Early Immune Remodeling Steers Clinical Response to First-Line Chemoimmunotherapy in Advanced Gastric Cancer

Adding anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/platinum improves survival in some advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas (GEA). To understand the effects of chemotherapy and immunotherapy, we conducted a phase II first-line trial (n = 47) sequentially adding pembrolizumab to 5-FU/platinum in advanced GEA. Using serial biopsy of the primary tumor at baseline, after one cycle of 5-FU/platinum, and after the addition of pembrolizumab, we transcriptionally profiled 358,067 single cells to identify evolving multicellular tumor microenvironment (TME) networks. Chemotherapy induced early on-treatment multicellular hubs with tumor-reactive T-cell and M1-like macrophage interactions in slow progressors. Faster progression featured increased MUC5A and MSLN containing treatment resistance programs in tumor cells and M2-like macrophages with immunosuppressive stromal interactions. After pembrolizumab, we observed increased CD8 T-cell infiltration and development of an immunity hub involving tumor-reactive CXCL13 T-cell program and epithelial interferon-stimulated gene programs. Strategies to drive increases in antitumor immune hub formation could expand the portion of patients benefiting from anti-PD-1 approaches.

SIGNIFICANCE

The benefit of 5-FU/platinum with anti-PD-1 in first-line advanced gastric cancer is limited to patient subgroups. Using a trial with sequential anti-PD-1, we show coordinated induction of multicellular TME hubs informs the ability of anti-PD-1 to potentiate T cell-driven responses. Differential TME hub development highlights features that underlie clinical outcomes. This article is featured in Selected Articles from This Issue, p. 695.

Stool protein mass spectrometry identifies biomarkers for the early detection of diffuse-type gastric cancer

There is a high unmet need for early detection approaches for diffuse gastric cancer (DGC). We examined whether the stool proteome of mouse models of GC or individuals with hereditary diffuse GC (HDGC) have utility as biomarkers for early detection. Proteomic mass spectrometry of stool from a genetically engineered mouse model driven by oncogenic KrasG12D and loss of p53 and Cdh1 in gastric parietal cells (known as TCON mice) identified differentially abundant proteins compared to littermate controls. Immunoblot assays validated a panel of proteins including actinin alpha 4 (ACTN4), N-acylsphingosine amidohydrolase 2 (ASAH2), dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4), and valosin-containing protein (VCP) as enriched in TCON stool compared to littermate control stool. Immunofluorescence analysis of these proteins in TCON stomach sections revealed increased protein expression as compared to littermate controls. Proteomic mass spectrometry of stool obtained from HDGC patients with CDH1 mutations identified increased expression of ASAH2, DPP4, VCP, lactotransferrin (LTF), and tropomyosin-2 (TPM2) relative to stool from healthy sex and age-matched donors. Chemical inhibition of ASAH2 using C6-urea ceramide was toxic to GC cell lines and patient derived-GC organoids. This toxicity was reversed by adding downstream products of the S1P synthesis pathway, suggesting a dependency on ASAH2 activity in GC. An exploratory analysis of the HDGC stool microbiome identified features which correlated with patient tumors. Here we provide evidence supporting the potential of analyzing stool biomarkers for the early detection of DGC.

Efficacy and Safety of Adagrasib plus Cetuximab in Patients with KRASG12C-Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Adagrasib, an irreversible, selective KRASG12C inhibitor, may be an effective treatment in KRASG12C-mutated colorectal cancer, particularly when combined with an anti-EGFR antibody. In this analysis of the KRYSTAL-1 trial, patients with previously treated KRASG12C-mutated unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer received adagrasib (600 mg twice daily) plus cetuximab. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review. Ninety-four patients received adagrasib plus cetuximab. With a median follow-up of 11.9 months, ORR was 34.0%, disease control rate was 85.1%, and median duration of response was 5.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.2-7.6). Median progression-free survival was 6.9 months (95% CI, 5.7-7.4) and median overall survival was 15.9 months (95% CI, 11.8-18.8). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in all patients; grade 3-4 in 27.7% and no grade 5. No TRAEs led to adagrasib discontinuation. Exploratory analyses suggest circulating tumor DNA may identify features of response and acquired resistance.

SIGNIFICANCE

Adagrasib plus cetuximab demonstrates promising clinical activity and tolerable safety in heavily pretreated patients with unresectable or metastatic KRASG12C-mutated colorectal cancer. These data support a potential new standard of care and highlight the significance of testing and identification of KRASG12C mutations in patients with colorectal cancer.

Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinomas With Defective Mismatch Repair: Current Knowledge and Clinical Management

Esophageal, gastroesophageal junction, and gastric adenocarcinomas, referred to collectively as gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas (GEAs), are a major cause of global cancer-related mortality. Our increasing molecular understanding has led to the addition of biomarker-directed approaches to defined subgroups and has improved survival in selected patients, such as those with HER2 and Claudin18.2 overexpression. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of cancer, including GEA, but biomarkers beyond PD-L1 expression are lacking. Mismatch repair deficiency and/or high microsatellite instability (dMMR/MSI-H) is observed in 8% to 22% of nonmetastatic GEA, and 3% to 5% of patients with metastatic disease. dMMR/MSI-H tumors are associated with more favorable prognosis and significant benefit from ICIs, although some heterogeneity exists. The activity of ICIs in advanced dMMR/MSI-H cancer is seen across lines of therapy and should be recommended in the frontline setting. In patients with nonmetastatic dMMR/MSI-H cancer, increasing evidence suggests that perioperative and adjuvant chemotherapy may not provide benefit to the dMMR/MSI-H subgroup. The activity of perioperative chemotherapy-free immune checkpoint regimens in patients with nonmetastatic dMMR/MSI-H cancer is highly promising and underscores the need to identify this unique subgroup. We recommend MMR/MSI testing for all patients with GEA at diagnosis, and review the key rationale and clinical management implications for patient with dMMR/MSI-H tumors across disease stages.

Pathologic complete response in patients with esophageal cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation and chemotherapy are recommended for the treatment of nonmetastatic esophageal cancer. The benefit of neoadjuvant treatment is mostly limited to patients who exhibit pathologic complete response (pCR). Existing estimates of pCR rates among patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy have not been synthesized and lack precision.

METHODS

We conducted an independently funded systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD42023397402) of pCR rates among patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemo(radiation). Studies were identified from Medline, EMBASE, and CENTRAL database searches. Eligible studies included trials published from 1992 to 2022 that focused on nonmetastatic esophageal cancer, including the gastroesophageal junction. Histology-specific pooled pCR prevalence was determined using the Freeman-Tukey transformation and a random effects model.

RESULTS

After eligibility assessment, 84 studies with 6451 patients were included. The pooled prevalence of pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in squamous cell carcinomas was 9% (95% CI: 6%-14%), ranging from 0% to 32%. The pooled prevalence of pCR after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in squamous cell carcinomas was 32% (95% CI: 26%-39%), ranging from 8% to 66%. For adenocarcinoma, the pooled prevalence of pCR was 6% (95% CI: 1%-12%) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 22% (18%-26%) after neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Under one-third of patients with esophageal cancer who receive neoadjuvant chemo(radiation) experience pCR. Patients diagnosed with squamous cell carcinomas had higher rates of pCR than those with adenocarcinomas. As pCR represents an increasingly utilized endpoint in neoadjuvant trials, these estimates of pooled pCR rates may serve as an important benchmark for future trial design.

DNA Damage by Radiopharmaceuticals and Mechanisms of Cellular Repair

DNA is an organic molecule that is highly vulnerable to chemical alterations and breaks caused by both internal and external factors. Cells possess complex and advanced mechanisms, including DNA repair, damage tolerance, cell cycle checkpoints, and cell death pathways, which together minimize the potentially harmful effects of DNA damage. However, in cancer cells, the normal DNA damage tolerance and response processes are disrupted or deregulated. This results in increased mutagenesis and genomic instability within the cancer cells, a known driver of cancer progression and therapeutic resistance. On the other hand, the inherent instability of the genome in rapidly dividing cancer cells can be exploited as a tool to kill by imposing DNA damage with radiopharmaceuticals. As the field of targeted radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) is rapidly growing in oncology, it is crucial to have a deep understanding of the impact of systemic radiation delivery by radiopharmaceuticals on the DNA of tumors and healthy tissues. The distribution and activation of DNA damage and repair pathways caused by RPT can be different based on the characteristics of the radioisotope and molecular target. Here we provide a comprehensive discussion of the biological effects of RPTs, with the main focus on the role of varying radioisotopes in inducing direct and indirect DNA damage and activating DNA repair pathways.

Ultrasensitive Detection of Circulating LINE-1 ORF1p as a Specific Multicancer Biomarker

Improved biomarkers are needed for early cancer detection, risk stratification, treatment selection, and monitoring treatment response. Although proteins can be useful blood-based biomarkers, many have limited sensitivity or specificity for these applications. Long INterspersed Element-1 (LINE-1) open reading frame 1 protein (ORF1p) is a transposable element protein overexpressed in carcinomas and high-risk precursors during carcinogenesis with negligible expression in normal tissues, suggesting ORF1p could be a highly specific cancer biomarker. To explore ORF1p as a blood-based biomarker, we engineered ultrasensitive digital immunoassays that detect mid-attomolar (10-17 mol/L) ORF1p concentrations in plasma across multiple cancers with high specificity. Plasma ORF1p shows promise for early detection of ovarian cancer, improves diagnostic performance in a multianalyte panel, provides early therapeutic response monitoring in gastroesophageal cancers, and is prognostic for overall survival in gastroesophageal and colorectal cancers. Together, these observations nominate ORF1p as a multicancer biomarker with potential utility for disease detection and monitoring.

SIGNIFICANCE

The LINE-1 ORF1p transposon protein is pervasively expressed in many cancers and is a highly specific biomarker of multiple common, lethal carcinomas and their high-risk precursors in tissue and blood. Ultrasensitive ORF1p assays from as little as 25 μL plasma are novel, rapid, cost-effective tools in cancer detection and monitoring. See related commentary by Doucet and Cristofari, p. 2502. This article is featured in Selected Articles from This Issue, p. 2489.

Patient-derived exosomes facilitate therapeutic targeting of oncogenic MET in advanced gastric cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) with peritoneal metastases and malignant ascites continues to have poor prognosis. Exosomes mediate intercellular communication during cancer progression and promote therapeutic resistance. Here, we report the significance of exosomes derived from malignant ascites (EXOAscites) in cancer progression and use modified exosomes as resources for cancer therapy. EXOAscites from patients with GC stimulated invasiveness and angiogenesis in an ex vivo three-dimensional autologous tumor spheroid microfluidic system. EXOAscites concentration increased invasiveness, and blockade of their secretion suppressed tumor progression. In MET-amplified GC, EXOAscites contain abundant MET; their selective delivery to tumor cells enhanced angiogenesis and invasiveness. Exosomal MET depletion substantially reduced invasiveness; an additive therapeutic effect was induced when combined with MET and/or VEGFR2 inhibition in a patient-derived MET-amplified GC model. Allogeneic MET-harboring exosome delivery induced invasion and angiogenesis in a MET non-amplified GC model. MET-amplified patient tissues showed higher exosome concentration than their adjacent normal tissues. Manipulating exosome content and production may be a promising complementary strategy against GC.

