Neuroendocrine prostate cancer xenografts with large-cell and small-cell features derived from a single patient's tumor: morphological, immunohistochemical, and gene expression profiles

BACKGROUND

Small-cell carcinoma (SCC) of the prostate is an AR-negative variant of prostate cancer found at progression in 10-20% of castrate-resistant disease. Its finding predicts a distinct clinical course and a poor prognosis. Large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a much rarer variant that behaves similarly to SCC. The biological mechanisms that drive these disease variants are poorly understood.

METHODS

Eight tumor fragments from the salvage pelvic exenteration specimen of a patient with castrate-resistant prostate carcinoma were subcutaneously implanted into 6- to 8-week-old male CB17 SCID mice. Serial tissue sections and tissue microarrays of the resulting MDA PCa 144 xenograft lines were used for histopathologic and immunohistochemical characterization of the xenografts and their tissue of origin. RNA from two representative xenograft sublines was used for gene-expression profiling.

RESULTS

All eight fragments formed tumors: four of the MDA PCa 144 xenograft sublines had morphologic characteristics of SCC and four, of LCNEC. All retained high fidelity to their parent tumor tissue, which remained stable through serial passages. Morphological transitions in the specimen of origin suggested LCNEC represents an intermediate step between adenocarcinoma and SCC. Over 2,500 genes were differentially expressed between the SCC (MDA PCa 144-13) and the LCNEC (MDA PCa 144-4) sublines and enriched in "Nervous System Development" Gene Ontology subtree.

CONCLUSION

The eight xenograft models described represent the spectrum of neuroendocrine carcinomas in prostate cancer and will be valuable preclinical tools to study the pathogenesis of and therapy targets for this increasingly recognized subset of lethal prostate cancer.

Prioritizing genes associated with prostate cancer development

Background

The genetic control of prostate cancer development is poorly understood. Large numbers of gene-expression datasets on different aspects of prostate tumorigenesis are available. We used these data to identify and prioritize candidate genes associated with the development of prostate cancer and bone metastases. Our working hypothesis was that combining meta-analyses on different but overlapping steps of prostate tumorigenesis will improve identification of genes associated with prostate cancer development.

Methods

A Z score-based meta-analysis of gene-expression data was used to identify candidate genes associated with prostate cancer development. To put together different datasets, we conducted a meta-analysis on 3 levels that follow the natural history of prostate cancer development. For experimental verification of candidates, we used in silico validation as well as in-house gene-expression data.

Results

Genes with experimental evidence of an association with prostate cancer development were overrepresented among our top candidates. The meta-analysis also identified a considerable number of novel candidate genes with no published evidence of a role in prostate cancer development. Functional annotation identified cytoskeleton, cell adhesion, extracellular matrix, and cell motility as the top functions associated with prostate cancer development. We identified 10 genes--CDC2, CCNA2, IGF1, EGR1, SRF, CTGF, CCL2, CAV1, SMAD4, and AURKA--that form hubs of the interaction network and therefore are likely to be primary drivers of prostate cancer development.

Conclusions

By using this large 3-level meta-analysis of the gene-expression data to identify candidate genes associated with prostate cancer development, we have generated a list of candidate genes that may be a useful resource for researchers studying the molecular mechanisms underlying prostate cancer development.

The dimerization domain of SOX9 is required for transcription activation of a chondrocyte-specific chromatin DNA template

