1
|
Griffin JM, Kroner BL, Wong SL, Preiss L, Wilder Smith A, Cheville AL, Mitchell SA, Lancki N, Hassett MJ, Schrag D, Osarogiagbon RU, Ridgeway JL, Cella D, Jensen RE, Flores AM, Austin JD, Yanez B. Disparities in electronic health record portal access and use among patients with cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2024; 116:476-484. [PMID: 37930884 PMCID: PMC10919330 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djad225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Revised: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Electronic health record-linked portals may improve health-care quality for patients with cancer. Barriers to portal access and use undermine interventions that rely on portals to reduce cancer care disparities. This study examined portal access and persistence of portal use and associations with patient and structural factors before the implementation of 3 portal-based interventions within the Improving the Management of symPtoms during And following Cancer Treatment (IMPACT) Consortium. METHODS Portal use data were extracted from electronic health records for the 12 months preceding intervention implementation. Sociodemographic factors, mode of accessing portals (web vs mobile), and number of clinical encounters before intervention implementation were also extracted. Rurality was derived using rural-urban commuting area codes. Broadband access was estimated using the 2015-2019 American Community Survey. Multiple logistic regression models tested the associations of these factors with portal access (ever accessed or never accessed) and persistence of portal use (accessed the portal ≤20 weeks vs ≥21 weeks in the 35-week study period). RESULTS Of 28 942 eligible patients, 10 061 (35%) never accessed the portal. Male sex, membership in a racial and ethnic minority group, rural dwelling, not working, and limited broadband access were associated with lower odds of portal access. Younger age and more clinical encounters were associated with higher odds of portal access. Of those with portal access, 25% were persistent users. Using multiple modalities for portal access, being middle-aged, and having more clinical encounters were associated with persistent portal use. CONCLUSION Patient and structural factors affect portal access and use and may exacerbate disparities in electronic health record-based cancer symptom surveillance and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joan M Griffin
- Division of Health Care Delivery Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Robert E. and Patricia D. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Barbara L Kroner
- Center for Clinical Research, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Sandra L Wong
- Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Liliana Preiss
- Center for Clinical Research, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Ashley Wilder Smith
- Outcomes Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Andrea L Cheville
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Sandra A Mitchell
- Outcomes Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Nicola Lancki
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Michael J Hassett
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Jennifer L Ridgeway
- Division of Health Care Delivery Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Robert E. and Patricia D. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - David Cella
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Roxanne E Jensen
- Outcomes Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Ann Marie Flores
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Science, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jessica D Austin
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Betina Yanez
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Paudel R, Enzinger AC, Uno H, Cronin C, Wong SL, Dizon DS, Hazard Jenkins H, Bian J, Osarogiagbon RU, Jensen RE, Mitchell SA, Schrag D, Hassett MJ. Effects of a change in recall period on reporting severe symptoms: an analysis of a pragmatic multisite trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2024:djae049. [PMID: 38445744 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djae049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Revised: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Optimal methods for deploying electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) to manage symptoms in routine oncologic practice remain uncertain. The eSyM symptom management program asks chemotherapy and surgery patients to self-report 12 symptoms regularly. Feedback from nurses and patients led to changing the recall period from the past 7 days to the past 24 hours. METHODS Using questionnaires submitted during the 16-weeks surrounding the recall period change, we assessed the likelihood of reporting a severe, or a moderate-severe, symptom across all 12 symptoms and separately for the 5 most prevalent symptoms. Interrupted time series analyses modeled the effects of the change using generalized linear mixed-effects models. Surgery and chemotherapy cohorts were analyzed separately. Study-wide effects were estimated using a meta-analysis method. RESULTS In total, 1,692 patients from 6 institutions submitted 7,823 eSyM assessments during the 16-weeks surrounding the recall period change. Shortening the recall period was associated with lower odds of severe symptom reporting in the surgery cohort (OR 0.65; 95% CI 0.46 to 0.93; p = .02) and lower odds of moderate-severe symptom reporting in the chemotherapy cohort (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.97; p = .02). Among the most prevalent symptoms, 24-hour recall was associated with lower rate of reporting post-operative constipation, but no differences in reporting rates for other symptoms. CONCLUSION A shorter recall period was associated with a reduction in the proportion of patients reporting moderate-severe symptoms. The optimal recall period may vary depending on whether ePROs are collected for active symptom management, as a clinical trial endpoint, or another purpose. (Clinicaltrails.gov (NCT03850912).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Hajime Uno
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Sandra L Wong
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Don S Dizon
- Lifespan Cancer Institute and Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Deborah Schrag
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kehl KL, Lavery JA, Brown S, Fuchs H, Riely G, Schrag D, Newcomb A, Nichols C, Micheel CM, Bedard PL, Sweeney SM, Fiandalo M, Panageas KS. Biomarker Inference and the Timing of Next-Generation Sequencing in a Multi-Institutional, Cross-Cancer Clinicogenomic Data Set. JCO Precis Oncol 2024; 8:e2300489. [PMID: 38484212 PMCID: PMC10954072 DOI: 10.1200/po.23.00489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2023] [Revised: 12/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Observational clinicogenomic data sets, consisting of tumor next-generation sequencing (NGS) data linked to clinical records, are commonly used for cancer research. However, in real-world practice, oncologists frequently request NGS in search of treatment options for progressive cancer. The extent and impact of this dynamic on analysis of clinicogenomic research data are not well understood. METHODS We analyzed clinicogenomic data for patients with non-small cell lung, colorectal, breast, prostate, pancreatic, or urothelial cancers in the American Association for Cancer Research Biopharmaceutical Consortium cohort. Associations between baseline and time-varying clinical characteristics and time from diagnosis to NGS were measured. To explore the impact of informative cohort entry on biomarker inference, statistical interactions between selected biomarkers and time to NGS with respect to overall survival were calculated. RESULTS Among 7,182 patients, time from diagnosis to NGS varied significantly by clinical factors, including cancer type, calendar year of sequencing, institution, and age and stage at diagnosis. NGS rates also varied significantly by dynamic clinical status variables; in an adjusted model, compared with patients with stable disease at any given time after diagnosis, patients with progressive disease by imaging or oncologist assessment had higher NGS rates (hazard ratio for NGS, 1.61 [95% CI, 1.45 to 1.78] and 2.32 [95% CI, 2.01 to 2.67], respectively). Statistical interactions between selected biomarkers and time to NGS with respect to survival, potentially indicating biased biomarker inference results, were explored. CONCLUSION To evaluate the appropriateness of a data set for a particular research question, it is crucial to measure associations between dynamic cancer status and the timing of NGS, as well as to evaluate interactions involving biomarkers of interest and NGS timing with respect to survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth L. Kehl
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jessica A. Lavery
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Samantha Brown
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Hannah Fuchs
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Gregory Riely
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Ashley Newcomb
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Chelsea Nichols
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Christine M. Micheel
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | | | | | | | - Katherine S. Panageas
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kehl KL, Mazor T, Trukhanov P, Lindsay J, Galvin MR, Farhat KS, McClure E, Giordano A, Gandhi L, Schrag D, Hassett MJ, Cerami E. Identifying Oncology Clinical Trial Candidates Using Artificial Intelligence Predictions of Treatment Change: A Pilot Implementation Study. JCO Precis Oncol 2024; 8:e2300507. [PMID: 38513166 DOI: 10.1200/po.23.00507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2023] [Revised: 11/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Precision oncology clinical trials often struggle to accrue, partly because it is difficult to find potentially eligible patients at moments when they need new treatment. We piloted deployment of artificial intelligence tools to identify such patients at a large academic cancer center. PATIENTS AND METHODS Neural networks that process radiology reports to identify patients likely to start new systemic therapy were applied prospectively for patients with solid tumors that had undergone next-generation sequencing at our center. Model output was linked to the MatchMiner tool, which matches patients to trials using tumor genomics. Reports listing genomically matched patients, sorted by probability of treatment change, were provided weekly to an oncology nurse navigator (ONN) coordinating recruitment to nine early-phase trials. The ONN contacted treating oncologists when patients likely to change treatment appeared potentially trial-eligible. RESULTS Within weekly reports to the ONN, 60,199 patient-trial matches were generated for 2,150 patients on the basis of genomics alone. Of these, 3,168 patient-trial matches (5%) corresponding to 525 patients were flagged for ONN review by our model, representing a 95% reduction in review compared with manual review of all patient-trial matches weekly. After ONN review for potential eligibility, treating oncologists for 74 patients were contacted. Common reasons for not contacting treating oncologists included cases where patients had already decided to continue current treatment (21%); the trial had no slots (14%); or the patient was ineligible on ONN review (12%). Of 74 patients whose oncologists were contacted, 10 (14%) had a consult regarding a trial and five (7%) enrolled. CONCLUSION This approach facilitated identification of potential patients for clinical trials in real time, but further work to improve accrual must address the many other barriers to trial enrollment in precision oncology research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tali Mazor
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sanz-Garcia E, Brown S, Lavery JA, Weiss J, Fuchs HE, Newcomb A, Postle A, Warner JL, LeNoue-Newton ML, Sweeney SM, Pillai S, Yu C, Nichols C, Mastrogiacomo B, Kundra R, Schultz N, Kehl KL, Riely GJ, Schrag D, Govindarajan A, Panageas KS, Bedard PL. Genomic Characterization and Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Peritoneal Metastases from the AACR GENIE Biopharma Collaborative Colorectal Cancer Registry. Cancer Res Commun 2024; 4:475-486. [PMID: 38329392 PMCID: PMC10876516 DOI: 10.1158/2767-9764.crc-23-0409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Revised: 12/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
Peritoneal metastases (PM) are common in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We aimed to characterize patients with mCRC and PM from a clinical and molecular perspective using the American Association of Cancer Research Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange (GENIE) Biopharma Collaborative (BPC) registry. Patients' tumor samples underwent targeted next-generation sequencing. Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes were collected retrospectively. Overall survival (OS) from advanced disease and progression-free survival (PFS) from start of cancer-directed drug regimen were estimated and adjusted for the left truncation bias. A total of 1,281 patients were analyzed, 244 (19%) had PM at time of advanced disease. PM were associated with female sex [OR: 1.67; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11-2.54; P = 0.014] and higher histologic grade (OR: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.08-2.71; P = 0.022), while rectal primary tumors were less frequent in patients with PM (OR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.29-0.88; P < 0.001). APC occurred less frequently in patients with PM (N = 151, 64% vs. N = 788, 79%) while MED12 alterations occurred more frequently in patients with PM (N = 20, 10% vs. N = 32, 4%); differences in MED12 were not significant when restricting to oncogenic and likely oncogenic variants according to OncoKB. Patients with PM had worse OS (HR: 1.45; 95% CI: 1.16-1.81) after adjustment for independently significant clinical and genomic predictors. PFS from initiation of first-line treatment did not differ by presence of PM. In conclusion, PM were more frequent in females and right-sided primary tumors. Differences in frequencies of MED12 and APC alterations were identified between patients with and without PM. PM were associated with shorter OS but not with PFS from first-line treatment. SIGNIFICANCE Utilizing the GENIE BPC registry, this study found that PM in patients with colorectal cancer occur more frequently in females and right-sided primary tumors and are associated with worse OS. In addition, we found a lower frequency of APC alterations and a higher frequency in MED12 alterations in patients with PM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrique Sanz-Garcia
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre – University Health Network, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Samantha Brown
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Jessica Weiss
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre – University Health Network, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Asha Postle
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Shawn M. Sweeney
- American Association of Cancer Research, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Shirin Pillai
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Celeste Yu
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre – University Health Network, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Ritika Kundra
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | | | | | - Deborah Schrag
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Anand Govindarajan
- Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Philippe L. Bedard
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre – University Health Network, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Moon I, LoPiccolo J, Baca SC, Sholl LM, Kehl KL, Hassett MJ, Liu D, Schrag D, Gusev A. Publisher Correction: Machine learning for genetics-based classification and treatment response prediction in cancer of unknown primary. Nat Med 2024; 30:607. [PMID: 37968374 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02693-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Intae Moon
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jaclyn LoPiccolo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sylvan C Baca
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lynette M Sholl
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kenneth L Kehl
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael J Hassett
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David Liu
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- The Broad Institute of MIT & Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Alexander Gusev
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- The Broad Institute of MIT & Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
- Division of Genetics, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hassett MJ, Dias S, Cronin C, Schrag D, McCleary N, Simpson J, Poirier-Shelton T, Bian J, Reich J, Dizon D, Begnoche M, Jenkins HH, Tasker L, Wong S, Pearson L, Paudel R, Osarogiagbon RU. Strategies for Implementing an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes-Based Symptom Management Program Across Six Cancer Centers. Res Sq 2024:rs.3.rs-3879836. [PMID: 38343857 PMCID: PMC10854305 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3879836/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/19/2024]
Abstract
Background Electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO)-based symptom management improves cancer patients' outcomes. However, implementation of ePROs is challenging, requiring technical resources for integration into clinical systems, substantial buy-in from clinicians and patients, novel workflows to support between-visit symptom management, and institutional investment. Methods The SIMPRO Research Consortium developed eSyM, an electronic health record-integrated, ePRO-based symptom management program for medical oncology and surgery patients and deployed it at six cancer centers between August 2019 and April 2022 in a type II hybrid effectiveness-implementation cluster randomized stepped-wedge study. Sites documented implementation strategies monthly using REDCap, itemized them using the Expert Recommendations for Implementation Change (ERIC) list and mapped their target barriers using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to inform eSyM program enhancement, facilitate inter-consortium knowledge sharing and guide future deployment efforts. Results We documented 226 implementation strategies: 35 'foundational' strategies were applied consortium-wide by the coordinating center and 191 other strategies were developed by individual sites. We consolidated these 191 site-developed strategies into 64 unique strategies (i.e., removed duplicates) and classified the remainder as either 'universal', consistently used by multiple sites (N=29), or 'adaptive', used only by individual sites (N=35). Universal strategies were perceived as having the highest impact; they addressed eSyM clinical preparation, training, engagement of patients/clinicians, and program evaluation. Across all documented SIMPRO strategies, 44 of the 73 ERIC strategies were addressed and all 5 CFIR barriers were addressed. Conclusion Methodical collection of theory-based implementation strategies fostered the identification of universal, high-impact strategies that facilitated adoption of a novel care-delivery intervention by patients, clinicians, and institutions. Attention to the high-impact strategies identified in this project could support implementation of ePROs as a component of routine cancer care at other institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Don Dizon
- Lifespan Cancer Institute and Brown University
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Grabski IN, Heymach JV, Kehl KL, Kopetz S, Lau KS, Riely GJ, Schrag D, Yaeger R, Irizarry RA, Haigis KM. Effects of KRAS Genetic Interactions on Outcomes in Cancers of the Lung, Pancreas, and Colorectum. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024; 33:158-169. [PMID: 37943166 PMCID: PMC10841605 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-23-0262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Revised: 07/02/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND KRAS is among the most commonly mutated oncogenes in cancer, and previous studies have shown associations with survival in many cancer contexts. Evidence from both clinical observations and mouse experiments further suggests that these associations are allele- and tissue-specific. These findings motivate using clinical data to understand gene interactions and clinical covariates within different alleles and tissues. METHODS We analyze genomic and clinical data from the AACR Project GENIE Biopharma Collaborative for samples from lung, colorectal, and pancreatic cancers. For each of these cancer types, we report epidemiological associations for different KRAS alleles, apply principal component analysis (PCA) to discover groups of genes co-mutated with KRAS, and identify distinct clusters of patient profiles with implications for survival. RESULTS KRAS mutations were associated with inferior survival in lung, colon, and pancreas, although the specific mutations implicated varied by disease. Tissue- and allele-specific associations with smoking, sex, age, and race were found. Tissue-specific genetic interactions with KRAS were identified by PCA, which were clustered to produce five, four, and two patient profiles in lung, colon, and pancreas. Membership in these profiles was associated with survival in all three cancer types. CONCLUSIONS KRAS mutations have tissue- and allele-specific associations with inferior survival, clinical covariates, and genetic interactions. IMPACT Our results provide greater insight into the tissue- and allele-specific associations with KRAS mutations and identify clusters of patients that are associated with survival and clinical attributes from combinations of genetic interactions with KRAS mutations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabella N. Grabski
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - John V. Heymach
- Department of Thoracic and Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kenneth L. Kehl
- Division of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Scott Kopetz
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ken S. Lau
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Gregory J. Riely
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rona Yaeger
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rafael A. Irizarry
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kevin M. Haigis
- Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Basch E, Dueck A, Weiser M, Schrag D. Reply to F. Dossa et al. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:121. [PMID: 37816205 PMCID: PMC10730033 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/12/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ethan Basch
- Ethan Basch, MD, Division of Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Amylou Dueck, PhD, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic School of Graduate Medical Education, Scottsdale, AZ; Martin Weiser, MD, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Deborah Schrag, MD, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Amylou Dueck
- Ethan Basch, MD, Division of Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Amylou Dueck, PhD, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic School of Graduate Medical Education, Scottsdale, AZ; Martin Weiser, MD, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Deborah Schrag, MD, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Martin Weiser
