Simultaneous Total Ankle Replacement and Contralateral Ankle Arthrodesis for Bilateral Ankle Osteoarthritis: A Retrospective Study Focused on Clinical Outcomes and Cost-effectiveness

Objective

Total ankle replacement (TAR) and ankle arthrodesis (AA) are two common surgical treatment options for end‐stage ankle osteoarthritis. However, few reports compare the outcomes of simultaneous TAR and contralateral AA for bilateral ankle osteoarthritis. The aim of this study was to assess changes in pain, joint range of movement (ROM), functional outcomes, patient satisfaction, and cost‐effectiveness following simultaneous TAR and contralateral AA.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted on 12 patients with bilateral end‐stage ankle osteoarthritis who underwent simultaneous TAR and contralateral AA in our institution between May 2016 and August 2018, and who had a minimum of two‐year follow‐up data. Clinical and radiological follow‐up data for all patients were collected after 4 months, 1 year and 2 years. The results were assessed clinically on a visual analogue scale (VAS) and included ROM, American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle hindfoot score, and satisfaction questionnaire. The total hospital costs of patients were also recorded. Independent sample t tests were conducted to compare continuous variables between groups. Paired sample t‐tests were conducted to compare changes from the preoperative to postoperative evaluations within each group.

Results

Both surgical groups presented with pain reduction (P < 0.001) at the one‐year postoperative session, which was generally consistent until the two‐year follow‐up. There was a significant increase (P < 0.001) in the mean AOFAS score postoperatively in both ankles. The functional outcomes at the one‐ and two‐year follow‐up were significantly better in patients in the TAR group than in those in the AA group (P < 0.001). Joint ROM differences were observed between the two groups after surgery (decreased ankle ROM in arthrodesis, P < 0.001; increased ankle ROM in arthroplasty, P < 0.001). The mean satisfaction score was 2 (range, 1–4) for the TAR group and 3 (range, 1–5) for the AA group. A significant difference in the satisfaction score was observed between the two groups (P = 0.036). Simultaneous TAR and contralateral AA was 34.1% less expensive than simultaneous bilateral TAR. No intraoperative complications were noted in either group. Wound healing occurred without problems within 2 weeks after surgery. No symptomatic deep venous thrombosis was found during follow‐up.

Conclusion

TAR had better patient‐perceived post‐operative function and preserves more anatomic sagittal plane motion compared to ankles undergoing AA. In addition, simultaneous TAR and contralateral AA are more cost‐effective than simultaneous bilateral TAR, with lower costs for the average patient.

Ilizarov Ankle Arthrodesis: A Simple Salvage Solution for Failed and Neglected Ankle Fractures

BACKGROUND

Infection around the ankle joint after fracture fixation, or septic arthritis with active discharging sinuses is often challenging to manage with conventional procedures of arthrodesis. The Ilizarov method of arthrodesis gives a better alternative for salvage in such cases.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study including 20 patients who were subjected to tibiotalar arthrodesis with Ilizarov method. The major pathologies included internal fixation of ankle fractures complicated by infection, posttraumatic infected ankle arthritis, and osteomyelitis. The patients were evaluated on the basis of Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov (ASAMI) criteria. The aim of the surgery was to achieve plantigrade, stable, and painless foot with no signs of infection.

RESULTS

A total of 20 patients were operated and reviewed at our institute. The study comprised of 15 male and 5 female patients with a mean age of 43.9 years (range 33-55 years). Out of 20 patients, 4 patients had complications of pin-tract infection and one had wire breakage of the forefoot ring. According to the ASAMI criteria, 17 patients had excellent bone scores and 18 patients had good functional scores. Union was achieved in all patients with resolution of infection and the mean limb length discrepancy was 1.92 cm (range 1-2.5 cm).

CONCLUSIONS

The Ilizarov fixator for ankle arthrodesis provides an excellent way for strong bone fusion, infection eradication, early weight-bearing, and the added benefits of compression at the arthrodesis site post-operatively.

Comparing the Results of Total Ankle Arthroplasty Vs Tibiotalar Fusion (Ankle Arthrodesis) in Patients with Ankle Osteoarthritis since 2006 to 2020- A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

This study compares the outcomes of patients undergoing total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) and tibiotalar fusion (ankle arthrodesis) in patients with end-stage osteoarthritis. The primary outcome assessed was Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS); secondary outcomes included the incidence of revision, re-operation, and complications.

METHODS

A systematic review of studies examining the outcomes of patients undergoing TAA and/or tibiotalar fusion from 2006 to 2020 was conducted. Individual cohort studies and randomized control trials were included. Outcomes were assessed at two and five years.