Mutations in SOX9, a gene essential for chondrocyte differentiation cause the human disease campomelic dysplasia (CD). To understand how SOX9 activates transcription, we characterized the DNA binding and cell-free transcription ability of wild-type SOX9 and a dimerization domain SOX9 mutant. Whereas formation of monomeric mutant SOX9-DNA complex increased linearly with increasing SOX9 concentrations, formation of a wild-type SOX9-DNA dimeric complex increased more slowly suggesting a more sigmoidal-type progression. Stability of SOX9-DNA complexes, however, was unaffected by the dimerization mutation. Both wild-type and mutant SOX9 activated transcription of a naked Col2a1 DNA template. However, after nucleosomal assembly, only wild-type and not the mutant was able to remodel chromatin and activate transcription of this template. Using a cell line, in which the Col2a1 vector was stably integrated, no differences were seen in the interactions of wild-type and mutant SOX9 with the chromatin of the Col2a1 vector using ChIP. However, the mutant was unable to activate transcription in agreement with in vitro results. We hypothesize that the SOX9 dimerization domain is necessary to remodel the Col2a1 chromatin in order to allow transcription to take place. These results further clarify the mechanism that accounts for CD in patients harboring SOX9 dimerization domain mutations.

CBF/NF-Y controls endoplasmic reticulum stress induced transcription through recruitment of both ATF6(N) and TBP

Previously the analysis of promoters regulated by endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress identified a composite promoter element, ERSE that interacts with both CBF/NF-Y (CBF) and ATF6(N) transcription factors. This prompted us to investigate the underlying mechanism by which CBF, a ubiquitously binding transcription factor, specifically controls transcription activation during ER stress. The in vitro DNA binding study performed using purified recombinant proteins revealed that CBF specifically recruits ATF6(N) to ERSE DNA but it does not interact with ATF6(N) in absence of DNA binding. Inhibition of CBF binding resulted in a significant reduction of optimal transcription activation of cellular genes during ER stress. Analysis of cellular promoters by ChIP demonstrated that CBF is needed for recruitment of both ATF6(N) and TBP but not for either acetylation of histone H3-K9 or trimethylation of histone H3-K4 during ER stress. Together these study results reveal that CBF controls ER stress-inducible transcription through recruitment of both ATF6(N) and TBP but not through chromatin modifications. Our observations are in agreement with the results of recently published studies that have shown that CBF controls transcription of varieties of inducible promoters through recruitment of general transcription factors but not through acetylation of histone H4. These findings provide a paradigm of the function of CBF in inducible transcription.

Inhibition of CBF/NF-Y mediated transcription activation arrests cells at G2/M phase and suppresses expression of genes activated at G2/M phase of the cell cycle

Previous studies showed that binding of the CBF/NF-Y (CBF) transcription factor to cellular promoters is essential for cell proliferation. This observation prompted us to investigate the function of CBF in relation to cell cycle progression and in cell-cycle-regulated transcription. In this study, we used a tetracycline-inducible adenoviral vector to express a truncated CBF-B subunit, Bdbd, lacking a transcription activation domain in various mammalian cell lines. The Bdbd polypeptide interacts with cellular CBF-A/CBF-C and binds to promoters containing CBF-binding sites. Interestingly, expression of Bdbd in various mammalian cells resulted in the inhibition of cell proliferation and specific cell cycle arrest at G₂/M phase. Gene expression analysis demonstrated that the expression of Bdbd strongly suppressed cell cycle-dependent transcription activation of Cyclin B1, Aurora A and CDK1 genes, key regulators for cell cycle progression at G₂/M phase. Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis showed that Bdbd significantly inhibited binding of TATA-binding protein, TBP to both Cyclin B1 and Aurora A promoters, but did not inhibit binding of E2F3 activator to Cyclin B1 promoter. This study suggested that the activation domain of CBF-B plays an essential role in the transcription activation of Cyclin B1 and Aurora A genes at G₂/M phase, thus regulating cell cycle progression at G₂/M phase.

