Adeno-to-squamous transition drives resistance to KRAS inhibition in LKB1 mutant lung cancer

KRASG12C inhibitors (adagrasib and sotorasib) have shown clinical promise in targeting KRASG12C-mutated lung cancers; however, most patients eventually develop resistance. In lung patients with adenocarcinoma with KRASG12C and STK11/LKB1 co-mutations, we find an enrichment of the squamous cell carcinoma gene signature in pre-treatment biopsies correlates with a poor response to adagrasib. Studies of Lkb1-deficient KRASG12C and KrasG12D lung cancer mouse models and organoids treated with KRAS inhibitors reveal tumors invoke a lineage plasticity program, adeno-to-squamous transition (AST), that enables resistance to KRAS inhibition. Transcriptomic and epigenomic analyses reveal ΔNp63 drives AST and modulates response to KRAS inhibition. We identify an intermediate high-plastic cell state marked by expression of an AST plasticity signature and Krt6a. Notably, expression of the AST plasticity signature and KRT6A at baseline correlates with poor adagrasib responses. These data indicate the role of AST in KRAS inhibitor resistance and provide predictive biomarkers for KRAS-targeted therapies in lung cancer.

Lymph-node-targeted, mKRAS-specific amphiphile vaccine in pancreatic and colorectal cancer: the phase 1 AMPLIFY-201 trial

Pancreatic and colorectal cancers are often KRAS mutated and are incurable when tumor DNA or protein persists or recurs after curative intent therapy. Cancer vaccine ELI-002 2P enhances lymph node delivery and immune response using amphiphile (Amph) modification of G12D and G12R mutant KRAS (mKRAS) peptides (Amph-Peptides-2P) together with CpG oligonucleotide adjuvant (Amph-CpG-7909). We treated 25 patients (20 pancreatic and five colorectal) who were positive for minimal residual mKRAS disease (ctDNA and/or serum tumor antigen) after locoregional treatment in a phase 1 study of fixed-dose Amph-Peptides-2P and ascending-dose Amph-CpG-7909; study enrollment is complete with patient follow-up ongoing. Primary endpoints included safety and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). The secondary endpoint was tumor biomarker response (longitudinal ctDNA or tumor antigen), with exploratory endpoints including immunogenicity and relapse-free survival (RFS). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed, and the RP2D was 10.0 mg of Amph-CpG-7909. Direct ex vivo mKRAS-specific T cell responses were observed in 21 of 25 patients (84%; 59% both CD4+ and CD8+); tumor biomarker responses were observed in 21 of 25 patients (84%); biomarker clearance was observed in six of 25 patients (24%; three pancreatic and three colorectal); and the median RFS was 16.33 months. Efficacy correlated with T cell responses above or below the median fold increase over baseline (12.75-fold): median tumor biomarker reduction was -76.0% versus -10.2% (P < 0.0014), and the median RFS was not reached versus 4.01 months (hazard ratio = 0.14; P = 0.0167). ELI-002 2P was safe and induced considerable T cell responses in patients with immunotherapy-recalcitrant KRAS-mutated tumors. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04853017 .

Early Changes in Circulating Cell-Free KRAS G12C Predict Response to Adagrasib in KRAS Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients

PURPOSE

Non-invasive monitoring of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has the potential to be a readily available measure for early prediction of clinical response. Here, we report on early ctDNA changes of KRAS G12C in a Phase 2 trial of adagrasib in patients with advanced, KRAS G12C-mutant lung cancer.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We performed serial droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and plasma NGS on 60 KRAS G12C-mutant patients with lung cancer that participated in cohort A of the KRYSTAL-1 clinical trial. We analyzed the change in ctDNA at 2 specific intervals: Between cycles 1 and 2 and at cycle 4. Changes in ctDNA were compared with clinical and radiographic response.

RESULTS

We found that, in general, a maximal response in KRAS G12C ctDNA levels could be observed during the initial approximately 3-week treatment period, well before the first scan at approximately 6 weeks. 35 patients (89.7%) exhibited a decrease in KRAS G12C cfDNA >90% and 33 patients (84.6%) achieved complete clearance by cycle 2. Patients with complete ctDNA clearance at cycle 2 showed an improved objective response rate (ORR) compared with patients with incomplete ctDNA clearance (60.6% vs. 33.3%). Furthermore, complete ctDNA clearance at cycle 4 was associated with an improved overall survival (14.7 vs. 5.4 months) and progression-free survival (HR, 0.3).

CONCLUSIONS

These results support using early plasma response of KRAS G12C assessed at approximately 3 weeks to anticipate the likelihood of a favorable objective clinical response.

Adagrasib with or without Cetuximab in Colorectal Cancer with Mutated KRAS G12C

BACKGROUND

Adagrasib, an oral small-molecule inhibitor of mutant KRAS G12C protein, has shown clinical activity in pretreated patients with several tumor types, including colorectal cancer. Preclinical studies suggest that combining a KRAS G12C inhibitor with an epidermal growth factor receptor antibody could be an effective clinical strategy.

METHODS

In this phase 1-2, open-label, nonrandomized clinical trial, we assigned heavily pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with mutant KRAS G12C to receive adagrasib monotherapy (600 mg orally twice daily) or adagrasib (at the same dose) in combination with intravenous cetuximab once a week (with an initial loading dose of 400 mg per square meter of body-surface area, followed by a dose of 250 mg per square meter) or every 2 weeks (with a dose of 500 mg per square meter). The primary end points were objective response (complete or partial response) and safety.

RESULTS

As of June 16, 2022, a total of 44 patients had received adagrasib, and 32 had received combination therapy with adagrasib and cetuximab, with a median follow-up of 20.1 months and 17.5 months, respectively. In the monotherapy group (43 evaluable patients), a response was reported in 19% of the patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 8 to 33). The median response duration was 4.3 months (95% CI, 2.3 to 8.3), and the median progression-free survival was 5.6 months (95% CI, 4.1 to 8.3). In the combination-therapy group (28 evaluable patients), the response was 46% (95% CI, 28 to 66). The median response duration was 7.6 months (95% CI, 5.7 to not estimable), and the median progression-free survival was 6.9 months (95% CI, 5.4 to 8.1). The percentage of grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events was 34% in the monotherapy group and 16% in the combination-therapy group. No grade 5 adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Adagrasib had antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with mutant KRAS G12C, both as oral monotherapy and in combination with cetuximab. The median response duration was more than 6 months in the combination-therapy group. Reversible adverse events were common in the two groups. (Funded by Mirati Therapeutics; KRYSTAL-1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03785249.).

Adagrasib in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Harboring a KRASG12C Mutation

BACKGROUND

Adagrasib, a KRAS^G12C inhibitor, irreversibly and selectively binds KRAS^G12C, locking it in its inactive state. Adagrasib showed clinical activity and had an acceptable adverse-event profile in the phase 1-1b part of the KRYSTAL-1 phase 1-2 study.

METHODS

In a registrational phase 2 cohort, we evaluated adagrasib (600 mg orally twice daily) in patients with KRAS^G12C -mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and anti-programmed death 1 or programmed death ligand 1 therapy. The primary end point was objective response assessed by blinded independent central review. Secondary end points included the duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety.

RESULTS

As of October 15, 2021, a total of 116 patients with KRAS^G12C -mutated NSCLC had been treated (median follow-up, 12.9 months); 98.3% had previously received both chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Of 112 patients with measurable disease at baseline, 48 (42.9%) had a confirmed objective response. The median duration of response was 8.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.2 to 13.8), and the median progression-free survival was 6.5 months (95% CI, 4.7 to 8.4). As of January 15, 2022 (median follow-up, 15.6 months), the median overall survival was 12.6 months (95% CI, 9.2 to 19.2). Among 33 patients with previously treated, stable central nervous system metastases, the intracranial confirmed objective response rate was 33.3% (95% CI, 18.0 to 51.8). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 97.4% of the patients - grade 1 or 2 in 52.6% and grade 3 or higher in 44.8% (including two grade 5 events) - and resulted in drug discontinuation in 6.9% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with previously treated KRAS^G12C -mutated NSCLC, adagrasib showed clinical efficacy without new safety signals. (Funded by Mirati Therapeutics; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03785249.).

