Electronic health intervention to manage symptoms of immunotherapy in patients with cancer (SOFIA): Results from a randomized controlled pilot trial

BACKGROUND

For patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors, early detection of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) is critical for one's safety. To this end, a smartphone app (SOFIA) was developed that featured the assessment of electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) focusing on irAEs as well as a set of comprehensive supportive information. Its feasibility and preliminary efficacy were evaluated in a randomized controlled trial (RCT).

METHODS

Patients who received immune checkpoint inhibition therapy were randomly assigned to an intervention group (IG) or a control group (CG; care as usual). During the 12-week intervention period, IG patients used SOFIA to report twice weekly ePROs and receive cancer- and immunotherapy-relevant contents. Before a patient's next clinical visit, the physician in charge was given the ePRO reports. The primary objective was to test the feasibility of SOFIA. Furthermore, the preliminary efficacy of SOFIA for health-related quality of life (HRQOL), psychosocial outcomes, and medical data was examined. Clinical outcomes were assessed at baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1), and a 3-month follow-up (T2).

RESULTS

Seventy-one patients were randomized to the IG (n = 34) or the CG (n = 37). SOFIA showed high feasibility and acceptance. At T1, patients in the IG reported significantly better HRQOL and role functioning and less depression, distress, and appetite loss. No significant differences were revealed regarding medical data, the utilization of supportive care services, or survival.

CONCLUSIONS

SOFIA showed high feasibility and acceptance and improved HRQOL and psychosocial outcomes. These results suggest further evaluation of efficacy in a large-scale confirmatory multicenter RCT.

Perioperative Atezolizumab Plus Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin, and Docetaxel for Resectable Esophagogastric Cancer: Interim Results From the Randomized, Multicenter, Phase II/III DANTE/IKF-s633 Trial

PURPOSE

This trial evaluates the addition of the PD-L1 antibody atezolizumab (ATZ) to standard-of-care fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) as a perioperative treatment for patients with resectable esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (EGA).

METHODS

DANTE started as multicenter, randomized phase II trial, which was subsequently converted to a phase III trial. Here, we present the results of the phase II proportion, focusing on surgical pathology and safety outcomes on an exploratory basis. Patients with resectable EGA (≥cT2 or cN+) were assigned to either four preoperative and postoperative cycles of FLOT combined with ATZ, followed by eight cycles of ATZ maintenance (arm A) or FLOT alone (arm B).

RESULTS

Two hundred ninety-five patients were randomly assigned (A, 146; B, 149) with balanced baseline characteristics between arms. Twenty-three patients (8%) had tumors with microsatellite instability (MSI), and 58% patients had tumors with a PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) of ≥1. Surgical morbidity (A, 45%; B, 42%) and 60-day mortality (A, 3%; B, 2%) were comparable between arms. Downstaging favored arm A versus arm B (ypT0, 23% v 15% [one-sided P = .044]; ypT0-T2, 61% v 48% [one-sided P = .015]; ypN0, 68% v 54% [one-sided P = .012]). Histopathologic complete regression rates (pathologic complete response or TRG1a) were higher after FLOT plus ATZ (A, 24%; B, 15%; one-sided P = .032), and the difference was more pronounced in the PD-L1 CPS ≥10 (A, 33%; B, 12%) and MSI (A, 63%; B, 27%) subpopulations. Complete margin-free (R0) resection rates were relatively high in both arms (A, 96%; B, 95%). The incidence and severity of adverse events were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of the exploratory nature of the data, the addition of ATZ to perioperative FLOT is safe and improved postoperative stage and histopathologic regression.

Analysis of Burnout Prevalence among German Physicians Working in a Palliative Care Setting: A Survey of the AIO Quality of Life Working Group

INTRODUCTION

Palliative care physicians (Pcps) face special challenges caring for terminally ill patients. We conducted this study to evaluate the burnout (bo) prevalence among pcps and sought to identify risk as well as protective factors as a basis for the development of preventive measures.

METHODS

Participants (Pcs) were invited via e-mail to complete an online survey between May and June 2022. Besides the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory assessing the bo dimensions of exhaustion (exh) and disengagement (dis), sociodemographic data were collected.

RESULTS

The study found that 58% (cut-off mean value [M] ≥2.18) or more specifically, 38% (cut-off M ≥2.5) of the pcs showed increased scores in the exh subscale as a key dimension of bo. All dimensions were correlated with the level of medical and palliative care training, with higher scores for physicians in training. Furthermore, pcs without preventive measures like employee appraisals at work were more likely to be considered exhausted, disengaged, or burned out. The discrepancy between high exh and low dis scores shows that the polled pcps, despite feeling exh, nevertheless considered their work meaningful.

CONCLUSION

Bo prevalence among pcps exceeds that of the general population and other specialties, whereas inexperienced pcps might be at high risk of shifting from exh to bo and could therefore benefit from tailored support. Further preventive measures including individual and organizational aspects are necessary to prevent bo and promote health among medical staff, thereby preserving quality of patient care. Elementary preventive measures such as employee appraisals can have a protective effect against bo.

Pattern and time point of relapse in locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma after multimodal treatment: implications for a useful structured follow-up

PURPOSE

Despite improvements in multimodal treatment of locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma, the majority of patients still relapses. The impact of structured follow-up for early detection of recurrence is unclear and controversially discussed.

METHODS

Patients with locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma having received neoadjuvant/perioperative chemotherapy followed by tumor resection between 2009 and 2021, underwent a structured follow-up including three-monthly imaging during the first 2 years, followed by semiannual and annual examinations in year 3-4 and 5, respectively. Clinical outcome including pattern and time point of relapse was analyzed.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty-seven patients were included in this analysis. In 50.2% (n = 129) of patients, recurrent disease was diagnosed, with the majority (94.6%) relapsing within the first 2 years. The most common site of relapse were lymph node metastases followed by peritoneal carcinomatosis and hepatic and pulmonary metastases. 52.7% of patients presented with symptoms at the time of relapse. Cumulative risk and time point of relapse differed significantly between patient with a node-positive tumor (ypN+) after neoadjuvant treatment (high-risk group) and patients with node-negative primary tumor (ypN0) (low-risk group). High-risk patients had a significantly inferior disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) with 11.1 and 29.0 months, respectively, whereas median DFS and OS were not reached for the low-risk group.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of relapse differs significantly between high- and low-risk patients. Only a part of relapses is associated with clinical symptoms. An individualized follow-up strategy is recommended for high- and low-risk patients considering the individual risk of relapse.

Pembrolizumab and trastuzumab in combination with FLOT in the perioperative treatment of HER2-positive, localized esophagogastric adenocarcinoma-a phase II trial of the AIO study group (AIO STO 0321)

Background

Esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (EGA) presents a substantial global health challenge as the number of cases continues to rise. The current standard approach for treating localized EGA involves a combination of triplet chemotherapy, which consists of a platinum compound, a fluoropyrimidine, and a taxane (known as FLOT), followed by surgery. In cases of metastatic EGA with HER2-positive status or in certain studies with localized EGA, the use of HER2-targeted antibodies such as trastuzumab has shown improved responses. Recently, the addition of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors, such as pembrolizumab, when combined with 5-FU, platinum-based chemotherapy, and trastuzumab, has demonstrated significant enhancements in response rates for HER2-positive metastatic EGA. However, there is currently insufficient evidence regarding this treatment approach in localized HER2-positive disease.

Methods

The PHERFLOT study is an open-label, single-arm, multicenter, exploratory phase II trial designed to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of perioperative pembrolizumab, FLOT, and trastuzumab in patients with previously untreated localized HER2-positive EGA. In total, 30 patients will be recruited. The co-primary end points are pathological complete response rate and disease-free survival rate after 2 years. Secondary objectives include safety and tolerability, efficacy in terms of progression-free survival and objective response rate and translational markers, such as blood-based signatures (e.g., immune repertoire changes or emergence of anti-HER2 resistance variants) or microbiota signatures that may correlate with immune activation and therapy response.

Discussion

Recent evidence from phase II clinical trials demonstrated improved efficacy through the addition of trastuzumab to perioperative FLOT. Furthermore, in advanced or metastatic EGA, the combination of trastuzumab, FLOT, and the PD1-inhibitor pembrolizumab significantly improved treatment response. The PHERFLOT study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of this treatment approach in HER2-positive-localized EGA, potentially identifying a promising new perioperative regimen for localized EGA, which then needs to be confirmed within a randomized trial. Furthermore, the accompanying translational program of the study might help to improve the stratification of suitable patients and to identify potential translational targets for future clinical trials.

Clinical trial registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT05504720.

S-1 maintenance therapy in Caucasian patients with metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma-final results of the randomized AIO MATEO phase II trial

PURPOSE

Platinum-fluoropyrimidine combinations are standard of care for treatment of metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma. The optimal duration of first-line chemotherapy is unknown, however, and maintenance strategies have not yet been established.