Human p32, interacts with B subunit of the CCAAT-binding factor, CBF/NF-Y, and inhibits CBF-mediated transcription activation in vitro

To understand the role of the CCAAT-binding factor, CBF, in transcription, we developed a strategy to purify the heterotrimeric CBF complex from HeLa cell extracts using two successive immunoaffinity chromatography steps. Here we show that the p32 protein, previously identified as the ASF/SF2 splicing factor-associated protein, copurified with the CBF complex. Studies of protein-protein interaction demonstrated that p32 interacts specifically with CBF-B subunit and also associates with CBF-DNA complex. Cellular localization by immunofluorescence staining revealed that p32 is present in the cell throughout the cytosol and nucleus, whereas CBF is present primarily in the nucleus. A portion of the p32 colocalizes with CBF-B in the nucleus. Interestingly, reconstitution of p32 in an in vitro transcription reaction demonstrated that p32 specifically inhibits CBF-mediated transcription activation. Altogether, our study identified p32 as a novel and specific corepressor of CBF-mediated transcription activation in vitro.

The B subunit of the CCAAT box binding transcription factor complex (CBF/NF-Y) is essential for early mouse development and cell proliferation

To understand the physiological function of the mammalian heterotrimeric CCAAT binding factor CBF, also known as NF-Y, we have generated a conditional Cbf-b mouse mutant by introducing loxP sites in the murine Cbf-b/Nf-ya gene. Controlled expression of Cre recombinase deletes the gene in vivo, which leads to a loss of DNA binding by the CBF complex and hence CBF-mediated transcription. Deletion of both Cbf-b alleles causes early embryo lethality, indicating that CBF activity is essential for early mouse development. In primary cultures of mouse embryonic fibroblasts, conditional inactivation of CBF results in a block in cell proliferation and inhibition of S phase or DNA synthesis, which is followed by induction of apoptosis. We conclude that the CBF transcription factor complex is essential for cell proliferation and viability.

CCAAT binding factor (CBF) binding mediates cell cycle activation of topoisomerase IIalpha. Conventional CBF activation domains are not required

To understand the role of the CCAAT binding factor (CBF) in transcription during the cell cycle, we studied the mouse topoisomerase II alpha (topo II alpha) promoter, which is activated during the late S and G(2)/M phases of the cell cycle and contains multiple CBF binding sites. Mutational analysis of the promoter shows that CBF binding to an inverted orientation of the CCAAT motif in the topo II alpha promoter, but not to a direct orientation, is required for transcription activation during the cell cycle. In contrast, analysis of the promoter in an in vitro reconstituted transcription system shows that CBF activates transcription of the topo II alpha promoter irrespective of the orientation of the CBF binding sites. This analysis demonstrates that only one of the three transcription start sites of the topo II alpha promoter is stimulated by CBF, indicating that transcription activation by CBF is dependent on basal promoter structure. Interestingly, mutations of the start site that abolish CBF-dependent transcription activation in vitro do not inhibit activation of the promoter during the cell cycle. Consistent with this observation, expression of a truncated CBF-B subunit lacking a transcription activation domain, which inhibits activity of a collagen promoter, does not affect activity of the topo II alpha promoter in fibroblast cells. In contrast, expression of an allele-specific CBF-B mutant that binds high affinity to a mutant CBF binding site containing a CCAAC motif revives transcription activation of an inactive mutant topo II alpha promoter containing CCAAC during the cell cycle. Altogether, this study indicates that CBF binding, but not conventional CBF activation domains, are required for activation of the topo II alpha promoter during the cell cycle. Considering these results together with results of another recent study, we hypothesize that binding of CBF that disrupts the nucleosomal structure in the topo II alpha promoter is a major function of CBF by which it regulates the cell cycle-dependent transcription of the topo II alpha promoter and possibly many other cell cycle-regulated promoters containing CBF binding sites.

