Routine 4D Cardiac CT to Identify Concomitant Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy in Older Adults with Severe Aortic Stenosis

Background Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) often coexists with severe aortic stenosis (AS). Although strain analysis from cardiac MRI and echocardiography was demonstrated to predict coexisting ATTR-CM, comparable data from four-dimensional (4D) cardiac CT are lacking despite wide availability. Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic performance of 4D cardiac CT-derived parameters in identifying ATTR-CM in older adults considered for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Materials and Methods This prospective single-center screening study for ATTR-CM included consecutive patients with severe AS considered for TAVI who underwent 4D cardiac CT between August 2019 and August 2021 approximately 1 day before technetium 99m (99mTc) 3,3-diphosphono-1,2-propanodicarboxylic-acid (DPD) scintigraphy. The diagnostic performance of CT-based left ventricular (LV), right ventricular, and left atrial dimensions, ejection fraction (EF), and myocardial strain were evaluated against 99mTc-DPD scintigraphy as the reference standard to identify ATTR-CM. Predictors and an unweighted cardiac CT score were validated with internal bootstrapping. The assignment of variables to the score was based on cutoff values achieving the highest Youden index J. Results Among 263 participants (mean age, 83 years ± 4.6 [SD]; 149 male and 114 female participants), 99mTc-DPD scintigraphy (Perugini grade 2 or 3) confirmed coexisting ATTR-CM in 27 (10.3%). CT-derived LV mass index, LV and LA global longitudinal strain (GLS), and relative apical longitudinal strain each predicted the presence of ATTR-CM with an area under the curve (AUC) of at least 0.70. Implementing these parameters with cutoff values of 81 g/m2 or higher, -14.9% or higher, less than 11.5%, and 1.7 or higher in the CT score, respectively, yielded high diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.81, 0.94; P < .001) robust to internal bootstrapping validation (AUC = 0.88; 95% CI: 0.82, 0.94). If two criteria were fulfilled, the sensitivity and specificity in the detection of ATTR-CM were 96.3% (95% CI: 81.0, 99.9) and 58.9% (95% CI: 52.3, 65.2), respectively. Conclusion When compared against 99mTc-DPD scintigraphy as the reference standard, routine 4D cardiac CT in older adults considered for TAVI provided high diagnostic performance in the detection of concomitant ATTR-CM by assessing LV and left atrial GLS, relative apical longitudinal strain, and LV mass index. ClinicalTrials.gov registration no.: NCT04061213 © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Tavakoli and Onder in this issue.

Long-term outcomes of measured and predicted prosthesis-patient mismatch following transcatheter aortic valve replacement

BACKGROUND

Both measured and predicted effective orifice area (EOA) indexed to the body surface area (EOAi) have been suggested to define prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The impact of PPM on clinical outcomes may accumulate with extended follow-up and vary according to the definition used.

AIMS

We aimed to investigate the long-term clinical impact of PPM in patients undergoing TAVR.

METHODS

Patients in a prospective TAVR registry were stratified by the presence of moderate (0.65-0.85 or 0.55-0.70 cm2/m2 if obese) or severe (≤0.65 or ≤0.55 cm2/m2 if obese) PPM according to echocardiographically measured EOAi (measured PPM), predicted EOAi based on published EOA reference values for each valve model and size (predicted PPMTHV), or predicted EOAi based on EOA reference values derived from computed tomography measurements of aortic annulus dimensions (predicted PPMCT).

RESULTS

In an analysis of 2,463 patients, the frequency of measured PPM (moderate: 27.0%; severe: 8.7%) was higher than the frequency of predicted PPMTHV (moderate: 11.3%; severe: 1.2%) or predicted PPMCT (moderate: 12.0%; severe: 0.1%). During a median follow-up of 429 days, 10-year mortality was comparable in patients with versus without measured PPM or predicted PPMCT. In contrast, patients with moderate predicted PPMTHV had a lower risk of 10-year all-cause mortality compared with those without PPM (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.73, 95% confidence interval: 0.55-0.96).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of predicted versus measured EOAi results in a lower estimate of PPM severity. We observed no increased risk of death in patients with PPM over a median follow-up time of 429 days.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov: NCT01368250.

Impact of right ventricular-pulmonary arterial coupling on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation

AIMS

The interplay between pulmonary hypertension (PH) and right ventricular (RV) function is reflected in an index of RV function to pulmonary artery (PA) systolic pressure (PASP). The present study aimed to assess the importance of RV-PA coupling on clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a prospective TAVI registry, clinical outcomes of TAVI patients with RV dysfunction or PH were stratified according to coupling or uncoupling of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) to PASP, and compared to those of patients with normal RV function and absence of PH. The median TAPSE/PASP ratio was used to differentiate uncoupling (>0.39) from coupling (<0.39). Among 404 TAVI patients, 201 patients (49.8 %) had RVD or PH at baseline: 174 patients had RV-PA uncoupling, and 27 had coupling at baseline. RV-PA hemodynamics normalized in 55.6 % of patients with RV-PA coupling and in 28.2 % of patients with RV-PA uncoupling, and deteriorated in 33.3 % of patients with RV-PA coupling and in 17.8 % of patients with no RVD, respectively, at discharge. Patients with RV-PA uncoupling after TAVI showed a trend towards an increased risk of cardiovascular death at 1 year as compared to patients with normal RV-function (HRadjusted 2.06, 95 % CI 0.97-4.37).