RESULTS

21 studies were included: 16 arthroplasty (2,016 patients) and 5 arthrodesis (256 patients) studies. No significant difference in PROMS was evident two years post-surgery - American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores were 78.8 (95% CI-confidence interval: 76.6-80.8; n=1548) and 80.8 (95% CI: 80.1-81.5; n=206 patients) for the arthroplasty and arthrodesis groups respectively. Two years post-surgery the revision rates for the arthroplasty and arthrodesis groups were similar - 3.5% (n=9) and 3.7% (n=61) respectively (OR-odds ratio: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.51-2.13); however, the re-operation rate was 2.5 times higher for the arthroplasty group (12.2%) in comparison to the arthrodesis group (5.1%) (OR: 2.57; 95% CI: 1.43-4.62). Documented complications in the arthroplasty group were half those documented in the arthrodesis group two years post-surgery (OR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.37-0.77). No arthrodesis studies were found which contained mean 5-year follow-up data within the study period.

CONCLUSION

Despite recent developments in TAA design, we found no clear evidence as to their superiority over ankle arthrodesis when considering patient outcomes two years postoperatively. However, this conclusion could be debatable in some types of patients such as diabetic patients, posttraumatic patients and patients with stiff hindfoot and midfoot.

Ankle and Tibiotalocalcaneal Fusion

Arthrodesis of the ankle and/or tibiotalocalcaneal joints is a reliable treatment of arthritic conditions of the ankle and hindfoot. It may be complicated by infection, nonunion, malunion, fracture, wound complications, nerve injury, and adjacent joint degeneration. These complications may be addressed with a variety of techniques but should be done so carefully so as not to lead to more complex problems. A thorough work-up and discussion should take place prior to any surgical intervention and treatment. Several cases are presented to illustrate revision arthrodesis techniques and the management of these complications.

Patient and Surgical Factors Affecting Fusion Rates After Arthroscopic and Open Ankle Fusion: A Review of a High-Risk Cohort

ABSTRACT

We present a case series with the objective of identifying risk factors for nonunion after open and arthroscopic primary ankle arthrodesis. Eighty-seven patients who underwent primary ankle arthrodesis and met inclusion criteria were divided into open (N = 46) and arthroscopic (N = 41) groups. Patient and operative characteristics were retrospectively analyzed as possible risk factors for nonunion within each technique. The nonunion rate was 11% in the open and 12% in the arthroscopic group. Obesity, smoking, and ASA class 3 were highly prevalent in both groups. In the arthroscopic group, a remote history of infection and the use of headed screws had notably higher risk of nonunion, though not statistically significant. In the open group, use of bone graft trended toward lower risk of nonunion, though also not statistically significant. The results of this study demonstrated, nonunion rates are comparable between open and arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis in high-risk patients. For patients with a remote history of infection, open ankle arthrodesis may be preferable, and bone graft importance may vary with open versus arthroscopic technique.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Effectiveness of Ilizarov Ankle Arthrodesis in the Treatment of End-Stage Varus Ankle Osteoarthritis: A Retrospective Study

Objective

To evaluate the outcomes of Ilizarov ankle arthrodesis in the treatment of end‐stage varus ankle osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods

This was a retrospective study of 63 patients with varus ankle OA who underwent Ilizarov ankle arthrodesis between June 2013 and December 2018. There were 24 males and 39 females with an average age of 56.57 ± 4.45 years (range, 47–64 years). Thirty‐six cases were affected on the left side, and 27 were affected on the right side. The patients' mean body mass index (BMI) was 25.18 ± 2.93 kg/m². According to the modified Takakura staging criteria, there were 18 cases of stage 3b (28.57%) and 45 cases of stage 4 (71.43%). Nine patients were primary (14.29%), 48 were traumatic (76.19%), and six were caused by rheumatoid OA (9.52%). Functional assessments were performed according to the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle‐hindfoot score, Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS), and visual analogue scale (VAS). The tibial anterior surface angle (TAS), coronal plane tibial‐talar angle (CPT), talar tilt angle (TT), deformity angle (DA), and tibial lateral surface angle (TLS) were assessed on X‐ray films.