CBF/NF-Y functions both in nucleosomal disruption and transcription activation of the chromatin-assembled topoisomerase IIalpha promoter. Transcription activation by CBF/NF-Y in chromatin is dependent on the promoter structure

To understand the role of CCAAT-binding factor (CBF) in transcription in the context of chromatin-assembled DNA, we used regularly spaced nucleosomal DNA using topoisomerase IIalpha (topo IIalpha) and alpha2(1) collagen promoter templates, which were subsequently reconstituted in an in vitro transcription reaction. Binding of CBF to the nucleosomal wild-type topo IIalpha promoter containing four CBF-binding sites disrupted the regular nucleosomal structure not only in the promoter region containing the CBF-binding sites but also in the downstream region over the transcription start site. In contrast, no nucleosome disruption was observed in a mutant topo IIalpha promoter containing mutations in all CBF-binding sites. Interestingly, CBF also activated transcription from nucleosomal wild-type topo IIalpha promoter. In this experiment, a promoter containing one wild-type CBF-binding site was activated very weakly, whereas the promoter containing mutations in all sites was not activated by CBF. A truncated CBF that lacked the glutamine-rich domains did not activate transcription from nucleosomal wild-type topo IIalpha promoter but disrupted the nucleosomal structure about as much as did the binding of full-length CBF. Two nucleosomal mouse alpha2(1) collagen promoter DNAs, one containing a single and the other containing four CBF- binding sites, were also reconstituted in an in vitro transcription reaction. None of the nucleosomal collagen promoters was activated by CBF. However, both of these collagen promoters were activated by CBF when the transcription reaction was performed using naked DNA templates. Binding of CBF to the nucleosomal collagen promoter containing four binding sites disrupted the nucleosomal structure, similarly as observed in the topo IIalpha promoter. Altogether this study indicates that CBF-mediated nucleosomal disruption occurred independently of transcription activation. It also suggests that specific promoter structure may play a role in the CBF-mediated transcription activation of nucleosomal topo IIalpha promoter template.

Transcriptional scaffold: CIITA interacts with NF-Y, RFX, and CREB to cause stereospecific regulation of the class II major histocompatibility complex promoter

Scaffold molecules interact with multiple effectors to elicit specific signal transduction pathways. CIITA, a non-DNA-binding regulator of class II major histocompatibility complex (MHC) gene transcription, may serve as a transcriptional scaffold. Regulation of the class II MHC promoter by CIITA requires strict spatial-helical arrangements of the X and Y promoter elements. The X element binds RFX (RFX5/RFXANK-RFXB/RFXAP) and CREB, while Y binds NF-Y/CBF (NF-YA, NF-YB, and NF-YC). CIITA interacts with all three. In vivo analysis using both N-terminal and C-terminal deletion constructs identified critical domains of CIITA that are required for interaction with NF-YB, NF-YC, RFX5, RFXANK/RFXB, and CREB. We propose that binding of NF-Y/CBF, RFX, and CREB by CIITA results in a macromolecular complex which allows transcription factors to interact with the class II MHC promoter in a spatially and helically constrained fashion.

Stable expression of a dominant negative mutant of CCAAT binding factor/NF-Y in mouse fibroblast cells resulting in retardation of cell growth and inhibition of transcription of various cellular genes

The heterotrimeric CCAAT-binding factor CBF specifically interacts with the CCAAT motif present in the proximal promoters of numerous mammalian genes. To understand the in vivo function of CBF, a dominant negative mutant of CBF-B subunit that inhibits DNA binding of wild type CBF was stably expressed in mouse fibroblast cells under control of tetracycline-responsive promoter. Expression of the mutant CBF-B but not the wild-type CBF-B resulted in retardation of fibroblast cell growth. The analysis of cell growth using bromodeoxyuridine labeling showed that expression of the mutant CBF-B decreased the number of cells entering into S phase, and also delayed induction of S phase in the quiescent cells after serum stimulation, thus indicating that the inhibition of CBF binding prolonged the progression of S phase in fibroblasts. These results provide direct evidence for the first time that CBF is an important regulator of fibroblast growth. The inhibition of CBF binding reduced expression of various cellular genes including the alpha2(1) collagen, E2F1, and topoisomerase IIalpha genes which promoters contain the CBF-binding site. This result implied that expression of many other genes which promoters contain CBF-binding site was also decreased by the inhibition of CBF binding, and that the decreased expression of multiple cellular genes possibly caused the retardation of fibroblast cell growth.

