potentially biologically rational treatment strategy for advanced EG cancers with these gene amplification. This multicenter, single-arm phase 2 trial enrolled patients with histologically confirmed advanced EG cancer with progression on at least one line of systemic therapy. Patients received Ganetespib 200 mg/m2 IV on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included: Progression Free Survival (PFS); to correlate the presence of HSP clients with ORR and PFS; evaluating the safety, tolerability and adverse events profile. In this study 26 eligible patients mainly: male 77%, median age 64 years were enrolled. The most common drug-related adverse events were diarrhea (77%), fatigue (65%), elevated ALKP (42%), and elevated AST (38%). The most common grade 3/4 AEs included: leucopenia (12%), fatigue (12%), diarrhea (8%), and elevated ALKP (8%). The ORR of 4% reflects the single patient of 26 who had a complete response and stayed on treatment for more than seventy (70) months. Median PFS and OS was 61 days (2.0 months), 94 days (3.1 months) respectively. Ganetespib showed manageable toxicity. While the study was terminated early due to insufficient evidence of single-agent activity, the durable CR and 2 minor responses suggest that there may be a subset of EG patients who could benefit from this drug.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lipika Goyal
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, 55 Fruit Street, 223 Bartlett Hall, Boston, 02114, MA, USA
| | - Surendra Pal Chaudhary
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, 55 Fruit Street, 223 Bartlett Hall, Boston, 02114, MA, USA.
| | - Eunice L Kwak
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, 55 Fruit Street, 223 Bartlett Hall, Boston, 02114, MA, USA
| | - Thomas A Abrams
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Amanda N Carpenter
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, 55 Fruit Street, 223 Bartlett Hall, Boston, 02114, MA, USA
| | - Brian M Wolpin
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Jill N Allen
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, 55 Fruit Street, 223 Bartlett Hall, Boston, 02114, MA, USA
| | - Rebecca Heist
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, 55 Fruit Street, 223 Bartlett Hall, Boston, 02114, MA, USA
| | | | - Jennifer A Chan
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Wolfram Goessling
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kimmie Ng
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Peter C Enzinger
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David P Ryan
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, 55 Fruit Street, 223 Bartlett Hall, Boston, 02114, MA, USA
| | - Jeffrey W Clark
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, 55 Fruit Street, 223 Bartlett Hall, Boston, 02114, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Moy RH, Dos Santos Fernandes G, Jonsson P, Chou JF, Basunia A, Ku GY, Chalasani SB, Boyar MS, Goldberg Z, Desai AM, Gabler A, Berger MF, Tang LH, Hechtman JF, Kelsen DP, Schattner M, Ilson DH, Solit DB, Taylor BS, Schultz N, Capanu M, Janjigian YY. Regorafenib in Combination with First-Line Chemotherapy for Metastatic Esophagogastric Cancer. Oncologist 2020; 25:e68-e74. [PMID: 31570517 PMCID: PMC6964136 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2019] [Accepted: 08/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Angiogenesis is critical to gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma growth and metastasis. Regorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor targeting angiogenic and stromal receptor tyrosine kinases. We evaluated whether regorafenib augments the antitumor effect of first-line chemotherapy in metastatic esophagogastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with previously untreated metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma received 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) every 14 days and regorafenib 160 mg daily on days 4 to 10 of each 14-day cycle. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS). To identify predictive biomarkers of outcome, we examined correlations between genomic characteristics of sequenced pretreatment tumors and PFS. RESULTS Between August 2013 and November 2014, 36 patients with metastatic esophagogastric cancer were accrued to this single-center phase II study (NCT01913639). The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia (36%), leucopenia (11%) and hypertension (8%). The 6-month PFS was 53% (95% confidence interval [CI], 38%-71%), the objective response rate was 54% (95% CI, 37%-70%), and the disease control rate was 77% (95% CI, 67%-94%). Next-generation sequencing did not identify any genomic alterations significantly correlated with response, and there was no association between homologous recombination deficiency and PFS with platinum-based chemotherapy. CONCLUSION Regorafenib (one week on-one week off schedule) is well tolerated in combination with first-line FOLFOX but does not improve 6-month PFS relative to historical control. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Prognosis for metastatic esophagogastric cancer remains poor despite modern systemic therapy regimens. This phase II trial indicates that the combination of regorafenib and FOLFOX is well tolerated but does not add to the efficacy of first-line chemotherapy in metastatic esophagogastric cancer. Notably, recently reported data suggest potential synergy between regorafenib and the PD-1 inhibitor nivolumab. As this study demonstrates that regorafenib plus FOLFOX is safe, and combined chemotherapy and immunotherapy show favorable toxicity profiles, future studies combining immunotherapy with regorafenib and chemotherapy may be feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan H. Moy
