Does NSCLC patient-rated performance status predict survival more accurately than physician ratings?

9022

Background: The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score is a well known predictor of survival, which impacts on treatment decisions. Patient (pt) rated activity level, using the Patient Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) scale, is identical in criteria to the ECOG scale used by physicians. We compared the patient rated activity level (Pt-PS) to physician rated PS (MD-PS), at baseline, and evaluated survival with respect to the 2 PS ratings. Methods: Pts with newly diagnosed advanced NSCLC (stages 3–4) completed a PG-SGA self rated questionnaire, which was then compared to the physician-generated ECOG score recorded prior to any treatment using a Wilcoxon signed rank test. Pts were treated with standard chemotherapy. Survival analysis was performed using a Kaplan Meier analysis and Cox regression. Results: 92 pts (M: F-48:44) with a mean age of 65 years (39–83) were included. 67 (73%) presented with stage 4 disease. 62 (67%) had an MD-PS of 0–1, whereas only 51 (55%) had a Pt-PS of 0 -1. MD-PS 3–4 was seen in 9 (10%), compared to 28 (30%) by Pt-PS. Pt-PS was significantly different from MD-PS in 48% of scores (p=0.003). When scores were not congruent, 29/44 (66%) pts evaluated themselves as having a worse PS than the physician. Survival analysis demonstrated that stage and functional status irrespective of method of reporting was predictive of survival (p=0.01 for MD-PS and p=0.001 for Pt-PS). However, when comparing median survival by method of performance status evaluation, Pt-PS was associated with superior stratification of survival than MD-PS ( table 1 ). Conclusions: Pt-PS and MD-PS are not congruent almost 50% of the time. Pt-PS allows for better stratification of survival and should be further evaluated in prospective trials.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

[Table: see text]

Quality of life and survival in patients receiving chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

19649

Background: Quality of life (QoL) is an important endpoint measure in clinical cancer trials. We evaluated prospectively the effects of two cycles of chemotherapy (CT) on QoL and the relationship between QoL and survival in advanced NSCLC patients (pts). Methods: The short-form of the SF36 was completed prior to and after 2 cycles of chemotherapy. An ITT analysis was used; a score of 0 was assigned to those who died and the last observation was carried forward for those with missing data. Results: Fifty-nine pts consented to participate and pre-chemo evaluation was available for 58 pts. Of these 58, only 40 pts completed the study (4 died, 14 did not complete the post evaluation). There were 26M: 32F with a median age of 61±11 years. Fifty pts (86%) were stage 3B (pl. eff)/4 and 50pts (86%) were PS 0–1. Overall QoL decreased significantly from 100±19 to 91±36 after two cycles of chemotherapy (p=0.03). This decline was attributed to a significant decrease in the physical health subscale (p=0.001), with 36% of pts reporting a clinically significant decline of =2. No change in the mental health subscale was observed. The symptoms that had the most profound negative impact on the physical health subscale were: ‘easily get sick’ (54%), ‘increased pain’ (30%) and ‘decreased activities’ (27%). SD+PR occurred in 36 (62%) pts, whereas 22 (38%) pts had PD after two cycles of chemotherapy. No correlation was found between response to chemo and change in QoL. The median survival (15±6.8mo), of pts whose QoL score remained stable or improved (n=36) was significantly better than those (n=22) whose QoL decreased (9±3.2 mo) (p=0.01). Conclusions: QoL decreased following chemotherapy due to a decrease in the physical health subscale. Further studies are required to determine if training can improve physical health and thus QoL and survival.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Physiological correlates of cancer-related fatigue in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients

8525

Background: Fatigue is a debilitating consequence of lung cancer and its treatments. The etiology of fatigue is unclear, and our current knowledge does not point to logical interventions. In this study, global fatigue score was assessed using the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI). A symptom questionnaire, as well as muscular and cardiorespiratory function, were assessed as potential contributors to the global fatigue score. Methods: Participants were evaluated by a physical therapist within the McGill Cancer Nutrition and Rehabilitation Program. Performance-based measures of physical function [upper limb strength and endurance (Jamar dynamometry), lower limb strength (30sec chair rise), cardiorespiratory function (2 minute walk -2MW)] and a symptom questionnaire [Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS)] were conducted at one point in time. Results: Eighty patients (43M:37F, mean age 68 ± 12 ) participated in the study. Forty-seven percent were actively receiving treatment at the time of assessment. On the BFI, 56% had moderate or severe fatigue and 88% indicated fatigue had interfered with their functioning during the past 24 hours. Global fatigue scores were unrelated to hand grip strength or endurance measurements but were significantly correlated with chair rise performance (R= -0.31, p<0.05), 2MW (R= -0.31, p<0.05), ESAS rating of pain (R=0.47, p<0.01), overall ESAS rating of breathlessness (R= 0.59, p<0.01), and ESAS rating of strength (R=0.58, p<0.01). Multivariate regression analysis suggested the best model for global fatigue scores incorporates chair rise performance, 2MW performance, ESAS rating of strength and ESAS rating of shortness of breath (adjusted R sq = 0.68, p<0.01). Conclusions: Fatigue is prevalent and impacts on the function of advanced NSCLC patients. Several key factors contribute to this fatigue, with muscular and cardiorespiratory restrictions playing an important role. Such findings may have clinical implications in the recommendations of rest and exercise to best manage fatigue.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Improving prevention systems in primary care practices: the Health Education and Research Trial (HEART)

BACKGROUND

The Health Education and Research Trial (HEART) was a multicenter clinical trial designed to test methods to improve primary care practice systems for heart disease prevention services. We present the trial methodology, the practices' use of medical record tools, and changes in documentation of cardiovascular risk factor screening and management.