Patient-Reported Outcomes, Tumor Markers, and Survival Outcomes in Advanced GI Cancer

Importance

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), such as quality of life (QOL) and symptoms, are often associated with clinical outcomes in patients with cancer. In practice, oncologists use serum tumor markers (TMs) (ie, carcinoembryonic antigen [CEA] and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 [CA 19-9]) and imaging to monitor clinical outcomes in patients with gastrointestinal cancer.

Objective

To examine associations of 1-month changes in PROs and TMs with treatment response and survival among patients with gastrointestinal cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study enrolled patients at Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center with at least 1 month follow-up from May 2019 to December 2020. Included patients were beginning first-line systemic therapy, aged 18 years or older, and had been diagnosed with metastatic pancreaticobiliary, colorectal, or gastroesophageal cancer. Data analyses took place from January 2021 to January 2022.

Intervention

PROs were collected, including QOL (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy General [FACT-G]), physical symptoms (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System [ESAS]), and psychological symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-4 [PHQ4] total, PHQ4-depression, and PHQ4-anxiety), as well as TMs (CEA and CA 19-9), at the time of chemotherapy initiation and 1 month later.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Associations of 1-month changes in PROs and TMs with treatment response (clinical benefit vs disease progression) at first scan, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), adjusted for baseline values using regression models.

Results

This study included 159 patients, with 134 patients (84.3%) evaluable for analysis. Patients had a median (range) age of 64.0 (28.0-84.0) years and 86 (64.2%) were male. One-month PRO changes (FACT-G: OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.03-1.11; P = .001; ESAS-total: OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.94-1.00; P = .02; ESAS-physical: OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.92-1.00; P = .03; PHQ4-depression: OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.49-0.92; P = .01) were significantly associated with treatment response, but PHQ4-total or TMs were not. Changes in FACT-G (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-0.99; P = .003), ESAS-total (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.05; P = .004), ESAS-physical (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.00-1.05; P = .02), PHQ4-depression (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.01-1.48; P = .04), and CEA (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 1.001-1.004; P = .001) were associated with PFS, but changes in PHQ4-total or TMs were not. Changes in ESAS-total (HR, 1.03, 95% CI, 1.01-1.06; P = .006) and ESAS-physical (HR, 1.04, 95% CI, 1.01-1.06; P = .015) were associated with OS, but changes in TMs were not associated with OS.

Conclusions and Relevance

These findings suggest that 1-month changes in PROs can be associated with treatment response and survival in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer. Notably, 1-month changes in TMs were not consistently associated with these outcomes. These findings highlight the potential for monitoring early changes in PROs to associate with clinical outcomes while underscoring the need to address the QOL and symptom concerns of patients with advanced cancer.

ILUSTRO: Phase II Multicohort Trial of Zolbetuximab in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Claudin 18.2-Positive Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

Zolbetuximab, an IgG1 monoclonal antibody, binds to claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) and mediates tumor cell death through antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and complement-dependent cytotoxicity. We sought to examine zolbetuximab combinations in CLDN18.2-positive HER2-negative gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This phase II study assessed efficacy and safety of zolbetuximab, alone or with modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6) or pembrolizumab, in CLDN18.2-positive advanced/metastatic G/GEJ adenocarcinoma. Patients received zolbetuximab as monotherapy in third/later-line (Cohort 1A, n = 30), with mFOLFOX6 in first-line (Cohort 2, n = 21), or with pembrolizumab in third/later-line (Cohort 3A, n = 3) treatment. The primary endpoint for Cohort 1A was objective response rate (ORR). Key secondary endpoints were ORR (Cohorts 2 and 3A), overall survival (OS; Cohort 1A), and progression-free survival (PFS) and safety (all cohorts).

RESULTS

ORR was 0% in Cohorts 1A and 3A, and 71.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 47.82-88.72] in Cohort 2. Median PFS was 1.54 months (95% CI, 1.31-2.56) in Cohort 1A, 2.96 months (95% CI, 1.48-4.44) in Cohort 3A, and 17.8 months (95% CI, 8.05-25.69) in Cohort 2. Median OS in Cohort 1A was 5.62 months (95% CI, 2.27-11.53). Gastrointestinal adverse events occurred across cohorts [nausea, 63%-90% (grade ≥ 3, 4.8%-6.7%) and vomiting, 33%-67% (grade ≥ 3, 6.7%-9.5%)].

CONCLUSIONS

Zolbetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 demonstrated promising efficacy in previously untreated patients with CLDN18.2-positive G/GEJ adenocarcinoma. These data support the first-line development of zolbetuximab in patients whose tumors are CLDN18.2-positive. Across cohorts, zolbetuximab treatment was tolerable with no new safety signals.

Pan-Cancer Prevalence of Microsatellite Instability-High (MSI-H) Identified by Circulating Tumor DNA and Associated Real-World Clinical Outcomes

PURPOSE

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are approved for advanced solid tumors with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H). Although several technologies can assess MSI-H status, detection and outcomes with circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-detected MSI-H are lacking. As such, we examined pan-cancer MSI-H prevalence across 21 cancers and outcomes after ctDNA-detected MSI-H.

METHODS

Patients with advanced cancer who had ctDNA testing (Guardant360) from October 1, 2018, to June 30, 2022, were retrospectively assessed for prevalence. GuardantINFORM, which includes anonymized genomic and structured payer claims data, was queried to assess outcomes. Patients who initiated new treatment within 90 days of MSI-H detection were sorted into immunotherapy included in treatment (IO) or no immunotherapy included (non-IO) groups. Real-world time to treatment discontinuation (rwTTD) and real-world time to next treatment (rwTTNT) were assessed in months as proxies of progression-free survival (PFS); real-world overall survival (rwOS) was assessed in months. Cox regression tests analyzed differences. Colorectal cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), prostate cancer, gastroesophageal cancer, and uterine cancer (UC) were assessed independently; all other cancers were grouped.

RESULTS

In total, 1.4% of 171,881 patients had MSI-H detected. Of 770 patients with outcomes available, rwTTD and rwTTNT were significantly longer for patients who received IO compared with non-IO for all cancers (P ≤ .05; hazard ratio [HR] range, 0.31-0.52 and 0.25-0.54, respectively) except NSCLC. rwOS had limited follow-up for all cohorts except UC (IO 39 v non-IO 23 months; HR, 0.18; P = .004); however, there was a consistent trend toward prolonged OS in IO-treated patients.

CONCLUSION

These data support use of a well-validated ctDNA assay to detect MSI-H across solid tumors and suggest prolonged PFS in patients treated with IO-containing regimens after detection. Tumor-agnostic, ctDNA-based MSI testing may be reliable for rapid decision making.

Outcomes and a prognostic classifier in patients with microsatellite instability-high metastatic gastric cancer receiving PD-1 blockade

BACKGROUND

Subgroup analyses of randomized trials suggest the superiority of immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapy over chemotherapy in patients with mismatch-repair deficient (dMMR) and/or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-high) advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. However, these subgroups are small and studies examining prognostic features within dMMR/MSI-high patients are lacking.

METHODS

We conducted an international cohort study at tertiary cancer centers and collected baseline clinicopathologic features of patients with dMMR/MSI-high metastatic or unresectable gastric cancer treated with anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1)-based therapies. The adjusted HRs of variables significantly associated with overall survival (OS) were used to develop a prognostic score.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty patients were included. At a median follow-up of 25.1 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 30.3 months (95% CI: 20.4 to NA) and 2-year PFS rate was 56% (95% CI: 48% to 66%). Median OS was of 62.5 months (95% CI: 28.4 to NA) and 2-year OS rate was 63% (95% CI: 55% to 73%). Among the 103 Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors-evaluable patients, objective response rate was 66% and disease control rate 87% across lines of therapy. In the multivariable models, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 1 or 2, non-resected primary tumor, presence of bone metastases and malignant ascites were independently associated with poorer PFS and OS. These four clinical variables were used to build a three-category (ie, good, intermediate, and poor risk) prognostic score. Compared with patients with good risk, patients with intermediate risk score had numerically inferior PFS and OS (2-year PFS rate: 54.3% versus 74.5%, HR 1.90, 95% CI: 0.99 to 3.66; 2-year OS rate: 66.8% versus 81.2%, HR 1.86, 95% CI: 0.87 to 3.98), whereas patients with poor risk score had significantly inferior PFS and OS (2-year PFS rate: 10.6%, HR 9.65, 95% CI: 4.67 to 19.92; 2-year OS rate: 13.3%, HR 11.93, 95% CI: 5.42 to 26.23).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall outcomes with anti-PD-1-based therapies are favorable in MSI-high gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas. However, within this overall favorable subgroup a more accurate prognostication using baseline clinical characteristics might identify patients at higher risk of rapid disease progression who may deserve intensified immunotherapy combination strategies.

Highly Sensitive Circulating Tumor DNA Assay Aids Clinical Management of Radiographically Occult Isolated Peritoneal Metastases in Patients With GI Cancer

PURPOSE

GI cancers commonly spread to the peritoneal cavity, particularly from primary adenocarcinomas of the stomach and appendix. Peritoneal metastases are difficult to visualize on cross-sectional imaging and cause substantial morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to determine whether serial highly sensitive tumor-informed circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) measurements could longitudinally track changes in disease burden and inform clinical care.

METHODS

This was a retrospective case series of patients with gastric or appendiceal adenocarcinoma and isolated peritoneal disease that was radiographically occult. Patients underwent quantitative tumor-informed ctDNA testing (Signatera) as part of routine clinical care. No interventions were prespecified based on ctDNA results.

RESULTS

Of 13 patients studied, the median age was 65 (range, 45-75) years, with 7 (54%) women, 5 (38%) patients with gastric, and 8 (62%) patients with appendiceal adenocarcinoma. Eight (62%) patients had detectable ctDNA at baseline measurement, with median value 0.13 MTM/mL (range, 0.06-11.68), and assay was technically unsuccessful in two cases with appendiceal cancer because of limited tumor tissue. Five (100%) patients with gastric cancer and 3 (50%) patients with appendiceal cancer had detectable ctDNA at baseline. Although baseline levels of ctDNA were low, longitudinal assessment tracked with changes in disease burden among patients undergoing chemotherapy for metastatic disease. In two patients undergoing surveillance after definitive surgical management of gastric adenocarcinoma, detection of ctDNA prompted diagnosis of isolated peritoneal disease.

CONCLUSION

Quantitative tumor-informed serial ctDNA testing aids clinical management of patients with isolated peritoneal disease. Low levels of baseline ctDNA suggest a role for highly sensitive ctDNA approaches over panel-based testing. Further exploration of this approach should be considered in patients with isolated peritoneal malignant disease.

A human vascularized microtumor model of patient-derived colorectal cancer recapitulates clinical disease

Accurately modeling tumor biology and testing novel therapies on patient-derived cells is critically important to developing therapeutic regimens personalized to a patient's specific disease. The vascularized microtumor (VMT), or "tumor-on-a-chip," is a physiologic preclinical cancer model that incorporates key features of the native human tumor microenvironment within a transparent microfluidic platform, allowing rapid drug screening in vitro. Herein we optimize methods for generating patient-derived VMT (pVMT) using fresh colorectal cancer (CRC) biopsies and surgical resections to test drug sensitivities at the individual patient level. In response to standard chemotherapy and TGF-βR1 inhibition, we observe heterogeneous responses between pVMT derived from 6 patient biopsies, with the pVMT recapitulating tumor growth, histological features, metabolic heterogeneity, and drug responses of actual CRC tumors. Our results suggest that a translational infrastructure providing rapid information from patient-derived tumor cells in the pVMT, as established in this study, will support efforts to improve patient outcomes.