- Ethan Basch, MD, Division of Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Amylou Dueck, PhD, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic School of Graduate Medical Education, Scottsdale, AZ; Martin Weiser, MD, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Deborah Schrag, MD, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Ethan Basch, MD, Division of Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Amylou Dueck, PhD, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic School of Graduate Medical Education, Scottsdale, AZ; Martin Weiser, MD, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Deborah Schrag, MD, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Paudel R, Tramontano AC, Cronin C, Wong SL, Dizon DS, Jenkins HH, Bian J, Osarogiagbon RU, Schrag D, Hassett MJ. Assessing Patient Readiness for an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome-Based Symptom Management Intervention in a Multisite Study. JCO Oncol Pract 2024; 20:77-84. [PMID: 38011613 PMCID: PMC10827290 DOI: 10.1200/op.23.00339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Revised: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE While the use of electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) in routine clinical practice is increasing, barriers to patient engagement limit adoption. Studies have focused on technology access as a key barrier, yet other characteristics may also confound readiness to use ePROs including patients' confidence in using technology and confidence in asking clinicians questions. METHODS To assess readiness to use ePROs, adult patients from six US-based health systems who started a new oncology treatment or underwent a cancer-directed surgery were invited to complete a survey that assessed access to and confidence in the use of technology, ease of asking clinicians questions about health, and symptom management self-efficacy. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression models were fit to assess the association between technology confidence, ease of asking questions, and symptom management self-efficacy. RESULTS We contacted 3,212 individuals, and 1,043 (33%) responded. The median age was 63 years, 68% were female, and 75% reported having access to patient portals. Over 80% had two or more electronic devices. Most patients reported high technology confidence, higher ease of asking clinicians questions, and high symptom management self-efficacy (n = 692; 66%). Patients with high technology confidence also reported higher ease of asking nurses about their health (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 4.58 [95% CI, 2.36 to 8.87]; P ≤ .001). Those who reported higher ease of asking nurses questions were more likely to report higher confidence in managing symptoms (AOR, 30.54 [95% CI, 12.91 to 72.30]; P ≤ .001). CONCLUSION Patient readiness to use ePROs likely depends on multiple factors, including technology and communication confidence, and symptom management self-efficacy. Future studies should assess interventions to address these factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Don S. Dizon
- Lifespan Cancer Institute and Brown University, Providence, RI
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kennecke HF, Auer R, Cho M, Dasari NA, Davies-Venn C, Eng C, Dorth J, Garcia-Aguilar J, George M, Goodman KA, Kreppel L, Meyer JE, Monzon J, Saltz L, Schrag D, Smith JJ, Zell JA, Das P. NCI Rectal-Anal Task Force consensus recommendations for design of clinical trials in rectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2023; 115:1457-1464. [PMID: 37535679 PMCID: PMC11032701 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djad143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The optimal management of locally advanced rectal cancer is rapidly evolving. The National Cancer Institute Rectal-Anal Task Force convened an expert panel to develop consensus on the design of future clinical trials of patients with rectal cancer. A series of 82 questions and subquestions, which addressed radiation and neoadjuvant therapy, patient perceptions, rectal cancer populations of special interest, and unique design elements, were subject to iterative review using a Delphi analytical approach to define areas of consensus and those in which consensus is not established. The task force achieved consensus on several areas, including the following: 1) the use of total neoadjuvant therapy with long-course radiation therapy either before or after chemotherapy, as well as short-course radiation therapy followed by chemotherapy, as the control arm of clinical trials; 2) the need for greater emphasis on patient involvement in treatment choices within the context of trial design; 3) efforts to identify those patients likely, or unlikely, to benefit from nonoperative management or minimally invasive surgery; 4) investigation of the utility of circulating tumor DNA measurements for tailoring treatment and surveillance; and 5) the need for identification of appropriate end points and recognition of challenges of data management for patients who enter nonoperative management trial arms. Substantial agreement was reached on priorities affecting the design of future clinical trials in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hagen F Kennecke
- Medical Oncology, Providence Cancer Institute Franz Clinic, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | - May Cho
- University of CA–Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - N Arvind Dasari
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Cathy Eng
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Jennifer Dorth
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Manju George
- Paltown Development Foundation, Crownsville, MD, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Leonard Saltz
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - J Joshua Smith
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Prajnan Das
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
de Bruijn I, Kundra R, Mastrogiacomo B, Tran TN, Sikina L, Mazor T, Li X, Ochoa A, Zhao G, Lai B, Abeshouse A, Baiceanu D, Ciftci E, Dogrusoz U, Dufilie A, Erkoc Z, Garcia Lara E, Fu Z, Gross B, Haynes C, Heath A, Higgins D, Jagannathan P, Kalletla K, Kumari P, Lindsay J, Lisman A, Leenknegt B, Lukasse P, Madela D, Madupuri R, van Nierop P, Plantalech O, Quach J, Resnick AC, Rodenburg SY, Satravada BA, Schaeffer F, Sheridan R, Singh J, Sirohi R, Sumer SO, van Hagen S, Wang A, Wilson M, Zhang H, Zhu K, Rusk N, Brown S, Lavery JA, Panageas KS, Rudolph JE, LeNoue-Newton ML, Warner JL, Guo X, Hunter-Zinck H, Yu TV, Pilai S, Nichols C, Gardos SM, Philip J, Kehl KL, Riely GJ, Schrag D, Lee J, Fiandalo MV, Sweeney SM, Pugh TJ, Sander C, Cerami E, Gao J, Schultz N. Analysis and Visualization of Longitudinal Genomic and Clinical Data from the AACR Project GENIE Biopharma Collaborative in cBioPortal. Cancer Res 2023; 83:3861-3867. [PMID: 37668528 PMCID: PMC10690089 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-23-0816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Revised: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023]
Abstract
International cancer registries make real-world genomic and clinical data available, but their joint analysis remains a challenge. AACR Project GENIE, an international cancer registry collecting data from 19 cancer centers, makes data from >130,000 patients publicly available through the cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics (https://genie.cbioportal.org). For 25,000 patients, additional real-world longitudinal clinical data, including treatment and outcome data, are being collected by the AACR Project GENIE Biopharma Collaborative using the PRISSMM data curation model. Several thousand of these cases are now also available in cBioPortal. We have significantly enhanced the functionalities of cBioPortal to support the visualization and analysis of this rich clinico-genomic linked dataset, as well as datasets generated by other centers and consortia. Examples of these enhancements include (i) visualization of the longitudinal clinical and genomic data at the patient level, including timelines for diagnoses, treatments, and outcomes; (ii) the ability to select samples based on treatment status, facilitating a comparison of molecular and clinical attributes between samples before and after a specific treatment; and (iii) survival analysis estimates based on individual treatment regimens received. Together, these features provide cBioPortal users with a toolkit to interactively investigate complex clinico-genomic data to generate hypotheses and make discoveries about the impact of specific genomic variants on prognosis and therapeutic sensitivities in cancer. SIGNIFICANCE Enhanced cBioPortal features allow clinicians and researchers to effectively investigate longitudinal clinico-genomic data from patients with cancer, which will improve exploration of data from the AACR Project GENIE Biopharma Collaborative and similar datasets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ino de Bruijn
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ritika Kundra
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | | | - Luke Sikina
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tali Mazor
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Xiang Li
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Angelica Ochoa
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Gaofei Zhao
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Bryan Lai
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Adam Abeshouse
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Ersin Ciftci
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Ziya Erkoc
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Zhaoyuan Fu
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Benjamin Gross
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Charles Haynes
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Allison Heath
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - David Higgins
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | - Priti Kumari
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Caris Life Sciences, Irving, Texas
| | | | - Aaron Lisman
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | | | - Divya Madela
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | | | | | - Joyce Quach
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Adam C. Resnick
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Rajat Sirohi
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Avery Wang
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Manda Wilson
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Hongxin Zhang
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kelsey Zhu
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Nicole Rusk
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Samantha Brown
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Xindi Guo
- Sage Bionetworks, Seattle, Washington
| | | | | | - Shirin Pilai
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | | | - John Philip
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | | | | | - Deborah Schrag
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jocelyn Lee
- American Association for Cancer Research: Project GENIE, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Michael V. Fiandalo
- American Association for Cancer Research: Project GENIE, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Shawn M. Sweeney
- American Association for Cancer Research: Project GENIE, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Trevor J. Pugh
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Ethan Cerami
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jianjiong Gao
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Caris Life Sciences, Irving, Texas
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Smith AW, DiMartino L, Garcia SF, Mitchell SA, Ruddy KJ, Smith JD, Wong SL, Cahue S, Cella D, Jensen RE, Hassett MJ, Hodgdon C, Kroner B, Osarogiagbon RU, Popovic J, Richardson K, Schrag D, Cheville AL. Systematic symptom management in the IMPACT Consortium: rationale and design for 3 effectiveness-implementation trials. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2023; 7:pkad073. [PMID: 37930033 PMCID: PMC10627528 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkad073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Revised: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer and its treatment produce deleterious symptoms across the phases of care. Poorly controlled symptoms negatively affect quality of life and result in increased health-care needs and hospitalization. The Improving the Management of symPtoms during And following Cancer Treatment (IMPACT) Consortium was created to develop 3 large-scale, systematic symptom management systems, deployed through electronic health record platforms, and to test them in pragmatic, randomized, hybrid effectiveness and implementation trials. Here, we describe the IMPACT Consortium's conceptual framework, its organizational components, and plans for evaluation. The study designs and lessons learned are highlighted in the context of disruptions related to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Wilder Smith
- Outcomes Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Lisa DiMartino
- Peter O’Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Austin, TX, USA
- RTI International, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Sofia F Garcia
- Department of Medical Social Sciences and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sandra A Mitchell
- Outcomes Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Justin D Smith
- Division of Health Systems Innovation and Research, Department of Population Health Sciences, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Sandra L Wong
- Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - September Cahue
- American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - David Cella
- Department of Medical Social Sciences and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Roxanne E Jensen
- Outcomes Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Michael J Hassett
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christine Hodgdon
- Guiding Researchers and Advocates to Scientific Partnerships, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Deborah Schrag
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrea L Cheville
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Blinder VS, Deal AM, Ginos B, Jansen J, Dueck AC, Mazza GL, Henson S, Carr P, Rogak LJ, Weiss A, Rapperport A, Jonsson M, Spears PA, Cella D, Gany F, Schrag D, Basch E. Financial Toxicity Monitoring in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Patient-Reported Outcomes During Cancer Treatment (Alliance AFT-39). J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:4652-4663. [PMID: 37625107 PMCID: PMC10564309 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.02834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Financial toxicity (FT) affects 20% of cancer survivors and is associated with poor clinical outcomes. No large-scale programs have been implemented to mitigate FT. We evaluated the effect of monthly FT screening as part of a larger patient-reported outcomes (PROs) digital monitoring intervention. METHODS PRO-TECT (AFT-39) is a cluster-randomized trial of patients undergoing systemic therapy for metastatic cancer. Practices were randomly assigned 1:1 to digital symptom monitoring (PRO practices) or usual care (control practices). Digital monitoring consisted of between-visit online or automated telephone patient surveys about symptoms, functioning, and FT (single-item screening question from Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity) for up to 1 year, with automated alerts sent to practice nurses for concerning survey scores. Clinical team actions in response to alerts were not mandated. The primary outcome of this planned secondary analysis was development or worsening of financial difficulties, assessed via the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 financial difficulties measure, at any time compared with baseline. A randomly selected subset of patients and nurses were interviewed about their experiences with the intervention. RESULTS One thousand one hundred ninety-one patients were enrolled (593 PRO; 598 control) at 52 US community oncology practices. Overall, 30.2% of patients treated at practices that received the FT screening intervention developed, or experienced worsening of, financial difficulties, compared with 39.0% treated at control practices (P = .004). Patients and nurses interviewed stated that FT screening identified patients for financial counseling who otherwise would be reluctant to seek, or unaware of the availability of, assistance. CONCLUSION In this report of a secondary outcome from a randomized clinical trial, FT screening as part of routine digital patient monitoring with PROs reduced the development, or worsening, of financial difficulties among patients undergoing systemic cancer therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Allison M. Deal
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Brenda Ginos
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Jennifer Jansen
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Amylou C. Dueck
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Gina L. Mazza
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Sydney Henson
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Philip Carr
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | - Anna Weiss
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | - Mattias Jonsson
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Patricia A. Spears
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - David Cella
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | - Ethan Basch
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Elmarakeby HA, Trukhanov PS, Arroyo VM, Riaz IB, Schrag D, Van Allen EM, Kehl KL. Empirical evaluation of language modeling to ascertain cancer outcomes from clinical text reports. BMC Bioinformatics 2023; 24:328. [PMID: 37658330 PMCID: PMC10474750 DOI: 10.1186/s12859-023-05439-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Longitudinal data on key cancer outcomes for clinical research, such as response to treatment and disease progression, are not captured in standard cancer registry reporting. Manual extraction of such outcomes from unstructured electronic health records is a slow, resource-intensive process. Natural language processing (NLP) methods can accelerate outcome annotation, but they require substantial labeled data. Transfer learning based on language modeling, particularly using the Transformer architecture, has achieved improvements in NLP performance. However, there has been no systematic evaluation of NLP model training strategies on the extraction of cancer outcomes from unstructured text. RESULTS We evaluated the performance of nine NLP models at the two tasks of identifying cancer response and cancer progression within imaging reports at a single academic center among patients with non-small cell lung cancer. We trained the classification models under different conditions, including training sample size, classification architecture, and language model pre-training. The training involved a labeled dataset of 14,218 imaging reports for 1112 patients with lung cancer. A subset of models was based on a pre-trained language model, DFCI-ImagingBERT, created by further pre-training a BERT-based model using an unlabeled dataset of 662,579 reports from 27,483 patients with cancer from our center. A classifier based on our DFCI-ImagingBERT, trained on more than 200 patients, achieved the best results in most experiments; however, these results were marginally better than simpler "bag of words" or convolutional neural network models. CONCLUSION When developing AI models to extract outcomes from imaging reports for clinical cancer research, if computational resources are plentiful but labeled training data are limited, large language models can be used for zero- or few-shot learning to achieve reasonable performance. When computational resources are more limited but labeled training data are readily available, even simple machine learning architectures can achieve good performance for such tasks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haitham A Elmarakeby
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
- Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
| | | | | | - Irbaz Bin Riaz
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Memorial-Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eliezer M Van Allen
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Kenneth L Kehl
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Doolin JW, Haakenstad EK, Neville BA, Lipsitz SR, Zhang S, Cleveland JLF, Hiruy S, Hassett MJ, Revette A, Schrag D, Basch E, McCleary NJ. Feasibility of Weekly Electronic Health Record-Embedded Patient-Reported Outcomes for Patients Starting Oral Cancer-Directed Therapy. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2023; 7:e2300043. [PMID: 37788407 DOI: 10.1200/cci.23.00043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Revised: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine the feasibility of integrating a symptom management platform into the electronic health record (EHR) using electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) during oral cancer-directed therapy (OCDT) and explore the impact of prompting oncology nurse navigators (ONNs) to respond to severe symptomatic adverse events (SAEs). MATERIALS AND METHODS Adults prescribed OCDT at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute were consecutively invited to participate. Participants received weekly messages to complete ePROs. The first half enrolled in a passive (P) group where ePROs responses could be viewed anytime, but outreach was not expected. The second half enrolled in an active (A) group where severe SAEs prompted emails to ONNs for outreach within 1 business day. Feasibility was the proportion of participants completing ≥2 ePROs during the first 30 days. Participants were followed for up to 90 days. RESULTS From June 25, 2019, to August 18, 2021, 100 participants enrolled, and 96 remained enrolled for at least 30 days. Overall, average age was 59 years, 80% female, and 9% used the platform in Spanish. Twenty-two A (45%) and 27 P (57%) participants met the feasibility threshold (P = .26). ePROs returned at 30 days were similar (P = .50): 0 ePROs 17 A, 13 P; 1 ePRO 10 A, 7 P; 2 ePROs 3 A, 5 P; 3 ePROs 1 A, 4 P; 4 ePROs 7 A, 8 P; and 5 ePROs 11 A, 10 P. Documented telephone encounters at 30 days were similar (109 A, 101 P; P = .86). CONCLUSION EHR-embedded ePROs administered weekly for people on OCDT was feasible, although many went incomplete. ePRO completion was not clearly affected by nursing calls for severe SAEs. Future efforts will investigate improving engagement and addressing symptoms proactively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jim W Doolin
- Department of Quality and Patient Safety, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Ellana K Haakenstad
- Department of Quality and Patient Safety, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Bridget A Neville
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Womens' Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Stu R Lipsitz
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Womens' Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Sunyi Zhang
- Department of Quality and Patient Safety, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | - Semegne Hiruy
- Department of Quality and Patient Safety, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Michael J Hassett
- Department of Quality and Patient Safety, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Anna Revette
- Department of Quality and Patient Safety, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | - Ethan Basch
- University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Nadine J McCleary