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical CollegeNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Gustavo Dos Santos Fernandes
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical CollegeNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Philip Jonsson
- Marie‐Josée & Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Joanne F. Chou
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Azfar Basunia
- Marie‐Josée & Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Geoffrey Y. Ku
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical CollegeNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Sree B. Chalasani
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical CollegeNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Michelle S. Boyar
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical CollegeNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Zoe Goldberg
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical CollegeNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Avni M. Desai
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical CollegeNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Amelia Gabler
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical CollegeNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Michael F. Berger
- Marie‐Josée & Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Laura H. Tang
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Jaclyn F. Hechtman
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - David P. Kelsen
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical CollegeNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Mark Schattner
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical CollegeNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - David H. Ilson
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical CollegeNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - David B. Solit
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical CollegeNew YorkNew YorkUSA
- Marie‐Josée & Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Barry S. Taylor
- Marie‐Josée & Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Nikolaus Schultz
- Marie‐Josée & Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Marinela Capanu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Yelena Y. Janjigian
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical CollegeNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
van Zweeden AA, van Groeningen CJ, Honeywell RJ, Giovannetti E, Ruijter R, Smorenburg CH, Giaccone G, Verheul HMW, Peters GJ, van der Vliet HJ. Randomized phase 2 study of gemcitabine and cisplatin with or without vitamin supplementation in patients with advanced esophagogastric cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2018; 82:39-48. [PMID: 29696360 PMCID: PMC6010482 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-018-3588-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2018] [Accepted: 04/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Preclinical research and prior clinical observations demonstrated reduced toxicity and suggested enhanced efficacy of cisplatin due to folic acid and vitamin B12 suppletion. In this randomized phase 2 trial, we evaluated the addition of folic acid and vitamin B12 to first-line palliative cisplatin and gemcitabine in patients with advanced esophagogastric cancer (AEGC). Methods Patients with AEGC were randomized to gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 (i.v. days 1, 8) and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 (i.v. day 1) q 3 weeks with or without folic acid (450 µg/day p.o.) and vitamin B12 (1000 µg i.m. q 9 weeks). The primary endpoint was response rate (RR). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), toxicity, and exploratory biomarker analyses. Cisplatin sensitivity and intracellular platinum levels were determined in adenocarcinoma cell lines cultured under high and low folate conditions in vitro. Results Adenocarcinoma cells cultured in medium with high folate levels were more sensitive to cisplatin and this was associated with increased intracellular platinum levels. In the randomized phase 2 clinical trial, which ran from October 2004 to September 2013, treatment was initiated in 78 of 82 randomized pts, 39 in each study arm. The RR was similar; 42.1% for supplemented patients vs. 32.4% for unsupplemented patients; p = 0.4. Median OS and TTP were 10.0 and 5.9 months for supplemented vs. 7.7 and 5.4 months for unsupplemented patients (OS, p = 0.9; TTP, p = 0.9). Plasma homocysteine was lower in the supplemented group [n = 20, 6.9 ± 1.6 (mean ± standard error of mean, SEM) µM; vs. 12.5 ± 4.0 µM; p < 0.001]. There was no significant difference in the Cmax of gemcitabine and cisplatin in the two treatment groups. Conclusion Folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation do not improve the RR, PFS, or OS of cisplatin and gemcitabine in patients with AEGC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A A van Zweeden
