Randomized phase III trial of adjuvant epicirubicin (E) followed by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) or CMF followed by E in patients with N- or ≤ 3 N+ rapidly proliferating breast cancer (RPBC)

560

Background: Antimetabolites are active in proliferating cells, and the adjuvant schedule CMF is highly effective in RPBC, whereas the sequential administration of doxorubicin (D) and CMF is superior to CMF–>D, especially in indolent tumors. In a phase III study, we evaluated whether adjuvant E followed by CMF is superior to the inverse sequence in RPBC. Methods: Patients with N-, T > 1 cm or ≤ 3 N+ and any T RPBC (defined by thymidine labeling index or grade or S-phase or Ki67/MIB1) were randomized to receive E (100 mg/m2 i.v. d 1, q 21 days for 4 cycles) followed by CMF (600, 40, 600 mg/m2 i.v. d 1 and 8, q 28 days for 4 cycles) (arm A) or CMF followed by E (arm B) or CMF (600, 40, 600 mg/m2 i.v. d 1 and 8, q 28 days for 6 cycles) (arm C). Arm C was closed after the EBCTCG 2000 meta-analysis (data not shown). The main endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the study had 80% power to detect a 7% absolute increase in 5-year OS with 400 patients per arm. Results: From November 1997 to December 2004, 1066 patients were enrolled (arms A/B/C: 440/438/188): N- 53%, estrogen receptor positive 63%, grade 3, 77%. At a median follow up of 69 months, 5-year disease-free survival was 80% in both arms (A and B) (p = 0.93, logrank test), with adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) 0.99 (95% CI 0.73–1.33, Cox model), and OS was 91% in arm A and 93% in arm B (p = 0.66, logrank), with AHR 0.88 (95% CI 0.58–1.35, Cox model). Adverse events were similar, apart from a small increase in grade 4 neutropenia in arm B. Conclusions: No relevant differences in clinical outcome were observed with the 2 different sequences. Further subgroup analyses are ongoing to verify the efficacy of each sequence as a function of biomolecular and hormonal profiles.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

FL-DNA approach for noninvasive early diagnosis of colorectal cancer in FOBT-screened patients

11062

Background: A promising approach for the early diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) is the evaluation of genomic DNA integrity (FL-DNA) extracted from stool. Pilot and confirmatory studies carried out by our group have shown that, thanks to its diagnostic accuracy, this molecular assay could be a useful tool for the non-invasive, early diagnosis of CRC. The aim of the present study was to verify whether the FL-DNA method could represent a valid alternative to the fecal occult blood test (FOBT) or whether it could be used alongside FOBT in screening programs to unmask false FOBT positives and spare patients from unnecessary colonoscopy. For this purpose, stool samples were collected from all individuals participating in the FOBT (OC-Sensor, Alpha Wassermann) Regional Screening Program run by the Cancer Prevention Unit of Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital in Forli. Methods: The program recruited subjects of either sex aged 50 to 69 years. Of the 560 individuals with FOBT-positive stool subjected to colonoscopy, 26 were diagnosed with adenocarcinoma, 264 with high-grade adenoma and 54 with low-grade adenoma. More than one third (216) of the group had only benign disease (hemorrhoids, diverticulitis, inflammation, etc), hyperplastic polyps or nothing. The integrity of fecal DNA was analyzed blindly by the FL-DNA test on the same specimen used for the occult blood determination. Results: Using a cut-off of 10 ng, the molecular analysis detected over 90% of the colorectal cancers and about 50% of the high- and low-grade adenomas. In particular, diagnostic accuracy was similar for lesions of any localization, level of dysplasia and histopathological characteristic, and higher for lesions > 2 cm and multiple lesions. The test also confirmed its capacity to identify colorectal cancer in asymptomatic individuals. Conclusions: FL-DNA represents a valid alternative to or support for approaches currently used in screening programs. A more in depth DNA stool evaluation in negative FOBT individuals could reveal the test's usefulness in unmasking colorectal tumors and adenomas missed by FOBT.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Serum amyloid a is a biomarker of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

RATIONALE

Much of the total disease burden and cost of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD). Serum amyloid A (SAA) is a novel candidate exacerbation biomarker identified by proteomic screening.

