Efficacy of bevacizumab and chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: broadening KRAS-focused clinical view

Background

The aim of the present retrospective study was to analyze clinical outcome and risk factors associated with treatment outcomes according to KRAS status in patient with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with bevacizumab (bev) plus chemotherapy in the first-line setting.

Methods

We performed observational study on 1622 patients with mCRC treated with bev plus oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-based chemotherapy, and correlated treatment outcomes with KRAS mutation status. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and additionally overall survival (OS). Adverse events of bevacizumab and risk factors including location of metastases were evaluated.

Results

Mutation in KRAS was present in 40.6% of mCRC cases. The median PFS in patients with wild-type KRAS (wtKRAS) vs mutant KRAS was 11.5 vs 11.4 months, respectively. The median OS was 30.7 vs 28.4 months (p = 0.312). Patients with KRAS mutation had lung metastases more frequently than wtKRAS individuals (32.0% vs 23.8%; p = 0.001). We observed no difference in clinical outcome between hepatic and extrahepatic metastatic disease.

Conclusion

KRAS mutation does not interfere with clinical benefit from first-line treatment with bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in mCRC patients.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12876-015-0266-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Long term experience of patients with unresectable or metastatic KIT positive gastrointestinal stromal tumours

A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients (183 in total, of which 105 were males and 78 females) with gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) was performed. The mean age was 61 years, median age 64 years. The most frequent localization of the tumour was stomach in 74 patients (40.4 %) and the small intestine in 46 patients (25.1 %). Two or more different synchronous or metachronous cancers occurred in 34 (18.6 %) patients with histologically confirmed GIST. Ninety-six patients were treated with imatinib mesylate in palliative setting during the course of their disease. The therapy was finished in 60 patients and 36 patients have been treated so far. The median progression-free survival reached 32.9 months in the group of 96 patients treated with imatinib. The median overall survival in the group of 96 patients treated for metastatic disease reached 77 months. Two-year and 5-year survival was 85.2 % and 63.1 %, respectively. The second-line therapy with sunitinib malate was administered in 37 patients, of which 31 finished and 6 continued in the therapy. The median progression free survival and median survival since the sunitinib therapy initiation reached 8.4 and 22.1 months, respectively (Tab. 2, Fig. 2, Ref. 16).

Radiotherapy with rituximab may be better than radiotherapy alone in first-line treatment of early-stage follicular lymphoma: is it time to change the standard strategy?

Early-stage follicular lymphoma (FL) has traditionally been treated with involved-field radiotherapy (RT). Rituximab (R) is a low-toxic, efficient systemic therapy for FL, but there are no data about its clinical impact in early FL. We retrospectively analyzed 93 patients with stage I-II indolent FL treated with RT (n=65) or RT+R (n=14) or R alone (n=14). Median follow-up was 5.0 years for patients with RT, 2.8 years for the RT+R subgroup and 2.5 years for patients treated with R. The complete response rate was 92%, 100% and 86% (not significant) and the median PFS was 3.3 years, not reached and 4.9 years (p=0.035) for the RT, RT+R and R arms, with no impact on overall survival. R combined with RT seems to give better results in terms of global FL control, but longer follow-up and prospective comparison are needed to verify these results.

The role of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and thymidine kinase (TK) levels in prediction of efficacy ofEGFR-TKIs in patients with advanced-stage NSCLC [corrected]

BACKGROUND/AIM

Tumor biomarkers are used for diagnostics and follow-up monitoring of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We focused on the predictive role of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and thymidine [corrected] kinase (TK) in patients with advanced-stage NSCLC treated with epidermal growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a total of 163 patients with advanced-stage (IIIB or IV) NSCLC treated with EGFR-TKIs (erlotinib or gefitinib), pre-treatment levels of NSE and TK were measured.

RESULTS

We observed significantly shorter progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with high NSE levels (p=0.002; p=0.003) and also in those with high TK levels (p=0.026; p=0.020). The multivariate Cox proportional hazards model confirmed that high NSE is a strong independent predictive factor for short PFS (hazard ratio; HR=2.36; p=0.003).

CONCLUSION

High pre-treatment serum levels of NSE is an independent biomarker predicting poor outcome of patients with NSCLC treated with EGFR-TKIs.