Results

The average operation time was 147.84 ± 13.67 min (range, 135–168 min). The average follow‐up time was 34.24 ± 8.72 months (range, 24–61 months). Bony fusion was achieved in all ankles, and the fusion time was 12.43 ± 1.99 weeks on average. The average AOFAS score at the final follow‐up increased from 42.14 ± 8.66 to 80.90 ± 6.80. The average VAS score and AOS pain and disability scores at the final follow‐up decreased from 7.29 ± 1.27 to 2.24 ± 0.94, from 67.94 ± 7.68 to 27.92 ± 5.82, and from 71.64 ± 9.37 to 41.32 ± 8.99, respectively. The average TAS, CPT, and TLS at the final follow‐up increased from 77.76° ± 4.44° to 89.81° ± 1.25°, from 69.04° ± 3.73° to 90.43° ± 1.80°, and from 82.14° ± 3.77° to 88.67° ± 2.50°, respectively. The average TT and DA at the final follow‐up decreased from 8.76° ± 4.30° to 2.05° ± 1.28° and from 20.95° ± 3.73° to 1.57° ± 0.93°, respectively. Three patients developed superficial pin tract infections, all settled with local dressing and antibiotic treatment. Two patients were found to have subtalar arthritis and underwent conservative treatment.

Conclusion

Ankle arthrodesis using the Ilizarov technique is efficient in treating end‐stage varus ankle OA.

Accuracy and quality of the British Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (BOFAS) Registry - Ankle Arthrodesis Pathway

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the completeness, accuracy, quality and clinical outcomes of the British Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (BOFAS) registry - Ankle Arthrodesis pathway.

METHODS

An observational study using retrospective data derived from the BOFAS registry. Adults aged ≥18 years with a record of undergoing ankle arthrodesis in the UK from 2014 to 31/10/2019 were included. Accuracy of data capture and completeness were explored using means, SD, medians and IQR for continuous variables and frequencies for categorical variables. The pre and post treatment pathway was evaluated by analysing Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) including MOXF-FQ scores for pain/walking/standing/social interaction; NRS pain; EQ-5D-5L; and EQ-5D-5L-Health VAS at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months.

RESULTS

Mean age of the study population (n = 186) was 62.3 (±12.9) years and 65% of the study cohort were male. Completeness of data collection was disappointing but variables such as BMI (62.4%) smoking status (82.3%) were reasonably well recorded. PROMs scores were well recorded at baseline but rapidly declined at 6 and 12-months intervals. Reductions in MOXFQ and NRS pain scores by 12 months following surgery were statistically significant (p = 0.001 and p = 0.008), illustrating that most patients demonstrated reductions in pain intensity, improved walking/standing ability, and social interaction.

CONCLUSION

These findings illustrate the potential effectiveness of surgery on all outcomes following ankle arthrodesis that merits evaluation in a clinical trial; but also demonstrated the difficulties in obtaining representative data sets. The analyses strongly suggest that with the improvements in data quality greater resources would bring, the BOFAS registry would become a valuable tool.

Arthroscopic Ankle Arthrodesis

End-stage ankle arthritis typically affects an active younger patient population as compared with hip and knee arthritis. The optimal surgical treatment depends on several patient-specific factors. Open ankle arthrodesis has achieved reliable outcomes for this condition over years; however, arthroscopic techniques seem to be advantageous and feasible even in cases with significant intraarticular deformity. This article describes the surgical technique of arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis and discusses the outcome compared with that of open ankle fusion and total ankle replacement.

Open Ankle Arthrodesis for Deformity Correction

Open ankle arthrodesis remains a reliable solution for ankle arthritis, especially in the setting of deformity. Careful preoperative evaluation needs to be performed, both clinically and radiographically. The specific deformity present helps determine the approach used and the fixation choices. Deformity is most commonly seen intraarticularly, though deformity can also be present anywhere along the lower extremity, including compensatory deformity in the foot. Multiple different techniques can be used to address both the deformity and achieve a successful ankle arthrodesis. Patient outcomes reported in the literature are generally good, with high union rates and improved functional outcomes.

Different approach to charcot neuroarthropathy: A case report

Introduction and importance

Charcot neuroarthropathy (CN) is a degenerative, progressive disease affecting the ankle and foot and it is usually a disabling factor in diabetic patients. Surgical management of CN aims to obtain a painless stable plantigrade foot which can be achieved through fusion. Achieving joint arthrodesis in CN usually carries a high failure rate.

Cases presentation

We presented two patients with late-stage CN foot deformity. The first case is a 52-year-old female with CN on her left ankle and presented without any infection or prior correction. The second case reported a 47-year-old man with complaints of deformity on his right ankle, he had undergone surgical treatment with an external fixator before, and now presented with infection in the surgical site.