Ultrasensitive detection of circulating LINE-1 ORF1p as a specific multi-cancer biomarker

Improved biomarkers are needed for early cancer detection, risk stratification, treatment selection, and monitoring treatment response. While proteins can be useful blood-based biomarkers, many have limited sensitivity or specificity for these applications. Long INterspersed Element-1 (LINE-1, L1) open reading frame 1 protein (ORF1p) is a transposable element protein overexpressed in carcinomas and high-risk precursors during carcinogenesis with negligible detectable expression in corresponding normal tissues, suggesting ORF1p could be a highly specific cancer biomarker. To explore the potential of ORF1p as a blood-based biomarker, we engineered ultrasensitive digital immunoassays that detect mid-attomolar (10-17 M) ORF1p concentrations in patient plasma samples across multiple cancers with high specificity. Plasma ORF1p shows promise for early detection of ovarian cancer, improves diagnostic performance in a multi-analyte panel, and provides early therapeutic response monitoring in gastric and esophageal cancers. Together, these observations nominate ORF1p as a multi-cancer biomarker with potential utility for disease detection and monitoring.

Targeting TBK1 to overcome resistance to cancer immunotherapy

Despite the success of PD-1 blockade in melanoma and other cancers, effective treatment strategies to overcome resistance to cancer immunotherapy are lacking1,2. Here we identify the innate immune kinase TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1)3 as a candidate immune-evasion gene in a pooled genetic screen4. Using a suite of genetic and pharmacological tools across multiple experimental model systems, we confirm a role for TBK1 as an immune-evasion gene. Targeting TBK1 enhances responses to PD-1 blockade by decreasing the cytotoxicity threshold to effector cytokines (TNF and IFNγ). TBK1 inhibition in combination with PD-1 blockade also demonstrated efficacy using patient-derived tumour models, with concordant findings in matched patient-derived organotypic tumour spheroids and matched patient-derived organoids. Tumour cells lacking TBK1 are primed to undergo RIPK- and caspase-dependent cell death in response to TNF and IFNγ in a JAK-STAT-dependent manner. Taken together, our results demonstrate that targeting TBK1 is an effective strategy to overcome resistance to cancer immunotherapy.

FGFR2-amplified gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma is a distinct genomic class: Lessons learned from a liquid biopsy platform

429

Background: Gastroesophageal cancers (GECs) are the 2nd highest cause of cancer mortality globally. Biomarkers such as MMR, PD-L1, and HER2 are critical for treatment strategies. Emerging biomarkers in late-stage clinical development include FGFR2b. Approximately 30% of GECs express FGFR2b, which is associated with a poor prognosis. FGFR2 amplification ( FGFR2amp) is seen in a subset of patients and may be particularly responsive to FGFR2-targeted approaches. We sought to elucidate the genomic landscape of FGFR2ampGECs using a ctDNA platform. Methods: We retrospectively queried the Guardant Health database from 2017-2022 for patients with advanced GECs who had ctDNA NGS (Guardant360, Redwood City, CA) performed as part of clinical care. Co-alterations were evaluated for patients who harbor FGFR2amp vs those without FGFR2amp detected via ctDNA. Fisher’s exact test was used for group comparisons. Results: Approximately 7100 patients met the diagnosis criteria. FGFR2amp was detected in 263 patients (3.7%). The majority were males (66 and median age in the cohort of FGFR2amp patients was 66 years (range 22-81 yrs). Most amps were high (+++) in gastric and GEJ (plasma CN≥4) and more frequently observed in patients who are tested at diagnosis (44%) vs progression (19%) (p=0.0147). The mean VAF across samples with high-level FGFR2amp is 22.42%. Patients with FGFR2amp were enriched for EGFR co-occuring amplifications and cell cycle pathway alterations. CDH1 was frequently mutated in pts under 50 who harbor FGFR2amp (p=0.0028). Thirty nine percent of patients with FGFR2amp were also found to harbor a gene fusion and 14% of patients with FGFR2amps harbored an activating fusion in FGFR1/2/3. Conclusions: FGFR2 is a validated target in GECs, and the contexture of FGFR2amp will be important to defining patient subgroups with responses to FGFR2-directed therapy. Here we define the FGFR2amp landscape which may help inform future combination strategies for this emerging biomarker.[Table: see text]

Trial in progress: A phase 2, multicenter, open-label study of DKN-01 in combination with tislelizumab and chemotherapy as 1L therapy in patients with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (G/GEJ; DisTinGuish)

TPS484

Background: Advanced G/GEJ cancer is a major cause of cancer-related mortality requiring novel therapies. DKN-01 is a humanized mAb that binds and neutralizes DKK1. DKK1 plays a major role in WNT-pathway regulation and is overexpressed in multiple cancers. DKK1 expression is associated with poor prognosis, an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, and resistance to chemotherapy in G/GEJ cancer. The non-randomized Part A of DisTinGuish demonstrated durable clinical benefit in patients with G/GEJ adenocarcinoma. Higher response rates were observed in patients with high tumoral DKK1 expression, when DKN-01 was administered in combination with an anti-PD1 mAb, tislelizumab, and chemotherapy1,2. Furthermore, in Part B, durable responses were seen in 2L patients with DKK1-high G/GEJ cancers treated with a chemotherapy-free doublet regimen, DKN-01 plus tislelizumab1. Part C will evaluate the efficacy of this chemoimmunotherapy combination in a randomized fashion in treatment-naïve G/GEJ adenocarcinoma patients. Methods: Part C is an ongoing, global, randomized phase 2 open-label study evaluating DKN-01 in combination with tislelizumab + chemotherapy (CAPOX or mFOLFOX6) vs tislelizumab + chemotherapy in patients with advanced G/GEJ adenocarcinoma. Patients are randomized 1:1 and stratified by DKK1 and PD-L1 expression. Approximately 160 patients will be enrolled from 5 different countries. Key inclusion criteria include patients with HER2 negative, G/GEJ adenocarcinoma who have received no prior systemic treatment in the unresectable locally advanced/metastatic setting and can provide tumor tissue to document PD-L1 CPS and DKK1 expression, as performed at a central lab. Key exclusion criteria include prior treatment with anti-PD1/L1/L2. The primary endpoint is PFS according to RECIST v1.1 as assessed by the investigator in patients with DKK1-high tumors. Key secondary and exploratory end points include PFS, OS, ORR, DoR in patients with tumors with any level of DKK1 expression, as assessed by both investigator and by blinded, central review. Recruitment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04363801 . References SJ Klempner, et al. DKN-01 and tislelizumab ± chemotherapy as a first-line (1L) and second-line (2L) investigational therapy in advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA): DisTinGuish Trial. JCO 40, no. 4_suppl, 2022, 292-292.  SJ Klempner, et al. DKN-01 and Tislelizumab + Chemotherapy as First-line (1L) Investigational Therapy in Advanced Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma (GEA): DisTinGuish Trial. ESMO Annual Meeting September 2022. Clinical trial information: NCT04363801 .

Circulating tumor DNA as a marker of recurrence risk in locoregional esophagogastric cancers with pathologic complete response

452

Background: Following neoadjuvant therapy and definitive surgery, up to one-third of patients (pts) with esophageal (E), gastroesophageal junction (GEJ), and gastric (G) adenocarcinoma with a pathologic complete response (pCR) (tumor regression grade 0 [TRG0]) will experience disease recurrence, while up to one-half of pts with a near-pCR (TRG1) experience disease recurrence. Our study aims to provide real-world evidence that postoperative circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is prognostic of recurrence in pts with pCR or near-pCR after curative-intent neoadjuvant treatment and surgery. Methods: We identified pts from 11 institutions with stages I-III esophagogastric cancers who completed neoadjuvant therapy and had TRG0 or TRG1 scores at the time of curative-intent surgery. Postoperative plasma samples were collected for ctDNA analysis within a 16-week molecular residual disease (MRD) window after definitive surgery and serially during routine clinical follow-up from 9/19/19 to 2/21/22. MRD by ctDNA was assessed using a personalized, tumor-informed ctDNA assay (bespoke Signatera mPCR-NGS assay). The primary outcome was recurrence-free survival (RFS), measured from the date of surgery to the first documented sign of radiographic recurrence. Survival analysis was performed using the maximum likelihood bias reduction method for Cox regression in R (version 4.1) package survival. Results: We obtained 250 blood samples from 42 pts with E (n=18), GEJ (n=16), and G (n=8) adenocarcinomas who received either neoadjuvant chemoradiation or chemotherapy. 11 pts had a pCR (TRG0), and 31 pts had a near-pCR (TRG1). For pts analyzed in the post-operative, 16-week MRD window (n=21), the presence of ctDNA correlated with a higher recurrence rate (66.7%; 2/3) compared to the absence of ctDNA (11.1%; 2/18). Detectable ctDNA was associated with a significantly shorter RFS (HR 23.0, 95% CI 2.0 – 268.1; p = 0.012). 38 pts had ctDNA analyzed at any post-MRD time point (>16 weeks after surgery) over a median follow-up of 22.3 months. With additional routine ctDNA testing at any post-MRD time point, the recurrence rate was 90.0% (9/10) in ctDNA-positive pts compared to 10.7% (3/28) in ctDNA-negative pts, exhibiting a further reduction in RFS (HR 44.4; 95% CI 5.4-366.3; p<0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of the ctDNA assay at any post-operative time point was 87.5% and 96.2%, respectively. Out of 10 ctDNA-positive pts, two (20%) converted from ctDNA-positive to ctDNA-negative with subsequent treatment. Conclusions: Within the subgroup of pts with favorable pathologic responses after neoadjuvant therapy (TRG 0-1), the presence of post-operative ctDNA identified pts with elevated recurrence risk. If validated in larger cohorts this approach may be used to select pts at risk for recurrence following neoadjuvant therapy, with potential implications for direction of adjuvant therapy.