CONCLUSION

After TAVI, RV-PA coupling changed in a significant proportion of patients and is a potentially important metric for risk stratification of TAVI patients with RVD or PH. TWEET: "Patients with right ventricular dysfunction and pulmonary hypertension are at increased risk of death after TAVI. Integrated right ventricular to pulmonary artery hemodynamics change after TAVI in a significant proportion of patients and is instrumental to refine risk stratification."

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov: NCT01368250.

Concomitant Coronary Atheroma Regression and Stabilization in Response to Lipid-Lowering Therapy

BACKGROUND

The frequency, characteristics, and outcomes of patients treated with high-intensity lipid-lowering therapy and showing concomitant atheroma volume reduction, lipid content reduction, and increase in fibrous cap thickness (ie, triple regression) are unknown.

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to investigate rates, determinants, and prognostic implications of triple regression in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction and treated with high-intensity lipid-lowering therapy.

METHODS

The PACMAN-AMI (Effects of the PCSK9 Antibody Alirocumab on Coronary Atherosclerosis in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial used serial intravascular ultrasound, near-infrared spectroscopy, and optical coherence tomography to compare the effects of alirocumab vs placebo in patients receiving high-intensity statin therapy. Triple regression was defined by the combined presence of percentage of atheroma volume reduction, maximum lipid core burden index within 4 mm reduction, and minimal fibrous cap thickness increase. Clinical outcomes at 1-year follow-up were assessed.

RESULTS

Overall, 84 patients (31.7%) showed triple regression (40.8% in the alirocumab group vs 23.0% in the placebo group; P = 0.002). On-treatment low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were lower in patients with vs without triple regression (between-group difference: -27.1 mg/dL; 95% CI: -37.7 to -16.6 mg/dL; P < 0.001). Triple regression was independently predicted by alirocumab treatment (OR: 2.83; 95% CI: 1.57-5.16; P = 0.001) and a higher baseline maximum lipid core burden index within 4 mm (OR: 1.03; 95% CI: 1.01-1.06; P = 0.013). The composite clinical endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven revascularization occurred less frequently in patients with vs without triple regression (8.3% vs 18.2%; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Triple regression occurred in one-third of patients with acute myocardial infarction who were receiving high-intensity lipid-lowering therapy and was associated with alirocumab treatment, higher baseline lipid content, and reduced cardiovascular events. (Vascular Effects of Alirocumab in Acute MI-Patients [PACMAN-AMI]; NCT03067844).

Impact of COVID-19 Surge Periods on Clinical Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Healthcare systems adopted various strategies to minimize the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical outcomes of patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We aimed to compare baseline characteristics and procedural and clinical outcomes of patients who underwent TAVI during COVID-19 surge periods with those of patients who underwent TAVI during the nonsurge and prepandemic periods. In the prospective Bern TAVI registry, the pandemic period was divided into surge and nonsurge periods on the basis of the mean number of occupied beds in the intensive care unit in each month and matched with 11 months immediately preceding the pandemic. A total of 1,069 patients underwent TAVI between April 1, 2019 and December 31, 2021. Patients who underwent TAVI during surge periods had a higher surgical risk (Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality) than that of patients who underwent TAVI during nonsurge and prepandemic periods. Diagnosis-to-procedure time (in days) was longer for patients who underwent TAVI during the surge period than during the nonsurge and prepandemic periods (95.20 ± 121.07 vs 70.99 ± 72.25 and 60.46 ± 75.43, both p <0.001). At 30 days, all-cause mortality was higher in the surge than in the nonsurge group (4.9 vs 1.1%, hazard ratio 4.68, 95% confidence interval 1.55 to 14.10, p = 0.006), and in the surge than in the prepandemic group (4.9 vs 1.3%, hazard ratio 3.67, 95% confidence interval 1.34 to 10.11, p = 0.012). In conclusion, TAVI during COVID-19 surge periods was associated with higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality score, delayed procedure scheduling, and increased 30-day mortality than that of TAVI during nonsurge and prepandemic periods.

Enoxaparin for symptomatic COVID-19 managed in the ambulatory setting: An individual patient level analysis of the OVID and ETHIC trials

BACKGROUND

Antithrombotic treatment may improve the disease course in non-critically ill, symptomatic COVID-19 outpatients.

METHODS

We performed an individual patient-level analysis of the OVID and ETHIC randomized controlled trials, which compared enoxaparin thromboprophylaxis for either 14 (OVID) or 21 days (ETHIC) vs. no thromboprophylaxis for outpatients with symptomatic COVID-19 and at least one additional risk factor. The primary efficacy outcome included all-cause hospitalization and all-cause death within 30 days from randomization. Both studies were prematurely stopped for futility. Secondary efficacy outcomes were major symptomatic venous thromboembolic events, arterial cardiovascular events, or their composite occurring within 30 days from randomization. The same outcomes were assessed over a 90-day follow-up. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding (ISTH criteria).