DESIGN

MATEO is an international randomized phase II trial exploring efficacy and safety of S-1 maintenance therapy in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma. After 3 months of first-line platinum-fluoropyrimidine-based induction therapy, patients without progression were randomized in a 2 : 1 allocation to receive S-1 monotherapy (arm A) or to continue combination chemotherapy (arm B). The primary objective was to show non-inferiority of overall survival in the S-1 maintenance group. Progression-free survival, adverse events, and quality of life were secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

From 2014 to 2019, 110 and 55 patients were randomized in arm A and arm B, respectively (recruitment closed prematurely). Median overall survival from randomization was 13.4 months for arm A and 11.4 months for arm B [hazard ratio 0.97 (80% confidence interval 0.76-1.23), P = 0.86]. Median progression-free survival from randomization was 4.3 and 6.1 months for arm A versus arm B, respectively [hazard ratio 1.10 (80% confidence interval 0.86-1.39), P = 0.62]. Patients in arm A had numerically fewer treatment-related adverse events (84.9% versus 93.9%) and significantly less peripheral sensory polyneuropathy ≥grade 2 (9.4% versus 36.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

S-1 maintenance following platinum-based induction therapy leads to non-inferior survival outcomes compared with the continuation of platinum-based combination. Toxicity patterns favor a fluoropyrimidine maintenance strategy. These data challenge the continued use of platinum combination chemotherapy after response to 3 months induction therapy in patients with advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative esophagogastric adenocarcinoma.

Clinical Characteristics and Oncological Outcomes of Surgically Treated Early-Onset Gastric Adenocarcinoma - a Retrospective Cohort Study

Introduction: The incidence of early-onset gastric adenocarcinoma (patients <50 years, EOGA) is rising. Tumors in younger patients are associated with prognostically unfavorable features. The impact of EOGA on patient survival, however, remains unclear. The aim of this study is to evaluate early-onset age as a prognostic factor compared to late-onset gastric adenocarcinoma (LOGA, >50years) in a surgical cohort and assess treatment options. Methods: We analyzed 738 patients (129 early-onset/609 late-onset) operated in curative intent from 2002 to 2021. Data was extracted from a prospectively managed database of an academic tertiary referral hospital. Differences in perioperative as well as oncological outcomes were calculated by chi-square test. Cox regression analysis was performed to assess disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: EOGA patients were more often treated with neoadjuvant therapy (62.8% vs. 43.7%, p<0.001) and extended surgical resections e.g. through additional resections (36.4% vs. 26.8%, p=0.027). EOGA was more often metastasized into regional lymph nodes (pN+ 67.4% vs. 55.3%, p=0.012) and to distant sites (pM+: 23.3% vs. 12.0%, p=0.001) and was more often poorly differentiated (G3/G4: 91.1% vs. 67.2%, p<0.001). There were no significant differences in overall complication rates (31.0% vs. 36.6%, p=0.227). Survival analysis showed shorter DFS (median DFS 25.6 months vs. not reached, p=0.006) but similar OS (median OS: 50.5 months vs. not reached, p=0.920) in EOGA compared to LOGA. Conclusions: This analysis confirmed that EOGA is associated with more aggressive tumor characteristics. Early-Onset was not a prognostic factor in the multivariate analysis. EOGA patients may be more capable to undergo intensive multimodal therapy including perioperative chemotherapy and extended surgery.

Combining Poly-(ARD-Ribose) Polymerase and Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 Inhibition in a Patient with Esophagogastric Adenocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (EGA) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Therapeutic options are limited for patients with recurrent or metastatic disease. Targeted therapy may be a suitable treatment for selected patients, but its efficacy remains elusive.

CASE PRESENTATION

Here, a 52-year-old male patient with advanced EGA Siewert Type II shows a significant response to combination therapy with olaparib and pembrolizumab. After progression following first- and second-line therapy, including a programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor, next-generation sequencing of a tumor sample was performed to identify possible molecular targets. A mutation in RAD51C, a member of the homology-directed repair (HDR) system, was identified in addition to high PD-L1 expression. As a result, therapy with the poly-(ARD-Ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor olaparib and the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1)-inhibitor pembrolizumab was initiated. A durable partial response lasting for more than 17 months was observed. A second molecular profiling from a newly occurring subcutaneous metastasis showed a loss of FGF10 but no fluctuations in the gene alteration of RAD51C and SMARCA4. Interestingly, the new lesion showed HER2-positivity (immunohistochemistry 3+ and fluorescence in situ hybridization [FISH]-positivity) in 30% of tumor cells.

CONCLUSION

In this case, a long-lasting response to the combination of olaparib and pembrolizumab was observed despite previous treatment with a PD-L1 inhibitor. This case illustrates the need for further clinical trials to analyze the efficacy of PARP inhibitor combinations in EGA.

Outcome and prognostic factors in patients undergoing salvage therapy for recurrent esophagogastric cancer after multimodal treatment

PURPOSE

Perioperative systemic treatment has significantly improved the outcome in locally advanced esophagogastric cancer. However, still the majority of patients relapse and die. Data on the optimal treatment after relapse are limited, and clinical and biological prognostic factors are lacking.

METHODS

Patients with a relapse after neoadjuvant/perioperative treatment and surgery for esophagogastric cancer were analyzed using a prospective database. Applied treatment regimens, clinical prognostic factors and biomarkers were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 246 patients 119 relapsed. Among patients with a relapse event, those with an early relapse (< 6 months) had an inferior overall survival (OS 6.3 vs. 13.8 months, p < 0.001) after relapse than those with a late relapse (> 6 months). OS after relapse was longer in patients with a microsatellite-unstable (MSI) tumor. Systemic treatment was initiated in 87 patients (73% of relapsed pat.); among those OS from the start of first-line treatment was inferior in patients with an early relapse with 6.9 vs. 10.0 months (p = 0.037). In 27 patients (23% of relapsed pat.), local therapy (irradiation or surgical intervention) was performed due to oligometastatic relapse, resulting in a prolonged OS in comparison to patients without local therapy (median OS 35.2 months vs. 7.8 months, p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis confirmed the prognostic benefit of the MSI status and a local intervention.

CONCLUSION

Patients relapsing after multimodal treatment have a heterogeneous prognosis depending on the relapse-free interval (if systemic treatment applied), extent of metastatic disease as well as MSI status. The benefit of additional local intervention after relapse should be addressed in a randomized trial.

Perioperative chemotherapy with 5-FU, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) for esophagogastric adenocarcinoma: ten years real-life experience from a surgical perspective

PURPOSE

According to the results of FLOT4 trial, perioperative FLOT chemotherapy improved overall survival (OS) in locally advanced, resectable esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (EGA) compared to perioperative ECF/ECX. We report real-life data 10 years after introduction of perioperative FLOT at our institution.

METHODS

Survival of 356 consecutive EGA patients (cT3/4 and/or cN + and/or cM1) who underwent curative surgical resection was retrospectively analysed from a prospective database. A total of 263 patients received preoperative chemotherapy according to FLOT protocol and 93 patients received an epirubicin/platinum/5FU-based regimen (EPF). Propensity score matching (PSM) according to pretretment characteristics was performed to compensate for heterogeneity between groups.

RESULTS

Median OS did not differ between groups (FLOT/EPF 52.1/46.4 months, p = 0.577). After PSM, survival was non-significantly improved after FLOT compared to EPF (median OS not reached/46.4 months, p = 0.156). Perioperative morbidity and mortality did not differ between groups. Histopathologic response rate was 35% after FLOT and 26% after EPF (p = 0.169). R0 resection could be achieved more frequently after FLOT than after EPF (93%/79%, p = 0.023).

CONCLUSION

Overall survival after perioperative FLOT followed by surgery is comparable to clinical trials. However, collective real-life application of FLOT failed to provide a significant survival benefit compared to EPF. In clinical reality, patient selection is triggered by age, comorbidity, tumor localization, and clinical tumor stage. Yet matched analyses support FLOT4 trial findings.

A simple approach for detecting HLA-A*02 alleles in archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples and an application example for studying cancer immunoediting

The HLA system represents a central component of the antigen presentation machinery. As every patient possesses a defined set of HLA molecules, only certain antigens can be presented on the cell surface. Thus, studying HLA type-dependent antigen presentation can improve the understanding of variation in susceptibility to various diseases, including infectious diseases and cancer. In archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue, the HLA type is difficult to analyze because of fragmentation of DNA, hindering the application of commonly used assays that rely on long DNA stretches. Addressing these difficulties, we present a refined approach for characterizing presence or absence of HLA-A*02, the most common HLA-A allele in the Caucasian population, in archival samples. We validated our genotyping strategy in a cohort of 90 samples with HLA status obtained by an NGS-based method. 90% (n = 81) of the samples could be analyzed with the approach. For all of them, the presence or absence of HLA-A*02 alleles was correctly determined with the method, demonstrating 100% sensitivity and specificity (95% CI: 91.40%-100% and 91.19%-100%). Furthermore, we provide an example of application in an independent cohort of 73 FFPE microsatellite-unstable (MSI) colorectal cancer samples. As MSI cancer cells encompass a high number of mutations in coding microsatellites, leading to the generation of highly immunogenic frameshift peptide antigens, they are ideally suited for studying relations between the mutational landscape of tumor cells and interindividual differences in the immune system, including the HLA genotype. Overall, our method can help to promote studying HLA type-dependency during the pathogenesis of a wide range of diseases, making archival and historic tissue samples accessible for identifying HLA-A*02 alleles.