Assessment of complete pathologic response after neoadjuvant immunotherapy for MSI-H gastrointestinal cancers

43

Background: Immunotherapy (IO) has shown remarkable efficacy in gastrointestinal (GI) cancers with high microsatellite instability (MSI-H). We evaluated real world outcomes of patients treated with neoadjuvant IO for MSI-H colorectal (CRC) and gastroesophageal (GE) cancers. Methods: We queried diagnoses, pathology reports, and clinic notes of patients receiving IO at Massachusetts General Hospital from October 2014 to March 2022 using the Research Patient Data Registry and MATLAB. 1140 patients were identified with esophageal, gastric, colon, or rectal primaries. Of these, 56 were MSI-H and seven received neoadjuvant IO with curative intent. Results: Of the seven patients who received neoadjuvant IO for MSI-H CRC or GE cancers, three patients achieved complete pathologic response (pCR). Three patients had partial responses; one had a single residual lymph node tumor cell, one had residual T1b tumor and negative nodes, and one had residual T3 tumor and positive nodes. All patients with pCR had non-metastatic disease. Three of four patients with partial responses or progression had metastatic disease. Five patients had no recurrence by median follow-up of 10 months post-resection. One patient's cancer recurred 15 months post-resection, and one patient had progressive disease on neoadjuvant IO so did not undergo primary resection. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant IO shows promise for MSI-H GI cancers. Three of seven patients (43%) had pCR and three others (43%) had notable partial responses. There is a need to understand IO-refractory primary tumors and the differing effects of IO in local versus metastatic disease. While our data is limited by sample size, larger clinical trials can establish the safety and utility of neoadjuvant IO, potentially sparing many patients from surgery. We will collaborate with other centers for a larger scale analysis on neoadjuvant IO in MSI-H GI cancers. [Table: see text]

Genomic alterations associated with resistance to EGFR monoclonal antibodies (mAb) in real-world patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)

52

Background: mCRC patients with RAS and BRAF mutant tumors do not benefit from treatment with EGFR mAb. However, some RAS/BRAF wild-type patients do not benefit from EGFR mAbs. We sought to investigate additional primary and acquired biomarkers of resistance to EGFR mAb in mCRC. We hypothesized (1) alterations in pre-specified genes of known biological but unconfirmed clinical significance are associated with less favorable outcomes in patients treated with EGFR mAb; (2) these alterations are acquired during treatment and are associated with the time of exposure to these drugs. Methods: We included mCRC patients with RAS/ BRAF wild-type tumors receiving EGFR mAb (cetuximab or panitumumab) in 1st line (1L, n = 248) or in 2L+ of therapy (n = 2,118). This study used the US-based de-identified Flatiron Health-Foundation Medicine real-world mCRC clinico-genomic database, originating from ~280 US cancer clinics between 01/2011 and 04/2022. Pre-specified genes included PIK3CA, PTEN, MAP2K1, and RTKs. Real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and overall survival (rwOS) were compared between patients +/- alterations by Cox models, adjusted for a risk score generated from known clinical prognostic features. Alterations were compared between patients with biopsies collected before and after starting treatment with EGFR mAb by chi-square, adjusted for multiple comparisons. The association between the amount of time on drug exposure and alterations was evaluated by linear regression. Results: Patients with RTK/ MAP2K1 alterations (n = 38, 15.3%) had less favorable outcomes (PFS HR 1.83, 95% CI 1.27-2.65, p = 0.001/ OS HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.00-2.51, p = 0.048). The same trend was observed for patients with PIK3CA/ PTEN alterations (n = 31, 12.5%, PFS HR 1.35, 95% CI 0.89-2.03, p = 0.155/ OS HR 1.75, 95% CI 1.08 -2.85, p = 0.024) and ERBB2amp (n = 21, 8.5%, PFS HR 1.52, 95% CI 0.93-2.5, p = 0.096/ OS HR 1.33, 95% CI 0.71-2.5, p = 0.373). Compared to biopsies obtained before (n = 1,834), those obtained after treatment initiation were enriched for RTK alterations (n = 284, +9%, p = 0.001), especially for METamp (+3%, p = 0.04). Compared to unexposed patients, patients exposed to EGFR inhibitors had higher odds (p < 0.001) of developing RTK alterations (OR: 1.84, 95% CI 1.54-2.19; OR 3.33, 95% CI 2.60-4.24; and OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.56-3.26 for 0-12, 12-24, and 24+ months of exposure, respectively). Additional analyses will be presented. Conclusions: RAS/RAF WT mCRC patients with baseline alterations in RTK genes have less favorable outcomes on EGFR inhibitors (intrinsic resistance), and post-EGFR mAb samples (acquired resistance) converge around RTK and MAPK alterations, particularly MET, in real-world data.

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) informs clinical practice in patients with recurrent/metastatic gastroesophageal cancers

427

Background: Gastric and esophageal cancers (GECs) together account for a significant global burden in terms of new diagnoses and deaths. Over the last several years, the utility of ctDNA has ranged from estimating tumor burden and characterizing the genomic landscape of tumor biology and response to therapy in the metastatic setting to detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) and cancer surveillance in the locally advanced setting. We have previously studied the role of a commercial ctDNA assay for MRD detection and surveillance in locally advanced GECs. Herein, we present our experience with the same ctDNA assay in advanced stage settings for GECs. Methods: In this retrospective analysis of real-world data obtained from commercial circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing, 53 patients with recurrent/ metastatic esophageal cancer were analyzed. A total of 216 plasma samples were collected between 10/29/2008 and 08/23/2022. The patients were divided into 3 cohorts: Cohort A (N=30) included patients with stage II/III disease who had confirmed clinical recurrence (R). Cohort B (N=25) included recurrent and Stage IV patients who achieved a state of no evidence of disease (NED) on imaging. Cohort C (N=5) included recurrent and Stage IV patients who transiently achieved NED on imaging. A personalized, tumor-informed multiplex PCR-based next-generation sequencing assay (Signatera) was used to quantify ctDNA either postoperatively, on adjuvant or palliative therapy, or during active surveillance. Results: Of 53 patients, 30 patients with recurrent stage II/III esophageal cancer had ctDNA status available postoperatively within 150 days of confirmed clinical recurrence. Cohort A: Among these cases, 25 patients were ctDNA-positive ahead of clinical recurrence (sensitivity 83.3%) with a median of 31 days (range: 1-147 days). Cohort B: Next, we explored the correlation between ctDNA status and imaging, wherein, 96% (24/25) of patients showed a significant correlation between ctDNA status (positive or negative) and disease status by imaging (Fisher exact test p=0.0001). Of the 23 patients, 17 patients were ctDNA-negative and showed NED on imaging (negative predictive value of 100%; 17/17). Cohort C: 100% of patients (N=6) who demonstrated recurrent disease on imaging after NED were ctDNA-positive prior to imaging (positive predictive value of 100%). Conclusions: Our data demonstrate the utility of ctDNA in accurately predicting disease progression and support the potential use of ctDNA to inform treatment decisions or prompt early radiographic imaging. ctDNA may ultimately supersede traditional radiographic surveillance with the advantage of being minimally invasive and cost-effective in monitoring patients during/post-treatment.

APOLLO: A randomized phase II double-blind study of olaparib versus placebo following curative intent therapy in patients with resected pancreatic cancer and a pathogenic BRCA1, BRCA2 or PALB2 mutation—ECOG-ACRIN EA2192

TPS763

Background: A meaningful subset of PDAC is characterized by a homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). The most well-defined patients within this group are those with pathogenic variants in BRCA1, BRCA2 and PALB2. In the metastatic setting, PARP inhibitor maintenance provides a progression-free survival benefit after a period of platinum based chemotherapy1,2, but the role of PARP inhibitors in the curative intent setting is undefined. The OlympiA study established one year of olaparib as the standard of care for patients with BRCA-related, early stage breast cancer who completed all other curative-intent treatment3. Therefore, we have designed a randomized, phase II double-blind study of one year of olaparib vs placebo in patients with pancreatic cancer and a germline or somatic variant in BRCA or PALB2 who have completed all curative intent therapy. Methods: We have enrolled and treated 23 of 152 planned patients on study NCT 04858334/EA2192. Eligibility criteria include: a pathogenic germline or somatic variant in BRCA1, BRCA2 or PALB2 as determined by local laboratory (central review required); completion of curative-intent resection and ≥ three months of multi-agent chemotherapy; no evidence of recurrent disease. At enrollment, patients must be within 12 weeks of their last anti-cancer intervention. Patients are randomized 2:1 to receive oral olaparib 300 mg twice daily or placebo for 12 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint is relapse-free survival. Overall survival is a secondary endpoint. Tumor tissue, fecal material (for microbiome analysis) and serial ctDNA samples are being collected. 1.Golan T, Locker GY, Kindler HL: N Engl J Med 381:1492-1493, 2019. 2. Reiss KA, Mick R, O'Hara MH, et al: J Clin Oncol 39:2497-2505, 2021. 3. Tutt ANJ, Garber JE, Geyer CE, Jr.: N Engl J Med 385:1440, 2021. Clinical trial information: NCT04858334 .

Combined PD-1, BRAF and MEK inhibition in BRAFV600E colorectal cancer: a phase 2 trial

While BRAF inhibitor combinations with EGFR and/or MEK inhibitors have improved clinical efficacy in BRAFV600E colorectal cancer (CRC), response rates remain low and lack durability. Preclinical data suggest that BRAF/MAPK pathway inhibition may augment the tumor immune response. We performed a proof-of-concept single-arm phase 2 clinical trial of combined PD-1, BRAF and MEK inhibition with sparatlizumab (PDR001), dabrafenib and trametinib in 37 patients with BRAFV600E CRC. The primary end point was overall response rate, and the secondary end points were progression-free survival, disease control rate, duration of response and overall survival. The study met its primary end point with a confirmed response rate (24.3% in all patients; 25% in microsatellite stable patients) and durability that were favorable relative to historical controls of BRAF-targeted combinations alone. Single-cell RNA sequencing of 23 paired pretreatment and day 15 on-treatment tumor biopsies revealed greater induction of tumor cell-intrinsic immune programs and more complete MAPK inhibition in patients with better clinical outcome. Immune program induction in matched patient-derived organoids correlated with the degree of MAPK inhibition. These data suggest a potential tumor cell-intrinsic mechanism of cooperativity between MAPK inhibition and immune response, warranting further clinical evaluation of optimized targeted and immune combinations in CRC. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03668431.

Microsatellite instability (MSI), mismatch repair (MMR), and tumor mutational burden (TMB) as predictive biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) effectiveness in real-world patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)

46

Background: The KEYNOTE-177 randomized controlled trial demonstrated that mCRC patients with MSI high (MSI-H) and/or deficient MMR (dMMR) have better outcomes on first-line ICI than chemotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate MSI by next-generation sequencing (NGS) as a predictive biomarker of ICI effectiveness in real-world settings, and compare MSI (NGS), dMMR (immunohistochemistry, IHC), and TMB (10 mut/Mb cutoff) in predicting ICI outcomes. Methods: A prospectively declared statistical analysis plan compared the effectiveness of first-line treatment ICI versus chemotherapy in patients with MSI-H mCRC, and compared the predictive power of ICI outcomes associated with biomarkers in any line of therapy (LOT). Patient data was obtained by the US-based de-identified Flatiron Health-Foundation Medicine real-world mCRC clinico-genomic database (FH-FMI CGDB), originating from ~280 US cancer clinics between Jan/2011 and Dec/2021. Differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated by Cox proportional hazard models, adjusted for a risk score generated from prognostic clinical features. The likelihood ratio test evaluated the superiority of a biomarker in anticipating outcomes. Results: Patients with MSI-H mCRC had more favorable outcomes receiving first-line ICI (n=49) than chemotherapy (n=89) for PFS (median 24.87 vs. 5.65 months, hazard ratio (HR): 0.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18-0.52, p <0.0001) and OS (median not reached (NR) vs. 24.1 months, HR: 0.45, 95% CI 0.23-0.88, p = 0.02). mCRC patients receiving ICI in any LOT (n=182) had favorable outcomes when MSI-H, dMMR, or TMB ≥10 (all p <0.001). MSI (NGS) and MMR (IHC) were 90% concordant. MSI reclassified six cases that were proficient (p)MMR (all with TMB >10, three with mutations in MMR genes, and 5 with BRAF mutation, consistent with MSI biology). When MSI (NGS) is added to dMMR (IHC) evaluation, there is an improvement in the prediction of TTNT (p = 0.0013), PFS (p = 0.0202), and OS (p = 0.0717), but adding MMR status to MSI did not improve explanatory power. Conclusions: MSI (NGS) robustly identifies mCRC patients with favorable outcomes on first-line ICI vs. chemotherapy, and is a nominally better predictor of ICI outcomes when compared with dMMR (IHC) alone. dMMR (IHC), MSI (NGS), and TMB have similar predictive power for ICI benefit. [Table: see text]

Adagrasib with or without Cetuximab in Colorectal Cancer with Mutated KRAS G12C

BACKGROUND

Adagrasib, an oral small-molecule inhibitor of mutant KRAS G12C protein, has shown clinical activity in pretreated patients with several tumor types, including colorectal cancer. Preclinical studies suggest that combining a KRAS G12C inhibitor with an epidermal growth factor receptor antibody could be an effective clinical strategy.