The B subunit of the CAAT-binding factor NFY binds the central segment of the Co-activator p300

We report that the heterotrimeric transcription factor NFY or "CAAT-binding factor" binds the -60 region of the human H ferritin promoter, the B site. DNA binding analysis with specific antibodies demonstrates that NFY/B/C subunits tightly bind this site and that NFY/C subunit is masked in vivo by binding with other protein(s). NFY binds the co-activator p300. Specifically, the NFY/B subunit interacts with the central segment of p300 in vivo and in vitro. cAMP substantially increases the formation of the NFY.p300 complex. Taken together these data provide a general model of cAMP induction of non-CRE-containing promoters and suggest that the NFY-B.p300 complex is located at the 5' end of the promoter and the NFY-B.C. TFIIB on the 3' end toward the transcription start site.

Pathway of complex formation between DNA and three subunits of CBF/NF-Y. Photocross-linking analysis of DNA-protein interaction and characterization of equilibrium steps of subunit interaction and dna binding

In this study, we used a photocross-linking method to identify specific contact of CCAAT-binding factor (CBF) subunits in a CBF-DNA complex. The analysis showed that all three subunits in the CBF-DNA complex were cross-linked to DNA and that CBF-B and CBF-C were cross-linked more strongly than CBF-A. None of the CBF-A and CBF-C subunits, which together formed a CBF-A/CBF-C heterodimer, were cross-linked without CBF-B; in contrast, CBF-B was cross-linked in the absence of CBF-A/CBF-C. No subunit of heterotrimeric CBF containing DNA-binding domain mutant of either CBF-B or CBF-C was cross-linked to DNA, and interestingly, cross-linking of CBF-B that occurred without CBF-A/CBF-C was inhibited in presence of mutant CBF-C/CBF-A heterodimer. Altogether, these results indicated that the specific DNA contact surface of each CBF subunit is generated as a result of interaction between CBF-B and CBF-A/CBF-C heterodimer and that the three CBF subunits interact interdependently with DNA to form a CBF-DNA complex. Equilibrium interactions among the three CBF subunits and between CBF subunits and DNA were studied by electrophoretic mobility shift assay. This showed that at equilibrium DNA-binding conditions, the CBF-A/CBF-C heterodimer is very stable, but association between CBF-B and CBF-A/CBF-C is very weak. The nature of the association of CBF-B with CBF-A/CBF-C was also revealed by studying the inhibition of CBF-DNA complex formation by the mutant CBF-B. This study indicated that the association between CBF-B and CBF-A/CBF-C is stabilized upon interaction with DNA, a process likely to favor formation of a high-affinity CBF-DNA complex.

Role of the CCAAT-binding protein CBF/NF-Y in transcription

The CCAAT motif is one of the common promoter elements present in the proximal promoter of numerous mammalian genes transcribed by RNA polymerase II. CBF (also called NF-Y and CP1) consists of three different subunits and interacts specifically with the CCAAT motif. In each CBF subunit, the segment needed for formation of the CBF-DNA complex is conserved from yeast to human and, interestingly, the conserved segment of two CBF subunits, CBF-A and CBF-C, are homologous to the histone-fold motif of eukaryotic histones and archaebacterial histone-like protein HMf-2. The histone fold motifs of CBF-A and CBF-C interact with each other to form a heterodimer that associates with CBF-B to form a heterotrimeric CBF molecule, which then binds to DNA.