- Department of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, Amstelland Hospital, Amstelveen, The Netherlands
| | - C J van Groeningen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Amstelland Hospital, Amstelveen, The Netherlands
| | - R J Honeywell
- Department of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E Giovannetti
- Department of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R Ruijter
- Department of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C H Smorenburg
- Department of Internal Medicine, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep Alkmaar, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - G Giaccone
- Department of Medical Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - H M W Verheul
- Department of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G J Peters
- Department of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hans J van der Vliet
- Department of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Room 3A38, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kinjo Y, Satoh S, Ochi S, Matsubara H, Fukugaki A, Ohara K, Iwamoto M, Matsumoto T, Matsushita T, Wada Y. Laparoscopic transhiatal lymphadenectomy in the lower mediastinum for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. Int Cancer Conf J 2018; 7:37-39. [PMID: 31149511 DOI: 10.1007/s13691-018-0318-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2017] [Accepted: 02/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagogastrectomy is difficult because the lower mediastinum is so deeply located that the operative field is narrow and restricted by surrounding organs. Therefore, we performed lymphadenectomy with opening of the bilateral mediastinal pleura to maintain safety and obtain better exposure of lymph nodes and important organs. We will present our technique for laparoscopic lower mediastinal lymphadenectomy and reconstruction for cancer of the esophagogastric junction. Five abdominal ports were used. Retraction of the left lobe of the liver exposed the esophageal hiatus. A long, narrow gastric tube (3 cm wide) was formed, and regional abdominal lymph nodes (No. 1, 2, 3a, 7, 8a, 9, 19, and 20) were resected. The diaphragmatic hiatus was widely split and the opened bilateral mediastinal pleura enabled better exposure for lymph node dissection and reconstruction. The level where the inferior vena cava passed through the diaphragm into the chest was used as a landmark to identify supradiaphragmatic (No. 111) and lower thoracic paraesophageal nodes (No. 110), which were completely retrieved with this procedure. The posterior mediastinal nodes (No. 112pulR, 112pulL, and 112aoA) were also retrieved with bilateral opening of the mediastinal pleura and dissection of the inferior pulmonary ligaments. An esophagogastric tube anastomosis with pseudo-fornix was made with a no-knife linear stapler to prevent postoperative reflux esophagitis. This approach enabled safe and accurate laparoscopic lower mediastinal nodal dissection. With the advantage of a narrow gastric tube, the good working space made tension-free anastomosis possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yousuke Kinjo
- Department of Surgery, Himeji Medical Center, 68 Honmachi, Himeji, Hyogo 670-8520 Japan
| | - Seiji Satoh
- Department of Surgery, Himeji Medical Center, 68 Honmachi, Himeji, Hyogo 670-8520 Japan
| | - Shingo Ochi
- Department of Surgery, Himeji Medical Center, 68 Honmachi, Himeji, Hyogo 670-8520 Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Matsubara
- Department of Surgery, Himeji Medical Center, 68 Honmachi, Himeji, Hyogo 670-8520 Japan
| | - Atsushi Fukugaki
- Department of Surgery, Himeji Medical Center, 68 Honmachi, Himeji, Hyogo 670-8520 Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Ohara
- Department of Surgery, Himeji Medical Center, 68 Honmachi, Himeji, Hyogo 670-8520 Japan
| | - Masayoshi Iwamoto
- Department of Surgery, Himeji Medical Center, 68 Honmachi, Himeji, Hyogo 670-8520 Japan
| | - Takuya Matsumoto
- Department of Surgery, Himeji Medical Center, 68 Honmachi, Himeji, Hyogo 670-8520 Japan
| | - Takakazu Matsushita
- Department of Surgery, Himeji Medical Center, 68 Honmachi, Himeji, Hyogo 670-8520 Japan
| | - Yasuo Wada