Activity of adagrasib (MRTX849) in patients with KRASG12C-mutated NSCLC and active, untreated CNS metastases in the KRYSTAL-1 trial

LBA9009

Background: CNS metastases (mets) occur in 27–42% of NSCLC harboring KRASG12C mutations and are associated with poor prognosis. Adagrasib (ada), an investigational agent, is a KRASG12C inhibitor that irreversibly and selectively binds KRASG12C, locking it in its inactive state, and is optimized for favorable PK properties, including a long half-life (̃24 h) and dose-dependent PK. Ada has demonstrated dose-dependent CNS penetration and intracranial (IC) tumor regression in preclinical models of CNS mets. Methods: KRYSTAL-1 (NCT03785249) is a multicohort Phase 1/2 study evaluating ada as monotherapy or in combination with selected agents in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors harboring a KRASG12C mutation. In a Phase 1b cohort, pts with KRASG12C-mutant NSCLC and active, untreated CNS mets were treated with ada 600 mg BID. The objectives for this Phase 1b cohort were to evaluate safety and clinical activity, including systemic and IC objective response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review (BICR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Systemic responses were assessed by RECIST 1.1; IC responses were assessed by modified RANO criteria and IC RECIST. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was collected when feasible and was used to measure ada concentrations for optional evaluation. Results: As of 31 December 2021, 25 pts with NSCLC were enrolled and treated. Median follow-up was 6.6 months at the cutoff date. Median age was 66 years, 52% were female, 28%/72% had ECOG PS 0/1, and median lines of prior systemic therapy was one (range 0–4+). IC ORR per modified RANO criteria by BICR was 31.6% (6/19; 3 CRs, 2 PRs, 1 unconfirmed PR); IC disease control rate (DCR) was 84.2% (16/19, including 10 SDs). Median IC DOR was not reached (95% CI 4.1–NE); median IC PFS was 4.2 months (95% CI 3.8–NE). CSF samples were obtained for two pts for whom regression of CNS mets was observed and ada CSF concentrations exceeded the CNS penetrance partition coefficients observed for other therapies with demonstrated CNS penetration and CNS antitumor activity (Kp,uu 0.47). Systemic ORR by BICR was 35.0% (7/20), DCR was 80.0% (16/20) and median DOR was 9.6 months (95% CI 2.7–9.6); median PFS was 5.6 months (95% CI 3.8–11.0). For all pts enrolled, OS was immature, and the median had not been reached at the time of analysis. Safety was consistent with that previously reported with ada; any grade TRAEs occurred in 96% of pts, grade 3 TRAEs in 36%, and there were no grade 4/5 TRAEs. Further data describing IC activity assessed by IC RECIST will be presented. Conclusions: Ada was well tolerated, and these preliminary data demonstrate CNS penetration and encouraging IC activity in pretreated pts with NSCLC harboring a KRASG12C mutation and active, untreated CNS mets. These are the first clinical data demonstrating CNS-specific activity of a KRASG12C inhibitor in this population. Clinical trial information: NCT03785249.

KRYSTAL-1: Updated activity and safety of adagrasib (MRTX849) in patients (Pts) with unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer (PDAC) and other gastrointestinal (GI) tumors harboring a KRASG12C mutation

519

Background: KRAS, the most frequently mutated oncogene in cancer, is a key mediator of the RAS/MAPK signaling cascade that promotes cellular growth and proliferation. KRAS mutations occur in approximately 90% of pancreatic cancer, and approximately 2% of these are KRASG12C mutations. Adagrasib, an investigational agent, is a KRASG12C inhibitor that irreversibly and selectively binds KRASG12C, locking it in its inactive state; adagrasib has been optimized for favorable pharmacokinetic (PK) properties, including long half-life (̃24 h), extensive tissue distribution, dose-dependent PK, as well as CNS penetration. Methods: KRYSTAL-1 (NCT03785249) is a multicohort Phase 1/2 study evaluating adagrasib as monotherapy or in combinations in pts with advanced solid tumors harboring a KRASG12C mutation. Here we report preliminary data from pts enrolled in a Phase 2 cohort evaluating single-agent adagrasib administered orally at 600 mg BID in previously treated pts with unresectable or metastatic solid tumors (excluding NSCLC and CRC), including pancreatic and other GI cancers. Study endpoints include clinical activity, safety, and PK. Results: The data cutoff was 10 September 2021. A total of 42 pts were enrolled in this cohort (median age 63.5 years, range 21–89; 52% female; 71% white; 29%/71% ECOG PS 0/1; median 2 prior lines of therapy, range 1–7; median follow-up 6.3 months), of whom 30 pts had KRASG12C-mutant GI tumors (12 PDAC, 8 biliary tract, 5 appendiceal, 2 gastro-esophageal junction, 2 small bowel, and 1 esophageal). In a preliminary analysis, 27 pts with GI tumors were evaluable for clinical activity; partial responses (PRs) were seen in 41% (11/27, including 3 unconfirmed PRs); the disease control rate (DCR) was 100% (27/27). Of the 12 pts with PDAC (median 3 prior lines of therapy; median follow-up 8.1 months), 10 were evaluable for clinical activity; PRs were seen in 50% (5/10, including 1 unconfirmed PR); the DCR was 100% (10/10). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.6 months (95% CI 1.0–9.7), and treatment was ongoing in 50% of pts with PDAC. Among the 17 evaluable pts with other GI tumors, 6 achieved PR (35%; 2 unconfirmed) with a DCR of 100% (17/17); 11 pts were still receiving treatment. In the overall cohort, treatment-related adverse events of any grade occurred in 91% (38/42), the most frequent being nausea (48%), diarrhea (43%), vomiting (43%), and fatigue (29%); grade 3/4 events occurred in 21% of pts, with no grade 5 events. Conclusions: Adagrasib monotherapy is well tolerated and demonstrates encouraging clinical activity in pretreated pts with PDAC and other GI tumors harboring a KRASG12C mutation. Further exploration of adagrasib is ongoing in this pt population (NCT03785249). Clinical trial information: NCT03785249.

KRYSTAL-12: A randomized phase 3 study of adagrasib (MRTX849) versus docetaxel in patients (pts) with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with KRASG12C mutation

TPS9129

Background: Despite significant advances in chemotherapy and immunotherapy for advanced NSCLC, the majority of pts ultimately develop progressive disease associated with poor outcomes. KRAS is a key mediator of the RAS/MAPK signaling cascade that promotes cell growth and proliferation. KRASG12C mutations occur in 14% of NSCLC (adenocarcinoma), and mutations in KRAS are associated with a poor prognosis. Although KRAS has historically been undruggable, recent research into the development of agents that specifically bind mutant KRAS has led to the development of direct inhibitors of KRASG12C. Adagrasib, an investigational agent, is a potent, covalent inhibitor of KRASG12C that irreversibly and selectively binds to and locks KRASG12C in its inactive state. Adagrasib was optimized for favorable pharmacokinetic (PK) properties, including oral bioavailability, long half-life (̃24 h), and extensive tissue distribution. Initial results have demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity and tolerability of adagrasib monotherapy in pts with NSCLC harboring a KRASG12C mutation. Methods: KRYSTAL-12 is a multicenter, randomized Phase 3 study evaluating the efficacy of adagrasib (600 mg BID) vs docetaxel in pts with advanced NSCLC harboring a KRASG12C mutation who have progressed during or after treatment with a platinum-based regimen and an immune checkpoint inhibitor. The study is designed to demonstrate improvement in the dual primary endpoints of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints include safety, objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1, duration of response (DOR), plasma PK parameters of adagrasib, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). The study will also explore correlations between gene alterations (at baseline and upon development of treatment resistance) and efficacy. Approximately 450 patients will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive adagrasib or docetaxel and will be stratified by region (United States/Canada vs other countries) and sequential vs concurrent administration of prior platinum-based chemotherapy and anti–PD-1/PD-L1 antibody. The planned sample size is sufficiently powered for the hypothesized treatment effect of the endpoints. Pts will receive study treatment until disease progression, unacceptable adverse events, investigator decision to terminate treatment, or patient withdrawal. This study is currently enrolling and will be open at sites in the United States, Europe, and Asia. Clinical trial information: NCT04685135.

Effect of Vocimagene Amiretrorepvec in Combination With Flucytosine vs Standard of Care on Survival Following Tumor Resection in Patients With Recurrent High-Grade Glioma: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

New treatments are needed to improve the prognosis of patients with recurrent high-grade glioma.