Burnout among German oncologists: a cross-sectional study in cooperation with the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie Quality of Life Working Group

PURPOSE

Oncologists are at an increased risk of developing burnout, leading to negative consequences in patient care and in professional satisfaction and quality of life. This study was designed to investigate exhaustion and disengagement among German oncologists and assess the prevalence of burnout among oncologists within different professional settings. Furthermore, we wanted to examine possible relations between sociodemographic factors, the oncological setting, professional experience and different aspects of burnout.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional study design, an Internet-based survey was conducted with 121 oncologists between April and July 2020 using the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory, which contains items on exhaustion, disengagement, and burnout. Furthermore, sociodemographic data of the participants were assessed. The participants were members of the Working Group Medical Oncology (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie) within the German Cancer Society.

RESULTS

The survey showed a burnout prevalence of 43.8%, which correlated with age and professional experience; that is, the prevalence is particularly high among younger oncologists. Exhaustion is closely related to employment status; that is, it was significantly higher among employed oncologists. There were remarkably low levels of disengagement among oncologists, highlighting the own demand to fulfil job requirements despite imminent or actual overburdening in daily work.

CONCLUSION

More support is necessary to mitigate the professional stressors in the healthcare system. To ensure quality medical care, employees should be offered preventive mental health services early in their careers.

Surgical and pathological outcome, and pathological regression, in patients receiving perioperative atezolizumab in combination with FLOT chemotherapy versus FLOT alone for resectable esophagogastric adenocarcinoma: Interim results from DANTE, a randomized, multicenter, phase IIb trial of the FLOT-AIO German Gastric Cancer Group and Swiss SAKK

4003

Background: DANTE evaluates atezolizumab in the perioperative treatment of resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma in combination with FLOT. Here, we report interim results. Methods: DANTE is a multicenter, investigator-initiated, phase IIb trial. Patients (pts) with resectable adenocarcinoma of the stomach and GEJ (≥cT2 and/or N+) were randomized to receive 4+4 cycles of periop. FLOT chemotherapy (arm B) or the same regime with additional atezolizumab at 840 mg, q2w, followed by atezolizumab monotherapy for 8 cycles at 1200 mg, q3w (arm A). The primary endpoint is progression-free survival. The secondary endpoints surgical outcome (pTNM, R0 resection rate and periop. morbidity/mortality), path. regression and safety are reported here. TNM stage was evaluated by local pathologists and path. regression (Becker-Classification) by local and central pathologists. PD-L1 and MSI status were centrally evaluated. Results: In total, 295 pts were randomized (A, 146; B, 149) with baseline characteristics as follows: median age 61y, male 74%, intestinal type 42%, GEJ 61%, cT3/4 77%, N+ 78%. Twenty-five pts (8.5%) were MSI; 50% had PD-L1 CPS ≥1, 23% PD-L1 CPS ≥5 and 15% PD-L1 CPS ≥10. Pre-op FLOT cycles were completed in 93% of pts and post-op cycles in 43% of pts, with no difference between arms. Surgical morbidity (A, 45%; B, 43%) and mortality (overall 2.5%) were comparable between arms, as were R0-resection rates (arm A, 92% vs. arm B, 91%). Downsizing favored arm A vs B (pT0, 23% vs 15%; pN0, 68% vs 54%). Increases in path. regression rates were seen, particularly with higher PD-L1 expression (Table). Conclusions: The analysis shows beneficial effects of atezolizumab combined with FLOT vs FLOT alone on path. stage and path. regression that seem to be more pronounced with higher PD-L1 expression. Sponsor: Institut für Klinische Krebsforschung IKF am Krankenhaus Nordwest. EudraCT: 2017-001979-23. Clinical trial information: NCT03421288. [Table: see text]

The Different Immune Profiles of Normal Colonic Mucosa in Cancer-Free Lynch Syndrome Carriers and Lynch Syndrome Colorectal Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Owing to the high load of immunogenic frameshift neoantigens, tumors arising in individuals with Lynch syndrome (LS), the most common inherited colorectal cancer (CRC) syndrome, are characterized by a pronounced immune infiltration. However, the immune status of normal colorectal mucosa in LS is not well characterized. We assessed the immune infiltrate in tumor-distant normal colorectal mucosa from LS CRC patients, sporadic microsatellite-unstable (MSI) and microsatellite-stable (MSS) CRC patients, and cancer-free LS carriers.

METHODS

CD3-positive, FOXP3-positive, and CD8-positive T cells were quantified in, respectively, 219, 233, and 201 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) normal colonic mucosa tissue sections from CRC patients and cancer-free LS carriers and 26, 22, and 19 LS CRCs. CD3-positive T cells were also quantified in an independent cohort of 97 FFPE normal rectal mucosa tissue sections from LS carriers enrolled in the CAPP2 clinical trial. The expression of 770 immune-relevant genes was analyzed in a subset of samples with the use of the NanoString nCounter platform.

RESULTS

LS normal mucosa specimens showed significantly elevated CD3-, FOXP3-, and CD8-positive T-cell densities compared with non-LS control specimens. Gene expression profiling and cluster analysis revealed distinct immune profiles in LS carrier mucosa with and without cancer manifestation. Long-term follow-up of LS carriers within the CAPP2 trial found a correlation between mucosal T-cell infiltrate and time to subsequent tumor occurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

LS carriers show elevated mucosal T-cell infiltration even in the absence of cancer. The normal mucosa immune profile may be a temporary or permanent tumor risk modifier in LS carriers.

Preventive effect of sensorimotor exercise and resistance training on chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a randomised-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common, unpleasant and usually long-lasting side effect of neurotoxic chemotherapeutic agents. This study aimed to investigate the preventive potential of sensorimotor- (SMT) and resistance training (RT) on CIPN.

METHODS

Patients (N = 170) were randomised to SMT, RT or usual care (UC). Both exercise groups trained 3×/week for a total of 105 min/week during neurotoxic chemotherapy (mean length: 20 weeks). Before and 3 weeks after neurotoxic chemotherapy, CIPN signs/symptoms were assessed via Total Neuropathy Score (TNSr; primary endpoint) and EORTC QLQ-CIPN15 questionnaire. In addition, balance (centre of pressure), muscle strength (isokinetic), quality of life (QoL, EORTC QLQ-C30) and relative chemotherapy dose intensity (RDI) were investigated. The follow-up period covered 6 months after the end of chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Intention-to-treat analyses (N = 159) revealed no differences regarding CIPN signs/symptoms. Exploratory per-protocol analyses (minimum training attendance rate 67%; N = 89) indicated that subjectively perceived sensory symptoms in the feet increased less during chemotherapy in the adherent exercisers (pooled group: SMT+RT) than in the UC group (-8.3 points (-16.1 to -0.4); P = 0.039, ES = 1.27). Furthermore, adherent exercisers received a higher RDI (96.6 ± 4.8 vs. 92.2 ± 9.4; P = 0.045), showed a better course of muscular strength (+20.8 Nm (11.2-30.4); P < 0.001, ES = 0.57) and QoL (+12.9 points (3.9-21.8); P = 0.005, ES = 0.64). During follow-up, CIPN signs/symptoms persisted in all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that SMT and/or RT alleviate subjectively perceived sensory CIPN symptoms in the feet and other clinically relevant cancer therapy-related outcomes, if an appropriate training stimulus is achieved.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02871284.

eHealth intervention to manage symptoms for patients with cancer on immunotherapy (SOFIA): a study protocol for a randomised controlled external pilot trial

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint therapy (ICT) is associated with a distinct pattern of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) caused by inadvertently redirecting immune responses to healthy tissues. IrAEs can occur at any time; however, in most cases, they arise during the first 14 weeks of the beginning of immune checkpoint blockade. In many cases, immunotherapy must be discontinued due to irAEs. Early detection of irAEs triggers the temporary withholding of ICT or initiation of short-term immunosuppressive treatment, is crucial in preventing further aggravation of irAEs and enables safe re-exposure to ICT. This prospective study aims to evaluate the feasibility of an eHealth intervention for patients under immunotherapy (managing symptoms of immunotherapy, SOFIA). The SOFIA-App consists of two components: SOFIA-Monitoring, a tool to rate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) including irAEs, and SOFIA-Coaching, which provides important information about cancer-specific and immunotherapy-specific topics and the counselling services of the National Centre for Tumour Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We outlined a patient-level two-arm randomised controlled pilot trial of the intervention (SOFIA) versus no-SOFIA for patients with cancer beginning an immunotherapy, aged ≥18 years, recruited from the NCT, Heidelberg. Feasibility outcomes include: recruitment rate; drop-out rate; reasons for refusal and drop-out; willingness to be randomised, utilisation rate of SOFIA-Monitoring and utilisation time of SOFIA-Coaching, physicians utilisation rate of the PROs; feasibility of the proposed outcome measures and optimal sample size estimation. The clinical outcomes are measures of quality of life, psychosocial symptoms, self-efficacy, physician-patient communication and medical process data, which are assessed at the beginning of the intervention, postintervention and at 6-month follow-up.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This trial protocol was approved by the Ethical Committee of Heidelberg University, Germany (Reference, S-581/2018).

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

We registered the study in the German Clinical Trial Register (Reference: DRKS00021064). Findings will be disseminated broadly via peer-reviewed empirical journals, articles and conference presentations.