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gastrointestinal Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Choudhury NJ, Lavery JA, Brown S, de Bruijn I, Jee J, Tran TN, Rizvi H, Arbour KC, Whiting K, Shen R, Hellmann M, Bedard PL, Yu C, Leighl N, LeNoue-Newton M, Micheel C, Warner JL, Ginsberg MS, Plodkowski A, Girshman J, Sawan P, Pillai S, Sweeney SM, Kehl KL, Panageas KS, Schultz N, Schrag D, Riely GJ. The GENIE BPC NSCLC Cohort: A Real-World Repository Integrating Standardized Clinical and Genomic Data for 1,846 Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:3418-3428. [PMID: 37223888 PMCID: PMC10472103 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-0580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Revised: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We describe the clinical and genomic landscape of the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cohort of the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Project Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange (GENIE) Biopharma Collaborative (BPC). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN A total of 1,846 patients with NSCLC whose tumors were sequenced from 2014 to 2018 at four institutions participating in AACR GENIE were randomly chosen for curation using the PRISSMM data model. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated for patients treated with standard therapies. RESULTS In this cohort, 44% of tumors harbored a targetable oncogenic alteration, with EGFR (20%), KRAS G12C (13%), and oncogenic fusions (ALK, RET, and ROS1; 5%) as the most frequent. Median OS (mOS) on first-line platinum-based therapy without immunotherapy was 17.4 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 14.9-19.5 months]. For second-line therapies, mOS was 9.2 months (95% CI, 7.5-11.3 months) for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and 6.4 months (95% CI, 5.1-8.1 months) for docetaxel ± ramucirumab. In a subset of patients treated with ICI in the second-line or later setting, median RECIST PFS (2.5 months; 95% CI, 2.2-2.8) and median real-world PFS based on imaging reports (2.2 months; 95% CI, 1.7-2.6) were similar. In exploratory analysis of the impact of tumor mutational burden (TMB) on survival on ICI treatment in the second-line or higher setting, TMB z-score harmonized across gene panels was associated with improved OS (univariable HR, 0.85; P = 0.03; n = 247 patients). CONCLUSIONS The GENIE BPC cohort provides comprehensive clinicogenomic data for patients with NSCLC, which can improve understanding of real-world patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noura J. Choudhury
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Jessica A. Lavery
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Samantha Brown
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ino de Bruijn
- Marie-Josee and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Justin Jee
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Thinh Ngoc Tran
- Marie-Josee and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Kathryn C. Arbour
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Karissa Whiting
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ronglai Shen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Philippe L. Bedard
- Cancer Clinical Research Unit, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Celeste Yu
- Cancer Clinical Research Unit, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Natasha Leighl
- Cancer Clinical Research Unit, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michele LeNoue-Newton
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Christine Micheel
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Jeremy L. Warner
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee
- Lifespan Cancer Institute, Providence, Rhode Island
- Legorreta Cancer Center at Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Michelle S. Ginsberg
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Andrew Plodkowski
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jeffrey Girshman
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Peter Sawan
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Shirin Pillai
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Shawn M. Sweeney
- American Association for Cancer Research, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Kenneth L. Kehl
- Department of Medical Oncology, Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Katherine S. Panageas
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nikolaus Schultz
- Marie-Josee and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Gregory J. Riely
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Moon I, LoPiccolo J, Baca SC, Sholl LM, Kehl KL, Hassett MJ, Liu D, Schrag D, Gusev A. Machine learning for genetics-based classification and treatment response prediction in cancer of unknown primary. Nat Med 2023; 29:2057-2067. [PMID: 37550415 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02482-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 08/09/2023]
Abstract
Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a type of cancer that cannot be traced back to its primary site and accounts for 3-5% of all cancers. Established targeted therapies are lacking for CUP, leading to generally poor outcomes. We developed OncoNPC, a machine-learning classifier trained on targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) data from 36,445 tumors across 22 cancer types from three institutions. Oncology NGS-based primary cancer-type classifier (OncoNPC) achieved a weighted F1 score of 0.942 for high confidence predictions ([Formula: see text]) on held-out tumor samples, which made up 65.2% of all the held-out samples. When applied to 971 CUP tumors collected at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, OncoNPC predicted primary cancer types with high confidence in 41.2% of the tumors. OncoNPC also identified CUP subgroups with significantly higher polygenic germline risk for the predicted cancer types and with significantly different survival outcomes. Notably, patients with CUP who received first palliative intent treatments concordant with their OncoNPC-predicted cancers had significantly better outcomes (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.348; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.210-0.570; P = [Formula: see text]). Furthermore, OncoNPC enabled a 2.2-fold increase in patients with CUP who could have received genomically guided therapies. OncoNPC thus provides evidence of distinct CUP subgroups and offers the potential for clinical decision support for managing patients with CUP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Intae Moon
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jaclyn LoPiccolo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sylvan C Baca
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lynette M Sholl
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kenneth L Kehl
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael J Hassett
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David Liu
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- The Broad Institute of MIT & Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Alexander Gusev
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- The Broad Institute of MIT & Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
- Division of Genetics, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Leiter RE, Varas MTB, Miralda K, Muneton-Castano Y, Furtado G, Revette A, Cronin C, Soares HP, Lopez A, Hayman LL, Lindsay AC, Schrag D, Enzinger AC. Adaptation of a Multimedia Chemotherapy Educational Intervention for Latinos: Letting Patient Narratives Speak for Themselves. J Cancer Educ 2023; 38:1353-1362. [PMID: 36773178 PMCID: PMC10772955 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-023-02270-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
This study aims to adapt a video-based, multimedia chemotherapy educational intervention to meet the needs of US Latinos with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies. A five-step hybrid adaptation process involved (1) creating a multidisciplinary team with diverse Latino subject experts, (2) appraising the parent intervention, (3) identifying key cultural considerations from a systematic literature review and semi-structured Latino patient/caregiver interviews, (4) revising the intervention, highlighting culturally relevant themes through video interviews with Latino cancer patients, and (5) target population review with responsive revisions. We developed a suite of videos, booklets, and websites available in English and Spanish, which convey the risks and benefits of common chemotherapy regimens. After revising the English materials, we translated them into Spanish using a multi-step process. The intervention centers upon conversations with 12 Latino patients about their treatment experiences; video clips highlight culturally relevant themes (personalismo, familismo, faith, communication gaps, prognostic information preferences) identified during the third adaptation step. The adapted intervention materials included a new section on coping, and one titled "how to feel the best you can feel," which reviews principles of side effect management, self-advocacy, proactive communication, and palliative care. Ten Latinos with advanced malignancies reviewed the intervention and found it to be easily understandable, relatable, and helpful. A five-step hybrid model was successful in adapting a chemotherapy educational intervention for Latinos. Incorporation of video interviews with Latino patients enabled the authentic representation of salient cultural themes. Use of authentic patient narratives can be useful for cross-cultural intervention adaptations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard E Leiter
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Jimmy Fund 805A, MA, 02215, Boston, USA.
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Maria Teresa Bejarano Varas
- Department of Oncology Hospital Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Keysha Miralda
- Department of Nursing and Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Grace Furtado
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anna Revette
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christine Cronin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Heloisa P Soares
- Division of Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute at University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Athalia Lopez
- Department of Patient Care Services, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Laura L Hayman
- Department of Nursing, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ana Cristina Lindsay
- Department of Exercise and Health Sciences, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrea C Enzinger
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Jimmy Fund 805A, MA, 02215, Boston, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Schrag D, Shi Q, Weiser MR, Gollub MJ, Saltz LB, Musher BL, Goldberg J, Al Baghdadi T, Goodman KA, McWilliams RR, Farma JM, George TJ, Kennecke HF, Shergill A, Montemurro M, Nelson GD, Colgrove B, Gordon V, Venook AP, O'Reilly EM, Meyerhardt JA, Dueck AC, Basch E, Chang GJ, Mamon HJ. Preoperative Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. N Engl J Med 2023; 389:322-334. [PMID: 37272534 PMCID: PMC10775881 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2303269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 67.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pelvic radiation plus sensitizing chemotherapy with a fluoropyrimidine (chemoradiotherapy) before surgery is standard care for locally advanced rectal cancer in North America. Whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) can be used in lieu of chemoradiotherapy is uncertain. METHODS We conducted a multicenter, unblinded, noninferiority, randomized trial of neoadjuvant FOLFOX (with chemoradiotherapy given only if the primary tumor decreased in size by <20% or if FOLFOX was discontinued because of side effects) as compared with chemoradiotherapy. Adults with rectal cancer that had been clinically staged as T2 node-positive, T3 node-negative, or T3 node-positive who were candidates for sphincter-sparing surgery were eligible to participate. The primary end point was disease-free survival. Noninferiority would be claimed if the upper limit of the two-sided 90.2% confidence interval of the hazard ratio for disease recurrence or death did not exceed 1.29. Secondary end points included overall survival, local recurrence (in a time-to-event analysis), complete pathological resection, complete response, and toxic effects. RESULTS From June 2012 through December 2018, a total of 1194 patients underwent randomization and 1128 started treatment; among those who started treatment, 585 were in the FOLFOX group and 543 in the chemoradiotherapy group. At a median follow-up of 58 months, FOLFOX was noninferior to chemoradiotherapy for disease-free survival (hazard ratio for disease recurrence or death, 0.92; 90.2% confidence interval [CI], 0.74 to 1.14; P = 0.005 for noninferiority). Five-year disease-free survival was 80.8% (95% CI, 77.9 to 83.7) in the FOLFOX group and 78.6% (95% CI, 75.4 to 81.8) in the chemoradiotherapy group. The groups were similar with respect to overall survival (hazard ratio for death, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.44) and local recurrence (hazard ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.44 to 3.16). In the FOLFOX group, 53 patients (9.1%) received preoperative chemoradiotherapy and 8 (1.4%) received postoperative chemoradiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS In patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who were eligible for sphincter-sparing surgery, preoperative FOLFOX was noninferior to preoperative chemoradiotherapy with respect to disease-free survival. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute; PROSPECT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01515787.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah Schrag
- From the Departments of Medicine (D.S., L.B.S., E.M.O.), Surgery (M.R.W.), and Radiology (M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (K.A.G.) - both in New York; Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center (Q.S., G.D.N., B.C., A.C.D.) and the Department of Oncology (R.R.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; SWOG Cancer Research Network and the Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine (B.L.M.), and the Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (G.J.C.) - both in Houston; the Departments of Surgery (J.G.) and Radiation Oncology (H.J.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, and the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (J.A.M.) - both in Boston; IHA Hematology Oncology, Ypsilanti, MI (T.A.B.); ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Network and Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia (J.M.F.); NRG Oncology and the University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville (T.J.G.); Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON (H.F.K.), and the Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg (V.G.) - both in Canada; Alliance Protocol Office, Chicago (A.S.); the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland (M.M.); Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.P.V.); and the Department of Medical Oncology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (E.B.)
| | - Qian Shi
- From the Departments of Medicine (D.S., L.B.S., E.M.O.), Surgery (M.R.W.), and Radiology (M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (K.A.G.) - both in New York; Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center (Q.S., G.D.N., B.C., A.C.D.) and the Department of Oncology (R.R.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; SWOG Cancer Research Network and the Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine (B.L.M.), and the Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (G.J.C.) - both in Houston; the Departments of Surgery (J.G.) and Radiation Oncology (H.J.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, and the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (J.A.M.) - both in Boston; IHA Hematology Oncology, Ypsilanti, MI (T.A.B.); ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Network and Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia (J.M.F.); NRG Oncology and the University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville (T.J.G.); Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON (H.F.K.), and the Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg (V.G.) - both in Canada; Alliance Protocol Office, Chicago (A.S.); the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland (M.M.); Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.P.V.); and the Department of Medical Oncology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (E.B.)
| | - Martin R Weiser
- From the Departments of Medicine (D.S., L.B.S., E.M.O.), Surgery (M.R.W.), and Radiology (M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (K.A.G.) - both in New York; Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center (Q.S., G.D.N., B.C., A.C.D.) and the Department of Oncology (R.R.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; SWOG Cancer Research Network and the Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine (B.L.M.), and the Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (G.J.C.) - both in Houston; the Departments of Surgery (J.G.) and Radiation Oncology (H.J.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, and the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (J.A.M.) - both in Boston; IHA Hematology Oncology, Ypsilanti, MI (T.A.B.); ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Network and Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia (J.M.F.); NRG Oncology and the University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville (T.J.G.); Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON (H.F.K.), and the Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg (V.G.) - both in Canada; Alliance Protocol Office, Chicago (A.S.); the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland (M.M.); Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.P.V.); and the Department of Medical Oncology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (E.B.)
| | - Marc J Gollub
- From the Departments of Medicine (D.S., L.B.S., E.M.O.), Surgery (M.R.W.), and Radiology (M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (K.A.G.) - both in New York; Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center (Q.S., G.D.N., B.C., A.C.D.) and the Department of Oncology (R.R.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; SWOG Cancer Research Network and the Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine (B.L.M.), and the Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (G.J.C.) - both in Houston; the Departments of Surgery (J.G.) and Radiation Oncology (H.J.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, and the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (J.A.M.) - both in Boston; IHA Hematology Oncology, Ypsilanti, MI (T.A.B.); ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Network and Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia (J.M.F.); NRG Oncology and the University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville (T.J.G.); Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON (H.F.K.), and the Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg (V.G.) - both in Canada; Alliance Protocol Office, Chicago (A.S.); the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland (M.M.); Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.P.V.); and the Department of Medical Oncology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (E.B.)
| | - Leonard B Saltz
- From the Departments of Medicine (D.S., L.B.S., E.M.O.), Surgery (M.R.W.), and Radiology (M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (K.A.G.) - both in New York; Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center (Q.S., G.D.N., B.C., A.C.D.) and the Department of Oncology (R.R.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; SWOG Cancer Research Network and the Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine (B.L.M.), and the Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (G.J.C.) - both in Houston; the Departments of Surgery (J.G.) and Radiation Oncology (H.J.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, and the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (J.A.M.) - both in Boston; IHA Hematology Oncology, Ypsilanti, MI (T.A.B.); ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Network and Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia (J.M.F.); NRG Oncology and the University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville (T.J.G.); Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON (H.F.K.), and the Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg (V.G.) - both in Canada; Alliance Protocol Office, Chicago (A.S.); the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland (M.M.); Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.P.V.); and the Department of Medical Oncology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (E.B.)
| | - Benjamin L Musher
- From the Departments of Medicine (D.S., L.B.S., E.M.O.), Surgery (M.R.W.), and Radiology (M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (K.A.G.) - both in New York; Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center (Q.S., G.D.N., B.C., A.C.D.) and the Department of Oncology (R.R.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; SWOG Cancer Research Network and the Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine (B.L.M.), and the Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (G.J.C.) - both in Houston; the Departments of Surgery (J.G.) and Radiation Oncology (H.J.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, and the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (J.A.M.) - both in Boston; IHA Hematology Oncology, Ypsilanti, MI (T.A.B.); ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Network and Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia (J.M.F.); NRG Oncology and the University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville (T.J.G.); Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON (H.F.K.), and the Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg (V.G.) - both in Canada; Alliance Protocol Office, Chicago (A.S.); the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland (M.M.); Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.P.V.); and the Department of Medical Oncology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (E.B.)
| | - Joel Goldberg
- From the Departments of Medicine (D.S., L.B.S., E.M.O.), Surgery (M.R.W.), and Radiology (M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (K.A.G.) - both in New York; Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center (Q.S., G.D.N., B.C., A.C.D.) and the Department of Oncology (R.R.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; SWOG Cancer Research Network and the Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine (B.L.M.), and the Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (G.J.C.) - both in Houston; the Departments of Surgery (J.G.) and Radiation Oncology (H.J.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, and the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (J.A.M.) - both in Boston; IHA Hematology Oncology, Ypsilanti, MI (T.A.B.); ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Network and Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia (J.M.F.); NRG Oncology and the University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville (T.J.G.); Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON (H.F.K.), and the Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg (V.G.) - both in Canada; Alliance Protocol Office, Chicago (A.S.); the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland (M.M.); Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.P.V.); and the Department of Medical Oncology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (E.B.)
| | - Tareq Al Baghdadi
- From the Departments of Medicine (D.S., L.B.S., E.M.O.), Surgery (M.R.W.), and Radiology (M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (K.A.G.) - both in New York; Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center (Q.S., G.D.N., B.C., A.C.D.) and the Department of Oncology (R.R.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; SWOG Cancer Research Network and the Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine (B.L.M.), and the Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (G.J.C.) - both in Houston; the Departments of Surgery (J.G.) and Radiation Oncology (H.J.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, and the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (J.A.M.) - both in Boston; IHA Hematology Oncology, Ypsilanti, MI (T.A.B.); ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Network and Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia (J.M.F.); NRG Oncology and the University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville (T.J.G.); Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON (H.F.K.), and the Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg (V.G.) - both in Canada; Alliance Protocol Office, Chicago (A.S.); the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland (M.M.); Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.P.V.); and the Department of Medical Oncology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (E.B.)