RESULTS

A total of 691 patients were randomized: 339 to receive enoxaparin and 352 to the control group. Over 30-day follow-up, the primary efficacy outcome occurred in 6.0 % of patients in the enoxaparin group vs. 5.8 % of controls for a risk ratio (RR) of 1.05 (95%CI 0.57-1.92). The incidence of major symptomatic venous thromboembolic events and arterial cardiovascular events was 0.9 % vs. 1.8 %, respectively (RR 0.52; 95%CI 0.13-2.06). Most cardiovascular thromboembolic events were represented by symptomatic venous thromboembolic events, occurring in 0.6 % vs. 1.5 % of patients, respectively. A similar distribution of outcomes between the treatment groups was observed over 90 days. No major bleeding occurred in the enoxaparin group vs. one (0.3 %) in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence for the clinical benefit of early administration of enoxaparin thromboprophylaxis in outpatients with symptomatic COVID-19. These results should be interpreted taking into consideration the relatively low occurrence of events.

Amyloid Transthyretin Cardiomyopathy in Elderly Patients With Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Background The prevalence of calcific aortic stenosis and amyloid transthyretin cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) increase with age, and they often coexist. The objective was to determine the prevalence of ATTR-CM in patients with severe aortic stenosis and evaluate differences in presentations and outcomes of patients with concomitant ATTR-CM undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Methods and Results Prospective screening for ATTR-CM with Technetium99-3,3-diphosphono-1,2-propanodicarboxylic acid bone scintigraphy was performed in 315 patients referred with severe aortic stenosis between August 2019 and August 2021. Myocardial Technetium99-3,3-diphosphono-1,2-propanodicarboxylic acid tracer uptake was detected in 34 patients (10.8%), leading to a diagnosis of ATTR-CM in 30 patients (Perugini ≥2: 9.5%). Age (85.7±4.9 versus 82.8±4.5; P=0.001), male sex (82.4% versus 57.7%; P=0.005), and prior carpal tunnel surgery (17.6% versus 4.3%; P=0.007) were associated with coexisting ATTR-CM, as were ECG (discordant QRS voltage to left ventricular wall thickness [42% versus 12%; P<0.001]), echocardiographic (left ventricular ejection fraction 48.8±12.8 versus 58.4±10.8; P<0.001; left ventricular mass index, 144.4±45.8 versus 117.2±34.4g/m2; P<0.001), and hemodynamic parameters (mean aortic valve gradient, 23.4±12.6 versus 35.5±16.6; P<0.001; mean pulmonary artery pressure, 29.5±9.7 versus 25.8±9.5; P=0.037). Periprocedural (cardiovascular death: hazard ratio [HR], 0.71 [95% CI, 0.04-12.53]; stroke: HR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.03-7.77]; pacemaker implantation: HR, 1.54 [95% CI, 0.69-3.43]) and 1-year clinical outcomes (cardiovascular death: HR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.37-2.96]; stroke: HR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.02-5.63]; pacemaker implantation: HR, 1.50 [95% CI, 0.67-3.34]) were similar between groups. Conclusions Coexisting ATTR-CM was observed in every 10th elderly patient with severe aortic stenosis referred for therapy. While patients with coexisting pathologies differ in clinical presentation and echocardiographic and hemodynamic parameters, peri-interventional risk and early clinical outcomes were comparable up to 1 year after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. REGISTRATION URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT04061213.

Final 3-Year Outcomes of a Randomized Trial Comparing a Self-Expanding to a Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve

BACKGROUND

In the SCOPE I trial (Safety and Efficacy of the Symetis ACURATE Neo/TF Compared to the Edwards SAPIEN 3 Bioprosthesis), transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the self-expanding ACURATE neo (NEO) did not meet noninferiority compared with the balloon-expandable SAPIEN 3 (S3) device regarding a composite end point at 30 days due to higher rates of prosthetic valve regurgitation and acute kidney injury. Data on long-term durability of NEO are scarce. Here, we report whether early differences between NEO and S3 translate into differences in clinical outcomes or bioprosthetic valve failure 3 years after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

METHODS

Patients with severe aortic stenosis were randomized to transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation with NEO or S3 at 20 European centers. Clinical outcomes at 3 years are compared using Cox proportional or Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard models by intention-to-treat. Bioprosthetic valve failure is reported for the valve-implant cohort.