Clinical discussion

Ankle arthrodesis has been considered by many as the treatment of choice for severe and late-stage CN foot. This treatment aims to give a rigid enough fixation which will maintain the stability of the ankle joint and prevents further destruction of surrounding tissue. Multiple modalities of treatment are available and must be chosen accordingly to each clinical case. Minimal implants and the use of multiple bone grafts could be considered as a plan of treatment. Both patients have promising and positive results from the two procedures.

Conclusion

Treatment of CN Foot with internal plate fixation combined with fibular strut graft seemed to give promising results, both radiographically and functionally. Furthermore, a slight modification of treatment with a minimal implant or iliac graft may be considered.

•

We present case reports consist of 2 patients with CN and diabetes mellitus condition.

•

The management for this varied condition has not described in many published literatures.

•

We performed minimal implant and multiple bone grafts technique surgery in different kind of patient's condition, both in non-infected and infected patient.

•

The follow up of clinical and radiograph imaging shows satisfiying outcome, and both patients now progresses to a partially weight bearing and continue to give promising results.

One-stage tibial deformity correction and ankle arthrodesis for ankle osteoarthritis and tibial malalignment after low tibial osteotomy

Introduction

There are no reports on one-stage corrective tibial opening wedge osteotomy and arthrodesis for osteoarthritis of the ankle and tibial malalignment after distal tibial osteotomy.

Presentation of case

The patient was a 70-year-old woman who presented with complaints of ankle pain and lower limb deformity after tibial osteotomy performed for ankle arthritis 17–18 years earlier. Clinical examination revealed marked swelling around the ankle joint and pain and tenderness at the joint line. Imaging showed tibial malalignment and severe osteoarthritic changes in the ankle. The patient had valgus deformity of 21° and recurvatum deformity of 4°. In two months, she admitted to Department of Orthopedics at Tokushima University Hospital in Japan and we performed one-stage corrective tibial opening wedge osteotomy and ankle arthrodesis with an anterolateral plate through a lateral longitudinal incision. After removal of the previous implants, the remaining articular cartilage and osteophytes were removed from the tibial and talar surfaces. After debridement of the talar trochlea and tibial plateau, the center of rotation and angular deformity of the tibia was cut transversely and a 1-cm bone graft obtained from the removed fibula was inserted into the osteotomy site, which decreased the tibial malalignment. An anterolateral locking plate was inserted over the anterior and lateral sides of the tibia, and the ankle was fused using 2 cannulated screws.

Discussion

The patient wore an above-knee splint for 6 weeks to avoid weight-bearing followed by gradual weightbearing with a brace thereafter. Osseous fusion was achieved after about 3.5 months. Radiographs obtained at the 2-year follow-up visit showed complete union of the tibia and talus. Full correction of valgus and recurvatum deformity was achieved, and the patient was able to perform daily activities with almost no pain.

Conclusion

We reported a rare case of ankle osteoarthritis and tibial malalignment that was successfully treated with one-stage corrective tibial opening wedge osteotomy and ankle arthrodesis using an anterolateral plate via a transfibular approach.

•

Ankle osteoarthritis and malalignment can be followed by osteotomy.

•

One-stage ankle arthrodesis and deformity correction should be considered.

•

Anterolateral plate was useful for arthrodesis and correction.

Open versus arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis in high-risk patients: a comparative study

PURPOSE

Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis is known to offer high fusion rates, improvements in pain and functional outcomes, low risks of complications, and reinterventions. The aim of this study is to compare open vs. arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis in patients at high risk of complications.

METHODS

A single-centre retrospective comparative analysis of ankle fusions was conducted. Patient records were screened for demographics, type of arthrodesis, follow-up length, pre-operative diagnosis, risk factors for non-union, operative time, radiographic union, time to union, complications, and reinterventions. The American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale, the Italian version of the Foot Function Index (FFI), and a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain scores collected pre-operatively and in the last follow-up were used to assess clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

There were 23 open and 21 arthroscopic ankle fusions. Union rate was higher (90.5% vs. 65.2%, p < 0.05) and complication rate was lower (14.3% vs. 47.8%, p < 0.05) in the arthroscopic group. In addition, patients who underwent arthroscopic arthrodesis reported better pain control, with higher improvements in VAS for pain scores. There was no significant difference in length of operative time, time to fusion, AOFAS, and FFI scores improvements between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis resulted in higher union rates, fewer complications, and lower reoperation rates in patients at high risk of complications.