Objective

To compare overall survival for patients receiving tumor resection followed by vocimagene amiretrorepvec (Toca 511) with flucytosine (Toca FC) vs standard of care (SOC).

Design, Setting, and Participants

A randomized, open-label phase 2/3 trial (TOCA 5) in 58 centers in the US, Canada, Israel, and South Korea, comparing posttumor resection treatment with Toca 511 followed by Toca FC vs a defined single choice of approved (SOC) therapies was conducted from November 30, 2015, to December 20, 2019. Patients received tumor resection for first or second recurrence of glioblastoma or anaplastic astrocytoma.

Interventions

Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive Toca 511/FC (n = 201) or SOC control (n = 202). For the Toca 511/FC group, patients received Toca 511 injected into the resection cavity wall at the time of surgery, followed by cycles of oral Toca FC 6 weeks after surgery. For the SOC control group, patients received investigators' choice of single therapy: lomustine, temozolomide, or bevacizumab.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) in time from randomization date to death due to any cause. Secondary outcomes reported in this study included safety, durable response rate (DRR), duration of DRR, durable clinical benefit rate, OS and DRR by IDH1 variant status, and 12-month OS.

Results

All 403 randomized patients (median [SD] age: 56 [11.46] years; 62.5% [252] men) were included in the efficacy analysis, and 400 patients were included in the safety analysis (3 patients on the SOC group did not receive resection). Final analysis included 271 deaths (141 deaths in the Toca 511/FC group and 130 deaths in the SOC control group). The median follow-up was 22.8 months. The median OS was 11.10 months for the Toca 511/FC group and 12.22 months for the control group (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% CI 0.83, 1.35; P = .62). The secondary end points did not demonstrate statistically significant differences. The rates of adverse events were similar in the Toca 511/FC group and the SOC control group.

Conclusions and Relevance

Among patients who underwent tumor resection for first or second recurrence of glioblastoma or anaplastic astrocytoma, administration of Toca 511 and Toca FC, compared with SOC, did not improve overall survival or other efficacy end points.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02414165.

Immune modulation after Toca 511 and Toca FC treatment of colorectal cancer patients

186

Background: Toca 511 (vocimagene amiretrorepvec) is a cancer-selective, retroviral replicating vector encoding yeast cytosine deaminase that converts 5-fluorocytosine (5-FC) into 5-fluorouracil in the tumor microenvironment (TME). In animal models, Toca 511 and 5-FC kill dividing cancer and nearby immunosuppressive cells, leading to antitumor immune activity. A Phase 1 study of Toca 511 & Toca FC (extended-release 5-FC) in patients with recurrent high grade glioma revealed results consistent with this proposed mechanism. A Phase 3 trial is ongoing. Methods: Toca 6 (NCT02576665) is a Phase 1b, single-arm, multicenter study designed to investigate immunological changes after Toca 511 & Toca FC treatment in patients with advanced solid tumors, including colorectal cancer (CRC). Patients received intravenous (IV) Toca 511 for 3 days, and underwent biopsy of metastatic tumor before and ~ 4 weeks after starting oral Toca FC. Toca FC was repeated every 4-6 weeks. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells and tumor biopsies were evaluated for treatment related immune responses. Results: 17 CRC patients with a median 5 lines of prior chemotherapy were enrolled. At last data cut-off, 9 patients were alive and the median overall survival was 9.4 months. A patient receiving concomitant panitumumab had a partial response. IV Toca 511 led to viral expression in tumor, which decreased post-Toca FC while maintaining a reservoir of virus in the remaining tumor. T cells shifted from naïve to effector phenotypes, CD4 memory T cells expanded, and/or B cells increased after Toca FC treatment in 36% of patients. Marked changes in tumor infiltrating cells (CD11b myeloid cells, Tregs, exhausted T cells and CD8 T cells) occurred after Toca FC treatment. Treatment has been generally well tolerated. We also plan to report insights gained from RNA analysis of TME and update on clinical finding. Conclusions: Clinical data suggest a signal of activity in these heavily pretreated CRC patients warranting further exploration. IV Toca 511 administration showed viral infection of CRC metastatic tumor. Toca 511 & Toca FC may be associated with T cell mediated immune activity in peripheral blood and metastatic tumor, consistent with pre-clinical data in multiple tumor types. Clinical trial information: NCT02576665.

Durable complete responses in some recurrent high-grade glioma patients treated with Toca 511 + Toca FC

Background

Vocimagene amiretrorepvec (Toca 511) is an investigational gamma-retroviral replicating vector encoding cytosine deaminase that, when used in combination with extended-release 5-fluorocytosine (Toca FC), results preclinically in local production of 5-fluorouracil, depletion of immune-suppressive myeloid cells, and subsequent induction of antitumor immunity. Recurrent high-grade glioma (rHGG) patients have a high unmet need for effective therapies that produce durable responses lasting more than 6 months. In this setting, relapse is nearly universal and most responses are transient.

Methods

In this Toca 511 ascending-dose phase I trial (NCT01470794), HGG patients who recurred after standard of care underwent surgical resection and received Toca 511 injected into the resection cavity wall, followed by orally administered cycles of Toca FC.

Results

Among 56 patients, durable complete responses were observed. A subgroup was identified based on Toca 511 dose and entry requirements for the follow-up phase III study. In this subgroup, which included both isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutant and wild-type tumors, the durable response rate is 21.7%. Median duration of follow-up for responders is 35.7+ months. As of August 25, 2017, all responders remain in response and are alive 33.9+ to 52.2+ months after Toca 511 administration, suggesting a positive association of durable response with overall survival.

Conclusions

Multiyear durable responses have been observed in rHGG patients treated with Toca 511 + Toca FC in a phase I trial, and the treatment will be further evaluated in a randomized phase III trial. Among IDH1 mutant patients treated at first recurrence, there may be an enrichment of complete responders.

Abstract A018: Effects of Toca 511 and Toca FC on tumor microenvironment and peripheral blood populations in patients with advanced malignancies

Toca 511 (vocimagene amiretrorepvec) is an investigational, conditionally lytic, retroviral replicating vector that selectively infects cancer cells due to cell division requirements for virus integration into the genome, and defects in innate and adaptive immune responses found in malignant tissues that support virus replication. Toca 511 spreads through cancer cells and stably delivers optimized yeast cytosine deaminase (CD) that, upon administration of the prodrug, Toca FC (an investigational, extended-release version of 5-fluorocytosine [5-FC]), converts 5-FC into 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). 5-FU kills infected dividing cancer cells and diffuses to and kills surrounding cells in the tumor microenvironment, including immunosuppressive myeloid cells. In animal models, this depletion of immunosuppressive myeloid cells leads to therapeutically active immunity against tumors. A similarly derived antitumor response may occur in cancer patients, as local injection of Toca 511 into the tumor bed after resection of recurrent high-grade glioma followed by treatment with Toca FC has been associated with prolonged survival and durable complete responses (median duration of follow-up: 37.4+ months); responses were delayed in onset, consistent with time to response for immuno-oncology agents. The current phase 1b, multicenter, open-label study (Toca 6; NCT02576665) is designed to investigate changes in immune activity after treatment with Toca 511 and Toca FC in patients with advanced malignancies. Toca 511 is administered intravenously (IV) daily for 3 days and then as a single injection into metastatic or recurrent tumor. Oral Toca FC is started ~4 weeks later and repeated every 4-6 weeks. Biopsies are obtained prior to and following exposure to Toca 511 and Toca FC treatment to evaluate changes in immune activity, and peripheral blood is obtained contemporaneously for evaluation. The study has enrolled 19 patients to date (colorectal cancer: 15; sarcoma: 2; non-small cell lung and pancreas cancer: 1 each). Treatment has been well tolerated. Viral RNA, DNA, and CD protein expression are observed in tumor after IV delivery of Toca 511. We plan to report on tumor microenvironment remodeling that follows treatment with Toca 511 and Toca FC. Infiltrating T-cell subpopulations, B cells, and monocytes quantified by immunofluorescence from stained formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples will be presented. Additionally, changes in peripheral blood, including T-cell effector, helper/memory, and regulatory populations, and myeloid lineage cells following exposure to Toca 511 alone and following subsequent exposure to Toca FC will be reported. Data from this study will inform future development of Toca 511 and Toca FC alone or in combination with other therapies in patients with solid tumors.