RESULTS

Among 739 patients, 84 of 372 patients (24.3%) had died in the NEO and 85 of 367 (25%) in the S3 group at 3 years. Comparing NEO with S3, the 3-year rates of all-cause death (hazard ratio, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.73-1.33]), stroke (subhazard ratio, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.56-1.92]), and hospitalization for congestive heart failure (subhazard ratio, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.51-1.07]) were similar between the groups. Aortic valve reinterventions were required in 4 NEO and 3 S3 patients (subhazard ratio, 1.32 [95% CI, 0.30-5.85]). New York Heart Association functional class ≤II was observed in 84% (NEO) and 85% (S3), respectively. Mean gradients remained lower after NEO at 3 years (8 versus 12 mm Hg; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Early differences between NEO and S3 did not translate into significant differences in clinical outcomes or bioprosthetic valve failure throughout 3 years.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov, Unique identifier: NCT03011346.

Impact of alirocumab on plaque regression and haemodynamics of non-culprit arteries in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a prespecified substudy of the PACMAN-AMI trial

BACKGROUND

Treatment with proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors on top of statins leads to plaque regression and stabilisation. The effects of PCSK9 inhibitors on coronary physiology and angiographic diameter stenosis (DS%) are unknown.

AIMS

This study aimed to investigate the effects of the PCSK9 inhibitor alirocumab on coronary haemodynamics as assessed by quantitative flow ratio (QFR) and DS% by three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography (3D-QCA) in non-infarct-related arteries (non-IRA) among acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients.

METHODS

This was a prespecified substudy of the randomised controlled PACMAN-AMI trial, comparing alirocumab versus placebo on top of rosuvastatin. QFR and 3D-QCA were assessed at baseline and 1 year in any non-IRA ≥2.0 mm and 3D-QCA DS% >25%. The prespecified primary endpoint was the number of patients with a mean QFR increase at 1 year, and the secondary endpoint was the change in 3D-QCA DS%.

RESULTS

Of 300 enrolled patients, 265 had serial follow-up, of which 193 underwent serial QFR/3D-QCA analysis in 282 non-IRA. At 1 year, QFR increased in 50/94 (53.2%) patients with alirocumab versus 40/99 (40.4%) with placebo (Δ12.8%; odds ratio 1.7, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.9 to 3.0; p=0.076). DS% decreased by 1.03±7.28% with alirocumab and increased by 1.70±8.27% with placebo (Δ-2.50%, 95% CI: -4.43 to -0.57; p=0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of AMI patients with alirocumab versus placebo for 1 year resulted in a significant regression in angiographic DS%, whereas no overall improvement of coronary haemodynamics was observed.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov: NCT03067844.

Clinical Outcomes in High-Gradient, Classical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient, and Paradoxical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Report From the SwissTAVI Registry

Background In view of the rising global burden of severe symptomatic aortic stenosis, its early recognition and treatment is key. Although patients with classical low-flow, low-gradient (C-LFLG) aortic stenosis have higher rates of death after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) when compared with patients with high-gradient (HG) aortic stenosis, there is conflicting evidence on the death rate in patients with severe paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient (P-LFLG) aortic stenosis. Therefore, we aimed to compare outcomes in real-world patients with severe HG, C-LFLG, and P-LFLG aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI. Methods and Results Clinical outcomes up to 5 years were addressed in the 3 groups of patients enrolled in the prospective, national, multicenter SwissTAVI registry. A total of 8914 patients undergoing TAVI at 15 heart valve centers in Switzerland were analyzed for the purpose of this study. We observed a significant difference in time to death at 1 year after TAVI, with the lowest observed in HG (8.8%) aortic stenosis, followed by P-LFLG (11.5%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.35 [95% CI, 1.16-1.56]; P<0.001) and C-LFLG (19.8%; HR, 1.93 [95% CI, 1.64-2.26]; P<0.001) aortic stenosis. Cardiovascular death showed similar differences between the groups. At 5 years, the all-cause death rate was 44.4% in HG, 52.1% in P-LFLG (HR, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.23-1.48]; P<0.001), and 62.8% in C-LFLG aortic stenosis (HR, 1.7 [95% CI, 1.54-1.88]; P<0.001). Conclusions Up to 5 years after TAVI, patients with P-LFLG have higher death rates than patients with HG aortic stenosis but lower death rates than patients with C-LFLG aortic stenosis.

Development and validation of explainable machine learning models for risk of mortality in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: TAVI risk machine scores

Aims

Identification of high-risk patients and individualized decision support based on objective criteria for rapid discharge after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are key requirements in the context of contemporary TAVI treatment. This study aimed to predict 30-day mortality following TAVI based on machine learning (ML) using data from the German Aortic Valve Registry.

Methods and results

Mortality risk was determined using a random forest ML model that was condensed in the newly developed TAVI Risk Machine (TRIM) scores, designed to represent clinically meaningful risk modelling before (TRIMpre) and in particular after (TRIMpost) TAVI. Algorithm was trained and cross-validated on data of 22 283 patients (729 died within 30 days post-TAVI) and generalisation was examined on data of 5864 patients (146 died). TRIMpost demonstrated significantly better performance than traditional scores [C-statistics value, 0.79; 95% confidence interval (CI)] [0.74; 0.83] compared to Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) with C-statistics value 0.69; 95%-CI [0.65; 0.74]). An abridged (aTRIMpost) score comprising 25 features (calculated using a web interface) exhibited significantly higher performance than traditional scores (C-statistics value, 0.74; 95%-CI [0.70; 0.78]). Validation on external data of 6693 patients (205 died within 30 days post-TAVI) of the Swiss TAVI Registry confirmed significantly better performance for the TRIMpost (C-statistics value 0.75, 95%-CI [0.72; 0.79]) compared to STS (C-statistics value 0.67, CI [0.63; 0.70]).