Beta-2-microglobulin Mutations Are Linked to a Distinct Metastatic Pattern and a Favorable Outcome in Microsatellite-Unstable Stage IV Gastrointestinal Cancers

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) shows remarkable clinical effects in patients with metastatic microsatellite-unstable (MSI) cancer. However, markers identifying potential non-responders are missing. We examined the prevalence of Beta-2-microglobulin (B2M) mutations, a common immune evasion mechanism, in stage IV MSI gastrointestinal cancer and its influence on metastatic pattern and patients’ survival under ICB. Twenty-five patients with metastatic, MSI gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma were included. Eighteen patients received ICB with pembrolizumab and one patient with nivolumab/ipilimumab. Sequencing was performed to determine B2M mutation status. B2M mutations and loss of B2M expression were detected in 6 out of 25 stage IV MSI cancers. B2M mutations were strongly associated with exclusively peritoneal/peritoneal and lymph node metastases (p=0.0055). However, no significant differences in therapy response (25% vs. 46.6%, p>0.99) and survival (median PFS: 19.5 vs 33.0 months, p=0.74; median OS 39 months vs. not reached, p>0.99) were observed between B2M-mutant and B2M-wild type tumor patients. Among metastatic MSI GI cancers, B2M-mutant tumors represent a biologically distinct disease with distinct metastatic patterns. To assess ICB response in B2M-mutant MSI cancer patients, future studies need to account for the fact that baseline survival of patients with B2M-mutant MSI cancer may be longer than of patients with B2M-wild type MSI cancer.

Efficacy and Safety of Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment in Patients with Advanced Renal or Urothelial Cell Carcinoma and Concomitant Chronic Kidney Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Simple Summary

Immune checkpoint inhibition plays a pivotal role in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma and metastatic urothelial carcinoma. The association of chronic kidney disease with these tumors is well established. However, to what extent kidney failure modifies the efficacy or the toxicity profiles of checkpoint inhibitors has been poorly investigated. In this paper, we reviewed the files of 85 patients with renal cell carcinoma and 41 with urothelial cancer who had received checkpoint inhibitor treatment, and found that 37.6% and 41.5% had evidence of chronic kidney disease, respectively. We found that neither general treatment-related nor immune-related adverse events differed between patients with normal or impaired renal function. Using a multivariate analysis, we found that chronic kidney disease had no effect on progression-free survival. However, irrespective of the tumor entity, chronic kidney disease was found to positively influence overall survival. We conclude that treatment with checkpoint inhibitors in patients with chronic kidney disease is safe and efficient.

Abstract

Background: Checkpoint inhibitors are a standard of care in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and urothelial carcinoma (UC). Patients with these tumors often suffer from concomitant chronic kidney disease (CKD). Limited data are available on the efficacy and toxicity of checkpoint inhibitors in patients with CKD. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 126 patients who received checkpoint inhibitors for RCC (n = 85) or UC (n = 41) and analyzed the frequency of treatment- and immune-related adverse events (AEs). We performed a multivariate analysis to determine progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 38.9% of patients had CKD. Frequencies of general AEs (49.0% in CKD vs. 48.1%, p > 0.99999) and immune-related AEs (28.6 vs. 24.7%, p ≥ 0.9999) did not significantly differ between the groups. There was no difference in PFS for patients with RCC or UC and CKD or without CKD (RCC: 6.81 vs. 7.54 months, HR 1.000 (95%CI 0.548–01.822), p = 0.999; UC:2.33 vs. 3.67 months, HR 01.492 (95%CI 0.686–3.247), p = 0.431). CKD appeared to be a potential effect modifier for OS in both RCC and UC (RCC: NR vs. 23.9 months, HR 0.502 (95%CI 0.219–1.152), p = 0.104; UC:18.84 vs. 15.42 months, HR 0.656 (95%CI 0.296–1.454), p = 0.299). Conclusions: Checkpoint inhibitor treatment in our cohort of patients with CKD was as safe and efficient as in the cohort of patients without CKD.

Cancer-related microangiopathic hemolytic anemia in patients with advanced gastric cancer: A retrospective single-center analysis

BACKGROUND

Microangiopathic hemolytic anemia (MAHA) with thrombocytopenia and organ failure caused by tumor-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is a life-threatening oncological emergency. Rapid diagnosis and precise distinction from other forms of TMA is crucial for appropriate therapy, which aims at treating the underlying malignancy. However, the prognosis of patients with cancer-related (CR)-MAHA is limited. To date, less than 50 patients with gastric cancer and CR-MAHA have been reported, mainly as single case reports, and detailed information on treatment strategies and outcome are scarce. We analyzed the characteristics and outcomes data of CR-MAHA patients with gastric cancer treated at our center between 2012 and 2019.

AIM

To gain knowledge about CR-MAHA and the course of disease.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients using an institutional prospectively maintained database. Patients who had CR-MAHA but other cancer types or cancer of unknown primary were excluded. The basic requirements for inclusion were: Histologically proven gastric adenocarcinoma; and clinical diagnosis of hemolytic anemia with schistocytes with or without thrombocytopenia. The observation period for each patient started with the first day of documented symptoms. The follow-up period for this analysis ended on February 1, 2020.

RESULTS

We identified eight patients with a median age of 54 years. Histologically, all patients had (partial) diffuse subtypes of gastric adenocarcinoma with partial or complete signet cell morphology. All patients had metastatic disease and one patient had a microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumor. In three patients, clinical signs of MAHA preceded the diagnosis of cancer, and in two patients, CR-MAHA indicated recurrent disease. All patients had severe hemolytic anemia and thrombocytopenia. Six patients experienced severe bone pain, and five patients had dyspnea. Systemic, 5-fluorouracil-based combination chemotherapy was initiated in six patients, which resulted in rapid initial response with significant improvement of clinical symptoms and blood values. Progression-free survival (PFS) of the whole cohort was 1.9 wk and median overall survival (OS) was 1.9 wk. For patients with chemotherapy, PFS was 9.0 wk and OS was 10.3 wk. The patient with the MSI-H tumor has been undergoing immunotherapy for more than 3 years.

CONCLUSION

The benefit of chemotherapy in CR-MAHA patients is limited. Immunotherapy for patients with MSI-H tumors may lead to long-term tumor control even in CR-MAHA patients.

Open-label, randomized, multicenter, phase IV trial comparing parenteral nutrition using multi-chamber bags (Eurotubes) versus traditional 2/3-chamber bags in subjects with metastatic or locally advanced inoperable cancer requiring parenteral nutrition: The PEKANNUSS trial of the AIO

TPS7086

Background: Approximately 50% of all cancer subjects suffer from cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome accompanied by an inadequate food intake and predicting mortality, poor therapeutic response, diminished functional capacity, and reduced QoL. Especially in the advanced stages, parenteral nutrition (PN) is often required and accompanied by an increased risk of blood stream infections associated with increased mortality and other serious medical conditions such as sepsis. Furthermore, the switch from oral food intake to PN changes the patient’s everyday life leading to reduced autonomy and flexibility (e.g. due to dependency on home nursing services). This study aims at evaluating the incidence of catheter-related infections (CRI) and the frequency of self-administered parenteral nutrition at home (HPN) in patients receiving standard PN via A) traditional two- or three-chamber bags (often requiring addition of vitamins and/or medications by home care service) or B). the multi-chamber bags Eurotubes (minimizing additional supplements and enabling self-administration by patients at home). In addition, one group of patients will receive low glucose HPN via Eurotubes to investigate a possible benefit on clinical outcome. Methods: This is an open-label, randomized, multicenter, investigator-initiated, phase IV trial. Overall, 350 patients with inoperable metastatic or locally advanced solid tumors who have an indication for parenteral nutrition will be enrolled. Patients will be randomized 1:1:1 ratio to Arm A (Standard PN using Eurotubes) or Arm B (Standard PN using 2/3-chamber bags), or to Arm A-1 (low glucose using Eurotubes). Patients will be assessed (physical exam, ECOG, weight, QoL, lab tests, AEs, HPN documentation) every 4 weeks during the 12 months HPN treatment period. Co-primary endpoints are incidence of CRI and patient autonomy (rate of self-administered PN at home). Secondary endpoints comprise weight change, change in albumin and CRP levels, overall survival, QoL, and safety. Recruitment has just started; first patient in was on February 5th, 2020. Clinical trial information: NCT04105777 .