OBJECTIVES

To assess SAA as a biomarker of AECOPD.

METHODS

Biomarkers were assessed (1) cross-sectionally (stable vs. AECOPD; 62 individuals) and (2) longitudinally with repeated measures (baseline vs. AECOPD vs. convalescence; 78 episodes in 37 individuals). Event severity was graded (I, ambulatory; II, hospitalized; III, respiratory failure) based on consensus guidelines.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Presumptively newly acquired pathogens were associated with onset of symptomatic AECOPD. In the cross-sectional study, both SAA and C-reactive protein (CRP) were elevated at AECOPD onset compared with stable disease (SAA median, 7.7 vs. 57.6 mg/L; P < 0.01; CRP median, 4.6 vs. 12.5 mg/L; P < 0.01). Receiver operator characteristics analysis was used to generate area-under-curve values for event severity. SAA discriminated level II/III events (SAA, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-0.94 vs. CRP, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.70-0.87; P = 0.05). Combining SAA or CRP with major symptoms (Anthonisen criteria, dyspnea) did not further improve the prediction model for severe episodes. IL-6 and procalcitonin were not informative.

CONCLUSIONS

SAA is a novel blood biomarker of AECOPD that is more sensitive than CRP alone or in combination with dyspnea. SAA may offer new insights into the pathogenesis of AECOPD.

A Multilaboratory Peer Assessment Quality Assurance Program-Based Evaluation of Anticardiolipin Antibody, and beta2-Glycoprotein I Antibody Testing

We evaluated the performance of anticardiolipin (aCL) and beta2-glycoprotein I (beta2-GPI) antibody assays through a large external quality assurance program. Data from the 2002 cycle of the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Program (RCPA QAP) were analyzed for variation in reported numerical values and semiquantitative results or interpretations according to method type or group and in conjunction with available clinical data. High interlaboratory variation in numerical results and notable method-based variation, combined with a general lack of consensus in semiquantitative reporting, continues to be observed. Numerical results from cross-laboratory testing of 12 serum samples (for immunoglobulin G [IgG]-aCL, IgM-aCL, and IgG-beta2-GPI) yielded interlaboratory coefficients of variation (CVs) that were higher than 50% in six of 12 (50%) specimens for IgG-aCL, and 12 of 12 (100%) specimens for IgM-aCL and IgG-beta2-GPI. Semiquantitative reporting also varied considerably, with total (100%) consensus occurring in only four of 36 (11%) occasions. General consensus (where > 90% of participating laboratories agreed that a given serum sample gave a result of either negative or positive) was only obtained on 13 of 36 (36%) occasions. Variation in results between different method types or groups were also present, resulting in potential biasing of the RCPA QAP-defined target results by the large number of laboratories using the dominant aCL assays. Finally, laboratory findings frequently did not agree with the available clinical information. In conclusion, in a large proportion of specimens from the 2002 RCPA QAP cycle, laboratories could not agree on whether a serum sample tested was aCL-positive or aCL-negative, or beta2-GPI-positive or beta2-GPI-negative. Despite prior attempts to improve the standardization of testing and reporting practices, laboratory testing for aCL and anti-beta2-GPI still demonstrates significant interlaboratory and intermethod variation, which needs to be taken into account for the clinical interpretation of test results, especially those from different laboratories.

Immunoreactivity to MIB-1 in breast cancer: methodological assessment and comparison with other proliferation indices

The recent availability of the monoclonal antibody MIB-1 (which is able to detect the human nuclear cell proliferation-associated antigen Ki-67 even on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections, microwave-treated and routinely processed for immunohistochemistry) could open new avenues for validation of the clinical role of tumour cell proliferation on large, consecutive and unselected series of human tumours. However, the routine use of such a marker requires a methodological standardization as well as the comparative assessment of some technical and biological aspects. The MIB-1 index was determined in parallel samples from 50 consecutive invasive breast carcinomas processed with different fixatives for different times. The median values of MIB-1 indices following 2, 6 and 24 h of formalin fixation were similar (29.4%, 30.6% and 29.7%, respectively) and consistent with those reported in the literature; squared linear regression coefficients were 0.99. The median values of MIB-1 indices were markedly lower in Bouin-fixed, paraffin embedded, and in frozen samples (20.0% and 19.8%, respectively), with a poor correlation coefficient with the values detected following formalin fixation (R2 = 0.456). Moderate and poor correlations were observed between Ki-67 index and MIB-1 detected on frozen (rs, 0.78) or formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples (rs, 0.47) and a minimal concordance was observed between TLI and MIB-1 or Ki-67 (rs, 0.25 and 0.22, respectively). Our results indicate interference of the fixative type on immunoreactivity to MIB-1 and also suggest that Ki-67 and MIB-1 reacted with different epitopes of the same antigen.