Conclusion

TRIM scores demonstrate good performance for risk estimation before and after TAVI. Together with clinical judgement, they may support standardised and objective decision-making before and after TAVI.

5-Year Outcomes With Self-Expanding vs Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Small Annuli

BACKGROUND

Self-expanding transcatheter heart valves (THVs) are associated with better echocardiographic hemodynamic performance than balloon-expandable THVs and are considered preferable in patients with small annuli.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to compare 5-year outcomes between self-expanding vs balloon-expandable THVs in severe aortic stenosis (AS) patients with small annuli.

METHODS

Consecutive severe AS patients with an aortic valve annulus area <430 mm² who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with either the CoreValve Evolut (Medtronic) or SAPIEN (Edwards Lifesciences) THV between 2012 and 2021 were enrolled from the Bern TAVI registry. A 1:1 propensity-matched analysis was performed to account for baseline differences between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 723 patients were included, and propensity score matching resulted in 171 pairs. Technical success was achieved in over 85% of both groups with no significant difference. Self-expanding THVs were associated with a lower transvalvular gradient (8.0 ± 4.8 mm Hg vs 12.5 ± 4.5 mm Hg; P < 0.001), a larger effective orifice area (1.81 ± 0.46 cm² vs 1.49 ± 0.42 cm²; P < 0.001), and a lower incidence of prosthesis-patient mismatch (19.7% vs 51.8%; P < 0.001) than balloon-expandable THVs. At 5 years, there were no significant differences in mortality (50.4% vs 39.6%; P = 0.269) between groups. Disabling stroke occurred more frequently in patients with a self-expanding THV than those with a balloon-expandable THV (6.6% vs 0.6%; P = 0.030). Similar results were obtained using inverse probability of treatment weighting in the Bern TAVI registry and the nationwide Swiss TAVI registry.

CONCLUSIONS

The echocardiographic hemodynamic advantage of self-expanding THVs was not associated with better clinical outcomes compared with balloon-expandable THVs up to 5 years in patients with small annuli. (Swiss TAVI Registry; NCT01368250).

Valve-in-valve TAVI and risk of coronary obstruction: Validation of the VIVID classification

BACKGROUND

The Valve-in-Valve International Data (VIVID) registry proposed a simplified classification to assess the risk of coronary obstruction during valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (ViV-TAVI) based on preprocedural multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). We investigated the validity of the VIVID classification in patients undergoing ViV-TAVI for degenerated bioprostheses.

METHODS

Patients undergoing ViV-TAVI for degenerated bioprostheses were prospectively included in this study. The risk of coronary obstruction among patients treated with stented valves was retrospectively evaluated based on anatomical assessment on pre-procedural MDCT.

RESULTS

Among a total of 137 patients that underwent ViV-TAVI between August 2007 and June 2021, 109 patients had stented, sutureless, or transcatheter degenerated bioprosthesis of which 96 (88%) had adequate MDCT data for risk assessment. High-risk anatomy for coronary obstruction (VIVID type IIB, IIIB, or IIIC) in either the left or right coronary artery was observed in 30 patients (31.3%). Of the 30 patients with high-risk anatomy, coronary protection using wire protection or BASILICA (bioprosthetic or native aortic scallop intentional laceration to prevent iatrogenic coronary artery obstruction) was performed in 3 patients (10.0%). Three patients treated with stentless valves and one patient treated with a stented valve with externally mounted leaflets had coronary obstruction. None of the patients with high risk anatomy according to MDCT had coronary obstruction even without coronary protection.

CONCLUSIONS

Coronary obstruction occurred in none of the patients classified as high-risk patients according to the VIVID classification despite the absence of coronary protection. Refined tools are required to assess the risk of coronary obstruction.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov. NCT01368250.

Continued non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists during transcatheter aortic valve implantation

BACKGROUND

One-third of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) have an indication for long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC).

AIMS

We aimed to investigate whether continued non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) therapy compared with continued vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy during TAVI is equally safe and effective.  Methods: Consecutive patients on OAC with either NOAC or VKA undergoing transfemoral TAVI at five European centres were enrolled. The primary outcome measure was a composite of major/life-threatening bleeding, stroke, and all-cause mortality at 30 days.

RESULTS

In total, 584 patients underwent TAVI under continued OAC with 294 (50.3%) patients receiving VKA and 290 (49.7%) patients receiving NOAC. At 30 days, the composite primary outcome had occurred in 51 (17.3%) versus 36 (12.4%) patients with continued VKA and with continued NOAC, respectively (odds ratio [OR] 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.43-1.07; p=0.092). Rates of major/life-threatening bleeding (OR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.52-1.47; p=0.606) and stroke (OR 1.02, 95% CI: 0.29-3.59; p=0.974) were not different between groups. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, continued NOAC, compared with continued VKA, was associated with a lower risk for all-cause 1-year mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.61, 95% CI: 0.37-0.98; p=0.043). The analysis of the propensity score-matched cohort revealed similar results.