Perioperative trastuzumab and pertuzumab in combination with FLOT versus FLOT alone for HER2-positive resectable esophagogastric adenocarcinoma: Final results of the PETRARCA multicenter randomized phase II trial of the AIO

4502

Background: Perioperative FLOT is a standard of care for resectable, esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (EGA). This trial evaluates the addition of trastuzumab (tras) and pertuzumab (per) to FLOT for HER2-positive resectable patients (pts). Methods: PETRARCA is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, investigator initiated trial planned as a phase II/III investigation. We report the phase II part of this trial. Pts with HER2+ resectable EGA (≥ cT2 or cN+) were enrolled. Pts were randomized 1:1 to 4 pre- and post-operative cycles of FLOT (Docetaxel 50 mg/m²; Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m²; Leucovorin 200 mg/m²; 5-FU 2600 mg/m², q2w) (Arm A) or the same regimen with tras 8/6 mg/kg and per 840 mg q3w, followed by 9 cycles tras/per (arm B). Primary endpoint for the phase II part was the rate of pathological complete remission (pCR). Main secondary endpoints were DFS, OS and safety. Results: The trial closed prematurely and did not proceed to phase III. In total, 81 pts were randomized (A, 41; B, 40). Baseline characteristics were balanced (overall, male 79%; median age 60; cT3/T4 86%; cN+ 85%; GEJ 75%). 93% in arm A and 90% in arm B completed pre-OP treatment as planned. More pts had at least one dose modification in arm B (A, 44%; B, 70%). The pCR rate was significantly improved with tras/per (A, 12%; B, 35%; p = 0.02). Likewise, the rate of pathological lymph node negativity was higher with tras/per (A, 39%; B, 68%). R0-resection rate (A, 90%; B, 93%) and surgical morbidity (A: 43%; B, 44%) were comparable. Moreover, in-house mortality was equal in both arms (overall 2.5%). Median DFS was 26 months in arm A and not yet reached in arm B (HR 0.58, p = 0.14). After a median follow-up of 22 months median OS was not yet reached. DFS and OS rates [with 95% CI] at 24 months were 54% [38-71%] and 77% [63-90%] in arm A and 70% [55-85%] and 84% [72-96%] in arm B, respectively. In terms of toxicity more ≥ grade 3 adverse events were reported with tras/per (75% vs. 85%), especially diarrhea (5% vs. 41%) and leukopenia (13% vs 23%). Conclusions: The addition of tras/per to perioperative FLOT significantly improved pCR and nodal negativity rates in pts with Her2+ resectable esophagogastric adenocarcinoma at the price of higher rates of diarrhea and leukopenia. Clinical trial information: NCT02581462 .

Combined PD-1 inhibition (Pembrolizumab) and CCR5 inhibition (Maraviroc) for the treatment of refractory microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): First results of the PICCASSO phase I trial

3010

Background: Checkpoint inhibition using PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors does not show clinically relevant activity in MSS/pMMR (Mismatch Repair Proficient) colorectal cancer. Previous work showed that inhibition of CCR5 (C-C chemokine receptor type 5) leads to a macrophage re-polarization towards M1 macrophages within the tumor microenvironment which directly affects immune cell infiltrates. The current phase I trial explores a combined modification of the innate immune system (by CCR 5 blockade) and the adaptive immune system (by PD-1 inhibition) in the treatment of MSS CRC. Methods: 20 patients with metastatic MSS/pMMR colorectal cancer with failure of fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, VEGF antibodies and EGFR antibodies (in ras WT patients) received pembrolizumab 200 mg q21d and maraviroc 300 mg bid cont. for 8 cycles, followed by pembrolizumab monotherapy for a maximum of 24 additional cycles. Imaging was performed every nine weeks (RECIST and irRECIST criteria). Primary endpoint was the feasibility rate (rate of patients receiving the protocol treatment during the core treatment without special event: treatment-related Grade ≥ 3 immune-related abnormalities, treatment-related Grade ≥ 4 AEs or any toxicity-related premature withdrawal of treatment). Secondary endpoints included safety/toxicity, ORR, PFS and OS. Results: 20 patients were enrolled. The median number of applied cycles was 3.5 for pembrolizumab and 3.5 for maraviroc. Two patients completed the core treatment period with pembrolizumab and started maintenance treatment. The feasibility rate was 94.7% (90% CI 77.4 to 99.7%), with one patient experiencing a special event. Except this grade 4 event (hyperglycemia) no ≥ 3 treatment-related toxicities were observed. According to irRECIST criteria one patient showed a partial response and one a stable disease as best response, resulting in an irDCR of 10.5%. Median PFS according to irRECIST was 2 months (CI 95%, 2 to 3), median OS 9 months (CI 95%, 6 to 20). Conclusions: Therapy with pembrolizumab and maraviroc was feasible and showed a beneficial toxicity pattern. Clinical activity in MSS CRC patients was limited, however prolonged disease stabilizations were observed in single patients and overall survival was higher than expected in this heavily pretreated population. Clinical trial information: NCT03274804 .

Metastatic adult pancreatoblastoma: Multimodal treatment and molecular characterization of a very rare disease

BACKGROUND

Pancreatoblastoma is a rare malignancy that occurs predominantly in children. Less than 50 adult cases, including 17 patients with metastatic disease, have been published to date. Recent outcome data from children with advanced-stage disease suggest an intensive multimodal treatment approach; however, little is known about the most beneficial therapy in adults. Molecular characterization of pancreatoblastoma is limited to a small number of pediatric cases and revealed few recurrent genetic events without immediate clinical relevance.

METHODS

Patients were treated between 2013 and 2018 at a high-volume German university cancer center. Molecular analyses included whole genome, exome, transcriptome, and fusion gene panel sequencing. Molecularly guided treatment recommendations were discussed within a dedicated molecular tumor board (MTB) embedded in a precision oncology program (NCT MASTER).

RESULTS

We identified four adult patients with metastatic pancreatoblastoma. In three patients, local approaches were combined with systemic treatment. Oxaliplatin-containing protocols showed an acceptable tumor control as well as an adequate toxicity profile. Overall survival was 15, 17, 18 and 24 months, respectively. Three tumors harbored genetic alterations involving the FGFR pathway that included an oncogenic FGFR2 fusion.

CONCLUSION

Oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy seems to be a reasonable approach in adult patients with advanced pancreatoblastoma, whereas the benefit of intensified treatment including local ablative techniques or surgical resection remains unclear. Our finding of FGFR alterations in three of four cases indicates a potential role of FGFR signaling in adult pancreatoblastoma whose clinical significance warrants further study.

Perioperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel versus fluorouracil or capecitabine plus cisplatin and epirubicin for locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4): a randomised, phase 2/3 trial

BACKGROUND

Docetaxel-based chemotherapy is effective in metastatic gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. This study reports on the safety and efficacy of the docetaxel-based triplet FLOT (fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel) as a perioperative therapy for patients with locally advanced, resectable tumours.

METHODS

In this controlled, open-label, phase 2/3 trial, we randomly assigned 716 patients with histologically-confirmed advanced clinical stage cT2 or higher or nodal positive stage (cN+), or both, resectable tumours, with no evidence of distant metastases, via central interactive web-based-response system, to receive either three pre-operative and three postoperative 3-week cycles of 50 mg/m² epirubicin and 60 mg/m² cisplatin on day 1 plus either 200 mg/m² fluorouracil as continuous intravenous infusion or 1250 mg/m² capecitabine orally on days 1 to 21 (ECF/ECX; control group) or four preoperative and four postoperative 2-week cycles of 50 mg/m² docetaxel, 85 mg/m² oxaliplatin, 200 mg/m² leucovorin and 2600 mg/m² fluorouracil as 24-h infusion on day 1 (FLOT; experimental group). The primary outcome of the trial was overall survival (superiority) analysed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01216644.

FINDINGS

Between Aug 8, 2010, and Feb 10, 2015, 716 patients were randomly assigned to treatment in 38 German hospitals or with practice-based oncologists. 360 patients were assigned to ECF/ECX and 356 patients to FLOT. Overall survival was increased in the FLOT group compared with the ECF/ECX group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·77; 95% confidence interval [CI; 0.63 to 0·94]; median overall survival, 50 months [38·33 to not reached] vs 35 months [27·35 to 46·26]). The number of patients with related serious adverse events (including those occurring during hospital stay for surgery) was similar in the two groups (96 [27%] in the ECF/ECX group vs 97 [27%] in the FLOT group), as was the number of toxic deaths (two [<1%] in both groups). Hospitalisation for toxicity occurred in 94 patients (26%) in the ECF/ECX group and 89 patients (25%) in the FLOT group.

INTERPRETATION

In locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, perioperative FLOT improved overall survival compared with perioperative ECF/ECX.

FUNDING

The German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe), Sanofi-Aventis, Chugai, and Stiftung Leben mit Krebs Foundation.

Neoadjuvant Therapy Improves Outcomes in Locally Advanced Signet-Ring-Cell Containing Esophagogastric Adenocarcinomas

BACKGROUND

Only a few studies have analyzed multimodal treatment concepts in the subgroup of signet-ring-cell containing upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. Recent retrospective, multicentric data favor primary resection without neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric signet-ring-cell containing carcinomas (SRCs). We compared the outcomes of primarily resected carcinomas with neoadjuvantly treated, locally advanced esophagogastric SRCs.

METHODS

A total of 310 patients with esophagogastric SRC-staged cT3/4/Nany/Many from a prospective unicentric database were included in this study; 192 (61.9%) received neoadjuvant therapy (NEO group) and 118 (38.1%) were primarily resected (RES group).