Assessing the usefulness of anticardiolipin antibody assays: a cautious approach is suggested by high variation and limited consensus in multilaboratory testing

An anticardiolipin antibody (ACA) assay has become a laboratory standard for the detection of antiphospholipid antibodies. We evaluated data from a quality assurance program to assess ACA assay usefulness. Cross-laboratory (n = 56) testing of 12 serum samples yielded interlaboratory coefficients of variation (CVs) for lgG ACA and IgM ACA that were higher than 50% in 17 (71%) of 24 cases. The situation for testing consensus was of equal concern. Total consensus occurred in 6 (25%) of 24 cases. General consensus (interlaboratory agreement, 90% or more) was obtained in 10 (42%) of 24 cases. In the majority of test cases, laboratories could not agree on whether a serum sample tested was ACA-positive or ACA-negative. Differing method-related issues also were evident; some methods tended toward higher or lower ACA values. Method-based majority consensus differed from participant majority consensus on many test occasions. Exceedingly high interlaboratory result variation, combined with a general lack of test result grading consensus and method-based variation, indicate that a cautious clinical approach toward laboratory findings is prudent. Laboratory tests should be repeated at least once before making a clinical diagnosis of any anti-phospholipid syndrome-like disorder.

Quality control for biomarker determination in oncology: the experience of the Italian Network for Quality Assessment of Tumor Biomarkers (INQAT)

Biomarker analysis and evaluation in oncology is the product of a number of processes (including managerial, technical and interpretation steps) which need to be monitored and controlled to prevent and correct errors and guarantee a satisfactory level of quality. Several biomarkers have recently moved to clinical validation studies and successively to clinical practice without any definition of standard procedures and/or quality control (QC) schemes necessary to guarantee the reproducibility of the laboratory information. In Italy several national scientific societies and single researchers have activated -- often on a pilot level -- specific external quality assessment protocols, thereby potentially jeopardizing the clinical reality even further. In view of the seriousness of the problem, in 1998 the Italian Ministry of Health sponsored a National Survey Project to coordinate and standardize the procedures and to develop QC programs for the analysis of cancer biomarkers of potential clinical relevance. Twelve QC programs focused on biomarkers and concerning morphological, immunohistochemical, biochemical, molecular, and immunoenzymatic assays were coordinated and implemented. Specifically, external QC programs for the analytical phase of immunohistochemical p53, Bcl-2, c-erb-2/neu/HER2, and microvessel density determination, of morphological evaluation of tumor differentiation grade, and of molecular p53 analysis were activated for the first time within the project. Several hundreds of Italian laboratories took part in these QC programs, the results of which are available on the web site of the Network (www.cqlaboncologico.it). Financial support from the Italian Government and the National Research Council (CNR) will guarantee the pursuit of activities that will be extended to new biomarkers, to preanalytical phases of the assays, and to revision of the criteria of clinical usefulness for evaluating the cost/benefit ratio.

Prognostic and predictive role of proliferation indices in adjuvant therapy of breast cancer

In breast cancer, proliferative activity represents one of the biologic processes most thoroughly investigated for its association with tumor progression. In addition to the mitotic activity component of pathologic grading systems, several proliferation indices have provided independent information on prognosis and response to specific treatments in large retrospective studies. Recently, results from treatment protocols prospectively planned to test the clinical utility of proliferative activity have indicated that tumor cell proliferation markers identify two subsets among patients with lymph node-negative cancers: 1) those at a very low risk of relapse and 2) those who will benefit from regimens including antimetabolites. Future efforts should compare the prognostic accuracy of different proliferation markers, confirm preliminary evidence of a relationship between proliferation and response to specific systemic treatments, and standardize assay techniques to facilitate their transfer to general oncology practice.