CONCLUSIONS

Continued NOAC compared with continued VKA during TAVI led to comparable outcomes with regard to the composite outcome measure indicating that continued OAC with both drugs is feasible. These hypothesis-generating results need to be confirmed by a dedicated randomised controlled trial.

Aortic annulus ellipticity and outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

BACKGROUND

Elliptical shape of the aortic annulus has been associated with an increased risk of device failure after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) compared with a circular annular shape.

AIMS

To assess the impact of annulus ellipticity on procedural outcomes and device performance in patients undergoing TAVI.

METHODS

In a prospective TAVI registry, aortic annulus ellipticity was assessed by preprocedural multidetector computed tomography. The annulus ratios, defined by the ratio of minimum and maximum annulus diameters measured in a transverse double oblique plane, were split into tertiles for comparisons between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 1732 patients undergoing TAVI between August 2007 and June 2020 were included in the present analysis. Patients in the tertile with the most elliptical shape of the annulus were more likely to be female (59.7% vs. 47.9%; p < 0.001) and had a higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality (5.4 ± 3.8 vs. 4.8 ± 3.5; p = 0.002). There were no significant differences in the rate of technical success (95.3% vs. 96.5%; p = 0.235), device success (83.6% vs. 86.5%; p = 0.118) and intended valve performance (90.7% vs. 91.7; p = 0.503) between patients in the most elliptical tertile and the rest. However, valve dislocation/embolization occurred more frequently in patients with elliptical as compared to circular annular shape (2.6% vs. 1.2%; p = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

Ellipticity of the aortic annulus does not affect procedural and device outcomes in patients undergoing TAVI irrespective of transcatheter heart valve design and generation. https:www.//clinicaltrials.gov. NCT01368250.

Enoxaparin for outpatients with COVID-19: 90-day results from the randomised, open-label, parallel-group, multinational, phase III OVID trial

INTRODUCTION

The benefits of early thromboprophylaxis in symptomatic COVID-19 outpatients remain unclear. We present the 90-day results from the randomised, open-label, parallel-group, investigator-initiated, multinational OVID phase III trial.

METHODS

Outpatients aged 50 years or older with acute symptomatic COVID-19 were randomised to receive enoxaparin 40 mg for 14 days once daily vs. standard of care (no thromboprophylaxis). The primary outcome was the composite of untoward hospitalisation and all-cause death within 30 days from randomisation. Secondary outcomes included arterial and venous major cardiovascular events, as well as the primary outcome within 90 days from randomisation. The study was prematurely terminated based on statistical criteria after the predefined interim analysis of 30-day data, which has been previously published. In the present analysis, we present the final, 90-day data from OVID and we additionally investigate the impact of thromboprophylaxis on the resolution of symptoms.

RESULTS

Of the 472 patients included in the intention-to-treat population, 234 were randomised to receive enoxaparin and 238 no thromboprophylaxis. The median age was 57 (Q1-Q3: 53-62) years and 217 (46 %) were women. The 90-day primary outcome occurred in 11 (4.7 %) patients of the enoxaparin arm and in 11 (4.6 %) controls (adjusted relative risk 1.00; 95 % CI: 0.44-2.25): 3 events per group occurred after day 30. The 90-day incidence of cardiovascular events was 0.9 % in the enoxaparin arm vs. 1.7 % in controls (relative risk 0.51; 95 % CI: 0.09-2.75). Individual symptoms improved progressively within 90 days with no difference between groups. At 90 days, 42 (17.9 %) patients in the enoxaparin arm and 40 (16.8 %) controls had persistent respiratory symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

In adult community patients with COVID-19, early thromboprophylaxis with enoxaparin did not improve the course of COVID-19 neither in terms of hospitalisation and death nor considering COVID-19-related symptoms.

SGLT2 inhibitor therapy for transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy: early tolerance and clinical response to dapagliflozin

AIMS

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) improve clinical outcomes in heart failure patients with reduced and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), but have not yet been investigated in transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM). This study aimed to evaluate tolerability, clinical outcomes, and changes in NT-proBNP levels and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in ATTR-CM patients treated with dapagliflozin.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with stable, tafamidis-treated ATTR-CM were retrospectively evaluated at the initiation of dapagliflozin and 3 months thereafter. Tafamidis-treated ATTR-CM patients without SGLT2i served as a reference cohort. Overall, SLGT2i therapy was initiated in 34 patients. Seventeen patients with stable disease on tafamidis, who were subsequently started on dapagliflozin, were included in the analysis. Patients selected for SGLT2i presented with signs of advanced disease, evidenced by higher Gillmore disease stage (stage ≥2: 53% vs. 27.5%; P = 0.041), baseline median NT-proBNP [median (IQR) 2668 pg/mL (1314-3451) vs. 1424 (810-2059); P = 0.038] and loop diuretic demand (76.5% vs. 45% of patients; P = 0.044), and lower LVEF (46.6 ± 12.9 vs. 53.7 ± 8.7%; P = 0.019) and GFR (51.8 ± 16.5 vs. 68.5 ± 18.6 mL/min; P = 0.037) compared with the reference cohort. At 3-month follow-up, a numerical decrease in NT-proBNP levels was observed in 13/17 (76.5%) patients in the dapagliflozin (-190 pg/mL, IQR: -1,028-71, P = 0.557) and 27/40 (67.5%) of patients in the control cohort (-115 pg/mL, IQR: -357-105, P = 0.551). Other disease parameters remained stable and no adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