- Department of Surgery, Himeji Medical Center, 68 Honmachi, Himeji, Hyogo 670-8520 Japan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Haag GM, Stocker G, Quidde J, Jaeger D, Lordick F. Randomized controlled trial of S-1 maintenance therapy in metastatic esophagogastric cancer - the multinational MATEO study. BMC Cancer 2017; 17:509. [PMID: 28760152 PMCID: PMC5537937 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3497-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2016] [Accepted: 07/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal duration of firstline chemotherapy in metastatic esophagogastric cancer is unknown. In most clinical trials therapy was given until tumour progression or limiting toxicity. Maintenance concepts aiming to prolong the duration of response and maintain quality of life have been established in other tumour types but not in esophagogastric cancer. S-1 is an oral fluoropyrimidine with proven efficacy in metastatic esophagogastric cancer. METHODS The Maintenance Teysuno® (S-1) in esophagogastric cancer (MATEO) trial is a multinational, randomized phase II study that explores the role of S-1 maintenance therapy in Her-2 negative, advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma. After a 12-week firstline platinum-fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy patients without tumour progression are randomized in a 2:1 allocation to receive S-1 alone or continue with the same regimen as during the primary period. The primary endpoint is overall survival. Secondary endpoints include safety and toxicity, progression-free survival and quality of life. Correlative biomarker analyses focus on the identification of a subgroup of patients with a prolonged benefit from S-1 based maintenance therapy. DISCUSSION MATEO will be the first trial to define the role of a S-1 based maintenance therapy in patients having received a platinum-based firstline chemotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT02128243 (date of registration: 29-04-2014).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georg-Martin Haag
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Gertraud Stocker
- University Cancer Center Leipzig (UCCL), University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, D-04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Julia Quidde
- II. Department of Internal Medicine (Oncology/Haematology), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, D-20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Dirk Jaeger
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florian Lordick
- University Cancer Center Leipzig (UCCL), University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, D-04103, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ishihara R, Oyama T, Abe S, Takahashi H, Ono H, Fujisaki J, Kaise M, Goda K, Kawada K, Koike T, Takeuchi M, Matsuda R, Hirasawa D, Yamada M, Kodaira J, Tanaka M, Omae M, Matsui A, Kanesaka T, Takahashi A, Hirooka S, Saito M, Tsuji Y, Maeda Y, Yamashita H, Oda I, Tomita Y, Matsunaga T, Terai S, Ozawa S, Kawano T, Seto Y. Risk of metastasis in adenocarcinoma of the esophagus: a multicenter retrospective study in a Japanese population. J Gastroenterol 2017; 52:800-808. [PMID: 27757547 DOI: 10.1007/s00535-016-1275-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2016] [Accepted: 10/07/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about the specific risks of metastasis in esophageal adenocarcinoma in relation to invasion depth or other pathologic factors. METHODS We conducted a multicenter retrospective study in 13 high-volume centers in Japan from January 2000 to October 2014 to elucidate the risk of metastasis of esophageal adenocarcinoma. A total of 458 patients (217 surgically resected and 241 endoscopically resected) with esophageal adenocarcinoma or esophagogastric adenocarcinoma involving the esophagus were included. Metastasis was considered positive if there was histologically confirmed metastasis in the surgical specimen or clinically confirmed metastasis during follow-up. Metastasis was considered negative if no metastasis was identified in resected specimens and during follow-up in patients treated surgically or no metastasis during follow-up for >5 years in patients treated by endoscopic resection. RESULTS Metastasis was identified in 72 patients. Multivariate analysis confirmed lymphovascular involvement [odds ratio (OR) 6.20; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 3.12-12.32; p < 0.001], a poorly differentiated component (OR 3.69; 95 % CI 1.92-7.10; p < 0.001), and lesion size >30 mm (OR 3.12; 95 % CI 1.63-5.97; p = 0.001) as independent risk factors for metastasis. No metastasis was detected in patients with mucosal cancer without lymphovascular involvement and a poorly differentiated component (0/186 lesions) or in patients with cancer invading the submucosa (1-500 µm) without lymphovascular involvement, a poorly differentiated component, and ≤30 mm (0/32 lesions). CONCLUSIONS Mucosal and submucosal cancers (1-500 µm invasion) without risk factors have a low incidence of metastasis and may thus be good candidates for endoscopic resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryu Ishihara
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, 3-3 Nakamichi 1-chome, Higashinari-ku, Osaka, 537-8511, Japan.