METHODS

Primary care practices were recruited from 4 Midwestern states. The factorial design resulted in 4 study groups: conference only, conference and quality improvement consultations, conference and prevention coordinator, and all interventions combined. Medical record audits and physician, staff, and patient surveys assessed practice change in cardiovascular disease risk factor documentation.

RESULTS

Practices participated fully in this project, set goals to improve preventive services, and implemented recommended medical record tools. The number of goals set and the increase in the use of medical record tools were greatest in the combined intervention group, with improvements noted in all groups. The use of patient history questionnaires, problem lists, and flow sheets was significantly higher in the combined intervention group when compared with the conference-only group. Documentation of risk factor screening in a recommended-medical record location improved in all intervention groups, with significant sustained improvements in the practices that received the combined intervention. Documented risk factor management significantly improved in all intervention groups compared with the conference-only control.

CONCLUSION

Primary care practices are interested in improving prevention systems and can change these systems in response to supportive external interventions. Promoting organizational change to produce sustained improvement in preventive service clinical outcomes is a complex process that requires further research.

Tools to improve documentation of smoking status. Continuous quality improvement and electronic medical records

BACKGROUND

Despite the deleterious effects of smoking on the nation's health and evidence that smoking cessation advice by family practice physicians is cost-effective, self-sustaining office systems to identify smokers in primary care clinics have been difficult to establish. We worked on a continuous quality improvement project group, aided by an electronic medical record, to design a system to document and periodically update smoking status in a consistent place in the medical record.

INTERVENTION

Using the continuous quality improvement plan-do-study-act cycle, a 7-member group worked with nursing staff to define roles, routines and responsibilities for medical assistants to screen for and document 1 of 4 categories of smoking status in the major problem list of the electronic medical record for at least 80% of patient appointments. Screening rate was tracked monthly by means of the electronic medical record and feedback was given to staff.

RESULTS

The screening rate rose from 18.4% to 80.3% within 2 weeks after the system was implemented and was maintained for 19 months. An additional benefit was an increased rate of smoking cessation counseling documented by providers, from a baseline rate of 17.1% to 48.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

A continuous quality improvement group process aided by an electronic medical record is useful to develop a self-sustaining office system to screen, document, and periodically update smoking status in a consistent place in the medical record. Although screening for and documenting smoking status are only the first step toward helping patients stop smoking, it is an important one.

Carbon-13 isotope effect studies of Trypanosoma brucei ornithine decarboxylase

Carbon isotope effect studies were undertaken with the wild-type pyridoxal 5'-phosphate (PLP)-dependent enzyme ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) from Trypanosoma brucei and with several active site mutants of the enzyme. For the decarboxylation of the optimal substrate, L-ornithine, by wild-type ODC, the observed carbon isotope effect (k12/k13) is 1.033 at pH 7.3. In comparison to the expected intrinsic isotope effect (k12/k13 = 1.06) for decarboxylation, this value suggests that both the rate of decarboxylation and the rate of Schiff base interchange with L-ornithine are partially rate-limiting for the reaction steps up to decarboxylation. In contrast, with the alternate substrate L-Lys, which shows lower catalytic efficiency, the carbon isotope effect increased to 1.063, demonstrating that decarboxylation has become the rate-limiting step. For the mutant enzymes, E274A ODC and C360A ODC, with L-ornithine as substrate the carbon isotope effect also approaches the intrinsic limit. Glu-274 was previously demonstrated to play a direct role in carbanion stabilization, and thus the large carbon isotope effect (k12/k13 = 1.055) is consistent with an impaired rate of decarboxylation compared to wild-type ODC. In contrast, for K69A ODC, the isotope effect is almost entirely suppressed, suggesting that Schiff-base formation (which now must occur from enzyme-bound PLP, rather than from an enzyme-bound PLP-Schiff base) has become rate-determining.

The delicate balance of law and ethics: a model for health administration educators

The purpose of this paper is to provide a model for educators involved in teaching interrelated ethical, moral and legal dilemmas confronting health care delivery. For purposes of discussion, the AIDS epidemic is used as an example. Similarly complex issues, such as invitro fertilization, transplantation policy, etc. could also be analyzed using this model. A review of federal law, including a number of relevant cases, and their relationship of fundamental ethics issues is provided.

Recent implementations of electronic medical records in four family practice residency programs

Electronic medical records (EMRs) are increasingly replacing paper records, and many residency program directors are interested in incorporating EMR systems into their clinics. The authors describe their experiences implementing EMRs in their family practice residency programs; the four programs are the Eau Claire Family Practice Residency Program, the Galveston Family Practice Residency Program, the Mayo-Scottsdale Residency Program, and the Wyoming Valley Family Practice Residency. The authors provide background information about each program and an overview of the EMR systems; they then describe the implementation processes, addressing training, integration with other software- and paper-based systems, security, costs, and effects on patient volume and staffing levels. Finally, they discuss the general benefits of and barriers to EMR-system implementations, and make recommendations for other programs considering implementing EMRs.