Citation Format: Jaime Merchan, Jordi Rodon, Derek Ostertag, Shree Venkat, Arthur Donahue, Peder Horner, Dalissa Tijera, Thian Kheoh, Douglas J. Jolly, Harry E. Gruber, Jolene S. Shorr, Gerald S. Falchook. Effects of Toca 511 and Toca FC on tumor microenvironment and peripheral blood populations in patients with advanced malignancies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Fourth CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR International Cancer Immunotherapy Conference: Translating Science into Survival; Sept 30-Oct 3, 2018; New York, NY. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2019;7(2 Suppl):Abstract nr A018.

Androgen receptor mutations in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with apalutamide

Background

Mutations in the androgen receptor (AR) ligand-binding domain (LBD), such as F877L and T878A, have been associated with resistance to next-generation AR-directed therapies. ARN-509-001 was a phase I/II study that evaluated apalutamide activity in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Here, we evaluated the type and frequency of 11 relevant AR-LBD mutations in apalutamide-treated CRPC patients.

Patients and methods

Blood samples from men with nonmetastatic CRPC (nmCRPC) and metastatic CRPC (mCRPC) pre- or post-abiraterone acetate and prednisone (AAP) treatment (≥6 months' exposure) were evaluated at baseline and disease progression in trial ARN-509-001. Mutations were detected in circulating tumor DNA using a digital polymerase chain reaction-based method known as BEAMing (beads, emulsification, amplification and magnetics) (Sysmex Inostics' GmbH).

Results

Of the 97 total patients, 51 had nmCRPC, 25 had AAP-naïve mCRPC, and 21 had post-AAP mCRPC. Ninety-three were assessable for the mutation analysis at baseline and 82 of the 93 at progression. The overall frequency of detected AR mutations at baseline was 7/93 (7.5%) and at progression was 6/82 (7.3%). Three of the 82 (3.7%) mCRPC patients (2 AAP-naïve and 1 post-AAP) acquired AR F877L during apalutamide treatment. At baseline, 3 of the 93 (3.2%) post-AAP patients had detectable AR T878A, which was lost after apalutamide treatment in 1 patient who continued apalutamide treatment for 12 months.

Conclusions

The overall frequency of detected mutations at baseline (7.5%) and progression (7.3%) using the sensitive BEAMing assay was low, suggesting that, based on this assay, AR-LBD mutations such as F877L and T878A are not common contributors to de novo or acquired resistance to apalutamide.

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier

NCT01171898.

Circulating Tumor Cell Number as a Response Measure of Prolonged Survival for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Comparison With Prostate-Specific Antigen Across Five Randomized Phase III Clinical Trials

Purpose Measures of response that are clinically meaningful and occur early are an unmet need in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer clinical research and practice. We explored, using individual patient data, week 13 circulating tumor cell (CTC) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response end points in five prospective randomized phase III trials that enrolled a total of 6,081 patients-COU-AA-301, AFFIRM, ELM-PC-5, ELM-PC-4, and COMET-1- ClinicalTrials.Gov identifiers: NCT00638690, NCT00974311, NCT01193257, NCT01193244, and NCT01605227, respectively. Methods Eight response end points were explored. CTC nonzero at baseline and 0 at 13 weeks (CTC0); CTC conversion (≥ 5 CTCs at baseline, ≤ 4 at 13 weeks-the US Food and Drug Administration cleared response measure); a 30%, 50%, and 70% decrease in CTC count; and a 30%, 50%, and 70% decrease in PSA level. Patients missing week-13 values were considered nonresponders. The discriminatory strength of each end point with respect to overall survival in each trial was assessed using the weighted c-index. Results Of the eight response end points, CTC0 and CTC conversion had the highest weighted c-indices, with smaller standard deviations. For CTC0, the mean (standard deviation) was 0.81 (0.04); for CTC conversion, 0.79 (0.03); for 30% decrease in CTC count, 0.72 (0.06); for 50% decrease in CTC count, 0.72 (0.06); for 70% decrease in CTC count, 0.73 (0.05); for 30% decrease in PSA level, 0.71 (0.03); for 50% decrease in PSA level, 0.72 (0.06); and for 70% decrease in PSA level, 0.74 (0.05). Seventy-five percent of eligible patients could be evaluated with the CTC0 end point, compared with 51% with the CTC conversion end point. Conclusion The CTC0 and CTC conversion end points had the highest discriminatory power for overall survival. Both are robust and meaningful response end points for early-phase metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer clinical trials. CTC0 is applicable to a significantly higher percentage of patients than CTC conversion.

Adding abiraterone to androgen deprivation therapy in men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is a need to synthesise the results of numerous randomised controlled trials evaluating the addition of therapies to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). This systematic review aims to assess the effects of adding abiraterone acetate plus prednisone/prednisolone (AAP) to ADT.

METHODS

Using our framework for adaptive meta-analysis (FAME), we started the review process before trials had been reported and worked collaboratively with trial investigators to anticipate when eligible trial results would emerge. Thus, we could determine the earliest opportunity for reliable meta-analysis and take account of unavailable trials in interpreting results. We searched multiple sources for trials comparing AAP plus ADT versus ADT in men with mHSPC. We obtained results for the primary outcome of overall survival (OS), secondary outcomes of clinical/radiological progression-free survival (PFS) and grade III-IV and grade V toxicity direct from trial teams. Hazard ratios (HRs) for the effects of AAP plus ADT on OS and PFS, Peto Odds Ratios (Peto ORs) for the effects on acute toxicity and interaction HRs for the effects on OS by patient subgroups were combined across trials using fixed-effect meta-analysis.

FINDINGS

We identified three eligible trials, one of which was still recruiting (PEACE-1 (NCT01957436)). Results from the two remaining trials (LATITUDE (NCT01715285) and STAMPEDE (NCT00268476)), representing 82% of all men randomised to AAP plus ADT versus ADT (without docetaxel in either arm), showed a highly significant 38% reduction in the risk of death with AAP plus ADT (HR = 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.53-0.71, p = 0.55 × 10-10), that translates into a 14% absolute improvement in 3-year OS. Despite differences in PFS definitions across trials, we also observed a consistent and highly significant 55% reduction in the risk of clinical/radiological PFS (HR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.40-0.51, p = 0.66 × 10-36) with the addition of AAP, that translates to a 28% absolute improvement at 3 years. There was no evidence of a difference in the OS benefit by Gleason sum score, performance status or nodal status, but the size of the benefit may vary by age. There were more grade III-IV acute cardiac, vascular and hepatic toxicities with AAP plus ADT but no excess of other toxicities or death.

INTERPRETATION

Adding AAP to ADT is a clinically effective treatment option for men with mHSPC, offering an alternative to docetaxel for men who are starting treatment for the first time. Future research will need to address which of these two agents or whether their combination is most effective, and for whom.

Abiraterone plus Prednisone in Metastatic, Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND

Abiraterone acetate, a drug that blocks endogenous androgen synthesis, plus prednisone is indicated for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. We evaluated the clinical benefit of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone with androgen-deprivation therapy in patients with newly diagnosed, metastatic, castration-sensitive prostate cancer.

METHODS

In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 1199 patients to receive either androgen-deprivation therapy plus abiraterone acetate (1000 mg daily, given once daily as four 250-mg tablets) plus prednisone (5 mg daily) (the abiraterone group) or androgen-deprivation therapy plus dual placebos (the placebo group). The two primary end points were overall survival and radiographic progression-free survival.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 30.4 months at a planned interim analysis (after 406 patients had died), the median overall survival was significantly longer in the abiraterone group than in the placebo group (not reached vs. 34.7 months) (hazard ratio for death, 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51 to 0.76; P<0.001). The median length of radiographic progression-free survival was 33.0 months in the abiraterone group and 14.8 months in the placebo group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.55; P<0.001). Significantly better outcomes in all secondary end points were observed in the abiraterone group, including the time until pain progression, next subsequent therapy for prostate cancer, initiation of chemotherapy, and prostate-specific antigen progression (P<0.001 for all comparisons), along with next symptomatic skeletal events (P=0.009). These findings led to the unanimous recommendation by the independent data and safety monitoring committee that the trial be unblinded and crossover be allowed for patients in the placebo group to receive abiraterone. Rates of grade 3 hypertension and hypokalemia were higher in the abiraterone group.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of abiraterone acetate and prednisone to androgen-deprivation therapy significantly increased overall survival and radiographic progression-free survival in men with newly diagnosed, metastatic, castration-sensitive prostate cancer. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; LATITUDE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01715285 .).