Barriers to recruitment to an orthopaedic randomized controlled trial comparing two surgical procedures for ankle arthritis : a qualitative study

Aims

A multicentre, randomized, clinician-led, pragmatic, parallel-group orthopaedic trial of two surgical procedures was set up to obtain high-quality evidence of effectiveness. However, the trial faced recruitment challenges and struggled to maintain recruitment rates over 30%, although this is not unusual for surgical trials. We conducted a qualitative study with the aim of gathering information about recruitment practices to identify barriers to patient consent and participation to an orthopaedic trial.

Methods

We collected 11 audio recordings of recruitment appointments and interviews of research team members (principal investigators and research nurses) from five hospitals involved in recruitment to an orthopaedic trial. We analyzed the qualitative data sets thematically with the aim of identifying aspects of informed consent and information provision that was either unclear, disrupted, or hindered trial recruitment.

Results

Recruiters faced four common obstacles when recruiting to a surgical orthopaedic trial: patient preferences for an intervention; a complex recruitment pathway; various logistical issues; and conflicting views on equipoise. Clinicians expressed concerns that the trial may not show significant differences in the treatments, validating their equipoise. However, they experienced role conflicts due to their own preference and perceived patient preference for an intervention arm.

Conclusion

This study provided initial information about barriers to recruitment to an orthopaedic randomized controlled trial. We shared these findings in an all-site investigators’ meeting and encouraged researchers to find solutions to identified barriers; this led to the successful completion of recruitment. Complex trials may benefit for using of a mixed-methods approach to mitigate against recruitment failure, and to improve patient participation and informed consent.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(8):631–637.

Sport activity levels following ankle fusion

PURPOSE

Ankle arthrodesis (AA) is frequently employed in the treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis, which is common following trauma and athletic injuries. While AA remains a popular therapeutic option, little data exists about activity and sporting capacity following AA. The objective of this research was to determine functional outcomes and sporting activity levels in patients following Ankle Arthrodesis.

METHODS

Validated questionnaires were emailed to 35 patients with a history of AA at an average follow-up of 52 months. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI), as well as the associated FADI-Sport. Responses were compared to those from a control population of RESULTS: 24 patients scheduled for AA, at an average pre-operative visit of three months. Activity levels were assessed prior to injury as well as pre- and post-operatively using the Tegner activity level scale. Average Tegner scores of the 35 surgical patients decreased from 3.82 ± 0.38 before their injury, to 1.15 ± 0.19 immediately pre-op, with recovery to 2.67 ± 0.26 following fusion. Average post arthrodesis FADI and FADI-sport scores in our patients were 76.5 ± 3.19% and 33.8 ± 23.06%. For the pre-operative control population, corresponding scores were 47.41 ± 2.61% and 22.24 ± 1.03%. Following AA, we found that patients improved upon their pre-op Tegner score, although they did not return to their pre-injury level of sporting participation. Additionally, patients reported that they had no current dysfunction with their lower leg.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing Ankle Arthrodesis should expect improved lower leg function, though will not likely return to their pre-injury level of activity.

Mini-open vs. Transfibular Approach for Ankle Arthrodesis, Which Approach is Superior in Joint Preparation: A Cadaver Study

BACKGROUND

Arthrodesis is considered the gold standard for end-stage ankle arthritis in patients who fail conservative management. Achieving union is paramount while minimizing complications. An essential item for successful union is preparation of the articular surface. Our study aims to evaluate the difference in joint preparation between direct lateral and dual mini-open approaches.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten below knee fresh-frozen specimens were used for this study. Five were prepared through lateral approach, and five using dual mini-incisions. After preparation, all ankles were dissected and images of tibial plafond and talar articular surfaces were taken. Surface areas of articulating facets and unprepared cartilage of talus, distal tibia, and distal fibula were measured and analyzed.

RESULTS

A greater amount of total surface area was prepared with the mini-open approach in comparison to the transfibular approach. Percentage of prepared surface area of total articulating surface (including talus and tibia/fibula), talus, tibia, and fibula with the transfibular approach were 76.9%, 77.7%, and 75%, respectively. Percentages were 90.9%, 92.9%, and 88.6% with the mini-open approach. When excluding medial gutter, there was no significant difference between techniques (83.94% vs. 90.85%, p = 0.1412).

CONCLUSION

Joint preparation with the mini-open approach is equally efficacious as the transfibular approach for the tibiotalar joint. The mini-open approach does provide superior preparation of the medial gutter and inferior tibial surface which may help to increase union rates and decreased complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V.