METHODS

In this phase 1-2, open-label, nonrandomized clinical trial, we assigned heavily pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with mutant KRAS G12C to receive adagrasib monotherapy (600 mg orally twice daily) or adagrasib (at the same dose) in combination with intravenous cetuximab once a week (with an initial loading dose of 400 mg per square meter of body-surface area, followed by a dose of 250 mg per square meter) or every 2 weeks (with a dose of 500 mg per square meter). The primary end points were objective response (complete or partial response) and safety.

RESULTS

As of June 16, 2022, a total of 44 patients had received adagrasib, and 32 had received combination therapy with adagrasib and cetuximab, with a median follow-up of 20.1 months and 17.5 months, respectively. In the monotherapy group (43 evaluable patients), a response was reported in 19% of the patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 8 to 33). The median response duration was 4.3 months (95% CI, 2.3 to 8.3), and the median progression-free survival was 5.6 months (95% CI, 4.1 to 8.3). In the combination-therapy group (28 evaluable patients), the response was 46% (95% CI, 28 to 66). The median response duration was 7.6 months (95% CI, 5.7 to not estimable), and the median progression-free survival was 6.9 months (95% CI, 5.4 to 8.1). The percentage of grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events was 34% in the monotherapy group and 16% in the combination-therapy group. No grade 5 adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Adagrasib had antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with mutant KRAS G12C, both as oral monotherapy and in combination with cetuximab. The median response duration was more than 6 months in the combination-therapy group. Reversible adverse events were common in the two groups. (Funded by Mirati Therapeutics; KRYSTAL-1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03785249.).

Comparative Effectiveness of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors vs Chemotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer With Measures of Microsatellite Instability, Mismatch Repair, or Tumor Mutational Burden

Importance

The KEYNOTE-177 trial demonstrated that patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) with high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and/or mismatch repair deficiency (DMMR) have better outcomes when receiving first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) compared with chemotherapy. Data on performance of ICIs in patients with MCRC in standard practice settings remain limited, and direct MMR vs MSI outcome association comparisons are lacking.

Objective

To validate MSI (determined by next-generation sequencing [NGS]) as a biomarker of ICI effectiveness among patients with MCRC in standard practice settings and examine the association of MSI assessed by NGS, DMMR by immunohistochemistry, and tumor mutational burden (cutoff, 10 mutations/megabase) with ICI outcomes.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This comparative effectiveness research study of outcomes in prospectively defined biomarker subgroups used data from a deidentified clinicogenomic database and included patients who received Foundation Medicine testing (FoundationOne or FoundationOne CDx) during routine clinical care at approximately 280 US academic or community-based cancer clinics between March 2014 and December 2021. The population included 1 cohort of patients with MSI-H MCRC who received first-line ICIs or chemotherapy and a second cohort who received ICIs in any line of therapy (LOT) for biomarker examination.

Exposures

ICI therapy or chemotherapy assigned at physician discretion without randomization.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The main outcomes were time to next treatment (TTNT), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Hazard ratios were adjusted for known prognostic imbalances. Comparisons of explanatory power used the likelihood ratio test.

Results

A total of 138 patients (median age, 67.0 years [IQR, 56.2-74.0 years]; 73 [52.9%] female) with MSI-H MCRC received first-line ICIs or chemotherapy. A total of 182 patients (median age, 64.5 years [IQR, 55.2-72.0]; 98 [53.8%] female) received ICIs in any LOT. Patients receiving first-line ICIs vs chemotherapy had longer TTNT (median, not reached [NR] vs 7.23 months [IQR, 6.21-9.72 months]; adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 0.17; 95% CI, 0.08-0.35; P < .001), PFS (median, 24.87 months [IQR, 19.10 months to NR] vs 5.65 months [IQR, 4.70-8.34 months]; AHR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.18-0.52; P < .001), and OS (median, NR vs 24.1 months [IQR, 13.90 months to NR]; HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.23-0.88; P = .02). MSI added to DMMR better anticipated TTNT and PFS in patients receiving ICIs than DMMR alone. The same was not observed when DMMR evaluation was added to MSI.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this comparative effectiveness research study, MSI assessed by NGS robustly identified patients with favorable outcomes on first-line ICIs vs chemotherapy and appeared to better anticipate ICI outcomes compared with DMMR.

Analysis of Circulating Tumor DNA to Predict Risk of Recurrence in Patients With Esophageal and Gastric Cancers

PURPOSE

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analyses allow for postoperative risk stratification in patients with curatively treated colon and breast cancers. Use of ctDNA in esophagogastric cancers (EGC) is less characterized and could identify high-risk patients who have been treated with curative intent.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis of real-world data, ctDNA levels were analyzed in the preoperative, postoperative, and surveillance settings in patients with EGC using a personalized multiplex polymerase chain reaction-based next-generation sequencing assay. Plasma samples (n = 943) from 295 patients at > 70 institutions were collected before surgery, postoperatively, and/or serially during routine clinical follow-up from September 19, 2019, to February 21, 2022. ctDNA detection was annotated to clinicopathologic features and recurrence-free survival.

RESULTS

A total of 295 patients with EGC were analyzed, and 212 patients with stages I-III disease were further explored. Pretreatment ctDNA was detected in 96% (23/24) of patients with preoperative time points. Postoperative ctDNA was detected in 23.5% (16/68) of patients with stage I-III EGC within 16 weeks (molecular residual disease window) after surgery without receiving systemic therapy. ctDNA detection at any time point after surgery (hazard ratio [HR], 23.6; 95% CI, 10.2 to 66.0; P < .0001), within the molecular residual disease window (HR, 10.7; 95% CI, 4.3 to 29.3; P < .0001), and during the surveillance period (HR, 17.7; 95% CI, 7.3 to 50.7; P < .0001) was associated with shorter recurrence-free survival. In multivariable analysis, ctDNA status and clinical stage of disease were independently associated with outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Using real-world data, we demonstrate that postoperative tumor-informed ctDNA detection in EGC is feasible and allows for enhanced patient risk stratification and prognostication during curative-intent therapy.

Epacadostat Plus Pembrolizumab and Chemotherapy for Advanced Solid Tumors: Results from the Phase I/II ECHO-207/KEYNOTE-723 Study

BACKGROUND

Epacadostat, an oral, selective inhibitor of IDO1, has shown activity when administered with pembrolizumab. We evaluated the addition of chemotherapy to epacadostat and pembrolizumab in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors. One proposed mechanism of resistance to PD-1 checkpoint inhibition is through immunosuppression mediated by L-kynurenine. IDO1, indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase 1 is the rate-limiting enzyme catalyzing the conversion of L-tryptophan to L-kynurenine. If IDO1 is a mechanism of tumor escape from checkpoint inhibition, then addition of an IDO1 inhibitor with a PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor could enable tumor response to immunotherapy.

METHODS

Patients received one of 7 tumor-appropriate chemotherapy regimens. Pembrolizumab 200 mg was infused intravenously every 3 weeks. Epacadostat 100 mg was administered orally twice daily. The primary objectives of phase I were determining safety/tolerability and defining the maximum tolerated or pharmacologically active dose of epacadostat. Phase II of the study was designed to enroll efficacy-expansion cohorts and to assess changes in the tumor and tumor microenvironment via mandatory-biopsy cohorts.

RESULTS

A total of 70 patients were enrolled. Twelve patients were enrolled in the phase II mandatory-biopsy cohorts. Due to early study closure, efficacy expansion did not enroll. Grades 3 and 4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 78.6% of patients. Neutropenia and disease progression were the only grades 3 and 4 TEAEs reported in ≥10.0% of patients. One treatment-related death was reported. The ORR was 31.4% across all treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

The combination of epacadostat 100 mg bid with pembrolizumab and chemotherapy had an acceptable safety profile. This regimen showed antitumor activity across multiple types of advanced or metastatic solid tumors (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03085914).

Real-world Validation of TMB and Microsatellite Instability as Predictive Biomarkers of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Effectiveness in Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancer

Patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer (mEG) and tumor mutational burden ≥10 mut/Mb (TMB ≥ 10) have more favorable outcomes on immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICPI) monotherapy compared with chemotherapy in subgroup analyses of randomized controlled trials. We sought to evaluate the robustness of these associations in real-world settings where patients and practices are more diverse. A total of 362 2 L and 692 1 L patients, respectively received ICPI (n = 99, 33) or chemotherapy (n = 263, 659) across approximately 280 U.S. academic or community-based cancer clinics March 2014-July 2021. Deidentified data were captured into a real-world clinico-genomic database. All patients underwent Foundation Medicine testing. Time to next treatment (TTNT) and overall survival (OS) comparing ICPI versus chemotherapy were adjusted for treatment assignment imbalances using propensity scores. 2L: TMB ≥ 10 had more favorable TTNT [median 24 vs. 4.1 months; HR: 0.19; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.09-0.44; P = 0.0001] and OS (median 43.1 vs. 6.2 months; HR: 0.24; 95% CI: 0.011-0.54; P = 0.0005), TMB < 10 did not (P > 0.05). 1L: TMB ≥ 10 had more favorable TTNT (not reached vs. median 4.1 months; HR: 0.13; 95% CI: 0.03-0.48; P = 0.0024) and OS (not reached vs. median 17.1 months; HR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.08-1.14; P = 0.078), TMB < 10 had less favorable TTNT (median 2.8 vs. 6.5 months; HR: 2.36; 95% CI: 1.25-4.45; P = 0.008) and OS (median 4.5 vs. 13.1 months; HR: 1.82, 95% CI: 0.87-3.81; P = 0.11). TMB ≥ 10 robustly identifies patients with mEG with more favorable outcomes on 2 L ICPI monotherapy versus chemotherapy. 1 L data are more limited, but effects are consistent with 2L.

Significance

Using real-world data, we sought to evaluate robustness of these clinical associations using the same assay platform and biomarker cut-off point used in both clinical trials and pan-tumor CDx approvals for later treatment lines. TMB ≥ 10 robustly identified patients with mEG with more favorable outcomes on ICPI monotherapy versus chemotherapy and suggests this subset of patients could be targeted for further trial development.

Margetuximab with retifanlimab as first-line therapy in HER2+/PD-L1+ unresectable or metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: MAHOGANY cohort A

Background

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) is globally treated with chemotherapy plus trastuzumab. Novel therapeutic strategies strive to not only optimize efficacy, but also limit toxicities. In MAHOGANY cohort A, margetuximab, an Fc-engineered, anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody (mAb) was combined with retifanlimab, an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 mAb, in the first-line HER2-positive/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive GEA.