P53 accumulation in primary breast cancer: a comparison between immunohistochemistry and a novel luminometric immunoassay

The accumulation of p53 protein was evaluated by a novel luminometric immunoassay (LIA) in cytosol samples from a series of 245 primary breast cancers. The cytosolic p53 content was not related to nodal status or hormone receptor status, but it was significantly and directly associated with tumor size and cell proliferation. A matched comparison between immunohistochemistry (IHC) and LIA results of individual tumors showed a significant association, albeit with a correlation coefficient of only 0.41. The agreement of results from the two assays was higher in node-positive, estrogen-receptor-negative and rapidly proliferating tumors than in the complementary subgroups. Overall, there was a significant trend in favor of an increase in p53 levels as determined by LIA with the increase in p53-positive cells shown by IHC. However, taking IHC detection as a reference, the sensitivity of the LIA was better for negative (86%) than for positive (61%) values. Based on these findings, a comparative assessment of the clinical relevance of LIA versus IHC results has to be recommended.

Cell proliferation and outcome following doxorubicin plus CMF regimens in node-positive breast cancer

At the Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan, a randomised adjuvant chemotherapy trial was carried out from 1982 to 1990 to compare alternating with sequential regimens of doxorubicin and CMF in 403 patients with more than 3 positive axillary nodes. Tumour proliferative activity was determined in 71% (285 cases) of women entering the clinical study. We investigated the relation between proliferative rate, determined as the [(3)H]thymidine labelling index (TLI) on tumour specimens obtained at diagnostic surgery, and clinical outcome following the 2 regimens, in which the same drugs were administered at the same dose intensity but with a different schedule. A high TLI was significantly associated with 12-year overall relapse (P = 0.009), distant metastasis (P = 0.001), and death (P = 0.002), even in the presence of information provided by tumour size, lymph node involvement, oestrogen receptors, and treatment regimen. The highest relapse-free survival (RFS) probability (45%, 95% CI 34-55%) was observed for patients with tumour TLI <5% and subjected to the sequential treatment. The lowest RFS probability (11%, 95% CI 0-26%) was observed for patients with tumour TLI >9% following the alternating regimen. Intermediate RFS probabilities, ranging from 23% to 34%, were observed for the other kinetic subgroups following the 2 treatment regimens. The benefit of sequential administration of doxorubicin and CMF was evident mainly in patients with tumours at low to intermediate proliferation.

Biomarkers and outcome after tamoxifen treatment in node-positive breast cancers from elderly women

The predictive role of tumour proliferative rate and expression of p53, bcl-2 and bax proteins, alone and in association with tumour size, nodal involvement and oestrogen receptors (ER), was analysed on 145 elderly patients (> or =70 years of age) with histologically assessed node-positive breast cancers treated with radical or conservative surgery plus radiotherapy followed by adjuvant tamoxifen for at least 1 year. The 7-year probability of relapse was significantly higher for patients with tumours rapidly proliferating (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.0, P = 0.01), overexpressing p53 (HR = 4.4, P = 0.0001), weakly or not exhibiting bcl-2 (HR = 1.9, P = 0.02), without ERs (HR = 3.4, P = 0.0001) or with > or = 4 positive lymph nodes (HR = 2.3, P = 0.003) than for patients with tumours expressing the opposite patho-biological profile. Conversely, tumour size and bax expression failed to influence relapse-free survival. Adjustment for the duration of tamoxifen treatment did not change these findings. Oestrogen receptors, cell proliferation, p53 accumulation and bcl-2 expression were also predictive for overall survival. Within ER-positive tumours, cell proliferation, p53 accumulation, bcl-2 expression and lymph node involvement provided significant and independent information for relapse and, in association, identified subgroups of patients with relapse probabilities of 20% (low-risk group, exhibiting only one unfavourable factor) to 90% (high-risk group, exhibiting three unfavourable factors). Such data could represent the initial framework for a biologically tailored therapy even for elderly patients and highlight the importance of a patho-biological characterization of their breast cancers.