Prognostic Index Model for Progression-Free Survival in Chemotherapy-Naïve Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Treated With Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone

BACKGROUND

Radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) is associated with overall survival (OS) in chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. Using readily assessable baseline clinical and laboratory parameters, we developed a prognostic index model for rPFS in chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC patients without visceral disease who were treated with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone.

METHODS

Data from the abiraterone acetate plus prednisone arm of COU-AA-302 were used. rPFS was defined based on modified Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 criteria. Baseline variables were assessed for association with rPFS through univariate Cox modeling. The lower (LLN) and upper (ULN) limits of laboratory normal were used to dichotomize most laboratory parameters; baseline median was used to dichotomize prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Prognostic factors for rPFS were identified by multivariate Cox modeling. Model accuracy was estimated by the C-index.

RESULTS

Presence of lymph node metastasis (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.76, P < .0001), lactate dehydrogenase > ULN (234 IU/L) (HR = 1.71, P = .0001), ≥ 10 bone metastases (HR = 1.71, P = .0015), hemoglobin ≤ LLN (12.7 g/dL) (HR = 1.47, P = .0030) and PSA > 39.5 ng/mL (HR = 1.42, P = .0078) were associated with poor outcome. Patients were categorized into 3 prognostic groups (good, n = 230; intermediate, n = 152; poor, n = 164) based on number of risk factors. Median rPFS was calculated (27.6, 16.6, and 8.3 months for good, intermediate, and poor, respectively). The C-index was 0.83 (95% confidence interval = 0.73-0.91).

CONCLUSIONS

The prognostic index model for rPFS reveals differential outcomes based on factors readily available in clinical practice. If validated, this model can be integrated into clinical practice and design of risk-stratified trials.

LATITUDE: A phase III, double-blind, randomized trial of androgen deprivation therapy with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone or placebos in newly diagnosed high-risk metastatic hormone-naive prostate cancer

LBA3

Background: Pts with newly diagnosed mHNPC, particularly with high-risk characteristics, have a poor prognosis. ADT+docetaxel showed improved outcomes in mHNPC, but many pts are not candidates for docetaxel and may benefit from alternative therapy. AA+P is indicated for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer pts. LATITUDE evaluates clinical benefit of early intervention with AA+P added to ADT in newly diagnosed, high-risk mHNPC pts. Methods: 1199 pts with newly diagnosed (≤ 3 mos prior to randomization) mHNPC (ECOG PS 0-2) with ≥ 2 of 3 risk factors (Gleason ≥ 8, ≥ 3 bone lesions, measurable visceral metastases) were randomized 1:1 to ADT+AA (1 g QD) + P (5 mg QD) or ADT+PBOs of AA and P. Co-primary end points were overall survival (OS) and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS). One rPFS (~565 events), 2 interim, and 1 final OS analyses (~426, ~554, and ~852 events) were planned. Results: At this first interim analysis (median follow-up of 30.4 mos; 406 deaths [48%]; 593 rPFS events), OS, rPFS, and all secondary end points significantly favored ADT+AA+P (Table). The IDMC unanimously recommended unblinding the study and crossing pts to ADT+AA+P. Grade 3/4 adverse events (ADT+AA+P vs ADT+PBOs) (%): hypertension (20.3 vs 10.0); hypokalemia (10.4 vs 1.3); increased ALT (5.5 vs 1.3) or AST (4.4 vs 1.5). Conclusions: Early use of AA+P added to ADT in pts with high-risk mHNPC yielded significantly improved OS, rPFS, and all secondary end points vs ADT+PBOs alone. ADT+AA+P had a favorable risk/benefit ratio and supports early intervention with AA+P in newly diagnosed, high-risk mHNPC. Clinical trial information: NCT01715285. [Table: see text]

Circulating tumor cell (CTC) number as a response endpoint in metastatic castration resistant (mCRPC) compared with PSA across five randomized phase 3 trials

5007

Background: Radiographic progression and overall survival (OS) are the traditional clinical benefit measures for mCRPC trials. Reliable indicators of response that occur early are a critical unmet need in practice and clinical research. We explored a week 13 CTC and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) endpoint relative to baseline in 5 prospective randomized phase 3 registration trials that enrolled 5912 pts. OS was the primary endpoint. Methods: CTC number (CellSearch) and PSA values in patients who survived at least 13 weeks were evaluated as response endpoints in COU-AA-301, AFFIRM, ELM-PC-5, ELM-PC-4 and COMET-1. Pts with missing values at week 13 were considered non-responders. The endpoints considered are shown in Table 1. Results: The discriminatory strength of the response endpoints with respect to OS was estimated using the weighted c-index. To summarize discrimination results for each measure, the mean and the standard deviation based on the weighted c-indices from the 5 studies were computed. Conclusions: CTC0 and CTC conversion endpoints had the highest discriminatory power for OS relative to the % decline in CTC or PSA endpoints. The percent of pts eligible and evaluable for the CTC0 endpoint was significantly higher than the conversion endpoint, 75% vs. 51%, respectively. These two absolute measures of CTC can be considered meaningful response indicators in mCRPC clinical trials. [Table: see text]

[Table: see text]

LATITUDE: A phase III, double-blind, randomized trial of androgen deprivation therapy with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone or placebos in newly diagnosed high-risk metastatic hormone-naive prostate cancer

LBA3

The full, final text of this abstract will be available at abstracts.asco.org at 7:30 AM (EDT) on Saturday, June 3, 2017, and in the Annual Meeting Proceedings online supplement to the June 20, 2017, issue of the Journal of Clinical Oncology. Onsite at the Meeting, this abstract will be printed in the Sunday edition of ASCO Daily News.

Clinical outcome of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients (pts) with a post-treatment circulating tumor cell (CTC) of 0 vs CTC > 0: Post hoc analysis of COU-AA-301

5015

Background: Assessment of radiographic response by RECIST in the majority of mCRPC pts is limited by the lack of measurable disease. Changes in CTC counts (CTCs) enumerated using Veridex CellSearch from unfavorable at baseline (BL [≥ 5 cells/7.5 mL]) to favorable (≤ 4) are prognostic for survival, and the test is FDA cleared as an aid in the monitoring of metastatic PC. The CTC cutpoint of ≥ 5 excludes many pts from response assessment. Examining CTCs alone and in combination with other biomarkers as a potential surrogate for clinical benefit was a secondary objective of COU-AA-301, a phase 3 trial of abiraterone acetate + prednisone vs prednisone alone in mCRPC. Methods: Pts from both treatment (tmt) groups with BL CTC > 0 were combined to assess CTC = 0 as a response criterion. Association between CTC response, defined as BL CTC > 0 and post-BL CTC = 0, and clinical outcomes was assessed. CTCs were determined at BL and 4, 8, and 12 wks. Pts with BL CTC > 0 and missing post-tmt CTCs were considered nonresponders. Radiographic response was first assessed at Wk 12. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Among739 pts with BL CTC > 0, 141 had measurable disease. At Wk 12, 19% (141/739) of pts were CTC responders and 81% (598/739) were CTC nonresponders. Among CTC responders, 74% (104/141) had stable disease or better by RECIST; 26% (37/141) were either not evaluable or had disease progression by RECIST. Median OS was 23.8 and 10.0 mos for CTC responders (n = 141) and nonresponders (n = 598), respectively. Among pts with liver and/or lung metastases, 86% (24/28) of CTC responders at Wk 12 had stable disease or better by RECIST; 14% (4/28) had disease progression by RECIST. Median OS was 19.9 and 7.1 mos for CTC responders (n = 28) and nonresponders (n = 127), respectively. Similar results were observed in Wk 8 CTC responders. Conclusions: For mCRPC pts with BL CTC > 0, CTC response on tmt (CTC = 0) is associated with longer survival and could be considered a response criterion. Additional analysis is required to fully characterize the relationship between CTC = 0 and objective response by RECIST in pts with measurable disease. Clinical trial information: NCT00638690.