Patients and methods

MAHOGANY cohort A part 1 is a single-arm trial to evaluate margetuximab plus retifanlimab in patients with HER2 immunohistochemistry 3+, PD-L1-positive (combined positive score ≥1%), and non-microsatellite instability-high tumors. Primary objectives for cohort A were safety/tolerability and the confirmed objective response rate (ORR).

Results

As of 3 August 2021, 43 patients were enrolled and received margetuximab/retifanlimab. Nine grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in eight (18.6%) patients and eight serious TRAEs in seven (16.3%) patients. There were no grade 4/5 TRAEs. Three patients discontinued margetuximab/retifanlimab because of immune-related adverse events. The ORR by independent assessment was 53% [21/40 (95% confidence interval (CI) 36.1-68.5)], with a median duration of response of 10.3 months (95% CI 4.6-not evaluable); disease control rate was 73% [29/40 (95% CI 56.1-85.4)]. The study sponsor discontinued the study in advance of the planned enrollment when it became apparent that the study design would no longer meet the requirements for drug approval because of recent advances in the treatment of GEA.

Conclusions

The chemotherapy-free regimen of combined margetuximab/retifanlimab as first-line treatment in double biomarker-selected patients demonstrated a favorable toxicity profile compared with historical outcomes using chemotherapy plus trastuzumab. The ORR observed in this study compares favorably versus ORR observed with other chemotherapy-free approaches.

•

The margetuximab/retifanlimab regimen has a favorable toxicity profile versus historical chemotherapy-based regimens in GEA.

•

The margetuximab/retifanlimab regimen as first-line therapy for GEA met the prespecified boundary for antitumor activity.

•

The 53% ORR [21/40 (95% CI 36.1-68.5)] in the combined regimen compared favorably with other chemotherapy-free approaches.

•

Median duration of response was 10.3 months (95% CI 4.57-not evaluable) and disease control rate was 73% [29/40 (95% CI 56.1-85.4)].

•

The study was discontinued for business reasons as chemotherapy-based regimens remain the dominant therapy for GEA.

Clinical trial perceptions among patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer in an academic cancer center

e18579

Background: Clinical trials (CTs) are essential for advancing care for individuals with cancer, yet a minority of patients participate in CTs. We conducted an exploratory analysis of CT perceptions (knowledge, attitudes, and barriers) among patients with GI cancer. Methods: We prospectively surveyed a convenience sample of patients treated for GI cancer at Massachusetts General Hospital from 11/2020–12/2021. We obtained sociodemographic/clinical characteristics via patient report and chart review. We assessed CT perceptions, communication confidence (Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions Questionnaire, PEPPI, range 0-50; higher score indicates higher confidence), and illness perceptions (Brief Illness Perceptions Questionnaire, BIPQ, range 0-80; higher score indicates more negative perceptions). Using descriptive statistics, we examined associations of CT perceptions with patient characteristics, communication confidence, and illness perceptions. Results: We enrolled 80 patients (median age = 66 years [range 24-85], 54% men, 93% white, 48% had metastatic disease, 69% had college/postgraduate degrees, 15% had participated in CTs [25% phase I, 75% phase II-III]). Cancer types were pancreatic (38%), colorectal/bowel (23%), hepatobiliary (18%), gastroesophageal (16%), and other (6%). Median PEPPI was 43 (range 16-50). Median BIPQ was 44 (range 1-66); 63% reported negative illness perceptions (BIPQ≥40). Most (89%) agreed CTs are essential to improving standard treatment, yet only 42% had discussed CTs during care. Overall, 38% reported a clear idea of what a CT means, and 8% thought most people are cured on CTs. Unmarried patients were more likely to think most people are cured on CTs (21% vs 4%, p = .017). Most (76%) saw CTs as opportunities to obtain new treatment; only 15% believed enrolling would mean missing out on standard care. Only 16% thought most patients like them enroll in CTs. Younger patients (≤65 years) were more likely to think most patients like them enroll (25% vs 8%, p = .046). Most (61%) felt confident differentiating a CT from other treatments. Older patients (> 65 years) were more likely than younger patients to agree/strongly agree that they feel confident differentiating a CT from other treatments (74% vs 49%, p = .025), as were men versus women (76% vs 43%, p = .003). Those with higher communication confidence (Medians [M]: 44 vs 40, p = .04) or more positive illness perceptions (M: 41 vs 50, p = .003) were also more likely to be confident differentiating a CT. Conclusions: In this exploratory analysis of CT perceptions among patients with GI cancer, we found high levels of CT knowledge and positive CT perceptions. We demonstrated hypothesis-generating associations among patient factors and CT perceptions, underscoring the need for future research to confirm our findings and to develop interventions to enhance CT decision-making and participation.

Changes in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy: General (FACT-G) to predict treatment response and survival outcomes in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal (GI) cancer

6570

Background: The FACT-G contains 27 questions within 4 subscale domains [Physical Well-Being, Social/Family Well-Being, Emotional Well-Being, Functional Well-Being] related to health-related quality of life (QOL) in the past 7 days, with higher scoring indicating better QOL. In this prospective cohort study, we assessed longitudinal FACT-G data with treatment response and survival outcomes among patients with metastatic GI cancer. Methods: From 5/2019-11/2021, we enrolled patients at Massachusetts General Hospital with metastatic GI cancer to study before their treatment start. We collected the FACT-G survey at baseline (start of treatment) and 1-month later. We then used regression models to assess associations of 1-month changes in FACT-G with treatment response and survival outcomes (progression-free survival [PFS] and overall survival [OS]). For treatment response, clinical benefit was defined as decreased or stable tumor burden versus progressive disease at the time of first scan. All models were adjusted for baseline values of each respective variable. Results: We enrolled 203 of 262 patients approached (77.5% enrollment); 160 had 1-month follow-up data (median age = 63.0 years [range: 28.0-84.0 years], 66.3% male, 45.6% pancreaticobiliary cancer). For treatment response, 66.3% experienced a clinical benefit and 33.8% had progressive disease at the time of first scan (mean time to first scan = 2.7 months). Increases in FACT-G Total were predictors for treatment response (OR = 1.05, p = 0.0028), and improved PFS (HR = 0.98, p = 0.026) and OS (HR = 0.98, p = 0.038). Increases in FACT-G Emotional were associated with clinical benefit at the time of first scan (OR = 1.18, p = 0.0024), improved PFS (HR = 0.94, p = 0.023), and improved OS (HR = 0.93, p = 0.012). Improvement in FACT-G Physical were predictors for clinical benefit at time of first scan (OR = 1.08, p = 0.038) and better PFS (HR = 0.96, p = 0.038), while increases in FACT-G Functional were associated with improved PFS (HR = 0.96, p = 0.034) and OS (HR = 0.96, p = 0.019). Finally, changes in FACT-G Social were only associated with treatment response (OR = 1.16, p = 0.011). Conclusions: We found that 1-month increases in FACT-G can predict for treatment response and improved survival outcomes in patients with metastatic GI cancers. Notably, the FACT-G Total and FACT-G Emotional subscore predicted for all three outcomes of interest, while the FACT-G Social only predicted for clinical benefit at first scan. These data support previous findings indicating the possible use of early changes in patient-reported outcomes as a biomarker for early treatment response while emphasizing the growing need to integrate more patient-centric interventions into clinical care for cancer patients. Clinical trial information: NCT04776837.

Association Between Aspirin Use and Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Prospective Cohort Study

Prospective data examining the association of aspirin use, according to dose and duration, with long-term risk of gastric adenocarcinoma in non-Asian cohorts are lacking. We evaluated the association between aspirin use and risk of gastric adenocarcinoma in two large prospective U.S. cohort studies, the Nurses' Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to calculate multivariable adjusted HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Among the 159,116 participants, we documented 316 gastric adenocarcinoma cases (176 women, 140 men) over 34 years encompassing 4.5 million person-years. Among women, regular aspirin use (at least two times or more per week) was significantly associated with lower risk of gastric adenocarcinoma (multivariable HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.37-0.73) compared with nonregular use. However, regular aspirin use was not associated with gastric adenocarcinoma risk among men (multivariable HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.77-1.52; Pheterogeneity for sex = 0.003). Among women, the lower risk of gastric adenocarcinoma was more apparent with increasing duration of aspirin use (Ptrend < 0.001) and more than five tablets per week (multivariable HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.31-0.84). Regular, long-term aspirin use was associated with lower risk of gastric adenocarcinoma among women, but not men. The benefit appeared after at least 10 years of use and was maximized at higher doses among women. The heterogeneity by sex in the association of aspirin use with risk of gastric adenocarcinoma requires further investigation.

PREVENTION RELEVANCE

Novel prevention is urgently needed to reduce incidence and mortality of gastric cancer. We found that regular aspirin use was associated with lower risk of gastric adenocarcinoma among women, but not men. The benefit appeared after at least 10 years of use and was maximized at higher doses among women. See related Spotlight, p. 213.

Early Tumor-Immune Microenvironmental Remodeling and Response to First-Line Fluoropyrimidine and Platinum Chemotherapy in Advanced Gastric Cancer

Chemotherapy is ubiquitous in first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer, yet responses are heterogeneous, and little is known about mediators of chemotherapy response. To move forward, an understanding of the effects of standard chemotherapy on the tumor-immune microenvironment (TME) is needed. Coupling whole-exome sequencing, bulk RNA and single-cell transcriptomics from paired pretreatment and on-treatment samples in treatment-naïve patients with HER2-positive and HER2-negative gastric cancer, we define features associated with response to platinum-based chemotherapy. Response was associated with on-treatment TME remodeling including natural killer (NK) cell recruitment, decreased tumor-associated macrophages, M1-macrophage repolarization, and increased effector T-cell infiltration. Among chemotherapy nonresponders, we observed low/absent PD-L1 expression or modulation, on-treatment increases in Wnt signaling, B-cell infiltration, and LAG3-expressing T cells coupled to an exodus of dendritic cells. We did not observe significant genomic changes in early on-treatment sampling. We provide a map of on-treatment TME modulation with standard chemotherapy and nominate candidate future approaches.

SIGNIFICANCE

Using paired pretreatment and on-treatment samples during standard first-line chemotherapy, we identify chemotherapy-induced NK-cell infiltration, macrophage repolarization, and increased antigen presentation among responders. Increased LAG3 expression and decreased dendritic cell abundance were seen in nonresponders, emphasizing remodeling of the TME during chemotherapy response and resistance. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 873.

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibition in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Amplified Gastroesophageal Cancer: Retrospective Global Experience

PURPOSE

Subset analyses from phase III evaluation of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition (EGFRi) suggest improved outcomes in patients with EGFR-amplified gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA), but large-scale analyses are lacking. This multi-institutional analysis sought to determine the role of EGFRi in the largest cohort of patients with EGFR-amplified GEA to date.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 60 patients from 15 tertiary cancer centers in six countries met the inclusion criteria. These criteria required histologically confirmed GEA in the metastatic or unresectable setting with EGFR amplification identified by using a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-approved assay, and who received on- or off-protocol EGFRi. Testing could be by tissue next-generation sequencing, plasma circulating tumor DNA next-generation sequencing, and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization performed by a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments approved laboratory. Treatment patterns and outcomes analysis was also performed using a deidentified clinicogenomic database (CGDB).