Biological markers as indicators of response to primary and adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer

Interest in translational studies on breast cancer is presently devoted to identify biological predictors of treatment response. In patients with operable breast cancer, subjected to primary and adjuvant chemotherapy, we analyzed the predictivity on objective clinical response and relapse-free survival of biological markers related to different cellular aspects and functions. Tumour proliferative rate (evaluated as the (3)H-thymidine-labelling index, TLI), oestrogen and progesterone receptors (ER and PgR, evaluated by the dextran-coated-charcoal method), nuclear DNA ploidy and the immunocytochemical expression of p53, bcl-2 and bax proteins were determined before primary treatment, at the time of diagnosis, and after primary chemotherapy, at surgery. Objective clinical response was significantly related only to pre-treatment p53 expression or PgR status, with a higher rate for tumours not expressing than for those expressing p53 (94% vs. 72%), as well as for PgR-negative (PgR(-)) than for PgR-positive (PgR(+)) tumours (86% vs. 68%). In the overall series, 8-year clinical outcome was significantly related only to post-treatment steroid receptors. In particular, higher 8-year relapse-free survival rate was observed for patients with ER(-) or PgR(-) than for those with ER(+) (64% vs. 38%) or PgR(+) (53% vs. 37%) tumours. Such findings held true even within the sub-set of patients who received adjuvant post-operative chemotherapy, i.e., those with node-positive (N(+)) or ER(-)/node-negative (N(-)) tumours, among whom also rapid proliferation or the presence of apoptosis-favouring markers (bcl-2(-) or bax(+), singly and in association) on surgical specimens identified a sub-set of women who benefited from systemic treatment. The different biological markers were variously indicative of clinical outcome, with a predictivity on tumour shrinkage for p53 and PgR, detected before primary chemotherapy, and on long-term follow-up for ER, PgR and, to a lesser extent, TLI and apoptosis-modulating markers. Int. J. Cancer (Pred. Oncol.) 84:580-586, 1999.

Clinical utility of anticardiolipin antibody assays: high inter-laboratory variation and limited consensus by participants of external quality assurance programs signals a cautious approach

Antibodies that bind phospholipid (anti-phospholipid antibodies [APA]) are a focus of major interest to both clinical and laboratory personnel across a variety of disciplines because of the assortment of disorders with which they are reportedly associated. A solid phase assay using cardiolipin as the test phospholipid (anti-cardiolipin antibody assay [ACA]) has now become a laboratory standard for the detection of APA. In the current report, data from two separate external quality assurance programs (QAP) and collected over the past four years, have been evaluated to assess the utility of the ACA. Despite attempted standardizations, exceedingly high inter-laboratory variation and a general lack of test result consensus would signal the adoption of a cautious clinical approach towards laboratory findings. For example, for a total of 21 cross-laboratory tested serum samples (tested for both IgG and IgM for 41 quantitative estimations), inter-laboratory variation for both ACA-IgG and ACA-IgM was higher than 50% in 20 of 41 testing cases (48.8%). The situation with regard to testing consensus was equally concerning. Total consensus (i.e., 100% of participating laboratories agreed that a given serum sample gave an ACA result of either negative or positive) occurred in less than 20% of cases for ACA-IgG. More importantly, in about 50% of serum testing occasions there was no general consensus in returned laboratory data (i.e., more than 80% of labs could not agree on whether a serum sample tested was either ACA-positive or ACA-negative). Thus, despite attempted international standardizations, exceedingly high inter-laboratory variation and a general lack of test result consensus would argue that the assay has limited utility. We conclude that single point laboratory results must be used with considerable caution before accepting that ACA activity is present in patient serum or not. We agree with recommendations indicating that laboratory tests should be repeated at least once prior to making a clinical diagnosis of any APS-like disorder.

International Consensus Statement on Testing and Reporting of Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibodies (ANCA)

Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) tests are used to diagnose and monitor inflammatory activity in the primary systemic small vessel vasculitides. ANCA is best demonstrated in these diseases by using a combination of indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) of normal peripheral blood neutrophils and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) that detect ANCA specific for proteinase 3 (PR3) or myeloperoxidase (MPO). For ANCA testing in "new" patients, IIF must be performed on all serum samples. Serum samples containing ANCA, any other cytoplasmic fluorescence, or an antinuclear antibody (ANA) that results in homogeneous or peripheral nuclear fluorescence then should be tested in ELISAs for PR3-ANCA and MPO-ANCA. Optimally, ELISAs for PR3-ANCA and MPO-ANCA should be performed on all serum samples. Inclusion of the most recent positive sample in the IIF or ELISA may help demonstrate a change in antibody level. Reports should use recommended terms. Any report of positive neutrophil fluorescence issued before the ELISA results are available should indicate that positive fluorescence alone is not specific for the diagnosis of Wegener granulomatosis or microscopic polyangiitis and that decisions about treatment should not be based solely on the ANCA results.