| | - Tsuneo Oyama
- Department of Endoscopy, Saku Central Hospital Advanced Care Center, Saku, Japan
| | - Seiichiro Abe
- Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Takahashi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Keiyukai Daini Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Ono
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Junko Fujisaki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Kaise
- Department of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kenichi Goda
- Department of Endoscopy, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kenro Kawada
- Department of Esophageal and General Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomoyuki Koike
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Manabu Takeuchi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | - Rie Matsuda
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Dai Hirasawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Sendai, Japan
| | - Masayoshi Yamada
- Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Junichi Kodaira
- Department of Gastroenterology, Keiyukai Daini Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Masaki Tanaka
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Masami Omae
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akira Matsui
- Department of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Kanesaka
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, 3-3 Nakamichi 1-chome, Higashinari-ku, Osaka, 537-8511, Japan
| | - Akiko Takahashi
- Department of Endoscopy, Saku Central Hospital Advanced Care Center, Saku, Japan
| | - Shinichi Hirooka
- Department of Pathology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masahiro Saito
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Yosuke Tsuji
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuki Maeda
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Sendai, Japan
| | - Hiroharu Yamashita
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ichiro Oda
- Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasuhiko Tomita
- Department of Pathology, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takashi Matsunaga
- Department of Medical Informatics, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shuji Terai
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | - Soji Ozawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan
| | - Tatsuyuki Kawano
- Department of Esophageal and General Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasuyuki Seto
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Bando H, Rubinstein L, Harris P, Yoshino T, Doi T, Ohtsu A, Welch J, Takebe N. Analysis of esophagogastric cancer patients enrolled in the National Cancer Institute Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program sponsored phase 1 trials. Gastric Cancer 2017; 20:481-488. [PMID: 27510411 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-016-0629-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2016] [Accepted: 08/02/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In phase 1 trials, an important entry criterion is life expectancy predicted to be more than 90 days, which is generally difficult to predict. The Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) prognostic score that is determined by lactate dehydrogenase level, albumin level, and number of metastatic sites of disease was developed to help project patient outcomes. There have been no systematic analyses to evaluate the utility of the RMH prognostic score for esophagogastric cancer patients. METHODS All nonpediatric phase 1 oncology trials sponsored by the National Cancer Institute Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program that began between 2001 and 2013 were considered in this review. RESULTS Of 4722 patients with solid tumors, 115 patients were eligible for our analysis; 54 (47 %) with cancer of the esophagus, 14 (12 %) with cancer of the esopagogastric junction, and 47 (41 %) with stomach cancer. Eighty-six patients (75 %) had a good RMH prognostic score (0 or 1) and 29 patients (25 %) had a poor RMH prognostic score (2 or 3). Disease control rates were significantly different between patients with good and poor RMH prognostic scores (49 % vs 17 %; two-sided Fisher's exact test P = 0.004). The median treatment duration and overall survival for good and poor RMH prognostic score patients were significantly different (median treatment duration 2.1 months vs 1.2 months respectively, P = 0.016; median overall survival 10.9 months vs 2.1 months respectively, P < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, age (60 years or older), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (2 or greater), and the RMH prognostic score (2 or 3) were significant predictors of poor survival. CONCLUSIONS The RMH prognostic score is a strong tool to predict the prognosis of esophagogastric cancer patients who might participate in a phase 1 trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hideaki Bando
- Investigational Drug Branch, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA. .,Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan. .,Course of Advanced Clinical Research of Cancer, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan.