RESULTS

Sixty patients with EGFR-amplified GEA received EGFRi, including 31 of 60 patients (52%) with concurrent chemotherapy. Across treatment lines, patients achieved a 43% objective response rate with a median progression-free survival of 4.6 months (95% CI, 3.5 to 6.4). Patients receiving EGFRi in first-, second-, and third-line therapy achieved a median overall survival of 20.6 months (95% CI, 13.5 to not reached [NR]), 9 months (95% CI, 7.9 to NR), and 8.4 months (7.6 to NR), respectively. This survival far exceeded the 11.2-month (95% CI, 8.7 to 14.2) median overall survival from first-line initiation of non-EGFRi therapy in patients with EGFR-amplified GEA in the CGDB. Despite this benefit, analysis of the CGDB (January 2011-December 2020) suggests that only 5% of patients with EGFR-amplified GEA received EGFRi.

CONCLUSION

Patients with EGFR-amplified GEA derive significant benefit from EGFRi. Further prospective investigation of EGFRi in a well-selected patient population is ongoing in an upcoming trial of amivantamab in EGFR and/or MET amplified GEA.

Are You a TMBeliever? Mutations and Atezolizumab Response in Solid Tumors

SUMMARY

Optimizing the utility of tumor mutational burden in solid tumors remains an unmet need and a clinical knowledge gap. Using a centrally determined cutoff of ≥16 mut/Mb, Friedman and colleagues demonstrate an ability to enrich for atezolizumab response in a pretreated pan-cancer multibasket study. See related article by Friedman et al., p. 654 (4).

The Genomics of Colorectal Cancer in Populations with African and European Ancestry

Blacks have a higher incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) and worse survival rates when compared to Whites. Comprehensive genomic profiling was performed in 46,140 colorectal adenocarcinoma cases. Ancestry-informative markers identified 5,301 patients of African descent (AFR) and 33,770 patients of European descent (EUR). AFR were younger, had fewer MSI-H tumors, and had significantly more frequent alterations in KRAS, APC, and PIK3CA. AFR had increased frequency of KRAS mutations specifically KRAS G12D and KRAS G13. There were no differences in rates of actionable kinase driver alterations (HER2, MET, NTRK, ALK, ROS1, RET). In patients with young onset CRC (&lt;50 years), AFR and EUR had similar frequency of MSI-H and TMB-H tumors, and strikingly different trends in APC mutations by age, as well as differences in MAPK pathway alterations. These findings inform treatment decisions, impact prognosis, and underscore the need for model systems representative of our diverse US population.

Chemotherapy predictors and a time-dependent chemotherapy effect in metastatic esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy has long been shown to confer a survival benefit in patients with metastatic esophageal cancer. However, not all patients with metastatic disease receive chemotherapy.

AIM

To evaluate a large cancer database of metastatic esophageal cancer cases to identify predictors of receipt to chemotherapy and survival.

METHODS

We interrogated the National Cancer Database (NCDB) between 2004-2015 and included patients with M1 disease who had received or did not receive chemotherapy. A logistic regression model was used to examine the associations between chemotherapy and potential confounders and a Cox proportional hazards model was employed to examine the effect of chemotherapy on overall survival (OS). Propensity score analyses were further performed to balance measurable confounders between patients treated with and without chemotherapy.

RESULTS

A total of 29182 patients met criteria for inclusion in this analysis, with 21911 (75%) receiving chemotherapy and 7271 (25%) not receiving chemotherapy. The median follow-up was 69.45 mo. The median OS for patients receiving chemotherapy was 9.53 mo (9.33-9.72) vs 2.43 mo (2.27-2.60) with no chemotherapy. Year of diagnosis 2010-2014 [odds ratio (OR): 1.29, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.17-1.43, P value < 0.001], median income > $46000 (OR: 1.49, 95%CI: 1.27-1.75, P value < 0.001), and node-positivity (OR: 1.35, 95%CI: 1.20-1.52, P < 0.001) were independent predictors of receiving chemotherapy, while female gender (OR: 0.86, 95%CI: 0.76-0.98, P = 0.019), black race (OR: 0.76, 95%CI: 0.67-0.93, P = 0.005), uninsured status (OR: 0.41, 95%CI: 0.33-0.52, P < 0.001), and high Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (OR for CCI ≥ 2: 0.61, 95%CI: 0.50-0.74, P < 0.001) predicted for lower odds of receiving chemotherapy. Modeling the effect of chemotherapy on OS using a time-dependent coefficient showed that chemotherapy was associated with improved OS up to 10 mo, after which there is no significant effect on OS. Moreover, uninsured status [hazard ratio (HR): 1.20, 95%CI: 1.09-1.31, P < 0.001], being from the geographic Midwest (HR: 1.07, 95%CI: 1.01-1.14, P = 0.032), high CCI (HR for CCI ≥ 2: 1.16, 95%CI: 1.07-1.26, P < 0.001), and higher tumor grade (HR for grade 3 vs grade 1: 1.28, 95%CI: 1.14-1.44, P < 0.001) and higher T stage (HR for T1 vs T4: 0.89, 95%CI: 0.84-0.95, P < 0.001) were independent predictors of worse OS on multivariable analyses.

CONCLUSION

In this large, retrospective NCDB analysis, we identified several socioeconomic and clinicopathologic predictors for receiving chemotherapy and OS in patients with metastatic esophageal cancer. The benefit of chemotherapy on OS is time-dependent and favors early initiation. Focused outreach in lower income and underinsured patients is critical as receipt of chemotherapy is associated with improved OS.

Gastric Cancer, Version 2.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

Gastric cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Over 95% of gastric cancers are adenocarcinomas, which are typically classified based on anatomic location and histologic type. Gastric cancer generally carries a poor prognosis because it is often diagnosed at an advanced stage. Systemic therapy can provide palliation, improved survival, and enhanced quality of life in patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. The implementation of biomarker testing, especially analysis of HER2 status, microsatellite instability (MSI) status, and the expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), has had a significant impact on clinical practice and patient care. Targeted therapies including trastuzumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab have produced encouraging results in clinical trials for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. Palliative management, which may include systemic therapy, chemoradiation, and/or best supportive care, is recommended for all patients with unresectable or metastatic cancer. Multidisciplinary team management is essential for all patients with localized gastric cancer. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for Gastric Cancer focuses on the management of unresectable locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic disease.

Ascites and resistance to immune checkpoint inhibition in dMMR/MSI-H metastatic colorectal and gastric cancers

Background

Despite unprecedented benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with mismatch repair deficient (dMMR)/microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) advanced gastrointestinal cancers, a relevant proportion of patients shows primary resistance or short-term disease control. Since malignant effusions represent an immune-suppressed niche, we investigated whether peritoneal involvement with or without ascites is a poor prognostic factor in patients with dMMR/MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and gastric cancer (mGC) receiving ICIs.

Methods

We conducted a global multicohort study at Tertiary Cancer Centers and collected clinic-pathological data from a cohort of patients with dMMR/MSI-H mCRC treated with anti-PD-(L)1 ±anti-CTLA-4 agents at 12 institutions (developing set). A cohort of patients with dMMR/MSI-high mGC treated with anti-PD-1 agents±chemotherapy at five institutions was used as validating dataset.

Results

The mCRC cohort included 502 patients. After a median follow-up of 31.2 months, patients without peritoneal metastases and those with peritoneal metastases and no ascites had similar outcomes (adjusted HR (aHR) 1.15, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.56 for progression-free survival (PFS); aHR 0.96, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.42 for overall survival (OS)), whereas inferior outcomes were observed in patients with peritoneal metastases and ascites (aHR 2.90, 95% CI 1.70 to 4.94; aHR 3.33, 95% CI 1.88 to 5.91) compared with patients without peritoneal involvement. The mGC cohort included 59 patients. After a median follow-up of 17.4 months, inferior PFS and OS were reported in patients with peritoneal metastases and ascites (aHR 3.83, 95% CI 1.68 to 8.72; aHR 3.44, 95% CI 1.39 to 8.53, respectively), but not in patients with only peritoneal metastases (aHR 1.87, 95% CI 0.64 to 5.46; aHR 2.15, 95% CI 0.64 to 7.27) when compared with patients without peritoneal involvement.

Conclusions

Patients with dMMR/MSI-H gastrointestinal cancers with peritoneal metastases and ascites should be considered as a peculiar subgroup with highly unfavorable outcomes to current ICI-based therapies. Novel strategies to target the immune-suppressive niche in malignant effusions should be investigated, as well as next-generation ICIs or intraperitoneal approaches.

Viewing education differently: A novel educational approach using virtual tumor board cases

653

Background: Caring for patients with cancer requires the expertise of specialists from pathology, radiology, surgical, radiation and medical oncology. Cancer centers discuss complicated cases at multidisciplinary tumor boards, where these experts collaborate on the optimal management strategies. Tumor boards present an opportunity for oncology providers to learn current guidelines and manage complex cases. Unfortunately, these opportunities occur infrequently and are limited to individual cancer centers. Virtual tumor board case scenarios could provide a valuable educational resource for professionals in all areas of oncology looking to enhance their knowledge and understanding of complex patient management. Methods: Well-renowned gastrointestinal oncology faculty conducted virtual tumor board panels via an online platform to discuss challenging cases submitted by community oncology providers and trainees. The panel consisted of specialists from radiology, medical, surgical, and radiation oncology. The case discussions were then formatted into individual scenario videos with case-based questions asked at the beginning and end of the discussions. These videos were viewed by trainees and practitioners in various fields of oncology. A survey was conducted to assess the educational value of these videos. Results: 10 unique gastrointestinal scenario videos were created from expert panel case discussions. These were viewed by 12 unique viewers, who were surveyed on their experience. Responders included Fellows/Residents (83%) and advanced practice providers (APPs) (17%). These included trainees/APPs from medical oncology (50%), radiation oncology (42%) and radiology (8%). All 12 responders felt the videos were a valuable educational resource that they would continue to use in the future. Of the responders, 7/12 (58%) felt these virtual scenarios were more educational than their own institutional tumor boards, while the remaining 5/12 (42%) felt they were equally educational. Responders to the survey indicated they would use these videos for a variety of purposes, as indicated below. Conclusions: Scenario videos created from virtual tumor boards conducted by expert panelists can provide a novel and valuable educational resource for trainees across all fields of oncology. It is a convenient way for viewers to stay up to date on current guidelines and apply the knowledge gained to their own practice. Additionally, it allows viewers a unique opportunity to hear from renowned experts in various oncology fields. Expansion and continued production of these scenario videos could enhance the education and practice of professionals in the field of oncology. Further assessment and evaluation of the impacts of these videos will be necessary.[Table: see text]

DKN-01 and tislelizumab ± chemotherapy as a first-line (1L) and second-line (2L) investigational therapy in advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA): DisTinGuish Trial