| | - Karyn A Goodman
- From the Departments of Medicine (D.S., L.B.S., E.M.O.), Surgery (M.R.W.), and Radiology (M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (K.A.G.) - both in New York; Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center (Q.S., G.D.N., B.C., A.C.D.) and the Department of Oncology (R.R.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; SWOG Cancer Research Network and the Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine (B.L.M.), and the Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (G.J.C.) - both in Houston; the Departments of Surgery (J.G.) and Radiation Oncology (H.J.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, and the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (J.A.M.) - both in Boston; IHA Hematology Oncology, Ypsilanti, MI (T.A.B.); ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Network and Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia (J.M.F.); NRG Oncology and the University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville (T.J.G.); Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON (H.F.K.), and the Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg (V.G.) - both in Canada; Alliance Protocol Office, Chicago (A.S.); the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland (M.M.); Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.P.V.); and the Department of Medical Oncology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (E.B.)
| | - Robert R McWilliams
- From the Departments of Medicine (D.S., L.B.S., E.M.O.), Surgery (M.R.W.), and Radiology (M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (K.A.G.) - both in New York; Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center (Q.S., G.D.N., B.C., A.C.D.) and the Department of Oncology (R.R.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; SWOG Cancer Research Network and the Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine (B.L.M.), and the Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (G.J.C.) - both in Houston; the Departments of Surgery (J.G.) and Radiation Oncology (H.J.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, and the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (J.A.M.) - both in Boston; IHA Hematology Oncology, Ypsilanti, MI (T.A.B.); ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Network and Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia (J.M.F.); NRG Oncology and the University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville (T.J.G.); Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON (H.F.K.), and the Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg (V.G.) - both in Canada; Alliance Protocol Office, Chicago (A.S.); the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland (M.M.); Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.P.V.); and the Department of Medical Oncology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (E.B.)
| | - Jeffrey M Farma
- From the Departments of Medicine (D.S., L.B.S., E.M.O.), Surgery (M.R.W.), and Radiology (M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (K.A.G.) - both in New York; Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center (Q.S., G.D.N., B.C., A.C.D.) and the Department of Oncology (R.R.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; SWOG Cancer Research Network and the Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine (B.L.M.), and the Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (G.J.C.) - both in Houston; the Departments of Surgery (J.G.) and Radiation Oncology (H.J.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, and the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (J.A.M.) - both in Boston; IHA Hematology Oncology, Ypsilanti, MI (T.A.B.); ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Network and Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia (J.M.F.); NRG Oncology and the University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville (T.J.G.); Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON (H.F.K.), and the Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg (V.G.) - both in Canada; Alliance Protocol Office, Chicago (A.S.); the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland (M.M.); Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.P.V.); and the Department of Medical Oncology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (E.B.)
| | - Thomas J George
- From the Departments of Medicine (D.S., L.B.S., E.M.O.), Surgery (M.R.W.), and Radiology (M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (K.A.G.) - both in New York; Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center (Q.S., G.D.N., B.C., A.C.D.) and the Department of Oncology (R.R.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; SWOG Cancer Research Network and the Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine (B.L.M.), and the Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (G.J.C.) - both in Houston; the Departments of Surgery (J.G.) and Radiation Oncology (H.J.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, and the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (J.A.M.) - both in Boston; IHA Hematology Oncology, Ypsilanti, MI (T.A.B.); ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Network and Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia (J.M.F.); NRG Oncology and the University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville (T.J.G.); Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON (H.F.K.), and the Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg (V.G.) - both in Canada; Alliance Protocol Office, Chicago (A.S.); the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland (M.M.); Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.P.V.); and the Department of Medical Oncology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (E.B.)
| | - Hagen F Kennecke
- From the Departments of Medicine (D.S., L.B.S., E.M.O.), Surgery (M.R.W.), and Radiology (M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (K.A.G.) - both in New York; Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center (Q.S., G.D.N., B.C., A.C.D.) and the Department of Oncology (R.R.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; SWOG Cancer Research Network and the Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine (B.L.M.), and the Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (G.J.C.) - both in Houston; the Departments of Surgery (J.G.) and Radiation Oncology (H.J.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, and the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (J.A.M.) - both in Boston; IHA Hematology Oncology, Ypsilanti, MI (T.A.B.); ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Network and Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia (J.M.F.); NRG Oncology and the University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville (T.J.G.); Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON (H.F.K.), and the Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg (V.G.) - both in Canada; Alliance Protocol Office, Chicago (A.S.); the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland (M.M.); Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.P.V.); and the Department of Medical Oncology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (E.B.)
| | - Ardaman Shergill
- From the Departments of Medicine (D.S., L.B.S., E.M.O.), Surgery (M.R.W.), and Radiology (M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (K.A.G.) - both in New York; Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center (Q.S., G.D.N., B.C., A.C.D.) and the Department of Oncology (R.R.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; SWOG Cancer Research Network and the Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine (B.L.M.), and the Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (G.J.C.) - both in Houston; the Departments of Surgery (J.G.) and Radiation Oncology (H.J.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, and the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (J.A.M.) - both in Boston; IHA Hematology Oncology, Ypsilanti, MI (T.A.B.); ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Network and Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia (J.M.F.); NRG Oncology and the University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville (T.J.G.); Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON (H.F.K.), and the Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg (V.G.) - both in Canada; Alliance Protocol Office, Chicago (A.S.); the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland (M.M.); Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.P.V.); and the Department of Medical Oncology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (E.B.)
| | - Michael Montemurro
- From the Departments of Medicine (D.S., L.B.S., E.M.O.), Surgery (M.R.W.), and Radiology (M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (K.A.G.) - both in New York; Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center (Q.S., G.D.N., B.C., A.C.D.) and the Department of Oncology (R.R.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; SWOG Cancer Research Network and the Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine (B.L.M.), and the Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (G.J.C.) - both in Houston; the Departments of Surgery (J.G.) and Radiation Oncology (H.J.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, and the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (J.A.M.) - both in Boston; IHA Hematology Oncology, Ypsilanti, MI (T.A.B.); ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Network and Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia (J.M.F.); NRG Oncology and the University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville (T.J.G.); Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON (H.F.K.), and the Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg (V.G.) - both in Canada; Alliance Protocol Office, Chicago (A.S.); the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland (M.M.); Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.P.V.); and the Department of Medical Oncology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (E.B.)
| | - Garth D Nelson
- From the Departments of Medicine (D.S., L.B.S., E.M.O.), Surgery (M.R.W.), and Radiology (M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (K.A.G.) - both in New York; Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center (Q.S., G.D.N., B.C., A.C.D.) and the Department of Oncology (R.R.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; SWOG Cancer Research Network and the Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine (B.L.M.), and the Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (G.J.C.) - both in Houston; the Departments of Surgery (J.G.) and Radiation Oncology (H.J.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, and the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (J.A.M.) - both in Boston; IHA Hematology Oncology, Ypsilanti, MI (T.A.B.); ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Network and Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia (J.M.F.); NRG Oncology and the University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville (T.J.G.); Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON (H.F.K.), and the Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg (V.G.) - both in Canada; Alliance Protocol Office, Chicago (A.S.); the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland (M.M.); Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.P.V.); and the Department of Medical Oncology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (E.B.)
| | - Brian Colgrove
- From the Departments of Medicine (D.S., L.B.S., E.M.O.), Surgery (M.R.W.), and Radiology (M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (K.A.G.) - both in New York; Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center (Q.S., G.D.N., B.C., A.C.D.) and the Department of Oncology (R.R.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; SWOG Cancer Research Network and the Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine (B.L.M.), and the Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (G.J.C.) - both in Houston; the Departments of Surgery (J.G.) and Radiation Oncology (H.J.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, and the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (J.A.M.) - both in Boston; IHA Hematology Oncology, Ypsilanti, MI (T.A.B.); ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Network and Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia (J.M.F.); NRG Oncology and the University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville (T.J.G.); Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON (H.F.K.), and the Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg (V.G.) - both in Canada; Alliance Protocol Office, Chicago (A.S.); the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland (M.M.); Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.P.V.); and the Department of Medical Oncology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (E.B.)
| | - Vallerie Gordon
- From the Departments of Medicine (D.S., L.B.S., E.M.O.), Surgery (M.R.W.), and Radiology (M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (K.A.G.) - both in New York; Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center (Q.S., G.D.N., B.C., A.C.D.) and the Department of Oncology (R.R.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; SWOG Cancer Research Network and the Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine (B.L.M.), and the Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (G.J.C.) - both in Houston; the Departments of Surgery (J.G.) and Radiation Oncology (H.J.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, and the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (J.A.M.) - both in Boston; IHA Hematology Oncology, Ypsilanti, MI (T.A.B.); ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Network and Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia (J.M.F.); NRG Oncology and the University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville (T.J.G.); Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON (H.F.K.), and the Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg (V.G.) - both in Canada; Alliance Protocol Office, Chicago (A.S.); the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland (M.M.); Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.P.V.); and the Department of Medical Oncology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (E.B.)
| | - Alan P Venook
- From the Departments of Medicine (D.S., L.B.S., E.M.O.), Surgery (M.R.W.), and Radiology (M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (K.A.G.) - both in New York; Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center (Q.S., G.D.N., B.C., A.C.D.) and the Department of Oncology (R.R.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; SWOG Cancer Research Network and the Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine (B.L.M.), and the Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (G.J.C.) - both in Houston; the Departments of Surgery (J.G.) and Radiation Oncology (H.J.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, and the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (J.A.M.) - both in Boston; IHA Hematology Oncology, Ypsilanti, MI (T.A.B.); ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Network and Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia (J.M.F.); NRG Oncology and the University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville (T.J.G.); Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON (H.F.K.), and the Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg (V.G.) - both in Canada; Alliance Protocol Office, Chicago (A.S.); the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland (M.M.); Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.P.V.); and the Department of Medical Oncology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (E.B.)
| | - Eileen M O'Reilly
- From the Departments of Medicine (D.S., L.B.S., E.M.O.), Surgery (M.R.W.), and Radiology (M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (K.A.G.) - both in New York; Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center (Q.S., G.D.N., B.C., A.C.D.) and the Department of Oncology (R.R.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; SWOG Cancer Research Network and the Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine (B.L.M.), and the Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (G.J.C.) - both in Houston; the Departments of Surgery (J.G.) and Radiation Oncology (H.J.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, and the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (J.A.M.) - both in Boston; IHA Hematology Oncology, Ypsilanti, MI (T.A.B.); ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Network and Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia (J.M.F.); NRG Oncology and the University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville (T.J.G.); Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON (H.F.K.), and the Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg (V.G.) - both in Canada; Alliance Protocol Office, Chicago (A.S.); the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland (M.M.); Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.P.V.); and the Department of Medical Oncology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (E.B.)
| | - Jeffrey A Meyerhardt
- From the Departments of Medicine (D.S., L.B.S., E.M.O.), Surgery (M.R.W.), and Radiology (M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (K.A.G.) - both in New York; Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center (Q.S., G.D.N., B.C., A.C.D.) and the Department of Oncology (R.R.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; SWOG Cancer Research Network and the Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine (B.L.M.), and the Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (G.J.C.) - both in Houston; the Departments of Surgery (J.G.) and Radiation Oncology (H.J.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, and the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (J.A.M.) - both in Boston; IHA Hematology Oncology, Ypsilanti, MI (T.A.B.); ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Network and Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia (J.M.F.); NRG Oncology and the University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville (T.J.G.); Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON (H.F.K.), and the Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg (V.G.) - both in Canada; Alliance Protocol Office, Chicago (A.S.); the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland (M.M.); Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.P.V.); and the Department of Medical Oncology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (E.B.)
| | - Amylou C Dueck
- From the Departments of Medicine (D.S., L.B.S., E.M.O.), Surgery (M.R.W.), and Radiology (M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (K.A.G.) - both in New York; Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center (Q.S., G.D.N., B.C., A.C.D.) and the Department of Oncology (R.R.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; SWOG Cancer Research Network and the Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine (B.L.M.), and the Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (G.J.C.) - both in Houston; the Departments of Surgery (J.G.) and Radiation Oncology (H.J.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, and the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (J.A.M.) - both in Boston; IHA Hematology Oncology, Ypsilanti, MI (T.A.B.); ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Network and Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia (J.M.F.); NRG Oncology and the University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville (T.J.G.); Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON (H.F.K.), and the Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg (V.G.) - both in Canada; Alliance Protocol Office, Chicago (A.S.); the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland (M.M.); Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.P.V.); and the Department of Medical Oncology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (E.B.)
| | - Ethan Basch
- From the Departments of Medicine (D.S., L.B.S., E.M.O.), Surgery (M.R.W.), and Radiology (M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (K.A.G.) - both in New York; Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center (Q.S., G.D.N., B.C., A.C.D.) and the Department of Oncology (R.R.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; SWOG Cancer Research Network and the Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine (B.L.M.), and the Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (G.J.C.) - both in Houston; the Departments of Surgery (J.G.) and Radiation Oncology (H.J.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, and the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (J.A.M.) - both in Boston; IHA Hematology Oncology, Ypsilanti, MI (T.A.B.); ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Network and Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia (J.M.F.); NRG Oncology and the University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville (T.J.G.); Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON (H.F.K.), and the Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg (V.G.) - both in Canada; Alliance Protocol Office, Chicago (A.S.); the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland (M.M.); Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.P.V.); and the Department of Medical Oncology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (E.B.)
| | - George J Chang
- From the Departments of Medicine (D.S., L.B.S., E.M.O.), Surgery (M.R.W.), and Radiology (M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (K.A.G.) - both in New York; Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center (Q.S., G.D.N., B.C., A.C.D.) and the Department of Oncology (R.R.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; SWOG Cancer Research Network and the Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine (B.L.M.), and the Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (G.J.C.) - both in Houston; the Departments of Surgery (J.G.) and Radiation Oncology (H.J.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, and the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (J.A.M.) - both in Boston; IHA Hematology Oncology, Ypsilanti, MI (T.A.B.); ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Network and Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia (J.M.F.); NRG Oncology and the University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville (T.J.G.); Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON (H.F.K.), and the Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg (V.G.) - both in Canada; Alliance Protocol Office, Chicago (A.S.); the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland (M.M.); Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.P.V.); and the Department of Medical Oncology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (E.B.)