RESULTS

Overall, 128 (41.3%) patients presented with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) and 182 (58.7%) presented with gastric cancer. Neoadjuvant therapy was significantly associated with resection in curative intent (NEO: 91.1%; RES: 75.4%; P = 0.001), improved (y)pT category (P = 0.035), improved (y)pN category (P < 0.001), and R0 resections (curative intent cohort: 76.0% in NEO vs. 60.7% in RES; P = 0.010), among others, but not with postoperative complications. Overall survival was significantly improved by neoadjuvant treatment {median survival 28.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 14.4-39.6) vs. RES: 14.9 months (10.6-17.5); P < 0.001}, as well as in subgroups (AEG and gastric tumors, R0-resected patients, and patients with and without relevant comorbidities). Independent prognostic factors were neoadjuvant therapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.66; P = 0.023), pT4 category (HR 1.71; P = 0.041), pN2 category (HR 1.86; P = 0.013), pN3 category (HR 2.40; P < 0.001), pM1 category (HR 1.95; P = 0.003), age > 70 years (HR 1.79; P = 0.006), gastric localization (HR 0.69; P = 0.032), American Society of Anesthesiologists classification 3/4 (HR 1.71; P = 0.004), and incomplete resection R1/2 (HR 1.6; P = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate a survival advantage for advanced-stage esophagogastric SRC patients by neoadjuvant treatment.

Postoperative follow-up programs improve survival in curatively resected gastric and junctional cancer patients: a propensity score matched analysis

BACKGROUND

To date there is no evidence that more intensive follow-up after surgery for esophagogastric adenocarcinoma translates into improved survival. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of standardized surveillance by a specialized center after resection on survival.

METHODS

Data of 587 patients were analyzed who underwent curative surgery for esophagogastric adenocarcinoma in our institution. Based on their postoperative surveillance, patients were assigned to either standardized follow-up (SFU) by the National Center for Tumor Diseases (SFU group) or individual follow-up by other physicians (non-SFU group). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to compensate for heterogeneity between groups. Groups were compared regarding clinicopathological findings, recurrence, and impact on survival before and after PSM.

RESULTS

Of 587 patients, 32.7% were in the SFU and 67.3% in the non-SFU group. Recurrence occurred in 39.4% of patients and 92.6% within the first 3 years; 73.6% were treated, and of those 17.1% underwent resection. In recurrent patients overall and post-recurrence survival (OS/PRS) was influenced by diagnostic tools (p < 0.05), treatment (p ≤ 0.001), and resection of recurrence (p ≤ 0.001). Standardized follow-up significantly improved OS (84.9 vs. 38.4 months, p = 0.040) in matched analysis and was an independent positive predictor of OS before and after PSM (p = 0.034/0.013, respectively).

CONCLUSION

After PSM, standardized follow-up by a specialized center significantly improved OS. Cross-sectional imaging and treatment of recurrence were associated with better outcome. Regular follow-up by cross-sectional imaging especially during the first 3 years should be recommended by national guidelines, since early detection might help select patients for treatment of recurrence and even resection in few designated cases.

Survival outcomes of patients with germ cell tumors treated with high-dose chemotherapy for refractory or relapsing disease

Introduction

Male patients with metastatic germ cell tumors can be cured in up to 96% of cases depending on stage and IGCCCG prognosis group. Treatment in relapse consists of conventional or high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) combined with local treatment modalities.

Results

Most patients were classified as poor risk according to IGCCCG (n = 24; 52%) and as intermediate (n = 12), high (n = 16), or very high risk (n = 9) at time of first relapse according to IPFSG criteria. In 67% of patients (n = 31) HDCT/ASCT was performed as first salvage treatment in relapse or for primary refractory disease following first line chemotherapy. In 46% of patients (n = 21) progressive disease was documented after mobilization and prior to HDCT/ASCT. Median progression free survival (mPFS) was 7.4 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.3-13.6) while median overall survival (mOS) was 22.2 months (95% CI: 8.9-35.5). When stratified for IPFSG risk group, mPFS (p < 0.001) and mOS (p = 0.009) differed significantly between risk groups (very low vs. low vs. intermediate vs. high vs. very high). Metastases to liver/bone/brain and platinum refractory disease were independent risk factors for inferior PFS (p = 0.024; p = 0.008) but not OS.

Materials and Methods

Forty-six patients treated with HDCT/ASCT at the university clinics in Heidelberg and Nuremberg between 2000-2016 were identified and analyzed. Data was collected retrospectively.

Conclusions

HDCT/ASCT offers a potential curative strategy for patients with relapsed GCT. Improvement is still needed in patients with intermediate, high, and very high IPFSG risk group.

Surgical strategies in true adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG II): thoracoabdominal or abdominal approach?

BACKGROUND

The optimal surgical approach for adenocarcinoma directly at the esophagogastric junction (AEG II) is still under debate. This study aims to evaluate the differences between right thoracoabdominal esophagectomy (TAE) (Ivor-Lewis operation) and transhiatal extended gastrectomy (THG) for AEG II.

METHODS

From a prospective database, 242 patients with AEG II (TAE, n = 56; THG, n = 186) were included and analyzed according to characteristics and perioperative morbidity and mortality and overall survival (chi-square, Mann-Whitney U, log-rank, Cox regression).

RESULTS

Groups were comparable at baseline with exception of age. Patients older than 70 years were more frequently resected by THG (p = 0.003). No differences in perioperative morbidity (p = 0.197) and mortality (p = 0.711) were observed, including anastomotic leakages (p = 0.625) and pulmonary complications (p = 0.494). There was no significant difference in R0 resection (p = 0.719) and number of resected lymph nodes (p = 0.202). Overall median survival was 38.4 months. Survival after TAE was significantly longer than after THG (median OS not reached versus 33.6 months, p = 0.02). Multivariate analysis revealed pN-category (p < 0.001) and type of surgery (p = 0.017) as independent prognostic factors. The type of surgery was confirmed as prognostic factor in locally advanced AEG II (cT 3/4 or cN1), but not in cT1/2 and cN0 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our single-center experience suggests that patients with (locally advanced) AEG II tumors may benefit from TAE compared to THG. For further evaluation, a randomized trial would be necessary.

Phase II trial of ipilimumab in melanoma patients with preexisting humoural immune response to NY-ESO-1

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint therapy has dramatically changed treatment options in patients with metastatic melanoma. However, a relevant part of patients still does not respond to treatment. Data regarding the prognostic or predictive significance of preexisting immune responses against tumour antigens are conflicting. Retrospective data suggested a higher clinical benefit of ipilimumab in melanoma patients with preexisting NY-ESO-1-specific immunity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-five patients with previously untreated or treated metastatic melanoma and preexisting humoural immune response against NY-ESO-1 received ipilimumab at a dose of 10 mg/kg in week 1, 4, 7, 10 followed by 3-month maintenance treatment for a maximum of 48 weeks. Primary endpoint was the disease control rate (irCR, irPR or irSD) according to immune-related response criteria (irRC). Secondary endpoints included the disease control rate according to RECIST criteria, progression-free survival and overall survival (OS). Humoural and cellular immune responses against NY-ESO-1 were analysed from blood samples.

RESULTS

Disease control rate according to irRC was 52%, irPR was observed in 36% of patients. Progression-free survival according to irRC was 7.8 months, according to RECIST criteria it was 2.9 months. Median OS was 22.7 months; the corresponding 1-year survival rate was 66.8%. Treatment-related grade 3 AEs occurred in 36% with no grade 4-5 AEs. No clear association was found between the presence of NY-ESO-1-specific cellular or humoural immune responses and clinical activity.

CONCLUSION

Ipilimumab demonstrated clinically relevant activity within this biomarker-defined population. NY-ESO-1 positivity, as a surrogate for a preexisting immune response against tumour antigens, might help identifying patients with a superior outcome from immune checkpoint blockade.

CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION

NCT01216696.

Palliative chemotherapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort analysis of efficacy and toxicity of the FOLFIRINOX regimen focusing on the older patient

Background

Pancreatic cancer occurs more frequently in older patients, but these are underrepresented in the phase III clinical studies that established the current treatment standards. This leads to uncertainty regarding the treatment of older patients with potentially toxic but active regimens like FOLFIRINOX.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients treated according to the FOLFIRINOX protocol at our institution between 2010 and 2014 with a focus on older patients.

Results

Overall survival in our cohort was 10.2 months. Only 43% of patients did not need dose adaptations, but dose reductions did not lead to an inferior survival. We did not find evidence that patients aged 65 years and older deemed fit enough for palliative treatment had more toxicities or a worse outcome than younger patients.

Conclusion

We conclude that treatment with the FOLFIRINOX protocol in patients with pancreatic cancer should not be withhold from patients solely based on their chronological age but rather be based on the patient’s performance status and comorbidities.