Clinical and Functional Outcomes in Patients with Distal Tibial Fracture Treated by Circular External Fixation: A Retrospective Cohort Study

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To examine clinical and functional outcomes in patients with intra- and extra-articular distal tibial fractures treated definitively by Ilizarov fixation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with tibial fractures extending within 1 Müller square of the ankle joint were identified from our Ilizarov database over a 5-year period. Data on treatment and outcome were assembled from this database and supplemented by a review of patient records. General measures of health-related quality of life and limb-specific functional outcome scores were recorded. Adverse events were documented according to Paley's classification.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty-eight patients with 169 fractures were identified, 28% were open and 63% intra-articular. One hundred and sixty-five (98%) of the fractures united, two following bone grafting in their original frames, at a median of 166.5 days (range 104-537). Three patients with nonunions united with further treatment. One patient (an end-stage diabetic) elected to undergo amputation following multiple early complications during treatment. Closed fractures united more rapidly than open (median 157 vs 183 days; p = 0.005) and true Pilon (43C3) fractures took longer to unite than other fractures (median 157 vs 177 days; p = 0.01).Sixty-seven percent of patients completed functional outcome scores. Sixty-two percent reported good or excellent ankle scores at more than 6 months post frame removal, 38% fair and 10% poor. Patients with intra-articular fractures reported significantly worse ankle scores than those with extra-articular injuries. General measures of health-related quality of life (EuroQol-5D) revealed significant ongoing effects despite good clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates a high union and low serious complication rate, suggesting that external ring fixation is a safe and effective treatment for these injuries.

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE

Giannoudis VP, Ewins E, Taylor DM, et al. Clinical and Functional Outcomes in Patients with Distal Tibial Fracture Treated by Circular External Fixation: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2021;16(2):86-95.

Clinical outcome results of total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis: a pilot randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Ankle arthrodesis (AA) and replacement (TAA) are widely accepted options in managing end-stage ankle arthritis (ESAA). We hypothesize that clinical outcomes would be similar for both interventions.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter randomized controlled trial that collected data on patient demographics, complication rates, Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) scores. We evaluated pre and postoperative scores within and between cohorts.

RESULTS

The thirty-nine ankles enrolled had a mean follow-up of 5.1 ± 2.8 years. Total AOS scores improved significantly in both groups; 59.4 ± 15.9 to 38 ± 20 (p-value = 0.002) for TAA and 64.6 ± 19.7 to 31.8 ± 16.5 (p-value < 0.001) for AA at last follow-up. Complication rate was higher in the AA cohort with four major complications (20%).

CONCLUSION

We observed a statistically significant benefit with TAA and AA. As a pilot trial, this study is meant to inform on design and feasibility of future RCTs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Double posterior lateral plating arthrodesis for charcot ankle: A case series

Introduction

Ankle arthrodesis is one of the managements for a significantly unstable Charcot ankle. Some of the methods of internal fixation for ankle arthrodesis include the use of intramedullary nails, screws, and plates. Ankle arthrodesis using intramedullary nails has become more popular. However, studies evaluating the use of plate fixation, particularly double posterior lateral plating, are limited. We report the clinical and radiological outcomes of double posterior lateral plating ankle arthrodesis in three diabetic Charcot ankle patients.

Presentation of case

Three patients, aged 73, 67, and 65 years old, complained of ankle pain and with a history of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The physical examination revealed swelling and erythema without a sign of active infection. The radiological examination showed ankle deformity, and the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot scores were 5, 10, and 0, respectively. All patients were diagnosed with a diabetic Charcot ankle and underwent ankle arthrodesis using double posterior lateral plating. Four months and six months follow up revealed talus union, improved ankle deformity, and improved AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot scores to 70, 76, and 73, respectively.

Discussion

Various methods of ankle arthrodesis are retrograde intramedullary nails, screws, and plates. In this report, we opt for plate fixation because it allows for stable internal fixation, adequate compression, high angular stability, and a lower irreversible deformation in osteoporotic bone.

Conclusion

Double posterior lateral plating ankle arthrodesis provided satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes. This method can be an alternative for patients with Charcot ankle requiring ankle arthrodesis.

•

Double posterior lateral plating ankle arthrodesis is satisfactory.

•

This method can be an alternative for patients with Charcot ankle.

•

Plate fixation allows stable internal fixation and adequate compression.