| | - Harvey J Mamon
- From the Departments of Medicine (D.S., L.B.S., E.M.O.), Surgery (M.R.W.), and Radiology (M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (K.A.G.) - both in New York; Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center (Q.S., G.D.N., B.C., A.C.D.) and the Department of Oncology (R.R.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; SWOG Cancer Research Network and the Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine (B.L.M.), and the Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (G.J.C.) - both in Houston; the Departments of Surgery (J.G.) and Radiation Oncology (H.J.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, and the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (J.A.M.) - both in Boston; IHA Hematology Oncology, Ypsilanti, MI (T.A.B.); ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Network and Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia (J.M.F.); NRG Oncology and the University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville (T.J.G.); Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON (H.F.K.), and the Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg (V.G.) - both in Canada; Alliance Protocol Office, Chicago (A.S.); the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland (M.M.); Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.P.V.); and the Department of Medical Oncology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (E.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Basch E, Dueck AC, Mitchell SA, Mamon H, Weiser M, Saltz L, Gollub M, Rogak L, Ginos B, Mazza GL, Colgrove B, Chang G, Minasian L, Denicoff A, Thanarajasingam G, Musher B, George T, Venook A, Farma J, O'Reilly E, Meyerhardt JA, Shi Q, Schrag D. Patient-Reported Outcomes During and After Treatment for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer in the PROSPECT Trial (Alliance N1048). J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:3724-3734. [PMID: 37270691 PMCID: PMC10351948 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.00903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/05/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer in North America is neoadjuvant pelvic chemoradiation with fluorouracil (5FUCRT). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) is an alternative that may spare patients the morbidity of radiation. Understanding the relative patient experiences with these options is necessary to inform treatment decisions. METHODS PROSPECT was a multicenter, unblinded, noninferiority, randomized trial of neoadjuvant FOLFOX versus 5FUCRT, which enrolled adults with rectal cancer clinically staged as T2N+, cT3N-, or cT3N+ who were candidates for sphincter-sparing surgery. Neoadjuvant FOLFOX was given in six cycles over 12 weeks, followed by surgery. Neoadjuvant 5FUCRT was delivered in 28 fractions over 5.5 weeks, followed by surgery. Adjuvant chemotherapy was suggested but not mandated in both groups. Enrolled patients were asked to provide patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at baseline, during neoadjuvant treatment, and at 12 months after surgery. PROs included 14 symptoms from the National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). Additional PRO instruments measured bowel, bladder, sexual function, and health-related quality of life (HRQL). RESULTS From June 2012 to December 2018, 1,194 patients were randomly assigned, 1,128 initiated treatment, and 940 contributed PRO-CTCAE data (493 FOLFOX; 447 5FUCRT). During neoadjuvant treatment, patients reported significantly lower rates of diarrhea and better overall bowel function with FOLFOX while anxiety, appetite loss, constipation, depression, dysphagia, dyspnea, edema, fatigue, mucositis, nausea, neuropathy, and vomiting were lower with 5FUCRT (all multiplicity adjusted P < .05). At 12 months after surgery, patients randomly assigned to FOLFOX reported significantly lower rates of fatigue and neuropathy and better sexual function versus 5FUCRT (all multiplicity adjusted P < .05). Neither bladder function nor HRQL differed between groups at any time point. CONCLUSION For patients with locally advanced rectal cancer choosing between neoadjuvant FOLFOX and 5FUCRT, the distinctive PRO profiles inform treatment selection and shared decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ethan Basch
- Division of Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Amylou C. Dueck
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | | | - Harvey Mamon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Martin Weiser
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Leonard Saltz
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Marc Gollub
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Lauren Rogak
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Brenda Ginos
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Gina L. Mazza
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Brian Colgrove
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - George Chang
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | - Benjamin Musher
- The Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG), Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Thomas George
- NRG Oncology, University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville, FL
| | - Alan Venook
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Jeffrey Farma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Eileen O'Reilly
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Qian Shi
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lee MK, Basch E, Mitchell SA, Minasian LM, Langlais BT, Thanarajasingam G, Ginos BF, Rogak LJ, Mendoza TR, Bennett AV, Schrag D, Mazza GL, Dueck AC. Reliability and validity of PRO-CTCAE® daily reporting with a 24-hour recall period. Qual Life Res 2023; 32:2047-2058. [PMID: 36897529 PMCID: PMC10241696 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-023-03374-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The standard recall period for the patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE®) is the past 7 days, but there are contexts where a 24-hour recall may be desirable. The purpose of this analysis was to investigate the reliability and validity of a subset of PRO-CTCAE items captured using a 24-hour recall. METHODS 27 PRO-CTCAE items representing 14 symptomatic adverse events (AEs) were collected using both a 24-hour recall (24 h) and the standard 7 day recall (7d) in a sample of patients receiving active cancer treatment (n = 113). Using data captured with a PRO-CTCAE-24h on days 6 and 7, and 20 and 21, we computed intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC); an ICC ≥ 0.70 was interpreted as demonstrating high test-retest reliability. Correlations between PRO-CTCAE-24h items on day 7 and conceptually relevant EORTC QLQ-C30 domains were examined. In responsiveness analysis, patients were deemed changed if they had a one-point or greater change in the corresponding PRO-CTCAE-7d item (from week 0 to week 1). RESULTS PRO-CTCAE-24h captured on two consecutive days demonstrated that 21 of 27 items (78%) had ICCs ≥ 0.70 (day 6/7 median ICC 0.76), (day 20/21 median ICC 0.84). Median correlation between attributes within a common AE was 0.75, and the median correlation between conceptually relevant EORTC QLQ-C30 domains and PRO-CTCAE-24 h items captured on day 7 was 0.44. In the analysis of responsiveness to change, the median standardized response mean (SRM) for patients with improvement was - 0.52 and that for patients with worsening was 0.71. CONCLUSION A 24-hour recall period for PRO-CTCAE items has acceptable measurement properties and can inform day-to-day variations in symptomatic AEs when daily PRO-CTCAE administration is implemented in a clinical trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M K Lee
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | - E Basch
- UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | | | - B T Langlais
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | | | - B F Ginos
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - L J Rogak
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - A V Bennett
- UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - D Schrag
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - G L Mazza
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - A C Dueck
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Schrag D, Uno H, Rosovsky R, Rutherford C, Sanfilippo K, Villano JL, Drescher M, Jayaram N, Holmes C, Feldman L, Zattra O, Farrar-Muir H, Cronin C, Basch E, Weiss A, Connors JM. Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin and Recurrent VTE in Patients With Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2023; 329:1924-1933. [PMID: 37266947 PMCID: PMC10265290 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.7843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
Importance In patients with cancer who have venous thromboembolism (VTE) events, long-term anticoagulation with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is recommended to prevent recurrent VTE. The effectiveness of a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) compared with LMWH for preventing recurrent VTE in patients with cancer is uncertain. Objective To evaluate DOACs, compared with LMWH, for preventing recurrent VTE and for rates of bleeding in patients with cancer following an initial VTE event. Design, Setting, and Participants Unblinded, comparative effectiveness, noninferiority randomized clinical trial conducted at 67 oncology practices in the US that enrolled 671 patients with cancer (any invasive solid tumor, lymphoma, multiple myeloma, or chronic lymphocytic leukemia) who had a new clinical or radiological diagnosis of VTE. Enrollment occurred from December 2016 to April 2020. Final follow-up was in November 2020. Intervention Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either a DOAC (n = 335) or LMWH (n = 336) and were followed up for 6 months or until death. Physicians and patients selected any DOAC or any LMWH (or fondaparinux) and physicians selected drug doses. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the recurrent VTE rate at 6 months. Noninferiority of anticoagulation with a DOAC vs LMWH was defined by the upper limit of the 1-sided 95% CI for the difference of a DOAC relative to LMWH of less than 3% in the randomized cohort that received at least 1 dose of assigned treatment. The 6 prespecified secondary outcomes included major bleeding, which was assessed using a 2.5% noninferiority margin. Results Between December 2016 and April 2020, 671 participants were randomized and 638 (95%) completed the trial (median age, 64 years; 353 women [55%]). Among those randomized to a DOAC, 330 received at least 1 dose. Among those randomized to LMWH, 308 received at least 1 dose. Rates of recurrent VTE were 6.1% in the DOAC group and 8.8% in the LMWH group (difference, -2.7%; 1-sided 95% CI, -100% to 0.7%) consistent with the prespecified noninferiority criterion. Of 6 prespecified secondary outcomes, none were statistically significant. Major bleeding occurred in 5.2% of participants in the DOAC group and 5.6% in the LMWH group (difference, -0.4%; 1-sided 95% CI, -100% to 2.5%) and did not meet the noninferiority criterion. Severe adverse events occurred in 33.8% of participants in the DOAC group and 35.1% in the LMWH group. The most common serious adverse events were anemia and death. Conclusions and Relevance Among adults with cancer and VTE, DOACs were noninferior to LMWH for preventing recurrent VTE over 6-month follow-up. These findings support use of a DOAC to prevent recurrent VTE in patients with cancer. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02744092.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah Schrag
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Hajime Uno
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Rachel Rosovsky
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | | | | | | | - Monic Drescher
- Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Nagesh Jayaram
- Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | | | | | - Ottavia Zattra
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Christine Cronin
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ethan Basch
- UNC Lineberger Cancer Center Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Anna Weiss
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Stadler ZK, Schrag D. Genetic Testing for Cancer Susceptibility. JAMA 2023:2805797. [PMID: 37276548 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.9474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Zsofia K Stadler
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Associate Editor, JAMA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Manz CR, Odayar VS, Schrag D. Cancer Screening Rates and Outcomes for Justice-Involved Individuals: A Scoping Review. J Correct Health Care 2023. [PMID: 37074345 DOI: 10.1089/jchc.21.11.0128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/20/2023]
Abstract
Individuals who have been incarcerated or under community supervision have elevated cancer mortality. This review summarizes existing knowledge on implementation and outcomes of cancer screening for justice-involved individuals to identify opportunities for reducing cancer disparities. This scoping review identified 16 studies published between January 1990 and June 2021 that reported cancer screening rates and outcomes in U.S. jails or prisons or for individuals under community supervision. Most studies evaluated cervical cancer screening, while fewer studies evaluated screening for breast, colon, prostate, lung, and hepatocellular cancers. Although incarcerated women are often up to date with cervical cancer screening, only about half had recent mammograms and only 20% of male patients were up to date with colorectal cancer screening. Justice-involved patients are at high risk of cancer, yet few studies have evaluated cancer screening for these populations and screening rates for many cancers appear low. The findings suggest that intensification of cancer screening for justice-involved populations may address cancer disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher R Manz
- Division of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Deborah Schrag
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Liddicoat Yamarik R, Chiu LA, Flannery M, Van Allen K, Adeyemi O, Cuthel AM, Brody AA, Goldfeld KS, Schrag D, Grudzen CR. Engagement, Advance Care Planning, and Hospice Use in a Telephonic Nurse-Led Palliative Care Program for Persons Living with Advanced Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15082310. [PMID: 37190238 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15082310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Revised: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Persons living with advanced cancer have intensive symptoms and psychosocial needs that often result in visits to the Emergency Department (ED). We report on program engagement, advance care planning (ACP), and hospice use for a 6-month longitudinal nurse-led, telephonic palliative care intervention for patients with advanced cancer as part of a larger randomized trial. Patients 50 years and older with metastatic solid tumors were recruited from 18 EDs and randomized to receive nursing calls focused on ACP, symptom management, and care coordination or specialty outpatient palliative care (ClinicialTrials.gov: NCT03325985). One hundred and five (50%) graduated from the 6-month program, 54 (26%) died or enrolled in hospice, 40 (19%) were lost to follow-up, and 19 (9%) withdrew prior to program completion. In a Cox proportional hazard regression, withdrawn subjects were more likely to be white and have a low symptom burden compared to those who did not withdraw. Two hundred eighteen persons living with advanced cancer were enrolled in the nursing arm, and 182 of those (83%) completed some ACP. Of the subjects who died, 43/54 (80%) enrolled in hospice. Our program demonstrated high rates of engagement, ACP, and hospice enrollment. Enrolling subjects with a high symptom burden may result in even greater program engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Laraine Ann Chiu
- Ronald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Mara Flannery
- Ronald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Kaitlyn Van Allen
- Ronald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Oluwaseun Adeyemi
- Ronald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Allison M Cuthel
- Ronald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Abraham A Brody
- Rory Meyers College of Nursing, New York University, New York, NY 10010, USA
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Palliative Care, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Keith S Goldfeld
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Tran TN, Pichotta KB, Liu SY, Fong C, Luthra A, Mastrogiacomo B, Maron S, Schrag D, Shah SP, Razavi P, Li BT, Riely GJ, Schultz N, Jee J. Abstract 4259: Identification of anti-neoplastic therapy given before initial visit at a referral center using natural language processing applied to medical oncology initial consultation notes. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2023-4259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Anticancer therapy changes tumor physiology and genomics, making it a key variable in cancer studies. Although antineoplastics given at a single institution may be available in research-ready format, treatment at external institutions prior to receiving care at academic medical centers, common among patients at these centers, is often only described in free-text clinical notes, necessitating manual curation for downstream analysis. To overcome this bottleneck, we trained and validated natural language processing (NLP) models using initial consult notes to identify whether patients had received treatment at external institutions and studied the impact of these putative treatments on tumor genomics.
Training data were derived from the AACR Project GENIE Biopharma Collaborative (BPC) for 2,663 patients at Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) across four cancer types. For each patient, we selected initial visits with medical and radiation oncologists based on an a priori note prioritization scheme and determined “ground-truth” prior external medications based on manually curated BPC administration records, whitelisting MSK-given medications. We trained logistic regression and clinical longformer models to identify external treatment receipt and evaluated model performance with 5-fold cross-validation. The clinical longformer model performed best across evaluation metrics, with an average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.972, macro-averaged precision/recall of 0.854/0.902 and macro-averaged F1 score of 0.876. Re-review of discrepant cases suggested that 75% of “false positives” may be due to curation error.
We used our model to infer treatment status in a pan-cancer cohort with tumor genomic profiling using our institutional sequencing platform. Out of 48,447 patients, 11,900 were predicted to have received external treatment. Patients with putative external treatment had higher alteration frequencies in resistance-related genes than untreated patients and comparable to known pre-treated patients, including ESR1 in patients with breast cancer, AR in patients with prostate cancer, and EGFR T790M in patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer. Patients with putative external treatments, similar to known pre-treated patients, had shorter survival compared to treatment-naïve patients of the same cancer type.
NLP can abstract external treatment status from clinical notes. When applied at scale, our model could help mitigate confounding variables and identify relationships between clinicogenomic variables and anticancer therapy.
Citation Format: Thinh N. Tran, Karl B. Pichotta, Si-Yang Liu, Christopher Fong, Anisha Luthra, Brooke Mastrogiacomo, Steven Maron, Deborah Schrag, Sohrab P. Shah, Pedram Razavi, Bob T. Li, Gregory J. Riely, Nikolaus Schultz, Justin Jee. Identification of anti-neoplastic therapy given before initial visit at a referral center using natural language processing applied to medical oncology initial consultation notes. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 4259.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thinh N. Tran
- 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Si-Yang Liu
- 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Anisha Luthra
- 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Steven Maron
- 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Pedram Razavi
- 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Bob T. Li
- 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Justin Jee
- 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Jee J, Fong C, Pichotta K, Tran T, Luthra A, Altoe M, Maron S, Shen R, Liu SY, Waters M, Kholodenko J, Mastrogiacomo B, Kim S, Brannon AR, Berger MF, Martin A, Chang J, Safonov A, Reis-Filho JS, Schrag D, Shah SP, Razavi P, Li BT, Riely GJ, Schultz N. Abstract 5721: Automated annotation for large-scale clinicogenomic models of lung cancer treatment response and overall survival. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2023-5721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
The digitization of health records and prompt availability of tumor DNA sequencing results offer a chance to study the determinants of cancer outcomes with unprecedented richness; however, abstraction of key attributes from free text presents a major limitation to large-scale analyses. Using natural language processing (NLP), we derived sites of metastasis, prior treatment at outside institutions, programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) levels, and smoking status from records of patients with tumor sequencing to create a richly annotated clinicogenomic cohort. We sought to define whether combining features would improve models of overall survival (OS) and treatment response as validated in a multi-institution, manually curated cohort. We leveraged the manually curated AACR GENIE Biopharma Collaborative (BPC) dataset to train NLP algorithms to abstract the aforementioned features from overlapping records available at Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK). All models achieved precision and recall > 0.85. We deployed these algorithms to records of all MSK patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and tumor profiling with our FDA-authorized institutional targeted sequencing platform (N=7,015). These labels were combined with genomic, demographic, histopathologic, internal treatment and staging data to train random survival forests (RSF) to predict OS and time-to-next-treatment (TTNT) for molecularly targeted and immunotherapies. RSFs trained on the MSK NSCLC cohort were validated with the curated, non-MSK BPC NSCLC cohort (N=977). The addition of NLP-derived variables to genomic features enhanced RSF predictive power for OS (c-index, 10x bootstrap 95%CI: 0.58, 0.57-0.59 vs 0.75, 0.74-0.76 combined) and targeted and immunotherapy TTNT. The size of the MSK NSCLC cohort enabled discovery of associations between metastatic sites, PD-L1 status, genomics, and TTNTs not apparent in the smaller BPC cohort. We measured the added predictive value of variables not available in BPC with MSK-only cross-validation analyses. White blood cell differential counts and additional tissue genomic features including tumor mutational burden and fraction genome altered added minimally, while circulating tumor DNA sequencing added prognostic power for OS over other factors including disease burden
Using NLP we present a large NSCLC cohort with rich clinicoradiographic annotation, leading to superior models of patient outcomes. Our data uncovers associations not observed in smaller, manually curated cohorts and provides a foundation for further research in therapy choice and prognostication.