Clinical Outcomes from Androgen Signaling-directed Therapy after Treatment with Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone in Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Post Hoc Analysis of COU-AA-302

In the COU-AA-302 trial, abiraterone acetate plus prednisone significantly increased overall survival for patients with chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Limited information exists regarding response to subsequent androgen signaling-directed therapies following abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in patients with mCRPC. We investigated clinical outcomes associated with subsequent abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (55 patients) and enzalutamide (33 patients) in a post hoc analysis of COU-AA-302. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response was assessed. Median time to PSA progression was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The PSA response rate (≥50% PSA decline, unconfirmed) was 44% and 67%, respectively. The median time to PSA progression was 3.9 mo (range 2.6-not estimable) for subsequent abiraterone acetate plus prednisone and 2.8 mo (range 1.8-not estimable) for subsequent enzalutamide. The majority of patients (68%) received intervening chemotherapy before subsequent abiraterone acetate plus prednisone or enzalutamide. While acknowledging the limitations of post hoc analyses and high censoring (>75%) in both treatment groups, these results suggest that subsequent therapy with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone or enzalutamide for patients who progressed on abiraterone acetate is associated with limited clinical benefit.

PATIENT SUMMARY

This analysis showed limited clinical benefit for subsequent abiraterone acetate plus prednisone or enzalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer following initial treatment with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone. This analysis does not support prioritization of subsequent abiraterone acetate plus prednisone or enzalutamide following initial therapy with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone.

Clinical versus radiographic progression and overall survival for patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) from COU-AA-302

193

Background: COU-AA-302 evaluated abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AA) vs prednisone (P) in chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC pts, with overall survival (OS) and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) as co-primary end points. Per study criteria, pts with radiographic progression (RAD) only were allowed to continue treatment, while those with unequivocal clinical progression (UCP) only were not, and were censored for rPFS. We evaluated the clinical significance of survival outcomes for pts with UCP only vs RAD only from the prospective COU-AA-302 trial. Methods: UCP was defined per protocol as ≥ 1 of the following: initiation of chronic opiates, ECOG performance status (PS) decline to ≥ 3, or initiation of chemotherapy, palliative radiation therapy, or surgery. OS was evaluated for each type of progression using Cox proportional hazard models. Results: 500 (92%) pts in the AA arm and 540 (100%) in the P arm discontinued study treatment. Of the 736 pts who discontinued treatment for a protocol-defined reason, 280 (38%) discontinued for UCP only, 332 (45%) for RAD only, and 124 (17%) for both UCP and RAD. Clinical events cited as the reason for discontinuation for UCP (AA vs P arm) included pain requiring opiates (22% vs 25%), ECOG PS ≥ 3 (4% vs 5%), and initiation of chemotherapy (50% vs 53%), radiation therapy (36% vs 27%) and surgery (3% vs 5%). UCP only pts had shorter median OS compared with RAD only pts (Table). Conclusions: UCP is a criterion used as an indicator for a censored event, yet appears to confer inferior survival relative to RAD. The high frequency of UCP implies that it may be an important determinant of clinical outcome. The events that drive UCP should be defined as part of the development of more informative interim trial end points, in line with the PCWG3-proposed “no longer clinically benefitting” outcome measure, which captures pts with UCP. Clinical trial information: NCT00887198. [Table: see text]

Subsequent Chemotherapy and Treatment Patterns After Abiraterone Acetate in Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Post Hoc Analysis of COU-AA-302

BACKGROUND

Treatment patterns for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) have changed substantially in the last few years. In trial COU-AA-302 (chemotherapy-naïve men with mCRPC), abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AA) significantly improved radiographic progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) when compared to placebo plus prednisone (P).

OBJECTIVE

This post hoc analysis investigated clinical responses to docetaxel as first subsequent therapy (FST) among patients who progressed following protocol-specified treatment with AA, and characterized subsequent treatment patterns among older (≥75 yr) and younger (<75 yr) patient subgroups.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Data were collected at the final OS analysis (96% of expected death events). Subsequent therapy data were prospectively collected, while response and discontinuation data were collected retrospectively following discontinuation of the study drug.

INTERVENTION

At the discretion of the investigator, 67% (365/546) of patients from the AA arm received subsequent treatment with one or more agents approved for mCRPC.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Efficacy analysis was performed for patients for whom baseline and at least one post-baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values were available.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Baseline and at least one post-baseline PSA values were available for 100 AA patients who received docetaxel as FST. While acknowledging the limitations of post hoc analyses, 40% (40/100) of these patients had an unconfirmed ≥50% PSA decline with first subsequent docetaxel therapy, and 27% (27/100) had a confirmed ≥50% PSA decline. The median docetaxel treatment duration among these 100 patients was 4.2 mo. Docetaxel was the most common FST among older and younger patients from each treatment arm. However, 43% (79/185) of older patients who progressed on AA received no subsequent therapy for mCRPC, compared with 17% (60/361) of younger patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with mCRPC who progress with AA treatment may still derive benefit from subsequent docetaxel therapy. These data support further assessment of treatment patterns following AA treatment for mCRPC, particularly among older patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00887198.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Treatment patterns for advanced prostate cancer have changed substantially in the last few years. This additional analysis provides evidence of clinical benefit for subsequent chemotherapy in men with advanced prostate cancer whose disease progressed after treatment with abiraterone acetate. Older patients were less likely to be treated with subsequent therapy.

Decline in Circulating Tumor Cell Count and Treatment Outcome in Advanced Prostate Cancer

Background

Treatment response biomarkers are urgently needed for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Baseline and post-treatment circulating tumor cell (CTC) counts of ≥5 cells/7.5 ml are associated with poor CRPC outcome.

Objective

To determine the value of a ≥30% CTC decline as a treatment response indicator.

Design, setting, and participants

We identified patients with a baseline CTC count ≥5 cells/7.5 ml and evaluable post-treatment CTC counts in two prospective trials.

Intervention

Patients were treated in the COU-AA-301 (abiraterone after chemotherapy) and IMMC-38 (chemotherapy) trials.

Outcome measures and statistical analysis

The association between a ≥30% CTC decline after treatment and survival was evaluated using univariable and multivariable Cox regression models at three landmark time points (4, 8, and 12 wk). Model performance was evaluated by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and c-indices.

Results

Overall 486 patients (122 in IMMC-38 and 364 in COU-AA-301) had a CTC count ≥5 cells/7.5 ml at baseline, with 440, 380, and 351 patients evaluable at 4, 8, and 12 wk, respectively. A 30% CTC decline was associated with increased survival at 4 wk (hazard ratio [HR] 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.36–0.56; p < 0.001), 8 wk (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.33–0.53; p < 0.001), and 12 wk (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.3–0.5; p < 0.001) in univariable and multivariable analyses. Stable CTC count (<30% fall or <30% increase) was not associated with a survival benefit when compared with increased CTC count. The association between a 30% CTC decline after treatment and survival was independent of baseline CTC count. CTC declines significantly improved the AUC at all time-points. Finally, in the COU-AA-301 trial, patients with CTC ≥5 cells/7.5 ml and a 30% CTC decline had similar overall survival in both arms.

Conclusions

A 30% CTC decline after treatment from an initial count ≥5 cells/7.5 ml is independently associated with CRPC overall survival following abiraterone and chemotherapy, improving the performance of a multivariable model as early as 4 wk after treatment. This potential surrogate must now be prospectively evaluated.

Patient summary

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are cancer cells that can be detected in the blood of prostate cancer patients. We analyzed changes in CTCs after treatment with abiraterone and chemotherapy in two large clinical trials, and found that patients who have a decline in CTC count have a better survival outcome.

Biomarker Associations with Efficacy of Abiraterone Acetate and Exemestane in Postmenopausal Patients with Estrogen Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Abiraterone may suppress androgens that stimulate breast cancer growth. We conducted a biomarker analysis of circulating tumor cells (CTCs), formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues (FFPETs), and serum samples from postmenopausal estrogen receptor (ER)⁺ breast cancer patients to identify subgroups with differential abiraterone sensitivity.

METHODS

Patients (randomized 1:1:1) were treated with 1,000 mg/d abiraterone acetate + 5 mg/d prednisone (AA), AA + 25 mg/d exemestane (AAE), or exemestane. The biomarker population included treated patients (n = 293). The CTC population included patients with ≥3 baseline CTCs (n = 104). Biomarker [e.g., androgen receptor (AR), ER, Ki-67, CYP17] expression was evaluated. Cox regression stratified by prior therapies in the metastatic setting (0/1 vs. 2) and setting of letrozole/anastrozole (adjuvant vs. metastatic) was used to assess biomarker associations with progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Serum testosterone and estrogen levels were lowered and progesterone increased with AA. Baseline AR or ER expression was not associated with PFS in CTCs or FFPETs for AAE versus exemestane, but dual positivity of AR and ER expression was associated with improved PFS [HR, 0.41; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.16-1.07; P = 0.070]. For AR expression in FFPETs obtained <1 year prior to first dose (n = 67), a trend for improved PFS was noted for AAE versus exemestane (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.24-1.33; P = 0.19).