Predictive role of CEA and CYFRA 21-1 in patients with advanced-stage NSCLC treated with erlotinib

BACKGROUND

Tumor biomarkers are used for predicting therapy effect and prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We focused on their potential role in prediction of the efficacy of erlotinib.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a total of 144 patients with advanced-stage (IIIB or IV) NSCLC treated with erlotinib, pre-treatment levels of soluble carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytokeratin markers in serum were measured.

RESULTS

The median progression-free and overall survival for patients with a high level of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) was 1.9 and 8.6 vs. 2.9 and 16.1 months for patients with low CEA (p=0.046 and p=0.116). The respective medians for patients with a high level of cytokeratin-19 fragment were 1.9 and 6.1 vs. 3.4 and 23.8 months for patients with the low cytokeratin-19 fragment (p<0.001 and p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

High pre-treatment serum levels of one or both biomarkers are associated with poor outcome of patients with NSCLC treated with erlotinib.

Bevacizumab with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin versus bevacizumab with capecitabine and oxaliplatin for metastatic colorectal carcinoma: results of a large registry-based cohort analysis

Background

Data from the Czech national registry were analysed retrospectively to describe treatment outcomes for capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX) regimen with bevacizumab versus 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) regimen with bevacizumab in the first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

Methods

A national registry containing anonymised individual data on patients treated with targeted therapies was used as a data source. In total, 2,191 mCRC patients who received a first-line therapy with bevacizumab combined with either FOLFOX regimen (n = 1,218, 55.6%) or XELOX regimen (n = 973, 44.4%) were included in the present analysis.

Results

No statistically significant difference in survival was observed between the two groups, with median overall survival (OS) of 27.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 24.6-29.5 months) and 30.6 months (95% CI 27.8-33.4 months) for FOLFOX/bevacizumab and XELOX/bevacizumab, respectively (p = 0.281). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11.4 months (95% CI 10.7-12.1 months) for FOLFOX/bevacizumab and 11.5 months (95% CI 10.8-12.3 months) for XELOX/bevacizumab (p = 0.337). The number of metastatic sites was identified as the most significant predictor of PFS and, together with the presence/absence of metastatic disease at diagnosis, also for OS.

Conclusions

According to this large registry-based analysis, XELOX and FOLFOX regimens have similar effectiveness for use in combination with bevacizumab in the first-line treatment of mCRC. Multiple metastatic sites and the presence of metastatic disease at diagnosis were the strongest negative predictors of OS regardless of backbone chemotherapy regimen.

Efficacy and toxicity of bevacizumab on combination with chemotherapy in different lines of treatment for metastatic colorectal carcinoma

The aim of the present study was to describe treatment outcomes for bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy based on data from the Czech registry of targeted therapies for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In total, 4,487 patients with mCRC who received bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy in first line (n=3,990, 88.9%), second line (n=386, 8.6%), or third/higher line (n=111, 2.5%) had evaluable data and were included in the present retrospective analysis.

RESULTS

The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11.3 months (95% conficence interval [CI]=11.0-11.7 months), 9.5 months (95% CI=8.2-10.9 months), and 7.3 months (95% CI=5.9-8.7 months; p<0.001), and the median overall survival from the start of bevacizumab-containing therapy was 28.4 months (95% CI=27.1-29.8 months), 25.9 months (95% CI=19.4-32.4 months), and 15.0 months (95% CI=10.7-19.3 months; p<0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The data describe efficacy of bevacizumab with chemotherapy for different treatment lines in a large patient cohort.

Clinical and laboratory prognostic factors in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib and sorafenib after progression on cytokines

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze prognostic factors in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) sunitinib or sorafenib after progression on cytokine therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A national database of patients treated with targeted agents was used as the data source. A total of 319 patients treated with sunitinib (n = 181) or sorafenib (n = 138) after progression on cytokine therapy were analyzed.

RESULTS

Prognostic factors significantly associated with poor overall survival in a multivariable Cox model included the time from diagnosis to the start of treatment with TKIs<1 year, increased neutrophil counts, increased lactate dehydrogenase, and Eastern Oncology Cooperative Group performance status 2 or higher. The parameters showing statistically significant association with progression-free survival included time from diagnosis to the beginning of treatment with TKI<1 year, increased lactate dehydrogenase, and Eastern Oncology Cooperative Group performance status 2 or higher. We have also validated the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium prognostic model in our cohort of patients.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrate that the International Database Consortium prognostic model performs well for European patients treated with TKIs, including sunitinib or sorafenib, after progression on cytokines and suggest that a reduction from original 6 down to 4 parameters is possible.