Citation Format: Justin Jee, Chris Fong, Karl Pichotta, Thinh Tran, Anisha Luthra, Mirella Altoe, Steven Maron, Ronglai Shen, Si-Yang Liu, Michele Waters, Joseph Kholodenko, Brooke Mastrogiacomo, Susie Kim, A Rose Brannon, Michael F. Berger, Axel Martin, Jason Chang, Anton Safonov, Jorge S. Reis-Filho, Deborah Schrag, Sohrab P. Shah, Pedram Razavi, Bob T. Li, Gregory J. Riely, Nikolaus Schultz. Automated annotation for large-scale clinicogenomic models of lung cancer treatment response and overall survival. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 5721.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin Jee
- 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Chris Fong
- 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Karl Pichotta
- 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Thinh Tran
- 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Anisha Luthra
- 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Mirella Altoe
- 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Steven Maron
- 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Ronglai Shen
- 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Si-Yang Liu
- 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | - Susie Kim
- 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | - Jason Chang
- 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Anton Safonov
- 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | - Pedram Razavi
- 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Bob T. Li
- 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Merola D, Young J, Schrag D, Lin KJ, Alwardt S, Schneeweiss S. Effectiveness research in oncology with electronic health record data: A retrospective cohort study emulating the PALOMA-2 trial. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2023; 32:426-434. [PMID: 36345809 PMCID: PMC10038825 DOI: 10.1002/pds.5565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Revised: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Oncology electronic health record (EHR) databases have increased in quality and availability over the past decade, yet it remains unclear whether these clinical practice data can be used to conduct reliable comparative effectiveness studies. We sought to emulate a clinical trial with EHR data in the advanced breast cancer population and compare our results against the trial. METHODS This cohort study used EHR data from US oncology practices. All elements of the study were defined to mimic the PALOMA-2 trial as closely as possible. Patients with hormone-positive, HER-2 negative metastatic breast cancer with no prior treatment for metastatic disease were included. Patients initiating palbociclib and letrozole on the same day following the earliest record of metastasis were compared to those initiating letrozole only. The primary associational measure was the conditional hazard ratio for time-to-next treatment (TTNT). TTNT is well-measured in our data source and amenable for calibration against the randomized study results of the PALOMA-2 trial. We used multiple imputation for several patient characteristics with missing values. RESULTS There were 3836 study-eligible women with advanced breast cancer. The hazard ratio for TTNT in the observational study (HR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.56-0.68) was closely aligned with that of the randomized trial (HR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.52-0.78). CONCLUSIONS Under our assumptions on missing data and comparability of the two study populations, results from our non-randomized study closely matched that of the randomized trial. Further studies are needed to determine whether EHR data can yield reliable conclusions on treatment effects in oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Merola
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jessica Young
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School & Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- CAUSALab, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical School, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kueiyu Joshua Lin
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sarah Alwardt
- Avalere Health, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Sebastian Schneeweiss
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kehl KL, Uno H, Gusev A, Groha S, Brown S, Lavery JA, Schrag D, Panageas KS. Elucidating Analytic Bias Due to Informative Cohort Entry in Cancer Clinico-genomic Datasets. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2023; 32:344-352. [PMID: 36626408 PMCID: PMC9992002 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-22-0875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2022] [Revised: 11/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oncologists often order genomic testing to inform treatment for worsening cancer. The resulting correlation between genomic testing timing and prognosis, or "informative entry," can bias observational clinico-genomic research. The efficacy of existing approaches to this problem in clinico-genomic cohorts is poorly understood. METHODS We simulated clinico-genomic cohorts followed from an index date to death. Subgroups in each cohort who underwent genomic testing before death were "observed." We varied data generation parameters under four scenarios: (i) independent testing and survival times; (ii) correlated testing and survival times for all patients; (iii) correlated testing and survival times for a subset of patients; and (iv) testing and mortality exclusively following progression events. We examined the behavior of conditional Kendall tau (Tc) statistics, Cox entry time coefficients, and biases in overall survival (OS) estimation and biomarker inference across scenarios. RESULTS Scenario #1 yielded null Tc and Cox entry time coefficients and unbiased OS inference. Scenario #2 yielded positive Tc, negative Cox entry time coefficients, underestimated OS, and biomarker associations biased toward the null. Scenario #3 yielded negative Tc, positive Cox entry time coefficients, and underestimated OS, but biomarker estimates were less biased. Scenario #4 yielded null Tc and Cox entry time coefficients, underestimated OS, and biased biomarker estimates. Transformation and copula modeling did not provide unbiased results. CONCLUSIONS Approaches to informative clinico-genomic cohort entry, including Tc and Cox entry time statistics, are sensitive to heterogeneity in genotyping and survival time distributions. IMPACT Novel methods are needed for unbiased inference using observational clinico-genomic data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth L. Kehl
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Hajime Uno
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Alexander Gusev
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Stefan Groha
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Samantha Brown
- Departments of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial-Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Jessica A. Lavery
- Departments of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial-Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Departments of Medicine, Memorial-Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Katherine S. Panageas
- Departments of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial-Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Keller RB, Mazor T, Sholl L, Aguirre AJ, Singh H, Sethi N, Bass A, Nagaraja AK, Brais LK, Hill E, Hennessey C, Cusick M, Del Vecchio Fitz C, Zwiesler Z, Siegel E, Ovalle A, Trukhanov P, Hansel J, Shapiro GI, Abrams TA, Biller LH, Chan JA, Cleary JM, Corsello SM, Enzinger AC, Enzinger PC, Mayer RJ, McCleary NJ, Meyerhardt JA, Ng K, Patel AK, Perez KJ, Rahma OE, Rubinson DA, Wisch JS, Yurgelun MB, Hassett MJ, MacConaill L, Schrag D, Cerami E, Wolpin BM, Nowak JA, Giannakis M. Programmatic Precision Oncology Decision Support for Patients With Gastrointestinal Cancer. JCO Precis Oncol 2023; 7:e2200342. [PMID: 36634297 PMCID: PMC9929103 DOI: 10.1200/po.22.00342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE With the growing number of available targeted therapeutics and molecular biomarkers, the optimal care of patients with cancer now depends on a comprehensive understanding of the rapidly evolving landscape of precision oncology, which can be challenging for oncologists to navigate alone. METHODS We developed and implemented a precision oncology decision support system, GI TARGET, (Gastrointestinal Treatment Assistance Regarding Genomic Evaluation of Tumors) within the Gastrointestinal Cancer Center at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. With a multidisciplinary team, we systematically reviewed tumor molecular profiling for GI tumors and provided molecularly informed clinical recommendations, which included identifying appropriate clinical trials aided by the computational matching platform MatchMiner, suggesting targeted therapy options on or off the US Food and Drug Administration-approved label, and consideration of additional or orthogonal molecular testing. RESULTS We reviewed genomic data and provided clinical recommendations for 506 patients with GI cancer who underwent tumor molecular profiling between January and June 2019 and determined follow-up using the electronic health record. Summary reports were provided to 19 medical oncologists for patients with colorectal (n = 198, 39%), pancreatic (n = 124, 24%), esophagogastric (n = 67, 13%), biliary (n = 40, 8%), and other GI cancers. We recommended ≥ 1 precision medicine clinical trial for 80% (406 of 506) of patients, leading to 24 enrollments. We recommended on-label and off-label targeted therapies for 6% (28 of 506) and 25% (125 of 506) of patients, respectively. Recommendations for additional or orthogonal testing were made for 42% (211 of 506) of patients. CONCLUSION The integration of precision medicine in routine cancer care through a dedicated multidisciplinary molecular tumor board is scalable and sustainable, and implementation of precision oncology recommendations has clinical utility for patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel B. Keller
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Tali Mazor
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Lynette Sholl
- Center for Advanced Molecular Diagnostics, Brigham & Women's Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Andrew J. Aguirre
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA,Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA
| | - Harshabad Singh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Nilay Sethi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Adam Bass
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Ankur K. Nagaraja
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Lauren K. Brais
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Emma Hill
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Connor Hennessey
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Margaret Cusick
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Zachary Zwiesler
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Ethan Siegel
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Andrea Ovalle
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Pavel Trukhanov
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Jason Hansel
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Geoffrey I. Shapiro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Thomas A. Abrams
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Leah H. Biller
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jennifer A. Chan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - James M. Cleary
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Steven M. Corsello
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Andrea C. Enzinger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Peter C. Enzinger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Robert J. Mayer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Nadine J. McCleary
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Kimmie Ng
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Anuj K. Patel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Kimberley J. Perez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Osama E. Rahma
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Douglas A. Rubinson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jeffrey S. Wisch
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Matthew B. Yurgelun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Michael J. Hassett
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Laura MacConaill
- Center for Advanced Molecular Diagnostics, Brigham & Women's Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Ethan Cerami
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Brian M. Wolpin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jonathan A. Nowak
- Center for Advanced Molecular Diagnostics, Brigham & Women's Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Marios Giannakis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA,Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA,Marios Giannakis, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, 450 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA 02215; e-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Moon I, LoPiccolo J, Baca SC, Sholl LM, Kehl KL, Hassett MJ, Liu D, Schrag D, Gusev A. Utilizing Electronic Health Records (EHR) and Tumor Panel Sequencing to Demystify Prognosis of Cancer of Unknown Primary (CUP) patients. Res Sq 2023:rs.3.rs-2450090. [PMID: 36711812 PMCID: PMC9882677 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2450090/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a type of cancer that cannot be traced back to its original site and accounts for 3-5% of all cancers. It does not have established targeted therapies, leading to poor outcomes. We developed OncoNPC, a machine learning classifier trained on targeted next-generation sequencing data from 34,567 tumors from three institutions. OncoNPC achieved a weighted F1 score of 0.94 for high confidence predictions on known cancer types (65% of held-out samples). When applied to 971 CUP tumors from patients treated at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, OncoNPC identified actionable molecular alterations in 23% of the tumors. Furthermore, OncoNPC identified CUP subtypes with significantly higher polygenic germline risk for the predicted cancer type and significantly different survival outcomes, supporting its validity. Importantly, CUP patients who received first palliative intent treatments concordant with their OncoNPC-predicted cancer sites had significantly better outcomes (H.R. 0.348, 95% C.I. 0.210 - 0.570, p-value 2.32 × 10-5). OncoNPC thus provides evidence of distinct CUP subtypes and offers the potential for clinical decision support for managing patients with CUP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Intae Moon
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jaclyn LoPiccolo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sylvan C. Baca
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lynette M. Sholl
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kenneth L. Kehl
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael J. Hassett
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David Liu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- The Broad Institute of MIT & Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alexander Gusev
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- The Broad Institute of MIT & Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Division of Genetics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Groha S, Alaiwi SA, Xu W, Naranbhai V, Nassar AH, Bakouny Z, El Zarif T, Saliby RM, Wan G, Rajeh A, Adib E, Nuzzo PV, Schmidt AL, Labaki C, Ricciuti B, Alessi JV, Braun DA, Shukla SA, Keenan TE, Van Allen E, Awad MM, Manos M, Rahma O, Zubiri L, Villani AC, Fairfax B, Hammer C, Khan Z, Reynolds K, Semenov Y, Schrag D, Kehl KL, Freedman ML, Choueiri TK, Gusev A. Germline variants associated with toxicity to immune checkpoint blockade. Nat Med 2022; 28:2584-2591. [PMID: 36526723 PMCID: PMC10958775 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-022-02094-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have yielded remarkable responses but often lead to immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Although germline causes for irAEs have been hypothesized, no individual variant associated with developing irAEs has been identified. We carried out a genome-wide association study of 1,751 patients on ICIs across 12 cancer types. We investigated two irAE phenotypes: (1) high-grade (3-5) and (2) all-grade events. We identified 3 genome-wide significant associations (P < 5 × 10-8) in the discovery cohort associated with all-grade irAEs: rs16906115 near IL7 (combined P = 3.6 × 10-11; hazard ratio (HR) = 2.1); rs75824728 near IL22RA1 (combined P = 3.5 × 10-8; HR = 1.8); and rs113861051 on 4p15 (combined P = 1.2 × 10-8, HR = 2.0); rs16906115 was replicated in 3 independent studies. The association near IL7 colocalized with the gain of a new cryptic exon for IL7, a critical regulator of lymphocyte homeostasis. Patients carrying the IL7 germline variant exhibited significantly increased lymphocyte stability after ICI initiation, which was itself predictive of downstream irAEs and improved survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Groha
- Division of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Broad Institute of Harvard & MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sarah Abou Alaiwi
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Wenxin Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Vivek Naranbhai
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Amin H Nassar
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ziad Bakouny
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Talal El Zarif
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Renee Maria Saliby
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Guihong Wan
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ahmad Rajeh
- Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elio Adib
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Pier V Nuzzo
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, School of Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Andrew L Schmidt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Chris Labaki
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Biagio Ricciuti
- Lowe Center for Thoracic Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joao Victor Alessi
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, School of Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - David A Braun
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Center of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Sachet A Shukla
- Broad Institute of Harvard & MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Translational Immunogenomics Lab, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tanya E Keenan
- Broad Institute of Harvard & MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Eliezer Van Allen
- Broad Institute of Harvard & MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Cancer Precision Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mark M Awad
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, School of Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Michael Manos
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Osama Rahma
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Alexandra-Chloe Villani
- Broad Institute of Harvard & MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Immunology and Inflammatory Diseases, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Zia Khan
- Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Kerry Reynolds
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Medical Oncology, Bartlett, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yevgeniy Semenov
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Division of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kenneth L Kehl
- Division of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matthew L Freedman
- Broad Institute of Harvard & MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Toni K Choueiri
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alexander Gusev
- Division of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
- Broad Institute of Harvard & MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- Division of Genetics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Van Egeren D, Kohli K, Warner JL, Bedard PL, Riely G, Lepisto E, Schrag D, LeNoue-Newton M, Catalano P, Kehl KL, Michor F, Fiandalo M, Foti M, Khotskaya Y, Lee J, Peters N, Sweeney S, Abraham J, Brenton JD, Caldas C, Doherty G, Nimmervoll B, Pinilla K, Martin JE, Rueda OM, Sammut SJ, Silva D, Cao K, Heath AP, Li M, Lilly J, MacFarland S, Maris JM, Mason JL, Morgan AM, Resnick A, Welsh M, Zhu Y, Johnson B, Li Y, Sholl L, Beaudoin R, Biswas R, Cerami E, Cushing O, Dand D, Ducar M, Gusev A, Hahn WC, Haigis K, Hassett M, Janeway KA, Jänne P, Jawale A, Johnson J, Kehl KL, Kumari P, Laucks V, Lepisto E, Lindeman N, Lindsay J, Lueders A, Macconaill L, Manam M, Mazor T, Miller D, Newcomb A, Orechia J, Ovalle A, Postle A, Quinn D, Reardon B, Rollins B, Shivdasani P, Tramontano A, Van Allen E, Van Nostrand SC, Bell J, Datto MB, Green M, Hubbard C, McCall SJ, Mettu NB, Strickler JH, Andre F, Besse B, Deloger M, Dogan S, Italiano A, Loriot Y, Ludovic L, Michels S, Scoazec J, Tran-Dien A, Vassal G, Freeman CE, Hsiao SJ, Ingham M, Pang J, Rabadan R, Roman LC, Carvajal R, DuBois R, Arcila ME, Benayed R, Berger MF, Bhuiya M, Brannon AR, Brown S, Chakravarty D, Chu C, de Bruijn I, Galle J, Gao J, Gardos S, Gross B, Kundra R, Kung AL, Ladanyi M, Lavery JA, Li X, Lisman A, Mastrogiacomo B, McCarthy C, Nichols C, Ochoa A, Panageas KS, Philip J, Pillai S, Riely GJ, Rizvi H, Rudolph J, Sawyers CL, Schrag D, Schultz N, Schwartz J, Sheridan R, Solit D, Wang A, Wilson M, Zehir A, Zhang H, Zhao G, Ahmed L, Bedard PL, Bruce JP, Chow H, Cooke S, Del Rossi S, Felicen S, Hakgor S, Jagannathan P, Kamel-Reid S, Krishna G, Leighl N, Lu Z, Nguyen A, Oldfield L, Plagianakos D, Pugh TJ, Rizvi A, Sabatini P, Shah E, Singaravelan N, Siu L, Srivastava G, Stickle N, Stockley T, Tang M, Virtaenen C, Watt S, Yu C, Bernard B, Bifulco C, Cramer JL, Lee S, Piening B, Reynolds S, Slagel J, Tittel P, Urba W, VanCampen J, Weerasinghe R, Acebedo A, Guinney J, Guo X, Hunter-Zinck H, Yu T, Dang K, Anagnostou V, Baras A, Brahmer J, Gocke C, Scharpf RB, Tao J, Velculescu VE, Alexander S, Bailey N, Gold P, Bierkens M, de Graaf J, Hudeček J, Meijer GA, Monkhorst K, Samsom KG, Sanders J, Sonke G, ten Hoeve J, van de Velde T, van den Berg J, Voest E, Steinhardt G, Kadri S, Pankhuri W, Wang P, Segal J, Moung C, Espinosa-Mendez C, Martell HJ, Onodera C, Quintanar Alfaro A, Sweet-Cordero EA, Talevich E, Turski M, Van’t Veer L, Wren A, Aguilar S, Dienstmann R, Mancuso F, Nuciforo P, Tabernero J, Viaplana C, Vivancos A, Anderson I, Chaugai S, Coco J, Fabbri D, Johnson D, Jones L, Li X, Lovly C, Mishra S, Mittendorf K, Wen L, Yang YJ, Ye C, Holt M, LeNoue-Newton ML, Micheel CM, Park BH, Rubinstein SM, Stricker T, Wang L, Warner J, Guan M, Jin G, Liu L, Topaloglu U, Urtis C, Zhang W, D’Eletto M, Hutchison S, Longtine J, Walther Z. Genomic analysis of early-stage lung cancer reveals a role for TP53 mutations in distant metastasis. Sci Rep 2022; 12:19055. [PMID: 36351964 PMCID: PMC9646734 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-21448-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have distant metastases have a poor prognosis. To determine which genomic factors of the primary tumor are associated with metastasis, we analyzed data from 759 patients originally diagnosed with stage I-III NSCLC as part of the AACR Project GENIE Biopharma Collaborative consortium. We found that TP53 mutations were significantly associated with the development of new distant metastases. TP53 mutations were also more prevalent in patients with a history of smoking, suggesting that these patients may be at increased risk for distant metastasis. Our results suggest that additional investigation of the optimal management of patients with early-stage NSCLC harboring TP53 mutations at diagnosis is warranted in light of their higher likelihood of developing new distant metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debra Van Egeren