CONCLUSIONS

An AA pharmacodynamic effect was shown by decreased serum androgen and estrogen levels and increased progesterone. AR and ER dual expression in CTCs and newly obtained FFPETs may predict AA sensitivity. Clin Cancer Res; 22(24); 6002-9. ©2016 AACR.

Phase 1b Study of Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone and Docetaxel in Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer

Coadministration of docetaxel and abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AA + P) may benefit patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) because of complementary mechanisms of action. COU-AA-206 was a phase 1b study to determine the safe dose combination of docetaxel and AA + P in three cohorts of chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC patients. Twenty-two patients received escalating doses of docetaxel plus AA + P. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) between weeks 2 and 7. The recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was the highest safe combination of docetaxel plus AA + P. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) changes and intensive pharmacokinetic parameters for each drug were evaluated. Docetaxel 75mg/m² + AA 1000mg + P 10mg was deemed the RP2D, with DLT in one of six patients. PSA declines from baseline of ≥50% and ≥90% were observed for 85.7% and 66.7% of patients, respectively. During median follow-up of 14.5 mo, eight patients had PSA progression and six had radiographic progression or died. Systemic exposure was comparable for docetaxel and abiraterone when given alone or in combination. Studies are ongoing to confirm the efficacy of potent androgen receptor-targeted therapy plus taxane in early mCRPC.

PATIENT SUMMARY

The combination of hormonal therapy and chemotherapy may improve outcomes in men with metastatic prostate cancer. This study demonstrates the ability to combine the hormonal therapy agent abiraterone acetate, plus prednisone, and the chemotherapy drug docetaxel with an acceptable side effect profile. A high rate of prostate-specific antigen decline was seen, but the study was small and additional research is needed before this becomes a standard approach.

Treatment patterns after abiraterone acetate in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): Post hoc analysis of COU-AA-302

168

Background: Treatment patterns of mCRPC have changed substantially in the last few years. In COU-AA-302 (chemotherapy-naïve men with mCRPC), abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AA) significantly improved radiographic progression-free survival and overall survival vs placebo plus prednisone (P). There is limited information about treatment patterns after AA. In this post hoc analysis of pts in the AA treatment arm who progressed, we characterized subsequent therapy after pts discontinued study drug. Methods: In COU-AA-302, 546 pts were randomized and received AA. Treatment patterns of pts receiving ≥ 1 subsequent therapy for mCRPC after progressing on AA were collected retrospectively and source verified. Results: As of March 2014, 8% (44/546) of pts continued on AA; 67% (365/546) received ≥ 1 subsequent therapy for mCRPC. 36% (194/546) and 15% (83/546) of pts had ≥ 2 and ≥ 3 subsequent therapies, respectively. 80% (435/543) of pts in the P arm had ≥ 1 subsequent therapy. Most frequent subsequent therapy in AA pts was taxane chemotherapy (docetaxel [DOC], cabazitaxel [CBZ]), androgen signaling–directed therapy (AA, enzalutamide [ENZ], ketoconazole [KETO]), and immunotherapy (sipuleucel-T [SIP-T]) (Table). Among AA pts who received DOC as first subsequent therapy, median age was 69 years; median duration of DOC post-AA (n = 261) was 3 months (IQR: 0.95-5.7); and PSA progression was the most common reason for discontinuation. Among AA pts with baseline PSA and ≥ 1 post-baseline PSA value, 40% (40/100) had ≥ 50% PSA decline (27/100 confirmed responses) with first subsequent DOC chemotherapy. Conclusions: This post hoc analysis indicates that treatment with subsequent therapy was common (67% and 80%) in pts with chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC who progressed with AA or P, respectively. PSA decline suggests antitumor activity in pts who progressed with AA and received subsequent DOC. Despite limitations of a retrospective analysis, these data support further assessment of subsequent therapy following AA treatment for mCRPC. Clinical trial information: NCT00887198. [Table: see text]

A prognostic index model for predicting overall survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with abiraterone acetate after docetaxel

A prognostic index model was developed, composed of six readily available and assessable factors and categorizing patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with abiraterone–prednisone into distinct prognostic risk groups. This model could be useful for determining patient prognosis for follow-up, monitoring and patient stratification for clinical trials.

Background

Few prognostic models for overall survival (OS) are available for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with recently approved agents. We developed a prognostic index model using readily available clinical and laboratory factors from a phase III trial of abiraterone acetate (hereafter abiraterone) in combination with prednisone in post-docetaxel mCRPC.

Patients and methods

Baseline data were available from 762 patients treated with abiraterone–prednisone. Factors were assessed for association with OS through a univariate Cox model and used in a multivariate Cox model with a stepwise procedure to identify those of significance. Data were validated using an independent, external, population-based cohort.

Results

Six risk factors individually associated with poor prognosis were included in the final model: lactate dehydrogenase > upper limit of normal (ULN) [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.31], Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 (HR = 2.19), presence of liver metastases (HR = 2.00), albumin ≤4 g/dl (HR = 1.54), alkaline phosphatase > ULN (HR = 1.38) and time from start of initial androgen-deprivation therapy to start of treatment ≤36 months (HR = 1.30). Patients were categorized into good (n = 369, 46%), intermediate (n = 321, 40%) and poor (n = 107, 13%) prognosis groups based on the number of risk factors and relative HRs. The C-index was 0.70 ± 0.014. The model was validated by the external dataset (n = 286).

Conclusion

This analysis identified six factors used to model survival in mCRPC and categorized patients into three distinct risk groups. Prognostic stratification with this model could assist clinical practice decisions for follow-up and monitoring, and may aid in clinical trial design.

Trial registration numbers

NCT00638690.

Does Gleason score at initial diagnosis predict efficacy of abiraterone acetate therapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer? An analysis of abiraterone acetate phase III trials

BACKGROUND

The usefulness of Gleason score (<8 or ≥8) at initial diagnosis as a predictive marker of response to abiraterone acetate (AA) plus prednisone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) was explored retrospectively.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Initial diagnosis Gleason score was obtained in 1048 of 1195 (COU-AA-301, post-docetaxel) and 996 of 1088 (COU-AA-302, chemotherapy-naïve) patients treated with AA 1 g plus prednisone 5 mg twice daily by mouth or placebo plus prednisone. Efficacy end points included radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and overall survival (OS). Distributions and medians were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) by Cox model.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar across studies and treatment groups. Regardless of Gleason score, AA treatment significantly improved rPFS in post-docetaxel [Gleason score <8: median, 6.4 versus 5.5 months (HR = 0.70; 95% CI 0.56-0.86), P = 0.0009 and Gleason score ≥8: median, 5.6 versus 2.9 months (HR = 0.58; 95% CI 0.48-0.72), P < 0.0001] and chemotherapy-naïve patients [Gleason score <8: median, 16.5 versus 8.2 months (HR = 0.50; 95% CI 0.40-0.62), P < 0.0001 and Gleason score ≥8: median, 13.8 versus 8.2 months (HR = 0.61; 95% CI 0.49-0.76), P < 0.0001]. Clinical benefit of AA treatment was also observed for OS, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, objective response and time to PSA progression across studies and Gleason score subgroups.

CONCLUSION

OS and rPFS trends demonstrate AA treatment benefit in patients with pre- or post-chemotherapy mCRPC regardless of Gleason score at initial diagnosis. The initial diagnostic Gleason score in patients with mCRPC should not be considered in the decision to treat with AA, as tumour metastases may no longer reflect the histology at the time of diagnosis.

CLINICAL TRIALS NUMBER

COU-AA-301 (NCT00638690); COU-AA-302 (NCT00887198).

Abiraterone acetate, exemestane or the combination in postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer

Resistance to nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors is a major obstacle in the management of estrogen receptor-positive postmenopausal metastatic breast cancer. The addition of abiraterone acetate to exemestane did not improve clinical outcomes compared with exemestane alone in an androgen receptor-enriched population, potentially due to induced serum progesterone as a resistance mechanism.