In tafamidis-treated ATTR-CM patients, initiation of dapagliflozin was well tolerated. The efficacy of SGLT2i therapy in patients with ATTR-CM needs to be studied in randomized controlled trials.

Effect of alirocumab added to high-Intensity statin therapy on endothelial function in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a sub-study of the randomized placebo-controlled PACMAN-AMI trial

Background

Endothelial dysfunction is involved early in the development of vascular dysfunction leading to atherosclerosis and cardiovascular diseases. Statins have shown to improve endothelial function. The role of the protein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9-inhibitor (PCSK9) alirocumab on endothelial function among patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains unknown.

Purpose

We investigated the effect of alirocumab on endothelial function among AMI patients receiving PCSK9i alirocumab in addition to high intensity statin therapy.

Methods

This is a pre-specified, sub-study nested within the PACMAN-AMI (effects of the PCSK9 antibody AliroCuMab on coronary Atherosclerosis in patieNts with Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial, a randomized trial that compared the effects of biweekly PCSK9-inhibitor alirocumab 150 mg vs. placebo, initiated within 24h of presentation in patients with AMI on top of high-intensity statin. Patients recruited at Bern University Hospital and adherent to the study drug (alirocumab or placebo) were analysed for the current study. Endothelial function was assessed by flow mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery at week 4 and 52 after treatment initiation.

Results

Among 139 patients (68 alirocumab, 71 placebo) completing the sub-study, baseline characteristics were well balanced between groups (alirocumab vs. placebo: mean age 57.5±10.1 years vs. 58.7±8.4 years, p=0.45; mean LDL-C 4.03±0.93 mmol/L vs. 4.05±0.74 mmol/L, p=NS). At week 52 LDL-C levels decreased to 0.65±0.71 mmol/L in the alirocumab group and to 1.98±0.71 mmol/L in the placebo group (p&lt;0.001). There was no difference in FMD at 52 weeks in the alirocumab (5.44±2.24%) versus placebo (5.45±2.19%) group (between groups difference FMD, −0.21% (95% CI −077 to 0.35), p=0.47). Compared to baseline, follow-up FMD was improved in both groups (from 4.52±1.87 to 5.44±2.24%, p&lt;0.001 in the alirocumab group and from 4.32±1.62 to 5.45±2.19%, p&lt;0.001 in the placebo group).

Conclusion

Among patients with acute myocardial infarction, the addition of subcutaneous biweekly alirocumab, compared with placebo, to high-intensity statin therapy did not result in additional improvement of endothelial function after 52 weeks of treatment.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Public hospital(s). Main funding source(s): The PACMAN-AMI study was supported by a research grant from Sanofi, Regeneron and Infraredx. This substudy was funded by the University of Bern.

Enoxaparin for primary thromboprophylaxis in symptomatic outpatients with COVID-19 (OVID): a randomised, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre, phase 3 trial

Background

COVID-19 is a viral prothrombotic respiratory infection. Heparins exert antithrombotic and anti-inflammatory effects, and might have antiviral properties. We aimed to investigate whether thromboprophylaxis with enoxaparin would prevent untoward hospitalisation and death in symptomatic, but clinically stable outpatients with COVID-19.

Methods

OVID was a randomised, open-label, parallel-group, investigator-initiated, phase 3 trial and was done at eight centres in Switzerland and Germany. Outpatients aged 50 years or older with acute COVID-19 were eligible if they presented with respiratory symptoms or body temperature higher than 37·5°C. Eligible participants underwent block-stratified randomisation (by age group 50–70 vs >70 years and by study centre) in a 1:1 ratio to receive either subcutaneous enoxaparin 40 mg once daily for 14 days versus standard of care (no thromboprophylaxis). The primary outcome was a composite of any untoward hospitalisation and all-cause death within 30 days of randomisation. Analysis of the efficacy outcomes was done in the intention-to-treat population. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. The study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04400799) and has been completed.