The two activation domains of the CCAAT-binding factor CBF interact with the dTAFII110 component of the Drosophila TFIID complex

The CCAAT-binding factor CBF is a heterotrimeric transcription factor that specifically binds to CCAAT sequences in many eukaryotic genes. Previous studies have shown that CBF contains two transcription activation domains: a glutamine-rich, serine-threonine-rich domain present in the CBF-B subunit and a glutamine-rich domain in the CBF-C subunit. In this study, by using a series of deletion mutations of CBF-B and CBF-C in transcription assay in vitro, we further delineated smaller segments in these domains that were sufficient to support transcriptional activation by CBF. To test whether transcription activation by CBF requires co-activators, we examined the interaction between CBF and dTAF110, a component of the Drosophila TFIID complex. Recent work has demonstrated that glutamine-rich domains of the Sp1 transcription factor interact with dTAF110 and that this interaction has an important role in mediating transcription activation. Here we first demonstrate in a direct interaction assay in vitro that CBF binds dTAF110. By using a yeast two-hybrid system we show that both of the transcription activation domains of CBF interact with dTAF110. A deletion analysis suggests that a segment of CBF-B needed for transcription activation is also involved in interaction with dTAF110. In CBF-C the C-terminal portion of the molecule seems to be needed for these two activities. Our results suggest that TAF110 might represent one of the co-activators that mediate transcriptional activation by CBF.

DNA binding specificity of the CCAAT-binding factor CBF/NF-Y

CBF is a heterotrimeric protein that binds to DNA containing CCAAT motifs. Here we have analyzed interactions of recombinant CBF with DNA using hydroxyl radical footprinting and methylation interference assays. In the CBF-DNA complex, three separate DNA regions are protected from hydroxyl radical cleavage, one located over and immediately adjacent to the CCAAT motif itself and the other two located on both sides of the CCAAT motif. The methylation interference assay showed, however, that only in the CCAAT motif region methylation of bases was able to interfere with the formation of a CBF-DNA complex, suggesting that CBF makes sequence-specific contacts only in the CCAAT motif region. To further determine the specific DNA sequences necessary for CBF binding, we employed a polymerase chain reaction-mediated random binding site selection method. This analysis showed that CBF binding to DNA requires the CCAAT sequence and other specific sequences immediately flanking both ends of the CCAAT motif. We also showed that the nature of the flanking nucleotide sequences affects the affinity of CBF for DNA. Interestingly, most of the CCAAT motifs present in various higher eukaryotic promoters correspond to the CBF binding sites that were selected, consistent with the hypothesis that these motifs are binding sites for CBF and, hence, that CBF could regulate transcription of numerous eukaryotic genes.

Cell-specific in vivo DNA-protein interactions at the proximal promoters of the pro alpha 1(I) and the pro alpha2(I) collagen genes

We performed in vivo dimethylsulfate footprinting of the 220 bp mouse proximal proalpha1(I) collagen promoter and the 350 bp mouse proximal proalpha2(I) collagen promoter in BALB/3T3 fibroblasts, primary mouse skin fibroblasts, S-194 B cells, NMuLi liver epithelial cells and RAG renal adenocarcinoma cells and in vitro DNase I footprinting of these promoters using nuclear extracts of these different cell types. Whereas proalpha1(I) and proalpha2(I) collagen RNAs were present in BALB/3T3 fibroblasts and primary fibroblasts, these RNAs could not be detected in the three other cell lines. Comparison of in vitro DNase I footprints for each of the two proximal collagen promoters indicated that the patterns of protection were very similar with the different nuclear extracts, suggesting that the DNA binding proteins binding to these promoters were present in all cell types tested. In contrast, in vivo footprints over these proximal promoters were cell-specific, occurring only in fibroblast cells and not in the other three cell types. The in vivo footprints were generally located within the in vitro footprinted regions. Our results suggest that although all cell types tested contained nuclear proteins that can bind to the proximal proalpha1(I) and proalpha2(I) collagen promoters in vitro , it is only in fibroblasts that these proteins bind to their cognate sites in vivo . We discuss possible regulatory mechanisms in type I collagen genes that can contribute to the cell-specific in vivo protein-DNA interactions at the proximal promoters.