Tobacco treatment outcomes in patients with and without a history of depression, Czech Republic, 2005-2010

Introduction

Higher prevalence of smoking among depressed patients, as well as the risk of depression in smokers, is well documented. The proportion of patients with a history of depression among those seeking intensive treatment of tobacco dependence is also high. In contrast, evidence of treatment success in this subgroup of patients is controversial. The aim of this study was to compare smoking abstinence rates after tobacco treatment in smokers with and without a history of depression.

Methods

We reviewed retrospective data from 1,730 smokers seeking treatment in Prague, Czech Republic. History of depression was defined as past diagnosis of depression or current treatment of depression. After a 1-year, self-reported smoking status was validated by expired-air carbon monoxide. We used logistic regression to analyze associations between abstinence rates, history of depression, and other factors (eg, age, sex, tobacco dependence).

Results

Of 1,730 smokers treated, 289 (16.7%) had a history of depression. The smoking abstinence rate at 1 year was 32.5% for smokers with a history of depression and 38.7% for those with no history (P = .048). Among women, abstinence did not differ between groups (35.0% vs 35.7%; P = .86). However, among men, those with a history of depression had lower rates of abstinence (27.4% vs 41.3%; P = .009). After adjustment for baseline covariates, history of depression was not significantly associated with smoking abstinence in men or women.

Conclusion

Intensive outpatient tobacco treatment programs can achieve abstinence rates among smokers with a history of depression similar to rates among the general population.

Sequential treatment of advanced-stage lung adenocarcinoma harboring wild-type EGFR gene: second-line pemetrexed followed by third-line erlotinib versus the reverse sequence

BACKGROUND

Pemetrexed and erlotinib represent novel agents for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The role of sequential treatment in NSCLC has not been elucidated yet. We compared the efficacy of second-line pemetrexed followed by third-line erlotinib (P-E) to treatment with the reverse sequence (E-P).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed data of 57 patients with advanced-stage (IIIB/IV) lung adenocarcinoma harboring wild-type epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene; 31 patients were treated with P-E and 26 patients with the E-P sequence.

RESULTS

The median progression-free survival (PFS) for patients treated with P-E was 3.6 months vs. 7.8 months for patients treated with E-P (p=0.029). The median overall survival (OS) for patients treated with P-E was 7.9 months vs. 26.3 months for patients treated with E-P (p=0.006).

CONCLUSION

The results proved a significant improvement of both PFS and OS for patients treated with the E-P sequence as compared to the P-E sequence.

Comparison of EGFR-TKI and chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of advanced EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC

Molecular targeted therapy based on EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI) is currently astate of the art option for management of advanced stage NSCLC. Activating EGFR mutations are preferable for a good treatment response to EGFR-TKI. The presented retrospective study evaluated a clinical observation of EGFR-TKI aiming at its efficacy and safety in comparison to a standard chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of advanced stage NSCLC. Total number of patients with advanced stage (IIIB, IV) EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC was 54 of which 23 were treated with EGFR-TKI and 31 patients with various chemotherapy regimens in the first line. The treatment efficacy was characterized in terms of disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The comparison of DCR was performed using Fisher's exact test and the differences in survival were tested using log-rank test. DCR for EGFR-TKI treatment was 95.6% vs. 70.9% for chemotherapy (p=0.032). Median of PFS in patients treated with EGFR-TKI was 7.2 months vs. 2.5 months in patients treated with chemotherapy (p<0.001). Median of OS was 14.5 months vs. 21.4 months (p=0.729). EGFR-TKI was associated with higher incidence of skin rash and diarrhoea; chemotherapy was associated with higher incidence of haematologic adverse events and nausea or vomiting. The analysis results showed a favourable DCR and PFS in patients treated with EGFR-TKI in the first line. The non-significant difference in OS could be attributed to a cross-over during the patient follow-up as well as the differences in performance status and age between both groups. EGFR-TKI is the optimal choice for the first-line treatment of EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC.