- grid.65499.370000 0001 2106 9910Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA USA ,grid.38142.3c000000041936754XDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA ,grid.2515.30000 0004 0378 8438Stem Cell Program, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA USA ,grid.5386.8000000041936877XDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY USA
| | - Khushi Kohli
- grid.65499.370000 0001 2106 9910Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA USA
| | - Jeremy L. Warner
- grid.152326.10000 0001 2264 7217Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN USA ,grid.152326.10000 0001 2264 7217Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN USA
| | - Philippe L. Bedard
- grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada
| | - Gregory Riely
- grid.51462.340000 0001 2171 9952Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA
| | - Eva Lepisto
- grid.65499.370000 0001 2106 9910Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA USA ,grid.429426.f0000 0000 9350 5788Present Address: Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation, Norwalk, CT USA
| | - Deborah Schrag
- grid.51462.340000 0001 2171 9952Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA
| | - Michele LeNoue-Newton
- grid.412807.80000 0004 1936 9916Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN USA
| | - Paul Catalano
- grid.65499.370000 0001 2106 9910Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA USA
| | - Kenneth L. Kehl
- grid.65499.370000 0001 2106 9910Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA USA
| | - Franziska Michor
- grid.65499.370000 0001 2106 9910Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA USA ,grid.38142.3c000000041936754XDepartment of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA USA ,grid.66859.340000 0004 0546 1623Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA USA ,grid.38142.3c000000041936754XDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA USA ,grid.65499.370000 0001 2106 9910The Center for Cancer Evolution, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA USA ,grid.38142.3c000000041936754XThe Ludwig Center at Harvard, Boston, MA USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Pappou EP, Temple LK, Patil S, Smith JJ, Wei IH, Nash GM, Guillem JG, Widmar M, Weiser MR, Paty PB, Schrag D, Garcia-Aguilar J. Quality of life and function after rectal cancer surgery with and without sphincter preservation. Front Oncol 2022; 12:944843. [PMID: 36353560 PMCID: PMC9639454 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.944843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite improvements in surgical techniques, functional outcomes and quality of life after therapy for rectal cancer remain suboptimal. We sought to prospectively evaluate the effect of bowel, bladder, and sexual functional outcomes on health-related quality of life (QOL) in patients with restorative versus non-restorative resections after rectal cancer surgery. A cohort of 211 patients with clinical stage I-III rectal cancer who underwent open surgery between 2006 and 2009 at Memorial Sloan Kettering were included. Subjects were asked to complete surveys preoperatively and at 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Validated instruments were used to measure QOL, bowel, bladder, and sexual function. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses evaluated predictors of 24- month QOL. In addition, longitudinal trends over the study period were evaluated using repeated measures models. In total, 180 patients (85%) completed at least 1 survey, and response rates at each time point were high (>70%). QOL was most impaired at 6 and 12 months and returned to baseline levels at 24 months. Among patients who underwent sphincter-preserving surgery (SPS; n=153 [85%]), overall bowel function at 24 months was significantly impaired and never returned to baseline. There were no differences in QOL at 24 months between patients who underwent SPS and those who did not (p=.29). Bowel function was correlated with QOL at 24 months (Pearson correlation,.41; p<.001). QOL among patients who have undergone SPS for rectal cancer is good despite poor function. Patients with ostomies are able to adjust to the functional changes and, overall, have good global QOL. Patients with low anastomoses had lower global QOL at 24 months than patients with permanent stomas. Our findings can help patients set expectations about function and quality of life after surgery for rectal cancer with and without a permanent stoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanouil P. Pappou
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States,*Correspondence: Emmanouil P. Pappou,
| | - Larissa K. Temple
- Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Sujata Patil
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - J. Joshua Smith
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Iris H. Wei
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Garrett M. Nash
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - José G. Guillem
- Department of Surgery, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Maria Widmar
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Martin R. Weiser
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Philip B. Paty
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Julio Garcia-Aguilar
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Nassar AH, Adib E, Abou Alaiwi S, El Zarif T, Groha S, Akl EW, Nuzzo PV, Mouhieddine TH, Perea-Chamblee T, Taraszka K, El-Khoury H, Labban M, Fong C, Arora KS, Labaki C, Xu W, Sonpavde G, Haddad RI, Mouw KW, Giannakis M, Hodi FS, Zaitlen N, Schoenfeld AJ, Schultz N, Berger MF, MacConaill LE, Ananda G, Kwiatkowski DJ, Choueiri TK, Schrag D, Carrot-Zhang J, Gusev A. Ancestry-driven recalibration of tumor mutational burden and disparate clinical outcomes in response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Cancer Cell 2022; 40:1161-1172.e5. [PMID: 36179682 PMCID: PMC9559771 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2022.08.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Revised: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
The immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) pembrolizumab is US FDA approved for treatment of solid tumors with high tumor mutational burden (TMB-high; ≥10 variants/Mb). However, the extent to which TMB-high generalizes as an accurate biomarker in diverse patient populations is largely unknown. Using two clinical cohorts, we investigated the interplay between genetic ancestry, TMB, and tumor-only versus tumor-normal paired sequencing in solid tumors. TMB estimates from tumor-only panels substantially overclassified individuals into the clinically important TMB-high group due to germline contamination, and this bias was particularly pronounced in patients with Asian/African ancestry. Among patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with ICIs, those misclassified as TMB-high from tumor-only panels did not associate with improved outcomes. TMB-high was significantly associated with improved outcomes only in European ancestries and merits validation in non-European ancestry populations. Ancestry-aware tumor-only TMB calibration and ancestry-diverse biomarker studies are critical to ensure that existing disparities are not exacerbated in precision medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amin H Nassar
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT 06510, USA; Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Elio Adib
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Sarah Abou Alaiwi
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Talal El Zarif
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Stefan Groha
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Division of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Elie W Akl
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Pier Vitale Nuzzo
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Tarek H Mouhieddine
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Tomin Perea-Chamblee
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Kodi Taraszka
- Department of Computational Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Habib El-Khoury
- Center for Prevention of Progression of Blood Cancers, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Muhieddine Labban
- Department of Urologic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Christopher Fong
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Kanika S Arora
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Chris Labaki
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Wenxin Xu
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Guru Sonpavde
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Robert I Haddad
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Kent W Mouw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Marios Giannakis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - F Stephen Hodi
- Melanoma Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Noah Zaitlen
- Department of Computational Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Adam J Schoenfeld
- Thoracic Oncology Service, Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Nikolaus Schultz
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Michael F Berger
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Laura E MacConaill
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Center for Cancer Genome Discovery, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Guruprasad Ananda
- Center for Cancer Genome Discovery, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | | | - Toni K Choueiri
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Jian Carrot-Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Alexander Gusev
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Division of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Merola D, Young J, Schrag D, Lin KJ, Robert N, Schneeweiss S. Oncology Drug Effectiveness from Electronic Health Record Data Calibrated Against RCT Evidence: The PARSIFAL Trial Emulation. Clin Epidemiol 2022; 14:1135-1144. [PMID: 36246306 PMCID: PMC9563733 DOI: 10.2147/clep.s373291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The use of electronic health records (EHR) data to assess drug effectiveness in clinical oncology practice is of great interest to regulators, clinicians, and payers. However, the utility of EHR data in clinical effectiveness studies may be limited by missing data, unmeasured confounding, and imperfect outcome surveillance. This study sought to emulate and compare the results of a randomized controlled trial investigating the efficacy of palbociclib with fulvestrant vs letrozole in advanced breast cancer. Methods This was a cohort study using longitudinal EHR data derived from outpatient oncology practices in the United States. Eligibility criteria from the PARSIFAL trial were emulated as closely as possible. Patients were included if they had hormone-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor - 2 (HER-2) negative metastatic breast cancer and had no record of prior treatment for metastatic disease. Patients initiating first-line treatment with palbociclib and fulvestrant following their first record of metastasis were compared to those initiating palbociclib and letrozole on the same day. Treatments were ascertained by oncology medication ordering records in the data source. The primary outcome was death as recorded in the oncologists' EHR systems. Results There were 1886 eligible women in the study cohort. Although the 3-year survival was meaningfully lower in clinical practice (59%) compared to the randomized trial (78%), the relative effect size was a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.07 (95% CI: 0.86-1.35), similar to the randomized trial (HR = 1.00; 95% CI: 0.68-1.48). Conclusion Despite common challenges encountered in EHR-based studies, it is possible to achieve similar conclusions to emulated randomized trials with the application of analytic approaches that address missing data, confounding, and selection bias. This is a promising finding in light of other emulations and ongoing efforts to improve data from clinical practice and causal analytics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Merola
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA,Department of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA,Correspondence: David Merola, Email
| | - Jessica Young
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA,Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School & Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical School New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kueiyu Joshua Lin
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA,Department of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA,Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Sebastian Schneeweiss
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA,Department of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Schumacher JR, Neuman HB, Yu M, Vanness DJ, Si Y, Burnside ES, Ruddy KJ, Partridge AH, Schrag D, Edge SB, Zhang Y, Jacobs EA, Havlena J, Francescatti AB, Winchester DP, McKellar DP, Spears PA, Kozower BD, Chang GJ, Greenberg CC. Surveillance Imaging vs Symptomatic Recurrence Detection and Survival in Stage II-III Breast Cancer (AFT-01). J Natl Cancer Inst 2022; 114:1371-1379. [PMID: 35913454 PMCID: PMC9552308 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djac131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2019] [Revised: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Guidelines for follow-up after locoregional breast cancer treatment recommend imaging for distant metastases only in the presence of patient signs and/or symptoms. However, guidelines have not been updated to reflect advances in imaging, systemic therapy, or the understanding of biological subtype. We assessed the association between mode of distant recurrence detection and survival. METHODS In this observational study, a stage-stratified random sample of women with stage II-III breast cancer in 2006-2007 and followed through 2016 was selected, including up to 10 women from each of 1217 Commission on Cancer facilities (n = 10 076). The explanatory variable was mode of recurrence detection (asymptomatic imaging vs signs and/or symptoms). The outcome was time from initial cancer diagnosis to death. Registrars abstracted scan type, intent (cancer-related vs not, asymptomatic surveillance vs not), and recurrence. Data were merged with each patient's National Cancer Database record. RESULTS Surveillance imaging detected 23.3% (284 of 1220) of distant recurrences (76.7%, 936 of 1220 by signs and/or symptoms). Based on propensity-weighted multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, patients with asymptomatic imaging compared with sign and/or symptom detected recurrences had a lower risk of death if estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) negative, HER2 negative (triple negative; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.54 to 0.99), or HER2 positive (HR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.33 to 0.80). No association was observed for ER- or PR-positive, HER2-negative (HR = 1.14, 95% CI = 0.91 to 1.44) cancers. CONCLUSIONS Recurrence detection by asymptomatic imaging compared with signs and/or symptoms was associated with lower risk of death for triple-negative and HER2-positive, but not ER- or PR-positive, HER2-negative cancers. A randomized trial is warranted to evaluate imaging surveillance for metastases results in these subgroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica R Schumacher
- Department of Surgery, Wisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Heather B Neuman
- Department of Surgery, Wisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Menggang Yu
- Department of Biostatistics & Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - David J Vanness
- Department of Health Policy and Administration, Penn State University, State College, PA, USA
| | - Yajuan Si
- Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Kathryn J Ruddy
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ann H Partridge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stephen B Edge
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Ying Zhang
- Department of Biostatistics & Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Jacobs
- Department of Medicine, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Jeffrey Havlena
- Department of Surgery, Wisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | | | | | - Daniel P McKellar
- Commission on Cancer, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Surgery, Wright State University, Dayton, OH, USA
| | - Patricia A Spears
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Benjamin D Kozower
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - George J Chang
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Caprice C Greenberg
- Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Bian JJ, Cronin C, Tramontano A, Schrag D, Osarogiagbon RU, Dizon DS, Wong SL, Hazard-Jenkins HW, Hassett MJ. Severe symptom reporting in medical oncology patients at community cancer centers assessed through eSyM. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.28_suppl.242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
242 Background: Among cancer patients (pts) treated with chemotherapy, electronic patient reported outcome (ePRO)-based symptom management programs at quaternary cancer care institutions have improved outcomes. Uptake of ePRO programs in the real-world setting, where less is known about severe symptom reporting, is often complicated by perceptions of increased workload and erroneous severe symptom reporting. The SIMPRO study group, which includes 6 diverse health systems, are implementing an integrated electronic symptom management (eSyM) program to address these challenges. Methods: SIMPRO sites deployed the Epic-embedded eSyM program for thoracic (THOR), gastrointestinal (GI), and gynecologic (GYN) medical oncology (MO) pts, who received PRO-CTCAE-based questionnaires via the patient portal twice weekly for 6 months after starting a new chemotherapy regimen. Symptoms were scored 0 (none), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), and 3 (severe) and automatically transmitted to care teams within Epic. The distribution and predictors of severe symptom reporting were assessed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression modeling. Results: From September 2019 – March 2022, 47% of eligible pts (2679/5716) submitted 27,062 questionnaires (median age of 67 years, 55% female, 78% white, 53% married, and 49% retired). 17% of eSyM questionnaires included at least 1 severe symptom (15% for GI, 14% for GYN, and 18% for THOR). Table displays the frequencies of all symptoms reported with fatigue, general pain, and constipation being most common. Among respondents, older, black, and employed pts reported significantly fewer severe symptoms (p < 0.03); cancer type was not associated with a greater likelihood of severe symptom reporting. Conclusions: Only approximately 1 of every 6 eSyM responses included a severe symptom, suggesting that routine monitoring in the real-world could help identify patients experiencing bothersome symptoms with minimal disruption to clinical workload. The mix of symptoms commonly reported as severe are challenging to treat with medications alone, arguing that symptom management strategies should provide multidisciplinary supportive care. Interventions that aide both patients and care teams and are embedded within eSyM or Epic could help address these symptoms without overburdening care teams. Clinical trial information: NCT03850912. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Don S. Dizon
- Lifespan Cancer Institute and Brown University, Providence, RI
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Cronin C, Tramontano A, Schrag D, Wong SL, Osarogiagbon RU, Hazard-Jenkins HW, Dizon DS, Bian JJ, Hassett MJ. Evaluating the use of web versus mobile devices for ePRO reporting and severe symptom responses at 6 cancer centers. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.28_suppl.241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
241 Background: Monitoring electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) improves quality of life, reduces acute care, and extends survival in cancer patients. Different modalities for collecting ePROs exist. Many efforts focus on mobile apps, but optimal methods for reporting are not well established. We sought to determine whether patient engagement and symptom reporting patterns differed by submission modality. Methods: Through the SIMPRO Consortium, ePRO questionnaires (eSyM) were collected from medical oncology (MO) and surgical (SUR) patients at six health systems between September 2019-March 2022. Questionnaires assessing 12 symptoms plus functional status and overall wellbeing were sent 2-3 times per week via patient portal and made accessible through two modalities: a web platform or mobile device app (mobile). Patterns and predictors of reporting modality were ascertained using descriptive statistics and logistic regression. Results: In total, 6460 patients submitted 47,736 questionnaires: 74% via web and 26% via mobile. Of 2679 MO responders, 53% reported via web, 0.7% via mobile only, and 43% via both. Older, black, and unemployed MO patients were more likely to report via web only. Of 3781 SUR responders, 55% reported via web, 0.3% via mobile only, and 45% via both. Older and unemployed SUR patients were more likely to report via web only; disabled SUR patients were less likely to use web only. Patients utilizing both modalities reported significantly more moderate-severe symptoms than web only responders [Table]. Conclusions: Very few patients reported via mobile only, which was unexpected in the context of trends toward mobile-based patient engagement. Moderate-severe symptoms were reported more frequently by dual-modality responders. Patients with access to both modalities may be more likely to report symptoms in real-time compared to web-users who may delay reporting until they have access to a device. The resulting difference between web and mobile reporting modalities could be due to age, race, and employment; future studies should assess other factors, such as locality and cellular coverage. This work emphasizes the importance of deploying ePROs via multiple modalities to maximize accessibility and response rates. Clinical trial information: NCT03850912. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Don S. Dizon
- Lifespan Cancer Institute and Brown University, Providence, RI
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Wong SL, Hazard-Jenkins HW, Schrag D, Osarogiagbon RU, Dizon DS, Bian JJ, Cronin C, Tramontano A, Hassett MJ. Severe symptom reporting in surgical patients assessed through an EHR-integrated ePRO questionnaire at 6 cancer centers. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.28_suppl.243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