| | - Larry Rubinstein
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Pamela Harris
- Investigational Drug Branch, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Takayuki Yoshino
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Toshihiko Doi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Atsushi Ohtsu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.,Course of Advanced Clinical Research of Cancer, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan
| | - John Welch
- Center for Global Health, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Naoko Takebe
- Investigational Drug Branch, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Janjigian YY, Braghiroli MI. Current Progress in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Targeted Therapies in Esophagogastric Cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2017; 26:313-324. [PMID: 28279471 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2016.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Esophagogastric cancer is a worldwide health problem. The addition of the epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-directed antibody trastuzumab to chemotherapy increased the overall survival of patients with metastatic HER2-positive esophagogastric cancer. This article discusses the available data to support HER2 as validated biomarker and recently completed and ongoing clinical trials of HER2-directed agents in metastatic and localized disease. Also reviewed is the mechanisms of resistance for HER2-directed therapy and ongoing research strategies including new imaging techniques and studies with patient-derived xenografts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yelena Y Janjigian
- Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, 300 East 66th Street, Room 1033, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Maria Ignez Braghiroli
- Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 East 66th Street, Room 1033, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Haag GM, Byl A, Jäger D, Berger AK. Perioperative Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients with Locally Advanced Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach and the Esophagogastric Junction: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis of Toxicity and Efficacy at the National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg. Oncology 2017; 92:291-298. [PMID: 28249280 DOI: 10.1159/000458531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2016] [Accepted: 01/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Esophagogastric cancer occurs more frequently in older patients, but these are underrepresented in clinical studies establishing the current treatment standards for perioperative chemotherapy in locally advanced disease. This leads to uncertainty regarding the treatment of older patients with potentially toxic but active regimens. METHODS Using a prospectively generated database, we analyzed 63 patients aged ≥70 years undergoing perioperative chemotherapy for locally advanced esophagogastric cancer. The information included Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, comorbidity index, body mass index, regimen of chemotherapy, toxicity, dosage adjustments, date of surgery, application of adjuvant treatment, date of progression, and date of death. Survival times were calculated. RESULTS The median age was 73 years. 96.8% of the patients received an oxaliplatin-containing regimen. In 17.5% of the patients, the dosage was reduced, and treatment was previously permanently stopped in 7.9%; 80% of the patients underwent curatively intended surgery, but only 27.5% of those undergoing resection started adjuvant treatment. Major histological regression was observed in 21.6% of the patients. The median survival was 19.1 months. Significantly improved survival times were observed for patients undergoing surgery (p = 0.008) and for patients with a triplet therapy (p = 0.004). Survival was worse for patients aged ≥75 years. CONCLUSION perioperative treatment is feasible and effective in elderly patients with esophagogastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georg Martin Haag
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Rice TW, Ishwaran H, Ferguson MK, Blackstone EH, Goldstraw P. Cancer of the Esophagus and Esophagogastric Junction: An Eighth Edition Staging Primer. J Thorac Oncol 2016; 12:36-42. [PMID: 27810391 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 375] [Impact Index Per Article: 46.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2016] [Revised: 10/11/2016] [Accepted: 10/18/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
This primer for eighth edition staging of esophageal and esophagogastric epithelial cancers presents separate classifications for the clinical (cTNM), pathologic (pTNM), and postneoadjuvant pathologic (ypTNM) stage groups, which are no longer shared. For pTNM, pT1 has been subcategorized as pT1a and pT1b for the subgrouping pStage I adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. A new, simplified esophagus-specific regional lymph node map has been introduced. Undifferentiated histologic grade (G4) has been eliminated; additional analysis is required to expose histopathologic cell type. Location has been removed as a category for pT2N0M0 squamous cell cancer. The definition of the esophagogastric junction has been revised. ypTNM stage groups are identical for both histopathologic cell types, unlike those for cTNM and pTNM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Peter Goldstraw
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Blank S, Knebel P, Haag GM, Bruckner T, Klaiber U, Burian M, Schaible A, Sisic L, Schmidt T, Diener MK, Ott K. Immediate tumor resection in patients with locally advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma with nonresponse to chemotherapy after 4 weeks of treatment versus resection after completion of chemotherapy (OPTITREAT trial, DRKS00004668): study protocol for a randomized controlled pilot trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2016; 2:18. [PMID: 27965838 PMCID: PMC5153833 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-016-0059-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2015] [Accepted: 03/08/2016] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a standard of care for patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and stomach in Europe, but still only 20–40 % respond to therapy and the critical issue; how to treat nonresponding patients is still unclear. So far, there is no