292

Background: Despite recent approval of anti-PD-1 antibodies as 1L therapy in HER2(-) advanced GEA, benefit remains modest and limited largely to PD-L1(+) patients (pts), primarily those with combined positive scores (CPS) ≥5. Thus novel therapeutic approaches are needed for this pt population. DKN-01 is a targeted anti-DKK1 mAb which has demonstrated improved clinical outcomes in pts with elevated tumoral DKK1 expression, a subset of pts with more aggressive disease and shorter overall survival. Methods: DisTinGuish (NCT04363801) is a Phase 2a single arm 2-part trial; Part A investigated DKN-01 (D) + tislelizumab (TS) + CAPOX as 1L therapy for pts with advanced HER2(-) GEA regardless of DKK1 status; Part B investigated two dosing cohorts of D (300 mg and 600 mg) + TS as 2L therapy for DKK1-high advanced GEA pts. Primary objective was to examine safety and tolerability and secondary objectives evaluated multiple efficacy endpoints including overall response rate (ORR) in a modified intent to treat (mITT) population (>1 dose D). Results: Forty-nine pts enrolled between 01 Sept 2020 and 15 Sept 2021; 25 pts in Part A and 24 pts in Part B (D-300 mg). Key clinicopathologic features and efficacy outcomes are shown in Table. The most common D-related AEs were low grade (G1/2) fatigue, nausea, and diarrhea. Nine pts had D-related ≥G3 toxicities, elevated AST/ALT, elevated alkaline phosphatase, hypophosphatemia, hyponatremia, lymphopenia, neutropenia, diarrhea, vomiting, fatigue all occurring in 1 pt and pulmonary embolism in 2 pts (one G5 event). No new safety signals were observed in Part A or B1. Duration of response (DoR), median PFS and median OS have not been reached for Part A. Last pt enrolled in Part B1 on 15 Sept 2021. Conclusions: The combination of D/TS + CAPOX represents a well-tolerated, active 1L combination, particularly for DKK1-high patients consistent with the proposed mechanism of action. Activity appears to be independent of PD-L1 status. Part B1 is aligned with biomarker enrichment and efficacy and biomarker data will be presented along with updated Part A efficacy data. Clinical trial information: NCT04363801. [Table: see text]

Making cancer care accessible: The practicality and value of a virtual gastrointestinal tumor board (VTB)

652

Background: Patients with cancer benefit from coordination with multiple subspecialties, often facilitated by discussion at a multidisciplinary tumor board. This enables collaboration on individualized patient plans and offers an opportunity for education. Regrettably, not all physicians have access to a multidisciplinary team, particularly those practicing outside of an academic setting or in underserved areas. Additionally, patients may want a second opinion but are limited by resources to travel to an academic center. A virtual tumor board could be a solution for these patients and physicians. Methods: Expert gastrointestinal (GI) oncology faculty in the US gathered via a virtual tumor board panel to discuss complex cases submitted by oncology providers and trainees. Panels consisted of a moderator and GI specialists from radiology, medical, surgical, and radiation oncology. The purposes of these panels were to test the feasibility of a virtual tumor board, provide expert opinions on complex cases, and create educational content. The panel’s recommendations were shared with the submitting providers within 48 hours and the recordings made available. Afterward, submitting physicians were surveyed to assess their satisfaction with the panel’s discussion and recommendations. Results: From March to June 2021, 4 GI virtual panels were conducted with 5 expert faculty discussing 44 patient scenarios from 14 providers; 12 providers (86%) submitted multiple cases. Surveys were sent to providers with a 50% response rate. Conclusions: Virtual tumor boards are feasible and lead to a high degree of satisfaction among the users. In this small cohort of responders, management of patients changed based on the panel’s recommendations, there was a perception that learning was improved, and the providers’ internal tumor boards’ recommendations were mostly included in the VTB discussion and expanded upon. Respondents felt that the service improved the care of patients and that they would submit future cases to this forum. Additional data from a larger cohort will be more helpful in understanding the impact of this endeavor.[Table: see text]

Clinical utility of microsatellite instability (MSI-H) identified on liquid biopsy in advanced gastrointestinal cancers (aGI)

56

Background: Identification of MSI-H is clinically meaningful in patients with aGI given the associated approval of multiple immune checkpoint inhibitors. MSI-H has long been assessed via tissue analysis; and insights from plasma-based approaches are limited to small validation studies. We sought to assess prevalence of initial and acquired MSI-H status across aGI and report real-world outcomes of colorectal (CRC) patients who received ICI after MSI-H identification by a commercially available liquid biopsy (LBx) assay. Methods: Genomic results from a well-validated LBx assay (Guardant360) completed as part of usual clinical care between 10/1/2018-9/7/2021 in patients with aGI were queried to assess MSI-H prevalence and identify cases of potential acquired MSI-H. Real-world evidence (RWE) was sourced from the GuardantINFORM database comprised of aggregated payer claims and de-identified records from 11/1/2018-3/31/2021. Patients with plasma-identified MSI-H who started new therapy < 60 days after assay report date were sorted into treatment groups: chemotherapy +/- biologic therapy (“chemo”) or immunotherapy via pembrolizumab or nivolumab (“ICI”). Real-world time to discontinuation (rwTTD) and real-world time to next treatment (rwTTNT) were assessed as proxies for progression free survival. Log-rank tests were used to assess differences in rwTTD, rwTTNT and overall survival. Results: Prevalence of MSI-H was ̃2% across aGI (Table). Five cases were observed to have potential acquired MSI not attributable to tumor shed identified on serial LBx tests. Of 222 MSI-H CRC patients eligible for RWE analysis, 89(40%) started new therapy within 60 days of results: 42(48%) received ICI, 39(44%) received chemo, 8(9%) received other/mixed regimens. Patients who received ICI had significantly longer rwTTD and rwTTNT compared to patients who received chemo [median months to discontinuation = 7.5 (95% CI 3.4-12.3) vs. 2 (95% 1.4-3.3) p<0.001; median months to next treatment = 23.8 (95% 10.6-NA) vs. 4.5 (95% CI 2.9-NA) p=0.006]; no overall survival difference was observed (p=0.559). Conclusions: This LBx assay detected MSI-H at similar frequencies to published tissue cohorts and may identify acquired MSI-H following early lines of therapy. Patients who received ICI following LBx identification of MSI-H achieved responses in line with published data in previously treated aGI. Well-validated LBx is a viable tool to identify initial and acquired MSI-H in aGI and may expand the number of patients who could benefit from ICI therapy, particularly in cases where access to tissue specimens is not feasible. [Table: see text]

ERBB2 Copy Number as a Quantitative Biomarker for Real-World Outcomes to Anti-Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Therapy in Advanced Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression or amplification (ERBB2amp) are biomarkers for approved anti-HER2 therapies. ERBB2amp may better predict response compared with immunohistochemistry or in situ hybridization, and quantitative copy number (CN) may further stratify patients. We characterized ERBB2amp in advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas (GEA) and hypothesized that increased CN was associated with better outcome to trastuzumab.

METHODS

Comprehensive genomic profiling, including assessment of ERBB2amp, was performed for 12,905 GEA tissue cases. Clinical outcomes were assessed using a clinicogenomic database linking deidentified electronic health record–derived clinical data to genomic data. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used for real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) comparisons.

RESULTS

ERBB2amp (CN ≥ 5) was detected in 15% (1,934 of 12,905) of GEA; median CN 22 (interquartile range 9-73). Median ERBB2 amplicon size was 0.27 megabase (interquartile range 0.13-0.95), and smaller amplicons were associated with higher CN (P < .001). In the clinicogenomic database, of 101 evaluable first-line trastuzumab-treated patients, ERBB2 CN was a significant predictor of rwPFS as a continuous variable (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.89; P = .002), whereas ERBB2 CN was not predictive of rwPFS on chemotherapy (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.93; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.20; P = .59). Among trastuzumab-treated patients, no significant associations with ERBB2 CN were observed for disease site, age, stage at advanced diagnosis, or most selected coalterations.

CONCLUSION

ERBB2amp was detected in 15% of GEA tissue samples, with significant diversity in ERBB2 CN and amplicon focality. ERBB2 CN was predictive of rwPFS as a continuous variable for patients treated with trastuzumab. Further studies exploring the clinical utility of quantitative ERBB2 CN, particularly in the setting of the evolving anti-HER2 landscape and combination therapies, are warranted.

ERBB2 copy number is a quantitative biomarker for outcomes to anti-HER2 therapy in advanced gastroesophageal cancer.

Amivantamab (JNJ-61186372) induces clinical, biochemical, molecular, and radiographic response in a treatment-refractory NSCLC patient harboring amplified triple EGFR mutations (L858R/ T790M/G796S) in cis

The sequential use of 1^st-/2^nd-generation to 3^rd-generation epidermal growth factor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has led to the emergence of triple EGFR mutations generally consisting of the founder mutation (del 19 or L858R), gatekeeper mutation (T790M) and mutation (C797S) that abolishes the covalent binding of osimertinib to the EGFR protein (i.e., del 19 or L858R/T790M/C797S). Besides C797S, other tertiary mutations confer structural steric hindrance to osimertinib rather than preventing its covalent binding to the EGFR kinase domain such as solvent front mutation (G796S) or others such as L792F/H mutation. "Fourth-generation" EGFR TKIs are being developed to inhibit these triple mutations, in particular, in the background of compound T790M/C797S mutations but they are still in early clinical stages of development. Amivantamab, a bi-specific EGFR/MET monoclonal antibody that can affect Fc mediated trogocytosis of the EGFR protein has been approved for the treatment of EGFR exon20 insertion mutations and has demonstrated activity against a myriad of compound EGFR mutations. Here we report amivantamab monotherapy induced symptomatic, biochemical, molecular, and radiographic responses in a NSCLC patient with triple EGFR mutations in cis in the background of EGFR amplification.

A Phase I, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Study of the OX40 Agonist Ivuxolimab in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Cancers

PURPOSE

Stimulation of effector T cells is an appealing immunotherapeutic approach in oncology. OX40 (CD134) is a costimulatory receptor expressed on activated CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells. Induction of OX40 following antigen recognition results in enhanced T-cell activation, proliferation, and survival, and OX40 targeting shows therapeutic efficacy in preclinical studies. We report the monotherapy dose-escalation portion of a multicenter, phase I trial (NCT02315066) of ivuxolimab (PF-04518600), a fully human immunoglobulin G2 agonistic monoclonal antibody specific for human OX40.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Adult patients (N = 52) with selected locally advanced or metastatic cancers received ivuxolimab 0.01 to 10 mg/kg. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability. Secondary/exploratory endpoints included preliminary assessment of antitumor activity and biomarker analyses.

RESULTS

The most common all-causality adverse events were fatigue (46.2%), nausea (28.8%), and decreased appetite (25.0%). Of 31 treatment-related adverse events, 30 (96.8%) were grade ≤2. No dose-limiting toxicities occurred. Ivuxolimab exposure increased in a dose-proportionate manner from 0.3 to 10 mg/kg. Full peripheral blood target engagement occurred at ≥0.3 mg/kg. Three (5.8%) patients achieved a partial response, and disease control was achieved in 56% of patients. Increased CD4⁺ central memory T-cell proliferation and activation, and clonal expansion of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells in peripheral blood were observed at 0.1 to 3.0 mg/kg. Increased immune cell infiltrate and OX40 expression were evident in on-treatment tumor biopsies.

CONCLUSIONS

Ivuxolimab was generally well tolerated with on-target immune activation at clinically relevant doses, showed preliminary antitumor activity, and may serve as a partner for combination studies.