Are fluoride levels in drinking water associated with hypothyroidism prevalence in England? A large observational study of GP practice data and fluoride levels in drinking water

BACKGROUND

While previous research has suggested that there is an association between fluoride ingestion and the incidence of hypothyroidism, few population level studies have been undertaken. In England, approximately 10% of the population live in areas with community fluoridation schemes and hypothyroidism prevalence can be assessed from general practice data. This observational study examines the association between levels of fluoride in water supplies with practice level hypothyroidism prevalence.

METHODS

We used a cross-sectional study design using secondary data to develop binary logistic regression models of predictive factors for hypothyroidism prevalence at practice level using 2012 data on fluoride levels in drinking water, 2012/2013 Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) diagnosed hypothyroidism prevalence data, 2013 General Practitioner registered patient numbers and 2012 practice level Index of Multiple Deprivation scores.

FINDINGS

We found that higher levels of fluoride in drinking water provide a useful contribution for predicting prevalence of hypothyroidism. We found that practices located in the West Midlands (a wholly fluoridated area) are nearly twice as likely to report high hypothyroidism prevalence in comparison to Greater Manchester (non-fluoridated area).

INTERPRETATION

In many areas of the world, hypothyroidism is a major health concern and in addition to other factors-such as iodine deficiency-fluoride exposure should be considered as a contributing factor. The findings of the study raise particular concerns about the validity of community fluoridation as a safe public health measure.

A phase I/II study of sepantronium bromide (YM155, survivin suppressor) with paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

This phase I/II study examined the safety and efficacy of Sepantronium Bromide (S), a small-molecule selective survivin suppressant, administered in combination with carboplatin (C) and paclitaxel (P).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-one patients were treated on study. Twenty-two patients received escalating doses of S (3.6-12 mg/m(2)) and 19 with untreated stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were treated with the maximum tolerated dose of 10 mg/m(2) in combination with standard doses of C (AUC6) and P (200 mg/m(2)) for six cycles. S was administered as a continuous intravenous infusion (CIVI) over 72 h in 21-day treatment cycles. Study end points included safety and toxic effect, response rate, progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS), as well as exploratory pharmacodynamic correlates.

RESULTS

Treatment with S was well tolerated, and toxic effects were mostly hematological in the phase II study. Two (11%) partial responses were observed with a median PFS of 5.7 months and median OS 16.1 months. Pharmacodynamic analysis did not demonstrate an association with response.

CONCLUSION

The combination of S (10 mg/m(2)/day 72-h CIVI) administered with C and P every 3 weeks exhibited a favorable safety profile but failed to demonstrate an improvement in response rate in advanced NSCLC.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

NCT01100931.

An assessment of the long-term health outcome of renal transplant recipients in Ireland

BACKGROUND

Renal transplantation remains the preferred method of renal replacement therapy in terms of patient survival, quality of life and cost. However, patients have a high risk of complications ranging from rejection episodes, infection and cancer, amongst others.

AIMS AND METHODS

In this study, we sought to determine the long-term health outcomes and preventive health measures undertaken for the 1,536 living renal transplant patients in Ireland using a self-reported questionnaire. Outcomes were divided into categories, namely, general health information, allograft-related information, immunosuppression-related complications and preventive health measures.

RESULTS

The results demonstrate a high rate of cardiovascular, neoplastic and infectious complications in our transplant patients. Moreover, preventive health measures are often not undertaken by patients and lifestyle choices can be poor.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the work needed by the transplantation community to improve patient education, adjust immunosuppression where necessary and aggressively manage patient risk factors.

Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain. A report of a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques aim to induce an electrical stimulation of the brain in an attempt to reduce chronic pain by directly altering brain activity. They include repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation techniques in chronic pain.

DESIGN

A Cochrane systematic review with meta-analyses.

METHODS

We employed a comprehensive search strategy. Randomised and quasi-randomised studies of rTMS, CES or tDCS were included if they employed a sham stimulation control group, recruited patients over the age of 18 with pain of three months duration or more and measured pain as a primary outcome. Where possible we entered data into meta-analyses.

RESULTS

We included 33 trials in the review (19 rTMS, eight CES and six tDCS). Only one study was judged as being at low risk of bias. Studies of rTMS demonstrated significant heterogeneity. Pre-specified subgroup analyses suggest that low-frequency stimulation is ineffective. A short-term effect on pain of active high-frequency stimulation of the motor cortex in single-dose studies was suggested (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.26 to -0.54, P < 0.00001). This equates to a 15% (95% CI 10% to 20%) reduction in pain which does not clearly exceed the pre-established criteria for a minimally clinically important difference (> 15%). For CES (four studies, 133 participants) no statistically significant difference was found between active stimulation and sham. Analysis of tDCS studies (five studies, 83 people) demonstrated significant heterogeneity and did not find a significant difference between active and sham stimulation. Pre-specified subgroup analysis of tDCS applied to the motor cortex suggested superiority of active stimulation over sham (SMD -0.59, 95% CI -1.10 to -0.08). Non-invasive brain stimulation appears to be associated with minor and transient side effects.

CONCLUSION

Single doses of high-frequency rTMS of the motor cortex may have small short-term effects on chronic pain. The effects do not clearly exceed the predetermined threshold of minimal clinical significance. Low-frequency rTMS is not effective in the treatment of chronic pain. There is insufficient evidence from which to draw firm conclusions regarding the efficacy of CES or tDCS. The available evidence suggests that tDCS applied to the motor cortex may have short-term effects on chronic pain and that CES may be ineffective. There is a need for further, rigorously designed studies of all types of stimulation.

Abstract ES6-2: Cell to Cell Variability in the Responses of Tumor Cells to Death Ligands and Other Anti-Cancer Drugs

Cell to cell variability in phenotype and fate is important for tissue homeostasis, the emergence of drug resistance and the evolution of tumors. I will discuss cell to cell variability in the responses of clonal populations of human cells to TRAIL, a prototypical inducer of receptor-mediated (extrinsic) apoptosis and an investigational therapeutic, as well as to other pro-apoptotic drugs. Some TRAIL-treated human cells die within ∼40 min, others only after 12 hr and some live indefinitely. During this variable delay initiator caspases (ICs) are active in processing substrates such as Bid and downstream effector caspases (ECs) but mitochondrial membrane permeablization (MOMP) does not occur and (ECs are catalytically inactive. We have explored three explanations for cell to cell differences among members of a clonal and notionally uniform population: (i) genetic or epigenetic variation (ii) the involvement of one or more biochemical processes subject to stochastic fluctuation (iii) difference in cell state such as position in the cell cycle or protein concentrations. To distinguish these three possibilities we compared the fates of sister cells exposed to TRAIL and other drugs using live-cell microscopy. Genetic and epigenetic factors are transmitted with near-perfect fidelity; reaction rates dominated by stochastic fluctuations are no more similar in sisters than in any two cells chosen at random and variability arising from differences in mRNA or protein levels should be transiently heritable (because division is a binomial process in which sister cells inherit roughly equal numbers of abundant cytosolic and nuclear factors but drift towards the population average over time). The later explanation is correct — natural fluctuations in protein levels dominate phenotypic heterogeneity in extrinsic apoptosis and cause transient phenotypic heritablility. Variability can be manipulated by protein over-expression and drugs and I will describe analytic methods for modeling these perturbations mathematically. A key conclusion from this work is that variability in the responses of cells to drugs is inherent to the stochastic operation of the biochemical pathways that anti-cancer drugs target. Fractional killing is one inevitable consequence.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr ES6-2.