Prognostic and predictive value of thymidine labelling index in breast cancer

In the last few decades, much effort has been directed towards identifying the phenotypic or functional aspect of tumor cells which can contribute to a biofunctional staging for improving the accuracy of pathologic staging used for identifying patients at different risk. Among known biologic factors, the proliferative capacity of the tumor cell population, a feature common to all tumors, has been widely investigated. Several approaches have been used to measure different aspects of the cell cycle. Among these, the thymidine labeling index (TLI) represents the fraction of cells in S-phase cell fraction and is based on the active incorporation of labelled thymidine into DNA. From basic studies conducted on several thousands of patients, the TLI of primary breast cancers appears closely related to steroid receptor status and generally unrelated to pathologic stage. Retrospective analyses performed on large series of patients treated with local regional therapy alone have consistently shown the relevance of TLI value to clinical aggressiveness in terms of relapse-free survival and overall survival. Moreover, TLI is a prognostic indicator which is independent of tumor size, steroid receptors, and p53 and bc12 protein expression, and which, together with patient age and tumor size, is able to identify patients at different risk of loco-regional or distant metastases. Recently, a direct relationship between TLI and response to polychemotherapy has been shown in patients with operable and advanced breast cancers. This finding, derived from retrospective and recently confirmed in prospective clinical studies, has led to the activation of cell kinetics based therapeutic protocols for patients with node-negative and one to three node-positive operable breast cancers.

Clinical studies of Bcl-2 and treatment benefit in breast cancer patients

Interest in translational studies aimed at investigating the role of biologic markers in predicting clinical outcome of breast cancer patients and, in particular, response to specific treatments, has progressively increased. Among biologic variables presently under investigation, apoptosis markers, in particular Bcl-2 and Bax expression, are receiving much attention for their relationship with the cellular response to genotoxic damage in experimental tumors. Retrospective, independent studies were carried out by several research groups on about 5000 patients with breast cancer at different stages and with an adequate follow-up. The outcome of separate analyses as a function of treatment generally demonstrated that Bcl-2 overexpression, which correlates with biologic features of a differentiated phenotype (slow proliferation, high steroid receptor levels, absence of p53 and c-erB-2 expression), is associated with a favorable outcome. Such a finding is mainly evident following surgery as well as endocrine treatment. Conversely, no or weak Bcl-2 expression, alone or in association with bax overexpression, appears indicative of a radiation response, and preliminary emerging evidence supports the involvement of such an association of apoptosis-related markers even as predictors of long-term response to neoadjuvant cytotoxic treatment. Although the findings of an involvement of Bcl-2 and Bax as determinants of treatment response should be confirmed within the context of randomized clinical trials, they indicate a combined consideration of proteins that negatively and positively regulate apoptosis in translational studies on the effect of chemical and physical agents at a cellular level.

Atypical C-ANCA following high dose intravenous immunoglobulin

AIMS

(1) To assess a range of intravenous immunoglobulin products for atypical classical antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (C-ANCA) staining and to determine if this is present in patients treated with high dose intravenous immunoglobulin (2 g/kg/month) and replacement doses (200 mg/kg fortnightly); (2) using the United Kingdom national external quality assessment scheme (NEQAS), to determine if laboratories could differentiate this pattern from classical ANCA.

METHODS

ANCA testing was performed on 30 batches of intravenous immunoglobulin from several manufacturers. Six patients treated with high dose intravenous immunoglobulin and 11 receiving replacement doses of immunoglobulin for hypogammaglobulinaemia were tested for ANCA by indirect immunofluorescence on cytospin preparations of ethanol fixed neutrophils and by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). One of the positive immunoglobulin batches was tested blindly by 125 laboratories involved in NEQAS by indirect immunofluorescence and by ELISA in some laboratories.

