Comparing the Results of Total Ankle Arthroplasty Vs Tibiotalar Fusion (Ankle Arthrodesis) in Patients with Ankle Osteoarthritis since 2006 to 2020- A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

This study compares the outcomes of patients undergoing total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) and tibiotalar fusion (ankle arthrodesis) in patients with end-stage osteoarthritis. The primary outcome assessed was Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS); secondary outcomes included the incidence of revision, re-operation, and complications.

METHODS

A systematic review of studies examining the outcomes of patients undergoing TAA and/or tibiotalar fusion from 2006 to 2020 was conducted. Individual cohort studies and randomized control trials were included. Outcomes were assessed at two and five years.

RESULTS

21 studies were included: 16 arthroplasty (2,016 patients) and 5 arthrodesis (256 patients) studies. No significant difference in PROMS was evident two years post-surgery - American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores were 78.8 (95% CI-confidence interval: 76.6-80.8; n=1548) and 80.8 (95% CI: 80.1-81.5; n=206 patients) for the arthroplasty and arthrodesis groups respectively. Two years post-surgery the revision rates for the arthroplasty and arthrodesis groups were similar - 3.5% (n=9) and 3.7% (n=61) respectively (OR-odds ratio: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.51-2.13); however, the re-operation rate was 2.5 times higher for the arthroplasty group (12.2%) in comparison to the arthrodesis group (5.1%) (OR: 2.57; 95% CI: 1.43-4.62). Documented complications in the arthroplasty group were half those documented in the arthrodesis group two years post-surgery (OR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.37-0.77). No arthrodesis studies were found which contained mean 5-year follow-up data within the study period.

CONCLUSION

Despite recent developments in TAA design, we found no clear evidence as to their superiority over ankle arthrodesis when considering patient outcomes two years postoperatively. However, this conclusion could be debatable in some types of patients such as diabetic patients, posttraumatic patients and patients with stiff hindfoot and midfoot.

Patient and Surgical Factors Affecting Fusion Rates After Arthroscopic and Open Ankle Fusion: A Review of a High-Risk Cohort

ABSTRACT

We present a case series with the objective of identifying risk factors for nonunion after open and arthroscopic primary ankle arthrodesis. Eighty-seven patients who underwent primary ankle arthrodesis and met inclusion criteria were divided into open (N = 46) and arthroscopic (N = 41) groups. Patient and operative characteristics were retrospectively analyzed as possible risk factors for nonunion within each technique. The nonunion rate was 11% in the open and 12% in the arthroscopic group. Obesity, smoking, and ASA class 3 were highly prevalent in both groups. In the arthroscopic group, a remote history of infection and the use of headed screws had notably higher risk of nonunion, though not statistically significant. In the open group, use of bone graft trended toward lower risk of nonunion, though also not statistically significant. The results of this study demonstrated, nonunion rates are comparable between open and arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis in high-risk patients. For patients with a remote history of infection, open ankle arthrodesis may be preferable, and bone graft importance may vary with open versus arthroscopic technique.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Arthroscopic Ankle Arthrodesis

End-stage ankle arthritis typically affects an active younger patient population as compared with hip and knee arthritis. The optimal surgical treatment depends on several patient-specific factors. Open ankle arthrodesis has achieved reliable outcomes for this condition over years; however, arthroscopic techniques seem to be advantageous and feasible even in cases with significant intraarticular deformity. This article describes the surgical technique of arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis and discusses the outcome compared with that of open ankle fusion and total ankle replacement.

Comparing 30-day all-cause readmission rates between tibiotalar fusion and total ankle replacement

BACKGROUND

End-stage ankle arthritis is a debilitating condition that negatively impacts patient quality of life. Tibiotalar fusion and total ankle replacement are treatment options for managing ankle arthritis. Few studies have examined short term readmission rates of these two procedures. The objective of this study was compare all-cause 30-day readmission rates between patients undergoing tibiotalar fusion vs. total ankle replacement.

METHODS

This study queried the Nationwide Readmission Database (NRD) from 2013-2014 and used international classification of disease, 9th revision (ICD-9) procedure codes to identify all patients who underwent a tibiotalar fusion or a total ankle replacement. Comorbidities, insurance status, hospital characteristics, and readmission rates were statistically compared between the two cohorts. Risk factors were then identified for 30-day readmission.

RESULTS

A total of 5660 patients were analyzed with 2667 in the tibiotalar fusion cohort and 2993 in the total ankle replacement cohort. Univariate analysis revealed that the readmission rate after tibiotalar fusion (4.4%) was statistically greater than after total ankle replacement (1.4%). Multivariable regression analysis indicated that deficiency anemia (OR 2.18), coagulopathy (OR 3.51), renal failure (OR 2.83), other insurance relative to private (OR 3.40), and tibiotalar fusion (OR 2.51) were all statistically significant independent risk factors for having a readmission within 30-days.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that during the short-term period following discharge from the hospital, patients who received a tibiotalar fusion are more likely to experience a 30-day readmission. These findings are important for decision making when a surgeon encounters a patient with end stage ankle arthritis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, cohort study.