Trend in Spain in the use of total ankle arthroplasty versus arthrodesis in the period 1997-2017

OBJECTIVE

The main objective of this study is to compare proportionally the incidence of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) versus ankle arthrodesis and to determine the variables that may have influenced its indication. The secondary objective is to analyse the trend in the use of TAA using a population-based analysis and to compare our results with those reported by national registries in other countries.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A retrospective review of the Minimum Basic Data Set from 1997-2017 was performed. Subjects were categorised according to surgical procedure. Their temporal evolution was analysed and hospital variables associated with the indication (age, sex, hospital complexity) were identified. In order to compare the trend in Spain with respect to other countries, the information was standardised as number of procedures per 100,000 inhabitants/year and a projection was made for the five-year period 2020-2025.

RESULTS

In the period 1997-2017, 11,669 ankle arthrodesis and 1,049 TAAs were performed. The trend was increasing and significant for both procedures, however, in the last 10 years analysed the proportional trend of TAA decreased significantly. Being female (OR 1.32), being 65 years or older (OR 1.50) and being operated in a complex hospital (OR 1.31) were associated with the indication for a TAA. Compared to other countries, Spain has much lower rates of TAA utilisation, with minimal growth estimated for the year 2025.

CONCLUSION

Although the use of TAA has increased, its growth has been lower than that of ankle arthrodesis and its current trend is proportionally decreasing, with female sex, age≥65 years and the patient being operated in a medium/high complexity hospital being associated with the indication for TAA. Compared with other countries, Spain has much lower rates of use and its projection over the next five years, although increasing, is expected to be minimal.

Trans-calcaneal retrograde nailing for secondary-displaced traumatic ankle fractures in diabetics with insensate feet: a less-invasive salvage-arthrodesis technique

PURPOSE

Secondary displacement of traumatic ankle fractures with subsequent soft-tissue breakdown is a troublesome issue after inappropriate conservative treatment among non-compliant diabetic patients with severe peripheral neuropathy. This study was conducted to evaluate the results of a less-invasive arthrodesis procedure as an alternative to osteosynthesis in these complex scenarios.

METHODS

A total of 46 diabetics, who underwent fluoroscopy-assisted trans-calcaneal retrograde nailing-based ankle arthrodesis between 2012 and 2018 for salvaging secondary-displaced diabetic ankle fractures in their insensate feet, were evaluated in this retrospective study. All fractures were associated with uninfected mechanical ulcers overlying malleoli, without Charcot changes, after failed conservative cast immobilization. The patients (mean age: 52.52 ± 3.70 years; 18 males; 46 feet) were evaluated radiologically for union and clinically for limb salvage, modified American Orthopedic Ankle and Foot Scale (AOAFS), and the overall subjective patients' satisfaction.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 29.5 ± 3.1 months. All ulcers have healed with local care only with 100% limb salvage. Four patients experienced minor wound healing problems at posterior heel, and another one developed acute Charcot changes that was successfully managed by offloading and repeat surgery. Forty patients (86.96%) had fully consolidated fusions with a mean time to fusion 15.78 ± 2.58 weeks, while the other six cases had stable fibrous-union. At the final follow-up, the mean modified-AOFAS was 76.85 ± 6.0 from 86 total points. All, but four patients (91.30%) were completely satisfied while the other four patients were partially satisfied.

CONCLUSIONS

The presented less-invasive arthrodesis technique is reproducible and effective alternative for salvaging unstable diabetic ankle fractures in the insensate feet when standard surgical procedures would be more risky.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective case series.

Differences in 30-day complications associated with total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis: A matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to identify whether total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) was associated with greater risk for 30-day complications and/or greater financial burden in comparison to ankle arthrodesis (AA).

METHODS

The PearlDiver Patient Records Database was queried to identify all patients who underwent an arthroscopic/open AA or TAA from 2006 to 2013. The two cohorts were then matched in a 1:1 manner to control for comorbidities and demographics. Postoperative complications were compared between the two cohorts, in addition to the associated costs with respect to each procedure.

RESULTS

No significant differences in risk for postoperative complications were noted between the two procedures with the numbers available. Significant differences were demonstrated in total length of hospital stay (LOS), with a mean of 2.13 days for the TAA cohort and 2.42 days for the AA cohort (p < 0.001). Higher mean total hospital costs were noted for TAA (x¯ = $62,416.62) compared to AA (x¯ = $37,737.43, p < 0.001); however, TAA was associated with a higher mean total reimbursement (x¯ = $12,254.43) than AA (x¯ = $7915.72, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

With no notable differences in 30-day complication rates, TAA remains a viable alternative to AA in the appropriately selected patient and provides the ability to preserve tibiotalar motion resulting in superior functional scores. Additionally, TAA demonstrated higher total costs to implant, but also greater reimbursement, in line with the recent literature suggesting TAA to be a cost-effective alternative to AA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III Retrospective study.