Skin rash as useful marker of erlotinib efficacy in NSCLC and its impact on clinical practice

Erlotinib is an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor used in treatment of advanced NSCLC. Patients harboring EGFR or KRAS mutations represent minority of all patients in caucasian population and there is no available predictor for a predominant group of patients harboring the wild-type EGFR and wild-type KRAS genes. Skin rash is the most frequent manifestation of cutaneous toxicity of erlotinib. Rash is associated with a good therapeutic response. We aimed at the evaluation of rash as a predictor of therapeutic effect of erlotinib in patients harboring the wild-type EGFR and KRAS wild-type genes and to assess its possible usage in a clinical practice.Totally 184 patients with advanced stage NSCLC (IIIB, IV) harboring the wild-type EGFR and wild-type KRAS genes were analysed. Comparison of ORR, PFS and OS according to the occurrence of rash was performed. In order to assess the impact of rash in clinical practice it was conducted landmark analysis of the group of patients whose rash was observed during first month of treatment (n=124). Patients in whom progression was observed during the first month of treatment were excluded from the landmark analysis. The comparison of ORR was performed using Fisher's exact test, visualization of survival was performed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and the differences in survival were tested using the log-rank test. Median PFS in patients who were observed with rash during the treatment was 3.0 vs. 1.2 months in patients with no rash (p<0.001), median of OS in patients who were observed with rash during the treatment was 13.9 vs. 5.8 months in patients with no rash (p<0.001). ORR in patients who were observed with rash during the treatment was 17.4% vs. 3.3% in patients with no rash (p=0.001). Median of PFS after 1 month of treatment in patients who were observed with rash during the first month was 2.9 vs. 1.1 months in patients with no rash (p=0.027). Median of OS after 1 month of treatment in patients who were observed with rash during the first month was 13.8 vs. 9.9 months in patients with no rash (p=0.082). Rash is strongly associated with better survival and ORR in patients harboring wild-type EGFR and wild-type KRAS genes. Occurrence of rash during the first month of treatment is a useful predictor of better effect of erlotinib after one month of treatment. Patients who were not observed with rash during the first month of treatment are in high risk of progression. Optimization of the treatment of these patients can contribute restaging after two months of treatment, assessment of plasma levels of erlotinib and eventually attempt to dose escalation.

Skin rash as useful marker of erlotinib efficacy in NSCLC and its impact on clinical practice

Erlotinib is an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor used in treatment of advanced NSCLC. Patients harboring EGFR or KRAS mutations represent minority of all patients in caucasian population and there is no available predictor for a predominant group of patients harboring the wild-type EGFR and wild-type KRAS genes. Skin rash is the most frequent manifestation of cutaneous toxicity of erlotinib. Rash is associated with a good therapeutic response. We aimed at the evaluation of rash as a predictor of therapeutic effect of erlotinib in patients harboring the wild-type EGFR and KRAS wild-type genes and to assess its possible usage in a clinical practice.Totally 184 patients with advanced stage NSCLC (IIIB, IV) harboring the wild-type EGFR and wild-type KRAS genes were analysed. Comparison of ORR, PFS and OS according to the occurrence of rash was performed. In order to assess the impact of rash in clinical practice it was conducted landmark analysis of the group of patients whose rash was observed during first month of treatment (n=124). Patients in whom progression was observed during the first month of treatment were excluded from the landmark analysis. The comparison of ORR was performed using Fisher's exact test, visualization of survival was performed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and the differences in survival were tested using the log-rank test. Median PFS in patients who were observed with rash during the treatment was 3.0 vs. 1.2 months in patients with no rash (p<0.001), median of OS in patients who were observed with rash during the treatment was 13.9 vs. 5.8 months in patients with no rash (p<0.001). ORR in patients who were observed with rash during the treatment was 17.4% vs. 3.3% in patients with no rash (p=0.001). Median of PFS after 1 month of treatment in patients who were observed with rash during the first month was 2.9 vs. 1.1 months in patients with no rash (p=0.027). Median of OS after 1 month of treatment in patients who were observed with rash during the first month was 13.8 vs. 9.9 months in patients with no rash (p=0.082). Rash is strongly associated with better survival and ORR in patients harboring wild-type EGFR and wild-type KRAS genes. Occurrence of rash during the first month of treatment is a useful predictor of better effect of erlotinib after one month of treatment. Patients who were not observed with rash during the first month of treatment are in high risk of progression. Optimization of the treatment of these patients can contribute restaging after two months of treatment, assessment of plasma levels of erlotinib and eventually attempt to dose escalation.