Perioperative chemotherapy with docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and fluorouracil/leucovorin (FLOT) versus epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil or capecitabine (ECF/ECX) for resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma (FLOT4-AIO): A multicenter, randomized phase 3 trial

4004

Background: The MAGIC trial established perioperative (periop) epirubicin, cisplatin, and 5-FU (ECF) as a standard treatment for patients (pts) with operable esophagogastric cancer, but survival continues to remain poor. FLOT4 (NCT01216644) is a multicenter, randomized, investigator-initiated, phase 3 trial. It compares the docetaxel-based triplet FLOT with the anthracycline-based triplet ECF/ECX as a periop treatment for pts with resectable gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma. Methods: Eligible pts of stage ≥cT2 and/or cN+ were randomized to either 3 preoperative and 3 post-operative 3-week cycles of ECF/ECX (epirubicin 50 mg/m2, cisplatin 60 mg/m², both d1, and 5-FU 200 mg/m² as continuous infusion or capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 orally d1-21) or 4 pre-operative and 4 post-operative 2-week cycles of FLOT (docetaxel 50 mg/m2, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m², leucovorin 200 mg/m², and 5-FU 2600 mg/m² as 24-hour infusion, all d1). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS; 80% power; HR of 0.76; 2-sided log-rank test at 5% type I error). Results: Between Aug 2010 and Feb 2015, 716 pts (360 ECF/ECX; 356 FLOT) were randomly allocated. Baseline characteristics were similar between arms (overall, male 74%; median age 62; cT3/T4 81%; cN+ 80%; GEJ 56%). 91% and 37% of pts with ECF/ECX and 90% and 50% with FLOT completed planned pre-operative and post-operative cycles, respectively. Median follow-up was 43 mon. 369 pts died (203 ECF/ECX; 166 FLOT). FLOT improved OS (mOS, 35 mon with ECX/ECF vs. 50 mon with FLOT; HR 0.77 [0.63 - 0.94]; p = 0.012). 3y OS rate was 48% with ECF/ECX and 57% with FLOT. FLOT also improved PFS (mPFS, 18 mon with ECX/ECF vs. 30 mon with FLOT; HR 0.75 [0.62 - 0.91]; p = 0.004). Periop complications were 50% with ECF/ECX and 51% with FLOT. 30- and 90-day mortality was 3% and 8% with ECF/ECX and 2% and 5% with FLOT. There was more G3/4 nausea and vomiting with ECF/ECX and more G3/4 neutropenia with FLOT. Conclusion: Periop FLOT improved outcome in patients with resectable gastric and GEJ cancer compared to periop ECF/ECX. Clinical trial information: NCT01216644.

Perioperative trastuzumab and pertuzumab in combination with FLOT versus FLOT alone for HER2 positive resectable esophagogastric adenocarcinoma: Petrarca—A phase II trial of the German AIO

TPS4133

Background: Neoadjuvant or perioperative chemotherapy has become a standard of care for locally advanced, resectable gastric cancer and adenocarcinoma of the GEJ. However, patient’s outcome is still unsatisfactory and 5-year survival, even in prospective trials, has been below 40%. Targeting HER2 with Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab prolonged survival in patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer as did Trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer. This provides a rationale for the evaluation of anti-HER2 treatment for resectable patients. Methods: This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, investigator initiated phase II trial. Patients with HER2-positive locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach and GEJ (i.e. ≥cT2 any N or any T N-positive) with exclusion of distant metastases are enrolled. HER2 status is centrally assessed. Patients are randomized 1:1 to 4 pre-operative 2-week cycles (8 weeks) of FLOT (Docetaxel 50 mg/m²; Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m²; Leucovorin 200 mg/m²; 5-FU 2600 mg/m²) followed by surgery and 4 additional cycles of FLOT (arm A); or the same therapy in combination with Trastuzumab 8/6 mg/kg and Pertuzumab 840 mg every 3 weeks pre- and postop, followed by a total of 9 additional cycles of Trastuzumab/Pertuzumab monotherapy (arm B). Primary endpoint of the phase II part (n = 100) of the trial is to show numerical improvement of the rate of pathological complete remission to approx. 25% with antibodies compared to approx. 16% with FLOT alone as assessed by a centralized pathology. Main secondary endpoints are safety and tolerability. Once results from phase II become available, study transition into phase III will be evaluated based on de facto results and current medical standards. Recruitment has already started; by February 2017 a total of 19 patients have been randomized. EudraCT: 2014-002695-86 Clinical trial information: NCT02581462.

Perioperative Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients with Locally Advanced Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach and the Esophagogastric Junction: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis of Toxicity and Efficacy at the National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg

OBJECTIVE

Esophagogastric cancer occurs more frequently in older patients, but these are underrepresented in clinical studies establishing the current treatment standards for perioperative chemotherapy in locally advanced disease. This leads to uncertainty regarding the treatment of older patients with potentially toxic but active regimens.

METHODS

Using a prospectively generated database, we analyzed 63 patients aged ≥70 years undergoing perioperative chemotherapy for locally advanced esophagogastric cancer. The information included Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, comorbidity index, body mass index, regimen of chemotherapy, toxicity, dosage adjustments, date of surgery, application of adjuvant treatment, date of progression, and date of death. Survival times were calculated.

RESULTS

The median age was 73 years. 96.8% of the patients received an oxaliplatin-containing regimen. In 17.5% of the patients, the dosage was reduced, and treatment was previously permanently stopped in 7.9%; 80% of the patients underwent curatively intended surgery, but only 27.5% of those undergoing resection started adjuvant treatment. Major histological regression was observed in 21.6% of the patients. The median survival was 19.1 months. Significantly improved survival times were observed for patients undergoing surgery (p = 0.008) and for patients with a triplet therapy (p = 0.004). Survival was worse for patients aged ≥75 years.

CONCLUSION

perioperative treatment is feasible and effective in elderly patients with esophagogastric cancer.

A phase I trial of the trifunctional anti Her2 × anti CD3 antibody ertumaxomab in patients with advanced solid tumors

Background

Ertumaxomab (ertu) is a bispecific, trifunctional antibody targeting Her2/neu, CD3 and the Fcγ-receptors I, IIa, and III forming a tri-cell complex between tumor cell, T cell and accessory cells.

Methods

Patients (pts) with Her2/neu (1+/SISH positive, 2+ and 3+) expressing tumors progressing after standard therapy were treated to investigate safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy. In this study, ertu was applied i.v. in 2 cycles following a predefined dose escalating scheme. Each cycle consisted of five ascending doses (10–500 μg) applied weekly within 28 days with a 21 day treatment-free interval. If 2 pts experienced a dose limiting toxicity (DLT) at a given dose level, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) had been exceeded.

Results

Fourteen heavily pretreated pts (e.g. breast, rectal, gastric cancer) were enrolled in the four main cohorts. Three (21 %) pts had to be replaced. Two serious adverse events (SAE) with possible relation to the investigational drug were seen, both fully reversible. A DLT was not detected. Consequently, the MTD could not be determined. All adverse events (AE) were transient and completely reversible. Most frequent AEs were fatigue (14/14), pain (13/14), cephalgia (12/14), chills (11/14), nausea (8/14), fever (7/14), emesis (7/14) and diarrhea (5/14). Single doses up to 300 μg were well tolerated (total dose up to 800 μg per cycle). We observed one partial remission and two disease stabilizations after first treatment cycle.

Conclusions

Single doses up to 300 μg could be safely administered in an escalating dose scheme. Immunological responses and clinical activity warrant further evaluation in patients with Her2 over expressing tumors.

Trial registration

EudraCT number: 2011-003201-14; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01569412

Palliative chemotherapy for gastroesophageal cancer in old and very old patients: A retrospective cohort study at the National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg

AIM: To investigate the outcome of palliative chemotherapy in old patients with gastroesophageal cancer at the National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg.

METHODS: Using a prospectively generated database, we retrospectively analyzed 55 patients ≥ 70 years under palliative chemotherapy for advanced gastroesophageal cancer at the outpatient clinic of the National Center for Tumor Diseases Heidelberg, Germany between January 2006 and December 2013. Further requirements for inclusion were (1) histologically proven diagnosis of gastroesophageal cancer; (2) advanced (metastatic or inoperable) disease; and (3) no history of radiation or radiochemotherapy. The clinical information included Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), presence and site of metastases at diagnosis, date of previous surgery and perioperative chemotherapy, start and stop date of first-line treatment, toxicities and consecutive dosage reductions of first-line treatment, response to first-line therapy, date of progression, usage of second-line therapies and date and cause of death. Survival times [progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and residual survival (RS)] were calculated. Toxicity and safety were examined. Prognostic factors including ECOG PS, age and previous perioperative treatment were analyzed.

RESULTS: Median age of our cohort was 76 years. 86% of patients received a combination of two cytotoxic drugs. 76 percent of patients had an oxaliplatin-based first-line therapy with the oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil regimen being the predominantely chosen regimen (69%). Drug modifications due to toxicity were necessary in 56% of patients, and 11% of patients stopped treatment due to toxicities. Survival times of our cohort are in good accordance with the major phase III trials that included mostly younger patients: PFS and OS were 5.8 and 9.5 mo, respectively. Survival differed significantly between patient groups with low (≤ 1) and high (≥ 2) ECOG PS (12.7 mo vs 3.8 mo, P < 0.001). Very old patients (≥ 75 years) did not show a worse outcome in terms of survival. Patients receiving second-line treatment (51%) had a significantly longer RS than patients with best supportive care (6.8 vs 1.4 mo, P = 0.001). Initial ECOG PS was a strong prognostic factor for PFS, OS and RS.

CONCLUSION: Old patients with non-curable gastroesophageal cancer should be offered chemotherapy, and ECOG PS is a tool for balancing benefit and harm upfront. Second-line treatment is reasonable.