Chromosomal assignment and tissue expression of CBF-C/NFY-C, the third subunit of the mammalian CCAAT-binding factor

The mammalian CCAAT-binding factor CBF (NFY) consists of three subunits, CBF-A, CBF-B, and CBF-C. All three subunits are evolutionarily conserved and are essential for DNA binding of CBF. In this study we report the identification of human and plant homologs of CBF-C. Northern analysis revealed that, like the other two subunits, CBF-C was produced at equal levels in all rat tissues that were examined. We assigned the mouse CBF-C gene (designated Nfyc) to chromosome 4 with tight linkage to Lmyc. Our mouse linkage data suggest that the human NFYC homolog will map to 1p32.

Evidence for three major transcription activation elements in the proximal mouse proalpha2(I) collagen promoter

In vivo transient expression and in vitro transcription experiments indicated that a segment between -170 and -40 bp upstream of the start of transcription of the mouse proalpha2(I) collagen gene was essential to activate transcription. DNase I protection experiments identified three strong footprints in this segment. Experiments with deletion mutants encompassing the sequences defined by these three footprints indicated that each of the three elements contributed to the transcriptional activity of the promoter. All three elements are GC-rich, redundant sites for a complex set of DNA binding proteins that includes SP1, other proteins that bind to an SP1 consensus site and proteins that bind to a Krox consensus site. In addition, the segment corresponding to the most proximal footprint also binds the multimeric CCAAT binding protein CBF. Addition of an excess amount of oligo- nucleotides corresponding to either of the two distal footprints significantly inhibited in vitro transcription of the -350 bp proalpha2(I) collagen promoter. Anti-SP1 antibodies that completely inhibited transcription of the early SV40 promoter had little effect on transcription of the wild-type -350 bp promoter, suggesting that SP1 has only a minor role in activity of this promoter. Our results show that the segment between base pairs -170 and -40 of the proalpha2(I) collagen promoter, which contains redundant binding sites for a complex set of nuclear proteins, is essential in the transcriptional activity of this promoter in fibroblasts.

Determination of functional domains in the C subunit of the CCAAT-binding factor (CBF) necessary for formation of a CBF-DNA complex: CBF-B interacts simultaneously with both the CBF-A and CBF-C subunits to form a heterotrimeric CBF molecule

The mammalian CCAAT-binding factor (CBF; also called NF-Y and CP1) is a heterotrimeric protein consisting of three subunits, CBF-A, CBF-B, and CBF-C, all of which are required for DNA binding and all of which are present in the CBF-DNA complex. In this study using cross-linking and immunoprecipitation methods, we first established that CBF-B interacts simultaneously with both subunits of the CBF-A-CBF-C heterodimer to form a heterotrimeric CBF molecule. We then performed a mutational analysis of CBF-C to define functional interactions with the other two CBF subunits and with DNA using several in vitro assays and an in vivo yeast two-hybrid system. Our experiments established that the evolutionarily conserved segment of CBF-C, which shows similarities with the histone-fold motif of histone H2A, was necessary for formation of the CBF-DNA complex. The domain of CBF-C which interacts with CBF-A included a large portion of this segment, one that corresponds to the segment of the histone-fold motif in H2A used for interaction with H2B. Two classes of interactions involved in formation of the CBF-A-CBF-C heterodimer were detected; one class, provided by residues in the middle of the interaction domain, was needed for formation of the CBF-A-CBF-C heterodimer. The other, provided by sequences flanking those of the first class was needed for stabilization of the heterodimer. Two separate domains were identified in the conserved segment of CBF-C for interaction with CBF-B; these were located on each side of the CBF-A interaction domain. Since our previous experiments identified a single CBF-B interaction domain in the histone-fold motif of CBF-A, we propose that a tridentate interaction domain in the CBF-A-CBF-C heterodimer interacts with the 21-amino-acid-long subunit interaction domain of CBF-B. Together with our previous mutational analysis of CBF-A (S. Sinha, I.-S. Kim, K.-Y. Sohn, B. de Crombrugghe, and S. N. Maity, Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:328-337, 1996), this study demonstrates that the histone fold-motifs of CBF-A and CBF-C interact with each other to form the CBF-A-CBF-C heterodimer and generate a hybrid surface which then interacts with CBF-B to form the heterotrimeric CBF molecule.