243 Background: Patients (pts) undergoing surgery for suspected malignancy may experience burdensome post-operative symptoms which can compromise outcomes and necessitate acute care. In prior randomized controlled trials at academic medical centers, patient-reported outcome (PRO)-based symptom management solutions improved clinical outcomes. Attempts to generalize this approach to real-world surgical pts have been challenged by perceptions that severe symptoms rarely occur, responding to severe symptoms can be burdensome, and uncertainty about which symptoms are likely to be severe and need interventions. Methods: Six US-based healthcare systems deployed eSyM, an EHR-integrated symptom management program. Pts undergoing surgery for suspected or confirmed thoracic (THOR), gastrointestinal (GI), and gynecologic (GYN) malignancies received automated questionnaires via MyChart portal 1-3 times weekly for up to 3 months after discharge. Questionnaires based on the PRO-CTCAE included 10 required and 20 optional symptoms, all scored as 0 (no symptoms), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), or 3 (severe). Additional questions assessed functional status, overall wellbeing, wound discharge, and wound redness. Frequency and predictors of severe reporting were assessed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression modeling. Results: 21,012 surgical eSyM questionnaires were submitted between October 2019 - March 2022 by 3,781 unique pts (median age 63 years, 66.9% female, 92.1% white, 57.9% married, and 37.5% retired). 17% of questionnaires (16% of GI, 14% of GYN, and 21% of THOR) included at least 1 severe symptom. Frequencies of severe symptom reporting appear in Table with physical function impairment, general pain, and fatigue as the top three. Severe symptoms were more likely to be reported by younger, female, or unemployed pts(p < 0.01). In comparison to GI pts, GYN pts reported fewer and THOR pts reported more severe symptoms (p < 0.03). Conclusions: A meaningful minority of pts reported severe symptoms, suggesting that symptom monitoring could benefit pts without over-taxing clinicians. There were few strong patient-level predictors of severe symptoms, arguing that population surveillance may be preferable to targeted surveillance. Interventions are needed to address common severe symptoms and future studies should define most effective mitigation strategies for these symptoms. Clinical trial information: NCT03850912. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Don S. Dizon
- Lifespan Cancer Institute and Brown University, Providence, RI
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Blinder VS, Deal AM, Ginos BF, Jansen J, Dueck AC, Mazza GL, Henson S, Carr PM, Rogak LJ, Weiss A, Rapperport A, Spears P, Gany F, Schrag D, Basch E. A randomized controlled trial of routine financial toxicity screening via electronic patient-reported outcomes (AFT-39). J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.28_suppl.180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
180 Background: Financial toxicity affects 20% of cancer survivors and is associated with decreased treatment adherence and poor clinical outcomes. No large-scale programs have been implemented to mitigate financial toxicity among patients undergoing cancer treatment. We evaluated the effect of monthly patient-reported financial toxicity screening as part of a larger digital monitoring intervention. Methods: PRO-TECT (AFT-39) is a cluster-randomized trial of patients undergoing systemic therapy for metastatic cancer. Practices were randomized 1:1 to digital symptom monitoring with patient-reported outcomes (“PRO practices”) or usual care (“control practices”). Digital monitoring consisted of between-visit online or automated telephone patient surveys containing symptom, functioning, and financial toxicity screening questions for up to one year, with automated alerts sent to practice nurses for concerning survey scores. Clinical team actions in response to alerts were not mandated. The primary outcome of this analysis was development or worsening of financial difficulties, assessed via the EORTC QLQ-C30 (“Has your physical condition or medical treatment caused you financial difficulties?”), at any time compared to baseline. A randomly selected subset of patients and nurses were interviewed about their experiences with the intervention. Results: 1,191 patients were enrolled (593 PRO; 598 control) at 52 US community oncology practices. Overall, 30.2% of patients treated at practices that received the intervention developed, or experienced worsening of, financial difficulties, compared to 39.0% of patients treated at control practices (p = 0.01). Patients and nurses interviewed stated that financial toxicity screening identified patients for financial counseling who otherwise would be reluctant to seek, or unaware of the availability of, assistance. Conclusions: Screening for financial toxicity as part of routine digital patient monitoring with PROs reduces the development, or worsening, of financial difficulties among patients undergoing systemic cancer therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03249090.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Amylou C. Dueck
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center and Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | | | - Sydney Henson
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Philip M Carr
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | - Anna Weiss
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | | | - Ethan Basch
- UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Papke DJ, Lindeman NI, Schrag D, Iorgulescu JB. Underutilization of Guideline-Recommended Mismatch Repair/Microsatellite Instability Biomarker Testing in Advanced Colorectal Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022; 31:1746-1751. [PMID: 35767976 PMCID: PMC9444979 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-22-0279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2022] [Revised: 05/18/2022] [Accepted: 06/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2017, DNA mismatch repair/microsatellite instability (MMR/MSI) testing was nationally recommended for advanced colorectal cancers based on favorable immune checkpoint inhibitor responses among patients with MMR-deficient/MSI-high tumors. METHODS Patients ages ≥20-years-old presenting with stage IV colorectal adenocarcinoma from 2010 to 2017 were identified from the National Cancer Database. 2017 was the latest year with available testing utilization data. Patient, tumor, socioeconomic, and care setting characteristics were evaluated for association with upfront MMR/MSI testing in 2017 using multivariable logistic regression and average adjusted predicted probabilities (%AAP). RESULTS Among 72,830 stage IV colorectal cancers, upfront MMR/MSI testing levels increased from 16.4% in 2010 to 56.4% in 2017. For patients diagnosed in 2017 (i.e., following national recommendations, n = 10,022), testing levels were lower for older patients (Padj < 0.001), and were independent of patients' race/ethnicity and insurance status. Patients from the poorest quartile of households received less testing [49.6%AAP, 99.9% confidence interval (CI) 45.5-53.7] than patients from the 3rd (56.9%AAP, 99.9% CI, 53.3-60.6; Padj < 0.001) or 4th quartiles (57.6%AAP, 99.9% CI, 54.3-60.9; Padj < 0.001). Although testing levels improved most at community programs, they remained lower in 2017 (46.6%AAP, 99.9% CI, 41.0-52.1) compared with academic/NCI-designated comprehensive cancer centers (62.8%AAP, 99.9% CI, 59.7-65.8; Padj < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Upfront MMR/MSI testing utilization for patients with advanced colorectal cancer has increased but there is still substantial need for optimization. Testing utilization disproportionately lagged for patients who were older, from the poorest quartile of households, or managed at community cancer programs. IMPACT Our findings indicate opportunities for improving rates of MMR/MSI testing and reporting, possibly through incorporation into quality control and accreditation metrics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J. Papke
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Neal I. Lindeman
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA,Center for Advanced Molecular Diagnostics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - J. Bryan Iorgulescu
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA,Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Weiser MR, Chou JF, Kim JK, Widmar M, Wei IH, Pappou EP, Smith JJ, Nash GM, Paty PB, Cercek A, Saltz LB, Romesser PB, Crane CH, Garcia-Aguilar J, Schrag D, Gönen M. A Dynamic Clinical Calculator for Estimating Conditional Recurrence-Free Survival After Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer and Either Surgery or Watch-and-Wait Management. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2233859. [PMID: 36173634 PMCID: PMC9523500 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.33859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The risk of recurrence in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer has historically been determined after surgery, relying on pathologic variables. A growing number of patients are being treated without surgery, and their risk of recurrence needs to be calculated differently. OBJECTIVE To develop a dynamic calculator for estimating the probability of recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with rectal cancer who undergo total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) (induction systemic chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy) and either surgery or watch-and-wait management. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study included patients who presented with stage II or III rectal cancer between June 1, 2009, and March 1, 2015, at a comprehensive cancer center. Conditional modeling was incorporated into a previously validated clinical calculator to allow the probability of RFS to be updated based on whether the patient remained in watch-and-wait management or underwent delayed surgery. Data were analyzed from November 2021 to March 2022. EXPOSURE TNT followed by immediate surgery or watch-and-wait management with the possibility of delayed surgery. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES RFS, concordance index, calibration curves. RESULTS Of the 302 patients in the cohort, 204 (68%) underwent surgery within 3 months from TNT completion (median [range] age, 51 [22-82] years; 78 [38%] women), 54 (18%) underwent surgery more than 3 months from TNT completion (ie, delayed surgery; median [range] age, 62 [31-87] years; 30 [56%] female), and 44 (14%) remained in watch-and-wait management as of April 21, 2021 (median [range] age, 58 [32-89] years; 16 [36%] women). Among patients who initially opted for watch-and-wait management, migration to surgery due to regrowth or patient choice occurred mostly within the first year following completion of TNT, and RFS did not differ significantly whether surgery was performed 3.0 to 5.9 months (73%; 95% CI, 52%-92%) vs 6.0 to 11.9 months (71%; 95% CI, 51%-99%) vs more than 12.0 months (70%; 95% CI, 49%-100%) from TNT completion (P = .70). RFS for patients in the watch-and-wait cohort at 12 months from completion of TNT more closely resembled patients who had undergone surgery and had a pathologic complete response than the watch-and-wait cohort at 3 months from completion of TNT. Accordingly, model performance improved over time, and the concordance index increased from 0.62 (95% CI, 0.53-0.71) at 3 months after TNT to 0.66 (95% CI, 0-0.75) at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study of patients with rectal cancer, the clinical calculator reliably estimated the likelihood of RFS for patients who underwent surgery immediately after TNT, patients who underwent delayed surgery after entering watch-and-wait management, and patients who remained in watch-and-wait management. Delayed surgery following attempted watch-and-wait did not appear to compromise oncologic outcomes. The risk calculator provided conditional survival estimates at any time during surveillance and could help physicians counsel patients with rectal cancer about the consequences of alternative treatment pathways and thereby support informed decisions that incorporate patients' preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin R. Weiser
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Joanne F. Chou
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jin K. Kim
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Maria Widmar
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Iris H. Wei
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Emmanouil P. Pappou
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - J. Joshua Smith
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Garrett M. Nash
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Philip B. Paty
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Andrea Cercek
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Leonard B. Saltz
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Paul B. Romesser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Christopher H. Crane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Julio Garcia-Aguilar
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Mithat Gönen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Stavrou E, Qiu J, Zafar A, Tramontano AC, Isakoff S, Winer E, Schrag D, Manz C. Breast Medical Oncologists' Perspectives of Telemedicine for Breast Cancer Care: A Survey Study. JCO Oncol Pract 2022; 18:e1447-e1453. [PMID: 35671420 PMCID: PMC9509057 DOI: 10.1200/op.22.00072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Revised: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The COVID-19 pandemic forced rapid adoption of telemedicine (TM) for breast oncology visits in the United States, but the appropriate role of postpandemic TM is uncertain. We sought to understand physician and advance practice practitioner perspectives on the use of TM for outpatient breast cancer care through an electronically administered survey. METHODS Breast medical oncology clinicians at two academic cancer centers and five satellite locations affiliated with the Dana Farber Cancer Institute and the Massachusetts General Cancer Center were invited to respond to a 21-question survey administered in September 2021 about clinicians' perceptions and attitudes toward TM during the previous 12 months. RESULTS Of the 71 survey invitations, 51 clinicians (36 physicians and 15 advance practice practitioners) provided survey responses (response rate = 72%). Ninety-two percent of respondents (n = 47) agreed that TM visits enhance patient care. Ninety-two percent of respondents (n = 46) also agreed that TM is valuable for early-stage breast cancer follow-up visits. Most respondents felt that there was no difference between TM and face-to-face (F2F) visits when it came to patient adherence, ease of ordering tests, ease of accessing patient records, and workflow outside of the visit (82%, 82%, 78%, and 53%, respectively). Fifty-one percent of respondents (n = 26) said that TM was better for timely access to follow-up appointments. Most respondents said that F2F visits were better for seeing physical problems, personal connection with patients, overall quality of visits, and patient-physician communication (100%, 75%, 65%, and 63%, respectively). CONCLUSION Breast clinicians believe that TM is a valuable tool to enhance outpatient breast cancer care. TM was felt to be appropriate for routine follow-up visits and second opinion consultations and is as good as or better than F2F visits for several routine aspects of breast cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Affan Zafar
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute
- Harvard Medical School
- Brigham and Women's Hospital
| | | | - Steven Isakoff
- Harvard Medical School
- Massachusetts General Cancer Center
| | - Eric Winer
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute
- Harvard Medical School
| | | | - Christopher Manz
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute
- Harvard Medical School
- Brigham and Women's Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Schrag D, McDonnell C, Nadauld L, Dilaveri C, Klein E, Reid R, Marinac C, Chung K, Lopatin M, Fung E, Beer T. 903O A prospective study of a multi-cancer early detection blood test. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.1029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
47
|
Haneuse S, Schrag D, Dominici F, Normand SL, Lee KH. MEASURING PERFORMANCE FOR END-OF-LIFE CARE. Ann Appl Stat 2022; 16:1586-1607. [PMID: 36483542 PMCID: PMC9728673 DOI: 10.1214/21-aoas1558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Although not without controversy, readmission is entrenched as a hospital quality metric with statistical analyses generally based on fitting a logistic-Normal generalized linear mixed model. Such analyses, however, ignore death as a competing risk, although doing so for clinical conditions with high mortality can have profound effects; a hospital's seemingly good performance for readmission may be an artifact of it having poor performance for mortality. in this paper we propose novel multivariate hospital-level performance measures for readmission and mortality that derive from framing the analysis as one of cluster-correlated semi-competing risks data. We also consider a number of profiling-related goals, including the identification of extreme performers and a bivariate classification of whether the hospital has higher-/lower-than-expected readmission and mortality rates via a Bayesian decision-theoretic approach that characterizes hospitals on the basis of minimizing the posterior expected loss for an appropriate loss function. in some settings, particularly if the number of hospitals is large, the computational burden may be prohibitive. To resolve this, we propose a series of analysis strategies that will be useful in practice. Throughout, the methods are illustrated with data from CMS on N = 17,685 patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer between 2000-2012 at one of J = 264 hospitals in California.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastien Haneuse
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health,
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
| | | | | | - Kyu Ha Lee
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Manz CR, Tramontano AC, Uno H, Parikh RB, Bekelman JE, Schrag D. Association of Oncologist Participation in Medicare's Oncology Care Model With Patient Receipt of Novel Cancer Therapies. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2234161. [PMID: 36173630 PMCID: PMC9523492 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.34161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Medicare's Oncology Care Model (OCM) was an alternative payment model that tied performance-based payments to cost and quality goals for participating oncology practices. A major concern about the OCM regarded inclusion of high-cost cancer therapies, which could potentially disincentivize oncologists from prescribing novel therapies. OBJECTIVE To examine whether oncologist participation in the OCM changed the likelihood that patients received novel therapies vs alternative treatments. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program data and Medicare claims compared patient receipt of novel therapies for patients treated by oncologists participating vs not participating in the OCM in the period before (January 2015-June 2016) and after (July 2016-December 2018) OCM initiation. Participants included Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries in SEER registries who were eligible to receive 1 of 10 novel cancer therapies that received US Food and Drug Administration approval in the 18 months before implementation of the OCM. The study excluded the Hawaii registry because complete data were not available at the time of the data request. Patients in the OCM vs non-OCM groups were matched on novel therapy cohort, outcome time period, and oncologist specialist status. Analysis was conducted between July 2021 and April 2022. EXPOSURES Oncologist participation in the OCM. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Preplanned analyses evaluated patient receipt of 1 of 10 novel therapies vs alternative therapies specific to the patient's cancer for the overall study sample and for racial subgroups. RESULTS The study included 2839 matched patients (760 in the OCM group and 2079 in the non-OCM group; median [IQR] age, 72.7 [68.3-77.6] years; 1591 women [56.0%]). Among patients in the non-OCM group, 33.2% received novel therapies before and 40.1% received novel therapies after the start of the OCM vs 39.9% and 50.3% of patients in the OCM group (adjusted difference-in-differences, 3.5 percentage points; 95% CI, -3.7 to 10.7 percentage points; P = .34). In subgroup analyses, second-line immunotherapy use in lung cancer was greater among patients in the OCM group vs non-OCM group (adjusted difference-in-differences, 17.4 percentage points; 95% CI, 4.8-30.0 percentage points; P = .007), but no differences were seen in other subgroups. Over the entire study period, patients with oncologists participating in the OCM were more likely to receive novel therapies than those with oncologists who were not participating (odds ratio, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.09-1.97; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This study found that participation in the OCM was not associated with oncologists' prescribing novel therapies to Medicare beneficiaries with cancer. These findings suggest that OCM financial incentives did not decrease patient access to novel therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher R. Manz
- Division of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Medical Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Angela C. Tramontano
- Division of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Hajime Uno
- Division of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ravi B. Parikh
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Justin E. Bekelman
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Schrag D, Beer T, McDonnell C, Nadauld L, Dilaveri C, Klein E, Reid R, Marinac C, Chung K, Lopatin M, Fung E, Patrick D. 908P Evaluation of anxiety, distress and satisfaction with a multi-cancer early detection test. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.1034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
50
|
Yu JB, Schrag D, Robin Yabroff K. Health Economics Research in Cancer Treatment: Current Challenges and Future Directions. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2022; 2022:51-56. [PMID: 35788370 DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgac009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The National Cancer Institute Division of Cancer Control and Population Science hosted a virtual conference on the Future of Cancer Health Economics Research and included a presentation from a workgroup that considered current challenges and future directions in health economics research centered on cancer treatment. The workgroup identified 3 broad categories of focus: data limitations, opportunities for training for clinicians and health economists interested in collaboration, and the need for prospective economic study of cancer treatment. Within these areas of focus, the workgroup recommended the following: improvement of the availability of key economic measures in data available to researchers, creation of more comprehensive datasets robust to insurance type or coverage, development of cancer care health economics research-focused symposia, instituting clear mechanisms to support integration of economic analyses alongside clinical trials, development of standardized methods to measure the cost of cancer care to health-care systems and patients, and development of standardized evaluations that include measures of social determinants of health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James B Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|