Lapatinib versus lapatinib plus capecitabine as second-line treatment in HER-2-overexpressing metastatic gastro-esophageal cancer (GC): A randomized phase II trial of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie (AIO)

112

Background: HER2 amplification is present in a subgroup of gastroesophageal cancers (GCs). HER2 inhibition with trastuzumab has shown to improve outcomes in advanced disease. Lapatinib ditosylate (LAP), a dual anti-EGFR and anti-HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor with preclinical activity against GC, has been approved in HER2-positive breast cancer. We aimed to study the activity of LAP in HER2-amplified GC. Methods: Patients (pts) with HER2-positive (gene amplification or increased copy numbers based on predefined criteria) advanced GC were randomly allocated 1:1 to receive LAP 1250 mg per day 1-21 plus capecitabine (CAP) 2000mg/m² on days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle or LAP 1500 mg monotherapy day 1-21 after having failed on a platinum-based first-line therapy. HER2 status was assessed centrally. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) as assessed by the investigator using RECIST 1.1 criteria. We aimed to include 38 pts per arm to show a response rate of >20% in either of the two arms. Results: 37 pts were enrolled (18 to LAP+CAP, 19 to LAP). Pts had received a median of three prior treatment lines, however, the treatment was intended to be tested as a second-line treatment. 12 pts in the LAP+CAP group (67%) and 12 pts in the LAP group (63%) had received prior trastuzumab. Only two pts (11.1%; 95% CI: 1.37 – 34.7), both in the LAP+CAP arm, achieved an objective response. The study was closed prematurely for futility. Median time to progression was 42 (95% CI: 38 to 61) days in the LAP group and 83 (95% CI: 42 to 86) days in the LAP+CAP group. Other secondary efficacy endpoints (progression-free and overall survival) were comparable in the two treatment groups. Rates of diarrhea were higher with LAP+CAP (61%; 95% CI: 35 to 83) compared to 26% (95%CI 9 to 51) with LAP mono, whereas other adverse events were mostly similar between the groups (18 [100%] vs. 17 [90%]). Conclusions: Lapatinib showed insufficient activity in HER2-amplified pretreated advanced GC. The safety profile of LAP or LAP+CAP was as expected with some more toxicity in the combination arm. Clinical trial information: NCT01145404.

Interim safety analysis of a phase III trial with 5-FU, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) versus epirubicin, cisplatin, and 5-FU (ECF) in patients with locally advanced, resectable gastric/oesophagogastric junction (OGJ) cancer: The AIO-sto-0210 FLOT4 study

4079

Background: Perioperative ECF is a standard treatment for localized gastric/OGJ adenocarcinoma. However, 5-year survival rate remains below 40%. The FLOT regimen is an effective combination with pathologic response rates in the 15% range. This phase III study compares both regimens in resectable stages. Methods: Pts are stratified by different baseline criteria and randomized to either 3 + 3 perioperative cycles of ECF (epirubicin 50 mg/m2, d1; cisplatin 60 mg/m², d1; 5-FU 200 mg/m², d1-d21, qd21) or 4 + 4 cycles of perioperative FLOT (docetaxel 50mg/m2, d1; 5-FU 2600 mg/m², d1; leucovorin 200 mg/m², d1; oxaliplatin 85 mg/m², d1, qd14). 5-FU can be replaced by capecitabine in the ECF-arm (ECX). Central pathology is performed. This is a preplanned safety analysis after 300 patients. Results: The ongoing studyhas enrolled 380 of planned 590 pts, so far. 305 pts were included in this analysis. Median age is 62 yrs; 78% of pts are male. The primaries were gastric in 44.9%, OGJ in 50.4% and not evaluable/documented in 4.7% of pts. 281 pts were eligible for safety analyses. Median no. of preoperative cycles was 3 and 4 with ECF/ECX and FLOT, respectively, 35.9% vs. 44.6% of pts (ECF/ECX vs. FLOT) started postoperative chemotherapy (ct) and 22.5% vs 33.1% received all planned cycles. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 28.0% of ECF/ECX and 45.3% of FLOT pts (p=.0026). Thromboembolic events occurred in 14.1% vs. 5.8% in pts with ECF/ECX vs. FLOT (p=.027). Serious adverse events occurred in 52.1% vs. 47.5% of pts with ECF/ECX vs. FLOT (p=.48). Preoperative delay/interruptions of ct were observed in 71.1% vs. 56.8% of pts with ECF/ECX vs. FLOT (p=.013). Dose modifications of preoperative ct were performed in 27.5% vs. 20.1% of treatment cycles with ECF/ECX vs. FLOT, respectively. 197 pts have undergone surgery so far. Severe surgical morbidity was similar in both arms (ECF/ECX, 19.8%; FLOT, 16.8%). Surgical mortality was observed in 4 and 2 pts with ECF/ECX and FLOT. Toxic deaths were observed in 1 pt each. Conclusions: Perioperative FLOT is feasible and safe. Clinical trial information: NCT01216644.

Interim safety results from a phase II/III trial with 5-FU, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) versus epirubicin, cisplatin, and 5-FU (ECF) in patients with locally advanced, resectable gastric/oesophagogastric junction (OGJ) cancer: A study of the AIO

4083

Background: Perioperative ECF is a standard treatment for localized gastric/OGJ adenocarcinoma. However, 5-year survival rate remain below 40%. The FLOT regime is an effective new combination with pathologic response rates in the 15% range. This phase II/III study compares both regimens in resectable stages. Methods: Pts are stratified by different baseline criteria and randomized to either 3 + 3 perioperative cycles of ECF (Epirubicin 50 mg/m2, d1 Cisplatin 60 mg/m², d1 5-FU 200 mg/m², d1-d21, qd21) or 4 + 4 cycles of perioperative FLOT (Docetaxel 50mg/m2, d1 5-FU 2600 mg/m², d1 leucovorin 200 mg/m², d1 Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m², d1, qd14). 5-FU can be replaced by Capecitabine in the ECF-arm (ECX). This is a preplanned toxicity analysis after 200 pts in order to decide whether to continue to a phase III trial. Results: 202 pts have been randomized so far. Median age is 62 yrs; 79% of pts are male. The Primaries were Gastric in 43.4%, OGJ in 53.2% and not evaluable/documented in 3.4% of pts. 190 pts were eligible for the safety analyses. Median no. of preoperative cycles was 3 and 4 with ECF/ECX and FLOT, respectively, and 68.7% vs. 66.0% of pts (ECF/ECX vs. FLOT) started postoperative chemotherapy (ct). Grade 3/4 side effects were observed in 52.1% of ECF/ECX and 59.6% of FLOT pts with no significant differences between arms regarding individual grade 3/4 toxicities. Thromboembolic events occurred in 14.5% vs. 8.5% in pts with ECF/ECX vs. FLOT (p=.25). Serious adverse events occurred in 60.3% vs. 39.7% of pts with ECF/ECX vs. FLOT. Preoperative delay/interruptions of ct were observed in 74.0% vs. 61.7% of pts with ECF/ECX vs. FLOT (p=.07). Dose modifications of preoperative ct were performed in 28.1% vs. 22.3% of treatment cycles with ECF/ECX vs. FLOT, respectively. 121 pts underwent surgery. Severe surgical morbidity was similar in both arms (ECF/ECX, 15.8%; FLOT, 14.1%). Surgical mortality was observed in 2 and 1 pts with ECF/ECX and FLOT. Toxic deaths were observed in 1 pt each. Conclusions: Perioperative FLOT is feasible and safe. This supports the continuation of the trial as a phase III.

A phase II study for metabolic in vivo response monitoring with sequential 18FDG-PET-CT during treatment with the EGFR-monoclonal-antibody cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer: the Heidelberg REMOTUX trial

BACKGROUND

The epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody cetuximab has proven activity in metastatic colorectal cancer. To date, the mechanisms of action are not completely understood. Especially the impact on tumor glucose metabolism, or tumor vascularization remains largely unclear. The understanding of mechanisms such as early changes in tumor metabolism is of clinical importance since there may be a substantial influence on choice and sequence of drug combinations. Early signals of response to cetuximab may prove useful to identify patients having a relevant clinical treatment benefit. The objective of this trial is to evaluate the predictive relevance of the relative change in (18)F-Fluorodeoxyglucose tumor uptake for early clinical response during short-term single agent treatment with cetuximab. Early clinical response will be routinely measured according to the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors. Accompanying research includes cytokine immune monitoring and analysis of tumor proteins and tumor genes.

METHODS/DESIGN

The REMOTUX trial is an investigator-initiated, prospective, open-label, single-arm, single-center early exploratory predictive study. The first (18)F-FDG PET-CT is conducted at baseline followed by the run-in phase with cetuximab at days 1 and 8. At day 14, the second (18)F-FDG PET-CT is performed. Subsequently, patients are treated according to the Folfiri-cetuximab regimen as an active and approved first-line regimen for metastatic colorectal carcinoma. At day 56, clinical response is evaluated with a CT-scan compared to the baseline analysis. Tracer uptake is assessed using standardized uptake values (SUVs). The main hypothesis to be tested in the primary analysis is whether or not the relative change in the SUV from baseline to day 14 has any predictive relevance for early clinical response determined at day 56. Patients are followed until death from any cause or until 24 months after the last patient has ended trial treatment.

DISCUSSION

The aim of this trial is to evaluate metabolic changes in metastatic colorectal cancer during short-term single agent treatment with cetuximab and to analyse their potential of predicting early clinical response. This could be helpful to answer the question if early identification of patients not responding to cetuximab is possible.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT200811021020; EudraCT 200901327923.