Comparison of efficacy and toxicity of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy in the first, second, and third or higher line of treatment for metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC): Data from the Czech multi-institutional registry

e14622

Background: Data from the Czech national registry of patients treated with targeted therapies for mCRC were analyzed retrospectively to compare treatment outcomes for bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy in the 1st, 2nd and 3rd line of treatment. Methods: The database was launched in 2005 as a clinical registry of patients with mCRC treated with bevacizumab. Epidemiological and clinical data are entered by all Czech comprehensive cancer centers administering targeted therapy. In total, 4487 mCRC patients who received bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy in either 1st line (n=3990, 88.9%), 2nd line (n=386, 8.6%), or 3rd and higher line (n=111, 2.5%) had evaluable data and were included in the present analysis. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the differences were assessed using the log-rank test. Results: Statistically significant differences were observed in the efficacy of combination chemotherapy with bevacizumab between the treatment lines. The objective response rate (ORR) in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd/higher line was 42.9%, 34.0% and 8.3%; (p<0.001) respectively. Similarly, in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd/higher line median progression free survival (mPFS) was 11.3 months (95% CI 11.0-11.7 months), 9.5 months (95% CI 8.2-10.9 months) , and 7.3 months (95% CI 5.9-8.7 months; p<0.001), and median overall survival (mOS) was 28.4 months (95% CI 27.1-29.8 months), 25.9 months (95% CI 19.4-32.4 months), and 15.0 months (95% CI 10.7-19.3 months; p<0.001), respectively. The spectrum of the most common adverse events was comparable in the 1st, 2nd, or 3rd/higher line, and incidence of adverse events was similar at 11.6%, 8.8% and 8.1%, respectively. Conclusions: The efficacy of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy decreased when administered in later lines of treatment for mCRC while the incidence and spectrum of toxicities remains unchanged.

Three lines of targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): A viable strategy?

e15581

Background: Sequential therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and the mTOR inhibitor everolimus has been proposed for mRCC. The aim of the present retrospective analysis was to compare the efficacy of everolimus used after one versus two prior TKIs and to assess the progress of a defined cohort of patients (pts) through sequential lines of therapy. Methods: In the national database of mRCC pts treated with targeted agents 368 pts received everolimus as the 2nd (N=269) or 3rd (N=99) targeted agents following TKIs sunitinib or sorafenib. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the differences were assessed using the Log-rank test. Furthermore, the treatment course was evaluated in 331 mRCC pts starting 1st line therapy with sunitinib or sorafenib in 2010. The data cut-off date was October 8, 2012. Results: Progression-free survival (PFS) for everolimus in the 2nd versus the 3rd line of targeted therapy was 6.5 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 5.3-7.7 months) versus 6.1 months (95% CI 4.0-8.3 months), respectively (P=0.159). The incidence and profile of adverse events were similar in both lines. PFS from the start of the first targeted agent to progression on the third targeted agent was similar for pts receiving three lines of therapy using the TKI-TKI-mTOR (N=99) and TKI-mTOR-TKI (N=17) sequence: 28.5 months (95% CI 25.2-31.7 months) versus 27.2 months (95% CI 24.0-30.4 months), respectively (P=0.281). The median follow-up for the initial cohort of 331 pts treated with sunitinib or sorafenib was 20.1 months. 152 pts (46%) subsequently received a 2nd line therapy, and 82 pts (25%) died before reaching the 2nd line. Of the 152 pts receiving the 2nd line therapy, only 38 pts (11%) went on to the 3rd line, and 46 pts (14%) died before reaching the 3rd line of therapy. The remaining pts still continued on 1st line (N=50; 15%) or 2nd line therapy (N=34; 10%), were lost to follow-up (N=30; 9%), or were alive but not receiving antineoplastic treatment (N=51; 15%). Conclusions: Everolimus has similar efficacy and toxicity whether used in the 2nd or the 3rd line of targeted therapy for mRCC. A minority of mRCC pts starting the 1st line targeted treatment can be expected to reach the 3rd line therapy.

Gene mutations in squamous cell NSCLC: insignificance of EGFR, KRAS and PIK3CA mutations in prediction of EGFR-TKI treatment efficacy

BACKGROUND

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene (KRAS) and phosphatidylinositide-3-kinase catalytic subunit-alpha (PIK3CA) mutations are biomarkers used for the prediction of efficacy of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In total, 223 patients with advanced-stage squamous cell NSCLC were tested; 179 patients were treated with EGFR-TKIs. Genetic testing was performed using a combination of denaturing capillary electrophoresis and direct Sanger sequencing.