Background

Androgen receptor (AR) signaling and incomplete inhibition of estrogen signaling may contribute to metastatic breast cancer (MBC) resistance to a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI; letrozole or anastrozole). We assessed whether combined inhibition of androgen biosynthesis with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone and estradiol synthesis with exemestane (E) may be of clinical benefit to postmenopausal patients with NSAI-pretreated estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) MBC.

Patients and methods

Patients (N = 297) were stratified by the number of prior therapies for metastatic disease (0–1 versus 2) and by prior NSAI use (adjuvant versus metastatic), and randomized (1 : 1 : 1) to receive oral once daily 1000 mg abiraterone acetate plus 5 mg prednisone (AA) versus AA with 25 mg E (AAE) versus 25 mg E alone (E). Each treatment arm was well balanced with regard to the proportion of patients with AR-positive breast cancer. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival, clinical benefit rate, duration of response, and overall response rate.

Results

There was no significant difference in PFS with AA versus E (3.7 versus 3.7 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 1.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82–1.60; P = 0.437) or AAE versus E (4.5 versus 3.7 months; HR = 0.96; 95% CI 0.70–1.32; P = 0.794). Increased serum progesterone concentrations were observed in both arms receiving AA, but not with E. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-emergent adverse events associated with AA, including hypokalemia and hypertension, were less common in patients in the E (2.0% and 2.9%, respectively) and AA arms (3.4% and 1.1%, respectively) than in the AAE arm (5.8% for both).

Conclusions

Adding AA to E in NSAI-pretreated ER+ MBC patients did not improve PFS compared with treatment with E. An AA-induced progesterone increase may have contributed to this lack of clinical activity.

ClinicalTrials.gov

NCT01381874.

Prior Endocrine Therapy Impact on Abiraterone Acetate Clinical Efficacy in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Post-hoc Analysis of Randomised Phase 3 Studies

BACKGROUND

The duration of prior hormonal treatment can predict responses to subsequent therapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

OBJECTIVE

To determine if prior endocrine therapy duration is an indicator of abiraterone acetate (AA) sensitivity.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Post-hoc exploratory analysis of randomised phase 3 studies examining post-docetaxel (COU-AA-301) or chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC (COU-AA-302) patients receiving AA. The treatment effect on overall survival (OS), radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response analysed by quartile duration of prior gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) or androgen receptor (AR) antagonist.

INTERVENTION

Patients were randomised to AA (1000mg, orally once daily) plus prednisone (5mg, orally twice daily) or placebo plus prednisone. Prior endocrine therapy was GnRHa (COU-AA-301, n=1127 [94%]; COU-AA-302, n=1057 [97%], 45.1 mo or 36.7 mo median duration, respectively) and/or orchiectomy (COU-AA-301, n=78 [7%] COU-AA-302, n=44 [4%]); castrated patients received prior AR antagonists (COU-AA-301, n=1015 [85%]; COU-AA-302, n=1078 [99%], 15.7 mo or 16.1 mo median duration, respectively).

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Cox model was used to obtain hazard ratio and associated 95% confidence interval with statistical inference by log rank statistic.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Clinical benefit with AA was observed for OS, rPFS, and PSA response for nearly all quartiles with GnRHa or AR antagonists in both COU-AA-301 and COU-AA-302. In COU-AA-301, patients with a longer duration of prior endocrine therapy tended to have greater AA OS, rPFS, and PSA response benefit, with lead-time chemotherapy bias potentially impacting COU-AA-301 results. Time to castration resistance was not captured. This analysis is limited as a post-hoc exploratory analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

In the COU-AA-301 and COU-AA-302 studies, AA produced clinical benefits regardless of prior endocrine therapy duration in patients with mCRPC.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients derived clinical benefits with abiraterone acetate regardless of prior endocrine therapy duration.

Abstract CT134: Androgen receptor (AR) mutations in patients (pts) with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) with and without prior abiraterone acetate (AA) treatment

Background: ARN-509 is a second-generation antiandrogen with antitumor activity in CRPC. Activating mutations in the AR ligand-binding domain (LBD) have been associated with resistance to first- (T877A) and second- (F876L) generation antiandrogens. We evaluated the type and frequency of relevant AR LBD mutations in ARN-509-treated CRPC pts at baseline (BL) and disease progression (PD).

Methods: ARN-509-001 was a phase I/II study that evaluated ARN-509 activity in nonmetastatic (M0), chemotherapy-naïve, and post-AA CRPC. Of the 97 pts enrolled in phase II at a dose of 240 mg/d, 92 were evaluable for the mutation analysis at BL and 82 at PD. Relevant mutations in circulating tumor DNA were detected using a digital PCR method called BEAMing (Beads, Emulsification, Amplification, and Magnetics) (Richardson AL. Clin Cancer Res. 2012).

Results: Median duration of therapy was ∼16 months. One pt in the M0 cohort and one in the chemotherapy-naïve cohort had the F876L mutation at BL. Two pts in the chemotherapy-naïve cohort and one in the post-AA cohort acquired the AR F876L mutation during treatment. Pts with M0 CRPC did not acquire a mutation (Table 1). Three pts in the post-AA cohort had the T877A mutation at BL; the T877A mutation was not detected in any other cohort at BL. In the post-AA cohort, one pt acquired the T877A mutation during treatment while another lost the mutation (Table). The two pts with detectable F876L at BL developed prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression at 4 and 6 months, respectively, compared with a median time to PSA progression of 16.4 months in the remainder of pts.

Conclusions: Pts with metastatic CRPC who were treated with ARN-509 had a low rate of acquisition of the AR F876L (3/82 = 4%) and AR T877A (1/82 = 1%) mutations. These results suggest that ARN-509 may be continued in the setting of a rising PSA. Larger studies are needed to confirm the prevalence of F876L, T877A, and the conversion rate.

AR F876LAR T877AEvaluableBLPDAcquiredBLPDAcquiredpatientsn/Nn/Nn/Nn/NTotal922/925/823/823/923/821/82M0491/491/470/470/500/470/47Chemotherapy-naïve241/243/202/200/200/200/20Post-AA190/191/151/153/193/151/15

Citation Format: Dana E. Rathkopf, Matthew R. Smith, Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, Charles J. Ryan, William R. Berry, Neal D. Shore, Glenn Liu, Celestia Higano, Joshi J. Alumkal, Ralph Hauke, Ronald Tutrone, Mansoor Saleh, Edna Chow Maneval, Shibu Thomas, Deborah Ricci, Margaret K. Yu, Carla J. de Boer, Angela Trinh, Thian Kheoh, Rajesh Bandekar, Howard I. Scher. Androgen receptor (AR) mutations in patients (pts) with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) with and without prior abiraterone acetate (AA) treatment. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr CT134. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-CT134

Efficacy and Safety of Abiraterone Acetate in Elderly (75 Years or Older) Chemotherapy Naïve Patients with Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE

Metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer primarily affects elderly men. In this post hoc analysis we investigated the safety and efficacy of abiraterone acetate in elderly (age 75 years or greater) and younger (less than 75 years) patient subgroups at the prespecified interim analysis (55% of total overall survival events) for the COU-AA-302 (Abiraterone Acetate in Asymptomatic or Mildly Symptomatic Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer) trial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients were stratified and randomized 1:1 to abiraterone acetate 1,000 mg plus prednisone/prednisolone 5 mg twice daily (abiraterone-prednisone) vs placebo plus prednisone/prednisolone 5 mg twice daily (prednisone alone). Co-primary end points were radiographic progression-free and overall survival. Median time to event and HR were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and a Cox model, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 350 elderly patients treated with abiraterone-prednisone had significant improvements in overall and radiographic progression-free survival vs those with prednisone alone (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.53-0.96 vs HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.48-0.83), similar to 738 younger patients (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.63-1.03 vs HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.40-0.59). All secondary end points favored the abiraterone-prednisone arm for both age subgroups. Specific adverse events with abiraterone-prednisone were similar between the age subgroups. Elderly patients in both treatment arms had higher rates of fluid retention and cardiac disorders than younger patients, although rates of dose reduction or treatment interruptions due to adverse events were low in both age subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Abiraterone acetate demonstrated clinical benefit and was well tolerated in elderly and younger men with chemotherapy naïve, metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer. Thus, findings support it as a treatment option for elderly patients who may not tolerate other therapies with greater toxicity.