RESULTS

16 of 31 batches of intravenous immunoglobulin from six different manufacturers were atypical C-ANCA positive. Three of six patients receiving high dose intravenous immunoglobulin and none of 11 patients on replacement doses were atypical C-ANCA positive. The results of the NEQAS assessment by indirect immunofluorescence were 68% C-ANCA positive, 17% negative, 9% atypical C-ANCA, and 6% P-ANCA.

CONCLUSIONS

Some but not all intravenous immunoglobulin products yield a positive atypical cANCA by indirect immunofluorescence. An identical pattern may be observed in patients receiving high dose intravenous immunoglobulin but not in those on replacement doses. Of laboratories participating in NEQAS, 68% reported this pattern as cANCA. This reinforces the importance of reporting only "classical ANCA," defined by international ANCA workshops, to maintain the specificity of ANCA immunofluorescence and its close disease associations.

Biological markers as indicators of pathological response to primary chemotherapy in oral-cavity cancers

The predictive role in terms of pathological response and prognostic role of biomarkers such as GST-pi, p53, bcl-2 and bax expression, immuno-histochemically detected, and of the S-phase cell fraction, autoradiographically determined as thymidine labeling index (TLI), were investigated within a prospective randomized phase III clinical trial on squamous-cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, including surgery or primary chemotherapy (PCT), which foresaw the prospective determination of biological markers. Pathological response was defined as the achievement after PCT of a pathological complete remission or the presence of microresidual disease. The study was performed on tumors obtained from a series of 100 previously untreated patients with resectable T2-4N0-2M0 carcinoma. All biomarkers were unrelated, except for an inverse relation between TLI and GST-pi and a direct relation between bcl-2 and bax expression. In patients treated with surgery alone, 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) appeared to be weakly, but not significantly, related only to GST-pi and p53 expression. In patients treated with PCT, pathological response and DFS were independent of p53 expression and cell proliferation. Conversely, low GST-pi and bax expression were indicative of pathological response but lost relevance as predictors of DFS, whereas absence of bcl-2 was associated with high probability of 3-year DFS in the overall series as well as in non-responding patients. Within this latter sub-set, all patients with bcl-2-positive tumors relapsed within 1 year of surgery, whereas a 60% probability of 3-year DFS was observed for patients with bcl-2-negative tumors (p = 0.02). This interim analysis appears to indicate that some biofunctional markers can provide information on pathological response to PCT and could help in understanding treatment efficacy at a cellular level.

UCN-01 abrogates G2 arrest through a Cdc2-dependent pathway that is associated with inactivation of the Wee1Hu kinase and activation of the Cdc25C phosphatase

We have previously demonstrated that UCN-01, a potent protein kinase inhibitor currently in phase I clinical trials for cancer treatment, abrogates G2 arrest following DNA damage. Here we used murine FT210 cells, which contain temperature-sensitive Cdc2 mutations, to determine if UCN-01 abrogates G2 arrest through a Cdc2-dependent pathway. We report that UCN-01 cannot induce mitosis in DNA-damaged FT210 cells at the non-permissive temperature for Cdc2 function. Failure to abrogate G2 arrest was not due to UCN-01-inactivation at the elevated temperature because parental FM3A cells, which have wild-type Cdc2, were sensitive to UCN-01-induced G2 checkpoint abrogation. Having established that UCN-01 acted through Cdc2, we next assessed UCN-01's effect on the Cdc2-inhibitory kinase, Wee1Hu, and the Cdc2-activating phosphatase, Cdc25C. We found that Wee1Hu was indeed inactivated in UCN-01-treated cells, possibly just prior to Cdc2 activation and entry of DNA-damaged cells into mitosis. This inhibition appeared, however, to be a consequence of a further upstream action since in vitro studies revealed purified Wee1Hu was relatively resistant to UCN-01-inhibition. Consistent with such an upstream action, UCN-01 also promoted the hyperphosphorylation (activation) of Cdc25C in DNA-damaged cells. Our results suggest that UCN-01 abrogates G2 checkpoint function through inhibition of a kinase residing upstream of Cdc2, Wee1Hu, and Cdc25C, and that changes observed in these mitotic regulators are downstream consequences of UCN-01's actions.