Findings

At the predefined formal interim analysis for efficacy (50% of total study population), the independent Data Safety Monitoring Board recommended early termination of the trial on the basis of predefined statistical criteria having considered the very low probability of showing superiority of thromboprophylaxis with enoxaparin for the primary outcome under the initial study design assumptions. Between Aug 15, 2020, and Jan 14, 2022, from 3319 participants prescreened, 472 were included in the intention-to-treat population and randomly assigned to receive enoxaparin (n=234) or standard of care (n=238). The median age was 57 years (IQR 53–62) and 217 (46%) were women. The 30-day risk of the primary outcome was similar in participants allocated to receive enoxaparin and in controls (8 [3%] of 234 vs 8 [3%] of 238; adjusted relative risk 0·98; 95% CI 0·37–2·56; p=0·96). All hospitalisations were related to COVID-19. No deaths were reported during the study. No major bleeding events were recorded. Eight serious adverse events were recorded in the enoxaparin group versus nine in the control group.

Interpretation

These findings suggest thromboprophylaxis with enoxaparin does not reduce early hospitalisations and deaths among outpatients with symptomatic COVID-19. Futility of the treatment under the initial study design assumptions could not be conclusively assessed owing to under-representation of older patients and consequent low event rates.

Funding

SNSF (National Research Programme COVID-19 NRP78: 198352), University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Dr-Ing Georg Pollert (Berlin), Johanna Dürmüller-Bol Foundation.

Risk and Timing of Noncardiac Surgery After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

IMPORTANCE

Noncardiac surgery after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a clinical challenge with concerns about safety and optimal management.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate perioperative risk of adverse events associated with noncardiac surgery after TAVI by timing of surgery, type of surgery, and TAVI valve performance.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cohort study was conducted using data from a prospective TAVI registry of patients at the tertiary care University Hospital in Bern, Switzerland. All patients undergoing noncardiac surgery after TAVI were identified. Data were analyzed from November through December 2021.

EXPOSURES

Timing, clinical urgency, and risk category of noncardiac surgery were assessed among patients who had undergone TAVI and subsequent noncardiac surgery.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

A composite of death, stroke, myocardial infarction, and major or life-threatening bleeding within 30 days after noncardiac surgery.

RESULTS

Among 2238 patients undergoing TAVI between 2013 and 2020, 300 patients (mean [SD] age, 81.8 [6.6] years; 144 [48.0%] women) underwent elective (160 patients) or urgent (140 patients) noncardiac surgery after TAVI and were included in the analysis. Of these individuals, 63 patients (21.0%) had noncardiac surgery within 30 days of TAVI. Procedures were categorized into low-risk (21 patients), intermediate-risk (190 patients), and high-risk (89 patients) surgery. Composite end points occurred within 30 days of surgery among 58 patients (Kaplan-Meier estimate, 19.7%; 95% CI, 15.6%-24.7%). There were no significant differences in baseline demographics between patients with the 30-day composite end point and 242 patients without this end point, including mean (SD) age (81.3 [7.1] years vs 81.9 [6.5] years; P = .28) and sex (25 [43.1%] women vs 119 [49.2%] women; P = .37). Timing (ie, ≤30 days from TAVI to noncardiac surgery), urgency, and risk category of surgery were not associated with increased risk of the end point. Moderate or severe prosthesis-patient mismatch (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.33; 95% CI, 1.37-3.95; P = .002) and moderate or severe paravalvular regurgitation (aHR, 3.61; 95% CI 1.25-10.41; P = .02) were independently associated with increased risk of the end point.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

These findings suggest that noncardiac surgery may be performed early after successful TAVI. Suboptimal device performance, such as prosthesis-patient mismatch and paravalvular regurgitation, was associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes after noncardiac surgery.

A prospective, multicentre first-in-man study of the polymer-free ultrathin-strut BIOrapid stent (BIOVITESSE)

BACKGROUND

Polymer-free drug-coated stents aim to avoid the inflammatory potential of durable polymers, thereby improving the long-term safety profile, and allowing a shorter duration of dual antiplatelet therapy.

AIMS

The BIOVITESSE study was conducted to assess the safety and clinical performance of the BIOrapid polymer-free coronary stent system coated with a novel highly lipophilic sirolimus derivate.

METHODS

BIOVITESSE was a prospective, multicentre, first-in-man study that enrolled subjects with de novo coronary lesions in two cohorts of 33 patients each. The primary endpoint of the first cohort was strut coverage at one month as assessed by optical coherence tomography. The primary endpoint of the second cohort was late lumen loss at nine-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Patients were on average 63 years old (range: 42-87) and 12% had diabetes. The 66 patients had 70 lesions with an average lesion length of 12.5±5.4 mm. Predilatation was performed in 91.4% and post-dilatation in 87.1% lesions; device success was obtained in 97.4%. At one month, 95.2±5.6% (95% CI: 93.2-97.2) of struts were covered and at nine months, in-stent late lumen loss was 0.31±0.30 mm (95% CI: 0.20-0.42) and in-segment late lumen loss was 0.20±0.29 mm. Two target lesion failures occurred (3.1%): one at day 1 (to cover an asymptomatic stent edge dissection), and one at day 288 post-procedure for restenosis. No stent thrombosis was reported during the 12-month study duration.

CONCLUSIONS

The BIOrapid stent system exhibited an excellent safety profile, high strut coverage at one-month, and moderate angiographic efficacy according to the late lumen loss at nine-month angiographic follow-up.