RESULTS

EGFR mutations were detected in 7.2%; KRAS mutations in 7.4% and PIK3CA mutations in 3.8% of patients. No correlation of EGFR or PIK3CA mutation status with progression-free survival (PFS) (p=0.425; p=0.197), nor overall survival (OS) (p=0.673; p=0.687), was observed. KRAS mutations correlated with shorter OS (p=0.039), but not with PFS (p=0.120).

CONCLUSION

We did not observe any role of EGFR, KRAS, PIK3CA mutations in prediction of EGFR-TKIs efficacy in patients with advanced-stage squamous cell NSCLC.

Second line treatment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): comparison of efficacy of erlotinib and chemotherapy

Molecular targeted therapy based on tyrosine kinase inhibitors, directed at the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is one of novel options for management of NSCLC. Erlotinib is EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor used for treatment of the advanced NSCLC. This presented study is focused on comparison of erlotinib and chemotherapy efficacy in the second line treatment of the advanced NSCLC. DCR and PFS became the primary endpoints.Total number of patients was 290. A group treated with chemotherapy in the second line consisted of 150 patients and a group treated with erlotinib in the second line consisted of 140 patients. Comparison of DCR was performed using Fisher's exact test, visualization of PFS was performed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and differences were tested using the log-rank test. Genetic testing was performed using PCR direct sequencing. In the group treated with chemotherapy 2 CR, 23 PR and 51 SD were achieved vs. 5 CR, 10 PR and 55 SD in the group treated with erlotinib in the second line. DCR in patients treated with chemotherapy was 54.0% vs. 51.3% in patients without EGFR mutation treated with erlotinib (p=0.707); in patients harboring EGFR mutation, treated with erlotinib (n=9) outstanding results were achieved: 4 CR, 2 PR and 3 SD (not tested). Median of PFS in patients treated with chemotherapy was 2.1 months vs. 1.9 months in patients without EGFR mutation (p=0.879) vs. 8.4 months in patients harboring EGFR mutation treated with erlotinib (p=0.017). Results of analysis show that even patients without EGFR mutation are able to benefit from erlotinib treatment in the second line. The efficacy (DCR, PFS) of erlotinib in patients without EGFR mutation was comparable with chemotherapy. The treatment efficacy in a subgroup of patients harbouring EGFR mutation treated with erlotinib was significantly better than in patients without EGFR mutation.

Skin toxicity and efficacy of sunitinib and sorafenib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a national registry-based study

BACKGROUND

A retrospective, registry-based analysis to assess the outcomes of metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) patients treated with sunitinib and sorafenib who developed dermatologic adverse events was performed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data on mRCC patients treated with sunitinib or sorafenib were obtained from the Czech Clinical Registry of Renal Cell Cancer Patients. Outcomes of patients who developed hand-foot syndrome (HFS) of any grade and/or grade 3/4 rash during the treatment were compared with patients without HFS and no, mild, or moderate rash.

RESULTS

The cohort included 705 patients treated with sunitinib and 365 patients treated with sorafenib. For sunitinib, the median overall survival (OS) was 43.0 months versus 31.0 months (P = 0.027) and median progression-free survival (PFS) 20.8 months versus 11.1 months (P = 0.007) for patients with versus without dermatologic toxicity, respectively. For sorafenib, the median OS and PFS were 27.9 and 24.6 months (P = 0.244), and 12.2 and 8.8 months (P = 0.050), respectively. In multivariable Cox regression, the skin toxicity was significantly associated with longer OS in the sunitinib cohort.

CONCLUSION

The presence of skin toxicity is associated with improved OS and PFS in patients with mRCC treated with sunitinib.

Objective response and time to progression on sequential treatment with sunitinib and sorafenib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) are often treated sequentially with targeted agents, although the optimal strategy is not known. A retrospective, registry-based study has been carried out to assess correlation between clinical response and progression-free survival in patients with mRCC treated sequentially with tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) sunitinib and sorafenib. Data on 218 mRCC patients treated with sunitinib and sorafenib who completed therapy with both TKIs were obtained from a database of mRCC patients. Standard nonparametric methods were used to assess correlation between response, PFS and length of treatment on the two agents. A strong correlation between responses to first- versus second TKI was observed (p < 0.001). No significant association was noted between the duration of therapy with the two TKIs (p = 0.056), although there was a weak statistically significant correlation between progression-free survival times in the subgroup patients who discontinued treatment because of disease progression. In conclusion, the duration of response on first TKI is of limited value in selecting mRCC patients for sequential TKI therapy. There is a strong correlation between the types of tumour response on the first- versus the second TKI.