An 18-base-pair sequence in the mouse proalpha1(II) collagen gene is sufficient for expression in cartilage and binds nuclear proteins that are selectively expressed in chondrocytes

The molecular mechanisms by which mesenchymal cells differentiate into chondrocytes are still poorly understood. We have used the gene for a chondrocyte marker, the proalpha1(II) collagen gene (Col2a1), as a model to delineate a minimal sequence needed for chondrocyte expression and identify chondrocyte-specific proteins binding to this sequence. We previously localized a cartilage-specific enhancer to 156 bp of the mouse Col2a1 intron 1. We show here that four copies of a 48-bp subsegment strongly increased promoter activity in transiently transfected rat chondrosarcoma (RCS) cells and mouse primary chondrocytes but not in 10T1/2 fibroblasts. They also directed cartilage specificity in transgenic mouse embryos. These 48 bp include two 11-bp inverted repeats with only one mismatch. Tandem copies of an 18-bp element containing the 3' repeat strongly enhanced promoter activity in RCS cells and chondrocytes but not in fibroblasts. Transgenic mice harboring 12 copies of this 18-mer expressed luciferase in ribs and vertebrae and in isolated chondrocytes but not in noncartilaginous tissues except skin and brain. In gel retardation assays, an RCS cell-specific protein and another closely related protein expressed only in RCS cells and primary chondrocytes bound to a 10-bp sequence within the 18-mer. Mutations in these 10 bp abolished activity of the multimerized 18-bp enhancer, and deletion of these 10 bp abolished enhancer activity of 465- and 231-bp intron 1 segments. This sequence contains a low-affinity binding site for POU domain proteins, and competition experiments with a high-affinity POU domain binding site strongly suggested that the chondrocyte proteins belong to this family. Together, our results indicate that an 18-bp sequence in Col2a1 intron 1 controls chondrocyte expression and suggest that RCS cells and chondrocytes contain specific POU domain proteins involved in enhancer activity.

The transcriptional activity of the CCAAT-binding factor CBF is mediated by two distinct activation domains, one in the CBF-B subunit and the other in the CBF-C subunit

CBF-A, CBF-B, and CBF-C together form the heterotrimeric mammalian CCAAT-binding factor, CBF, which binds to DNA to form a CBF-DNA complex. Here we examined the transcription activation function of CBF in an in vitro reconstituted system using the three purified recombinant CBF subunits expressed in Escherichia coli. Two of the subunits, CBF-A and CBF-C, were coexpressed and purified as a CBF-A/CBF-C complex. Addition of the three wild-type recombinant CBF subunits to EL4 cell nuclear extracts depleted of CBF stimulated transcription 5-20-fold from proalpha2(1) collagen promoters and 10-fold from the Rous sarcoma virus long terminal repeat. Two CBF deletion mutants, one containing full-length CBF-A and CBF-C and a CBF-B lacking the NH2-terminal residues 1-224, and the other containing full- length CBF-A and CBF-B and a CBF-C lacking the COOH-terminal residues 114-309, also stimulated transcription from these promoters, but the level of activation was reduced to half that obtained with the full-length CBF subunits. In contrast, a CBF deletion mutant protein containing full-length CBF-A and deleted forms of both CBF-B and CBF-C showed very little transcription activation from these promoters. Hence, this study demonstrates that the heterotrimeric CBF protein consists of two transcription activation domains, one present in CBF-B and the other in CBF-C, and that the two domains act additively in the in vitro assay. The activation domains of both CBF-B and CBF-C, which are rich in glutamine and hydrophobic residues, showed amino acid sequence similarities with each other and with the glutamine-rich activation domain of transcription factor Sp1.