Retrograde nailing, trabecular metal implant and use of bone marrow aspirate concentrate after failed ankle joint replacement

BACKGROUND

Ankle fusion after removal of alloplasty is known to be a procedure with a high potential for non-unions and poor function, especially tibio-talo-calcaneal fusion. We wanted to review our results after using a novel method for the procedure, combining retrograde nailing with a trabecular metal implant and bone marrow aspirate concentration applied in an ostoconductive pad in addition to autologous bone grafting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective review of a patient series, with some prospectively registered data. 31 ankles in 30 patients were operated from January 2016 to February 2019.

RESULTS

There were two non-unions (6.5%), and one delayed union, none of these were reoperated. The mean postoperative Manchester-Oxford Foot and Ankle Questionnaire score (MOxFQ) was 33.6 points. 9 patients scored an average MOxFQ at 72.9 immediately before surgery, while at follow-up this had decreased to 36.2, an improvement of 36.7 points (95% CI 18.3-54.9). There were 1 minor infection and 5 possible nerve injuries. One patient had the leg amputated 1 year after the surgery due to a non-related necrotizing fasciitis.

CONCLUSION

We present reasonably good short to medium term patient satisfaction and fusion rates with this novel combination of techniques.

Corticoperiosteal medial femoral condyle flap for recalcitrant nonunion in ankle and foot: Outcomes and radiological evaluation of donor site morbidity

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of free corticoperiosteal medial femoral condyle (MFC) flap for ankle, hindfoot and midfoot reconstruction in patients with recalcitrant nonunion.

METHODS

Patients who underwent ankle and foot reconstruction using the MFC flap at our clinic were recruited for assessment of the union rate, time to union and functional outcome. Furthermore, a clinical and radiological examination of the donor knee was performed using both computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients with a mean follow-up time of 2.5 years were included; 10 of them had a previously failed ankle and foot arthrodesis. Union was achieved in 11 patients in an average time of 10 months after MFC flap surgery. Donor site morbidity was minor with no radiological evidence for soft tissue or bone complication.

CONCLUSION

MFC flaps are a useful and safe reconstructive tool and may be considered after failed ankle and foot arthrodesis.

Revision of the Malaligned Ankle Arthrodesis

A malaligned ankle arthrodesis is a painful and complicated pathology. Deformities may be present in the frontal, sagittal, or transverse plane or a combination of planes. Thorough preoperative evaluation of the deformity and the patient as a whole is crucial to successful revision. Surgical site for revision should be based on center of rotation of angulation, when possible. Revision commonly is performed through opening wedge osteotomy. Closing wedge and focal dome osteotomies, however, are excellent options. Revision also may be performed through external fixation or total ankle replacement. Although the literature is not rich with data, the options discussed provide favorable results.

Clinical outcomes comparing arthroscopic vs open ankle arthrodesis

BACKGROUND

Over the last twenty years, minimally invasive ankle arthrodesis has evolved into a well-tolerated and safe procedure. It has grown in favor to open ankle arthrodesis due to shorter length of stay and fewer complications recorded. This paper aims to compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic vs open ankle arthrodesis at 24-months followup.

METHODS

From 2004 to 2015, we reviewed a prospectively collected database in a tertiary hospital foot and ankle registry. 28 feet that underwent arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis were matched to 56 feet that underwent open ankle arthrodesis for age, sex and body mass index (BMI). Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-hindfoot Scores and Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) were obtained to assess clinical outcomes. These parameters were collected before surgery, at 6months and 24months after surgery.

RESULTS

The arthroscopic group demonstrated significant less pain in the perioperative period (arthroscopic: 1.9±1.2, open: 3.8±1.1, p<0.001) and shorter length of hospitalization stay (arthroscopic: 2.1±0.7 open: 3.5±1.7, p<0.001). Patients who underwent arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis also reported a higher SF-36 score on physical functioning at 6months (arthroscopic: 58.4±27.1, open: 47.1±24.0, p<0.05) and higher AOFAS Ankle-hindfoot Scale score at 24-months (arthroscopic: 78.9±18.9, open: 68.9±24.7, p<0.05). There were no postoperative complications in the arthroscopic group but 11 in the open group, including 9 which required followup operations. There was no significant difference in length of operative procedure between both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that the arthroscopic group displayed better clinical outcomes compared to the open group at the 24months followup. The advantages of arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis include significantly less perioperative pain, higher AOFAS Ankle-hindfoot scores at 24months, shorter length of stay, fewer postoperative complications and followup operations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative series.