randomized trial evaluating the impact of early termination of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and immediate tumor resection in nonresponding patients with locally advanced gastroesophageal cancer on postoperative outcome. With this exploratory pilot trial, we want to get first estimates about the effect of discontinuation of chemotherapy with the aim to plan and conduct a further definitive trial. Methods/design OPTITREAT is designed as a single-center, randomized controlled pilot trial with two parallel study groups. Four weeks after starting neoadjuvant chemotherapy in all patients, clinical response will be assessed by endoscopy and endosonographic ultrasound. Then, nonresponding patients (n = 84) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to intervention group with stopping chemotherapy and immediate tumor resection or control group with completion of chemotherapy before surgery. Outcome measures are overall survival, R0 resection rate, perioperative morbidity and mortality, histopathological response, and quality of life. Statistical analysis will be based on the intention-to-treat population. Due to the study design as an explorative pilot trial, no formal sample size calculation was performed. The planned total sample size of 120 patients is considered ethical and large enough to show the feasibility and safety of the concept. First data on differences between the study groups in the defined endpoints will also be generated. Discussion Individualized therapy is of utmost interest in the treatment of locally advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma as less than half of the patients show objective response to current chemotherapy regimens. The findings of the OPTITREAT trial will help to get first data about clinical response evaluation followed by immediate tumor resection in nonresponding patients after 4 weeks of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Based on the results of this pilot study, a future confirmatory trial will be planned to prove efficacy and evaluate significance. Trial registration German Clinical Trial Register number: DRKS00004668
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Blank
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, Heidelberg, 69120 Germany
| | - Phillip Knebel
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, Heidelberg, 69120 Germany.,Study Centre of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, Heidelberg, 69120 Germany
| | - Georg-Martin Haag
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Center of Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, Heidelberg, 69120 Germany
| | - Thomas Bruckner
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 305, Heidelberg, 69120 Germany
| | - Ulla Klaiber
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, Heidelberg, 69120 Germany
| | - Maria Burian
- Department of General Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Endoscopic Center, University of Gießen, Rudolf-Buchheimstr. 7, Gießen, 35392 Germany
| | - Anja Schaible
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, Heidelberg, 69120 Germany.,Interdisciplinary Endoscopic Center, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, Heidelberg, 69120 Germany
| | - Leila Sisic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, Heidelberg, 69120 Germany
| | - Thomas Schmidt
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, Heidelberg, 69120 Germany
| | - Markus K Diener
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, Heidelberg, 69120 Germany.,Study Centre of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, Heidelberg, 69120 Germany
| | - Katja Ott
- Department of Surgery, RoMed Klinikum, Pettenkoferstr. 10, Rosenheim, 83022 Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Catenacci DVT. Next-generation clinical trials: Novel strategies to address the challenge of tumor molecular heterogeneity. Mol Oncol 2015; 9:967-96. [PMID: 25557400 PMCID: PMC4402102 DOI: 10.1016/j.molonc.2014.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2014] [Revised: 09/23/2014] [Accepted: 09/26/2014] [Indexed: 02/09/2023] Open
Abstract
The promise of 'personalized cancer care' with therapies toward specific molecular aberrations has potential to improve outcomes. However, there is recognized heterogeneity within any given tumor-type from patient to patient (inter-patient heterogeneity), and within an individual (intra-patient heterogeneity) as demonstrated by molecular evolution through space (primary tumor to metastasis) and time (after therapy). These issues have become hurdles to advancing cancer treatment outcomes with novel molecularly targeted agents. Classic trial design paradigms are challenged by heterogeneity, as they are unable to test targeted therapeutics against low frequency genomic 'oncogenic driver' aberrations with adequate power. Usual accrual difficulties to clinical trials are exacerbated by low frequencies of any given molecular driver. To address these challenges, there is need for innovative clinical trial designs and strategies implementing novel diagnostic biomarker technologies to account for inter-patient molecular diversity and scarce tissue for analysis. Importantly, there is also need for pre-defined treatment priority algorithms given numerous aberrations commonly observed within any one individual sample. Access to multiple available therapeutic agents simultaneously is crucial. Finally intra-patient heterogeneity through time may be addressed by serial biomarker assessment at the time of tumor progression. This report discusses various 'next-generation' biomarker-driven trial designs and their potentials and limitations to tackle these recognized molecular heterogeneity challenges. Regulatory hurdles, with respect to drug and companion diagnostic development and approval, are considered. Focus is on the 'Expansion Platform Design Types I and II', the latter demonstrated with a first example, 'PANGEA: Personalized Anti-Neoplastics for Gastro-Esophageal Adenocarcinoma'. Applying integral medium-throughput genomic and proteomic assays along with a practical biomarker assessment and treatment algorithm, 'PANGEA' attempts to address the problem of heterogeneity towards successful implementation of molecularly targeted therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel V T Catenacci
- University of Chicago Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology & Oncology, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC2115, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
| |
Collapse
|